The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20160130 Ver 1_Year 5 Monitoring Report_20211018ID#* 20160130 Select Reviewer: Katie Merritt Initial Review Completed Date 10/19/2021 Mitigation Project Submittal - 10/18/2021 Version* 1 Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?* Type of Mitigation Project:* Stream Wetlands Buffer Nutrient Offset (Select all that apply) Project Contact Information Contact Name:* Tasha King Project Information O Yes O No Email Address:* tking@wildlandseng.com ID#:* 20160130 Version:* 1 Existing ID# Existing Version Project Type: DMS • Mitigation Bank Project Name: North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel County: Durham Document Information Mitigation Document Type:* Mitigation Monitoring Report File Upload: North Fork Little River - Monitoring Year 5 Annual 4.99MB Report.pdf Please upload only one PDF of the complete file that needs to be submitted... Signature Print Name: * Tasha King Signature: * r.--Are, North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Wildlands Holdings V, LLC's North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Riparian Buffer Mitigation Bank Monitoring Year 5 Report October 2021 kt� WILD LAND S ENO IN E E RI N G PREPARED BY: Wildlands Engineering, Inc. 312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225 Raleigh, NC 27609 Phone: 919-851-9986 MONITORING YEAR 5 REPORT North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Wildlands Holdings V, LLC's North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Riparian Buffer Mitigation Bank TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................2 1.1 Project Description.................................................................................................................2 1.2 Bank Sponsor.......................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Project History........................................................................................................................ 2 1.4 Project Location...................................................................................................................... 3 1.5 Project Design......................................................................................................................... 3 2 VEGETATION MONITORING....................................................................................................4 2.1 Success Criteria.......................................................................................................................4 2.2 Description of Species and Monitoring Protocol................................................................... 5 2.3 Results of Vegetation Monitoring.......................................................................................... 5 2.4 Parcel Maintenance................................................................................................................6 2.5 Conclusions.............................................................................................................................6 3 REFERENCES..........................................................................................................................7 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Project Reporting History Table 2 Tree and Shrub Species Selected for Buffer Restoration Table 3 Character/Existing Tree and Shrub Species (Piedmont Bottomland Forest) Table 4 Monitoring Plot Summary — Planting (As -Built) Table 5 Monitoring Plot Summary —Year 5 APPENDICES Appendix A: Figures Figure 1 Parcel Location Figure 2 Service Area Figure 3 Credit Generation Map Figure 4 Monitoring Components Map Appendix B: Bank Credit Ledger Appendix C: Vegetation Assessment Data Table 6 Vegetation Plot Success Summary Table 7 Stem Count Total and Planted Species by Vegetation Plot Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results Appendix E: Overview Photographs North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Page 1 Monitoring Year 5 Report 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Project Description The North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel (Parcel) is part of the Wildlands Holdings V, LLC (Sponsor) North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank (Bank). The purpose of the Bank is to provide riparian buffer credits to compensate for buffer impacts within the Hydrologic Unit Code 03020201 and to provide nutrient offset payments within the Falls Lake Watershed. The Parcel location is depicted on Figure 1. The Parcel is located in a rural watershed within the Neuse River Basin (HUC 03020201) and within sub - basin 02-00-10 depicted in Figure 2. Stormwater runoff drains into eight identified features (A-H): three unnamed tributaries to the North Fork of the Little River and five ditches. All Parcel features flow into unnamed tributary Feature A, which then flows into another unnamed tributary to the North Fork of the Little River, the Little River, the Little River Reservoir, the Eno River, and ultimately into Falls Lake. All of the intermittent streams on the Parcel are classified as Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW) by Division of Water Resources (DWR). The Little River Reservoir is a major source of drinking water for the City of Durham; Falls Lake is a major source of drinking water for the City of Raleigh. To protect these reservoirs, the Little River and its waters are also classified as Water Supply II (WS-II) and as a High Quality Water (HOW) by DWR. Prior to construction, the Parcel consisted primarily of open agricultural fields, used mainly in row crop production for corn. Streams, ditches, and other stormwater conveyances on the Parcel had little to no riparian buffer and were mowed in most locations on an annual basis. The project included restoring the buffer along North Fork Little River, three unnamed tributaries, as well as five ditches. Riparian and agricultural ditch buffers were restored on the Parcel in order to reduce non -point source contaminant discharges to downstream waters in the Falls Lake Watershed. The project property is 33.43 acres and is protected with a permanent conservation easement. In general, riparian buffer restoration area widths on streams extend out to 100 feet from top of bank for Neuse River buffer credits and out to 200 feet for nutrient offset credits. 1.2 Bank Sponsor The North Fork Little River Parcel is a part of the Bank. The Mitigation Banking Instrument (MBI) for the Bank was signed on April 19, 2016. Wildlands Holdings V, LLC 1430 South Mint Street, Suite 104 Charlotte, NC 28203 Phone: 704-332-7754 Attn: Shawn Wilkerson Email: sllkerson@wildlandseng.com The bank sponsor name changed from Wildlands Holdings II, LLC to Wildlands Holdings V, LLC on March 21, 2018 for organizational purposes. 1.3 Project History The MBI was approved in April 2016. The North Fork Bank Parcel Development Plan (BPDP) was approved and initial credit release obtained in May 2016. The easement was assigned to Unique Places to Save, LLC, a 501(c)(3) non-profit corporation, in January 2018. Project planting was completed in January 2017. Year 1 project monitoring was completed in September 2017 and Years 2, 3, 4, and 5 North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Page 2 Monitoring Year 5 Report monitoring were completed in September 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021 respectively. Project reporting history is provided in Table 1. Table 1. Project Reporting History Activity Completion Date Wildlands Holdings II, LLC Neuse MBI April 2016 Bank Parcel Development Package Approved May 2016 Conservation Easement May 2016 Bare Root Planting January 2017 As -Built & Baseline Monitoring Document April 2017 Year 1 Monitoring Completed September 2017 Assignment of Conservation Easement January 2018 Bank Sponsor Name Changed to Wildlands Holdings V, LLC March 2018 Year 2 Monitoring Completed September 2018 Year 3 Monitoring Completed September 2019 Year 4 Monitoring Completed September 2020 Year 5 Monitoring Completed October 2021 1.4 Project Location The Parcel is located in northwestern Durham County, approximately 14 miles north of the City of Durham (36' 10' 9.48" N and 78' 55' 49.44" W) in a rural watershed within the Neuse River Basin (HUC 03020201) and within DWR sub -basin 02-00-10. To get to the Parcel from downtown Durham, travel north on U.S. Highway 501 North for approximately 12.7 miles. Turn left onto S. Lowell Road and continue west for approximately 1.9 miles to the intersection with Johnson Mill Road. The Parcel will be on the north side of S. Lowell Road at this intersection (Figure 1). 1.5 Project Design The Parcel will generate 13.90 acres of Neuse riparian buffer credits and 18.31 acres of nutrient offset credits. Therefore, based on 2,273 pounds of nitrogen per acre of riparian restoration the Parcel will provide 41,619 pounds of nitrogen nutrient offset credits. The Parcel will also provide 2,680.58 pounds of phosphorus nutrient offset credits based on the 146.4 pounds of phosphorus per acre of riparian restoration. Parcel credit generation is shown in Figure 3. The revegetation plan for the Parcel included planting of bare root trees and controlling invasive species growth. Bare root trees selected for the Parcel were native bottomland hardwood species typical for Piedmont Bottomland Forest communities as defined by Schafale and Weakley (1990). Tree species selected for planting on the Parcel as well as size specifications, planting density, and plant composition are detailed in Table 2. North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Page 3 Monitoring Year 5 Report Table 2. Tree and Shrub Species Selected for Buffer Restoration Common Name Scientific Name Size (feet) Planting Density (Stems/Acre) Planting Composition (%) Persimmon Diospyros virginiana 2-3 105 14.3 Tulip Poplar Liriodendron tulipifera 2-3 105 14.3 Willow Oak Quercus phellos 2-3 105 14.3 Sycamore Platanus occidentalis 2-3 105 14.3 River Birch Betula nigra 2-3 105 14.3 Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxii 2-3 105 14.3 Green Ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica 2-3 105 14.3 Totals 735 100 Natural recruitment of desirable Character Tree species shall be counted towards the survival and success rate of the restored site. "Character Trees" are defined as planted or volunteer species identified from a survey of local vegetation on less degraded sections of the specified stream and from reference literature that details native species. A list of Character Tree species (other than the planted species) is included in Table 3. Table 3. Character/Existing Tree and Shrub Species (Piedmont Bottomland Forest*) Scientific Name Common Name Wetland Indicator Status Carya aquatica Water Hickory OBL Quercus shumardii Shumard Oak FACW- Celtis laevigata Sugarberry FACW Ilex decidua Deciduous Holly FACW- Nyssa aquatica Water Tupelo OBL Salix nigra Black Willow OBL Fraxinus caroliniana Water Ash OBL Nyssa sylvatica Blackgum FAC Diospyros virginiana Persimmon FAC Acer rubrum Red Maple FAC Liquidambar styraciflua Sweetgum FAC+ Pinus taeda Loblolly Pine FAC Quercus rubra Red Oak FACU Juniperus virginiana Eastern Red Cedar FACU- Notes: *Source: Schafale & Weakley (1990) 2.0 Vegetation Monitoring 2.1 Success Criteria Buffer vegetative success criteria are based upon the density and growth of Character Tree species as defined in Tables 2 & 3. Vegetative success criteria are based upon guidelines set forth in the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (effective November 1, 2015), and is defined as a success rate equivalent to 260 live stems per acre at the end of the 5-year monitoring period. North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Page 4 Monitoring Year 5 Report If vegetative success criteria are not achieved based on acreage density calculations from combined monitoring plots over the entire restoration area, or if an inspection of a buffer restoration site indicates that portions of the Parcel do not have sufficient stem densities or are otherwise deficient, supplemental planting shall be performed with tree species approved by DWR. Supplemental planting shall be performed as needed until vegetative success criteria are met. No quantitative measurements of herbaceous assemblages will be required to meet the vegetative success criteria. 2.2 Description of Species and Monitoring Protocol The quantity of monitoring plots was determined in accordance with the Carolina Vegetative Sampling Protocol (CVS) Protocol (Levels I & II) such that at least 2 percent of the Site is encompassed in monitoring plots. A total of 27 plots (10 meters by 10 meters) were established within the credit generation area. PVC pipe was used to mark the four corners of the plots. Monitoring plot locations are shown in Figure 4. GPS points were taken at each of the corners and a reference photo was taken from the southwest corner of each plot (Appendix D). All planted stems within the plots were marked with flagging tape and recorded. Total numbers of tree species planted within the monitoring plots as well as planting density and plant composition are detailed in Table 4. Results of the Monitoring Year 5 stem count are summarized in Appendix C. Table 4. Monitoring Plot Summary — Planting (As -Built) Scientific Name Total Stems Flagged Calculated Planting Density (Stems/Acre) Planting Composition o) (/ Betula nigra 56 84 14 Diospyros virginiana 53 79 13 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 61 91 15 Liriodendron tulipifera 60 90 15 Platanus occidentalis 61 91 15 Quercus michauxii 53 79 13 Quercus phellos 60 90 15 Totals 404 606 100 2.3 Results of Vegetation Monitoring The 27 vegetation plots were sampled in September 2021 at the end of the fifth growing season. A reference photo was taken from the southwest corner of each plot, which can be found in Appendix D along with the stem count raw data. Total numbers of tree species identified within the monitoring plots as well as density and composition are summarized in Table 5. Vegetation result tables with planted stem density, and stem count by plot and species are summarized in Appendix C. Results of vegetation sampling during monitoring year five indicated a mean survival value of 429 planted stems per acre across vegetation plots. Vegetation plot stem densities range from 243 to 567 stems per acre. Surviving stem density in 26 of the 27 plots met the success threshold of 260 stems per acre required at the end of year five monitoring by more than 20%. Vegetation plot 22 is short of the stems per acre requirement by one tree, with a planted stem density of 243 stems per acre (see Tables 6 and 7). The planted trees remaining in vegetation plot 22 are healthy and a desirable sycamore (Platanus occidentalis) volunteer brings the total plot stem density to 283 stems per acre (Table 7). The average planted stem heights for individual vegetation plots range from over 3.4 feet to 10.5 feet and the average stem height for all plots spread across the Parcel is over 5.5 feet tall (Table 6). North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Page 5 Monitoring Year 5 Report Table 5. Monitoring Plot Summary — Year 5 Scientific Name Total Stems Flagged Calculated Live Stem Density (Stems/Acre) Live Stem Composition (%) Betula nigra 34 51 12 Diospyros virginiana 40 60 14 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 50 75 17 Liriodendron tulipifera 31 47 11 Platanus occidentalis 42 63 15 Quercus michauxii 30 45 10 Quercus phellos 59 88 21 Totals 286 429 100 2.4 Parcel Maintenance Adaptive measures will be developed, or appropriate remedial actions will be implemented in the event that the Parcel or a specific component of the Parcel fails to achieve the success criteria outlined in the BPDP. Maintenance will be performed to correct any identified problems on the Parcel that have a high likelihood of affecting project success. Such items include but are not limited to; excess tree mortality caused by fire, flooding, drought, or insects. Any actions implemented will be designed to achieve the success criteria and will include a work schedule and updated monitoring criteria. Heavy deer browse has been observed across the Parcel limiting the growth of otherwise healthy trees. Soil samples were taken in May 2021 and confirm that slow tree growth is due to deer browse, not lack of soil nutrients. Planted stem survival rate is high and average tree height is increasing every year. Average tree heights for each vegetation plot in Monitoring Year 5 are shown in Figure 5 and upward trends in tree height are graphed in Appendix D. In an attempt to help the tree leaders grow above typical deer browse height, Wildlands added soil amendments across approximately 13 acres of low growth area in the winter of 2020/2021. Herbaceous vegetation along all features is healthy but DWR has requested additional planted woody stems along Feature A. Wildlands will plant additional woody stems in the winter of 2021/2022. 2.5 Conclusions Vegetation is thriving across the Parcel and is exceeding performance standards despite heavy deer browse. Monitoring Year 5 data shows an average density of 429 planted stems per acre across all vegetation plots, with all but vegetation plot 22 exceeding the 260 stems per acre standard by more than 20%. When a desirable volunteer species (sycamore) is included in calculations for vegetation plot 22, stem density increases to 283 stems per acre. The average stem height for all plots throughout the Parcel is over 5.5 feet tall. As in all previous years, monitoring data shows positive trends in vegetation establishment and this trajectory is expected to continue. Wildlands plans to plant additional woody stems in the winter of 2021/2022. North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Page 6 Monitoring Year 5 Report 3.0 References Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Restoration. NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Ecosystem Enhancement Program. October 2004. Lee, Michael T., Peet, Robert K., Steven D., Wentworth, Thomas R. 2006. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation Version 4.0. Retrieved from http://www.nceep.net/business/monitoring/veg/datasheets.htm. Peet, R.K., T.R. Wentworth and P.S. White. 1998. A flexible, multipurpose method for recording vegetation composition and structure. Castanea 63:262-274. http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm Schafale, M.P. and Weakley, A.S. 1990. A Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Third Approximation. Wildlands Holdings II, LLC (2016). North Fork Little River Banking Instrument. NCDWR, Raleigh NC. http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/nutrientbufferbanks North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Page 7 Monitoring Year 5 Report Appendix A: Figures c CilOrga MopkFns Rd - - . � I i zl� oI> 8'10� 's u�i1Q i alof i � l � l i ♦'�` axfO' R I l USN 7 I l Prospect Hill l — — — — — — — — — — — — - — J North r Rougemont I I S C. r 1 Ste m Bahama dyer l4 I& North Fork Little River Parcel Location � I f J Clllilcf l � . � 1 C reed —'� -- Eno c� Hillsborough Rs�r�sar� 9,; r _ t J F ails Lake State r ° ` Recieatgn t "L Aria ti rsay .:,Durham rr 3 f I n 4 ! �.HyghWa- 54-vy_ i ,\ Carrborr, Chapel Hill Figure 1 Parcel Location North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset WILD LANDS 0 2 4 Miles and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel ENGINEERING I I HUC03ozozol Durham County, NC j Service Area -Nutrient Offset Credits Service Area- Riparian Buffer �,� j l I Jg5 •� County Boundaries 'J�i North Fork Little River Parcel Location Louisbui -A aJ r •r '' cnrham •�- % _har,;'Hill ! ; �••J �' 1 ! Ralei';il-I it � ' •' ,++ Garner Holly lane j o� prings Y eensor '++) Clayton F. •/ o mmAh Ang1« _ 1a; R ZL F-111F As 4e k Caals ' .^•� % Liililirlon Is, •"1 � .Y � r•,,,_y n • Erwin ' � 4f � IT� �•� D unn a • � �� •fit yy�.-�� ''� . - �.1 L 0 4 iF r+ r+rrnr, 1 %Wkw WILDLANDS o s 10Miles VY ENGINEERING I I I I I Figure z Service Area North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel I HUC 03020201 Durham County, NC Figure 3 Credit Generation Map North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset WILD LANDS 0 150 300 Feet and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel ENGINEERING I I HUC03020201 Durham County, NC R �v �a 100' 200' Its lY.r aaim Conservation Easement Area (33.43 ac) - Vegetation Plots Zone A (0-50') Buffer Restoration (8.34 ac) Zone B (51'-100') Buffer Restoration (5.56 ac) Zone A (0-50) Nutrient Offset (1.08 ac) Zone B (51'-100) Nutrient Offset (3.18 ac) Zone C (100'-200') Nutrient Offset (14.05 ac) No Credit (0.41 ac) - Jurisdictional Stream Ditch Figure 4 Monitoring Components Map North Fork Little River Mitigation Site W I L D L A N D S 0 150 300 Feet H UC 03020201 ENGINEERING I i i i Durham County, NC 8 44 i. P � 5 �QL3Q FP4t4reB , i� FegtOre G OQd3 yy 16 Ids 3 a Conservation Easement Area (33.43 ac) Vegetation Plots Zone A (0-50') Buffer Restoration (8.34 ac) @� Zone B (51'-100) Buffer Restoration (5.56 ac) Zone A (0-50') Nutrient Offset (1.08 ac) @ Zone B (51'-100) Nutrient Offset (3.18 ac) Zone C (100'-200) Nutrient Offset (14.05 ac) No Credit (0.41 ac) Jurisdictional Stream Ditch Figure S. Average Tree Heights by Vegetation Plot North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset WILD LANDS 0 150 300 Feet and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel ENGINEERING I I HUC03020201 Durham County, NC Appendix B: Bank Credit Ledger m r r t t t t t t t t t t c r r t t t t t 30 `o `o `0 o E v o o o o 0 E o v o o n° v 3 `0 `0 3 `0 0 -E«« 0 0 c c 3 `0 0 c z u o u z u u Y 3 u u u u u Y u 3 u u= =mo o` z u 0 u z u u u u 00e oz �, 0 u u, 4+ 1 MI�o ❑„ y m �o o N �n m �o �o o m .� .� n� m m ,� o �n n co w co co w co co n n n n �o v v ry c, c, v M m ai v w w ry w n w o m o �n c n m � ,� m ❑ A u p w v ai rwn m m � m m co aii n rc io � o v v ry o v m o m n. m rv� ry m o � o o o 0 m m o ry m m co ry ry m co �o o 0 ai �o �o v 0 �o �o m y •� a p c ca r: ry .o i O O O o . . . . . . . . J � � Z a Z Y m ry 0 O O O O °1 O vl O ry M O 0 V W 0 V �O O O 0 �O 0 .y O o ry o q O O O I� O O O N O 01 O ry O O .-I � O O . O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o a G 0 a o ry « a 0 v o ry mv, m co � �n �o vrvi ^� w ca m rv� v m v °� m ry m o 6 ai of m ai �' n ry v m ry I a n °1 0� c N v m u` � « a Z m _ Q y Q o o w n m o o ry w o w o 0 Y a p c o o m u' a Z E E E 0 0 m E L r o z p' o o - s 3 3 o o m « o o E o c o' -O �• o ��e m ¢ E -o m'm' - Ewa - a" o.o 'a - 4 ¢ o a 3 3 r - m v v z z E c rvo m u u E E t t t t ° u o o m M o o ° o -O m m `o m m u c Q c v tO c Y °° o O o o o c O o « o E E LL LL x �e E°w w° o d U « o °' d 3t o d v d 0 o o u u j a c c «' Y Y a3 a3 o v 0 a a a c o a a t on ' rvo a z v . MO N N N o c c c o m x 'oD ` w. 6 N C N N -- 2 2 X l7 o O o 0 0 -O o m> j o« m z z o o z' z z t- 3 3 ._ -- "' _ `o o o o ¢¢ Z o 3 3 m m m(D a' 0 3 LL ¢° 3 o 0 0- o v m u LL - o t ? o 0 z 0 « z o z z m m' s =o m u' e - `o «o o 'y z o 0 0 0 o c a EE oo c o__ `m m °o E E .... c u ° v E E E E c c m E E J afOi o v v r t m > w �_ SSuu� o o z° z a z o o« `Y uu -° YY c O O m` m` -- v E E o o av�a - s vm_«-° Vu v o u o¢-f0oa� o o v.v.ww .. ._ z 3 z o 3 �xx o- - m ° mu.«- x ._ o a v Y u x x a 33 Au`um33��co co a>usisu~i - a . w . . . . . . . . . . . w n n n n n n n n n n n n o '^ z - rv.. 0 0 m 0 0 m 0 0 m m 0 0 m m 0 0 m m 0 0 m m 0 0 m m 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 c c 0 0 v a 0 0 0 0 .... 0 0 0 0 E E 'o n E E c E E c 'o n° E E E E E E E E E E o n° o E E E E 'O n E E E E s-E m t-E m o c t E = r r m r m m t t m �, t E m m t t m m t -E = -a m t m m t t= s s E c 'O c 'o 0 0 0 o 0- o 0 u- 0- `o K o o o u o o O O O u O o O o w o V O O o O o O 0 o K o o ,� o o a• o o m 3 `o `0 3 Y `o `o o o w ,� ,� o o o `o 3 o o o 0 o o a• a' o `o 3 uo 0u Y O O o u ._Ou u u c� 3 u u c� z u u z 3 ._ z u u u u 3 u u u u z u u u u ._ u u 3 3 u u z m m ai o6 o6 o6 oo is is is is m w w m m N ri o 0 0 0 0 o m m `O o o� N m ov m v co o m m ry n co � a a lo lo �o �o � � w m n mmv .� a � i w c ..m" m m m n n N n m .� m ry m y m v o n n.-+m v N n N n �o o ry �n �n N o �o v N N ry ry o n o o 00 m `c°+ rvo �. �n m m o m �o �o vi v mo.-+m m y �o v v v om ry c c c c m oc c m c ai 0 0 0 0 o n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 .-+ 0 o .-+ 0 0 n m o �n 0 0 rvo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m o �o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o .-+ v 0 0 o m N m o 0 0 0 m o 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 4 m m co v o N m e "'ro is v � co v, w o 6 ry m o � � m mo fi �+ , � n a m m ai i 4 aim •� o 0 0 w 0 0 0 m 0 0 m 0 a a 0 o a E _ E E s 0 -o 0 o Elw -E -E N` O - O Y x x orS oil Q L - O .o. O O_ O oo E ¢~ - - m m oil m o oil o >> =o - N O m LL LL v v O - O O m m m Y m m a, ¢ = o o a o o c c E o x-- «�_ a o s 0 T _ a, nn x��o «« o '�^ o o . Wm o oin== '>N K K O x Q o o O O K K N u -V' o N o 0 0 0 >- o` o S o� t>> o'rc > - - o o 0 3 0 3'- mw o z v - an E E ¢ ¢ nt-- O m m ~ 'z 0 Q C vSi F voi w u w F F z in v� Q>> m m ..., v�i w 2 LL- Y 2 F F m m � E E o o o o E oo o .o. _ E t o p « p .o. 8 v L o _ E t r -o t o p` o o z E o - - °p o' o c z E J $ _ _ cwtp o m o 0 o m E E E E o o c- o o o 0 o Y 'o 1p 'o 0 0 o o z c J J J V E ID N o c _ '« « v o wm wm m >>>> o o a u c ` J o 00 o m m O O o S" o p 0 0 p 0 o v 0 m - oo¢ Y o o 0 0 mu - - m u t a a =' t t t w w Y z o O 3 EEEE > o o voi u= u` V v� p in in ¢ >> m n n d n n m qqp 0 n n � 0 n n m 0 n n m vi 0 .-. n n m ......nnnmmoo n n n n n n m vi n n v o n n 0 0 n n 0 0� n n .+� m m o 0 m m 0 0 m m 0 0 m m 0 0 m m a000nnnn 0 0 m m 0 0 m m 0 0 m m 0 0 E E E E E E E E v n E E E E E E n n E E c E E E s E E E n 'o O u = u -E m E _ o 0 u v o 0 m `0 3 0 0 `o `0 m 0 3 `o 0 0 `o o 0-o o o O-o-o u o v O o ,� o O o ,� u o v O O ,� o o w o u a u m v 3 0 0 `o 0 o o E o O o O o 0 E ,� t o 0 ,� z o `o 0 `o 0 z `o 0 O `o 0 w o 300 ouu z uuuu �3� �l uu�33zuu��0' Ul o'uuz�ouuzuu�o �o �o �n �n v m m li O m o 0 0 q q q v o m m m n n n n � rvv v v vvvvvv v ry o v 0 vvmrri O m o m m m m vvvvvvvN o ry q o' o v ry ry n n ri C �O V .-i m .-I n n 01 tS O Ot W n m v�l tp tS CO O W OI V N vrvt vt o6 o6 vl �O M vl O O O tp V O O m OI .y m vl m O O N C V 01 N V N N O O N M tp n n V n n m m N M O 01 tp m n tG tG m m M �O vl N n O tp V m m O W m O m tp V .-I .-I m m I� N vl m M m O 01 m w N O t0 m n M Ot .-I w M N M O N N 01 m tp m m N M i tp O tp n m V I� N M V m O M tp tp m O V oc m Ot O 6 m N n m vl vl 6 �O O vt tp M n n O .-I V 01 M N M 01 M m 01 .--i N M M M m V .-I V V N N M .-I m m CO m m W N vl O M �O O O O O O c O O O O O O O O o O O O O O O O O O O O N O rI O O ri O O O O O O O O O rI O O O O O O O V O O O O 01 O O O O ri O O O O OI N O N O O O O N O O O N rI n p m p N O O m O N r W O O O O m I� vl V m N 0 0 a 0 a o vm a 0 0 0 0 m v m a 0 0 m a o o o In m ao ui E 0 _ E o v 0 O o o Q o E O E E O W O W O Q O E L O m o E E O o o m m L o c7 o > o 0 t O t O a> a 0 t 00 o 0 o j L O Y w m 0- 0 C C o N > - N - O C o E c o o 0 3 = = o 0 o - o 0 0 o 0 0 c~ m m o o a a u u - - v a t o '" m y N N v v n n w m = '^ _ '^ x o o N m m 0 0 m _o - - vE E my c c E c.�>>u E� v v om oo¢ oo oa o m' - y w E E v o a o0 0 rr E 0 Est 0 m"' a a o«« x x` - m o o E - a " a¢ tt o 0 Ij o= m' u - m W LL - o o -- v o o «« o o v Y Y c `o o o c" 20 c m m a v m m m o o v u a x x E E c c u c a o o D o m u` u` m o E 8 0' a 0' - >'> o g g m m z v v ' o o a m m o m v v a = w � .i .i .i u =' a t t Z v S« z 3 z 3 « o 0 >> "��>�az� ,„ azzauP as"aD03a�a�°o� .V°1. a� �U E z `a f 0 E o o o o z a z lw E _ o E c E « J J o ry $ O .o m0 -lo _ EO - EO -- - 0 « .... o -- o L u m t r m 0 0~ mo 'J 'J u c f - v c u - « CO 3 c 3 m o -- - a - v o o L L c a w - v m - o a c - o .o. v a c v v 3 3 w ``°. z LL z m LL v v m � '� v a m s 2 w w 'o r v --- -moo N o a 3 >: - z vv o 3 0- o o m 3 m' m' i E a m L- z z a v o LL=_ u m v>> u o m== c o a c t s t c c v v a _. _. v c s v v - w o F w«---- v F v« vv al z z w u>> u o' a u u' a a a` 3 3 a' u a o' LL m m u a u a a m m m m 0 0 m m m o 0 .-+ m m 0 0 m m 0 m m m m .`-i m m o c o 0 m m 0 0 m m m 0 0 m m a c 0 0 m m n c 0 0 m m ry N .-+ .-I p 0 c o 0 0 0 c m 0 0 0 0 a s 0 0 p 0 O 0 O p v—i �o 0 0 p io .+ 0 0 0 0 v - . 0 0 m m 0 0 m 0 � C L L L L C L L L L C S S C O L L S S S S •+ w -E-E w -Et •+ S w S ` 2 S S ` C C S S ` C 2 L L C L L L L m 0 O O O O O O O O V D D O O w D O w 2 O w O O w 0 0_ m 0 0 0- m w pOVwVwwO o 0 3 `o `o m o 0 0 o m o o 3 `o `0 3 `0 0 0 0 o `0 3 `o `0 Ow 0 w Ow o w- O O moo w w- O�,V3 3 lo 0 3 3 `o `o `o `o ooao0 0 0� mY mozoY z u u z u u 3 u u u u 3 u u oz u u z u u u u u u z u u u u u u 3 u u z u z 3 z u u u u w w - mm m co m mn m Iq vvmmmmn�om w cc O Iq wrry ry ry o' -q � m ` �o w,�on�o vivo m �o v, v,o �ovcmomm riccc�n m viv q �n q �nvvvvm mm�o �n v,vvm rcn rri �o �o �o ww vi v ❑ A u c n�o w c m m o o om ts v' moo rcn ti ti N w mv, mmmmo.-+m a m m �o v,mv, w o m w N vm�nmmm.-+goo ,� o N M o N n n N �o �o �o o ,� N c �o ,� �o o co m w ai viv ri oai goo .N.o o O. caN ro co ai co .� vowai �o �oorvry oco rrim ai J .o o moo �o v omvm mmm v Nowwnnnnn�n cvn vvw n n �nwnnnnnn�n mm vm �nvm n�o �omN�o �n �nww mvcmmmwm �o � Z a a E O O 0 0 0 . O O V 0 O O 0 0. O O .y O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O a 0 Q a � iO o � 0 �omrvm 0 ,y o c mw �o ov"i m N N Nn c mmo w-i c to lovwoNco O O �n �o O O mm o c m nv w 16o y vN o ^� om co o ai aio �co comrvai vino no m � N v m u` `o c � o a a a' a Y c y ¢ o 0 0 0 0 m o n _ o �o v�i vrvi ro o o aw, m N c u a a E o 0 E E O O m c m m E u - u E o t o o E v s w M L c oa a m r o E o � O C b« $ o 0 0 E m m o S E t O O' C p - Oo - « - L N O N « N O V d N S W N C N Nti N c O O ¢ O V O E -oc a E _ 'o ww o o E E 3 3 Q O " o o m m o o - O¢ m z w -- m Z Z o o= o« Y o 0 0 o c v� c c v, o u o c c¢ m m o w w �i w w o 3 >> a « c m o o c 4 ¢ LL LL m m - O o " o o w m m Y E E v O O a '> '> o a s '> E m Ewe Y 3 3 a� .� _o c c w w m" « E o o 3 _ _ Qom m o pF a3i a3i u`u=m c7 !7 v ¢¢t^^ m a� 2 axivv mLL owtf -¢¢ m x m m a `._ E Ei'n o - m N o m o o o o o" o _ 0 Y o 0> o z z c c `_° m- m m i i o 0 z o a s o o z z 3 o 3 '�o o- -- n «- a n° n n«- ¢¢-- o 0 0- t>> v" o c c o 0 3 3 z z m ' m m o '" E 3w �°�°�°z3 >> '" u u`�° o 0 0= E E m o~wuw �� r r zz�n m' m' o 0 0 u o E o o tf o o o' o. o z c O c O o o z a E E E m m o o o a v o J J J m m m E E« o v ° m E E c o > - '" f0 6 o f0 c m E E E E v a E E c c E E J c w u v v E E O v r t __ m v m E N c '" o m v o v o v o 0 x x 0 0 x x z 01 m p D o c J z z w a z '- o 0 a 0 0 °1- x m v>> v o L-- J �e IMFm m u u Ew a~ a - - « N m u S c t_ u u « c v v V o 0 o o 0 0 o o a v o s o ¢-mo��22 3 3 ;�xx - - - m-moN a m m m w w taa o oa' mu,« cu c a o o� o¢0000 ti33 o uum33 uss �N3Na nu u u�muxux=u u o'er `up u��uu ovEvEvEvE m h w ... . o 0 ........... m m 0 0 m m 0 0 m m 0 0 m m 0 0 m m 0 0 m m\ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------mmm-mm-ce-n-- �o 0 0 m io 0 0 �o 0 0 0 d 0 0 0 0 c^, 0 0 .-+ vo0- I E c E E E o 0 o a E E E 0 E n E E t c c E E c E E E E c 'O v n E E t E c E c E E o n 0 a° o=-E E E E E 0 a° = ?= 'O 'O o ? m 'O m= ? m ? m= o 0 u ,«,« v o 0 0 0 o 0 `o 3 w V o 0 O O o o O w o,«,« 0 O O o o u u,«,« v v 0 0 o o u 3 0 �' o `o 3 3 �' 0 `o `o w o u v o o,«,« O O o o o O u,«,« v o O w o o o u� p p `o 0 w w o o E `o-w p p 0 0 z 0 3 `o p `0 3 `o 3uuuuz�uuuu�uu33uuz3uuzzuu�3��uu3uu�3zuu��o�uuz��zo �n �o moo mmco goo 0000nn�ov n rl ov O O mmmn O O O O nnm N N O O �n Qom .-+Ommco ri nm �o ri O vO1i �o O O v°1i v°1i O O v'N v.+ O O oom O O O I N--- �n Oommm I Iri O 00 O O --, rl O m—t env O O o a O O I� N CO O V in N I1 I� ri n N W 01 M V N V O �O vl m w .-1 O ti w ri ry O �O tp I� n V ri O N �O w 01 I� W M n m V r I� r w n CO I� O Cq 01 W N 01 CO CO V V V tp N V M V V .-i i11 M tD V� N ri 01 in tp tp 01 01 tp CO 01 vl c O 01 tp vl vl vl uj O O O V ci M � W tp O OI W CO CO L� V I01 O tp 01 CO tp tp CO CO N tp N O I� N O I� M O N m m M V � W N W Ot O O O O M 01 V O O O vt O N I� O O N 0 O 0 0 O M N OI O O O O O OI N O O .-I O O O O O O O O O O W N O O Ot O O O O O O eN+l O O O O V O O n O O O O vl O ti 0 O O n �O O O O �O � O t0 Nw lO ai .-+ W O W rrio �O Ot w N t ri co oo��o O N �O W �rricoo N I� I� W O O rrio� V I OI �O rvori O O O cn orricoocai vt 01 N N O N CO �O 01 V .-+ O O Ol M �N O O W ri r O 01 coorvo ri .y C r ac O M M c 0 0 0 0 0 o a 0 a 0 a 0 0 as 0 0 0 E 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 3 � o E u E - r o � E t C Y E - O o E - 0 0 -oO E E > c O E o o C O No « Noo r O E O m O - O N C O O X v oii x ob - -oo j o Q O O O om m o o o o E L ,o> - w - o 000 c o 3 3 3« - - ' o o t «° - a o -wu -- o oc> o E v o 0 0¢ o m o o -> - c E En�� c c°c° c ESL oO o0 0;� _ _ o 0 0 m o m vu o0 v-- °��' o o c n o v o o v� - >_ N N o o u «« cin in �� F F o 0 a z u z s Nxx N-- s vo v o o `o `o « v v Y c ,' o o« a v m m « v c7 E E o- o i'n u` a z z u v v o o o o `o u u •' o o>'> rc - f0 o 0o « E c m - ° -° _ ._ a t v« m m O t «« t m v s s m x v u E m v>> t « u -- c ._ - > o ¢ > o"" > m" m" ti E ¢ u °c , °c w = LL - v o Y x m ._ ._ -- --- u" u" v > ., o a z m m v o a z o« z ¢ u a" a « z a o' 3 u° m' E E s o z � s L z t `Y o m L o a o' E o o o o z r .o. v t o' E -E E t v o lw o UL _ E ° c E •• o ".7 c z t E m f o Lq m o u o' o o' o - E _ 1° o' v - - c _ c - « o o N c_ o o m tOi tOi t to c c E u J -o e N u a c J u m 3 N 3 m J >> N z H LL m v O O -- _- a F= - - ,t, N o S J v F 3 �n 3 F o o J J c c w E-- E v u u N - v v m z fO " v v N o o moo LL -«-o u- J o a 0 u` 0- m z z m m N N v m s v o v m c v v b o a 3 m mmwu v m w 'c^ u w « ` o 0«« a o o m v-- ¢ o LL LL¢¢ o o 3 m' m' L vi E - �o o - z z Z _ n Z O x� -- cxx o� c czw LL--« LL=ov = c - Ctrs p p - .' v u u"--" z > o o«« ti z z 3 z z o- 3 m z v v- o -« a"i c c v a«iv-'-' v>>«' cs m y v LL ¢>> m m o - o o o z c u u u u' a a` 3 3 a u a o' LL u u a �o �o �o n n n n ro m m - .-+ - n ry - - - m - - io - Qo m � §§§§/\\§§[§[§§§[§[§[ cn ❑ � _ « - Q J � �4 § \� \ \\ \ 3 \ \ \ } } [ m§ 7 §7 ( § § 7 \k r [` lo mn - \\\�\)} 1.§ /lo } \\((\$ma cc \\\\\\\\\\ jj`��`jjkjkj{ !l3±I»3 Appendix C: Vegetation Assessment Data C O c� G Lai w M CE m C -0 7 � N v N N u p u LM aj N v ar 'C: O a z o � v N > E N m L Q M N Q J } Y C l0 O 0 LL O H Z C:2 o* +• N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N a+ VI N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Z N N N N N cu Saj to } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } } cu c v v •cu M Lf1Lf1 r, Lr) Lf1 Lr) l0 Lr) � l0 l0 Lf1 l0 � l0 � l0 l0 Lr) � l0 a a IT Z w N O s .0 nn ai'o ` a, mN y -ZI: -I ci l0 Cl l0 Lq I- M -ZI: - Lq O N O l0 Ln M t t m N m O M I� O m I� Ln -4 -4 Ln -4 Ln m Ln CO 0 Lf l0 Lf Lf l0 M I-� M l0 .4 Lf iy Q a y " i+ N UD C y > G iD u rl ci O l0 N O M l0 Ln � Ln O 0 CO m l0 M n O n O Ln Ol l0 - CO CO N CO M N � l0 l0 N O M O M� n Tif M y Q c-I ci ci Ln L.f1 CO Ln I� l0 l0 l0 n n l0 Ln M Ln CO CO l0 Ol ate-' O h H E cu cu •' u n l 0 � Ln l0 � � Ln Ln l0 � l 0 Ln 0 lLn L t n Ln Ln M Ln l0 Ln Ln I" C InQ l0 l0 N N O M l0 N l0 O O N N M� M O l0 l0 O O�� N� O l0 O t M Ln Ln M� M M M� Ln M� M Ln t� N Ln t� Ln a •� a to C •5 . E -I _ Gl CO N CO N l0 N zt c-I M ci N N zt Ii Ii O Ii N Ii al Ii zt M Ln ci Ln ci ci ci l0 ci al ci N ci W ci I, ci M ci M ci N N N N l0 c-I M N Y Y N O H GJ CU E C m'* Ii Ii M Ii l0 M O Ii Ln m ci N m N n M O� m M� n M M N m Ii l0 m O Y O N to 'N y o ci O O li li O O O li O O O O O O O O li O O O r1 O O O O O N 'O UD yL E O1 zt M O N O O M N c-I N O 0 0 1O c-I M c-I O� i acu J ci t-i t-i t-i t-i ci t-i ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci N 1 CA M Ol O 00 ci t fV M M c-I a -I m c-I fV O � m I" m ci m O m O M Ol Ln �D Ln I� N m I" M oq M O Il n ci O M Ol C }, O I� Ln Ol to M M O 00 M O Ol Ol 00 fV M 00 O fV :t 00 O :t w Ln Ol M fV 00 fV O I" Ol fV Ol fV M O w w m O :t lD Ln O Ln Ln Ol m yL Ol Ol m I� Ln w Ol Ol m Ln lD c-I mwO N N O mn Ln ci c-I M ui M a -I O M a -I O O fV O O fV O O fV O O fV O O fV O O N O O N O � fV O c fV O ci fV O c fV O c fV O O fV O O N O c N O c fV O c fV O c N O O N O O fV O O fV O O fV O O fV O O f4 O O f4 O N N N N N N N N N fV fV fV fV fV fV N fV fV fV N fV fV fV fV fV fV fV N m m N 00 ci t m ci w N l" m m m ci r" m a r" of am t a a r" m C I� ci Ln Ln f4 O M rV M -i Ln O� Il Ol Ln O m N I� Ol Il rV Ol Ol Il a -I m Ln lD Ln Ln lD lD m N N c-I m N m I� O ci Ln O� O� a O n Ln Ln Ol Ln Ln m m N N Ln m 0 O rn m rn m O 0 O 0 O ci ci ci ci ci ci 0 O O 0 0 O ci 0 O 0 O O 0 O O O O O O 0 rn m m rn rn Z � � o, o, o, o, o, o, o, o, o, o, o, o, o, o, o, o, o, o, o, o, o, o, � � r, O v Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Lf1 Lf1 Lf1 } m O c-I N M Ln l0 Il W al O N M Ln wI� O LL LL LL LL L.L w LL m ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci N ( N N N N N N O. Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z GJ \ # § 2 e m » _a r Q ej Z » r a r N_/ % § ) r a r e 't) _ z _ a a Q = j Ln a. T> - ` - a a e_/ z g 2 77 ) e z / \ 14 - g 2 § CL ] $ CL 3 F _ In � e a r r__ % 5\ 2 2 f > _ N e _ r z r r e =/ = r r z § Im77 )=rr z - - - N e r�_ r a a/ - � Nero e- §2 /z$ ) _ a _ r e z / cu \\\\U e e e e e E�« m k / / / / / - cu j j e \ cu /e aa /e / / / a /e )a a E ) \ ■ - e= E», =�ajL -_ ® ff /}\\)\\\)�\)/ \\)/\/ _um eb��°�®11a,- co 23\\/\)\\/2\jƒ\\\j\\ / E _ - \ . z k f \ ® - / - } \ ~ [ _ \ - j 2) 2 - G & e \ ƒ) } / �))) \ 6 / « { \ § 2 § 7\&{@@@®l:E777 \2%=:===±±«/aaattt § ■ GJ \ # § 2 e _ _ r r > a r _ % a/ _ r a r m z § 2 __/ g 0 _ r ar Q z) CE - r - » - » - Q m § 14 - ® - - - t - ° § - / 9 0 - ® - - - 5 ° / CL a r4 � - - - r Q ® 2 > Z ] $ CL 3 In a _ a e z/ Ln 2 2 f > T-ro H aI HN ]I-z/ In I I I I I I I r In a _ a m z/ Z r � _ a m - � % § / 77 ) r a _ a m 't/ CL _ r � N - - Q ® / 2 ° ` - - a)- ` § / In 0 / u-Uu e e e e e Ecu « m k / / / / / lucu - cu cL e j j e j e e e 3 e e e e e e e e j In / aa / a / )e a / / /a | ) \ ■ - e= E», =��E) /}\\)\\\) \)/ \\)/\/ �� _ eb��°�®2°3e�-: 23<<(D< \/2\jƒ\\\j\< / E _ - \ . z k � \ ® - / - } \ ~ f _ \ \\ / [ \ 6 / « { \ ) U, § 2 § �§j7\&{@@@®l:E777 //))\2LL— ±±«/(Z(ZV) - § ■ aJ 2 I Ln O 00 � 1 N m c-I c-I N m c-I O > d o M N J O N M c-I c-I N Ol LnlD C ICI M r IV N m lV lV lV O rIj rIj rIj O N w O> CL c o a N J c-I c-I N N N N O l D � Ln O C a `~ r ti m N m In N o 14 N O N .--� N O — m cy N M M N c-I rl w �p co N 1 > d O N } J w O c-I N m m N c-I N lD co O O Y d 0 r In ti a m ti a s a � C Ln —_ In ti a m N O a Ln a c� d o a N O m ti a m ~ a s a r ti a N ti ti In ti N oo Ln Ln 1 a -I N O fV M c-I N Lf1 Oo > d o a Vf J O N M c-I N N Ln00 p C COL ~ V O fn 1 m c-I N N c-I c-I c-I coc-I O lD N > cL o M N J O c-I N N c-I c-I c-I Oo lD N C a m W W cu 7 7 (J O a r aj aj aj aj aj mo Q £ ar Q y VI aj aj aj aj aj N_ v Q •'^ N •y r r r r r VI h N O. aJ -0 L -0 L aJ -0 L aJ aJ aJ - i aJ O aJ aJ aJ aJ aJ aJ aJ aJ L aJ aJ aJ N E O. cu h N N N OJ aJ N N N N N N N N N N N N N h r V7 Ln r Ln H H r In r w r r r r r r r r Ln r r r N E c ° - o m z L E m m U T aJ 0 C O u U aJ a O U aJ E a t -6 a C co C x C v d E 7 m d c N aJ U O T E W w C E O Q m •ut m m C L m O u u a u K O aj ('J O_ �O fa M° T O O_ OJ -6 v u v v 3 v v v v a c v Q E' 3 o -2 v a on v > O a c — m w Q Q C7 Q w U Ln H a o o L>n Ln w w Q y a Z o L m z O v� G O O> O O O a O .Q Ok al al al U 7 L N N = a Q O O Q in h 7 O O O O L O Q O OQj N L 7 A 7 7 7 ac3 a a U 7 a' a aa(Z(Z a0 a0 a0 U C)a lL al J d V) E GJ \ # § 2 e e/ _ a a s 0. 2 __/= g 0 _ a » QCE =/ / cm - - ® ® - - = t § 2 - / 0 - - ^ ^ - ` S ° / rn _ � N r _ > z\ Z 2 > ] $ � 3 - - ®- -ar r4 e m/ ) a r _ j\ � \ \ T-ro- - H ~ -^°i 5 ° / I I I I I I I I 1 1 - - N »N -r m m m\ _ » _ r § 2 _ / g 0 `/ r r _ _ a a r r 3 m co N 14 r r _ a a r § 2 __/_$ =\ M \\\0 e e e e e E�« m k / / / / / lu - cu cu e j j e j e e e 3 e 2 e e e e e e e e j e e e "\ cu / a a / a a /) a | ) \ ■ - e= E», co =��E) -_ ® ff /}\\:'E E \)/ \\)/\/ �� _ eb��°�®2°3e�—: Co 23\\/\)\\/2\jƒ\\\j\\ / E _ - \ . z k z\ ® - / — } \ _ \ / 2 @ { \ & e \ ƒ) } 3 ) \ / / { QQz �§j7\&{@@@®l:E777 //))\2% § ■ ) § / > .0 I \ m m k k E / 2 a Q( - � » r a a _ ° § 2 - \ a C°k / CL a Ine e/ Ln § m/ T _ a r a_/'t g 2 0Ln 3 z\ 0. __0 a_ a r » Q z/ ) LU aj \ M0 e ; E I / / , - w CL : « « ; « ; ; ; « ; 2 ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; « ; ; ; " \ In /aa////////{{{//a/// ®a a/ \ E| ■ § \ E }'D _ /(\j\ f= co j7\\)5C§ 0, 0m 2/§�l��§«)©®»;�/EEg§ ;a }/\\f\±UInF— \\\3j\\ E z )3\ \e\[ /\(\ | & ®[ \ 4 e { \ �§ § § � § m ) % ( \@ E$*[ § § t & a ¥ e b ®$ m m ma o .:_«««__= m a t t r ■ aJ 2 lO m ti o ti m 0 ^ �Or Ln Ln �O �O �O Ln �O a 0 n a� O N ^ — �p �D m .ti o ti m O o^ ^ o 0 1 Ln Ln lD lD lD Ln lD O J O lD m .--� o ti m 0 o I, o O a a A r m a Ln a a Ln Ln a M ^ ti O Ln n a� Ln ^ a m O W ^^ •--� O a -I 1 m Ln Ln Ln 'n N O^ Ln } 77 J m a v^i a rn o ^ o a rmn Ln r lD M N M `~ � M N rn Lmn rnn Lrnn rn m a oo a� O N ^ — m rn w m MD m rn rn o^ ^ Ln 1 m M Ln m a m Lnm N O 4n cu m m m a m vrn ^ v a rn m r �D oo M Ln .ti 0 N lD rn lD ^ c-I t M co c-I lD M oo o c Ln Ln Q Nm ^^ lo m O O a m^ of �n ^ N en 1 m Ill m a m Ln N fV 77 c} C 'n O M 't M Ln Ln ^ o N V a r D rn N of O �n m m Ln of a m O a)cy ^ � ^ Nn .� m Ln Ln m m t m Ln .� m .� Ln 0 N .... N m O rIj Om bJ ^ fV qr d m m � Ln N p a 77 a m a o ^ cm Ln rn Ln � a r - N �D m O - ^ W a fV rn�t w O rn m N t ^ N m Ln Ln N t m m Ln e M c Ln a� N O N ^ — O O O bJ ^ N N Ln d rn m � m Lrn n N p a } J m a m a om ^ rn c vrnilool a a W W aj ` 7 7 (J o o a r aj aj aj aj aj mcc Q £ N Q y VI aj aj aj aj aj N_ v Q lu 'N cu O. w L L aJ L W W W i W O W W W W W w w w L w w w E G cu h N N N OJ aJ N N N N N N N N N N � E E E h H N N H N H H H N H W H H H H H H H H N H H H N E c ° o m Z - E t m o m U T N C O t U aj a N O U aj in E aj fU0 L -O d C m C 0 2 C d 7 m d C D_ N aj U Y Q T E W W C E O Q m •0 m m C E m O u a K O � ('J O_ d0 m T O O_ N -O v u v v 3 v v v v° c aj 3 v a bn v >_ b C — -6 Q Q C7 Q w U v3i H a o o Ln Ln w w Q cua a m Z O v� G Ocr- O O O O a a o O N E O bD C ti "J v v " w c c v v c C, a, a, v IT v u .5 .� O C a a v v o E v v a m E E al m d al a� � C i J C) w O ° ¢ a > E Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results Veg Plot 1 - Year 5 Tree ID Species X (m) Y (m) Height (cm) 1 Betula nigra 0.4 0.8 Dead 2 Liriodendron tulipifera 0.4 2.6 62 3 Platanus occidentalis 0.4 4.5 465 4 Quercus michauxii 0.4 6.7 67 5 Quercus phellos 0.5 9.1 320 6 Quercus michauxii 5.0 8.8 Dead 7 Platanus occidentalis 4.9 6.8 580 8 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 5.0 4.4 215 9 Liriodendron tulipifera 4.9 2.4 Dead 10 Quercus phellos 5.1 0.8 215 11 Platanus occidentalis 9.2 0.8 Dead 12 Quercus michauxii 9.3 2.9 Dead 13 Quercus michauxii 9.2 5.1 Dead 14 Liriodendron tulipifera 9.2 7.2 16 15 Quercus phellos 9.3 9.4 365 Average Tree Height Over Time - VP 1 10 8 +� 6 t U 4 0 Q 0 1 2 3 4 5 Monitoring Year North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results Veg Plot 2 - Year 5 Tree ID Species X (m) Y (m) Height (cm) 16 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 0.5 0.7 298 17 Quercus phellos 0.4 2.9 265 18 Quercus michauxii 0.3 5.0 262 19 Quercus phellos 0.3 7.2 320 20 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 0.3 9.0 275 21 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 4.2 9.2 195 22 Quercus michauxii 4.3 6.9 44 23 Quercus michauxii 4.0 5.3 120 24 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 4.7 3.3 144 25 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 4.7 1.0 147 26 Quercus phellos 9.3 1.2 315 27 Diospyros virginiana 9.4 3.1 121 28 Betula nigra 9.4 5.3 Dead 29 Betula nigra 9.2 7.4 425 30 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 9.0 9.7 86 Average Tree Height Over Time - VP 2 8 Cj Cj C I 6 t to 4 Z r2■I1 Cj 0 Q 0 1 2 3 4 5 Monitoring Year North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results Veg Plot 3 - Year 5 Tree ID Species X (m) Y (m) Height (cm) 31 Quercus michauxii 0.2 0.5 198 32 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 0.3 3.2 100 33 Betula nigra 0.4 5 223 34 Platanus occidentalis 0.6 7.3 245 35 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 0.5 9.7 97 36 Liriodendron tulipifera 5 9.2 18 37 Diospyros virginiana 5.1 7.2 222 38 Platanus occidentalis 5.4 4.9 Dead 39 Quercus phellos 5.2 3.2 157 40 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 4.9 1.2 168 41 Platanus occidentalis 9.1 1.2 118 42 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 9.1 3.3 117 43 Betula nigra 9.1 4.9 154 44 Liriodendron tulipifera 9.2 9.4 Dead 1493 Betula nigra 9.2 7.3 195 14V . Average Tree Height Over Time - VP 3 °J 5 4 t °0 3 Fj = 2 Cj cc I > 0 a 0 1 2 3 4 5 Monitoring Year North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results Veg Plot 4 - Year 5 Tree ID Species X (m) Y (m) Height (cm) 47 Diospyros virginiono 0.4 0.7 64 48 Liriodendron tulipifero 0.4 3.2 Dead 49 Diospyros virginiono 0.5 5.2 99 50 Diospyros virginiono 0.5 7.1 52 51 Froxinus pennsylvonico 0.6 9.3 109 52 Liriodendron tulipifero 5.2 8.9 Missing 53 Diospyros virginiono 5.5 7 107 54 Plotonus occidentolis 5.5 5.5 Dead 55 Liriodendron tulipifero 5.5 3.4 Dead 56 Betulo nigro 5.3 1 Dead 57 Quercus michouxii 9.1 0.6 Dead 58 Plotonus occidentolis 9.2 2.5 233 59 Plotonus occidentolis 9.3 4.9 280 60 Betulo nigro 9.3 7.1 Dead 61 Quercus phellos 9.2 9.6 189 Average Tree Height Over Time - VP 4 5 +- v 4 - 3 ao v 2 L A ago 1 0 v Q 0 1 2 3 4 5 Monitoring Year North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results Veg Plot 5 - Year 5 Tree ID Species X (m) Y (m) Height (cm) 62 Platanus occidentalis 0.1 1.7 134 63 Platanus occidentalis 0.2 4.3 153 64 Diospyros virginiana 0.4 6.0 205 65 Betula nigra 0.6 8.1 405 66 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 0.7 9.5 150 67 Quercus phellos 4.6 9.0 73 68 Quercus michauxii 4.6 7.3 Dead 69 Diospyros virginiana 4.7 5.5 161 70 Quercus phellos 4.7 3.6 51 71 Liriodendron tulipifera 4.8 1.7 Missing 72 Diospyros virginiana 9.2 1.4 45 73 Liriodendron tulipifera 9.2 3.7 Dead 74 Diospyros virginiana 9.2 5.3 114 75 Betula nigra 9.1 7.4 Dead 76 Platanus occidentalis 9.0 9.5 Dead Average Tree Height Over Time - VP 5 °J 5 +� 4 t °0 3 2 1 , ao Monitoring Year North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results Veg Plot 6 - Year 5 Tree ID Species X (m) Y (m) Height (cm) 77 Platanus occidentalis 0.3 1.0 234 78 Quercus phellos 0.3 3.3 206 79 Quercus phellos 0.3 5.4 54 80 Betula nigra 0.2 7.3 182 81 Betula nigra 0.2 8.2 63 82 Betula nigra 4.2 9.3 171 83 Betula nigra 4.4 7.6 167 84 Quercus michauxii 4.5 5.3 Dead 85 Diospyros virginiana 4.5 5.9 259 86 Liriodendron tulipifera 4.5 1.2 Dead 87 Quercus phellos 9.1 0.9 181 88 Diospyros virginiana 9.2 2.8 149 89 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 9.0 5.4 Dead 90 Platanus occidentalis 9.1 7.6 226 91 Diospyros virginiana 9.0 9.0 141 Average Tree Height Over Time - VP 6 5 +, 4 t 3 cc ■ ■ Cj 0 Q 0 1 2 3 4 Monitoring Year North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results Veg Plot 7 - Year 5 Tree ID Species X (m) Y (m) Height (cm) 94 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 0.1 0.5 Dead 95 Quercus michauxii 2.0 0.4 118 96 Diospyros virginiana 4.3 0.5 59 97 Diospyros virginiana 6.7 0.6 Dead 98 Diospyros virginiana 9.1 0.8 183 99 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 9.0 4.8 105 100 Diospyros virginiana 6.8 4.8 91 101 Betula nigra 4.7 4.6 Dead 102 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 2.5 4.5 119 103 Betula nigra 0.8 4.6 Dead 104 Platanus occidentalis 0.7 9.0 305 105 Platanus occidentalis 2.5 9.1 Dead 106 Quercus michauxii 4.8 9.2 Dead 107 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 7.1 9.2 74 108 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 9.9 9.2 179 Average Tree Height Over Time - VP 7 4 +, 3 Sao 2 do 0 cc Cj 0 1 2 3 4 5 Q Monitoring Year North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results Veg Plot 8 - Year 5 Tree ID Species X (m) Y (m) Height (cm) 109 Liriodendron tulipifera 0.4 1.1 Dead 110 Diospyros virginiana 2.9 1.1 Dead 111 Diospyros virginiana 4.9 1.2 96 112 Diospyros virginiana 6.6 0.8 136 113 Diospyros virginiana 9.0 0.6 179 114 Quercus phellos 9.0 5.1 320 115 Platanus occidentalis 7.2 5.2 256 116 Quercus phellos 5.1 5.2 Dead 117 Liriodendron tulipifera 3.3 5.4 Dead 118 Betula nigra 0.9 5.5 Dead 119 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 1.0 9.7 109 120 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 3.7 9.8 96 121 Quercus michauxii 5.5 9.6 Dead 122 Quercus phellos 7.4 9.4 192 123 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 9.5 9.3 Dead `J Average Tree Height Over Time - VP 8 5 +, 4 t ao 3 2 1 1 to 1 C) 0 Q 0 1 2 3 Monitoring Year North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results Veg Plot 9 - Year 5 Tree ID Species X (m) Y (m) Height (cm) 124 Platanus occidentalis 1.3 0.9 Dead 125 Betula nigra 4.0 0.8 237 126 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 5.3 0.8 254 127 Liriodendron tulipifera 7.5 0.8 Dead 128 Quercus phellos 9.4 0.8 310 129 Diospyros virginiana 8.0 5.2 Dead 130 Quercus michauxii 7.2 5.1 Dead 131 Quercus michauxii 5.4 5.1 174 132 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 3.3 5.0 330 133 Betula nigra 1.1 5.0 205 134 Betula nigra 0.7 9.2 Dead 135 Diospyros virginiana 3.2 9.4 167 136 Quercus phellos 5.2 9.5 248 137 Betula nigra 7.1 9.5 364 138 Liriodendron tulipifera 9.5 9.5 Dead Average Tree Height Over Time - VP 9 10 8 6 4 0 Q 0 1 2 3 4 5 Monitoring Year North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results Veg Plot 10 - Year 5 Tree ID Species X (m) Y (m) Height (cm) 139 Betula nigra 1.2 0.6 305 140 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 1.2 2.4 68 141 Liriodendron tulipifera 1.2 4.7 Dead 142 Diospyros virginiana 1.2 7.0 111 143 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 1.1 9.4 124 144 Platanus occidentalis 5.5 9.4 Dead 145 Betula nigra 5.7 7.1 200 146 Quercus phellos 5.9 4.8 204 147 Diospyros virginiana 6.2 2.6 109 148 Quercus phellos 6.2 0.7 197 149 Quercus phellos 9.1 0.6 188 150 Quercus michauxii 9.0 2.6 142 151 Platanus occidentalis 9.0 4.8 Dead 152 Quercus michauxii 8.8 7.1 Dead 153 Quercus michauxii 8.7 9.4 Dead Average Tree Height Over Time - VP 10 v 5 v } 4 Sao 3 1 ' ' Qj v 0 Q 0 1 2 3 Monitoring Year North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results Veg Plot 11- Year 5 Tree ID Species X (m) Y (m) Height (cm) 154 Platanus occidentalis 1.0 4.0 Dead 155 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 1.5 2.7 130 156 Quercus phellos 1.6 4.8 340 157 Betula nigra 1.5 6.7 Dead 158 Diospyros virginiana 1.4 9.1 128 159 Diospyros virginiana 5.4 9.2 290 160 Quercus phellos 5.8 6.9 450 161 Quercus phellos 5.9 5.0 340 162 Quercus michauxii 6.0 2.8 Dead 163 Liriodendron tulipifera 6.0 0.3 81 164 Betula nigra 9.1 0.2 82 165 Betula nigra 9.2 2.6 Dead 166 Quercus phellos 9.0 5.0 360 167 Platanus occidentalis 8.8 7.2 525 168 Quercus michauxii 8.9 9.0 Dead Average Tree Height Over Time - VP 11 10 v 8 6 ao v 4 UO > 2 0 . Q Monitoring Year North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results Veg Plot 12 - Year 5 Tree ID Species X (m) Y (m) Height (cm) 169 Quercus phellos 0.5 1.7 300 170 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 2.8 2.0 237 171 Quercus michauxii 5.0 2.4 285 172 Quercus phellos 7.1 2.6 305 173 Quercus michauxii 9.0 2.9 233 174 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 8.9 6.7 Dead 175 Quercus phellos 7.0 6.5 405 176 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 4.6 6.4 248 177 Quercus michauxii 2.6 6.2 369 178 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 0.4 6.1 204 179 Betula nigra 0.5 9.2 261 180 Quercus phellos 2.4 9.5 263 181 Platanus occidentalis 4.5 9.6 580 182 Platanus occidentalis 6.8 9.7 475 183 Liriodendron tulipifera 9.1 9.7 Dead Average Tree Height Over Time - VP 12 12 10 g 6 °J 4 co ■ 1 cc ■ Q 0 1 2 3 4 5 Monitoring Year North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results Veg Plot 13 - Year 5 Tree ID Species X (m) Y (m) Height (cm) 184 Quercus michauxii 0.8 0.4 Dead 185 Platanus occidentalis 3.0 0.3 205 186 Liriodendron tulipifera 4.9 0.2 17 187 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 6.9 0.3 99 188 Liriodendron tulipifera 8.9 0.3 Dead 189 Betula nigra 8.7 4.6 Dead 190 Betula nigra 6.9 4.5 335 191 Liriodendron tulipifera 4.9 4.5 Dead 192 Liriodendron tulipifera 2.8 4.4 Dead 193 Quercus michauxii 0.8 4.3 255 194 Quercus michauxii 0.4 9.1 Dead 195 Liriodendron tulipifera 2.6 9.2 39 196 Quercus phellos 5.0 9.1 210 197 Betula nigra 7.0 9.0 Dead 198 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 9.4 8.9 68 Average Tree Height Over Time - VP 13 5 +, 4 t 2P 3 = 2 tLo 1 1 1 1 � 0 Q 0 1 2 3 4 Monitoring Year North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results Veg Plot 14 - Year 5 Tree ID Species X (m) Y (m) Height (cm) 199 Platanus occidentalis 0.6 1.0 315 200 Diospyros virginiana 2.7 1.0 171 201 Diospyros virginiana 4.4 1.0 90 202 Quercus phellos 6.4 0.9 189 203 Quercus phellos 8.6 0.9 253 204 Platanus occidentalis 8.6 5.5 228 205 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 6.8 5.3 139 206 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 5.0 5.4 262 207 Betula nigra 2.8 5.1 Dead 208 Quercus michauxii 0.5 4.8 Dead 209 Liriodendron tulipifera 0.6 9.5 Dead 210 Diospyros virginiana 2.8 9.5 134 211 Diospyros virginiana 4.9 9.6 135 212 Platanus occidentalis 6.7 9.5 207 213 Quercus michauxii 8.7 9.4 144 Average Tree Height Over Time - VP 14 a 6 5 4 3 to > 0 a Monitoring Year North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results Veg Plot 15 - Year 5 Tree ID Species X (m) Y (m) Height (cm) 214 Platanus occidentalis 0.5 0.8 164 215 Quercus michauxii 2.4 0.8 Dead 216 Diospyros virginiana 4.8 0.8 15 217 Platanus occidentalis 7.0 0.7 Dead 218 Betula nigra 9.6 0.8 254 219 Quercus phellos 9.5 5.4 178 220 Platanus occidentalis 7.2 5.4 213 221 Platanus occidentalis 5.2 5.3 132 222 Platanus occidentalis 3.0 4.5 137 223 Betula nigra 1.0 5.2 229 224 Betula nigra 0.7 9.5 Dead 225 Betula nigra 2.7 9.5 110 226 Quercus phellos 5.2 9.5 90 227 Liriodendron tulipifera 7.2 9.5 Dead 228 Quercus phellos 1 9.5 9.5 170 Average Tree Height Over Time - VP 15 a 5 4 3 = 2 cc1 �o Cj Q 0 1 2 3 4 Monitoring Year North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results Veg Plot 16 - Year 5 Tree ID Species X (m) Y (m) Height (cm) 229 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 0.4 0.4 102 230 Platanus occidentalis 0.5 2.8 410 231 Liriodendron tulipifera 0.4 5.1 82 232 Quercus michauxii 0.5 7.3 129 233 Quercus phellos 0.3 9.5 288 234 Platanus occidentalis 4.3 9.3 325 235 Betula nigra 4.3 7.4 Dead 236 Quercus michauxii 4.5 4.7 Dead 237 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 4.8 2.6 117 238 Liriodendron tulipifera 4.8 0.6 77 239 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 9.0 0.7 Dead 240 Liriodendron tulipifera 9.0 2.7 25 241 Quercus michauxii 9.0 5.0 17 242 Betula nigra 8.9 7.3 117 243 Platanus occidentalis 8.8 9.6 291 Average Tree Height Over Time - VP 16 a 5 4 3 2 U 0 > a 0 1 2 3 4 Monitoring Year North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results Veg Plot 17 - Year 5 Tree ID Species X (m) Y (m) Height (cm) 244 Quercus phellos 0.4 0.5 310 245 Diospyros virginiana 2.8 0.5 Dead 246 Quercus phellos 5.0 0.5 260 247 Liriodendron tulipifera 7.3 0.5 124 248 Diospyros virginiana 9.5 0.5 Dead 249 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 9.0 5.0 80 250 Platanus occidentalis 6.8 5.0 405 251 Quercus michauxii 4.8 5.0 Dead 252 Diospyros virginiana 2.5 5.0 375 253 Quercus michauxii 0.4 5.0 37 254 Quercus michauxii 0.4 9.3 135 255 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 2.2 9.3 Dead 256 Liriodendron tulipifera 4.6 9.3 146 257 Betula nigra 6.8 9.3 106 258 Diospyros virginiana 8.6 9.3 Dead Average Tree Height Over Time - VP 17 v 6 v } 5 tao 4 v = 3 tLo 2 1 1 Q n Monitoring Year North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results Veg Plot 18 - Year 5 Tree ID Species X (m) Y (m) Height (cm) 259 Liriodendron tulipifera 0.5 0.8 Dead 260 Betula nigra 2.9 0.8 127 261 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 5.0 0.8 243 262 Quercus michauxii 7.3 0.8 91 263 Liriodendron tulipifera 9.4 0.8 Dead 264 Liriodendron tulipifera 9.0 5.3 Dead 265 Quercus michauxii 7.0 5.2 98 266 Liriodendron tulipifera 4.8 5.2 47 267 Platanus occidentalis 2.0 5.2 Dead 268 Diospyros virginiana 0.5 5.1 Dead 269 Betula nigra 0.5 9.3 177 270 Diospyros virginiana 2.6 9.3 116 271 Diospyros virginiana 4.0 9.3 114 273 Diospyros virginiana 6.6 9.3 68 274 Quercus michauxii 8.9 9.3 Dead Average Tree Height Over Time - VP 18 4 +, 3 t 1 1 1 U01 0 L 0 1 2 3 4 5 a Monitoring Year North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results Veg Plot 19 - Year 5 Tree ID Species X (m) Y (m) Height (cm) 275 Quercus michauxii 1.1 0.7 190 276 Quercus phellos 1.1 2.7 266 277 Quercus phellos 1.1 5.1 228 278 Betula nigra 1.2 7.1 109 279 Quercus michauxii 1.2 9.5 140 280 Diospyros virginiana 5.4 9.7 200 281 Betula nigra 5.4 7.2 136 282 Quercus phellos 5.5 5.0 223 283 Platanus occidentalis 5.5 3.0 425 284 Quercus michauxii 5.6 1.0 Dead 285 Diospyros virginiana 9.8 1.1 325 286 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 9.8 3.5 258 302 Diospyros virginiana 9.8 5.2 160 303 Betula nigra 9.8 7.4 72 304 Platanus occidentalis 9.8 9.6 419 Average Tree Height Over Time - VP 19 a 7 6 5 4 U0 3 > 2 Q � Monitoring Year North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results Veg Plot 20 - Year 5 Tree ID Species X (m) Y (m) Height (cm) 287 Liriodendron tulipifera 0.5 1.0 44 288 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 2.7 0.7 101 289 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 5.0 0.6 146 290 Betula nigra 7.2 0.5 Dead 291 Quercus phellos 9.4 0.6 133 292 Liriodendron tulipifera 9.1 4.5 42 293 Quercus michauxii 7.0 4.5 Dead 294 Liriodendron tulipifera 5.0 4.6 137 295 Quercus phellos 3.0 4.8 178 296 Diospyros virginiana 0.6 4.8 Dead 297 Quercus phellos 0.4 9.6 29 298 Betula nigra 2.7 9.7 Dead 299 Quercus michauxii 5.2 9.4 152 300 Betula nigra 7.3 9.3 Dead 301 Liriodendron tulipifera 9.2 9.4 60 Average Tree Height Over Time - VP 20 °J 3 +� 2 0 U0 cc 0 1 2 3 4 5 QMonitoring Year North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results Veg Plot 21- Year 5 Tree ID Species X (m) Y (m) Height (cm) 305 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 0.4 0.9 Dead 306 Diospyros virginiana 1.8 0.7 14 307 Diospyros virginiana 3.6 0.7 Dead 308 Quercus phellos 6.0 0.7 100 309 Betula nigra 8.3 0.7 Dead 310 Liriodendron tulipifera 8.6 6.0 58 311 Quercus michauxii 6.6 5.9 216 312 Quercus phellos 4.4 5.9 48 313 Quercus phellos 2.8 5.4 177 314 Platanus occidentalis 0.5 5.4 342 316 Liriodendron tulipifera 0.3 9.6 Dead 317 Betula nigra 2.4 9.6 164 318 Platanus occidentalis 4.2 9.3 Dead 319 Liriodendron tulipifera 5.8 9.3 192 320 Quercus michauxii 8.6 9.3 151 Average Tree Height Over Time - VP 21 a 5 4 3 1 , to L 0 Q 0 1 2 3 4 5 Monitoring Year North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results Veg Plot 22 - Year 5 Tree ID Species X (m) Y (m) Height (cm) 321 Quercus michauxii 0.5 1.2 Dead 322 Platanus occidentalis 2.7 1.2 Dead 323 Liriodendron tulipifera 4.7 1.1 Dead 324 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 7.3 1.0 137 325 Liriodendron tulipifera 9.1 1.2 Dead 326 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 8.0 5.7 137 327 Diospyros virginiana 7.0 5.5 46 328 Platanus occidentalis 4.3 5.5 Dead 329 Liriodendron tulipifera 2.4 5.7 Dead 330 Platanus occidentalis 0.5 5.2 213 1870 (331) Liriodendron tulipifera 0.5 9.9 Missing 332 Quercus phellos 2.3 9.5 45 333 Liriodendron tulipifera 5.0 9.5 Dead 334 Platanus occidentalis 7.1 9.5 182 335 Betula nigra 9.7 9.5 Dead Average Tree Height Over Time - VP 22 5 v 4 3 L 2 1 1 1 1 1 v L 0 M v 0 1 2 3 4 5 Q Monitoring Year North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results Veg Plot 23 - Year 5 Tree ID Species X (m) Y (m) Height (cm) 336 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 0.9 1.2 60 337 Betula nigra 0.8 3.1 161 338 Liriodendron tulipifera 0.6 5.3 71 339 Diospyros virginiana 0.5 5.7 Dead 340 Quercus phellos 0.5 9.6 217 341 Liriodendron tulipifera 4.8 9.6 97 342 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 4.7 7.2 98 343 Platanus occidentalis 4.6 5.2 350 344 Quercus phellos 4.9 2.8 178 345 Liriodendron tulipifera 4.8 0.7 Dead 346 Platanus occidentalis 9.1 0.7 Dead 347 Diospyros virginiana 8.9 2.5 129 348 Quercus phellos 9.0 4.7 77 P35]01 Quercus phellos 8.9 6.9 187 Betula nigra 8.9 9.2 Dead L Average Tree Height Over Time - VP 23 a 5 4 3 U0 ■ ■ 1 L0 > 0 1 2 3 4 5 a Monitoring Year North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results Veg Plot 24 - Year 5 Tree ID Species X (m) Y (m) Height (cm) 351 Platanus occidentalis 0.4 0.9 Dead 352 Diospyros virginiana 0.4 2.8 Dead 353 Liriodendron tulipifera 0.5 4.8 18 354 Liriodendron tulipifera 0.4 6.7 24 355 Quercus phellos 0.4 8.8 81 356 Quercus phellos 4.5 9.0 108 357 Quercus michauxii 4.5 6.9 62 358 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 4.5 4.7 85 359 Platanus occidentalis 4.5 2.9 289 360 Quercus michauxii 4.5 1.0 219 361 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 8.7 0.7 154 362 Quercus phellos 8.7 2.3 92 363 Platanus occidentalis 8.8 4.4 335 364 Betula nigra 8.7 6.8 85 365 Quercus phellos 8.6 9.2 46 Average Tree Height Over Time - VP 24 4 3 � 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 Q' Monitoring Year North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results Veg Plot 25 - Year 5 Tree ID Species X (m) Y (m) Height (cm) 366 Betula nigra 0.3 0.7 Dead 367 Platanus occidentalis 0.2 2.4 Dead 368 Diospyros virginiana 0.4 4.4 159 369 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 0.4 6.5 91 370 Platanus occidentalis 0.5 8.7 342 371 Liriodendron tulipifera 4.8 8.6 271 372 Liriodendron tulipifera 4.7 6.6 82 373 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 4.7 4.6 56 374 Betula nigra 4.6 2.6 42 375 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 4.8 0.5 Dead 376 Platanus occidentalis 9.1 0.9 310 377 Betula nigra 9.0 3.0 43 378 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 9.0 5.0 Dead 379 Platanus occidentalis 9.1 6.8 360 380 Platanus occidentalis 9.1 8.8 372 Average Tree Height Over Time - VP 25 a 6 5 4 3 Z to � 1 Q Monitoring Year North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results Veg Plot 26 - Year 5 Tree ID Species X (m) Y (m) Height (cm) 381 Quercus michauxii 0.3 0.8 207 382 Quercus phellos 0.2 2.6 113 383 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 0.2 4.6 Dead 384 Liriodendron tulipifera 0.2 6.8 157 385 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 0.3 9.1 Dead 1875 (386) Liriodendron tulipifera 4.4 8.7 173 387 Diospyros virginiana 4.4 6.8 209 388 Liriodendron tulipifera 4.5 4.9 94 389 Quercus michauxii 4.5 2.7 58 390 Quercus michauxii 4.5 0.9 Dead 391 Quercus phellos 8.9 0.6 173 392 Liriodendron tulipifera 8.8 2.6 Dead 393 Liriodendron tulipifera 8.6 4.5 94 394 Quercus michauxii 8.6 6.5 Dead 395 Quercus phellos 8.6 8.6 149 Average Tree Height Over Time - VP 26 5 a 4 3 � 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 Q Monitoring Year North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results Veg Plot 27 - Year 5 Tree ID Species X (m) Y (m) Height (cm) 396 Liriodendron tulipifera 0.8 0.5 100 397 Platanus occidentalis 0.9 2.3 360 398 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 0.7 4.3 74 399 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 0.5 6.3 77 400 Quercus michauxii 0.2 8.3 73 401 Betula nigra 5.0 8.5 336 402 Liriodendron tulipifera 5.0 6.4 98 403 Liriodendron tulipifera 4.9 4.0 55 404 Quercus phellos 4.9 2.1 243 405 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 4.9 0.2 62 406 Betula nigra 9.6 0.3 72 407 Platanus occidentalis 9.5 2.7 415 408 Platanus occidentalis 9.4 4.7 Dead 409 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 9.4 6.8 55 410 Quercus michauxii 9.3 8.7 119 Average Tree Height Over Time - VP 27 5 v 4 Sao 3 = 2 to � 0 Q 0 1 2 3 4 Monitoring Year North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos and Data Results APPENDIX E. Overview Photographs North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix E: Overview Photographs North Fork Little River Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel Appendix E: Overview Photographs