The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20131054 Ver 1_Application_20131001��o-��d w'aw+. � `�.�. � .��. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPAR'I`MENT �F TRANSPORTAT�ON P�T MCC�tORv G6VERI�IOR September I9, 2013 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington Regulatory Field Office 69 Darlington A�enue Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 ANTHONY J. TATrI SECRETARY ATTENTION: Mr. Brad Shaver NCDOT Coordinator SUB,�ECT: Nationwide I4 Permit Application %r Secondary Road Inaprovement on SR I938 (Quaker Bridge Road), Onslo�v County. WBS#: 3C.D67078 (DWQ PermiE Fee: $240} Dear Mr. Shaver: Please find enclosed a PCN appiication fiom the Nortl� Carolina Department of Transporta#ion (NCDO'i) for a Nationwide 14 permit for the secondary road improvement groject on SR 1938 (Qua[cer Bridge Road} in Onslow County. The scope of the project will be to widen, grade, drain, and base the 030 mile of existin� unpaved road to current NCDOT secondary road standards tn irnpro�e the road�vay safety and stabali#y. These standards include 20 feet of travel lanes and 5 feet af grassed shnulders on both sides within 60 feet of rigf�t of way. An aciion ID was assigned (2011 00404) after a iield review in February 2011. Wetland data forn►s and maps are attached for the final JD. The water body at this location is Margaret Branch {C NSW}. We wi[l lay Pipe A(Sta. 56+57) f7at with inverts of 92.5. We wiIl also lay Pipe B(Sta. SS-�80) flat, matching the existing elevation at the in3et, 95.9. This is approximately 1.2' below the existing elevation at the outtet. We do not believe burying the pipe here will affect the drainage pattem. The outlet is located at th� very edge of the wetland and naturally drains away from the road. There will be temporary impacts from excavation at the inlet and outlet of both pipes far zns#allation. This area is off of the right of way and will be restored back to exisiing grade elevatian. We were unable to obtain any easements for the surrounding property. 'T"etnporary rrr�pacts for dewatering activities wil[ occur at Pipe A and extend 10 feet from the inlet and outlet of the pipe. The stream at Pipe A is considered to be a perennial stream. We will be parmanently filling approximateIy 20 linear feet of st�eam. Will there be any type of mitigatian for this impact? By capy of this letter and enclosures, NCDOT is also requesting issuance of 401 Water Qualiry Cer�iiication {WQC) #3886 from the Division of Water Resources (DWR). A method of debiting $240 to proc�ss the WQG permit request has been pravided as noted in ihe subjecc [ine of this application. Tf you have any questions or need any additiona] inFormation, please contact me at (910) ;41-2000. Enclosures Cc: {withaut wetland forms} Mason Herndon, DWR Sonia Carrillo, DWR 5incerely, Celia Foushee Engineering Technician , -.: >: :.,�:- >'. `Q�Q� W AT�RQG -� � � � � o -c OfFice Us� Only: Corps action ID no. DWQ project no. Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2D08 Pre�-Construction Notification PC Form A. A licant Informatian 9. Processing 1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: � Seetion 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit 1b. Specify �fationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number: 'f c. Nas ihe NWP ar GP number been �erified by the Corps? � Y�s ❑ No 1d. Type{s) of appro�a[ sought from the DWQ (cE�eck all tF�at apply): � 409 Water Quality Certificat[an — Regular � ❑ Non-404 .�urisdictianal General permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certifcation —�xpress ❑ Riparian BufFer Authorization 1 e. Is this no#if[cation solely for the record For the record only far DWQ 40� For the r�cord only for Corps PerrrEit: because written apprava[ is not required? C�rtification: ❑ Y�s � Na ❑ Yes � i�o 1f. Is payment into a rnitigation bank or in-lieu fee progrem proposeci for mitigation � yes ❑ No of impacts? If sp, attach the acceptance [etter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program. 1g. Is the project located in any of NCs fwenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h � Yes ❑ No below. 1 h. ls the project [ocated within a NC DCM Area of En�ironmenial Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes � No 2. Project Infarmation 2a. Name of projact: SR 1938 Q�aker Bridge Road 2b. County: Onlsow 2c. Nearest municipality 1 town: Richfands 2d. Subdivision name: NIA 2e. NC�OT only, T.I.P. ar state 3C.067078 projecf no: 3. Owner lnforma�ion 3a. Name{s) an Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation 3b. Deed Book and Page No. NIA 3c. Res ponsible Party (for LLC if ��A applicable}: 3d. Street acidress: NIA 3e. City, state, zip: NlA 3f. 7elephone no.: NIA 3g. Fax no.: N!A 3h. �mail address: NIA Page I of 11 F'CN Form — Version 1.3 C7ecember 1�, 2008 Version 4. Applicant 6nformation (if differeni from owner) 4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent � Other, speciiy; 4b. Na�ne: Karen E. Fussell, P.E. 4c. Busines s name North Caro[ina Department of Transpartation (if applicab[e): 4d. Str�et address: 55D1 Barbados Bl�d 4e. City, state, zip: Castle Hayn�, NC 28423 4f. Te[e�hone no.: 910.341.2pp4 4g. Fax no.: 910.675.0143 4h. Email address: iVIA 5. AgentlConsultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: Cefia �oushee Sb. Business name �[p�h Caro[ina Depariment of Transportation (if applicable): 5c. 5treet acidress: 55D1 Barbados Bl�d 5d. City, siate, zip: Castle Hayne, NC 28429 5e. Telephone no.: 910.341.2D48 5f. Fax no.: 910.675.0143 5g. Email address: cbfoushee@ncdo#.gov Page 2 of 91 PCN �orm — Version 1.3 December 10, 2C108 Version B. Praject Information and Prior Project Hisfory 1. Property Identification 1 a. Property identification no. (tax P1N or parcel ID}: NIA 1 b. Site coordir�ates (in decimal degrees): Latitude:34.882798 Longitude: - 77.485413 (DD.QD�Q�Q) (-DD.L7�DDDD) 1c. Prop erty size: 2.18 acres 2. SurFace Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Margaret Branch proposed praject: 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest recei�ing water: C NSW 2c. River basin: White Oak 3. Projeci Description 3a, Describe the existing canditions on the site and the general land use in tE�e �icinity of the project at the time of this application: The site is currently an unpa�ed soif and rock secondary road. tand use in the vicinity inclUdes residential areas, fores�ed, agricultur�, and a mineral mir�e. 3b. �ist the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.0$7 acres 3c. List the total estimated linear feet af all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the praper�y: 33' 3d. Explain the purpose of the pro�ased praject: To impro�e the existing roadway by �ringing it up to NCDOT standards ia include �a�ing to pro�ide a 6etter and safer roadway. 3e. Describe the o�erall project in detail, including the type of equipment fo be used: This project will widen, grade, drain, add base, pave and stabilize the existir�g road ta NCDOT secandary road standards to 20 feet of travel lanes and 5 feet of grassed shouEders using standard road construciion equipment inc[uding a motor grader, exca�ators, and dump trucks. �.ater ditches or swale section will have a 2:1 �egetated slopes andlor 3:1 slopes where possible. �4. Jurisdictional f]eterminations �4a. Have j�riscfictional wetland or siream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained far this praperiy 1 � Yes ❑ No ❑ lJnknown project (including all prior phas�s) in th� past? Comments: Field �isit: February 2011 4b. If the Corps made the jUrisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? ❑ Preliminary � FinaE 4c. ]f yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? AgencylConsultant Company: Environmental Services, Inc. Name (if known): Robert Turnbull Other: �ld. If y�s, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State deterrninations and attach documentation. Assigned action 1D 2D1'f0a4�4; See atfiached wetland data sheets far issuance of final JD. 5. Project FEistory Sa. Have permifs or certifcations been requested or obtained for � Yes ❑ No � Unknown this project (including all prior phases) in #he past? 5b. ]f yes, explain in detaii according to "E�elp fil�" instructians. Page 3 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes � No 6b. If yes, explain. Page 4 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version C. Proposed Impacts Inventory '[. lmpacts 5ummary 'f a. Which sections were completed beiow for your project (check all that apply): � Wetlands � Streams - tributaries ❑ BufF�rs ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland lmpacts 6f there are wetland impacts proposed on the sita, ihen complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact 7ype of jurisdietion number — iype of impact Type of wet[and Forested (Carps - 404, 10 Area of impact Permanent {P) oE (if known) DWQ — nan-404, other} (acres) Tem ora i Ri�erine Swamp � Yes � Corps � WA � P[� T Canstruction �iif O.D8 (�3748ft } Forest ❑ No ❑ DWQ WA ❑ P� T �emporary Riverine Swamp ❑ Yes � Corps z Excavation Forest ❑ No ❑ DWQ �0.01 {�52ft ) Ri�erine 5wamp ❑ Yes � Corps 2 WB � P ❑ T Canstruction Fill �aresi ❑ �a ❑ pWQ <d.09 (�35ft } WB � P�� iemporary Ri�erine Swamp ❑ Yes ❑ Corps �� 4�z� Excavation Forest ❑ No ❑ DWQ Ri�erine Swamp ❑ Yes � Gorps z WC � P � T Construction Fifl <0.01 {�379ff ) �arest ❑ No ❑ DWQ W6 ❑ P � T ❑ Yes ❑ Carps ❑ No ❑ DWQ 2g. Toial wetland impacts (P)0.09(4160ft2} (�")�0.01(96ft ) 2h. Corr�ments: 3. Strearrt [mpacts If there are perennial or intermitt�nt stream impacfs (inclucling temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for ai[ stream sites impac�ed. 3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 39� Stream imPact Type of impact Stream name Perenn9al Type of jurisdiction Average impact number - (P�R) or (Corps - 4a4, 10 stream [ength Permanent {P) ar intermiitent pWQ — non-4D4, �+�dth {linear Temporary (� (1NT)? oiher) {feet) feet) SA1 � P❑ T Constructior� Fill Margaret Branch � p�R � Corps 5-10 1 Q ❑ INT � DWQ SA1 ❑ P� i Dewatering Margaret Branch � P�R � Corps 5-10 � p ❑ [NT � DWQ SA2 � P❑� Construction Fi{I Margaret Branch ��'ER � Carps 5..� 0 10 ❑ IN7 � DWQ SA2 ❑ P� T Dewatering Margaret Branch � PER � Corps 5-10 10 ❑ 1NT � DWQ s� � p � � ❑ P�R ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ 56 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ �'�R ❑ Corps ❑ [Ni ❑ DWQ 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts (P) 20ft {T) 20ft 3i. Corr3rr�ents: Page 5 af 11 PC�I Form — Version 1.3 December 90, 200$ Version 4. Open Water l�pacts 1f there are praposed impacts tn lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, saunds, the Aflantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individual[y list all open wa��r impacts below. 4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e. Open water Name of waterbody impact number-- (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbady type Area of impact (acres) Permanent (P) ar �'em ora T 01 ❑P❑T 02 ❑P[]i 03 ❑P�T 04 ❑P�T Af Total open water impacts 4g. Comments: 5. Pond or Lake Canstruction !f ond or IaEca construction ro osed, then com lete the chart belaw. 5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e. Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) iJpland Pond ID Proposed use or purpose {acres) number of pand �looded Filled Excavated Flooded Fifled Exca�ated F[oorled P'f P2 5�: Total 5g. Corriments: Sh. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres}: 5k. Met�od af canstructian: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ] if projeci will irnpact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart beEow. If yes, then individually fist all buffer impacts be[ow. 6f an im acts re uire miti atian, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this forrn. 6a. ❑ N�use ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other: Project is in wF�ich protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman 6Y�. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. Gg. Buffer impact number— Reasan Buffer Zone � impact Zone 2 impact Permanen� {P) or for Str�am nam� mitigafion (square feat) (square feet} i'em ora im act re uired? B1 ❑P❑i ❑Yes ❑ �Ia B2 ❑ P ❑ 'T ❑ Yes ❑ No B3 ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ No 6h. Total buffer impacts 6i. Comments: Page 6 of 19 PCN Form — Version 1.3 Decernber 90, 2008 Version D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 't. Avoidance and Minirr�ization 1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to a�oid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. NCDOT's original proposal at this site was to install an '[ 8' wide pipe. After discussion we are now incorporating the smaller pipe (9 0 feet wide) to better match the existing channel width and placing an overflow pipe further �p the roadway. The temporary #ribuiary impacts are the minimum necessary ta per�orrr� the dawatering culverf insfallation activities. 1 b. 5pecifically describe measur�s taken to avoid ar minimize the proposed impacts through cons�ruction techniques. Dewaterir�g de�ices and bypass pumping will be utilized. Orange safety fence will be utilized at the wetland and siream bounderies to delineate them as jurisdictional and a�oid further impacts off of the ROW or project �icinity, Sediment and erosion contral BMPs will be utilized throughout this project. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for [mpacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the S#ate 2a. Does th� project require Compensatory Mitigation far � Yes ❑ No impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by {check all that apply): ❑ DWQ � Cor�S ❑ Mitigation bank 2c. If yes, which mitigat ian option wi61 be used for this � Payment to in-lieu fee program project? ❑ Permiftee Responsible Mitigation 3. Comptete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigaiion Bank: 3b. Credits Purchased (aftach receipt and letter) iype: Quantity: 3c. Comments: 4. Complefe if Ma[cing a Payment to In-lieu Fee Prograrr� 4a. AppravaE letter from in-li�u f�e pragram is attached. � Yes 4b. 5tream mitigatian requested: 20 linear feet 4c. lf using stream mitigation, stream temperature: � warm ❑ cool ❑cofd 4d. Btaffer mitigation request�d (DWQ on[y}: square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4g. Coastal (iidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres 4h. Comm�nts: 5. Comp[ete if Using a Perrr�ittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a [f using a permittee responsible miiigation plan, pra�ide a description af the proposed mitigation plan. Fage 7 of 11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 becember 10, 2008 Version 6. Buffer Mitigation (Siate Regufated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by [3WQ 6a. Wifl the proj�ct result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes � Na buffer mitigatio�7 6b. ]f yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian bufFer that requires rnitigatian. Calculate the amount of mitigafion required. 6c. 6d. 6e. Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba} Zone 2 '[ .5 6f. iota{ buffer mitigation required: 6g. 1f buffer mitigation is required, discuss whai type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., paymenf io private mitigation ban[�, permi�tee responsible riparian buffer restora#ion, payment into an appro�ed in-lieu f�e fund). $h. COfil[TlEiltS: Page8of11 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2048 Version E. Stormwater Managettt�nt and Diff�se Ffow Plan (required by C7WQ) 9. Diffuse Flow Plan 1a Does the praject include or is it adjacent to profected riparian bufFers identified � Yes � No within one of the NC Riparian BufFer Protecfion Rules? 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse f[ow plan included? {f no, explain why. ❑ Yes ❑ No Comments: 2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan 2a. What is the overa[[ percent imperviousness of this project? 33% (this is a width of 20' o# pavement in a 60' ROIN) 2b. Daes this praject require a 5tormwater Management Plan? � Yes ❑ No 2c. 1f this project DDES NOT require a Siormwater Management P[an, explain why: 2d. If ihis project DDES require a Storrr�water Management Plan, then provide a brief, narra#ive description of t�e plan: Grass shoulders will provide for infiltration and ditches or swale sections will have 2:1 or 3:1 (where possible) slopes. The lateral ditch or swale sections will ha�e �egetatian established and will be as shallow as practicab[e. ❑ Certified Local Go�ernment 2e. Who will be responsible for the revi�w of the 5tormwater Management Plan? ❑ aWQ Stormwater Program � �WQ 401 Unit 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Re�iew 3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? ❑ Phase II 3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management prograrns ❑ NSW apply (check a[I that appfy}: ❑ USMP ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ Othar: 3c. Has the approveci Stormwater Management Plan with praof of appro�al been ❑ Yes ❑ No atfached? 4. �WQ 5tormwater Pro ram Re�iew ❑ Coastal counties ❑ HQW 4a. Which of the fof[owing state-implemented stormwater management programs apply � p�W (checK all #hat apply): ❑ 5ession Law 2Q06-246 ❑ Other: 4b. Has th� approved Stormwat�r Management Plan with proof of appro�al been attached? NOTE: Tf�e plan is described above, but is being su6mitted for the first � Yes ❑ No time with this application. 5. DWQ 4Q1 Uni# Stormwater Revi�w 5a. Does the Stormwater Manag�ment Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No 5b. Hd�e all af the 401 Lfnit submittal requirements �een met? ❑ Yes ❑ E�o Page 9 of 11 PC�I �arm — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version F. Supplementary Information 1. En�ironmental Documentation �DWQ Requirement) 1a. Does the project involve an expenditure af public (federallstatelloca[} funds or the � Yes ❑ No use of pul�lic (federallstate) land? 1 b. If you answered "yes" #o the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant ta the requir�ments of th� Na�ional or State ❑ Yes � No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPAISEPA)? On[y MCDC Required. 1c. ]f you answere d"yes" to the abo�e, has the documenf review be�n finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the N�PA or SEPA final appro�al letter.) ❑ Yes ❑ No Commer�ts: 2. Vio[ations (DWQ Requiremen�� 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Weiland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .9 300}, DWQ SurFace Water or Wet{and Standards, ❑ Yes � Na or Riparian Buffer Rules ('15A NCAC 2B .0200)? 2�. Is this an aft�r-th�-fact permit app[ication? ❑ Yes (`Zj No 2c. Ef you answered "yes° to one or 6ofh af the abo�e questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requiremen�) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in � Yes � No additional de�elopment, which coufd impact nearby downstream water quality? 3b. If you answered "yes" ta the abo�e, submit a qualitative or quaniifative eumulaiive impact analysis in accordanc� with th� most receni DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. 4. Sewage Dispasal (DWQ Requirement} 4a. C[early detail the ultimate ireatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated fram the proposed project, or a�a9lable capacity of the subject faci[ity, NIA Page 10 of '[ 1 PCN Form — Versian 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 5. �ndangered S�ecies and Designateci Gritical Hahitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � Yes � No habitat? 5b. Have you checked with the USFVVS concerning Endangered Species Act [� Yes � No impacts? ❑ Raleigh 5c. If yes, ind icate the USFWS Fielcf Office you ha�e contacted. ❑ Asheville 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered 5pecies or Designated Critical Habitat? Robert Turnbull, ESi, federally protected species assessment. Alligatarmrssrssippierrsis (American alligafor), 7halictrum cooleyr (Cooley's meadowrue), Carex lutea {Golden sedge), and Lysrmachia asperulaefolia (Rough-leav�d [oosestrife) are listed as federally endangered species with potential habitat present. However, the work at this location wifl not have any efFect on them. 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement} 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essentiaf fsh habitat? ❑ Yes � No 6b. What data sources did you use to datermine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? NOAA Essential Fish Habitat Mapper 7. Historic or Prehistaric Cultura{ Resources (Corps R�quirement) 7a. Wil[ this praject occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments ha�e designated as ha�ing historic ar cultural preservation � Yes � No status (e.g., Nafionai Historic Tr�ast designation or prop�rti�s significant in Norih Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. Whai data so�rces did you use ta determine whether your site would impact historic or archeo[ogical resources? Robert Turnbull, ESI, Cultura[ Resources assessment 8. �lood �one �esignafiion (Corps Requirement} 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year �loodplain? ❑ Yes � Na 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: 8c. What source(s) did you use to make t�e floodplain deierrnination? FEMA GIS data Celia Foushee � JV�/v� � f � �l3 ApplicantlAgent's Printed Name ApplicantlAgent's Signature Date (Agent's signature is �alid only if an authorization Eetter from the applicant is ravided. Page 1 l of 11 PC�[ �orm — Version 1.3 Decembar 10, 20t38 Version Mr. 5tonewail Matl�is, P.E. NCDO"T Division 3 �n�ironmentaE Officer North Carolina llepaRment af Transportation 5501 Sarbados �3oulavard Castle Hayne, North Carolina 28429 Dear Mr. Mat��is: n�. ��* � � „; ' ea *; ��s�.� 'R'f . `�i°.- ��`,�F,[�°�:�. , ! PROGRAM 5eptember 30, 2013 Subject: EEP Mitigation AcceptaEice Le#ter: Improveme3its to SR 1938 (QuakarBridge Road), Onslow Counry; WBS Number 3C.Ob7078 The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the �casystem Enhancenient Program (EEP} wilJ provida the car►3pensatory stream miti�ation for the subject project. $ased on tl�e information received on Sepien�bex 24, 2013, tlte iEnpacts are [ocated i�i CU 030300D1 of the White Qak River basin in the Soutt�crn Outer Coastal �lain (SOCP} Eco-Aegion, and are as follows: White Oak 5tream Wetlands Buffer (Sq. Ft.) 03030001 Nan- Coastal SQCP �pld Coo3 Warm �tiparian �� arian Marsh �Qne ] Zone 2 Iznpacts 0 0 I0.0 � 0 � 0 0 {fectlaeres) This impaot and associated znitigarion need were under prpjecked by the NCD�T in the 20U impact data. EEP wilE coi�unit to implement suf�'tcient compensatory stream mitigation credits to offset #he impacES associated with tiiis project as determined by the reguiatory agencies using Ct�e delivery tirneEine listed in Section F.3.c.iii af tlie N.C. Department of Environment and Natural lZesources' Ecosystem Lnhancen�ent Pragram In-Lieu Fee Instrument dated July 2$, 2010. ifthe al�ove refcrenced ixnpact amounts are revised, then this mitigatian acceptance letter will no longer be valid and a i�e�� n�itigation acceptance letCer will be required fram EEP. 842Q. If you have any questians or need additional information, pleasa contaet Ms. Beth Harmon at 919-7b7- SincerelY, �`.� 7a e B. Stan�ill EE Asset Managenaent Supex-visor cc: Mr. Brad Shaver, USACE — Wilmin�;ton Regulatory �'ield Of�ice Mr. Masan Hemdan, Division of Water QuaEity, Fayetteville Office Ms. Linda Fitzpatrick, NCDQT — �'I?EA Fi�e; SR 193$ -� Di�isioit 3 1Z.e,st�Yr,�... � ... PYatP,ctc� C�r.r,� Sta,t� �� NCDENR �farth Carofina �cosystem Enhancement Pragram, 1fi52 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1 652 1 9i9-707-84201 http:llportal,ncdenr.orglwebleep '��c�n�� Mr�� - S� 4�1�$ Q+na�.e�r �nd�'� � � ��.-- _{;��,_�.. � ^�\��` AI— 9��, I J��' _��rr �` ��n 1'. i' -�'I .F � \ ,,1 � �'�—` `ti,� � - ---t.___ _ - � � �..� r �" `� � � � �,+;}` I� r S° � � �� al ,.��r�� `i � , c� _= m.�� ,,� �� `�' � 14� ¢ ' `� C'�. `� f ��-' ��4 �r. �r, im.a� t'o.. � �� 'I � l �r �Y' ', � � °ay �i�` : S`'" v � �6 J r � ` .RS � �` A t. , r, : � � k��'ry� _�� f `r1 /"% 0 1' • •, �' 1-. .f'�� I �I !, 5� �. n `J"I I f �lo . � 1 � �I l �/ � - f g; , � �`, �I al � �� "" -._._-._.✓�j �x` ��t =' �` .I �al "� „x _ '�.r�,s,� `� �`�I � �'��=�7. ��"--' ,_��-i/ rn' ^� ' � SacpCp ° �~ �r �I ' �y / ' r� �I y c� r � ti,/ � �� o� {�.� s,. .�� oV < �U f � ~�GI'`,„I � f w� or�; ifi f _' � �y'�ve�:q5,g� ��'��I%=� nl '� l � '&, � ..�c ..li � st f�, � �, \�.r`�� ' iL�.�'� R\ . �` \ ��¢� _ .-! '' Cb :� � � r d � �� ~' y�� `, r v�� i� \ \ $� u }'�1L'� � � I 1 �' $ � � -f � ,' �I 8,` a� 1 S"'�'r _� j r i ! '� � , � P , n� ''1� ^�� , � < � x ,a � �; w� { ^� �; , � `t � � �:,, ; � � ,� �; _ C� � � � � �. 1 \ � `_ S� ,� � L 1 . '' �''. <. ,- f � �, � ` �s � r .�+ � ��,,--� � ,�, f ° ''" � � `''F�� ti � �� . t \ � `� `` y' ! � . ` � ' r �'� 7l �V:� �� ~f r--- i `,�� ^� FF � s ' ; l F '� c` � � `'v ,. � �- � � 1 ',�;; �,_��,f � �o ` ( •�? 1 � � � � �� n �� ! � �' � � .��i � ��,r L,_ � r i ; „ } � � Z- ��''. � ,t s� � � r� �� G l ` i � . ed� �� so � ,/ . - t ES � � I ' �� 4 �'� �j 'yb n�S . � ^'I 0l�I � � � 14 _ 1 �/ .� �� r`, � l r�I �"' _ — � _ __ 1 � 4 gx+' n.I �� w �, . � / 1� MI "� � ' i �I ! e>�` 1 � - 1 �I \ �, '� ,�, �., sr�� . I � � \ f � �--- - , _ �'� ° , "� �� . �l `� .y -Y �.% <r / ;,,. �- �� __— -__ � � _ ._ `� �,,4 N�� ` t - ` t, J 1 � � � ! ��' � ` ; " ,�� ;� � " `�•. �.�� :�i � ,� � ' ,--�� "��i t ` � r �, w �",�- _ — _v �' :�; i \ =� _ � ,f. _-!r' � _:� �11 c � . m%' ~L t., �� f` p � C � �E.' { ``\ �I � r ��- �r `;I �c� �.r 1 , `'°~��_ � _ ri :� �� ';� �-___ � . , � �I �y �: W `�'� 3 � _ �t `' �,. 4-*` ��' Ean a . �4 � `` �.� t+I � �� l) �� ° ! sn , /h� .M f� / y_I \ ti a' { ;.9� _ i ry� . 4' � Jf/' � � `` / � ` � / ' � ',� 4`� \ ' _ .'� / � �J �� r`` ' _ t J/ !e' � ! . !'�' + ` �'�. � C r. .o ' , � c.. Y __.� f!/� �� . � _ !J� � e � A '� �� 1 ..a y i � ! ! }� b ; �'I e �� :: �, �i t' i.'.! m s * � � �; i =�grf r �� i � � i � �� e t ° � �t; htyr �� `r9 � /'� `.o � -� ,� �,-��. �..J C3 q . � �--�"- "�f `.,��.,�--� � �� ,� " ;' � rr � . J'� , 'f; /'' ; ,� �I i� >>{ �, � _ Q� �, -- Q _ ' � � ' � t i C,. � � �';�o� -.� �f` � � � n �•' ' } �� \` � �!' «,� � � l .�¢,, � y S '_ '�� 4�J �� .-_?,,:� �-� ,.- . w J �� `�_� � i � ` CsR' 1P�° a ss �' ) � )�� ,� / � ` 4\ . �. � a. _� C m� "`� �:t�� } F�f ■ - _- � � p �` 1 `_ r v � �� f/ �n`�� ;,` . � 1 /^•� e� % . .�_ • � � I ?F° I � " � e�st. � � � � �' . �.. � � A '. Ji Y- ��i ,l u � : r� ''`� � J-. � n -- �ry°. _ s' ��/ • �i' ' ¢t�� 1_..✓,s `i� _ tq� �t; � ,_ ,� � � . : "� ��_ h��- `'��l! ` �_f �.�LOIaF //�/ . � � "'►. � '_..� ' . . � / _E t _ _� ��i. ' _✓ �\` �`� � � r� - � �� { - � - "� �. - � � f o � `• °�';�-; ` � � ''; �. ,k ;yG�n Branrh._ti -'"', � . , — f� j ._ - - ,r ; ,t.�?��`'�'• ; {L � �� `• � ' `�`�� /� __ _._ -- j,�13tL (r-�1' .j - f p, '�.5 i ✓ � �! ' y -�ff . k ., - �� r `, °� �1 � � ' e`� �-� 4� � w ,/'" Go►� Cautse i �_____ '` �, o' -r ' � t / ' � .� y .t . � ",- . � ,;,,� -- :�' � � Q Project Study Area* %3-' �.i �'�: � - "�' ��4 , ,� ,� f ' ✓ �ea "Location and Extent is approximate � wr,. _�.�' .�aq t 0 1000 2Q00 - � � � � •t � � Feet / /_. i .��. _ � '=i„, ""`;�"._ $ource�� 2Q11 National Geographic SocietylE.SRI, � � - .�� i-cubed seamless USGS quadrangles {Jacksonvilla �y _ � � � �'• -�� NW, Richlantls, Jacksonville Norih and Catherine - ~ '�:, . Ga1 Cou�SB Lake, NC}, Pra�ed Boundary approx�mated my ESI. �-. -, .• pisclaimer 7he informalian depicted an Ihis �igurc is lar � :�• �•�, ' �4 s � info�mafianai pwposes only arid was noi prepzrcd lor, antl is �� • � �� S nct suilable for legal ar engineenng purposes. • • � •� ... �� `*1 'ti , ��° "�` Project Location �„ -p� '�; Quaker Bridc�e Road (SR1 g3�� L,: yr `Ft _ y;�� nslow County, North Carolina .,, n.�., ;. Pdlh P lGcoGralPro�ects126??10521231G154ig_I�ec_2s mxd pale 9�SI�Q1? 2� 7p 44 QM i� , 4 r` N '.� 4 . �i � • �l � � i r � r � � r �4 "'; • d� e, , , � ,�945'� � ��91 if��'s �. -` �► ai� � �'4 + � � � � — ..�. ..� Y r ' .r - .... � - �. �� .i. � ' � - - < 4 � � � 1 "" - a°y 1 � ��p � sas �'►ti� � ;�y*.� _s - �_ • � ��*� '� w- � ! - ��♦ „�► � �' .►� - u !- �.+ y�� _ b� sy � � '«' �► �„ s.� + _ — �. � : � ��- �— � i + �".! ,. '�.- +�� — f _ # � +� �- i�� ' � _ �, , � .f -+� .r ' .�► +r- �. � �#� � _�_ � _ � �� -i- a F�} ��. i - \ - i!�_ ' � '" \ � s � w _ . I ='y � - _ .., . -� � yiw. s`��,z� ,�o s - _ Fg �� ..� �. - +��` J r � � ---. e sr � \ , , lA ,;�` f. _ � Project: ER12D52.23 �ate: Sep 2012 []rwnlChkd: KTIRT Figure: 1 L�NE LEGEND ••••••��•••�•••�•••• EXISTING SOIL ROADBED — — — — — - EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY — - — - — - — - — - - FRONT SLOPE OF DITCH ---------------- BACK SLOPE OF DITCH — - — - — _ — _ — _ _ PROPOSED CENTERLINE OF R/W ��rce� 1 �a. ff''s�m�c�im r'�a�s}n�usm ��ce� � ��rga¢°e� �. ��m�nn�psm�n ��ce� � �o� �nsec� ]i��ce� 5 Nm� inse� ABBREVIATIONS EIP Existing Iron Pipe EIR Existing Iron Rebar f{W Right of Way PP Power Pole TP Telephone Pedestal RCP Reinforced Concrete Pipe PEP Polyeihylene Pipe PVCP Polyvinylchloride Pipe THIS IS THE LIGHTWOOD STUMP MENTIDNED IN DB 72,PG 257 (1]-12-19m8)AS THE BEG[NNING OF THE EFFIE HARRELL PROPERTY,NOW BELONGING \ TO HER HEIRS. IT IS AL50 "THE SOUTHEASTERN CORNER OF THE HARRELL LAND" MENTIONED IN \ TRACT 1 DF GEORGE F.MARSHBURN'S DB 576,PG 586. � � ` 38+42.61 \ 46.58' LT � � � P/ Sto 38 f42.6/ �= O/" 08' 3T" LT '_,�.—�—_ _ �_ __ _ �__ r �t� _ �:`� _ ]�'.f$ie ]�mrrel� �eirs �1� ��, 1�� 5i Rl+JCD ��aJ�lJ9 JC'"`�Y 1 V➢1L � � �� P� PT 47 f/3T4 1311 �um Branch 1308 ` �; ♦ �• -_�' �. PROJECT 5� r�e �O\� 1314 Pr.Sta 5►+� p : N�t'��rRr1 R■� � / � � // J�. % � 1938 / `P ° Gum ° Branch �a. 3 ,3s2 ,Emma Thompson �Z 1314 Rd. > � �^�^ c 1389 /�� 1996 — � cy ,o,g „991 1308 19 2 5 i9 �a RhodestaW� 1316 VI��NI�C� l��l� PC Sto 5/f04.59 PT Sta 52 f50.T� ' � �1 _` � �,� � � � �'I�'�- cz E� E�4G PA'ED 117�OM'R �.: � ' -- _�� --�� _ � —_ —'��— � �. '�".� PP 44+08.52 _-------- � -- "� -_` ��'�,�„�-�� _ -- -- - � _ �� 28.97' LT �='�� =..�- ---3.�� .—+: '� R/W 38+42.61 � ��...`,_�'= �1--.., �..�5�. ��-�' ` ' - -__ -__�.----------"-- ------'--'_�-. — ,_.:—�ms.:::� --�� ' '�.- .:—.:m:. ..�- � :\`";` 25.80' RT `� _ ,�� '�� - -------------- — _ — —� :.—�-r� : .- :—. � .. � -- •• — - — --" hr ' ``�� EIP 38+74.28 �' _ ��'�� -°'� =-�=� ------- --_----_. .S9O.8�J� �-----'�"�' .... •�. � ... q6"q�:'�:;,'\ O�C 19J4'RT -l-l� �� . ------�"� ---__"_N 15�+f0�E �:� ��_-'"- � - --- � � �':`,, � '-�` � —1�� -- _ � �--�� - ' _-_ ZS� _�s� 15'RCP , f • � ��--`— � —__ _- - - -- �`— � EIP 44+88.52 I \�"�`�:;. � _"--_- \ 23.28' RT I \ � '. � � . E%ISTING'.!�'R/M �,;� r� ��Al]�� 'u�' ��.� � C�I�]E°]C1ElFg�' � o s'°�� rcr� � I �. s�� N��rc�°��9 Izvc °: ,�� I r ■ �rr �l� 29�5, ]P� �� R - rA.32�o' ` � FOR SUIiVE1' OF FIRST 24t70 FEET pF RpAQ, SEE NAP 359-0 DATED P4-lD-2002 £NTITLED 'SR 1938 FROA1 SR J3�8 /N A NORTHEELSTERLY DIRECTlON FOR 2400A0 FT lQ45 A/U TO ENO OF STATE SYSTE4fAS SURVEYED Et R,G,YI/Nl. FpR SUAVEY OF PART 2 FROAI STA 24t00,00 1'0 STA 38+42b1. SEE NAP 3T3-0 DATED �-20-2G1D2 ENTITLED 'EXTENSlON OF SR 1938 FROM END OF EX/STlNG R/W !N A NORTHEASTERLY OIRECTIdN FOR /442.6/ FT [U27 A/!l TO END OF PROPOSED EXTEHSION'AS SURVEYED BY D.N:RACINE. 09/24/2013 �1 M1� 54, l�� b88 Ml� 2, 1�� Date By Chonqes W/26/OS KAA 60DED ON A CUL-DE-SAC TO PREYpUS END OF PRWECI. D3/29/OS 6A4 REYOVED CIJL-DE-SAC PREVpUSLY AOOED. BRUNSYICK iiMBER 0&IECTED TO iT ANp REFL75ED 70 SiCN. REVi5E0 OwNERS'NA4ES A�D AOOED PARCEL 1UIYIBERS. O4/0T/05 KAA sDOED PROPOSED P�PE SCNEDULE TO SHEEi 2, D2/29/p RN AODEO PROPOSED P�PE 8 AND PpE'S 1ltorth Carolina Dept. of Transportation Division of Highways — Division 3/District 1 SECONDARY ROAD ADDITION SURVEY PRpPOSED EXTENStON TO SR 1938 'OUAKER BRIDGE ROAO' FROM END OF EXISTING R/W AT STA.38+42.61 IN A NORTHEASTERLY DIRECTION FOR 2.8U2.0T FT (0.53 MI) TO STA.66+44.68 Dote:12-IO-02 Survey by: B.D. Dovis Scole; I' = 50' fuii: I' = 100' holf Drawn by: K.A. Arriola RiChlOntls Town5hip, Onslow County �p■��.� Snee+ i of 5 L�NE LEGEND ��•�•••••��•��•••• EXISTING 501� ROADBED — — — — — - EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY — - — - — - — - — - - FRONT SLOPE OF DITCH ---------------- BACK SLOPE OF DITCH — - — _ — _ — _ _ _ _ PROPOSED CENTERLINE OF R/W AB&REVIATI011tS EIP Existing Iron Pipe EIR Existing Iron Rebar fLW Right of Way PP Power Pole TP Telephone Pedestal RCP Reinforced Concrete Pipe PEP PolyeThylene Pipe PVCP Polyvinylchloride Pipe �' �fie �asse�l �Ieims /� Rl'lID / by JL�� baYA / ➢�1� �43�, 1P'G ��b / � O � ; �� =� ,�\ ��.� � `\ `\\ � : . •.; , a e�� , ' - �� ;.� ...o w � �o�� E.�=.�.� �bE E«...��, � � P/ Sto 56 +5T.�31 lVa Curve �= 00'S/'/�'RT � �\ � � CREEK � \ �� R � 48' CMP 56+57.93 � 's, � �15.83' LT ' \ �n � / / � WETLANDS PERMANENT SURFACE � � WATER IMPACTS � �EXCAVATION IN WETLANDS. / / / EXISTI GILG ADE ELEVAT�ION� WAMERRMPACTSRFACE / / // / / / / / / / � / / � / � � / / � � / '� �P� � � O /� // � �/ � / O / � � -o�� O9 � � 1311 Gum Branch 1308 ,` .Q � � 1308 PROJECT 5� �� ,�,r �/ 1314 �� /, / / .� 1938 Gum Branch 1382 na Thompson Rd. � 0 � � ;a `� � / �o / / �� / a � � / � 1314 1996 =ss / � �, / � c� �, / � �, .�.� � �8 � a�� '� / � �'^� � ��, � � ��r�es ��d� rns ang}n �¢°, l b ,� � �, � � � � �r l � � 4� /Z � �� , �� a1� � s ,� �' � � � � �i �' � / �" � � /� � � �'' ,•,,., ". //'/ . �. %''//�j,�/% ��i i��;/i�� - ��% lia,.•,, - '` . � �� 6 �1Le �� 6, � J� ��bV y �� 9��9 �� \� S I T E 1�'llJCD ay51y Jf"lII YQ� 1WrillD G�y ll'"� b�ll' � � 14 ( FROM ABOUT STA 55 00 TO S�TA 59+00 ON RI GHT SI DE) PIPE SCHEDULE EXISTING P1PE PROPOSED P1PE PIPE STATION SIZE LENGTH SIZE LENGTH COMMENTS A 56+57 48" CMP 3P�, 10J'X4'10" 5�, CABC g 55+8m 10'X3'5" 5�, CABC 09/24/2013 � �'� � 9 � � � // � �y � p � $ � � �� 1925 �� / / �� $�� °/ � PP 59+68.35 p/ Sto 63+39A/ �� l ""� l�1 �\� 23.95' LT � No Curve � /l / � � � �� p°� \ � '� � I � � N I 7C � � � - OD 03 29` RT / � � �. � � � ,\':`�:\ ��,r, � � �� Na Cur65 f38.T7 /� 4/�]EQsINAl1L� A. I�i[�lEg'1C�N j y ., 7 �•� �.68.,,��, • � � : � �� /�+ ' / II �l� 296� 1�� lb / ��'�'; \�` ' �'`' � 12' PVCP / / �� OV �Q 58� R% �� / 9 \ r � �;�� ••''•• �� }2'PVCP / �q �ll.D 6Qad�y lC"'lII / e v9 � ��,� ��;� l� � �� l i 1308 1316 � :� � �� / GUY POLE 59+6B.�7 �`"�� •.,, ��'� /�/ POT Stv 65+93.34/ ., �, � / `,�! / 2�J8' RT \��'� ••., '�; � EIR 64+39.12 i��''•.. �� :��z\�� 8.87'LT � IH[��h�eY Mn�,er�➢s IL,IC,� �' ••.. . •;� � �. � R/W 66+44.33/ / �� N�i° �a��..�9 IN�. �,, r'��• � �l� i545, 11��G 3�9 �\� , •�.''' . � � �• Rc � z5.��' LT / R�, �y �p ,�+ cpq 15' RCP ••�� . • Ie,� . � , \ PVC ? � lldl[� G�51oy ll"lU GO �1� �43�, ]I�Qs i�5 \`\` �� , ��6. , ��„ �' Y / Q EIR 63+39.0� ` � '' „ � B.Bm'RT �`' ��'`''�. ��'F•, - ,�. ��, � �"� ��' \ � '�' ��, R/W 65+14.28 � \ �\ ��'�• \ ` \ � ��'�_ 25.d0' RT � / �' � ' �:.' . , ' � ' �' � � R/W� � � `� '• , �SI �' . ��`, � \ 65+45.48 � � � � � ✓�'�Q' \' 43.61'RT ��--� �'\�� ►oIQ' ��;`� R/W 66+44.33 \ � � � ' � � 25.80'RT `�� `�'� EOP Sio 66 f44.33 � � � � � � End STATE MA/NTA/N R/W. � �� :• � � PRIVATE�GATES Revisions 1ltorth Carolina �ept. of Trcznsportation Division of Highways — Division 3/District 1 aizsios K�e AppEO ON A CIA.-DE•SAC TO PqEVi0U5 ENQ �P PROJELL SECONDARY ROAD ADDITION SURVEY 93/29/OS Km pEYOVED CUL-DE-SdL PREVi0U5LV ADOED. BRUNSMiCK Ti46ER pRpppSED EXTENSION TO SR 1938 'OUAKER BR�DGE ROAD' OBJECfED TO iT 6ND REFUSED TO S�GN. 8EV6E0 OqNERS'NAYES - MD ADDED PARCEL NWBERS, FRUM END IiF EXISTING R/W AT STA. 38+42.61 IN A �aiorios KAA ADOED PFi0PO5ED PiPE SCNEOULE TO StEET 2, NURTHEASTERLY DIRECTIUN FOR 2.$OZ.OT FT (0.53 MD �Zi29nz � UPDDATED PNOPERiYpON1�ER5 �DEASODED CU.-DE•SeC Tn STA, 66+44,68 Dote: 12-10-02 Survey by: B.D. Dovis D9/06/�3 CBF REYDVED PDE'S tUNA&.E TO 081AN EASEYENTSI SCOI@; I' = 50' fUll; I' = I�0' hOlf Drown by. K.A. Arriolo eD0E0 tET�eNp �►ip SraEeu nwe[75. RiChIOndS Township, On51ow County I�U1P■3$7-p Sneet 2 of 5 101 100 99 98 97 �� 95 94 93 92 91 90 89 SCALE ON�SOW - SITE I- PIPE "A" SR 1938 �� = 2' VERTICAL QUAKER BRIDGE RD PIPE PROFI�E I" = 20' HORIZONTAL DATA COLLECTEDa TEMPORARY SURFACE 09/10/20I3 WATER IMPACTS C/L �PERMANENT SURFACE WATER IMPACTS CROWN OF ROAD — 98.1 ,PROPOSED 10'x4'10"CABC 50'L EXISTING 48"x30'CMP EXISTING INLET� EXISTING INVERT — 93,2 STREAMBED TEMPORARY IMPACTS� FOR DEWATERING 10' PAST PIPE EXCAVATION TO PLACE PIPE � AREA WILL BE RETURNED TO EXISTING GRADE ELEVATION, PROPOSED INLET INVERT — 92,5 3 R/W � 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 0 � 0 DATEo 09/24/2013 EXISTING STREAMBED �EXISTING OUTLET INVERT — 93,2 3�I� I � TEMPORARY IMPACTS FOR DEWATERING — 10' PAST PIPE EXCAVATION TO PLACE PIPE, AREA WILL BE RETURNED TO EXISTING GRADE ELEVATIONe PROPOSED OUTLET INVERT — 92,5 R/W 0 20 30 40 50 50 70 l0l I00 99 98 97 •+ 95 9q 93 �� 91 90 89 PAGE 4 OF 5 103 102 �� 0� 99 98 97 96 95 9q 93 92 91 SCALE ON�SOW - SITE I- PIPE "B" SR 19�8 �� = 2' VERTICAL QUAKER BRIDGE RD PIPE PROFI�E I" = 20' HORIZONTAL ��3 DATA COLLECTEDe � FILL IN WETLANDS 09/10/2013 � � 2 C/L EXCAVATION IN WETLANDS, AREA WILL BE RETURNED TO i EXISTING GRADE ELEVATION EXCAVATION IN WETLANDSa AREA WILL BE RETURNED TO EXISTING GRADE ELEVATIONo\ PROPOSED INLET INVERT — 95,9 KNOWN ELEVATION— GROUND ELEVATION CROWN OF ROAD — 9807 3 EXTENT OF WETLANQ IMPACT AT INLET R/W �� ROPOSED 10'x3'5°CABC 50'L IOO 99 KNOWN ELEVATION 98 9701 GROUND ELEVATION � 7 96 EXCAVATION IN WETLANDS, AREA WILL BE RETURNED TO 95 EXISTING GRADE ELEVATION, PROPOSED OUTLET g q INVERT — 95,9 93 92 R/W 91 EXTENT OF WETLAND IMPACTS AT OUTLET 80 70 6� 50 40 30 20 0 � 0 20 30 40 50 50 70 DATEe 09/24/2013 O PAGE 5 OF 5