20040838 Ver 4_401 Application_20070713

r
~ x-03 d ~
Office Use Only: Form Version March OS
USACE Action ID No. 200421186 DWQ No. 04-0838 V P~ 4
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
L Processing ~} ~ ~ ~ `
~..;,
Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
X Section 404 Permit X Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
X 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP 14 / WQC 3404
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, .attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ^
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
~~c~~od~Q
Name: City of Raleigh Parks and Recreation Depar~t~- ~ 2007
Mailing Address: Attn: Mr. Victor Lebsock
PO Box 590 1VETLAN05AN~BTAA~1w~T$p11flANC~
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602
Telephone Number: 919-890-3285 Fax Number: 919-890-3299
E-mail Address: victor.lebsock(a,ci.ralei~h.nc.us
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Mr. Christopher Hopper
Company Affiliation: Robert J. Goldstein & Associates, Inc.
Mailing Address: 1221 Corporation Parkway
Raleis;h, North Carolina 27610
Telephone Number: 919-872-1174 Fax Number: 919-872-9214
E-mail Address: chopper(c(c~ri;;aCarolina.com
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 1 of 9

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Walnut Creek Greenwav Trail Additions and Extensions
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): Not Applicable
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): Greenwav Trail utilizing easements
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: City of Raleigh
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Not Applicable
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): The amended portion of
the project is located in the City of Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina, along the
northern floodplain of Walnut Creek between Lake Wheeler Road (SR 1009) and South
Saunders Street (NC 50/70/401). The proposed reg enway follows an existing sanitary sewer
easement for roughly 4,700 feet.
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): Decimal Degrees provided below.
Stream Impact l: Lat 35.75932296 Lon -78.65898230
Stream Impact 2: Lat 35.75856145 Lon -78.65523970
Stream Impact 3: Lat 35.75625320 Lon -78.65310482
6. Property size (acres): The amended portion of this project is roughly 4,700 feet longL and
includes a 14-foot wide trail (10' of pavement and 2' shoulders on each side of pavement).
Estimated area: 1.5 acres.
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Walnut Creek (HUC 03020201090010)
8. River Basin: Neuse River
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 2 of 9

(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The land use along the re~yportion paralleling Walnut
Creek (3 900 feet) is almost entirely maintained as sanitary sewer easement. The sewer
easement alignment is mowed on a regular basis and contains only herbaceous vegetation.
Currently_permitted alignments of this project take the trail into adjacent woods, but project
designers have relocated the trail entirely within previously disturbed areas of the sewer
easement to minimize impacts to woodlands and forested wetlands. The southern half of the
segment that will join the trail with Lake Wheeler Road at Centennial Parkway (400 feet)
will traverse a herbaceous field that overlays a recent hazardous waste clean-up site, and the
northern half of this segment (400 feet) will be installed across a bottomland hardwood
forest. This is necessary to link the Walnut Creek Greenway with Lake Wheeler Road at the
NC Farmer's Market. l
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The
overall project received permit approval from both USACE and NCDWQ in January 2005.
The permit effective date was January 31, 2005 (USACE Action ID 200421186; NC DWQ
Project No. 04-838) and the matority of the project has been completed. This application is
being submitted as an amendment to the original project. This amendment is being requested
for several reasons (see attached for full explanation of those changes). The revised project
alignments are comprised of three segments: 1) from Lake Wheeler Road on the west, to the
Norfolk Southern Railroad bridge over Walnut Creek (1,700 feet); 21 from the Norfolk
Southern Railroad east and southeast to the end of the. recently constructed trail east of a
large former beaver impoundment of an intermittent tributary of Walnut Creek (2,200 feet);
and 3 a spur trail that will connect to Lake Wheeler Road across from the NC Farmer's
Market with Segment 1 (800 feet). Stream crossings will be accomplished with the use of
culverts, buried to 20 percent of their diameter in the streambed. Wetland areas will be
traversed with a paved trail and culverts will be installed every 40 to 60 feet to facilitate the
movement of water in these areas. Pavement will be used in order to allow use of the
greenway as a means of inspecting the twin sewer interceptors lying within the sewer
easement as a secondary use of the recreational trail. The use of boardwalk through adjacent
forested wetland and riparian areas would require clearing of these areas, and is not
considered the most environmentally sound approach. Typical excavating and grading
equipment will be used during construction of the paved portions of the trail.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: Three stream crossings and five wetland impacts
are proposed to provide a g_reenway trail for local residents, and to provide a better means of
periodically inspecting a major sewer interceptor of the City of Raleigh. Traditional benefits
of these trails include recreational, educational, and alternative transportation options to City
of Raleigh and Wake County citizens.
IV. Prior Project History
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 3 of 9

If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
See Attached.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
The purpose of this amendment request is to complete the proposed project. This is expected to
be the last related permit request for this ~roiect
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts:
See Attached.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
cenarately list impacts due to hnth structure and floodnns?.
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year
Floodplain Nearest
Stream Impact
(acres)
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) ( es/no) (linear feet)
WTL CC (Fig 2) Fill -Recreational Trail Bottomland Hardwoods Yes 0 .006
WTL CD (Fig 4) Fill -Recreational Trail Herbaceous (easement) Yes 0 .074
WTL CE (Fig 4) Fill -Recreational Trail Herbaceous (easement) Yes 25 .013
WTL CF (Fig 6) Fill -Recreational Trail Herbaceous (easement) Yes 0 .04
WTL CG (Fig 3) Fill -Recreational Trail Herbaceous (easement) Yes 0 .031
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 4 of 9

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.164
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: Linear Corridor
across multiple properties. The full extents of wetlands have not been defined.
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Perennial or Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact
Intermittent? Stream Width Length Impact
indicate on ma Before Im act linear feet acres
Culvert - 4-8 feet
STR 1 (Fig 3) UT Walnut Creek Perpendicular Perennial 20 feet .002
crossing
Culvert - 2-4 feet
STR 2 (Fig 4) UT Walnut Creek Perpendicular Intermittent 20 feet .001
crossing
Culvert - 4-6 feet
STR 3 (Fig 6) UT Walnut Creek Perpendicular Intermittent 20 feet .002
crossing

Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 60 feet .005
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number (if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
indicate on ma ocean, etc. acres
None
None
None
Total Open Water Impact (acres) None
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Im act (acres): .005
Wetland Impact (acres): .164
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 5 of 9

Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Im act to Waters of the U.S. (acres) .169
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 60
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes X No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
Not Applicable
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): Not Applicable
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): Not Applicable
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: Not Applicable
Size of watershed draining to pond: None Expected pond surface area: None
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
See Attached
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 6 of 9

necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina (see DWQ website for most current
version.).
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Attached Impact Fi>?ures 1 through 6 identify the location of each impact proposed. Project
owners are requesting .166 acre of mitigation from NC EEP's In-Lieu Fee Program (.164
wetlands, and .002 for unauthorized fill in Walnut Creek) and 60 linear feet of streams. The
2:1 ratio for mitigation requested by the Corps of Engineers has been applied The total
mitigation beinl? requested is summarized below in sub-paragraph 2 NC EEP's acceptance
letter is attached in Attachment C.
No riparian buffer impact mitigation is proposed.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://www.nceep.net/pages/inlieureplace.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed,
please check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 60 (120 after 2:1 multiplier)
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): None
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): .166 (.332 after 2:1 multiplier
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): None
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): None
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 7 of 9

IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes X No ^
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No X
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify)? Yes X No ^
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact Multiplier Required
s uare feet Miti ation
1 7,158 3 (2 for Catawba) NA
2 19,359 1.5 NA
Total 26,517
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additiona120 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260.
No Mitigation Proposed
Updated 11/1/2005
Page 8 of 9

XI, Starmwater {required b~~ ,DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing. and proposed} versus. total acrea,~e on th+e site. laisctrss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and ~~~etlands do~~~nstrc~tn~ fi-c~rZ7
the .property.. If percent impervious surface c:xcecds 2Q~'/o, please provide ealculativns
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.
See .Attached
AIL Sewage Disposal (required by DVVQ')
Clearly detail the altin~ate treatment methods and tlispositiot~ (non-discharWxe or ~lisch~~~ ~~~•! ~~i'
wastewater gei3erated irony the proposed project, err 4i~:ul~il~lc'apacity c~I`t11e. strl,jcct f`~r~~fi~
Not Applicable
Xli. V'ialatons (required b~ DWQ)
Is this site in violation. of DWQ Wetland Rules {l5A NCAC 2H ,OSOQ) or any Buffer Rules`'
Yes ^ No X'
is this an after-the-fact permit application'. Yes ^ No X
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based an past and :reasonably anticipated future impacts} result an Krdcliti~~nK~l
develaprnent, ~=hieh could impact nearby dc~wnstrean3 water quaity? l'es ^ loo
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the mast recent North:. Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our ~-ehsite at
http:l/h?o.enr.state.nc.uslncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
~IQt Applicable.
X~. Uther Circumstances {optional'}:
Tt is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance tit' ticsirc~ti
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applic°;r~~t ,~tt11
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limitti on
work. schedules (e.,~., draw-down schedules for lakes; dates: associated with Endan~cred and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control}.
None Known.
t
ApplicantlAgent's Signature Bate ~
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided
r~~~~s~a s ~ ~;~~~>
Page 9 of 9

Explanations and Supplemental Information:
Re: Permit amendment request ~ Walnut Creek Greenway Trail Additions and
Extensions -Lake Wheeler Road to Garner Road, Raleigh, NC.
INTRODUCTION:
This application is being submitted to request an amendment to an existing permit
(USAGE Action ID: 200421186 - NC DWQ Project No: 04-0838). The project is known
as "Walnut Creek Greenway Trail Additions and Extensions -Lake Wheeler Road to
Garner Road, Raleigh, NC". Figure 1 illustrates the location of the existing permitted
project and the location of this requested amendment (westernmost 4,7001inear feet
being revisited). Construction in areas to the east of the amendment area is either
complete or near completion. There are three major changes on the ground that have
prompted this request; 1) the removal of beaver impoundments that resulted in
substantially reduced wetland areas; 2) impacts to an existing Norfolk Southern Railroad
crossing of Walnut Creek following Tropical Depression Alberto (Alberto); and 3)
impacts to a large wetland complex resulting from US EPA and NC Division of Waste
Management cleanup of a hazardous waste site.
Because of reduced wetland areas, the use of boardwalk through forested wetlands has
been abandoned and project designers now intend to construct a paved trail almost
entirely within the existing cleared sanitary sewer easement.
Removal of Beaver Impoundments:
Figure 2.1 illustrates the extent of surface water existing at the time of 2004 stream and
wetland surveys along the proposed greenway trail alignment. The images provided are
along the eastern half of the amendment area, east of the Norfolk Southern Railroad
bridge over Walnut Creek. The beaver dam, identified in the inset on the right, began a
chain of impoundments that roughly paralleled the previous alignment on the north. The
floodplain north of the previous alignment drains to the east and connects with Walnut
Creek via stream channels that were dammed by the beavers. The water has receded
substantially because of the breach, as illustrated in photos provided in the lower left of
Figure 2.1, and the resulting reduction in local hydrology has eliminated large areas
previously identified as wetlands.
Norfolk Southern Railroad Crossing:
Figure 2.2 provides on-site photographs of the condition of the Norfolk Southern
Railroad bridge prior to Tropical Depression Alberto (March 2004) and its current
condition (May 2007). As these photos show, floodwaters have carried away large
amounts of the previous embankment material and prompted a redesign of the proposed
trail beneath the bridge. Figure 2.3 illustrates both previous, and current surface contours
of the scour area.
The previous design of the railroad crossing consisted of an elevated greenway. Redesign
of the greenway beneath the Norfolk Southern Railroad bridge is needed to protect the
bridge structure. A combination greenway floor/retaining wall structure will protect the
existing bridge structure. The floor will serve as the greenway trail, while the retaining

wall will allow restabilizing the embankment beneath the bridge. The project designers
have contacted Norfolk Southern Railroad requesting a change in design, which will
provide additional flow area for all storm events when runoff creates flow above the
bankfull capacity of Walnut Creek. The current design removes flow area from beneath
the bridge during significant storm events. This additional flow area will result in reduced
velocities under the bridge, thus minimizing the affects of the storm event and protecting
the railroad's steel pile system that supports the existing bridge. The conceptual design is
shown in the figure below.
USEPA/NCDWM Clean-uo Site:
Figure 2.4 provides aerial photography of the clean-up site during 2005 (prior to clean-
up) and 2006 (during clean-up). There is a good deal of instability at the site today, as
illustrated in the photographs provided. Photo 1 endeavors to show two culverts that
were installed in a stream channel under the access road. Only the very top of one of the
two culverts remains visible under accumulated sediment. Photo 2 is looking north along
the now abandoned access road, and up a new stormwater channel that is beginning to be
cut across the site and possibly now contributing to erosion of the cap. Sediment in this
channel is greater than one foot deep. Photo 3 is further up the new stormwater channel,
also looking north, and illustrates the fill material that has impacted this property. The
adjacent floodplain previously contained many rivuets and wetland pockets, which have
now been filled in with sediment deposits from backed up stormwater. Photo 4 was taken
downstream of what was previously just a stormwater channel, showing the area cap on
the left. Water being backed up from what was the stream because of failing culverts to
the north is now flowing further south and eroding under the soil cap placed over the site
as part of clean-up activities.

The project team has initiated contact with USEPA and is coordinating to have more
appropriately sized culverts replaced (or existing culverts removed) to restore flow to the
original stream channel. The success of the site's cleanup depends on properly managing
water that currently threatens its integrity. Once the stream flows are stabilized, the area
is expected to revert to its pre-existing condition. The access road may be retained for
future use by US EPA to access the site (negotiations with US EPA are currently
ongoing). This access road enabled greenway project designers to avoid the majority of
wetland areas and additional forest clearing in this vicinity, by crossing over onto the
existing access road and follow it south to the Walnut Creek greenway. No stream
crossings are proposed in this location, which should enable US EPA to restore their
impact area without compromising this project.
PCN EXPLANATIONS:
Item IV. Prior Project History
The overall project received permit. approval from both USAGE and NCDWQ in January
2005. The permit effective date was January 31, 2005 (USAGE Action ID 200421186;
NC DWQ Project No. 04-838) and the majority of the project has been completed. This
application is being submitted as an amendment to the original project. A one-year
extension was granted to project owners after a request to USAGE in September 2006.
The existing permit extension will expire on March 18, 2008.
A site visit with the USAGE was conducted on 3 July 2007, and impact areas identified
during that visit are included in Attachment E. The NC DWQ site visit was conducted
with Ms. Amy Chapman on June 7, 2007. Proposed impacts have changed as described
below.
.Original wetland impacts (boardwalk through forested wetland) permitted within
amendment area: 0.286 acre
.Revised wetland impacts (paved trail through disturbed corridor) proposed within
amendment area: 0.164 acre
.Original stream impacts permitted within amendment area: three crossings, total of 32
linear feet.
.Revised stream impacts proposed within amendment area: three crossings, total of 60
linear feet.
.Original buffer impacts permitted within amendment area: Zone I - 0.51 acre, Zone II -
0.6 acre.
.Revised buffer impacts proposed within amendment area: Zone I - 0.16 acre, Zone II -
0.44 acre.
Item VI.1. Written Description of Proposed Impacts
The proposed greenway will be constructed of asphalt (ten feet wide) and have two feet
gravel shoulders on either side. The portion of trail passing under the Norfolk Southern

Railroad (Impact Figure 3) will be constructed of concrete and include a nearly ten feet
wide path and landward retaining wall.
With the exception of Stream crossing 1 (Impact figure 3), the spur alignment to Lake
Wheeler Road and the Farmer's Market (Impact figure 2), and the westernmost area
where the main trail terminates at Lake Wheeler Road (Impact figure 1), the revised path
will be constructed entirely within existing sanitary sewer easement.
Stream crossings will be accomplished by installing culverts, 20 feet in length, each
buried to 20 percent of their width in the streambed at each of the three proposed stream
crossings (Impact Figures 3, 4, and 6). A single 48-inch culvert is proposed for stream
crossing 1 (Impact Figure 3), dua136-inch culverts are proposed for stream crossing 2
(Impact Figure 4), and a single 36-inch culvert is proposed for stream crossing 3 (Impact
Figure 6j. A paved trail will then be used to cross the stream channels.
Wetland crossings will be accomplished by filling and paving. Project designers have
incorporated 18-inch culverts in wetland areas to facilitate the natural movements of
water in these areas. The culverts will be spaced 40-60 feet apart.
Item VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
The proposed revisions will reduce the area of wetlands impacted by .122 acre, and
riparian buffers by 0.51 acre (Zone I impacts reduced by .35 acre and Zone II impacts
reduced by .16 acre). Although the type of wetland impact has changed (fill in disturbed
corridor vs. clearing forested wetlands to install boardwalk), the relocation of the
alignment into previously disturbed areas is considered minimization of impacts. Stream
impacts have increased by 28 linear feet (32 feet currently permitted for these crossings)
because of the removal of proposed boardwalk crossings that were permitted previously
as having no impact. Use of culverts better facilitates vehicles used by the City's Public
Utilities Department during periodic inspection of its major sewer interceptors in this
area.
The City of Raleigh Public Utilities Department (CORPUD) discourages the use of
boardwalk in their sewer easements because of access and maintenance requirements of
those lines. To minimize wetland impacts and comply with CORPUD guidelines, the
previous project alignment utilized boardwalk outside the existing easement. The
corridor that would have been cleared through hardwood forests required impacting 1.51
acre of Walnut Creek's floodplain forests. Because of construction vehicle mobility
constraints over boardwalk and wetland areas, an access road was also proposed and
extended from Wetland CD (Impact figure 4) north to Maywood Road. This road would
have impacted 0.19 acre of wetlands, and required the clearing of an additiona10.28 acre
of bottomland hardwood forests.
The reduction in wetland areas described in the introduction portion of this letter has
enabled project designers to pursue asphalt pavement along the entire alignment (with the
exception of concrete needed at the Norfolk Southern Railroad crossing). This change
has reduced impacts to both forested wetlands and adjacent non-wetland forests and

enables greenway construction contractors to access the entire alignment from either end,
rather than cutting a new access road from the north. Culverts have been proposed at
each of the three stream crossings that will be buried to 20 percent of their depth in the
streambed to facilitate the natural movements of water and aquatic fauna. A single 48-
inch culvert is proposed for stream crossing 1 (Impact Figure 3), dua136-inch culverts are
proposed for stream crossing 2 (Impact Figure 4), and a single 36-inch culvert is
proposed for stream crossing 3 (Impact Figure 6). The culverts are necessary to enable
construction vehicle access to the entire trail, eliminate the previously proposed access
road between Walnut Creek and Maywood Avenue, and facilitate vehicular access along
the entire route.
The currently proposed project will also enable the CORPUD to access the sanitary sewer
for normal inspection and future maintenance with minimal impacts to adjacent wetland,
stream, and riparian buffer areas.
Item VIII.1. Brief Explanation of Mitigation Plan
Mitigation for the project will consist of adherence to the regional and general conditions
set forth in the existing permit application, and payment to the North Carolina Ecosystem
Enhancement Program's In-Lieu Fee Program at a 2:1 ratio. Mitigation requested, after
applying the 2:1 multiplier, is .332 acre of riparian wetlands and 1201inear feet of
streams. EEP's acceptance letter is included in Attachment C.
Item XI. Brief Description of Stormwater Controls
Stormwater controls will be provided in the form of adherence with regional and general
conditions attached to the existing permit. Also, project designers have been
coordinating with RJG&A to design wetland culverts to mimic pre-existing drainage
directions. Wetland CC (Impact Figure 2) drains naturally to the southeast, and culverts
will be installed with slight sloping (1/8 inch per foot) to preserve this flow direction. All
remaining wetland areas, especially those east of the Norfolk Southern Railroad crossing,
drain north into their floodplains and are ultimately discharged to Walnut Creek via
unnamed tributary streams. Each of these wetlands will incorporate culverts that direct
water north into larger wetland areas, rather than be directed toward Walnut Creek. None
of the proposed culverts will discharge directly to Walnut Creek, and all will be located
so that existing wetland connections with the creek are maintained. Each wetland culvert
will be 18 inches in diameter and sloped at 1/8th inch per foot of pipe.

Attachment A
Figure 1: Overall Location Map
Figure 2.1: Location of Beaverdam Breach and Hydrologic Changes Since
Figure 2.2: March 2004 and May 2007 photos of Railroad Crossing
Figure 2.3: Pre- and Post-Alberto Surface Contours at Railroad Crossing
Figure 2.4: Pre- and Post- USEPA/NCDWM Clean-up Site
Impact Figures 1-6

1 l ~88f (8 L09081 E •
a I I I, I I I~ I~~~~,II I II~
o m ~n O
~-~-~ -_ '1 r -' y ` ~
I - Y rr~ ~ ~i - r• y a ~ 1c - ,~ ~," ~;
~~,--- ~'_ -z _i r lam- ~ ~ f s ~, Y~ -
'. R `vim'! '_ tt_ 6r "-- '•-_~.B ~ ~~ . - .
.- , ~ / L y 7
' N ~ ~ ' 'L__i ~ - r I.G.7FNE(~ _, "~~ ~ RD I - I' ti , _ .- ~C
i ~ -ac ~ ~ ~ y a
T ~ D J ~ ~ sr r ti `~ ./ .~
1 ' Sam 0 I 1 S / c I No 3i~l~s -- ...1 i ~ s ' 1 ~ - „~ - J a ~ J - ~ c`9
~„ I ~^ .~... ~ a
;, ~,
.•• a
x-i: '
it I
' ~ I 1' ' I r ,r ~ ~) ~ ~,
~' ~ ill ~ ~ ~.. ~ - 8
~ . r -- ,~ ~ ~ '~ .. ~ ~ = air`-`a` ~ ~-~= ~., ~ .~ ~ `-' ^~ z `-, Y .~ , ~ ~
•, ~- ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~- a"
- -~
X a_
11 `~ ~ ~ r ~ `~_ '~° `~' "~~~~ '~ t
~' ~ . • _ 5
~" ~ u ~' ~ ~ ~' ~t s, '~ ~ ~~~ I z.
r '7 _ ~ - 7 - A ':. ~~ ~ r.
~ _
i
a
~. :J = _
v _ 3 _ _"
'1 /
`ti 1..1 J
S .~.
ti
• ""a f/J m ~ ~ -- ~ - ~ ~ ~~ r y t >
~~ ~ u ~
1 -
T
J
1 `x: _~~`~~ ~~ 1 ~ ~ - ~~ • _ ~ I Z ~ C y
- a t=r; ~ ~-r~ 1 _ ~ ~. _ _ ~t
~ ~ v ~ ~ $ _

,-,
~~
o ~
~~ L
O ~
Z 11
I++..L
t U
++ ~
O ~
N G
(~ ll..
°~ U
a~
c~ ~
~ c~
°~ m
U
.Q
~ ~
C
(A t0
(~
N ~
(~ O
N
~ ~
~-- LL
~ U
O ~
~ ~
L
~~ ti/
UU
o~
o ~
~~
~U
N
o ~
c ~
°~ ~
aXi ~
~~
~ o
c~ ~
t ~
U .~
t4 +''
N U~
~ _O
O
(4 ~
~ O
N N
>~
N
~ ~
O ~
~ ~
O ~
(d c4
U O
O
J '~
.~
r
N i
~ N
L

0
~i
~~ ~
~~~
c
a~
~ ~ c
C7 - c~
~ ~ro ~
a~ ~ ~
a~ ~ a~
U ~ ~
~~o
~~
`' ~
L ~ Q
~ ~
~ ~
O ~ ~
c0
fd ~ ~
~ N (0 ~
'N j~+`+
N N
L
0 ~~
U ~ ~ ~
~8~C
~ (4
~ ~ O O
C
~ ~ ~ ~
O U ~ ~
~c~~NU
~_
~ ~ ~
C
O `~ p (6
sZO~~
O Y Q~
Q~~ O
~~g~
~N~
m
o~~~
o~~ °~
t
~ +'
~ ~ ~ C
Q L (~
~ ~ ~ ~
O~ N ~
~~ O
~ ~ U ~
~ ~ ~
~ O ~ ~
~~ °~~
O~+t-' ~.
Np O
U iy N ~
(~ ~
~ ~ L4 ~~1f
Nyt~
N ~ .~.`
~ ~ N ~
a1.~ O
LL (6 ~
N
Q
C
O
.N
N
N
Q
N
.n.
O
H
N
O
0
N
s
U
(tis
a~
a
0
N
C
U
O
C
O
(~6
U
0
N
W
II
m
Q
c
0
~N
N
N
Q
U
.Q
O
C
O
O
C
N
N
~ N
~ ~
o~
00
~ N N
N ~ ~
~ •L U
O ~ ~
O
a~
c
(~ ~
~ ~
L `
N ~ C
~ ~j U
Q U '~
~ y ~
+' ~ c
0 0 ~~
U
,~ N
0 0
_ ~
~ ~ N
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
ZZZ
~c"vm

N
N
' A, yQ
W ` ~
C COC
O
:~~~ +-' ~ ~j V
~
O Q
~ o
~
~

N ~ m
a ~
Q
~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a
=, c ~ Q
N ~ ~ ( I
~ ~
O a ~
4, /

.~
v
0
a
0
L
Q
~'
Q
~U
.~
C
.N
N
.~
t~
Q
C
(~
N
U
0
U
Z
c
c~
Q
a
W
0
d
c
c~
a
v
N
N
~l
LL

..,, ~ j~ ~~~1~ '~ J
--~ -_ , --
~~
~~~~ ~
_.~
--_ ~ ~ -
~, _ -
k ;' ~
LL
~`~-~ f4
-- Q
----
~---
i --- /
~---_
--,
~ ---- ~
+ --
{~ ------
i ~ }~/
------- - -~ j ~ /
----- ~
---- - i ~
--- -- ~ LL
~. ~
i
i ! ~
---- Q.
i
----,~ f
--
m
---~' ~

. ~

,; - ~
--~! o `1 ~ o1k S°utrern RR
N°'~
---- t ~,
~-- -
,' ~ ,
~+
-- - ~
a
aNi ti` ~ °o
o~
,., .
~ ~~ _ _
~_ ! -1
~ ~ l
~ ~ m
~°b ~ ~ Y
m
a a~ ' ~ LL
I ~
~ ~~ '
~~~ ( --
~ I
U ~
QZ
a
0
0
0
0
c°h

N
N
Q
N
C
N
_ ~ ~z
p
Q
•~
L
^~
LL
.~
~ N
C
N
N
~ O
Y ~
p
U
c ', o
>~
r ~
~ •~ o
~ ~ o
LL ,~ ~
U ~
U
'. (Q N y .- y N r
N C N C~ C C C C
of c ca Na NQ N N m ~ -~
V ••• ~ ~ Y -
U ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~
.' o a~ mamma ~a ~ ~ a~
'. d ~ ~ ~ m ~ m ~ m m ~~ ~
.: ...
..
..
.' '.
~• .-.
`' .• ••
.~ ti
.~ ~. ~ N
~.. U M
~ U
~ '.~ ~ Q
~' '. ~ ~ ,
cn ~ -
~ . ~~ ~ N
N ••• p
. ~
N •' O
N ~ N
.~
U '.
f0 .
Q ~•
'.
N ~.
N ~.
C
O ~~
N ~~
~ ~ r~
~ ~ •• ~ .-.
.p~ cn ~ .: u~i ~
p~ O ~ ~. N to
d/p O -~ :.
p~ - ~ •. ~ r
LL ~,
~~ ~ ~ :.
~~ rv c_ ~. o- ~- o
~ o~ ,~::...:' E E mob'
~-pp ~. ~N ~
7
~ c .•. O O
'• •' ~~1 N N

.-,
~ "
(y0 N~
H ~ d~ r N N r
~ l6 N N
Y
N
~ ~ ~ o ~
~
¢ c ~ c ~
Q ~ .~ ~ N N
,.° ~ c
N
n m m m ~ m N
N N
~ °'
~ m~
° ~ CO
~ N
o ~ m
~ ~
.
>
~ ~
o ~ ~
E
~
a ~~ m >
E
m_ m m Uj
~ m
a ..i
~ .
`-' O
~ r
~ ~
ca as
~'~ ,c
~
i ~
N N
v
%i /I N N
N
N
7
Q
d
d
.~
d
a
T
l6
C
d
m
Y
d
d
U
c
M R
V
~ t
Ol ~
~~
R
U ~
~ O
_~
U
Q~I
a°~i
O
o~
r
In
O
Souther Ral~oad
No'~olk
r
rn
c
.~ ~ /
O ~ /
N
U o
~ ~Qi
G~
'~~
~~~~
N
N
rn
ii
N
~~
~~
1~
~t
r-,
> , \~~
f//
.-. ~
~ ~
N
N ~
~ ~
~ r
~~
~ ~
r N
N N
00
N N
~'
~~~
N
~_
~ N U
C7 00 Q
(~ (4
~ ~.2
~ ~U
--~
r N ~
~ ~ ~
N
NN~S

lD N N ~ N N
~ ~
~
Q
- N ~
C m
a N ~
~~
~ N
C
~ Q~
C
~ Y
C_
N to
N
N
N 'p
O
C~ N Q
N
N
N m
~~ J
Q m m~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ o v m

~ a
E ? a
~ w ...
m ~ Q ~ ~
~~ m m~ m ~~ a
~ 111~~I
N
N
7
Q
d
Q'
C
m
d
E
Q
.~
m
a
.~
H
T
l6
3
c
d
,~
V
Y
d
m
U
7
C
~~
7d
O1 L
m
v ~
~ ~
d w
~ o
. ~
U
Q~
N
N
U7
N
~_
N
r
U
N
C
N
~~
N
Q'4n
N ~
M
(~') (")
d ~
mr
U U
10 14
as
E E
r N
N 01
N N
•-• ,~
.-. ~
~ Q
N
~ N N
Of ~ ~
N h `''
tf
T Q.
U U E
lC lC
a aw
EEU
--~
~ N C
N N ~
NN~S
N
Of
C
"w ~.
N
O ~
Uo
ro N

l6
f- N N
~ N~ ~ N N
N l6 m N
Y to

~ -p m C m
"O Q ~ Q C d C ~
~ Q ~ ~ C N
~ N C
N ~ C N N N N m~ J
o. m
o a~ m ~ d ~
a, a a ~ ~ ~ ~
~ a~ ,~ o ~
Q

a ~
~~ m E
m~ m m _
~ `n a
~ /
V
N
l(")
LL

~~
LL
O
N IT
0
v
O
O
O

N
l!~ ~
C7 ~
~ ~
.._. _~
~ ~
O
Q ~
~ ~
N
- ~
(V .~
O U
N ~

l ~ i
T
N
N
C
O
N
G~~
al~~ti
V`
~~

~_
47
t7f
ll

\~ -.: .Y
(i..'::::::,~.: r::
lfI
r
U l(7
l0
a~
7
- D
N ~
N ~
N «
~~
a- ~
N N
M N
(~ r
~ M
O 1~
r r
U U
10 l6
o. a
E E
r N
N N
C C
O O
N N
_ r
(9 N N c- ~ N r
~ ~ d ~
N ~ Q1
~ a aQ °Q N ~ Q~ ~
~ m ~ ~
oQ o o Y in
C N
~ ~ .~
m
N ~ ~ N
m m m m
~ N N N
°' ~ m °' E J
°
~
-
m
o m ~ Q ~ a
a~ a
i v
a `-
a S~~ m E m~ m m ~~ a

~~ ~
N
~ 6 CO
Q f n ~
N ~ ~
1 ~ N r
C7~`-'
~ ~ U
(O ~
~ r Q
V U
f0 l6
d d LL
E Ev
- - .o
r N C
N N ~
C C ~
N N
M
~f
c
'in .-.
~ ~
U~
0
N
N .._.
L

Attachment B
Wetland Determination Data Forms

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project /Site: Walnut Creek Greenway Trail -Lake Wheeler Road to S. Saunders Date: 21-24 May 07
Applicant /Owner: City of Raleigh Parks and Recreation Department County: -Wake-
Investigator: Christopher D. Hopper, Robert J. Goldstein 8 Assoc. Inc. State: NC
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? ves X No Community ID:Marsh
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? ves No X Transect ID: Wtl CA
Is the area a potential problem area? ves No X Plot ID:
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Juncas effusus Herb FACW+ 9.
2. Carex lurida Herb OBL 10.
3. Polygonum sagittatum Herb OBL 11.
4. Microstegium viminium Herb FAC+ 12.
5. Hibiscus moscheutos H/S OBL 13.
6. Arundinaria gig_antea Herb FACW 14.
7, 15.
g. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 100
Remarks: Wetland Vegetation Present Based Upon Greater than 50% of the Plant Species are Classified as
FAC-OBL in the National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands.
* Herb/Shrub community maintained by mowing in sewer ROW.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Other Inundated
-Saturated in Upper 12"
No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
_ Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
x Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Secondary Indicators:
Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 8 (in.) FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Depression / compaction wetland inside sanitary sewer right-of--way.

SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Chewacla Drainage Class: Poor
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Aquic Fluventic Dvstrochrepts Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
10 lOYR 4/1 lOYR 4/6 15%
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
x Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Within a Wetland? Yes X No,
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Remarks: Location is classified as a wetland based upon the criteria set forth in the 1987 Army Corps of
Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project /Site: Walnut Creek Greenway Trail -Lake Wheeler Road to S. Saunders Date: 21-24 May O7
Applicant /Owner: City of Raleigh Parks and Recreation Department County: -Wake-
Investigator: Christopher D. Hopper, Robert J. Goldstein 8~ Assoc. Inc. State: NC
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes X No Community ID:Marsh
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No X Transect : Wtl CB,
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No X CD, CE, CF, CH
(explain on reverse if needed) Plot ID:
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Betula nigra Tree FACW 9. Acer rubrum Shrub FAC
2. Ulmus americana Tree FACW 10. Boehmeria cylindrica Herb FACW+
3. Acer rubrum Tree FAC 11. Microstegium viminium Herb FAC+
4. Ouercus phellos Tree FACW- 12. Juncas effusus Herb FACW+
5. Liquidambar styraciflua Tree FAC+ 13. Lycopus virginicus Herb OBL
6. LiQustrum sinense Shrub FAC 14. Toxicodendron radicans Vine FAC
7. Betula nigra Shrub FACW 15. Vitis aestivalis Vine FAC-
8. Sambucus canadensis Shrub FACW 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 93
Remarks: Wetland Vegetation Present Based Upon Greater than 50% of the Plant Species are Classified as
FAC-OBL in the National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands.
* Herb/Shrub community maintained by mowing in sewer ROW, bounded by bottomland hardwood swamp forest.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Other Inundated
x Saturated in Upper 12"
No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: ~ Sediment Deposits
x Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Secondary Indicators:
Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) x Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0- 8 (in.) x FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Depression / compaction wetland inside sanitary sewer right-of--way, bounded by unaltered bottomland
hardwood forests. Wetland CB has direct connection to Walnut Creek - CD, CE, and CF are contiguous with
beaver swamps to north and are in fact all different portions of the same larger wetland complex -all connect with
Walnut Creek via discharge through Wetland CF.

SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Chewacla Drainage Class: Poor
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Aquic Fluventic Dvstrochrepts Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inched Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure. etc.
10 2.SY 4/1 2.SY 4/4 5%
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
X Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Wetlands CB and CD have water ponded in portions at the surface -nearly two weeks after most
recent precipitation event. Wetland CE and CF are saturated in upper 12. Recent removal of beaver dams on larger
wetland have reduced local soil saturation.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Within a Wetland? Yes X No_
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Remarks: Location is classified as a wetland based upon the criteria set forth in the 1987 Army Corps of
Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project /Site: Walnut Creek Greenway Trail -Lake Wheeler Road to S. Saunders Date: 21-24 May 07
Applicant /Owner: City of Raleigh Parks and Recreation Department County: -Wake-
Investigator: Christopher D. Hopper, Robert J. Goldstein ~ Assoc. Inc. State: NC
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes X No Community ID: Swamp
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes X No, Transect :WTI- CC
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No X Plot ID:
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Saecies Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Saecies Stratum Indicator
1. Betula nigra Tree FACW 9. Acer rubrum Shrub FAC
2. Ulmus americana Tree FACW 10. Boehmeria cylindrica Herb FACW+
3. Acer rubrum Tree FAC 11. Microsteeium viminium Herb FAC+
4. Quercus phellos Tree FACW- 12. Juncas effusus Herb FACW+
5. Liquidambar styraciflua Tree FAC+ 13. Lycopus virginicus Herb OBL
6. Ligustrum sinense Shrub FAC 14. Toxicodendron radicans Vine FAC
7. Betula nigra Shrub FACW 15. Vitis aestivalis Vine FAC-
8. Sambucus canadensis Shrub FACW 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 93
Remarks: Wetland Vegetation Present Based Upon Greater than 50% of the Plant Species are Classified as
FAC-OBL in the National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands.
* Herb/Shrub community maintained by mowing in sewer ROW, bounded by bottomland hardwood swamp forest.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Other Inundated
x Saturated in Upper 12"
No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
x Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: (in.) Secondary Indicators:
Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) x Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 0- 8 (in.) x FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Recent USEPA and NCDWM clean-up of a contaminated site in this area have significantly impacted
local hydrology. This wetland was previously much larger in size -braided drainage channels on the adjacent
floodplain have been silted over and no longer qualify as 404 wetlands.

SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Altivista fine sandy loam
Drainage Class: Moderately well
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Aquic Hapludults Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
10 2.SY 4/1 2.SY 4/4 5%
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
_Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
-Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
x Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Soils are complex in this wetland. Up to half of samples taken are representative of past land uses - a
fertilizer/phosphate processing facility now contaminated with arsenic and lead. The questionable soil samples are a
maroonish-colored saturated sand. Extents of qualifying munsell colors were delineated.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Within a Wetland? Yes X No.
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Remarks: Location is classified as a wetland based upon the criteria set forth in the 1987 Army Corps of
Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project /Site: Walnut Creek Greenway Trail -Lake Wheeler Road to S. Saunders Date: 21-24 May 07
Applicant /Owner: City of Raleigh Parks and Recreation Department County: -Wake-
Investigator: Christopher D. Hopper, Robert J. Goldstein 8 Assoc. Inc. State: NC
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes X No Community ID: Upland
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No X Transect : WTL CA,
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No X CB, CC, CD, CE, CF,
(explain on reverse if needed) CG, CH
Plot ID: UPLANDS
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
1. Ulmus americanus T/S FACW 9. Arimdinaria gigantea Herb FACW
2. Liquidambar styraciflua T/S FAC+ 10. Juncus effusus Herb FACW+
3. Platanus occidentalis Tree FACW- 11. Boehmeria cylindrica Herb FACW+
4. Fraxinus pennsylvanica T/S FACW 12. Impatiens capensis Herb FACW
5. Carpinus caroliniana T/S FAC 13. Vitis labrusca Vine FAC+
6. Liriodendron tuli~ifera T/S FAC 14. Toxicodendron radicans Vine FAC
7. Rubus arbutus Shrub FACU+ 15.
8. Dioscorea batatas Herb FAC 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-). 93
Remarks: Wetland Vegetation Present Based Upon Greater than 50% of the Plant Species are Classified as
FAC-OBL in the National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands.
* Vegetation community of adjacent non-wetland forests -community type is present adjacent to all wetl and areas
along this reach of Walnut Creeek.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators:
Other _ Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12"
No Recorded Data Available water Marks
Drift Lines
Field Observations: Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: (in•) Secondary Indicators:
Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit: (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: >12 (in.) TFAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:

SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): Chewacla Drainage Class: Poor
Taxonomy (Subgroup): AcLuic Fluventic Dystrochre~ts Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Profile Descriation:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure. etc.
10 lOYR 4/2
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
-Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
T Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Within a Wetland? Yes_ No X
Hydric Soils Present? Yes T No X
Remarks: Locations are not classified as a wetland based upon the criteria set forth in the 1987 Army Corps
of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.

Attachment C
Previous Permit Approval Letters
Agent Authorization Letter
NC EEP ILF Program Acceptance Letter

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMTNCrTC)N DISTRICT
Action 1D: 20042118b Caurtty: Wake
GENERAL PERMIT (ItEGIUNA:L A.~D NATIONWIDE] VERIFICATIC?N
Property C}wner: City of Raleigh -Parks & Recreation Department
Attn: Vic Lebsoek .
Mailing Address: P d Box S9i1 ~ .
LL Raleigh,111orth Carolina 24b02 .. Telephone Na.: (919] 890-3285
Authorized Agent: Robert J. Goldstein. & Associates, Inc.
Attn:. Sean Peffer
Mailing Address; 8480 Garvey Drive
Raleigh, North Carolina ~?b16 Telephone Na,: (919] 872-11?4
Location of property (road namelnumber, town, etc.}: The graposed greenway trail begins on the east side of Lake..
Wheeler Road {SR 1009}, runs generally east along Walnut Creek, and terminates an the west side of Garner Road
(SR IQ04) in Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina.
Site Coordinates: 35.7588865 °N ?$.660?322..°W USES Quad: Raleigh West
- Waterway: Walnut. Creek River Basin: Meuse 13t1C: 030211201
Description ~of pmjects area and activity (see.page:2 for°a summary of autharzetl impacts}.This permit authorizes
placement a€ fill material to construct an asphaltJboardwalk greenway trail, .
Applicable Law: ~ Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USG 1344)
Section l0 (Rivers and I~arbors Act, 33 USC 403)....
Autharizat4n: Nationwi~Te or Regional General Permit Ntamber{s}: 14
Your work is authorized by the above. referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the attached
conditions and your submitted plans. Any violation of the attached conditions or deviation from your submitted plans maysubject the
permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order and/or appropriate legal action.
This verification will remain valid until the expiration. date identified below unless the nationwide authorization is modified,.
suspended. or revoked. lf, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and/or
modified, this verification ~~~ill remain valid. until the expiration date identified below, provided it complies with all requirements of
the modified nationwide perruit, If the nationwide .permit authorization expires or issuspended,-revoked, or is modified,,such that. the
activity would no Longer comply with ttie terms. and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have `commenced (i.e., are
under construction]' or-are under contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorzed;provided the
activity is completed. within twelve months of the date of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or' revocation,. unless.
discretionary authority has been exercised on a case-by case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the authorization,
Activities, subject to Section 4ff4 (as indicated above] may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification. You
should contact tte NC Divisati of Water Quality (telephone [phone]] to determine Section 44l requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area,Management Act (CAMA),
pror,ta beginning. work you must contact the N.C. I)ivision~ak Coastal Management
This. Department of the Army verification does not relieve the perrnittee of the responsibility to obtain any other. required Federal:,
Saxe ar locatlspprovalslperrnits_ ~ ~ ~ ~ -
- l`fthere are an'y gttestions.regardng this verification;, any.of the. conditions of the Permit, or the Carps bf Ettgine~ers regulatory .
program,. please contact Jcntiifer Burdette at telephone (919] $7b-8441, ext 22. ~ ,
Corps. Regulatory Official G~"~ Date: 01I3J2005 Verification F.xpirati0n Date; Oi~/3112007
Copy Furnished: -
Page _I of 3 ,

Determination of Jnrisdiction:
^ Based an preliminary information, there appear to be waters of the US including wetlands within the above described project area..
This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process
(Reference 33 CFR Part 33I}.
There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the abo~~e described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section lfl afthe Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 4©~ ofthe Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination maybe relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date ofthis
notification.
There are waters of the US andfar wetlands ~°ithin the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of Section
404. of the Clean Water Act: (CWAx33 USG § 1344). Unless there is a change. in the law oraur published regulations, this
determination. may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the :date of this. notification.
^ The jurisdictional areas within the above described project area have Been identified under a previous action. Please reference the
jurisdictional determinatonissued on (Action ID; ).
Basis of Jurisdictional Deterrnination. Areas crossed by the proposed greenwav exhibit wetland criteria. as described in the 1987
Carps Wetland Delineation Manual and are adjacent to Walnut Creek. and. unnamed. tributaries to Walnut Creek. The
proposed greenwav aIsa crosses stream channels thzt exhibit an Ordinary High Water Mark as indicated by changes in sail
character and absence or terrestrial vegetation .and are hydrologically connected to Walnut Creek, a tributary of the l~'euse
.River,
Carps Regulatory Official.. w ~~, ~ ~~.~ Date: 4113.1/2445 Determination Expiration Date:
Summary of Authorized Impacts and Required Mititatzon
Action ID ~TWP 1 GP en Water ac Wetland ac Uni artan# Steam I I octant Scam
Temporary . Permanent Temporary Permanent Temporary Permanent Temporary Permanent
244421186 14 0.36

Irrt act Totals 4 o d 4.36 0 U 4 0
Total Loss of Waters o€lhe U.S. {ac) 4:.36 Total Loss of Waters of the U.S. 1 4
Re aired Wetland Miti atop (ac} 0 Re aired Stream Mitis;ation (1 4
tldditional Remarks andlor Special Permit Condition:
Please note that the total wetland impact of 4.36 acre consists of 4.30 acre for asphalt trail construction and 4.06
acre far construction of boardwalk posts.
Wage 2 of Z

~~~ W AT~g4
.a ~,,
r
y
d 'C
'~.___
City of Raleigh
Parks & Recreation Departtrtent
Attn: Mr. Vic Lebsock
P.O. Box 5.90
Raleigh, NG 27602
n~i~t~~~ ~: Easley. Governor
William G. Ross -r., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Ataa W. ICliruek, P;E. Director
Division of water Quality
January ~~, 2005
DWQ Project # 04-0838
Wake. County
Page l of `3
Subject Property: Walnut Creek Greenway Trail Add3~tions & Extensions
Lake. Wheeler Road to Garner Road, Raleigh, NC
Walnut Creep: [03-04-02 27-34-(4), C :NSW]
Approval of.401 Water Quality Certification and Authorization Cert~iflcate per the Neuse River
Buffer Prntec#ion Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0233} with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr. Lebsack:
You have-.our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and'those listed below, to place fill
within or otherwise. fill 0.30 acres of wetlands, boardwalk over 0.57 acres of wetlands and impact 2.62
acres (or approximately 114,127 square feet (ftz)} of protected riparian buffers for the purpose of
canstructing'a greenway trail.. at the subject property, as described. within. your application dated May 19,
2f?04 and additional infot~mation received by the N.C. Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on December 20,
2004. After reviewing your application, we have decided that the impacts are covered by General Water
Quality Cemfication Number(s) 3404 (GC3404}. The Certification(s) allows you to use Nationwide
Permit{s} 14 when issued by the VS Army Coxps of Engineers (USAGE). This letter shall also act as
your approved Authorization Certificate for impacts to the protected riparian buffers per 15A NCAC 2B
.0233. In addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with any other required federal, state or local
permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to} Erosion and Sediment
Control, and l~don-discharge reg~laatiians. Als+~, this approval to proceed. v~tth ya~ur prnpas~ad impacts
ar to conduct impacts to waters as depicted. in your applfcaton shall expire upon eacpiration of the
404 Permit,
This approval is for the purpose. and design that you described in your application. If you change your
project, you must. notify us and you may be required to send us a new application, if the property is sold,
the new owner must be :given. a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for
complying with all conditions. Tf total fills for this project {now or in ~ future) exceed one acre of
wetland yr 150 linear feet of stream,... compensatory mitigation may be required as described. in 1SA
NCAC ZH .0506 jh}. This approval requires you to follovr the conditions listed in the attached.
certification atYd any :additional conditions listed below.
at~t oversignriExpress Revi~v uns
1850 hail Service Center, f~tetgh, North Cs~vfins 27899.1850
2321 Cr~ires Boulevard, Ssite250, tieiegh, Martlt C.aro~ 27804
Phalle: 919-733.17881 PAX 9i9-a33~88331 tn#smet httpJfi2o.stl~.st$is.rro.t~lrtCwelt~nds

an F~~~i ~s~,rh~x~a++~, ate,„ Frri,r _ sr~s. Ranmkxiltt39i. Pnaf t`.avwmimarFsanar

City of Raleigh
Page 2 of 3
tanuary 12, 20035
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
1. Impacts Approved -The fallowing impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other. Specific
and general conditions of this Certification are: met. No other impacts are approved including
incidental impacts:
Amount Approved.
~n1tS~ Plan Laation or Reference:
444 Wetlands 4.34 (acres) aved trail
404 Wetlands 0.57 (acres} boardwalk
Buffers 114,127 (s care ft.) -
2. Erosion ~ pediment Control Practices -.Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full
compliance with all sificatians governing the proper design, installation and operation and
maintenance of such Best..lVianagement Practices in order to prated surfac8 waters standards:
a. The erasion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed, installed,
operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina
Sediment curd Erosion Cvntrod Planning and Design. Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control.
measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most
recent version of the North Catalina Seciiment`and Erosion Comrol Manual. The devices
shall be maintained on all construction sites, barrow sites, and waste pile {spoil) projects,.
including contractor-owned ar leased"borrow pits associated with the project.
3. No Waste, Spoil, Solids, ar Fill. of Any Kind..- No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind. shall occur
in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond the footprint of the impacts depicted in the.Pre-
Construction Notification. All construction activities, including the design,. installation, operation,
and rrtaintanance 4f sediment and erosion control Best Management Practices, shall be perffonned
act that no violations of state water quality. standards, statutes, a rules occur..
4. No Sediment & Erosion Control Measures. w/n Wetlands or Waters - ~ediuaent and erasion
control measures shall not: be placed.. in wetlands. or waters to the maximum extent practicable. If
ptacemerrt of sediment and. erosion control. devices in wetlands and waters is unavoidable, they.
shall be removed and the natural grade restored within. six months of the date that the Division of
Land Resources has released. the prc~}ect.
5. ProtectiveFencng -The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary and along the construction
corridor within these boundaries approved under this authorization shall be clearly marked with
orange warning fencing (ar similar high visibility material} for the areas that have been approved
to infringe within the buffer, wetland or water prior to any land disturbing activities. to ensure
compliance with 15A NCAC 28.233 and. cC 3404.
6. Certificate of Completion -Upon completion. of all work. approved within the 441 Water Quality
Certification or applicable Buffer Rules, and any subse9uent modifications, the applicant is
required to return the attached certificate of completion to the 401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina:
Division of Water Quality, 16501 Marl Service Center, Raleigh,.. NC> 27699-1654.
?. Plans -This authorization applies to the construction plans received by the Division of Water
Quality on. December 2t}, 2t>04 and. sealed by Ralph Troutman:, P.E. on December 17, 2004.

City of Raleigh
Page 3 of 3
January 12, 2005
Violations of any condition herein set forth. may result in revocation of this Certification and may result in
criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your proposed impacts ar to conduct
impacts to waters. as depicted n.yaur application and. as-authorized by this Certification, shall expire upon
expiration of the 404 or LAMA Permit,
If you d4 not. accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved wetland or
stream impacts), you may ask. for an adjudicatary hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that
you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 1508 of
the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, G?14 Mail Service. Center,
Raleigh, N,C. 27699-6714, 't'his certification and. its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a
hearing,
Any disputes over determinations regarding,this Authorization Certificate (associated with the approved
buffer impacts) shall be referred in writing to the Director for a decision, The Director's decision is
subject. to review as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of G.S. 1508.
This letter completes the review of the Division. of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act and the Meuse riparian buffer protection arule as described within 15A NCAC 2B .0233.. If you have.
any questions,. please. telephone. Jahn Dorney or Cyndi Karoly at 919-'733-1785.
AWKICBK/bz
Enclosures: GC 3404
Certifiicate of Completion
Sincerely,
Alan W. Klimek,. P.E.
.~ ' cc. Sean Peffer, Goldstein & Associates,: lnc., $480 Garvey Drive, Raleigh,. NC 27616
USACE Raleigh. Regulatory Field.. office
1)WQ Raleigh Regional (3ffce
1~ile Cagy
Central Files
Filename: 040$38

n:,~ iu ~nn4 n~, ys •~ty-~~in-.~~~~ *~~_ ~-~ur~~ !rtu +~u~i~v rout ~ife~~
E+~121/1994 11:?5 929-8?2~9214 PAGE ~2

~n~ON~iPNTAL Go?~SL7,T~1N'T'S
S'rrce l9t~3 Tei;(41~}S?2•t 17d u.' iKtls~iatl?•,.xx~+
34E0 Gar`sy Dri++a '~i +312<+:•+12 i a
1•dX:~
~taleib7t, ~iorth Gco[i+~ $T6[ 6.3175 .
wet!x+i~~ w•.~.~ .~~,:'ar~.lim;i :~+m

id~teie
c
17nsi-sorn
...
A,get~t Authorization
Ibis lettias is inter-ded to allow repreaer-tatiti°ss of ~vbcrt i. Gol~.stein and Associates. Inc-
(pgetxt) to act ar behalf of the clicndpiaperry owner w=hctt canespon~lin8 with, the U.S. Anny
Carps> of Engirloers (USAGE). In order t'ar the U5A~'E to ca7duct correspondrr-cetyith air
Agent an behalf v~'the property ov-mer, tllp p~roperfy Qwncr must pro~~ida a signal ~taternent
authvriziag the atcti•~tty. Flvasc llnvt' tlxe pzoperiy owoer ~gn and date t;1is letter ~>7d return a
cape to oux mice.
1, ~~~~,.~ •..., grant reprer-ensasives of itvbert J. Gv;dsteirt and Associates,
Ina. ~e authori±y to ect as my Agent when curr~spvndirtg with the USAGE retarding the
Property' located at
ACOE Field ice Location
AC4E Ficid office County :~attager ~
Vwner6 glgo[sttnsti Dats ,~
Cc: Sean Pefr4r.:tJGdc.A
Gtitiero»mehMl,}s16rs+n~n7,f •CGltvi-WllhtrNrAt,U!~seer Sdrwneh:9 sl~rirdarionaf 1~eNrtfld Daitnevrrloas ~+E~trtn,~~revf cprrr,a: ~'.n,r~;c
GIS/~PS ~d~pix,~ wR4tR11M!!y ~.trokreolo~irnt Sur+~gv nod Tex,~r[~ ~ iYnrrr-gyipylt PrDjeds /Rent F.autr~ ~ti~k A.fse,}sMCKI,t /~+rkt Afmau~;rn,r.+r t!'rrr~•~ ~1. rr~
~fennarrnest sifiretre~n ~Ys+a Analysed •ASfrrl~pnn A'atxs •S~r~tr Rerrarlrter, ~ 11(seieipglSoli4 y'++7+t+Ga+al~illa ~Seh~rl,.n:e
,vxNewaler Thrtfrreref Plae,~r ~ ~rpd ,.,.+! X07 P'e~-xt!a ~Crrernd~.rr; ;r!IdooicRrrRp .siv-ygrcyir ~n~alnenra ~ r yy~r lYi~m;cs !<~xner,,x;v

s~~stem
l~jf~ 1~~ 'e~nen~
PROGRAM
July 12, 2007
Victor Lebsock
City of Raleigh Parks and Recreation Dept.
PO Box S90
Raleigh, NC 27602
Project: Walnut Creek Greenway County: Wake
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program {NCEEP) is willing to
accept payment for impacts associated with the above referenced project. Please note that this decision does not assure that
the payment will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the
applicant to contact these agencies to determine if payment to the NCEEP will be approved.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. I# we have not received a copy of
the issued 404 Permit/401 CertificatiodCAMA permit within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It is the
applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to NCEEP. Once NCEEP receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice
will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized
work. The amount of the In Lieu Fee to be paid to NCEEP by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and
policies listed at www.nceep.net.
Based on the information supplied by you the impacts that may require compensatory mitigation aze summarized in the
following table.
Neuse
03020201 Stream (feet) Wetlands (acres) Buffer I
{Sq. Ft.) Buffer II
(Sq. Ft.)
Cold Cool Warm Ri Arian Non-Ri azian Coastal Marsh
Impacts 0 0 50 0.156 0 0 0 0
Credits 0 0 120 0.332 0 0 0 0
Upon receipt of payment, EEP will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. If the regulatory agencies
require mitigation credits greater than indicated above, and the applicant wants NCEEP to be responsible for the additional
mitigation, the applicant will need to submit a mitigation request to NCEEP for approval prior to permit issuance. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding between the N. C. Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers dated November 4, 1998.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
cc: Cyndi Karoly, NCDWQ Wetlands/401 Unit
Jamie Shern, USACE-Raleigh (20042186)
Amy Chapman, NCDWQ- Wetlands/401 Unit (04-0838)
Chris Hopper, agent
File
®~~
~.sto~u-t~... ~ ... PYOt~~ ©~•tY Stag ~~`~
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program, 1 fi52 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 / 919-715-0476 / www.nceep.net

Attachment D
Typical Trail and Stream Crossing Cross-Sections

1
d
1
8' 1tl
MA%IbUM CtEARINC
111X15
MINIMUM DEPTH OF GRUBBING
q• 2' I-2
MA%1lIUM GRUBBNG GRADE POINT SLOPE TOWARD CREEK
~~ 01/B' / FT
po o,p ppq pOQOGp~~ QD,.~.: ;OC Dq .,oo. qq DO•. Oq cD :OVA OQ :q0 ~(~pO pO p0p0 00
Co coo P~ ooaoooooooo~o~aooooo0oooooaoooo~oaooooo00 000000000~oooovGo,oao~
op°op°o0oopoo0oo0°op°opoo0°o opoopoop°op°c0°o(
NotE: uN1ESS oncaWSE SHOWN oN ORAWNGS, C Aec
GNADE PONi E1EVAn0N 96LLL BE WSnNG CRWIdI
E1' TO fRONDE POSRNE DRAINAGE ACROSS GREEN-
WAY TRAIL PART.
GREENWAY^TRAIL PATH 1
~ D4
IM ClFARINC
UMIIS
1•
MAJ(WUI.1 GRUBBNG
W75
MINIMUM DEP1N DF (RUBBING
6' CONCRETE PATX
GRADE PgNT ROPE TDWPAD CRFf9(
01/B' / FT
J1
rwTE uxESS o1HERVMSE slaxa aN g2ANENGS.
rxADE PgNT EuvAnoN SHAD eE Exlmxc rxouno
41' i0 PRONDE PDSIRK DRAINAGE ACROSS GREEN-
WAY WAIL PAM • _
~ GREENWAY CONCRETE TRAIL PATF{~
Nrs D4
GREENWAY TRAIL ENTRANCE~31
Mrs D4
E'
MA CIFARIN!
UMI15
4'
MA1(YUY GRUBBING
OMITS
?o0poo~G°~o0°opDO~6eo 00 0~~;
poop°o 1 ~ ~4'S,
a
FABRIC NNERE gREC1ED BY ENGINEER OA OWNER
s'
MAXIMUM CSEAAIN
UM115
4~
MAXIMUM GRUBBING
I1Nn5
0~-835 ~~

r
i
6
9
~t
=<.
N~~
g0
V
w
J
U
F
Q
d
Q
w
}
d'
m
~ SEGMENTAL CdJCAEIE CAP UNIT SEtYAENTAL CONCRETE CAP UNIT
I I
00o a0ol 0 00,o0o0oco0oo0000o coo oq0 oao oOO~oQO oooVooO 000 00 .0000 °o00co0 00•~ do ~ 0 0p0 000 0
00 op opoop°op°opoo0oo0000000oo0oop°o0°op°opoopo opo 0°opoo0oo v °00
C oc oo Ooo OOo Ooo Goo Ooo Ooo OoonOOopGOc;sQOo 000 Occ Ooc~uo + po Oc ood0~ea~~poaCr°pooc - " pc Gpp°c °
2' MIN) z' (n)
ABC SN ~ $ i
8 i ~y ~pP ~/ ~ w
~ I I ob
I ~` GREENWAY TRAIL PATH WITH SEGMENTAL CONCRETE RETAINING WAL 4 ~ I Pit ~clrr~'y~a~
Nrs D4 I sECUENru CONCAEIE uNlr ~ E ~ 112d-D4
sEGMP>!lu GYNCREIE uuu I
GaNCxErE CONCRER:
8'
E
No. Revision Date B oe:im x,M s~M ~
D~9, W~ DMe 1'°50' WALNUT CREEK GREENWAY WITHERS ~ RAVENEL
A,a 929 DS TYPICAL SECTIONS D4
~^~ MMNa. RALEIGH, N.C. ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
AET 98099 111 A1xKman Dme Gry, NwN Gmliro l]511 Le1:919~643310 ht 919A6)f008 .vm.wilhdvaw'el.cvn

Attachment E
RLS Wetland Survey Maps

P~
~0
L ~
i ~
~\

~\

~\
~`
~ ~ i
~ ~ ~~ i
~\
N 60
N
N6Y N
NCO %
N Pi/
N m~
~~
5
1
._1
i,
i,
~`
1
'~`
1~
~'
1,
1
1
1
1~
',
~,
i`
1
1
1 ~
~ ~ 1
~ Nf0 `•~ 1
rv
N ^ ''~~ u
a N
N• N ~
MI ND N~ Nj~i ~
..~JYb, ~
r~ ....N~
~ 0~
6 ~ 7? 1
i
1 v
-------
/ N0
V ~ N ~ th
i
i
i
i
i
T---_-__-. ~L
~ ~ -_-
~ -------
~~ 1
I~ ~
ii
~i i
~i i
i~ ~
~~ ~
~~ ~

\
\

\

\ ¢
\ Z
\
\

\
\

~ ~~ ~ 0 1 1 \
v
2 ' ~ ~--------------1-------------~----------~
~`~ ~ m ~ p~-0$38 Vy
~ ~ ~ ~0 , r, CWIRLE5 R, BROWN PLS, DO HEREBY CERi1FY THAT THIS MAP WAS PREPARED I
\ ~ Z- , JURISDICTIONAL ARFA8ONAS DELMEATED BYYROBERT J GOLDSTEInN ik ASSOCWrES, r~
`~ ,~ , ~ ~ OF RALEIDH, NORTH CAROLINA.
\~~ 1~ ~ - I
` ~ ~ I
~,~ I , , NC PLS L-3597
J I
1 , ~~~, I
1 s
l~
`~
~ 1 -
~NT~RS - ~ ~ ~ it ~
T,gTF4© ~~\ i t
\ ~ ~ GRAPHIC SCALE
~~+` ~ ~ ~~ ~ aria 200 Rio
7 inch = 200 ft.
~-~~ ~~
I
I

Nor
K01 ~:,
L~
N
I w;.
Nm
I NW N
.. ~
Nw
Nm
I
No. Rvii Dale BY ~~ .~ D~.,._~, CITY OF RALEIGH
WITHERS RAVENEL =""w°
WALNUT CREEK GREENWAY WETLANDS EXIHIBIT ~
c~,xM ev im w. lNiIN!!R6 t P1ANXlRS 1 SYtYEY0R5
ra a>oeoco RALEIGH WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA mrn.,~o>MCm.~~.m~oimansli ~,mv+txnno n,:~ivvsc.~~oe ,,.~...~ elm

// \\ \
'THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPX OF THIS PLAT A ATELY DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY OF THE JURISDICTION OF \ \
SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN ATER ACT WITH THE DESIGNATED INSET AREA, AS DETERMINED BY THE \ \
UNDERSIGNED ON THIS DA OTHER AREAS OF JURISDICTION MAY BE PRESENT ON THE SITE BUT HAVE NOT \
BEEN DELINEATED. UNtJ: THERE IS A CHANGE IN THE LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS, THIS \
DETERMINATION OF SEC 404 ~IRISDICTION MAY BE RELIED UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED FlVE YEARS \\ \ //
FROM THIS DATE. THE` DETERMINATION WAS MADE UT1lJZING THE 1987 CORPS OF ENgNEERS WETLANDS \ \y/
DELINEATION MAN ~~ \
/ \ /
~ \ /
REGULATORYiOFFlCIAL \ / /
~ \ 73iize:o~9507", i1 0 3s:e~44~s, ~ ~2 \ /
/ \ 731228.6526, 2100485.849,, MF G'833 /
731244.9617, 2100527.3989, NF C84 \ \ /
TITS \ 731244.64n, 2100596.0875,, MYF CB7 /
/ \ 7312327813, 2100593.7762, MMF C88 \ /
731207.1911, 210081a5044 WF C89 \ /
~ \ 731221.1827, 2100821.9762, MYF C810
731235.4974, 2100605.0769, IMF 0811 \• /
/ /~~~ \~ 731247.7779, 2100603.5144 WF CB12 \ / /
USACE A`C\ON ID ~ \ / /
~ \ \ /
\ \\ /~~/
I, CHARLES R. BROWN, PLS, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS AIAP WAS PREPARED ~ /
UNDER MY SUPERVI~AND ACCURATELY DEPICTS 7HE LOCATIONS OF SECTION ~O4 ~ /
JURISDICTIONAL AR AS DELINEATED BY R08ERT J. GOLDSTEIN ~ ASSOCIATES, INC \ /
OF RALEIGH, NORTH UNA /
\ - \~ //
\ /
CHARLES R. BROWN, NC PLS L-597 \ / /
\ ~ ~~ //
v ~ ~~~~-
\ \\ //
\ ~ /
\ ~ //
\ ~ /
\ x-----------------------WFCB12---------
\ / WF CB7
\ // WF CB8 '. WF CBlI
\ / '
\ /
\ // WF CB10
\ / wEnA~os "~"' WF CB9
\ / 480 SF
\ / am Ac
\ /
\ /
\ /
\ /
\ /
\ /
\ /
\ /
/
v GRAPHIC SCALE

M
0
a
z
50 0 25 50 100
1 inch = 50 ft.
~~~ "° ° Ud1e n °°~' ~k ' CITY OF RALEIGH
--~~~ Ornm By •~ U:h I • ~ SAee Nn.
°~ WALNUT CREEK GREENWAY WETLANDS EXHIBIT W~THERB ~ RAVENEL
"~~ k'~° LNiiNELRi I lLAMNLR! I SNRYlYO R3
wx otaoeom RALEIGH WAKECOUN'fl' NORTH CAROLINA ,nAUr:,~roMC~r,r,~.nc,rows;s,i m,~„r~rv~nw ~M,~,v.s;croe .,.,...~.~,.~,,.i.,>m

WF CDl
WF CDZ '
WF CD3... ..'.... RE11J~1D3 ~ I
Is~l1 s~ I
WF CD4 •••~•~•~•••••~.'.'.'... oas ~c
wF ens .....'.'.'.'.•.•.•.•.•.•.'.•.•.•.•.•... I
..' .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:...:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.::.:.:.:... WF ~ CD15
WF CD6'
~_~
WF C 7 ....................................~.
.............................. .
WF CD9 ~~~ (
WF CD11
WF CD10
"THIS GERTiFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT ACCUR~ DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY OF THE JURISDICTION,DF ...-~,
SEC110N 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT WITH THE DESIGNATE6 N,~ SET AREA, A5 DETERMINED BY THE ` ~
UNDER~GNED ON THIS DATE. OTHER AREAS OF JURISDICTION MA ESE ON THE SITE BUT HA OT ~
BEEN DELJNEAIED. UNLESS THERE IS A CHANGE IN THE LAW OR OUR PUBLISH REGULATIONS, THIS
DETERMINATION OF SECTION 404 JURISDIC110N MAY BE RELIED UPON FOR A PERIOQ NOT TO EXCEED VE YEARS
FROM THIS DATE. THIS DETERMINATION WAS MADE U1ILIZING THE 1987 CORPS ~ ENt~NEERS WE NDS WF
DELINEA110N MANUAL. ~"'-' ~ F CD13
WF CD12
REGULATORY OFFICIAL
TITLE
DATE
USACE ACT10N ID
1, CHARLES R. BRONTt, PLS, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS PREPARED
UNDER MY SUPERVISION, AND ACCURATELY DEPIC-5 THE LOCATR}NS OF SECTION 404
OFRRAtE1GH ORTN CAROUNA EATED BY ROBERT J. GOLDSTEIN de ASSOCIATES, !NC ~~~~
CHARLES R. BROwN, NC PLS L-3597
CDl
/'.'~
WF CD16
i
WF CDZ3
WF CD17
_ WF CD22
~ WF CD18
WF CDZI
731267.9074, 2102304.7365, WF CES
731235.0043, 2102277.5836, WF CE7
731224.8511, 2102252.1227, WF CE6
731254:4388, 2102215.9316, WF CE4
731256.2990, 2102229.5446, WF CE5
731286.3327, 2102169.1275, WF CE3
731313.7770, 2102207.8204, WF CE2
731325.4047, 2102205.2933, WF CE1
731454.8254, 2102056.5728, WF CD23
731449.6212, 2102044.5461, WF CD22
731426.2221, 2102027.6996, WF CD21
731415.4475, 2102011,4223, WF CD20
731422.1961, 2102004.6658, WF CD19
731433.2618, 2102009.4497, WF CD18
731457.1047, 2102031.4675, WF CD17
731477.2263, 2102021.1585, WF CDt6
731462.6954, 2102009.7256, WF CD35
731459.4360, 2101993.5031, WF CD14
731441.6062, 2101967.7976, WF CD13
731429.1646, 2101978.6730, WF CD12
731432.3850, 21019428749, WF CD11
731451.4336, 2101919.4887, WF CD10
731441.3770, 2101900,2080, WF CD9
731458.6260, 2101653.7675, WF CDS
731474.6308, 2101794.7961, WF CD7
731491.0175, 2101744.7332, WF CD6
731511.8791, 2101774,2863, WF CD5
731514.5586, 2101793.6651, WF CD4
731527.4056, 2101801.3791, WF CD3
731541.6396, 2101772.0493, WF CD2
731553.1323, 2101746.1628, WF CDt
WF CE1
WF CD1gl
I
1
w~nAHOS AREA
WF CE2 •• a~A~c
M
4
z
..................
.....-••-•~•~•••••••-••••••••• WF CE8
...................
~ WF CE3
`WF CD80
1
1
1
~ GRAPHIC SCALE
50 ~ 0 25 50 lOD
1 inch = 50 ft.
WF CE4 ••••••••
WF CES ••• • WF CE7
WF CE6
No. v'~ Date B n~~y., w~R scw' -~ sn«n ns
CITY OF RALEIGH WITHERS (~' RAVENEL ~5t
°~'~ ~ °~ ~ WALNUT CREEK GREENWAY WETLANDS EXHIBIT LMRINElRS 1 lLANNlRS 1 511RVEYORS
cxk.~a sr ~~m'm.
~,,,,~ RALEIGHT WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA ~nM~<un.+oa~~r,~o rr.,„it„a+sn ~~:ns+sxnw r,,:~s,azvuue ,,,,w,.«r~~i.«,~

s
S
Y
.\
. ~
'THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY OF THE JURISDICTION OF ! 1
SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT WITH THE DESIGN{~TED INSET AREA, AS DETERMINED BY THE ~
~
UNDERSI(~JED ON THIS DATE. OTHER AREAS OF dJRiSDIC11bN MAY BE PRESENT ON THE SIIE BUT HAVE NOT
BEEN DELINEATED. UNLESS THERE IS A CHANGE IN THE LA \OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULA1iONS, THIS
CTION 404 JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED CJPON FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED FIVE YEARS ~
i
DETERMINATION OF SE
FROM THIS DATE. THIS DETERMINATION WAS MADE UTILIZING THE 1987 CORPS OF ENGINEERS WETLANDS ,
~ , ~''
DELINEATION MANUAL. \ ~ ~-'
"~
\ ,
1 '
\
,~
~
,
\
REGULATORY OFFICIAL \ ''
~ ~ /
\ ~
\ \~ 1
\TITLE ~
\ \ 1
\ \
\ 1
DATE \ \ ~
\ \ ~
\ \ ~
USACE ACTT ID \
\
~
\ ti
\ \ WF CCII >,
\
CfuRLES R. eROwN, `aLS, oo HEREer cERn~r THar THIS ~ was PREPARED
~
UNDER MY SUPERVISKIN, AND ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE LOCATIONS OF SECTION 404 \ WF CC13
JURISDICTIONAL ARFAS AS NEAiED BY R08ERf J. GOiDSTt7N do A550CIAlES, INC \
~ `
OF RALEIGH, NORTH cAROLI
_ \\ WF CCl2 WF CC~9
\ \
\
C R. BROwN, NC PLS L-3597 \
/ ~~~
\
\ WF CC15 ~
\
731678.4489,2100892.9300,WF CC9 \ WF CC17
\ / ~~
~ ~ ~ ~•••~.~ ~•~ WF CC8
~
'
•
•
'
•
'
~
'
'
•
731605.5042,2100894,1832,WF CC8 .~
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
731616.2340,2100882.2496,WF CC11 \ ' ' ' ' ',' ' ' • ' wEn.~os ,~
731616.4812,2100863.2472,WF CC15 \ / / .:......... ~ ~,
731607.1623,2100848.6695,WF CC16 \ /
2100833.7767
731615
0482
WF CC17 \ WF CCl8 , , , , , , ,
• • • • • • • 1
,
,
.
731608.90i3,2100822.4453,WF GC18 \ /
/ '.'.'.'.'.'.'
WF CC7 ~
731630.8825,2100863.6523,WF CC12 \ /
WF CCl ..
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
731634.9052,2100844.7462,WF \ /
731652.7416,2100839.3798,WF CC13 \ / WF CCZ ~
73i588.1770,2100876.0283,WF CC5 \ / WF CC6
/
731565.1315,2100890.9597,WF CC7 \
/
731562.7377,2100881.4524,WF CC6 \ /
731570.8134,2100863.3139,WF CC4 \ /
731559.8596,2100852.5277,WF CC3
/
731558.1155,2100838.9077,WF CC2 \ / WF CC5
731558.9281,2100$14.2627,WF CC1 \ /
WF CC4
~
WF CC3
/
~ /
\ /
\ GRAPHIC SCALE / '
9Q D 25 50 l0a /

\ 1 inch = 5Q h. /
\ /

~'
~t
~~
'1
1
11
~~
`l
M
a
a
z
I'
~'
I,
I,
1
----
No. ag;isloo Dale $~ ~~R ~, ~.,,.~, CITY OF RALEIGH WITHERS ,~ RAVENEL 5M""°
p,g p, lNi1NEERS I PLANN[RS 1 SURVEYORS
-- ~~~~ °° WALNUT CREEK GREENWAY WETLANDS EXHIBIT 5
ckn~a~ wnw
ru mm,erou RALEIGH WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA 'n~~K`~'~a~cm.~°m~~d:~v5n b:v~+csnw q.:s„a~reu~e ~...~.~.

I
I'
~~.
e3
UNDERSIGNED ON THIS DATE. OTHER AREAS OF ~1RISDIC114N MAY BE PRESENT ON THE SITE BUT HAVE NOT
BEEN DELINEATED. UNLESS THERE IS A CHANGE IN THE LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS, THIS
DETERMINAl10N OF SEC110N 404 JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED FIVE YEARS
FROM THIS DATE. THIS DETERMINATION WAS MADE .UTILIZING THE 1987 CORPS ~ ENGINEERS WETLANDS
DELINEATION MANUAL.
REGULATORY OFFICIAL
1111E
DATE
USACE AC110N ID
t, CHARLES R. BROWN, PLS, 00 HtREBY CERtTFY THAT THIS AfAP WAS PREPARED
UNDER MY SUPERVISION, AND ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE LOCATIONS OF SECTION 404
JURISDICTIONAL ARE4S AS DEilNEATED BY ROBERT J. GOLDSTEIN dr ASSOCIATES fNC
OF RN.EICH, NORTH CAROLINA,
rwtRi~ a_ RaowN_ Nr, vrs ~-as9~
o~av IWI or.
o ~'"
1`
1 WF 12
~ WF 10
IWF 13
1
WF 1 .... WF 11 WF 8
.'.`.'.'.•.'.. WF 9 ....
.•. { ...'.'.'. .......... ~~ ~ ~ ~.r. .
WF Z .. ~ ...... ........~, ~. . .
.'y'.'.'.'.'.' ' ~ WF 5
WF 4
WF 3
WALNUT CREEK GREENWAY
WAKE COUNTY NO
CAROLINA
i':,''~i8~4.8164, UUyl~a.~:,u , VV- ';;
~ 731473.3670, 100961.1757, WF 1
731441.1539, 2~ 00962.4459, WF 2
~ 731420.5997, 200982.3961, WF 3
~ 731430.4474, 2 01030.0731, WF 4
~ 731443.6293, 2tb1019.471D, WF 11
731460.5091, 21~1010.6211, WF 12
~ 731462.6908, 210'056.4738, WF 10
731459.198, 210 91.4012, WF 9
731437.8365, 210102.7334, WF 5
731470.2637, 21011y46.0840, WF 8
~ 731465.6549, 21011$9.3537, WF 7
731457.4257, 21011 5.4176, WF 6
731540.7419, 210126)}.9369, WF CGt
~ 731522.7408, 210128 .2356, WF CG2
8
731506.8931, 21012
0280, WF CG3
21012478646
WF CG4
731505.1932
,
,
731509.8969, 2101231.Q345, WF CG5
~ 731529.4468, 2101216. 13, WF CG6 "~
~ 731548.2409, 2101181. ` 7, WF CG7 a
~ , z
WF CG7 ~ "'~ ~~"

1 o
~s ~c ~
. t
~ i .

.. ~ 1
••••• ••• WF CGl
• 1
•
1
WF CG6 ••.,:•.•.,.•,•.•,,1• WF
CG2 t

•
• l
WF CG5• • • • • • • •
~
• WF CG3 ~
WF CG4 ~
,. - ~
1
~~~ ~
~ 1
WF 7 .--'
1
~~ 1

~ 1
)WF 6
, ~
~ 1
l ~
1 1
1
i ~
1 ~
1 ~
~ i
~ }
1 ~
1
1
`
I
GRAPHIC SCALE `
50 ' 0 'S 5' ` 1W
~i '~'~ 1
1 inch = 50 k,

WETLANDS EXHIBIT
WITHERS ~(' RAVENEL I~ ~,"°
EMRINEER3 I PLANMlRS 1 3URYEYORS
III I.tNen»Qtive Gry,N~Crd'na1)511 eL'li}W4lltl M91f~6; i00d xrn..YCU.n'celmm

"THIS CERTIFlES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY OF THE JURISDICTION OF
SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT WITH THE DESIGNATED INSET AREA, AS DETERMINED BY THE
UNDERSIGNED ON THIS DATE. OTHER AREAS OF JURISDICTION MAY BE PRESENT ON THE SITE BUT HAVE NOT
BEEN DELINEATID. UNLESS THERE IS A CHANGE IN THE LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS, THIS
DETERMINATION OF SECTION 404 JURISDICTION MAY BE RELIED UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED FlVE YEARS
FROM THIS DAZE. THIS DETERMINATION WAS MADE UTILIZING THE 1987 CORPS OF ENGINEERS WETLANDS
DELINEATION MANUAL.
REGULATORY OFFlCIAL
~>~E
DALE
USACE ACTION ID
t, CFG4RLES R. BROWN, PLS, DO HERESY CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP WAS PREPARED
UNDER MY SUPERVISION, AND ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE LOCATIONS OF SECTION 404
JURlSDlCiIONAI ARMS AS DEUNEAIED BY ROBERT J. GOLDSTElN do ASSOCIATES, 1NC
OF RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLIWA.
~ ~.
C .BROWN, NC PLS L-3597
------------
r-
I WF CF10
I
I WF CF9 '
I WF CF3
I
i
I
I
I
I
i
i
i
i
i
I
'. 730334.1120, 2102924.8841, wF CF3
73033&4009, 2102917.2718, MF CF4
I WF CF8 '.. 21o2s1z6193, r~ cFs
7304021142, ZiD28ai.B164, WF CF8
I ,•,•,+ 730360.8859, 210293&5523, NF CF2
7303722598, 2102950.9875, WF CFt
I .•.•.•.• ~ ~ 730450.4271. 2102865.8103, NF CF7
at7 Ac 730519.7958, 2102858.6776, WF CFB
730564.0124, 2102847.912a ws- t3.9
•,•••••,•. 7395eaos36, z1o2644.oe6s, wF cflo
f '.'.'.'.'.'.
I WF CF7 ~~••~•'•~•~
I '.'.'.'.'.'.'.
I ......
I '•:•:•:•:•:•.
I WF CF6 •.'.'.'.'.'.
I '.'.'.'.'.'.
C ~•~•••••• WF CFl
I WF CFS •. ~ ~ WF CF2
I
I WF CF4
M
rb
O
a
z
GRAPHIC SCALE
'i°
~•-~• -1
1 inch = 50 ft.
'"" PVian- Vd1e °" pn ~ ~ o ~•-~ CITY OF RALEIGH ~~
WALNUT CREEK GREENWAY WETLANDS EXHIBIT WITHERS ~(' RAVENEL
cknw a. ~ „s rvo~ - [Mi1N[ERS I PLANNLRS E SU LYLYDRS
way mseroo RALEIGH WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA n~„~x~.,~mn,c,~,,wmc~m~ns~ ~a9rs+ssvw euri~a~booe.w.wn,n~t~