820113_Routine_20210923

Facility Number
.effiVision of Water1Resourcesi
Q Division of Smhand' Water"
Oth'er:Agency;
Type of Visit: O'C�ompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: tQltoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:/Arrival Time:
Farm Name:
(� g Sag, -
Owner Name: SteY-.�-
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: S- Ler/ i s
Onsite Representative:
7/ :oS
Departure Time:
!3 D
Owner Email:
Phone:
County: __ __ ` Region:'/ / Z 0
Title:
Certified Operator: Operator: ma+ r,C
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field El Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
i8'2777
❑ Yes El< ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes _j J 1VOIo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes latcr6 ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3
2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: g% //3
Date of Inspection: 9—,23— p-f
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
Structure 1 Structure 2
JJ
Structure 3 Structure 4
❑ Yes agt ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift 0 Application Outside of Approved Area
I? , n
12. Crop Type(s): , G&t 4
❑ Yes [o ❑ NA ❑ NE
13. Soil Type(s):
(-q,aola ain fr.
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
ace; [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes alCiO ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes Qfifo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes UNo ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes lENo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes E]'No ❑ NA 0 NE
❑ Yes ago ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ago ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Other:
❑ Yes 0-Ni; ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
Page 2 of 3
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
[] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
QNo ❑NA El NE
5/12/2020 Continued

Facility Number: 1,-- //3
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ['Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
rate of Inspection: `r _23_7a ?-1(
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
❑ Yes
ago
LJz
❑ NA
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ago ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ago ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ago ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes Q1 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ago ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
El Yes Ergo El NA ❑NE
❑ Yes []No ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Yes []No ❑NA El NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
7Arow
Tit g
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 3 of 3
5/12/2020