20201225 Ver 2_BPDP for PN_20211019

ID#* 20201225
Select Reviewer:
Katie Merritt
Initial Review Completed Date 10/21/2021
Mitigation Project Submittal - 10/19/2021
Version* 2
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?*
Type of Mitigation Project:*
Stream Wetlands Buffer Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Raymond Holz
Project Information
ID#:* 20201225
Existing ID#
Project Type: DMS Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Elm Grove
County: Edgecombe
Document Information
O Yes O No
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Version:* 2
Existing Version
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Plans
File Upload: 2020-1225v2 Elm Grove BPDP For Public
18.38MB
Notice_2021-10-19_. pdf
Please upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Signature
Print Name: * Raymond Holz
Signature: *

BANK PARCEL DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE
ELM GROVE NUTRIENT OFFSET MITIGATION BANK PARCEL
TAR-PAMLICO RIVER BASIN
DWR ID#: 2020-1225v2
Bank Parcel Sponsor
Restoration Systems, LLC
POC: Barrett Jenkins ([e-mail])
Ph: 919-755-9490
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604

Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes St. Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina
Ph: [phone]
Fx: [phone]
Elm Grove BPDP
DWR ID# 2020-1225v2
Response to DWR Comments Dated October 19th, 2021
Comments Received (Black Text) & Responses (Blue Text)
Page 10
1. Comment: Reduce to 5% and compensate with another stem
Response: We have made our final tree order and updated Table 7 and Table 8 to reflect species ordered, see below.
I also added "Trees will be planted on approximately 8ft x 8ft spacing at 680 stems per acre."
Table 1: Proposed Hardwood Tree Bare Root Planting Plan by Species*
Common Name
Scientific Name
% of Total Planted Trees
Forest Strata
River birch
Betula nigra
9%
Canopy
Persimmon
Diospyros virginiana
9%
Canopy
Tulip poplar
Liriodendron tulipifera
9%
Canopy
Red mulberry
Morus rubra
9%
Canopy
Black gum
Nyssa sylvatica
9%
Canopy
Sycamore
Platanus occidentalis
9%
Canopy
Swamp chestnut oak
Quercus michauxii
9%
Canopy
Water oak
Quercus nigra
9%
Canopy
American elm
Ulmus americans
9%
Canopy
Hackberry
Celtis occidentalis
6%
Midstory
Red bud
Cercis canadensis
6%
Midstory
*Note: Species availability may result in the substitution of regionally appropriate native species.
Table 2: Proposed Shrub Bare Root Planting Plan by Species*
Common Name
Scientific Name
% of Total Planted Shrubs
Forest Strata
Crabapple
Malus angustifolia
50%
Subcanopy
Arrowwood
Prunus angustifolia
50%
Subcanopy
*Note: Species availability may result in the substitution of regionally appropriate native species.
Page 19
2. Comment: Differentiate between "Stream and "Ditch" to make comparison with the credit table simple. (In reference
to the Figure 6: Nutrient Offset Credit Map)
Response: Figure 6 was updated Feature Classifications were added.
Page 38
3. Comment: <50' +features: D2, G, B2, A2 (In reference to Project Credit Table)
Response: A new row was added to the Project Credit Table to show sq. ft. of areas with <50'.
4. Comment: Remove all these numbers
Response: Table updated.
5. Comment: My fault: tally the areas <50' and record them here... just check "No" in both boxes. These areas are still
considered "Planted Areas" so should still go in the table for "Total Area".
Response: A new row was added to the Project Credit Table to show sq. ft. of areas with <50'.
Page 1 of 5

Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes St. Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina
Ph: [phone]
Fx: [phone]
6. Comment: Address comment regarding diffused flow being shown in the table as part of the "total area". How much
is being deducted? Show transparency, otherwise the total areas of 1,815,333 appear to include the areas required
to be deducted. Diffused flow deduction = belongs on G.
Response: A new row was added to the Project Credit Table to show sq. ft. removed for diffused flow deduction.
Page 2 of 5

BANK PARCEL DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE
ELM GROVE NUTRIENT OFFSET BANK PARCEL
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0
Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Bank Sponsor........................................................................................................................ 1
1.2 Project Location & Fee -Simple Ownership........................................................................... 1
1.3 Directions to Parcel from Raleigh: ........................................................................................ 2
1.4 Parcel Overview....................................................................................................................2
1.5 Historic Land Use.................................................................................................................. 2
2.0
Project Area — Current Conditions................................................................................................... 2
2.1 Physiography........................................................................................................................2
2.2 Soils.......................................................................................................................................3
2.3 Existing Vegetative Communities.........................................................................................3
2.4 Parcel Design and Implementation Constraints...................................................................3
2.4.1 Existing Utility Line...................................................................................................4
2.4.2 Threatened and Endangered Species.......................................................................4
2.4.3 Cultural Resources....................................................................................................4
3.0
Restoration Plan...............................................................................................................................4
3.1 Project Schedule................................................................................................................... 5
3.2 Permitting.............................................................................................................................6
3.3 Planting Plan.........................................................................................................................6
3.4 Parcel Protection & Easement Boundaries.......................................................................... 7
3.5 As -Built Report..................................................................................................................... 8
4.0
Monitoring and Maintenance Plan..................................................................................................8
4.1 Monitoring Protocol & Performance Standards...................................................................8
4.2 Parcel Maintenance..............................................................................................................8
4.3 Long Term Management Plan.............................................................................................. 8
5.0
Financial Assurance..........................................................................................................................8
6.0
Mitigation Potential.........................................................................................................................9
7.0
Credit Release..................................................................................................................................9
8.0
References....................................................................................................................................... 9
TABLES
Table 1: Bank Parcel Fee Simple Ownership................................................................................................. 1
Table2: Project Features..............................................................................................................................2
Table3: Parcel Soils....................................................................................................................................... 3
Table 4: USFWS FSC Species List...................................................................................................................4
Table 5: Restoration Plan Activities.............................................................................................................. 5
Table6: Project Schedule.............................................................................................................................. 6
Table 7: Proposed Hardwood Tree Bare Root Planting Plan by Species....................................................... 7
Table 8: Proposed Shrub Bare Root Planting Plan by Species...................................................................... 7
Table 9: Summary of Nutrient Offset Credits.............................................................................................10
Elm Grove Bank Parcel Development Package (DWR ID#: 2020-1225 V2)
Tar -Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020103 pg. i

APPENDICES
Appendix A —
Figures, Historic Aerial Imagery (EDR), Existing Condition Photos
Figure 1—
Vicinity Map
Figure 2
— Service Area Map
Figure 3
— Site Map
Figure 4
— USGS Map
Figure 5
— NRCS Map
Figure 6
— Nutrient Offset Credit Map
Figure 7
— Monitoring Map
Historic Arial Imagery— EDR
Parcel Photos — Existing Conditions
Appendix B — DWR Correspondence
Appendix C — Soil Survey and FEMA Map
Appendix D — USFWS Species Report
Appendix E — EDR Report
Appendix F — SHPO
Elm Grove Bank Parcel Development Package (DWR ID#: 2020-1225 V2)
Tar -Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020103 pg. ii

Bank Parcel Development Package
Elm Grove Nutrient Offset Bank Parcel
Edgecombe County, NC — Tar -Pamlico River Basin
1.0 Introduction
The Elm Grove Nutrient Offset Bank Parcel ("Parcel" or "Site") is being proposed under the terms and
conditions of the proposed Elm Grove Nutrient Offset Banking Instrument, which will be entered into by
Restoration Systems, LLC (RS), Bank Sponsor (Sponsor), and the North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality (NCDEQ), Division of Water Resources (DWR). The Parcel shall be planned and
designed according to the MBI, 15A NCAC 02B .0703, and the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A
NCAC 02B .0295.
Located in Edgecombe County, North Carolina, the project encompasses 44.63 acres of land utilized for
row crop production. The project will restore the riparian area along three (3) unnamed tributaries and
four (4) surface water conveyances (ditches) with hydrologic connection to the Tar River. The primary
purpose of the Parcel is to provide nutrient offset credits for stormwater and wastewater requirements
within the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Cataloging Unit 03020103. The Parcel is located on two
contiguous tracts of land held by the same owner, situated two miles east of the Tar River (Figure 1 and
2, Appendix A).
DWR representatives conducted an onsite determination for parcel applicability and suitability on October
28, 2020. A Stream Determination letter for the Parcel was provided on October 29, 2020, and a Site
Viability for Buffer & Nutrient Offset letter was provided by the Division on December 14, 2020 (Appendix
B).
1.1 Bank Sponsor
The Site is proposed by Restoration Systems, LLC (RS). Contact information for RS is provided below;
Restoration Systems, LLC
Attention: Barrett Jenkins
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, NC 27604
[e-mail]
919-755-9490
1.2 Project Location & Fee -Simple Ownership
Farfields, LLC is the current fee -simple owner both tracts associated with the Bank Parcel, which have
been historically and are currently used as agricultural fields. The Parcel is located approximately 3.5 miles
northeast of Tarboro in Edgecombe County, NC (Figure 1). The Parcel is within the Tar -Pamlico River Basin
14-digit USGS Cataloging Unit 03020103010010 of the Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain (North Carolina
Division of Water Quality [NCDWQ] Sub -basin Number 03-03-03) (Figure 1). Fee simple ownership and
details are provided in Table 1.
Table 1: Bank Parcel Fee Simple Ownership
Owner Name
D.B/Pg.
NC PIN#
Acreage
Farfields, LLC
1697/0489
4749-68-0128-00
68.7
Farfields, LLC
1697/0489
4749-79-2203-00
190.91
Elm Grove Bank Parcel Development Package (DWR ID#: 2020-1225 V2)
Tar -Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020103 pg. 1

1.3 Directions to Parcel from Raleigh:
- Get on 1-440 E from Capital Blvd
- Take US-64 E to Tarboro
- Take US-258 N 5 miles — Parcel is located on your right
Site Coordinates: 35.936380°,-77.495125'
1.4 Parcel Overview
The Bank Parcel totals 44.63 acres over two tracks of land, totaling 259.61 acres. Primary land use is
agricultural and silviculture. The Parcel includes four (4) surface water conveyances (ditches) with direct
hydrologic connection to three (3) unnamed tributaries which drain to the Tar River two miles southwest.
(Figure 1, Appendix A).
Parcel surface water conveyances and unnamed tributaries are periodically cleared of vegetation and
maintained as cleared ditches with some brush accumulation along feature slopes. An existing utility line
runs adjacent to the western property boundary along Highway 258 and at the northern end of Feature
D2. These utility lines are excluded from the Parcel's footprint.
DWR representatives conducted an onsite stream determination and a site viability assessment for
mitigation potential and nutrient offset on October 28, 2020. A Stream Determination Letter for the Site
was provided by the Division on October 29, 2020, and Site Viability letter for Buffer Mitigation & Nutrient
Offset was provided by the Division on December 14, 2020 (both letters found in Appendix B). A summary
of Parcel features and their viability are summarized in Table 2 and shown in Figures 3 and 4, Appendix A.
Table 2: Project Features
DWR Feature ID
In Field Classification
Subject to Buffer Rules
Nutrient Offset Viability
Al
Ditch >3ft depth
No
Yes
A2
Strea m
Yes
Yes
B1
Ditch >3ft depth
No
Yes
B2
Strea m
Yes
Yes
C
Ditch >3ft depth
No
Yes
D2
Strea m
Yes
Yes
G
Ditch >3ft depth
No
Yes
1.5 Historic Land Use
A review of historic aerials suggests the current utilization of the land for row crop production has
persisted since 1960 (Appendix A).
2.0 Project Area — Current Conditions
2.1 Physiography
The Parcel encapsulates a heavily modified headwater stream system within the Southeastern Plains.
Specifically, Ecoregion IV — 65p Southeastern Floodplains and Low Terraces that comprise a riverine
ecoregion that provides important wildlife corridors and habitat. Composed of alluvium and terrace
deposits of sand, clay, and gravel, the region includes large sluggish rivers and backwaters with ponds,
swamps, and oxbow lakes. It includes oak -dominated bottomland hardwood forests (Quercus michauxii,
Q. nigra, Q. phellos, Acer rubrum, Fraxinus pennsylvanica, Carya aquatica, C. ovata, C. cordiformis), and
some river swamp forests of bald cypress or pond cypress (Taxodium distichum, T. ascendens) and water
tupelo and swamp tupelo (Nyssa aquatica, N. biflora). Similar to 63n, the flood -prone region includes
Elm Grove Bank Parcel Development Package (DWR ID#: 2020-1225 V2)
Tar -Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020103 pg. 2

brownwater floodplains and blackwater floodplains. The brownwater floodplains originate in or cross the
Piedmont (45) and the sediments contain more weatherable and mixed minerals than the blackwater
floodplains that have their watersheds entirely within the coastal plain. The low terraces are mostly
forested, although some cropland or pasture occurs in some areas that are better drained. (Griffith et al.
2002).
The watershed is dominated by agricultural land, lowland forests, fringe forests, and impervious surfaces
associated with single-family homes and roads (Figure 3, Appendix A). Surrounding area land use is
primarily row -crop agriculture and silviculture, with some low -density residential housing, and cattle
pasture. Site photos were taken periodically throughout the development of this report and can be found
in Appendix A. Land use conditions have generally remained consistent since photos were collected, and
no significant changes to the Site have occurred.
2.2 Soils
A detailed soil report for the Parcel was produced using the Natural Resource Conservation Service's
(NRCS) Web Soil Survey. Based on the custom Edgecombe County report, the Parcel contains four soil
series outlined in Table 3. The complete survey is provided in Appendix C.
Table 3: Parcel Soils
Map Unit
Symbol
Map Unit Name
Percent of
Bank Parcel
Hydric
Soil Rating
AaA
Altavista fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes
32%
No
Ro
Roanoke loam
36%
Yes
StB
State loamy sand, 0 to 4 percent slopes
2%
No
TaB
Tarboro loamy sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes
30%
No
Source: https.Ilwebsoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.govIApplHomePage.htm
2.3 Existing Vegetative Communities
Agricultural fields account for nearly 100 percent of the Parcel's current land use. Primary crops are
cotton, corn, and soybeans. Forests immediately adjacent to the Parcel are heavily manipulated and
comprised of managed pines or primary successional species, i.e. red maple (Acer rubrum), sweetgum
(Liquidambarstyraciflua), and tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera). The Parcel contains minimal invasive
species, including Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense) and Cattails (Typha sp.). Undisturbed adjacent
reference forests could not be identified.
2.4 Parcel Design and Implementation Constraints
The presence of conditions or characteristics that have the potential to hinder restoration activities on
the Parcel were evaluated. The evaluation focused primarily on the presence of hazardous materials,
utility and restrictive easements, rare/threatened/endangered species or critical habitats, and the
potential for hydrologic trespass. Existing information regarding Parcel constraints was acquired and
reviewed, including an Environmental Records Report developed by Environmental Data Resources Inc.,
which located no evidence of environmental risk associated with the Parcel (Appendix E). In addition, any
Parcel condition that could potentially restrict the restoration and implementation was documented
during the field investigation. The culverted crossing connecting Feature G to Feature D1 (Figure 6) will be
included in the conservation easement footprint as shown on the final survey to provide controlled access
to the easement holder to maintain the functioning culvert and hydrologic connectivity between the
features. The culverted area will not generate mitigation credit, and the easement holder will have the
ability to maintain the culvert. As a result of our review and field surveys, no known Parcel constraints
Elm Grove Bank Parcel Development Package (DWR ID#: 2020-1225 V2)
Tar -Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020103 pg. 3

exist that may hinder proposed restoration activities. Potential constraints reviewed include the
following:
2.4.1 Existing Utility Line
An existing utility line runs adjacent to the western property boundary along Highway 258 and at the
northern end of Feature D2. These utility lines are excluded from the Parcel's footprint.
2.4.2 Threatened and Endangered Species
Species with the classification of Endangered (E), Threatened (T), or officially Proposed (P) for such listing
are protected under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA), as amended (16 U.S.0 1531 et seq.). Five
species are federally listed within the Parcel boundaries for Edgecombe County by the United States Fish
and Wildlife Service (USFWS) (USFWS 2008) and are listed below.
Table 4: USFWS FSC Species List
Common Name
Scientific Name
Neuse River Waterdog
Necturus lewisi
Carolina Madtom
Noturus furiosus
Atlantic Pigtoe
Fusconaia masoni
Tar River Spinymussel
Elliptio steinstansana
Yellow Lance
Elliptio lanceolate
Based on communications with the USFWS, there are no critical habitats within the project area. The
biological conclusion of the proposed mitigation activities is no effect. Implementation of this project will
result in positive benefits for these species listed above through improved habitat and water quality
(Appendix D).
2.4.3 Cultural Resources
The term "cultural resources" refers to prehistoric or historic archaeological sites, structures, or artifact
deposits over 50 years old. "Significant" cultural resources are those that are eligible or potentially eligible
for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. Evaluations of site significance are made with
reference to the eligibility criteria of the National Register (36 CFR 60).
Field visits were conducted in December 2020 to ascertain the presence of structures or features that may
be eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. An online search using the North Carolina State
Historic Preservation Office's (SHPO) Web GIS Service (http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpowebA and the National
Register of Historic Places GIS Search identified the Knight -Jenkins house, located on the Parcel's subject
fee -simple tract, but outside of the Parcel boundary, and five features within a 1.0-mile radius of the Bank
Parcel: (https://www.nps.gov/maps/full.html?mapld=7ad17cc9-b808-4ff8-a2f9-a99909164466).
Due to the nature of the project work and the absence of historic structures within the footprint of the
Parcel, IRS has determined the project, as proposed, will not affect any historic structures. Confirmation
of this opinion was provided by SHPO in a letter dated March 5, 2021, provided in Appendix F.
3.0 Restoration Plan
The primary goals associated with the restoration of riparian areas within the Bank Parcel will focus on
improving water quality, enhancing flood attenuation, and restoring wildlife habitat permanently. The
Elm Grove Bank Parcel Development Package (DWR ID#: 2020-1225 V2)
Tar -Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020103 pg. 4

project goals will be achieved by creating a forested riparian buffer adjacent to stream channels and
agricultural ditches. Goals will be accomplished by the following.
1. Removing nonpoint sources of pollution associated with agricultural production, including a)
ceasing the broadcast application of fertilizer, pesticides, and other agricultural materials into and
adjacent to Parcel surface water conveyances (ditches) and streams b) providing a restored
riparian area to filter runoff from adjacent agricultural lands.
2. Reducing sedimentation within onsite and downstream receiving waters by reducing bank
erosion, vegetation maintenance, and agricultural land disturbances.
3. Promoting floodwater attenuation by increasing frictional resistance of floodwaters crossing
Parcel floodplains.
4. Improving aquatic habitat by enhancing stream bed shading and natural detritus input.
5. Providing a terrestrial wildlife corridor and refuge in an area extensively developed for agricultural
production.
6. Restoring and re-establishing natural community structure, habitat diversity, and functional
continuity.
7. Protecting the Parcel's riparian buffer functions and values in perpetuity.
Goals will be accomplished by implementing restoration activities detailed in Table 5. The width of the
restored riparian buffer, which will generate nutrient offset credit (NOC), will be a minimum of 50 feet
and a maximum of 200 feet on each side of site features. Parcel design will ensure no adverse impacts to
wetlands or existing riparian buffers occur.
Table 5: Restoration Plan Activities
Restoration
Plan Activity
Action
1.) Prior to planting, the bank parcel will be disked in linear bands parallel to the direction
of surface water flows. The established microtopography on leveled surfaces will
promote diffuse flow and surface water storage throughout the floodplain.
2.) Herbaceous vegetation treatment will be performed as needed before planting and may
include selected herbicide treatments and/or limited mechanical clearing to remove
undesirable vegetation. Where required, invasive species will be selectively removed
Riparian
and/or spot treated by a licensed pesticide applicator.
Restoration
3.) Establishment of a native herbaceous community via site -specific seed mix including
both native types of grass and forbs, with a variety of annual and perennial plants
known to benefit wildlife and pollinators. The grass seed component will focus on low -
growing species which favor the establishment of the target forest community. Forbs
will include a diverse mixture of native and naturalized forbs and wildflowers.
4.) Establishment of a native hardwood forest via planting bare -root saplings along all
Parcel Features from the top of bank to the Parcel's easement boundary.
3.1 Project Schedule
Restoration is planned to begin in the winter of 2021, with planting occurring in January/February of 2022.
Table 6 details the complete project timeline and includes restoration plan activities and project
milestones.
Elm Grove Bank Parcel Development Package (DWR ID#: 2020-1225 V2)
Tar -Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020103 pg. 5

Table 6: Project Schedule
Activity / Milestone
Date
Approval of MBI, BPDP, and recording of the conservation easement
Q4 2021
Soil preparation
Q1 2022
Planting
Q1 2022
As -Built
Q2 2022
Year 1 monitoring
Q4 2022
Year 2 monitoring
Q4 2023
Year 3 monitoring
Q4 2024
Year 4 monitoring
Q4 2025
Year 5 monitoring
Q4 2026
Closeout
Q1 2027
3.2 Permitting
Activities outlined above do not require a permit or written notification to any regulatory agencies, i.e.,
US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), DWR, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), North
Carolina Department of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources (NC DEMLR) and/or Edgecombe County.
Reasoning for each is summarized below:
USACE — Under no applicable USACE regulation do the restoration activities require a USACE permit.
DWR — Under no applicable DWR regulation do restoration activities require a DWR permit or
consultation. A parcel visit with DWR Staff was conducted on October 28, 2020.
FEMA — The Parcel is located within the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) zone AE and Zone X
(Appendix C). No grading activities are proposed in the floodplain; therefore, a floodplain
development permit is not required. No hydraulic modeling is proposed for this project.
NC DEMLR: Sediment and Erosion Control — Restoration activities do not require a sediment and
erosion control permit.
Edgecombe County — No applicable County ordinance, code, or regulation apply to restoration
activities.
3.3 Planting Plan
All species are proposed based on their ability for sediment stabilization, rapid growth rate, the ability to
withstand hydraulic forces associated with flood events and suitability to site conditions. Trees and shrubs
will be mixed thoroughly before planting to provide a diverse and random planting across the Site.
Planting will occur at a density sufficient to meet the performance standards outlined in the Rule 15A
NCAC 02B .0295 of 4 species of trees and shrubs at a density of 260 stems per acre at the end of five years
with no one tree or shrub species being greater than 50% of the established stems. Shrub species will
count towards success criteria per the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295
(November 1, 2015). Tree species and shrubs proposed for planting are detailed in tables 7 and 8,
respectively. Final species and density will be based on species availability at the time of planting and
detailed in the As -Built Report. An appropriate seed mix of annual and perennial species will also be
applied to provide temporary and permanent ground cover for soil stabilization and reduction of sediment
loss during rain events in areas without existing herbaceous cover. Canopy cover will initially be provided
Elm Grove Bank Parcel Development Package (DWR ID#: 2020-1225 V2)
Tar -Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020103 pg. 6

by fast-growing emergent species, but a diversity of species have been selected to provide a vertically
layered canopy structure at maturity. Trees will be planted on approximately 8ft x 8ft spacing at 680
stems per acre.
Table 7: Proposed Hardwood Tree Bare Root Planting Plan by Species*
Common Name
Scientific Name
% of Total Planted Trees
Forest Strata
River birch
Betula nigra
9%
Canopy
Persimmon
Diospyros virginiana
9%
Canopy
Tulip poplar
Liriodendron tulipifera
9%
Canopy
Red mulberry
Morus rubra
9%
Canopy
Black gum
Nyssa sylvatica
9%
Canopy
Sycamore
Platanus occidentalis
9%
Canopy
Swamp chestnut oak
Quercus michauxii
9%
Canopy
Water oak
Quercus nigra
9%
Canopy
American elm
Ulmus americana
9%
Canopy
Hackberry
Celtis occidentalis
6%
Midstory
Red bud
Cercis canadensis
6%
Midstory
*Note: Species availability may result in the substitution of regionally appropriate native species.
Table 8: Proposed Shrub Bare Root Planting Plan by Species*
% of Total Planted
Common Name
Scientific Name
Forest Strata
Shrubs
Crabapple
Malus angustifolia
50%
Subcanopy
Arrowwood
Prunus angustifolia
50%
Subcanopy
*Note: Species availability may result in the substitution of regionally appropriate native species.
3.4 Parcel Protection & Easement Boundaries
Prior to the release of any credits, IRS will record a permanent conservation easement approved by DWR
at the Edgecombe County Register of Deeds sufficient to ensure protection, operation, and maintenance
of restored riparian buffers and other riparian areas in perpetuity.
The form of the conservation easement shall be consistent with the standards employed by the State of
North Carolina in the protection of restored riparian buffers and riparian areas and shall be approved by
the DWR prior to the release of any credits.
Parcel easement boundaries will be identified in the field to ensure a clear distinction between the Parcel
and adjacent land use. Boundaries may be identified by fencing, marker, bollard, post, tree -blazing, or
other means as allowed by Parcel conditions and/or the conservation easement and installed before As -
Built approval by DWR. Boundary markers will include placards identifying the contact information for the
easement holder. Boundary markers disturbed, damaged, or destroyed will be repaired and/or replaced
on an as -needed basis. The easement boundary will be checked annually as part of monitoring activities
and reported to DWR.
Elm Grove Bank Parcel Development Package (DWR ID#: 2020-1225 V2)
Tar -Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020103 pg. 7

3.5 As -Built Report
As defined in the MBI, an As -Built Report will be submitted to DWR, documenting the completion of the
Site's Restoration Plan.
4.0 Monitoring and Maintenance Plan
4.1 Monitoring Protocol & Performance Standards
Restoration monitoring procedures for vegetation at each Phase will monitor plant survival and species
diversity. Quantitative sampling will include thirty-four (34) permanent 10 x 10-meter vegetation plots as
outlined in the CVS Level 1-2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008) and will occur
no earlier than the first calendar day of Fall each year (Figure 7). The number of monitoring plots will allow
coverage of 2% of the restored acreage. A reference photo will be taken from the origin point of each
plot. All planted stems in the plots will be marked with flagging tape and recorded. Data collected will
include species, height, planting type (planted stem and/or volunteer), and vigor. Monitoring of the
restoration efforts will be performed for five years or until success criteria are achieved. IRS shall submit
to DWR annual monitoring reports no later than December 31 of each year. Each report will document
the success of the vegetation and any maintenance, supplemental planting, or encroachment within the
easement areas. Success criteria will be based on the survival of planted species at a density of 260 stems
per acre after five years of monitoring. The first annual monitoring activities will commence at the end of
the first growing season, at least five months after planting has been completed.
4.2 Parcel Maintenance
A remedial action plan will be developed and implemented with the approval of DWR in the event the
Parcel or a specific component of the Parcel fails to achieve success criteria as outlined above. Other
vegetation maintenance and repair activities may include pruning, mulching, and fertilizing. In the event
that exotic invasive plant species require treatment, such species will be controlled by mechanical
(physical removal with the use of a chainsaw) and/or herbicide application in accordance with North
Carolina Department of Agriculture (NCDA) rules and regulations. IRS will ensure herbicide application is
safe for water quality.
If mowing is deemed necessary by the Sponsor during the monitoring period, the Sponsor must receive
approval by the DWR prior to any mowing activities within Zone 1 and Zone 2 of the Tar -Pamlico buffers.
Failure to receive approval to mow within the Tar -Pamlico buffer as defined in 15A NCAC 02B .0611 by
the DWR, could result in Tar -Pamlico buffer violations and violations of the conservation easement.
4.3 Long Term Management Plan
The conservation easement will preserve all areas and prohibit all use of the property inconsistent with
its use as nutrient offset, including any activity that would materially alter the biological integrity of the
Parcel. IRS will transfer or assign the conservation easement and its interests in perpetuity to a qualified
holder under NC General Statute ("GS") 121-34 et seq. and 170(h) of the Internal Revenue Code prior to
the submittal of the Year 4 Monitoring Report. The holder shall be a land trust or stewardship program
that is accredited by the Land Trust Accreditation Commission and/or has been approved by DWR. A land
trust must be certified under 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.
5.0 Financial Assurance
As stated in the Elm Grove Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation Banking Instrument, dated
to -be signed ;
IRS will secure all financial assurances according to the MBI. No bond shall be less than $150,000 to
cover costs of construction and no less than $100,000, initially to cover monitoring expenses.
Elm Grove Bank Parcel Development Package (DWR ID#: 2020-1225 V2)
Tar -Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020103 pg. 8

Monitoring bonds shall be renewed with confirmation of renewal provided to DWR with each annual
monitoring report. DWR reserves the right to alter the credit release schedule if monitoring reports
are submitted without proof of bond renewals.
6.0 Mitigation Potential
Of the approximately 44.63 acres protected under the conservation easement, 41.674 acres or 1,815,334
square feet are anticipated to provide nutrient offset credit (Figure 6) equivalent to 94,726.554 lbs. of
nitrogen offset credit and 6,101.122 lbs. of phosphorous offset credit. The nutrient offset credit summary
below was derived based on Restoration Systems' conceptual design and may be adjusted in the AsBuilt
Report. The management objectives, mitigation type, and proposed credits are detailed in the Project
Credit Table provided in Table 9. These Nutrient Offset Credits will be neither convertible or transferable
to any other credit type, including Riparian Buffer Mitigation.
Credit deductions were calculated to account of areas with less than or 50 feet and for diffused flow (DWR
Diffuse Flow Memorandum 2008-0819). Accordingly, 5,498 sq. ft. was removed from crediting for areas
with less than 50 feet of easement width, measured from the top of bank of parcel features, and 4,350
sq. ft. was removed in accordance with DWR's Diffuse Flow Memorandum.
7.0 Credit Release
Upon submittal of the appropriate documentation by the Sponsor and subsequent approval by DWR, the
mitigation credits associated with the Elm Grove Mitigation Site will be released as described in the credit
release table found in the Restoration Systems Elm Grove Nutrient Offset Banking Instrument.
8.0 References
Schafale, M. P. and Weakley, 2012. A Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Fourth
Approximation.
USDA, Soil Conservation Service, 1974. Soil Survey of Edgecombe County, NC.
Elm Grove Bank Parcel Development Package (DWR ID#: 2020-1225 V2)
Tar -Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020103 pg. 9

§2
§2
{
\
kk
\
\\\
\�\lo
{|)
)
]
\/)
_
)
xm
fƒ
)
!
!
§
fmm
t
§
z
2,
77[\„
z
o
In
�
j
\I.��k�4zo
lo
lo
TO TO
To
To
To
TO
TO
)
o��®46
)®§|!|z
£32
-
-
46
k{�
-
d
d
-
-
-
z §

Appendix A — Figures, Historic Aerial Imagery (EDR), Existing Condition Photos
Figure 1—
Vicinity Map
Figure 2 —
Service Area Map
Figure 3 —
Site Map
Figure 4 —
USGS Map
Figure 5 —
NRCS Map
Figure 6 —
Nutrient Offset Credit Map
Figure 7 —
Monitoring Map
Historic Arial Imagery— EDR
Parcel Photos — Existing Conditions
Elm Grove Bank Parcel Development Package (DWR ID#: 2020-1225 V2) Appendices
Tar -Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020103

;
12-
U)
\
_
&
_
:§k�
k\k/
�/§
/
\
\
f;I�
,
_22�
mim
�WJ
E
2
e
#
0
E
}
` ��
w)
\
\
)
\
}
/
\
: ��-
.
k
2 7
{
>
2�% §
/
kk§ §
§
e
o
o
in
6 \ -E\ C.)
o E \ \
«o ! E E E !
E E So
} .
\ / ƒ

C)
z
IN
Y Q = N o >
i 4+I p W W W C W M l' O O LO
OO N o-5 E 2rd ) uj
C7Qo zn2 aE Q ..N
N
?oEwz
LL
Q 0� O=a N W �m N V1 ~ U)
a a z w F o o in o-
-
g
s
4b�`,,N-01
ry
\,fib u
�, t-: ,�?,ram f-•l11 _—.., � E / ��wp1°J1� -
1 j I u
E J '
/ O
tic
— S
/ tt�y.J.'_ d
'fPM4&N-Z)N
t7
C
\ E
d)
U _ \ 2,19jv
Z
Uo v_ \__ �\ ��Q. 63'tM N
co
g � O
E N
O
3 M
N p
C U
C
/ w cU a U m
CY e' // a Ld
wC7z S
U U co
Sbisoo " u)
-- - s
o
N Q W O u)
z�
- 7 JNJ O UPI O t'

U U
O N
U4+I p W W '"' O O O LC
O. O 7 t9 i L� U Q `O N CO w
O n J
Q Oof
0 N O �Od N Lo O ..�
O V1 Q' �'� m Z Y 9 C N Op ! \r
Z ,> m m YO -j W Z E V1 °� Q Z N V_
0 E— OVj :: uj FY 00 z) a .. LL
n via`
a @ m m .o
W F v) 0 0 in D-
z
r aol
56
r r ,
cl
�a
�l
o
}
Z
0
a
oLLo
coy
cl
�om t m
Z
Cyi -
N
-
41 __
Q o
DO
o
m
— o
`m
I
11 o m u� m
Z ��� 05 r Q m U o
om
r{. iD� m m tiJ llJ aj E
m LLCM LL -0 0 °?
�M N ro
m
Q o E N
LLCM in a � m
u o
a o
> m m
a w w F z o a a
J 000.0.
W
UI
m
UI

U
z
O
o
O
>
LO
0 O N
� V 4
�=�VI 2'
�OQ
Q
O
�Z
NLU
ON
LO
o Z ��'
m�
� W
N
9
W
��
m
..
ZO
0
(��o
EO — 2v)
is
z
W Q'Q
E
o
Zz)
2
Q
..
LL
Q
via`
�m
�
a
a
z
w
F
o
o
in
a
-
T Q
�
P.
.S•
7
a
a
n
ram.
u)
o
Z
Z
z
o.
P,
z
L_
w
r
-
dL
m
oLL°\
o
a
a
m m
LLCM
o
z
0
z
+
n
n
d rrM
mom
LLCM
CO
Im
r-
258
N, Hi9niay U Z
0
U)
z ata m
m�
U dog
U
u
i
f
m (
jnc3 te316010aO 'sOl-kOlW aWl I juawpodea rs,n woAj Pa
pue iDDIAACIS UOjj21JOSUD:) 1!0 'aanjjn )jj6 pl �o juawlamda LL
Q f
(n °
U)
£
6 C'
E £
V 4 a w u

H z
i N N W LPL W �
�0 LLI
�LU
° wU U¢
F- r¢
zo U � W
z 2i
o O NoN
,Vn
N 20 J E z 0 Z LLL Q Z LL
O d O w m LL
m N O N Y N
O
a` a` z w F--
E Ed
�o v
- 0 o
EF Z°ouo _.-_
� m
E Y
m E
D o
O
F o
o i
EN
0 0
z E1F j E
xA I
0 in
d' p E W -
00
U
coil
cl
co
U m O II
J
o
O z ----
i
I I
I
I
, Z58
I
om vo
v�
¢avmc
E0 OF o
a
U vv¢F:
a0
Z W w m 0
Q
o
0
am°
E WEm o
In O o o v —
w ~ _ 0 d -
E
n m � c 0 C 0 Z
o In a n 0 E o o -
F m r o
a o o in o -2
E v v w
E E j m m m U � 2
n w w `
I'n o a a= O O O D Z Z a

U
z
O >
i d 0 W LL W C U' O O LO
0 7 t9� iLLU Z N M w
0 O N 0 d 0 Q ON
o NY a� Z Ur 9 O
Z D N °� 0 0 _j O O Q Z N LL
N
n � o�a � w~m
a a z w F o o to o-
-
o �
E
U�o�2
z°duo
❑•
\ I
El
I I
W I I
1 I
I �1
❑ ❑
� I
El
El
--------------------
- _ - _ _ _ _ - El --------
El
IEl
❑
ElI I
1 �
❑ \. El
El
p ❑
I
I I
4Er ❑
0 El
I _
❑,'
i U
- m
O
❑ O
❑ 250 E m m
NG N.gn WaY _
LL
a C,
m 3
0
F LL
V N
N v N
N
� O Q
m m a m
o o o o ro
m o m
yo
O N Q
m
Q O m
o
O O Q O > N O O
C9 C9 C9 p o m m m U U o o
E E E U 4 O O O o o m m
w w v w z in �' F F F m z z of a
o
�000-OD u�'

Elm Grove
4432 US-258
Tarboro, NC 27886
Inquiry Number: 6342644.5
January 26, 2021
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
IrE
��� Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com

EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package 01/26/21
Site Name: Client Name:
Elm Grove
4432 US-258
Tarboro, NC 27886
EDR Inquiry # 6342644.5
Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
Contact: JD Hamby
CEDW
Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) Aerial Photo Decade Package is a screening tool designed to assist
environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR's
professional researchers provide digitally reproduced historical aerial photographs, and when available, provide one photo
per decade.
Search Results:
Year
Scale
Details
Source
2016
1 "=625'
Flight Year: 2016
USDA/NAIP
2012
1 "=625'
Flight Year: 2012
USDA/NAIP
2009
1 "=625'
Flight Year: 2009
USDA/NAIP
2006
1 "=625'
Flight Year: 2006
USDA/NAIP
1998
1 "=625'
Acquisition Date: January 01, 1998
USGS/DOQQ
1993
1 "=625'
Acquisition Date: January 01, 1993
USGS/DOQQ
1977
1 "=625'
Flight Date: March 01, 1977
USGS
1974
1 "=625'
Flight Date: April 01, 1974
USGS
1964
1 "=625'
Flight Date: April 01, 1964
USGS
1961
1 "=625'
Flight Date: August 17, 1961
USGS
1956
1 "=625'
Flight Date: December 26, 1956
USGS
1950
1 "=625'
Flight Date: November 21, 1950
USGS
When delivered electronically by EDR, the aerial photo images included with this report are for ONE TIME USE
ONLY. Further reproduction of these aerial photo images is prohibited without permission from EDR. For more
information contact your EDR Account Executive.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot
be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY
EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY
DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE
OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE,
WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING,
WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any
analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to
provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property.
Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2021 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of
Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are
the property of their respective owners.
6342644 - 5 page 2

ki

Zvi
�L�:��•�
SA}}.S� ! cfrSTFy-•j .• MN'y r ,� ,•.
kr, 0�
VV
t � y•'y f � �ir ���°i.d�' �"��" iS. fi;t: � 1� 5 � 'k. � 7 ''S
IS
Kok
T ,
i
'✓Tli°jr'tri;YrlSy�+�(;�.&L„�-�, 4y} ��'! ,�d�:ty �� it
' •L a 5' pr d li,r , •.. - ... .
'�•:` a'
. ,�1
%r

FV
� I
0

l
1
INQUIRY M 6342644.5 /�
YEAR: 1998 `j�J�' ► �
. N
(PEOR'
= 625' r
A
0
II,
.a
w►
�� '�. r��re"�'tyl• .Ly�1
1
r'
rv� 1 1YC�� �-•V �r�� �r.
try
14
M.IL
.'iik,. •

•
PF
.o
1 do it '
x y •+ #
dv
JrIle
t -
NQUIRY k 6342644.5 N
A
YEAR: 1977
(rEDR
i L
1

N

F -

YEAR: 1961

1%-
INQUIRY 6342644.5 4 N
YEAR: 1950 — (r
625' FOR
C

21
f
�p VII
4.
1 � l
_. •-.i:: �a .n. _ l.X.� Cw. J9�. � - ._ ..i�:.,i`a h.4 i:`�a: �.�, tl�-'ed, ya. .. ..
Photo 1— Feature D2, Photo Date 10/06/2020
Feature ,
74
Photo 2 — Feature D2 to D1, Photo Date 10/06/2020
Elm Grove Bank Parcel Development Plan
Tar -Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020103

Feature G
Feature D2 -
1 Feature B1 Feature Al
1 --
1
Feature C
Feature B2
Feature A2
1
Feature ,41`Feature A2 -
Feature B1 � T
- � 54
Feature C

Appendix B — DWR Correspondence
Elm Grove Bank Parcel Development Package (DWR ID#: 2020-1225 V2) Appendices
Tar -Pamlico River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020103

DocuSign Envelope ID: 5EE00457-1AA2-4F56-B9F9-1C3138834F569
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. DANIEL SMITH
Director
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
October 29, 2020
DWR Project # 2020-1125
Edgecombe County
Restoration Systems, LLC.
Barrett Jenkins
(sent via email at: [e-mail])
Subject: On -Site Determination for Applicability to the Tar -Pamlico Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 02B
.0734)
Project Name: Elm Grove
Address / Location: 4432 US 258, Tarboro, NC 27886
Determination Date: October 28, 2020 Staff: Rick Trone
Dear Mr. Jenkins,
On October 28, 2020, Rick Trone of the Division of Water Resources conducted an on -site review of
features located on the subject property at the request of Restoration Systems, LLC to determine
the applicability to the Tar -Pamlico Riparian Area Protection Rules (15A NCAC 02B .0734).
The enclosed map(s) depict the feature(s) evaluated. This information is also summarized in the
table below. Streams that are considered "Subject" have been located on the most recently
published NRCS Soil Survey of Edgecombe County and/or the most recent copy of the USGS
Topographic (at 1:24,000 scale) map(s), have been located on the ground at the site, and possess
characteristics that qualify them to be at least intermittent streams. Features that are considered
"Not Subject" have been determined to not be at least intermittent or not present on the property
or not depicted on the required maps.
This determination only addresses the applicability to the buffer rules and does not approve any
activity within buffers or within waters of the state. There may be other streams or features
located on the property that do not appear on the maps referenced above. Any of the features
on the site may be considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers and
subject to the Clean Water Act.
The following table addresses the features rated during the DWR site visit:
D �,� North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
512 North Salishury Street 11617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
NORTH CARQLINA
pia mfity /^� 919.707.9000

DocuSign Envelope ID: 5EE00457-1AA2-4F56-B9F9-1C3138834F569
DWR # 2020-1125, Elm Grove
Edgecombe County
Page 2 of 4
Feature
Subject
Depicted
Depicted on
E/I/P/Other
to Buffer
Start @
Stop @
on
ID
Rules
Soil Survey
USGS To o
p
Al
Other
No
Top of feature
A2
X
DWR flag @
A2
I
Yes
approximately 35.93341
Culvert at Hwy 258
X
-77.49446
ConfluenceCw/feature
131
Other
No
Top of feature
X
Confluence w/feature C @
132
1
Yes
approximately 35.93513
Culvert at Hwy 258
X
-77.49448
C
Other
No
Not subject throughout project area
X
DWR flag @
D1
Other
No
Top of feature
approximately
X
X
35.93720-77.49239
DWR flag @
D2
I
Yes
approximately 35.93720
Outside project area
X
X
-77.49239
E
Other
No
Feature not present
X
F
Other
No
Not subject throughout project area
X
G
Other
No
Top of feature I Feature D
X
Pond 1
Other
No
Throughout project area
X
This on -site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or
affected parties that dispute a determination made by the DWR may request a determination by
the Director. An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) calendar days of the date of this
letter to the Director in writing.
If sending via U.S. Postal Service: If sending via delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc.)
DWR 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch DWR 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
Supervisor Supervisor
1617 Mail Service Center 512 N Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Raleigh, NC 27604
This determination is final and binding as detailed above unless an appeal is requested within sixty
(60) calendar days.
This letter only addresses the features on the subject property and within the proposed project
easement and does not approve any activity within buffers or within waters of the state. If you
have any additional questions or require additional information, please contact Rick Trone at (919)
707-3631 or [e-mail]. This determination is subject to review as provided in Articles
3 & 4 of G.S. 150B.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 5EE00457-1AA2-4F56-B9F9-1C3138834F569
DWR # 2020-1125, Elm Grove
Edgecombe County
Page 3 of 4
Sincerely,
DocuSigned by!
Ile
199491)91BA53EF4EO
Paul Wojoski, Supervisor
401 & Buffer Permitting Branch
Enclosures: USGS Topographical Map, NRCS Soil Survey, Site Map
cc: 401 & Buffer Permitting Branch files

2S�
� o
(7 O
E (1) ao
w -0
`^ o
N O
ci b0
O -0 N W
O
N
N
Q
O
N
C
W
_O
U)
O
O
0

DocuSign Envelope ID: 5EE00457-1AA2-4F56-B9F9-1C3138834F569
Elm Grove
Edgecombe County, NC-DWR Project # 20-1225
StB �\
D2 F: Not subject raQ
ab
D2: Subject @
14% o DWR flag 4 StB
E: Not present/Not subject
r � Ta
J A aA
A D1: Not subject
C: Not subject
132: Subject at
confluence w/C
F71
z . -
A2: Subject @ T aB
DWR flag
S
Tad AAA
B1: Not subject
G: Not subject
e�
v
A1: Not subject
5�
P
F
�o
0
W�
NRCS Soil Survey Sheet 15��
Mix
Edgecombe Co NC 1979 Locations are approximate
Legend: and are provided for refer-
ence only::nn
luA`1vl
-project boundary

DocuSign Envelope ID: 5EE00457-1AA2-4F56-B9F9-1C3138834F569
I
E I m Grove
Edgecombe County, NC-DWR Project # 20-1225
D2: Subject @
DWR flag
D1: Not subject
0
43
Pond 1: not subject
50
' r
CJI
f
y
USGS Topographical Map r�5rA?Z
Speed Quadrangle 2019 Locations are approximate
and are provided for refer -
Legend: _ F ence only::M
In`I
-Project boundary

DocuSign Envelope ID: EC232A55-7B5F-4C59-9E82-854F6200B48C
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. DANIEL SMITH
Director
Barrett Jenkins
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
December 14, 2020
Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes St, Suite 211
Raleigh, NC 27604
(via electronic mail: bienkinsgrestorationsystems.com)
DWR# 2020-1225
Re: Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation & Nutrient Offset — Elm Grove Site
Near 4432 US 258, Tarboro, NC
Lat., Long. 35.935659,-77.495615
Tar -Pamlico 03020103
Dear Mr. Jenkins,
On September 15, 2020, Katie Merritt, with the Division of Water Resources (DWR), received a
request from you on behalf of Restoration Systems, LLC (RS) for a site visit near the above -
referenced site in the Tar -Pamlico River Basin within the 8-digit Hydrologic Unit Code 03020103.
The site visit was to determine the potential for riparian buffer mitigation and nutrient offset within a
proposed Easement Boundary, which is more accurately shown in the attached maps labeled "Elm
Grove Farm Site Overview" (Figure 1) prepared by RS and edited by DWR. On October 28, 2020,
Ms. Merritt performed a site assessment of the subject site. Staff with RS were also present.
Ms. Merritt's evaluation of the features onsite and their associated mitigation determination for the
riparian areas are provided in the table below. This evaluation was made from Top of Bank (TOB)
and landward 200' from each feature for buffer mitigation pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295
(effective November 1, 2015) and for nutrient offset credits pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0703.
Feature
Classification
tSubiect
6Riparian Land uses
Buffer
'Nutrient
4,1Mitigation Tyne Determination Win
onsite
adiacent to Feature
Credit
Offset
to
riparian areas
Buffer
0( 200,)
Viable
Viable
Rule
Al
Ditch
No
Non -forested agricultural
No
Yes
Non -forested fields - Restoration Site per
(Begins at
>3' depth
fields
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
point shown
on map)
A2
Stream
Yes
Non -forested agricultural
Yes
Yes
Non -forested fields - Restoration Site per
(begins at
fields and partially within a
See note
See note
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
DWR stream
DOT R.O.W
call flag)
Note: No credits are allowed within the
DOT R.O.W
B1
Ditch
No
Non -forested agricultural
No
Yes
Non -forested fields - Restoration Site per
>3' depth
fields
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
D Q
�� North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 1 1611 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1611
NOR fH CA An INA
o.oa emnrF"Im�ma��w�=r� /`� 919,707.9000

DocuSign Envelope ID: EC232A55-7B5F-4C59-9E82-854F6200B48C Elm Grove Site
Restoration Systems, LLC
December 14, 2020
Feature
Classification
'Subject
'Riparian Land uses
Buffer
'Nutrient
4^1Mitigation Type Determination w/in
onsite
to
adjacent to Feature
Credit
Offset
riparian areas
Buffer
0( 200')
Viable
Viable
Rule
132
Stream
Yes
Non -forested agricultural
Yes
Yes
Non -forested fields - Restoration Site per
(begins at
fields
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
DWR stream
call flag)
C
Ditch
No
Non -forested agricultural
No
Yes
Non -forested fields - Restoration Site per
>3' depth
fields
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
D1
Ditch
No
Non -forested agricultural
No
No
Not hydrologically connected to a stream
>3' depth
fields
D2
Stream
Yes
Non -forested agricultural
Yes
Yes
Non -forested fields - Restoration Site per
(begins at
fields with downstream
See note
See note
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
DWR stream
partially within a DOT
call flag)
R.O.W
Note: No credits are allowed within the
DOT R.O.W
E
Not Present
No
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
F
Ditch
No
Non -forested agricultural
No
Yes
Non -forested fields - Restoration Site per
>3' depth
fields
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
Easement must include all of Pond F to its
confluence with D2 to be creditable.
Pond F
In -line pond
No
Non -forested agricultural
No
No
No
fields adjacent to a high
forested berm along tops of
banks on all sides.
G
Ditch
No
Non -forested agricultural
No
Yes
Non -forested fields - Restoration Site per
>3' depth
fields
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)
'Subjectivity calls for the features were determined by DWR in correspondence dated October 29, 2020 using the 1:24,000 scale
quadrangle topographic map prepared by USGS and the most recent printed version of the soil survey map prepared by the NRCS .
2The area of preservation credit within a buffer mitigation site shall comprise of no more than 25 percent (25%) of the total area of buffer
mitigation per 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(5) and 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(4). Site cannot be a Preservation Only site to comply with this rule.
'NC Division of Water Resources - Methodology and Calculations for determining Nutrient Reductions associated with Riparian Buffer
Establishment
'Determinations made for this Site are determined based on the proposal provided in maps and figures submitted with the request.
s All features proposed for buffer mitigation or nutrient offset, must have a conservation easement established that includes the tops of
channel banks when being measured perpendicular and landward from the banks, even if no credit is viable within that riparian area.
'The area of the mitigation site on ephemeral channels shall comprise no more than 25 percent (25%) of the total area of buffer
mitigation per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(7).
Determinations provided in the table above were made using a proposed easement boundary showing
proposed mitigation areas shown in Figure 1. Maps representing the proposal for the site are
attached to this letter and are initialed by Ms. Merritt on December 14, 2020. Substantial changes to
the proposed easement boundary could affect the Site's potential to generate buffer and nutrient
offset credits.
Page 2 of 3

DocuSign Envelope ID: EC232A55-7B5F-4C59-9E82-854F6200B48C Elm Grove Site
Restoration Systems, LLC
December 14, 2020
This letter does not constitute an approval of this Site to generate buffer and nutrient offset credits.
Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295, a mitigation proposal and a mitigation plan shall be submitted to
DWR for written approval prior to conducting any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or
surface waters for buffer mitigation credit. Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0703, a proposal regarding a
proposed nutrient load -reducing measure for nutrient offset credit shall be submitted to DWR for
approval prior to any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or surface waters.
All vegetative plantings, performance criteria and other mitigation requirements for riparian
restoration, enhancement and preservation must follow the requirements in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 to
be eligible for buffer and/or nutrient offset mitigation credits. For any areas depicted as not being
viable for nutrient offset credit above, one could propose a different measure, along with supporting
calculations and sufficient detail to support estimates of load reduction, for review by the DWR to
determine viability for nutrient offset in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0703.
This viability assessment will expire on December 14, 2022 or upon approval of a mitigation
plan by the DWR, whichever comes first. This letter should be provided in any nutrient offset,
buffer, stream or wetland mitigation plan for this Site.
Please contact Katie Merritt at [phone] if you have any questions regarding this
correspondence.
Sincerely,
DocuSigned by:
W102
949D91BA53EF4E0...
Paul Wojoski, Supervisor
401 and Buffer Permitting Branch
PW/kym
Attachments: "Elm Grove Farm Site Overview" (Figure 1)
cc: File Copy (Katie Merritt)
Page 3 of 3

T�

Appendix C — Soil Survey and FEMA Map
Elm Grove Bank Parcel Development Plan Appendices

USDA United States
Department of
Agriculture
N RCS
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
Edgecombe
County, North
Carolina
February 15, 2021

Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.
They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information
about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for
many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban
planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.
Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste
disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand,
protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil
properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.
The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of
soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for
identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some
cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/
portal/nres/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering
applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center
(https:Hoffices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nres) or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/contactus/?
cid=nres142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as
septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to
basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States
Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its
programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,
and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,
sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require

alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at [phone] (voice
and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of
Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or
call [phone] (voice) or [phone] (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity
provider and employer.

Contents
Preface....................................................................................................................
2
How Soil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5
SoilMap..................................................................................................................
8
SoilMap................................................................................................................9
Legend................................................................................................................10
MapUnit Legend................................................................................................
11
MapUnit Descriptions.........................................................................................11
Edgecombe County, North Carolina...............................................................
13
AaA—Altavista fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes...............................13
CeB—Conetoe loamy sand, 0 to 4 percent slopes .....................................
14
Ro—Roanoke loam.....................................................................................15
StB—State loamy sand, 0 to 4 percent slopes............................................17
TaB—Tarboro loamy sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes........................................18
Wh—Wehadkee silt loam............................................................................19
References............................................................................................................
21

How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous
areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous
areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and
limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length,
and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and
native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil
profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The
profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the
soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is
devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other
biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource
areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that
share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water
resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey
areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that
is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the
area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind
of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and
miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific
segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they
were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict
with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a
specific location on the landscape.
Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their
characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil
scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only
a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented
by an understanding of the soil -vegetation -landscape relationship, are sufficient to
verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.
Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They
noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock
fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them
to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their
properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).
Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil
characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for
comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic
classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character
of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil

Custom Soil Resource Report
scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the
individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that
they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and
research.
The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the
objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a
unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable
proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components
of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way
diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such
landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite
investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.
The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of
mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape,
and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the
soil -landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at
specific locations. Once the soil -landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller
number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded.
These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color,
depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for
content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil
typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.
Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of
characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct
measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit
component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other
properties.
While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally
are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists
interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field -observed
characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the
soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through
observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management.
Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new
interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other
sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of
specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management
are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same
kinds of soil.
Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on
such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over
long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example,
soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will
have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict
that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.
After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the
survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and

Custom Soil Resource Report
identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings,
fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.

Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of
soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.

_ a026C _+ _a _a _a _a
,zza ,sza
. e
/
\
/
t
E
J )
§
= E
0 co
3/
/
(
/
/
± 0
/ �
^
®\
E
®*
§
\
)
/
\
(
_
=q
)
)\
\
e
z
)
)
B
\ /
�
)
)/
\
§
/
_ _§
/
ziiijc
q
_
aO%_2 _a _a _a 000SL+ _a
}
/

a)
m
a) .o L
�y
2yy
N
a)
I
�0 `p
a3 p a)
U p 'O
U
a) � a)
O
-O
N
O
a)
a3
N
_
c
U) O
O
a)
U (6 (6 0
E
O
6 U) w -O
+
N
O
N
C E
= 0)
Q
O-
O) E
U a5
O
U)
C
>N
> 7 —
'6 .
U
C
— U a)
O m E
Z
O
a)
O
O_ a5 — a3
N
O
a3 N a
U)
a3
U
N
y fOA
Q
a)
(A
E m A�
N
a) C7
O O Q N
t
'6 U)�
Z
O O
N
Utl)
7 0
U E y '6
Q
3
y
_
O) a) p
O
Q
a3
y (n
O d
a) -p a5
a) '6 y 7 a3
Q
Z O
N
2i
O
'O
a)
O>
a)
O
a) Q y
o
E
O LLI
U
p C p O N
(6 Q
(n
>'
C N
O
O_
O
p_ C
U a3 a)
L
U)
Q L
C U) "
7 C
a)
2
C y
p a) Q
O
0
=
y E y
a3
N
a) (6
(6 .0 (u O O
a)
O
U
a5
O
O_ tlj (0
E
>+
a)
>
N
p O a)
— C N
7 U
a)
>, O .2 U
O U O
"�-'
E a)
O
N
0
(u >,
y
Z
z
w
� �0�
a)
O
(OA
g
O
��. a) m
7 y U O
O-0
E�
y
m
Q
US m
Mn
Q
U
U
U) E(6
�
3 J>
(n N O_ 'E O
C
N—
-O i
L1J
Q
t -0 0 0
E
Q
O_ 0 a) O
as
a)
a3
Z E
Q Q U
o
a`) Utl)
a)
a3
a)
a)
o N p
-E
y
O
E C y
>+
N N jp
O) (6
a3
a3 a)
E
O O N
>'
p -p
O y
O_ N >+
a) U N (6 7
,y '6
N Q
U)
�
._
T
O '6 a3 O_
O
U)
C m N y
a) N Ern
O a)
M 7 U)
°?
.J 3 C (0 2
U .O
Q (6
'C
o
�
L O N E
Q as
y
O
C
E a) .c
N '6 (A
N E
0— a5
O C
E as p
O o
U a) ""
'6
O>
a3 O
a)
M
O '6
O O
y
E
a5
2) O N
Q
a) 7
y y
a) U) 'O
y U O N (0
Q a)
7 >,
� a)
E O
O
O)
o 'Q a) C
L ON.
O 'N a) O U
a) a)
p a) p
M O n� U
Q'O om
L
0 7
O N
a5 L()
L O O t
W E= U U)
a E
u) > U
2 Q
H O
U) U)
(n
N
H U.— U)
Q
y
d y
R O
(i U
R
L
L
Q
Q
>.
0O
0
0
L
d �Z00
Q
o
O
m a
CL O
U) cn
>
a
N L_ y
O (n cn
�
o
°Ro
a)
m
U
J a Q
0
R
N
R
O
0
C
p
O
WR
4
R
5 R
fVn
�
F
m
W
J
y
a
a
p
y
o
o
(�
)
w
o
a
o
a
N
y
Q
ECL
a
aO
Q
Q
Q
Q Q
O o
O
m
°
o
o` LoU
>,
(Qno
a)O
3
—oo
3
O
>>
L
aRaoMn
E
O
O
a)
oo00
Y
UQ)y
ao
p m
m U
o
U (7 (7
J J
a)
a
O m
cn
R a)
cn cn
in in
O
cn
w
a
R ❑
R +Vy�
■
y0 ❑ a i/
®
�ap�
<> { �
yp�
"V
`}
!
}�
y
Q
y
0
r

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
AaA
Altavista fine sandy loam, 0 to 3
percent slopes
116.1
33.8%
CeB
Conetoe loamy sand, 0 to 4
percent slopes
22.5
6.6%
Ro
Roanoke loam
78.3
22.8%
StB
State loamy sand, 0 to 4
percent slopes
18.5
5.4%
TaB
Tarboro loamy sand, 0 to 6
percent slopes
60.8
17.7%
Wh
Wehadkee silt loam
47.3
13.8%
Totals for Area of Interest
343.4
100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
11

Custom Soil Resource Report
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or
landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha -Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
12

Custom Soil Resource Report
Edgecombe County, North Carolina
AaA—Altavista fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol. 132pf
Elevation: 80 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 265 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Altavista and similar soils: 91 percent
Minor components: 9 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Altavista
Setting
Landform: Stream terraces
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Old loamy alluvium derived from igneous and metamorphic rock
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 8 inches: fine sandy loam
E - 8 to 15 inches: fine sandy loam
Bt - 15 to 42 inches: sandy clay loam
C - 42 to 80 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 3 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Moderately well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 18 to 30 inches
Frequency of flooding: Rare
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: High (about 9.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Roanoke, undrained
Percent of map unit. 5 percent
Landform: Depressions on stream terraces, backswamps on stream terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Flat
Down -slope shape: Concave
13

Custom Soil Resource Report
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Tomotley, undrained
Percent of map unit: 2 percent
Landform: Depressions on stream terraces, flats on stream terraces
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Wehadkee, undrained
Percent of map unit: 1 percent
Landform: Depressions on flood plains
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Bibb, undrained
Percent of map unit: 1 percent
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
CeB—Conetoe loamy sand, 0 to 4 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 132rl
Elevation: 20 to 160 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 280 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Conetoe and similar soils: 90 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Conetoe
Setting
Landform: Ridges on stream terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder, summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Sandy and loamy alluvium and/or fluviomarine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 8 inches: loamy sand
14

Custom Soil Resource Report
E - 8 to 25 inches: loamy sand
Bt - 25 to 41 inches: sandy loam
BC - 41 to 48 inches: loamy sand
C - 48 to 90 inches: sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 5 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 5.95 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 6.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
Ro—Roanoke loam
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 132x5
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 210 to 265 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Roanoke, undrained, and similar soils: 85 percent
Roanoke, drained, and similar soils: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Roanoke, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Depressions on stream terraces, backswamps on stream terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Flat
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Old clayey alluvium derived from igneous and metamorphic rock
Typical profile
A - 0 to 7 inches: loam
BAg - 7 to 10 inches: loam
Btg - 10 to 43 inches: clay
BCg - 43 to 52 inches: clay
15

Custom Soil Resource Report
Cg - 52 to 80 inches: gravelly sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to
moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: OccasionalNone
Frequency of ponding: Rare
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 8.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Description of Roanoke, Drained
Setting
Landform: Depressions on stream terraces, backswamps on stream terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Flat
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Old clayey alluvium derived from igneous and metamorphic rock
Typical profile
A - 0 to 7 inches: loam
BAg - 7 to 10 inches: loam
Btg - 10 to 43 inches: clay
BCg - 43 to 52 inches: clay
Cg - 52 to 80 inches: gravelly sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to
moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: OccasionalNone
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 8.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
it.

Custom Soil Resource Report
StB—State loamy sand, 0 to 4 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol. 132x6
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 210 to 265 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
State and similar soils: 75 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of State
Setting
Landform: Stream terraces
Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Old loamy alluvium derived from igneous and metamorphic rock
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 6 inches: loamy sand
E - 6 to 10 inches: loamy fine sand
Bt1 - 10 to 38 inches: sandy clay loam
Bt2 - 38 to 42 inches: fine sandy loam
C - 42 to 90 inches: fine sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 3 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 48 to 72 inches
Frequency of flooding: Rare
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 7.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 1
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
17

Custom Soil Resource Report
TAB —Tarboro loamy sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 132x7
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 210 to 265 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Tarboro and similar soils: 80 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Tarboro
Setting
Landform: Ridges on stream terraces
Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Sandy fluviomarine deposits and/or alluvium
Typical profile
A - 0 to 9 inches: loamy sand
C1 - 9 to 48 inches: sand
C2 - 48 to 99 inches: gravelly sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Somewhat excessively drained
Runoff class: Very low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High to very high (5.95
to 19.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: Rare
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Very low (about 2.7 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3s
Hydrologic Soil Group: A
Hydric soil rating: No
18

Custom Soil Resource Report
VAIMT17 aMMI:70[1C 1Ii"i1
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 132xh
Elevation: 80 to 330 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 55 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 210 to 265 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Wehadkee, undrained, and similar soils: 80 percent
Wehadkee, drained, and similar soils: 10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Wehadkee, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Depressions on flood plains
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Loamy alluvium
Typical profile
A - 0 to 7 inches: loam
Bg - 7 to 58 inches: loam
Cg - 58 to 84 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Runoff class: Very high
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: FrequentNone
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: High (about 10.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
Description of Wehadkee, Drained
Setting
Landform: Depressions on flood plains
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
19

Custom Soil Resource Report
Parent material: Loamy alluvium
Typical profile
A - 0 to 7 inches: loam
Bg - 7 to 58 inches: loam
Cg - 58 to 84 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Runoff class: Very high
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: FrequentNone
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: High (about 10.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4w
Hydrologic Soil Group: B/D
Hydric soil rating: Yes
20

References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling
and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep -water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
n res/d eta i I/n ati o n a I/s o i Is/?cid = n res 142 p2_0 54262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://
www. nres. usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://
www. nres. usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/
home/?cid=nres142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/
detail/national/landuse/rangepastu re/?cid=stelprdb1043084
21

Custom Soil Resource Report
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
n res/d eta i I/so i Is/scie ntists/?cid=n res 142 p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States,
the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook
296. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?
cid = n res 142 p2_05 3624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http:H
www.nrcs.usda.gov/lnternet/FSE—DOCUMENTS/nrcsl 42p2_052290. pdf
22

a)
a)
�5
ry
H
^L
W
J
N
m
_0
2
0
Z
k
O
O
e
p e
cc
Q 0 C N
0 e
x
N
0
LL
i N _6
a)
a)
c
N
ca
L
U
m
t t E
ca
3
C
= d
a>
N J
-6
=
a)
j LL
m
D ° a
O
E—
¢ a)
m
W
a) v
o
0 0 0
v a)
Q 0 k
N _6
as
2
LLL
O (6
C C
o O J
C
W T
LL l a)
a) a) C
O v
o LLL �S
V
0
V
a)
3
_O
_O N Ca
O 0 a) 0
-p N N
O
C
YO O
L > O (6
(6
m
° Q -6
O
O L ° a5
C C, a) 0 E
LL
N
E
LL
3 W CO
>
15 N a)
LL O
C
U ° CO +�'
_6 O O
N
0'
a)
a) YO
N a) a) T O
m
a) C LL
CO Q O T
'0
Y
C O a) LL
C
O
0
U Y
0 '� N V
~ °O
N Q
~
W O
0¢ m
C
ca '6
DLL L a) L
a)
N
_
c
N
m� o h
m m
�_ a �_
Q
o as
-)
3) 3
as m as
0
ca
5
o
ca
a)
u�i m w
_ °
N N
N ci , i)
j L i) N d
d
w
d
L N
° O N
O T
O O "O a3
LL U Q J Q
Q
W
Q
U J
U U 00 J
U LL 2
N
LL
O W
u�a
LU
0'w
M: W
L
a
w a
a
Z U
OLU Q
Q
Q p
w
C 7
LL
r
as
LLI
=0
r
O
fn 2
r LL
O
a) �
a)
(6 �
ECL
OCL
z
2�
(6 N
E���
L C
C
p
E
a)N p y 0
to w
._ to
ca
m0�
�3m
Er0-0m
m . CO o
oNaw)E-p
m
-0 0
° E
o Q o y as
o� p 6 a w
N
v
ca C U
a)
ate+ N
w�v
T W 'O O
.0
Y w 'C a)
N
E (6 O
2 0-0
U T co-,
4
>
Q
a) N Y
N= N
_6
d-0 E a)
_6 E E
D i E (a 0
> (6
Q
ate+ a)
c a) OQ
U Q
CO a)
-0
C
N
-p Q'a O t,
ba O C
O p > (6
p� Q
N 4 a)
20
N�
a)0 ci - E O
0 °- (a a) N
n
-0 D_
4
10
ccEo
aa)m
.Ow
E -0M
-0ca
Z
V O
w O O-
O N E
c a) L
w .Q
W C
LL E
a) O a)
(6 N N 0 C
Q d LL
w .. p _6
C ca
N
a�+y„ U
i ��� T
3U)Ew
V � V
O-
oas °
❑❑®
t0C
r O- ca
3 c
N 3 N
i
°
2 J\ ca _O 0
N
> ER E N E N
0 -�
N Q t
0
_O 2 O (6 N
�6Zp
= 0
EEaca
�
pea
ca �c�
Z
O- o a) -
-O y O L a)
Q y
as a o
Q
a
©
ca w 0
E� a L°
0 ._ 0- 0 t m
° `O �r E
m
E m 0-m
ax
q- t 0 6 o
E a)
¢
:E =6i
= CO aOi
to wo���
r'oras
rasa r-0
S
z
0
M
N
z
0
0
J
LL
W
ff
u-
2�
C)
H
a
O t�
�j
w�
w
`
x
J� .
W �
•
Al
ICD0
ICD0
0
O
O
LO
O
LO
N
m_�

Appendix D — USFWS Species Report
Elm Grove Bank Parcel Development Plan Appendices

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To: February 15, 2021
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2021-SLI-0675
Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-01456
Project Name: Elm Grove
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The species list generated pursuant to the information you provided identifies threatened,
endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical
habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by
your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally -listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally -protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or

02/15/2021 Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-01456 2
evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally -protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require
development of an eagle conservation plan (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/
eagle_guidance.html). Additionally, wind energy projects should follow the wind energy
guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to migratory birds and
bats.
Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications
towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http://
www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm; http://
www.towerkill.com; and http://www.fws.gov/migratoDLbirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/
towers/comtow.html.
Not all Threatened and Endangered Species that occur in North Carolina are subject to section 7
consultation with the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service. Atlantic and shortnose sturgeon, sea
turtles,when in the water, and certain marine mammals are under purview of the National Marine
Fisheries Service. If your project occurs in marine, estuarine, or coastal river systems you should
also contact the National Marine Fisheries Service, http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in
the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project
that you submit to our office. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis
of this office atjohn—[e-mail].

02/15/2021 Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-01456
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List

02/15/2021 Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-01456
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

02/15/2021
Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-01456
Project Summary
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2021-SLI-0675
Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-01456
Project Name: Elm Grove
Project Type: LAND - RESTORATION / ENHANCEMENT
Project Description: Nutrient Offset Project
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:
www. google.com/maps/(a)35.937039300000066,-77.49089723503215,14z
Counties: Edgecombe County, North Carolina

02/15/2021 Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-01456 3
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 5 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesi, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Amphibians
NAME STATUS
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi Proposed
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not Threatened
available.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772
Fishes
NAME STATUS
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus Proposed
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not Endangered
available.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528

02/15/2021 Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-01456
4
Clams
NAME
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not
available.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164
Tar River Spinymussel Elliptio steinstansana
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1392
Yellow Lance Elliptio lanceolata
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not
available.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4511
STATUS
Proposed
Threatened
Endangered
Threatened
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

Appendix E — EDR Report
Elm Grove Bank Parcel Development Plan Appendices

Elm Grove
4432 US-258
Tarboro, NC 27886
Inquiry Number: 6342644.2s
January 26, 2021
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
(rEDW Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
FORM-LBD-CCA

TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION
PAGE
Executive Summary-------------------------------------------------------
ES1
Overview Map
2
Detail Map
3
Map Findings Summary----------------------------------------------------
4
Map Findings
8
Orphan Summary---------------------------------------------------------
10
Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking
GR-1
GEOCHECK ADDENDUM
Physical Setting Source Addendum------------------------------------------
A-1
Physical Setting Source Summary
A-2
Physical Setting SSURGO Soil Map-------------------------------------------
A-5
Physical Setting Source Map
A-12
Physical Setting Source Map Findings----------------------------------------
A-14
Physical Setting Source Records Searched------------------------------------.
PSGR-1
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data
Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from
other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION,
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE,
ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL,
CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY
LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings,
environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor
should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any
property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2020 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole
or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other
trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
TC6342644.2s Page 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR).
The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA's Standards
and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for
Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site
Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property (E 2247-16), the ASTM Standard Practice for Limited
Environmental Due Diligence: Transaction Screen Process (E 1528-14) or custom requirements developed
for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.
TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION
ADDRESS
4432 US-258
TARBORO, NC 27886
COORDINATES
Latitude (North):
Longitude (West):
Universal Tranverse Mercator
UTM X (Meters):
UTM Y (Meters):
Elevation:
35.9372100 - 35' 56' 13.95"
77.4921700 - 77' 29' 31.81 "
Zone 18
275181.2
3979654.5
47 ft. above sea level
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY
Target Property Map: 5944982 SPEED, NC
Version Date: 2013
West Map: 5945661 TARBORO, NC
Version Date: 2013
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT
Portions of Photo from: 20140618, 20141006, 20140706
Source: USDA
TC6342644.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1

F- MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:
4432 US-258
TARBORO, NC 27843
Click on Map ID to see full detail.
MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.)
ID SITE NAME ADDRESS DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTION
1 MURPHY BROWN SPILL NC HWY258/122 LAST Higher 2048, 0.388, South
6342644.2s Page 2

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS
The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR.
DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES
No mapped sites were found in EDR's search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government
records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the
following databases:
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL___________________________ National Priority List
Proposed NPL________________ Proposed National Priority List Sites
NPL LIENS -------------------- Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Delisted NPL__________________ National Priority List Deletions
Federal CERCLIS list
FEDERAL FACILITY__________ Federal Facility Site Information listing
SEMS_________________________ Superfund Enterprise Management System
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
SEMS-ARCHIVE-------------- Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
CORRACTS------------------ Corrective Action Report
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
RCRA-TSDF------------------ RCRA- Treatment, Storage and Disposal
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-LQG------------------- RCRA- Large Quantity Generators
RCRA-SQG------------------- RCRA- Small Quantity Generators
RCRA-VSQG----------------- RCRA - Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity
Generators)
Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries
LUCIS_________________________ Land Use Control Information System
TC6342644.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
US ENG CONTROLS_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Engineering Controls Sites List
US INST CONTROLS_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. Institutional Controls Sites List
Federal ERNS list
ERNS_________________________ Emergency Response Notification System
State- and tribal - equivalent NPL
NC HSDS_____________________ Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS
SHWS------------------------- Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists
SWF/LF_______________________ List of Solid Waste Facilities
DEBRIS_______________________ Solid Waste Active Disaster Debris Sites Listing
OLI____________________________ Old Landfill Inventory
LCID__________________________ Land -Clearing and Inert Debris (LCID) Landfill Notifications
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
LUST -------------------------- Regional UST Database
INDIAN LUST_________________ Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUST TRUST_________________ State Trust Fund Database
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
FEMA UST____________________ Underground Storage Tank Listing
UST___________________________ Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
AST___________________________ AST Database
INDIAN UST__________________ Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries
INST CONTROL_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
VCP___________________________ Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
INDIAN VCP__________________ Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
State and tribal Brownfields sites
BROWNFIELDS______________ Brownfields Projects Inventory
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS----------- A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
SWRCY_______________________ Recycling Center Listing
TC6342644.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
HIST LF_______________________ Solid Waste Facility Listing
INDIAN ODI___________________ Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
ODI___________________________ Open Dump Inventory
DEBRIS REGION 9----------- Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
IHS OPEN DUMPS___________ Open Dumps on Indian Land
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL_________________ Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register
US CDL_______________________ National Clandestine Laboratory Register
Local Land Records
LIENS 2_______________________ CERCLA Lien Information
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS________________________
Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
SPILLS________________________
Spills Incident Listing
IMD___________________________
Incident Management Database
SPILLS 90____________________
SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch
SPILLS 80____________________
SPILLS 80 data from FirstSearch
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated
FUDS_________________________
Formerly Used Defense Sites
DOD__________________________
Department of Defense Sites
SCRD DRYCLEANERS_______
State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
US FIN ASSUR_______________
Financial Assurance Information
EPA WATCH LIST____________
EPA WATCH LIST
2020 COR ACTION_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ 2020 Corrective Action Program List
TSCA_________________________
Toxic Substances Control Act
TRIS__________________________
Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
SSTS--------------------------
Section 7 Tracking Systems
ROD__________________________
Records Of Decision
RMP__________________________
Risk Management Plans
RAATS________________________
RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
PRP___________________________
Potentially Responsible Parties
PADS_________________________
PCB Activity Database System
ICIS___________________________
Integrated Compliance Information System
FTTS__________________________
FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide
Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
MLTS_________________________
Material Licensing Tracking System
COAL ASH DOE_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ Steam -Electric Plant Operation Data
COAL ASH EPA______________
Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
PCB TRANSFORMER_______
PCB Transformer Registration Database
RADINFO ---------------------
Radiation Information Database
HIST FTTS____________________
FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
DOT OPS_____________________
Incident and Accident Data
CONSENT____________________
Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
INDIAN RESERV_____________
Indian Reservations
FUSRAP______________________
Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
UMTRA_______________________
Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
LEAD SMELTERS____________
Lead Smelter Sites
TC6342644.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
US AIRS______________________
Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem
US MINES____________________
Mines Master Index File
ABANDONED MINES ---------
Abandoned Mines
FINDS -------------------------
Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
ECHO -------------------------
Enforcement & Compliance History Information
UXO ---------------------------
Unexploded Ordnance Sites
DOCKET HWC----------------
Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
FUELS PROGRAM___________
EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
AIRS__________________________
Air Quality Permit Listing
ASBESTOS___________________
ASBESTOS
COAL ASH____________________
Coal Ash Disposal Sites
DRYCLEANERS______________
Drycleaning Sites
Financial Assurance -----------
Financial Assurance Information Listing
NPDES------------------------
NPDES Facility Location Listing
UIC----------------------------
Underground Injection Wells Listing
AOP---------------------------
Animal Operation Permits Listing
SEPT HAULERS______________
Permitted Septage Haulers Listing
MINES MRDS-----------------
Mineral Resources Data System
CCB___________________________
Coal Ash Structural Fills (CCB) Listing
PCSRP------------------------
Petroleum -Contaminated Soil Remediation Permits
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP_____________________ EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
EDR Hist Auto ----------------- EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations
EDR Hist Cleaner_____________ EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners
4Q MN=1d11Y=IN=IeZrZeP/=INkiIky,I=I,rreI:Na19�I
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA HWS____________________ Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
RGA LF_______________________ Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
RGA LUST____________________ Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS
Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases
Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on
a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity
should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been
differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property.
Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed
data on individual sites can be reviewed.
Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases.
Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis.
TC6342644.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
LAST: A listing of leaking aboveground storage tank site locations.
A review of the LAST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/30/2020 has revealed that there is 1 LAST
site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property.
Equal/Higher Elevation
MURPHY BROWN SPILL
Close Out: 05/22/2013
Incident Number: 92352
Current Status: C
Address Direction / Distance Map ID Page
NC HWY258/122 S 1/4 - 1/2 (0.388 mi.)
TC6342644.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
There were no unmapped sites in this report.
TC6342644.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8

OVERVIEW MAP - 6342644.2S
7/
IV
Target Property
A
Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property
♦
Sites at elevations lower than
the target property
1
Manufactured Gas Plants
National Priority List Sites
Dept. Defense Sites
0 1/4 1/2 1 Mlles
Indian Reservations BIA Hazardous Substance
Special Flood Hazard Area (1%) Disposal Sites
0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard
National Wetland Inventory
0 State Wetlands
This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display and/or hide map information. The
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.
SITE NAME: Elm Grove CLIENT: Restoration Systems, LLC
ADDRESS: 4432 US-258 CONTACT: JD Hamby
Tarboro INC 27886 INQUIRY #: 6342644.2s
LAT/LONG: 35.93721 / 77.49217 DATE: January 26, 2021 8:50 am
Copyright �o 2021 EDR, Inc. (,) 2015 TonnTom Rai. 2015.

DETAIL MAP - 6342644.2S
Target Property
A
Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property
♦
Sites at elevations lower than
the target property
1
Manufactured Gas Plants
i
Sensitive Receptors
National Priority List Sites
Dept. Defense Sites
0 1 /9 1 /4 1 /2 Mlles
Indian Reservations BIA Hazardous Substance
Special Flood Hazard Area (1%) Disposal Sites
0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard
National Wetland Inventory
0 State Wetlands
This report includes Interactive Map Layers to
display and/or hide map information. The
legend includes only those icons for the
default map view.
SITE NAME: Elm Grove CLIENT: Restoration Systems, LLC
ADDRESS: 4432 US-258 CONTACT: JD Hamby
Tarboro INC 27886 INQUIRY #: 6342644.2s
LAT/LONG: 35.93721 / 77.49217 DATE: January 26, 2021 8:51 am
Copyright �o 2021 EDR, Inc. (,) 2015 TonnTom Rai. 2015.

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target
Total
Database (Miles) Property
< 1/8
1/8-1/4
1/4-1/2
1/2 - 1
> 1
Plotted
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
Proposed NPL 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
NPL LIENS 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Delisted NPL 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
Federal CERCLIS list
FEDERAL FACILITY 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
SEMS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
SEMS-ARCHIVE 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
CORRACTS 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
RCRA-TSDF 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-LQG 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
RCRA-SQG 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
RCRA-VSQG 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
Federal institutional controls /
engineering controls registries
LUCIS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
US ENG CONTROLS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
US INST CONTROLS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
Federal ERNS list
ERNS 0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
State- and tribal - equivalent NPL
NC HSDS 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS
SHWS 1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
State and tribal landfill and/or
solid waste disposal site lists
SWF/LF 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
DEBRIS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
OLI 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
LCID 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
TC6342644.2s Page 4

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target
Total
Database (Miles) Property
< 1 /8
1/8- 1 /4
1/4- 1 /2
1/2- 1
> 1
Plotted
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
LAST 0.500
0
0
1
NR
NR
1
LUST 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
INDIAN LUST 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
LUST TRUST 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
FEMA UST 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
UST 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
AST 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
INDIAN UST 0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
State and tribal institutional
control / engineering control registries
INST CONTROL 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
VCP 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
INDIAN VCP 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
State and tribal Brownfields sites
BROWNFIELDS 0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS
0.500
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid
Waste Disposal Sites
SWRCY
0.500
HIST LF
0.500
INDIAN ODI
0.500
ODI
0.500
DEBRIS REGION 9
0.500
IHS OPEN DUMPS
0.500
Local Lists of Hazardous waste /
Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL
0.001
US CDL
0.001
Local Land Records
LIENS 2
0.001
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS
0.001
SPILLS
0.001
IMD
0.500
0 0
0
NR
NR 0
0 0
0
NR
NR 0
0 0
0
NR
NR 0
0 0
0
NR
NR 0
0 0
0
NR
NR 0
0 0
0
NR
NR 0
0 0
0
NR
NR 0
0 NR
NR
NR
NR 0
0 NR
NR
NR
NR 0
0 NR
NR
NR
NR 0
0 NR
NR
NR
NR 0
0 NR
NR
NR
NR 0
0 0
0
NR
NR 0
TC6342644.2s Page 5

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target
Total
Database
(Miles) Property
< 1 /8
1/8- 1 /4
1/4- 1 /2
1/2- 1
> 1
Plotted
SPILLS 90
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
SPILLS 80
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
FUDS
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
DOD
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
SCRD DRYCLEANERS
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
US FIN ASSUR
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
EPA WATCH LIST
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
2020 COR ACTION
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
TSCA
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
TRIS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
SSTS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
ROD
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
RMP
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
RAATS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
PRP
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
PADS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
ICIS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
FTTS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
MLTS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
COAL ASH DOE
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
COAL ASH EPA
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
PCB TRANSFORMER
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
RADINFO
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
HIST FTTS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
DOT OPS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
CONSENT
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
INDIAN RESERV
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
FUSRAP
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
UMTRA
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
LEAD SMELTERS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
US AIRS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
US MINES
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
ABANDONED MINES
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
FINDS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
ECHO
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
UXO
1.000
0
0
0
0
NR
0
DOCKET HWC
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
FUELS PROGRAM
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
AIRS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
ASBESTOS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
COAL ASH
0.500
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
DRYCLEANERS
0.250
0
0
NR
NR
NR
0
Financial Assurance
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
NPDES
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
UIC
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
AOP
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
SEPT HAULERS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
MINES MRDS
0.001
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
0
TC6342644.2s Page 6

MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
Distance Target
Database (Miles) Property
CCB 0.500
PCSRP 0.500
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP 1.000
EDR Hist Auto 0.125
EDR Hist Cleaner 0.125
4Q:111111:7x9ISIN=IN=IeZrZeP/=INkiIky,I=I,111&1: 3a19*?
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA HWS 0.001
RGA LF 0.001
RGA LUST 0.001
- Totals -- 0
NOTES:
TP = Target Property
NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance
Sites may be listed in more than one database
< 1/8
1/8-1/4
1/4-1/2
1/2 - 1
> 1
0
0
0
NR
NR
0
0
0
NR
NR
Total
Plotted
0
0
0 0
0
0
NR 0
0 NR
NR
NR
NR 0
0 NR
NR
NR
NR 0
0 NR
NR
NR
NR 0
0 NR
NR
NR
NR 0
0 NR
NR
NR
NR 0
0 0
1
0
0 1
TC6342644.2s Page 7

Map ID
MAP FINDINGS
Direction
Distance
EDR ID Number
Elevation
Site
Database(s) EPA ID Number
1
MURPHY BROWN SPILL
LAST S113813415
South
NC HWY258/122
N/A
1/4-1/2
PRINCEVILLE, NC 27886
0.388 mi.
2048 ft.
Relative:
LAST:
Higher
Name: MURPHY BROWN SPILL
Actual:
Address: NC HWY258/122
48 ft.
City,State,Zip: PRINCEVILLE,
NC 27886
Facility ID: Not reported
UST Number: RA-92374
Incident Number: 92352
Contamination Type:
GW
Source Type: 12
Product Type: P
Date Reported: 10/11/2011
Date Occur: 10/10/2011
Cleanup: 10/20/2011
Closure Request: Not reported
Close Out: 05/22/2013
Level Of Soil Cleanup Achieved:
Not reported
Tank Regulated Status:
R
# Of Supply Wells: 0
Commercial/NonCommercial UST Site:
C
Risk Classification:
L
Risk Class Based On Review:
L
Corrective Action Plan Type:
Not reported
NOV Issue Date: Not reported
NORR Issue Date: Not reported
Site Priority: Not reported
Phase Of LSA Req: Not reported
Site Risk Reason: Not reported
Land Use: Not reported
MTBE: No
MTBE 1: Unknown
Flag: No
Flag 1: No
LUR Filed: Not reported
Release Detection: 0
Current Status: C
RBCA GW: Not reported
PETOPT: 3
RPL: False
CD Num: 0
Reel Num: 0
RPOW: False
RPOP: False
Error Flag: 0
Error Code: N
Valid: False
Lat/Long: Not reported
Lat/Long Decimal: 35.92596-77.49136
Testlat: Not reported
Regional Officer Project Mgr:
HMM
Region:
RAL
Company:
Murphy Brown
Contact Person:
Katie Elmer
Telephone:
9194182148
TC6342644.2s Page 8

Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation
MAP FINDINGS
Site
MURPHY BROWN SPILL (Continued)
EDR ID Number
Database(s) EPA ID Number
RP Address:
434 West Main St
RP City,St,Zip:
Waverly, VA
RP County:
Not reported
Comments:
50 to 60 gallons of diesel fuel released from saddle tank, as result
of an accident.Pads and booms placed - consultant- doesen't
say -probably should have been reported to Surface Water of the Div.
of Water Quality. Spill also occurred to soil. Intial sampling,
10/10, 10/11, 10/20/2011.Excavation conducted 10/20/2011, soil
confirmation samples taken on 12/06/2011, with results below state
action levels.
5 Min Quad:
Not reported
PIRF:
Facility Id:
92352
Date Occurred:
10/10/2011
Date Reported:
10/11/2011
Description Of Incident:
Rupture of saddle tank on truck, spilling 50-60 gallons.
Owner/Operator:
Not reported
Ownership:
4
Operation Type:
8
Type:
Not reported
Location:
8
Site Priority:
Not reported
Priority Update:
Not reported
Wells Affected Y/N:
N
Wells Affected Number:
Not reported
Samples Taken By:
Not reported
Samples Include:
Not reported
7#5 Min Quad:
Not reported
5 Min Quad:
Not reported
Pirf/Min Soil:
Not reported
Release Code:
9
Cause:
Not reported
Source:
Not reported
Source Type:
D
Last Modified:
Not reported
Incident Phase:
Not reported
NOV Issued:
Not reported
NORR Issued:
Not reported
45 Day Report:
Not reported
Public Meeting Held:
Not reported
Corrective Action Planned:
Not reported
SOC Signed:
Not reported
Reclassification Report:
Not reported
IRS Designation:
Not reported
Closure Request Date:
Not reported
Close-out Report:
Not reported
TC6342644.2s Page 9

Q)

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency
on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required.
Number of Days to Update: Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days
from the date the government agency made the information available to the public.
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL: National Priority List
National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority
cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon
coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center
(EPIC) and regional EPA offices.
Date of Government Version: 10/28/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/25/2020
Number of Days to Update: 20
NPL Site Boundaries
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/14/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/12/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Sources:
EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC)
Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 1
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 3
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 4
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 5
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 10
Telephone [phone]
EPA Region 6
Telephone:[phone]
EPA Region 7
Telephone:[phone]
EPA Region 8
Telephone:[phone]
EPA Region 9
Telephone: [phone]
Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites
A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule
in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on
the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing.
Date of Government Version: 10/28/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/25/2020
Number of Days to Update: 20
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/14/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/12/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority
to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner
received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens.
TC6342644.2s Page GR-1

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994
Number of Days to Update: 56
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
Delisted NPL: National Priority List Deletions
The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the
EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the
NPL where no further response is appropriate.
Date of Government Version: 10/28/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/25/2020
Number of Days to Update: 20
Federal CERCLIS list
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/14/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/12/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing
A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAG) sites found in the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPA Federal Facilities
Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities.
Date of Government Version: 04/03/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/14/2019
Number of Days to Update: 39
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/23/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/12/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SEMS: Superfund Enterprise Management System
SEMS (Superfund Enterprise Management System) tracks hazardous waste sites, potentially hazardous waste sites,
and remedial activities performed in support of EPA's Superfund Program across the United States. The list was
formerly know as CERCLIS, renamed to SEMS by the EPA in 2015. The list contains data on potentially hazardous
waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons,
pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA).
This dataset also contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and the
sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL.
Date of Government Version: 10/28/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/25/2020
Number of Days to Update: 20
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/14/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/26/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
SEMS-ARCHIVE: Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive
TC6342644.2s Page GR-2

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
SEMS-ARCHIVE (Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive) tracks sites that have no further interest under
the Federal Superfund Program based on available information. The list was formerly known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP,
renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015. EPA may perform a minimal level of assessment work at a site while
it is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes available. Archived sites have been removed
and archived from the inventory of SEMS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA's knowledge,
assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the
site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or
other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. The decision does not necessarily mean
that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that. based upon available information, the
location is not judged to be potential NPL site.
Date of Government Version: 10/28/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/25/2020
Number of Days to Update: 20
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/14/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/26/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report
CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity.
Date of Government Version: 12/14/2020 Source: EPA
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2020 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2020
Number of Days to Update: 5 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that
move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the
waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste.
Date of Government Version: 12/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2020
Number of Days to Update: 5
Federal RCRA generators list
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate
over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 12/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2020
Number of Days to Update: 5
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6342644.2s Page GR-3

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate
between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 12/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2020
Number of Days to Update: 5
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
RCRA-VSQG: RCRA - Very Small Quantity Generators (Formerly Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators)
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Very small quantity generators (VSQGs) generate
less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 12/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2020
Number of Days to Update: 5
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries
LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System
LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure
properties.
Date of Government Version: 08/06/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/21/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2020
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Department of the Navy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/05/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/22/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List
A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building
foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental
media or effect human health.
Date of Government Version: 10/28/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/18/2020
Number of Days to Update: 13
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/05/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/08/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US INST CONTROLS: Institutional Controls Sites List
A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures,
such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation
care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally
required as part of the institutional controls.
Date of Government Version: 10/28/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/18/2020
Number of Days to Update: 13
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/05/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/08/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6342644.2s Page GR-4

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Federal ERNS list
ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System
Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous
substances.
Date of Government Version: 12/14/2020 Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/15/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2020 Last EDR Contact: 12/15/2020
Number of Days to Update: 7 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
State- and tribal - equivalent NPL
HSDS: Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
Locations of uncontrolled and unregulated hazardous waste sites. The file includes sites on the National Priority
List as well as those on the state priority list.
Date of Government Version: 08/09/2011 Source: North Carolina Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/08/2011 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/05/2011 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2021
Number of Days to Update: 27 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS
SHWS: Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
State Hazardous Waste Sites. State hazardous waste site records are the states' equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites
may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds
(state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potentially
responsible parties. Available information varies by state.
Date of Government Version: 09/04/2020 Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/09/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/03/2020 Last EDR Contact: 12/08/2020
Number of Days to Update: 85 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/22/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists
SWF/LF: List of Solid Waste Facilities
Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites. SWF/LF type records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal
facilities or landfills in a particular state. Depending on the state, these may be active or inactive facilities
or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Subtitle D Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal
sites.
Date of Government Version: 09/10/2020 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/23/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/14/2020 Last EDR Contact: 12/23/2020
Number of Days to Update: 82 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
OLI: Old Landfill Inventory
Old landfill inventory location information. (Does not include no further action sites and other agency lead
sites).
Date of Government Version: 09/11/2020 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/09/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/30/2020 Last EDR Contact: 01/08/2021
Number of Days to Update: 82 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6342644.2s Page GR-5

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
DEBRIS: Solid Waste Active Disaster Debris Sites Listing
NCDEQ Division of Waste Management Solid Waste Section Temporary Disaster Debris Staging Site (TDDSS) Locations
which are available to be activated in a disaster or emergency.. Disaster Debris Sites can only be used for temporary
disaster debris storage if the site's responsible party activates the site for use by notifying the NCDEQ DWM
Solid Waste Section staff during an emergency
Date of Government Version: 09/02/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/16/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/08/2020
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/14/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/29/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LCID: Land -Clearing and Inert Debris (LCID) Landfill Notifications
A list all of the Land -Clearing and Inert Debris (LCID) Landfill Notification facilities (under 2 acres in
size) in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: 04/30/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/09/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/23/2020
Number of Days to Update: 76
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LAST: Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks
A listing of leaking aboveground storage tank site locations.
Date of Government Version: 10/30/2020 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/03/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/22/2021 Last EDR Contact: 11/03/2020
Number of Days to Update: 80 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
LUST: Regional UST Database
This database contains information obtained from the Regional Offices. It provides a more detailed explanation
of current and historic activity for individual sites, as well as what was previously found in the Incident Management
Database. Sites in this database with Incident Numbers are considered LUSTs.
Date of Government Version: 10/30/2020 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/03/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/18/2020 Last EDR Contact: 11/03/2020
Number of Days to Update: 15 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming.
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: EPA Region 8
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada
Date of Government Version: 04/08/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6342644.2s Page GR-6

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin.
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: EPA, Region 5
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma.
Date of Government Version: 04/08/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: EPA Region 6
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska
Date of Government Version: 04/15/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: EPA Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/26/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: EPA Region 4
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington.
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: EPA Region 10
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land.
Date of Government Version: 04/29/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: EPA Region 1
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LUST TRUST: State Trust Fund Database
This database contains information about claims against the State Trust Funds for reimbursements for expenses
incurred while remediating Leaking USTs.
Date of Government Version: 10/02/2020 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/07/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/31/2020 Last EDR Contact: 01/06/2021
Number of Days to Update: 85 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6342644.2s Page GR-7

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing
A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks.
Date of Government Version: 07/21/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/03/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/25/2020
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: FEMA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/04/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UST: Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
Registered Underground Storage Tanks. UST's are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA) and must be registered with the state department responsible for administering the UST program. Available
information varies by state program.
Date of Government Version: 10/30/2020 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/04/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/31/2020 Last EDR Contact: 11/04/2020
Number of Days to Update: 57 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
AST: AST Database
Facilities with aboveground storage tanks that have a capacity greater than 21,000 gallons.
Date of Government Version: 08/12/2020 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/15/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/07/2020 Last EDR Contact: 12/09/2020
Number of Days to Update: 83 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/29/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes).
Date of Government Version: 04/08/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: EPA Region 6
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/08/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: EPA Region 9
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/03/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: EPA Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6342644.2s Page GR-8

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/13/2020
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA Region 8
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: EPA Region 10
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/15/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: EPA Region 5
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee
and Tribal Nations)
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/26/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: EPA Region 4
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal
Nations).
Date of Government Version: 04/29/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: EPA, Region 1
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries
INST CONTROL: No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
A land use restricted site is a property where there are limits or requirements on future use of the property
due to varying levels of cleanup possible, practical, or necessary at the site.
Date of Government Version: 09/04/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/09/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/03/2020
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/11/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/22/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6342644.2s Page GR-9

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1.
Date of Government Version: 07/27/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016
Number of Days to Update: 142
Source: EPA, Region 1
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/15/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng
A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7.
Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: EPA, Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/20/2009
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009
Data Release Frequency: Varies
VCP: Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
Responsible Party Voluntary Action site locations.
Date of Government Version: 09/04/2020 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/09/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/03/2020 Last EDR Contact: 12/08/2020
Number of Days to Update: 85 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/22/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
State and tribal Brownfields sites
BROWNFIELDS: Brownfields Projects Inventory
A brownfield site is an abandoned, idled, or underused property where the threat of environmental contamination
has hindered its redevelopment. All of the sites in the inventory are working toward a brownfield agreement for
cleanup and liabitliy control.
Date of Government Version: 12/01/2020 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/08/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/09/2020 Last EDR Contact: 12/08/2020
Number of Days to Update: 1 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/12/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence
or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these
properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment.
Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) stores information reported by EPA Brownfields
grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on
Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions. A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from
Cleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information
is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs.
Date of Government Version: 09/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/15/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/10/2020
Number of Days to Update: 86
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/11/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/29/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
TC6342644.2s Page GR-10

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
HIST LF: Solid Waste Facility Listing
A listing of solid waste facilities.
Date of Government Version: 11/06/2006 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/13/2007 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2007 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2009
Number of Days to Update: 17 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SWRCY: Recycling Center Listing
A listing of recycling center locations.
Date of Government Version: 09/16/2020 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/17/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/09/2020 Last EDR Contact: 01/25/2021
Number of Days to Update: 83 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/10/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
Location of open dumps on Indian land.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008
Number of Days to Update: 52
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/25/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/10/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside
County and northern Imperial County, California.
Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009 Source: EPA, Region 9
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2021
Number of Days to Update: 137 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
ODI: Open Dump Inventory
An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258
Subtitle D Criteria.
Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985 Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004
Number of Days to Update: 39 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
IHS OPEN DUMPS: Open Dumps on Indian Land
A listing of all open dumps located on Indian Land in the United States.
Date of Government Version: 04/01/2014 Source: Department of Health & Human Serivices, Indian Health Service
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/06/2014 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Last EDR Contact: 10/30/2020
Number of Days to Update: 176 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/08/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
TC6342644.2s Page GR-11

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register
A listing of clandestine drug lab locations that have been removed from the DEAs National Clandestine Laboratory
Register.
Date of Government Version: 03/18/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/19/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/09/2020
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Drug Enforcement Administration
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/08/2021
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs
A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this
web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported
they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites.
In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry
and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example,
contacting local law enforcement and local health departments.
Date of Government Version: 03/18/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/19/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/09/2020
Number of Days to Update: 82
Local Land Records
Source: Drug Enforcement Administration
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/08/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information
A Federal CERCLA ('Superfund') lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent
Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination.
CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties.
Date of Government Version: 10/28/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/25/2020
Number of Days to Update: 20
Records of Emergency Release Reports
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/14/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/12/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT.
Date of Government Version: 09/20/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/22/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/14/2020
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: U.S. Department of Transportation
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
SPILLS: Spills Incident Listing
A listing spills, hazardous material releases, sanitary sewer overflows, wastewater treatment plant bypasses and
upsets, citizen complaints, and any other environmental emergency calls reported to the agency.
Date of Government Version: 10/09/2020 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/22/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/14/2021 Last EDR Contact: 01/11/2021
Number of Days to Update: 84 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/22/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
IMD: Incident Management Database
Groundwater and/or soil contamination incidents
TC6342644.2s Page GR-12

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 10/30/2020 Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/03/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/21/2021 Last EDR Contact: 11/03/2020
Number of Days to Update: 79 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SPILLS 90: SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch
Spills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch databases. Typically,
they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990. Duplicate records that are
already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90.
Date of Government Version: 09/27/2012
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2013
Number of Days to Update: 62
Source: FirstSearch
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SPILLS 80: SPILLS80 data from FirstSearch
Spills 80 includes those spill and release records available from FirstSearch databases prior to 1990. Typically,
they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded before 1990. Duplicate records that
are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 80.
Date of Government Version: 06/14/2001
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2013
Number of Days to Update: 62
Other Ascertainable Records
Source: FirstSearch
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated
RCRAInfo is EPA's comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non -Generators do not presently generate hazardous
waste.
Date of Government Version: 12/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/17/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2020
Number of Days to Update: 5
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites
The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers
is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions.
Date of Government Version: 09/29/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/17/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/25/2021
Number of Days to Update: 69
Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/17/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DOD: Department of Defense Sites
This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that
have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007
Number of Days to Update: 62
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/15/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/26/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
TC6342644.2s Page GR-13

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands
Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps
of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land,
Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management,
Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service.
Date of Government Version: 04/02/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/11/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/06/2019
Number of Days to Update: 574
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/07/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: N/A
SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office
of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established
drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas,
Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin.
Date of Government Version: 01/01/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2017
Number of Days to Update: 63
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/09/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/22/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information
All owners and operators of facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide
proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up, closure, and post -closure care of their facilities.
Date of Government Version: 09/21/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/22/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/14/2020
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST
EPA maintains a "Watch List' to facilitate dialogue between EPA, state and local environmental agencies on enforcement
matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Being
on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by
EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation
has in fact occurred. Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged
violations that were detected, but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA, state and
local agencies - primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved.
Date of Government Version: 08/30/2013
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2014
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2014
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/02/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List
The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action
Universe. This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action. The 2020 universe
contains a wide variety of sites. Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but
have since been cleaned up. Still others have not been fully investigated yet, and may require little or no remediation.
Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations.
Date of Government Version: 09/30/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/08/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018
Number of Days to Update: 73
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/06/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6342644.2s Page GR-14

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act
Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the
TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant
site.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/17/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/10/2020
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/18/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/29/2021
Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years
TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and
land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/14/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/04/2020
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/17/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Annually
SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems
Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all
registered pesticide -producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March
1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices
being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year.
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2021
Number of Days to Update: 77
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/21/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Annually
ROD: Records Of Decision
Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical
and health information to aid in the cleanup.
Date of Government Version: 10/28/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/25/2020
Number of Days to Update: 20
RMP: Risk Management Plans
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/14/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Annually
TC6342644.2s Page GR-15

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance
for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program
Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing
industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances
to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects
of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst -case and alternative
accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee
training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures
and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur.
Date of Government Version: 11/02/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/12/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/25/2021
Number of Days to Update: 74
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA
pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration
actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of
the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources
made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database.
Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995
Number of Days to Update: 35
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties
A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties
Date of Government Version: 04/27/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/06/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/09/2020
Number of Days to Update: 34
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/14/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PADS: PCB Activity Database System
PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers
of PCB's who are required to notify the EPA of such activities.
Date of Government Version: 10/09/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/11/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/20/2019
Number of Days to Update: 70
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Annually
ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System
The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement
and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
program.
Date of Government Version: 11/18/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017
Number of Days to Update: 79
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/30/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6342644.2s Page GR-16

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA,
TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right -to -Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the
Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017
Number of Days to Update: 25 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements.
Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009
Number of Days to Update: 25
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
MILTS: Material Licensing Tracking System
MILTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which
possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency,
EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version: 08/05/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/10/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/08/2020
Number of Days to Update: 59
Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
COAL ASH DOE: Steam -Electric Plant Operation Data
A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/04/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/15/2020
Number of Days to Update: 42
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/01/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings.
Date of Government Version: 01/12/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/05/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2019
Number of Days to Update: 251
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 11/30/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database
The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals.
Date of Government Version: 09/13/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/06/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2020
Number of Days to Update: 96
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/06/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RADINFO: Radiation Information Database
The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity.
TC6342644.2s Page GR-17

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 07/01/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/23/2019
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/12/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The
information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA
(Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions
are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters
with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included
in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated.
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007
Number of Days to Update: 40
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing
A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA
regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation
of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some
EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing
EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that
may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated.
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007
Number of Days to Update: 40
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data
Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data.
Date of Government Version: 01/02/2020 Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/28/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/17/2020 Last EDR Contact: 10/27/2020
Number of Days to Update: 80 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/08/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released
periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters.
Date of Government Version: 09/30/2020 Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/08/2020 Telephone: Varies
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2021 Last EDR Contact: 01/04/2021
Number of Days to Update: 88 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
BRS: Biennial Reporting System
The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation
and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG)
and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/22/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/20/2020
Number of Days to Update: 151
Source: EPA/NTIS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/23/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency: Biennially
TC6342644.2s Page GR-18

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations
This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater
than 640 acres.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/14/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2017
Number of Days to Update: 546
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
FUSRAP: Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
DOE established the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) in 1974 to remediate sites where
radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations.
Date of Government Version: 08/08/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/11/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/14/2018
Number of Days to Update: 3
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/06/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills
shut down, large piles of the sand -like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from
the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings
were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized.
Date of Government Version: 08/30/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/28/2020
Number of Days to Update: 74
LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites
A listing of former lead smelter site locations.
Date of Government Version: 10/28/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/05/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/25/2020
Number of Days to Update: 20
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/20/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/14/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/12/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites
A list of several hundred sites in the U.S. where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931and 1964. These sites
may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust
Date of Government Version: 04/05/2001
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010
Number of Days to Update: 36
Source: American Journal of Public Health
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2009
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
US AIRS (AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem (AFS)
The database is a sub -system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). AFS contains compliance data
on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies. This
information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution, such as electric power plants,
steel mills, factories, and universities, and provides information about the air pollutants they produce. Action,
air program, air program pollutant, and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance
data from industrial plants.
TC6342644.2s Page GR-19

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017
Number of Days to Update: 100
US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data
A listing of minor source facilities.
Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017
Number of Days to Update: 100
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Annually
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018
Data Release Frequency: Annually
MINES VIOLATIONS: MSHA Violation Assessment Data
Mines violation and assessment information. Department of Labor, Mine Safety & Health Administration.
Date of Government Version: 11/24/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/25/2021
Number of Days to Update: 56
Source: DOL, Mine Safety & Health Admi
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/24/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
US MINES: Mines Master Index File
Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes
violation information.
Date of Government Version: 11/03/2020 Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/25/2021 Last EDR Contact: 11/23/2020
Number of Days to Update: 63 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/08/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
US MINES 2: Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database Listing
This map layer includes ferrous (ferrous metal mines are facilities that extract ferrous metals, such as iron
ore or molybdenum) and nonferrous (Nonferrous metal mines are facilities that extract nonferrous metals, such
as gold, silver, copper, zinc, and lead) metal mines in the United States.
Date of Government Version: 05/06/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/27/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/13/2020
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/25/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/08/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US MINES 3: Active Mines & Mineral Plants Database Listing
Active Mines and Mineral Processing Plant operations for commodities monitored by the Minerals Information Team
of the USGS.
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/08/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2011
Number of Days to Update: 97
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/25/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/08/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ABANDONED MINES: Abandoned Mines
An inventory of land and water impacted by past mining (primarily coal mining) is maintained by OSMRE to provide
information needed to implement the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). The inventory
contains information on the location, type, and extent of AML impacts, as well as, information on the cost associated
with the reclamation of those problems. The inventory is based upon field surveys by State, Tribal, and OSMRE
program officials. It is dynamic to the extent that it is modified as new problems are identified and existing
problems are reclaimed.
TC6342644.2s Page GR-20

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 09/16/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/17/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/10/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Department of Interior
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/10/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/22/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and 'pointers' to other sources that contain more
detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric
Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial
enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal
Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities
Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System).
Date of Government Version: 11/04/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/25/2021
Number of Days to Update: 55
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/01/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
DOCKET HWC: Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
A complete list of the Federal Agency Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Facilities.
Date of Government Version: 05/31/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/26/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/05/2018
Number of Days to Update: 71
UXO: Unexploded Ordnance Sites
A listing of unexploded ordnance site locations
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/02/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2020
Number of Days to Update: 77
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/17/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/08/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Source: Department of Defense
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/15/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/26/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ECHO: Enforcement & Compliance History Information
ECHO provides integrated compliance and enforcement information for about 800,000 regulated facilities nationwide.
Date of Government Version: 10/03/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/06/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2021
Number of Days to Update: 90
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FUELS PROGRAM: EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
This listing includes facilities that are registered under the Part 80 (Code of Federal Regulations) EPA Fuels
Programs. All companies now are required to submit new and updated registrations.
Date of Government Version: 11/13/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/13/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/25/2021
Number of Days to Update: 73
AIRS: Air Quality Permit Listing
A listing of facilities with air quality permits.
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/13/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC6342644.2s Page GR-21

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 09/08/2020 Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/09/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/03/2020 Last EDR Contact: 12/08/2020
Number of Days to Update: 85 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/22/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ASBESTOS: ASBESTOS
Asbestos notification sites
Date of Government Version: 08/04/2020 Source: Department of Health & Human Services
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2020 Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2021
Number of Days to Update: 76 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/03/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
COAL ASH: Coal Ash Disposal Sites
A listing of coal combustion products distribution permits issued by the Division for the treatment, storage,
transportation, use and disposal of coal combustion products.
Date of Government Version: 09/10/2020 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/23/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/14/2020 Last EDR Contact: 12/23/2020
Number of Days to Update: 82 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DRYCLEANERS: Drycleaning Sites
Potential and known drycleaning sites, active and abandoned, that the Drycleaning Solvent Cleanup Program has
knowledge of and entered into this database.
Date of Government Version: 09/08/2020 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/16/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/08/2020 Last EDR Contact: 12/18/2020
Number of Days to Update: 83 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/29/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing
A listing of financial assurance information for underground storage tank facilities. Financial assurance is intended
to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post -closure care, and corrective measures
if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay.
Date of Government Version: 10/30/2020 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/04/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/31/2020 Last EDR Contact: 11/04/2020
Number of Days to Update: 57 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing
Information for solid waste facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available
to pay for the cost of closure, post -closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated
facility is unable or unwilling to pay.
Date of Government Version: 10/02/2012 Source: Department of Environmental & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/03/2012 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/26/2012 Last EDR Contact: 12/16/2020
Number of Days to Update: 23 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Financial Assurance 3: Financial Assurance Information
Hazardous waste financial assurance information.
TC6342644.2s Page GR-22

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 09/04/2020 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/04/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/30/2020 Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2020
Number of Days to Update: 87 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/22/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
NPDES: NPDES Facility Location Listing
General information regarding NPDES(National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System) permits.
Date of Government Version: 10/01/2020 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/15/2021 Last EDR Contact: 10/27/2020
Number of Days to Update: 80 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/08/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UIC: Underground Injection Wells Listing
A listing of uncerground injection wells locations.
Date of Government Version: 10/26/2020 Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/07/2020 Last EDR Contact: 11/25/2020
Number of Days to Update: 7 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
AOP: Animal Operation Permits Listing
This listing includes animal operations that are required to be permitted by the state.
Date of Government Version: 04/01/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/26/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/27/2020
Number of Days to Update: 1
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/11/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/22/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SEPT HAULERS: Permitted Septage Haulers Listing
This list of all active and permitted Septage Land Application Site (SLAS) and Septage Detention and Treatment
Facility (SDTF) sites in North Carolina. The purpose of this map is to provide the public and government entities
a visual overview of the businesses that manage septage and septage facilities throughout the state.
Date of Government Version: 05/13/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/07/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/23/2020
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PCS: Permit Compliance System
PCS is a computerized management information system that contains data on National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) permit holding facilities. PCS tracks the permit, compliance, and enforcement status of NPDES
facilities.
Date of Government Version: 07/14/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/05/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2011
Number of Days to Update: 55
Source: EPA, Office of Water
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/04/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
PCS INACTIVE: Listing of Inactive PCS Permits
An inactive permit is a facility that has shut down or is no longer discharging.
Date of Government Version: 11/05/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/06/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/06/2015
Number of Days to Update: 120
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/04/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi -Annually
TC6342644.2s Page GR-23

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
PCS ENF: Enforcement data
No description is available for this data
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/05/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2015
Number of Days to Update: 29
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/30/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
CCB: Coal Ash Structural Fills (CCB) Listing
These are not permitted Coal Ash landfills A list all of the now closed Coal Ash Structural Fills (CCB) in North
Carolina, in point data form. The purpose is to provide the public and other government entities a visual overview
of coal ash structural fills throughout the state and increase public awareness of their current locations.
Date of Government Version: 02/27/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/07/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/23/2020
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/08/2021
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PCSRP: Petroleum -Contaminated Soil Remediation Permits
To treat petroleum -contaminated soil in order to protect North Carolinaa??s environment and the health of the
citizens of North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: 07/06/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/07/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/23/2020
Number of Days to Update: 78
MINES MRDS: Mineral Resources Data System
Mineral Resources Data System
Date of Government Version: 04/06/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/21/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/24/2019
Number of Days to Update: 3
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
Source: Department of Environmental Quality
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/30/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 11/25/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/08/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants)
compiled by EDR's researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800's to 1950's
to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture
of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production,
such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds
are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently
disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil
and groundwater contamination.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: EDR, Inc.
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
EDR Hist Auto: EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations
EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential
gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR's review was limited
to those categories of sources that might, in EDR's opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station
establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station,
filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within
a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR's HRHR effort presents
unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns,
but may not show up in current government records searches.
TC6342644.2s Page GR-24

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A
Source: EDR, Inc.
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: N/A
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners
EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential
dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR's review was limited to those categories of sources
that might, in EDR's opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were
not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls
within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR's HRHR effort
presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental
concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: EDR, Inc.
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA HWS: Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
The EDR Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste database provides a list of SHWS incidents derived
from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled
from Records formerly available from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/24/2013 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Number of Days to Update: 176 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases
and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available
from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2014 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Number of Days to Update: 196 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents
derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists.
Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North
Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/A Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/20/2013 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Number of Days to Update: 172 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC6342644.2s Page GR-25

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
OTHER DATABASE(S)
Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be
complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the
area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily
mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report.
CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data
Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through
transporters to a tsd facility.
Date of Government Version: 08/10/2020 Source: Department of Energy & Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/02/2020 Last EDR Contact: 11/09/2020
Number of Days to Update: 13 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/22/2021
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018 Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/10/2019 Telephone: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/16/2019 Last EDR Contact: 01/08/2021
Number of Days to Update: 36 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/2021
Data Release Frequency: Annually
NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data
Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD
facility.
Date of Government Version: 01/01/2019 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/29/2020 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2020 Last EDR Contact: 10/30/2020
Number of Days to Update: 72 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/08/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 06/30/2018 Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/19/2019 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/10/2019 Last EDR Contact: 01/11/2021
Number of Days to Update: 53 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/26/2021
Data Release Frequency: Annually
RI MANIFEST: Manifest information
Hazardous waste manifest information
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018 Source: Department of Environmental Management
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/02/2019 Telephone: [phone]
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/10/2019 Last EDR Contact: 11/11/2020
Number of Days to Update: 69 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Annually
WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 05/31/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/03/2019
Number of Days to Update: 76
Source: Department of Natural Resources
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 12/03/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/22/2021
Data Release Frequency: Annually
TC6342644.2s Page GR-26

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Oil/Gas Pipelines
Source: Endeavor Business Media
Petroleum Bundle (Crude Oil, Refined Products, Petrochemicals, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty
Gases (Miscellaneous)) N = Natural Gas Bundle (Natural Gas, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases
(Miscellaneous)). This map includes information copyrighted by Endeavor Business Media. This information
is provided on a best effort basis and Endeavor Business Media does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its
fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of Endeavor Business
Media.
Electric Power Transmission Line Data
Source: Endeavor Business Media
This map includes information copyrighted by Endeavor Business Media. This information is provided on a best
effort basis and Endeavor Business Media does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any
particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of Endeavor Business Media.
Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity
to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all
sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers,
and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located.
AHA Hospitals:
Source: American Hospital Association, Inc.
Telephone: [phone]
The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association's annual survey of hospitals.
Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Telephone: [phone]
A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services,
a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Nursing Homes
Source: National Institutes of Health
Telephone: [phone]
Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States.
Public Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone: [phone]
The National Center for Education Statistics' primary database on elementary
and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical
database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are
comparable across all states.
Private Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone: [phone]
The National Center for Education Statistics' primary database on private school locations in the United States.
Daycare Centers: Child Care Facility List
Source: Department of Health & Human Services
Telephone: [phone]
Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and
500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood
Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL.
Source: FEMA
Telephone: [phone]
Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR
in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory
Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service
Telephone: [phone]
TC6342644.2s Page GR-27

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
TC6342644.2s Page GR-28

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM
TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS
ELM GROVE
4432 US-258
TARBORO, NC 27886
Irill :zC]=11 11112:z•»a:4WK90191NQI,Fit r*1
Latitude (North):
Longitude (West):
Universal Tranverse Mercator:
UTM X (Meters):
UTM Y (Meters):
Elevation:
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
Target Property Map:
Version Date:
West Map:
Version Date:
35.93721 - 35' 56' 13.96"
77.49217 - 77' 29' 31.81 "
Zone 18
275181.2
3979654.5
47 ft. above sea level
5944982 SPEED, NC
2013
5945661 TARBORO, NC
2013
EDR's GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in
forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration.
Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principle investigative components:
1. Groundwater flow direction, and
2. Groundwater flow velocity.
Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics
of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the
geologic strata.
TC6342644.2s Page A-1

GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION
Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
using site -specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other
sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data
collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers).
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to
assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or,
should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY
General Topographic Gradient: General WNW
SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES
c
0
North I South
TIP
0
N N A A N N N N
W W W O T v O O O O
. -
West
TIP
Target Property Elevation: 47 ft.
East
1/2 1 Miles
Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated
on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity
should be field verified.
TC6342644.2s Page A-2

GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist
the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways
and bodies of water).
FEMA FLOOD ZONE
Flood Plain Panel at Target Property
3720474900K
Additional Panels in search area:
3720484000K
3720485000K
3720475900K
NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY
NWI Quad at Target Property
SPEED
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
FEMA Source Type
FEMA FIRM Flood data
FEMA Source Type
FEMA FIRM Flood data
FEMA FIRM Flood data
FEMA FIRM Flood data
NWI Electronic
Data Coverage
YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map
Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator
of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the
environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
AQUIFLOW®
Search Radius: 1.000 Mile.
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory
authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined
hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table.
LOCATION GENERAL DIRECTION
MAP ID FROM TP GROUNDWATER FLOW
Not Reported
TC6342644.2s Page A-3

GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION
Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary
to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil
characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes
move more quickly through sandy -gravelly types of soils than silty -clayey types of soils.
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed
at which contaminant migration may be occurring.
ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT
GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION
Era: Cenozoic Category: Stratified Sequence
System: Tertiary
Series: Miocene
Code: Tm (decoded above as Era, System & Series)
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology
of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman
Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).
TC6342644.2s Page A-4

SSURGO SOIL MAP - 6342644.2s
1
I
j
\\\
4
III
I
I
�
f
* Target Property
N SSURGO Soil
N Water
0 1116 118 14Al.
SITE NAME: Elm Grove CLIENT: Restoration Systems, LLC
ADDRESS: 4432 US-258 CONTACT: JD Hamby
Tarboro NC 27886 INQUIRY #: 6342644.2s
LAT/LONG: 35.93721 / 77.49217 DATE: January 26, 2021 8:51 am
Copyright �o 2021 EDR, Inc.(,) 2015 Tom Tom Ref. 2015.

GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil
Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information
for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns
in a landscape. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service SSURGO data.
Soil Map ID: 1
Soil Component Name: Roanoke
Soil Surface Texture: loam
Hydrologic Group: Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a high
water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer.
Soil Drainage Class: Poorly drained
Hydric Status: All hydric
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: High
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min: > 15 inches
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
Soil Reaction
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
micro m/sec
(pH)
1
0 inches
7 inches
loam
Silt -Clay
FINE-GRAINED
Max: 141
Max: 5.5
Materials (more
SOILS, Silts and
Min: 0.42
Min: 3.5
than 35 pct.
Clays (liquid
passing No.
limit less than
200), Silty
50%), silt.
Soils.
2
7 inches
14 inches
loam
Silt -Clay
FINE-GRAINED
Max: 141
Max: 5.5
Materials (more
SOILS, Silts and
Min: 0.42
Min: 3.5
than 35 pct.
Clays (liquid
passing No.
limit less than
200), Silty
50%), silt.
Soils.
3
14 inches
53 inches
clay
Silt -Clay
FINE-GRAINED
Max: 141
Max: 5.5
Materials (more
SOILS, Silts and
Min: 0.42
Min: 3.5
than 35 pct.
Clays (liquid
passing No.
limit less than
200), Silty
50%), silt.
Soils.
4
53 inches
68 inches
sandy loam
Silt -Clay
FINE-GRAINED
Max: 141
Max: 5.5
Materials (more
SOILS, Silts and
Min: 0.42
Min: 3.5
than 35 pct.
Clays (liquid
passing No.
limit less than
200), Silty
50%), silt.
Soils.
TC6342644.2s Page A-6

GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Map ID: 2
Soil Component Name:
Soil Surface Texture:
Hydrologic Group:
Soil Drainage Class:
Hydric Status: Partially hydric
Altavista
fine sandy loam
Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward
movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures.
Moderately well drained
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Moderate
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min: > 46 inches
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
Soil Reaction
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
micro m/sec
(pH)
1
0 inches
7 inches
fine sandy loam
Silt -Clay
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 42
Max: 6.5
Materials (more
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 14
Min: 3.5
than 35 pct.
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
2
7 inches
14 inches
fine sandy loam
Silt -Clay
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 42
Max: 6.5
Materials (more
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 14
Min: 3.5
than 35 pct.
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
3
14 inches
42 inches
sandy clay loam
Silt -Clay
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 42
Max: 6.5
Materials (more
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 14
Min: 3.5
than 35 pct.
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
4
42 inches
59 inches
sandy loam
Silt -Clay
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 42
Max: 6.5
Materials (more
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 14
Min: 3.5
than 35 pct.
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Silty Sand.
200), Silty
Soils.
TC6342644.2s Page A-7

GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Map ID: 3
Soil Component Name: Conetoe
Soil Surface Texture: loamy sand
Hydrologic Group: Class A - High infiltration rates. Soils are deep, well drained to
excessively drained sands and gravels.
Soil Drainage Class: Well drained
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Low
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
Soil Reaction
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
micro m/sec
(pH)
1
0 inches
7 inches
loamy sand
Granular
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 141
Max: 6 Min:
materials (35
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 42
3.6
pct. or less
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Clayey sand.
200), Silty, or
COARSE -GRAINED
Clayey Gravel
SOILS, Sands,
and Sand.
Sands with fines,
Silty Sand.
2
7 inches
25 inches
loamy sand
Granular
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 141
Max: 6 Min:
materials (35
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 42
3.6
pct. or less
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Clayey sand.
200), Silty, or
COARSE -GRAINED
Clayey Gravel
SOILS, Sands,
and Sand.
Sands with fines,
Silty Sand.
3
25 inches
40 inches
sandy loam
Granular
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 141
Max: 6 Min:
materials (35
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 42
3.6
pct. or less
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Clayey sand.
200), Silty, or
COARSE -GRAINED
Clayey Gravel
SOILS, Sands,
and Sand.
Sands with fines,
Silty Sand.
4
40 inches
48 inches
loamy sand
Granular
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 141
Max: 6 Min:
materials (35
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 42
3.6
pct. or less
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Clayey sand.
200), Silty, or
COARSE -GRAINED
Clayey Gravel
SOILS, Sands,
and Sand.
Sands with fines,
Silty Sand.
TC6342644.2s Page A-8

GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
Soil Reaction
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
micro m/sec
(pH)
5
48 inches
89 inches
sand
Granular
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 141
Max: 6 Min:
materials (35
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 42
3.6
pct. or less
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Clayey sand.
200), Silty, or
COARSE -GRAINED
Clayey Gravel
SOILS, Sands,
and Sand.
Sands with fines,
Silty Sand.
Soil Map ID: 4
Soil Component Name: Tarboro
Soil Surface Texture: loamy sand
Hydrologic Group: Class A - High infiltration rates. Soils are deep, well drained to
excessively drained sands and gravels.
Soil Drainage Class: Somewhat excessively drained
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Low
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
Soil Reaction
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
micro m/sec
(pH)
1
0 inches
9 inches
loamy sand
Granular
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 141
Max: 6.5
materials (35
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 141
Min: 4.5
pct. or less
Clean Sands,
passing No.
Poorly graded
200), Silty, or
sand.
Clayey Gravel
COARSE -GRAINED
and Sand.
SOILS, Sands,
Sands with fines,
Clayey sand.
TC6342644.2s Page A-9

GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
Soil Reaction
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
micro m/sec
(pH)
2
9 inches
48 inches
sand
Granular
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 141
Max: 6.5
materials (35
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 141
Min: 4.5
pct. or less
Clean Sands,
passing No.
Poorly graded
200), Silty, or
sand.
Clayey Gravel
COARSE -GRAINED
and Sand.
SOILS, Sands,
Sands with fines,
Clayey sand.
3
48 inches
98 inches
gravelly sand
Granular
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 141
Max: 6.5
materials (35
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 141
Min: 4.5
pct. or less
Clean Sands,
passing No.
Poorly graded
200), Silty, or
sand.
Clayey Gravel
COARSE -GRAINED
and Sand.
SOILS, Sands,
Sands with fines,
Clayey sand.
Soil Map ID: 5
Soil Component Name:
State
Soil Surface Texture:
loamy sand
Hydrologic Group:
Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse
textures.
Soil Drainage Class:
Well drained
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel:
Moderate
Depth to Bedrock Min:
> 0 inches
Depth to Watertable Min:
> 153 inches
TC6342644.2s Page A-10

GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
Soil Layer Information
Boundary
Classification
Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
Soil Reaction
Layer
Upper
Lower
Soil Texture Class
AASHTO Group
Unified Soil
micro m/sec
(pH)
1
0 inches
9 inches
loamy sand
Granular
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 141
Max: 6.5
materials (35
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 14
Min: 3.6
pct. or less
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Clayey sand.
200), Silty, or
COARSE -GRAINED
Clayey Gravel
SOILS, Sands,
and Sand.
Sands with fines,
Silty Sand.
2
9 inches
44 inches
sandy clay loam
Granular
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 141
Max: 6.5
materials (35
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 14
Min: 3.6
pct. or less
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Clayey sand.
200), Silty, or
COARSE -GRAINED
Clayey Gravel
SOILS, Sands,
and Sand.
Sands with fines,
Silty Sand.
3
44 inches
90 inches
loamy sand
Granular
COARSE -GRAINED
Max: 141
Max: 6.5
materials (35
SOILS, Sands,
Min: 14
Min: 3.6
pct. or less
Sands with fines,
passing No.
Clayey sand.
200), Silty, or
COARSE -GRAINED
Clayey Gravel
SOILS, Sands,
and Sand.
Sands with fines,
Silty Sand.
LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental
professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an
opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells.
WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION
DATABASE
SEARCH DISTANCE (miles)
Federal USGS
1.000
Federal FRDS PWS
Nearest PWS within 1 mile
State Database
1.000
y=I Q =I :7A I&WICIaTA =IIaI.1101Nky,FAN Ile] .I
MAP ID
WELL ID
LOCATION
FROM TP
TC6342644.2s Page A-11

GEOCHECe - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY
FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
No Wells Found
FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
No PWS System Found
Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location.
STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
No Wells Found
OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION
TC6342644.2s Page A-12

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP - 6342644.2s
0
0
m �40
O
County Boundary
N Major Roads
N Contour Lines
OO Earthquake epicenter, Richter 5 or greater
® Water Wells
© Public Water Supply Wells
® Cluster of Multiple Icons
0
NC
0 1/4 1/2 1 Miles
Groundwater Flow Direction Wildlife Areas
Indeterminate Groundwater Flow at Location Natural Areas
c v Groundwater Flow Varies at Location o Rare & Endangered Species
El
SITE NAME: Elm Grove CLIENT: Restoration Systems, LLC
ADDRESS: 4432 US-258 CONTACT: JD Hamby
Tarboro INC 27886 INQUIRY #: 6342644.2s
LAT/LONG: 35.93721 / 77.49217 DATE: January 26, 2021 8:51 am
Copyright �o 2021 EDR, Inc. (,) 2015 TonnTom Rel. 2015.

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
Map ID
Direction
Distance Database EDR ID Number
NC_NHEO NC50017021
Elclass: A Precision1: M
Eostat: E Gisid: 101714
Edr id: NC50017021
Acres: 964.87 Sitename:
Quality type: Not Reported Sig:
Site id: 1668 Edr id:
NC_SNHA NC10001668
FISHING CREEK FLOODPLAIN FOREST
C
NC10001668
NC_SNHA NC10003195
Acres:
175.37
Sitename:
TAR RIVER FLOODPLAIN
Quality type:
PRIMARY
Sig:
C
Site id:
3195
Edr id:
NC10003195
NC_SNHA NC10003198
Acres:
374.46
Sitename:
TAR RIVER FLOODPLAIN
Quality type:
PRIMARY
Sig:
C
Site id:
3198
Edr id:
NC10003198
NC_SNHA NC10003199
Acres:
53.3
Sitename:
TAR RIVER FLOODPLAIN
Quality type:
SECONDARY
Sig:
C
Site id:
3199
Edr id:
NC10003199
NC_SNHA NC10003200
Acres:
276
Sitename:
TAR RIVER FLOODPLAIN
Quality type:
PRIMARY
Sig:
C
Site id:
3200
Edr id:
NC10003200
NC_SNHA NC10003201
Acres:
51.57
Sitename:
TAR RIVER FLOODPLAIN
Quality type:
SECONDARY
Sig:
C
Site id:
3201
Edr id:
NC10003201
TC6342644.2s Page A-14

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
Map ID
Direction
Distance Database EDR ID Number
NC_SNHA NC10003202
Acres: 18.36 Sitename: TAR RIVER FLOODPLAIN
Quality type: SECONDARY Sig: C
Site id: 3202 Edr id: NC10003202
NC_SNHA NC10003203
Acres:
106.66
Sitename:
TAR RIVER FLOODPLAIN
Quality type:
PRIMARY
Sig:
C
Site id:
3203
Edr id:
NC10003203
NC_SNHA NC10003204
Acres:
278.28
Sitename:
TAR RIVER FLOODPLAIN
Quality type:
SECONDARY
Sig:
C
Site id:
3204
Edr id:
NC10003204
NC_SNHA NC10003336
Acres:
2082.38
Sitename:
LOWER TAR RIVER AQUATIC HABITAT
Quality type:
Not Reported
Sig:
B
Site id:
3336
Edr id:
NC10003336
NC_SNHA NC10003420
Acres:
815.33
Sitename:
FISHING CREEK AQUATIC HABITAT
Quality type:
Not Reported
Sig:
A
Site id:
3420
Edr id:
NC10003420
NC_SNHA NC10003438
Acres:
199.09
Sitename:
TAR RIVER FLOODPLAIN
Quality type:
PRIMARY
Sig:
C
Site id:
3438
Edr id:
NC10003438
TC6342644.2s Page A-15

GEOCHECK®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
RADON
AREA RADON INFORMATION
Federal EPA Radon Zone for EDGECOMBE County: 3
Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L.
Zone 2 indoor average level — 2 pCi/L and — 4 pCi/L.
Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L.
Federal Area Radon Information for EDGECOMBE COUNTY, NC
Number of sites tested: 4
Area
Average Activity
% <4 pCi/L
% 4-20 pCi/L
% >20 pCi/L
Living Area - 1 st Floor
0.200 pCi/L
100%
0%
0%
Living Area - 2nd Floor
Not Reported
Not Reported
Not Reported
Not Reported
Basement
Not Reported
Not Reported
Not Reported
Not Reported
TC6342644.2s Page A-16

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model (DEM)
Source: United States Geologic Survey
EDR acquired the USGS 7.5' Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds
to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data
with consistent elevation units and projection.
Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and
500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood
Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL.
Source: FEMA
Telephone: [phone]
Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR
in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory
Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service
Telephone: [phone]
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
AQUIFLOWR Information System
Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has
extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table
information.
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit
Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital
representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).
STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national
Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil
survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation
of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO)
soil survey maps.
SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
Telephone: [phone]
SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, mapping
scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to
construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the
original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county
natural resource planning and management.
TC6342644.2s Page PSGR-1

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
FEDERAL WATER WELLS
PWS: Public Water Systems
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: [phone]
Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at
least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources.
PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: [phone]
Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after
August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS).
USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS)
This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface
water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater.
STATE RECORDS
North Carolina Public Water Supply Wells
Source: Department of Environmental Health
Telephone: [phone]
OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION
North Carolina Wildlife Resources/Game Lands
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
All publicly owned game lands managed by the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission and as listed in Hunting
and Fishing Maps.
NC Natural Heritage Sites: Natural Heritage Element Occurrence Sites
Source: Natural Heritage Occurrence Sites Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
A point coverage identifying locations of rare and endangered species, occurrences of exemplary or unique natural
ecosystems (terrestrial or aquatic), and special animal habitats (e.g., colonial waterbird nesting sites).
NC Natural Areas: Significant Natural Heritage Areas
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
A polygon converage identifying sites (terrestrial or aquatic) that have particular biodiversity significance.
A site's significance may be due to the presenceof rare species, rare or high quality natural communities, or
other important ecological features.
RADON
State Database: NC Radon
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Radon Statistical and Non Statiscal Data
Area Radon Information
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey.
The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at
private sources such as universities and research institutions.
TC6342644.2s Page PSGR-2

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
EPA Radon Zones
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor
radon levels.
OTHER
Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities
Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656
Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater
Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR's Topographic map are digitized quaternary faultlines, prepared
in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
TC6342644.2s Page PSGR-3

Appendix F — SHPO
Elm Grove Bank Parcel Development Plan Appendices

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Roy Cooper Secretary D. Reid Wilson
March 5, 2021
JD Hamby jhambygrestorationsystems.com
Restoration Systems LLC
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, NC 27604
Re: Elm Grove Mitigation Project, 4432 US-258, Tarboro, Edgecombe County, ER 21-0324
Dear Mr. Hamby:
Thank you for your letter of January 25, 2021, regarding the above -referenced undertaking. We have
reviewed the submittal and offer the following comments.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected
by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-814-6579
or environmental.reviewgncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
Ramona Bartos, Deputy
State Historic Preservation Officer
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6898

January 25, 2021
Renee Gledhill -Earley,
Environmental Review Coordinator
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office
109 East Jones Street
Raleigh, NC 27699-4617
Sent electronically to Environmental. [e-mail]
Re: Elm Grove Mitigation Project, Edgecombe County, NC
Dear Renee,
The purpose of this letter is to request written concurrence from the State Historic Preservation Office
(SHPO) for the Elm Grove Mitigation Project in Edgecombe County, a Nutrient Off -set Mitigation Bank
servicing the Tar -Pamlico River Basin. Please review and comment on any possible issues that might emerge
with respect to SHPO from a potential stream restoration project depicted on the attached mapping.
Project Name: Elm Grove Mitigation Project
Project Location: 4432 US-258 Tarboro, NC 27886
Project Contact: JD Hamby, Restoration Systems LLC, 1101 Haynes St. Suite 211,
Raleigh, NC 27604
Project Description: The project has been identified for the purpose of providing in -kind mitigation for
unavoidable nutrient loading impacts. Permits from the NC DWR will be obtained to restore riparian buffer
areas that drain into waters of the US. Soil and erosion control permits will also be obtained. The project
encompasses 53 acres of agricultural fields, currently used for row crops. All 53 acres of riparian buffer area
will be replanted in native hardwoods.
The term "cultural resources" refers to prehistoric or historic archaeological sites, structures, or artifact
deposits over 50 years old. "Significant" cultural resources are those that are eligible or potentially
eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. Evaluations of site significance are made
with reference to the eligibility criteria of the National Register (36 CFR 60) and in consultation with the
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO).
Field visits were conducted in the fall of 2020 to conduct evaluations for presence of structures or
features that may be eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. One structure was identified
within the parcel boundaries, but not withing the proposed conservation easement boundaries, that
may be eligible for the National Register, ED0774 I Knight -Jenkins House. This frame farmhouse will not
be impacted nor disturbed during the course of our project, and a buffer around the structure will be

implemented in the field during the planting process. In addition to field reviews for historically relevant
structures, a records search was conducted at the SHPO office to determine if documented occurrences
of historic structures or artifacts occur within, or adjacent to the Site. The SHPO records identify the
Knight -Jenkins features within the parcel boundaries and five features within a 1.0-mile radius of the
Site.
• ED0464 Batts House and Outbuildings (NR: 2006),
• ED0775 Petway-Moore House (Gone)
• DOE : ED0442 : Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Bridge
• SD : ED0771 : Purvis Tenant House (Gone)
• SD : ED0795 : Riverside Hotel (Gone)
Typical SHPO coordination will occur prior to construction activities to determine if any significant
cultural resources are present; however, no constraints are expected at this time. We thank you in
advance for your timely response and cooperation. Please feel free to contact me with any questions
that you may have concerning the extent of site disturbance associated with this project.
Yours truly,
RESTORATION SYSTEMS, LLC
_�'1
JD Hamby
Project Manager
[e-mail]
919-755-9490
Attachments — USGS Map, Existing Conditions

LO
v
It
FED 0774-
ight-Jenkins House
040
97/7A6
0
Legend
® Elm Grove Site Easement Area
Farfield Farm Parcels R
Esri, HE�Erarmin, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user
4 community, Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Sr iety, i-cubed