20060638 Ver 4_401 Application_20130923

DUKE
ENERGYe
PROGRESS
Ms. Emily Greer
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Washington Regulatory Field Office
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, NC 27889
Mr. Anthony Scarbraugh
NCDENR, Division of Water Resources
Washington Regional Office
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
QV4
C' U — 'D to - v tt:4- H. F. Lee Energy Complex
Duke Energy Progress
1199 Black Jack Church Road
Goldsboro, NC 27530
September 17, 2013
��
N0�
SEP 2 3 2013
-gun
Subject: Proposed Maintenance Dredging of Existing Lee Energy Complex
Make -up Water Intake Canal
Dear Ms. Greer & Mr. Scarbraugh:
Duke Energy Progress (DEP, formerly Progress Energy Carolinas) has previously
applied for and received authorization under Nationwide Permit No. 3 (most recently in
2010, reference Corps Action ID: SAW- 2010 - 00973) to perform maintenance dredging
in a man -made intake canal used to provide make -up water to the cooling water
reservoir at the Lee Energy Complex in Wayne County
DEP is applying for reauthorization of this maintenance dredging under NWP 3, and
requesting authorization from the Corps to conduct dredging on an as- needed basis
through the effective date of the currently issued NWP 3. We would note that in a
telephone conversation with Mr. Buzz Bryson of Environmental Services, Inc (and
recently retired from DEP), Mr. Scarbraugh indicated that it would be appropriate to
submit the PCN to NCDENR -DWR "for information only ".
This canal was constructed decades ago, and DEP has conducted maintenance
dredging on an irregular, as- needed basis over the years. The process has become
relatively standardized, as the proposed work has been reviewed by the Corps,
NCDENR and other agencies multiple times, and shown to have no discernible impact.
DEP proposes to conduct the maintenance dredging using a tracked hoe or dragline,
operating from high ground. Prior to excavation, a silt curtain will be temporarily
installed between the work area and the intersecting "bypass canal', to prevent any
sediment from entering the bypass canal or Neuse River. Dredging will be limited to the
existing footprint of the canal, with no lateral or vertical expansion of the canal
dimensions. Typically, only relatively small amounts of sediment are required to be
www.duke- energy com

removed to ensure proper intake pump operation. Because there are no wetlands or
wooded buffer adjacent to the canal (the area is maintained with a mowed grass cover),
there will be no impacts to those areas.
Excavated material will be transported to and disposed of on high ground, outside the
buffer, and no return water will be allowed to drain to the river or tributaries or wetlands.
The disposal area will include a low berm to contain the material until it dries. The area
will be under an acre, so no erosion control plan approval or pre /post- construction
stormwater approval is required. DEP will, however, stabilize the area will a temporary
and permanent ground cover.
For this request, DEP is proposing that 65 cubic yards be removed, within a 35 - foot
length of the canal. DEP is proposing to start dredging as soon as possible following
authorization by the Corps, and be completed within approximately 30 days.
The enclosed preconstruction notification and supporting drawings provide detail on the
proposed work.
We would appreciate your review of this project. Please do not hesitate to contact me
at 919 - 722 -6450 or rick.grantc@-duke -energ y.com if you have any questions.
Thank you very much.
Vew truly yours,
f44 dJeD---'
Rick Grant
Enclosures
-1.- Pre-construction -Notification
2. Map of site location
c: Mr. Ricky Miller (DEP, w/ enclosures)
Mr. Jeff Harbour (ESI, w/ enclosures)
Mr. Buzz Bryson (ESI, w/ enclosures)

4- _ ,
9�
0 4 8 12 16 20 mi
0
S
3
rt
r
cD
c�
rt
cD
as
3
m
F
0
rt
rt
_C
C1'
M
USGS Northwest Goldsboro Quad
1:500,000 scale a Progress Energy

s
i3
n
3
CD
r
N
r
CD
CD
2)
3
m
r«
CA
CD
s�
-a
0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2 mi
USGS Northwest Goldsboro Quad 01%
1:48,000 scale Progress Energy

h
Ct
f
�t
;-�� f
It..t
.fir
• -•'•I}
' i
;,,Sj r;'
I'i'::!
1
,:;
.i
,
I
-tk
I '1 I }.t
_ �, �,t1
1
'
�
.,
!i
�,t
�.
is
�F ;;
I
lt�J•i�.r:i
; }js
_
11F,
":
F;
t'
°;
M..
J, -f
7
t
i
i
'
!.►
!.
•{Y'
;, i'
'+ r
-•;*r .ii
:a {.
ilf
t
�1
:'���.
Ils' i
�
I
1 �r
t
s
:,I
I
i
j.t
tj
f
F'
_j
• �_
,I•i �•
i!:,
t
4+1
�
;
I t•
�,• -
1 I�r
i
,
`
1`1!(
I
TAN r
t
'�k:
I '
�
NE Ii
IT
�,
,i.
I
lF
r
+•
'
•��
,
•tr
•
,:
LI
I
.�
;;�r
MR.
�,A
r
^tl
• 1
t
11:
H.,IiF
1
'
{�'
�rl
t'if l'1
'i t
i .1.�
i,'t F!{l
`' +•!
�+�J�I.
'I
' �T
.: R�
,r'.!�'�'a•
t 1
IM.;
+ r
>€
'�i
it !T T� rl{
��`�,
'.
i �
-,.,
'1��
`i:
I
��:
!
.i
t
, 1
'; rtT :�
IF , `'
r }
!•'�
I�r!
!
t �
;
r
•
♦••
i�
, r-
,1�1,
,'
''I
r1
1
I
i
A
i..' I•�'
I
7
1
,,
i
i
,
-i.
�'t';.
I
t-
•1
f
+
•+ ; -•
•,�
�
r
� i� I
? {� rr�r
Irj(
kj
�.
I
:i'j
�; il�
'
�r
,1
;`
I.:
jf�,��F
I -1
;
:tl'
'
t 1 _ r
�Ti;!
;�;
1!
(' •''
:7�
• I ,
#i_...
j '
F : �•.
;i
i. 1-_
�i .I
•
•
_
•��
v _I ,
r'�:!f•.,
1{• 11
FF •lrf '
'
, :LF
�tji
'i.�Il�.ta.
;#
It''
.�;
r
kr:t�l!
,+'
r,tt
11�
I
�
_
_
E,I
t
I
i
h'
t� ��1
L
;
`�+
1 �• 2
J.
1
�
:1•
:.
ji.[[�-'
1.�.[��
!
U.17'
�
_
r _{ r;
t
.,�Fi!
t,�l•:
�','1•i
�I..f; ;�
i •t-i —�l: t
►;r-;` •'',',
`,}
:.'r—Ic
,
;1::
i.
,
}
,•
F,
;4'�
t .�,
„a,:
�1 F�
;�-
*
�
�
}i�
�'
�
i r II..
•��
��'
ik•+;�I:
. ;lx
��;;
,_
''.
41T. jl(.!!•T'•'
•',
�
����
'? 1•.
-I
J1.' rrl
',a
i-`4`,^'
i:�;r
'1. �
.;
iF i •�
I.
�
('�,
';i�',;I•
t �j•!!
•I��Ll:
t it1 r
1iIF' ;
�
`
1'
I,i ,.
i'!
',
I
�•
�%
!,1.
'
;I
••!1
!�
`��'
t
'�
,�' .;I! }: {!r
'- •!
,.
r
,''
�
x`=
i �
ri;�:
+`II
1
'Ft'
',;,
� • 7
`'
ii'�;1 i
;:':
I
i
�'T ?•
.'fit,,
1
+l
-t=.
i
t,l
�rh
,a
.'
-4
�.
;+�—• «
�,+� � •
� .' {'
r1' j r,�r+
•
-.t.,.� -' i
_ i
`ta �
-
�
� .�
i .
+
F�';
�
h �,
T
� �
,i-
x '
l.�
��
i
I�
�
is•
-
� '?��
h
?;� `>
,,+ tr
-
•'_
`:•�Lj.
:j�yr
•�t:t -.1'
a'
-
-` .+L• I{
;
I•�.
;T:
!t'F
�'
3
,�, =
:'
;
'
,p
_!.,
# -
t�•
i'" i
'' y
_' 1
, t
i
I 1
rr i
I
•
{I f
;
'+.
4
r►.
' I
1�'
J7—T
:.
;441
r.
-:
,—N
J4
f
om .
4'Ir.
-1'r
;a.r
rr :�
ttl,
r,:
f�-
1 ,i•
t,�
1•
, r
f1.
�f,
-
',.i,'
I
I
—1
;
:
r
=TA
�•
,
�
:t,
1�
'':
J�. -�.,I
i {i
-
•
Ef r .,
;,
;j
� I
If. ��
I t,;•
II ' ,
, ' #,.,1
i
, 1
'''
1
•}�•
f «'
_
fil
u
I
F }�
.a
yl
�
Y
''
r
, ,'
RV
r �r'
�L1i'•=ST
•if
[; �'� •-t
'I`t_
'
-y`
T1�
i ;1 -�
,: ,� a
1,1�_
1{
1 j:
l,r.�
"Lill :
I
}i • -r
I
'll �{
Fi'
1rl�:k
�'•
11.1•!1
j ,
;r
y
i {+,
'r
IjT�I
7 S'
1
'
,
'
HIM`
`
�.
I' ,
�;
�I
jj
�F
f,�' {
r
! I
:!
A;�
�
;
Il
1
I
FT,
t
`.
1
,
1
y
t,
Lr
1.
Fi1
.i
1 r' •1!
'f
,r
I
•�•
. lli
;i}{ .l
� i
� '
�,'
� C'���
'�
`
1
.�
� ',
♦•
J
•
� f
?•
'
j,
(
P
Z&4
11
..
t.
T-
�`
1!� riiy
l
_l;
a'•
1
"
1
Ff''
y{ ;
'1
''
{ji ' ,
I ;.�
J,'
.*+
'
4
r 7
:
i�F
L��'..
�llil•li
'14
t1'1
a,
+I v31
�•�'t
i
!
-!�H'4f
Ct
f
�t

�f W AT �9PG
`J
� 1
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 13
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
X Section 404 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 3 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
IX Yes No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
401 Water Quality Certification — Regular Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
401 Water Quality Certification — Express Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not
required?
or the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
Yes X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
Yes X No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in4ieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from
mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program.
Yes X No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes,
answer 1 h below.
Yes X No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental
Concern (AEC)?
Yes X No
1.
Project Information
a.
Name of project:
Duke Energy Progress H.F. Lee Energy Complex Cooling Lake Make -up
Water Intake Canal Maintenance_ Dredging
b. County:
Wayne
c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Goldsboro
d.
Subdivision name:
/A
e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
N/A
1.
Owner Information
a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Carolina Power and Light Company d /b /a Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc.
b.
Deed Book and Page No.
Book 1453 Page 229
c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
N/A
d.
Street address:
1199 Black Jack Church Road
e.
City, state, zip:
Goldsboro, NC 27530
f.
Telephone no.:
919) 722 -6450
g.
Fax no.:
(919) 772 -6425
h.
Email address:
ick. rant duke -ener .com
Page 1 of 13

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
a. Applicant is:
Agent X Other,- specify: (Duke Energy Progress employee) - - -
b. Name:
Rick Grant
c. Business name
(if applicable):
Duke Energy Progress
d. Street address:
1199 Black Jack Church Road
e. City, state, zip:
Goldsboro, NC
f. Telephone no.:
19- 722 -6450
g. Fax no.:
19- 772 -6425
h. Email address:
ick.grant@ duke - energy.com
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
a: Name:
William T. (Buzz) Bryson
b. Business name
(if applicable):
Environmental Services Inc.
c. Street address:
524 S. New Hope Road
d. City, state, zip:
NC
e. Telephone no.:
[aleigh,
9- 212 -1760 (office); 919 - 815 -8243 (cell)
f. Fax no.:
9- 212 -1707
g. Email address:
jysonftLic.rr.com
Page 2 of 13
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
PIN Number: 2579623548
Latitude: 35.372903 Longitude:
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
78.088140
(DD.DDDDDD) (_
DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size:
2,119 acres
1. Surface Waters
a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project:
Neuse River
b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving
water:
Class WS -IV NSW
c. River basin:
Neuse
I. Project Description
a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time
of this application:
The site contains electric generation units and associated facilities. Area surrounding the plant is
predominantly agricultural and residential.
b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
N/A No new impacts to wetlands proposed
c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Periodic maintenance dredging of man -made canal providing make -up water to the cooling reservoir.
e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed maintenance dredging involves removal of approximately 65 cubic yards of sediment
deposited in the intake canal where make -up water pumps are located. Dredging will be limited to
restoring a portion of the canal to near - original dimensions to ensure that the make -up pumps can operate
effectively. A silt curtain will be installed between the work area and the junction of the intake canal with
the "bypass canal" (see attached figure). No wetlands will be impacted. All excavated material will be
removed for disposal on high ground, and no return water from the spoil area will be allowed to re -enter
the Neuse River. There will be no expansion of the original canal's footprint, and no additional impact to
any jurisdictional areas (waters/wetlands /buffer). This canal, and periodic maintenance dredging, predated
the Neuse buffer rules.
Page 3 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

1. Jurisdictional Determinations
a.- Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations
by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for
this property / project (including all prior phases) in the
past?
X Yes No Unknown
Comments: Most recent JD was on 07/25/07,
conducted by Tracey Wheeler. Ref. SAW -2007-
02660 -196.
b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination,
Preliminary Final X Unknown
what type of determination was made?
c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known):
Other:
1. Project History
a. Have permits or certifications been requested or
obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in
X Yes No Unknown
the past?
b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
Latest was Corps Action ID: SAW - 2010 - 00973, dated June 17, 2010. Canal has been dredged multiple
times over the past decades, under various Corps' general permits, with no known impacts.
1. Future Project Plans
Be. Is this a phased project?
Yes X No
b. If yes, explain. The project is not phased, but on -going dredging on an irregular schedule (depending upon
sediment build -up) is anticipated, and permission asked for by this PCN.
Page 4 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
Wetlands Streams - tributaries Buffers
X Open Waters (man -made canal) Pond Construction
Page 5 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

1. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area
impacted.
a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary
1 P T
Yes
Corps
No
DWQ
2 P T
Yes
Corps
No
DWQ
3 P T
Yes
Corps
No
DWQ
4 P T
Yes
Corps
No
DWQ
5 P T
Yes
Corps
No
DWQ
6 P T
Yes
Corps
No
DWQ
g. Total wetland impacts
h. Comments.
1. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then
complete this question for all stream sites impacted.
a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
1 XP T
PER
Corps
INT
DWQ
2 P T
PER
Corps
INT
DWQ
3 P T
PER
Corps
INT
DWQ
4 P T
PER
Corps
INT
DWQ
5 P T
PER
Corps
INT
DWQ
6 P T
PER
Corps
INT.
.DWQ
h. Total stream and tributary impacts -
i. Comments:
Page 6 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

1. Open Water impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other
pen water of the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
— Permanent
(P) or
Temporary
01 P T
Unnamed man -made
canal
Periodic dredging
Manmade intake
<
0.1
canal
02 P T
03 P T
04 P T
f. Total open water impacts
g. Comments:
1. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed. en complete the chart below.
a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
and ID
Proposed use or purpose of
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
umber
pond
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
f. Total
g. Comments:
h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
Yes No If yes, permit ID no:
i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
Pk. Method of construction:
Page 7 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

S. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all
buffer impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
a.
X Neuse Tar - Pamlico Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
Catawba Randleman
b.
Bc.
8d.
Be.
Bf.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason for
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P)
impact
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
or Temporary
required?
B1 P T
Yes
No
B2 P T
Yes
No
B3 P T
Neuse
Yes
X No
6h. Total buffer impacts
No new impacts
No new impacts
i. Comments: Initial impact occured decades ago, prior to buffer rules. No new impacts.
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The proposed maintenance dredging will be limited to the confines of the man -made intake canal, and will
have no new impacts to the canal or Neuse River.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction
techniques.
Dredging will be of limited duration. A silt curtain will prevent any sediment from entering the Neuse River or
bypass canal ". Removed material will be disposed of on high ground, no return water will be allowed to re-
nter the Neuse or tributaries. The excavated material will be stabilized with a ground cover.
1. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation
Yes X No
for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the
State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
DWQ Corps
Mitigation bank
c. If yes, which mitigation option will be -used for this
payment to in -lieu fee program
project?
Permittee Responsible Mitigation
1. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
ype
uantity
Page 8 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

c. Comments:
1. Complete If Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
warm cool cold
d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
h. Comments:
1. Complete If Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
1. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
Be. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that
requires buffer mitigation?
Yes X No
b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation.
Calculate the amount of mitigation required.
Zone
c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private
mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee
fund).
h. Comments:
Page 9 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers
identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
X Yes No
1b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: There are no post construction stormwater impacts (no
impervious surface). Impacts will be limited to the temporary canal
Yes X No
dredging, and spoil disposal on high ground. There will be no new
impacts to any Neuse buffer.
1. Stormwater Management Plan
a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
Yes X No
c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Proposed project
involves only maintenance dredging of existing man -made make -up water canal. Area impacted by
spoil disposal will be outside of the buffer, and will be less than 1 acre (no erosion control plan approval
required), and there will be no impervious surface created. Although no erosion control plan approval will
be sought, the spoil area will include a low berm to prevent any runoff to the river, and the area will be
stabilized with a suitable ground cover.
d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of
the plan:
e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management
Certified Local Government
Plan?
DWQ Stormwater Program
DWQ 401 Unit
1. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Wayne County
Phase 11
b. Which of the following locally- implemented stormwater management
NSW
programs apply (check all that apply):
USMP
Water Supply Watershed
Other:
c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval
Yes No
been attached?
. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
Coastal counties
a. Which of the following state- implemented stormwater management
HQW
ORW
programs apply (check all that apply):
Session Law 2006 -246
Other:
Page 10 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

r b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval I been attached?-.--- Yes _ No
S. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate
requirements? I Yes No
b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? Yes No
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state /local) Yes X No
funds or the use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b. if you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation
of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the
National or State (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act Yes No
(NEPA/SEPA)?
c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been
finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA
or SEPA final approval letter.) Yes No
Comments:
1. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500),
Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Yes X No
Wetland Standards, or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application? Yes X No
Fc. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): I
. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts)
result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream Yes X No
water quality?
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in
accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
I1. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
r. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater
generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
NIA
Page 11 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

1. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected
Yes No
species or habitat?
b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered
Yes No
Species Act impacts?
c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
Asheville
d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or
Designated Critical Habitat?
1. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish
abitat?
Yes X No
b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
http://ocean.floddamadne.org/efk_coralfims/viewer.htm
1. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or
tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural
preservation status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or
Yes X No
properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)?
b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological
resources?
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources State Historic Preservation office
. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
a. Will this project occur in a FEMA - designated 100 -year floodplain?
X Yes No
b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: No material or structure added; no change in
elevations.
!—C--What-source(s)-did-you use to make the floodplain determination?
Page 12 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

Steve Cahoon
Senior Technical Specialist
Environmental Services
Duke Energy Progress
Rick Grant
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
9/17/2013
Applican Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only If an authorization letter from the
applicant is provided.)
Page 13 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version