20080989 Ver 2_More Info Received_20131017

Dennison, Laurie
From: Bob Zarzecki <bzarzecki @sandec.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2013 8:51 AM
To: Lastinger, James C SAW (James.C.Lastinger @usace.army.mil); Higgins, Karen; Smith,
Cherri L; Dennison, Laurie
Subject: RE: STON'EMONT Application SAW- 2008 -00870 / DWQ 0J -0989
Attachments: Pages from Stonemont PCN_October 15, 2013 -2.pdf I
To All
I noticed an error in the application. It's in the Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) section on
Page 9. 1 stated in the application that there will be a need for a future stream crossing with a road,
but that it was not requested at this time. This was from the earlier plans that proposed a stub road
across the stream to the south to provide interconnectivity to the property south of this
development. The applicant worked with the Town on an alternative that would avoid the need for
this future stream crossing by providing a road stub to the east which would allow a future road to
cross above the stream origin to provide connectivity to the property to the south. So, I stricken this
sentence from the application, and provided this revised page 9 attached to this email. Sorry for the
confusion.
Bob Zarzecki
Wetlands Department Manager
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
From: Robert Zarzecki [mailto:bobzarzeckiC&gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 9:56 AM
To: Bob Zarzecki
Subject: Fwd: STONEMONT Application SAW- 2008 -00870 / DWQ 09 -0989
---- - - - - -- Forwarded message ---- - - - - --
From: Robert Zarzecki <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 9:55 AM
Subject: Fwd: STONEMONT Application SAW- 2008 -00870 / DWQ 09 -0989
To: " Lastinger, James C SAW" <James.C.Lastin [e-mail]>
---- - - - - -- Forwarded message ---- - - - - --
From: Bob Zarzecki <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 9:54 AM
Subject: STONEMONT Application SAW- 2008 -00870 / DWQ 09 -0989
To: " Lastinger, James C SAW (James.C.Lastin er ,usace.armv.mil)" < James .C.LastingerQusace.army.mil >,
"karen.higgins@ncdenrgov_" <karen.hig ins ,ncdenr.gov >, "Dennison, Laurie
(laurie i.dennisona.ncdenr.gov)" < laurie e.dennisonancdenr.gov >, "cherri.smithQncdenr.gov"
<cherri. smithkncdenr. gov>
Cc: "[e-mail]" <bobzarzecki(a mail.com>
To All:
Attached is a complete application for the Stonemont Subdivision project in Holly Springs, Wake
County, NC. The paper copies will be hand delivered later today. The project received prior

approvals back in 2008, but was never built. Please don't hesitate to let me know if you have any
questions.
Thanks!
Bob Zarzecki
Wetlands Department Manager
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
We've moved to:
North Quarter Office Park
8412 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27615
(919) 846 -5900 Office Phone
(919) 256 -4517 Direct Line
(919) 846 -9467 Fax
(919) 270 -2068 Mobile
bzarzecki(cD,sandec.com
Visit us at SandEC.coml
This electronic communication, including all attachments, is intended only for the named addressee (s) and may contain confidential information This electronic
communication may not have passed through our standard review /quality control process. Design data and recommendations included herein are provided as a
matter of convenience and should not be used for final design. Rely only on final, hardcopy materials bearing the consultant's original signature and seal If you
are not the named addressee (s), any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited. If you have received this electronic
communication in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete the original communication from your system. Thank you

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes Q No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (if so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑Yes Q No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after- the -fad permit application?
❑Yes Q No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes Q No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The protect is being developed in compliance with local zoning and development regulations and is consistent with other single family residential
development in the area. It is not anticipated to result in either Indirect or cumulative impacts to the surrounding properties.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater from the development will be disposed of through the Town of Holly Springs municipal sanitary sewer system. The Town will work with
DENR to ensure available capacity.
O��j e9of10
2013 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009