HomeMy WebLinkAbout20051457 Ver 1_USGS streamflow and ground-water conditions in NC through Monday February 27 2012.msg_20120228Strickland, Bev
From:
John C Weaver Dcweaver @usgs.gov]
Sent:
Tuesday, February 28, 2012 10:59 AM
To:
Linwood Peele; Jackson, Donna
Cc:
Ashley. E.Hatchell @usace. army. miI; brian.cullen @noaa.gov; Brian. Hai nes @ncdenr.gov;
david.lane @ncdenr.gov; debra.owen @ncdenr.gov; eric.seymour @noaa.gov; gagalleh @duke -
energy.com; garry_grabow @ncsu.edu; george.mathews @noaa.gov; harold.m.brady @ncdenr.gov;
jamie.kritzer @ncdenr.gov; jcweaver @usgs.gov; Jeff.Orrock @noaa.gov; jim.prevette @ncdenr.gov;
jucilene.hoffmann @ncdenr.gov; Lara.Pagano @noaa.gov; linwood.peele @ncdenr.gov;
Michael .A.Young @saw02.usace. army. miI; michael.moneypenny @noaa.gov; mike.orbon @ncdenr.gov;
neelufa.sarwar @ncdenr.gov; Patricia. Tanner @noaa.gov; Peter. Corrigan @noaa.gov;
richard.neuherz @noaa.gov; rwall @ncem.org; ryan_boyles @ncsu.edu; sarah.young @ncdenr.gov;
todd.hamill @noaa.gov; Tom.Fransen @ncdenr.gov; tom.reeder @ncdenr.gov; tony_dorn @nass.usda.gov;
Torey_Lawrence @nass.usda.gov; Vernon. Cox @ncagr.gov; Wayne.Munden @ncdenr.gov;
woody. yonts @ncdenr.gov; Brian Fuchs; Allison.Wash @va.usda.gov; Kathleen Carroll; Darin Figurskey;
Glenn Carrin; Yonts, Woody
Subject:
USGS streamflow and ground -water conditions in NC through Monday, February 27, 2012
NC Drought advisory group,
Precipitation across North Carolina during the past week resulted in a pattern of "have and have nots" with most of the
state in the latter category, as indicated by the precipitation totals maps for the state (http:/ /water.weather.gov /precip/ or
http : / /www.nc - climate.ncsu.edu /mpe departure). Areas of 0.5+ inch rainfall occurred in parts of the northern mountains
and Piedmont region as well parts of the southern and central Coastal Plain, in association with a storm system that
moved across the state on Friday. The rest of the state received less than 0.5 inch with little to no rain in a narrow band
adjacent to the state border in the southern mountains and Piedmont region.
Examination of the current real -time streamflow map (http: / /waterwatch.usgs.gov/ new / ?m= real &r =nc &w= real %2Cmap)
indicates fairly widespread below - normal conditions across much of the state, particularly across the southern tier.
Streamflow conditions across the northern half of the state are generally in the below - normal range, with exception of the
northern mountains and northwest Piedmont where flows are depicted in the normal ranges for some streamgages.
Streamflow conditions in the 'less than 10th percentile" range are currently depicted at numerous streamgages from the
southern mountains into southern Piedmont then across the eastern half of the state. Examination of the 28 -day average
streamflow map (http: / /waterwatch.usgs.gov/ new /index.php ?m= pa28d &r =nc &w =map) indicates widespread "less than
10th percentile" and record low (for the calendar date) conditions for the Piedmont and Coastal Plain regions.
As of February 26 (Sunday), streamflow conditions indicate 61 percent of sites across North Carolina have percentiles
for 7 -day average flows falling below the 25th percentile for the calendar date (see graph below). This percentage
suggests improvements in overall streamflows relative to 81 percent just a week ago.
Groundwater levels at the 10 Blue Ridge, Piedmont, and Sand Hills observations wells continue to be depicted on the
Climate Response Network in North Carolina (http: / /ogw01.er.usgs.gov /crn /StateMaps /NC.html) in the normal range for 8
wells, continued much below normal (less than 10th percentile) at the Marston well in Scotland County, and record low
for the month at the Chapel Hill well in Orange County (functionally dry since late October):
• well near Marston in Scotland County
(http: // qroundwaterwatch .usgs.gov /AWLSites.asp ?S= 345812079313401 &ncd =crn)
• well at Chapel Hill in Orange County
(http: // qroundwaterwatch .usgs.gov /AWLSites. asp ?S = 355522079043001 &ncd =crn), functionally "dry" since late
October
As noted last week, the water levels in 2 of the 6 Coastal Plain wells in Pitt and Washington Counties continue to be
depicted in the normal ranges. The water levels at 3 of the 4 remaining wells are depicted in the below - normal range in
Brunswick County, Jones County, and Pasquotank County. Water levels at the remaining well in Wayne County continue
to be in the much below - normal range ( http : / /groundwaterwatch.usgs.gov /AWLSites. asp ?S = 351849078163901 &ncd =crn).
Draft 1 for this week's release was available as of Monday afternoon with no changes yet indicated for North Carolina. No
changes made to last week's release as "status quo" was applied statewide with overall conditions in a general holding
pattern.
Concerning this week's release...
Last week's telecom included some discussions about introducing DO into the southern mountains if no substantial rainfall
occurred. Precipitation across that region was very limited during the past week. Given that streamflow conditions in that
region are within the below - normal ranges with an expanding presence of "less than 10th percentile" conditions, the
introduction of DO across the southern mountains appears to be warranted.
As we shift closer towards the start of the spring season, depictions in the eastern half of the state continue to be
somewhat challenging as little to no substantial impacts have been reported in recent weeks. Given the occurrence of
rainfall late last week, it may be appropriate to again apply "status quo" to the depictions in the eastern half of the state( ?).
An area that many need closer monitoring for possible deterioration to D1 in drought depiction is the Broad and Catawba
River basins. The 28 -day average streamflow conditions in the Broad River basin are depicted in the "less than 10th
percentile" range at most all streamgages in that area.
Comments and opinions welcome...
Thanks.
JCWeaver
****************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
J. Curtis Weaver, Hydrologist, PE
USGS North Carolina Water Science Center
3916 Sunset Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
Phone: (919) 571 -4043 H Fax: (919) 571 -4041
Mobile: (919) 830 -6235
E -mail address -- jcweaver @usgs.gov
Internet address -- http: / /nc.water.usgs.gov/
****************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
-- USDM draft (if available) --
As of Monday afternoon, draft 1 for this week's version was available with no changes yet indicated for North Carolina.
Mark Svoboda, climatologist with the National Drought Mitigation Center in Lincoln, Nebraska, is again the USDM author
for this week's release. In the email accompanying draft 1, he made no specific comments concerning the Carolinas
region.
USDM archive (you can select North Carolina from the drop -down box near the top, a quick way to see the last two USDM
releases):
http:// drought.unl.edu /dm /archive.html
-- Observed precipitation --
Sources of precipitation totals are available from the following:
(1) USGS rainfall totals (sorted by county) for the last 7 days at
http : / /waterdata.usgs.gov /nc /nwis /current ?tvpe = precip &group kev= county cd
(2) State Climate Office of North Carolina at http : / /www.nc- climate.ncsu.edu /mpe departure/
(3) NOAA NWS's Advanced Hydrologic Prediction Service at http://water.weather.gov/preci
shown below pulled from the NOAA NWS's Advanced Hydrologic Prediction Service at
http: / /water.weather.gov /precip/
- -- i � � .sit -_ �" i ■ -
fi
,
tp
' 1111 "�, �` �fi .�
�.
�� h�io "" ►�
t
11
r
of i4
USDM archive (you can select North Carolina from the drop -down box near the top, a quick way to see the last two USDM
releases):
http:// drought.unl.edu /dm /archive.html
-- Observed precipitation --
Sources of precipitation totals are available from the following:
(1) USGS rainfall totals (sorted by county) for the last 7 days at
http : / /waterdata.usgs.gov /nc /nwis /current ?tvpe = precip &group kev= county cd
(2) State Climate Office of North Carolina at http : / /www.nc- climate.ncsu.edu /mpe departure/
(3) NOAA NWS's Advanced Hydrologic Prediction Service at http://water.weather.gov/preci
shown below pulled from the NOAA NWS's Advanced Hydrologic Prediction Service at
http: / /water.weather.gov /precip/
North Carolina: Current 7 —Day Observed Precipitation
Valid at 2/28/2012 1200 UTC— Created 2/28/12 13:55 UTC
-- Streamflow --
Current conditions are depicted as real -time, 7 -day, 14 -day, and 28 -day flows available in the WaterWatch series of maps
at:
http://waterwatch.usgs.gov/classic/?m=real&r=nc&w=real%2Cmap
Current conditions...
Tuesday, February 28, 2012 08 :30ET
WIM
MUSIGS
Last week's conditions...
Tuesday, February 21, 2012 08 :30ET
When viewing the USGS WaterWatch streamflow information, you can hover your cursor over a site and a pop -up box
Explanation - Percentile classes
......,.
X10
Lew
1024 5 -7 76 -90 >
�
............ - �: High Idol- ranked l
M N ch beds ur
- ---- ---- -�
Be lbw al P trr� al Al y g % asc.l� aD0VV,
mar €Y I r� rm l
When viewing the USGS WaterWatch streamflow information, you can hover your cursor over a site and a pop -up box
appears with various pieces of information, including the percentile for the current streamflow AND the current percentage
of mean and median for the calendar date.
Highlighting current flows (February 28 morning) at some selected gaging stations (obtained from
http : / /waterdata.usgs.gov /nc /nwis /current / ?type =flow ):
Site number
Site name (and County)
Flow Feb 21
Current
flow
(% of)
Median Feb 28
02053200
Potecasi Creek near Union (Hertford) --
320
cfs
180
cfs
55%
330 cfs
02106500
Black River near Tomahawk (Sampson) --
523
cfs
546
cfs
49%
1,120 cfs
02085500
Flat River at Bahama (Durham) --
145
cfs
51
cfs
380
134 cfs
02096960
Haw River near Bynum (Chatham) --
1,200
cfs
708
cfs
63%
1,120 cfs
02115360
Yadkin River at Enon (Yadkin) --
1,990
cfs
1,800
cfs
750
2,410 cfs
02152100
First Broad River near Casar (Cleveland) --
41
cfs
47
cfs
51%
92 cfs
03451500
French Broad River at Asheville (Buncombe) --
1,610
cfs
1,300
cfs
600
2,170 cfs
03550000
Valley River at Tomotla (Cherokee) --
242
cfs
188
cfs
56%
336 cfs
Focusing on the 7-day average flows...
Visit the WaterWatch pages at http: / /waterwatch.usgs.gov /classic / ?r =nc to get the most recent data for sites of interest.
Durations plots for selected individual USGS stations can be accessed at http: / /nc.water.usgs.gov /drought /duration.html
The OVERALL 7 -day average flows by HUC map
(http:Hwaterwatch.usgs.gov /classic / ?m= pa07d &r= nc &w =pa07d nwc %2Cmap) are depicted in the image below:
Monday, February 27, 2012
I, SGS
6
To help provide more detail by major basin, the BELOW NORMAL 7 -day average flows by HUC map
(http: / /waterwatch.usgs.gov /classic /index.php ?map type =drvw &state =nc) are depicted in the image below:
Monday, February 27, 2012
As of February 26 (Sunday), the graph of 7 -day flow percentiles shown below indicates 61 percent of sites across North
Carolina have percentiles for 7 -day average flows falling below the 25th percentile for the calendar date. And 18 percent
of sites across North Carolina are shown as having 7 -day average flows below the 10th percentile or reaching new
minimum for calendar date.
Compared to February 19 (Sunday), the current values indicate improvements in overall streamflow conditions during
course of the past week, considering 81 % of sites across the state were below the 25th percentile and 54% of sites were
below 10th percentile and /or reaching new minimum for the calendar date.
Below is a graph developed from the 7 -day average flow summary table available at:
http: / /waterwater.usgs.gov/ classic / ?m= pa07d &r= nc &w= paO7d %2Ctable
1
100
ONN A4,
Less than 25th percentile Percentage of sites in North Carolina with 7 -dad?
Less than 10th percentile indicated percentile range or love
New min forthe clay
Date
Another measure of the streamflow conditions is available from maps of median percentiles for 7 -day average flows for
the previous 7 -, 14- 30 -, 60 -, and 90 -day periods updated through February 27 (Monday). These maps are intended to
provide some kind of "long- term" index of the streamflow conditions (not available through the USGS WaterWatch pages)
that is mapped according to the classification scheme for streamflow used by the U.S. Drought Monitor. Map images (via
the above URL) showing the median percentiles for 7 -day average flows for previous 7 and 30 days are shown below.
http: / /nc. water. usgs .gov /drought/dm- streamflow.html
8
°s I'
Jr
El
3 �{
Q
Previous 7 days
Monday, February 27, 2012
L
EINI
Explanation
Unregulated
Regulated
No - No Drought ( >30 percentile)
DO - Abnormally Dry (21 to 30 percentile)
D
❑
D1 - Moderate Drought (11 to 20 percentile)
D2 - Severe Drought (6 to 10 percentile)
r
s'
D3 - Extreme Drought (3 to 5 percentile)
D4 - Exceptional Drought (0 to 2 percentile)
n/d - Not determined
❑
0
The following ArcMap screenshot shows the change in the median percentiles of 7 -day average flows for 7 -day period
from last week (with last week's U.S. Drought Monitor in the background). In other words, at a given site, take last
week's median percentile and compare it to this week's median percentile. Sites in red indicate a decrease in the median
percentile from last week to this week (suggesting a decline in streamflow). Sites in blue indicate an increase in the
median percentile from last week to this week (suggesting an improvement decline in streamflow). The size of the circles
indicates the general range in percentile increase or decrease (note legend to left of the map).
File Edit View Bookmarks Insert Selection Tools Window Help
61 (9 ' ` "r �� +'" YC j err �'
_ � + �
Ei Leers
❑►r Automated DM maps (short string)
E] ❑1 (weekly change in 7 -day median percent F'
® gall othervalues?
10 to 25 percentile increase
25 to 50 percentile decrease
Greaterthan 50 percentile decrease
E
Editor T € t ax { {Qr Create NevAi FeatLffe
13
�rrrrrrrrrr ,,,,,,,,e
Display Source Selection J
Drawing ❑ 'ril 1B B U
A r _4
-- Ground Water --
10
PAPE
5 to 10 percentile increase
0 to 5 percentile increase
No percentile change
g to 5 percentile decrease
5 to 10 percentile decrease
10 to 25 percentile decrease
25 to 50 percentile decrease
Greaterthan 50 percentile decrease
E
Editor T € t ax { {Qr Create NevAi FeatLffe
13
�rrrrrrrrrr ,,,,,,,,e
Display Source Selection J
Drawing ❑ 'ril 1B B U
A r _4
-- Ground Water --
10
PAPE
Please visit the North Carolina Real -Time Network page at
http: / /groundwaterwatch. usqs. gov /StateMapsNet.asp ?ncd= rtn &sc =37 (map shown below) for more information on
ground -water conditions at selected USGS observation wells in North Carolina.
VES VIRGINIA �1lars
ok taunt4 aim
Logan ?Oak G�a'PpaYanriodtlantic
into, I R
Bedde �" Salud$ 4
thd'ir Framo ° White Mane Beach
Welc Unio L' tIUY 60
o,
Y ial Hdlgh tEastville
P aski oanol fr grt Ms Virginia
4onyvay G rthlgydle Beach
n
Kingstree,
Myrtle Beach
'c
Georgetown
nerviile t! a rr t i c
O e e a a
7
Explanation - Percentile class
�.
......ee __
New <10 1024 25-75 75-90 >90 New Not
Bel' ..... — - 66`v.. "
Low hrlach ''""' ""'Bel' Normal love hrluGl l cve� High Ranked
Shown below are the hydrographs at four selected wells across North Carolina... real -time page for USGS ground water
data in NC is available at http: / /waterdata.usgs.gov /nc /nwis /current ?tvpe =qw
(MOUNTAINS) NC -144 at Blantyre in Transylvania County
(http: / /waterdata.usgs.gov /nc /nwis /dv / ?site no= 351808082374302 &agency cd =USGS &referred module =sw)
11
12
USES
351808082374302
TR -065
HC -144) AT BLANTYRE, HC
(RE OLITH
C
28.66
2119.00
4J
0
F
28.50
2118,56
�
29.66
2118.66
a
z
29.56
CU
(U L
2117.56
m
Q
36.66
aO DO
CU
4J
2117.66
°
36.56
CU
L
2116.56
'0
C
C
G
31.66
O
Feb
Feb
Feb Feb
LO
04
11
18 25
2012
2012
2012 2012
- - -- Provisional Data Subject to Revision - - --
0 Measured depth to
water level — Depth to water level
12
(WESTERN PIEDMONT) NC -193, Piedmont RS near Barber in Rowan County
(http: / /waterdata .usgs.gov /nc /nwis /dv / ?dd cd =01 72019 00003 &format =imq default &site no= 354057080362601 &set to
qscale v =0 &begin date = 20070319)
13
USES
351 0808237430
TR -065
(SIC -144) AT BLANTYRE, HC
(RE OLITH
a
27.9
212919
m
Q
Q.
.0
28.0
2119.9
4
4
2919
2118.9
S
d
Duo
39.9
2117.9
z
Qz
31.9
211819
32.9
211519
�}
33.0
2114.9
L
C6
Q
cu
G
34.0
211319
M
J
H
C
�
a
35.0
L
Mar May
Jul
Sep Now Jan
2911 2911
2911
2911 2911 2912
— Daily nean depth to
water level Period of provisional
data
Period of approved data
(WESTERN PIEDMONT) NC -193, Piedmont RS near Barber in Rowan County
(http: / /waterdata .usgs.gov /nc /nwis /dv / ?dd cd =01 72019 00003 &format =imq default &site no= 354057080362601 &set to
qscale v =0 &begin date = 20070319)
13
14
SGS 3540 x'0803 01 Rte -149 NC -193)
PIEDMONT RS 1 NR
BARBER
(RE OLIT
m
C
4J
7 +25
Thy
Q
7 +39
670 +79
4
7 +35
679 +65
Lo
0
7 +49
679 +69
Qb
Qy L
m
'i 0
7 +45
679 +55
L
Q
Gi
DO
7 +59
679 +5$
°}
'i
�
L
O
*'
7 +55
679 +45
GU
m
L
�
7 +69
679 +49
C
Feb Feb
Feb
Feb
+o
94 11
18
25
2912 2912
2912
2912
- - -- Provisional Data Subject
to Revision
- - --
0
Measured depth to water level
— Depth to water
level
14
(EASTERN PIEDMONT) Local number WK -284, NCDENR Lake Wheeler Research Station at Raleigh in Wake County
(http: // groundwaterwatch .usgs.gov /AWLSites.asp ?S= 354404078403101 &ncd =rtn)
SGS 354057080362601 Rte -149 (SIC -193) PIEDMONT RS 1 NR BARBER (RE OLIT
a
672 +9
1
6 +0
0LITHWELL)
0
CU
�
27 +85
4J
6.5
671 +5
347 +15
�
°
7 +9
671 +9
G
347 +19
} L)
C
7 +5
679 +5
z
L
M
-0
8 +9
L7
679 +9
r
C]
347 +99
�}
L
8 +5
669 +5
—4
4J
C6
L
Gi
4�
°
9 +9
346 +95
669 +9
+}
s
-J
r
H
G
9.5
668 +5
0
Mar May Jul Sep Now Jan
CL7
2911 2911 2911 2911 2911 2912
— Daily nean depth to water level Period of provisional data
s
28 +15
Period of approved data
(EASTERN PIEDMONT) Local number WK -284, NCDENR Lake Wheeler Research Station at Raleigh in Wake County
(http: // groundwaterwatch .usgs.gov /AWLSites.asp ?S= 354404078403101 &ncd =rtn)
15
USES
3 544040 78403101 WK -284 LAK E' HEELER
RS MW-3 S (RE G
0LITHWELL)
27 +85
e«
347 +15
�
°
27 +9$
347 +19
347 +$5
L7
28 +99
C]
347 +99
28 +95
346 +95
L
28 +19
au DO
-W
346 +99
rcu
s
28 +15
L
0
346 +85
cu
-W
.0
28 +29
+o
i
346 +8$
Q
°
Feb Feb Feb
Feb
L
94 11 18
25
ca
2912 2912 2912
2912
- - -- Provisional data Subject to
Revision - - --
- Depth to water level
— Lowest recorded water level prior to MY2911 (27 +89 ft Dec
12, 2998)
15
UPS
3 544040 78403101 WK -284 LAK E' HEELER RS MW-3 S (RE G
0LITH'W at)
25 +99
359 +99
4
4}
GF
N
25 +59
349 +59
y
26 +99
349 +99
}
G]
Z
26 +59
348 +59
27 +99
348 +99
+4
r
ri
°
�
27 59 +
347 +5$
y
L
�
28 +99
347 +99
L
G:
G
a=
M
>-
28 +5$
N
Mar
May Jul Sep Now Jan
r-
0
2911
2911 2911 2911 2911 2912
0
ca
— Daily
naxinun depth to water level
Daily
nininun depth to water level
--Daily
nean depth to water level
Period
of approved data
Period
of provisional data
Lowest
recorded water level prior to MY2911 (27 +89 ft Dec
12, 2998)
(COASTAL PLAIN) NC -160 near Simpson in Pitt County
( http:/ /waterdata.usgs.gov /nc /nwis /dv/ ?site no= 353219077153801 &agency cd =USGS &referred module =sw)
16
17
USES 353219077153801 PI-532 (NC-160) NR IMP ON, NC (SURFICIAL,)
C
GU
2.80
Q. CU
53.40
3.00
53.20
z
3.20
(U L
53.00
m
L
CU
(U
4J
3.40
D
L
O
52.80
CU
4J
m
4J
CL
3.60
C
52.60
L
Feb Feb Feb Feb
04 11 18 25
2012 2012 2012 2012
---- Provisional Data Subject to Revision ----
17
18
USGS 353 19077153801 PI -532
(NC-160)
NR SIMPSON, N
URFI IAL)
O
4ti
1.O
55.0
Q-
0
2.0
54 *O
S
o%
3.0
#$
52.0
41
5.0
51.0
�-
6.0
CU
}
�}
r
-
7.0
49.0
rl
L
C6
p
8.O
Gi
P
48.$
s
N
9.0
C
o
Mar
Nay Jul
Sep
Now Jan
2911
2911 2911
2911
2911 2912
— Daily
nean depth to water level
Period
of approved data
Period
of provisional data
— Lowest
recorded water level
prior to
MY2011 (8.97 ft Oct 23,24, 2007)
18