Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20210224 Ver 1_Public Notice Comments_20211028 (178)Public Notice Comment Form ID#* 20210224 Project Name* Westpoint First Name Affiliation (if applicable) Phone Number 5125692651 Version* 1 Number only. Last Name Email * piperbk@utexas.edu ***The intent for collecting an email address is to allow us send you a receipt for submittal of this comment. Please pick the response below that represents your stance on the above mentioned project? * Yes - I agree with the project. No - I do not agree with the project. Comment I oppose the Westpoint development and the proposal on the basis that it has the potential to negatively impact an important sources of drinking water, recreation, and habitat. I do not think this project or specific permit is in the Public Interest of Durham residents or the environment- and I believe a Public Hearing should be required for this development. Below are some concerns raised by the Save Black Meadow Ridge group that require further investigation and demand answers from developers before the project moves forward: —"Drinking water is always one of the highest priority items of Public Interest within a community. While the building development regulations may not be in place yet --as this project is in a timing loophole --it is imperative the US Army Corps of Engineers, NC Division of Water Resources, and City of Durham look at the impacts of this aspect more closely as they relate to the 404/401 permit application. Under Section 7 of the Nationwide Permit 13, we find: "No activity may occur in the proximity of a public water supply intake, except where the activity is for the repair or improvement of public water supply intake structures or adjacent bank stabilization." While the new intake is not operational yet, phase one plans have started, and work will be taking place on both projects at the same time. It is very likely the new intake will be in place during work on the Westpoint development, such that Section 7 should apply. " —"The mouth of Warren Creek (which the developer calls "unnamed tributary") and Black Meadow Creek are the two watershed / wetland areas that the 401 permit is applying for disturbances on. These two creeks will be the main avenues for development site runoff. The concern with this comes from the fact that the mouths of two tributaries are some of the highest used places on the West Point on the Eno City Park for swimming, fishing, and recreation. In particular, the pools at the end of Black Meadow Creek are used for fishing and playing in - especially by younger children with their families. Warren Creek on the other hand flows near Sennett's Hole which is used by hundreds of people every summer weekend for swimming, fishing, and recreation. Diminished water quality in these creeks would likely have human health impacts, given how active the area is visited. This further exemplifies the strong public interest in further assessing and protecting the water quality of this critical region." The group makes additional strong points against this development and for the review and rejection of this development. I urge you to listen to all of the individuals, families and groups who want to maintain the safety and beauty of the Eno and Durham. Upload Supplementary Files Pdf file type only Any information (e.g., personal or contact) you provide on this comment form or in an attachment may be publicly disclosed and searchable on the Internet and will be provided to the Department or Agency issuing the notice.