20200398 Ver 2_Cotton Farms_PCN Attachment_20211027

HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS
P.O. Box 400, Lillington NC 27546-0400
Phone [phone] / Fax [phone]
www.halowensoil.com
25 October 2021
Mrs. Emily Greer
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
Reference: Pre -Construction Notification for
Cotton Farms Subdivision (Proposed)
Harnett County, North Carolina
Dear Mrs. Greer,
A Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) is being submitted for the above referenced
project. The subject site is located on the northeastern side of Cotton Road near Deer Tail Lane,
Fuquay-Varina, NC. It is composed of three tracts totaling 161 acres owned by Reese
Construction LLC.
PIN
Acres
0643-36-2905
45.90
0643-27-3733
11.49
0643-48-3310
102.67
The subject site is located in the Hector Creek -Cape Fear River Subwatershed (HUC
03030004-0502) in the Cape Fear River Basin, and is in a Class-WS-IV water supply watershed
(HQW). A wetland delineation was conducted for the site by Hal Owen & Associates Inc. in
April 2021.
The proposed development is for a 133 lot single family residential subdivision named
Cotton Farms. The development plan proposes a single road crossing that will result in 0.323
acre of permanent wetland impact and 155 linear feet of stream impact. This pre -construction
notification is being submitted pursuant to USACE Nationwide Permit 29 and NCDWR Water
Quality General Certification 4256.
Attachments include:
• Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Package
• Site Plans and Impact Maps
• Threatened\Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat Assessment
• NC Historic Properties map
Soil Science Investigations * Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Consulting

If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact me at
your convenience.
CC:
Sincerely,
Krissina B. Newcomb
Environmental Scientist
(Owner)
Clint Reese
Reese Construction LLC
3720 Lucky Drive
Apex, NC 27539
919-329-5501
[e-mail]
(Engineer)
Danny Blackburn
Blackburn Consulting Engineers
305 East main Street
Clayton, NC 27520
919-553-2900
[e-mail]

HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION PACKAGE
Soil Science Investigations • Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Consulting

urisdictional Determination Reauest
US Army Corps
of Engineers.
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.aimy.mil/Missions/Re ul�atoiyPermitProi4ram/Contact/CountyLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: Cotton Road
City, State: Fuquay-Varina, NC 27526
County: Harnett
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 0643-36-2905, 0643-27-3733, 0&
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Hal Owen & Associates. Inc.
Mailing Address: PO Box 400
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
Select one:
Lillington, NC 27546
910-893-8743
[e-mail]
I am the current property owner.
I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultanti
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: Reese Construction LLC
Mailing Address: 3720 Lucky Drive
Apex, NC 27539
Telephone Number: 919-329-5501
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Krissina Newcomb
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner ❑✓ Authorized Agents
22 September 2021
Date
��7.coa rrcj • J��ew-c��
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑✓ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
❑ A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
❑ I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
s For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
a If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
s Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERNIINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
0 I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminM JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓� Size of Property or Review Area 161 acres.
❑✓ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
35.502398
Longitude:-78.853832
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 1 Ix 17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. hM2://www.saw.usace.4rmy.mil/Missions/Regulatoly-Permit-
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F4Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDS• please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'.
Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
F4 USGS Topographic Map
0 Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
❑ NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
hJ Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.4rmy.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/readocs/JD/RGL 08-02_App A Prelim _JD_Form fillable.pdf
8 Please see hM2://www.saw.usace.4M.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federaljurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY INFORMATION
Pro'ect Name:
Cotton Farms
Address:
Cotton Road Fu ua -Varina
PIN:
0643-36-2905 0643-27-3733 0643-48-3310
County:
Harnett
APPLICANT INFORMATION
Name:
Reese Construction LLC
Mailing Address:
3720 Lucky Drive Apex, NC 27539
Telephone Number:
919-329-5501
E-mail Address:
reeseconstruction hotmail.com
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of
conducting on -site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination
pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors
Act of 1899. I, the undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property
identified herein, or acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the
property.
I hereby authorize Mrs. Krissina Newcomb of Hal Owen & Associates, Inc, to act on
my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance of
jurisdictional determinations, CWA Section 401 and 404 permits and certifications, and
any and all standard and special conditions attached.
This authorization will remain in effect for (5) five years unless revoked by the
undersigned in writing.
Au*uAzed Sign a Tide
(Please legibly p ' t e here: C I.ti M • �e ��.� Y
q-zc-z1
Date

B3913 - P 911
HARNETT COUNTY TAX ID #
080643 0013 02
080643 0018
12-22-2020 BY: EG
State of North Carolina
County of Harnett
For Registration Matthew S. Willis
Register of Deeds
Harnett County, NC
Electronically Recorded
2020 Dec 22 11:44 AM NC Rev Stamp: $ 3400.00
Book: 3913 Page:911 - 912 Fee: $ 26.00
Instrument Number: 2020024068
GENERAL
WARRANTY DEED
Excise Tax: $3400.00
Parcel ID Number: 080643 0013 02 & 080643 0018
Prepared by: The Law Office of Kathy Anderson Mercogliano, P.A., P.O. Box 1281, Fuquay-Varina, NC 27526
Mail to: Grantee
THIS DEED made this 22nd day of December, 2020, by and between
GRANTOR
A & D Developers, LLC, a North Carolina Limited
Liability Company
5340 Rock Service Station Road
Raleigh, NC 27603
GRANTEE
Reese Construction, LLC, a North Carolina Limited
Liability Company
3720 Lucky Drive
Apex, NC 27539
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs, successors, and assigns,
and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine or neuter as required by context.
WITNESSETH
THAT the Grantor, for a valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
has and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the Grantee in fee simple, all that certain lot or
parcel of land situated in Harnett County, North Carolina, and more particularly described as follows:
Tract 1: Being all of Tract 1, containing 11.485 acres, more or less, as shown on a survey entitled
"Survey for A&D Developers, L.L.C." by Mauldin -Watkins Surveying, P.A. and recorded as Map
Number 2007-21, Harnett County Registry. The metes and bounds description shown thereon is
incorporated herein by reference. See Deed Book 2337, Page 965, Harnett County Registry.
Tract 2: Being all of a tract containing 102.67 acres, more or less, as shown on a plat entitled "Carlie
Cotton Tract' and recorded in Plat Cabinet 1, Slide 244, Harnett County Registry. See Deed Book
1771, Page 191, Harnett County Registry.
The above described parcel is conveyed subject to all easements, rights -of -way and restrictions listed on
the public record.
submitted electronically by "Mercogliano & Associates, PA"
in compliance with North Carolina statutes governing recordable documents
and the terms of the submitter agreement with the Harnett county Register of Deeds.

B3913 - P 912
The above described parcel is conveyed subject to the 2020 ad valorem taxes and all ad valorem taxes
thereafter.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above -described lot or parcel of land and all privileges and appurtenances thereto
belonging to the Grantee in tee simple.
AND the Grantor covenants with the Grantee, that Grantor is lawfully seized of the premises in fee simple, has the
right and power to convey the same in fee simple, that title is marketable and free from any and all encumbrances
and that Grantor will forever warrant and defend the title against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has duly executed the foregoing as of the day and year first above written.
A & D Developers, LLC
A North Carolina Limited Liability Company
By; JO (SEAL)
Leon^Ande on, Member/Manager
T
By: JSEAL)
Alfr& Earl Davis, Member/Manager
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF HARNETT
I, Kathy A. Mercogliano, a Notary Public of Harnett County, North Carolina, certify that Leon Anderson and
Alfred Earl Davis, with whom I am personally acquainted, personally came before me, being duly sworn by me
says that they are the Members/Managers of A & D Developers, LLC, the limited liability company described
herein and which executed the foregoing instrument; and that the name of the company was subscribed thereto by
said Members/Managers and that said Members/Managers subscribed its names thereto, all by order of the
Members of said company; and that said instrument is the act and deed of said company
WITNESS my hand and notarial stamp or seal this 22°d day of December, 2020.
:ITHar5t
eroo nano
EPubc Kathy . Mercogli o,Notary
ot�rtty —�
P�carltt Carolina 141y comm'ssion expires AugW
blie
30, 2025.

B3912 - P 977
For Registration Matthew S. Willis
Register of Deeds
Harnett County, NC
Electronically Recorded
2020 Dec 21 09:53 AM NC Rev Stamp: $ 2000.00
Book: 3912 Page: 977 - 979 Fee: $ 26.00
Instrument Number: 2020023905
HARNETT COUNTY TAX ID #
080643 0007 01
12-21-2020 BY: IDS
Excise Tax: $2,000.00
Harnett County Parcel ID#: 080643-0007-01
Mail after recording to: GRANTEE
This instrument was prepared by: David N. Bryan, P.A., P.O. Box 1238, Holly Springs, NC 27540-1238
No title search, opinion, or tax advice was given with regard to the property conveyed.
Brief Description for the Index: 145.897 Acres Hector's Creek TownshiAp
NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL WARRANTY DEED
,�j�� D ect,� rZa�•0
THIS DEED made this VI lday of 1mae�, M1, by and between
GRANTOR
BDP Holdings, LLC, a North Carolina
company
9712 Holly Springs Road
Apex, NC 27539
GRANTEE
Reese Construction, LLC, a North
Carolina Company
3720 Lucky Drive
Apex, NC 27539
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs, successors, and
assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine or neuter as required by context.
WITNESSETH, that the Grantor, for a valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt of which is
hereby acknowledged, has and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the Grantee in
fee simple, all that certain lot or parcel of land situated in Harnett County, North Carolina, and more
particularly described as follows:
BEING all of that 45.897 Acres as shown on that map entitled, "Exempt Division Survey for Carl
Cotton, Jr." dated March 2, 2007 and recorded on September 14, 2007 as Map # 2007, Page 801,
Harnett County Registry.
submitted electronically by "D.R. wells Law, PLLC"
in compliance with North Carolina statutes governing recordable documents
and the terms of the submitter agreement with the Harnett County Register of Deeds.

B3912 - P 978
The property hereinabove described was acquired by Grantor by instr unent recorded in Boob 2426, Page
432-434, Harnett County Registry.
A map showing the above described property is recorded in Book of Maps 2007, Page 801, Harnett County
Re is
All or a portion of the property herein conveyed does not include the primary residence of a Grantor_
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges and appurtenances thereto
belonging to the Grantee in Fee Simple.
And the Grantor covenants with the Grantee, that the Grantor is seized of the premises in fee simple, has
the right to convey the same in fee simple, that title is marketable and free and clear of all encumbrances,
and that Grantor will warrant and defend the title against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever
except for the exceptions hereinafter stated.
Title to the property hereinabove described is subject to the following exceptions:
1. Easements and Restrictions and Rights of Way of record (if any).
2. Unpaid ad valorem taxes for 2021 and subsequent years.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has duly executed the foregoing as of the day and year first above
written.
GRANTOR:
BDP Holdings, LLC
By:
William P. Brewer, III, Manager
By:
By:
JcnM.Vhompson, Manager

B3912 - P 979
STATE OF N W�CWOL A
COUNTY OF
I, a Notary Public of the County and State aforementioned,
do hereby certify William P. Brewer, III, Manager, BDP Holdings, LLC, personally known to me or
having provided satisfactory evidence of identity, personally came before me this day and acknowledged
the due execution of the foregoing instrument for the purposes set forth therein and in the capacity
indicated.
�p�,r„ lyfi� 2az�
Witness my hand and official stamp or seal, this the ' day of Ja,-I .
otary P is
My Commission Expires: %,{3�,
TIFFANY CLARK
STATE OF a
m
1�OLINA i s Notary Public
COUNTYO� North Carol;na
, j_ I [ I (I -VIA I "AIM Kr , a Notary Public of the County and State aforementioned,
do hereby certify David S. Orriroger, Manager, BDP Holdings, LLC, personally known to me or
having provided satisfactory evidence of identity, personally came before me this day and acknowledged
the due execution of the foregoing instrument for the purposes set forth therein and in the capacity
indicated.
lit TPel i1 r, 7-%U
Witness my hand and official stamp or seal, this the day of J ,2WF1.
LPL V
NotaryP lic
My Commission Expires:
TIFFANY CLARK
STATE OF NO INI�OLA Notary Public
COUNTY OF
'���iIN " ln�
�3h'., North Carolina
e,n County
I, 1' a Notary Public of the County and State aforementioned,
do hereby certiff Joseph M. Thompson, Manager, BDP Holdings, LLC, personally known to me or
having provided satisfactory evidence of identity, personally came before me this day and acknowledged
the due execution of the foregoing instrument for the purposes set forth therein and in the capacity
indicated -
Witness my hand and official stamp or seal, this the O'day of
My Commission Expires: �q/t ) m2A
TIFFANY CLARK
' Notary Public
r4o+th Carolina
,tonCounty

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Cotton Farms City/County: Harnett County Sampling Date: 23 SEP 2021
Applicant/Owner: Reese Construction LLC State: NC Sampling Point: 1
Investigator(s): Krlsslna Newcomb Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): drainageway Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 4
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat; 35.499022 Long:-78.85537 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: CeD- Cecil fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes NWI classification: riverine
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Observation point located near wetland flag Al2.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al) _
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
X Saturation (A3) _
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 11
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 7
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Beside stream
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: 1
30ft radius
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
°
/° Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1
Liquidambar styraciflua
40
Y
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
2
Acer Rubrum
40
Y
FAC
Ligustrum sinense
20
N
FACU
Total Number of Dominant 9
3
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Betula nigra
15
N
FACW
Percent of Dominant Species
78
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
115
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
57.5
20% of
total cover:
23
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub
Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius
)
FACW species x 2 =
1
Ligustrum sinense
20
Y
FACU
FAC species x 3 =
2
Alnus serrulata
20
Y
OBL
FACU species x 4 =
3
Liquidambar styraciflua
10
Y
FAC
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
_ 2 -Dominance Test is >50%
9
50
— 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
25
= Total Cover
10
— 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:
20% of
total cover:
Herb
Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius
)
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Ligustrum sinense
20
Y
FACU
— Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1
2
Boehmeria cylindrica
10
Y
FACW
3.—
Athyrium asplenioides
15
y
FAC
'Indicators of soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unlessless disturbed or problematic.
4.
Asplenium spp.
1
N
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5.
6
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7.
height.
8.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9•
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
10.
m) tall.
11.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
46
= Total Cover
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
50% of total cover:
23
20% of
total cover:
9.2
30ft radius
Woody vine —All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
Y
height.
1.
Vitis rotundifolia
3
FAC
2.
Parthenocissus quinquefolia
1
N
FACU
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5.
Vegetation
X
�=
Total Cover
Present? Yes No
50% of total cover:
2
20% of
total cover:
•8
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color moist
%
Color (moist) % Type
Loc
Texture Remarks
0-2
100
L
2-4
10YR 5/2
89
10YR 4/6 1 C
M
SL
10YR4/2 10
4-12
10YR 4/1
80
10YR 4/6 10 C
M
L
10YR 4/4 10 C
M
'TVDe: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. `Location: PL=Pore Lininq, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
X
Depth (inches):
Hydric
Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Cotton Farms City/County: Harnett County Sampling Date: 23 SEP 2021
Applicant/Owner: Reese Construction LLC State: NC Sampling Point: 2
Investigator(s): Krlsslna Newcomb Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): linear Local relief (concave, convex, none): none
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.499122 Long:-78.855233
Soil Map Unit Name: CeD- Cecil fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes NWI classification:
Slope (%): 8
_ Datum:
none
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No N
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Observation point located near wetland flag Al2.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: 2
30ft radius
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover
Species?
Status
1. Carya glabra
35
Y
FACU
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
30
Y
FAC
3 Pinus taeda
20
N
FAC
4 Quercus nigra
15
N
FAC
5 Prunus serotina
15
N
FACU
6.
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species 6
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant 9
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
67
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
7
Prevalence Index worksheet:
115
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
57.5 20% of
total cover:
23
OBL species
x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius
FACW species
x 2 =)
1. Acer rubrum
10
Y
FAC
FAC species
x 3 =
2. Carya glabra
10
Y
FACU
FACU species
x 4 =
3 Ligustrum sinense
5
N
FACU
UPL species
x 5=
4 Microstegium vimineum
5
N
FAC
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
5
Elephantopus spp.
1
N
6.
Quercus nigra
1
N
FAC
7.
8.
9.
32
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
16 20% of total cover:
6.4
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius )
1.
Microstegium vimineum
10
Y
FAC
2.
Smilax rotundifolia
5
Y
FAC
3.
Acer rubrum
5
Y
FAC
4,
Vaccinium arboreum
1
N
FACU
5
Elephantopus spp.
1
N
6.
Quercus nigra
N
FAC
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
11.5
Total Cover
4.6
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30ft radius )
1.
Toxicodendron radicans
1
Y
FAC
2.
Parthenocissus quinquefolia
1
Y
FACU
3.
4.
5.
�=
1
Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
.4
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
heioht.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation X
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Type Loc
Texture Remarks
0-2
10YR 3/2
100
10YR 3/2
SL
2-5
10YR 5/6
100
10YR 5/6
SL
5-10
10YR 7/6
100
10YR 7/6
SL
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox(S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
TVDe:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD:
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Harnett County City: Fuquay-Varina
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 35.502398 Long.:-78.853832
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody:
Hectors Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
A
35.49890818
-78.85567443
2
wetland
404
B
35.50205119,
-78.85131574
g
wetland
404
C
35.50486127
-78.84886743
0.05
wetland
404
p
35.50549577
-78.85499724
4
wetland
404
S-A
35.49897003
-78.85538275
760ft
stream
404
S-B
35.50122200
-78.85306320
2400 ft
stream
404
S-D 35.50559771,-78.85474597 2080 ft stream 404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
■❑ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:
0 Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
■❑ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Fuquay-Varina, NC and Lillington, NC (2019)
■❑ Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Websoil survey, Harnett County, NC.
0 National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: FWS NWI
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
0 FEMA/FIRM maps: FEMA Panel 0642
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
0 Photographs: 0 Aerial (Name & Date): Google Earth (2021)
or 0 Other (Name & Date): Landscape Photographs (Oct 2021)
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
25 Oct 2021
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
' Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

Vicinity Map
The subject property is located northeast of Cotton Road, Fuquay-Varina, NC.
Site coordinates are 35 502398 -78 853832
WW__Lj
Site
Harnett
Harneft C
K,piing
Hafq,etl County
BUIL's CP
institution
Shawtomi
Site
Cf e�- -
Hal Owen & Associates, Inc. September 2021 Cotton Farms

II • - •e
f
-Il
'O
mZ f 'WA ..•
N T u i •`
m = C T (A 10 10 rt
J LL
° LL Ua C LL C
U S = O U
5
y:
o�
0[, �1 pm ,
W A
, P10r 7A zq

USDA United States
Department of
Agriculture
N RCS
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
Harnett County,
North Carolina
Cotton Farms
October 8, 2021

Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.
They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information
about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for
many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban
planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.
Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste
disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand,
protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil
properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.
The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of
soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for
identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some
cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/
portal/nres/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering
applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center
(https:Hoffices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nres) or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/contactus/?
cid=nres142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as
septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to
basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States
Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its
programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,
and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,
sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require

alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at [phone] (voice
and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of
Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or
call [phone] (voice) or [phone] (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity
provider and employer.

Contents
Preface......................................................................................
How Soil Surveys
Are Made ...................................................
SoilMap....................................................................................
SoilMap.................................................................................
Legend...................................................................................
MapUnit
Legend....................................................................
Map Unit
Descriptions............................................................
Harnett County, North Carolina ..........................................
Bb—Bibb
soils, frequently flooded ..................................
BnB—Blaney
loamy sand, 2 to 8 percent slopes............
CeB—Cecil
fine sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes........
CeD—Cecil
fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes......
DoA—Dothan
loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes...........
DoB—Dothan
loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes...........
EnB—Enon
fine sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes........
FaB—Fuquay
loamy sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes...........
GaB—Gilead
loamy sand, 2 to 8 percent slopes............
LoF—Louisa
fine sandy loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes..
PaE—Pacolet
fine sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes
VaB—Vaucluse
loamy sand, 2 to 8 percent slopes.........
W—Water....................................................................... .
Wh—Wehadkee
loam, frequently flooded ......................
References...............................................................................
.2
..5
.8
..9
10
11
11
14
14
15
16
17
18
19
21
22
24
25
26
27
29
29
31

How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous
areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous
areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and
limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length,
and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and
native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil
profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The
profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the
soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is
devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other
biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource
areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that
share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water
resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey
areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that
is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the
area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind
of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and
miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific
segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they
were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict
with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a
specific location on the landscape.
Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their
characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil
scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only
a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented
by an understanding of the soil -vegetation -landscape relationship, are sufficient to
verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.
Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They
noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock
fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them
to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their
properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).
Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil
characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for
comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic
classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character
of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil

Custom Soil Resource Report
scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the
individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that
they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and
research.
The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the
objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a
unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable
proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components
of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way
diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such
landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite
investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.
The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of
mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape,
and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the
soil -landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at
specific locations. Once the soil -landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller
number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded.
These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color,
depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for
content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil
typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.
Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of
characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct
measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit
component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other
properties.
While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally
are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists
interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field -observed
characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the
soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through
observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management.
Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new
interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other
sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of
specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management
are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same
kinds of soil.
Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on
such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over
long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example,
soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will
have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict
that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.
After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the
survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and

Custom Soil Resource Report
identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings,
fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.

Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of
soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.

Z
=
o
Z
iD
O
00MBE OOKOSE oaOsc ODNOSE 002006C
009006C ODKycec 0= ODDOCK
M „£Z ,OS o8L
M „£Z ,OS o8L
g
g
g
g
o PAP
O
CL
J
7 Q
O CO
0U)
-
,..Ln
N1
pA�+�
oo
o
Q�
.
/
m
Q
't
w.
.. oo
d3
m
m
=
Z
M../.ZS oa,
M../.ZS oa,
OOb6£O£ OOZ6£O£ 0006£O£ 0080£6£ 0090z6£
z
=
o
OOGO£6£ OOZO£3c 0000£O£
z
iD
b

t
E
J
§
_
3
ƒ
\
E
\
/
e{\�
\
k=�
_
{
/o=-
0
-
R
2
-
\
����/
\
�00
2
/
§.2
-
O
ƒ \
0
\
2
[
m /
]/±e
z
2§
ƒ
\{))
��mW
\
E
\ \CL
§
\�
o
__
§{_#�
O
]
_
§2f2®
fo
��
m_
\
_
/ \/\
_
�/
2/\\
Mn�
§
3�
]E:
§ w
/G/\)
°
/
CL
��2o
-
�2
-
$
./
��~0�
=�
\6
/
_ -
Q
°
/g2§#
of
§
_ §
..
°3
/
ƒE
/
/\��2
-
<
--
�0
2
)E
&§_
�mg
E�§[e
\
��
o-§
�G���
=o
\/
/\
/\
/E�/
&/
)k
\\\
/\\Ĥ
/o
$2
U)
�\
oƒf¥
&Sf)
C
) (CL
>
/
,
} /
\ °
f
-
/
)
4 )
J
)
ƒ
_ [
/ e
i /
§ /
,
|\ .2 /
g \
\ _)
2
k0.
§
W
,
-
2
J �
�
�
CL
\
§CL
=
,
0
)
e
&
& %
&
E
, a
a
3 3
3|
_CL
E e A
_/
E
®
%
4
{ )
: -
_ - -
\ o o
&
--
_ / _
k�
\ \
\ \
) / U) 2
_
&
6 )
® \
))
) )
) §£
a ) )
j j
j j
§ /
Mn ƒ
) ) \
j 3 J 7
{
a.
7/
El■]
2
#
�
0

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
Bb
Bibb soils, frequently flooded
3.5
0.6%
BnB
Blaney loamy sand, 2 to 8
percent slopes
7.4
1.3%
CeB
Cecil fine sandy loam, 2 to 8
percent slopes
116.8
20.8%
CeD
Cecil fine sandy loam, 8 to 15
percent slopes
133.7
23.8%
DoA
Dothan loamy sand, 0 to 2
percent slopes
3.5
0.6%
DoB
Dothan loamy sand, 2 to 6
percent slopes
36.5
6.5%
EnB
Enon fine sandy loam, 2 to 8
percent slopes
26.1
4.6%
FaB
Fuquay loamy sand, 0 to 6
percent slopes
64.7
11.5%
GaB
Gilead loamy sand, 2 to 8
percent slopes
0.1
0.0%
LoF
Louisa fine sandy loam, 25 to
45 percent slopes
12.1
2.2%
PaE
Pacolet fine sandy loam, 15 to
25 percent slopes
109.6
19.5%
VaB
Vaucluse loamy sand, 2 to 8
percent slopes
15.9
2.8%
W
Water
1.5
0.3%
Wh
Wehadkee loam, frequently
flooded
31.1
5.5%
Totals for Area of Interest
662.6
100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
11

Custom Soil Resource Report
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into Iandforms or
Iandform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha -Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
12

Custom Soil Resource Report
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
13

Custom Soil Resource Report
Harnett County, North Carolina
Bb—Bibb soils, frequently flooded
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3snw
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 210 to 265 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Bibb, undrained, and similar soils: 80 percent
Johnston, undrained, and similar soils: 10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Bibb, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Sandy and loamy alluvium
Typical profile
A - 0 to 6 inches: sandy loam
Cgl - 6 to 60 inches: sandy loam
Cg2 - 60 to 80 inches: loamy sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95
in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: NoneFrequent
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 7.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 5w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Description of Johnston, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Flood plains
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Sandy and loamy alluvium
14

Custom Soil Resource Report
Typical profile
A - 0 to 30 inches: mucky loam
Cgl - 30 to 34 inches: loamy fine sand
Cg2 - 34 to 80 inches: fine sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Very poorly drained
Runoff class: Ponded
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 5.95
in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 inches
Frequency of flooding: NoneFrequent
Frequency of ponding: Frequent
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 9.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7w
Hydrologic Soil Group: A/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
BnB—Blaney loamy sand, 2 to 8 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol. 3snx
Elevation: 160 to 660 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 52 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 210 to 245 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Blaney and similar soils: 90 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Blaney
Setting
Landform: Low hills
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Sandy and loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
A - 0 to 4 inches: loamy sand
E - 4 to 25 inches: loamy sand
15

Custom Soil Resource Report
Bt - 25 to 62 inches: sandy clay loam
C - 62 to 80 inches: loamy coarse sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 8 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high (0.20
to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 4.0 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3s
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Ecological site: F137XY002GA - Loamy Summit Woodland - PROVISIONAL
Hydric soil rating: No
CeB—Cecil fine sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol. 3spl
Elevation: 200 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 240 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Cecil and similar soils: 90 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Cecil
Setting
Landform: I me rfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Saprolite derived from granite and gneiss and/or schist
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 7 inches: fine sandy loam
Bt - 7 to 40 inches: clay
BC - 40 to 55 inches: clay loam
C - 55 to 80 inches: sandy loam
it.

Custom Soil Resource Report
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 8 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 8.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
CeD—Cecil fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3sp2
Elevation: 200 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 240 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Cecil and similar soils: 85 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Cecil
Setting
Landform: Imerfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Saprolite derived from granite and gneiss and/or schist
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 7 inches: fine sandy loam
Bt - 7 to 40 inches: clay
BC - 40 to 55 inches: clay loam
C - 55 to 80 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 8 to 15 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
17

Custom Soil Resource Report
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 8.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
DoA—Dothan loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 2wb8x
Elevation: 50 to 660 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 69 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 55 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 190 to 310 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Dothan and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Dothan
Setting
Landform: Imerfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 7 inches: loamy sand
E - 7 to 13 inches: loamy sand
Bt - 13 to 40 inches: sandy clay loam
Btv - 40 to 79 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high (0.20
to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 36 to 59 inches
18

Custom Soil Resource Report
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Maximum salinity. Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm)
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 6.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 1
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Forage suitability group: Loamy and clayey soils on rises and knolls of mesic
uplands (G133AA321 FL)
Other vegetative classification: Loamy and clayey soils on rises and knolls of
mesic uplands (G133AA321 FL)
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Norfolk
Percent of map unit. 7 percent
Landform: Imerfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Fuquay
Percent of map unit. 4 percent
Landform: Imerfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Goldsboro
Percent of map unit. 4 percent
Landform: Imerfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
DoB—Dothan loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol. 2wb94
Elevation: 50 to 660 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 69 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 55 to 70 degrees F
19

Custom Soil Resource Report
Frost -free period: 190 to 310 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Dothan and similar soils: 82 percent
Minor components: 18 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Dothan
Setting
Landform: Imerfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 7 inches: loamy sand
E - 7 to 13 inches: loamy sand
Bt - 13 to 40 inches: sandy clay loam
Btv - 40 to 79 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high (0.20
to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 36 to 59 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Maximum salinity. Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm)
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 6.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Forage suitability group: Loamy and clayey soils on rises and knolls of mesic
uplands (G133AA321 FL)
Other vegetative classification: Loamy and clayey soils on rises and knolls of
mesic uplands (G133AA321 FL)
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Norfolk
Percent of map unit. 8 percent
Landform: Imerfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
20

Custom Soil Resource Report
Fuquay
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Imerfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Orangeburg
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Marine terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder, backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex, linear
Hydric soil rating: No
EnB—Enon fine sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3sp9
Elevation: 200 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 240 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Enon and similar soils: 85 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Enon
Setting
Landform: Imerfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Saprolite derived from diorite and/or gabbro and/or diabase
and/or gneiss
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 7 inches: fine sandy loam
BA - 7 to 10 inches: sandy clay loam
Bt - 10 to 27 inches: clay
BC - 27 to 33 inches: clay loam
C - 33 to 80 inches: loam
21

Custom Soil Resource Report
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 8 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to
moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 8.3 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: No
FaB—Fuquay loamy sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol. 2wb9d
Elevation: 160 to 660 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 69 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 55 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 190 to 310 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Fuquay and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Fuquay
Setting
Landform: I me rfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Sandy marine deposits over loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 10 inches: loamy sand
E - 10 to 28 inches: loamy sand
Bt - 28 to 44 inches: sandy clay loam
Btv - 44 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
22

Custom Soil Resource Report
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high (0.20
to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 40 to 61 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Maximum salinity. Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm)
Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum: 4.0
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 5.8 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2s
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Forage suitability group: Sandy over loamy soils on rises, knolls, and ridges of
mesic uplands (G133AA221 FL)
Other vegetative classification: Sandy over loamy soils on rises, knolls, and ridges
of mesic uplands (G133AA221 FL)
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Dothan
Percent of map unit. 7 percent
Landform: Imerfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Linear
Other vegetative classification: Loamy and clayey soils on rises and knolls of
mesic uplands (G133AA321 FL)
Hydric soil rating: No
Candor
Percent of map unit. 5 percent
Landform: Marine terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder, footslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve
Down -slope shape: Convex, linear
Across -slope shape: Convex, linear
Hydric soil rating: No
Blaney
Percent of map unit. 3 percent
Landform: Ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder, backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve, side slope
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
23

Custom Soil Resource Report
GaB—Gilead loamy sand, 2 to 8 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol. 3sph
Elevation: 160 to 660 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 52 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 210 to 245 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Gilead and similar soils: 90 percent
Minor components: 5 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Gilead
Setting
Landform: Low hills
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Loamy and clayey marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 5 inches: loamy sand
Bt1 - 5 to 8 inches: sandy loam
Bt2 - 8 to 42 inches: sandy clay
Bt3 - 42 to 52 inches: sandy clay loam
C1 - 52 to 76 inches: clay
C2 - 76 to 80 inches: gravelly sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 8 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Moderately well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to moderately
high (0.00 to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 18 to 30 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 7.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: No
24

Custom Soil Resource Report
Minor Components
Bibb, undrained
Percent of map unit: 3 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Johnston, undrained
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
LoF—Louisa fine sandy loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3sps
Elevation: 200 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 240 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Louisa and similar soils: 85 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Louisa
Setting
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Residuum weathered from mica schist and/or other micaceous
metamorphic rock
Typical profile
A - 0 to 4 inches: fine sandy loam
Bw- 4 to 12 inches: channery loam
C - 12 to 18 inches: channery loam
Cr - 18 to 80 inches: weathered bedrock
Properties and qualities
Slope: 25 to 45 percent
25

Custom Soil Resource Report
Depth to restrictive feature: 10 to 20 inches to paralithic bedrock
Drainage class: Somewhat excessively drained
Runoff class: High
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to high (0.00
to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Very low (about 2.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7e
Hydrologic Soil Group: D
Hydric soil rating: No
PaE—Pacolet fine sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol. 3sg5
Elevation: 200 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 240 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Pacolet and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 13 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Pacolet
Setting
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Saprolite derived from granite and gneiss and/or schist
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 5 inches: sandy loam
E - 5 to 8 inches: sandy loam
Bt - 8 to 29 inches: clay
BC - 29 to 38 inches: sandy clay loam
C - 38 to 80 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 15 to 25 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
W

Custom Soil Resource Report
Runoff class: High
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 7.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Spartanburg
Percent of map unit. 8 percent
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
Bethlehem
Percent of map unit. 5 percent
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
VaB—Vaucluse loamy sand, 2 to 8 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol. 3sgj
Elevation: 80 to 660 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 210 to 265 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Vaucluse and similar soils: 80 percent
Minor components: 5 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
27

Custom Soil Resource Report
Description of Vaucluse
Setting
Landform: Low hills
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Loamy and sandy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 6 inches: loamy sand
E - 6 to 15 inches: loamy sand
Bt - 15 to 29 inches: sandy clay loam
Btx - 29 to 58 inches: sandy clay loam
BC - 58 to 80 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 8 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 15 to 35 inches to fragipan
Drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to
moderately high (0.06 to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Very low (about 2.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3s
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Ecological site: F137XY002GA - Loamy Summit Woodland - PROVISIONAL
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Bibb, undrained
Percent of map unit. 3 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Johnston, undrained
Percent of map unit. 2 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
28

Custom Soil Resource Report
ViTAMY 'i
Map Unit Composition
Water: 100 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Water
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 8w
Hydric soil rating: No
Wh—Wehadkee loam, frequently flooded
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3sgv
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 210 to 265 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Wehadkee, undrained, and similar soils: 80 percent
Wehadkee, drained, and similar soils: 10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Wehadkee, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Depressions on flood plains
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy alluvium
Typical profile
A - 0 to 7 inches: loam
Bg - 7 to 58 inches: loam
Cg - 58 to 84 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Runoff class: Very high
29

Custom Soil Resource Report
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: FrequentNone
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 10.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Description of Wehadkee, Drained
Setting
Landform: Depressions on flood plains
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy alluvium
Typical profile
A - 0 to 7 inches: loam
Bg - 7 to 58 inches: loam
Cg - 58 to 84 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Runoff class: Very high
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: FrequentNone
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 10.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
30

References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling
and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep -water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
n res/d eta i I/n ati o n a I/s o i Is/?cid = n res 142 p2_0 54262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://
www. nres. usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://
www. nres. usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/
home/?cid=nres142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/
detail/national/landuse/rangepastu re/?cid=stelprdb1043084
31

Custom Soil Resource Report
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
n res/d eta i I/so i Is/scie ntists/?cid=n res 142 p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States,
the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook
296. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?
cid = n res 142 p2_05 3624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http:H
www.nrcs.usda.gov/lnternet/FSE—DOCUMENTS/nrcsl 42p2_052290. pdf
32

U

Mk
"'�' �
", �= � �, ,.e 5 �` .h - i, 3; `'�'.. ,i� ° •�Wr�-{,�'' mod.' .�j- ��
fiR t f t
Alt
x� k�
Po
�t

HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
SITE PLANS AND IMPACT MAPS
Soil Science Investigations • Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Consulting

giros `�
�m-lWd PUPUR ngXOMP oosz-sss (6%) .. a asm �
Ma
M 3m xouvr� J r, c .• CUWJ .Nt3UO3
Lams NIM isva sos f J' ` , ;
6WO .9 OMMMKM S MUMMOO
(
z
z O
.- N M It F-
W W
<�<<zz�
aa<caoW
aaaar=�cn
z z z z U 0 0
20008 r2
J Q U
wwwwz�3
zzzzQww
-1-j-1=1a J
w, dw-
w ooin :5
Lj—u a00000 sa
0 `�zzzzz� o-
wmQQQQ<CU
W
> W
W
O
MEwwwwwo-O
U
—N M tt 10 (0 11 w0)
f— F— F— F— E— F— F— F— F—
< WW W Wwwwww
wwwwwwwww
= p
}U'
O
0
C."
U o n
0
H
� Cl) �4 000
(' N M ~rW
Z d 0
W Z
W Fw
�m�NNai J p JriA
CC<w0
in 0 Q ap aNw
~
JQSw
d'zwo yY"Oaa-
zOo w
r�� Q
w pwN�
>
n.z0pz�
W Z>W»�
0' �
d
2
�nwWaaa
— �2z
LL
N tl� O
F-
~o V ohm
m c'! (1)v
p
o p to N c N
wow -' Wtiw`rrn
Cl)
zUwDui
m
0 0 Q- d �'
_i V1 'pV
< >
wW
=°DU
OF �7 N.m v
o6z
"_O
U.
�-•
rN
d" d WW ao I r6°DfOpV d.
Z � F� po OMcp9
I
<
N F
op
zo w (00 zU 0 pN zrc*,
0
C1
a
op
U o z`�:Jw2` I W o
N w�dg=O0.. > q �F=M:
C;)0)w
coLL -i
�>wMdO ¢
01 F-Wp
aaW
(LLI0azaC?wwI>-
w O
�W
m
�aq �d�OC?Nw� Wiwi�=w
3
o>vu,z»>wO
OzOd'a�3o��o�pWmNuo�¢w
�XNCzCDW
z
Lz=w
w�oO=FoW�Owtiawa
cod
Fzz
wo=>z
oadoaNiS:3: ma-0

I.wdW-.O—q,l.,qqp 0063--eg8 (6T6) aTIM &MO
6294a 3K 'Nolkno SKHYjl KOJL03
lRams N" Im got
Mao—& ofum=om OMMEMOD IQUISXDM
I (—dm am
a
Z5
ass
kfilqk�lji
WMA",
0
LO
C>
Ol
c)
0
tx)

OOZ = alooS
21333n8 NV32J1S,02 EM SONVI13M 031V3NI-130
GN3031 ONIOVHS 00-V ON 0 ON
asm ism
oagkz am SYWJ MOLLOO
J.'EMS NIM JSM 909
. z
e,w-j ammmm Slum mnsmoo mwd mouvamm QNY7t311t 21 Rl"

= L GIDDS
213AAna NV3aS,02 EM SONV113M 031V3Nn3(J EM IN
(IN3031 9NIGVHS oot ooz 0 ooz
'�vm swat Imm
oasa aN lx=M Simi X0II03
&33= NIM ams 909
jg
Xud HOLOWErm
ITIHS HOIVh
WIR,
A, 1, lT . ..
VP
SW
Al I W,
11AN
W

�sx snug-molloo
z
V)
Cl)
z x
pp
M
Cl)
O.9,41
ado I-P
vt
-hR -is 404:1
z
0
e
w
C) ul
� �
00
0 { o
C3
Cl)
0) OD OD
C141 (N N
< I'- I-
0 UJ
z = 04 C14
m
coo
ul
LU IX
LU
LU
QD

HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
ENDANGERED SPECIES AND DESIGNATED CRITICAL HABITAT ASSESSMENT
Soil Science Investigations • Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Consulting

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2022-SLI-0138
Event Code: 04EN2000-2022-E-00297
Project Name: Cotton Farms
October 26, 2021
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The species list generated pursuant to the information you provided identifies threatened,
endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical
habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by
your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally -listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally -protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or

10/26/2021 Event Code: 04EN2000-2022-E-00297 2
evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally -protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require
development of an eagle conservation plan (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/
eagle_guidance.html). Additionally, wind energy projects should follow the wind energy
guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to migratory birds and
bats.
Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications
towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http://
www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm; http://
www.towerkill.com; and http://www.fws.gov/migratoDLbirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/
towers/comtow.html.
Not all Threatened and Endangered Species that occur in North Carolina are subject to section 7
consultation with the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service. Atlantic and shortnose sturgeon, sea
turtles,when in the water, and certain marine mammals are under purview of the National Marine
Fisheries Service. If your project occurs in marine, estuarine, or coastal river systems you should
also contact the National Marine Fisheries Service, http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in
the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project
that you submit to our office. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis
of this office atjohn—[e-mail].

10/26/2021 Event Code: 04EN2000-2022-E-00297
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List

10/26/2021 Event Code: 04EN2000-2022-E-00297
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

10/26/2021
Event Code: 04EN2000-2022-E-00297
Project Summary
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2022-SLI-0138
Event Code: Some(04EN2000-2022-E-00297)
Project Name: Cotton Farms
Project Type: DEVELOPMENT
Project Description: SFR SD, Cotton Rd, Fuquay-Varina
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:
www.google.com/maps/(a-)35.5013494,-78.85574981390457,14z
'i•1
Counties: Harnett County, North Carolina

10/26/2021 Event Code: 04EN2000-2022-E-00297 3
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 6 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesi, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Birds
NAME STATUS
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Reptiles
NAME STATUS
American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis Similarity of
No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Appearance
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/776 (Threatened)
Fishes
NAME STATUS
Cape Fear Shiner Notropis mekistocholas Endangered
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6063

10/26/2021 Event Code: 04EN2000-2022-E-00297
4
Clams
NAME
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not
available.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164
Insects
NAME
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
Flowering Plants
NAME.
Rough -leaved Loosestrife Lysimachia asperulaefolia
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2747
STATUS
Proposed
Threatened
STATUS
Candidate
STATUS
Endangered
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

Roy Cooper, Governor
■ ■■■
r ■■ ■ INC DEPARTMENT OF
■■,■i NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
■ ■■
October 25. 2021
Krissina Newcomb
Hal Owen & Associates Inc
PO Box 400
Lillington, NC 27546
RE: Cotton Farms SD
Dear Krissina Newcomb:
❑. Reid Wilson, Secretary
Misty Buchanan
Deputy Director, Natural Heritage Program
I1114101 1. DTMMe]MI
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
httr)s://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or Federally -
listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rod ney.butler�ncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPAR7HEN7 OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
121 W. JONES STREET. RALEIGH. NC 27603 • 1691 MAIL SERVICE CENTER. RALEIGH. NC 27609
OFC 919.707.9120 • FAX [phone]

/
\$
r
v
a
v
v
\
g/
7 a
v
e
v
v
f
\ /
\
/
$
\
\
u
3 /
CO
e
m
2 CO
.g
co}
/
g /
/
2
\
\
0
0
?§
/
\IO
\
s
0T
_
///:
\ouy
^ 2
Oe
e
4.2
e
s
e
s
e
s
e
s
%
2
2
2
\\
g
/
\\
2
Y
Y
Y
Y
/
2
e
§
\
e
&
&
&
&
&
«
0
2
> x
?
�
\\
\
/
/
-
\(®
� 0
\
E\/ƒ
3
e
e
e
e
4
°/®
__
»\
\
\ /
/®a —
\
// dƒ
\
e
e
e
e
e
ƒƒ
=
y c a o
\
/
\
\
\
\
\
CO
}\
s \ /
/
e
\ \
±
///J
4
°©©
\
\
\
\
\
\
/ / / /
t
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
`
\
(�
c
4
7
m
\
�
e
3
\/�
=
y
)
\y
s
0
CO
Z
2
e
CO
\
co
z
\
E
\
±
E
\
/
}
D`
E
\\\
CO\
\
\/
_
2
&�
\
�\
§
\
—
n
�
(
/
CO
®
O
\
a)O
CO
w
%
\ /
\
.g
7
CO
ƒ
»
E
�
/ \
_
e
\
E
.k
H
?
e
\ 2
%
/ % (
/
\
}
\�
e
\
E
CO
y=
5
a» E
2
$»
O
}
s
m
/
s\=
s s
\
2±
e
s
\E
2
\
u
\/
2\
0
C///
y t
t/
y
2
\
)/
/
\
/
e %-
7\\/
g
a 2
z o
o
®E
z
3
e
f
E
CO
E\\»
a x
2 z>
E
2 s
s±
\ y
/
E
\(
/
.±
e=
z±
a
=
_
/
/
\ \
/ y
\
< / /
/ /
\ /
% /
\
(
\ \
v
o
e
a
\
\
n
\
y
y
y
y
cc)\
E
»
`
\ 2
\
\
/
/
/
/
/
/
\
CO
§
~
4
\\
CO
\
\
/
/ /
/
/
\
x
4
e
E
g
e
z
\
z
o\\
=
E
2
= =
E 2 E
2
=
E 2
_
E
2
/
\f
E
E 2
E
2
E 2 E
2
E 2
E
l
z\
t
*
2
e
w/
e-
\
e c
0
e
o e o
e
o e
o
CO»
e
e
0
\/
353
ooze
ZeZe
ZeZe
Z72
Z
§
/

N•�py.s�
CR3Nt�ate Rd
Q
cg
-4
P18 UUwg
C
Gy
OQ
O
u
J
O
u
Z
a
0
C�
y
aQ
0 -
o�
c
�aAg a
Y
U� Jtlfu] irr;i
S��4J
W
a
m z
O Z
m co
_0 N Q
cc:) Z
N N
t a m z
a`)
o El ElEl
M
O
M
N
a

HAL OWEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
NC HISTORIC PROPERTIES MAP
Soil Science Investigations • Wetland Delineations, Permitting, and Consulting

NCHPO HPOWEB
r
4`
T
Site
HT0898 Hauser 08.7 Huse
Y
�k
f
Fi■TO■1�6■1�Jol7nsol7=F� rm
010
HT0896 Haul
9/21 /2021, 12:40:08 PM
Cotton Farms - shapefile
■..: Local districts & boundaries
Local individual resources & centerpoints
Local Landmark
' Local Landmark, Gone
Local HD Center Point
1:24,000
0 0.15 0.3 0.6 mi
0 0.28 0.55 1.1 km
State of North Carolina DOT, Esri, HERE, Garmin, INCREMENT P, NGA
USGS, Participating NC Counties, NCCGIA NC OneMap, US EPA
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office
State of North Carolina DOT, Esri, HERE, Garmin, INCREMENT P, NGA USGS I Participating NC Counties, NCCGIA NC OneMap, US EPA I Esri, HERE