820014_Routine_20211016

Pas
Type of Visit: t Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: b6 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:
Farm Name:
►o
(o• al
Arrival Time:
Departure Time:
Pl e Ridg-e atr'�n #g
Owner Name: M \ Uul e 1 . ,g t a (1 ,1
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
1O;3o
Owner Email:
Phone:
County: c(1025ON Region: '\0
Btenfi Mtfth��il
Onsite Representative:
Title: ftCl l qc .
Certified Operator: Q7C 1 1,) N •nn n I I 9 r ai c i
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Integrator:
Phone:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
f 007 9737
ker f
T y De$igtu #Cdi rent at +
5f L.t 5 ai i { Syr J i
yrX t'Sw ey + Cajr+acity rPo
J
Poultry
$ y§4 r r l O
DestQn py fi
opacity r Po
{r &yn`
I)esr nt C pp
g $: `4rent${
w+,tCatile Capacity
Wean to Finish
Layer
r
Dairy Cow
)6;
Wean to Feeder
f r
Non Layer
Dairy Calf
iv,
Feeder to Finish
coo
+
a'
+
�"_+
M l ��
1 i i
+s=$ z'+ . {
ul
�r pon'� � ,
{, _ �+
'G R
Designt currient+
Ca i ' i
O$? �c 4 = ;r'Pt �
1
{;
Dairy Heifer
Xtln
1
Farrow to Wean
`»..=`sM
Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder
� �
l;
Non -Dairy
r.
+w*a
Farrow to Finish
y t;
t�
Layers
Y �� F
Beef Stocker
Ff
tY
Gilts
4s•Non-Layers --
_
Beef Feeder
r;s
Boars
` ,•Pullets --
Beef Brood Cow
ty
i,r r
i„Other „
t �•���
•
v
u
Turke Points
1
1b•Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d.< Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes El No El NA ❑NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: ?)Z -
Waste Collection & Treatment
Li
Date of Inspection: ID. I to fir
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
N
1,1
al-
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 7,1 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
0 PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
El Yes ‘11 No ❑NA ❑NE
El Yes ER No El NA ❑NE
12. Crop Type(s): Berm I^1 I� (11I (" V"` is e
13. Soil Type(s): U1Q() nun N o o\ K
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes vg No ❑ NA 0 NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 0 Yes .!� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes 'IA No ❑ NA 0 NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No 0 NA
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ['Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Fcl No ❑ NA ❑ NE
0 Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis 0 Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall 0 Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 14 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes 4No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 5/12/2020 Continued
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
No El NA ❑NE
No 0 NA ❑NE
)Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE

Facility Number: Ea - 14
J
Date of Inspection:
a - lip- 9,
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes T�,j No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check El Yes a No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ['Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes xi No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes ct No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes y No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
dE9 bob i c,pfl1e4 3-thbrec vi% e (dfl-ting hoc!
house, o-eon up .3 WQKC sir irc aired,
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Ko ti e fO me h pt
Phone: CI lV 17Ir/
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Date:
5/12/2020