20131059 Ver 1_401 Application_20131013

TO: Karen Higgins
N.C. Division of Water Resources, Webscape Unit
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
(919) 807 -6360 9
WE ARE SENDING YOU:
X herewith under separate cover drawings
If material received is not as listed, please notify us at once.
DATE: October 2, 2013
FILE: 47819
RE: PCN for Grifols South Campus
Parking Expansion
descriptive literature letters
We are pleased to provide you with the enclosed Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) for Nationwide Permit 39
for the Grifols, Inc. (Grifols) South Campus Parking Expansion project. Please give me a call at 919 - 783 -7777 if
you have any questions, or email me at [e-mail].
(t F A E
cc: David Auge, Grifols
Michael Hall, O'Brien & Gere
Michael Waligura, O'Brien & Gere
Dan Simmons, Triangle Civilworks
,CT 3 2It:3
uENR - GVATFR C•
CONFIDENTIALITY
Very truly yours,
O'BRIEN & GERE ENGINEERS, INC.
Daniel Ramsay, WPIT
Scientist -2
This material is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain
confidential information belonging to the sender. Ifyou are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this
information is strictly prohibited. Ifyou have received this material in error, please immediately notify us by
telephone to arrange for the return of these documents.
2610 Wycliff Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27607 1 p 919- 783 -7777 1 f919-783-0757 I www.obg.com
360° Engineering and Project Delivery Solutions
■ O'[3131CN 6 GCI;C
Pre - Construction Notification for Nationwide
5
Permit 39 for Grifols South Campus Parking Y
Expansion
Design Plans for Grifols South Campus Parking
3 11 "x17" copies
Expansion
Design Plans for Grifols South Campus Parking
2 Full -size copies
Expansion
$240 Check for Minor Water Quality Application
1 Check
Review
*Action letter code: R- reviewed
N- reviewed and noted I foryour information
S- resubmit
J- rejected Y foryour approval
REMARKS:
We are pleased to provide you with the enclosed Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) for Nationwide Permit 39
for the Grifols, Inc. (Grifols) South Campus Parking Expansion project. Please give me a call at 919 - 783 -7777 if
you have any questions, or email me at [e-mail].
(t F A E
cc: David Auge, Grifols
Michael Hall, O'Brien & Gere
Michael Waligura, O'Brien & Gere
Dan Simmons, Triangle Civilworks
,CT 3 2It:3
uENR - GVATFR C•
CONFIDENTIALITY
Very truly yours,
O'BRIEN & GERE ENGINEERS, INC.
Daniel Ramsay, WPIT
Scientist -2
This material is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain
confidential information belonging to the sender. Ifyou are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this
information is strictly prohibited. Ifyou have received this material in error, please immediately notify us by
telephone to arrange for the return of these documents.
2610 Wycliff Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27607 1 p 919- 783 -7777 1 f919-783-0757 I www.obg.com
360° Engineering and Project Delivery Solutions
■ O'[3131CN 6 GCI;C

AIA OyWAT �9IG
olii�<
7;`1?059
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information -
1.
Processing'
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 39 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑X Yes ❑ No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes NX No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑X Yes ❑ No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
South Campus Parking Expansion
2b.
County:
Johnston
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Clayton, NC
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
N/A
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
GRIFOLS THERAPEUTIC INC
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
04213, pg #0946
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Sergi Roura
p (`, iJ`J I
3d.
Street address:
8368 US 70 Business West
_
3e.
City, state, zip:
Clayton, NC 27520
i ! - LiJ .
3f.
Telephone no.:
(919) 359 -5155
3g.
Fax no.:
(919) 359 -5851 W ndsr�,
3h.
Email address:
sergi.roura @grifols.com
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

r
I
I
rr-
4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a
Applicant is
❑ Agent ❑X Other, specify Owner's Representative
4b
Name
Karen Cook
4c
Business name
(if applicable)
Gnfols, Inc
4d
Street address
8368 US 70 Business West
4e
City, state, zip
Clayton, NC 27520
4f
Telephone no
(919) 359 -4802
4g
Fax no
(919) 359 -5851
4h
Email address
karen cook @gnfols com
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a
Name
Daniel Ramsay
5b
Business name
(if applicable)
O'Brien & Gere
5c
Street address
2610 Wycliff Rd Suite 104
5d
City, state, zip
Raleigh, NC 27607
5e
Telephone no
919 - 783 -7777
5f
Fax no
919 - 783 -0757
5g
Email address
daniel rmsay@obg corn
Page 2 of 10

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a
Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID)
Pin# 167800 - 304225
lb
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees)
I Latitude 35 61778 Longitude -78 416944
1c
Property size
2015 acres
2
Surface Waters
2a
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project
Un -named Tributary to the Neuse River
2b
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water
WS -IV, NSW
2c
River basin
Neuse - HUC# 03020201
3.
Project Description
3a Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application
The proposed project area currently contains cleared and graded areas, upland forest, forested wetlands, and a pond Existing Grifols facility building
and parking lots are located to the northwest of the project area, and the general land use is industrial
3b
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property 0 76
3c
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (Intermittent and perennial) on the property 0
3d Explain the purpose of the proposed project
The Grifols main facility does not have adequate adjacent parking for planned expansions to operations Current overflow parking is across
Highway 70 from the South Campus, and accidents have occurred where the shuttle bus has been struck crossing the highway
3e Describe the overall project in detail, Including the type of equipment to be used
Please see attached additional page and design plans (Attachment 1)
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments saw - 2013 -ooa46
4b
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
Preliminary ❑ Final
4c
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known) James Lastinger
Agency /Consultant Company O'Brien & Gere
Other
4d If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation
A pre - application site visit was conducted by James Lastinger on February 26, 2013 Martin Richmond, NCDWQ, visited site on January 15, 2013,
and issued Surface Water Determination Letter NBRRO#13 -014 on March 4, 2013 Please see Attachment 2
5
Project History
5a
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
5b
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions
6.
Future Project Plans
6a
Is this a phased project?
❑X Yes ❑ No
6b If yes, explain
The western proposed parking lot and access road will be constructed in Phase 1, and the eastern parking lot will be constructed in Phase 2 All
wetland impacts associated with the proposed project will occur for the construction of Phase 1
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

'i
I
I�
r--
r -
I,
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply)
❑X Wetlands ❑ Streams —tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2 Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted
2a
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b
Type of impact
2c
Type of wetland
2d
Forested
2e
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 P
Fill
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps
049
W2
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W3
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W4
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W5
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
W6
Choose one
Choose one
Yes /No
2g Total Wetland Impacts
049
2h Comments
Wetland fill will occur to construct the parking lot, the retaining wall, and the culverted access drive crossing Per James Lastinger's recommendation
at the pre - application site visit on February 26, 2013, wetland impacts will be mitigated at a 2 1 ratio Impact figure F -1 is provided in Attachment 1
3 Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted
3a
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b
Type of impact
3c
Stream name
3d
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e
Type of
jurisdiction
3f
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1
Choose one
S2
Choose one
S3
Choose one
-
S4
Choose one
S5
Choose one
-
S6 -
Choose one
3h Total stream and tributary impacts
N Comments
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

i
t
i
{
I
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U S then indiv ually list all open water impacts below
4a
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c
Type of impact
4d
Waterbody
type
4e
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose one
Choose
02
Choose one
Choose
03
Choose one
Choose
04
Choose one
Choose
4f Total open water impacts
4g Comments
S. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below
5a
Pond ID number
5b
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f Total-
5g Comments
5h Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no
51 Expected pond surface area (acres)
5j Size of pond watershed (acres)
5k Method of construction
6 Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form
6a Project is in which protected basin?
❑X Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other
6b
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c
Reason for impact
6d
Stream name
6e
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet )
6g
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1 -
Yes /No
B2
Yes /No
B3
Yes /No
B4 -
Yes /No
B5
Yes /No
B6
Yes /No
6h Total Buffer Impacts
61 Comments
Page 5 of 10

I�-
L
i
r--
t
i
li
D
Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.
Avoidance and Minimization
1a Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project
Please see attached additional page
1b Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques
Please see attached additional page
2
Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U S. or Waters of the State
2a
Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
Impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2b
If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply)
❑ DWQ ❑X Corps
2c
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑X Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to In -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3.
Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a
Name of Mitigation Bank Neu -Con Umbrella Bank - Howell Woods Site
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type Riparian wetland
Type Choose one
Type Choose one
Quantity 0 98
Quantity
Quantity
Please see attached a er ot availability tor riparian wetland credits (Attachment The credits required by the approve
3c Comments Nationwide Permit 39 will be purchased following receipt of the permit
4
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a Approval letter from In -lieu fee program Is attached
❑ Yes
4b
Stream mitigation requested
linear feet
4c
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature
Choose one
4d
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only)
square feet
4e
Riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4f
Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4g
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested
acres
4h Comments
5.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a
If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

6 Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation
Yes ❑X No
6b If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the
amount of mitigation required
Zone
6c
Reason for impact
6d
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1 5
6f Total buffer mitigation required,
6g If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g , payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund)
6h Comments
Page 7 of 10

J
I
E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a
Does the project Include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers Identified
❑x Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan Included? If no, explain why
The existing stormwater pond has a Neuse Riparian Buffer The wetlands in the project area drain into
The for the drive
❑ Yes ❑X NO
the
existing stormwater pond through an existing 24" culvert culvert proposed access
crossing the existing wetlands will outlet into the remaining wetland before entering the buffer The
existing
wetland at the outlet will naturally provide diffuse flow into the buffer
2
Stormwater Management Plan
2a
What Is the overall percent Imperviousness of this project?
33%
2b
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑x Yes ❑ No
2c
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why
2d
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan
Please see attached additional page
2e
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
Johnston County - Certified Local Gov't
3
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a
In which local government's jurisdiction Is this project?
Johnston County
0 Phase II
M NSW
3b
Which of the following locally - Implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply)
❑X Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other
3c
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑X No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a
Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply)
❑Session Law 2006 -246
[:]Other
4b
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

y ,
`1
F
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) funds or the
❑ Yes ❑X No
use of public (federal /state) land?
lb
If you answered `yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA /SEPA)?
1c
If you answered `yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter)
Comments
2
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
El Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B 0200)?
2b
Is this an after - the -fact permit applications
El Yes ❑X No
2c
If you answered `yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s)
3
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
El Yes X❑ No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description
No
supporting industry is required for this industry
4
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility
Wastewater generated from this project will be routed to the existing permitted POTW
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1 4 January 2009

I�
E,
I,
i
I�
1
f
I
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a WIII this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c If yes, Indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted
Raleigh
5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Cntical
Habitat?
Correspondence with USFWS and NCNHP is attached USFWS Indicated the project is not likely to adversely affect any federally- listed species,
critical habitat, or proposed species, NCNHP found no records within the project boundaries, and no current records within one mile of the project
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a WIII this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Not inclose proximity to known Essential Fish Habitat Utilized SAFMC Habitat and Ecosystem Atlas to assess proximity
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a WIII this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g , National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would Impact historic or archeological resources?
Letter from NC State Historic Preservation Office included as Attachment 4
S. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a WIII this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements
8c What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FIRM Panel 1677 and 1678J included in submittal (Attachment 5)
Karen Cook
i
)'715Ole 0
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
L Applicant/Agent's Signature
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authonzation
letter from the applicant is provided
Page 10 of 10

13.3e. Project Description: Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be
used:
To accommodate the disruption to employee parking on the existing Grifols Clayton manufacturing plant caused
by planned expansions to operations, Grifols proposes to construct a new parking lot as close as possible to the
plant site for dislocated employees. This parking lot must be constructed before allowing these future
expansions to move forward. To serve this new parking lot, a new access driveway is to be constructed from
Powhatan Rd. to the south to the parking lot and provide connection to the existing plant site. Construction will
largely be carried out by heavy earth moving equipment such as bull dozers, pan graders and dump trucks.
D.1.1a. Avoidance and Minimization: Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the
proposed impacts in designing project.
• Retaining wall to be installed along eastern edge of Phase 1 lot to limit fill in the wetlands.
• Silt Fence and other miscellaneous sediment control devices will help prevent deposition of eroded soil in the
remaining wetlands.
• Low access drive profile limits footprint of fill over wetland crossing
• Access drive alignment adjusted to avoid impact to Neuse Riparian Buffer around existing stormwater pond.
• Diversion of existing amenity pond baseflow to remaining wetlands to keep wetlands recharged.
D.1.1b. Avoidance and Minimization: Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the
proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Before any earth is disturbed, the contractor shall have the perimeter silt fence staked by a registered land
surveyor in order to assure an accurate construction boundary is observed, preventing additional disturbance to
the existing wetlands. The contractor shall be required to attach orange plastic construction fence to the silt
fence stakes and post signs on the fence stating, `WETLANDS - DO NOT ENTER'. The contractor shall be made
aware of the importance of preserving the remaining wetlands and shall be directed to inform his /her
subcontractors. The plans at the new driveway wetland crossing shall also call for the contractor to keep the
work area around the new culvert installation dry, pumping any accumulated ground water in the work area
through a silt bag.
E.2.2d. Stormwater Management Plan: If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then
provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Stormwater management shall be designed per Johnston County Stormwater Management Design Manual, latest
edition. Accordingly, the difference between the pre - development and the post - development discharge volume
for the 1 -yr, 24 -hr design storm shall be attenuated on -site. To accomplish this, stormwater produced from the
new parking lot is to be directed into the existing storm sewer system and conveyed to the existing stormwater
pond on -site. The existing pond will be analyzed to determine whether there is enough storage volume
available, and, if not, the outlet device modified to create that volume. Additionally, the baseflow due to
groundwater from the upstream amenity pond is to be directed through a new emergency spillway to the
existing wetlands. This action will keep the remaining wetlands recharged. The project will also be designed to
comply with Johnston County's requirement to limit Total Nitrogen export to a maximum of 3.6 lb /ac /yr
through a combination of on -site best management practices and offset payment to a mitigation bank.
360° Engineering and Project Delivery Solutions GURIEN E GCRC
■

TABLE OF CONTENTS
ATTACHMENTS
1. Design Plans and Impact Figure
2. Wetland Delineation Letter Report
3. Mitigation Bank Letter of Availability
4. N.C. State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) Correspondence
5. Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM)
6. Agent Authorization Form
i DRAFf I September 24, 2013 G GBRIEN 6 GERE
I: \Talecris- Biothe. 12335 \47819.Talecris - 404-40 \Dots \Reports \2013_Parking PCN

Design Plans and Impact Figure
an GBRICN 6 GCRC

d
—
i�ii
16540' 'a
N
N\GH� PV 42
J'
G
N' GLEN LAUREL
L
LLJ
US SO PO
eGS�I /Sti�Lgy� /��Oq�Rti
S
PROJECT
LOCATION
Gp�
p�s�O�Cp�t�
���p•• �.
O •F �FP
P tP
� N
5 DISTURBED PO�HA
AREA
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
LEGEND:
CEXISTING WETLANDS
WETLAND IMPACTS
— x— �c—ic— TEMPORARY SILT FENCE
WETLANDS IMPACT
(INCLUDED IN W1)
EXISTING AMENITY POND
on Q�� 1
1' 61 EXISTING
STORM WATER POND
-\ 30' fL� 20' —
<, ZONE 1 - - ZONE 2
50' NEUSE
RIPARIAN BUFFER
NC GRID
• �D G �- NSfl52 .4V
TEMPORARY
SILT FENCING
WETLANDS IMPACT -W1
AREA = 21,390sf (0.49ac)
PROPOSED
RETAINING WALL
4, -
yTEMPORARY
SILT FENCING
PR
NC
FOR (
TRIANGLE
CIVILWORKS GRIFOLS THERAPEUTICS WETLANDS IMPACT
PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION PARKING EXPANSION - PHASE 1
NCBELS N0. (-26(),, 21 I TYLER DRIVE 60 0 60
SMITHFIELD, NC 27577
919- 209 -9955 1 " =60'
I: \TRICIVILWKS\ PROJECTS \GRIFOLS- TALECRIS \SOUTH CAMPUS PARKING \PHASE 1 \DOCUMENTS \DWG \SHEETS \F -1 WETLAND IMPACTS.DWG
FIGURE NO.
F -1
—
i�ii
16540' 'a
J'
TEMPORARY
SILT FENCING
WETLANDS IMPACT -W1
AREA = 21,390sf (0.49ac)
PROPOSED
RETAINING WALL
4, -
yTEMPORARY
SILT FENCING
PR
NC
FOR (
TRIANGLE
CIVILWORKS GRIFOLS THERAPEUTICS WETLANDS IMPACT
PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION PARKING EXPANSION - PHASE 1
NCBELS N0. (-26(),, 21 I TYLER DRIVE 60 0 60
SMITHFIELD, NC 27577
919- 209 -9955 1 " =60'
I: \TRICIVILWKS\ PROJECTS \GRIFOLS- TALECRIS \SOUTH CAMPUS PARKING \PHASE 1 \DOCUMENTS \DWG \SHEETS \F -1 WETLAND IMPACTS.DWG
FIGURE NO.
F -1

Wetland Delineation Letter Report
Sm O'DRICN 6 GCRC

■ O'BRICN6GCRC
July 11, 2013
Mr. David Auge
HES Manager, Environmental
Grifols Therapeutics, Inc.
8368 US 70 Business West
Clayton, NC 27520
RE: Wetland & Waters of the U.S. Delineation Letter Report for 20 -Acre Waltham IV Property
FILE: 47819
Dear David,
O'Brien & Gere is pleased to submit this letter report summarizing the delineation of jurisdictional wetlands &
waters of the U.S. conducted in July 2012 at the Waltham IV property in Clayton, Johnston County, NC (the Site).
A site location map is provided in this letter report as Figure 1. The wetland delineation was conducted at the
request of Grifols, Inc. (Grifols) to support acquisition of the Site by Grifols, which was completed in December
2012.
Grifols currently plans to construct a parking lot on a portion of the Site to support the Grifols Main Facility.
Impacts to wetlands & waters of the U.S. associated with constructing the parking lot will require submission of
a Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) for a Nationwide Permit from the Wilmington District of the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
(NCDENR) Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ).
DELINEATION METHODS
Wetland delineation field activities were conducted by one O'Brien & Gere scientist on July 23 -24, 2012.
Appended to this report is a photographic log (Attachment 1) depicting the wetland habitats observed during
the field effort as well as the Wetland Data Forms (Attachment 2) generated during this effort. The county soil
survey for the project area as well as the National Wetland Inventory map for the project area are also included
in this letter report (Figures 2 and 3, respectively).
The wetland delineation was conducted in accordance with the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation
Manual (Y -87 -1 Manual) and the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual:
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region (Version 2.0) (Regional Supplement). Where differences in the two
documents occur, the Regional Supplement takes precedence.
The Y -87 -1 Manual describes wetlands as those areas that have permanent or periodic inundation or saturation
by surface or ground water to create anaerobic conditions in the soil to support a prevalence of vegetation
typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Therefore, environmental criteria for wetlands includes
the following:
• the prevalent vegetation is hydrophytic
• the soils observed have been classified as hydric, and /or anaerobic conditions have developed in the
soils, and
■ the area is either permanently or periodically inundated, or the soil is permanently or periodically
saturated to the surface during the growing season.
2610 Wycliff Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27607 1 p 919 - 783 -7777 1 f 919 - 783 -0757 1 www.obg.com
360° Engineering and Project Delivery Solutions

Mr. David Auge
July 11, 2013
Page 2
© 2012 O'Brien & Gere. All Rights Reserved.
To support the field delineation, off -site investigation included review of available information from the
following sources:
■ Soil Survey of Johnston County, NC (U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation
Services [NRCS], 1994)
■ National Hydric Soils List: Johnston County, NC (NRCS, 2012)
■ National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) Map for Johnston County, NC (U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
[USFWS1,1983)
■ National Wetland Plant List, Atlantic Gulf & Coastal Plain Region (Lichvar, 2012)
While information obtained from off -site sources was consulted during this wetland delineation, final wetland
determinations were made based on information obtained in the field. The following describes the approach
used to complete the wetland identification and delineation effort:
1. Plant community types were observed and their dominant component species were identified. Wetland
indicator status was obtained, if available, for each species identified and recorded on the field data sheet.
If 50 percent or more of the dominant species in the plant community were observed to have an indicator
status of facultative (FAC) or wetter (FACW, OBL), then a hydrophytic vegetative community was
determined present.
2. Prospective wetland areas were examined for the presence of hydrology in the areas occupied by the
hydrophytic plant community. If wetland hydrology indicators (water marks, water stained leaves,
sediment deposits, drainage patters, inundation, etc.) were observed, then sufficient forcing hydrology
for the existence of wetlands was considered present.
3. Shovel pits of the soil substrate in the prospective wetland areas were examined in multiple locations.
The characteristics of the soil were compared to hydric soil indicators as prescribed by the Field
Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States, A Guide for Identifying and Delineating Hydric Soils, Version
70 (NRCS, 2010). If the soils were observed to have positive hydric soil indicators (histosol, depleted
matrix, dark surface, etc.), then hydric soil was considered present.
4. If all of the above characteristics (hydrophytic vegetation, hydrology, and hydric soils) were found to be
present in a prospective wetland area, the area was defined as a wetland. If the any of the above
characteristics were found to be absent in a prospective wetland area, the area was not considered a
wetland. The point between the area where all three of these criteria are present and the area where at
least one of these criteria is absent is defined as the wetland border.
The O'Brien & Gere scientist also examined the survey area for streams and other jurisdictional waters of the
U.S.
DELINEATION FINDINGS
OFF -SITE FINDINGS
Soils Review
Soil survey information for Johnston County, NC was obtained from the most recent printed version of the soil
survey, which was published by NRCS in 1994. The following soil types were identified for the survey area
(Figure 2):
■ GeB: Gilead sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
■ Ra: Rains sandy loam
■ UcB: Uchee loamy coarse sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes
2610 Wycliff Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27607 1 p 919 - 783 -7777 1 f 919 - 783 -0757 1 www.obg.com
360° Engineering and Project Delivery Solutions

Mr David Auge
July 11, 2013
Page 3
© 2012 O'Brien & Gere All Rights Reserved
■ VrA Varma loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
■ W Open water
Of the soils listed above, Ra is the only hydric soil (MRCS, 2012) During the field investigation, soil type Ra was
confirmed present m Wetland A The soil at wetland soil pit TS -3 in Wetland B did not match the mapped soil
units, and was likely affected by deposition (Attachment 2) Non - wetland areas contained soil that more closely
matched characteristics of GeB Open water was confirmed present during the field effort as well, as the pond
depicted on the soil survey to the east of Wetland B is still present However, a stream drainage identified on the
soil survey connecting the pond on the Site to another pond to the north of the Site (Figure 2) was not confirmed
present during the field effort Instead, Wetland B was located where the stream drainage is depicted
NWI Review
The NWI map (Figure 3) does not indicate the presence of wetlands at the Site
Protected Species Coordination Review
Protected species coordination was conducted with the USFWS Raleigh Field Office and the North Carolina
Department of the Environment and Natural Resources Natural Heritage Program ( NCNHP) The USFWS and
NCNHP coordination responses are included in Attachment 3. In a letter dated April 24, 2013, NCNHP
responded that "there are no NHP records within the boundaries of the proposed project, and no current
records within one mile of the project " In a letter dated May 3, 2013, USFWS stated that the proposed action is
not likely to adversely affect any federally - listed endangered species or threatened species, their formally
designated critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Endangered Species Act (the Act)
at the Site Additionally, USFWS indicated that the requirements of Section 7(a)(2) of the Act have been
satisfied for the project
ON -SITE FINDINGS
' Delineated Wetlands
Wetland A (Figure 4) was a low quality wetland Swale that provides stormwater drainage for an industrial
f facility to the east of the Site (Attachment 1, Photo 1) Wetland A extends off the property to the south, and also
discharges to Wetland B to the north Approximately 0 04 acres of Wetland A are located within the boundaries
of the Site The swale is likely periodically mown for routine facility maintenance, and was dominated by
- emergent herbaceous vegetation, including marsh flatsedge(Cyperus pseudovegetus) and Virginia buttonweed
(Diodia virginiana) The soil was primarily composed of sandy loam and sandy clay, and had a Depleted Matrix
(Indicator F3) Strong hydrology indicators were observed, including surface water, high water table,
_ saturation, and hydrogen sulfide odor
Wetland B was a moderate quality forested wetland that contains a network of wetland drainages and seeps
along the gentle slope of a headwater valley (Attachment 1, Photo 2) Wetland B outlets into a stormwater pond
that drains to an unnamed jurisdictional tributary of the Neuse River Wetland B is approximately 0 9 acres,
with approximately 0 72 acres located within the boundaries of the Site Historic beaver activity was observed
on the north end of Wetland B, but recent activity was not observed Dominant vegetation included swamp
tupelo (Nyssa biflora), sweetgum (Liquidambarstyraciflua), sweet pepperbush (Clethra alnifolia), giant cane
(Arundinaria gigantea), and roundleaf greenbrier (Smilax rotundifolia) The soil was comprised of sandy loam
and sand, and contained an Umbric Surface (Indicator F13) Strong hydrology indicators were observed,
including a high water table, saturation, and water - stained leaves
Delineated Waters of the U.S.
Jurisdictional streams were not identified at the Site A man -made pond was identified as a jurisdictional water
of the U S (WUS 1 on Figure 4) that discharges to Wetland B (Attachment 1, Photo 3)
2610 Wycliff Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27607 1 p 919 - 783 -7777 1 f 919 - 783 -0757 1 www obg com
360° Engineering and Project Delivery Solutions

Mr. David Auge
July 11, 2013 © 2012 O'Brien & Gere. All Rights Reserved
Page 4
Potential Protected Species Habitat
Habitats encountered within the project area include cleared upland (Attachment 1, Photo 4), emergent wetland,
forested wetland, mid - successional mixed forest, early- successional mixed forest, and a man -made pond. Based
on the coordination with USFWS and NCNHP (Attachment 3), no species with special conservation status are
expected to occur within the project area.
REGULATORY SITE VISITS
NCDWQ Buffer Determination
On January 15, 2013, Martin Richmond, NCDWQ, visited the Site to determine whether there were streams or
other water features at the Site that are jurisdictional under the Neuse River Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 02B
.0233). The printed soil survey map (Figure 2) shows pond WUS 1, as well as a connecting stream line to the
pond to the north of the Site. However, Mr. Richmond determined in the field that the line shown on the soil
survey does not correspond to a jurisdictional stream, and stated that the jurisdictional buffer ends at the pond
to the north of the Site, and does not include Wetland A, Wetland B, or WUS 1. Mr. Richmond summarized his
findings in a letter dated March 4, 2013 (Attachment 3).
USACE Pre - Application Site Visit
On February 26, 2013, James Lastinger, USACE, visited the Site to for a pre - application site visit. Mr. Lastinger
confirmed that Wetland A, Wetland B, and pond WUS 1 were federally jurisdictional, and did not alter the
delineated wetland boundaries. Mr. Lastinger stated that impacts to Wetland B would be mitigated at a 2:1
ratio. Mr. Lastinger also stated that impacts to pond WUS 1 would not be mitigated, but would contribute to the
Nationwide Permit impact limit of 0.5 acres. Mr. Lastinger said that impacts to wetlands & waters of the U.S.
associated with activities at the Main Facility would be considered separately from impacts associated with
activities at the North Fractionation Facility.
CONCLUSIONS
Two jurisdictional wetlands and one jurisdictional pond were identified at the Site (Figure 4). The proposed
project may impact Wetland B and pond WUS 1. Unavoidable permanent or temporary impacts associated with
the proposed project should be permitted by submission of a PCN for Nationwide Permit 39 to USACE and
NCDWQ.
Your interest in the services of O'Brien & Gere are appreciated. If you have questions regarding this letter
report, please contact Daniel Ramsay at (919) 783 -7777, ext. 18.
Sincerely,
O'BRIEN & GERE ENGINEERS, INC.
Michael Waligura, REM
Technical Associate
Cc: Daniel Ramsay, O'Brien & Gere
Michael Hall, O'Brien & Gere
Attachments: Figures
Attachment 1- Site Photographs
Attachment 2 - Wetland Delineation Datasheets
Attachment 3 - Coordination Letters and Responses
2610 Wycliff Road, Suite 104, Raleigh, NC 27607 1 p 919 - 783 -7777 1 f 919 - 783 -0757 1 www.obg.com
360° Engineering and Project Delivery Solutions

G
E
0
0
a
LEGEND GRIFOLS, INC.
r—I Approximate Project Area MAIN FACILITY PARKING LOT PROJECT N
CLAYTON, NC
SITE LOCATION MAP
0 1,000 2,000 4,000
X013 _ GBRIEN 5 GERE
47819 Feet
I�,K J'-
- r-s�-
VI V ,�
FIGURE 1
r
ISA �' • � � s
Is
�Powhatari and Clayton'USGS Quadrangles Copyright:© 2043 Nat1 I eo�raphic' ale , t e

V►,. "w- a—I
.,�� � ,/�•1••. y, :fit
'ham - :: t •..��� •� ..
i ,.� ■� � , ggam�, : ''�'�jj ®�-- �1.►t. �`�
ALL
IN
Al
s •.�
•�� � V ,' fYyi l� t
r7f•� r � � '� � �O

m
O
m
E
C
C
a
w
a
0
0
0
a
FIGURE 3
PUBHh P�ul
c
s
7o CUBHh
ro
PF01A
Powhatan
y rECtt DR
70
s,
r
Sources: Esri, DeLorme, NAVTEQ, TomTom, Intermap ement P
Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster
NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), and
the GIS User Community
LEGEND GRIFOLS, INC.
�Approximate Project Area MAIN FACILITY PARKING LOT PROJECT N^
- Freshwater Forested /Shrub Wetland CLAYTON, NC
Freshwater Pond
NATIONAL WETLANDS INVENTORY MAP
° 250 5 00 1,000
ON O'DRICN 6 GORE
SIt12013
47819 Feet

LEGEND
Wetland Test Site
t
f ; Wetlands /Waters of the U.S.
Tract Boundary
GRIFOLS, INC FIGURE 4: WETLAND DELINEATION MAP
WETLAND DELINEATION "
WALTHAM TRACT
CLAYTON, NC 47819
47819
0 50 100 200 300 400
Feet O'BRIEN G GERE

Grifols Main Facility Parking Lot Project
Clayton, NC ru O'ORIEN 6 GERE
•' ,. , .,., - .. •" "• ' �"�': � it <
l: .•G. - ' � •'fir ,;�* � .ti •y
�` �'`. �4f �,.il ��• ,F! .64'9.` �.�
y/r s
WC
-•• •
•• • •
Photo No. 3 — WUS 1: Impounded pond in the western portion of the site.
Grifols Main Facility Parking Lot Project
Clayton, NC ru O'ORIEN 6 GERE

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site Waltham Tract City /County Clayton/Johnston Sampling Date 7/23/2012
Applicant/Owner Gnfols State North Carolina Sampling Point TS -1 (WET)
Investigator(s) Daniel Ramsay Section, Township, Range
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc) swale Local relief (concave, convex, none) concave Slope ( %) <1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR P Lat 35 °36' 55 9 N Long 78 °24' 54 7 W Datum NAD 1983
Soil Map Unit Name Rains sandy loam, 0 -2% slopes (hydnc) NWI classification N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes FS No r (If no, explain in Remarks)
Are Vegetation Sod " or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes I" No
Are Vegetation , Sod 7—, or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SummAKY Ur rINLANUs – Attacn site map snowing sampung point iocatnons, transects, importam reatures, etc
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 'tom No �— Is the Sampled Area Yes � No r
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No within a Wetland?
Remarks (Explain alternative procedures here or in separate report)
Wetland A swale appears to have been constructed to manage stormwater from the adjacent parking lot
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required, check all that apply)
Soil Surface Cracks (136)
Water (Al)
Aqua Fauna (613)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
_Surface
r High Water Table (A2)
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
– Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
_Tf— Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
7_ Moss Tri m Lines (B16)
T_ Water Marks (131)
�— Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
– Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_
r Sediment Deposits (132)
— Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
T_ Drift Deposits (63)
_17—Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)°
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
T_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
T_ Iron Deposits (135)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
– Shallow Aquitard (D3)
T_ inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
–�FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
T— Water - Stained Leaves (69)
–r- Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T,U)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes
No r Depth (inches) 1
Water Table Present? Yes
No r Depth (inches) 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ff] No r
Saturation Present? Yes F
No r Depth (inches) 0
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks
Recent thunderstorm activity (past 48 hours)
Atlantic and Gulf Coast Plain Region - Version 2 0
U S Army Corps of Engineers Reproduced by O'Brien & Gere
I
_ _l

i � I
r
I
Sampling Point TS -1 (WET)
VEUETATIUN — Use scientltic names of plants
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30 ft radius) % Cover
Species9 Status
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 2 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata 2 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 100% (A/B)
0
= Total Cover
50% of total cover 0
20% of total cover 0
Prevalence Index worksheet
Sapling Stratum (Plot size 30 ft radius)
Total % Cover of Multiply by
OBL species 1 x 1 = 1
FACW species 2 x2= 4
FAC species 0 x3= 0
FACU species 0 x4= 0
UPL species 0 x5= 0
Column Totals 3 (A) 5 (B)
0
= Total Cover
50% of total cover 0
20% of total cover 0
Prevalence Index = B/A = 1 666666667
Shrub Stratum (Plot size 30 ft radius)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
i 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
ffl-3 - Prevalence Index is s3 0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
0
= Total Cover
50% of total cover 0
20% of total cover 0
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
Herb Stratum (Plot size 30 ft elongated within swale)
present, unless disturbed or problematic
Cyperus pseudovegetus 20
Yes FACW
Dlodra virgrnrana 20 Yes FACW
E/eochans sp 10
No NL
Definitions of Vegetation Strata
Carex sp 10
No NL
Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Juncus effusus 5
No OBL
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in
Xyns sp 3
No NL
(7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6m) or more in height and less
than 3 in (7 6cm) DBH
68
= Total Cover
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
50% of total cover 34
20% of total cover 14
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6m) in height
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 30 ft radius)
Herb — All herbaceous (non - woody) plants including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants,
except woody vines, less than approximately 3 It (1m)
in height
Woody vines — All woody vines, regardless of height
0 0
50% of total cover 0
= Total Cover
20% of total cover 0
Hydrophytic Vegetation
Present? Yes M No r
Remarks (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Area is periodically mown
U S Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coast Plain Region - Version 2 0
Reproduced by O'Brien & Gere

Sampling Point TS -1 (WET)
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type, Loc2
Texture Remarks
0 -2 10 YR 413 100
-
loamy sand likely washed in
2-6 10 YR 4/1 67
10 YR 8/1 3 D M
sandy loam
i 5 Y 8/1 15
i
- -
inclusions (dual
sandy clay
7 5 YR 7/8 15
- -
matrix)
6 -22 10 YR 5/1 60
10 YR 6/8 20 C M
sandy clay loam -
5 Y 8/ 1 20 D M
'Type C= Concentration D =De letion RM= Reduced Matrix CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains
2Location PL =Pore Lining, M =Matrix
Hydric Sod Indicators (applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted)
Indicators for Problematic Hvdnc So1Is3
r' Histosol (Al)
r Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S,T,U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
T_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
r Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S,T,U)
F 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
7— Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (1718) (outside MLRA
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
r Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Ir 150A,B)
7— Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (173)
Piedmont Floodplain Sods (F19)
7— Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P,T,U)
�— Redox Dark Surface (F6)
r (LRR P,S,T)
r 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P,T,U)
r Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
7— Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
r Redox Depressions (F8)
r (MLRA 15313)
7— 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P,T)
—Marl (F10) (LRR U)
7F__ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All 1)
— Depleted Ochnc (F11) (MLRA 151)
r Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
r Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O,P,T)
—r —Other (Explain in Remarks)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P,T,U)
IF (MLRA 150A)
^Delta Ochrnc (F17) (MLRA 151)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O,S)
r Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
TPiedmont Floodplain Sods (F19) (MLRA 149A) wetland hydrology must be present, unless
T_ Sandy Redox (S5)
C—Anomalous Bright Loamy Sods (F20) (MLRA
disturbed or problematic
Stripped Matrix (S6)
149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P,S,T,U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type -
Hydnc Sod Present? Yes W No r
Depth (inches) -
Remarks
Swale appears to flow south
Sod likely disturbed during construction of swale
U 5 Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coast Plain Region - Version 2 0
Reproduced by O'Brien & Gere

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
- . ProjecUSite Waltham Tract City /County Clayton/Johnston Sampling Date 7/23/2012
Applicant/Owner Gnfols State North Carolina Sampling Point TS -2 (UPL)
Investigator(s) Daniel Ramsay Section, Township, Range -
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc) flat Local relief (concave, convex, none) none Slope ( %) 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR P Lat 35 °36' 56 3 N Long 78 °24' 53 6 W Datum NAD 1983
Sod Map Unit Name Rains sandy loam, 0 -2% slopes NWI classification N/A
- - Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes F1 No r (If no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation n Soil r , or Hydrology r significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes I9 No
Are Vegetation F , Soil T, or Hydrology r naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
I
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No -� Is the Sampled Area Yes r No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 7f No e� within a Wetland?
Remarks (Explain alternative procedures here or in separate report )
Upland soil point for Wetland A
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required,
check all that apply)
r Soil Surface Cracks (B6)
Water (Al)
Aqua Fauna (B13)
r Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_Surface
r High Water Table (A2)
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
- Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
r Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
T -Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1)
�- Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Tf� Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
it Sediment Deposits (62)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
r Crayfish Burrows (C8)
I- Drift Deposits (133)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
- Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
T-Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
T- Geomorphic Position (D2)
T_ Iron Deposits (B5)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
T_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
�_ FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
1_ Water - Stained Leaves (B9)
-r-Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T,U)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes r
No Depth (inches) -
Water Table Present? Yes r
No Pt Depth (inches) -
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r No
Saturation Present? Yes f
Noy Depth (inches) -
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks
Flat topography, hydrology likely reduced by the ditch 100 feet to the west.
Atlantic and Gulf Coast Plain Region - Version 2 0
U S Army Corps of Engineers Reproduced by O'Brien & Gere

,- -I
Sampling Point TS -2 (UPL)
V tt t= I A I wN - use scienrmc names or pianrs
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30 ft radius) % Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 4 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata 5 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 80% (A/B)
0
= Total Cover
50% of total cover 0
20% of total cover 0
Prevalence Index worksheet
Sapling Stratum (Plot size 30 ft radius)
Total % Cover of Multiply by
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
FACW species 1 x 2 = 2
FAC species 4 x 3 = 12
FACU species 0 x4= 0
UPL species 0 X5= 0
Column Totals 5 (A) 14 (B)
0
= Total Cover
50% of total cover 0
20% of total cover 0
Prevalence Index = B/A = 28
Shrub Stratum (Plot size 30 ft radius)
Pmus taeda 1
Yes FAC
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
r 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is s3 0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1
= Total Cover
50% of total cover 0 5
20% of total cover 0 2
'Indicators of hydric sod and wetland hydrology must be
Herb Stratum (Plot size 30 ft)
present, unless disturbed or problematic
Athynum filrx -femora 60
Yes FAC
Poaceae sp 20 Yes NIL
LrqurdambarstyracrBua 1
No FAC
Definitions of Vegetation Strata
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in
(7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6m) or more in height and less
than 3 in (7 6cm) DBH
81
= Total Cover
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
50% of total cover 47
20% of total cover 16
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6m) in height
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 30 ft radius)
Herb - Ali herbaceous (non - woody) plants, including
Smilax glauca 2
Yes FACW
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants,
Toxicodendron radicans 1
Yes FAC
except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m)
in height
Woody vines -All woody vines, regardless of height
0 3
50% of total cover 1 5
-
= Total Cover
20% of total cover 0 6
Hydrophytic Vegetation
Present? Yes V No r
-
Remarks (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Vegetation mown periodically
U S Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coast Plain Region - Version 2 0
Reproduced by O'Brien & Gere

f
Sampling Point TS -2 (UPL)
Anil
Profile Description (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators )
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2
Texture Remarks
0 -3 10 YR 5/1 100
-
sandy loam -
3 -12 2 5 Y 6/3 80
25Y6/8 20 C M
sandy clay loam -
'Type C= Concentration D =De letion RM= Reduced Matrix CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains
2Location PL =Pore Lining, M= Matrix
Hydnc Soil Indicators (applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted)
Indicators for Problematic Hvdnc Sods
Ir Histosol (Al)
r Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S,T,U)
r 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
7_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—� Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S,T,U)
F 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
T_ Black Histic (A3)
—� Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
�_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
r- 150A,B)
Stratified Layers (A5)
—� Depleted Matrix (F3)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P,T,U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
F (LRR P,S,T)
�5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P,T,U)
r Depleted Dark Surface (177)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Sods (F20)
I� Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
r Redox Depressions (F8)
r (MLRA 153B)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P,T)
�— Marl (F10) (LRR U)
�_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
r Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
r Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O,P,T)
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Umbnc Surface (1713) (LRR P,T,U)
(MLRA 150A)
r Delta Ochnc (F17) (MLRA 151)
T_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O,S)
C" Reduced Vertic (F18) (Ii 150A, 1508)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
f Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) wetland hydrology must be present, unless
Sandy Redox (S5)
r Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA
disturbed or problematic
Stripped Matrix (S6)
149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P,S,T,U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type -
Hydric Sod Present? Yes r' No r1
Depth (inches) -
Remarks
2 inches of undecomposed organic litter and
rhizomes not included
A few faint oxidized rhizospheres present
- did not consider sufficient for wetland hydrology
0-3 inches in A horizon, therefore 2% concentrations are required for indicator criterion F3 to be met
I �
Atlantic and Gulf Coast Plain Region - Version 2 0
U S Army Corps of Engineers Reproduced by O'Brien & Gere

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
1r Project/Site Waltham Tract City /County Clayton/Johnston Sampling Date 7/23/2012
Applicant/Owner Gnfols State North Carolina Sampling Point TS -3 (WET)
Investigator(s) Daniel Ramsay Section, Township, Range -
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc) terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none) concave Slope ( %) 1 -2
" Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR P Lat 35 °37' 03 3 N Long 78 °24' 57 7 W Datum NAD 1983
"
Soil Map Unit Name Gilead sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes (non- hydnc) NWI classification N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes K No r (If no, explain in Remarks)
Are Vegetation i Sod , or Hydrology r significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No r
iAre Vegetation 7�_ , Sod I or Hydrology 7 naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
i
5UMMAKY VF I-INU1Nti5 — Attacn Site map snowing sampung point iocations, transects, important reatures, etc
Hydric Sod Present? Yes No
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes -1211— No is the Sampled Area Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes -53-- No within a Wetland?
Remarks (Explain alternative procedures here or in separate report )
Wetland B is a network of wetland drainages along the gentle slope of a headwater valley (TS-3 is representative)
Historical beaver activity, none observed at present
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one required, check all that apply)
Soil Surface Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (Al)
Aqua Fauna (1313)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
-Fr'- High Water Table (A2)
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
— Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
—Moss Tri m Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1)
— Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
T_ Sediment Deposits (132)
— Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (63)
�— Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
-� Saturation Visible on Aenal Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
—Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
T_ Iron Deposits (135)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
7— Shallow Agwtard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery
(137)
—FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
-ff- Water - Stained Leaves (B9)
�Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T,U)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes !"
No Depth (inches) -
Water Table Present? Yes
No f` Depth (inches) 12
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes M No
Saturation Present? Yes
NoTDepth (inches) 8
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks
Atlantic and Gulf Coast Plain Region - Version 2 0
U S Army Corps of Engineers Reproduced by O'Brien & Gere
I

Sampling Point TS -3 (WET)
VEGETATION — use Scientific names of plants
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30 ft radius) % Cover
Species?
Status
Nyssa biflora
30
Yes
OBL
Number of Dominant Species
Lviodendron tulipfera
30
Yes
FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 10 (A)
Acer rubrum
25
Yes
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata 11 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 91% (A/B)
85
= Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet
50% of total cover 43 20% of total cover 17
Sapling Stratum (Plot size 30 ft radius)
Liquidambar styraciflua
5
Yes
FAC
Total % Cover of Multiply by
Acer rubrum
3
Yes
FAC
OBL species 2 x 1 = 2
Lmodendron tulipfera
3
Yes
FACW
FACW species 6 x2= 12
Magnolia wrgimana
1
No
FACU
FAC species 6 x3= 18
FACU species 2 x4= 8
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
Column Totals 16 (A) 40 (B)
12
= Total Cover
50% of total cover 6
20% of total cover 2 4
Prevalence Index = B/A = 25
Shrub Stratum (Plot size 30 ft radius)
Clethra almfoha
40
Yes
FACW
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
Magnolia virgrn►ana
25
Yes
FACW
Acer rubrum
5
No
FAC
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
75-2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53 0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
70
= Total Cover
50% of total cover 35
20% of total cover 14
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
Herb Stratum (Plot size 30 ft radius)
present, unless disturbed or problematic
Arundmana gigantea
20
Yes
FACW
Woodwardia aerolata 10 Yes OBL
Clethra alnifoha
7
No
FACW
Definitions of Vegetation Strata
Osmunda cmnamomea
3
No
FACW
Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in
(7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6m) or more in height and less
than 3 in (7 6cm) DBH
40
= Total Cover
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
50% of total cover 20
20% of total cover 8
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6m) in height
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 30 ft radius)
Herb — All herbaceous (non - woody) plants, including
Smilax rotundifoba
15
Yes
FAC
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants,
Toxicodendron radicans
3
No
FAC
except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1m)
in height
Woody vines — All woody vines, regardless of height
u 18
50% of total cover 9
—
= Total Cover
20% of total cover 3 6
Hydrophytic Vegetation
Yes No r
Present? —
Remarks (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Atlantic and Gulf Coast Plain Region - Version 2 0
U S Army Corps of Engineers Reproduced by O'Brien & Gere

i
SOIL
s
j
Profile Description
(Describe to the depth r
Depth
Matrix
(inches)
Color (moist) %
0 -10
10 YR 3/1 100
10 -16+
10 YR 5/1 100
1 to document the indicator or confirm 1
Redox Features
Color (moist) % ape' Loc'
Sampling Point TS -3 (WET)
bsence of indicators )
Texture Remarks
sandy loam -
sand -
'Type C= Concentration D =De letion RM= Reduced Matrix CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains
`Location PL =Pore Lining, M =Matrix
Hydric Sod Indicators (applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted)
Indicators for Problematic Hvdric Sods'
F_ Histosol (Al)
r Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S,T,U)
r 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
7_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S,T,U)
T2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
I� Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
r Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
150A,B)
7_ Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matnx (F3)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
7— Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P,T,U)
— Redox Dark Surface (F6)
F (LRR P,S,T)
�5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P,T,U)
r Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
—� Redox Depressions (F8)
(MLRA 1536)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P,T)
�— Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
IrsVery Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
T_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
r Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O,P,T)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P,T,U)
r (MLRA 150A)
r Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
7— Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O,S)
IT Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1508)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
r Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) wetland hydrology must be present, unless
Sandy Redox (S5)
r Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (li
disturbed or problematic
Stripped Matrix (S6)
149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P,S,T,U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
r
Type -
Hydnc Soil Present? Yes No
Depth (inches) -
Remarks
U S Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coast Plain Region - Version 2 0
Reproduced by O'Brien & Gere

I
J
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site Waltham Tract City /County Clayton /Johnston sampling Date 7/23/2012
Applicant/Owner Grifols State NC Sampling Point TS- 4(UPL)
Investigator(s) Daniel Ramsay, WPIT Section, Township, Range
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc ) hillSlope Local relief (concave, convex, none) convex Slope ( %) 3
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR P Lat 35 °37' 03 0 N Long 7824' 57 5 W Datum NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name Gilead sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes (non - hydric) NWI classification N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year9 Yes Y No (If no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation Sod ❑, or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No ❑
Are Vegetation ®, Sod ®, or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes El No ❑ Is the Sampled Area
d
H nc Sod Present? Yes x 13 y No ❑ within a Wetland? Yes ® No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Upland point for Wetland B
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required,
check all that apply)
_❑ Surface Sod Cracks (66)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
El Water - Stained Leaves (B9)
®I Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2)
.0 Aquatic Fauna (B13)
PJ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1)
_❑
❑mot Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
�q
Sediment Deposits (B2)
p
!-I Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
!.J Crayfish Burrows (C8)
plJ�I
L-I Drift Deposits (B3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Sods (C6)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (B5)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Shallow Agwtard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
FAC- Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations
❑
0
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches)
Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No
F1 Depth (inches) '13
Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No
El Depth (inches) >13
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring
well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks
Recent thunderstorm activity (past 48 hours)
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Interim Version

i
I
VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants Sampling Point TS- 4(UPL)
Tree Stratum 30 ft
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
Dominance Test worksheet
(Plot size )
Number of Dominant Species
1 Liquldambar styraciflua
30
Yes FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 6 (A)
2 Linodendron tulipifera
30
Yes FACU
Total Number of Dominant
7
3
Species Across All Strata (B)
4
Percent of Dominant Species
86
5
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC (A/B)
6
Prevalence Index worksheet
7
60
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of Multiply by
Sapling Stratum (Plot size - )
OBL species x 1 =
1
FACW species x 2 =
2
FAC species x 3 =
3
FACU species x4=
4
UPL species x 5 =
5
Column Totals (A) (B)
6
Prevalence Index = B/A =
7
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators
Shrub Stratum (Plot size 30 ft )
= Total Cover
Dominance Testis >50%
1 Vaccinium elliotti
25
Yes FACW
_ Prevalence Index is s3 0'
2 Acer rubrum
20
Yes FAC
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3 Quercus nigra
15
No FAC
4 Pinus taeda
10
No FAC
'Indicators of hydnc sod and wetland hydrology must
5 Morella cenfera
5
No FACW
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
6 Llnodendron tullplfera
5
No FACU
Definitions of Vegetation Strata
7 Clethra alnifolia
5
No FACW
85
Tree —Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
30 ft
= Total Cover
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in
Herb Stratum (Plot size )
(7 6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
1 Athyrium felix- femina
3
Yes FAC
2 Clethra alnlfolla
2
Yes FACW
Sapling —Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and less
3 Quercus nigra
1
No FAC
than 3 in (7 6 cm) DBH
4
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
5
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height
6
Herb — All herbaceous (non- woody) plants, including
7
herbaceous vines, regardless of size Includes woody
$
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
3 ft (1 m) in height
9
10
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height
11
12
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 30 ft
6
)
=Total Cover
1 Vltis rotundifoha
10
Yes FAC
2 Smilax rotundlfoha
2
No FAC
3
4
Hydrophytic
5
12
Vegetation
IM
= Total Cover
Present? Yes No
Remarks (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Vegetative community is in primary successional stage (8 -15 years old)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Interim Version

SOIL
Sampling Point TS- 4(UPL)
Profile Description (Descnbe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators )
Depth Matnx
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks
0 -3 2 5Y 4/2 100
- - loam
3-5 2 5Y 5/4 85
2 5Y 3/1 10 C M sandy loam
3 -5 - -
7 5YR 5/6 5 C M - -
5-8 2 5Y 4/1 95
5YR 4/4 5 C M sandy loam
8 -13+ 2 5Y 4/2 98
5YR 5/8 2 C M sandy loam
'Type C= Concentration, D =De letion, RM= Reduced Matrix, CS= Covered or Coated Sand Grains 2Location PL =Pore Lining, M =Matnx
Hydnc Sod Indicators
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sods'
® Histosol (Al)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) .0 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) jo 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplam Sods (1719) (LRR P, S, T)
® Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Sods (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Redox Dark Surface (F6) (MLRA 153B)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Red Parent Material (TF2)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Redox Depressions (F8) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Marl (F10) (LRR U) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1)
Depleted Ochnc (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron - Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
�t
n Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) !J Umbnc Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
u Delta Ochnc (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Piedmont Floodplain Sods (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_
® Stripped Matrix (S6)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed)
Type
IM El
Depth (inches)
Hydnc Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Interim Version

a O'BRICN6GCRC
April 12, 2013
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program
Information Request
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1601
Re: Threatened & Endangered Species Information Request
Grifols Main Facility Parking Lot Project
Clayton, Johnston County, North Carolina
Dear Sir or Madam:
O'Brien & Gere has been contracted to prepare a Section 404 Permit application (NWP) for the construction
of a parking facility and access road associated with the Grifols Main Facility located near the City of
Clayton, Johnston County, North Carolina. Enclosed is a location map (USGS topographic map) showing the
project location (35° 37'4" N/ 78° 25' 1" W- NAD83 /WGS84) for your reference.
A wetland delineation was completed by O'Brien & Gere on July 23, 2012, where a total of 0.88 acres of
wetlands and 2.34 acres of waters of the U.S. were identified and verified onsite by the US Army Corps of
Engineers - Wilmington District on March 1, 2013. Enclosed is a figure showing the results of the wetland
delineation, for your reference. A Corps permit application is being prepared for some wetland impacts
that are planned as part of the development approach. In accordance with the NWP review process and
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA), O'Brien & Gere is interested in determining if there are any
known occurrences of federal or state - listed threatened or endangered (T &E) species or any areas of
designated critical habitat on -site or in the project vicinity.
The site contains a mixture of secondary - growth hardwood forest and cleared areas for industrial
development. Forested and emergent wetland areas and a pond are also present on the site.
Representative photos of the property are provided as an attachment to this letter to document existing
habitat conditions.
Please include as much detail as possible (e.g., a photocopy of the USGS topographic map or a list of
latitude /longitude) for each known occurrence. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at
(919) 783 -7777. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Very truly yours,
O'BRIEN & GERE ENGINEERS, INC.
per.�)&
Daniel B. Ramsay, WPIT
Project Scientist
Enclosure
2610 Wycliff Rd, Ste. 104, Raleigh, NC 27607 1 p 919-783-77771 f 919 - 783 -0757 1 www.obg.com
360° Engineering and Project Delivery Solutions

m
0
E
E
w
a
0
0
a
LEGEND GRIFOLS, INC.
�Approximate Project Area MAIN FACILITY PARKING LOT PROJECT N
CLAYTON, NC
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
o ,,00a 2,000 4,000, O'DRICN E GGRG
4!10/13
47819 Feet ° --
ob
FIGURE 1

GRIFOLS, INC WETLAND DELINEATION MAP
WETLAND DELINEATION "
WALTHAM TRACT
CLAYTON, NC 44,8;'9
0 50 100 200 300 400 I ,,
O'BRIEN 6 GERE
Feet

Photo No. 1— Wetland A: View north of wetland swale along southwestern Photo No. 2 — View southwest across cleared area for industrial development
edge of the site. I on the eastern side of the site.
Photo No. 3 — Impounded pond in the western portion of the site. Photo No. 4 — Wetland B: View northwest into forested wetland in north I
central portion of the site.
Grifols Main Facility Parking Lot Project
Clayton, NC G O'DRIEN 6I'sERE

NORTH CAROLINA
Natural
Heritage
Program
SCIENCE GUIDING CONSERVATION
Information Request
Please submit this form by email:
[e-mail]
Or mail:
NC Natural Heritage Program
Information Request
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh NC 27699 -1601
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program provides information on the distribution of rare
animals, rare plants, natural communities, Significant Natural Heritage Areas, Dedicated State
Nature Preserves, and Registered Heritage Areas. To request information, please complete this
form and submit to NC NHP. Response to information requests will typically be provided in 10
working days, however complex requests or requests received during periods of heavy workload
may require additional time.
Contact Information
Name
Daniel Ramsay, WPIT
Company
O'Brien & Gere
Street Address
2610 Wycliff Rd, Ste 104
City ST ZIP Code
Raleigh, NC 27607
Phone
919- 783 -7777
Fax
919- 783 -0757
E -Mail Address
Daniel.ramsay @obg.com
Project Type: Sensitive Environment _ Transportation _ Forestry _ Energy _ Other X
Project Description
Please provide ALL of these items with your request:
This completed information request form.
2. A cover letter describing the proposed activity, including existing vegetation cover,
structures at the site, and the type of data requested. Additional pages may be provided by
email attachment or through the mail.
3. a. Latitude /Longitude in decimal degrees OR
3. b. A copy of appropriate portion of a USGS topographic map with the project area clearly
outlined and the name of the quadrangle used or provide GIS shape files of the project area.
A county map with major highways, rivers, creeks, and towns labeled is acceptable if
accompanied by a project site map.

_i
�1
i
L�
Latitude (decimal degrees)- 351 37'4" N
Longitude (decimal degrees): 78° 25' 1" W
Topographic Quad. Powhatan & Clayton
County. Clayton
i
Project Description-
O'Brien & Gere has been contracted to prepare a Section 404 Permit application (NWP) for
the construction of a parking facility and access road associated with the Grifols Main Facility
located near the City of Clayton, Johnston County, North Carolina.
Thank you for completing this form and for your interest in the Natural Heritage
resources on North Carolina. Please submit by email or postal service at the
address listed at the top of the form.

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory John E Skvarla, III
Governor Secretary
April 24, 2013
Mr Daniel B Ramsay, WPIT
O'Brien & Gere
2610 Wycliff Road, Ste 104
Raleigh, NC 27607
RE Natural Heritage Program records at the Grifols Main Facility Parking Lot Project, Clayton, Johnston
County, NC
NHP Project # 20130424 -01LEG
Dear Mr Ramsay,
Thank you for contacting the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP) about records of rare
species, natural communities, Significant Natural Heritage Areas (SNHAs), or conservation lands within
the vicinity of the Grifols Main Facility parking lot project in Clayton There are no NHP records within
the boundaries of the proposed project and no current records within one mile of the project
I�
For future projects, you may wish to visit the Natural Heritage Program's new Data Services website
(http / /portal ncdenr ore /web /nhp /data - services) to access NHP information on rare species, natural
communities, significant natural areas, and land managed for conservation in the vicinity of your project
area You can use the NHP Map Viewer to search for records within 1 to 5 miles of your project area, or
I- the Database Search tool for record summaries by county and USGS 7 5- minute topo map
Please do not hesitate to contact me at 919 - 707 -8647 or laura gadd @ncdenr gov if you need further
information
Sincerely,
Laura Gadd, Botanist
NC Natural Heritage Program
_ 1601 Mall Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1601
Phone 919 - 707 -86001 Internet www ncdenr gov
? An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper

■ O'QRICN 6 GCRC
April 12, 2013
Mr. John Hammond, Fish & Wildlife Biologist
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
P.O. Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636 -3726
Re: Threatened & Endangered Species Information Request
Grifols Main Facility Parking Lot Project
Clayton, Johnston County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Hammond:
O'Brien & Gere has been contracted to prepare a Section 404 Permit application (NWP) for the construction
of a parking facility and access road associated with the Grifols Main Facility located near the City of
Clayton, Johnston County, North Carolina. Enclosed is a location map (USGS topographic map) showing the
project location (35° 37'4" N/ 78° 25' 1" W- NAD83 /WGS84) for your reference.
A wetland delineation was completed by O'Brien & Gere on July 23, 2012, where a total of 0.88 acres of
wetlands and 2.34 acres of waters of the U.S. were identified and verified onsite by the US Army Corps of
Engineers - Wilmington District on March 1, 2013. Enclosed is a figure showing the results of the wetland
delineation, for your reference. A Corps permit application is being prepared for some wetland impacts
that are planned as part of the development approach. In accordance with the NWP review process and
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA), O'Brien & Gere is interested in determining if there are any
known occurrences of federally - listed threatened or endangered (T &E) species or any areas of designated
critical habitat on -site or in the project vicinity.
According to the US Fish & Wildlife Service's website, five federally - listed species are known to occur in
Johnston County and include: Haliaeetus leucocephalus (Bald eagle), Picoides borealis (Red- cockaded
woodpecker), Alasmidonta heterodon (Dwarf wedgemussel), Elliptio steinstansana (Tar River spinymussel),
and Rhus michauxii (Michaux's sumac). The site contains a mixture of secondary - growth hardwood forest
and cleared areas for industrial development. Forested and emergent wetland areas and a pond are also
present on the site. Representative photos of the property are provided as an attachment to this letter to
document existing habitat conditions.
Please include as much detail as possible (e.g., a photocopy of the USGS topographic map or a list of
latitude /longitude) for each known occurrence. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at
(919) 783 -7777. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Very truly yours,
O'BRIEN & GERE ENGINEERS, INC.
Daniel B. Ramsay, WPIT
Project Scientist
Enclosure
2610 Wycliff Rd, Ste. 104, Raleigh, NC 27607 1 p 919-783-77771 f 919 - 783 -0757 1 www.obg.com
360° Engineering and Project Delivery Solutions

0
,d
NX
FIGURE 1
F. r O
• iii
L i 4
• 1 'Co. I j
O —
f � t
,l l � ` � t6 i• P �
0
in
w :
I"
S Powhatan and Clayton'USGS Quadrangles Copyri•ht ©' Natt al Geographic Sa&tet
a
LEGEND
= Approximate Project Area
4/10/13
47819
GRIFOLS, INC.
MAIN FACILITY PARKING LOT PROJECT N
CLAYTON, NC
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
o 1,000 2,000 4,000 O'BRICN 6 GERE
Feet GO

GRIFOLS, INC WETLAND DELINEATION MAP
WETLAND DELINEATION "
WALTHAM TRACT
CLAYTON, NC 4/10/13 47819
0 50 100 200 300 400
Feet _
O'DRICN 5 GERE

Photo No. 1— Wetland A: View north of wetland swale along southwestern Photo No. 2 —View southwest across cleared area for industrial development
edge of the site. I on the eastern side of the site.
Photo No. 3 — Impounded pond in the western portion of the site. Photo No. 4 — Wetland B: View northwest into forested wetland in north
central portion of the site.
Grifols Main Facility Parking Lot Project
Clayton, NC G O'DRICN 6 GCRC

i
Smarr
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636 -3726
May 3, 2013
Daniel Ramsay
O'Brien & Geie Engineers, Inc
2610 Wycliff Road, Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27607
r _ ::e: Grifols'Main Fac.lity Pa,king JLot Project- Johi,bt:n. County, NC
Dear Mr. Ramsay.
This letter is to inform you that a list of all federally - protected endangered and threatened species
with known occurrences in North Carolina is now available on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service's (Service) web page at http: / /www.fws.gov /raleigh. Therefore, if you have projects that
occur within the Raleigh Field Office's area of responsibility (see attached county list), you no
longer need to contact the Raleigh Field Office for a list of federally- protected species.
II
Our web page contains a complete and frequently updated list of all endangered and threatened
_ species protected by the provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16
�J U S C 1531 et seq.)(Act), and a list of fedeial species of concern, that are known to occur in
each county in North Carolina.
�' Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non - federal
L_' representative), in consultation with the,Service, insuie that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally- listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in de *.eiminirg whether additional consultation. with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally- piotected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or
evaluation and can be found on our web page at http: / /www fws gov/raleigh Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes
i
i The term "federal species of concern" refers to those species which the Service believes might be in need of
concentrated conservation actions Federal species of concern receive no legal piotection and their designation does
not necessarily imply that the species will eventually be proposed for listing as a federally endangeied or threatened
species However, we recommend that all piacticable measures be taken to avoid or minimize adverse impacts to
federal species of concern '
�f

If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally - listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i e , likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally - protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
-- of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
With regard to the above - referenced project, we offer the following remarks. Our comments ale
submitted pursuant to, and in accordance with, provisions of the Endangered Species Act
Based on the information provided and other information available, it appears that the proposed
action is not likely to adversely affect any federally - listed endangered or threatened species, their
formally designated critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Act at
these sites. We believe that the requirements of section 7(a)(2) of the Act have been satisfied for
your project. Please remember that obligations under section 7 consultation must be
reconsidered if. (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect
listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered, (2) this action is
i� subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered to this review; or, (3) a new species
is listed or critical habitat determined that may be affected by the identified action.
` However, the Service is concerned about the potential impacts the proposed action might have
on aquatic species. Aquatic resources are highly susceptible to sedimentation Therefore, we
recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid adverse impacts to aquatic species,
' including implementing directional boring methods and stringent sediment and erosion control
measures An erosion and sedimentation control plan should be submitted to and approved by
the North Carolina Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section prior to construction
JErosion and sedimentation controls should be installed and maintained between the construction
site and any nearby down - gradient surface waters In addition, we recommend maintaining
natural, vegetated buffers on all streams and creeks adjacent to the project site.
The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission has developed a Guidance Memorandum (a
copy can be found on our websrte at (http: / /www.fws.gov /raleigh) to address and mitigate
secondary and cumulative impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources and water quality.
We recommend that you consider this document in the development of your plojects and in
completing an initiation package for consultation (if necessary)
2

-r
4
t
j
We hope you find our web page useful and informative and that following the process described
above will reduce the time requited, and eliminate the need, for general correspondence for
species' lists If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis of this office at
(919) 856 -4520 ext 26.
Sincerely,
��
P to Benjamin
Field Supervisor
3

rI
i
�y
List of Counties In the Service's Raleigh Field Office Area of Responsibility
Alamance
Beaufort
Bertie
Bladen
Brunswick
Camden
Carteret
Caswell
Chatham
Chowan
Columbus
Craven
Cumberland
Currituck
Dare
Duplin
Durham
Edgecombe
Franklin
Gates
Granville
Greene
Guilford
Halifax
Harnett
Hertford
Hoke
Hyde
Johnston
Jones
Lee
Lenoir
Martin
Montgomery
Moore
Nash
New Hanover
Northampton
Onslow
Orange
Pamlico
Pasquotank
Pender
2
Perquimans
Person
Pitt
Randolph
Richmond
Robeson
Rockingham
Sampson
Scotland
Tyrrell
Vance
Wake
Warren
Washington
Wayne
Wilson

PIMA
Rua
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Pat McCrory Charles Wakild, PE John E. Skvada, III
Governor Director Secretary
March 4, 2013
Wyatt Brown
Brown Environmental Group
Via eMail
Subject: Surface Water Determination Letter
NBRRO# 13 -014
Johnston County
The Raleigh Regional Office of the NC Division of Water Quality /Surface Water Protection Section conducted a
site visit at the subject property and is providing the below- listed determination pursuant to your request for a formal
surface water determination:
BASIN:
® Neuse (15A NCAC 2B .0233) ❑ Tar - Pamlico (15A NCAC 2B .0259)
❑ Ephemeral /IntermittenUPerennial Determination ❑ Isolated Wetland Determination
Project Name:
Location/Di rections:
Subject Stream
Grifols Pond near Hwy 70
Subject property is tract adjacent to Grifols, big pond next to highway 70.
UT to Neuse River
Date of Determination: January 30, 2013
Feature
E/l/P*
Not
Subject
Subject
Start @
to
Stream
Form Pts.
Soil
SurveyTo
USGS
A
X
X
X
*E/I /P = Ephemera! /IntermittendPerennial
Explanation: The feature(s) listed above has or have been located on the Soil Survey of Johnston County, North
Carolina or the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic map at a 1.24,000 scale. Each feature that is checked
"Not Subject" has been determined not to be a stream or is not present on the property. Features that are checked
"Subject" have been located on the property and possess characteristics that qualify it to be a stream. There may be
other streams located on your property that do not show up on the maps referenced above but, still may be
considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers and/or to the Division of Water Quality.
This on -site determination shall expire rive (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected parties that
dispute a determination made by the DWQ or Delegated Local Authority may request a determination by the
M
!y
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Ralcigh Regional Office Surface Water Protection Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet www.nowa"wft.org 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699 -1628 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycle&10% Post Consumer Paper

Grifols Pond near 70
Johnston County
March 4, 2013
Page 2 of 2
Director. An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) days of date of this letter or from the date the affected
party (including downstream and /or adjacent owners) is notified of this letter. A request for a determination by the
Director shall be referred to the Director in writing c/o Karen Higgins, DWQ Wctlands/401 Unit, 1650 Mail Service
Center, Raleigh NC 27699 -1650.
This determination is final and binding unless, as detailed above, you ask for a hearing or appeal within sixty (60)
days.
The owner /future owners should notify the Division of Water Quality (including any other (Local, State, and Federal
Agencies) of this decision concerning any future correspondences regarding the subject property (stated above). This
project may require a Section 404/401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries should be directed to the
Division of Water Quality (Central Office) at (919)-807 -6301, and the US Army Corp of Engineers (Raleigh
Regulatory Field Office) at (919 )-5444884.
Respectful ly.
t
Martin Ric and
Enviro ental Specialist
cc: RRO /SWP File Copy

rszl
1, f `
jyyyyjj� t . a
k. i 1
Ado
r ,

ACME Mapper 2.0 - 5.8 km SE of Clayton NC
http://mapper.acme.com/
loll
�'� 3/4/2013 8:55 AM

Mitigation Bank Letter of Availability
G G BRICN 6 GCRC

Neu -Con Wetland and Stream Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Statement of Availability September 16, 2013
NC Division of Water Resources
Ms. Katie Merritt /Mr Eric Kulz
512 N Salisbury St, Raleigh,
9th floor
NC 27604, Archdale Building
Re Project: South Campus Parking Expansion:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Mr Monte Matthews
CESAW -RG -R
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Center, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
This document confirms that Grifols, Inc (Applicant) for the South Campus Parking Expansion
project has expressed an interest to utilize 0.98 Riparian Wetland Mitigation Credits from EBX
sponsored Neu -Con Stream Umbrella Mitigation Bank in Neuse HUC 03020201, Cox II Site. As
the Bank sites official Sponsor, EBX, attests to the fact that mitigation is available for
consumption at this time
Banker will notify applicant if the 0.98 Riparian Wetland Credits become considered "At Risk"
of not being available prior to permit issuance Credits are not considered secured until
payment in full is received from the applicant resulting in the issuance of an Affidavit of Sale by
the bank acknowledging that the applicant has fully secured credits from the bank and the
Banker has accepted full responsibility for the mitigation obligation requiring the credits /units
The Banker will issue the Affidavit of Sale within ten (10) days of receipt of the balance of the
Purchase Price. Banker shall provide to Applicant with a copy of the Affidavit of Sale and a
documented copy of the debit of credits from the Bank Official Credit Ledger(s) showing the
permit number and the resource type secured by the applicant A copy of the Affidavit of Sale,
with an updated Official Credit Ledger will also be sent to regulatory agencies showing the
proper documentation
If any questions need to be answered, please contact me at 239 - 872 -1678
Best Regards
Matthew R Fisher
EBX -EM, LLC
909 Capability Drive Suite 3100 Raleigh, NC 27606

N.C. State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO)
Correspondence
GO O'BRICN 6 GCRC

■ O'BRICN6GCRC
April 12, 2013
Ms. Renee Gledhill - Earley
Environmental Review Coordinator
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office
4617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -4617
Re: Historic and Archeological Resources Review Tracking Number #:
Grifols Main Facility Parking Lot Project
Clayton, Johnston County, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Gledhill - Earley:
O'Brien & Gere has been contracted to prepare a Section 404 Permit application (NWP) for the construction
of a parking facility and access road associated with the Grifols, Inc. (Grifols) Main Facility located near the
City of Clayton, Johnston County, North Carolina. Enclosed is a location map (USGS topographic map)
showing the project location (35° 37'4" N/ 78° 25' 1" W- NAD83 /WGS84) for your reference.
The approximately 20 -acre site contains a mixture of secondary - growth hardwood forest and areas that
have been cleared for industrial development. Forested and emergent wetland areas and a pond are also
present on the site. Representative photographs of the site are enclosed. Currently, the plan is to construct
a parking lot and access road in the northern portion of the site, adjacent to the existing Grifols Main
Facility parking lot bordering the site to the north. Based on a check of the North Carolina State Historic
Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS Service on April 10, 2013, there are no historic properties located within
or immediately adjacent to the project area. Furthermore, based on information provided to O'Brien &
Gere, we are not aware of any buildings greater than 50 years old within or immediately adjacent to the
project area.
Grifols requests a historic and archeological resources review of the project area, and a concurrence from
the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) that the project is recommended to be allowed
to proceed. If you can make that recommendation, please return a signed copy of this letter or provide
concurrence or other response in whatever form is standard for this level of review in your organization. If
you have any questions, please feel free to call me at (919) 783 -7777 or email me at
daniel.ramsayOc obg.com. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Very truly yours,
O'BRIEN & GERE ENGINEERS, INC.
4 &Aa %. 41) -
Daniel B. Ramsay, WPIT
Project Scientist
cc: Michael Waligura
Enclosure
2610 Wycliff Rd, Ste. 104, Raleigh, NC 27607 1 p 919-783-77771 f 919 - 783 -0757 1 www.obg.com
360° Engineering and Project Delivery Solutions

April 12, 2013
Page 2
Concurrence Signature
Renee Gledhill- Earley, Environmental Review Coordinator
Date
Tracking Number#
County
2610 Wycliff Rd, Ste 104, Raleigh, NC 276071 p 919 - 783 -7777 1 f 919 - 783 -0757 1 www obg com
360° Engineering and Project Delivery Solutions
© 2013 O'Brien & Gere All Rights Reserved

0
r
w
0
a
LEGEND GRIFOLS, INC.
17-1 Approximate Project Area MAIN FACILITY PARKING LOT PROJECT N
CLAYTON, NC
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
° 1,000 2. 000 4, 000 GBRIEN E GERE
4110/13
47819 Feet
FIGURE 1
-;,.I! i-, an"; su-,A , wilos,-, --- - �-v �;
—II.A
`6 •�'r � O..rrl � I
L
Powhatari a nd Clayton'USGS Quadrangles ; -copy •ht:© 2083 NaEt I Geographic

IPhoto No. 1 —View north of wetland swale along southwestern edge of the I Photo No. 2 —View southwest across cleared area for industrial development I
site. on the eastern side of the site.
I Photo No. 3 — Impounded pond in the western portion of the site. I Photo No. 4 —View northwest into forested wetland in north central portion I
of the site.
Grifols Main Facility Parking Lot Project
Clayton, NC ru O'DRIEN 6 SERE

North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Kartos, Administrator
Pat McCrory, Governor
Susan Kluttz, Secrcrary
Kevin Cherry, Deputy Seerctary
April 25, 2013
Daniel Ramsay
O'Brien & Gere Engineers, Inc.
2610 Wycliff Road
Suite 104
Raleigh, NC 27607
Office of Archives and I listory
Division of I lisroriea) Resources
Re: Construct Grifols Main Facility Parking Lot, Clayton, Johnston County, ER 13 -0773
Dear Mr. Ramsay:
Thank you for your letter of April 12, 2013, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by
the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR
Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
please contact Renee Gledhill- Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919 -807 -6579. In all future
communication concerning this project, please cite the above- referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
(1� �;ACDtt
�Wltamona M. Bartos
Location 11M) I :ast)oncs Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 \fail Scrvicc (enter, Raleigh NC 27699 -401' Telephone /Fax: (919) ff07- 6570/t107 -6599

Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM)
FM3 72016 7700)
FM3 72016 7800J
rim CYBRICN 6 GCRC

s
0
fr =_ �r � f�� _.
a• _ t a
E. N
mg ills = x = 5(R � o PC
,�..�
isi fn C R
g O 0 x
I- a
Va °a�
ommmmo
a g(D X
y R CL
n
,
QTO.�
o
dm
AL
UFO 0
A
UFO Tr
sy� im
� S O's
T1�C0
M-azm �
a�ID 9.
T33' -im
o;mWm
�; o
N
NHag
m
o Z c >
w O A
soya
5z5z m
S
0 58 O
T
22 a
3°Qai3
o
m
3M 0m�
mss
0 o A
0 m
OD
ON
-
3 z
0
C13 0 cm
E. N
mg ills = x = 5(R � o PC
,�..�
isi fn C R
g O 0 x
tr �7OT �9 �
O Z
3
a ° �`� =
9 o� s3° g y
° M a
r
° os O Z
mrr ss Vo A
CIO 9 �I
f
IN a;#
Z
e o 3 �� �p
L
Tm
w w o
°O gg a
R a
i
�s
I- a
Va °a�
ommmmo
a g(D X
y R CL
n
,
QTO.�
o
dm
AL
UFO 0
A
UFO Tr
sy� im
� S O's
T1�C0
M-azm �
a�ID 9.
T33' -im
o;mWm
�; o
N
NHag
m
o Z c >
w O A
soya
5z5z m
S
0 58 O
T
22 a
3°Qai3
o
m
3M 0m�
mss
0 o A
0 m
OD
ON
-
3 z
t r
4 a, F 4
V
co
D
o r
m
i
II �
0 Z
CA 0
m
°O
o
To O
q
0
C13 0 cm
E. N
mg ills = x = 5(R � o PC
,�..�
isi fn C R
g O 0 x
tr �7OT �9 �
O Z
3
a ° �`� =
9 o� s3° g y
° M a
r
° os O Z
mrr ss Vo A
CIO 9 �I
f
IN a;#
Z
e o 3 �� �p
L
Tm
w w o
°O gg a
R a
i
t r
4 a, F 4
V
co
D
o r
m
i
II �
0 Z
CA 0
m
°O
o
To O
q

Ir' .� '. iloP�'. .K f±✓� il��i�l l p III I�tl t�t Y:'J Il�d i YJi C„�j�� "� It �I.:
r 741
.r
'i
r.'P;C: +,�'
d
�i
�V
r I
p�W
M
2 172 500 FEET
if
1 734 DOD M
78'25'00^
4
GRID NORTH
SCALE 111 = 5001 (1 : 6,000)
0 500 1000
FEET
PANEL 1678J
FIRM
FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP
NORTH CAROLINA
PANEL 1618
(SEE LOCATOR DIAGRAM OR MAP INDEX FOR FIRM I
PANEL LAYOUT)
CONTAINS.
COMMAITY CID No. PANEL SUFFIX
CIAYT(KTOW. OF 370138 187a J j
JOHNS70N CO1H:rY 310138 1818 J
Noon 1. J9 7M Yp Number swum b — ,"meld be .W
v.hen plerin0 mep ordem: the Community Number shown
i nbow ~41 be used on imumncc nppl-I ill mo WbjW
EFFECTIVE DATE MAP NUMBER
DECEMBER 2, 2005 31201618001
•yY ��r„fli Ll v
State of North Carolina
Federal Emergency Management Agency ;
JOINS PANEL N This Is an official copy of a portion of the above referenced flood map. It
was extracted using F -MIT On -Line. This map does not reflect changes
or amendments which may have been made subsequent to the date on the
title dock. For the latest product information about National Flood Insurance
Program flood maps check the FEMA Flood Map Store at www.msc.feme.gov

Agent Authorization Form
an GBRICN 6 GCRC

SAMPLE AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT NO.
STREET ADDRESS:
PLAN NO
Not Available.
Please print:
Property Owner: GRIFOLS THERAPEUTIC INC
Property Owner:
PARCEL ID: Pin# 167800 -30 -4225
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
Daniel Ramsay
(Contractor / Agent)
Of O'Brien & Gere Engineers, Inc.
(Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above):
8368 U5 70 Business West, Clayton, NC 27520
Telephone: [phone]
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
Mr. Sergi Roura
_Author zed Signature
Date:
Authorized Signature
Date: