NC0087858_Regional Office Historical File Pre 2018

arllrl©n Environmental, PA
615 Bruce Thomas Road
Monroe, North Carolina 281 12
January 30, 2019
Mr. Ed Watson
North. Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Re: Calibration of Effluent Flow Meter
Equipment & Supply, Inc.
4507 Highway 74 West, Monroe, North Carolina
NPDES Permit No. NC0087858
Project No. 309-102
Dear Mr. Watson:
Phone and Fax: (7 34) 76, 4-4
Www.harmonenvironmenta
As discussed in our January 29, 2019 telephone conversation, tl to effluent flow meter at the
Equipment & Supply Inc. facility was recalibrated on January 29, 2019 by Clear Water, Inc.
personnel. During this recalibration process, the total flow was reset from 9,584,139 gallons to 0
gallons.
Please call iyou have any questions or require any additional information.
Sincerely,
Harmon Environmental, PA
Richard L. Harmon, P.G.
President/Principal Illydrogeologist
cc: Mr. Tim Secrest

WATER POLLUTION CONTROL SYSTEM OPERATOR DESIGNATION FORM (WPCSOCC)
NCAC 15A SG ,0201
Press TAB to enter information
Permfttee Owner/Officer Name: Equipment 8& Supply, Inc.
Mailing Address: 4507 Highway 74 West
City: Monroe
Email Address: tlm
@eqkllpSytGt3m
Facility
County:
Signature:
a : Equip
Union
ent & Supply,
nc..
State: NC
Permit
Phone: [phone]
Zip: 28110
Date:
NC0087858
YOU MUST SUBMIT A SEPARATE FORM FOR EACH TYPE AND CLwASSiFICATiON OF SYSTEM:
Facility Type;:
cil Grade:
PC
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE (ORC)
Print Full Name: Richard Laurance Harmon
Certificate Type: PC
Email Address: harmonenvyahao-com
Certificate Grade: I
Work Phone: [phone]
Certificate #: 988627
Signature:
.
B " M . Effective Date: //y
certify that 1 agree to my designation as the Operator iri Responsible Charge for the facility noted, ! understand and will abide by the
rules and regulations pertaining to the responsibilities of the ORC as set forth in 15A NCAC 08G .0204 and foiling to do so can result in
Disciplinary Actions by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission."
ACKUP ORC
Print Full Name: Kettle He
Certificate Type: PC Certificate Grade: I
Email Address: [e-mail]
Signature:
Work Phone: [phone]
Certificate #: 28628
Effective Date:
"l certify that 1 agree to my fiesiignation ors a ick-up Operator in Responsible Charge for the facility noted, l understand and will abide by
the rules and regulations pertaining to the responsibilities of the ORC as set forth in 15A NCAC ORG .0204 and foiling to do so can result in
Disciplinary Actions by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission.'
Mail, fax or email WPCSOCC, 161.8 Mail Service Center,
ORIGINAL to: Raleigh, NC 27699-1618
Mail or Fax
a COPY to:
Asheville
2090 US Hwy 70
Swannan©a, NC 28778
Fax: [phone]
Phone: [phone]
Washington
943 Washington Sq, Mall
Washington, NC 27889
Fax: [phone]
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Fayetteville
225 Green St., Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043
Fax: [phone]
Phone: [phone]
Wil ire ingtan
127 Cardinal Dr.
Wilmington, NC 28405-2845
Fax: [phone]
Phone: [phone]
Email: c,
Mooresville
610 E. Center Ave., Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
Fax: [phone]
Phone: [phone]
Winston-Salem
45 W. Hanes Mall Rd,
Winston-Salem, NC 27105
Fax: [phone]
Phone: [phone]
Raleigh
3800 Barrett Dr,
Raleigh, NC 27609
Fax: [phone]
Phone: [phone]
Revised 4'2016

Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
November 7, 2016
Mr. Tim Seacrest •
Equipment and Supply
4507 West US Hwy 74
Monroe, NC 28110
PAT M C�tORY
Governor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
• Director
Subject: Compliance Inspection Report
Equipment and Supply
Permit #NC0087858
Groundwater Remediation
Monroe, Union County
Dear Mr. Seacrest:
On November 4, 2016, the Mooresville Regional Office (MRO) performed a site inspection of the
Remediation System at the Equipment and Supply facility located at 4507 West US Highway 74 Monroe,
Union County to determine compliance with remediation activities as per permit #NC00877858.
Enclosed is a copy of the site inspection report.
The system is online and performing at levels consistent with the active permit for this facility.
Laboratory data indicate the system is being effective in the reduction of the Chlorinated Solvent
constituents. The continued monitoring of the system is recommended. A copy of the inspection report
is attached.
Should you have questions with the site inspection report or the findings listed herein, I may be reached
by phone at [phone] or email,([e-mail]).
Sincerely,
7-14T/6---f
dward Watson
Hydrogeologist
Mooresville Regional Office
Water Quality Regional Operations
Section, Division of Water Resources
Attachment: Compliance Inspection Report
CC: Richard Harmon, ORC (via email)
WQROS Central Office
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources 1 Water Quality Regional Operations;
Mooresville Regional Office 1610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301 I Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
704 663 1699

EPA
Transaction Code
1 ( ( 2 Li
21111 1 (,I_I
United States Envaronmenist Prartectipn Agency
Washington, 0.C, 20460
Water" Compliance inspection Report
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e.,, PCS)
NPDES
NC0087858
Form Approved.
OMB No. 2040-0057
Approval expires 8-31-98
yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
I11 121
16/11/04 117 18 I S. t 19 2Q1
�. 1I I.I I I I ILI I I l LI I I I I I I III I [I I_..I r
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating II B1 I
67 I I 70 Li 71 l J
Section 9: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
POTW name and NPDES eermit Number)
Equipment And Supply Inc
4507 Highway 74 West
Monroe NC 26112
Na
R
/11
Richard Laurance Harrnor /ORCf704-764-56941
Address
nd Fax Number(s)
sponsible OfficiaVTitlelPhone and Fax Number
Jim Diggs,4507 Hwy 74 W Monroe NC 28110Nice
President/704-289-858 517042631206
Permit
• Egiuent/Receiving G I"ate
CIA
N
Contacted
No
Reserved
731 I 174 751
I 1
Tl
09:59A 16/11/04
Exit Time/Date
12:30PM 18/11/04
Other Facility Data
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Che r only those areas evaluated)
II Flow Measurement
II Records/Reports
Faititgr Site Review
Permit Effective Date
15/02/01
Permit. Expiration Date
19/01 /31
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and as necessa
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Insp
Edward Watson
0
Signature of Management Q A Reviewer
Corr. . R)ASI --
EPA Form 3580-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers
MRO GW/R
Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers
i
Date

31
NPDES
NC0087856
yrlmolday
16/11/04
117
Inspection Type
18
(Cont.)
1
Section D: Summary of `"IndinglComments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
Staff from the MRO DWR arrived onsite at 09:59AM to perform a routine compliance inspection of this
facility. Staff met with Mr. Richard Harmon, ORC for the facility and Tim Seacrest of Equipment and
Supply.
A copy of the recent permit was onsite and able to be reviewed. The three most recent quarterly
Chronic Toxicity samples were reviewed: All toxicity tested were at passing levels. Two months of lab
data was also reviewed and there is evidence that the constituent levels are being reduced for the
CVOCs being treated.
The airstripper has to be manually cleaned on a monthly basis due to insitu Calcium which creates a
build up in the system. RW-1 well was also reviewed during the site visit. The RW appeared to be in
good condition and no issues were noted. During the site visit, it was noted that there are two missing
couplings that need to be put into place from a recent system pump motor replacement.
The effluent flow meter was recently calibrated and a calibration sticker was present on the meter. The
flow meter calibration record was also provided for review during the site visit.
Outfall-1 was not discharging during the inspection event. However, previous inspections have not
indicated issues with solids, foam or discoloration being present at this outfall. All other site outfalls are
related to stormwater and no flow was occuring at these outfalls.
Operator logs were reviewed during the site visit and all paperwork appeared to be in good order. Prior
to the site visit MRO staff made mention of a missing NDMR for July of 2015 for which an NOV had
been issued. MRO staff recieved a copy of the missing NDMR during the site visit. The NOV was
discovered to have been placed into the file. The ORC was unaware of the violation being issued. The
ORC requests that future notification also be sent directly to him. The NOV occurred during a time of
transition at Equipment and Supply. A new person is now handling the Health and Safety conditions of
the facility for Equipment and Supply and is working with the ORC to maintaion the facility.
Paget 2

Permit: MC0087858 Omer • Facility: Equipment And Supply Inc
Inspection Dots: 11/04/2018
inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has t
application?
Is the facility as described in the permit?
# Are there any special conditions for the permit?
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
Comment: The system and outfalls wereable to be reviewed and no compliance issue
violations were observed durincf the inspection event.
Yes No NA NE
II El 0
■©©0
■ 0 0 0
■ ©©1
■ 0 ©0
Page#

State of North Carolina
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Environmental Staff Report
Quality
To: ® NPDES Unit ❑ Non -Discharge Unit Application No.: NC0087858
Attn: Facility name: Equipment and Supply Company
From: (Edward Watson)
Mooresville Regional Office
Note: This form has been adapted from the non -discharge facility staff report to document the review of both non -
discharge and NPDES permit applications and/or renewals. Please complete all sections as they are applicable.
ll?rrew
I. GENERAL AND SITE VISIT INFORMATION sfi v�c
1. Was a site visit conducted? ® Yes or ❑ No
a. Date of site visit: 10/04/2016
b. Site visit conducted by: Edward Watson
c. Inspection report attached? ® Yes or ❑ No
d. Person contacted: Richard Harmon_ and their contact information: (704)- 764- 5694 ext.
e. Driving directions:
• 2. Discharge Point(s):
Latitude: Longitude:
Latitude: Longitude:
3. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: N/A
Classification:
River Basin and Subbasin No.
Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses:
l . /�►-Q ea- //Dl/ft-
II. PROPOSED FACILITIES: NEW APPLICATIONS
1. Facility Classification: (Please attach completed rating sheet to be attached to issued permit)
Proposed flow:
Current permitted flow:
2. Are the new treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal system? ❑ Yes or ❑ No
If no, explain: This is a Permit renewal.
3. Are site conditions (soils, depth to water table, etc.) consistent with the submitted reports? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
If no, please explain:
4. Do the plans and site map represent the actual site (property lines, wells, etc.)? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
If no, please explain:
5. Is the proposed residuals management plan adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
If no, please explain:
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 1 of 8

6. Are the proposed application rates (e.g., hydraulic, nutrient) acceptable? ❑ Yes El No ❑ N/A
V
If no, please explain: .
7. Are there any setback conflicts for proposed treatment, storage and disposal sites? ❑ Yes or ❑ No
If yes, attach a map showing conflict areas.
8. Is the proposed or existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program: No monitoring wells are
required for this permit.
9. For residuals, will seasonal or other restrictions be required? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA
If yes, attach list of sites with restrictions (Certification B)
Describe the residuals handling and utilization scheme:
10. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters:
11. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only):
M. EXISTING FACILITIES: MODIFICATION AND RENEWAL APPLICATIONS
1. Are there appropriately certified Operators in Charge (ORCs) for the facility? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
ORC: Richard Harmon Certificate #: Backup ORC: Certificate #:
2. Is the design, maintenance and operation of the treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal
system? ® Yes or [{ No
Um), please explain:
Description of existing facilities:
Proposed flow:
Current permitted flow:
Explain anything observed during the site visit that needs to be addressed by the permit, or that may be important
for the permit writer to know (i.e., equipment condition, function, maintenance, a change in facility ownership,
etc.)
3. Are the site conditions (e.g., soils, topography, depth to water table, etc.) maintained appropriately and adequately
assimilating the waste? ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain:
4. Has the site changed in any way that may affect the permit (e.g., drainage added, new wells inside the compliance
boundary, new development, etc.)? ❑ Yes or ® No
If yes, please explain:
5. Is the residuals management plan adequate? ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain:
6. Are the existing application rates (e.g., hydraulic, nutrient) still acceptable? ® Yes or ❑ No
If no, please explain:
7. Is the existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program:
8. Are there any setback conflicts for existing treatment, storage and disposal sites? ❑ Yes or ® No
If yes, attach a map showing conflict areas.
9. Is the description of the facilities as written in the existing permit correct? ® Yes or 0 No
If no, please explain:
10. Were monitoring wells properly constructed and located? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
If no, please explain:
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 2 of 8

11. Are the monitoring well coordinates correct in BIMS? ® Yes El No ❑ N/A
ete the following (expand table if necessary);
Monitoring Well
Latitude
Longitude
o
/
U
0
I
rr
o
/
If
0
r
it
o
r
ff.
0
r
If
o
1
rr
0
-
1
rf
. 12. Has a review of all self -monitoring data been conducted (e.g., DMR, NDMR, NDAR, GW)? ® Yes or ❑ No
Please summarize any findings resulting from this review:
Provide input to help the permit writer evaluate any requests for reduced monitoring, if applicable.
13. Are there any permit changes needed in order to address ongoing BIMS violations? ❑ Yes or ® No
If yes, please explain:
14. Check all that apply:
® No compliance issues ❑ Current enforcement action(s) n Currently under JOC
El Notice(s) of violation ❑ Currently under SOC ❑ Currently under moratorium
Please explain and attach any documents that may help clarify answer/comments (i.e., NOV, NOD, etc.)
If the facility has had compliance problems during the permit cycle, please explain the status. Has the RO been
working with the Permittee? Is a solution underway or in place?
Have all compliance dates/conditions in the existing permit been satisfied? ® Yes ❑ No El N/A
If no, please explain:
15. Are there any issues related to compliance/enforcement that should be resolved before issuing this permit?
❑ Yes ❑No®N/A
If yes, please explain:
16. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: N/A
17. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only): N/A
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 3 of 8

IV. REGIONAL OFFICE RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Do you foresee any problems with issuance/renewal of this permit? ❑ Yes or Z No
If yes, please explain:
2. List any items that you would like the NPDES Unit or Non -Discharge Unit Central Office to obtain through an
additional information request:
Item
Reason
3. List specific permit conditions recommended to be removed from the permit when issued:
Condition
Reason
4. List specific special conditions or compliance schedules recommended to be included in the permit when issued:
Condition
Reason
5. Recommendation: ❑ Hold, pending receipt and review of additional information by regional office
❑ Hold, pending review of draft permit by regional office
❑ Issue upon receipt of needed additional information
® Issue
❑ Deny (Please state reasons: )
6. Signature of report preparer: Edward Watson, Hydrogeologist
Signature of regional supervisor:
Date:
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14
Page 4 of 8

V. ADDITIONAL REGIONAL STAFF REVIEW ITEMS
Date: 10/04/16 County: Union
To: Division of Water Resources Permittee: Equipment and Supply Company
Central Office Reviewer: W. Corey Basinger Project Name: Smith Residence SFR
Regional Login No: Application No.: NC0087858
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
1. This application is (check all that apply): 0 New X Renewal
0 Minor Modification 0 Major Modification
X Surface Irrigation 0 Reuse 0 Recycle 0 High Rate Infiltration 0 Evaporation/Infiltration Lagoon
0 Land Application of Residuals 0 Attachment B included
0 Distribution of Residuals 0 Surface Disposal
0 503 regulated 0 503 exempt
0 Closed -loop Groundwater Remediation 0 Other Injection Wells (including in situ remediation)
Was a site visit conducted in order to prepare this report? 0 Yes or 0 No.
a. Date of site visit: 5/10/16
b. Person contacted and contact information: Steve Barry, R.S. AOWA, Inc 888/552-2792
c. Site visit conducted by: Edward Watson.
d. Inspection Report Attached: 1 Yes or No.
2. Is the following information entered into the BIMS record for this application correct?
1 Yes or 0 No. If no, please complete the following or indicate that it is correct on the current application.
For Treatment Facilities:
a. Location:
b. Driving Directions:
c. USGS Quadrangle Map name and number:
d. Latitude: Longitude:
For Disposal and Injection Sites:
(If multiple sites either indicate which sites the information applies to, copy and paste a new section into the document
for each site, or attach additional pages for each site)
a. Location(s): b. Driving Directions:
R number) in eastern Cabarrus Co., travel west on Ponderosa Lane 0.6 mile. The house is on the left, up a hill.
c. USGS Quadrangle Map name and number: Mt. Pleasant, NC P61
d. Latitude: 35.429515 Longitude: 80.501633
II. NEW AND MAJOR MODIFICATION APPLICATIONS (this section not needed for renewals or minor
modifications, skip to next section)
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 5 of 8

Water Resources
LNVIaaONMENt C Rdfi L(.
Jim Diggs
Equipment And Supply Inc
4507 Hwy 74 W
Monroe, NC 28110
Subject..
August 25, 201E
NPDES Electronic Reporting Requirements
Equipment And Supply Info
NPDES Permit Number: NC0087858
Dear NPDES Permittee:
PAT MCCRORY
D R. V A N D E R Vr A A R T
JAY ZIMMERMAN
The U,S, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently published the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) Electronic Reporting Rule, The rule requires NPDES regulated facilities to
report information electronically, instead of filing written paper reports, The rule does not change what
information is required from facilities. It only changes the method by which information is provided (Le.,
electronic rather than paper -based).
EPA is phasing in the requirements oaf the rule over a 5-year period. The two phases of the rule, and their
key milestones, are:
Phase 1—Starting on December21, 2016, regulated entities that are required to submit Discharge
Monitoring Reports (DMRs) will begin submitting these reports electronically. If you are currently
reporting your DMR data electronically using eDMR, then you simply need to continue reporting
in the same way as you are now, The key change is that, starting on December 21, 2016,.
electronic reporting of DMRs will be required, instead of voluntary.
Phase 2 Starting on December 21, 2020, regulated entities that are required to subrnit certain
other NPDES reports will begin submitting these reports electronically, Reports covered in the
second phase include Notices of Intent to discharge in compliance with an NPDES general permit,
Sewer Overflow/Bypass Event Reports, and a number of other NPDES program reports.
Incorporating Electronic Reporting Requirements into NPDES Permits
The NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule requires authorized NPDES programs to incorporate electronic
reporting requirements into NPDES permits beginning December 21, 2015. Under the new rule, the
electronic reporting process supersedes the paper reporting process. According to our files, your NPDES
permit became effective after November 2013, and should contain the requirement to electronically
report your Discharge Monitoring Reports using NC DWR's eDMR system.
In addition to requiring permittees to report information electronically, the rule also requires permute
to identify the initial recipient for the NPDES electronic reporting data [see 40 CFR 122.41(I)(9)]. initial
Envirotrcn ta1 Qua[lty Vuter Resour4es
f:;,l:rgh„ A:=slit C ardli u 699-I61
9,19 807 6300

recipient of electronic NPDES information from NPOES-requlated facilities (initial recipient) means the
entity (EPA or the state authorized by EPA to implement the NPDES program) that is the designated entity
for receiving electronic NPDES Data [see 40 CFR 127,2(b)]. Permittees are required to electronically
submit the required NPDES information to the appropriate initial recipient, as determined by EPA. By July
18, 2016, EPA must identify and publish on its web site and in the Federal Register a listing of initial
recipients by state and by NPDES data group. Once available, you can use EPA's web site to find out or
determine the initial recipient of your electronic submission.
NC DWR has submitted a request to EPA to be the initial recipient for the following NPDES data groups,
1. Discharge Monitoring Reports;
2, General Permit Reports [Notices of Intent to discharge (NOIs); Notices of Termination (NOTs)];
3. Pretreatment Program Reports; and
4. Sewer Overflow/Bypass Event Reports
EPA's web site will also link to the appropriate electronic reporting tool for each type of electronic
submission for each state, Instructions on how to access and use the appropriate electronic reporting
tool will be available as well.
For more information on EPA's NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule, visit
httpl/www2,epa,govlsorripliance/final-national-poilutant-discharge-elimination-astem-npdes-
electronic-reporting-rule. For more information on electronic reporting to NC DWR, visit
http://deci.nc.govLaboutidivons water-resource,sjedmr pdeselectror'HcreporUng or cocontact Vanessa
Manuel at 919-807-6392 or via email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Jre43 O. Poo±
forS. Jay Zmrnerman, P.G.
Cc: NPDES File
Central Files
Mooresville Regi
a
Office
Water Quality Program

Water Resources
LE 1VtROttli'+'SEMr AL'OtailL;F Y'
February 4, 2016
Mr. Jim Diggs, Vice -President
Equipment & Supply, Inc.
4507 Highway 74 West,
Monroe, NC 28110
'PAT M. C C.R O R Y
DER VAAR.'(°
Secretary
AY ZIMMERMAN
oteettor
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Equipment & Supply, Inc.
Ground water remediation
NPDES Permit No. NC0087858
Union County
Dear Mr. Diggs:
Enclosed is a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection for the inspection conducted at
the subject facility on January 28, 2016 by Ori Tuvia and Ed Watson. Your representative Glen
Hudson Harmon cooperation during the site visit was much appreciated. Please advise the staff
involved with this NPDES Permit by forwarding a copy of the enclosed report.
As was discussed on site, please change DMRs to reflect Toxicity sampling is done by grab.
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions concerning
this report, please do not hesitate to contact Ori Tuvia at [phone], or at
©[e-mail].
Sincerely,
Ori Tuvia, Environmental Engineer
Mooresville Regional Office
Division of Water Resources, DEQ
Cc: NPDES (Derek Denard)
MR0 Files
Richard Harmon (E-Copy)
Mooresville Region l Office
Location: 610 East Center Ave., Suite' tt1 Mooresville, NC 28115
Phone: [phone] \ Fax [phone] \ Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748

I
EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, D,C.20460
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Form Approved.
OMB No. 2040-0057
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/molday Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 E 2 l5 I 3 1 NC0087856 111 12 I 16/01/28 `17 18 i 2 I 19 121 201
21111111 1111111 1 [ 1I 111 Ij11 1 1 11111 111111I II 1 1
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating
6711.o
70i,1 (
B1 QA Reserved
16
71 I„ I 72 L, 1 731
1 174
75[ 1 1 1 1 1 1 `B0
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also Include
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
Equipment And Supply Inc
4507 Highway 74 West
Monroe NC 28112
Entry Time/Date
10:15AM 18/01/28
Permit Effective Date
15/02/01
Exit Tlme/Date
11:30AM 16/01/28
Permit Expiration Date
19/01/31
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
N! -
Glenn Hudson/ll
Richard Laurance Harmon/II
Richard Laurance Harmon/ORC/704-764-5694/
Name. Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Jim Diggs,4507 Hwy 74 W Monroe NC 28110/Vice
President/704-289-656517042831206
Contacted
No
Other Facility Data
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit
II Self -Monitoring Program
El Laboratory
• Flow Measurement 1.1 Operations & Maintenance II Records/Reports
II Facility Site Review Multimedia Effluent/Receiving Waters
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s)
Edward Watson
Ori A Tuvia
Signature of Manaferrtt Q A Reviewer
William.0 Basinger
Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
MRO GW!/l
MRO WQ//704-663-1699!
/z /
Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
MRO WQ//704-235-2194/
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previauss editions are obsolete
Page# 1

MPDES
NC0087858
yr/me/day InspectRon Type
121
16i01/2B j 17 18
(Cont)
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and check! sts as necessary)
Notes by Ed Watson:
The system includes:
two (2) onsite Recovery wells used for the extraction of onsite groundwater in the area of concem
(A.O.C.), two (2) on -site piezometers, inlet equalizing/storage tank and a four (4) stack air stripper
which has a ventilation stack.
Discharging into an unnamed tributary of Stewarts Creek in the Yadkin Pee -Dee Basin.
The system is treating groundwater for CVOCs of a single use of one 55 gallon drum of
Trichioroethane that was previously used on -site as a degreasing agent prior to finishing.
# 2

Permit: NC0087858 Owner - Facility: Equipment And Supply Inc
Inspection Date: 01I28I2016 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new
application?
Is the facility as described in the permit?
# Are there any special conditions for the permit?
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
Comment: Permit is up to date and was_present on site.
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ II ❑ ❑
II ❑ ❑ ❑
II ❑ ❑ ❑
Record Keeping • Yes No NA NE
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit? IN ❑ 0 ❑
Is all required information readily available, complete and current? I 0 0 0
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)? MI 0 0 0
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs? • 0 0 0
Is the chain -of -custody complete? • ❑ 0 0
Dates, times and location of sampling •
Name of individual performing the sampling •
Results of analysis and calibration •
Dates of analysis •
Name of person performing analyses
Transported COCs •
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters? • 0 0 0
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ? 0 0 • 0
(If the facility is = or> 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator 0 0 1 ❑
on each shift?
Is the ORC visitation log available and current? • 0 0 0
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification? • 0 0 0
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification? 0 0 • 0
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site? • 0 0 0
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review? 0 ❑ • 0
Comment: All records are well maintained. DMR's for the months of May 2014 - April 2015 were
reviewed. DMR's need to reflect that Toxicity sampling is done by grab and not composite.
Effluent Sampling
Is composite sampling flow proportional?
Yes No NA NE
Page# 3

Permit: NC0087858
Inspection Met 01128/2018
Owner - Equipment And Supply Inc
inspection Types Compliance Evaluation
Effluent Sampling
Is sample collected below all treatment units?
Is proper volume collected?
Is the tubing clean?
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6,0 degrees
Celsius)?
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type
representative)?
Y 5 No NA NE
MI 0 0 0
11 0 El El
DLIUD
IN 0 0 El
11 0 0 0
Comment: The prmtreQures grab sampling for all permit parameters.
Clearwater Inc, calibrates flow meter yearly.
Prism Lab performs testing for: TCA, 1,1 DCE , 1,2 DCE, PCE, TCE and vinyl Chloride.
ETS Lab performs testing for Toxicity test.
Laboratory
Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory?
Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters) performed by a certified lab?
# Is the facility using a contract lab?
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6,0 degrees
Celsius)?
Incubator (Fecal Coliform) set to 44,5 degrees Celsius+/- 0,2 degrees?
Incubator (BOD) set to 20.0 degrees Celsius +/- 1 0 degrees?
Yes No NA NE
• 000
III 0 0 0
• 0 El El
II El El 0
0 0 11 El
0 0 11 0
Comment: Prism Lab performs testing for: TCA, 1,1 DCE , 1,2 DCE, PCE. TCE nd 'n 1 Chloride.
ETS Lab performs testing for Toxicity test.
Flow Measurement -Effluent
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
Is the flow meter operational?
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
Comment: Clearwater Inc. calibrates flow meter yearly.
Operations & Maintenance
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping?
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable
Solids, pH, DO, Sludge Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment: The site was observed to be well maintained at the time of the inspection.
The site has two onsite Recovery wells treated by a four stack air stripper.
Additionally the site also has eight monitoring wells
Yes No NA NE
II 0 E3
1000
11 El 0 0
• El 0 0
Yes No NA NE
111 0 0
Page# 4

North Carolina Depart
Pat McCrory
Governor
CERTIF'IF D MAIL7
RETURN RECEIPT
ent of Environmental
September 25, 2015
3 2630 00018998 3 27
UESTED
Mr. Glen Hudson.
Equipment And Supply Inc..
4507 Highway 74 West
Monroe, NC 28112
Subject:
NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Missing Discharge Monitoring Reports (l')a Rs)
Equipment And Supply Inc.
NPDES Permit NC0087858
Union County
NOV-2015 -LR-0038
uaiity
Donald R. van der Veer(
Secretary
t-.70 DV DI C ar. NRIDVI
WOROS
>FFlC r,.
Dear Mr. Hudson:.
i"has as to inform you that the 'Division of Water Resources did not receive your monthly monitoring report for
lnl r 2015. This is in violation of Part I1, condition D(2) of the NP.DES permit, as well as 15A NCAC 2B 506(a),
vhiclt requires the submitted of Discharge Monitoring Reports no later than the last calendar day_:lollowing the
reporting period. Failure to submit reports as required will subject the violator, to the assessment of a civil penalty
of up to $25,000 per violation.
To prevent further action, please sulit'ttit the reports within fifteen (15
If this facility is inactive or not constructed., you may submit a w'rien
request should include a begin, date and end date for the period of monitor
Additionally, this letter provides notice that this office ill recrarrrraaend th.e assessment cfcivtl penalties if future
reports are not received within the required time frame duiing,the next twcl.ve,(1;2) reporting moitt.hs The
Division must take these steps because timely subnitttarl of discharge monitoring reports as essential to the
efficient operation of our water quality programs_ We appreciate your assistance in this natter. If you have any
questions about this letter or discharge monitoring reports, please contact me at 919-807-6307 or via e-mail at
derek.denard(a).,ncdenr.gov.
lay Zimmerman., Director
Division of Water Resources
g-
cc. NPDES I`"ile
Central Files
Mooresville. Regional Office -e WQ RegionalOperations
1617 Mail Service Center, aleigh, North Carolina 27699.1617
Phone; 919-$97-63001Intemet: wvw nivaterquaRity.©rg
An Equal Opportunity t Affirmative Action Employer - Made in part by recycled paper
ceipt of this notice.
pend monitorint

1.0
Acronyms
AST
DEHNR
DENR
DMR
E&S
EPA
ft/ft
ft/d
GCL
HP
HWS
ID No.
Inc.
MW
NCAC
N
No.
NPDES
PA
P.G.
PRM
PVC
PZ
AWL
USGS
US
VOCs
www
Equipment & Supply, inc.
4507 Highway 74 West
Monroe, North Carolina
July 2015 Groundwater Sampling Event
Above Ground Storage Tank
North Carolina Department of Environment Health and Natural Resources
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Discharge Monitoring Report
Equipment & Supply, Inc.
Environmental Protection Agency (United States)
feet per foot
feet per day
Gross Contaminant Level
Horse Power
Hazardous Waste Section of the Division of Solid Waste, North Carolina
Identification Number
Incorporated
Monitor Well
North Carolina Administrative Code
North
Number
National Pollution Discharge Elimination System
Professional Association
Licensed Geologist
Products Recovery Management, Inc.
Poly Vinyl Chloride
Piezometer
Micrograms per Liter
United States Geologic Survey
United States
Volatile Organic Compounds
world wide web
2.0 Executive Summary
On July 13, 2015, Harmon Environmental, PA personnel collected groundwater samples from the
seven monitor wells (MW-1, MW-1A, MW-2, MW-5, MW-6, MW-8 and MW-9) two recovery
wells (RW-1 and RW-2) and one piezometer (PZ-1) at the Equipment & Supply, Inc. facility in
accordance with the March 1, 2013, 2008 Revised Groundwater Sampling and Analysis Plan. Prior
to initiating groundwater sampling activities, on July 13, 2015, the water level was measured in these
Equipment & Supply, Inc.
4507 Highway 74 West
Monroe, North Carolina
September 2, 2015
1
Harmon Environmental, PA
615 Bruce Thomas Road
Monroe, North Carolina
www.harmonenvironmental.com

wells and piezometer. At the time of the sampling event, the groundwater at the site was flowing
toward the two recovery wells.
The groundwater samples collected during the July 2015 groundwater sampling event were analyzed
by Prism Laboratories, Inc. for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in accordance with SW-846
Method 8260B. Analytical results associated with this event indicated the presence of cis-1,2-
dichloroethene, trans-1,2-dichloroethene, trichloroethene and vinyl chloride in the sample collected
from monitor well MW-1 at concentrations exceeding the Groundwater Quality Standards
established in North Carolina Administrative Code, Title 15A, Subchapter 2L (15A NCAC 2L).
Cis-1,2-dichloroethene, trans-1,2-dichloroethene, trichloroethene, vinyl chloride and
tetrachloroethene were detected in the sample from MW-1 at concentrations of 7,300 micrograms per
liter (p,g/L), 210 µg/L, 14,000 µg/L, 28 µg/L and 8.9 µg/L, respectively. The Groundwater Quality
for cis-1,2-dichloroethene, trans-1,2-dichloroethene, trichloroethene, vinyl chloride and
tetrachloroethene are µg/L, 70 µg/L,100 µg/L, 3.0 µg/L, 0.03 µg/L and 0.7 µg/L, respectively. 1,1-
Dichloroethene was also detected in the sample collected from monitor well MW-1 at a
concentration of 20 µg/L. This compound was detected below the North Carolina Groundwater
Quality Standard of 350 µg/L.
Vinyl chloride was detected at a concentration of 0.78 µg/L in the groundwater sample collected
from monitor well MW-6. The Groundwater Quality Standard for vinyl chloride is 0.03 µg/L.
Trichloroethene was detected in this sample at a concentration of 2.8 µg/L, below the Groundwater
Quality Standard for this compound of 3.0 µg/L. Cis-1,2-dichlorothene was detected in the sample
from monitor well MW-6 at a concentration of 21 µg/L. The North Carolina Groundwater Quality
Standard for cis-1,2-dichloroethene is 70 µg/L. Trans-1,2-dichloroethene was also detected in the
sample collected from monitor well MW-6 at an estimated concentration of 8.7 µg/L. The North
Carolina Groundwater Quality Standard for cis-1,2-dichloroethene is 70 µg/L.
Trichloroethene was detected in the sample collected from monitor well MW-8 at a concentrations of
4.2 µg/L. The North Carolina Groundwater Quality Standard for trichloroethene is 3.0 µg/L.
In addition to sampling the monitor wells, samples were collected from recovery well RW-1 and
RW-2 during this sampling event. Trichloroethene was detected in the sample from RW-1 at a
concentration of 57 µg/L. Vinyl chloride was detected in the sample from recovery well RW-1 at an
estimated concentration of 1.9 µg/L. Cis-1,2-dichloroethene and trans 1,2-dichloroethene were
detected in the sample from RW-1 at concentrations of 51 µg/L and 8.8 µg/L, respectively.
Trichloroethene was detected in the sample collected from recovery well RW-2 at a concentration of
70 µg/L and vinyl chloride was detected in the RW-2 sample at a concentration of 1.8 µg/L. Cis-1,2-
dichloroethene was detected in the RW-2 sample at a concentration of 20 µg/L and trans-1,2-
dichloroethene was detected in the RW-2 sample at an estimated concentration of 0.9 µg/L.
At the request of the Hazardous Waste Section (HWS) of the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources (DENR), in a December 6, 2006 letter, Figures 8, 9 and 10
present the isoconcentration contour maps for trichloroethene, cis-1,2-dichloroethene and vinyl
Equipment & Supply, Inc.
. 4507 Highway 74 West
Monroe, North Carolina
September 2, 2015
2
Harmon Environmental, PA
615 Bruce Thomas Road
Monroe, North Carolina
www.harmonenvironmental.com

chloride, respectively. The vertical and horizontal extent of the volatile organic compound (VOC).
impacted groundwater plume appears to be contained by the extraction system.
At the request of the HWS of the DENR in a November 30, 2009 letter, Figure 11, Figure 12, Figure
13, Figure 14 and Figure 15 have been included in this report. These figures depict the detected
concentrations of trichloroethene, cis-1,2-dichloroethene, trans-1,2-dichlorethene, vinyl chloride and
1,1,-dichloroethene in samples collected from monitor wells MW-1, MW-6 and MW-8 over time.
As indicated in these figures, the constituent concentrations detected in the on -site monitor wells
have reduced substantially since the initiation of the remediation system in July 2006. Based on
these analytical results Harmon Environmental, PA recommends the groundwater monitoring and
remediation activities at the Equipment & Supply, Inc. facility continue.
In the March 11, 2010 letter, the DENR requested copies of the monthly influent/effluent results.
The National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit issued to the Equipment &
Supply, Inc. facility does not require the collection of influent samples. As a result, we are unable to
provide the requested information. A subsequent September 10, 2010 letter, the DENR requested the
following brief summary of the results of the routine sampling associated with the NPDES Permit re-
issued on February 3, 2010.
Equipment & Supply, Inc. is required to sample the treatment system effluent once a month for
VOCs. This sample is analyzed by EPA Method 624 for: 1,1,2-trichoroethane;1,1-dchloroethene;
cis-1,2-dichloroethene; tetrachloroethene; trans-1,2-dichlorothene; trichloroethene and; vinyl
chloride.
On July 6, 2015, Harmon Environmental, PA personnel collected the monthly effluent sample from
the groundwater remediation system. The analytical results associated with this sample did not
indicate the presence of targeted constituents at concentration exceeding the analytical method
detection limit. Based on the analytical data associated with the groundwater samples collected from
recovery well RW-1 and RW-2 relative to the effluent concentration detected in the sample collected
from the system outfall on July 13, 2015, the groundwater remediation system is operating with an
efficiency of greater than 99%.
The NPDES Permit further requires Equipment & Supply, Inc. to collect a Chronic Toxicity grab
sample of the treatment system effluent quarterly. Since the re -issuance of the Permit, these
composite samples have passed the Chronic Toxicity test.
In a November 5, 2012 1etter from the DENR, the sampling schedule was revised to annually and the
DENR requested Equipment & Supply Inc. summarize the operational data (dates, times, flow meter
readings pump run times, cycle data, etc.) for each of the two recovery wells. While this data is not
available through the programmable logic controller, we have summarized the data accumulated
during routine inspections since July 2014 Groundwater Sampling Report (Attachment D).
Equipment & Supply, Inc.
4507 Highway 74 West
Monroe, North Carolina
September 2, 2015
3
Harmon Environmental, PA
615 Bruce Thomas Road
Monroe, North Carolina
www. harmonenvironmental. com

3.0 Introduction
Equipment & Supply, Inc. owns and operates an aviation equipment manufacturing facility located at
4507 Highway 74 West in Monroe, North Carolina. Figure 1 depicts the location of the site on an
excerpt of a United States Geologic Survey (USGS) 7.5 minute topographic map of the region.
Equipment & Supply, Inc. is located on a 43 acre tract located on the southwest side of US Highway
74, within the City of Monroe, in Union County, North Carolina. The Equipment & Supply, Inc.
facility occupies approximately 17 acres of the property. Equipment & Supply, Inc. began operations
at the site in 1971. The main facility and associated out -buildings have been utilized exclusively to
warehouse, restore and fabricate specialty metal parts for the aerospace industry.
The four primary buildings on the property include an approximately 38,000 square -foot office and
manufacturing facility, an approximately 10,800 square -foot concrete paneled warehouse building,
an approximately 16,800 square -foot corrugated metal building comprised of two equipment
assembly buildings, the former plating building and an approximately 32,000 square -foot warehouse
building. Lawn areas, employee and visitor parking lots, and shipping and receiving driveways are
located near these buildings. An exterior parts storage area is located southwest of the buildings.
The layout of the facility is presented in Figure 2.
On August 23, 1991, Equipment & Supply, Inc. received a letter from the North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources (DEHNR) indicating that an
investigation was conducted on August 6, 1991 concerning an unpermitted discharge of overflow
rinse water from a cadmium electroplating operation.
Between April 1992 and September 1994 Equipment & Supply, Inc. retained an environmental
consultant to assess, excavate and remove cadmium -impacted soil from this discharge area. In
conjunction with these activities, five monitor wells were installed at the site. The analytical results
associated with samples collected from these monitor wells indicated the presence of chlorinated
VOCs in the shallow groundwater at one location on -site.
In January, 1995, Equipment & Supply, Inc. submitted a Closure Plan summarizing the excavation
and appropriate disposal of the remaining cadmium -impacted soil within the ditch. In additional to
preparing the Closure Plan, a Groundwater Assessment Plan was submitted to the North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR).
Following completion of the DENR approved soil remediation activities and completion of the
groundwater assessment activities, Equipment & Supply, Inc. entered into an Administrative
Agreement with the DENR which required the remediation of the VOC impacted -groundwater
detected at the site.
In January 2006, groundwater remediation activities began at the Equipment & Supply, Inc. facility.
VOC-impacted groundwater is pumped from two on -site recovery wells and transferred to an on -site
Equipment & Supply, Inc.
4507 Highway 74 West
Monroe, North Carolina
September 2, 2015
4
Hannon Environmental, PA
615 Bruce Thomas Road
Monroe, North Carolina
www. harmonenvironmental. com

groundwater remediation system where air stripping technology is employed to remove the VOCs.
The air stream is exhausted to the atmosphere and the .treated groundwater is discharged via a
National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitted outfall to an unnamed
tributary of Stewarts Creek located on -site.
Equipment & Supply, Inc. is required to maintain the existing monitor and recovery well network
and to collect groundwater samples semi-annually. Groundwater sampling activities are conducted
in general accordance with the January 16, 2008 Revised Sampling and Analysis Plan, modified to
address observations presented by the Hazardous Waste Section (HWS) of the North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) December 6, 2006 and December 2,
2008, November 30, 2009 and March 11, 2010 letters and a May 24, 2010 e-mail from Mr. Adam
Ulishney of the DENR to Harmon Environmental, PA.
In a November 5, 2012 letter, the DENR requested Equipment & Supply, Inc. submit a .revised
Sampling and Analysis Plan for the facility. The DENR requested the sampling schedule be revised
from semi-annual to annual; samples be collected from the two recovery wells; summarize the
operational data from the two recovery wells and; collected dissolved oxygen measurements during
the July 2013 sampling event.
On July 13, 2015, Harmon Environmental, PA personnel collected groundwater samples from seven
on -site and off site shallow and deep monitor wells, two recovery wells and one piezometer (MW-1,
MW-1A, MW-2, MW-5, MW-6, MW-8, MW-9, RW-1, RW-2 and PZ-1) for VOCs analyses. A
detailed discussion summarizing these activities is presented in the following Sections.
4.0 Description of the History of the Remediation System
In January 2006, groundwater remediation activities began at the Equipment & Supply, Inc. facility.
VOC-impacted groundwater is pumped from two on -site recovery wells and transferred to an on -site
groundwater remediation system where air stripping technology is employed to remove the VOCs.
The air stream is exhausted to the atmosphere and the treated groundwater is discharged via. a
NPDES permitted outfall to an unnamed tributary of Stewarts Creek located on -site. A Remediation
System Start-up Report was submitted to the DENR on May 5, 2006 summarizing the corrective
action system.
The groundwater recovery system consists of two 75 foot deep, 6-inch diameter, PVC casing and
manufactured 0.01-inch slotted screen. Each well is equipped with a Durham-GEO (Model No. TR-
2313) stainless steel well pump. The pumps were installed with the intakes located at approximately
50 feet below grade in each well. The discharge pipes and electrical supply are routed through a
sanitary seal at each well head and routed below ground to the groundwater treatment facility.
The groundwater treatment system consists of a 1,000-gallon equalization tank, a 0.5 horsepower
(HP) transfer pump, a Product Recovery Management Inc. (PRM) Skid Mounted air stripper (Model
No. 234), a discharge pump, a control panel and associated valves, gauges and flow meters.
Equipment & Supply, Inc.
4507 Highway 74 West
Monroe, North Carolina
September 2, 2015
5
Harmon Environmental, PA
615 Bruce Thomas Road
Monroe, North Carolina
www. harmonenvironmental. com

With the exception of routine maintenance, the groundwater remediation system has operated
continuously since start-up in January 2006. The system pumps approximately 2,800 gallons of
groundwater a day. The effluent is sampled monthly and the results are submitted to the DENR in
accordance with the facility's NPDES Permit. The current version of this Permit was issued to
Equipment & Supply, Inc. on January 31, 2019.
As previously discussed, Equipment & Supply, Inc. is required to sample the treatment system
effluent once a month for VOCs. This sample is analyzed by EPA Method 624 for: 1,1,2-
trichoroethane; 1,1-dichloroethene; cis-1,2-dichloroethene; tetrachloroethene; trans-1,2-
dichlorothene; trichloroethene and; vinyl chloride. The results associated with the monthly samples
collected since issuance on the Permit have not indicated the presence of targeted compounds in
excess of the method detection limits.
The NPDES Permit further requires Equipment & Supply, Inc_ to collect a Chronic Toxicity grab
sample of the treatment system effluent quarterly. Since the re -issuance of the Permit, these
composite samples have passed the Chronic Toxicity test.
5.0 Summary of the 2015 Groundwater Sampling Activities
On July 13, 2015, Harmon Environmental, PA personnel collected groundwater samples from the
seven monitor wells (MW-1, MW-1 A, MW-2, MW-5, MW-6, MW-8 and MW-9), the two recovery
wells (RW-1 and RW-2) and the one piezometer (PZ-1) at the Equipment & Supply, Inc. facility.
Prior to initiating groundwater sampling activities on July 13, 2015, the water level was measured in
these wells and piezometer. The measured water level, and well construction information is
summarized in Table 1. Following collection of the depth -to -groundwater measurements, with the
exception of monitor well MW-1A, each monitor well was purged in general accordance with the
procedures outlined in the March 1, 2013 Revised Sampling and Analysis Plan. The monitor wells
and piezometer were purged of three well volumes or until dry using dedicated disposable Teflon®
bailers. Monitor well MW lA was purged of approximately one well volume using a submersible
well pump.
Following completion of the purging process, on July 13, 2015, monitor wells MW-1, MW-2, MW-
5, MW-6, MW-8, MW-9 and piezometer PZ-1 were each sampled with dedicated disposable
Teflon? bailers. Monitor well MW-1A was samples using the submersible pump, and recovery
wells RW-1 and RW-2 were sampled via the sampling taps within the remediation system. The
groundwater samples were collected directly into glassware provided by the analyzing laboratory and
placed in a cooler on ice pending delivery to Prism Laboratories, Inc. (Prism) for analyses. Chain -of -
Custody protocol was maintained throughout the sample shipment process. In addition to collecting
representative samples for laboratory analyses, the pH and temperature of the groundwater samples
from each well were measured in the field and recorded. These measurements are presentedin Table
2. Copies of the Groundwater Collection Certification Form and the Groundwater Sample
Collection Log Forms are presented in Attachment A. As indicated in these field logs the field
testing equipment was calibrated at 08:05 on July 13, 2015.
Equipment & Supply, Inc.
4507 Highway 74 West
Monroe, North Carolina
September 2, 2015
6
Harmon Environmental, PA
615 Bruce Thomas Road
Monroe, North Carolina
www.harmonenvironmental.com

Upon receipt, Prism analyzed the samples for the presence of VOCs in accordance with SW-846
Method 8260B. The analytical results associated with the groundwater samples are summarized in
Table 3 and Figure 7.
6.0 History of the Groundwater Sampling Activities
Between 1992 and 2001 eleven monitor wells (MW-1, MW-1A, MW-2, MW-3, MW-3i, MW-4,
MW-5, MW-6, MW-7, MW-8 and MW-9) and five piezometers (PZ-1, PZ-2, PZ-3, PZ-4 and PZ-5)
were installed at the Equipment & Supply, Inc. facility.
Historically, the on -site monitor wells have routinely been sampled in accordance with the facility's
Sampling and Analysis Plan. The monitor well network was sampled quarterly until late 1995. The
schedule was then modified to semi-annually sampling. Currently, monitor wells MW-1, MW-1A,
MW-2, MW-5, MW-6, MW-8, MW-9 and piezometer PZ-1 are included in the routine groundwater
sampling activities at the site. Well Construction Records for these seven wells and one piezometer
are presented in Attachment B. No other monitor wells or recovery wells remain at the site. Monitor
wells MW-3, MW-3i, MW-4, MW-7, PZ-2, PZ-3, PZ-4 and PZ-5 have been appropriately
abandoned. Well Abandonment Records for these four wells and four piezometers are also presented
in Attachment B.
Tables 5 through 13 compare the recent groundwater sample results with historic data associated
with each respective well. The laboratory data reports and Chain -of -Custody Records for the July
15, 2015 sampling activities are presented in Attachment C.
7.0 Site Hydrogeology
Considerable geologic and hydrogeologic information has been generated during the soil and
groundwater quality investigations conducted at the Equipment & Supply, Inc. facility. The data
acquired during these assessment activities indicate the site is located within the Carolina Slate Belt
of the Piedmont Physiographic Province. The Piedmont Province is a northeast -southwest trending
region extending from the Hudson River in New York State to Alabama. The topography of the
Piedmont is typically described as a slightly elevated region with low to moderate relief, generally
dissected with valleys created by streams flowing on rocks of varying erosional resistance. Ridges
and uplands are typically developed by slower weathering processes on areas of more resistant rock.
Most rocks types in the Piedmont are covered with thick residual soil; however, thin soil zones are
not uncommon. Soils found in the Piedmont are generally developed through in -situ weathering of
fractured and faulty rock structures.
The Carolina Slate Belt is generally described as consisting of low-grade metamorphosed volcanic
and sedimentary rocks, situated in the east -central portion of the Piedmont Province in North
Carolina. Coastal plain sediments overlap the Carolina SIate Belt to the east and the Charlotte Belt,
consisting of higher grade metamorphic rocks border the Slate Belt to the west.
Equipment & Supply, Inc.
4507 Highway 74 West
Monroe, North Carolina
September 2, 2015
7
Harmon Environmental, PA
615 Bruce Thomas Road
Monroe, North Carolina
www.harmonenvironinental.com

Rocks comprising the Carolina Slate Belt consist of laiinated and non-Iaminated metamorphosed
peltic rocks. Rock color varies from bluish -gray when fresh to brown and reddish -orange when
weathered. When present, laminated bedding planes are typically well developed and exhibit
bedding plane cleavage. Igneous intrusions have been observed throughout the Carolina Slate Belt.
These intrusions are typically comprised of diabase and metagabbro. The diabase occurs most
commonly as dikes, with a general mineralogy of plagioclase, clineopyroxene, and chlorite, with
biotite and quartz filling voids. The metagabbro is generally xenoblastic, but abundant sericite and
epidote obscure structure (Randazzo, 1972).
Quartz veins are present throughout the Carolina Slate Belt. These veins (i.e. dikes and sills) are
typically intruded into fractures in the country rock. Large muscovite flakes are commonly seen
along these intrusions, possibly indicating recrystalization of the country rock at the time of
intrusion. The quartz is usually milky in appearance (Randazzo, 1972).
The Gold Hill Shear Zone is a major structural feature present along the western side of the Carolina
Slate Belt. The Gold Hill Shear Zone is thought to be a thrust fault generally trending approximately
15 degrees east and extending southward from Southmont, in Davidson County, North Carolina to
the eastern edge of Indian Trail, North Carolina. Previous investigations indicate the rocks along the
western margin of the Shear Zone are characterized by higher ranking metamorphism including the
occurrence of both slate and phyllite. Local fault planes, quartz veins and minor joints are also
commonly associated with this major shear zone trends (Randazzo, 1972; The Geologic Map of
North Carolina, 1985).
Boring logs have been prepared in conjunction with the installation of monitor wells and
piezometers. These logs were prepared by previous consultants during assessment projects at the site.
Based on these boring logs, the Ethology underlying the Equipment & Supply, Inc. facility appears to
be relatively uniform. In general, approximately six inches of top soil was present across a majority
of the site. Underlying this top soil was a yellowish to orangeish brown clayey silt to silty clay
material apparently weathered in -place from the underlying parent rock. This clayey silt horizon
ranged in thickness from less than one foot to 10.5 feet across the site. Underlying this saprolite
material was a layer of greenish gray partially weathered phyllite rock. This material ranged in
thickness from one to 12 feet. The contact between the partially weathered rock and the underlying
phyllite was observed to range in depth from approximately two feet below grade in the vicinity of
monitor well MW-9 to greater than 25 feet in the vicinity of monitor well MW-3. The phyIlite
parent rock on -site has been described as a dense dry green to gray argillite or phyllite.
The aquifer underlying the site is typical of the composite weathered fractured rock aquifers located
within the Piedmont of North Carolina. The aquifer is unconfined, existing under phreatic, or water
table conditions. Under these conditions, the water table surface is in equilibrium with the
atmospheric pressure and is not confined by low -permeable layers between the surface of the water
table and the surface of the ground. Under normal conditions, the average depth to groundwater at
the Equipment & Supply, Inc. is approximately 5.5 feet below the ground surface.
Equipment & Supply, Inc.
4507 Highway 74 West
Monroe, North Carolina
September 2, 2015
8
Harmon Environmental, PA
615 Bruce Thomas Road
Monroe, North Carolina
www.harmonenvironmental. com

Groundwater under water table conditions is typically recharged by direct infiltration from
precipitation. The water flows through the pore space in the geologic media to its ultimate discharge
in topographic low regions where the water table surface intersects the surface of the ground. As a
result of these typical flow patterns, the potentiometric (water table) surface expressed by water table
aquifers typically appears as a subdued replica of the topography.
Figure 4 presents a potentiometric map of the water table at the Equipment & Supply Inc. site based
on the water level measurements collected on July 13, 2015. This map represents the typical shallow
groundwater flow at the site while the recovery wells are in operation. As indicated by this Figure,
the shallow groundwater flow on -site is toward the recovery wells. Based on the
July 13, 2015 water level data, the calculated horizontal component of hydraulic gradient ranged
from approximately 0.19 feet per foot (ft/ft) to approximately 0.2 ft/ft. Based on the July 13, 2015
water level measurements, the vertical component of hydraulic gradient was calculated to be
approximately 0.06 ft/ft downward in the vicinity of the monitor well MW-1IMW- lA (See Figures 5
and 6).
Table 4 presents the historic groundwater elevations measured in select monitor wells since the
initiation of groundwater remediation at the site.
To evaluate the performance of the recovery wells and to further characterize the aquifer at the
Equipment & Supply, Inc. facility, on May 15, 2006 and May 16, 2006 Harmon Environmental, PA
personnel conducted a constant draw -down test on recovery wells R-1 and R-2 at the site. Recovery
well R-1 was pumped at an average rate of 2.98 gallons per minute (GPM). Recovery well R-2 was
pumped at an average rate of 3.9 GPM. During this test, water levels were routinely measured in
recovery wells R-1 and R-2; monitor wells MW-1, MW-1A, MW-2, MW-5, MW-6, MW-7, MW-8
and MW-9; and piezometers PZ-1 and PZ-3.
Harmon Environmental, PA utilized AQTESOLVTM which incorporates these assumptions to
interpret the data generated during the pump test using the following three specific analytical
methods:
Cooper -Jacob Straight -Line Method (Cooper and Jacob, I946): This method was developed to
analyze unsteady state conditions in confined aquifers. Data modifications were made to correct for
the partial penetration of the wells and the decreasing saturated thickness associated with the draw -
down of the water table (Kruseman, 1990).
Theis Method (Theis, 1953): This method was originally developed for the analyses of unsteady -state
conditions in confined aquifers. Data corrections were made to correct for the partial penetration of
the wells and the decreasing saturated thickness associated with the draw -down of the water table
(Kruseman, 1990).
Neuman Method (Neuman, 1975): This method allows for the analysis of unsteady -state conditions
from anisotropic unconfined aquifers considering delayed yield and taking .into account partial
penetration of the extraction well and observation wells (Kruseman 1990).
Equipment & Supply, Inc.
4507 Highway 74 West
Monroe, North Carolina
September 2, 2015
9
Harmon Environmental, PA
615 Bruce Thomas Road
Monroe, North Carolina
www. harm on environm ental. com

The time methods of data reduction generated relatively similar aquifer parameters results relative to
each of the pumping wells. The arithmetic mean values generated by the Theis, Cooper -Jacob and
Neuman Methods for wells associated with recovery well R-1 were 0.50 feet per day (ft/d), 0.52 ftld
and 0.36 ftld, respectfully. The geometric mean values generated by the Theis, Cooper -Jacob and
Neuman Methods for wells associated with recovery well R-1 were 0.22 ft/d, 0.29 ft/d and 0.19 ft/d,
respectfully.
The arithmetic mean values generated by the Theis, Cooper -Jacob and Neuman Methods for wells
associated with recovery well R-2 were 1.08 ft/d, 1.05 ftld and 1.05 ft/d respectfully. The geometric
mean values generated by the Theis, Cooper -Jacob and Neuman Methods for wells associated with
recovery well R-2 were 0.8 ftld, 0.77 ft/d and 0.43 ftld, respectfully.
r
8.0 Analytical Results
As indicated in Table 2, VOCs were detected in monitor wells MW-1, MW-1A, MW-2, MW-6 and
MW-8. Analytical results associated with this event indicated the presence of cis-1,2-
dichloroethene, trans-1,2-dichloroethene, trichloroethene and vinyl chloride in the sample collected
from monitor well MW-1 at concentrations exceeding the Groundwater Quality Standards
established in 15A NCAC 2L. Cis-1,2-dichloroethene, trans-1,2-dichloroethene, trichloroethene,
vinyl chloride and tetrachloroethene were detected in the sample from MW-1 at concentrations of
7,300 µg/L, 210 µg/L, 14,000 µg/L, 28 µg/L and 8.9 µg/L, respectively. The Groundwater Quality
for cis-1,2-dichloroethene, trans-1,2-dichloroethene, trichloroethene, vinyl chloride and
tetrachloroethene are µg/L, 70 µg/L, 100 µg/L, 3.0 µg/L, 0.03 µg/L and 0.7 µg/L, respectively. 1,1-
Dichloroethene was also detected in the sample collected from monitor well MW-1 at a
concentration of 20 µg/L. This compound was detected below the North Carolina Groundwater
Quality Standard of 350 µg/L.
Vinyl chloride was detected at a concentration of 0.78 µg/L in the groundwater sample collected
from monitor well MW-6. The Groundwater Quality Standard for vinyl chloride is 0.03 µg/L.
Trichloroethene was detected in this sample at a concentration of 2.8 µg/L, below the Groundwater
Quality Standard for this compound of 3.0 µg/L. Cis-1,2-dichlorothene was detected in the sample
from monitor well MW-6 at a concentration of 21 µg/L. The North Carolina Groundwater Quality
Standard for cis-1,2-dichloroethene is 70 µg/L. Trans-1,2-dichloroethene was also detected in the
sample collected from monitor well MW-6 at an estimated concentration of 8.7 µg/L. The North
Carolina Groundwater Quality Standard for cis-1,2-dichloroethene is 70 µg/L.
Trichloroethene was detected in the sample collected from monitor well MW-8 at a concentrations of
4.2 µg/L. The North Carolina Groundwater Quality Standard for trichloroethene is 3.0 µg/L.
In addition to sampling the monitor wells, samples were collected from recovery well RW-1 and
RW-2 during this sampling event. Trichloroethene was detected in the sample from RW-1 at a
concentration of 57 µg/L. Vinyl chloride was detected in the sample from recovery well RW-1 at an
estimated concentration of 1.9 µg/L. Cis-1,2-dichloroethene and trans 1,2-dichloroethene were
Equipment & Supply, Inc.
4507 Highway 74 West
Monroe, North Carolina
September 2, 2015
10
Harmon Environmental, PA
615 Bruce Thomas Road
Monroe, North Carolina
www.harmonenvironmental. com

detected in the sample from RW-1 at concentrations of 51 µg/L and 8.8 pg/L, respectively.
Trichloroethene was detected in the sample collected from recovery well RW-2 at a concentration of
70 µg/L and vinyl chloride was detected in the RW-2 sample at a concentration of 1.8 ug/L. Cis-1,2-
dichloroethene was detected in the RW-2 sample at a concentration of 20 µg/L and trans-1,2-
dichloroethene was detected in the RW-2 sample at an estimated concentration of 0,9 µg/L.
Copies of the analytical report for the July 2015 sampling activities are presented in Attachment C.
At the request of the HWS of the DENR, in a December 6, 2006 letter, Figures 8, 9 and 10 present
the isoconcentration contour maps for trichloroethene, cis-1,2-dichloroethene and vinyl chloride,
respectively.
9.0 Conclusions
On July 13, 2015, Harmon Environmental, PA personnel collected groundwater samples from the
seven monitor wells (MW-1, MW-1A, MW-2, MW-5, MW-6, MW-8 and MW-9), two recovery
wells (RW-1 and RW-2) and the one piezometer (PZ-1) at the Equipment & Supply, Inc. facility in
accordance with The March 1, 2013 Revised Groundwater Sampling and Analysis Plan. Prior to
initiating groundwater sampling activities, the water level was measured in these wells and
piezometer. As indicated in Figures 4 through 6, at the time of the sampling event, the groundwater
at the site is flowing toward the two recovery wells.
Analytical results associated with this event indicated the presence of cis-1,2-dichloroethene, trans-
1,2-dichloroethene, trichloroethene and vinyl chloride in the sample collected from monitor well
MW-1 at concentrations exceeding the Groundwater Quality Standards established in 15A NCAC
2L. Cis-1,2-dichloroethene, trans-1,2-dichloroethene, trichloroethene, vinyl chloride and
tetrachloroethene were detected in the sample from MW-1 at concentrations of 7,300 µg/L, 210
µg/L, 14,000 µg/L, 28 µg/L and 8.9 µg/L, respectively. The Groundwater Quality for cis-1,2-
dichloroethene, trans-1,2-dichloroethene, trichloroethene, vinyl chloride and tetrachloroethene are
µg/L, 70 µg/L, 100 µgfL, 3.0 µg/L, 0.03 µg/L and 0.7 µg/L, respectively. 1,1-Dichloroethene was
also detected in the sample collected from monitor well MW-1 at a concentration of 20 µg/L. This
compound was detected below the North Carolina Groundwater Quality Standard of 350 µg/L.
Vinyl chloride was detected at a concentration of 0.78 µg/L in the groundwater sample collected
from monitor well MW-6. The Groundwater Quality Standard for vinyl chloride is 0.03 µgfL.
Trichloroethene was detected in. this sample at a concentration of 2.8 µgfL, below the Groundwater
Quality Standard for this compound of 3.0 µg/L. Cis-1,2-dichlorothene was detected in the sample
from monitor well MW-6 at a concentration of 21 µg/L. The North Carolina Groundwater Quality
Standard for cis-1,2-dichloroethene is 70 µg/L. Trans-1,2-dichloroethene was also detected in the
sample collected from monitor well MW-6 at an estimated concentration of 8.7 µg/L. The North
Carolina Groundwater Quality Standard for cis-1,2-dichloroethene is 70 µg/L.
Trichloroethene was detected in the sample collected from monitor well MW-8 at a concentrations of
4.2 µg/L. The North Carolina Groundwater Quality Standard for trichloroethene is 3.0 µg/L.
Equipment & Supply, Inc.
4507 Highway 74 West
Monroe, North Carolina
September 2, 2015
11
Harmon Environmental, PA
615 Bruce Thomas Road
Monroe, North Carolina
www.harmonenvironmental.com

In addition to sampling the monitor wells, samples were collected from recovery well RW-1 and
RW-2 during this sampling event. Trichloroethene was detected in the sample from RW-1 at a
concentration of 57 µg/L. Vinyl chloride was detected in the sample from recovery well RW-1 at an
estimated concentration of 1.9 p.g/L. Cis-1,2-dichloroethene and trans 1,2-dichloroethene were
detected in the sample from RW-1 at concentrations of 51 µg/L and 8.8 p.g/L, respectively.
Trichloroethene was detected in the sample collected from recovery well RW-2 at a concentration of
70 p.g/L and vinyl chloride was detected in the RW-2 sample at a concentration of 1.8 µg/L. Cis-1,2-
dichloroethene was detected in the RW-2 sample at a concentration of 20 p.g/L and trans-1,2-
dichloroethene was detected in the RW-2 sample at an estimated concentration of 0.9 µg/L.
In the March 11, 2010 letter, the DENR requested copies of the monthly influent/effluent results.
The National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit issued to the Equipment &
Supply, Inc. facility does not require the collection of influent samples. As a result, we are unable to
provide the requested information. Equipment & Supply, Inc. is required to sample the treatment
system effluent once a month for VOCs. This sample is analyzed by EPA Method 624 for: 1,1,2-
trichoroethane; 1,1-dichloroethene; cis-1,2-dichloroethene; tetrachloroethene; trans-1,2-
dichlorothene; trichloroethene and; vinyl chloride. The results associated with the monthly samples
collected since issuance on the Permit have not indicated the presence of targeted compounds in
excess of the method detection limits.
The NPDES Permit further requires Equipment & Supply, Inc. to collect a Chronic Toxicity grab
sample of the treatment system effluent quarterly. Since the re -issuance of the Permit, these
composite samples have passed the Chronic Toxicity test.
On July 6, 2015, Hannon Environmental, PA personnel collected the monthly effluent sample from
the groundwater remediation system. The analytical results associated with this sample did not
indicate the presence of targeted constituents at concentration exceeding the analytical method
detection limit. Based on the analytical data associated with the groundwater samples collected from
recovery well RW-1 and RW-2 relative to the effluent concentration detected in the sample collected
from the system outfall on July 13, 2015, the groundwater remediation system is operating with an
efficiency of greater than 99%.
Copies of the analytical report and Chain -of -Custody Records for the July 13, 2015 sampling
activities are presented in Attachment C. At the request of the Hazardous Waste Section (HWS) of
the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR), in a December 6,
2006 letter, Figures 8 and 9 present the isoconcentration contour maps for trichloroethene and cis-
1,2-dichloroethene, respectively. The vertical and horizontal extent of the volatile organic
compound (VOC) impacted groundwater plume appears to be contained by the extraction system.
Based on the analytical results Hannon Environmental, PA recommends the groundwater monitoring
and remediation activities at the Equipment & Supply, Inc. facility continue.
Equipment & Supply, Inc.
4507 Highway 74 West
Monroe, North Carolina
September 2, 2015
12
Harmon Environmental, PA
615 Bruce Thomas Road
Monroe, North Carolina
www.harmonenvironmentaLcom

HIGHWAY 74
APPROXIMATE PROPERTY BOUNDARY
PZ-5
OFFICES
HIGHWAY 74
MANUFACTURING
BUILDING
PZ-4 .
PZ-3
WARE-
HOUSE
l MW-31
•
l . • MW-3
I eI
MW 2 WAREHOUSE
MW-1
MW-1A
MW-7
i
R-1
PZ-1Q
EQUIPMENT
ASSEMBLY
BUILDING No. 1 PAINTING
ROOM)
/
/ '
MW-5
R-2
MW-6
PZ-2 A
/
GROUNDWATER
TREATMENT
BUILDING
MW-8
Q5 MW-9
EQUIPMENT
FORMER ASSEMBLY
PLATING BUILDING No. 2
BUILDING
LEGEND
A APPROXIMATE LOCATION
PZ-1 PIEZOMETER
APPROXIMATE LOCATION
MW-2 MONITOR WELL
APPROXIMATE LOCATION
R-2 RECOVERY WELL
A APPROXIMATE LOCATION
PZ-4 ABANDONED PIEZOMETER
APPROXIMATE LOCATION
MW-3 ABANDONED MONITOR1)
APPROXIMATE LOCATION
SURFACE WATER DRAINAC
APPROXIMATE LOCATION
• JULY 26, 2010 SURFACE Wi
SAMPLE

APPROXIMATE PROPERTY BOUNDARY
OFFICES
MANUFACTURING
BUILDING
HIGHWAY 74
HIGHWAY 74
WARE-
HOUSE
EQUIPMENT
ASSEMBLY
BUILDING No.1
PZ-1 A
88.71
WAREHOUSE
R-2
56.9
1
MW-8
68.11
- MW-9
/ I / 90.69
EQUIPMENT
FORMER ASSEMBLY LEGEND
PAINTING
ROOM PLATING
BUILDING BUILDING No.2
BUILDING
/ / A APPROXIMATE PIEZOMETER LOCAL
/ - IiiI5 APPROXIMATE MONITOR WELL LO
/ 0 APPROXIMATE RECOVERY WELL LC
88.71
—60—
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF
SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE
GENERALIZED SHALLOW
HORIZONTAL GROUNDWATER FLC
RELATIVE GROUNDWATER ELEVAT1
MEASURED ON JULY 13, 2015 BY
HARMON ENVIRONMENTAL, PA PE
RELATIVE GROUNDWATER
— ELEVATION CONTOUR
ARBITRARY 100.00 FT BENCHMARK
ESTABLISHED BY AQUATERRA, INC.
FEBRUARY 18,1994
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
'ED IN THIS DRAWING ARE BASED ON INTERPOLATION
4 THE MONITOR WELL NETWORK BY HARMON
! 11. 7015.
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF
STRUCTURES

SCALE IN FEET
0
100
URS PRESENTED HEREIN WERE CALCULATED
RELATIVE GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONS
ORK ON JULY 13, 2015 BY HARMON
3ASED ON AN ARBITRARY ON -SITE DATUM.
REIN ARE BASED ON INTERPOLATION
WITH THE MONITOR WELLS DEPICTED ON
-ARP OR GRADATIONAL AND ARE
TE FOR ONLY THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF
YELLOWISH TO ORANGISH BROWN CLAYEY
SILT TO SILTY CLAY
GREENISH GREY PARTIALLY WEATHERED
PHYLLITE
DENSE GREEN TO GREY ARGILLITE OR
PHYLLITE
75.68
80
t--
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
RELATIVE GROUNDWATER ELEVATION AS MEASL
JULY 13, 2015 BY HARMON ENVIRONMENTAL, PI
PERSONNEL.
VERTICAL GROUNDWATER EQUAL POTENTIAL LI
CALCULATED BASED ON JULY 13, 2015 GROUND\
ELEVATION MEASUREMENTS.
TWO DIMENSIONAL GROUNDWATER FLOW VEC
CALCULATED BASED ON JULY 13, 2015 GROUND\
ELEVATION MEASUREMENTS
WATER TABLE ELEVATION BASED ON JULY 13, 20
GROUNDWATER ELEVATION MEASUREMENTS.
APPROXIMATE MONITOR WELL SCREEN

SCALE IN FEET
0 200
JRS PRESENTED HEREIN WERE CALCULATED
RELATIVE GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONS
DRK ON JULY 13, 2105 BY HARMON
LASED ON AN ARBITRARY ON -SITE DATUM.
.E1N ARE BASED ON INTERPOLATION
WITH THE MONITOR WELLS DEPICTED ON
TARP OR GRADATIONAL AND ARE
TE FOR ONLY THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF
-I I I=I 11
_Illy;,
:3//3
YELLOWISH TO ORANGISH BROWN CLAYEY
SILT TO SILTY CLAY
GREENISH GREY PARTIALLY WEATHERED
PHYLLITE
DENSE GREEN TO GREY ARGILLITE OR
PHYLLITE
RELATIVE GROUNDWATER ELEVATION AS MEASL
79.67 JULY 13, 2015 BY HARMON ENVIRONMENTAL, P/
PERSONN EL.
VERTICAL GROUNDWATER EQUAL POTENTIAL LI
- 70- CALCULATED BASED ON JULY 13, 2015 GROUND\
ELEVATION MEASUREMENTS.
TWO DIMENSIONAL GROUNDWATER FLOW VEC
CALCULATED BASED ON JULY 13, 2015 GROUND%
ELEVATION MEASUREMENTS '
WATER TABLE ELEVATION BASED ON JULY 13, 21(
GROUNDWATER ELEVATION MEASUREMENTS.
APPROXIMATE MONITOR WELL SCREEN

Table 5
Historic Analytical Data Summary
Groundwater Samples from Monitor Welt MW-1
Equipment & Supply, Inc.
Monroe, North Carolina
EPA ID No. NCD 986 194 42I
Project No. 309-82
W Q
�D co
0 1,1-Dichloroethylene
a)
c
a,
E.
v i
o
.c
u
0
cv
T.)F
v
c
w
>.
s
a
o
�
N
-
d
r
a)
v
O
2
0
V
ro
a1
w
C
0.,
0
1-
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
o Trichloroethylene
o Vinyl Chloride
u, total Xylenes
Chloroethane
A
Acetone
0
NA
96
<5
10
3/29/95
7.0
NA
78
<5
7.0
<5
4,000
155
<5
<10
<100
7/12/95
5.3
2,000
77
<5
<5
<5
2,500
65
<5
<10 '
<100
9/25/95
<100
1,800
<100
<100
<100
2,000
<200
<100
<10
<100
3/27/96
<100
NA
NA
<100
<100
<100
3,900
<200
<5
<10
<100
3/17/97
<5
NA
44.5
<10
<5
<5
3,470
19.9
<5
<10 _
<i00
9/23/97
<5
1,100
95
<5
<5
<5
5,000
30
<5
<10
<50
12/17/97
7.0
2,100
120
<5
<5
<5
12,000
26
<5
<10
<50
3/26/98
<5
510
69
<5
<5
<5
7,900
<10
<5
<10
<50
12/7/98
<100
890
' <100
<100
NA
<100
4,500
<500
NA
<500
<50
1/31/02
60
8,800
200(J)
14
19
9.2
24,000
940(J)
12
<10
<50
8/15/02
<200
12,000
<200
<200
<200
<200
27,000
680
<200
<400
<2,000
1/28/03
<1,000
9,700
<1,000
<1,000
<1,000
<1,000
16,000
<2,000
<1,000
<2,000
<10,000
8/18/03
<1,000
3,800
<1,000
<1,000
<1,000
<1,000
16,000
<2,000
<1,000
<2,000
<10,000.
1/12/04
<1,000
2,300
<1,000
<1,000
<1,000
<1,000
11,000
<2,000
<1,000
<2,000
<10,000
7/19/04
<5,000
2,000(J)
<5,000
<5,000
<5,000
<5,000
8,600
<10,000
<5,000
<10,000
<50,000
1/10/05
<1,000
2,300
<2,000
<1,000
<1,000
<1,000
7,500
<2,000
<2,000
<1,600
<2,500

Table 5 Cont.
Historic Analytical Data Summary
Groundwater Samples from Monitor Well MW-1
Equipment & Supply, Inc.
Date
w
,
O
V_
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
v
C
a
a
s
a
o
L
V
F-'
N
�
Tetrachloroethylene
0J
,
O
a)c
m
r
o
u
L
CV'
Trichloroethylene
Vinyl Chloride
total Xylenes
Chloroethane
Acetone
7/29/05
<100
1,900
190(J)
<100
<100
<100
7,800
<200
<200
<160
<1,000
1/26/06
130
24,000
460
<100
310
<100
62,000
1,600
>200
<160
<1,000
8/21/06
<100
7,500
190(J)
<100
<100
<100
16,000
<200
<200
<160
<1,000
1/25/07
<100
3,200
85(J)
<100
<100
<100
8,700
120(J)
<200
<17
<1,000
7/18/07
<100
4,500
130(J)
<100
<100
<100
11,000
92(J)
<200
<17
<1,000
1/29/08
Dry Well
7/2/08
<100
3,500
140(J)
<100
<100
<100
6,000
100(J)
<200
<500
<1,000
1/8/09
7.4(J)
2,400
35.0
<10
<10
<10
1,900
7.3(J)
<20
6.8(J)
<1,000
7/13/09
18
5,900
130
<10
<10
<10
21,000
8.2(J)
<20
10(J)
<100
1/11/10
<10
1,500
25
<10
<10
<10
4,700
<20
<20
<50
<100
7/26/10
11
1,200
24 '
<10
<10
<10
3,400
10(J)
<20
<50 -
<100
1/17/11
<40
730
<80
<40
<40
<40
1,700
<80
<80
<200
<400
7/7/11
9.0(J)
2,700
85
<10
<10
<10
5,600
14(J)
<20
<50
<100
1/12/12
17
1,700
24
<10
<10
<10
2,600
16(J)
<20
<50
10(J)
7/24/12
24
9,700
210
<20
<20
<20
27,000
140
<40
<50
<200
6/15/13
29
10,000
300
<20
<20
<20
20,000
180
<40
<20
<200
7/29/14
18(J)
6,800
240
<20
<20
<20
13,000
180
<20
<100
<200
7/13/15
20
7,300
210
8.9
<5
<5
14,000
28
<10
<5
<50

Table 5 Cont.
Historic Analytical Data Summary
Groundwater Samples from Monitor Well MW-1
Equipment & Supply, Inc.
Notes:
Groundwater samples collected between November 1994 and March 1995 were collected by Resolve Environmental Services, P.A.
(Resolve) personnel and analyzed by Hydrogeologic, Inc. of Frankfort, Kentucky in accordance with SW-846 Method 8240.
Groundwater samples collected between July 1995 and March 1996 were collected by Resolve personnel and analyzed by IEA, Inc. of Cary,
North Carolina in accordance with SW-846 Method 8240.
Groundwater samples collected in March 1997 were collected by Resolve personnel and analyzed by Hydrogeologic. Inc. of Frankfort, Kentucky
in accordance with SW-846 Method 8240.
Groundwater samples collected between September 1997 and March 1998 were collected by Resolve personnel and analyzed by Prisrr
Laboratories, Inc. of Charlotte, North Carolina in accordance with SW-846 Method 8240.
Groundwater samples collected in December 1998 were collected by Resolve personnel and analyzed by Prism Laboratories, Inc. of Charlotte,
North Carolina in accordance with EPA Method 601.
Groundwater samples collected between January 2002 and July 2015 were collected by Harmon Environmental, PA personnel and analyzed
by Prism Laboratories, Inc. of Charlotte, North Carolina in accordance with SW-846 Method 8260
September 1995 sample was analyzed for 1,2-Dichloroethene (total).
(J) = Detected below the method reporting limit.
NA = Not analyzed
AI! constituents presented in micrograms per liter (pg/1)
Only data associated with detected compounds is presented in this table. For complete analytical results, please see reports associated will'
specific sampling event.

N
0
N
ko
0
CO
co
0
V
N
vi
0
V
00
N
C
0
N
Gti
0
O%
N
0
Ul
`�
o
\
0
V1
kp
0
.A
N
0
41'
CO00
0
W
N
\
0
W
co
1_n
0
N
N
\o
0
N
N
k0
00
oo
vj
cf1
O
.-.
a)
AAAA
I 0.8 (J)
n
c
n
n
t.n
n
n
n
n
n
z
n
Benzene
AAAA
A
n
n
A
A
A
<5
A
cm
<5
A
ut
<5
A
l
1,1-Dichloroethylene
n
A
n
0
,
n
AAAAAA
cm
cm
A
cmun
AAA
t.n
cnAA
EL
A
to
cis-],2-Dichlth lene
oroeY
N
N
NA
NA
N
N
N
N
tV
Al
v1
uni
A
V1
A
lnil
trans 1,2-Dichloroethylene
n
n
AAA
AAA
A
AA
AA
<5
yr
n
v,
Tetrachloroethylene
n
n
n
n
n
A
n-
A
0
n
n
r.Ul
U1
AA
NA
th
Toulene
AA
AAA
..--a.
—a
.—a
A
._.,
A
r
A
•—.
A
A
LitU1
AA
IA
AAA
Ul
Vt
n
n
clt
112-Trichloroethane
,,
N
IQ
N
^`
1N
CO
N
N.)
N.)Ul
ch
V1
U1
Ul
V1
O
cnn
Trichioroethylene
N
DJ
DJ
DJ
N.)
N.)
NJ
N.)N
1 <10
n
0
A
O
n
O
n
O
n
O
lnJ1
<10
Vinyl Chloride
AAAA
0
0
0
0
n
0
AA
0
0
2.8(1)
n
0
<50
A
0
<50
ALA
0
A
0
<50
NA
n
0
Acetone
A
N.)
AAA
NJ
IQ
N
A
N
AAA
N.)
N.)
N.)
AA
N
U1
AA
U1
U1
V1
V1
Unl
>
�,
total Xylenes

W
In
II 7/29/14 1
Vi
W
N
.p.
N
Ls-)
N
1 I. [/L/L II
N
(n
--6
N
Or
0
--+
O
�•
W
o
co
m
0?h
tiV
O
tp
N
A
r
A
._.
A
A
_,
A
�.
A
._-.
A
�.
Benzene
<0.50
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
1,1-Dichloroethylene
A
o
o
A
o
o
�-
...
0
v
0
v
A
A
A
A
A
cis-i,2-Dichloroethylene
A
0in
0
N
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
N
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
<0.50
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
Tetrachloroethylene
A
in
o
_,
o
v
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
Toulene
A
°
0
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
1,L,2-Trichioroethane
L <0.50
N
A
N.)
N.)N
N.)
N.)N
N.)Trichloroethylene
A
in
O
NJ
N.)
N.)
N.)
NJ
N.)
N
N
co
`
Vinyl Chloride
A
u
;,,
v
A
o
A
0
A
0
A
0
A
0
A
0
<10
<10
Acetone
A
N
N
A
A
A
N
A
N
A
total Xylenes
•duo) 9 algal

0
N
0
rn
N
rn
N
Ui
..
l
..
O4
'.'L
A
OO
N
W
II 8/15/02 I
N
o
03
N
V
II 9/23/97
`
N
L
0
t.
ro
o
4
-
w
a'
<40
n
00
0
0
0
:_
—
A
A
A
v,
1,1-Dichloroethylene
350
0
0
I 760
280
740
0
0
0
0
o
0
p
o
0
o
OLL
w
n
lT,
a'
N
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
4
o
o
w
55 (i)
Cu.
.�
CO
w
o
ui
37
.i
cn
trans 1,2 Dichloroethyiene
0
0
4
4
{'
<40
<200
A
o
A
0
0
Ln
<5
ui
un,
vn,
Tetrachioroethylene
<10
<40
A
A
AP
4
0
o
0
ten,
0
ten,
0
v,
0
A
A
NA
v, AAA
,
<5
Toulene
A
o
<40
<4
A
AoA
I <200
0A
I <50
0
"'
"l
A
A
%A
Al
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
o
180
I 420
I 740
OLL
o
650
600
370
850
430
Lu
kiD o
280
280
n
w
Trichloroethylene
W
o
o
OZL
N
460
270
240
140
360
140
n
o
n
0
n
0
n
o
Vinyl Chloride
A
0
ono
0
A
CO
CO
co
0
o
0
I <50 I
to
0
v,
0
v,
vn,
y
�n„
u,.
tn„
U',
total Xylenes
m
o, z
z
°
w,o
co
kip

CJl
.p
1-0
ivN
—
0
O
CO
O
t0
O
03
O
CO
0
A
o
o
n
A
n
o
y
n
0.52(J)
n
o
u,
';
o
0
1,1-Dichloroethylene
^'
IQ
k4La
O
56
-4
Cr.
`)
-
w
0
m
0
320
380
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
o
Cr'
•••
•
0
o
N
in
w
-°
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
o
O
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A—
o
Tetrachloroethylene
A
o
in
O
A
-a
A
a
A
A
r
A
A
.-.+,
A
A
A
A——
.-,
0
O
Toulene
•
0
AA
A
1
A
A
A
A
A
A
n
L <10
o
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
iv
bo
Co
b
w
�,
.�
o
00
48
-Fs
120
is
Trichloroethylene
I 0.78
0
w
IQ
tio
n.)
IQ
Co
w
y
u,
p
N
37
Vinyl Chloride
A
N
N
A
N
N
A
A
N.
N
N
<20 I!
o
Total Xylenes

Table 9 Cont.
Historic Analytical Data Summary
Groundwater Samples from Monitor Well MW-6
Equipment & Supply, Inc.
Notes:
Groundwater samples collected between December 1995 and January 1996 were collected by Resolve Environmental
Services, P.A. (Resolve) personnel and analyzed by Hydrogeologic, inc. of Frankfort, Kentucky in accordance with
SW-846 Method 8240.
Groundwater samples collected September 1997 and December 1997 were collected by Resolve personnel and
analyzed by Prism Laboratories, Inc. of Charlotte, North Carolina in accordance with SW-846 Method 8240.
Groundwater samples collected in December 1998 were collected by Resolve personnel and analyzed by Prism
Laboratories, Inc. of Charlotte, North Carolina in accordance with EPA Method 601.
Groundwater samples collected between January 2002 and July 2015 were collected by Harmon Environmental, PA
personnel, analyzed by Prism Laboratories, Inc. of Charlotte, North Carolina in accordance with SW-846 Method 8260.
September 1995 sample was analyzed for 1,2-Dichloroethene (total).
(J) = Detected below the method reporting limit.
NA = Not analyzed
All constituents presented in micrograms per liter (pg/I)
Only data associated with detected compounds is presented in this table. For complete analytical results, please see
reports associated with specific sampling event.

Table 10
Historic Analytical Data Summary
Groundwater Samples from Monitor Well MW-8
Equipment & Supply, Inc.
Monroe, North Carolina
EPA ID No. NCD 986 194 421
Project No. 309-82
Date
co
m
-
2
_O
L
0
r-
a)
c
a)
ar
o`
o
s
u
3v
N
.V
trans-1,2-Dkchioroethylene
Tetrachloroethylene
Toulene
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
c
a,
co
.c
v
O
O
v
Vinyl Chloride
total Xylenes
i
9/17/99
10
460
21
<5
<5
22
29,000
32
<5
10/8/99
12
100
8.9
14
NA
<1
6,100
<5
NA
1/29/02
5.1
430(J)
11
<5
<5
11
15,000
31
<5
8/15/02
<2,000
<2,000
<2,000
<2,000
<2,000
<2,000
29,000
<4,000
<2,000
1/28/03
<2,000
<2,000
<2,000
<2,000
<2,000
<2,000
18,000
<4,000
<2,000
8/18/03
<2,000
<2,000
<2,000
<2,000
<2,000
<2,000
11,000
<4,000
<2,000
1/12/04
<2,000
<2,000
<2,000
<2,000
<2,000
<2,000
38,000
<4,000
<2,000
7/19/04
<10,000
<10,000
<10,000
<10,000
<10,000
<10,000
17,000
<20,000
<10,000
1/10/05
<2,000
<2,000
<4,000
<2,000
<2,000
<2,000
24,000
<4,000
<4,000
7/29/05
<2,000
<2,000
<4,000
<2,000
<2,000
<2,000
25,000
<4,000
<4,000
1/26/06
<200
580
<400
<200
<200
<200
11,000
<400
<400
8/21/06
<200
270
<400
<200
<200
<200
2,700
<400
<400
1/25/07
<10
110
<20
<10
<10
<10
920
<20
<20
7/i8/07
<10
160
<20
<10
<10
<10
580
<20
<20
1/29/08
<1
110
1.4(J)
<1
<1
<1
200
<2
<2
7/2/08
<1
140
1.5(J)
<1
<1
<1
180
0.56(J)
<2
1/8/09
<1
71
1.2(J)
<1
<1
<1
51
10
<2

kn
-A
�
w
N
`�P
N
r
N
\
-
N
O
O
0
((D
0
-4
RI
A
PA
0
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
1,1-Dichloroethylene
N
a
cocow'o"'
r
C,
120
cis ],2-Dichloroethyleneo
A
o
0
to
IQA A
A
A
A
A-N
�-
N!
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
A
0
0
A
n
A
n
n
n
n
n
A
Tetrachloroethylene
<0.50
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
Toulene
A
0
�n
0
A
A
r
A
.J.
A
r
A
A
A
A
A
•
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
K)
N
iQ
N
.
--+
w
r
20
14
45
-A
011
Trichloroethylene
A
o
it
o
A
N
o
v
A
N
A
N
A
N
A
N
A
N
A
N
o
.—
Vinyl Chloride
A
NA
N
N
A
N
NA
A
N
A
A
0
total Xylenes

Table 1
RW-1 Operational Data 'Summary
Equipment & Supply, Inc.
.4507 Highway 74 W„ Monroe, North Carolina
EPA ID Number NCD 986 194 421'
Project No.309-82-
Date Time 'ORC
6/4/2014 8:10 RLH
8/11/2014
8/18/2014.
8/251201.4
8/8/2014'
9/2/2014
9/4/2014
9/8/2014
9/15/2914
9/22/2014
9/25/2014
9/29/2014
10/6/2014
10/13/2014
10/20/2014
10/27/2014
1113l2014
11/10/2014
11/17/2014
11/24/2014
11/26/2014
'12/112014
12/2/2014
12/8/2014
1219/2014
12/11/2014
12/15/2014
12/23/2014
12/29/2014
1/5/2015
1/6/2015'
1/12/2015
1/19/2015
1/26/2015
2/2/2015
2/5/2015
.2/9/2015
2/16/2015
2123/2015,,
3/2/2015
3/312015
3/5/2015
3/1012015
311712015`
3/23/2015'
3/27/2015
3/30/20,15.
4f6/2015
,4/13/2015
4/20/2015
4/27/2015.
5/1 /2015
5/4/2015
5/11/2015
5/1912015
5/26/2015
5/29/2015
=6/1/2015
'6/8/2015
6/9/2015
6/11/2015
'6/15/2015
8.10 RLH
8:00 RLH
8:15 RLH
8:00 RLH
7:45 RLH
8:45 RLH
8:15 RLH
8:10 RLH,
8;;00 RLH
8:00 RLH
8:00 RLH
8:40 RLH
8:15 RLH
8:10 RLH
9:30 RLH
8:00 RLI:1
8:00 RLH
7;48 RLH
8:05 RLH
8:10 RLH
8:00 RLH
7:45 RLH
8115 RLH
7t55 RLH
7:55' RLH
8:00 RLH
8:30 RLH
9:00 RLH
7:55 RLH
8:20 RLH
8:50 RLH
8:15 RLH
9:20 RLH
9:30 RLH
10:40 RLH
8:15 RLH
12:40 RLH
8:00 RLH
8:45 RLH
8:00 RLH
7:45 RLH,
.B:30 RLH
9:40 RLH,
'8:20 RLH
8:45 RLR
8:20 RLH
8:15 RLH
14:20 RLH'
8:20 RLH,
8:00 Rt.W
7:30 RLH
8:00 RLH
8:00 RLH
14:30 JPN
7:55 RLH
14:09 RLH
8:40 RLH
5:00 RLH
7:45 RLH
759 RLH
8:00 RLH
Flow Hours Cycles Pressure Comments_
2994472 11994.9 53972 0 8:25 cdtlected EFF sample
3000693 12017.6 54041 0
3005977 12037.4 54110 0
3010918 120563 54180 4
3013705 12066.9 54223' 0
3016142 12076.2 54261 0
3017395 12081 54281 0•
3020030 12091.1 54322 0
3024730 12109.3 45392 2
3029479 12127.6 54463 0
3031692, 12362 54496 0
3031712 1236:3 54496 0
3036765 12156 54566 0
3041482 12274.4 54637
3046341 12193.4 54707
3050850 12211.1 54774
3055732 12230.4 54846
'3060415 12248,9 54914
3085090 12267.654984
3069947 12287.1 55054
3071609 12293.7 55077
3071862 12294.9 55081
3072547 12298.5 55087
•3073259 12300.5, 55094
3073913 12303 55100
3074490 12305.3 55105
3075166 12307.9 55111
'3076940 12315 55127
3077612 12327.6 55133,
3084214 12343.9 '55197
.3085382 12348.4 55209
3089393 12375 55252
3094047 123388 55321
-3098702 12461.7 .66354
3098920 12402.6 55360
3098978 12402.8 67883
;3102363 12416.4 55399
3108018 12439.1, 55469'. 0
3112412 12456,8 55524 0
3118129 12479:9 55590 0
3118805 12483.1 55599 0
3120504 12489.6 55618 0
.3124662 .12506.5 55667' 0
3130612 12531 55735' 0
3135707 1255212 55792,
3139336 12567.4, 55832
31.41784 12577:7 55859
3147930 12603.7 55926
3154422 12631.4 55994
3159019 12651.3. 56040
3165956 126812 56104,
3170052 12699.1 56143
3172858 12722>3 56169
3179714 12741.4 56234
3187595 12776.4: 56316•
3193980 12804,9 56378,
3196982: 128184 56408
3189596; 12830.3' 56434
3205501 12856,8. 56490
3206544 12861.5 56500
3208393' 123690 56518
3212129: 12886.9 56555
Cleaned Trays
7:55 Collected Eff Sample, 8:00 CollectedTox sarriple
8:00 Collected Tax sample.
Cleaned Trays, Shut Down system to Reparin EFF`Lirle
Restarted System © 8:45
8:55 Collected Eff sample
4 Sampled RW 1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 Cleaned trays
'0
0 B:00 Collected Tox sample
0 Cleaned Float 1n Eff tank
0 8:00 Collected Tax sample
0 B:00 Collected Tox sample
0 Cleaned_ Eff Pump
0 Eff Pump Doyvn/Circuit Tripped
0 Eff Pump DowrtlCircuit Tripped
0 8:00 Collected Eff .Sample
0 Cleaned Trays.
0 System Down. Anti -Siphon Leak, Calibrated Eff meter
0
0 Eff Pump Down/Circuit Tripped
0 Eff Pump Down/Circuit Tripped, need thermal overload
0 replaced thermal overload
0 8:35 collected Elf sample
Cleaned:Trays
collected Eff sample
8:02 collected Tox sample
8:00 Collected Toxsample,
0
0. Cleaned Trays_
0
0 8:35 collected Eff sample
3
0 Cleaned Elf Pump and Meter'
0
;0
0 8:10 Collected Eft Sample
0
3'
0
0 cleaned trays
0
4 Cleaned Eff Flow Meter
0 repelled leak In Eff Pump 8:00.collected 1ox:sample
0 8:00 Collected-Tox sample
0
Cleaned Trays

6/22/2015 8:00 RLH 3217818', 12913:i 56614 3 cleaned eff'pump.
6/29/2015 7 45,, RLH 8224477 12944 56680 0 cleared, trays
7/6/2015 8:00 RLH 3230414 12972,4 56744 • 0 8:15 Collerled'Eff,sample,
71/312015 1.0 00RLH 3236444 12971:,4 56744 0

Table 2
RW-2 Operational Data Summary
Equipment & Supply, Inc.,
4507 Highway 74 W.,- Monroe, North CaroIfna
EPA ID Number NCD 986 194 421
Project No. 309-82
Date Time 'ORC Flow Hours Cycles Pressure Comments
8/4/2014 8;10 RLH 2061777 2520.5 95653 0 8:25 collected Eff sample
8/11/2014 8:10 RLH 2069932 2546.4 95740 0
8/18I2014 8:00 RLH' 2078337 2573.7 95828 0
8/25/2014. 8:15 RLH 2O88658 2602.5 95914 0 Repaired Anti -Syphon
8/2812014 8:00 RLH 2091679 2621.895964 0 Cleaned Trays
9/2/2014 7:45 RLH 2096134' 2637.8 96010 0 7:55 Collected Eff.sample, 8:00 collected Tox sample
914/2014 8:45 RLH 2098382 2545.8 96035 0 8:00 Collected Tox sample
9/8/2014 815 RLH 2103022 '2662.4 96085 0
9/1512014 8;10 RLH 2110844 2690.4 96258 0
;9/22/2014 8:00 RLH 2118767 2719 96268 0
9/25/2014 8:00 RLH 2122424 2732.2` 96298 '0 Cleaned Trays, Shut down to replace eff pfpe-
9/29/2014 8:00 RLH 21224461 2732,3 96398 4 restarted system at 8:45
10(6/2014 8:40 RLH 2131501 2766.1 96382 0, 5:55 collected eff sample'
10/13/2014 8:15 RLH 219647 2796,6 96469 4 sampled RW-2,
10/2012014 8:10' RLH 21477.76 2826.9' 96554 4,
10/27/2014 9:30. RLH 2155274 2854.8 .96635 0
11/3/2014 8;00_ RLH 2163464. 2885 96723 0' Cleaned -Trays
11/10/2014 8:00 RLH 2171048. 2913.2 96806 3 8:20 Collected Eff sample
11/17/2014 7:48 RLH 2278723 2942.2 96892 0'
11/24/2014 8:05 RLH 2186452 2971.7 96979. 0
11/2612014 8:10 RLH 2188907 2981 97006 0 cleaned trays
12/1/2014 8:00 RLH-2189423 2983 97012 0
12/2/2014- '7:45 RLH .2190474 2987.6 97018 0 7:55 Collected Eff sample, 8:00 collected Tax sample
12/8/2014, 8:15 RLH :2191653 2992.5 '97027 0 'cleaned -Of Tank float
12/912014 7:55 RLH '2192920 2998..5 97032 0 8:00 Collected Tox sample
12/1112014' 7:55 RLH 2193768 3002 97038: 0 8:00.Collected Tox sample
12/15/2014' 6:00 RLH '2194899 3007.2 97044 0 cleaned'eff pump
12/23/2014 8:30 RLH 22197749 3019 197061 0 effluent pump circuit tripped
12129120t4 ,9:00 RLH 2198980 3024.6 97066 0 effluent pump circuit,tripped
1/5/2015 7:55 RLH 2209014 •3063:9 97141 0 8:00.collected elf sample
1/6/2015 8:20 RLH 2210706 3070,4 .97156 0 cteaned.trays
1/12/2015 8:50 RLH 2215554 3101,2 97208'' 0 System Down, Anti -syphon valve leak. Calibrated eff meter
1/19115 8:15 RLH'' .2228100 3131.9 97289' 0
1/26/2015" 9:20 RLH 2230736 •3151.3 97329 0. eff pump failure
2/2/2015' 9:30 RLH' :2231111 3152,9. 97335 0 effluent,pump-circuit tripped;
2/5/2015. 10:40'RLH, 2231174 3153.2 :97336 0 replaced (hernial Overload for eff pump
2/9/2015. 8:15 RLH 2288425 3187.9 '973721 4 8:35 collected eff sample
2/16/2015 12:40 RLH 2248732 3230 97453. 0
2/23/2015 8:00 RLH. 2256417 3261 97516 0 cleaned trays
3/2/2015 8:45 RLH 2266191 3299.9 97592 0 collected Eff. sample
3/3/2015 8:00 RLH 2267640 3305.4 97603 0 8:02 collected Tox,sample
3/5/2015 7:45 RLH 2270391 3316.7 97626' '.0 8:00 CollectedTox sample
3/1012015 8:30 RLH' 2277773 3345.2: 97682 i0
'3/17/2015 9;40 "RLH 2287046 '33837 97763. 0
3/2312015 8:20 RLH 2295038 3415.2 97832 0
3/27/2015 8:45 RLH 2300608, 3437.2 97881 0 cleaned trays`
3/3012015 8:20 RLH 2304207 3451.4 97913 0
4/6/20 5 8:15 RLH 23'13315 3487.5 97995 0 8:35 collected eff sample
4/.13/2015 14:20 RLH 2322603: 3524.6 98080 0
4/20/2015 8:20 RLH 2329305 3552, 98134 0 cleaned eff pump and flow meter
4/27/2015 8:00 RLH 2338733 3590.3 98213 0
5/1/2015 7:30 RLH 2354127. 3611.9 98262 0 cleaned frays
.5/4120f5 8:00 RLH 2347613 3625.9 98295 0 8:10 collected eff sample
5l11/2015 8;00 RLH 2356089 3659.8 98378 4, . `„
5/19/2015 14:30 JPN .23658131 ,3698:9 98481 3,5
5/26/2015 7:55 RLH 2374466 3729.3 98561 0
5/29/2015 14:09 RLH 2377175 3744.2 98600 0 5feenedtray1
6/1/2015 8;40 RLH 2380418 3757,4 98634 0.
6/8/2015 8:00 RLH 2357621 3786.2 98707 4 Cleaned Eff.Meter
6/9/2015. 7:45 RLH 23887761 3790.8 98719 4 Repaired Leak in Eff Pump 8:05 collected Tox Sample
6/11/2015 7:59 RLH '2391023 3799.8 98743 0 8:00'Collected Tex sample
6/15/2015' '8:00 RLH 2395588 3618.1 9'8792 0

6/22/2015 8 Q0 RLH 2402486 3845:9 9886 0 Cleaned Efff Pump
6/29/2015" 7:45 RLH 2410391 3877,5 98954. 0 cleaned frays,
//612015 8:00 RLH 2417635 39071 99037 0.8:15'cpllected Effsample
7/13/2015 10:00 RLH 2425041 3937:3 99124 0 Samples RW-2.

North Carolina De
Pat McCrory
Governor
NCDENR
partment of Environment and Natu
al Resources
John E. Skvarla, III
Secretary
4,2014
Mr. Glen Hudson
Equipment & Supply, Inc.
4507 Highway 74 West
Monroe, North Carolina 28110
Subject: Toxicity Test Results
Equipment & Supply, Inc.
NPDES Permit No. NC0087858
Union County
Dear Mr. Hudson:
Enclosed is a copy of the toxicity test results relative to the samples collected at the subject facility on June
3 and 5, 2014.by Mr. Wes Bell of this Office. Whole effluent samples were collected for use in a chronic
Ceriodaphnia dubia pass/fail toxicity test. The test utilizing these samples resulted in a test failure. Effluent
samples were split with Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc. (ETS). The test conducted by ETS, .Inc. resulted in a
pass. Because of the conflicting results, the facility is considered compliant and no additional follow-up testing will
be perforrned at this time.
The report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions concerning this report, please
do not hesitate to contact Ms. Carol Hollenkamp at [phone] and/or Mr. Wes Bell at (704) 23.5-2192, or at
carol.hollenkampgnedenr.gov and wes.bell(c ncdenr._gov.
Sincerely,
ael L. Parker, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional. Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDENR
Enclosure:
Toxicity Test Results
cc; MSG 1617 Central. Files -Basement
Susan Meadows, Aquatic Toxicity Unit
Richard Harmon, Harmon Environmental, PA (via email)
Union County Health Department
WB
Mooresville Regional Office
Location: 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115
Prone (704) 663-16991 Fax, (704) 663-60401 Customer Service.1-877-623-6748
i ntornot. ,uww nrumtorm nlih, nm

Mr. Glen Hudson
PageTo
July 14, 2014
Whole effluent samples were collected on June 3, 2014 and June 5, 2014 by facility representative Richard
Harmon (ORC) and Wes Bell for use in a chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia pass/fail toxicity test. Equipment & Supply,
Inc. has an effluent discharge permitted at 0.0216 MGD entering an unnamed tributary to Stewarts Creek (7Q10 of
0.0 CFS). The test using these samples resulted in a Fail. Toxicity test information follows:
Test Type
Test Concentration
Test Result
Control Survival
Control Mean Reproduction
Test Treatment Survival
Treatment Mean Reproduction
First Sample pH
First Sample Conductivity
First Sample Total Residual Chlorine
Second Sample pH
Second Sample Conductivity
Second Sample Total Residual Chlorine
3-Brood Ceriodaphnia dubia pass/fail
90% sample
Fail
100%
27.6 neonates
100%
18.5 neonates
7.99 SU
931 micromhos/cm
<0.1.0 mg/1
7.96 SU
902 micromhos/cm
<0.10 mg/1
Test results for the above samples indicate that the effluent would be predicted to have water quality impacts on the
receiving water under conditions of maximum permitted discharge at 7Q10. These samples were split and tested by
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc. (ETS). The chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia pass/fail toxicity test run by ETS
resulted in a Pass. Aquatic Toxicity Branch (ATB) staff has reviewed the disagreeing split results and determined
follow-up testing is not needed. Both tests met all test acceptability criteria. However, the ATB test was
marginally acceptable in several areas. These were 1.) high control variability (36.3%); 2.) only 83% third brood
reproduction for the controls; and 3.) the % reduction in reproduction was only 0.8% over the minimum difference
that would be statistically significant. For these reasons, the ATB test is valid but marginally acceptable. The ATB
test meets the criteria for a compliance bioassay inspection, and the ETS test meets all criteria for the facility's
quarterly compliance testing.

Division of Water Resources
July 8, 2014
To: Michael Parker
Water Quality Regional Operations, MR0
Through: Cindy A. Moore V"
Supervisor, Aquatic Toxicology Branch (ATB)
From: Carol Hollenkamp L�
Quality Assurance Officer, Aquatic Toxicology Branch (ATB)
Subject: Whole effluent toxicity test results
Equipment & Supply, Inc.
NPDES Permit # NC0087858/001
Union County
The aquatic toxicity test using grab samples of effluent discharged from the Equipment & Supply, Inc. has
been completed. Equipment & Supply, Inc. has a permitted effluent discharge that is 0.0216 million gallons
per day (MGD) entering an unnamed tributary to Stewarts Creek (7Q10 of 0.0 CFS). Whole effluent samples
were collected on June 3 and June 5 by Wes Bell and facility representative Richard Harmon for use in a
chronic Ceriodaphnia dubia pass -fail toxicity test. The test resulted in a fail. Toxicity test information
follows.
Test Type 3-Brood Ceriodaphnia dubia chronic pass fail
Test Concentrations 90%
Test Result Fail
Control Survival 100%
Control Mean Reproduction 27.6 neonates
Test Treatment Survival 100%
Treatment Mean Reproduction 18.5 neonates
First Sample pH 7.99 SU
First Sample Conductivity 931 micromhos/cm
First Sample Total Residual Chlorine <0.10 mg/L
Second Sample pH 7.96 SU
Second Sample Conductivity 902 micromhos/cm
Second Sample Total Residual Chlorine <0.10 mgfL
Test results for the above samples indicate that the effluent may be predicted to have water quality
impacts on receiving water under conditions of maximum permitted discharge at 7Q10 flow. These
samples were split and tested by Environmental. Testing Solutions, Inc (ETS). The chronic Ceriodaphnia
dubia pass/fail toxicity test run by ETS resulted in a pass. ATB has reviewed the disagreeing split results
and determined follow-up testing is not needed. Both tests met all test acceptability criteria. However,
the ATB test was marginally acceptable in several areas. These were 1.) high control variability (36.3%);
2.) only 83% third brood reproduction for the controls; and 3.) the % reduction in reproduction was only
0.8% over the minimum difference that would be statistically significant. For these reasons, the ATB test
is valid but marginally acceptable. The ATB test meets the criteria for a compliance bioassay inspection,
and the. ETS test meets all criteria for the facility's quarterly compliance testing. Please contact us if you
have any questions or if further effluent toxicity monitoring is desired. We may be reached at (919) 743-
8401.
Basin: YAD14
cc: Central Files; Wes Bell (MRO)
Aquatic Toxicology Branch Water Sciences Section

ell, Wes
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Hollenkamp, Carol
Thursday, July 10, 2014 10:34 AM
Parker, Michael
Bell, Wes; Ventaloro, Christopher; Moore, Cindy
Toxicity Test Report
Equipment&Supply_0614.pdf
My emails yesterday seemed to have had corrupted PDF files or were returned to me so I am resending this from
yesterday. If the attachment will not open, please let: me know.
Attached is the toxicity test report for Equipment&Supply Company. If you have any questions, just let me know.
Carol Hollenkamp
Aquatic Toxicology Branch/Water Sciences Section
North Carolina Division of Water Resources/DENR
1621 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Website: http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ess/atu
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
1

North Carolina Depa
NCDENR
nt of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory John E, Skvarla, III
Governor Secretary
Mr. Glen Hudson
Equipment and Supply, Inc.
4507 Highway 74 West
Monroe, North Carolina 28110
May 14, 2014
Subject: Rescission of Notice of Deficiency — Monitoring Limitation
Tracking #: NOD-2014-MV-0018
Equipment and Supply, Inc. Treatment System
NPDES Permit No. NC0087858
Union County
Dear Mr, Hudson:
On May 12, 2014, this office received a response to the above referenced Notice of Deficiency
(NOD). The NOD was issued for not monitoring flow on January 31, 2014. Based on the amended
January 2014 DMRs received on May 12, 2014, this office is rescinding the above referenced Notice
of Deficiency. If you have questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact Ms.
Marcia. Allocco at [phone].
cc: Wastewater Branch
MSC 1617 — Centra
MA
Michael L. Parker, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDENR
Iles basement
Mooresville Regional Office
Location: 610 EasS Center Ave., Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28S 15
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Customer Sea
Internet: http'.11portal.ncdenr.orgdweblwq
An Equal DpperfEmity `: Affirmative Action Employer -- % Recyciaetl1 O% Post
877-62,0-fi-44

Allocco, Marcia
• From: Moore, Cindy
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 2:27 PM
To: Rick Harmon
Cc: Allocco, Marcia
Subject: Equipment & Supply, Inc. NPDES Permit Renewal
NPDES# 0087858 which is a ground water remediation site, is up for renewal. The facility has requested the
sample to be changed from composite to grab. The remediation site has WET testing because of the VOC
parameter in the permit. All other parameters are grab but the WET test. All VOC data and WET test have been
compliant. Due to the backlog of NPDES permit renewals, Tom Belnick has given his permission to change
from composite to grab for the WET test until the permit can be finalized. Wes Bell in the Mooresville Regional
office has also given the ok. ATB's best professional judgment, due to the above mentioned data and the fact
that they have some intermittent flows, would lead us to grant the change from composite to grab.
Thanks
Cindy
Cindy Moore
NC Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources - Aquatic Toxicology Branch
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
From: Rick Harmon [mailto:[e-mail]1
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2014 4:30 PM
To: Moore, Cindy
Subject: Fw: Equipment &Supply, Inc. NPDES Permit Renewal
Richard Harmon, P.G.
Harmon Environmental, PA
615 Bruce Thomas Road
Monroe, NC 28112
[phone] Phone & Fax
www.harmonenvironmental.com
Forwarded Message
From: Rick Harmon <harmonenvayahoo.com>
To: "Cindy.a.moorec ncdenr.Qov" <Cindy.a.mooreancdenr.gov>
Sent: Thursday, October 3, 2013 10:55 AM
Subject: Equipment & Supply, Inc. NPDES Permit Renewal
i

Ms. Moore:
Per your request, attached please find a copy of a letter discussing the toxicity sampling method required at the
Equipment & Supply, .p } . !Taw. ,nonroe, North Carolina. A hard copy of'this letter will follow by US
Mail.
Please call if you have any questions.
Richard Harmon, P.G.
Harmon Environmental, PA
61.5 Bruce Thomas Road
Monroe, NC 28112
(704) 764--5694 Phone & Fax
w w w . harm onenv ironrnental.com
2

Bell, Wes
From: :,Belnick; Tom
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 9:47 AM
To: Moore, Cindy; Sell, Wes
Cc: Reid, Dianne; Giorgino, John; Meadows, Susan
Subject: RE: NC0087858/001
Permit NC0087858
Permit Expiration: 1/31/2014
Yadkin River Basin
Request: Change Tox Test from Composite to Grab
Cindy- I'm fine with change from composite to grab for tox test. Please relay info to Permittee, and NPDES will
incorporate change when we get to permit renewal. This might take awhile given several vacancies. Permit is currently
assigned to Jim McKay, but will need to be reassigned since Jim will be retiring next month. Thanks.
Tom Belnick
Supervisor, NPDES Complex Permitting Unit
NCDWR/Water Quality Programs
919-807-6390
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties
From: Moore, Cindy
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 8:30 AM
To: Belnick, Tom; Bell, Wes
Cc: Reid, Dianne; Giorgino, John; Meadows, Susan
Subject: FW: NC0087858/001
NPDES# 0087858 which is a ground water remediation site, is up for renewal. The facility has requested the sample to
be changed from composite to grab. The remediation site has WET testing because of the VOC parameter in the
permit. All other parameters are grab but the WET test. Due to the backlog of permits needing to be renewed ( Tom
states he is down 3 people) , they have requested permission to change from composite to grab for the WET test until
permit can be finalized. Included in this email is their DMR.data and other parameters they test. They have one fail for
WET testing back in 2006 when they tried to use a chemical descaler. Since then , all VOC data and WET test have been
compliant. ATB's best professional judgment, due to the above mentioned data and the fact that they have some
intermittent flows, would lead us to grant the change from composite to grab. Please respond with your comments and
if this is acceptable.
Thanks
From: Giorgino, John
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 7:31 AM
To: Moore, Cindy
Subject: RE: NC0087858/001
See attached pdf file for outfall limits and average flow for the past reporting month (.0216 mgd). Also find attached the
flows over the past 5 years. Considering the flow, I think they have a valid reason to go to a grab.
1

John Giorgino
Environmental Biologist
North Carolina Division of Water Resources
Environmental Sciences Section
Aquatic Toxicology Unit
Mailing Address:
1621 MSC
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
Office: 919 743-8441
Fax: [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public
Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
From: Moore, Cindy
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2014 3:47 PM
To: Giorgino, John
Subject: NC0087858/001
This is a ground water remediation site that has passed since 2006. I think they had one fail at the very beginning but
otherwise have passed. Can you look at Flow and what other parameters they are monitoring? And if they have had any
other exceedences
Thanks
Cindyu
Cindy Moore
NC Department of Environmental and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources - Aquatic Toxicology Unit
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.
2

Nc VAR
North Carolina Department of Environment and N
Nat Ivieuory
Governor
Mr, Jim Diggs, Vice -President
Equipment & Supply, Inc.
4507 Highway 74 West
Monroe, North Carolina 28110
Dear Mr, Diggs:
May 14, 2014
ural R
s
urces
John E. Skvarla,
Secretary
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Equipment & Supply, Inc. Groundwater Remediation
NPDES Permit No. NC0087858
Union County
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection report for the inspection
conducted at the subject facility on May 12, 2014, by Ms. Marcia Allocco of this office. Please ensure
that a copy of the enclosed report is forwarded to the facility's Operator -in -Responsible -Charge
(ORC).
Thank you for your staffs and the ORC's assistance during the inspection and your efforts to comply
with the requirements of your permit. It is requested that a written response be submitted to this
office by June 6, 2014, addressing the deficiencies noted in the Recordkeeping section of the
attached inspection report.
The inspection report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions
concerning the report, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone] or
[e-mail].
cc: Wastewater Branch
MSC 1617 — Central files basement
MA
Sincerely,
Marcia Allocco, MS; Environmental Senior Specialist
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDENR
Mooresville Regional Office
Location; 610 East Center Ave., Suite 301 klcoresville, NC 2 115
Phone: [phone]" 1 Fax: [phone] ( Customer Service: 1-677-623.6746
Internet: http°llportal.ncdenf orglwebiwg
AnEquaG0pporiundyl>$6 t1 ActonE,,mployer-;ti4%Recycledffp%Post C: nsemerpape'

EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, D.C. 20460
�fiP1,'C;Or'n^!i .13r ?-l1t r?r-fie,r►..Rpnrit-t ..._
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Form Approved.
OMB No. 2040-0057
Approval. expires 8, 31-98 __ .
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector FacType
1� jj 2 J I 31 NC0087858 1 11 121 14/05/12 1 17 I r 181 19I C I 2011
Remarks
2111111111 1111111111111111 1111 111111111111 11111116E
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA Reserved--- —
671 1.0 1 69 70111 I 71 1 N 1 72 N 73 74 751 1 1 1 1 1 1 180
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
Equipment And Supply Inc
4507 Highway 74 West
Monroe NC 28112
Entry Time/Date
08:35 AM 14/05/12
Permit Effective Date
10/05/01
Exit Time/Dale
10:02 AM 14/05/12
Permit Expiration Date
14/01/31
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
/11
Richard Laurance Harmon/ORC/704-764-56941
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Glen Hudson,4507 Highway 74 West Monroe NC 28112/1704-289-6565/
Contacted
No
Other Facility Data
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
III Permit • Flow Measurement • Operations & Maintenance m Records/Reports
Self -Monitoring Program • Facility Site Review m Effluent/Receiving Waters • Laboratory
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Marcia Alamo MRO WQ//704-663-1699 Ext.2204/
Signature -of -Management Q A Reviewer—
gency/Office/Phone-and Fax Numbers Date
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page # 1

NPDES yr/mofday Inspection Type
69087858 1 �21, 4/05/12 I ' 18
Section D: Summary+ f Finding/Comments (Attach dditionai sheets of narrative end checklists as necessary)
Page # 2

Permit: NC0087858 Owner - Facility: Equipment And Supply Inc
Inspection Date: 05/12/2014
Permit
. Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
0. t
Yes No NA NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new application? ROOD
Is the facility as described in the permit? • 0 0 fl
# Are there any special conditions for the permit? n ■ n n
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public? ■ ❑ 0
0
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection? • 0 ❑ 0
Comment: The current permit was effective as of May 1, 2010, and expired on
January 31, 2014; the Division received a permit renewal application on August 1,
2013. The groundwater remediation system was [ast inspected (compliance evaluation
inspection) on September 22, 2010. Please continue to operate under the expired
permit until it is reissued.
Operations & Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? ■ 0 0 0
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable Solids, pH, DO, Sludge
Judge, and other that are applicable?
❑ ■ ❑
Comment: The facility appeared to be properly operated and well maintained.
Flow Measurement - Effluent Yes No NA NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting? • ❑ ❑
0
Is flow meter calibrated annually? ■ 0 0 0
is the flow meter operational? •000
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter? 0 0 • 0
Comment: A flow totalizer is used to report flow on the monthly discharge reports and
is calibrated once per year. Clearwater, Inc. completed the most recent calibration on
1/20/14; the maximum deviation from the true discharge was <10%.
Effluent Pipe Yes No NA NE
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained? ■ ❑ 0 0
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris? ■ 0 ❑ 0
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly? 0 0 • 0
Comment: _ There was. one_dischargeEvent during the inspection; effluentjwas_cleai _
and did not contain floatable lids or foam. 1 he receiving stream appeared as a
ponded area with little to no flow and it was not impacted by the discharge..
Effluent Sampling Yes No NA NE
Is composite sampling flow proportional? ■ 0 0
0
Is sample collected below all treatment units? • 0 0 0
Page # 3

Permit: NC0087858 Owner - Facility: Equipment And Supply Inc
inspection Date: 05112/2014 Inspection Type: Comp6ance Evaluation
— —
Effluent Sampling Yes No NA NE
Is proper volume collected? .000
Is the tubing clean? ODO•
ft Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6 Q degrees Celsius)? 0 0 0 •
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type representative)? • 000
Comment: NC0087858 requires grab samples for all permit parameters except
chronic toxicity testing. A flow -proportioned ISCO sampler has been used to collect the
composite sample for toxicity testing. An approval to switch to grab samples for the
toxicity testing was issued by Cindy Moore of the Division's Toxicity testing unit on May
8, 2014,
Record Keeping
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit'?
Is alk required information readily available, complete and current?
Are all records maintained for 3 years (labreg. required 5 years)?
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
Is the chain -of -custody complete?
Dates, times and location of sampling
Name of individual perfor ng the sampling
Results of analysis and calibration
Dates of analysis
Name of person performing analyses
Transported COCs
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters?
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ?
(if the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified opora
is the ORC visitation log available and current?
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification?
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification?
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site?
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review?
Yes No NA NE
• 000
N onn
O 000
• OEI.0
n 000
•
MI
•
•
•
• 000
00•0
n each shift? 00•0
alL1On
• 000
O C_100
aC300
00•0
Page # 4

Permit: NC0087858
Inspection Date: 05/12/2014
- -
Record Keeping
Comment: Prism Laboratories, Inc. (certification # 402) has been contracted to
perform all chemical analyses required by the permit. Environmental Testing Solutions,
Inc. performs the required toxicity testing. The ORC noted that samples are stored off
site in a refrigerator if the samples cannot be transferred to the analytical laboratory on
the day of sampling. Please commence the use of a temperature tracking log to
document the temperature within the sample storage refrigerator to ensure the samples
meet the < or = to 6 degrees C (unfrozen) requirement of 40 CFR part 136 Table 11,
footnote 18. The temperature should be monitored using a NIST or other traceable
thermometer and the documentation of this traceability added to your permit
recordkeeping for future inspections. Please also ensure that the sample collection time
(as noted on the reviewed COCs) does not precede the ORC arrival time noted on the
associated discharge monitoring report.
Owner - Facility: Equipment And Supply Inc
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
•
Yes No NA NE
Page # 5

North Carolina Depa
Pat McCrory
Governor
Mr. Glen Hudson
Equipment and Supply, Inc,
4507 Highway 74 West
Monroe, North Carolina 28110
Dear Mr. Hudson:
NCDENR
ent of Environment and Natural Resources
John E. Skvari!a, Ill
Secretary
May 5, 2014
Subject: Notice of Deficiency — Monitoring Limitation
Tracking No. NOD-2014-MV-0018
Equipment and Supply Inc. Treatment System
NPDES Permit No. NC0087858
Union County
A review of the January 2014 self -monitoring report forthe subject facility revealed a violation of the
following parameter at Outfall 001:
Date
/31/14
Parameter Reported Value
Flow None
Monitoring Requirement
Monitor continuously
Remedial actions, if not already implemented, should be taken to correct the causes(s) of the noted
violation, Unresolved violations may lead to the issuance of a Notice of Violation and/or assessments
of civil penalties by the Division of Water Resources.
If the violations are of a continuing nature, not related to operation and/or maintenance problems, and
you anticipate remedial construction activities, then you may wish to consider applying for a Special
Order by Consent (SOC). If the violations are due to a transcription error (data left off the DMR)
please submit an amended DMR (two copies) to this Office along with a cover letter asking for
rescission of the Notice of Deficiency. Please address your correspondence to Ms- Marcia Allocco at
the letterhead address.
Thank you for your attention to this matter, If you have questions concerning this matter or to apply
for a SOC, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Allocco at [phone].
Michael L. ParkerrwRegional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDENR
cc: Wastewater Branch
MSC 1617 — Central Files Basement
MA
Mooresville Regional Office
Location. 610 East Center Ave„ Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Customer Service:, 1-877-62.3-6748
Internet: http:llportal.ncbenr.orgwueb/wq
An Equal 0pp0rfun4y Affirmative Action Ennployter _ 0% Recjldee9ttO% Post COnsLUTler paper

North Carolin
Se Jelly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Mr. Glen Hudson
Equipment and Supply, Inc.
4507 Highway 74 West
Monroe, NC 28110
Dear N'Ir. Hudson:
NCDENR
Department of Environment and Natural Resou
iision of Water Quality
Coleen. H. Sullins
Director
October 1,
Subject: Con
Equipmen
NPDES Permit ii" i . C00878 8
Union County, North Carolina.
valuation Inspection
Rcinediation Site
Dee Freeman
Secretary
En dosed please find a copy of the Compliance Evaluaticn InspectionReport for the inspection conducted at the
subject facility on September 22, 2010 by Ms. Donna Hood of this Office. Please inform the facili.ty's Operator -in -
Responsible Charge of our Findings by forwarding a copy of the enclosed report.
The report s.i
do not hesitate to cot act P43s. flood or me at (704)
Enclosure
Sincerely,
Robert B. I rebs
Surfac P
be self-e.xplatnatory, however slr :�uld you have any questions concerning this r
1699.
Mooresville Regiornai r ±fsc
Location: 610 East Center Ave.,, Suite 301 Mooresys19 L. NC 25115
Phurte: (704) 5.63 Let+a'; Pax: (704( 66 {-60401 Customer e Service: 1-3 ? -623 5?48
trter/101: www r,cwvaterquairly.org:
Egvat OF€"'ortuniiy `: AffKnave Adion ;r;j o
nat. upervisor
One
NorthCarolina.
Naturally
please

United States Environmental Protection Agency
E PA Washington, D.C. 20460
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Form Approved.
OMB No, 2040-0057
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day . Inspection
1 LI 2 151 31 N00087858 111 121 10/09/22 117
I
Type Inspector Fac Type
181C1 19Ls. 1 2D� I
'
Remarks
211111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111166
inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 CA
671 1 69 701 1 711 1 721 E,11
Reserved
—
731 1 174 75I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 80
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
union County remediation site
9507 Highway 79 West
Monroe NC 28112
Entry Time/Date
10:00 AM 10/09/22
Permit Effective Date
10/05/01
Exit Time/Date
11:30 AM 10/0w/22
Permit Expiration Date
19/01/31
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)ITitles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
///
Other Facility Data
Name, Address of Responsible OfficialTtle/Phone and Fax Number
Glen Hudson,9507 Highway 74 West Monroe NC 28112//704-289-6565/ Contacted
No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
`Permit Flow Measurement ® Operations & Maintenance
Records/Reports
® Laboratory
and checklists as necessary)
Self -Monitoring Program Facility Site Review Effluent/Receiving Waters
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspectors) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
❑onna H d MR0 WQ//704-663-1699 Ext.2193/
/o//
' nature of Management Q A eviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers
Dale
Marcie Allocco MRO WQ//704-663-1699 Ext.2204/
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page # 1

NPDES y fr el °r !rspeo;Ian Type

Permit: NC0087858 CNN ner - Facility: Union County remediation site
Inspection Date: 09/22/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Yes No NA NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new application? ❑ 0 • 0
Is the facility as described in the permit? p n n ❑
# Are there any special conditions for the permit? n ■ n n
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public? p n n n
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection'? ■ n ❑ ❑
Comment:
Operations & Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? ■ ❑ n ❑
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable Solids, pH, DO, Sludge ■ n n 0
Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment: The facility appeared well maintained and operated at the time of the
inspection.
Record Keeping Yes No NA NE
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit? v n ❑ ❑
is all required information readily available, complete and current? ■ n n n
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)? ®n n n
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs? ® n n n
Is the chain -of -custody complete? ■ n n ❑
Dates, times and location of sampling I31
Name of individual performing the sampling ■
Results of analysis and calibration ■
Dates of analysis ■
Name of person performing analyses ■
Transported COCs ■
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters? ® ❑ ❑ 0
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ? n n p ❑
(If the facility is = or> 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator on each shift? ❑ ❑ ® ❑
Is the ORC visitation log available and current? ■ n n n
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification? ®n n n
Is the backup operator certified at one grade Tess or greater than the facility classification? ■ n n n
Page # 3

Permit: Ni:0087359
Owner - Facility: Union County rernedsation site
Inspection Date: O,22/2010 Inspection Type: "cirnplliarce Eva€Uation
Record Keeping
Is a copal` of the currant Nt''CE
Fac ty has copy of previous ye
Annual Report on fil
Comment DMRs for July 2009-June 2010 were reviewer for the inspection. No
violations were reported for the review period. Please calculate and report the monthly
average on the DMR as discussed during the inspection. Also, begin reporting flow on
a daily basis as discussed during the inspection.
Laboratory
Are field parameters performed by certified personnel er laboratory'?
Are alL other parameters(excrudirrg field parameters) performed by a certified lad"'
# Is the fan, tlity us<ng a contract lab?
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than cr equal to 0 0 degrees Celsius
Incubator (Fecal Colrform) se! to 44 5 degrees Celsius*1-
Incubator (SOD) s
Comment All laboratory analyses are performed by Prism Labs (#402).
Effluent Pipe
pr 0 degrees Celsius +,t `t 0 degrees?
d's rigfrt ;:f`way t t ,e out'uli crocer'.y Ta?r la;ned'
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris?
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properlrf"?
Comment: The receiving stream appeared unaffected by the discharge on the day of
the unspectlon.
Flow Measurement - Effluent
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
Is flow meter calibrated annually'?
Is the floe meter opera
(If units are separated} Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
Comment: The meter was last calibrated on Johnston, Inc. on January 27, 2010,
Effluent Sampling
Is cumpos:te sampling flow proportional?
Is sample collected beIcw all treatment units?
Is proper volume collected?
Is the tubing clean?
Y_
Yes No NA NE
■ n n n
■ :nnn
Yes No NA NE
n n■n
■ n n n
■ nnn
■ nnn
n n■n
n n■n
Yes No NA NE
■ nnn
■ nnn
n n■n
Yes No NA NE
■ nnn
■ nnn
■ nnn
nn■n
Yes No NA NE
nn■n
■ nnn
■ nnn
nln■n
Page # 4

Permit: NC0087858 Owner - Facility: Union County remediation site
Inspection Date: 09/22/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Effluent Sampling
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees Celsius)?
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type representative)?
Comment:
Upstream / Downstream Sampling Yes No NA NE
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type, and sampling location)? ❑ n ■ ❑
Comment:
Yes No NA NE
❑ ❑ E ❑
annn
Page # 5

ATA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natu
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
Glen Hudson
Equipment And Supply, Inc.
4507 U.S. 74 West
Monroe, NC 2'
Dear Permitte
2
June 2, 2008
Subject: Renewal Notice
NPDES Permit NC0087858
Union County remediation site
Union County
NC DEN 0
DM -Surface Wat Protection
Your NPDES permit expires on January 31, 2009. Federal (40 CFR 122.41) and North Carolina (15A
NCAC 2H.0105 (e)) regulations state that permit renewal applications must be filed at least 180 days prior
to expiration of the current permit. If you have already mailed your renewal application, you may
disregard this notice.
Your renewal package must be sent to the Division postmarked no later than August 4, 2008.
Failure to request renewal by this date may result in a civil penalty assessment. Larger penalties may be
assessed depending upon the delinquency of the request.
If any wastewater discharge will occur after January 31, 2009, the current permit must be renewed.
Discharge of wastewater without a valid permit would violate North Carolina General. Statute 143-215.1;
unpermitted discharges of wastewater may be assessed civil penalties of up to 325,000 per day.
If all wastewater discharge has ceased at your facility and you wish to rescind this permit, contact
me at the telephone number or address listed below.
Use the enclosed checklist to complete your renewal package. The checklist identifies the items you
must submit with the permit renewal application. If you have any questions, please contact me at the
telephone number or e-mail address listed below,
Sincerely,
Charles H. Weaver, Jr.
NPDES Unit
cc: Central Files
Mooresville Regional Gfce, Surface'G"ater Protection.
NPDES File
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone], extension 511 / FAX [phone] [e-mail]
North Carolina
7Vaturatti
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycledll0% Post Consumer Paper

NPDES PERMIT NC0087858
UNION COUNTY REMEDIATION SITE
UNION COUNTY
The following items are REQUIRED for all renewal packages:
• A cover letter requesting renewal of the permit and documenting any changes at the facility since
issuance of the last permit. Submit one signed original and two copies.
• The completed application form (copy attached), signed by the permittee or an Authorized
Representative. Submit one signed original and two copies.
• If an Authorized Representative (such as a consulting engineer or environmental consultant) prepares
the renewal package, written documentation must be provided showing the authority delegated to any
such Authorized Representative (see Part II.B.11.b of the existing NPDES permit).
)> A narrative description of the sludge management plan for the facility. Describe how sludge (or other
solids) generated during wastewater treatment are handled and disposed. If your facility has no such
plan (or the permitted facility does not generate any solids), explain this in writing. Submit one signed
original and two copies.
The following items must be submitted by any Municipal or Industrial facilities discharging
process wastewater:
Industrial facilities classified as Primary Industries (see Appendices A-D to Title 40 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, Part 12.2) and ALL Municipal facilities with a permitted flow? 1.0 MGD must submit a
Priority Pollutant Analysis (PPA) in accordance with 40 CFR Part 122.21.
The above requirement does NOT apply to privately owned facilities treating 100%
domestic wastewater, or facilities which discharge non -process wastewater (cooling
water, filter backwash, etc.)
Send the com lewd renewal package to:
Mrs. Dina Sprinkle
NC DENR / DWQ / Point Source Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617

Harmon Enviro
615 Bruce Thomas Road
Monroe, North Carolina 28112
September 10, 2007
Mr. Mike Parker
North Carolina. Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
610 East Center Street, Suite 310
Moorseville, North Carolina 28115
Re: Equipment & Supply, Inc.
4507.Highway 74 West
Monroe, North Carolina
NPDES Permit No. NC0087858
Project No. 309-26
Dear Mr. Parker:
a , PA
Phoneand Fax:
harmonenvo'
SEP
1
Surface War Protec ion
On behalf of Equipment & Supply, Inc., Harmon Environmental, PA respectfully submits this letter
summarizing the incident encountered at the referenced site during our September 5, 2007 weekly
facility inspection. Upon arriving at the site at 9:45 AM on September 5, 2007, Harmon
Environmental, PA personnel observed the groundwater remediation system was shut down. The
secondary containment dike was full of water and the ground outside the building was wet over an
area approximately 170 feet long by approximately 7 feet wide..
Harmon Environmental, PA immediately reported this incident to Mr. Cile:nn Hudson with
Equipment & Supply, Inc., the Moorsville Regional Office of the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) and Union County Emergency Management.
Based on our subsequent inspection ofthe system w°e have determined that the incident resulted from
a faulty float switch located in the "high -high" position in the 1,000-gallon influent tank. Water
accumulated in the influent tank as a result of the effluent pump inadvertently being turned off
during a routine inspection.
Our records indicate that on August 28, 2007, the ORC visited the site for the weekly inspection.
During this inspection, the anti -siphon valve on the discharge line appeared to be fouled. The ORC
shut down the effluent discharge pump to clean and repair the anti -siphon valve. Based on the
position ofthe switches observed in the control panel on September 5, 2007, the ORC apparently did
not reactivate the effluent discharge pump following the repair of the anti -siphon valve.
Based on the hour meters, flow meters and cycle counters, it appears the effluent tank located at the
base of the air stripping unit reached high alarm conditions after approximately 0.1 hours. Upon
reaching high alarm, the float switch within this tank terminated the transfer of additional water into

Mr. Mike Parker
September 10, 2007
Page 2
the stripping tower by shutting down the Equalization Pump. The two recovery wells, GW-1 and
GW-2 continued to pump filling the influent tank.
The "high -high" float switch in the influent tank is designed to deactivate the two recovery well
pumps when this tank is full. Inspection of this float switch after the incident indicated that this
float switch was stuck in the down position.
Based on the meter readings, the influent tank overflowed and flooded the containment dike over the
subsequent 2-3 days. The blower appears to have flooded and shut down at approximately 5:00 PM
on August 30, 2007.
Based on the influent flow meters, approximately 9,600 gallons of untreated groundwater was
released over the secondary containment dike as a result of this incident. As previously indicated, the
released water appears to have been absorbed by the soil on -site and did not appear to reach surface
waters. Further, the area of the release is within the zone -of -influence of the groundwater
remediation system.
Harmon Environmental, PA is scheduled to restart the system during the week of September 10,
2007. Following restart of the system, Harmon Environmental, PA has extended the weekly
inspection to include testing the "high -high" float switch in the influent tank. Further, Equipment &
Supply, Inc. has requested a devise be installed in the secondary containment dike to deactivate the
entire remediation system in the event water begins to accumulate. We will notify you upon
completion of the installation of this additional fail-safe.
Please call if you have any questions or require any additional information.
Sincerely,
Harmon Environmental, PA
,,,A ------
Richard L. Harmon, P.G.
President/Operator in Responsible Charge
cc: Mr. Glenn Hudson, Equipment & Supply, Inc.

September 5, 006
CERTIFIED MAIL 70°4'4:11a©©a°3-94q 2s3g
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr, Glen Hudson
Equipment and Supply Company
4507 Highway 74 West
Monroe, NC 28110
SUBJECT:
Dear Mr. Hudson:
Michael F..Easley, Governor
William G. Ross .1r., Secretdry
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) Testing
NPDES Pernut No. NC0087858
Equipment and Supply Company GW Remediation Site
Union County
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
SEP112Ok
This is to inform you that a review of your toxicity self -monitoring report form for the month of :tune 2006
indicates a violation of the toxicity limitation specified in your NPDES Permit.
You should take whatever remedial actions are necessary to eliminate the conditions causing the effluent toxicity
violation(s). Your efforts may include conducting a Toxicity Reduction Evaluation (TRE), a site -specific study designed
to identify the causative agents of effluent toxicity, isolate the sources of toxicity, evaluate the effectiveness of toxicity
control options; and confirm reductions in effluent toxicity. Please be aware that North Carolina General Statutes provide
for assessment of civil penalties for violations of NPDES permit limitations and requirements.
The reverse side of this Notice contains important information concerning your Whole Effluent Toxicity
Monitoring and Reporting Requirements. Please note appropriate mailing addresses for submitting Pour Discharge
Monitoring Reports (DMRs) and Aquatic Toxicity (AT) Test F'orrns. We encourage you to review this information; if it
would be helpful to discuss this situation or possible solutions to resolve effluent toxicity noncompliance, please contact
me or Mr. John Giorgino with this office at [phone].
Chief, Environmental Sciences Section.
cc: Rex Gleason -Mooresville Regional Office
John Lesley -Mooresville Regional Office
Aquatic Toxicology Unit
Central Files
One
NotthC"arolina
„Naturally
North Cait'ta Division of Water Quality 1621 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-.1621 Phone [phone] Customer Service
I.esb.enr.state.nc.us 4401 Reedy Creek Rd. Raleigh, NC 27607 FAX [phone] l-877-62.3-6748
An. Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycledll0% Post Consumer Paper

WHOLE EFFLUENT TOXICITY M©NIT'ORING AND REPORTING INFORMATION
Thefollowing items are provided in an effort to assist you with identifying critical and sometimes overlooked toxicity testing and
reportingittfornation. Please take time to review this information. The items below do not address or include all the toxicity testing
and reporting requirements contained in your NPDES permit, If you should have any questions about your toxicity testing
requirement, please contact Mr. Kevin Bowden with the Aquatic Toxicology Unit at [phone] or another Unit representative at the
same number.
The permittee is responsible for ensuring that toxicity tc
forms are appropriately filed.
c
ducted according to the pemlit requirement and that toxi
y
port
Y The reporting of whole effluent toxicity testing data is a dual requirement. All toxicity test results must be entered (with the appropriate
parameter code) on your monthly Discharge Monitoring Report which is submitted to:
North Carolina Division of Water Qual
Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC: 27699-1.617
IN ADDITION
Toxicity test data (original "AT' fo
,t be submitted to the following address:
North Carolina ➢ivision of Water Quality
Environmental Sciences Section
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Toxicity test results shall be tiled with the Environmental Sciences Section no later than 30 days after the end of the reportint
period (eg, January test result is duc by the end of February).
Toxicity test condition language contained in your NPDES penult may require use of multiple concentration toxicity 'testing upon failure
of any single quarterly toxicity test. If the initial pass/fail test fails or if the chronic value is lower than the permit limit, then at least two
multiple concentration toxicity tests (one per month) will be conducted over the following two months. As many analyses as can be
completed will be accepted. If your NPDES permit does not require use of multiple concentration toxicity testing upon failure of any
single quarterly test, you may choose to conduct either single concentration toxicity testing or multiple concentration toxicity testing per
the Division's WET enforcement initiatives effective July I, 1999. Follow-up multiple concentration toxicity testing will influence the
Division's enforcement response.
Toxicity testing months are specified by the NPDES Permit, except for NPDES. Permits which contain episodic toxicity monitoring
requirements (eg., if thc testing months specified in your NPDES permit arc March, .June, September, and December, then toxicity testing
must. be conducted during these months).
If your NPDES Peru°
provide written notif
of the calendar year,
ecifies episodic monitoring and your facility does not Have a discharge from January 1.-June 30, then you must
on to the Environmental Sciences Section by June 30 that a discharge did riot occur during the first six months
If you receive notification from your contract laboratory that a test was invalidated. you should immediately notify the Environmental
Sciences Section at [phone] and provide written documentation indicating why the test was invalidated and the date when
follow-up testing will occur.
If your facility is required to conduct toxicity testing during a month in which no discharge occurs, you should complete the information
block located at the top of the AT form indicating the facility name, permit number, pipc number, county and the month/year of the
subject report. You should also write "No Flow" on the AT form, sign the form and submit following normal procedures.
The Aquatic Toxicity Test foams shall be signed by the facility's Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC) except for facilities which have
not received a facility classification. In these cases, a duly authorized facility representative must sign the AT form. The AT form must
also be signed by the performing lab supervisor.
To determine if your AT test'fo s were received on time by the Division of Water Qua.hty, you niav consider submitting your toxicity
test results certified mail, returi receipt requested to the Environmental Sciences Section.

August 24, 2006
CERTIFIED MAIL 7046-CVO -0dk,3-$4R6
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Jeremia S..Murphy
Eagle Engineering
1420 Shade Tree Way
Alpharetta, GA 30004
SUBJECT:
Dear r. Murphy:
North Carolina Department o
NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) Testing
NPDES Permit No. NC0087858
Equipment and Supply Company GW Remediati.on Site
Union County
Michael F. Easley, Gov anor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Environment and Natural Resources
P.E. Director
r Quality
This is to inform you that a review of your toxicity self -monitoring report form for the month of June 2006
indicates a violation of the toxicity limitation specified in your NPDES Permit:
You should take whatever remedial actions are necessary to eliminate the conditions causing the effluent toxicity
violation(s). Your efforts may include conducting a Toxicity Reduction Evaluation (TRE), a site -specific study designed
to identify the causative agents of effluent toxicity, isolate the sources of toxicity, evaluate the effectiveness of toxicity
control options, and confirm reductions in effluent toxicity. Please be aware that North. Carolina General Statutes provide
for assessment of civil penalties for violations of NPDES permit limitations and requirements.
The reverse side of this Notice contains important information concerning your Whole Effluent. Toxicity
Monitoring and Reporting Requirements. Please note appropriate mailing addresses ,,for submitting your Discharge
Monitoring Reports (DMRs) and Aquatic T©.xicity (AT) Test Forms. We encourage you to review this information; if it
would be helpful to discuss this situation or possible solutions to resolve effluent toxicity noncompliance, please contact
me or Mr. John Giorgino with this office at [phone].
Sincerely,
Chief, Environmental Sciences Section
cc: Rex Gleason -Mooresville Regional Office
John Lesley -Mooresville Regional Office
Aquatic Toxicology Unit
Central Files
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1621 Mail Service Center
Internet. wuwv.esb.enr.state.nc.us 4401 Reedy Creek Rd.
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621 Phone [phone]
Raleigh, NC 276
FAX [phone]
one
No thCarolina
r tam
Customer Servic
1-877-623-6748
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

WHOLE EFFLUENT TOXICITY MONITORING AND REPORTING INFORMATION
'.-- The following items are provided in an effort: to assist you with identifying critical and sometimes overlooked toxicity testing and
reporting information. Please take time to review this information. The items below do not address or include all the toxicity testing
and reporting requirements contained in your NPDES permit, If you should have any questions about your toxicity testing
requirement, please contact Mr. Kevin Bowden with the Aquatic Toxicology Unit at [phone] or another Unit representative at the
same number.
• The permittee is responsible for ensuring that toxicity te
forms are appropriately filed,
conducted according to the permit requirement and that toxicity report
The reporting of whole effluent toxicity testing data is a dual requirement. All toxicity test results must be entered (with the appropriate
parameter code) on your monthly Discharge Monitoring Report which is submitted to:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
IN ADDITION
Toxicity test data (original "AT" form) must be submitted to the following address:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Environmental Sciences Section
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
• Toxicity test results shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Section no later than 30 days aftcr the end of the reporting
period (eg, January test result is due by the end of February).
• Toxicity test condition language contained in your NPDES perrnit may require use ofmultiple conccntration toxicity testing upon failure
of any single quarterly toxicity test. If the initial pass/fail test fails or if the chronic value is lower than the permit limit, then at least two
multiple concentration toxicity tests (one per month) will be conducted over the following two months. As many analyses as can he
completed will be accepted. If your NPDES permit does not require use of multiple concentration toxicity testing upon failure of any
single quarterly test, you may choose to conduct either single concentration toxicity testing or multiple concentration toxicity testing per
the Division's WET enforcement initiatives effective ,fuly 1, 1999. Follow-up multiple concentration toxicity testing will influence the
Division's enforcement response.
Toxicity testing months are specified by the NPDES Perrnit, except for NPDES Permits which contain episodic toxicity monitornig
requirements (eg, if the testing months specified in your NPDES permit are March, June, September, and December, then toxicity test
must be conducted during these months).
>r If your NPDES Pe it specifies episodic monitoring and your facility does not have a discharge from January 1-June 30, then you must
provide written notification to the Environmental Sciences Section by June 30 that a discharge did not occur during the first six months
of the calendar year.
If you receive notification from your contract laboratory that a test was invalidated, you should immediately notify the Environmental
Sciences Section at [phone] and provide wrdocurncntation indicating why the test was invalidated and the date when
follow-up testing will occur.
);': If your facility is required to conduct toxicity testing during a month in which no discharge occurs, you should complete the inforrnation
block located at the top of the AT form indicating the facility name, permit number, pipe number, county and the month/year of the
subject report, You should also write "No Flow" on the AT form, sign the form and submit following normal procedures.
The Aquatic Toxicity Test forms shall be signed by the facility's Operator in Responsible Charge (ORC) except for facilities which have
not received a facility classification. In these cases, a duly authorized facility representative rnust sign the AT forrn. The AT foin must
also be signed by the perfortning lab supervisor.
To determine if your AT test forms were received on time by the Division of Water Quality-, you may consider submitting your toxicity
test results certified mail, return receipt requested to the Environmental Sciences Section,

Mr. Andrew Adams, Owner
Equipment And Supply Inc
4507 Highway 74 West
Monroe, NC 28112
SUBJECT:
Dear Pe
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
July 26, 2006
Payment Acknowledgment
Civil Penalty Assessment
Union County remediation site
Permit Number: NC0087858
Case Number: LV-2006-0212
Union County
A ) T"U,,; R, t
MOOm
U 2 7 2006
This letter is to acknowledge receipt of check number 34055 in the amount of $280.15 received
from you dated July 19, 2006. This payment satisfies in full the above civil assessment levied
against the subject facility, and this case has been closed. Payment of this penalty in no way
precludes future action by this Division for additional violations of the applicable Statutes,
Regulations, or Permits.
If you have any questions, please call Robert L Sledge at 919-733-5083 Ext.547.
Sincerely,
Carolyn Bryant
cc: DWQ Mooresville Regional Office Supervisor
Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
7 S-7015 Customer Service
48
No hCarolina
No

EQUIPMENT.&SUPPLY;=,IN'
45O7 HWY.,74 WEST
.NC, 281'10
"s-TELEPHONE [phone] ;
H103405Soi'
:053 LO L3961: 03320 2565"
1

Michael E_ Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W, Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
July 26, 2006
Barry L Webb
City of Belmont
P4 Box 431
Be➢mont, NC 28012
SUBJECT: Payment Acknowledgment
Civil Penalty Assessment
Belmont WWTP
Permit Number: NC0021181
Case Number: LV-2006-0203
Gaston County
Dear Mr. Webb:
JUL 2 8 2006
This letter is to acknowledge receipt of check number 041908 in the amount of $1,580.15 received
from you dated July 19, 2006. This payrnent satisfies in full the above civil assessment levied
against the subject facility, and this case has been closed. Payment of this penalty in no way
precludes future action by this Division for additional violations of the applicable Statutes,
Regulations, or Permits.
If you have any questions, please call Robert L Sledge at 919-733-5083 Ext.547.
Sincerely,
Carolyn Brya
cc: DWQ Mooresville Regional ©ffice Supervisor
Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 [phone] Customer Service 1 800 63 "7`748
N 1rCarolina
aura!!y

RAN'
T
PAY
TO THE
ORDER
OF
WACHOVIA BANK & TRUST COMPANY, N.A.
BELMONT, N.C. 28012
66-021
530
DATE
JUL
1ND 15 CENTS****
* *1
' City of Belmont
115 N. Main Street
P.O. Box 431
Belmont, N.C. 28012
[phone]
THOUSAND 580 DOLLARS
NCDE.NR
BELMONT, NC.
«'004 L9O8ii' 1:0 5 3000 2 L91: 20088 2 L.20O06 3u'
CHECK NO.
19 2006
041908
CHECK AMOUNT
41908
$1580. 15
THIS DISBURSEMENT HAS BEEN APPROVED AS REQUIRED BY
THE LOCAL GO. BUDGET A Via' C• • ROL ACT.
Al _Aim Alitareara,iir
i; t4rAUTHORI
j s
4

Michael F. Easley, Govemc f �j&,Q�
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
July 5, 2006
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Andrew Adams, Owner
Equipment & Supply, Inc.
4507 Highway 74 West •
Monroe, North Carolina 28110
SUBJECT:
Dear Mr. Adams:
7003 2260 0001 3494 6465
Notice of Violation and Assessment of Civil
Penalty for Violations of N.C. General Statute
143-215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0087858
Groundwater Remediation WWTF
Union County
Case No. LV-2006-0212
This letter transmits a Notice of Violation and assessment of civil penalty in the amount
of $280.15 ($200.00 civil penalty + $80.15 enforcement costs) against Equipment & Supply,
Inc.
This assessment is based upon the following facts: A review has been conducted of the
self -monitoring data from April 2006. This review has shown the subject facility to be in
violation of the discharge limitations found in NPDES Permit No. NC0087858. The violations
are summarized in Attachment A to this letter.
Based upon the above facts, I conclude as a matter of law that Equipment & Supply, Inc.
violated the terms, conditions, or requirements of NPDES Permit No. NC0087858 and North
Carolina General Statute (G.S.) 143-215.1(a)(6) in the manner and extent shown in Attachment
A. A civil penalty may be assessed in accordance with the maximums established by G.S. 143-
215.6A(a)(2).
Based upon the above findings of fact and conclusions of law, and in accordance with
authority provided by the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources
and the Director of the Division of Water Quality, I, D. Rex Gleason, Surface Water Protection
Regional Supervisor for the Mooresville Region, hereby make the following civil penalty
assessment against Equipment & Supply, Inc.:
NCDENR
Mooresville Regional Office
Internet: ww v.ncwalerqualily.org
Division of Water Quality Phone [phone]
610 East Center Ave, Suite 301 Mooresville, NC 28115 Fax [phone]
None Carolina
1 aturalfr'
Customer Service
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

200.00
For2 of the two (2) violation(s) of G.S. 143-
215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Perrnit No, NC0087858, by
discharging waste into the waters of th.e State in
violation of the permit daily maximum effluent
limit for trichloroethene.
200.00 TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY
80..15 Enforcement costs,
280.15
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
Pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have taken.
into account the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and the factors set forth at G.S. 1.43B-
282.1(b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public
health, or to private property resulting from the violations;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violations;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violations were committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs
over which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority;
and
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you rnust do one of the following;
1. Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of Environment
and Natural Resources (do not include waiver form). Payment of the penalty will
not foreclose further enforcement action for any continuing or new violation(s).
Please submit payment to the attention of:
Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Division of Water Quality
161.7 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 2'7699-1617
OR

2. Submit a written request for remission including a detailed justification for
such request:
Please be aware that a request for remission is limited to consideration of the five
factors listed below as they may relate to the reasonableness of the amount of the
penalty assessed. Requesting remission is not the proper procedure for contesting
whether the violation(s) occurred or the accuracy of any of the factual statements
contained in the civil penalty assessment document. Because a remission request
forecloses the option of an administrative hearing, such a request must be
accompanied by a waiver of your right to an administrative hearing and a
stipulation that no factual or legal issues are in dispute. Please prepare a detailed
statement that establishes why you believe the civil penalty should be remitted,
and submit it to the Division of Water Quality at the address listed below. In
determining whether a remission request will be approved, the following factors
shall be considered:
whether one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-
282.1(b) were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
whether the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage
resulting from the violation;
whether the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
whether the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous
violations; or
whether payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the
remaining necessary remedial actions.
Please note that all information presented in support of your request for remission
must be submitted in writing. The Director of the Division of Water Quality will
review your evidence and inform you of his decision in the matter of your
remission request. The response will provide details regarding case status,
directions for payment, and provision for further appeal of the penalty to the •
Environmental Management Commission's Committee on Civil Penalty
Remissions (Committee). Please be advised that the Committee cannot consider
infornation that was not part of the original remission request considered by the
Director. Therefore, it is very important that you prepare a complete and thorough
statement in support of your request for remission.
In order to request remission, you must complete and submit the enclosed
"Waiver of Right to an Administrative Hearing and Stipulation of Facts" form
within thirty (30) days of receipt of this notice. The Division of Water Quality
also requests that you complete and submit the enclosed "Justification for
Remission Request." Both forms should be submitted to the following address:

Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 1 '99-161.7
OR
File a petition for an administrative hearing with the Office of
Administrative Hearings:
If you wish to contest any statement in the attached assessment document you.
must file a petition for an adminiStrative hearing. You may obtain the petition.
form from the Office of .Administrative Hearings. You must file the petition with
the Office of Administrative Hearings within thirty (30) days of receipt of this
notice. A petition is considered filed when it is received in the Office of
Administrative Hearings during normal office hours. The Office of
Administrative Hearings accepts filings Monday through Friday between the
hours of 8:00 aan: and 5:00 p.m., except for official state holidays. The orig,in.ai
and one (1) copy of the petition must be filed with the Office of Administrative
Hearings. The petition may be faxed — provided the original and one copy of the
document is received in the Office of Administrative Hearings within five (5)
business days following the faxed transmission. The mailing address for the
Office of Administrative Hearings is:
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714
Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone]
A copy of the petition
ust also be served on DENR as foliows:
Ms. Mary Penny Thompson, General Counsel
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Please indicate the case number (as found on page one of on the
petition.
Failure to exercise one of the options above within thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter,
as evidenced by an internal date/time received stamp (not a postmark), will result in this matter
being referred to the Attorney General's Office for collection of the penalty through a civil
action.
Please be advised that additional penalties may be assessed for violations that occur after
the review period of this assessment. Ifthe violations are of a continuing nature, not related to

operation and/or maintenance problems, and you anticipate remedial construction activities, then
you may wish to consider applying for a Special Order by Consent. If you have any questions
about this civil penalty assessment or a Special Order by Consent, please contact the Water
Quality Section staff of the Mooresville Regional Office at 704/663-1699.
S c)CD fe 45-1—
ate') D. Rex Gle on, P.E.
Surface Water Protection Regional Supervisor
Mooresville Regional Office
Division of Water Quality
ATTACHMENTS
cc: Water Quality Regional Supervisor w/ attachments
Compliance/Enforcement File w/ attachments
Central Files w/ attachments

ATTACHMENT A
CASE NO. LV-2006-0212
Pipe No, Parameter Reported Value Permit Limit
001 Trichloroethene *30 4g/1 3.08 p.g/1 (Daily maximum)
001 Trichloroethene *25 vig/1 3.08 14/1 (Daily maximum)
D
iotescivilpenaltyassess

-/
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
COUNTY OF UNION
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT
OF CIVIL PENALTY AGAINST
EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY, INC.
PERMIT NO. NC0087858
WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. LV-2006-0212
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling $280.15 for violation(s) as set forth in the
assessment document of the Division of Water Quality dated July 5, 2006, the undersigned,
desiring to seek remission of the civil penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative
hearing in the above -stated matter and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the
assessment document. The undersigned further understands that all evidence presented in
support of remission of this civil penalty must be submitted to the Director of the Division of
Water Quality within 30 days of receipt of the notice of assessment. No new evidence in support
of a remission request will be allowed after 30 days from the receipt of the notice of assessment.
This the day of , 2006
BY
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE

DWQ(1 VI L ASSESSMENT R „K a r ACTORS CONSIDERATION
Case Number: IN-2006-0212
Assessed Entity: Equipment & Supply, Inc.
Region: Mooresville
County: Union
()
()
()
( )
Whether one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors were wrongly applied to
the detriinent of the petitioner;
Whether the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting
frotn the violation;
Whether the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
Whether the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
) Whether payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining
necessary remedial actions,
Decision: (Check One)
Request Denied Full Remission
,e
an
Remission 1 1 Amount Remitted
ek, P.E.

Ji.U6 03 06 03:36p
704 764 5694
p,3
Water Pollution Control System ORC Designation Form
wPcSocc
NCAC 15A:08G .0201
General Information:
Perrnittee Owner/Officer Name: Equipment & Supply, Inc.
Mailing Address: 4507 High 74 West
City: Mora le
Telephone Number: (7 ) 289-6565
Signature:
*MIN R ■R R y4111A•M414R RRR ea.
Facility Information:
Facility: _Equi mp en chi Su
Permit Number: , 985402
State: 11C Zip: 2
County:
Uni
SUBMIT A SEPARATE FORM FOR. EAC[I TYPE OF SYSTEM
IV lark (X) Type of Facility Class (1 4)
Wastewater Plant
Physicai/Chernicat
Collection System
Class
Spray Irrigation N/A
Land Application N/A
Subsurface
N/A
4IS IIPRR!M1111RRRR■R14 AR■RRM R411R■R14RRRR■R•RIRRR I11■RURRR R R 1Y RY1nARRR■ RRRIMRRRRRRRRRRYt MAR*
Operator in. Responsible Charge:
Print Narne: Richard L. Hatton Social Security #
Certificate Type and Grade: Chernical/Physical Grade I Certifi
Work Telephone: ( 794 ) _764-5694 Signature:
4 i1 Sti*F9p■R■RR* 41I1RRR1•111ri111PMOi RgMRRRRRtIM■■ 11iMRR R■R• f1MRRR■ 10iWllft'14#f 1k11411#ARMR■M RR MI tit ONO RRR■RR
Back -Up Operator in Responsible Charg
Print Name: Joseph P. Nestor
Certificate Type and Grade: ChC tnical7
Work Telephone: ( 704J 442-1365
r Fax to:
ysictl Grade 1 Certificate #: 988633
wPcsocc
1618 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1618
Fax: [phone]
Revised 10/2000

JUN 28,2006 00:27 8023108
PGP RViC
'FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SITEET
FROM:
_..
John 1.csley Fronk Gravvly
•
IbII
NCI) F.NR — 1 )1k1,2 /_27 /2006
1.111,1•2=
r,)X tit' \ILII-P; •roTAI. Ill*PACIP3 in:cid.' wk.:1, reniqt•
704-663-6040 13
1.111NH NUMBER: WW1': RH:1-alinit:r. NUMMI:
7(14 663.1699
Y011t MTMENCR NUML!qi
Pcnnit. Nu. NCOOK7858
LAGIWI XEI IR. D 1.1.1.411;P: COMMENT 13 KPI.Y LJ i.ii KM:NE:LK
I IMMENTS:
1041 CANDLEWICK DION.% s C.197173
Pagel

JUN 28,200 00:27
June 27, 200(r
Attu: Mr,
h1t#East I
Re;
ter Avr:mtlL", 5uil.:101
ltitrrtll £`ttttriiarr 281 I i
l°uttprcmctrt and aiy. Jac.
tinsuoralwuier Remedial tcrn WW 1"F
^4.1'1)#sS Permit No. N('fl(ViI7R5R
1:;Ci10•11 I:U (
er
ut: 'lrraicity anal y s A grab sample was also cr
:tort audlatlltnt, Poring letephrtne conversations with la
8023108
elrlht,I�,nl'^�"
t' imti`rrnred
that the col positc ehrnitie toxicity stsmrptr: hud (';riled Markman l?atvircrtlatretrt al, PA personnel Icmpornrily dirttvutirtued
oi. kratia5i3 arl° iitiii rll ?R "t4rtM l�,:kkatirM tirrrtsrli11.11 Of ihet:e iv.inI't., AS of tech)' rt:le, M.!dlr}:ri)'li4.
lsso iat9t7 with :all satinilvi huv4 viol email '1 lws.c rtsulLK. are attached and confirm thi
e#argnoae iitxrr"itr ,t tly:i;.
:Arritn11,ettleuLs Irlrve trees made to perl.crrm tr iocitie k.anteenUntin ny Anaiysi t at the relcieneatl ih.�etltil
for t:aeh of rho next two rnotnths. 1"hank yu
please contact the undersigned
Rtr. <`;Irar#m I Irrr!+r ttrlt
Mr. Rictrard Ilarmam, E'
yiurr rim4 and 1(you IvIt'e nnv iym;ctioats or concerns.
Page 2

JUN 28,2006 00:27
PRISM
IABORATORJEShC.
Cate: O61271136
Company. Harmon Environmental, PA
Contact: Ride Harmon
Addsoirc 615 Bruce Thomas Rd.
Monroe. NC 28112
802310E
Clod Project ID
Prism COC Group No:
Collarffon D e(a):
Lab Subrnktrif bata(e):
Case Narrative
Equipment8 Supply
G0606ti94
06/oatos
06/06/M6
This data package contains the analytical results for the project identified above and includes a Case Narrative, Laboratory Report and a
Subcontracted Laboratory Report with corresponding Chain -of -Custody totaling 11 pages. A chain-okrstody is also attached for the samples
submitted to Priem kris project
Data qualifiers are Ragged individually en emit sample. A key reference for the data qualifies appears at the end of this case narrative, Quality
control statements sraliur sample speoiftc remarks are included in the Sample momenta section of the laboratory report Beach sample
affected.
Semi Voids Analysts
NIA
Vahan Analysts
N/A
1s:(laolVSI$
NIA
Wet 1,421051 Micro Analysis
See Subcontract tort
Please cell if you have any quesaons relating to this OrlaYliod repot.
Date Reviewed by: Paula A. Gilleland .._... .. Project Manager: Paula A Citlefand
Signature: t.rd aalid, Signature::
Review Data: 06/27/06 Appian! oat. 0612f
Data Qualifiers Key Reference!
Compound also detected in the method blank.
ii, Result ordsTdo dew QC limas.
D0: Compound diluted ouL
E: Estirneted concentration, calibration range exceeded.
J: The arelyte was positively idcn tied but tho value I9 estimated beiow Ina naprdirg emit
H: Estimated ccncentrallon WM a high bias.
L: Estimated coneentea cn With a tow Inas.
At A matt( effect represent.
Notes: This report should not be reproduced, except in ice entirely, without the writitan oansentof Prism Laboratories, Inc, The results in (his
report relate only to the samples submitted tor analysis,
449 SpdngbccakRoad. P.O. Sot240543, Charbtte NC 282240403
Phor[a 784/529 4154 Tod Fro: 80042943e4 Fax MOM 0109
Page 3

JUN 28,2006 00:27
a MI I
FM Aryglwr \ Eisen e■mlhnreu
Harrison Environmental, PA
Attn: Rick Marmon
615 Bruce Thomas Rd.
Monroe, NC 28112
Parameter
8023108
NC CmtlMetien No.402
SC Cerliffcsden No. 09012
NC Drinking Water Cart. No. 37735
Project ID: Equipment & Supply
Sample Matra: Water
Laboratory Report
06/27/06
Client Sample ID:
Prism Sample ID:
COC Group:
Time Collected:
Time Submitted:
E&S Cutfail 001
152453
G0606004
06/06/06 8:00
06/06/06 8:55
Result Units Repel MDL Chinon Method Analyefs
Limit Factor Date/Time
Chronic Toxicity Pesecail wISetio is hnla dufk
Subcontract Report Sea Attached
Analyst Batch
Ip
1 600/4.91/002
• Ana .yoie Note for Suboontrdut Report: Sample was eUbcortttra.ctcd to smaronmentai Tooting
Solutions, rna.
Sample Dorranent(s):
B L = Below Reporting Link
.! = Estimated Wee between the Reporting Limit rand Me MD/.
Thu marts in this/aped Male only to tha samples sehmeta fee eirelysia and mot stoic cerffigation regrdiamerrte other than
NE3.AC eettif entie r excerpt for those tnsinncec Indicstadhi The ceso ranee re endear Ms! comments.
Angara D. Overu .b, V.P. L.oboratary Services
mar report should not be reproduced. except In its endrsty, without the written consent of Prism Laboratories, Inc.
449 Sixingbroek Road • P.O. Sax 240543 - Charlotte, NC 24-054.3
Phone: [phone] - Toll Free Number: 1.8CD 529.8364 - Fame 704/926-6409
Page 1 of 1
Page 4

JUN 28,2006 00:27
8023108 Page 5
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Pa Box 7565 Phone: [phone]� 6
Asheville, NC 28802 Fax: [phone]
E-mai1: [e-mail]
June 23, 2006
Ms, Paula Gilleland
Prism Laboratories
PO Hox 240543
Charlottc, NC 28224-0543
RE: ETS PROJECT NUMBER: 2575
Dear Ms. Gilleland:
Enclosed are toxicity test results for samples from the Equipment and Supply, Inc.
received by EnvironmentalTesting Solutions, Inc. SLUM 07 through June 10, 2006.
Parameter Test Procedure
Code
TGP3B
North Carolina Ccriodaphhia.Chronic Effluent
Toxicity procedure— Dcccmber 1985, Revised:
February 1998
(Ceriodaahnie Pass/Fail Toxicity Test)
EPA Method
- Number _
EPA-B2I-R-02-013
Final
'Result
FAIL
If this test was performed as an NPDES requirement or by Administrative Letter, please
enter an F on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the collection gate
June 05, 2006 using the parameter code TGP3B.
Additionally, please sign and submit the original DWQ Aquatic Toxicity Forst (AT-1) by
July 3112006.
If you have any questions concerning these results, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
cej
its Sumner
Laboratory Director
'I'his•report should not be reproduced, except in ifs entirety, without the written
consent of Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc,
North Carolina Certijrcnte Numbers Biological Analyses: 37, Drinkiiig Water: 37786, Wastewater: 600
South Carolina Certificate Number Clean Water Act: 99055-001-

JUN 28,2006 00:28
8023108
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LCsfl
Phone: [phone]
Pax: (87.8) 350-9368
lrmail: JiniStnilper aotcom
Date: June 7,3. 2006
Facility. Prism Laboratories, Inc. NPDIS il: NC-0037858 Pipe #: 001 County Union
lrquiptnent & Supply, Inc.
Laboratory Performing Test Environmental Tester: Solutions. Fit.
Signalize of Openstor is 11espoirsible Charge:
Signalize o1'Lhtratc y Suparvfanr
Coutur intS: .
2575
Sampka:
060607.11,060610.06
Mai! Original Tim North CarolinaDepartmeat of!?nvirattmant andNahusi liagoirresl
DWQ/Bnvimmnental Sciences Brmxh
112i Mail Service Center
RaleiB1, NC 27699.1621
North Qrrolias Ccrlodaphnia Chronic passitrail Raproduptiou Toxicity Test
Control OrRarllr n
1 2 3 4
Number of Young Produuad
33
, 33
33
_32
34
33
35
3230--
28
33
29
Adult Survival: Rive, (Dead
L
L
I.�
L
L.,
L
L
L
L
I.
L
L
Effluent Percentage
90%
Treatment 2 °monismnt
1. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Cliroulo Test Bu nits
Calculated t: NA
Tabular t: NA
% Reduction 100.0
Famed
litotralay
0.0
Avenge
Rtp},dadlaa
Cotrtral
32.1
Tniarxat 2
100.0
Trtsteetd
0.0
Coatird CV
6.4
Pars Fall
Number of Young Produced
`Adult Survival: (Ljiva, (D)end
pH (S.U) 1st Sample
Control [7.65 f7.53�
Treatment 2 8.53J 8.49
A.O. (mom)
Control
Treatment 2
1
1st Sarr:ple
7.6
7.7
7.8
7.9
0
15 17
0
D
0
D
0
lit Semple tad
{7.61I7.651
e.49 8.48
A
1st Sample 2ndSin •lc
0
1;3
7.9
7.8
7.9
7.8
I
0
U
LCSAcute Tonicity Test
(Mortality exlnrsscd as: VD, combining replicates.)
Carararanaa(%)
Mortality(%)
1.C50
9596 Confidence Limits
to
Organism Tested:
0 0^
D
D
0
13
d 4
r..b:rati,..s
100
•
X
Test Slam palm. 06-07-06
Collection (Start) Date:
Sample 1 06-05-06 Sr:mmple 2 08-08-06
Sample Tyne/Duration
a.m n.�.
Sample 1
Snnmlo 2
x
71.1'
x
u..
ALkablity ('ac CsCOIL)
Hardseu (rngl.1120. /L)
CansledirRY 0ftellndes10
Tota11&sidr4l Chlorine. (maA.}
Kw* 'rev. etReceipt CC)
i
IIMMEM
320
ant 0
<0.10
0.7
Method ufDdtermination
ITrirrened Spearman Karin r
Probit
Other:
Cariodayhala dubia burstitm: 7-clays
Control
HO cots.
pR (S.f1)
1XO (rngfL)
This data package contains the taxiclty text results sarnmarimi an ibis farm and inc1rrdea a Cover Pagc
.41 ! Farm, Laboratory Benahrhatts, Sratfsticut! Arratyue, Chat* af•C ustody form and Quality Control Charts.
DWQ form AT-1(3/8) rev. 1119S
Page 6

L ebPd
fi Cillq Jv oauasaid i spur pxanpoud 3ima(Io maw ap Jo maw 392u uddn a4111; gz V meN
X X PC X X x ?
..1 —1 "1 -y
tr1 sr
.L gwto mayid215
vwa manpaitrag pan
OMJ ICMaaaU
61 )r
fg
It
SMaD,Q wC =ql x
�Dzap . a •an;l ,1)
1iI!}a011' UIPV irin
411b/Jaw RIMY_
F e _LI paaoyac8 3cna,� g
loothwiS
Quo i$Mnan»J
070-15e•
rs
pas14a1tlq Ja1ab 1GiJu02
-q q mug -maps
-ezj Z
:U0!11Vgj
Antis pun Jpqumu.Owgrtaui
*Wiwi SuQ! ibpivg
aT i ivJril pAAL
—
111411111
Ialsegral
yap�a r1�
+411E2900 1I1FY _ Z
dea
(0e) O.ilyeaa�=p
ItrO J w) sssnpiq
(1fo'JV flu) 14!11n,IIy
(ma,ngtnn) 61!*! RpuoD
/T25-4 pQ
Ctrs) Hd
22l0rutl.tea
o10'h c
ii7C1 •C10 9
k pv-a► '
torq
t1
paanPuad lraad }olgy
pompoxdE1mm L{OQ
-_ (ply=u'axrj..
t.
0 1 -1) t
61C1 q 1
*10 0. °10 11
ova desa,
: 101Pire,JWK1 pitiifa/ 4jp4
Wob•1tt-14►4eradwa•L nsro i :uvwista%Ju! IrnagJsj` l
uaaMng lunq :e1911%
"1041 91. IY@ht dici+-aio Stircn/Jv sang pu arow
....MUpio intotE-tz> 'ate umunno
:aorltuuofuisusyuv inj
au•}1 angett Lro1 as j
lemaual quo!}M�jl11 ]say
1.0
*woo s1 n5 %
e,2 ]euraj ulawnsgul1dsijvS1 �)
gigundRuPds110 aca)ry
0D1
:040Z s) 41Puoi4 %
*40 z)spools Naon! tilgarnPV%
10111. 00 1
1cfer j
7,0
:cxazy)si1nyv itlmou
vise Q
myaluj rrern1 (Y1 r �rl .
1 9
• CTE0 iO` At°Q T -# 007110., Nip d : uopmetiofut e�dRr8
orgnp nruuIdivpou9. .•Fa!aadg N66I `dan.egag .uot3ea Pphi 0141'0700T E el>i N
E1010-111-ItS-l+da) lsaj AyraixoJ,1man=g;Io9Aila!na111.1.nuno. eD tivoN'uoti maoJui I0.1u0
I Jo I avd •auI ,s>aopnias ouy#saJ,113 ttauluo.RAur
80ZEZ08
11
8Z:00 400Z'8Z NIIP

JUN 28,2006 00:28
_Environmental Testing Solutions Inc.
8023108
North Carolina Chronic Pass/Fall Whole Rffluent Toxicity Test
(EPA-821-R-02-013 Method.1062.0, NC Modification- Februery,1998)
Species: Ceriodaphnia dubia
Parted with Control B
Page 1 of 1
2- Darr (X0.O v
Ciient; - -` rr Laf lfgairu..b,4fle NPDF.S #:. NC
Facilily; C,_14ilipijuzaisk5orphrjr1C. County:
OutralUPipe:
Comments:
b 061659
001
Full-slrtatlfth ehemht,y:
Parameter
Sample 1
Sample 2
Sample 1
Sample 2
PR (5.11.)
0.5g
a Li
Collection start date:
f 415-06
06 tit.
DO (mg/L)
EC I
e.p
Colieetiei end time:
OfGC?O
OP 6
Conductivity
(pmhos/cm)
, ,
.
a
82.0
Crab/Composite
Nitration);
gel-jiood,
0002.
PI , j
1yr►obi.te
Chlorihc
(m8114
*MP
� 0
AO AO
Temperature (C) upon
reeeint:. _
d 1 .
Dilution preparation:
Physical characteristics:
�...-...q.0
fl0}per
W12t,
no tAiati
r
Testconcentratien:
go-r,
mL Sample:
mC. Dilution carter.
_
ETS protect number:
fknbia I0.19te
AZ1`Sinsole number:
lopyrup.
en at on chemiglry:
Parameter
Initiation
Renewal One
Renewal Two
Analyst . , -
i PEA-
-
en (S.U.)
'
t9.v3
1 el' t
e.
9.4
!3.'#
DO (mg(L)
_
t4.
27_
-4
i
'LS.3
9 . p
2qj,
-
Conductivity (nrnhos/cm)
2 5
'�
7rmperioure ft')
.,�
Initial 1 Final
Whit
! Final
Initial
,
Final
list GbncentrWlon: 90
Dar
Replicate
nnelber mir
L
r 2_
3
4
5
6
7
8
9•
10
11
12
2
Adnit rKOrfaltty
= live. ty = death
�"
-
Q
�•
L
0
L
L
L
L.
L.
L
L
5
Yawn produced
Q 1
f�
0
0
.O
0
O
0
Adult mortality1:6Itt,b•
p . Ino,.D m daed)
b
b
b
d
tt
.
b
L or 7
Young produced
1
p .
Total young produced
0
CD
O
O
O
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
Float Adult Mortality
(L t• lies, D a tlead)
Du
b
t
b
b•36he
ts
16
b
A �8 tiu the uyycr t:gM count of ca numycl of yntuna produced tadicit�s the presence o1 two hoods
TeS1 remits:
°!e Mortality;
j O. -
Mean Offkpring/Femalo:
!Yr Reduction from control
i0061
Calculated r•.
N4
Tabular t:
NA
4
Paso or Fail
rA 1 te
Page 8

Environmental Testing Solutions,, Inc.
Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test (EPA 821 R-O2-013, Method 1002.0)
Species: Ceriofaphnia dubia
Quality Control
Verlfiratton of Data Entry, Calculations, and Statistical Analyses
Client! Priam Labaretartes,ine. - Equipment & Supply. Inc.
Test dates: June 07-144006
Project reinter: 2575
Revdwedby: r J1lf/AR.4+ ....r.,
Concentration
(36)
Day
Noraber of young produced 6y_re
—
Dente cuauber
Sienna
Ito
kweage
eepeaduenfon
(enspeiseernale}
v Jr
Osedlriefettlf
reeralian
res)
Palm! ndaeNaafrom
cooed 061
1
7
3
4
3
6
7
S
9
1e
11
12
C Control
5
17
LS
17
13
t9
16
17
17
15
15
16
15
-
/D0
32.1
6.4
Not applicable
7
16
L6
16
19
15
17
18
I5
15
13
17
13
Total
33
33
33
32
34
33
35
32
30
213
33
~
29
%
5
0.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
D
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
IOU
7
o
a
0
0
0
0
0
o
c
o
0
0
Tate]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
v
0
0
0
Dnonett's MSD value:
PMSD=
MSD = 1►frmirser±n Significant Diffaame -
PMSD - FaeentMinimnu, Siginilraut ttlEtecenee
PMSD is alunsurc Of testprec s:1e- 'the Ph D is the minimum percent difference between the °metro; end ireatrre st that am be declared
ctitistieally s'cgpiMaot'ia&'Micle effluent toxicityttst Cu average, a sigma:ant difference occurs for Enurnnrrleatal Tentes Sohtlians, Inc.
chromic toxicity tests when* toxicant reduces Ceriodaphr is etptndu oa by9.5% &writhe onto/
teem' PMSDbm:nddeta®eedtytiRi{PA(10tpaced ile) =11%.
Upper R&D bouxt4 determined by 1114$PA(4P"per mile) - 37°.b.
The lower and upper bout were caleulattd by the 1.13EFA using 393 teals eandtcted frotn331abotaturira Sri Ca :apinia reprcluGvm in
chfrmie reference laxicant bate.
LSEPA. 2003. Understanding and Accaartin2 far Method Variabilityin Whole WHIM TnaicityApplications Under NetanatPol1ufantD}sebarge Flimmatian program EPA-833-R43.003_ us Envizacunental
Prater -lien Ageaery, Gineicoeti. OH.
Efi p.mirfhl-G7-21

JUN 28,2006 00:29
Shipping teams:
351 Depot Street
Asheville, NC 28801
8023108
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Whole Effluent Toxicity Chain -of -Custody Form
Phone.: [phone]
Far [phone]
Fac,W Prism Laboratories, Inc.
speeitc;
Tait type:
Equipment and Supply, Inc.
Certodaphaia dubia
Pass/Fail Chronic
NPDES#: NC0087858 Pipe#: 001 county. Union
Purchase order.
Mom di efe 90%
Parameter code: TGP3B
i
Sample information: (to be wmpleted by ample cotttmtor)
Comporitasample;
Start date: 4,..5rQir
'Mane:
T
01eg
Sample loratium 6. S cUrPAa,.
On 1 I n5X'153L)
Volume waded for testing: 1L
Bad dale: C. - f.- go.
T
Q U
Number of containers filled for leafing:
Nnmbeeefsampkaperhout
Milled d:uog collection?
If allied, specfytemspemin=
0.9•5
Total rosidualchlnattle(mglL):
4 tea
_
Teropreabae at time of collect/an (°C):
Method of transport to laboratory:
Co^�ma=
Grab sample:
Date
u
T—
Nola: l)C) Nt)T c 4ket SAW bsfare 8:00AM. Triple rinse sample cm twiner with Kemple before filling. Completely Eli
the &a mplc container with no air apnea. Pack the container Co1uplldely is ice. The aample mast be rvccwcd al < 4.01C.
An additional feu of $50 00 per sample will be clamed for samples collected before 8i00 AM.
Sample cnmlody: (to be completed by sample collector and f arty pummel)
bawds cokededby:
lilastA Lleited
RdEagati d b3'
#pss0.lati
rad
i. dim 19_
ua.Sd Mt
LIA4 oiw
Sample receipt it formation: (lo be nominated by ETS personnel)
Mtge (atslai2 to ET5 try:
AB,. g•ZTban
rm�
Custr dy ac& Intact?:
Pow -
Received by
Paa
Received at EIS by:
�.4rs
Samples received in good condition?'
1 N. 1
can loon ta:
demo.
Sample tell peratole upon receipt at ETS (°C):
3R
Pagject number: Samplenumber. ac+0400 2-11
Page 10

JUN 28,2006 00:29
•
Shipping address:
351 Depot Street
Asheville, NC 28801
8023108
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Whole Effluent Tox elty Chaln-of-Custody Form
Phone-. [phone]
Fix: [phone]
May: Prism Laboratories, Inc. 101:111s #: NC0087858 Pipe*: 001 t linty: Union
Rgiupinenl and Supply, Inc- _ Farnham mac::
speciesprciev Ceriudaphxia dlibia
Teat type: Pass/PailChronic
E feentaiI Madam 90%
Parameter coda_ TGP313
Sample. information: (lute completed by sample collector)
Coininlaite ellmpl :
sondale: Calafa6.
•
Time $;,! $
Satnpb lacstifla: gar
volume collected fez testing! 1 L.
End dole: (/4 /CC'?
Time: 5.16 .
Number of containers AIM for tasting,: 1
Model ofsamples perhour:
Chilled during %mile -dice
If culled, spay ap t
p'
Tomltesidnattchlorine ( II
L{r.s --
Tempocteue at limo of collection (CC): -
Method of howling to laboratnay:
Comments:
Grub sample.:
Date:
Tin c
Node: t1n NfiT aollaxt slurp ei before $:UDAX Triple rinse sample ewutatuer with sample before filling. Completely fill
Ilse sample container with no air apace. Pack the container mrnprate:y in ice. The temple mist bereoeivcd ate LO C.
An additional fee of $50.00 per sample will be charged for samples collected before 8:00 AM.
Simple custody: (Io be completed by simple collector andfacibty pa:cannel)
t/son.l= rdlcrinl
2111nookked by
Ws/4, 0:7r
Examplereceipt inrormatian:' (to :hacampleicdby l'Spersonnel) •
Custody seals intact?!
L1
Samgtles t<ccetvcd is good ammellt[on?t 17:1 11
Ye
comment
Sample ternperutu re upon receipt at'ETS CC):
Project number: 461'5" Sample number! Woo(p 10.Q4'
Page 11

JUN 28,2006 00:30
8023108
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Ceriodaphnia dubia Control Reproduction, Coefficient of Variation, and PMSD
in Sodium Chloride Chronic Reference Toxicant Tests
40
w 35
tri
a 30
w td w
' 25
20
a moo,
L. 15
40
0
30
ty
00 20
" U
0
et
40
30
04 20
10
1 [ 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 Z i i 1 1
•
Minimum Acceptance Criteria (> 15.0 offspring per Surviving female)
1 1 1 1 1 1_- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1, 1 I I
I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -
North Carolina Acceptance Limit (< 40.0%)
Kentucky Acceptance Limit (<30.0%)
............................... ......................................
I I 1 1 1 I 1 1, j 1 1 1 11 11 1 1 1 1
0 t 1 1 1
0- o oor- m
USEPA Upper PMSD Bound (90"'percentile <37.0%)
1 1 1 I i 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1
Test date
Page 12
—•-- Control Reproduction, Coefficient of Variation (CV), or Percent Minimum Significant Difference
(PMSD) PMSD is the minimum significant difference between the control and treatment that can be
declared statistically significant.
--- •— • Central Tendency (mean Control Reproduction, CV, or PMSD)
• • •• •-• Control Limits (mean Control Reproduction, CV, or PMSD ± 2 Standard Deviations)

JUN 28,2006 00:30
7-day IC25 (gf, NaC1)
1.12
i.10
LD8
1.46
1.04
2.5
2.0
i.5
1.0
0.5
8023108
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
Ceriodaphnia dubia
Sodium Chloride Chronic Reference Toxicant Control Chart
using Moderately Hard Synthetic Water
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
USEPA Control Limits (f 2 Standard Deviations)
t 1 1 t 1 t 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 l 1---1
t t , , 1- 1 1 1 t 1 ► 1 1 1 t t 1 1
USEPA Warning and Control Limits (75t and 90thPercentile Cvs)
1.
1.4. 1 i 1 1 Y'-T-1— 1 i. 1 1 1 1 1 1 -r
1.3 - Laboratory Warning and Control Limits (1 Oth and 25m Percentile CVO)
1.4 �..—.._ _.. _,.,.., ..
0.9
0.8 1 t t , 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 ,. ,
t1 1 \ ,SAS ♦ 1 °5 110a o j tr *ta
Test date
Page 13
--. 7-day ICHS = 25% inhibition concentration. An estimation of the concentration of sodium chloride
that would cause.a 25% reduction in Ceriodaphnia reproduction for the test population.
— ` - Central Tendency (mean IC,$)
--- •- Warning Limits (mean ICas ± SA.10 or SA.7S)
Control Limits (mean 1C,S SA,a, SA , ur 2 Standard Deviations)

MAY 10,2006 13:14
1949 Candlewick Drive
Ft. Mill, SC 29715
(803) 802-108 a1Tioe
(704) E319-1525 Mobile
FaX
To: JOHN LESLEY
Ftlx: 704.6040
Phan:
8023108
PGP Services
Form Frank Gravely
Pag•SI 8
Date; 5 (10 ! 2006
R= EQPT AND SUPPLY CC:
PERMIT NO, NC0087858
❑ urgent XO For Review 0 Plate Cerement XD Maio Reply ❑ Please Recycle
• Comments:
MR. LESLEY,
ATTACHED IS LETTER OF NOTIFICATION. WE BELIEVE THIS PROBLEM HAS SEEN
RECTIFIED AND WE WILL RESTART THE SYSTEM SHORTLY. THE CHRONIC TOXICITY DATA
HAS BEEN SENT PRIORITY MAIL TODAY TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE BRANCH. THIS
WAS A CLERICAL ERROR AND WE APOLOGIZE' FOR THE DELAY. PLEASE LET ME KNOW IF
THERE IS ANY FURTHER INFORMATION YOU MAY NEED, OR ANY QUESTIONS. THANKS.
FRANK,
Page 1

MAY 10,2006 13:15 8023108 Page 2
i
I•in't bftli, xr' r„7:1,i
CIO
May 10. 21106
Division of Water Quality
Mooresville Regional Office:
Attn: Mr. John Lesley
610 !vast Center Avenue. Suite 301
Mooresville, Nonh Carolina 28115
Re: Equipment and Supply, Inc.
GmundwaterRernediution WW1'F•
NH.M S Permit No. NC0087858
Mr. Lesley,
In acexrdiuice with Purl TI Section E6 (b) of the referenced discharge permit, and atter a phone convermion with you,
we would like to submit the toilowing information regarding the subject facility..
Effluent sample, were collected mi April 10, 2006 and submitted to a certified laboratory for de
required analysis.
On April 25, 2006, the subject facility rematliation equipment was turned off in order to 11 rliarm routine
cleaning of the air seripp4r and tither routine maintcnancc.
Laboratory unatlyties were received via fax on April 26, 2066 indicating lliii n breakthrough of
Trichloroethene had. occurred rat the stripper unit (analytics attached to previous correspondence).
Ms. Linda Jones at the Raleigh, N.C. DWQ office was contaciod nn April 27, 2006 and given all
relevant information concerning the upset and 24-hour notifiction. Mr. lieu-gharule: of the
Mooresville. N.C. DWQ office contacted us and received the same information. Ile instructed our
office to provide this information to you and also attach Otis infetrmatittn to the Monitoring Report
submitted monthly to the Raleigh office.
Effluent samples were collected on April. 21, 2006 and submitted to a certified laboratoryfor the
required analysis.
laboratory analylics were reeeived via e-mail. in May 9. 2006 indicating that a breakthrough of
Trichlurnetbcrie had occurred at the stripper unit (analytics attached).
A message was lett for Mr. Rex Gle:a_son in canter to provide 24-hour notification.
It is our opinion that this upset may tome been caused by calcium scaling in the air stripper. As indicated in recent
icleephonc conversations between Mr. Joseph Nestor, P.E. of NRSCO F.nvimnmenlal, PLLC and Ms. Susan Wilson of
the DIiNR, Equipment and Supply, Inc. intends to incorporate a sequestering agent dosing; system In 11 _le proem:. This
dosing system was installed dieing the lust week of April. In conjunction with the addition of the dosing system, Oro
air .stripper wins disassembled and cleaned. We believe that these aCtivitirs will cause till Gon+tivacnfr of concern to
return to below Doily Maximum Limits established in the permit documents. The system has remained out of
operation since April 25, 2006. We will reSurtie operation tit this facility within the next week.
']hank you for your time and consideration, If you have any questions or concerns, please contact the undersigned.
-Regards,
'Manic Gravely, PE, ORC
PGP Services. LLC
Cc: Equipment and Supply
Mr. Rick Harmon, Hannon Environmental
File

;ff,,10`' ? 40
MAY 10,2006 13:15
NC Coale iaafi n 1o. 402
$C OorltilcotiOn No, 08012
NC Drinking Wider Cort. No- 3r735
pa war. Anima a aaerae:ar aroma
Harmon Environmental, PA
Attn: Rkk Harmon
615 Bruce Thomas Rd.
Monroe, NC 28112
Parameter
1.1,2-Tdchleroothmo
1.1-0Iahi aelhane
cia-1,2-Dictioroothono �41, /' Tatrechloroothorre )
/
Toluene
Total Manes
trans-1,2-D3chlorostF n 30k
Tdablaraethana
Vinyl Chlarkle
M t$i b7ICeR
Cadmium
5ampie Preps dlor :
8023108 Page 3
Project ID: Equipment & Supply
Sample Matrbc Water
% Laboratory Report
ort
Client Sample ID:
Priam Semple ID:
CaC Group:
Time Collected:
Time Submitted;
Result Unite Report MDL Dilution Method
Limit Factor
wows
EFt=
148738
G0406557
04/21/08 010
04/21'08 15:00
Analyetg Analyst Bstt:h
Date/Tone ID
BR4 pm, 0,50 0.40 1 VA 0510210614:25 Iwamoltotm 014504
SRL ygIL 1.0 0A2 1 024 05IO2I06 14 25 kcimplaolef Q14564
2t pa 1.0 047 1 024 Otio2/06 14 ,5 ivamp4ono 014504
B1IL pgsL. 0-75 OAS 1 624 05612106 14 25 Intsm010020 414504
BAL ugiL 1.0 0.30 1 624 05r02/061416 ?mmplgilao 014504
BR1. pa1L 9.0 2.6 1 524 05i02108 145 lwampipotb 414604
ERL p01L 2.n 0.66 1 624 050210e 14 5 tc0111100450 014504
25 pgIL 1-0 0.02 1 624 05A005 14 5 kcemplpab Q14504
BILL pg1L 1.0 0.e0 1 024 06102105 14:25 kmmplgoao 014504
Surrogate % Recovery Control Limits
Toluene 01 00 76 -121
Nbrornotluoromethano 08 74 -133
6romoftuC:oboruane 00 69 -130
SRL mg& 0.0010 0.0002 1 200.7 05103 17:44 mmrpes4 Q14460
50 rnL 1 50 mL 260.7 04PZWO6 7:10offprint'
P16232
Semple Cemmerrl(e); titkei 3 td ") V. GrRQ " 1_`'i i'►/'
PAL m Maw Repcultng L .5- --' a ,-C-P�+— l -0 +_ Sr 4" i
J m Eadmordd venue tteiween ilea Reporaig Una and ma MDL I�, (',a,,. L v`st • i -s
7M mugs fn 101smow uoJffi® wrly to iha same 441om7ted for irealydo end most date =Mean,, ante other than
NSLAC eNtilkattal esroept for hratarrces indicated m the case namadva and/or bat comnmrda.
Angela D. Overacts/1. V.P. kabondoly Seruiees
Tlda rapprt ono Id not be reproduced. except In Its an@rety. without the Written consent of Prism Leborntortes, inc.
449 Sprbrgbrook Road - p.a. Box 210543 - Rhartol4. NC 22224.0543
Phone [phone] - Toll Free Number:1-O00j628.8894 - Fare 7041025.0400 Pago 1 of 1Lf
iti
{,Cn3 1b4 co-t 0 . Fi��

MAY 10,2006 13:15 8023108 Page 4
Case Narrative
Dew 518r06
Compsty: Hammon Environmental. PA
Gentset: Rick Herman
on
Address: 6155 &trace Thomas Rd.
Monroe, NC am
PRISM
LADONATORIS.roc
Cllord Relict ID: Equ ment & Supply
Client Project Mara or No:
Prism COG Group No: GMO6657
Collection Date(* ems
Lob Stbmlttm3! Dom 4I21A 8
Vs dela package canteine the analytical resifts far the project!battled above end Includes a Case Narragve, Laboratory Repcd
end (biddy Control Data Mating 5 pages. A ehah-af wstody Is also aided for be ssmptee aabmitfed b Priem for hfs praJac!
Dataquatiflers are flogged indivlduafyen each semis. A Key Reference for the dataquall lera appears at tho bottom of fhis page.
Quality conbi state tents andfor eernpla apedfo remarks ere Included in the earnple comments section rite
laboratory report for each sernido Wads&
Please call tyou have any sensations relating b Qas analytical report.
Data Reviewed by: Paula A. Gilleland Protect Wagon Paula A Gilleland
C J.t .
Review Dab: 516fi6 Approval Dots 5J8m6
Gala Quallior Kay Reference
9: Result outside of QC limits
6: Carr:pound also detected in the method blank
D0; Compound a h9'hrtad out.
E: Estimated concentration, callbra ion range a ceded
J: The anafpta was pesaiively Identified battle value Is estimated beiwn the reporting k eit
,1f4; Eefirneled concentratbn with o tdgh btps
Esfrnafed concentration with a low bias
hh Moab( it
T: Tentatively Identified compound. The concentration is estimated.
Noble: This report should not be reproduced, except in &s entirely, hour the written consent of Prism i.aborabrlos,
The result In Ile report relate only to the samples euhrnlitod for analysts.
449 Spr1ngbrcok Road, P. 0. sax 240543, C ierlotle, NC 28224.0403
Phenix 7041529.5 4 Tetil Free: b041529-6364 Fax [phone]
Floorrrmanla3aaaarreewe Revised ei25115

GieritCompany NM*Y�
ReportTalGaU*aCt Rome:
Reporting Addt u: GP 15
. PR�SlK . CHAIR OF CUSTODY RECORD
LAIOLUOMES,—,�` E .. 9ts M _ OP a m MwrE PROPER MUM
itl! BervrraAnstAlcai dByiet rt mial So4/eaa
41®SprksObrss is acid • P.0.l3os 21054S ollaniono, IiC i9131.00
Ptrorn:7Ofllt39.6S64 • F r 7541625.O1CO
F,ratlitmr„AltriglisAproration*ATTACK oro, project �I r�� (U LEVEL I III
a a Iprnan* , . er QC
�jdr1C4.'?1LAslAS12-4
�
Project Nape Efy1•011 1 O
Shod Hold Anaheim ceelig3 UST Proleer (Yea)
Ati rz Wrote
••L •. 341
/ tar -Incivotti
LAB US ONLY
� WA
WET 0erracip 41, •—
PROPEI PRFSSI4AT11i 3 trlf6>1nE7 =
R eed Ydrttel kaossTmeir -
:PROPER-OONTAlif wie ' ..•
Plwla 7C4f ka`Wu %c fYeS? ltlo) 3!+ - I$
BE FILLED IN BY CI.JENT/SAMPLNiG t7 ija .
cAKHic7ltian: NELAS_U91lGE_FI. NCL�
Erraill (Y�) Email Adder mm�
EEO PDF t:rtoal_Oltwr
Blto Local/on Mow f•=Q•Uerr lirkir ft
Sits Localltion Physical Adi r'p= 4so1 1
Pert Ordar Nib/ealirp R rise s= .
Ried Ilse Dab) Cr, DAY D2Osis. US psis 7 a OW DSPM
'Woking ' R6-DDrboA'$msidard104sra
,-Ar . S received alter 1 SSD ea b, mammared buses, ea_
7 &V ilenaro d tn. b bawd an buns drys, aodatifng 59.5ersOr and ioldeys.
SO OTHER WA
T�
WStef Chlorinate& YES__,.
Sample iced Upon Codeatiors O_
j 1Al.+lalf Ale 2421
cowman
� 5Yf ui01EIENSE FORUMS aem
mama= sown
are.leOlen
CLIENT
LOESDf 7i01[
DATE
f�ptLt tEo
Me
CPUMAN
Roam
Wing COMMA
AKLLlf6EBREDUES1!D
P'
PRISaIralai
'DEEMPS DIELOW
No_
SIZE
AorViy0),.///// FEEultflla9
ID NO.
tlWAS
WAWA
Frr
f
`Ir/Zl1c4
P.ZA
L
414454. `
rjSe)c
WS136
-
•
1
/��
` .)
1 fe...r..ava,.
PRESS 1:101M4 FIRMLY •
a GOPIES
6empleea Sfplrat= kt) 1 •_
Sa► pked By if riot Narne)'r'"i rah * f
Miamian any go; A.
Upon. - . • this Chain of Custody 4 four for Mora to mowed with 9a r.gl.saQd�cilo gea Mint be
PRISM USE 0 N L Y
eubodttsd •• .• to ttra fJ to Pka}a o limagsr�be • -.. •� t yew' 1, an4rsas lams tam
��"� ' f /IjVJ�.
*{
Addliforeai Caamarita:
�
4.! / !
K •
fOW v°Jaj
(
slcr Deoeiura The
t3ard Tear Few
�4
•
Ae>.. --A• .1- oda7 ATmoo YDTietLbifesa _
inn —. �' '" .}." suuua o:aAwraess fe wtslwli TOY.
Winn
4Ck•
w+•
aarm. Dupe 3raa.sd-. raneaww. MOW
c so OEM 0 sc l qa I WATER: RINKP GWATER I �s Cl � sci COMA 1 LANDFILL I nCh O c asc
GONTAIER TYPE CMS: A = After Cis Crles6 mains P a Plaoft Ti..• Te1orJrsd Gap VOA C Velagie Ot arcs Analysts (Imo Head Spat)
F RF 9 [ F4 : OK
TCRr-7$ 3 Ct JI .31'rS
ORIGINAL

MAY 10,2006 13:16 8023108 Page 6
41111111111111111111
IWOONOO011000ftelliskaup
- Hermon Envlrarunental, PA
Attn: Rick Hamm
615 Bruce'iTei#rras Rd.
Monroe, NC 28112
MI & rHf It . as lhod 200.7
4u hod Blank
NC CerURrall n No, 402
SC Co nn Na. 02012
NC Drinking W Star Cart No, 37736
Level 11 QC Report
618106
Prcjed IR: Equipment & supply MC Group lumber: G0405557
QetWThno Submitted: 4/21106 16100
MOO o vii
Om RI. Ile0 MO ro
Cadmium
-0.0001 0A01 4.0006 mmL Q14489
Laboratory Coate/ !ample
MI Af • rrar OG
DOM
Cadmium
WITlx gpk.
148465 Cadtnern
9.2409 026 m 1. ea 85- t15 Q14489
Ihtrin Eplki ltuptfeste
Rods Mt
146460 Cadmium
RoeMan• woo % R oc 1D
02245 0.25 mot 90 70. 130
014480
APO
59111, Rob, unu % r r, re, cc RIO
0.2354 025 iro . 94 70 -130 6 0- 20 0144139
This report 4h1a ld netbo reprrauced, except In Its mere% Whom the *men cement of Priam L0borutwi.a. Inc.
449 Bpurnebroub Rood - P.O. to 240643 - Marlette. NC 212244543
Phh4r14: 704/5294354 - Toll Free Number. 1-90W520.6 84 - Four: 70025.8499 Page 1 of 3

Ihme-
gsgsg
1%) } .a p7 ..
C 0 0 0 O
Q `D D S S
IMO
a
c1
*q
DDOODfl DE ,3
EFEf
fffMMI
� 1 i. r r r P d
IHEIPM
Sg5TarLil
*m a Eu
i � µ
r v
O � aQr pr
a
ag
ffnffMr
ADDDDHDp
1
+yddng .9 1uewdi*nb3
rul
al
a

MAY 10,2006 13:16 8023108 Page 8
idlvr�-M�r 4-
II_hl____J I.rpu.
Hannon Environmental, PA
Att= Flick Hannon
8i6 arum Thomas Rd.
Monroe, NC 28112
NO Ced55aagon tea 402
Sc CeilificatIm No. 80012
NC Winking Water Cert. No. 37735
Leal 11 QC Report
518/06
Project ID: Equlpmcnt & Supply CDC Group Number: GO405057
Didellime Submitted: 41211C8 11k0a
Matrix
$ Itwa� lSift LllFal R� � R.RPD Rt . oo era
* 1�
Total xylem 53.37 e0 15 80 66 -137 11 0- 20 014604
5e11e-1,2 hloraethen. 75.8E 80 NIL 94 54.155 15 0.22 014504
TrIctilemitherre gum 80 Ms. 85 71-157 15 0-18 014504
Vinyl Chloride Ba.0a 80 te74 85 10 - 261 14 0- 23 Q14804
Tits regal should net be reproduced. Meet In lie eagrey, without the wrtteen consent el Priam lAberutorles. Inc.
4451130egbrook Ro.d - P.O. Uax240843 • Charialtk NC 2t1224-0543
Phoom 704152a4304 - Toll Fro, &sober 14100152543M • Fax [phone] Page 3 013

0
A
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr, Se,ntary
North Carolina Department of .Environment and Natural. Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P E. Director
Division of Water Quality
©ate Bch 8, 2006
L. L. Jester
Equipment & Supply, Inc.
4507 Highway 74 West
Monroe, NC 28111
MAR C
Subject: Notice of Incomplete Discharge Monitoring Repo rtNCpl87858
Dear Permittee:
OFFICE
The purpose of this letter is to call your attention to problems with the recent submittal of the Discharge
Monitoring Report (DMR) from your facility. As you may know, the data recorded on your DMR is keyed
into the Division's database, Our data entry s ff has informed me of problems with your recent DMR.
submittal. Until these problems have been corrected, your DMR will be considered incomplete. Please
see the attached form along with a copy of the problem DMR for details regarding the DMR's deficiency.
Incomplete or illegible DMRs affect our stars ability to provide a timely and effective evaluation of DMR
submittals. Please be aware that until the Division receives a corrected DMR, you may be considered
noncompliant with your NPDES permit and 15A NCAC 0213 M506, and you may be subject to further
enforcement action. Please take the necessary steps to correct the problems and submit two copies of the
amended DMR within fifteen (15) days of the date of this letter to the following address:
Attention: Michele Phillips
Division of Water Quality
Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Future DMR submittals with the same or similar problems will be unacceptable. If you have any questions
about the proper completion of DMRs, please contact Michele Phillips at 919-733-5083 Ext. 534. Thank
you for your assistance in this matter.
cc: Mooresville Regional 0 c
Central Files
Sincerely,
Michele Phillips
N. C. Division of Water Quality
Internet http://h2o.enrstatertc.us
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-161.7 Phone: [phone] Customer Service
Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax: [phone]
1-877-623-6748 •
An Equal OppatuiitylAit*matnee Action Employer

Notice of Incomplete Discharge Monitoring Report
Permit Number:
Facility: q L
County: vv
DMR Month and Year: 1--cuLL4....coav� v 1,
The Division of Water Quality deems the aforementioned DMR as incomplete due to the
following reason(s): (Please see highlighted areas on the attached DMR for details)
❑ The written values are illegible
❑ The Average, Maximum, and/or Minimum data points have been omitted
❑ The Units of Measure have been omitted or are incorrect
❑ The DMR Parameter Codes have been omitted
Other:
With regard to parameter 34481 (Toluene, dissolved), which you reported, our database
shows the codes should be 34010 (Toluene). Please inform this office if the analytical
method used was indeed what you reported or if the lab actually analyzed for the code our
database shows. If the latter is correct please update your form template with the correct
code and resubmit per the enclosed Ietter.

n Sri ro
December 30, 2005
Mr. Cecil G. Madden, Jr., P.E.
Supervisor
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Construction Grants and Loans Section
Design Management Unit
1633 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1633
Re: Engineer' Certification
Ground Water Recovery and Treatment System
Equipment & Supply Company, Inc.
ATC No. 087858A01
NDPES Permit No, NC0087858
Monroe, Union County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Madden:
Nesco Environmental, P_L.L.C. (Nesco Environmental) prepared this
correspondence on behalf of Harmon Environmental, PA for Equipment & Supply
Company, Inc. The construction of the ground water recovery and treatment system
at the referenced project location is complete.. Attached is the Engineer's Certification
that is required by your office..
Nesco Environmental understands that Equipment & Supply Company, Inc.
intends to start operation of the system during the week of January 9, 2005. A copy of
this correspondence is being forwarded to Mr, Rex Gleason, Water Quality Regional
Supervisor for the Mooresvile Regional Office, The transmittal of the copy to Mr.
Gleason is intended to satisfy the 48-hour pre -start-up notification requirement
required by that office.
Environmental andGeologicServices
6736 Rocky Falls Road Charlotte, NC 28211 Phone/Fax [phone]
[e-mail]

Cecil Madden, Jr., P.E.
NCDENR
December 30, 2005
If you have any questions or comments, please fell free to contact me at (704)
442-1365.
Sincerely,
NESCO ENVIRONMENTAL, P.L.L.C.
P. 146----
Joseph P. Nestor, P.G., P.E.
President
cc: Richard Harmon, P.G. - Harmon Environmental, PA
Rex Gleason — Mooresville Regional Office
JPN/jpn 20051230

ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION
1, Joseph P. Nestor, as a duly registered Professional Engineer in the State of North
Carolina, having been authorized to observe periodically the construction of the
Groundwater Remediation WWTP, located off Highway 74 West, northwest of
Bakers, in Union County for the Equipment and Supply, Inc., hereby state that, to the
best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the
following construction:
Two recovery well pumps (5 gpm capacity each), flow meters, one 1,000-
gallon storage tank, two transfer pumps, and an air stripper with internal
sump, associated piping and appurtenances in conformity with the project
plan, specifications, and other supporting data subsequently filed and
approved by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources.
I certify that the construction of the above referenced project was observed to be
built within substantial compliance and intent of the approved plans and
specifications.
Signature
Date December 30, 2005
Registration No. 23056

>. r aarewornal Limited Llabillity Company
December 30, 2005
Mr. Cecil G. Madden, Jr. r P.E.
Supervisor
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Construction Grants and Loans Section
Design Management Unit
1633 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1633
Re: Engineer' Certification
Ground Water Recovery and Treatment System
Equipment & Supply Company, Inc.
ATC No. 087858A01
NDPES Permit No. NC0087858
Monroe, Union County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Madden:
t OPT. OF tNVIRONM
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RESV l t OFFICE
r
JAN0 6
Nesco Environmental, P.L.L.C. (Nesco Environmental) prepared this
correspondence on behalf of Harmon Environmental, PA for Equipment & Supply
Company, Inc. The construction of the ground water recovery and treatment system
at the referenced project location is complete. Attached is the Engineer's Certification
that is required by your office.
Nesco Environmental understands that Equipment & Supply Company, Inc.
intends to start operation of the system during the week of January 9, 2005. A copy of
this correspondence is being forwarded to Mr. Rex Gleason, Water Quality Regional
Supervisor for the Mooresvile Regional Office.
Environmental and Geologic Services
6736 Rocky Falls Road Charlotte, NC 28211 Phone/Fax [phone]
[e-mail]

Cecil Madden, Jr., P.E.
NCDENR
December 30, 2005
If you have any questions or comments, please fell free to contact me at (704)
442-1365.
Sincerely,.
NESCO ENVIRON
NTAL, P.L.L.C.
Joseph P. Nestor, P.C., P.E.
President
cc: Richard Harmon, P.G. - Harmon Environmental, PA
JPN/jpn 200 2 0

ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION
1, Joseph P. Nestor, as a duly registered Professional Engineer in the State of North
Carolina, having been authorized to observe periodically the construction of the
Groundwater Remediation WWTP, located off Highway 74 West, northwest of
Bakers, in Union County for the Equipment and Supply, Inc., hereby state that, to the
best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used in the observation of the
following construction
Two recovery well pumps (5 gpm capacity each), flow meters, one 1,000-
gallon storage tank, two transfer pumps, and an air stripper with intemal
sump, associated piping and appurtenances in conformity with the project
plan, specifications, and other supporting data subsequently filed and
approved by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources.
I certify that the construction of the above referenced project was observed to be
built within substantial compliance and intent of the approved plans and
specifications.
Signature
Date December 30, 2005
Registration No. 23056

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G, Ross Jr,, Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Chairman
Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
Mr. Andrew Adams
Equipment and Supply, Inc
4507 Highway 74 West
Monroe, NC 28110
December 1, 2005
System: Equipment and Supply, Inc Groundwater Remediation System
Classification: Grade 1 Physical Chemical System
Subject: Designation of ORC and Backup ORC for Physical / Chemical
Permit: NC0087858
Dear Mr. Adams:
The Water Pollution Control System Certification Commission has classified the subject facility as a
Grade 1 Physical Chemical Pollution Control Treatment System based upon your permit, the Water
Pollution Control System Certification Commission Rules 15A NCAC 8G .0306 (a), and input from the
Division of Water Quality / Raleigh Regional Office. Classification is effective the date of this letter.
In accordance with 15A NCAC 8G .0202 and your permit, you must designate an Operator in
Responsible Charge (ORC) and Back -Up Operator who has a current physical chemical certification of
the appropriate level. Your facility requires a Grade 1 or higher Physical Chemical Treatment Plant
Operator in Responsible Charge and Grade 1 or higher Back -Up Operator. Failure to designate a
properly certified operator and back-up operator constitutes a violation of the permit issued for this facility.
Our records indicate that this facility does not have a certified and/or valid Physical Chemical Grade 1
operator as ORC and Backup designated at this time. An ORC and a Backup ORC with the required
certification must be designated within 90calendar days from the date of this letter. Enclosed is a new
designation form. Please complete this designation form and submit it to this office by March 2, 2006
If individuals managing this system do not have a Physical Chemical Grade 1 certification then they must
complete a Commission approved school and take the state's certification examination. Contact
NCAWWANVEA [phone] or Environmental Training Associates [phone] or Lenoir
Community College [phone] ext. 133 for school information. If you have any questions
concerning this facility classification and ORC requirement, please reference our website
(h2o.enr.state.nc.us/tacu) and search under' Wastewater Rules" or contact me at 919/733-0026 ext. 341.
Sincerely,
James Pugh, Education and Training Specialist
Technical Assistance and Certification Unit
cc: Mooresville Regional Office
TAC Files
Central Files
Technical Assistance & Certification Unit
1618 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1618
DENR Customer Service Center
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer
Internet httpJ!h2o.enr.state.nc.us/taculindex.html
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
Telephone [phone]
50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper