HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0086550_Inspection_20090218NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
February 18, 2009
Blake Proctor
Town of Fairmont
PO Box 248
Fairmont NC 28340.
SUBJECT: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Town of Fairmont
Fairmont Regional WWTP
Permit No: NC0086550
Robeson County
Dear Mr. Proctor:
Enclosed you will find a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection report for
the inspection that I conducted on February 17, 2009. All observations and
recommendations are in Section D. Summary of Findings/Comments of this inspection
report.
We appreciate the time and professional courtesy that was extended by your staff
during the inspection. If you have any questions or comments concerning this report,
please contact me at (910) 433-3312.
Sincerely,
2. L__.
Dale Lopez
Environmental Specialist
Id!
Enclosures: EPA Water Compliance Inspection Report
Regional Field Inspectors Check List for Field Parameters
cc: Johnny J. Britt, ORC
Central Files
Fayetteville Regional Office Files
225 Green St, Suite 714, Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043
Phone: 910-433-3300 FAX: 910-486-07071 Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer
_one
ortlaCarol.i_na
Naturally
United States Environmental Protection Agency
. E n /�!�/`1 Washington, D.C. 20460
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Form Approved.
OMB No. 2040-0057
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection
1 I NI 2 151 31 NC0086550 111 121 09/02/17 117
Type Inspector Fac Type
18i ci 191 sl 20II
. Remarks
211111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111166
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA Reserved
671 . 2.0 169 791 31 711 1 721 I N I 731 1 174 751 I l l l I I 180
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
Fairmont Regional WWTP
Off US Hwy 74•
Fairmont NC 28390 •
Entry Time/Date
10:30 PM 09/02/17
Permit Effective Date
09/10/01
Exit Time/Date
02:30 PM 09/02/17
Permit Expiration Date
09/07/31
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
///
Johnny J Britt/ORC/910-628-0064/
Other Facility Data
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Johnny J Britt, PO Box 248 Fairmont NC Contacted
283400248/Superintendent/910-628-0064/ No
• Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check.only those areas evaluated)
Waters
as necessary)
ti Permit r Flow Measurement K , Operations & Maintenance ; Records/Reports
® Effluent/Receiving
and checklists
gg Self -Monitoring Program Sludge Handling Disposal Facility Site Review
111 Laboratory
Section D: Summary of Findinq/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative
(See attachment summary)
•
•
•
Name(s) and StgEyature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
�.„
Dale Lopez 3`• . FRO WQ//910 433 3300 Ext.712/
Signature of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
fq041- 470 S/s A ,
a
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page # 1
31
NPDES
NC0086550
111 121
yr/mo/day
09/02/17
17
Inspection Type
181c1
(cont.) 1
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
On the day of this inspection, all units were operational, and the facility appeared to be in compliance with
the conditions of the NPDES permit. Bill Lester (Hobbs & Upchurch) is in the process of writing the Sludge
Management Plan. This facility has only dewatered one time (Atlantic Dewatering) and that occurred last
year. The effluent flow calibration was performed by C. Wright on August 27, 2008. One generator with
automatic switchover handles the VWVf P for back-up power. It is routinely tested once per month, under
load. A repaired effluent pump was installed on the day of this inspection. #1 clarifier and #1 chlorine
contact chamber were operational, but off line. They may be put on line when the Town of Fairbluff begins
sending wastewater in June 2009. The influent pump station was located at the old WWTP, approximately
eleven miles.
Page # 2
Permit: NC0086550 Owner - Facility: Fairmont Regional VWVfP
Inspection Date: 02/17/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Operations & Maintenance
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping?
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable Solids, pH, DO, Sludge
Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment:
Permit
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less).Has the permittee submitted a new application?
Is the facility as described in the permit?
# Are there any special conditions for the permit'?
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
Comment:
Record Keeping
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit?
Is all required information readily available, complete and current?
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)?
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
Is the chain -of -custody complete?
Dates, times and location of sampling
Name of individual performing the sampling
Results of analysis and calibration
Dates of analysis
Name of person performing analyses
Transported COCs
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters?
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ?
(If the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator on each shift?
Is the ORC visitation log available and current?
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification?
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification?
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site?
Yes No NA NE
O 000
n nn
Yes No NA NE
n nn
Einnn
Ennn
n nn
K:vnnn
Yes No NA NE
n nn
® nnn
®nnn
n nn
onEln
GiE
nnn
n nn®
WHEW
® nnn
Ennn
Ennn
n nnE
Page # 3
Permit: NC0086550 Owner - Facility: Fairmont Regional VWVTP
Inspection Date: 02/17/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Record Keeping
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review?
Comment:
Effluent Pipe
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained?
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris?
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly?
Comment:
Flow Measurement - Effluent
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
Is the flow meter operational?
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
Comment:
Aerobic Digester
Is the capacity adequate?
Is the mixing adequate?
Is the site free of excessive foaming in the tank?
# Is the odor acceptable?
# Is tankage available for properly waste sludge?
Comment:
Solids Handling Equipment
Is the equipment operational?
Is the chemical feed equipment operational?
Is storage adequate?
Is the site free of high level of solids in filtrate from filter presses or vacuum filters?
Is the site free of sludge buildup on belts and/or rollers of filter press?
Is the site free of excessive moisture in belt filter press sludge cake?
The facility has an approved sludge management plan?
Comment: The Sludge Management Plan is in the process by Bill Lester (Hobbs &
Upchurch).
Yes No NA NE
❑ ❑ ❑ a
Yes No NA NE
ginnn
® nnn
n nn n
Yes No NA NE
® nnn
nnn
®nnn
n nn
Yes No NA NE
® nnn
® nnn
g rin ❑
• nnn
nnn
Yes No NA NE
w nnn
n nrgn
Annn
n ngEn
n nn
n nt_.n
o nnn
Page # 4
Permit: NC0086550 Owner - Facility: Fairmont Regional VWVTP
Inspection Date: 02/17/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Pump Station - Influent
Is the pump wet well free of bypass lines or structures?
Is the wet well free of excessive grease?
Are all pumps present?
Are all pumps operable?
Are float controls operable?
Is SCADA telemetry available and operational?
Is audible and visual alarm available and operational?
Comment:
Pump Station - Effluent
Is the pump wet well free of bypass lines or structures?
Are all pumps present?
Are all pumps operable?
Are float controls operable?
Is SCADA telemetry available and operational?
Is audible and visual alarm available and operational?
Comment:
Bar Screens
Type of bar screen
a.Manual
b.Mechanical
Are the bars adequately screening debris?
Is the screen free of excessive debris?
Is disposal of screening in compliance?
Is the unit"in good condition?
Comment:
Grit Removal
Type of grit removal
a.Manual
b. Mechanical
Is the grit free of excessive organic matter?
Yes No NA NE
BODO
n nn
n nn
Ennn
FEnnn
Iunnn
n nn
Yes No NA NE
snnn
nnn
n nn
n nn
Ennn
n nn
Yes No NA NE
gannn
n nn
n nn
e nnn
Yes No NA NE
n
nnn
Page # 5
Permit: NC0086550 Owner - Facility: Fairmont Regional WVVTP
Inspection Date: 02/17/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Grit Removal
Is the grit free of excessive odor?
# Is disposal of grit in compliance?
Comment: The two grit pumps are out -of -service, and no plans for repair. Brian's
Waste Recycling removes the grit approximately three times per year.
Secondary Clarifier
Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater?
Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier?
Are weirs level?
Is the site free of weir blockage?
Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting?
Is scum removal adequate?
Is the site free of excessive floating sludge?
Is the drive unit operational?
Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)?
Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc?
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately'/ of the sidewall depth)
Comment: There appears to be an accumulation of solids buildup in the center well.
On the day of this inspection, the sludge blanket was 6-1/2 feet to 7 feet in a total depth
of 16 feet.
Aeration Basins
Mode of operation
Type of aeration system
Is the basin free of dead spots?
Are surface aerators and mixers operational?
Are the diffusers operational?
Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process?
Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface?
Is the DO level acceptable?
Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mg/I)
Comment: The DO averaged 0.6 mg/L.
De -chlorination
Yes No NA NE
loan
n nn
Yes No NA NE
n nn
n onn
ggnnn
n nn
n nn
n nn
nnn
n nn
n nn
n nn
n nn
041,
Yes No NA NE
Ext. Air
Diffused
® nnn
n n®n
® nnn
n nn
® nnn
tinnn
DDD
Yes No NA NE
Page # 6
Permit: NC0086550 Owner - Facblity: Fairmont Regional VWVfP
Inspection Date: 02/17/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
De -chlorination
Type of system ?
Is the feed ratio proportional to chlorine amount (1 to 1)?
Is storage appropriate for cylinders?
# Is de -chlorination substance stored away from chlorine containers?
Comment:
Are the tablets the proper size and type?
Are tablet de -chlorinators operational?
Number of tubes in use?
Comment:
Standby Power
Is automatically activated standby power available?
Is the generator tested by interrupting primary power source?
Is the generator tested under load?
Was generator tested & operational during the inspection?
Do the generator(s) have adequate capacity to operate the entire wastewater site?
Is there an emergency agreement with a fuel vendor for extended run on back-up power?
Is the generator fuel level monitored?
Comment: The influent pump station generator was tested under load during the
inspection.
Pumps-RAS-WAS
Are pumps in place?
Are pumps operational?
Are there adequate spare parts and supplies on site?
Comment:
La boratory
Are'field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory?
Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters) performed by a certified lab?
# is the facility using a contract lab?
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)?
Incubator (Fecal Coliform) set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/- 0.2 degrees?
Yes No NA NE
Gas
n nn
Elinnn
Ennn
nn®n
nnn
Yes No NA NE
nnn
Eid
nnn
r�nnn
g nnn
� nn.n
nnngt
n
Yes No NA NE
g nnn
® nnn
n•nnm
Yes No NA NE
n nn
n nn
®nnn
n nn
n n®n
Page # 7
Permit: NC0086550 Owner - Facility: Fairmont Regional VWVTP
Inspection Date: 02/17/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Laboratory
Incubator (BOD) set to 20.0 degrees Celsius +/- 1.0 degrees?
Comment:
Disinfection -Liquid
Is there adequate reserve supply of disinfectant?
(Sodium Hypochlorite) Is pump feed system operational?
Is bulk storage tank containment area adequate? (free of leaks/open drains)
Is the level of chlorine residual acceptable?
Is the contact chamber free of growth, or sludge buildup?
Is there chlorine residual prior to de -chlorination?
Comment:
Effluent Sampling
Is composite sampling flow proportional?
Is sample collected below all treatment units?
Is proper volume collected?
Is the tubing clean?
#.Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)?
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type representative)?
Comment: The effluent composite refrigerator temperature was -1 degree Celsius.
Yes No NA NE
n n m n
Yes No NA NE
g nnn
n nn
n nn
g nnn
n nn
n nn
Yes No NA NE
ennnn
n nn
n nng
f nnn
g nnn
o nnn
Page # 8
Regional Field Inspectors Check List for Field Parameters
Name of site to be Inspected: Fairmont WWTP Plant Date:February 17 2009
Inspector:Dale Lopez
Field certification # (if applicable):
NPDES #:NC0086550
Region: FRO
I. Circle the parameter or parameters performed at this site.
Residual Chlorine
, Settleable Solids,
II. Instrumentation:
pH
DO
, Conductivity,
Temperature
A. Does the facility have the equipment necessary to analyze field parameters as circled above?
1. A pH meter VWR SP21 f Yes No
2. A Residual Chlorine meter
3. DO meter
Environmental Instruments
FYS 1550A�
4. A Cone for settleable solids
5. A thermometer or meter that measures temperature.
6. Conductivity meter
III. Calibration/Analysis:
1. Is the pH meter calibrated with 2 buffers and
checked with a third buffer each day of use?
2. For Total Residual Chlorine, is a check standard
analyzed each day of use?
3. Is the air calibration of the DO meter performed
each day of use?
4. For Settleable Solids, is 1 liter of sample
settled for 1 hour?
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes No
Yes
No
Yes No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
5. Is the temperature measuring device calibrated
annually against a certified thermometer? Yes
6. For Conductivity, is a calibration standard
analyzed each day of use?
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
NE
IV. Documentation:
1. Is the date and time that the sample was collected documented?
2. Is the sample site documented?
3. Is the sample collector documented?
4. Is the analysis date and time documented?
5. Did the analyst sign the documentation?
6. Is record of calibration documented?
7. For Settleable Solids, is sample volume and
1 hour time settling time documented?
8. For Temperature, is the annual calibration of
the measuring device documented?
fres
f yes
fres
Yes
fres
fres
Yes
fres
No
No
No
No
No
No
Comments: pH 4 exp.= Apr 2009, pH 7= May 2009, and pH 10 = Jun 2009
Please submit a copy of this completed form to the Laboratory Certification Program.
DWQ Lab Certification
Chemistry Lab
Courier # 52-01-01
FIELD INSPECTOR CHECKLIST REV. 04/23/2002