20131089 Ver 1_Application_20131010

OCT 1 0 2013
l ��SNR � 6YA7Er`' � ,
A$tachl�oen""t �.. 6 n ,J# act Bridge Replacement Process
Low Impact Bridge Pro'yig& No.: BD -5102W County Pitt
Bridge No.431 over Parker Creek WBS Element number 45348.1.23
This project is subject to the Low Impact Bridge Process as agreed to on October 6,
2009. This project meets the documentation requirements and approval procedures
under NEPA, as defined by FHWA, for Low Impact Bridge Replacements. This project
meets the standards of NCDOT's Minimum Criteria Rules.
Date: September 26, 2013
Applicant Name: North Carolina Department of Transportation
Applicant Address: P.O. Box 1587
Greenville, NC 27835 2- 0 1 3, 1 0 8
Primary Contact for Project: Maria Rogerson PE
Phone No.: 252 - 439 -2800
Is this an after - the -fact application: Yes X No
River Basin: Tar - Pamlico
Stream Classification: Parker Creek C: NSW
Regulatory Authorization Options for this Activity
Federal: USACE Nationwide General Permit 3 — Maintenance
State: General Water Quality Certification #3687 and /or Buffer Authorization
Local: None
Project Description — The Project involves the replacement of Pitt County Bridge No. 431, an existing
1 @ IT - 8 ", 1 @ 17' - 1 ", 1 @ 18'- 0" reinforced concrete deck bridge on timberjoists with a 1 @ 70'-
0", 24" prestressed concrete cored slab bridge at the same location. The project also includes 290' of
approach roadway improvements and relocation of four gravel drives. In accordance with Neuse River
Buffer Regulations, the bridge does not contain deck drains. Therefore, all stormwater from the bridge
will be directed into a closed drainage system via shoulder berm gutter to inlets and dischargered in to an
existing swale at -L- Sta. 12 +89.00 LT. All runofff from the roadway not captured by this drainage system
will flow across the vegetated roadway shoulders into the existing roadside swales. This project includes
one minor swale revision where it was not possible to meet grass swale treatment criteria due to project
constraints.
Signature:
Print Name: Maria Rogerson
Title: Division Bridge Program Manager

Low/Minimal Impact Bridge Project Data Sheet
TIP NO
BD -5102W
WBS
45348.1.23
County
Pitt
Bridge Number
730431
Description
SR 1591
Parkers Creek
Basin
Classification
Stream SIN
Type
Size width & depth)
Tar - Pamlico
QNSW
28 -95
perennial/inland
14'x 1.5'
Type
Existing Structure Size
Suff. Rating
1� 17'b" 1@17-1". 1 18'
53'
.27.2
Proposed Structure Type
Size (lengthxMdth out -out)
Bridge
70'x 36'
Stream USACE Impacts (LF)
Non 404 Impacts (LF )
0
1 0
USACE Impacts (AC)
Wetlands Non 404 Impacts (AC)
CAMA Impacts AC
0
0
N/A
NC DWQ Buffers Impacts (SF)
Zone 1 =268 SF, Zone 2 =730 SF
Total =998 SF
Buffer Application Required > 40R ) (Y/N)
Y
NC DWQ StormWater Permit Required /N
No
Habitat (y /n)
T&E Species Present
Bio Conclusion
No Habitat
N/A
No Effect
Moratorium Type (per WRC)
Dates
No
NIA
Native/Hatchery
Trout Waters Trout Species Present
Trout Conditions YIN
WRC Reviewer
No
No
No
WA
CAMA AECs
No
Essential Fish Habitat 1n
No
Nay. Opening
No
USCG Permit
No
Historic Properties
No
Archaeological Resources
No
Tribal Lands
No
Resources
No
6 WC F1 Resources
No
Wild and Scenic River
No
Forest Service Lands
No
TVA Area
No
FEMA Buyout
No
FEMA Flood Study
No
USTs Haz Mats
No
Relocatees
No
Location LAT
LONG
35.6438611
- 77.3456944
No Tar River spinymussell
survey required for this project
Project Comments
Completed
o
Leal Engineer, bate
Division Environmental Officer, Date
NOTE: BE -Bald Eagle, WIM -West Indian Manatee,
TRSM -Tar River Spinymussel
10/2/2013

® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
Gordon Myers, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Maria Rogerson, P.E.
Division Bridge Program Manager, NCDOT
FROM: Travis Wilson, Highway Project Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: August 17, 2012
SUBJECT: Division 2 Bridge Replacements
Biologists with the N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) have reviewed the
information provided and have the following preliminary comments on the subject project. Our
comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act
(42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(c)) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16
U.S.C. 661- 667d).
Our standard recommendations for bridge replacement projects of this scope are as
follows:
1. We generally prefer spanning structures. Spanning structures usually do not require
work within the stream and do not require stream channel realignment. The horizontal
and vertical clearances provided by bridges allows for human and wildlife passage
beneath the structure, does not block fish passage, and does not block navigation by
canoeists and boaters.
2. Bridge deck drains should not discharge directly into the stream.
3. Live concrete should not be allowed to contact the water in or entering into the stream.
4. If possible, bridge supports (bents) should not be placed in the stream.
5. If temporary access roads or detours are constructed, they should be removed back to
original ground elevations immediately upon the completion of the project. Disturbed
areas should be seeded or mulched to stabilize the soil and native tree species should
be planted with a spacing of not more than 10'x10'. If possible, when using temporary
Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699 -1721
Telephone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]

Bridge Memo Page 2 August 17, 2012
structures the area should be cleared but not grubbed. Clearing the area with chain
saws, mowers, bush -hogs, or other mechanized equipment and leaving the stumps and
root mat intact, allows the area to revegetate naturally and minimizes disturbed soil.
6. A clear bank (riprap free) area of at least 10 feet should remain on each side of the
steam underneath the bridge.
7. In trout waters, the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission reviews all U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers nationwide and general `404' permits. We have the option of
requesting additional measures to protect trout and trout habitat and we can
recommend that the project require an individual `404' permit.
8. In streams that contain threatened or endangered species, NCDOT biologist Mr.
Logan Williams should be notified. Special measures to protect these sensitive species
may be required. NCDOT should also contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for
information on requirements of the Endangered Species Act as it relates to the project.
9. In streams that are used by anadromous fish, the NCDOT official policy entitled
"Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage (May 12, 1997)" should
be followed.
10. Sedimentation and erosion control measures sufficient to protect aquatic resources
must be implemented prior to any ground disturbing activities. Structures should be
maintained regularly, especially following rainfall events.
11. Temporary or permanent herbaceous vegetation should be planted on all bare soil
within 15 days of ground disturbing activities to provide long -term erosion control.
12. All work in or adjacent to stream waters should be conducted in a dry work area.
Sandbags, rock berms, cofferdams, or other diversion structures should be used where
possible to prevent excavation in flowing water.
13. Heavy equipment should be operated from the bank rather than in stream channels in
order to minimize sedimentation and reduce the likelihood of introducing other
pollutants into streams.
14. Only clean, sediment -free rock should be used as temporary fill (causeways), and
should be removed without excessive disturbance of the natural stream bottom when
construction is completed.
15. During subsurface investigations, equipment should be inspected daily and
maintained to prevent contamination of surface waters from leaking fuels, lubricants,
hydraulic fluids, or other toxic materials.
If corrugated metal pipe arches, reinforced concrete pipes, or concrete box culverts are
used:
1. The culvert must be designed to allow for aquatic life and fish passage. Generally, the
culvert or pipe invert should be buried at least 1 foot below the natural streambed
(measured from the natural thalweg depth). If multiple barrels are required, barrels
other than the base flow barrel(s) should be placed on or near stream bankfull or
floodplain bench elevation (similar to Lyonsfield design). These should be

Bridge Memo Page 3 August 17, 2012
reconnected to floodplain benches as appropriate. This may be accomplished by
utilizing sills on the upstream and downstream ends to restrict or divert flow to the
base flow barrel(s). Silled barrels should be filled with sediment so as not to cause
noxious or mosquito breeding conditions. Sufficient water depth should be provided
in the base flow barrel(s) during low flows to accommodate fish movement. If
culverts are longer than 40 -50 linear feet, alternating or notched baffles should be
installed in a manner that mimics existing stream pattern. This should enhance
aquatic life passage: 1) by depositing sediments in the barrel, 2) by maintaining
channel depth and flow regimes, and 3) by providing resting places for fish and other
aquatic organisms. In essence, base flow barrel(s) should provide a continuum of
water depth and channel width without substantial modifications of velocity.
2. If multiple pipes or cells are used, at least one pipe or box should be designed to
remain dry during normal flows to allow for wildlife passage.
Culverts or pipes should be situated along the existing channel alignment whenever
possible to avoid channel realignment. Widening the stream channel must be avoided.
Stream channel widening at the inlet or outlet end of structures typically decreases
water velocity causing sediment deposition that requires increased maintenance and
disrupts aquatic life passage.
4. Riprap should not be placed in the active thalweg channel or placed in the streambed
in a manner that precludes aquatic life passage. Bioengineering boulders or structures
should be professionally designed, sized, and installed.
In most cases, we prefer the replacement of the existing structure at the same location
with road closure. If road closure is not feasible, a temporary detour should be designed and
located to avoid wetland impacts, minimize the need for clearing and to avoid destabilizing
stream banks. If the structure will be on a new alignment, the old structure should be removed
and the approach fills removed from the 100 -year floodplain. Approach fills should be removed
down to the natural ground elevation. The area should be stabilized with grass and planted with
native tree species. If the area reclaimed was previously wetlands, NCDOT should restore the
area to wetlands. If successful, the site may be utilized as mitigation for the subject project or
other projects in the watershed.
Project specific comments:
• Beaufort County Bridge No. 297 over Broad Creek on SR 1520: We recommend
replacing this bridge with a bridge. Standard recommendations apply.
• Beaufort County Bridge No. 316 over Unnamed Canal on SR 1627: We recommend
replacing this bridge with a bridge. Standard recommendations apply.
• Greene County Bridge No. 8 over Sandy Run on SR 1301: We recommend replacing this
bridge with a bridge. Standard recommendations apply.
• Greene County Bridge No. 9 over Sandy Run on SR 1324: We recommend replacing this
bridge with a bridge. Standard recommendations apply.

Bridge Memo Page 4 August 17, 2012
• Greene County Bridge No. 93 over Beaman Run on SR 1240: We recommend replacing
this bridge with a bridge. Standard recommendations apply.
• Pitt County Bridge No. 142 over Cross Swamp on SR 1777: We recommend replacing
this bridge with a bridge. Standard recommendations apply.
• Pitt County Bridge No. 69 over Cross Swamp on SR 1139: We recommend replacing this
bridge with a bridge. Standard recommendations apply.
• Pitt County Bridge No. 43 lover Cross Swamp on SR 1591: We recommend replacing
this bridge with a bridge. Standard recommendations apply.
• Pitt County Bridge No. 415 over Cross Swamp on SR 1108: We recommend replacing this
bridge with a bridge. Standard recommendations apply.
• Pitt County Bridge No. 20 over Cross Swamp on SR 1941: We recommend replacing this
bridge with a bridge. Standard recommendations apply. '
• Lenoir County Bridge No. 142 over Bearwell Branch on SR 1922: We recommend replacing
this bridge with a bridge. Standard recommendations apply.
If you need further assistance or information on NCWRC concerns regarding bridge
replacements, please contact me at (919) 528 -9886. Thank you for the opportunity to review and
comment on this project.

Project Racking No.: 12-11-0012
12 -11 -0012
NO NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES
p,`.. ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES _
PRESENT OR AFFECTED FORM io
This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this project. It is not
oa �� Y P p J � �..:..
>�: 0 valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You must consult separately with they
Historic Architecture and Landscapes Group.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Pmed No: BD -5102W County: Pitt
WBS No: 45348.L23 Domment.• ?
F.A. No. na Funding. ® State ❑ Federal
Federal Permit Required? ®Yes ❑ No Permit Type: NWP 3
Pm
jectDesc*dax.• NCDOT Division 2 intends to replace Bridge No. 431 on SR 1591, Industrial
Boulevard, over Parker Creek The project will remove the existing 53 -foot long by 29.4 -foot wide timber
structure and replace it with a concrete cored slab bridge, presumable at the same location and same
alignment. The proposed project will be 500 feet (slightly over 152 meters) with a 60 -foot (nearly 18.3 - meter)
wide ROW. Thus, the proposed Area of Potential Effects (APE) is estimated at nearly.7 acres (almost .3
hectares). During construction, traffic will be maintained on local roads.
SUMMARY OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL FINDINGS
The North Camisn ,0epattment ofTh"sporta,, on /NCDOV Aszrhaeology, C-mop teze;medthe
s u hje c t pmje c t an d de to t m is e d
® There are no National Register listed ARC[IAEOLOGICAL SITES within the project's area
of potential effects.
® No subsurface archaeological investigations are required for this project.
❑ Subsurface investigations did not reveal the presence of any archaeological resources.
❑ Subsurface investigations did not reveal the presence of any archaeological resources considered
eligible for the National Register.
® All identified archaeological sites located within the APE have been considered and all
compliance for archaeological resources with Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act and GS 121 -12(a) has been completed for this project.
❑ There are'no National Register Eligible or Listed ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES present or affected
by this project. (Attach any notes or documents ar neede4
NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED
form for Minor 7Mnsportation Projects as Qrmlii ted in the 20117 Programmatic Agreement.
I of 6

Project Dvcking No.: 12-11-0012
Briefdescrrpdron ofmrewactri es, Irsvlts ofrereeQV, andco>sclussons:
As noted on the Survey Required Form the review of maps and site files at the North Carolina Office of State
Archaeology revealed no archaeological sites within the project APE, but revealed more than a dozen
archaeological sites in similar settings nearby. The examination of the Pitt County soil survey maps also
suggested that the project area retained characteristics often found at other sites. At the same time, much of
the project area was seem to have been developed and to have undergone potentially significant landscape
changes. Therefore, an archaeological reconnaissance to determine the necessity and scope of further
archaeological investigations was recommended.
On April 22, 2013 N ®OT archaeologists Brian Overton and Shane Petersen conducted an archaeological
reconnaissance of the APE. As expect several areas, particularly the portion of the APE southeast of the
bridge, had been significantly altered by commercial development. It quickly became apparent that much of
the proposed APE fell within very broad ditch -lines and easement slopes adjacent SR 1591. While
archaeological deposits may retain integrity on the alluvial terraces along Parker Creek, it was clear that it
would be very unlikely that any archaeological resources remained intact within the proposed APE.
No further archaeological investigations are recommended for the replacement of Bridge No. 431 as
proposed. Should the project change further investigation may be necessary. The project as described should
be considered to be compliant with Section 106 and NOGS 121 -12a.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: ® Map(s) ❑ Previous SurveyInfo
Signed:
❑ Other:
0
NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST II
® Photos ❑Correspondence
os -oi -13
Date
NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED
form for Minor Transportation Projects as Otafi led in the 1007 Programmatic Agreement.
2of6

Project Tracking No. (Internal Use)
12 -11 -0012
HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPES
NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM
This form only pertains to Historic Architecture and Landscapes for this project. It
is not valid for Archaeological Resources. You must consult separately with the
Archaeology Group.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No:
BD -5102W
County:
Pitt
WBS No.:
45348.1.23
Document
Type:
Fed. Aid No:
Funding:
X State ❑ Federal
Federal
Permit(s):
X Yes ❑ No
I
Permit
I T e s
NWP 3
Proiect Description: Replace Bridge No. 431 on SR 1591 (Industrial Boulevard) over Parker Creek (off -
site detour planned; no easements or ROW acquisition).
SUMMARY OF HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPES REVIEW
DESCRIPTION OF REVIEWACTIVITIES, RESULTS, AND CONCLUSIONS: HPOWeb reviewed on 27 November
2012 and yielded no NR, SL, LD, DE, or SS properties in the Area of Potential Effects (APE). Pitt County
current GIS mapping, aerial photography, and tax information indicated an APE of cultivated fields and
commercial /industrial development with resources dating to the final three decades of the twentieth
century (viewed 10 December 2012). Constructed in 1975, Bridge No. 431 is neither included in the
NCDOT Historic Bridge Survey, nor representative of any distinctive engineering or aesthetic type. Google
Maps "Street View" confirmed absence of critical historic structures /landscapes in APE (viewed 10
December 2011).
No architectural survey is required for the project as currently defined.
WHY THE AVAILABLE INFORMATION PROVIDES A RELJABLE BASIS FOR REASONABLY PREDICTING THAT
THERE ARE NO UNIDENTIFIED SIGNIFICANT HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL OR LANDSCAPE RESOURCES IN
THEPROJECTAREA: APE extends 600 feet from each end of the existing bridge (W -E) and 100 feet to
either side of the existing SR 1591 (Industrial Boulevard) center line (N -S) to encompass proposed
construction. The county architectural survey and related publication include no properties in the APE
(Scott Power, fie HlstoncArrhitedure of Pitt County, North Carolina, Greenville: Pitt County Historical Society, 1991). County
GIS /tax materials and other visuals support the absence of significant architectural resources. No
National Register - listed properties are located within the APE or along the proposed off -site detour route.
Should any design elements of the project change, please notify NCDOT Historic Architecture
as additional review may be necessary.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
X Map(s) ❑Previous Survey Info. ❑Photos ❑Correspondence ❑Design Plans
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIAN
Architecture and Landscapes -- NO SURVEY REQUIRED
NCDOT Architectural Historian
Date
Historic Architecture and landscapes NO SURVF_Y REQUIRED form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2W7 Programmatic Agreement.

E
cu
N cn
(D
Zino
0) a) (n
0 LE
-_ CE
0
E
w C)
0) a) a)
Lu
m m
co a- E
- E
w 0
U-
Q�
E CL .1
(u
D
U)
a) U) OL
E
F
EE CL
o
ci
E
(n
cu
'0
a) o) -o
,Z
N C:
L)
J—
cn
-W
0
<
CL
0 '0
>
x
w
E Co
Fa)
o
(n
a) _0
C:
C
LO
C,
co
tm
CO
0
04
w
T
0
2
(D
r tj
N LL
F-

I�I�I�IYI
�I�II�II�I
��i�i�i
��II�II.
�I
�
..
1�II�I
�����
�'

Z
O
�a
w
O 3:
C7
LL
(L 2
0
O
U'
z
c',
X04
m
M
=
2 LL
H
O
N
H O
V
Z
N
LL Z
O O
Z) LO
O
00
F Fn
O
iw
=
W =
~
� D
a
O
z
CG
G
N
Q
a
w
LL
L
W
Z
Z
N
Z
O
O
U)
O
'A
V/
Q
®
Q
LL
J
W m
z'
o
0
O
co
Z O
O C
O
F�
F O
o
cn
+
o
J
O
J
z
Q
w
~
�
O

z
b
U
d
O
Q,
M
a
Per
cn
O
.�i
u
^�H
a
L.
M
z
BFI
O
a
0
0
a
I
w
ti
Q
O�
w�
�o
U
w S
y M
V
U
tY� O
tO �
3 0
3`
w�
w�
S_
l
ze
o�
a
0

Project Tracking No.: 12-11-0012
Driveway and parking lot southeast of Bridge No. 431 over Parker Creek (facing southeast).
Bridge No. 431 over Parker Creek on SR 1591, Industrial Boulevard (facing west).
"NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFF.CTF.D
form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
446

Project Tracking No.:12 -I1 -0012
Right -of -way southwest of Bridge No. 431 (facing west).
Driveway and utility easement northwest of Bridge No. 431 (facing northwest).
"NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTFI)
form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in rite 1007 Programpnallc Agreement.
5 of 6

Project Tracking No.: 12-11-0012
Bridge No. 431 over Parker Leek on SR 1591, Industrial Boulevard (facing east).
"NO NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRESENT OR AFFECTED
form for Minor Transportation Projects as Qualified in the 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
6of6

Pitt 431
PITT 431
SR 1591 (INDUSTRIAL BLVD)
OVER PARKER CREEK
GREENVILLE NE USGS QUAD MAP
AND SHEET 34 OF THE SOIL SURVEY
OF PITT COUNTY
FIRM PANEL 4688
MAP NUMBER 3720468800)
LOWER TAR 03020103
TAR(PAMLICO RIVER BASIN
WBS ELEMENT NUMBER 45348.1.23
SEPTEMBER 18, 2012
PITT 431
N 693546.7787'
k ° " "''f - - E 2491507.944
8 Y'R N 35 -38-40
R�4 I W 77 -20-44 -
• N 35.644375
W 77.345591
1529 -
_ �I: ,._• I �.rr _
.. .err-. '��' r1� +I►.'' 1 - (j •••�. _, — .. -�.. --
r
cr.. i •� - I� �` � � r� r " _ \ `' "z ,� 1605
1 SR }
, ,;'y y:+'° tii i :.- h , ,.r. '. '�O; 'Ti'�F..'..' .—. _ _ — �_ C •t�1 t. 1 •�: -..v. -t -1h, "
�` r � � •S,iafiJ.l;vT; •.v'�. �`,.� •- I, y�.� :� r .� � � • is
8i � —� r ,- _�i, •I'r r..
1•7 !t` �.•.. i= ._� ,� a-� nt:! — ;•F ,IY► 'r.l '•rUtY':- __ I' 'g�dw�.w� ..��'Swa'"t 1:
�: •`•,. \ .� 141-' • ` ,- ! i { ! !rjA-`''; •., ti� t - II•II f �•
� q.• Nom,. / t �r , . ' !•'•�'�. I. J, �.�i
—, — �I 1 _ tM _ � ,�A i. t � -:::'� :i t' r lr t ( ` t '•• --•• -� -�• _,"„eF, • * �
S
3,000 1,500 0 3,000 Feet

Pitt 431 PITT 431
SR 1591 (INDUSTRIAL BLVD)
OVER PARKER CREEK
GREENVILLE NE USGS QUAD MAP
AND SHEET 34 OF THE SOIL SURVEY
OF PITT COUNTY
FIRM PANEL 4688
MAP NUMBER 3720468800)
LOWER TAR 03020103
TAR/PAMLICO RIVER BASIN
WBS ELEMENT NUMBER 45348.1.23
SEPTEMBER 18, 2012
\ 4 9
3
ry
y�
C
PITT 431
N 693546.7787
^`r
y
_
E 2491507.944
SRS
9
cv N 35 -38-40
W 77 -20-44
N 35.644375
y n W 77.345591
i "
NC33 SR�519
N
/ ^h
SR1591 SR1605 yam/
tea,
O�
©1
A (�
y SR` C33 1581
78
3,000 1,500 0 3,000 Feet
se.
SR1529
US264
SRI 537 1

Pitt 431 PITT 431
SR 1591 (INDUSTRIAL BLVD)
OVER PARKER CREEK
GREENVILLE NE USGS QUAD MAP
AND SHEET 34 OF THE SOIL SURVEY
OF PITT COUNTY
f
FIRM PANEL 4688
MAP NUMBER 3720468800)
LOWER TAR 03020103
TAR/PAMLICO RIVER BASIN
�. WBS ELEMENT NUMBER 45348.1.23
SEPTEMBER 18, 2012
/..ern 'l '� �•"`��{J •� ' %, .
.a
PITT 431
- �' � `- '�� ;,.T.:.M� . �„�r. •�.�_ N 693546.7787 � .. I
" - E 2491507.944
I4f r� . er N 35 -38-40
48 �► W 77 -20-44
N 35.644375 6
y W 77.345591 r°dR1529-
NC 33
SRJ6p5
\ rr,. "11 '�i "I Y v iJf'• I �ON� ~� �
�GTL•NVl:i -r. t-° I ' - _ — .1 :11537
I`
kb-
SalI
17X nl.
Pei
CA
�� "� a. ±� '�'�i ±-S•: :Irrh� �.i r n_ � - rc _:, c `�Q6 i _- _ ' B�d��sL !`r'Sma+rA.
T4
3,000 1,500 0 3,000 Feet 4 _ _ r �._ ai.,: �' r r _ ��•

My
N
t
� O)
`
..°
O ° N
C .0 N
a
E E
E a) N
Q C
p
p N
O O
m
O
a) N N O_
�o —_ J a) O
'O
E @ O 7 O-
@
N O U N
M
C
O O O C L
W
O
w
N
>
a) N t U O
O) N a)
O O
C,- (O
N
m
m
j
m
O
O
cYj
C': Cn N C
p m L O
a
Q
�
C
_
a� m J F d
1
N
O
N m "O
ai
N
E
o
y
a`)
o
O a)
U a) m
m
6
04
E
7
C
U
a7
3
U -Op m f0
y N N
\
N
p
U m C
O
7
U)
U
x
N
N m
U n C .0 N
(L
O)
W
N
p m o N O cu
C6
co
Q
N
C p 0 2-
�° o
°
a
o c c 0),b
m
(p
y )-
,-
E
O
m
-
L
O) N m C
O N a) p M
04
0.
aS
p N
9
L
o
LL UO
Z
N
7p
N
m
20 .0, a) a) m
0) T o a
t
Z
.x
y t
v
�c
�
ca
_7
C
m
w Q)
P
LO
O
-p
p m fn
a
E
H
Z
C) a)
m
O
O)
ao
a)
>
N w m .0
m L` N
U=
co Of
O
m
p
N
O_
N
d-
N
CL
Z
a) o
CL
CY
L
E
w
Z
N
N
V d c4 N O
a)
v
d
°
Z
N
c°
W
Q) 0)
Q
p)
m U
O
m
O
N
OD C a) O
-
U
o O p n
r
E
7 0
U °°
Q
0N)
Cl.
_�
.>
_ m
�� >rn1o�
a Ram
Z'
u
C
N
C
o m (.m
OF
Cm
F
C
aa)
CL 2 Ix
O a
O
a)
-
«
X U
m Z a3 )
w
N
d O
C
O
O
UZ
z
o
W,, c
m
c
; Z
m
ON
ai E
Lo
o,
m
C E Q Q
m
m
o
D
c v_ a) N m °
ma
m
o� C
W
0
°N
73
c> 3-'
m
Q
C
�m
Ev) m
Q Z
d
a
'D
O
0).0 U
C = J
4)
m
m
m
N
N
"O N m N N
O _m O
m 2
C9
J
m
.c
m O c a) N
U
u
U O
m
C
y
O
Y N N Q
C m N C y
L
C
-p
O
O
M
7 p (6 N
o
°
Uo p> E
z
O
L
oom
t o o
El
OL
fn
CL
o
0
f1
r
a
y
O`
0.
(u
c m Y N
=
E
m
c n
m o o
E N >
`°
_
L
_° _a
N C L
U Q O a a O
N
m
>
w
m
o
O
.3
N N
m_ C a) c
N N '� N t7., om)
c
rMi
rn
m >
c° `o
-m Q3
CD o
O
u2
.>
U
Z tp
>O
C
N
Q)
Lm c`6i
' N L d
U
.... CO
C
C
O
>>
N
�=
N
C,
o
-p
y
O
Z
z
o
m
a 0)
o
o
O
U
C
Y
m
O
"O
7
.0 N C7) C
C
Lo Z
N
U
a)
O
L O
—
p 0>
>
N
O
O
p N
U x>
O
M
C
N>
._
E
U
m
E
E
N o
C
.N
a) L L
0 Q) L m
in
CO
d m
r
d
Y
d
°)
a)
d '_ o
CD
�'�)
N
°
aci
a`
��c
ti°
m E E m
m
m
u
o0
C, U`
N
U
m
H
m
a_
o
m
H
N m
L`�°oo3
H .2 .� w �:. N
N
N
C
a
0
C
0
m
O
Z
E
W
U
..
C
O
M
QD
w
)
a
v
_
n
N
O
;n
..
N
N
1a
o
O
m
U)
t
y
c°v
O
d
U
w
aNi
m
a
j?
- m
cm
C
A
d
W
C
=
C
O
0
aa))
m
m
Z
m
o
Z
..
>
'y
U
E
C
t
=
y
H
v
3 Of
-
o
N
�;
mid
.
N
o
>
a)
0
o
y
0
m
m
�,
v
`m
00
0
L_m)
�
m
>
a
o
U
..
>
E
v
r
r>
>
o
o
n
a`
Z
U
W
a`
z
O
mIMI
I a`
a`
F
Q
C7

' ®\
)
!
0may
y
qq
z
z
.
%
CL
/�
)
z
m
z
w
cn
�
%2
-
L)
CL FL
>,
2
f
f E
@
]Iz
z
E
4, $
\
j/U)
/
e@
c
©k
o)z
z
G
6
§
Eo
6
\ §r
(
�k
/0
E
§ \zm
E
$
E
§ o
m
C
§
CL
0 m
E
k} k
co
E
{
k
2 7
§
a
\\
k
£f�0
L)
a
2
\k
•
°
CL ■ W
w
. >
0)
0
z
-
2
2
° » ® a
«z
2
f
6
'
�
)k§�
0
z
$§
§�
z
a
0
\�
\f
§
-
-
\
0
]«\
0
)
\�
a-
0 \
Q
I
/ E
B
- f
k)
)
f /
&
%
m
( -
®
)�/
) \\
22
4
L
E
f
/
\ w
CO
2
¥ _
}
\
\\
0
,
{0
§G$(r
X02
§
\0
'�
\E()t)
)§
ƒ)))a
E. L
C13 CD
Q
\
\J¥
®
f

5
O 4/ N
2
d
h
�U=
Z
ME
—
O N
C
C-
C U
O m
-
O
a)
N
C
m
m
a f!
'0
C C
2.2
E
m -o
C
7 Ca
d
a)
C
N .-
d
N O.
m
O
�
O
C �
O
N
A
c �
N N
u U
M
U
m 3
(d
C L
O U
U L
�
U 3
R
C
C
O
w
U
Q
N 0
V d
o
o
N
na
o
v
M
o
m
-Fu
c
C
y ,O
J
x0
N •O
L
O m
t
00
N
O
co
t C
~
C '
m
w
a J
a)
N
_
16
r Z
U
E
o ¢
CL E
r
c 3
_j
U) `v n. �
rn
g
m OIF U
O Z W
C
C N
C
y`
C
Y
W
o m
a
d
E
00
0
0
o
O
o
0
0
0
o
O
o
0
0
o
O
o
0
o
O
E
E
o
W
C (7 Y
N
E
O E
E
O
vmi
U m
d) a Q
N
U
V T
L' ¢ O
Q
3
w d
N
m
O Q
0 >+W a
N
a
o u
m F- w
c
a>
0
C0 E
•0
7 2
3 a z
m m �
00
F-
¢°
N
O Cf J
0
m a@
`
O
m 0
U =�L
O
U N
may
O
Z 3
co
O ca
m a>
O
Z
a
O
c
m
C 3
U
� co
-
N C
77
V
U
m
C m
N
d
m
N O
O
y
C
N
d
CL
O
j
O
3
co
m
w
m o
a� axi
mL
3
o
c
w_
E
O
LL
o
a) m
cu
3
v
0) c
- m
m 2
m
N
O
Q)
U
m
E
m
7
a) 'C
E�
Eo
N
O)
E C
C_
N
O
p
co •y
Oo
O
E N
a) a
N QN
N
Q
ami
co (� co
N
ca 2
3 aI
CD
= Q
N
N
N C
m
_
• •
~
O
O
O
O
O
m
»
0
Z
O
Z
a)
»
y Env
❑
�,
SCj z
1-
co
'
o U
QI
}
r
b0 o
IL
a0i o
0
ui
w
_
»
r z
Z
co

0
z
U
m
c
m
w
U
T
S
7
0
N
C �
T U
3 D
t m
rn o
U
_ C
al �
D �
-
� c
(D O
YN
0
N �
� 0
ai
D
v m
U
D Q
c n
�o ca
✓J N
� m
om
U 00
z N
- T
o
o
o "
N h
co
L N
C
a1
� U
� D
c c
o as
N N
U1 C
>
X
.O U
0 0
o N
F-
N O
2 p
� a
U N
a-
2)
N
E c
a
0w
c O
M c
N
N
N O
CD U
H
O a
U �
Z =
o
o
w
d�
� r
bGM • �f�
�
; �
�
Ei
m W
E
0 fp
0
c
O
CY V
O
y
c
O�
p U
v
U c
Z
7 y
N
al
C
V
� N
0 D
c c
in
p L
d
N
6 E
?0
x
0 o
a
n c
0 0
° c
m
N C
_m
— Q
.
c
o
°
°
d a)
Z
°
a g
u
n
(D
IL
a
O Z'
@ >
c 0
d
C
a k a
W
c
E
W
mQ a
U
U
N Z
O
aci
E ; Z O
'°
co
v
t Q Q
H
Fu
m
O m
o
m fA 2 .0
o
0 > W a
Q
U
v
A f- w
c; Q z
�
o
CM "
o
Z
o
Q
ci
w d
= O
ym
C v�
LL
U O
�
0
L H
h
a
c
O
O
Z
m
c .�
�
y N
>
CL
m
Q
tll
r
y c
M @
a)
m
U
m
—
C
'Q—i
E
�
O
U
V
�
c
Q) _
N
-0
io
a
o
d
E N
y a)
O
D 1
y_ CL
E
>
>
T ~
a
¢
c v
0 U
O
w
>
m w
m
= _
N
N
C
O
0
m
+
0
z
i+
N
v
M
� J
❑
A
a
�o
>
•
a
aoi o
❑
T d
Z
fL
0
z
U
m
c
m
w
U
T
S
7
0
N
C �
T U
3 D
t m
rn o
U
_ C
al �
D �
-
� c
(D O
YN
0
N �
� 0
ai
D
v m
U
D Q
c n
�o ca
✓J N
� m
om
U 00
z N
- T
o
o
o "
N h
co
L N
C
a1
� U
� D
c c
o as
N N
U1 C
>
X
.O U
0 0
o N
F-
N O
2 p
� a
U N
a-
2)
N
E c
a
0w
c O
M c
N
N
N O
CD U
H
O a
U �
Z =
o
o
w
d�
� r

�UV9 Uis
$BxbF�
Fn�IF�
a�
i
�^
w
1t 1-
at
a
O
Z
T
S
Z
s
2
.g
�ID4 ®�AIS
� S m
cZ+ �
m a
t t O
1y Y yy •__ U -_ li u � �
£ b t _ �O Owi• ^• O OV+•+ WOE
n ii C + N
Z 00. 0 NW4.. Q m OO ` O -co
OW
W A V N °W F v NOW D_O
its
LO
.. ............................... I K ✓�
P I ? p Z
in .666 S C . A=
'1 :M
g p g i2
s
is .1 :k�iNi R
Stream.. �MKE115C.G EK....S�'uc.
Inv. No...A .441..1.0. No. ..4Q -Ak( W. Project No.....11,l11Aii ... ?OF F114 -74. W1.7MI 510Y.Wyy7, ►/r A4 .�. ....
s 0
0
� N
O � O
� = O
pBD-
o a
s 9
;a all
OO
J °
K Y O ii
N
m .
O >
>
O
WO � W
•1 .� �
g � :S � i�ie
+
� U O T N
O a6
N O
�
aE Z
O OU O
N O
RH
U.
.Y
Z
Z
1
.
i
�^
w
1t 1-
at
a
O
Z
T
S
Z
s
2
.g
�ID4 ®�AIS
� S m
cZ+ �
m a
t t O
1y Y yy •__ U -_ li u � �
£ b t _ �O Owi• ^• O OV+•+ WOE
n ii C + N
Z 00. 0 NW4.. Q m OO ` O -co
OW
W A V N °W F v NOW D_O
its
LO
.. ............................... I K ✓�
P I ? p Z
in .666 S C . A=
'1 :M
g p g i2
s
is .1 :k�iNi R
Stream.. �MKE115C.G EK....S�'uc.
Inv. No...A .441..1.0. No. ..4Q -Ak( W. Project No.....11,l11Aii ... ?OF F114 -74. W1.7MI 510Y.Wyy7, ►/r A4 .�. ....
s 0
0
� N
O � O
� = O
pBD-
o a
OO
J °
K Y O ii
N
m .
O >
>
O
WO � W
W
O „
U
+
� U O T N
O a6
N O
�
aE Z
O OU O
N O
RH
U.
.Y
vv
j
11 11111„
ti
�j :� :y
QA-
G4W
ON�OQp�.�
O JU �I N.00�j
a
W>3.
�a4 °
`r 5
E
I
++
N
0
O
I
I
O
N-r
N}
m
O �wr1 W5
>sNWS 2
0
W O X
W m W
a
oa
WP
v�
LL: a
I
S
OF
7t°
�wO �
o_
I_
Z0
V
w
J
LL-
Q titi
oP
P!,
I°
r r
iV
0
� N
O � O
� = O
o a
OO
J °
K Y O ii
N
m .
O >
>
O
WO � W
W
O „
U
+
� U O T N
O a6
N O
�
aE Z
O OU O
N O
w
J
LL-
Q titi
oP
P!,
I°
iV
OO
J °
J ; W
°
O >
>
O
WO � W
W
m V
¢
V? m
m
0ti'� QI
^^J
4..L