The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20200285 Ver 3_Daniel Farm _ PCN Additional Information Oct 11 2021_20211011October 11, 2021 To: Stephanie Goss NC Division of Water Resources Fr: Wyatt Brown Brown's Environmental Group, Inc. Re: Daniel Farm Subdivison Benson, NC Johnston County Revision to Original PCN submitted June 2021 SAW# 2020-00395 DWR# 20200285 v.1 Stephanie, Attached is Information for the revised Daniel Fam subdivision. Information originally submitted with no revisions has been omitted (USFWS, NC SHPO, etc). The PCN Info sheet contains the updated info, with revised sections highlighted as Revised from Original PCN. Revisions include the total parcels, site plans/impact maps, subdivision plans, JD Request (included is the Approved JD Request Form), and one additional wetland impact. Briefly: Initial delineation conducted 2015, verbal concurrence provided by USACE (David Shaeffer). Two ponds determined to be upland (excluded) by USACE (Samantha Daley). Construction begun 2017, without authorization. After the fact impacts are included. PCN submitted June 2021 requesting authorization for ATF impacts. Future impacts were planned at the time, but USACE requested permitting of ATF prior to moving forward with additional phases. Additional Parcel (Parcel #3 Buff kin Tract) added July 2021, post submittal. USACE Request for entire subdivision to be included in PCN Request. This Addlnfo submittal is complete for the entire Daniel Farm Subdivison. Daniel Farm PCN Permitting Information Revised Oct 2021 Daniel Farm Subdivision PCN Info Sheet Section A. Process Information Processing Info Prior AID: SAW-2015-01037 DWQ# 20210415 Section B. Applicant/Owner Information Primary Contact Information (no change) Wyatt Brown Brown's Environmental Group, Inc. 242 Batten Farm Rd Selma 27576 Owner Information (no change) Daniel -Lan Development, LLC 1075 Country Club Rd Smithfield 27577 Applicant Information (no change) Same as Owner Agent/Consultant Information (no change) Wyatt Brown Brown's Environmental Group Inc. 242 Batten Farm Rd Selma 27576 • Attachment: Agent Authorization Section C. Project Information and Prior Project History Instructions 1, Project Name (no change) Daniel Farm Subdivision Benson Property Identification (New Lots added from Original PCN) Parcel1: 162400-84-4154 Bk 05073 Pg 0079 Parcel2: 162400-74-5161 Bk 05073 Pg 0079 Parcel3: 162400-64-8374 Bk 05468 Pg 0950 Parcel4: 162400-71-1041 Bk 05073 Pg 0079 Parcel5: 162400-81-3495 Bk 05069 Pg 0379 Parcel6: 162400-82-5470 Bk 05267 Pg 0792 1 13.27 Ac 14.46 Ac 30.31 Ac 68.89 Ac 15.31 Ac 4.88 Ac 147.12 Ac Daniel Farm Subdivision PCN Info Sheet 12700 A NC Hwy 210 Benson 27504 Lat: 35.51930 N Long:-78.56867 W • Attachment: Property /D Exhibit; • Attachments: 1) Location 2) 2016 Aerial 2) 2018 Aerial 3) USGS Topo 4) NRCS Soils 3. Surface Waters (no change) Beaverdam Branch Pole Branch (South Tracts — Open Space) Neuse Basin Class C; NSW 03020201 09 03 Class C; NSW 03020201 09 03 Project Description and History (revised from Original PCN) The Daniel Farm subdivision is multi -phase single family residential subdivision, located on NC Hwy 210 in Johnston County, NC. The subdivision consists of 6 separate parcels. The northern three parcels, which are situated north of Hwy 210, will be developed as housing. The southern three parcels, situated south of Hwy 210, will be undeveloped and designated as Open Space. Two of the northern parcels have been cleared and are currently under construction as the Daniel Farm Subdivision. Prior to clearing and grading, the property was agricultural use. Adjacent properties are comprised primarily of single-family residential subdivisions and/or agricultural use. Total Wetland Acres: 13.558 Total Stream LF: 4.827 Project Purpose: To construct a single-family residential subdivision with required infrastructure, utilities, and amenities, to meet high demand in the western Johnston County area. Project Detail This submittal is requesting after -the -fact authorization for impacts associated with construction of the initial phases of the Daniel Farm project. Also included are proposed impacts for additional phases on Parcel 3, adjacent to the west. After the fact impacts include two permanent wetland impacts for lot fill, and 4 temporary stream and/or wetland sewer crossings. Three of Daniel Farm parcels — 2 north and 1 south - were originally delineated in 2015. Potentially jurisdictional features included 2 wetlands, 2 streams, and 2 farm ponds on the two northern parcels where development has already occurred. The JD Info for these three parcels is included with this submittal. K Daniel Farm Subdivision PCN Info Sheet Subdivision plans including lot layouts, utilities, stormwater, and erosion & sediment control were prepared and approved by Johnston County Public Utilities in 2017. Roadway and utility construction began in 2018 and have been completed. Lots were recorded beginning in 2019. Early phases of the subdivision have been completed, houses have been constructed and are presently occupied. During construction of Daniel Farm, the following impacts inadvertently occurred: • Permanent wetland impacts occurred during construction of Street B (as shown on attached E&SC plans), which extends along the western boundary throughout the subdivision. Construction of this roadway will permanently impact and remove 0.10 acres of wetlands, situated near the headwaters of an intermittent stream (Wetland I and Stream 2 on the JD delineation map). This impact will allow the roadway to continue into developable uplands and provide access to at least 16 additional lots. • Temporary stream and wetland impacts occurred Stream 2 and Wetland I during the construction of a sewer collection line. This construction also required permanent conversion of forested wetland to herbaceous wetland within a permanently maintained utility corridor (Stream 2). The temporary impacts have been completed and restored. Two farm ponds on the site were determined to be isolated and have been converted to stormwater management ponds. Verification of the isolated determination is included in the JD Packet. Parcel 3 (the Buffkin Tract) was delineated in 2020 and included as part of the subdivision. Potentially jurisdictional features include 5 Wetlands and 2 streams. This parcel is currently undeveloped. The JD Info for Parcel 3 is included with this submittal. • Attachments: Site Plans 5_ Jurisdictional Determinations • Attachments: 1) Approved JD Packet 2) Preliminary JD Packet Future Project Plans (revised from Original PCN, The Daniel Farm Subdivision will be constructed on the three northern parcels in different phases (some of which have been completed); however, the project is considered whole for permitting purposes. The three southern parcels will remain undeveloped and be designated as Open Space. Daniel Farm Subdivision PCN Info Sheet Section D. Proposed Impacts Inventory Instructions Impacts Summary Wetland Impacts (revised from Original PCN) Site # Reason Impact Type of Wetland Forested Type of Impact Type Wetland ID Jurisdiction Acres 1* Road Fill P Headwater Wetland I Yes Both 0.099 Forest 2* Sewer T Headwater Wetland I Yes Both 0.053 Corridor Forest 3* Sewer T Headwater Wetland I Yes Both 0.064 Corridor Forest 4* Sewer T Headwater Wetland I Yes Both 0.001 Corridor Forest 5* Sewer T Headwater Wetland I Yes Both 0.039 Corridor Forest 6 Lot Fill P Headwater Wetland C Yes Both 0.042 Forest *= After the Fact Permitting Request Stream Impacts (no change) Site # Reason Impact Type of Stream Stream Type of Stream Impact for Type Impact Name Type Jurisdiction Width Length Impact 1 Sewer Temporary Other Stream Intermittent Both 2 ft 25 2 2 Sewer Temporary Other Stream Intermittent Both 2 ft 25 ft 3 Buffer Impacts (Authorized through Johnston County). All sewer crossing impacts are considered 'Allowable') 0 Daniel Farm Subdivision PCN Info Sheet Section E. Impact Justification and Mitigation Instructions Avoidance and Minimization (revised from Original PCN) Prior to site design, streams, wetlands, and riparian buffers were delineated to identify potential resource areas to avoid where practical. Impacts have been avoided where possible, while allowing access to developable uplands. Permanent Wetland Impact #1 is required for the construction of a roadway which provides access to 16 developable upland lots. The sewer corridor is located to provide access for the subdivision while avoiding the main bottom land hardwood forest along Stream 1. Permanent Wetland Impact #6 is required for the construction of a residential lot. This fill is required to clip a small portion of the wetland and provide stable for upland construction. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts (revised from Originai rk-iv) The applicant is proposing to pay mitigation at 2:1 ratio for two permanent wetland impacts, 1:1 ratio for sewer corridor conversion impacts Payment will be through Private Mitigation bank. • Attachments: SOA Letter No other revisions have been made to Original PCN 5 Parcel Information Revised Oct 2021 H H W W M M ✓ a N ✓ a N W U U W U U C M M C a a M M O O M M O O .. .. .. 'O a1 .. .. .. .. .. .. N N Cli 3C N .. .. .. 'O a1 .. .. .. .. .. .. N N Cli 3C N O N N Ul Ul Ul O 01 — O N N 0 0 0 O a1 z z-0-0-0 z z'D'� L-aaa �aaa 3 3 'ca 'ca 'ca 3 3 'ca 'ca 'ca O O g g g O O g g d W L O w , J _T vi O Q L if * O C N , d E O N N A T c p N C � T C n W } u z ZD �a w z o o � � o J ull , N Q 0 u z O AK z u z t LL t 0 Q W d J z rn p o �•� 1 z , a �' Ln } �F O_ Q o o o m u L.L \z 0 Q W J Q Lu W u t J Q u = J t LLJ N' r i Li wLn , f N M i MT T u L Q M W �� a z r f p 1 T ( f 1 � 2 f O i f1J N Z CDf cr z O r z fn 1 � _ ; V CL N d f c un Q , [ z * * * DISCLAIMER * * * Johnston County assumes no legal responsibility for the information represented here. Result 0 Result 0 id: 13EO5003K id: 13EO4003I Tag: 13EO5003K Tag: 13EO4003I Owner Name 1: DANIEL-LAN DEVELOPMENT, Owner Name 1: DANIEL-LAN DEVELOPMENT, LLC LLC Owner Name 2: Owner Name 2: Mail Address 1: 1075 COUNTRY CLUB RD Mail Address 1: 1075 COUNTRY CLUB RD Mail Address 2: Mail Address 2: Mail Address 3: SMITHFIELD, NC 27577-8310 Mail Address 3: SMITHFIELD, NC 27577-8310 Book: 05468 Book: 05267 Page: 0950 Page: 0792 Result 0 Result 0 id: 13EO5007D id: 13EO5003C Tag: 13EO5007D Tag: 13EO5003C Owner Name 1: DANIEL-LAN DEVELOPMENT, Owner Name 1: DANIEL-LAN DEVELOPMENT, LLC LLC Owner Name 2: Owner Name 2: Mail Address 1: 1075 COUNTRY CLUB RD Mail Address 1: 1075 COUNTRY CLUB RD Mail Address 2: Mail Address 2: Mail Address 3: SMITHFIELD, NC 27577-8310 Mail Address 3: SMITHFIELD, NC 27577-8310 Book: 05069 Book: 05073 Page: 0379 Page: 0079 March 20, 2019 US Army Corps of Engineers 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587 Mr. Ross Sullivan Re: Daniels Farm , Johnston County I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein, do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. The property's PIN numbers are: 162400-74-5061, 162400-83-2985, 162400-83-4257, 162400-93-0696, 162400-71-1041 and 163400-73-6001.. Also, Mr. Wyatt Brown of Brown's Environmental Group, Inc. has my permission to act as my agent on this property concerning wetlands and streams. Lanny Clifton Daniel -Lan Development, LLC Site Maps Revised Oct 2021 1. Location Map 2.Aerial Photo 3. USGS Topographic Map 4. NRCS Soil Survey Map 5. Site Plans/Impact Map Legend _ ' ' F1 _. it '•` � 1.4 � r Daniel Farm Subdivision .lAP 1`�J� El � r-n- 1 1 eµpy�y c+ NY � _ .I '� ;;� ':ram •nn,� ] ti�� r3 3 Ids c f k 1'fM.r(-C�r •f1a[I5. I. {-� --.ti iEi FD J_,Ig �T' �rfAa:u. AA': ..�-__._ ��• �r GRiu4IC'hG Pa_ I - lk 1_ ' - 1 Ir� II ti � yr Yn.T r✓u.-I ®Figure By: MRR 1 Location Map Daniel Farm Subdivision NC Hwy 210, Benson NC Pleasant Grove Township, Johnston County Scale NTS 6/25/21 Legend Daniel Farm Subdi Parcel : 'DANIEL-LAN DEVELOPMENT, LLC Parcel 2 y .' 00-64-8374 DANIEL-LAN DEVELOPMENT, LLC +_3 A , PIN# 162400-74-5161 V 14.46 Acres Parcel 1 _ �DPNIEL-LAN DEVELOPMENT, LLC PIN# 162400-84-4154 13.27 Acres 01 ym 7 Y T �• n A. yam. 1�T— �� . N ; Parcel 4 W • PII 69 lead& Parcel DANIEL-LAN DEVELOPMENT, LLC PIN# 162400-82-5470 4.88 Acres Parcel DANIEL-LAN DEVELOPMENT, LLC PIN# 162400-81-3495 15.31 Acres 0 Daniel Farm Subdivision �f15 l McGee Cr s ds� v � zio t �— J p � 0 r 50 � /NEDR� O F51000�❑ By: MRR 0 Figure 3 ��,oPo9,aPn�MaP USGS Topographic Map Edmondson Quadrangle Source: USGS Mapping Services oa�,e�Fa,m��ea�,.,o� Daniel Farm Subdivision NC Hwy 210, Benson NC Pleasant Grove Township, Johnston County �,. scale NTS � 9/28/21 d CAA • Legend IA. Daniel Farm Subdivision • w I Go 1 7 • � � j was - A 1 uA r � ' �` N k8 - NoB a a B -.e r� I i i D -NkB T NDB D r i - al B.T F 14 k8 r yGen - 1 4 Gel t Uc Fg— ]Soil r NRCS Soil Survey Map Survey of Johnston County, 1994 Daniel Farm Subdivision NC Hwy 210, Benson NC Scale NTS By: MRR Map Sheet 5 Pleasant Grove Township, Johnston County zpl Nh - ----- --- ---- -- ---- - - -- ------- ---- ----- oz z, o o ---- �—J Ln z < > p L3 Z g a — — - -- — ---- ---- ---- :L 9 LL o w Lu r 14 ---- ---- ---- - -- ---------------------- ----- Ell --- - ---- ----- ---- 03 -� -- --------------- -------- -- - - - - P, - - --- ------ f ----------- - - - ------- - - U3— Yl 14 0 0 O-N% 0 z < . !g.l IQ I LLLLL] JD Request Packet JD Packet 1. Approved JD Summary 2. Preliminary JD Request Approved JD • Delineation Map with Isolated Ponds Highlighted • JD Request Summary with Timeline • eMail fm USACE to Brown's Environmental Group, Inc. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS REGULATORY PROGRAM APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM (INTERIM) NAVIGABLE WATERS PROTECTION RULE I. ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION Completion Date of Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD): Select. ORM Number: SAW-2015-01037 Associated JDs: SAW-2015-01037 NCDWR# 20210415 Review Area Location': State/Territory: NC City: Benson County/Parish/Borough: Johnston County Center Coordinates of Review Area: Latitude 35.51930 Longitude-78.56867 II. FINDINGS A. Summary: Check all that apply. At least one box from the following list MUST be selected. Complete the corresponding sections/tables and summarize data sources. ❑ The review area is comprised entirely of dry land (i.e., there are no waters or water features, including wetlands, of any kind in the entire review area). Rationale: N/A or describe rationale. ❑ There are "navigable waters of the United States" within Rivers and Harbors Act jurisdiction within the review area (complete table in Section II.B). ❑ There are "waters of the United States" within Clean Water Act jurisdiction within the review area (complete appropriate tables in Section II.C). ❑x There are waters or water features excluded from Clean Water Act jurisdiction within the review area (complete table in Section II.D). B. Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 Section 10 (§ 10)2 10 Name § 10 Size § 10 Criteria Rationale for § 10 Determination N/A. N/A I N/t, N/A. N/A. C. Clean Water Act Section 404 Territorial Seas and Traditional Navigable Waters ((a)(1) waters):3 a 1 Name a 1 Size a 1 Criteria Rationale fora 1 Determination N/A. N/A I N/A. Tributaries a 2 waters): (a)(2) Name (a)(2) Size (a)(2) Criteria Rationale for (a)(2) Determination N/A N/A I N/A N/A. N/A. Lakes and ponds, and impoundments of jurisdictional waters ((a)(3) waters): (a)(3) Name (a)(3) Size (a)(3) Criteria Rationale fora 3 Determination N/A. N/A I N/A. Adjacent wetlands ((a)(4) waters): a 4 Name a 4 Size a 4 Criteria Rationale fora 4 Determination N/A. N/A I N/A. N/A. Map(s)/figure(s) are attached to the AJD provided to the requestor 2 If the navigable water is not subject to the ebb and flow of the tide or included on the District's list of Rivers and Harbors Act Section 10 navigable waters list, do NOT use this document to make the determination. The District must continue to follow the procedure outlined in 33 CFR part 329.14 to make a Rivers and Harbors Act Section 10 navigability determination. 3 A stand-alone TNW determination is completed independently of a request for an AJD. A stand-alone TNW determination is conducted for a specific segment of river or stream or other type of waterbody, such as a lake, where upstream or downstream limits or lake borders are established. A stand- alone TNW determination should be completed following applicable guidance and should NOT be documented on the AJD Form. Page 1 of 3 Form Version 29 July 2020_updated U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS REGULATORY PROGRAM APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM (INTERIM) NAVIGABLE WATERS PROTECTION RULE D. Excluded Waters or Features Excluded waters b 1 — b 12 :4 Exclusion Name Exclusion Size Exclusions Rationale for Exclusion Determination Pond 01 and 0.22 acre(s) (b)(8) Artificial No connecting waters; Pond is surrounded by Pond 02 (Pond lake/pond Uplands 01) and constructed or 0.95 excavated in (Pond upland or a non- 02) jurisdictional water, so long as the artificial lake or pond is not an impoundment of a jurisdictional water that meets c 6. III. SUPPORTING INFORMATION A. Select/enter all resources that were used to aid in this determination and attach data/maps to this document and/or references/citations in the administrative record, as appropriate. ❑x Information submitted by, or on behalf of, the applicant/consultant: eMail with Corps, June 6, 2017 This information Select. sufficient for purposes of this AJD. Rationale: N/A or describe rationale for insufficiency (including partial insufficiency). ❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps: Title(s) and/or date(s). ❑ Photographs: Select. Title(s) and/or date(s). ❑x Corps site visit(s) conducted on: Date(s). ❑x Previous Jurisdictional Determinations (AJDs or PJDs): SAW-2015-01037 ❑ Antecedent Precipitation Tool: provide detailed discussion in Section 111.B. ❑ USDA NRCS Soil Survey: Title(s) and/or date(s) ❑ USFWS NWI maps: Title(s) and/or date(s). ❑ USGS topographic maps: Title(s) and/or date(s). Other data sources used to aid in this determination: Data Source (select) Name and/or date and other relevant information USGS Sources N/A. USDA Sources N/A. NOAA Sources N/A. USACE Sources eMail with Corps, June 6, 2017 State/Local/Tribal Sources N/A. Other Sources N/A. B. Typical year assessment(s): N/A 4 Some excluded waters, such as (b)(2) and (b)(4), may not be specifically identified on the AJD form unless a requestor specifically asks a Corps district to do so. Corps districts may, in case -by -case instances, choose to identify some or all of these waters within the review area. 5 Because of the broad nature of the (b)(1) exclusion and in an effort to collect data on specific types of waters that would be covered by the (b)(1) exclusion, four sub -categories of (b)(1) exclusions were administratively created for the purposes of the AJD Form. These four sub -categories are not new exclusions, but are simply administrative distinctions and remain (b)(1) exclusions as defined by the NWPR. Page 2 of 3 Form Version 29 July 2020_updated U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS REGULATORY PROGRAM APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM (INTERIM) NAVIGABLE WATERS PROTECTION RULE C. Additional comments to support AJD: Both Pond 01 and Pond 02 were verified as constructed in uplands by USACE in 2015 and again in 2017. Email with confirmation are included with this request. Page 3 of 3 Form Version 29 July 2020_updated UnoDUolSUuor ZO puod pup TO puo �d . MH �N o O ° z OTZ �¢ uoiSinipgnS wjep Iaiupd Saay M@IA@�] dC panoaddy a r1 W >�o w z a IL W _ Oa•a.- � r a GC LU F INC. yrn rn W r d N 0 oaa aWa 3 A* , Daniel Farm Subdivision SAW-2015-01037 JD Request Timeline and Summary May 2021 2015 • Delineation of streams and wetlands was conducted on both Daniel Farm North and Daniel Farm South by Wyatt Brown, Brown's Environmental Group, Inc. • During site meeting, USACE David Shaeffer agreed with the delineation. No written confirmation was issued. • Subdivision planning began. 2017 • During site meeting, USACE Samantha Daley agreed the two farm ponds located on north side were constructed in uplands and not jurisdictional. The ponds are not shown as jurisdictional on the original 2015 delineation. • The Non -Jurisdictional status was verified this in email 7/6/17. USACE asked for amended JD Request to include Approved for the ponds and Preliminary for all jurisdictional features. • In late 2017, the county approved site plans, utility, ESC, and stormwater plans and site work began. 2019 • Planning began for Daniel Farm South. Wyatt Brown checked with USACE Samantha Daley regarding the JD status. • USACE noted that the original delineation info was 4 years old, land had been cleared, and asked for revised exhibits, PJD forms, etc. for both north and south sides, revised tables and acreages, and info on the ponds for the Approved portion. Current status: There is still no written Preliminary and Approved JD for the project, north or south side. martinrrichmond@gmail.com From: wyatt brown <brownenvgrp@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 8, 2020 7:22 PM To: Martin Richmond Subject: Fwd: [Non-DoD Source] Re: SAW-2015-01037 Johnston County Pond Attachments: Daniels Farm Agent letter.docx; aerial owner 1.pdf, Preliminary JD.pdf, Continued Aquatic Resource Table from Preliminary JD Form.docx; SAW_JD_Request_12-2013 _fillable_form (1) (1).pdf, Stream, wetland map.pdf, Wet data form A.doc; Wet data form B.doc; Wet data form C, D, Edoc; Wet data form Fdoc; Wet data form G.doc; Wet data form J line.doc; Dry data form 1doc Lets talk about this before you go. I can talk tonight if you can. ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: wyatt brown <brownenvgrp@gmail.com> Date: Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 4:38 PM Subject: Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: SAW-2015-01037 Johnston County Pond To: Dailey, Samantha J CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <Samantha.J.Dailey@usace.army.mil> Sam I have attached the Preliminary JD package as we discussed, I reworked everything and it took a lot longer than I thought. All is combined under one name and it accurately represents what was approved in the field. Please contact me if any questions and I appreciate your time and help with this. I hope you are doing well. Wyatt On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 8:55 AM Dailey, Samantha J CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <Samantha.J.Dailev@usace.army.mil> wrote: Hey Wyatt, I'm finally getting around to these and given the information was submitted almost 4 years ago, and they've already done some major earth moving out there, I need you to provide a revised aerial map that shows all of the features, for both sites. If the project is being done as a whole, the nomenclature is the same for both sites, so the feature nomenclature should be revised so there are no duplicate names. Please also provide a revised table to reflect those changes. In addition, please provide the acreage for the ponds so that I can complete the approved JD for those. If you have any additional questions please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you, Sam Samantha Dailey Regulatory Project Manager U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Division 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Wake Forest, NC 27587 (919) 554-4884, Ext. 22 Samantha.i.dailey@usace.army.mil -----Original Message ----- From: wyatt brown [mailto:brownenvgrp@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 18, 2019 8:15 PM To: Dailey, Samantha J CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <Samantha.J.Dailey@usace.army.mil> Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: SAW-2015-01037 Johnston County Pond Sam I hope you are well and are I'm sure you have been walking in water like I have with all the rain this winter. I hate to bother you but I've noticed I havent received the preliminary JD's we discussed. We are soon beginning work on one of the parcels. Don't hesitate to call me and we'll discuss this. thanks Wyatt On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 1:13 PM Wyatt Brown <brownenvgrp@gmail.com <mailto:brownenvgrp@gmail.com> > wrote: Sam Thank you, we will use the large pond for sediment/stormwater without an impact. For the JD's I would say soon as possible, let me know what you need. Wyatt Wyatt Brown, LSS, CPESC Pres., Brown's Environmental Group, Inc. (919) 524-5956 > On Jul 6, 2017, at 12:54 PM, Dailey, Samantha J CIV USARMY CESAW (US) <Samantha.J.Dailey@usace.army.mil <mailto:Samantha.J.Dailev@usace.army.mil> > wrote: > Wyatt, > Both ponds appear to have been constructed in uplands, outside of waters of the U.S. The spillway draining the pond does have an ordinary high water mark, but resembles more of an ephemeral channel. I would like to move forward with a preliminary JD for all areas except the ponds, which will need to be done under an approved JD. Please let me know the timeframe for needing this documentation. > Thank you, > Sam > Samantha Dailey > Regulatory Project Manager > U.S. Army Corps of Engineers > Regulatory Division > 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 > Wake Forest, NC 27587 > (919) 554-4884, Ext. Ext. 22 > Samantha.l.dailey@usace.army.mil <mailto:Samantha.i.dailey@usace.army.mil> Wyatt Brown, LSS, CPESC Brown's Environmental Group, Inc 919-524-5956 Wyatt Brown, LSS, CPESC Brown's Environmental Group, Inc 919-524-5956 Wyatt Brown, LSS, CPESC Brown's Environmental Group, Inc 919-524-5956 Preliminary JD Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions ACTION ID #: SAW- 2015-01037 Prepare file folder ❑ 1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Daniel Farm Begin Date (Date Received): Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑ 2. Work Type: Private ❑Institutional ❑Government ❑ Commercial 3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 133d and 133e]: Daniel Farm is a multi -phased single-family residential subdivision located on Hwy 210 near McGees Crossroads in Johnston County, NC. 4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A41: Daniel -Lan Development Co. LLC 5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]: Wyatt Brown, Brown's Environmental Group, Inc. 6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 135b]: Prior AID# SAW-2015-01037 7. Project Location — Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form Blb]: Site address: 12714 Hwy 210; Benson, NC Lat: 35.51340 N;-78.57139 8. Project Location —Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form Bla]: See Attached Property Table 9. Project Location —County [PCN Form A2b]: Johnston 10. Project Location —Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Benson, NC 11. Project Information —Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: Pole Branch; Beaverdam Branch 12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: 03020201 Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ❑✓ Regulatory Action Type: ❑ Standard Permit ✓❑ Nationwide Permit # ❑ Regional General Permit # ❑✓ Jurisdictional Determination Request Section 10 and 404 ❑ ❑Pre -Application Request ❑ Unauthorized Activity ❑ Compliance ❑No Permit Required Revised 20150602 Jurisdictional Determination Request 1:1 US Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request to the appropriate Corps Field Office (or project manager, if known) via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. A current list of county assignments by Field Office and project manager can be found on-line at: htip://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re u_ l�atoryPermitProgram.aspx , by telephoning: 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below: ASHEVILLE REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE US Army Corps of Engineers 151 Patton Avenue, Room 208 Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006 General Number: (828) 271-7980 Fax Number: (828) 281-8120 RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE US Army Corps of Engineers 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587 General Number: (919) 554-4884 Fax Number: (919) 562-0421 WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE US Army Corps of Engineers 2407 West Fifth Street Washington, North Carolina 27889 General Number: (910) 251-4610 Fax Number: (252) 975-1399 WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE US Army Corps of Engineers 69 Darlington Avenue Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 General Number: 910-251-4633 Fax Number: (910) 251-4025 Version: December 2013 Page 1 Jurisdictional Determination Request INSTRUCTIONS: All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E and F. NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part G. NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner to be considered a complete request. NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols. NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work. Version: December 2013 Page 2 Jurisdictional Determination Request A. PARCEL INFORMATION Street Address: 12700 A NC HWY 210 City, State: Benson, NC 27504 County: Johnston Directions: 1-40 east to 210, head south on 210, property - 2 miles on right and left Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): See Attached Property Table B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION Name: Wyatt Brown, Brown's Env Group, Inc Mailing Address: 242 Batten Farm Road, Selma NC 27576 Telephone Number: 919-524-5956 Electronic Mail Address': brownenvgrp@gmail.com Select one: ❑ I am the current property owner. ❑� I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant2 ❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase ❑ Other, please explain. C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Name: Daniels -Lan Development Co. LLC Mailing Address: 2701 Polenta Road Clayton, NC 27520 Telephone Number: Electronic Mail Address': Proof of Ownership Attached (e.g. a copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record data) 1 If available Z Must attach completed Agent Authorization Form 3 If available Version: December 2013 Page 3 Jurisdictional Determination Request D. PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein, do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. see attached letter Property Owner (please print) Property Owner Signature E. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION TYPE Select One: Date I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein. This request does include a delineation. I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein. This request does NOT include a delineation. ❑ I am requesting that the Corps investigate the property/project area for the presence or absence of WoUS5 and provide an approved JD for the property identified herein. This request does NOT include a request for a verified delineation. ❑ I am requesting that the Corps delineate the boundaries of all WoUS on a property/project area and provide an approved JD (this may or may not include a survey plat). ❑ I am requesting that the Corps evaluate and approve a delineation of WoUS (conducted by others) on a property/project area and provide an approved JD (may or may not include a survey plat). 4 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E. 5 Waters of the United States Version: December 2013 Page 4 Jurisdictional Determination Request F. ALL REQUESTS ❑✓ Map of Property or Project Area (attached). This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the area of evaluation. ❑ Size of Property or Project Area --127 acres _Q i verify that the property (or project) boundaries have recently been surveyed and marked by a licensed land surveyor OR are otherwise clearly marked or distinguishable. G. JD REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS OR AGENCIES (1) Preliminary JD Requests: ❑� Completed and signed Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form6. Project Coordinates: 35.51340 Latitude-78.57139 Maps (no larger than 11x17) with Project Boundary Overlay: Longitude 7 Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns 7 Aerial Photography of the project area 7 USGS Topographic Map 7 Soil Survey Map ❑� Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps) 6 See Appendix A of this Form. From Regulatory Guidance Letter No. 08-02, dated June 26, 2008 Version: December 2013 Page 5 Jurisdictional Determination Request Delineation Information (when applicable): Wetlands: ❑✓ Wetland Data Sheetsg Tributaries: ❑ USACE Assessment Forms ❑� Upland Data Sheets ❑ Other Assessment Forms (when appropriate) ❑ Landscape Photos, if taken ❑✓ Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes: ■ All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify) ■ Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches ■ Locations of photo stations ■ Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources (2) Approved JDs including Verification of a Delineation: ❑� Project Coordinates: 35.51783 Latitude-78.56760 Longitude Maps (no larger than 11xl7) with Project Boundary Overlay: ❑ Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns ❑� Aerial Photography of the project area 7 USGS Topographic Map ❑✓ Soil Survey Map ❑✓ Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site Plan, previous delineation maps) 1987 Manual Regional Supplements and Data forms can be found at: http://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoryProgramandPermits/reg supp.aspx Wetland and Stream Assessment Methodologies can be found at: http://Portal.ncdenr.org/c/document library/get file?uuid=76f3c58b-dab8-4960-ba43-45b7faf06f4c&groupld=38364and, http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/dots/regulatory/publicnotices/2013/NCSAM Draft User Manual 130318.pdf 8 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland/community type. Version: December 2013 Page 6 Jurisdictional Determination Request Delineation Information (when applicable): Wetlands: ❑ Wetland Data Sheets Tributaries: ❑ USACE Assessment Forms ❑ Upland Data Sheets ❑ Other Assessment Forms (when appropriate) ❑ Landscape Photos, if taken ❑� Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes: • All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify) • Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches • Locations of photo stations • Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources Supporting Jurisdictional Information (for Approved JDs only) ❑ Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form(s) (also known as "Rapanos Form(s)") Map(s) depicting the potential (or lack of potential) hydrologic connection(s), adjacency, etc. to navigable waters. 9 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland/community type. Version: December 2013 Page 7 Jurisdictional Determination Request L REQUESTS FOR CORPS APPROVAL OF SURVEY PLAT Prior to final production of a Plat, the Wilmington District recommends that the Land Surveyor electronically submit a draft of a Survey Plat to the Corps project manager for review. Due to storage limitations of our administrative records, the Corps requires that all hard - copy submittals include at least one original Plat (to scale) that is no larger than 11"x17" (the use of match lines for larger tracts acceptable). Additional copies of a plat, including those larger than 11"xl7", may also be submitted for Corps signature as needed. The Corps also accepts electronic submittals of plats, such as those transmitted as a Portable Document Format (PDF) file. Upon verification, the Corps can electronically sign these plats and return them via e-mail to the requestor. (1) PLATS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL ❑ Must be sealed and signed by a licensed professional land surveyor ❑ Must be to scale (all maps must include both a graphic scale and a verbal scale) ❑ Must be legible ❑ Must include a North Arrow, Scale(s), Title, Property Information ❑ Must include a legible WoUS Delineation Table of distances and bearings/metes and bounds/GPS coordinates of all surveyed delineation points ❑ Must clearly depict surveyed property or project boundaries ❑ Must clearly identify the known surveyed point(s) used as reference (e.g. property corner, USGS monument) ❑ When wetlands are depicted: • Must include acreage (or square footage) of wetland polygons • Must identify each wetland polygon using an alphanumeric system Version: December 2013 Page 8 Jurisdictional Determination Request ❑ When tributaries are depicted: • Must include either a surveyed, approximate centerline of tributary with approximate width of tributary OR surveyed Ordinary High Water Marks (OHWM) of tributary • Must identify each tributary using an alphanumeric system • Must include linear footage of tributaries and calculated area (using approximate widths or surveyed OHWM) • Must include name of tributary (based on the most recent USGS topographic map) or, when no USGS name exists, identify as "unnamed tributary" ❑ all depicted WoUS (wetland polygons and tributary lines) must intersect or tie -to surveyed project/property boundaries ❑ Must include the location of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches ❑ Must include, label accordingly, and depict acreage of all waters not currently subject to the requirements of the CWA (e.g. "isolated wetlands", "non - jurisdictional waters"). NOTE: An approved JD must be conducted in order to make an official Corps determination that a particular waterbody or wetland is not jurisdictional. ❑ Must include and survey all existing conveyances (pipes, culverts, etc.) that transport WoUS Version: December 2013 Page 9 Jurisdictional Determination Request (2) CERTIFICATION LANGUAGE ❑ When the entire actual Jurisdictional Boundary. i�picted: include the following Corps Certification language: "This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary of the jurisdiction of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the undersigned on this date. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, the determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five (5) years from this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the appropriate Regional Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual." Regulatory Official: Title: Date: USACE Action /D No.: ❑ When uplands may be present within a depicted Jurisdictional Boundary include the following Corps Certification language: "This certifies that this copy of this plat identifies all areas of waters of the United States regulated pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the undersigned on this date. Unless there is change in the law or our published regulations, this determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the appropriate Regional Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual." Regulatory Official: Title: Date: USACE Action /D No.: Version: December 2013 Page 10 Jurisdictional Determination Request (3) GPS SURVEYS For Surveys prepared using a Global Positioning System (GPS), the Survey must include all of the above, as well as: ❑ be at sub -meter accuracy at each survey point. ❑ include an accuracy verification: One or more known points (property corner, monument) shall be located with the GPS and cross-referenced with the existing traditional property survey (metes and bounds). ❑ include a brief description of the GPS equipment utilized. Version: December 2013 Page 11 Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM BACKGROUND INFORMATION A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 3/25/19 B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Wyatt Brown, Brown's Environmental Group, Inc C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: SAW-2015-01037 D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: (USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES) State: NC County/parish/borough:JohnSton City: Benson Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat.: 35.52340 Long.:-78.51739 Universal Transverse Mercator: NAD83 Name of nearest waterbody: Pole Branch, Beaverdam Branch E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): ❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date: ❑ Field Determination. Date(s): TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY JURISDICTION. Site number Latitude (decimal degrees) Longitude (decimal degrees) Estimated amount of aquatic resource in review area (acreage and linear feet, if applicable) Type of aquatic resource (i.e., wetland vs. non -wetland waters) Geographic authority to which the aquatic resource "may be" subject (i.e., Section 404 or Section 10/404) Stream 1 35.51991 -78.56722 1458 ft non -wetland 404 Stream 2 35.51851 -78.56722 452 ft non -wetland 404 Stream 3 35.51586 -78.56613 367 ft non -wetland 404 Stream 4 35.50898 -78.56889 239 ft non -wetland 404 Stream 5 35.51150 -78.58287 886 ft non -wetland 404 Stream 6 35.51383 -78.57097 1425 ft non -wetland 404 z 0 0 oc o�c 0 a J c� W 0 V m Ln W m a x U x a W oc a W_ W oc z N W U OC 0 N W oc U a C( a 0 W J m a U a a O ++ a0) ...... ......... a. O_ 6' WAd O d O d O d O d O d O d O d O d O d O d O d O d O d O d O CS 3 4 4 4 4 4 'a 13 s a s a s a s a s a s a s a s a s a 3 3 3 3 3 3 a• s s s s s s a a a a a a a a a Z N N N N N N N N N — — — — — U a a i N 3 U Ln r M ko Ln N ^ M N N ^ N M �h d O N M N O °p 0 Ln M O N W Oa ` WF M N c0 �. O O O O O O O O ti a a a s N N N N M ti 01 c0 c0 ^^ c0 0) ti c0 "I N N M �P c0 kD N M c0 0) 10 Ln N a1 i ^ %0 ^ %0 %D %0 %0 N c0 O ^ ti ^ ti ^ M ^ �F ^ M ^ O 10 01 �D ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ti 0) ti Ln to co co 0) O Ln c0 01 to Ln to N " ti O to " en " O N " 4, 0) c0 Ln co ti en en " O ti * 01 O co a J ti Ln ti Ln ti Ln 0 Ln ti" Ln Ln "" Ln Ln M... Ln Ln Ln O Ln N Din ti Ln M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M ti N en WP Ln %0 Q co Q W W a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a z tn tn tn tn lb tn lb tn — 3 — 3 — 3 — 3 — 3 — 3 — 3 3 3 1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate. 2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre - construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information: SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply) Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where indicated for all checked items: ■❑ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor: Map: 0 Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor. ❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report. ❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale: ❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps: ❑ Corps navigable waters' study: ❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: ■❑ ❑ USGS NHD data. ❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps. U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1:24K Benson Quadrangle, 2016 0 Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Johnston County, NC Map Sheet 5 ❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: ❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s): ❑ FEMA/FIRM maps: ❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929) ■❑ Photographs: ■❑ Aerial (Name & Date): NCOneMap 2017; Google Earth 2018 or ❑ Other (Name & Date): ❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: ❑ Other information (please specify): IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations. Signature and date of Regulatory staff member completing PJD Digitally signed by Wyatt Brown ya }t } L Brown Date: 2019.04.14 17 33 12-04'00' Signature and date of person requesting PJD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is impracticable)' ' Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an action. March 20, 2019 US Army Corps of Engineers 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587 Mr. Ross Sullivan Re: Daniels Farm , Johnston County I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein, do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. The property's PIN numbers are: 162400-74-5061, 162400-83-2985, 162400-83-4257, 162400-93-0696, 162400-71-1041 and 163400-73-6001.. Also, Mr. Wyatt Brown of Brown's Environmental Group, Inc. has my permission to act as my agent on this property concerning wetlands and streams. Lanny Clifton Daniel -Lan Development, LLC H Wo ^ M � N U U a m in m 0LL QUz N Z O O i G1 W W N N U M M�� a � Z o� O N W kn O O L .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. y N V? E E N N N N N Q d L L L L L m L L a Q z R zz Gam: R daa d zCL y a)�� is L co c O Ogggv�v� L w N N m a a g m E L ° O _ d W � Q J � a d N M 'y U ° G. w M x 00 i II 00 # � ZT � R % r O % O d a to y E R V N O 7 � R C a 7 � c 3 u W 2 o C7 o N R U t F � r f * * * DISCLAIMER * * * Johnston County assumes no legal responsibility for the information represented here. Result 2 id: 13EO4003A Tag: 13EO4003A N C P i n: 162400-84-4154 Mapsheet No: 1624 Owner Name 1: DANIEL-LAN DEVELOPMENT, LLC Owner Name 2: Mail Address 1: 1075 COUNTRY CLUB RD Mail Address 2: Mail Address 3: SMITHFIELD, NC 27577-8310 Site Address 1: 12741 NC HWY 210 Site Address 2: BENSON, NC 27504- Book: 05073 Page: 0079 Market Value: 107820 Assessed Acreage: 13.270 Calc. Acreage: 13.270 Sales Price: 2174000 Sale Date: 2017-12-13 lA-wdaI Cem fn `'-r- �— ails�hkg CI " _ f l � i I � ]• - f �I ~� � � � W wa750N RD � '� � r 1 Emis Ce ' m J j snOs :Jf Me(;,. Cr s roads. H®Refcutp Lein za- .�GFE lL° gD=��. � J � r — s�� •�gp t.� `f �s+�k+ilLL'gD' �:. • Jf � (((,� f 1r _�ti��Y 7 � � ) I! Jar-�!/� :•"t� 'i % / � ;'-. iR+1ND STAMD W �� °a, f '•� ' � -� 1 S�f'�, 1,.I �LLI � �: 1 �� f/�� SYERHENSDN �/ I ` r 5_1 By: MRR Figure 1 Location Map Daniel Farm Subdivision NC Hwy 210 Johnston County, NC scale NTS) 6 ROWNe� 03/19/21 Fa- HImage Aerial Photograph Date: 2016 Daniel Farm North NC Hwy 210 scale 1' —400'N By: MRRSource: NCOneMap Imagery Johnston County, NC 05/24/21 i Legend Daniel Farm North Review Boundary h • N ��FF F 400 800 1200 ft FO-1 MRRSource: HImage Aerial Photograph Date: 2018 NCOneMap Imagery Daniel Farm North NC Hwy 210 Johnston County, NC scale 1' =400'By: 05/24/21 Legend Daniel Farm North Review Boundary os�roads r� 1b] r .ow ®Figure 3 USGS Topographic Map Edmondson Quadrangle Source: TNM/USGS Mapping Services Daniel Farm North NC Hwy 210 Johnston County, NC scale NTS 05/24/21 By: MRR Legend Daniel Farm North Review Boundary r r NuB M� ■ rs r NkB -.8- —rod A r 1W FO-1 By: MRR Figure 4 NRCS Soil Survey Map Soil Survey of Johnston County Map Sheet 5 Daniel Farm North NC Hwy 210 Johnston County, NC s�aie NTS 05/24/21 O � % i� --- v w00 a �a w o Ln m m o f a ic w N 0 • a_'' d CWLO C 00 Q y� �� ti y V C co a � CD � N t CDLn o a)` Qom. C? N N o c L m CL n ! W Lc c CD In N v c = to _ C ` c u s +� u >. C Y1 R N t CD 1 H �. 0 .' t C m CD M N 00 N N N�+hR L V cn m U U _ N E m M 7 m >� (D CD m y �N o WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region 3/12/15 Project/Site: Matthews Property City/County: Johnston Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner: Daniels -Lan Dev, LLC State: NC Sampling Point: A Investigator(s): Wyatt Brown Section, Township, Range: Cleveland Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Wet flat Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 1 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Soil Map Unit Name: Bibb Lat: 35.51255 Long:-78.57180 Datum: NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes F� No El Is the Sampled Area IIC�II Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Yes FO No El within a Wetland? Yes F� No Hydrology Present? Yes No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) X Surface Water (Al) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313) High Water Table (A2) ❑ Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U) Saturation (A3) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Water Marks (131) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) M Water -Stained Leaves (139) Field Observations Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Drainage Patterns (1310) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) num moss (D8) (LRR T Surface Water Present? Yes X No I-1 Depth (inches): 12 in Water Table Present? Yes M No I-1 Depth (inches): 4 in Saturation Present? Yes M No Il Depth (inches): 4 in Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes M No El includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0 Remarks: Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A) Total Number of Dominant 5 Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species 100 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = U PL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: I 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% I 3- Prevalence Index is :53.01 I Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft. (1 m) tall. Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vine — All woody vines, greater than 3.28 ft. in height. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius ) % Cover Species? Status 1 Liquidambar styraciflua 30 F� Fac 2 Salix alba 50 Fac W 3. ❑ 4. ❑ 5. ❑ 6. ❑ 7. ❑ 8. El 80 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20 20% of total cover-1 6 Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius ) 1 Acerrubum 40 Fac 2 Liquidambar styraciflua 10 Fac 3. ❑ 4. ❑ 5. ❑ 6. ❑ 7. ❑ 8. El 50 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 25 20% of total cover 10 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft raadius ) 1 Juncus 10 Fac W 2. ❑ 3. ❑ 4. ❑ 5. ❑ 6. ❑ 7. ❑ 8. ❑ 9. ❑ 10. ❑ 11. ❑ 12. ❑ 10 = Total Cover 50% of total cover:—5— 20% of total cover:-2— Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. ❑ 2. ❑ 3. ❑ 4. ❑ 5. ❑ = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below) Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Sampling Point: Yes M No El US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0 SOIL SamDlina Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' LoC2 Texture Remarks 0-12 10YR 2/1 100 sl 12=14 10YR 4 /1 100 CS scl 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': II Histosol (Al) II Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) II 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) II Histic Epipedon (A2) II Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) II 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) II Black Histic (A3) II Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) II Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B) II Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) II Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) II Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T) II Stratified Layers (A5) M Depleted Matrix (F3) II Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 153B) II Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) II Redox Dark Surface (F6) II Red Parent Material (TF2) II 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) II Depleted Dark Surface (F7) II Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) II Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) II Redox Depressions (F8) II Other (Explain in Remarks) II 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) II Marl (F10) (LRR U) II Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) II Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) II Thick Dark Surface (Al2) II Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology II Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) II Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. II Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) II Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) II Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) II Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B) II Sandy Redox (S5) II Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) II Stripped Matrix (S6) II Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D) II Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No = Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region 3/12/15 Project/Site: Matthews Property City/County: Johnston Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner: Daniels -Lan Dev, LLC State: NC Sampling Point: B Investigator(s): Wyatt Brown Section, Township, Range: Cleveland Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Wet flat Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 1 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Soil Map Unit Name: Gilead Lat: 35.51269 Long:-78.57121 Datum: NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes F� No El Is the Sampled Area IIC�II Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Yes FO No El within a Wetland? Yes F� No Hydrology Present? Yes No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Water (Al) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U) • Saturation (A3) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) • Water Marks (131) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) M Water -Stained Leaves (139) Field Observations Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Drainage Patterns (1310) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) num moss (D8) (LRR T Surface Water Present? Yes No F� Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes I-1 No F� Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes M No Il Depth (inches): 8 in Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes M No El (includes capillary frinae) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0 Remarks: Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A) Total Number of Dominant 5 Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species 100 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = U PL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: I 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% I 3- Prevalence Index is :53.01 I Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft. (1 m) tall. Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vine — All woody vines, greater than 3.28 ft. in height. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius ) % Cover Species? Status 1 Liquidambar styraciflua 50 Fac 2 Salix alba 20 Fac W 3. ❑ 4. ❑ 5. ❑ 6. ❑ 7. ❑ 8. El 70 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 35 20% of total cover-1 4 Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius ) 1 Acerrubum 30 Fac 2 Liquidambar styraciflua 10 Fac 3. ❑ 4. ❑ 5. ❑ 6. ❑ 7. ❑ 8. El 40 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover 8 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft raadius ) 1 Juncus 10 Fac W 2. ❑ 3. ❑ 4. ❑ 5. ❑ 6. ❑ 7. ❑ 8. ❑ 9. ❑ 10. ❑ 11. ❑ 12. ❑ 10 = Total Cover 50% of total cover:—5— 20% of total cover:-2— Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. ❑ 2. ❑ 3. ❑ 4. ❑ 5. ❑ = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below) Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Sampling Point: Yes M No El US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0 SOIL SamDlina Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' LoC2 Texture Remarks 0-3 10YR 3/1 100 sl 4-12 10YR 7/1 100 CS scl 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: II Histosol (Al) II Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) II 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) II Histic Epipedon (A2) II Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) II 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) II Black Histic (A3) II Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) II Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B) II Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) II Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) II Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T) II Stratified Layers (A5) M Depleted Matrix (F3) II Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 153B) II Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) II Redox Dark Surface (F6) II Red Parent Material (TF2) II 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) II Depleted Dark Surface (F7) II Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) II Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) II Redox Depressions (F8) II Other (Explain in Remarks) II 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) II Marl (F10) (LRR U) II Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) II Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) II Thick Dark Surface (Al2) II Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology II Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) II Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. II Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) II Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) II Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) II Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B) II Sandy Redox (S5) II Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) II Stripped Matrix (S6) II Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D) II Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No = Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region 3/12/15 Project/Site: Matthews Property City/County: Johnston Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner: Daniels -Lan Dev, LLC State: NC Sampling Point: C, D, E Investigator(s): Wyatt Brown Section, Township, Range: Cleveland Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Wet flat Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 1 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Soil Map Unit Name: Gilead D slo Lat: 35.51012 Long:-78.57491 Datum: NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes F� No El Is the Sampled Area IIC�II Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Yes FO No El within a Wetland? Yes F� No Hydrology Present? Yes No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Water (Al) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313) High Water Table (A2) ❑ Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U) Saturation (A3) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) M Water -Stained Leaves (139) Field Observations Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Drainage Patterns (1310) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) num moss (D8) (LRR T Surface Water Present? Yes M No I-1 Depth (inches): 1 inch Water Table Present? Yes M No I-1 Depth (inches): surface Saturation Present? Yes M No Il Depth (inches): surface Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes M No El includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0 Remarks: Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A) Total Number of Dominant 6 Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species 100 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = U PL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: I 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% I 3- Prevalence Index is :53.01 I Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft. (1 m) tall. Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vine — All woody vines, greater than 3.28 ft. in height. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius ) % Cover Species? Status 1 Liquidambar styraciflua 40 Fac 2 Salix alba 10 Fac W 3. ❑ 4. ❑ 5. ❑ 6. ❑ 7. ❑ 8. El 50 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 27.5 20% of total cover-1 1 Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius ) 1 Acerrubum 40 Fac 2 Liquidambar styraciflua 10 Fac 3 Rubus spp. 30 Fac 4. ❑ 5. ❑ 6. ❑ 7. ❑ 8. El 80 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 40 20% of total cover 16 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft raadius ) 1 Juncus 10 Fac W 2. ❑ 3. ❑ 4. ❑ 5. ❑ 6. ❑ 7. ❑ 8. ❑ 9. ❑ 10. ❑ 11. ❑ 12. ❑ 10 = Total Cover 50% of total cover:—5— 20% of total cover:-2— Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. ❑ 2. ❑ 3. ❑ 4. ❑ 5. ❑ = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below) Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Sampling Point: Yes M No El US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0 SOIL SamDlina Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' LoC2 Texture Remarks 0-3 10YR 2/1 100 sl 3-11 10YR 5/1 100 CS scl 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: II Histosol (Al) II Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) II 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) II Histic Epipedon (A2) II Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) II 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) II Black Histic (A3) II Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) II Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B) II Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) II Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) II Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T) II Stratified Layers (A5) M Depleted Matrix (F3) II Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 153B) II Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) II Redox Dark Surface (F6) II Red Parent Material (TF2) II 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) II Depleted Dark Surface (F7) II Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) II Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) II Redox Depressions (F8) II Other (Explain in Remarks) II 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) II Marl (F10) (LRR U) II Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) II Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) II Thick Dark Surface (Al2) II Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology II Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) II Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. II Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) II Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) II Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) II Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B) II Sandy Redox (S5) II Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) II Stripped Matrix (S6) II Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D) II Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No = Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region 3/12/15 Project/Site: Matthews Property City/County: Johnston Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner: Daniels -Lan Dev, LLC State: NC Sampling Point: Wet F Investigator(s): Wyatt Brown Section, Township, Range: Cleveland Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Wet flat Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Soil Map Unit Name: Gilead Lat: 35.51416 Long:-78.57083 Datum: NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes F� No El Is the Sampled Area IIC�II Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Yes FO No El within a Wetland? Yes F� No Hydrology Present? Yes No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Water (Al) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U) • Saturation (A3) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) • Water Marks (131) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) M Water -Stained Leaves (139) Field Observations Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Drainage Patterns (1310) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) num moss (D8) (LRR T Surface Water Present? Yes No F� Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes I-1 No F� Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes M No Il Depth (inches): 4 in Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes M No El (includes capillary frinae) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0 Remarks: Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species 100 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = U PL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: I 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% I 3- Prevalence Index is :53.01 I Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft. (1 m) tall. Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vine — All woody vines, greater than 3.28 ft. in height. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius ) % Cover Species? Status 1. ❑ 2. ❑ 3. ❑ 4. ❑ 5. ❑ 6. ❑ 7. ❑ 8. El = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius ) 1 Acerrubum 20 Fac 2 Liquidambar styraciflua 60 Fac 3. ❑ 4. ❑ 5. ❑ 6. ❑ 7. ❑ 8. El 80 = Total Cover 50% of total cover 40 20% of total cover 6 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft raadius ) 1 Juncus 10 Fac W 2. ❑ 3. ❑ 4. ❑ 5. ❑ 6. ❑ 7. ❑ 8. ❑ 9. ❑ 10. ❑ 11. ❑ 12. ❑ 10 = Total Cover 50% of total cover:-5 20% of total cover:-2- Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. ❑ 2. ❑ 3. ❑ 4. ❑ 5. ❑ = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below) Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Sampling Point: Yes M No El US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0 SOIL SamDlina Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' LoC2 Texture Remarks 0-3 10YR 3/2 100 sl 4-12 10YR 6/1 100 scl 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: II Histosol (Al) II Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) II 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) II Histic Epipedon (A2) II Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) II 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) II Black Histic (A3) II Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) II Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B) II Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) II Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) II Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T) II Stratified Layers (A5) M Depleted Matrix (F3) II Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 153B) II Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) II Redox Dark Surface (F6) II Red Parent Material (TF2) II 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) II Depleted Dark Surface (F7) II Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) II Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) II Redox Depressions (F8) II Other (Explain in Remarks) II 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) II Marl (F10) (LRR U) II Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) II Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) II Thick Dark Surface (Al2) II Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology II Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) II Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. II Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) II Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) II Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) II Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B) II Sandy Redox (S5) II Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) II Stripped Matrix (S6) II Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D) II Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No = Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region 3/12/15 Project/Site: Matthews Property City/County: Johnston Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner: Daniels -Lan Dev, LLC State: NC Sampling Point: Wet G Investigator(s): Wyatt Brown Section, Township, Range: Cleveland Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Wet flat Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Soil Map Unit Name: Gilead Lat: 35.50906 Long:-78.57174 Datum: NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes F� No El Is the Sampled Area IIC�II Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Yes FO No El within a Wetland? Yes F� No Hydrology Present? Yes No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Water (Al) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U) • Saturation (A3) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) • Water Marks (131) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) M Water -Stained Leaves (139) Field Observations Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Drainage Patterns (1310) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) num moss (D8) (LRR T Surface Water Present? Yes No F� Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes I-1 No F� Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes M No Il Depth (inches): 9in Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes M No El (includes capillary frinae) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0 Remarks: Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species 100 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = U PL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: I 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% I 3- Prevalence Index is :53.01 I Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft. (1 m) tall. Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vine — All woody vines, greater than 3.28 ft. in height. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius ) % Cover Species? Status 1 Liquidambar styraciflua 50 Fac 2 Pinus taeda 20 ❑ 3. ❑ 4. ❑ 5. ❑ 6. ❑ 7. ❑ 8. El 70 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 35 20% of total cover: 14 Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius ) 1 Acerrubum 30 Fac 2. ❑ 3. ❑ 4. ❑ 5. ❑ 6. ❑ 7. ❑ 8. El 30 = Total Cover 50% of total cover 15 20% of total cover 6 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft raadius ) 1 Juncus 10 Fac W 2. ❑ 3. ❑ 4. ❑ 5. ❑ 6. ❑ 7. ❑ 8. ❑ 9. ❑ 10. ❑ 11. ❑ 12. ❑ 10 = Total Cover 50% of total cover:—5 20% of total cover:-2— Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. ❑ 2. ❑ 3. ❑ 4. ❑ 5. ❑ = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below) Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Sampling Point: Yes M No El US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0 SOIL SamDlina Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' LoC2 Texture Remarks 0-3 10YR 3/2 100 sl 4-12 10YR 6/2 100 scl 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: II Histosol (Al) II Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) II 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) II Histic Epipedon (A2) II Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) II 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) II Black Histic (A3) II Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) II Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B) II Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) II Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) II Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T) II Stratified Layers (A5) M Depleted Matrix (F3) II Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 153B) II Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) II Redox Dark Surface (F6) II Red Parent Material (TF2) II 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) II Depleted Dark Surface (F7) II Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) II Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) II Redox Depressions (F8) II Other (Explain in Remarks) II 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) II Marl (F10) (LRR U) II Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) II Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) II Thick Dark Surface (Al2) II Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology II Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) II Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. II Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) II Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) II Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) II Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B) II Sandy Redox (S5) II Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) II Stripped Matrix (S6) II Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D) II Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No = Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region 3/12/15 Project/Site: Matthews Property North City/County: Johnston Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner: Daniels -Lan Dev, LLC Lanny Clifton State: NC Sampling Point: J Investigator(s): Wyatt Brown Section, Township, Range: Cleveland Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Wet flat Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 2 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Soil Map Unit Name: Gilead Lat: 35.51812 Long:-78.56652 Datum: NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes F� No El Is the Sampled Area IIC�II Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Yes FO No El within a Wetland? Yes F� No Hydrology Present? Yes No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Water (Al) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313) High Water Table (A2) ❑ Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U) Saturation (A3) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) M Water -Stained Leaves (139) Field Observations Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Drainage Patterns (1310) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) num moss (D8) (LRR T Surface Water Present? Yes M No I-1 Depth (inches): 3 inches Water Table Present? Yes M No I-1 Depth (inches): surface Saturation Present? Yes M No Il Depth (inches): surface Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes M No El includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0 Remarks: Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species 100 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = U PL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: I 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% I 3- Prevalence Index is :53.01 I Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft. (1 m) tall. Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vine — All woody vines, greater than 3.28 ft. in height. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius ) % Cover Species? Status 1 Liquidambar styraciflua 20 ❑ Fac 2. ❑ 3 Pinus taeda 60 Fac 4. ❑ 5. ❑ 6. ❑ 7. ❑ 8. El 80 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 40 20% of total cover-1 6 Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius ) 1 Acerrubum 30 Fac 4. ❑ 5. ❑ 6. ❑ 7. ❑ 8. El 30 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover 6 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft raadius ) 1 Juncus 10 Fac W 2. ❑ 3. ❑ 4. ❑ 5. ❑ 6. ❑ 7. ❑ 8. ❑ 9. ❑ 10. ❑ 11. ❑ 12. ❑ 10 = Total Cover 50% of total cover:—5 20% of total cover:-2— Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. ❑ 2. ❑ 3. ❑ 4. ❑ 5. ❑ = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below) Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Sampling Point: Yes M No El US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0 SOIL SamDlina Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' LoC2 Texture Remarks 0-6 10YR 3/1 100 sl 6-12 10YR 6/1 100 scl 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: II Histosol (Al) II Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) II 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) II Histic Epipedon (A2) II Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) II 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) II Black Histic (A3) II Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) II Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B) II Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) II Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) II Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T) II Stratified Layers (A5) M Depleted Matrix (F3) II Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 153B) II Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) II Redox Dark Surface (F6) II Red Parent Material (TF2) II 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) II Depleted Dark Surface (F7) II Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) II Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) II Redox Depressions (F8) II Other (Explain in Remarks) II 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) II Marl (F10) (LRR U) II Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) II Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) II Thick Dark Surface (Al2) II Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology II Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) II Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. II Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) II Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) II Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) II Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B) II Sandy Redox (S5) II Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) II Stripped Matrix (S6) II Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D) II Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No = Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region 3/12/15 Project/Site: Matthews Property City/County: Johnston Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner: Daniel G Daniels -Lan Dev, LLC Lanny Clifton State: NC Sampling Point: Dry North Investigator(s): Wyatt Brown Section, Township, Range: Cleveland Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hill slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 4 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Soil Map Unit Name: Nankin Lat: 35.50949 Long:-78.57321 Datum: NWI classification: Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ® No ❑ Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes El No M ICI Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Wetland Yes � No M within a Wetland? Yes F—] No Hydrology Present? Yes No Remarks: Sample taken in yellow pine forest. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) ❑ Surface Water (Al) ❑ Aquatic Fauna (1313) ❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U) ❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) ❑ Water Marks (131) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) ❑ Sediment Deposits (132) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Drift Deposits (133) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Iron Deposits (135) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) ❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) Field Observations Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) ❑ Drainage Patterns (1310) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316) ❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) num moss (D8) (LRR T Surface Water Present? Yes I-1 No F� Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes I-1 No F� Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes El No F� Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes El No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0 Remarks: Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A) Total Number of Dominant 2 Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species 100 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = U PL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: I 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% I 3- Prevalence Index is :53.01 I Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft. (1 m) tall. Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vine — All woody vines, greater than 3.28 ft. in height. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius ) % Cover Species? Status 1 Pinus tadea 90 F� Fac 2. ❑ 3. ❑ 4. ❑ 5. ❑ 6. ❑ 7. ❑ 8. El 90 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 45 20% of total cover-1 8 Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft radius ) 1. Liquidambar styraciflua 15 Fac 2. ❑ 3. ❑ 4. ❑ 5. ❑ 6. ❑ 7. ❑ 8. El 15 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 7.5 20% of total cover 3 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 ft raadius ) 1. ❑ 2. ❑ 3. ❑ 4. ❑ 5. ❑ 6. ❑ 7. ❑ 8. ❑ 9. ❑ 10. ❑ 11. ❑ 12. ❑ 100 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 50 20% of total cover: 20 Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. ❑ 2. ❑ 3. ❑ 4. ❑ 5. ❑ = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Sampling Point: Yes M No El US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0 Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below). US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0 SOIL SamDlina Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' LoC2 Texture Remarks 0-7 10YR 6/2 100 sl 7-15 5YR 5/6 100 scl 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': II Histosol (Al) II Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) II 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) II Histic Epipedon (A2) II Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) II 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) II Black Histic (A3) II Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) II Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B) II Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) II Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) II Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T) II Stratified Layers (A5) II Depleted Matrix (F3) II Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 153B) II Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) II Redox Dark Surface (F6) II Red Parent Material (TF2) II 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) II Depleted Dark Surface (F7) II Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) II Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) II Redox Depressions (F8) II Other (Explain in Remarks) II 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) II Marl (F10) (LRR U) II Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) II Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) II Thick Dark Surface (Al2) II Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology II Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) II Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. II Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) II Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) II Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) II Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B) II Sandy Redox (S5) II Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) II Stripped Matrix (S6) II Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D) II Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No = Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0