Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20051457 Ver 1_RE USGS streamflow and ground-water conditions in NC through Monday November 14.msg_20111115Strickland, Bev From: Fransen, Tom [tom.fransen @ncdenr.gov] Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 2:43 PM To: Young, Sarah Cc: Peele, Linwood; Reeder, Tom Subject: RE: USGS streamflow and ground -water conditions in NC through Monday, November 14 Sarah, Some rain moving across NC Wednesday night and Thursday, but will not be a big rain maker. There will be similar pattern next Monday or Tuesday. General 1 and 2 week forecast above normal temperatures and below normal rainfall. The areas of concern continue to be the SW mountains and SW Piedmont. This is a screen shot of the agreed upon changes for this week. Minor changes to DO and expansion of D! in Western NC. Let me know if you have any questions. Tom From: Young, Sarah Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 12:23 PM To: Fransen, Tom Subject: Fwd: USGS streamflow and ground -water conditions in NC through Monday, November 14 Tom: please send me a quick summary of what was discussed on the drought call after it occurs. Thanks so much, Sarah Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4GLTE smartphone - - - -- Forwarded message - - - -- From: "John C Weaver" <jcweaver@usgs.gov> To: "Peele, Linwood" Qinwood.peele@ncdenr.gov> Cc: " Ashley. E. Hatchell@us ace. army. mil" < Ashley. E. Hatchell@us ace. army. mil>, "brian.cullen@noaa.gov" <brian.cullen@noaa.gov >, "Haines, Brian" <brian.haines@ncagr.gov >, "Lane, David" <david.lane@ncagr.gov >, "Owen, Debra" <debra.owen@ncdenr.gov >, "eric.seymour@noaa.gov" <eric.seymour@noaa.gov >, " ga alg leh@duke- energy.com" <ga alg leh@duke- energy.com >, "garry_grabow@ncsu.edu" <garry_grabow@ncsu.edu >, "george.mathews@noaa.gov" <george.mathews@noaa.gov >, 'Brady, Harold M." <harold.m.brady_@ncdenr.gov >, "Kritzer, Jamie" <jamie.kritzer@ncdenr.gov >, "jcweaver@usgs.gov" <jcweaver@usgs.gov >, "Jeff.Orrock@noaa.gov" <Jeff.Orrock@noaa.gov >, "Prevette, Jim" <jim.prevette@ncagr.gov >, "Hoffmann, Jucilene" <jucilene.hoffmann@ncdenr.gov >, "Lara.Pagano@noaa.gov" <Lara.Pagano@noaa.gov >, "Peele, Linwood" Qinwood.peele@ncdenr.gov >, " Michael. A. Young@ s aw02.usace. army. mil" < Michael. A. Young@ saw02.usace. army. mil>, "michael.moneypenny_@noaa.gov" <michael.moneypenny_@noaa.gov >, "Orbon, Mike" <mike. orbon@ncdenr. gov>, "Sarwar, Neelufa" <neelufa.sarwar@ncdenr.gov >, "Patricia. Tanner@noaa. gov" <Patricia.Tanner@noaa.gov >, "Peter.Corrigan@noaa.gov" <Peter. Corrigan@noaa. gov>, "richard.neuherz@noaa.gov" <richard.neuherz@noaa.gov >, "rwall@ncem.org" <rwall@ncem.org >, "ryan_boyles@ncsu.edu" <ryan_boyles@ncsu.edu >, "Young, Sarah" <sarah.young@ncdenr.gov >, "todd.hamill@noaa.gov" <todd.hamill@noaa.gov >, "Fransen, Tom" <tom.fransen@ncdenr.gov >, "Reeder, Tom" <tom.reeder@ncdenr.gov >, "tony_dom@nass.usda.gov" <tony_dom@nass.usda.gov >, "Lawrence, Torey" <Torey_Lawrence@nass.usda.gov >, "Cox, Vernon N' <Vernon.Cox@ncagr.gov >, "Munden, Wayne" <wayne.munden@ncdenr.gov >, "Yonts, Woody" <woody_yonts@ncdenr.gov >, 'Brian Fuchs" <bfuchs@UNLNOTES.UNL.EDU >, "Allison.Wash@va.usda.gov" <Allison.Wash@va.usda.gov >, "Kathleen Carroll" <Kathleen.Carroll@noaa.gov >, "Darin Figurskey" <Darin.Fi urskey_@noaa.gov >, "Glenn Carrin" <Glenn.Carrin@noaa.gov >, "Yonts, Woody" <woodyyonts@ncdenr.gov> Subject: USGS streamflow and ground -water conditions in NC through Monday, November 14 Date: Tue, Nov 15, 2011 11:11 am NC Drought advisory group, Very little to no precipitation fell across all of North Carolina during the past week with the highest amounts indicated in the 0.25 to 0.5 -inch range in parts of Cherokee, Graham, and Swain Counties (http://water.weather.gov/precip lack of rainfall is reflected in the streamflow conditions depicted on the current real -time streamflow map (http:Hwaterwatch.usgs.gov/ new / ?m= real &r =nc &w= real %2Cmap). While a mix of conditions in the normal and below - normal ranges is visible across most of the state, the extent of below - normal conditions appears to be expanding. The map indicates a number of sites across the state with streamflows in the 'less than 10th percentile" range, most notably in the Broad and Catawba River basins. Examination of the 28 -day average streamflow map (http: / /waterwatch.usgs.gov/ new /index.php ?m= pa28d &r =nc &w =map) echoes the low streamflow conditions in the Broad River basin with several gages in the 'less than 10th percentile" range. Others areas with "less than 10th percentile" streamflow conditions that need continued monitoring include the Sand Hills and southern Coastal Plain, southwest mountains, and northern Piedmont. As of November 13 (Sunday), streamflow conditions indicate 34 percent of sites across North Carolina have percentiles for 7 -day average flows falling below the 25th percentile for the calendar date (see graph below). This percentage suggests declines in overall streamflow relative to 18 percent just a week ago. Water levels at the 10 Blue Ridge, Piedmont, and Sand Hills observations wells are depicted on the Climate Response Network in North Carolina (http: / /ogw01.er.usgs.gov /crn /StateMaps /NC.html) in the normal range for 7 wells, below normal for 1 well near Cruso in Haywood County (http: // qroundwaterwatch .usgs.gov /AWLSites. asp ?S = 352315082484401 &ncd =crn), and continued much below normal for 2 wells: well near Marston in Scotland County (http: // qroundwaterwatch .usgs.gov /AWLSites.asp ?S= 345812079313401 &ncd =crn) well at Chapel Hill in Orange County (http: // qroundwaterwatch .usgs.gov /AWLSites.asp ?S= 355522079043001 &ncd =crn). The water levels for the 6 wells in the Coastal Plain are depicted in the normal range for 5 wells and continued below normal for the 1 well near Grantham in Wayne County (http: // qroundwaterwatch .usgs.gov /AWLSites.asp ?S= 353219077153801 &ncd =crn). Draft 1 for this week's release was available as of Monday afternoon with no changes yet indicated for North Carolina. Changes to the NC depictions in last week's USDM included trimming of the D1 /D0 in the upper Neuse and Tar River basins. Given the lack of precipitation across North Carolina last week (http:/ /water.weather.gov /precip /) and the overall streamflows (http: / /waterwatch.usgs.gov/ new / ?m= real &r =nc &w= real %2Cmap), conditions that warrant deteriorations in drought classification may be developing. However, with an impending rain event forecast across much of North Carolina, this may justify holding off on any changes( ?). Particular areas that may warrant some consideration for worsening depictions include the southwest mountains (Little Tennessee and Hiwassee basins) as well as the northwest Piedmont and foothills region where 30 -day percent of normal precipitation appears to be dropping into the 25 -50 percent range. Other areas with 30 -day percent of normal precipitation in the 25 -50 range includes some parts of the Sand Hills region, southern Coastal Plain, and the northeast corner of the state. Water levels at the Elizabeth City well are depicted in the normal range, but have been in a fairly steep declining pattern since mid October (http: // qroundwaterwatch .usgs.gov /AWLSites.asp ?S= 361829076163201 &ncd =crn). We're shifting into the time of year where natural and man -made demands on the hydrologic system are declining, evaporation is down, and agricultural activity has declined. Thus it becomes challenging to identify impacts from the dryness other than in the streams and groundwater. Comments and opinions welcome... Thanks. JCWeaver ****************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** J. Curtis Weaver, Hydrologist, PE USGS North Carolina Water Science Center 3916 Sunset Ridge Road Raleigh, NC 27607 Phone: (919) 571 -4043 H Fax: (919) 571 -4041 Mobile: (919) 830 -6235 E -mail address -- jcweaver(c�usgs.gov Internet address --.http://nc.water.usgs.gov ****************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** -- USDM draft (if available) -- As of Monday afternoon, draft 1 for this week's version was available with no changes yet indicated for North Carolina. Anthony Artusa, meteorologist with the NOAA Climate Prediction Center in Camp Springs, Maryland, is the USDM author for this week's release. In the email accompanying draft 1, he made no specific comments concerning the Carolinas region. USDM archive (you can select North Carolina from the drop -down box near the top, a quick way to see the last two USDM releases): http: / /drought.unl.edu /dm /archive.html -- Observed precipitation -- Sources of precipitation totals are available from the following: (1) USGS rainfall totals (sorted by county) for the last 7 days at http : / /waterdata.usgs.gov /nc /nwis /current ?tvpe = precip &group kev= county cd (2) State Climate Office of North Carolina at http : / /www.nc - climate.ncsu.edu /mpe departure/ (3) NOAA NWS's Advanced Hydrologic Prediction Service at http://water.weather.gov/preci shown below pulled from the NOAA NWS's Advanced Hydrologic Prediction Service at http : / /water.weather.gov /precip/ North Carolina: Current 7 —Day Observed Precipitation Valid at 11/14/2011 1200 UTC— Created 11/14/11 23:55 UTC -- Streamflow -- Focusing on current streamflow conditions... Current conditions are depicted as real -time, 7 -day, 14 -day, and 28 -day flows available in the WaterWatch series of maps at: http://waterwatch.usgs.gov/classic/?m=real&r=nc&w=real%2Cmap Current conditions... 5 Tuesday, Mouenber 15, 2011 08 :30ET WIM MUSIGS Last week's conditions... Tuesday, Mouenber 08, 2011 08 :30ET When viewing the USGS WaterWatch streamflow information, you can hover your cursor over a site and a pop -up box Explanation - Percentile classes ......,. X10 Lew 1024 5 -7 76 -90 > � ............ - �: High Idol- ranked l M N ch beds ur - ---- ---- -� Be lbw al P trr� al Al y g % asc.l� aD0VV, mar €Y I r� rm l When viewing the USGS WaterWatch streamflow information, you can hover your cursor over a site and a pop -up box appears with various pieces of information, including the percentile for the current streamflow AND the current percentage of mean and median for the calendar date. Highlighting current flows (November 15 morning) at some selected gaging stations (obtained from http : / /waterdata.usgs.gov /nc /nwis /current / ?type =flow ): Site number Site name (and County) Flow Nov 08 Current flow (% of) Median Nov 15 02053200 Potecasi Creek near Union (Hertford) -- 207 cfs 97 cfs 262% 37 cfs 02106500 Black River near Tomahawk (Sampson) -- 398 cfs 217 cfs 650 334 cfs 02085500 Flat River at Bahama (Durham) -- 23 cfs 3.2 cfs 12% 26 cfs 02096960 Haw River near Bynum (Chatham) -- 755 cfs 256 cfs 73% 351 cfs 02115360 Yadkin River at Enon (Yadkin) -- 1,230 cfs 1,010 cfs 62% 1,610 cfs 02152100 First Broad River near Casar (Cleveland) -- 25 cfs 24 cfs 47% 51 cfs 03451500 French Broad River at Asheville (Buncombe) -- 904 cfs 748 cfs 59% 1,260 cfs 03550000 Valley River at Tomotla (Cherokee) -- 59 cfs 59 cfs 59% 100 cfs Focusing on the 7-day average flows... Visit the WaterWatch pages at http: / /waterwatch.usgs.gov /classic / ?r =nc to get the most recent data for sites of interest. Durations plots for selected individual USGS stations can be accessed at http: / /nc.water.usgs.gov /drought /duration.html The OVERALL 7 -day average flows by HUC map (http:Hwaterwatch.usgs.gov /classic / ?m= pa07d &r= nc &w =pa07d nwc %2Cmap) are depicted in the image below: Monday, Houenber 14, 2011 I, SGS 7 To help provide more detail by major basin, the BELOW NORMAL 7 -day average flows by HUC map (http: / /waterwatch.usgs.gov /classic /index.php ?map type =drvw &state =nc) are depicted in the image below: Monday, Houenber 14, 2011 As of November 13 (Sunday), the graph of 7 -day flow percentiles shown below indicates 34 percent of sites across North Carolina have percentiles for 7 -day average flows falling below the 25th percentile for the calendar date. And 9 percent of sites across North Carolina are shown as having 7 -day average flows below the 10th percentile or reaching new minimum for calendar date. Compared to November 06 (Sunday), the current values indicate declines in overall streamflow conditions during course of the past week, considering 18% of sites across the state were below the 25th percentile and 3% of sites were below 10th percentile and /or reaching new minimum for the calendar date. Below is a graph developed from the 7 -day average flow summary table available at: http: / /waterwater.usgs.gov/ classic / ?m= pa07d &r= nc &w= paO7d %2Ctable 1 �f f Less than 25th percentile Less than 10th percentile New min forthe clay Percentage of sites in North Carolina with 7 -day indicated percentile range or love ON AN Date Another measure of the streamflow conditions is available from maps of median percentiles for 7 -day average flows for the previous 7 -, 14- 30 -, 60 -, and 90 -day periods updated through November 14 (Monday). These maps are intended to provide some kind of "long- term" index of the streamflow conditions (not available through the USGS WaterWatch pages) that is mapped according to the classification scheme for streamflow used by the U.S. Drought Monitor. Map images (via the above URL) showing the median percentiles for 7 -day average flows for previous 7 and 30 days are shown below. http: / /nc. water. usgs .gov /drought/dm- streamflow.html 0 Previous 7 days Monday, November 14, 2011 Previous 30 days Monday, November 14, 2011 Explanation No - No Drought ( >30 percentile) DO - Abnormally Dry (21 to 30 percentile) D1 - Moderate Drought (11 to 20 percentile) D2 - Severe Drought (6 to 10 percentile) D3 - Extreme Drought (3 to 5 percentile) D4 - Exceptional Drought (0 to 2 percentile) n/d - Not determined Unregulated Regulated a IM D ❑ 10 The following ArcMap screenshot shows the change in the median percentiles of 7 -day average flows for 7 -day period from last week (with last week's U.S. Drought Monitor in the background). In other words, at a given site, take last week's median percentile and compare it to this week's median percentile. Sites in red indicate a decrease in the median percentile from last week to this week (suggesting a decline in streamflow). Sites in blue indicate an increase in the median percentile from last week to this week (suggesting an improvement decline in streamflow). The size of the circles indicates the general range in percentile increase or decrease (note legend to left of the map). File Edit View Bookmarks Insert Selection Tools 'Window Help Ei Leers ❑► Automated DM maps (short string) E] ❑1 (weekly change in 7 -day median percen' ® gall othervalues? 10 to 25 percentile increase 5 to 10 p•ercentile increase 0 to 5 percentile increase No percentile change 4 to 5 percentile decrease 5 to 10 p•ercentile decrease IF 10 to 25 percentile decrease r x mi t Ei Leers ❑► Automated DM maps (short string) E] ❑1 (weekly change in 7 -day median percen' ® gall othervalues? 10 to 25 percentile increase 25 to 50 percentile decrease 01 Greaterthan 50 percentile decrease E EM Display Source I Selection Catalog y B �r U7 _i Drawing', T € [ a,f� � 1 ❑ ' � � [ a�� anal T � Itt Tf it J[ 41 T T � � -- Ground Water -- 11 5 to 10 p•ercentile increase 0 to 5 percentile increase No percentile change 4 to 5 percentile decrease 5 to 10 p•ercentile decrease 10 to 25 percentile decrease 25 to 50 percentile decrease 01 Greaterthan 50 percentile decrease E EM Display Source I Selection Catalog y B �r U7 _i Drawing', T € [ a,f� � 1 ❑ ' � � [ a�� anal T � Itt Tf it J[ 41 T T � � -- Ground Water -- 11 Please visit the Climate Response Network page at http: / /groundwaterwatch. usqs. gov /StateMapsNet.asp ?ncd= crn &sc =37 (map shown below) for more information on ground -water conditions at selected USGS observation wells in North Carolina. ONES VIRGINIA ft�unty �I"frloCte�� a '�� 17 Uniarsauu ok p'f Logan 4 pap �a,ppAhannock Atlantic into Bedtle $alud'a 4 ° [min harp t g'�' ° White $tone Beach 4L 1, Welo Unio L k]ur, ?: We o nial ki igh E,ashriIIe R asks gan4k F� Ori New Virginia 7 Explanation - Percentile class �. ......ee __ New <10 1024 25-75 75-90 >90 New Not Bel' ..... — - ....... " Low hrluch Below Bel¢w Normal l ove hrluGl l cve� High Ranked Shown below are the hydrographs at four selected wells across North Carolina... real -time page for USGS ground water data in NC is available at http: / /waterdata.usgs.gov /nc /nwis /current ?tvpe =qw (MOUNTAINS) NC -144 at Blantyre in Transylvania County (http: / /waterdata.usgs.gov /nc /nwis /dv / ?site no= 351808082374302 &agency cd =USGS &referred module =sw) 12 13 USES 351 080823 '430 TR-065 (NC-144) AT BLANTYRE, NC (REGOLITH) 33.20 4J 2113.80 CU Q. 33.40 2113.60 33.60 z 2113.40 33.80 (U L m 2113.20 L (U 4J 34.00 CU D O 2113.00 L CU 34.20 4J m 4-) C CL 2112.80 O 34.40 L 0 Oct Oct Nov Nov 22 29 05 12 2011 2011 2011 2011 ---- Provisional Data Subject to Revision ---- 13 (WESTERN PIEDMONT) NC -193, Piedmont RS near Barber in Rowan County (http: / /waterdata .usgs.gov /nc /nwis /dv / ?dd cd =01 72019 00003 &format =imq default &site no= 354057080362601 &set to qscale v =0 &begin date = 20070319) 14 USES 351 0808237430 TR -065 (SIC -144) AT BLANTYRE, HC (RE OLITH a 27.9 2129.9 m Q Q. fyp �y 28.9 ry �y �y 2119.9 y 4 4. ey�y �y 29.0 ry +� p �y 2116.9 S d 8 30.0 2117.9 z Gam] 31.9 2116.9 4J M 32,9 2115.9 } 33.0 2114.9 L G 34.0 2113.9 M J H C � a 35.0 L Jan Mar May Jul Sep Now 2911 2911 2911 2911 2911 2911 — Daily nean depth to water level Period of provisional data Period of approved data (WESTERN PIEDMONT) NC -193, Piedmont RS near Barber in Rowan County (http: / /waterdata .usgs.gov /nc /nwis /dv / ?dd cd =01 72019 00003 &format =imq default &site no= 354057080362601 &set to qscale v =0 &begin date = 20070319) 14 15 SGS 3540 x'0803 01 RO-149 (NC-193) PIEDMONT RS 1 NR BARBER (REGOLITI 7.88 670.20 C 4J CU CU Q. 0 8.00 670.00 4J 8.20 669.80 z (U (U L m ,-I = 8.40 66!9.60 CU L (U CU L 8.60 669.40 CU CL C L 8.80 669.20 0 Oct Oct Nov Nov 22 29 05 12 2011 2011 2011 2011 ---- Provisional Data Subject to Revision ---- 15 (EASTERN PIEDMONT) NC -126 at Chapel Hill in Orange County ( http:/ /waterdata.usgs.gov /nc /nwis /dv/ ?site no= 355522079043001 &agency cd =USGS &referred module =sw) 16 SGS 354057080362601 Rte -149 (SIC -193) PIEDMONT RS 1 NR BARBER (RE OLIT a 672 +0 m 6 +0 .0 Q. 4J 6.5 671 +5 7 +9 671 +6 G } L) c 7 +5 670 +5 z L no m i 8 +0 670 +0 C c} �} L 8 +5 669 +5 —I a Gib Q ° 9 +0 669 +0 +} s J r H CE G 9.5 668 +5 0 0 Jan Mar May Jul Sep Now CL 2011 2911 2911 2011 2911 2911 — Daily nean depth to water level Period of provisional data Period of approved data (EASTERN PIEDMONT) NC -126 at Chapel Hill in Orange County ( http:/ /waterdata.usgs.gov /nc /nwis /dv/ ?site no= 355522079043001 &agency cd =USGS &referred module =sw) 16 (COASTAL PLAIN) NC -160 near Simpson in Pitt County ( http:/ /waterdata.usgs.gov /nc /nwis /dv/ ?site no= 353219077153801 &agency cd =USGS &referred module =sw) 17 USGS 3555 079043001 OR -069 (NC -126) AT CHAPEL HILL, H (RE t LITH) a 43.0 468.5 w cu Q Q. 43.5 468.9 44.9 467.5 0 z Do L) 44.5 467.9 L s 45.9 466.5 cu D L 45.5 466.9 C6 Gib Q +} ° 46.9 465.5 s J r H � a 46.5 465.9 L Jan Mar May Jul Sep Now 2911 2911 2911 2911 2911 2911 — Daily nean depth to water level Period of provisional data Period of approved data (COASTAL PLAIN) NC -160 near Simpson in Pitt County ( http:/ /waterdata.usgs.gov /nc /nwis /dv/ ?site no= 353219077153801 &agency cd =USGS &referred module =sw) 17 18 USES 353219077153801 PI-532 (NC-160) NR IMP ON, NC (SURFICIAL,) 2.00 C 54.00 CU 2.50 53.50 m 3.00 z 53.00 (U L m 3.50 CU L (U D 0 4J 52.50 L 4.00 CU 4 CL 52.00 4.50 Oct Oct Nov Nov 22 29 05 12 2011 2011 2011 2011 ---- Provisional Data Subject to Revision ---- 18 19 USGS 353 19077153801 PI -532 (NC-160) NR SIMPSON, N URFI IAL) O 4ti 1.9 55.0 Q- 0 2 +9 54 *0 3.0 53.0 0% #$ 52.0 41 0 5.0 51.0 0 �- #09t9 } CU �} r -W 7.9 49.0 rl L C6 p 8.9 Gi P 48.0 s N 9.0 C o Jan Mar May Jul Sep Now 2011 2911 2911 2911 2911 2911 — Daily nean depth to water level Period of approved data Period of provisional data — Lowest recorded water level prior to MY2011 (8.97 ft Oct 23,24, 2007) 19