20051690 Ver 1_Other Agency Comments_20130916 (2)

Strickland, Bev
From: Kulz, Eric
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 2:37 PM
To: Tugwell, Todd SAW; Emily_Jernigan @fws.gov; Kathryn_Matthews @fws.gov; Sollod, Steve; Wilson,
Travis W.
Cc: Russell, Periann; Strickland, Bev; Eaton, Larry
Subject: Carbonton Dam - Chatahm, Lee and Alamance Co. ( #05 -1690)
Attachments: Carbonton Dam Tributary Info.xlsx
I have attached a table with the watershed sizes for the tribs, along with some notes from
our August 15, 2012 memo regarding the site visits conducted so far by DWR.
I did not bother to calculate watershed areas for the large systems (Big and Little
Governors, Line Creek Lick Creek and McClendons Creek).
Eric W. Kulz
Environmental Senior Specialist
N.C. Division of Water Resources - Water Quality Programs Wetlands, Buffers, Stormwater -
Compliance & Permitting Unit
1650 MSC
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1650
Phone: [phone]
E -mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public
Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Tugwell, Todd SAW [ mailto :Todd.Tugwell(@usace.army.mil]
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 3:06 PM
To: Emily Jernigan(@fws.gov; Kathryn Matthews(@fws.gov; Sollod, Steve; Kulz, Eric; Wilson,
Travis W.
Subject: Carbonton Files (UNCLASSIFIED)
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
FYI
Todd
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
1

TRIB ID
ACRES
Big Gov Trib
333
Trib 1
1280
Trib 2
538
Trib 3
57
Trib 4
205
Trib 5
326
Trib 6
352
Trib 7
1504
Trib 8
512
Trib 9
429
Trib 10
134
Trib 11
294
Line Creek
Big Governors Creek
Little Governors Creek
McClenclons Creek
Lick Creek

CARBONTON DAM TRIBUTARY INFO
ni nTPZ
Beaver impounded; 300' channel below lowest dam unstable.
50' of intermittent channel, ephemeral above.
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
I/P point 30 -50' upstream from Deep River. E/I point 100' above that.
TBD
I/P point 30 -50' upstream from Deep River. E/I point 75' above that.
Mostly beaver impounded. Short (300') degraded flowing section with limited aquatic community
OK based on IRT discussions
OK based on IRT discussions
OK based on IRT discussions (some question as to the % of T &E credit; WRC to comment)
TBD