820473_Routine_20211016

Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: CEO Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: aa yy..�
Farm Name: Nn131 I }A f i rj�7h QSC * 9 ( LLL
Owner Name: 1" F yiI Icht€ l `7 1 LLC
1410al
01, 50
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Arrival Time:
Departure Time:
030
Owner Email:
Phone:
County:Gall)FJVf Region: fro
Facility Contact: U l [, nt 1 i I i I V1 .e 11
Onsite Representative: p� p Q
Certified Operator: NO' J DO d t il O {V T11 l
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Title: Te ch 7 FC
Latitude:
Integrator:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
(i
Swine ; `
Dcsign Curren D srgn rent =•s
Cat3aci l'op ' l' WetPouttry Capacrattie
Designh Cµrrent'
{
Capacity *op.
6x
Wean to Finish
Layer
Dairy Cow
f F[
Wean to Feeder
Non Layer
_
Dairy Calf
N
Feeder to Finish
, (1-1
'Mpg
r 1
° <wD 'Po;�tltr
a', ,
Desiggtiirint
x F
Cat�ci , „tPo
Dairy
Da Heifer
w1
Farrow to Wean
,
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
G.
Non -Dairy
Farrow to Finish
Beef Stocker
Gilts
t Non -Layers
� Y
Beef Feeder
r
£
Boars
"',•Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
r..
4
Othet
■®--4
��
F
. s.5
, Turke Poults
dl
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field El Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑Yes ENNo ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
[�No ❑NA
9No ❑NA
RNo ❑NA
No ❑NA
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: bg, - '-f17j
Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
'5a
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
Structure 5
tqNo ❑NA El NE
Et No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
❑ Yes 'No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes in No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes t] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes t No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.CropType(s): CocI)1t 6GI I IVdot, U)1t 1e . .
13. Soil Type(s): Oto ng ebtitg , µ V r
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
Page 2 of 3
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑Other:
❑ Yes Cl No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
El No
❑ No
N No
NJ No
El No
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
NNo ❑NA ❑NE
No El NA ❑NE
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: $7)j - t { 7
Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
Lc No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes No ❑NA
❑ Yes 61 No ❑ NA
❑ Yes ti No ❑ NA
❑ Yes No ❑ NA
❑ Yes No ❑ NA
❑Yes NINo ❑NA
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond D Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
No
kl No
N] No
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YESanswers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to bet er explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
ovRig-uc Mc fg-rei
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Kale FolitAilOt
Kogoy-jettik-4---eng
Phone: { I 1 l/r q-115
Date:
5/12/2020