20210415 Ver 1_More Information Received_20211027

Staff Review Form
NORTH CAROLINA
Envlronm¢ntcl Qvofiry
Updated September 4, 2020
Staff Review
Does this application have all the attachments needed to accept it into the review process?*
Yes No
ID# *
20210415
Version* 1
Is this project a public transportation project?*
Yes
• No
Reviewer List: * Colleen Cohn:eads\cmcohn
Select Reviewing Office: *
Raleigh Regional Office - [phone]
Does this project require a request for payment to be sent?*
Yes
No

Project Submittal Form
*
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk below are required. You will not be able to submit the form until all
mandatory questions are answered.
Project Type: *
For the Record Only (Courtesy Copy)
New Project
Modification/New Project with Existing ID
More Information Response
Other Agency Comments
Pre -Application Submittal
Re-Issuance\Renewal Request
Stream or Buffer Appeal
Is this supplemental information that needs to be sent to the Corps?*
Yes No
Project Contact Information
Name: Wyatt I brown
Who is submitting the information?
Email Address: [e-mail]
Project Information
Existing ID #: Existing Version:
20210415 1
20170001 (no dashes) 1
Project Name: Daniels North
Is this a public transportation project?
Yes
No
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
Yes No Unknown
County (ies)
Johnston
Please upload all files that need to be submited.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Daniel Farm PCN Additional Information Oct 11
2021.pdf
Daniels Southside email.pdf
Only pdf or kmz files are accepted.
14.56MB
71.06KB

Describe the attachments or
comments:
This is additional information, adding another tract (Buffkin) to the original submittal. We were
waiting for
Daniels South plans to be completed and combine Daniels South, and Buffkin with previously
submitted Daniels North. However the owners have decided Daniels South will not be constructed, it
will be placed in open space. (I have attached an email from one of the owners stating this.) Don't
hesitate to contact me if any questions.
thanks
Wyatt
(This was sent originally on 10/13/21, This is a duplicate copy, I mistakenly had the wrong project number on it)
Sign and Submit
By checking the box and signing box below, I certify that:
• I, the project proponent, hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the
best of my knowledge and belief.
• I, the project proponent, hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401
certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• I agree that submission of this online form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General
Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General
Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a
written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the online form.
Signature:
Submittal Date: Is filled in automatically.

Daniels Southside
Inbox
[e-mail]
to me
Fri, Sep 24,
1:49 PM
Wyatt, please let this email confirm our discussion that there will be no impact to the tract of land called
Daniels Southside located off Hwy 210 in the McGee's Crossroads area. This entire tract will be set aside
as open space and whatever offset that Johnston County requires. If you need anything else please don't
hesitate to contact me. Thanks Doug Jones Daniel Lan Development LLC

October 11, 2021
To: Stephanie Goss
NC Division of Water Resources
Fr: Wyatt Brown
Brown's Environmental Group, Inc.
Re: Daniel Farm Subdivison
Benson, NC Johnston County
Revision to Original PCN submitted June 2021
SAW# 2020-00395 DWR# 20200285 v.1
Stephanie,
Attached is Information for the revised Daniel Fam subdivision.
Information originally submitted with no revisions has been omitted (USFWS, NC SHPO, etc).
The PCN Info sheet contains the updated info, with revised sections highlighted as Revised from Original
PCN.
Revisions include the total parcels, site plans/impact maps, subdivision plans, JD Request (included is the
Approved JD Request Form), and one additional wetland impact.
Briefly:
Initial delineation conducted 2015, verbal concurrence provided by USACE (David Shaeffer).
Two ponds determined to be upland (excluded) by USACE (Samantha Daley).
Construction begun 2017, without authorization. After the fact impacts are included.
PCN submitted June 2021 requesting authorization for ATF impacts. Future impacts were planned at the
time, but USACE requested permitting of ATF prior to moving forward with additional phases.
Additional Parcel (Parcel #3 Buffkin Tract) added July 2021, post submittal.
USACE Request for entire subdivision to be included in PCN Request.
This Addlnfo submittal is complete for the entire Daniel Farm Subdivison.

Daniel Farm
PCN Permitting Information
Revised Oct 2021

Daniel Farm Subdivision
PCN Info Sheet
Section A. Process Information
Processing Info
Prior AID: SAW-2015-01037 DWQ# 20210415
Section B. Applicant/Owner Information
Primary Contact Information (no change)
Wyatt Brown Brown's Environmental Group, Inc. 242 Batten Farm Rd Selma 27576
Owner Information (no change)
Daniel -Lan Development, LLC 1075 Country Club Rd Smithfield 27577
Applicant Information (no change)
Same as Owner
Agent/Consultant Information (no change)
Wyatt Brown Brown's Environmental Group, Inc. 242 Batten Farm Rd Selma 27576
• Attachment: Aqent Authorization
Section C. Project Information and Prior Project History Instructions
1, Project Name (no change)
Daniel Farm Subdivision Benson
Property Identification (New Lots added from Original PCN)
Parcel 1: 162400-84-4154 Bk 05073 Pg 0079 13.27 Ac
Parcel 2: 162400-74-5161 Bk 05073 Pg 0079 14.46 Ac
Parcel 3: 162400-64-8374 Bk 05468 Pg 0950 30.31 Ac
Parcel 4: 162400-71-1041 Bk 05073 Pg 0079 68.89 Ac
Parcel 5: 162400-81-3495 Bk 05069 Pg 0379 15.31 Ac
Parcel 6: 162400-82-5470 Bk 05267 Pg 0792 4.88 Ac
147.12 Ac
1

Daniel Farm Subdivision
PCN Info Sheet
12700 A NC Hwy 210 Benson 27504
Lat: 35.51930 N Long: -78.56867 W
• Attachment: Property ID Exhibit;
• Attachments: 1) Location 2) 2016 Aerial 2) 2018 Aerial 3) USGS Topo 4) NRCS Soils
3. Surface Waters (no change)
Beaverdam Branch Class C; NSW 03020201 09 03
Pole Branch (South Tracts — Open Space) Class C; NSW 03020201 09 03
Neuse Basin
Project Description and History (revised from Original PCN)
The Daniel Farm subdivision is multi -phase single family residential subdivision, located on NC Hwy 210
in Johnston County, NC. The subdivision consists of 6 separate parcels. The northern three parcels,
which are situated north of Hwy 210, will be developed as housing. The southern three parcels, situated
south of Hwy 210, will be undeveloped and designated as Open Space.
Two of the northern parcels have been cleared and are currently under construction as the Daniel Farm
Subdivision.
Prior to clearing and grading, the property was agricultural use. Adjacent properties are comprised
primarily of single-family residential subdivisions and/or agricultural use.
Total Wetland Acres: 13.558 Total Stream LF: 4,827
Project Purpose:
To construct a single-family residential subdivision with required infrastructure, utilities, and amenities,
to meet high demand in the western Johnston County area.
Project Detail
This submittal is requesting after -the -fact authorization for impacts associated with construction of the
initial phases of the Daniel Farm project. Also included are proposed impacts for additional phases on
Parcel 3, adjacent to the west.
After the fact impacts include two permanent wetland impacts for lot fill, and 4 temporary stream
and/or wetland sewer crossings.
Three of Daniel Farm parcels — 2 north and 1 south - were originally delineated in 2015. Potentially
jurisdictional features included 2 wetlands, 2 streams, and 2 farm ponds on the two northern parcels
where development has already occurred. The JD Info for these three parcels is included with this
submittal.
2

Daniel Farm Subdivision
PCN Info Sheet
Subdivision plans including lot layouts, utilities, stormwater, and erosion & sediment control were
prepared and approved by Johnston County Public Utilities in 2017. Roadway and utility construction
began in 2018 and have been completed. Lots were recorded beginning in 2019. Early phases of the
subdivision have been completed, houses have been constructed and are presently occupied.
During construction of Daniel Farm, the following impacts inadvertently occurred:
• Permanent wetland impacts occurred during construction of Street B (as shown on attached
E&SC plans), which extends along the western boundary throughout the subdivision.
Construction of this roadway will permanently impact and remove 0.10 acres of wetlands,
situated near the headwaters of an intermittent stream (Wetland I and Stream 2 on the JD
delineation map). This impact will allow the roadway to continue into developable uplands and
provide access to at least 16 additional lots.
• Temporary stream and wetland impacts occurred Stream 2 and Wetland I during the
construction of a sewer collection line. This construction also required permanent conversion of
forested wetland to herbaceous wetland within a permanently maintained utility corridor
(Stream 2). The temporary impacts have been completed and restored.
Two farm ponds on the site were determined to be isolated and have been converted to stormwater
management ponds. Verification of the isolated determination is included in the JD Packet.
Parcel 3 (the Buffkin Tract) was delineated in 2020 and included as part of the subdivision. Potentially
jurisdictional features include 5 Wetlands and 2 streams. This parcel is currently undeveloped. The JD
Info for Parcel 3 is included with this submittal.
• Attachments: Site Plans
Iurisdictional Determinations
• Attachments: 1) Approved JD Packet 2) Preliminary JD Packet
Future Project Plans (revised from Original PCN,
The Daniel Farm Subdivision will be constructed on the three northern parcels in different phases (some
of which have been completed); however, the project is considered whole for permitting purposes. The
three southern parcels will remain undeveloped and be designated as Open Space.
3

Daniel Farm Subdivision
PCN Info Sheet
Section D. Proposed Impacts Inventory Instructions
Impacts Summary
Wetland Impacts (revised from Original PCN)
Site #
Reason
Impact
Type
Type of
Wetland
Wetland
ID
Forested
Type of
Jurisdiction
Impact
Acres
1*
Road Fill
P
Headwater
Forest
Wetland 1
Yes
Both
0.099
2*
Sewer
Corridor
T
Headwater
Forest
Wetland 1
Yes
Both
0.053
3*
Sewer
Corridor
T
Headwater
Forest
Wetland 1
Yes
Both
0.064
4*
Sewer
Corridor
T
Headwater
Forest
Wetland 1
Yes
Both
0.001
5*
Sewer
Corridor
T
Headwater
Forest
Wetland 1
Yes
Both
0.039
6
Lot Fill
P
Headwater
Forest
Wetland C
Yes
Both
0.042
*= After the Fact Permitting Request
Stream Impacts (no change)
Site #
Reason
for
Impact
Impact
Type
Type of
Impact
Stream
Name
Stream
Type
Type of
Jurisdiction
Stream
Width
Impact
Length
1
Sewer
Temporary
Other
Stream
2
Intermittent
Both
2 ft
25
2
Sewer
Temporary
Other
Stream
3
Intermittent
Both
2 ft
25 ft
Buffer Impacts (Authorized through Johnston County).
All sewer crossing impacts are considered 'Allowable')
4

Daniel Farm Subdivision
PCN Info Sheet
Section E. Impact Justification and Mitigation Instructions
Avoidance and Minimization (revised from Original PCN)
Prior to site design, streams, wetlands, and riparian buffers were delineated to identify potential
resource areas to avoid where practical. Impacts have been avoided where possible, while allowing
access to developable uplands.
Permanent Wetland Impact #1 is required for the construction of a roadway which provides access to 16
developable upland lots.
The sewer corridor is located to provide access for the subdivision while avoiding the main bottomland
hardwood forest along Stream 1.
Permanent Wetland Impact #6 is required for the construction of a residential lot. This fill is required to
clip a small portion of the wetland and provide stable for upland construction.
Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts (revised from Original rk_.iv)
The applicant is proposing to pay mitigation at 2:1 ratio for two permanent wetland impacts, 1:1 ratio
for sewer corridor conversion impacts
Payment will be through Private Mitigation bank.
• Attachments: SOA Letter
No other revisions have been made to Original PCN
5

Parcel Information
Revised Oct 2021

OHWON V * * * DISCLAIMER
'i Johnston County assumes no legal responsibility for the information represented here.
NORTR.CAROLINA ..a.:''
Result 0
id: 13E04003A
Tag: 13E04003A
Owner Name 1: DANIEL-LAN DEVELOPMENT,
LLC
Owner Name 2:
Mail Address 1: 1075 COUNTRY CLUB RD
Mail Address 2:
Mail Address 3: SMITHFIELD, NC 27577-8310
Book: 05073
0079
Result 0
id: 13E04003B
Tag: 13E04003B
Owner Name 1: DANIEL-LAN DEVELOPMENT,
LLC
Owner Name 2:
Mail Address 1: 1075 COUNTRY CLUB RD
Mail Address 2:
DOE RUN
OLD r , ON GREED • D
♦ ♦ ♦ 1 ♦ ♦
B• • IK RUN PH 4 ♦♦
CROSSROADS N r
♦
♦ „� ♦ y ♦ ♦ ♦
••• ♦
K Y PH
R . OINTE•PH ♦ ♦
♦
♦ ♦
AIRINGTON
W
' IN • • 'I
A
.
WELLINGTON : BD ISION
♦ ♦ M • RRISON
3
ANOR
21
•
0H 3
-a4�
' r ■
IIIPage:
�
GREENLEAF
REENLE '
♦
•ALM HAR.OR S/D
♦
1%—••*-
• •
00 :
♦
SAN
♦
- 6
S/D P ,
nY WIND S .
MAC SON
PIN A •
is
5
LEWOOD
♦
LA •ING PH 2Mail
5 r
♦
CR ♦ ♦
•Book:
Address 3: SMITHFIELD, NC 27577-8310
05073
Page: 0079
1 `
JONES ACR SEC. 2
SPRIN :RAN H
, • • IT! 1 •D FOREST, PHAS ONE ♦
A/m.1AI"
A
Scale: 1:40240 - 1 in. = 3353.32 feet
Johnston County GIS
d i (The scale is only accurate when printed landscape on a 8 1/2 x 11 size sheet with no page scaling.) September 27, 2021

NORTH.CAROLINA
* * * DISCLAIMER
Johnston County assumes no legal responsibility for the information represented here.
Result 0 Result 0
id: 13E05003K id: 13E04003I
Tag: 13E05003K Tag: 13E04003I
Owner Name 1: DANIEL-LAN DEVELOPMENT, Owner Name 1: DANIEL-LAN DEVELOPMENT,
LLC LLC
Owner Name 2: Owner Name 2:
Mail Address 1: 1075 COUNTRY CLUB RD Mail Address 1: 1075 COUNTRY CLUB RD
Mail Address 2: Mail Address 2:
Mail Address 3: SMITHFIELD, NC 27577-8310 Mail Address 3: SMITHFIELD, NC 27577-8310
Book: 05468 Book: 05267
Page: 0950 Page: 0792
Result 0 Result 0
id: 13E05007D id: 13E05003C
Tag: 13E05007D Tag: 13E05003C
Owner Name 1: DANIEL-LAN DEVELOPMENT, Owner Name 1: DANIEL-LAN DEVELOPMENT,
LLC LLC
Owner Name 2: Owner Name 2:
Mail Address 1: 1075 COUNTRY CLUB RD Mail Address 1: 1075 COUNTRY CLUB RD
Mail Address 2: Mail Address 2:
Mail Address 3: SMITHFIELD, NC 27577-8310 Mail Address 3: SMITHFIELD, NC 27577-8310
Book: 05069 Book: 05073
Page: 0379 Page: 0079

March 20, 2019
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Mr. Ross Sullivan
Re: Daniels Farm , Johnston County
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein, do
authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon
the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations and issuing a
determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of
the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. The property's PIN
numbers are: 162400-74-5061, 162400-83-2985, 162400-83-4257, 162400-93-0696, 162400-71-1041
and 163400-73-6001..
Also, Mr. Wyatt Brown of Brown's Environmental Group, Inc. has my permission to act as my agent on
this property concerning wetlands and streams.
Lanny Clifton
Daniel -Lan Development, LLC

Site Maps
Revised Oct 2021
1. Location Map
2.Aerial Photo
3. USGS Topographic Map
4. NRCS Soil Survey Map
5. Site Plans/Impact Map

Daniel Farm Subdivision
IfeCiee
Wink➢VANDr1x •
•
Coats
4+ossnn:Id
r
Figure
1
Location Map
Daniel Farm Subdivision
NC Hwy 210, Benson NC
Pleasant Grove Township, Johnston County
Scale
NTS
41>
snow" '-
6/25/21
By: MRR

r.
•+
Parcel 3
DANIEL-LAN DEVELOPMENT, LLC
00-64-837,4
30.31 Mitts
Parcel 4
DANIEL-LAN DEVELOPMENT, LLC
PIN# 162400-71-1041.
69.49 Acres
Legend
Daniel Farm Subdivision
Parcel 2
DANIEL-LAN DEVELOPMENT, LLC
PIN# 162400-74-5161
14.46 Acres
Parcel 1
4'D ,NIEL-LAN DEVELOPMENT, LLC
PIN# 162400-84-4154
13.27 Acres
4
Parcel 6
DANIEL-LAN DEVELOPMENT, LLC I
PIN# 162400-82-5470
4.88 Acres
Parcel 5
DANIEL-LAN DEVELOPMENT, LLC
PIN# 162400-81-3495
15.31 Acres
.6
Figure
2
By: MRR
Aerial Photograph/Parcels Map
Source: Google Earth Images
Photo Date: 3/4/2018
Daniel Farm Subdivision
NC Hwy 210, Benson NC
Pleasant Grove Township, Johnston County
Scale
NTS
9/28/21
BROWNS

liir
Figure
3
USGS Topographic Map
Edmondson Quadrangle
Source: USGS Mapping Services
Daniel Farm Subdivision
NC Hwy 210, Benson NC
Pleasant Grove Township, Johnston County
Scale
NTS
(-0.)
9ROWN•5-
9/28/21
By: MRR

Figure
4
NRCS Soil Survey Map
Soil Survey of Johnston County, 1994
Map Sheet 5
Daniel Farm Subdivision
NC Hwy 210, Benson NC
Pleasant Grove Township, Johnston County
Scale
NTS
.4)
9/28/21
By: MRR

NC HWY 210
VICINITY MAP (NOT TO SCALE)
WETLAND IMPACTS
IMPACT AREA #
AREA
1
0.0994 AC.
2
0.0528 AC.
3
0.0644 AC.
4
0.0002 AC.
5
0.0389 AC.
6
0.0419 AC.
TOTAL
0.2976 AC.
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTS
IMPACT AREA #
LENGTH
1
31 L.F.
2
26 L.F.
TOTAL
57 L.F.
CALL BEFORE YOU DIG!
NORTH CAROLINA LAW REQUIRES NOTIFICATION OF
THE UNDERGROUND FACILITY OWNER NOT LESS
THAN TWO (2) BUT NO MORE THAN TEN (10)
WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION OR
DEMOLITION
North Carolina One -Call
Center, Inc.
www.ncocc.org
1-800-632-4949
III
WETLAND IMPACT AREA #6
(LOT GRADING) — 0.0419 AC. r
231 I
)
/ /
// WETLAND IMPACT AREA #1 (ROADWAY \\ I
_ CONSTR ICTION) — 0.0994 AC.
,/
\ / /'' / // / // �) / I / / I 1
IIII1I 1
,
`\ I // i / // / / I r / / 11
-�.\ I / / /'/'//'// ,//,/ /// i 1 / 11 /
\ \\ ' /,' ' I 1
`\ ,,// / / / '// / I
\` \\ \\ `' / �\ i I
`\ \ \ //'/// //'//'//'//////1\/ /
/ I I
\in
\ \ \ / /
// / / / / /
\ \ \
/ / / / I I / I I I \ \
• \\ \ \\•- ' / - ' ,/' ,' \ \ \ \\ \\ 11 \\
` \ \` / , , / 11 \I \ 1 \ \\
\ \ �_ —� / / _- \ -\ \ \\ \
' / _ -1 \\ \ \ \ \ •N '
\ \ \ \ \
SOME WATER, SANITARY SEWER, ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE AND CABLE
SERVICES COULD EXIST ALONG THE CONSTRUCTION ROUTE THAT
MAY NOT BE SHOWN ON THE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE
RESPONSIBLE FOR NOTIFYING THE PROPER UTILITY IN ADVANCE TO
LOCATE THESE SERVICES.
SURVEY INFORMATION:
All survey information/data shown, and/or represented in these
construction drawings has been provided by a Professional Land
Surveyor and is not the work of Dalton Engineering and Associates, PA.
42 III
OND2
NOT
DICTI
/
// / / \
/ /
/ /' /-\ 1 1
\ I I
// /
/ / // / /
/ / / / / / / / / /\ /
/ 1 / / /
/ / 1 I I /
•
/ / /
•
• / // , / / / // , // I 1 1 I 1 /
/ /
/ 11 /
/ / / I 1 /
SCALE: 1" = 120'
b' 60 120
240
- 24.7fi,
T'-_199 1
---------------
---------------------
NC HWY 210 - 60' PUBLIC R/W
WETLAND IMPACT AREA #2 (SEWER
LINE CONSTRUCTION) — 0.0528 AC.
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT 1
(STREAM 2) — 31 L.F.
1 - -
li I/ 1--
I I 189 it
186
.1I I I 188 187 i l ;185(�I\�Iii i 184 183 i I
(182
• ---t_ J �-_-1 1 I----�I I
-- ---- ----
WETLAND IMPACT MAP
FOR THE
DANIEL FARM SUBDIVISION
PLEASANT GROVE TOWNSHIP - JOHNSTON COUNTY, N.C.
4- 4- 4
4- �....
`.k-___-`
4- 4- 4- 4-
4- 4-
-------------------
WETLAND IMPACT AREA #3 (SEWER
LINE CONSTRUCTION) — 0.0644 AC.
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT 2
(STREAM 3) — 26 L.F.
4- 4-
4Y W W 4Y 4Y
4- 4Y 4Y 4L 4Y 4Y -se
w - w w -- -w
WETLAND IMPACT AREA #4 (SEWER
LINE CONSTRUCTION) — 0.0002 AC.
WETLAND IMPACT AREA #5 (SEWER
LINE CONSTRUCTION) — 0.0389 AC.
Dalton Engineering
and Associates, P. A.
446 East Main Street
P.O. Box 426
Clayton, NC 27520
[phone]
Fax [phone]
File: 17003—MASTER 1 Drawn: WJB 1 Sheet: 1 OF 1

JD Request Packet

JD Packet
1. Approved JD Summary
2. Preliminary JD Request

Approved JD
• Delineation Map with Isolated Ponds
Highlighted
• JD Request Summary with Timeline
• eMail fm USACE to Brown's Environmental
Group, Inc.

1 1
1 sal
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
REGULATORY PROGRAM
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM (INTERIM)
NAVIGABLE WATERS PROTECTION RULE
I. ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION
Completion Date of Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD): Select.
ORM Number: SAW-2015-01037
Associated JDs: SAW-2015-01037 NCDWR# 20210415
Review Area Location': State/Territory: NC City: Benson County/Parish/Borough: Johnston County
Center Coordinates of Review Area: Latitude 35.51930 Longitude -78.56867
II. FINDINGS
A. Summary: Check all that apply. At least one box from the following list MUST be selected. Complete the
corresponding sections/tables and summarize data sources.
❑ The review area is comprised entirely of dry land (i.e., there are no waters or water features, including
wetlands, of any kind in the entire review area). Rationale: N/A or describe rationale.
❑ There are "navigable waters of the United States" within Rivers and Harbors Act jurisdiction within the
review area (complete table in Section II.B).
❑ There are "waters of the United States" within Clean Water Act jurisdiction within the review area
(complete appropriate tables in Section II.C).
❑x There are waters or water features excluded from Clean Water Act jurisdiction within the review area
(complete table in Section II.D).
B. Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 Section 10 (§ 10)2
§ 10 Name
§ 10 Size
§ 10 Criteria
Rationale for § 10 Determination
N/A.
N/A N/i-,
N/A.
N/A.
C. Clean Water Act Section 404
Territorial Seas and Traditional Navigable Waters ((a)(1) waters):3
(a)(1) Name
(a)(1) Size
(a)(1) Criteria
Rationale for (a)(1) Determination
N/A.
N/A
N/A.
Tributaries ((a)(2) waters):
(a)(2) Name
(a)(2) Size
(a)(2) Criteria
Rationale for (a)(2) Determination
N/A
N/A N/A
N/A.
N/A.
Lakes and ponds, and impoundments of jurisdictional waters ((a)(3) waters):
(a)(3) Name
(a)(3) Size
(a)(3) Criteria
Rationale for (a)(3) Determination
N/A.
N/A
N/A.
Adjacent wetlands ((a)(4) waters):
(a)(4) Name
(a)(4) Size
(a)(4) Criteria
Rationale for (a)(4) Determination
N/A.
N/A
N/A.
N/A.
1 Map(s)/figure(s) are attached to the AJD provided to the requestor.
2 If the navigable water is not subject to the ebb and flow of the tide or included on the District's list of Rivers and Harbors Act Section 10 navigable
waters list, do NOT use this document to make the determination. The District must continue to follow the procedure outlined in 33 CFR part 329.14 to
make a Rivers and Harbors Act Section 10 navigability determination.
3 A stand-alone TNW determination is completed independently of a request for an AJD. A stand-alone TNW determination is conducted for a specific
segment of river or stream or other type of waterbody, such as a lake, where upstream or downstream limits or lake borders are established. A stand-
alone TNW determination should be completed following applicable guidance and should NOT be documented on the AJD Form.
Page 1 of 3 Form Version 29 July 2020_updated

1 1
1
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
REGULATORY PROGRAM
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM (INTERIM)
NAVIGABLE WATERS PROTECTION RULE
D. Excluded Waters or Features
Excluded waters ((b)(1) — (b)(12)):4
Exclusion Name
f Exclusion Size
Exclusions
Rationale for Exclusion Determination
Pond 01 and
0.22
acre(s)
(b)(8) Artificial
No connecting waters; Pond is surrounded by
Pond 02
(Pond
01) and
0.95
(Pond
02)
lake/pond
constructed or
excavated in
upland or a non-
jurisdictional
water, so long as
the artificial lake
or pond is not an
impoundment of
a jurisdictional
water that meets
Uplands
(c)(6).
III. SUPPORTING INFORMATION
A. Select/enter all resources that were used to aid in this determination and attach data/maps to this
document and/or references/citations in the administrative record, as appropriate.
❑x Information submitted by, or on behalf of, the applicant/consultant: eMail with Corps, June 6, 2017
This information Select. sufficient for purposes of this AJD.
Rationale: N/A or describe rationale for insufficiency (including partial insufficiency).
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps: Title(s) and/or date(s).
❑ Photographs: Select. Title(s) and/or date(s).
❑x Corps site visit(s) conducted on: Date(s).
❑x Previous Jurisdictional Determinations (AJDs or PJDs): SAW-2015-01037
❑ Antecedent Precipitation Tool: provide detailed discussion in Section III.B.
❑ USDA NRCS Soil Survey: Title(s) and/or date(s)
❑ USFWS NWI maps: Title(s) and/or date(s).
❑ USGS topographic maps: Title(s) and/or date(s).
Other data sources used to aid in this determination:
Data Source (select)
Name and/or date and other relevant information
USGS Sources
N/A.
USDA Sources
N/A.
NOAA Sources
N/A.
USACE Sources
eMail with Corps, June 6, 2017
State/Local/Tribal Sources
N/A.
Other Sources
N/A.
B. Typical year assessment(s): N/A
4 Some excluded waters, such as (b)(2) and (b)(4), may not be specifically identified on the AJD form unless a requestor specifically asks a Corps district
to do so. Corps districts may, in case -by -case instances, choose to identify some or all of these waters within the review area.
5 Because of the broad nature of the (b)(1) exclusion and in an effort to collect data on specific types of waters that would be covered by the (b)(1)
exclusion, four sub -categories of (b)(1) exclusions were administratively created for the purposes of the AJD Form. These four sub -categories are not
new exclusions, but are simply administrative distinctions and remain (b)(1) exclusions as defined by the NWPR.
Page 2 of 3 Form Version 29 July 2020_updated

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
REGULATORY PROGRAM
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM (INTERIM)
e NAVIGABLE WATERS PROTECTION RULE
C. Additional comments to support AJD: Both Pond 01 and Pond 02 were verified as constructed in
uplands by USACE in 2015 and again in 2017. Email with confirmation are included with this request.
Page 3 of 3 Form Version 29 July 2020_updated

APPROVED]D
REVIEW AREA
POND 01
APPROVED-
- REVIEW AREA
POND 02

Daniel Farm Subdivision
SAW-2015-01037
JD Request Timeline and Summary
May 2021
2015
• Delineation of streams and wetlands was conducted on both Daniel Farm North and Daniel Farm
South by Wyatt Brown, Brown's Environmental Group, Inc.
• During site meeting, USACE David Shaeffer agreed with the delineation. No written
confirmation was issued.
• Subdivision planning began.
2017
• During site meeting, USACE Samantha Daley agreed the two farm ponds located on north side
were constructed in uplands and not jurisdictional. The ponds are not shown as jurisdictional on
the original 2015 delineation.
• The Non -Jurisdictional status was verified this in email 7/6/17. USACE asked for amended JD
Request to include Approved for the ponds and Preliminary for all jurisdictional features.
• In late 2017, the county approved site plans, utility, ESC, and stormwater plans and site work
began.
2019
• Planning began for Daniel Farm South. Wyatt Brown checked with USACE Samantha Daley
regarding the JD status.
• USACE noted that the original delineation info was 4 years old, land had been cleared, and asked
for revised exhibits, PJD forms, etc. for both north and south sides, revised tables and acreages,
and info on the ponds for the Approved portion.
Current status:
There is still no written Preliminary and Approved JD for the project, north or south side.

[e-mail]
From: wyatt brown <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 8, 2020 7:22 PM
To: Martin Richmond
Subject: Fwd: [Non-DoD Source] Re: SAW-2015-01037 Johnston County Pond
Attachments: Daniels Farm Agent letter.docx; aerial owner 1.pdf; Preliminary JD.pdf; Continued
Aquatic Resource Table from Preliminary JD Form.docx; SAW_JD_Request_12-2013
_fillable_form (1) (1).pdf; Stream, wetland map.pdf; Wet data form A.doc; Wet data form
B.doc; Wet data form C, D, E.doc; Wet data form F.doc; Wet data form G.doc; Wet data
form J line.doc; Dry data form 1.doc
Lets talk about this before you go. I can talk tonight if you can.
Forwarded message
From: wyatt brown <[e-mail]>
Date: Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 4:38 PM
Subject: Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: SAW-2015-01037 Johnston County Pond
To: Dailey, Samantha J CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Sam
I have attached the Preliminary JD package as we discussed, I reworked everything and it took a lot longer than I
thought. All is combined under one name and it accurately represents what was approved in the field. Please contact me
if any questions and I appreciate your time and help with this. I hope you are doing well.
Wyatt
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 8:55 AM Dailey, Samantha J CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
wrote:
Hey Wyatt,
I'm finally getting around to these and given the information was submitted almost 4 years ago, and they've already
done some major earth moving out there, I need you to provide a revised aerial map that shows all of the features, for
both sites. If the project is being done as a whole, the nomenclature is the same for both sites, so the feature
nomenclature should be revised so there are no duplicate names. Please also provide a revised table to reflect those
changes. In addition, please provide the acreage for the ponds so that I can complete the approved JD for those. If you
have any additional questions please do not hesitate to contact me.
Thank you,
Sam
Samantha Dailey
Regulatory Project Manager
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Division
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
[phone], Ext. 22
[e-mail]
1

Original Message
From: wyatt brown [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2019 8:15 PM
To: Dailey, Samantha J CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: SAW-2015-01037 Johnston County Pond
Sam
I hope you are well and are I'm sure you have been walking in water like I have with all the rain this winter. I hate to
bother you but I've noticed I havent received the preliminary JD's we discussed. We are soon beginning work on one of
the parcels. Don't hesitate to call me and we'll discuss this.
thanks
Wyatt
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 1:13 PM Wyatt Brown <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> > wrote:
Sa m
Thank you, we will use the large pond for sediment/stormwater without an impact. For the JD's I would say soon as
possible, let me know what you need.
Wyatt
Wyatt Brown, LSS, CPESC
Pres., Brown's Environmental Group, Inc.
[phone]
> On Jul 6, 2017, at 12:54 PM, Dailey, Samantha J CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <[e-mail]
<mailto:[e-mail]> > wrote:
>
> Wyatt,
>
> Both ponds appear to have been constructed in uplands, outside of waters of the U.S. The spillway draining the
pond does have an ordinary high water mark, but resembles more of an ephemeral channel. I would like to move
forward with a preliminary JD for all areas except the ponds, which will need to be done under an approved JD. Please
let me know the timeframe for needing this documentation.
>
> Thank you,
> Sam
>
> Samantha Dailey
> Regulatory Project Manager
> U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
> Regulatory Division
> 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
> Wake Forest, NC 27587
> [phone], Ext. Ext. 22
> [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
>
>
>
>
2

Wyatt Brown, LSS, CPESC
Brown's Environmental Group, Inc
919-524-5956
Wyatt Brown, LSS, CPESC
Brown's Environmental Group, Inc
919-524-5956
Wyatt Brown, LSS, CPESC
Brown's Environmental Group, Inc
919-524-5956
3

Preliminary JD

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID #: SAW- 2015-01037
Prepare file folder n
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Daniel Farm
2. Work Type: Private
Begin Date (Date Received):
Assign Action ID Number in ORM
Institutional n Government fl Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form B3d and B3e]:
Daniel Farm is a multi -phased single-family residential subdivision located on Hwy 210 near McGees Crossroads in Johnston County,
NC.
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: Daniel -Lan Development Co. LLC
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
Wyatt Brown, Brown's Environmental Group, Inc.
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form B5b]: Prior AID# SAW-2015-01037
7. Project Location — Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form Blb]:
Site address: 12714 Hwy 210; Benson, NC
Lat: 35.51340 N;-78.57139
8. Project Location — Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form Bla]: See Attached Property Table
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Johnston
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Benson, NC
11. Project Information —Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form B2a]: Pole Branch; Beaverdam Branch
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form B2c] : 03020201
Authorization: Section 10 fl Section 404 fl Section 10 and 404 fl
Regulatory Action Type:
F7 Standard Permit
Nationwide Permit #
❑ Regional General Permit #
F7 Jurisdictional Determination Request
fPre-Application Request
F7 Unauthorized Activity
fl Compliance
FINo Permit Required
Revised 20150602

Jurisdictional Determination Request
US Army Corps
of Engineers
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
to the appropriate Corps Field Office (or project manager, if known) via mail, electronic mail, or
facsimile. A current list of county assignments by Field Office and project manager can be
found on-line at: http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitProgram.aspx , by
telephoning: 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below:
ASHEVILLE REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
Version: December 2013 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E and F.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part G.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that all JD
requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to proceed with the
determination, which may include inspection of the property when necessary. This form must be
signed by the current property owner to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for JD
requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) projects will be
conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD may not
be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or
your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you
should also request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural
Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: December 2013 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address:
City, State:
County:
Directions:
12700 A NC HWY 210
Benson, NC 27504
Johnston
1-40 east to 210, head south on 210, property — 2 miles on right and left
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN):
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address':
Select one:
See Attached Property Table
Wyatt Brown, Brown's Env Group, Inc
242 Batten Farm Road, Selma NC 27576
919-524-5956
[e-mail]
I am the current property owner.
I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant2
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: Daniels -Lan Development Co. LLC
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address':
2701 Polenta Road
Clayton, NC 27520
❑ Proof of Ownership Attached (e.g. a copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record data)
1 If available
2 Must attach completed Agent Authorization Form
3 If available
Version: December 2013 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION4
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations
and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899.
see attached letter
Property Owner (please print) Date
Property Owner Signature
E. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION TYPE
Select One:
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This request does include a delineation.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This request does NOT include a delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps investigate the property/project area for the presence or
absence of WoUS5 and provide an approved JD for the property identified herein. This
request does NOT include a request for a verified delineation.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps delineate the boundaries of all WoUS on a property/project
area and provide an approved JD (this may or may not include a survey plat).
I I I am requesting that the Corps evaluate and approve a delineation of WoUS (conducted
by others) on a property/project area and provide an approved JD (may or may not
include a survey plat).
4 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
5 Waters of the United States
Version: December 2013 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F.
✓
ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area (attached). This Map must clearly depict the boundaries
of the area of evaluation.
Size of Property or Project Area --127 acres
T verify that the property (or project) boundaries have recently been surveyed and marked
by a licensed land surveyor OR are otherwise clearly marked or distinguishable.
G. JD REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS OR AGENCIES
(1) Preliminary JD Requests:
nCompleted and signed Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form6.
✓
Project Coordinates: 35.51340 Latitude-78.57139
Maps (no larger than 11x17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
✓
✓
Longitude
Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
Aerial Photography of the project area
USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
6 See Appendix A of this Form. From Regulatory Guidance Letter No. 08-02, dated June 26, 2008
Version: December 2013
Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
❑ Wetland Data Sheets8
Upland Data Sheets
Landscape Photos, if taken
Tributaries:
❑ USACE Assessment Forms
Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
• All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
• Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
• Locations of photo stations
• Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources
(2) Approved JDs including Verification of a Delineation:
✓
Project Coordinates: 35.51783 Latitude -78.56760 Longitude
Maps (no larger than 11x17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
❑ Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
✓
Aerial Photography of the project area
USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site Plan,
previous delineation maps)
1987 Manual Regional Supplements and Data forms can be found at:
http://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoryProgramandPermits/reg supp.aspx
Wetland and Stream Assessment Methodologies can be found at:
http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document library/get file?uuid=76f3c58b-dab8-4960-ba43-45b7faf06f4c&groupld=38364 and,
http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/dots/regulatory/publicnotices/2013/NCSAM Draft User Manual 130318.pdf
8 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland/community type.
Version: December 2013
Page 6

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Infoituation (when applicable):
Wetlands:
❑ Wetland Data Sheets9
Upland Data Sheets
Landscape Photos, if taken
Tributaries:
❑ USACE Assessment Forms
Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
• All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
• Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
• Locations of photo stations
• Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources
Supporting Jurisdictional Information (for Approved JDs only)
Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form(s) (also known as "Rapanos
Form(s)")
Map(s) depicting the potential (or lack of potential) hydrologic connection(s),
adjacency, etc. to navigable waters.
9 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland/community type.
Version: December 2013
Page 7

Jurisdictional Determination Request
I. REQUESTS FOR CORPS APPROVAL OF SURVEY PLAT
Prior to final production of a Plat, the Wilmington District recommends that the Land
Surveyor electronically submit a draft of a Survey Plat to the Corps project manager for
review.
Due to storage limitations of our administrative records, the Corps requires that all hard -
copy submittals include at least one original Plat (to scale) that is no larger than 11"x17"
(the use of match lines for larger tracts acceptable). Additional copies of a plat, including
those larger than 11"x17", may also be submitted for Corps signature as needed. The
Corps also accepts electronic submittals of plats, such as those transmitted as a Portable
Document Format (PDF) file. Upon verification, the Corps can electronically sign these
plats and return them via e-mail to the requestor.
(1) PLATS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL
nMust be sealed and signed by a licensed professional land surveyor
Must be to scale (all maps must include both a graphic scale and a verbal scale)
Must be legible
Must include a North Arrow, Scale(s), Title, Property Information
Must include a legible WoUS Delineation Table of distances and bearings/metes
and bounds/GPS coordinates of all surveyed delineation points
Must clearly depict surveyed property or project boundaries
Must clearly identify the known surveyed point(s) used as reference (e.g. property
corner, USGS monument)
When wetlands are depicted:
• Must include acreage (or square footage) of wetland polygons
• Must identify each wetland polygon using an alphanumeric system
Version: December 2013
Page 8

Jurisdictional Determination Request
riWhen tributaries are depicted:
• Must include either a surveyed, approximate centerline of tributary with
approximate width of tributary OR surveyed Ordinary High Water Marks
(OHWM) of tributary
• Must identify each tributary using an alphanumeric system
• Must include linear footage of tributaries and calculated area (using approximate
widths or surveyed OHWM)
• Must include name of tributary (based on the most recent USGS topographic
map) or, when no USGS name exists, identify as "unnamed tributary"
all depicted WoUS (wetland polygons and tributary lines) must intersect or tie -to
surveyed project/property boundaries
nMust include the location of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment
reaches
Must include, label accordingly, and depict acreage of all waters not currently
subject to the requirements of the CWA (e.g. "isolated wetlands", "non -
jurisdictional waters"). NOTE: An approved JD must be conducted in order to
make an official Corps determination that a particular waterbody or wetland is not
jurisdictional.
❑ Must include and survey all existing conveyances (pipes, culverts, etc.) that
transport WoUS
Version: December 2013 Page 9

Jurisdictional Determination Request
(2) CERTIFICATION LANGUAGE
When the entire actual Jurisdictional Boundary is depicted:
include the following Corps Certification language:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary of the jurisdiction
of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the undersigned on this date.
Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, the determination of
Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five (5) years from
this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the appropriate Regional
Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USACE Action ID No.:
When uplands may be present within a depicted Jurisdictional Boundary:
include the following Corps Certification language:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat identifies all areas of waters of the United States
regulated pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the
undersigned on this date. Unless there is change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed
five years from this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the
appropriate Regional Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USACE Action ID No.:
Version: December 2013
Page 10

Jurisdictional Determination Request
(3) GPS SURVEYS
For Surveys prepared using a Global Positioning System (GPS), the Survey must include
all of the above, as well as:
be at sub -meter accuracy at each survey point.
include an accuracy verification:
One or more known points (property corner, monument) shall be located with the
GPS and cross-referenced with the existing traditional property survey (metes and
bounds).
include a brief description of the GPS equipment utilized.
Version: December 2013 Page 11

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 3/25/19
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Wyatt Brown, Brown's Environmental Group, Inc
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: SAW-2015-01037
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough:JohnSton City: Benson
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 35.52340 Long.: -78.51739
Universal Transverse Mercator: NAD83
Name of nearest waterbody: Pole Branch, Beaverdam Branch
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
Stream 1
35.51991
-78.56722
1458 ft
non -wetland
404
stream 2
35.51851
-78.56722
452 ft
non -wetland
404
Stream 3
35.51586
-78.56613
367 ft
non -wetland
404
Stream 4
35.50898
-78.56889
239 ft
non -wetland
404
Stream 5
35.51150
-78.58287
886 ft
non -wetland
404
Stream 6
35.51383
-78.57097
1425 ft
non -wetland
404

TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY JURISDICTION
Site Number
Lat
Long
Estimated
amount of
aquatic resource
in Review Area
(LF/AC)
Type of Aquatic resource
Geographic
authority to
which the aquatic
resouorce "may
be" subject
Stream 1
35.51991
-78.56722
1,458
Potential Non -wetland Waters
404/401
Stream 2
35.51851
-78.56722
452
Potential Non -wetland Waters
404/401
Stream 3
35.51586
-78.56613
367
Potential Non -wetland Waters
404/401
Stream 4
35.50898
-78.56889
239
Potential Non -wetland Waters
404/401
Stream 5
35.51150
-78.58287
886
Potential Non -wetland Waters
404/401
Stream 6
35.51383
-78.57097
1425
Potential Non -wetland Waters
404/401
4,827
Wetland A
35.51394
-78.57181
0.25
Potential Wetland
404/401
Wetland B
35.51256
-78.57121
0.2
Potential Wetland
404/401
Wetland C
35.5116
-78.57532
0.27
Potential Wetland
404/401
Wetland D
35.51017
-78.57484
0.45
Potential Wetland
404/401
Wetland E
35.51101
-78.57326
0.04
Potential Wetland
404/401
Wetland F
35.51416
-78.57083
0.32
Potential Wetland
404/401
Wetland G
35.50913
-78.57169
0.02
Potential Wetland
404/401
Wetland I
35.52000
-78.56945
12
Potential Wetland
404/401
Wetland J
35.51812
-78.56652
0.008
Potential Wetland
404/401
13.558

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
• Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:
• Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
n Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
n Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
• U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1:24K Benson Quadrangle, 2016
O Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Johnston County, NC Map Sheet 5
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
• Photographs: • Aerial (Name & Date): NCOneMap 2017; Google Earth 2018
or n Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determi nations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
}} Digitasigned Wyatt
ya t L Brown
Date: 2019.04.14lly by 17 33 12Brown -04'00'
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

March 20, 2019
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Mr. Ross Sullivan
Re: Daniels Farm , Johnston County
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein, do
authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon
the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations and issuing a
determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of
the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. The property's PIN
numbers are: 162400-74-5061, 162400-83-2985, 162400-83-4257, 162400-93-0696, 162400-71-1041
and 163400-73-6001..
Also, Mr. Wyatt Brown of Brown's Environmental Group, Inc. has my permission to act as my agent on
this property concerning wetlands and streams.
Lanny Clifton
Daniel -Lan Development, LLC

JOHNI'ON * * * DISCLAIMER
UN V'.`. Johnston County assumes no legal responsibility for the information represented here.
. ;0 1NA ,.....
li hl
Result 1
id: 13E04003A
Tag: 13E04003A
NCPin: 162400-84-4154
Mapsheet No: 1624
Owner Name 1: DANIEL-LAN DEVELOPMENT,
LLC
Owner Name 2:
Address 1: 1075 COUNTRY CLUB RD
Mail Address 2:
Mail Address 3: SMITHFIELD, NC 27577-8310
Site Address 1: 12700 ANC HWY 210
Site Address 2: BENSON, NC 27504-
Book: 05073
Page: 0079
Market Value: 107820
Assessed Acreage: 13.270
Calc. Acreage: 13.270
Sales Price: 2174000
Sale Date: 2017 12 13
►04'44
,
M:CG.EE,RD
���
I
�
�
VI
•
111110
1
illMail
1111
N.t.
D
-
.
'v AO
i
;
O
_
/
I /
Vile
�;
IIIIII�?
PH 1
lye
II
BUM
a
-
Scale: 1:10060 - 1 in. = 838.33 feet
Johnston County GIS
d i (The scale is only accurate when printed landscape on a 8 1/2 x 11 size sheet with no page scaling.) February 3, 2021

�HN5I'ON
N
NORTR.CAROL1NA
* * * DISCLAIMER
Johnston County assumes no legal responsibility for the information represented here.
Result 2
id: 13E04003A
Tag: 13E04003A
N C P i n: 162400-84-4154
Mapsheet No: 1624
Owner Name 1: DANIEL-LAN DEVELOPMENT,
LLC
Owner Name 2:
Mail Address 1: 1075 COUNTRY CLUB RD
Mail Address 2:
Mail Address 3: SMITHFIELD, NC 27577-8310
Site Address 1: 12741 NC HWY 210
Site Address 2: BENSON, NC 27504-
Book: 05073
Page: 0079
Market Value: 107820
Assessed Acreage: 13.270
Calc. Acreage: 13.270
Sales Price: 2174000
Sale Date: 2017-12-13

"
Figure
1
Location Map
Daniel Farm Subdivision
NC Hwy 210
Johnston County, NC
Scale
NTS�
crowrv•s_
�' " "KK
03/19/21
By: MRR

'
Figure
2A
Aerial Photograph
Image Date: 2016
Source: NCOneMap Imagery
Daniel Farm North
NC Hwy 210
Johnston County, NC
Scale
1=400'
.A.)
05/24/21
By: MRR

a
Figure
2B
Aerial Photograph
Image Date: 2018
Source: NCOneMap Imagery
Daniel Farm North
NC Hwy 210
Johnston County, NC
Scale
1 =400
—3
t`
BROWN
05/24/21
By: MRR

"
Figure
3
USGS Topographic Map
Edmondson Quadrangle
Source: TNM/USGS Mapping Services
Daniel Farm North
NC Hwy 210
Johnston County, NC
Scale
NTS
.4)
""
05/24/21
By: MRR

"ti4
Figure
4
NRCS Soil Survey Map
Soil Survey of Johnston County
Map Sheet 5
Daniel Farm North
NC Hwy 210
Johnston County, NC
Scale
NTS
��
BROWN'S
""".a "
05/24/21
By: MRR

GJOHN5I'ON
OUN
NORTH•CAROLINA
Stream 2, 452 ft.
Stream 3, 367 ft.
Stream 5, 886 ft.
Stream 6, 1425 ft.
Wetland C.27 ac
4ti
Wetland E, .40 ac
Wetland D .45 ac
Wetland I, 12.0 ac.
* * * DISCLAIMER
ton County assumes no legal responsibility for the information represented here.
Stream 1, 1458 ft.
HIGHVIEW DR
Wetland F, .320 ac
Wetland B, .20 ac
Wetland A,.25 ac
t�`r. eif�w
Stream 4, 239 ft
Wetland G .02 ac
�1al ►WI�7 r R a1
Wetland J, .008 ac
Scale: 1:9864 - 1 in. = 821.97 feet
(The scale is only accurate when printed landscape on a 8 1/2 x 11 size sheet with no page scaling.)
Johnston County GIS
April 15, 2019

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Matthews Property
Applicant/Owner: Daniels -Lan Dev, LLC
Investigator(s): Wyatt Brown
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Wet flat
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat:
Soil Map Unit Name: Bibb
City/County: Johnston
Sampling Date:
3/12/15
State: NC Sampling Point: A
Section, Township, Range: Cleveland
Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 1
35.51255
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
Yes ® No
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic?
Long: -78.57180 Datum:
NWI classification:
❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present? Wetland
Hydrology Present?
Yes _IIC�II
Yes JOl
Yes
No
No
No
❑
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes 171 No ❑
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
X Surface Water (A1)
E High Water Table (A2)
El Saturation (A3)
El Water Marks (B1)
II Sediment Deposits (B2)
II Drift Deposits (B3)
II Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
II Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
ElWater -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
n H• ydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
n O• xidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
n P• resence of Reduced Iron (C4)
n R• ecent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
n T• hin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
ESparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
ShallowAquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Water Table Present?
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)
Yes X
Yes _El
Yes _El
No P1 Depth (inches): 12 in
No P1 Depth (inches): 4 in
No P1 Depth (inches): 4 in
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Fl No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

Remarks:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
Total Number of Dominant 5
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species 100
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (NB)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
jJ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
E2 - Dominance Test is >50%
jJ3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.01
J__I Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
larger in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft. (1 m) tall.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine — All woody vines, greater than 3.28 ft. in
height.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius ) % Cover Species? Status
1 Liquidambar styraciflua 30 ▪ Fac
2. Salix alba 50 ▪ Fac W
3. II
4. II
5. II
6. II
7. ❑
8. P1
80 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20 20% of total cover: 16
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Sampling Point:
Yes No P1
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
1. Acer rubum 40 ▪ Fac
2. Liquidambar styraciflua 10 Fac
3. ❑
4. ❑
5. ❑
6. ❑
7. ❑
8. P1
50 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 25 20% of total cover 10
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft raadius
1 Juncus 10 Fac W
2. ❑
3. ❑
4. ❑
5. ❑
6. ❑
7. ❑
8. ❑
9. ❑
10. ❑
11. ❑
12. ❑
10 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1. ❑
2. ❑
3. ❑
4. ❑
5. ❑
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the
Depth Matrix Redox Features
absence of indicators.)
Texture Remarks
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2
0-12 10YR 2/1 100 sl
12=14 10YR 4 /1 100 CS scl
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
P1 Histosol (A1) n Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) P1 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
P1 Histic Epipedon (A2) n Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) P1 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
II Black Histic (A3) II Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0) II Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
II Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) II Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) II Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
II Stratified Layers (A5) El Depleted Matrix (F3) II Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 153B)
P1 Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) n Redox Dark Surface (F6) P1 Red Parent Material (TF2)
P1 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) n Depleted Dark Surface (F7) P1 Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
P1 Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) n Redox Depressions (F8) P1 Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) n Marl (F10) (LRR U)
II Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) II Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
II Thick Dark Surface (Al2) II Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology
II Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) II Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
II Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S) II Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
P1 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) n Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
P1 Sandy Redox (S5) n Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
P1 Stripped Matrix (S6) n Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
P1 Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes a No
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Matthews Property
Applicant/Owner: Daniels -Lan Dev, LLC
Investigator(s): Wyatt Brown
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Wet flat
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P
Soil Map Unit Name: Gilead
City/County: Johnston
Sampling Date:
3/12/15
State: NC Sampling Point: B
Section, Township, Range: Cleveland
Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 1
Lat: 35.51269
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes
® No
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic?
Long: -78.57121 Datum:
NWI classification:
❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present? Wetland
Hydrology Present?
Yes _IIC�II
Yes JOl
Yes
No
No
No
❑
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes 171 No ❑
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Surface Water (A1)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
El Saturation (A3)
El Water Marks (B1)
II Sediment Deposits (B2)
II Drift Deposits (B3)
II Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
II Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
ElWater -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
n H• ydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
n O• xidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
n P• resence of Reduced Iron (C4)
n R• ecent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
n T• hin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
ESparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
ShallowAquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Water Table Present?
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)
Yes
Yes I --I
Yes
No
No
N o =
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches): 8 in
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 171 No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

Remarks:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
Total Number of Dominant 5
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species 100
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (NB)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
jJ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
E2 - Dominance Test is >50%
jJ3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.01
J__I Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
larger in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft. (1 m) tall.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine — All woody vines, greater than 3.28 ft. in
height.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius ) % Cover Species? Status
1 Liquidambar styraciflua 50 ▪ Fac
2. Salix alba 20 ▪ Fac W
3. II
4. II
5. II
6. II
7. ❑
8. P1
70 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 35 20% of total cover: 14
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Sampling Point:
Yes No P1
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
1. Acer rubum 30 ▪ Fac
2. Liquidambar styraciflua 10 Fac
3. ❑
4. ❑
5. ❑
6. ❑
7. ❑
8. P1
40 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover 8
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft raadius
1 Juncus 10 Fac W
2. ❑
3. ❑
4. ❑
5. ❑
6. ❑
7. ❑
8. ❑
9. ❑
10. ❑
11. ❑
12. ❑
10 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1. ❑
2. ❑
3. ❑
4. ❑
5. ❑
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the
Depth Matrix Redox Features
absence of indicators.)
Texture Remarks
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2
0-3 10YR 3/1 100 sl
4-12 10YR 7/1 100 CS scl
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
P1 Histosol (A1) n Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) P1 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
P1 Histic Epipedon (A2) n Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) P1 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
II Black Histic (A3) II Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0) II Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
II Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) II Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) II Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
II Stratified Layers (A5) El Depleted Matrix (F3) II Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 153B)
P1 Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) n Redox Dark Surface (F6) P1 Red Parent Material (TF2)
P1 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) n Depleted Dark Surface (F7) P1 Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
P1 Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) n Redox Depressions (F8) P1 Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) n Marl (F10) (LRR U)
II Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) II Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
II Thick Dark Surface (Al2) II Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology
II Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) II Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
II Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S) II Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
P1 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) n Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
P1 Sandy Redox (S5) n Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
P1 Stripped Matrix (S6) n Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
P1 Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes a No
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Matthews Property
Applicant/Owner: Daniels -Lan Dev, LLC
Investigator(s): Wyatt Brown
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Wet flat
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat:
Soil Map Unit Name: Gilead D slope
City/County: Johnston
Sampling Date:
3/12/15
State: NC Sampling Point: C, D, E
Section, Township, Range: Cleveland
Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 1
35.51012
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?
Yes ® No
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic?
Long: -78.57491 Datum:
NWI classification:
❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present? Wetland
Hydrology Present?
Yes _IIC�II
Yes JOl
Yes
No
No
No
❑
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes 171 No ❑
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
ESurface Water (A1)
E High Water Table (A2)
El Saturation (A3)
II Water Marks (B1)
II Sediment Deposits (B2)
II Drift Deposits (B3)
II Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
II Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
ElWater -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
n H• ydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
n O• xidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
n P• resence of Reduced Iron (C4)
n R• ecent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
n T• hin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
ESparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
ShallowAquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Water Table Present?
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)
Yes E
Yes E
Yes E
No P1 Depth (inches): 1 inch
No P1 Depth (inches): surface
No P1 Depth (inches): surface
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Fl No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

Remarks:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
Total Number of Dominant 6
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species 100
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (NB)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
jJ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
E2 - Dominance Test is >50%
jJ3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.01
J__I Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
larger in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft. (1 m) tall.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine — All woody vines, greater than 3.28 ft. in
height.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
1 Liquidambar styraciflua 40 ▪ Fac
2. Salix alba
10 ▪ Fac W
3. ❑
4. ❑
5. ❑
6. ❑
7. ❑
8. P1
50 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 27.5 20% of total cover: 11
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Sampling Point:
Yes No P1
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
1. Acer rubum 40 ▪ Fac
2. Liquidambar styraciflua 10 • Fac
3 Rubus spp. 30 • Fac
4. ❑
5. ❑
6. ❑
7. ❑
8. P1
80 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 40 20% of total cover 16
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft raadius
1 Juncus 10 E. Fac W
2. ❑
3. ❑
4. ❑
5. ❑
6. ❑
7. ❑
8. ❑
9. ❑
10. ❑
11. ❑
12. ❑
10 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1. ❑
2. ❑
3. ❑
4. ❑
5. ❑
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the
Depth Matrix Redox Features
absence of indicators.)
Texture Remarks
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2
0-3 10YR 2/1 100 sl
3-11 10YR 5/1 100 CS scl
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
P1 Histosol (A1) n Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) P1 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
P1 Histic Epipedon (A2) n Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) P1 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
II Black Histic (A3) II Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0) II Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
II Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) II Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) II Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
II Stratified Layers (A5) El Depleted Matrix (F3) II Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 153B)
P1 Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) n Redox Dark Surface (F6) P1 Red Parent Material (TF2)
P1 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) n Depleted Dark Surface (F7) P1 Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
P1 Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) n Redox Depressions (F8) P1 Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) n Marl (F10) (LRR U)
II Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) II Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
II Thick Dark Surface (Al2) II Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology
II Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) II Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
II Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S) II Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
P1 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) n Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
P1 Sandy Redox (S5) n Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
P1 Stripped Matrix (S6) n Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
P1 Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes a No
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Matthews Property
Applicant/Owner: Daniels -Lan Dev, LLC
Investigator(s): Wyatt Brown
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Wet flat
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P
Soil Map Unit Name: Gilead
City/County: Johnston
Sampling Date:
3/12/15
State: NC Sampling Point: Wet F
Section, Township, Range: Cleveland
Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0
Lat: 35.51416
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes
® No
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic?
Long: -78.57083 Datum:
NWI classification:
❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present? Wetland
Hydrology Present?
Yes _IIC�II
Yes JOl
Yes
No
No
No
❑
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes 171 No ❑
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Surface Water (A1)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
El Saturation (A3)
El Water Marks (B1)
II Sediment Deposits (B2)
II Drift Deposits (B3)
II Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
II Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
ElWater -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
n H• ydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
n O• xidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
n P• resence of Reduced Iron (C4)
n R• ecent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
n T• hin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
ESparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
ShallowAquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Water Table Present?
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)
Yes
Yes I --I
Yes
No
No
N o =
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches): 4 in
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 171 No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

Remarks:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
Total Number of Dominant 3
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species 100
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (NB)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
jJ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
E2 - Dominance Test is >50%
jJ3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.01
J__I Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
larger in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft. (1 m) tall.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine — All woody vines, greater than 3.28 ft. in
height.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius ) % Cover Species? Status
1. II
2. II
3. II
4. II
5. II
6. II
7. ❑
8. P1
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Sampling Point:
Yes No P1
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
1. Acer rubum 20 ▪ Fac
2. Liquidambar styraciflua 60 ▪ Fac
3. II
4. II
5. II
6. II
7. ❑
P1
80 = Total Cover
50% of total cover 40 20% of total cover 6
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft raadius
1 Juncus 10 E. Fac W
2. ❑
3. ❑
4. ❑
5. ❑
6. ❑
7. ❑
8. ❑
9. ❑
10. ❑
11. ❑
12. ❑
10 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1. ❑
2. ❑
3. ❑
4. ❑
5. ❑
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the
Depth Matrix Redox Features
absence of indicators.)
Texture Remarks
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2
0-3 10YR 3/2 100 sl
4-12 10YR 6/1 100 scl
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
P1 Histosol (A1) n Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) P1 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
P1 Histic Epipedon (A2) n Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) P1 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
II Black Histic (A3) II Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0) II Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
II Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) II Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) II Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
II Stratified Layers (A5) El Depleted Matrix (F3) II Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 153B)
P1 Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) n Redox Dark Surface (F6) P1 Red Parent Material (TF2)
P1 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) n Depleted Dark Surface (F7) P1 Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
P1 Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) n Redox Depressions (F8) P1 Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) n Marl (F10) (LRR U)
II Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) II Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
II Thick Dark Surface (Al2) II Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology
II Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) II Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
II Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S) II Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
P1 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) n Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
P1 Sandy Redox (S5) n Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
P1 Stripped Matrix (S6) n Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
P1 Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes a No
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Matthews Property
Applicant/Owner: Daniels -Lan Dev, LLC
Investigator(s): Wyatt Brown
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Wet flat
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P
Soil Map Unit Name: Gilead
City/County: Johnston
Sampling Date:
3/12/15
State: NC Sampling Point: Wet G
Section, Township, Range: Cleveland
Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0
Lat: 35.50906
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes
® No
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic?
Long: -78.57174 Datum:
NWI classification:
❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present? Wetland
Hydrology Present?
Yes _IIC�II
Yes JOl
Yes
No
No
No
❑
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes 171 No ❑
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Surface Water (A1)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
El Saturation (A3)
El Water Marks (B1)
II Sediment Deposits (B2)
II Drift Deposits (B3)
II Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
II Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
ElWater -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
n H• ydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
n O• xidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
n P• resence of Reduced Iron (C4)
n R• ecent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
n T• hin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
ESparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
ShallowAquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Water Table Present?
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)
Yes
Yes I --I
Yes
No
No
N o =
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches): 9in
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 171 No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

Remarks:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
Total Number of Dominant 3
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species 100
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (NB)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
jJ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
E2 - Dominance Test is >50%
jJ3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.01
J__I Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
larger in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft. (1 m) tall.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine — All woody vines, greater than 3.28 ft. in
height.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius ) % Cover Species? Status
1 Liquidambar styraciflua 50 2 Fac
2. Pinus taeda 20 II
3. II
4. II
5. II
6. II
7. ❑
8. P1
70 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 35 20% of total cover: 14
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Sampling Point:
Yes No P1
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
1. Acer rubum 30 Fac
2. II
3. II
4. II
5. II
6. II
7. ❑
P1
30 = Total Cover
50% of total cover 15 20% of total cover 6
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft raadius
1 Juncus 10 Fac W
2. ❑
3. ❑
4. ❑
5. ❑
6. ❑
7. ❑
8. ❑
9. ❑
10. ❑
11. ❑
12. ❑
10 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1. ❑
2. ❑
3. ❑
4. ❑
5. ❑
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the
Depth Matrix Redox Features
absence of indicators.)
Texture Remarks
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2
0-3 10YR 3/2 100 sl
4-12 10YR 6/2 100 scl
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
P1 Histosol (A1) n Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) P1 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
P1 Histic Epipedon (A2) n Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) P1 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
II Black Histic (A3) II Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0) II Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
II Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) II Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) II Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
II Stratified Layers (A5) El Depleted Matrix (F3) II Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 153B)
P1 Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) n Redox Dark Surface (F6) P1 Red Parent Material (TF2)
P1 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) n Depleted Dark Surface (F7) P1 Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
P1 Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) n Redox Depressions (F8) P1 Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) n Marl (F10) (LRR U)
II Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) II Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
II Thick Dark Surface (Al2) II Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology
II Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) II Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
II Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S) II Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
P1 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) n Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
P1 Sandy Redox (S5) n Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
P1 Stripped Matrix (S6) n Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
P1 Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes a No
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Matthews Property North
Applicant/Owner: Daniels -Lan Dev, LLC Lanny Clifton
Investigator(s): Wyatt Brown
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Wet flat
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat:
Soil Map Unit Name: Gilead
City/County: Johnston
Sampling Date:
3/12/15
State: NC Sampling Point: J
Section, Township, Range: Cleveland
Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 2
35.51812
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes
® No
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic?
Long: -78.56652 Datum:
NWI classification:
❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present? Wetland
Hydrology Present?
Yes _IIC�II
Yes JOl
Yes
No
No
No
❑
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes 171 No ❑
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
ESurface Water (A1)
E High Water Table (A2)
El Saturation (A3)
II Water Marks (B1)
II Sediment Deposits (B2)
II Drift Deposits (B3)
II Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
II Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
ElWater -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
n H• ydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
n O• xidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
n P• resence of Reduced Iron (C4)
n R• ecent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
n T• hin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
ESparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
ShallowAquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Water Table Present?
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)
Yes E
Yes E
Yes E
No P1 Depth (inches): 3 inches
No P1 Depth (inches): surface
No P1 Depth (inches): surface
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Fl No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

Remarks:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
Total Number of Dominant 3
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species 100
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (NB)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
jJ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
E2 - Dominance Test is >50%
jJ3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.01
J__I Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
larger in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft. (1 m) tall.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine — All woody vines, greater than 3.28 ft. in
height.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius
1 Liquidambar styraciflua
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
20 ❑ Fac
2. ❑
3 Pinus taeda 60 Fac
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
50% of total cover: 40
P1
80 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 16
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Sampling Point:
Yes No P1
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
1. Acer rubum 30 Fac
5. ❑
6. ❑
7. ❑
8. P1
30 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover 6
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft raadius
1 Juncus 10 E. Fac W
2. ❑
3. ❑
4. ❑
5. ❑
6. ❑
7. ❑
8. ❑
9. ❑
10. ❑
11. ❑
12. ❑
10 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1. ❑
2. ❑
3. ❑
4. ❑
5. ❑
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the
Depth Matrix Redox Features
absence of indicators.)
Texture Remarks
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2
0-6 10YR 3/1 100 sl
6-12 10YR 6/1 100 scl
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
P1 Histosol (A1) n Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) P1 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
P1 Histic Epipedon (A2) n Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) P1 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
II Black Histic (A3) II Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0) II Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
II Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) II Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) II Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
II Stratified Layers (A5) El Depleted Matrix (F3) II Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 153B)
P1 Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) n Redox Dark Surface (F6) P1 Red Parent Material (TF2)
P1 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) n Depleted Dark Surface (F7) P1 Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
P1 Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) n Redox Depressions (F8) P1 Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) n Marl (F10) (LRR U)
II Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) II Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
II Thick Dark Surface (Al2) II Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology
II Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) II Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
II Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S) II Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
P1 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) n Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
P1 Sandy Redox (S5) n Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
P1 Stripped Matrix (S6) n Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
P1 Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes a No
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: Matthews Property
Applicant/Owner: Daniel G Daniels -Lan Dev, LLC
Investigator(s): Wyatt Brown
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hill slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P
Soil Map Unit Name: Nankin
Lanny Clifton
Lat:
City/County: Johnston
Sampling Date:
3/12/15
State: NC Sampling Point: Dry North
Section, Township, Range: Cleveland
Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 4
35.50949
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology
® No
❑ significantly disturbed?
❑ naturally problematic?
Long: -78.57321 Datum:
NWI classification:
❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present? Wetland
Hydrology Present?
Yes P1
Yes 1 l
Yes
No
No
No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes ❑ No M.
Remarks:
Sample taken in yellow pine forest.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Water (A1)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Water Marks (B1)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
n H• ydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
n O• xidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
n P• resence of Reduced Iron (C4)
n R• ecent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
n T• hin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
ShallowAquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes n No =1 Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes n No =1 Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes n No =1 Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes P1 No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

Remarks:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
Total Number of Dominant 2
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species 100
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (NB)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
jJ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
E2 - Dominance Test is >50%
jJ3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.01
J__I Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
larger in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft. (1 m) tall.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine — All woody vines, greater than 3.28 ft. in
height.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
1 Pinus tadea
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
90 Fac
II
P1
90 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 45 20% of total cover: 18
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Sampling Point:
Yes Fl No P1
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius )
1. Liquidambar styraciflua 15 Fac
2. ❑
3. ❑
4. ❑
5. ❑
6. ❑
7. ❑
8. P1
15 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 7.5 20% of total cover 3
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft raadius
1. ❑
2. ❑
3. ❑
4. ❑
5. ❑
6. ❑
7. ❑
8. ❑
9. ❑
10. ❑
11. ❑
12. ❑
100 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 50 20% of total cover: 20
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1. ❑
2. ❑
3. ❑
4. ❑
5. ❑
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the
Depth Matrix Redox Features
absence of indicators.)
Texture Remarks
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2
0-7 10YR 6/2 100 sl
7-15 5YR 5/6 100 scl
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
P1 Histosol (A1) n Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) P1 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
P1 Histic Epipedon (A2) n Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) P1 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
II Black Histic (A3) II Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0) II Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
II Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) II Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) II Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
II Stratified Layers (A5) II Depleted Matrix (F3) II Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 153B)
P1 Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) n Redox Dark Surface (F6) P1 Red Parent Material (TF2)
P1 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) n Depleted Dark Surface (F7) P1 Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
P1 Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) n Redox Depressions (F8) P1 Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) n Marl (F10) (LRR U)
II Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) II Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
II Thick Dark Surface (Al2) II Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology
II Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) II Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
II Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S) II Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
P1 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) n Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
P1 Sandy Redox (S5) n Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
P1 Stripped Matrix (S6) n Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
P1 Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No a
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0