HomeMy WebLinkAboutSW3210701_Supplement-EZ Form_20211020SUPPLEMENT-EZ COVER PAGE
FORMS LOADED
PROJECT
INFORMATION
1
Project Name
Wicker Park
2
Project Area ac
69.15
3
Coastal Wetland Area ac
_
0
4
Surface Water Area ac
1.7
5
Is this project High or Low Density?
Both High and Low Density
6
Does this project use an off -site SCM?
No
NUMBER AND TYPE OF SCMs:
11
Infiltration S stem
0
12
Bioretention Cell
0
13
Wet Pond
3
14
Stormwater Wetland
0
0
0
15
Permeable Pavement
16
iSand Filter
Rainwater HarvestingRWH
0
Green Roof
0 _
0
0
Level spreader -Filter StripLS FS
k22
Disconnected Impervious Surface DIS
Treatment Swale
_
0
D Pond
0
0
StormFilter
Silva Cell
0 _
0
0
25
113agitter
1 Filterra
26
FORMS LOADED
DESIGNER CERTIFICATION
27
Name and Title:
Or anization:
Stuart Woodard, Project Manager
28
McAdams
29
Street address:
3430 Torin don Way, Suite 110
30
City,State Zip:
Charlotte NC 28277
31
Phone num
540. 577. 3607
32
Email:
woodard@mcadamsco,com
Certifcalion Statement
I certify, under penalty of law that this Supplement-EZ form and all supporting information were prepared under my direction or supervision; that
the information provided in the form is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete; and that the engineering plans,
specifications, operation and maintenance agreements and other supporting information are consistent with the information provided here.
7"
GINS
rk.AFJ6d .•.
Signature of Designer
Date
io_ 1g Zoz1
DRAINAGE AREAS
1 'is this a high densitX project?
2 1 If so, number of drainage areas/SCMs
Yes
3
3
Does this project have low density areas?
Yes
4
If so number of low density drainage areas
1
5
Is all/part of this project subject to previous rule
versions?
No
FORMS LOADED
DRAINAGE AREA INFORMATION
Entire Site
1
2
3
ILD 1
4
Type of SCM
N/A
Wet Pond
Wet Pond
Wet Pond
Bypass Area
5
Total drainage area (sq ft
3 012 113
442 822
275917
1028016
1265358
6
Onslte drainage areas ft
2930790
378353
275917
1011162
1265358
7
Offsite drainage_area (sg ft)
81323
64469
0
16854
0
8
Total BUA in project (sq ft
991674 sf
211456 sf
133828 sf
445873 sf
200517 sf
9
New BUA on subdivided lots (subject to
ermitting) (sq ft
584640 sf
68440 sf
84680 sf
296960 sf
134560 sf
10
New BUA not on subdivided lots (subject to
ermittin sf
325711 sf
78547 sf
49148 sf
132059 sf
65957 sf
11
Offsite BUA (sq ft
81323 sf
64469 sf
sf
16854 sf
sf
12
Breakdown of new BUA not on subdivided lots:
Parking Jsqft
14293 sf
1865 sf
3283 sf
8863 sf
282 sf
Sidewalk (sq ft
66443 sf
10094 sf
11995 sf
31516 sf
12839 sf
Roof (sq ft
11267 sf
11267 sf
sf
sf
sf
Roadwa . s ft
191160 sf
34411 sf
33871 sf
91680 sf
31199 sf
Futuresq ft .
42547 sf
20909 sf
sf
sf
21638 sf
Other, please specify in the comment box
below (sq ft
sf
sf
sf
sf
sf
13
New infiltrating permeable pavement on
subdivided lots s ft
N/A
NIA
N/A
N/A
N/A
14
New infiltrating permeable pavement not on
subdivided lots (sq ft
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
15
Existing BUA that will remain (not subject to
ermittinR) (sq ft
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
16
Existing BUA thAt is already permitted ft
N/A
NIA
N/A
N/A
NIA
17
Existing BUA that will be removed (sq ft
NIA
N/A
NIA
N/A
N/A
18
Percent BUA
33%
48%
49%
43%
16%
19
Design storm inches
N/A
1.0 in
1.0In
1A in
NIA
20
Design volume of SCM cu ft
NIA
17704 cf
11187 cf
37724 cf
NIA
21
lCalculation method for design volume
NIA
SAIDA
SAIDA
SAIDA
NIA
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
22
Please use this space to provide any additional information about the
drainage areas :
WET POND
1
1.7raina a area number
1 2
3
2
Minimum required treatment volume cu ft
17704 of 11197 d
37724 cf
GEN R
3
Is the SCM sized to treat the SW from aU surfaces at build -put?
Yes
Yes
Yes
4
Is the SCM located away from contaminated soils?
Yes
Yes
Yes
5
What are the side slopes of the SCM H:V ?
3:1
3:1
3:1
6
Does the SCM have retaining walls, gabion walls or other
engineered side slopes?
No
No
No
7
Are the inlets, outlets, and receiving stream protected from erosion
10- ear storm)?
Yes
Yes
Yes
6
Is there an overflow or bypass for inflow volume in excess of the
design volume?
Yes
Yes
Yes
9
What is the method for dewatering the SCM for maintenance?
Pump (preferred)
Pump (preferred)
Drawdown Orifice
10
If applicable, will the SCM be cleaned out after construction?
Yes
Yes
Yes
11
Does the maintenance access comply with General MDC B ?
Yes
Yes
Yes
12
Does the drains a easement comply with General MDC 9 ?
Yes
Yes
Yes
13
If the SCM is on a single family lot, does (will?) the plat comply with
General MDC 10 ?
N/A
N/A
N/A
14
Is there an O&M Agreement that complies with General MDC (11)?
Yes
Yes
Yes
15
Is there an O&M Plan that complies with General MDC 12 ?
Yes
Yes
Yes
16
Does the SCM follow the device specific MDC?
Yes
Yes
Yes
17
Was the SCM desi nerd by an INC licensed rofesslonal?
Yes
Yes
Yes
WET PO
O MOC FROM 02H.IW3
18
Sizing method used
SAIDA
SAIDA
$AOA
19
Has a stage/storage table been provided in the calculations?
Yes
Yes
Yes
20
Elevation of the excavated main pool depth (bottom of sediment
removal) (fmsl
652.00
603.00
596.00
21
Elevation of the main pool bottom (top of sediment removal) (fmsl)
653.00
604.00
597.00
22
Elevation of the bottom of the vegetated shelf fmsl
657.50
609.50
601.50
23
Elevation of the permanent pool fmsl
658.00
610.00
602.00
24
Elevation of the to of the vegetated shelf fmsl
658.50
610.50
602.50
25
Elevation of the temporary pool fmsl
659A3
611-10
603.26
26
Surface area of the main permanent pool (square feet
7664
5866
20095
27
Volume of the main permanent pool cubic feet
25027 cf
19231 cf
70230 cf
28
Average depth of the main pool feet
3.27 ft
3.28 ft
3.49 ft
29
Avers a depth euation used
Equation 2
Equation 2
Equation 2
30
If using a uation 3, main pool perimeter feet
N/A
N/A
N/A
31
If using equation 3. width of submerged veg. shelf feet
N/A
N/A
N/A
32
Volume of the foreba cubic feet
3849 cf
3662 cf
11307 cf
33
Is this 15-20% of the volume in the mainpool?
Yes
Yes
Yes
34
Clean -out depth for foreba inches
48 in
48 in
48 in
35
Design volume of SCM cu ft
17704 cf
11187 cf
37724 cf
36
Is the outlet an orifice or a weir?
Orifice
Orifice
Orifice
37
If orifice, orifice diameter (inches)
2 in
1.75 in
3.5 in
38
If weir, weir hei t inches
N/A
N/A
N/A
39
If weir, weir length inches
N/A
N/A
N/A
40
Drawdown time for the temporary pool (days)
2.32
2.18
2.01
41
Are the inlet(s) and outlet located in a manner that avoids short-
circuiting?
Yes
Yes
Yes
42
Are berms or baffles provided to improve the flowpath?
No
No
No
43
De th of forebay at entrance inches
60 in
60 in
60 in
44
Depth of forebay at exit inches
54 in
54 in
54 in
45
Does water flow out of the forebay in a non -erosive manner?
Yes
Yes
Yes
46
Width of the vegetated shelf feet
loft
loft
loft
47
Slope of vegetated shelf H:V
10:1
10:1
10:1
48
Does the orifice drawdown from below the top surface of the
permanentpool?
Yes
Yes
Yes
49
Does the pond minimize impacts to the receiving channel from the 1
r 24-hr storm?
Yes
Yes
Yes
50
Are fountains proposed? (If Y, please provide documentation that
MDC 9 is met,
No
No
No
51
Is a trash rack or other device provided to protect the outlet system?
Yes
Yes
Yes
52
Are the dam and embankment planted in non -clumping turf grass?
Yes
Yes
Yes
53
Species of turf that will be used on the dam and embankment
Tall Fescue
Tall Fescue
Tall Fescue
54
Hasa lantin Ian been rovided for the ve etated shelf?
Yes
Yes
Yes
ADDITIONAL
ORMATION
55
Please use this space to provide any additional information about
the wet pond(s):
Wet Pond 1 9:31 AM 10/18/2021
LOW DENSITY
nislin
Riau IRCIVI ENT$f D ENSITY PR
1
Is project below density thresholds set forth In the applicable stormwater rule?
Yes
Yes
2
Does project maximize dispersed flow and minimize channelization of flow?
3
Has the use of piping, been minimized per .1003(2)(c)?
Yes
4
Side slopes of the vegetated conveyances(H:V)
(3:1)
5
Maximum velocity in the vegetated conveyances during the 10- ear storm?
4.5
6
Are curb outlet swales proposed?
Yes
7
Maximum longitudinal slope of curb outlet swale(s) (% ).
5 %
8
Bottom width of curb outlet swale(s) (feet)
2 ft
9
Maximum side sloe of curb outlet swale s H:V
(3:1)
10
Minimum length of curb outlet swale(s) (feet)
100 ft
11
Are treatment swales used instead of curb outlet swales?
No
12
Is stormwater released at the edge of the setback as dispersed flow?
Yes
13
Have stormwater outlets been designed to Rrevent downslope erosion?
Yes
14
JAre variations to rule .1003 proposed?
No
ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION
15
Please use this space to provide any additional information about this low density project:
®
Drainage
Area (ac)