20120142 Ver 1_InspectionReport_34542 3 6_10-13-2021_20211013

North Carolina Department of Transportation
Roadside Environmental Unit
Erosion & Sedimentation / Stormwater Report
ICA
Immediate Corrective Action
This project does not comply with the North Carolina Erosion and Sedimentation Control laws.Immediate Corrective Action is needed
to resolve the situation to full compliance with the Law:(T15A:04B.0000).
Project Information
Inspection Date: 10/13/2021 Evaluator: Josh Young
Project#: 34542.3.6 TIP#: R-3421A&B Contract#: C204368
Division #: 8 County: Richmond
Project Type: Contract Engineer: Asheboro Resident
Project Length: 6.10 Disturbed Acres: 0
River Basin: Yadkin HQW Zone: NO Trout Zone: NO
Location 1-73/74 From US-74 ByPass West of Rockingham at SR-1109(Zion Church Rd)to North of SR
Description: 1304(Harrington Rd)
Project Evaluation
Report Type: ❑Routine ❑✓ ICA ❑ICA Ex 1st ❑ICA Ex 2nd ❑CICA- SWO
❑PCN ❑ECPAR
Installation Maintenance Effectiveness Plan Overall Project
Length Section of BMPs of BMPs of BMPs Implementation Evaluation
1.8 R-3421 A -- -- -- -- --
4.3 R-3421 B -- -- -- -- --
Permitted Area(s) -- -- -- -- --
Permit Site 4 6 6 6 6 6
Grading Scale: 0-6=Immediate Corrective Action Required, 7=Fair, 8=Good, 9=Very Good, 10=Excellent
Remarks and Recommendations:
The reason for the site review today was to look at several permitted areas on both the A and B sections of the
project. I met Ryan Conchilla (DWR), Art King, Michael McKenzie, Darren Cranford, Lonnie Owens, John
Partin, and several other contractor employees onsite. We discovered a silt loss with (approx. 2 to 3 cubic
yards of material) in a Jurisdictional Stream at STA 178+50 LT (Site 4). The project has received an excessive
amount of rainfall over the last several weeks, however two basins (ID B-121 and ID B-122)were removed
from this ESA/Permitted location without contacting roadside environmental for prior approval. Both basins
should have remained in place during the construction and stabilization of the fill slope. I was informed that
both basins were removed due to conflicting with the proposed fill line. It appears that there may be enough
R/W to adjust basins to outer limits of project to build the fill slope and while also meeting the surface
dewatering requirements per the NCGO1 permit. I am issuing an ICA based on removal of two basins without
prior REU approval, inadequate runoff management to BMP devices, and soil stabilization timeframes not
being followed per the NCGO1 permit. I recommend that the contractor follow guidance giving by DWR and the
DEO for any retrieval of material in the Jurisdictional Stream and wetland areas.
Moving forward: I recommend that both basins be reinstalled to the outer limits of project near R/W if possible.
10/15/2021 9:22 AM Page 1 of 2

If needed, please reach out to Roadside Environmental for guidance on where basins need to be installed. If
basin sizing becomes an issue, please let REU know so we can discuss possible basin changes with
designers. I also recommend that all perimeter EC measures along with TSD and rock checks with PAM be
installed per approved EC plan moving forward to help prevent another silt loss in this area. I highly
recommend moving forward that all areas especially in ESA areas are well protected by having all the required
EC measures in place per the approved EC plans. Keep in mind that ESA areas are required to be worked until
completion and stabilized per the NCG01 permit.
I plan on making a site visit next week to ensure that this area is cleaned up and that all required EC measures
are in place per the approved EC plan. The ICA will remain in place until all the above items have been
addressed and all the lost material has been retrieved per guidance given by DWR and the DEO offices.
If you have any questions or concerns please feel free to email or call.
Thankyou
10/15/2021 9:22 AM Page 2 of 2