20051457 Ver 1_FW SB 781 1.msg_20110801

Strickland, Bev
From: Reeder, Tom [tom.reeder @ncdenr.gov]
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2011 2:09 PM
To: Godreau, Jessica
Subject: FW: SB 781
Jessica — Do you have any info regarding how our testing and monitoring requirements relate to the EPA minimum in answer
to Butch's question below? Thanks.
Tom Reeder
Director, NC Division of Water Resources
Phone: 919 - 715 -3045
email: tom.reeder @ncdenr.gov
From: CCSD Manager < manager @ccsdwater.com>
Reply -To: CCSD Manager < manager @ccsdwater.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 201113:54:18 -0400
To: Tom Reeder <tom.reeder(@ncdenr.eov>
Subject: SB 781
Dear Tom
1 have been reading S.B. 781 especially 150B -19.2 and .3.
What 1 am looking for is the difference between EPA verses N.C. rules more restrictive. Do you know where 1 might
find this info.
Tom 1 have been working 15 years here at the Cleveland County Water and the only changes to the production of
the filtration water was the turbidity. We are testing way to much,as you know better than 1 water has its own
properties and does not changes unless there are conditions to make changes. (spills,run off & etc.)
Since Public Water is under DWR are there any charts showing the EPA requirements compared to N. C.
Thanks
Butch
Post Script
Thursday conversion with the Corp. about HB 609 was an ear full. January 2000 and 1.5 million dollars latter we
are just having our stake holding meeting. Henry is a good Guy, but he is the fourth team leader from the Corp. The
time line & the money you quoted made everyone take notice.