The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20211529 Ver 1_Meeting Request Review Doc Attachment_20211019(Version 2.08; Released April 2018)17BP.13.R.166TIP No.:B-5878County(ies):Madison Page 1 of 2TIP Number:Date:Phone:Phone:Email:Email:County(ies):CAMA County?NoDesign/Future: Year:2031Existing: Year:Aquatic T&E Species?NoComments:No NoN/ANoDeck Drains Discharge Over Water Body?(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the General Project Narrative)(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative)ac.The existing 2-lane gravel approach is approximately 13' total width with a total clear roadway approximate width of 16.5' at the existing bridge. 840accarver@matternandcraig.comProject Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body? Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer?NRTR Stream ID:Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day):Existing SiteProject Length (lin. miles or feet): ac.Surface Water Body (1): Class CNCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water BodyN/ABuffer Rules in Effect:N/ANone420The proposed typical section consists of two 10' wide travel lanes with 3' grasssed shoulders.Waterbody Information2011NCDWR Stream Index No.:17BP.13.R.166Impairments:Other Stream Classification: Primary Classification: Project Built-Upon Area (ac.)The purpose of the proposed project is to replace Bridge No. 560353 on SR1155 (Anderson Branch Rd) over Paw Paw Creek in Madison County. The existing bridge is a single span 25'-6"' timber deck on I-beams rated in fair condition on the latest structure safety report. The replacement structure will be two 1 @ 18' x 5' three sided bottomless RCBC approximately 75' downstream of the existing structure. The proposed culverts will have a skew of 135 degrees. The roadway alignment will be relocated and the grade for the new structure will be raised slightly to accommodate proper vertical and horizontal curve design standards. The majority of the roadway storm water run-off will sheet flow off of the roadway across vegetated shoulders prior to entering the stream. A proposed cross-culvert will collect storm water runoff from the discharge point of the existing culvert and will convey the storm water under the proposed roadway to a new ditch which will discharge into Paw Paw Creek. 12 Broad StreetNorth Carolina Department of TransportationHighway Stormwater Program STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR NCDOT PROJECTSProject Type:Bridge MaintenanceAddress:General Project InformationN/AWBS Element:Culvert Replacing BridgeWBS Element:Designer (Aaron Carver) - Mattern & Craig Consulting EngineersNCDOT Contact:828.298.1128Asheville, NC 28801Contractor / Designer:828.254.2201mkcalloway@ncdot.govAsheville, NC 28803Address:11/8/2018MadisonMarshall Mike Calloway20 Old 74River Basin(s): City/Town:0.33Typical Cross Section Description: Surrounding Land Use: General Project Narrative:(Description of Minimization of Water Quality Impacts)NoRural-Woods and open Grass LandPaw Paw Creek6-1050.410.06 miProject DescriptionProposed ProjectFrench BroadTVASupplemental Classification: Trout Waters (Tr) Wetlands within Project Limits? (Version 2.08; Released April 2018)17BP.13.R.166TIP No.:B-5878County(ies):Madison Page 2 of 2Sheet No.:4Station:13+38.7Sq. MilesBarrel Height (ft):Culvert Length (ft)%%Evaluate/Describe Roadway Geometric Constraints:Roadway is being realigned approximately 75' downstream of the existing bridge with only constraints being tie points with existing roadways.Proposed Culvert 2-yr Outlet Velocity (ft/s):5.2Natural Stream Channel 10-yr Velocity (ft/s):9.2Proposed Culvert 10-yr Outlet Velocity (ft/s):8.4Roadway Geometric ConsiderationsBank Stabilization:Wing walls are planned to maintain bank stabilizations along the roadway. Minor rip-rap bank stabilizations is planned approximately 10' upstream, and 10' downstream of the proposed culvert to protect graded slopes. Natural Stream Channel 2-yr Velocity (ft/s):6.6Outlet VelocitiesBends at Inlet/Outlet?(describe culvert alignment with stream)NoStream Realignment Necessary? (provide justification)NoCulvert/Stream AlignmentStream Patterns Upstream and Downstream of the Culvert that Could Affect Fish Passage and Bank Stability:Typical mountainous stream geometry with drops and pools, with approximate 10' wide stream bed. Existing banks appear stable. Bed Forms Impacted by Culvert (riffles, pools, glides, etc.):Reinforced concrete box culverts to match exsitng stream geometry and minimize impacts. Low Flow Floodplain Bench Required? (provide justification)NoApproximately 10' wide low flow area, approximately 1' deep.Proposed Sills/Baffles:1.0' sills and baffle across main channel, 2.0' sills and baffle across high-flow culvert.Existing Low Flow Velocities in the Stream (ft/s):0.8Proposed Low Flow Velocities Through the Culvert (ft/s):2.5Alternating Low Flow Sills/Baffles:1.0' sills across main channel, 2.0' sills across high-flow culvert.Culvert BurialProposed Culvert Burial Depth (ft):1.0'Existing Streambed Material:Cobble and gravel with coarse sand.Proposed Low Flow Dimensions Through the Culvert:Avoidance and Minimization Efforts:(Bridge to Culvert)The 10' wide reinforced box culverts were selected to reduce impacts to the stream bed downstream of the existing structure. One culvert will maintain the approximate natural channel width of 10' and will utilize 1' sills, while the additional 10' wide culvert will utilize 2' sills for high flow water surface elevations. Both culverts will utilize excavated, existing bed material.Stream SlopeFish and/or Aquatic Life PassageExisting Average Stream Slope (%):2.76Existing Low Flow Channel Dimensions in the Stream:Stream width varies, but it has an approximately 10' wide low flow area, approximately 1' deep.Proposed Culvert Slope (%):1.40Surface Water Body:(1)Paw Paw Creek50Culvert Type:R.C.B.C.10Proposed Structure SummarySheet No. & StationDrainage Area (ac or sq mi):2.8Number of Barrels:2Barrel Width/Diameter (ft):10North Carolina Department of TransportationHighway Stormwater ProgramSTORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLANFOR NCDOT PROJECTSWBS Element:Bridge to Culvert Avoidance and Minimization PROJECT: 17BP.13.R.166 See Sheet 1-A For Index of Sheets See Sheet 1-8 for Conventional Symbols BEGIN PROJECT P a>NP aNisi END PROJECT 1155 1155 .Anderson Branch Rd 1133`, Paw Paw Rd N� 4- VICINITY MAP (NOT TO SCALE) )IVISI MADISON COUNTY LOCATION: BRIDGE NO. 353 ON SR 1155 (ANDER S ON BRANCH ROAD) OVER PAW PAW CREEK TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE AND C UL VER T WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT S' S. 10„,„ END CULVERT —L— STA 10 + 91.70 / �sr BEGIN PROJECT 17BP.13.R.166 —L— STA.10 + 06.59 NW' ANDERSON -L- SR 1155 ANDERSON BRANCH v s BEGIN CULVERT —L— STA 10 + 70.55 rl STATE STATE PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS N.C. 17BP.13. R.166 1 STATE PROJECT NO. F. A. ]PROW. NO. DESCRIPTION 17BP.13.PE.166 N/A P.E. 17BP.13.ROW.166 N/A R'W/ & UTIL 17BP.13.R.166 N/A CONST "or emin, Pk Cr .414401.110.101WAY,4014 MI6 OM Ka 1 ilk Yr SPitt"41' PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 1 OF 6 4 END PROJECT 17BP.13.R.166 —L— STA. 13 +21.87 CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II. DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED PLANS PREPARED BY: Z.(1 Mattern & Craig ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS 12 BROAD STREET ASHEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28801 (828) 254-2201 FAX (828) 254-4562 NC LIC. NO. C-1154 DESIGN DATA ADT (2011) =420 V = 25 MPH FUNC CLASS = RURAL LOCAL SUBREGIONAL TIER PROJECT LENGTH LENGTH ROADWAY PROJECT 17BP.13.R.166 = 0.056 MILES LENGTH STRUCTURE PROJECT 17BP.13.R.166 = 0.004 MILES TOTAL LENGTH PROJECT 17BP.13.R.166 = 0.060 MILES Prepared in the Office of: MATTERN & CRAIG 12 BROAD ST. ASHEVILLE, NC 28801 FOR NCDOT DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS 2018 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS RIGHT OF WAY DATE: FEBRUARY 19, 2019 LETTING DATE: NOVEMBER 3, 2021 AARON CARVER, PE PROJECT ENGINEER MENG YANG, El PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER NCDOT CONTACT: MIKE CALLOWAY DIVISION 13 BRIDGE PROGRAM MANAGER ROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER P.E. SIGNATURE: HYDRAULICS ENGINEER P.E. SIGNATURE: REVISIONS J)" J," NCH 3R0A3 EV 515/38 C DOIS JO 98 R. 8 7AY\E and, R. DAY\ 2 9G 650 0 o O_ W 0 z J �0 06 39 39 „)' BY- 3 TONS CLASS II RIP RAP W/4 SY GEOTEXTILE 3 TONS CLASS II RIP RAP W/4 SY GEOTEXTILE W003S 26' BY-5 , / F R OUTC //+ P6Fc5]NG DS ROCK OUTCROPPING JOS DB 232 9 PC Sta, /0-7L/2°94 ROCK OUTCRO=PING -L- CURVE DATA PI Sta 12+30.55 = 90° 27' 57.0" (RT) D = 35° 48' 35.5" L = 252.63' T = R = 160.00' SE04 R0=73 DS=25MPH JOS DH L. RA DB 232 9G END CULVERT -L- STA 10 + 91.70 ` ) EMOVE GE BEGIN PROJECT -L- STA 10 + 06.59 0 ° 4� L RA 9G -L- POT Sta. 10+00.00 -EY - POC Sta.l3+77.55 V S-Y 82 �3, VS 82 -EY- CURVE DATA PI Sta 10+69.68 PI Stu 11+47.57 A= 6°26'15.3"(RT) A= 19°12' 49.2" (RT) D = 5° 40' 42.0" D = 45° 35' 58.8" L = 113.37' L = 42.14' T = 56.75' T = 2/°27' R = 1,009.03' R = 125.65' PI Sta 13+10.37 PI Sta 14+47.77 A = 53° 2/' 23.3" (RT) A = 25° 38' 32.0" (LT) D = 40° 55' 32.4" D = /6° 5/' 06.0" L = 130.37' L = 152.16' T = 70°35' T = 77.38' R = 140.00' R = 340.00' EY -DRI- CURVE DATA PI Sta 10+32.85 A = 27° /0' 32.2" (LT) D = 114° 35' 29.6" L = 23.72' T = 12.09' R = 50.00' INV=1893. ir -DR2- CURVE DATA Pl Sta 10+18.65 0 = /9° 42' 27.6" (LT) D = 114° 35' 29.6" L = /7.20' T = 8.68' R = 50.00' WOODS +79.13 -L- 50.00 LT 0" CVI Pl Sta 12+07.76 A. = 58° 53' 45.8" (RT) D = 82° 16' 46.6" L = 7/.58' T = 39.3/' R = 69.64' PI Sta 16+21.17 A = 7° 00' /7.5" (RT) D = 9° 32' 57.5" L = 73.35' T = 36.72' R = 600.00' 2, /0'x/0'RCBC 39 0 3 3 39 0 -L2 STA 12+65.00 -DRIP STA 10+00.00 CO N D0 NOT DISTURB SHED E +28.08- 30.00 LT2 JOH\\IE S. RAYS DB 232 PG 178 -L- STA 12+74.00 -DR2- STA 10+00.00 END -DR2- STA 10+25.35 8 L 0 z IIs'r IN* at S l° 30' 54.8/ PC Sta. 10+20.76 +67.76 -L- 45.00 RT 2 TONS CLASS 'B' RIP RAP W/7 SY GEOTEXTILE 5REMOVE FENCE 39 NS CLASS 'B' P W 6 SY ILE 39 oos 5�o + 55.00 -EY- 184.66 LT +21.87 -L- 45.00 RT 13.00 RT (3 / J O -6 \ R PT Sta.10+27.17 c PC Sta. 10+09.97 PT Sta. 10+44.48 S 40° 4/' 27.0" E -Y +21.8 0 LT 13.00 LT + 93.00 -EY- 192.00 LT PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. /7BP.13°R°/66 PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 2 OF 6 DENOTES IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER DENOTES TEMPORARY IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED +21.87 -L- 50.00 LT END -DR1- STA 10+80.35 + 88.00 -EY- 173.00 LT \\I- S. RAVS-Y DB 232 9G 178 3 \O�� RIP RA E6TEXT KEG 39 39 CLASS II %4 SY 3x 39 END PROJECT -L- STA 13+21.87 NC GRID NAD 83 NA 2011 SEE SHEET 5 FOR PROFILE SEE SHEETS C-1 THRU C-? FOR CULVERT PLANS P1 Sta 10+69.68 0= 6° 26' 15.5" (RT) D = 5° 40' 42.0" L = 115.57' T = 56.75' R = 1,009.051 P1 Sta /3+10.37 A = 53° 2/' 2303" (RT) D = 40° 55' 32.4" L = 150.57' T = 70.55' R = 140.00' -L- CURVE DATA P1 Sta 12+30.55 = 90° 27' 57.0" (RT) D = 35° 48' 35.5" L = 252.63' T = /6/03/' R = 160.00' SE04 R0=73 DS=25MPH P1 Sta /1 +47.57 = 19° /2' 49.2" (RT) D = 45° 35' 58.8" L = 42.14' T = 21.27' R = 125.65' P/ A D L T R -DRI- CURVE DATA P1 Sta 10+32.85 A = 27° /0' 32.2" (LT) D = II4° 35' 29.6" L = 23.72' T = /2.09' R = 50.00' Sta 12+07.76 = 58° 53' 45.8" (RT) = 82° /6' 46.6" = 7/°58' = 39e3/' = 69.64' P1 Sta /4+47.77 P1 A = 25° 38' 32.0" (LT) A D = /6° 5/' 06.0" D L = 152.16' L T = 77.38' T R = 540.00' R Sta 16+2/J7 = 7° 00' /7.5" (RT) = 9° 32' 57.5" = 73035' = 36.72' = 600.00' -DR2- CURVE DATA P1 Sta 10+18.65 0 = /9° 42' 27.6" (LT) D = 1/4° 35' 29.6" L = 17.20' T = 8.68' R = 50.00' -I La--RAYS-Y G 182 co co +07.09 ‘-EY- 00LT 920 ---- --- - --------- - TA--J2"+65.00_-- =Ql � __STA--10f00 Q---------------- f� JOH\\IE S. RAYS DB 232 PG 178 -L- STA 12+74.00 -DR2- STA 10+00.00 45.00 RT -2 To CLASS 'B' \; 18g7RAP7 SY -184.6+55.0o6 LT EY EMl?E FENCE - + 21.87. -L- 45.00 RT. 13.00 RT DNS CLASS glib ---\SY-, DENOTES TEMPORARY IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED SEE SHEET 5 FOR PROFILE SEE SHEETS C-1 THRU C-? FOR CULVERT PLANS PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. /7BPJ3oRJ66 REVISIONS 100 -50 0 50 100 CL STA 10+81.1 —L- GP — 1894 05 1 • 900 EXI STING BRID GE AN D ABUTMENTS (LO +/ CATED 75' UPSTREA M @10'X10'RCBC W/ 6" TOP BEVEL W/ 1'-0" AND 2'—O" SILLS AND BAFF ACROSS BOTTOM W/ CAST IN PLACE HEADWALLS/WINGWALLS SKEW 90' L E S • 9 0 0 1 • 890 PROP 10 O YR WSEL = 1 PROP 25 889 5 YR 1.0' S ILL TOP OF BANK LT 8 9 0 1 I WSEt = t 880 NWS WS 8-24-201 EL =' 7 18 83 7 '1 0' BA FFL E 0' 00 P 5 0 ROFILE A S 0 LO ILL \ TOP OF BANK RT INV RT ELEV. = 188.4 SLOP = 1.»0% N ED PROFILE ALONG CHANNE L 8 8 0 0 100 G UL ERT PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 4 OF 6 DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED 1945 PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. /7BP.13°R166 5 1940 ROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER HYDRAULICS ENGINEER 1935 1930 C L STA ' 0+81 1 -L- GP - 1894J05 1925 1920 W/1- 2 Q 10'X'0' CBC W/ 6' TOP BEVEL AND 2'-3' SILL AND BAFFLES ACROSS BO -OM W/ CAST IN PILAC HF 4DWAI LSW GWALI 5 SKEW 90° PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 5 OF 6 1915 DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED EN ADL 1910 1905 1900 1895 1890 1885 1880 W L- I /S f ELEI/.- , 5.8 2/ 4 L O 0 NT - / +9 = 1, 92 22 /u: = / K - 900 OS - rh h I- STA 1046�6 5p ELCV.=1894 CO , )2 NWG WO-CL= 1 8-24 883 7 -2017 1910 1905 1900 1895 1890 1885 1880 1875 1875 1870 1870 1865 1860 1855 BM #1 N 768018 -L- STA. 11+ ELEVATION RRS IN 15" E 88922 46.95 29.08' LT = 1896.62' BLACK WALNUT 1865 1860 S E E SHE E T 4 0 R L AL G N M EN T 1855 1850 1850 10+00 10+30 10+60 10+90 11+20 11+50 11+80 12+10 12+40 12+70 13+00 13+30 1945 1945 1940 1940 1935 1935 1930 DR1 1930 D R2 1925 1925 1920 1915 1910 1905 1900 1895 1890 E C R E /N /- V G R S A T 9 A 9 E 0+ �6 / 6 L EN GRA - /- S ELEV / 2009 /K, 2 Q/ EL - VG _ /f 5 / t60 1, 9 4 O' J 83 5 1920 1915 1910 1905 1900 1895 E E L L G/ E G N V -/ R A A 0 E f 2 0 5 8 2 2 4 9 .0 r/ EL K J = //4.0 1,90 _.78 /0' 5 NU L Li+ v S 4 T A 9 AU2 /G Q5 . 4 2 3 5 CD 3 'C 1890 1885 1885 1880 1880 1875 1870 1865 1860 1875 1870 1865 1860 CULVERT HYDRAULIC DATA DESIGN DISCHARGE DESIGN FREQUENCY DESIGN HW ELEVATION BASE DISCHARGE BASE FREQUENCY BASE HW ELEVATION OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY OVERTOPPING ELEVATION WS. ELEVATION AT DATE OF SURVEY (NOVEMBER 20/8) 1,000 CFS 25 YRS 1888.6 FT 1,400 CFS /00 YRS 1889.5 FT 2,300 CFS 500+ YRS 1893.4 FT = 1883.7 FT 10+00 10+30 10+60 10+90 10+00 10+30 10+60 10+90 Hand Existing Existing Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural Site Station Structure Fill In Fill In in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts StreamNo. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ft) (ft) (ft) 1 10+70/10+92 LT Impervious dikes < 0.01 32 1 10+70/10+93 LT 2@10'x10' RCBC < 0.01 24 1 10+70/10+92 RT Impervious dikes < 0.01 26 1 10+70/10+93 RT 2@10'x10' RCBC < 0.01 26 TOTALS*: 0.01 0.01 50 58 0*Rounded totals are sum of actual impactsNOTES:Revised 2018 Feb SHEET 6OF 6 WETLAND AND SURACE WATER IMPACTS SUMMARYWETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTSMadison17BP.13.R.166 NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONDIVISION OF HIGHWAYS12/20/2019