20040500 Ver 2_Monitoring Report Year 5_20110902

r
Back Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration
EEP Project No. 17
2010 Monitoring Report: Year 5 of 5
Construction Completed: December 2005
Submission Date: February 2011
RECEIVED
SEP - 2 2011
NC ECOSYSTEM
ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
Prepared for:
NCDENR -EEP
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
Prepared by:
Jordan, Jones and Goulding
309 East Morehead Street, Suite 110
Charlotte, NC 28202
~
r1l'i
system
I•Y[)C:N AM
MMA
LAO
MCDENR

Table of Contents
SECTION 1- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 1 Goals and Objectives 1 -1
12 Vegetative Assessment 1 -2
13 Stream Assessment 1 -2
14 Wetland Assessment 1 -4
1 5 Annual Monitoring Summary 1 -5
SECTION 2 - METHODOLOGY
2 1 Methodology 2 -1
SECTION 3 - REFERENCES
SECTION 4 - APPENDICES
List of Appendices
Appendix 1— General Figures and Plan Views
1 1 Project Vicinity Map
1 2 Current Condition Plan View
Appendix 2 — General Project Tables
2 1 Project Mitigation Structure and Objectives
2 2 Project Activity and Reporting History
2 3 Project Contacts
2 4 Project Attribute Table
Appendix 3 — Vegetation Assessment Data
3 1 Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success
3 2 Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
3 3 Vegetation Plot Summary Data Table
3 4 Vegetation Condition Assessment
Back Creek Monitoring Report February 2011
EEP Project No 17 Monitoring Year 5 of 5

11
Table of Contents
Appendix 4 — Stream Assessment Data
41 Stream Station Photos
42 Qualitative Visual Stability Assessment
43 Verification of Bankf ill Events
44 Cross - Section Plots and Raw Data Tables
45 Longitudinal Plots and Raw Data Tables
46 Pebble Count Plots and Raw Data Tables
Appendix 5 — Wetland Assessment Data
5 1 Precipitation — Water Level Plots for Gauges
5 2 Wetland Criteria Attainment
Back Creek Momtormg Report February 2011
EEP Project No 17 Momtormg Year 5 of 5

SECTION 1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

SECTION 1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Back Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration Project (Site) is a 17 5 acre lot located in
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina, northeast of the City of Charlotte (Appendix 1 1) Back
Creek drams approximately 4 square rules and is located within the Piedmont Ecoregion in the
Yadkin- Peedee River Basin (USGS HUC 03040105) The Site is a mitigation project for the
North Carolina Department of Transportation ( NCDOT) The project was transferred from
NCDOT to the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) in 2006
Construction of the restoration project was completed in December 2005, and tree planting was
completed in February 2006
This report serves as year five of the five year monitoring plan for the Site
1.1 Goals and Objectives
Historically, the Site was utilized for livestock grazing and agricultural hay production
Currently, the Site is dominated by fallow, successional fields, and a few stands of isolated
hardwood forests Sewer line construction and past land use have impaired the streams stability
due to dredging and straightening of the upstream reach Urban development in the watershed
has also contributed to the instability of the Site
The following goals were established for the Site
1 Restore approximately 3,525 linear feet (If) of Back Creek
2 Restore approximately 827 if of tributaries to Back Creek
3 Restore approximately 1 5 acres (ac) of jurisdictional wetland, enhance approximately 1 8 ac
of jurisdictional wetland, and create approximately 0 5 ac of open water /freshwater marsh
adjacent to on -site channels
4 Reforest approximately 17 5 ac of flood prone area and adjacent upland slopes with native
forest species
TABLE 1 PROJECT TOTALS
Footage
Creditable Footage
+_
Main stem
3371 feet
3251 feet*
Upper tributary
411 feet
411 feet
Central tributary
354 feet
304 feet*
4136 feet
3966 feet
*The differences between the creditable footage and the footage have to do with a 120 foot length of
the main stem that is within the 1485 ROW, effectively making a single sided easement and
therefore not creditable The central tributary has —50 feet in the same situation
Back Creek Monitoring Report February 2011
EEP Project No 17 Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Pate 1 -2
Executive Summary
The site also contains 3 5 ac (proposed as 1 8 ac) of wetland enhancement and 0 4 ac (proposed
as 2 0 ac) of wetland restoration Appendix 2 provides more detailed project activity, history,
contact information, and watershed/site background information for this project
1.2 Vegetative Assessment
JJG conducted the 2010 (year 5 of 5) vegetative assessment and vegetative plot analysis in
October 2010 Vegetation assessments were conducted following the NCEEP 2004 Stem
Counting Protocol which consists of counting woody stems within the established vegetation
plots The four vegetative plots previously established in the design phase were selected
randomly and represent the riparian buffer zone The planted vegetative community goal for
these plots is to establish a Piedmont floodplain forest The following success criteria for
vegetation were established for the Site by EcoScience (2003)
■ 320 stems per acre years 1 through 3
■ 290 stems per acre year 4
■ 260 stems per acre year 5
Vegetation problem areas previously noted along the streambanks that had suffered localized
loss of vegetative cover appear to re- stabilizing In these areas, it is assumed that flood events
may have caused bank erosion, therefore, removing vegetation in previous monitoring years
Most of these problem areas have either fully recovered or are continuing to improve with each
growing season
The 2010 vegetation monitoring results indicate that the Site appears to be meeting vegetation
success criteria with the exception of Plot 4 The Site's average stem density is approximately
364 planted stems per acre with a plot size of 0 057 ac, which exceeds the year 5 goal of 260
planted stems per acre Only one of the four vegetation monitoring plots (Plot 4) continues to
result in a low survival rate Initially, planted stem mortality within Plot 4 was most hkely due to
the severe drought experienced during the 2007 growing season During the recent growing
seasons, volunteer species and resprouting of suspected dead saplings have increased the stems
per acre for Plot 4 For the 2010 monitoring year, Plot 4 resulting in a stem density increase due
to volunteer species from 140 stems per acre to 404 stems per acre, which meets success criteria
for the year 5 goal
In conclusion, the Site has met the vegetation success criteria requirements for monitoring year
five (2010) Some loss of streambank vegetation was evident in 2006, however, the overall
growth of the streambank vegetation is good and continues to improve as seen over the past few
monitoring years The overall success of the woody vegetation momtored within three of the
four plots appears to be better than what was initially assessed in September 2006 This is most
likely due to the resprouting of suspected dead saplings and new volunteer species Although all
plots met the vegetation success threshold with the exception of Plot 4, the results from Plot 4
did not affect the site's average planted stem density to be considered unsuccessful Please refer
to Appendix 12 and 3 for detailed information regarding the 2010 vegetation current conditions
and monitoring data results
Back Creek Monitoring Report February 2011
EEP Project No 17 Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Page 1 -3
Executive Summary
1.3 Stream Assessment
A total of nine cross - sections were established along Back Creek, seven were established along
the main channel and one cross - section was established along both the upstream tributary and the
central tributary Stream dimension, profile, and substrate were evaluated along 3,100 if of the
main channel The upstream and central tributaries were evaluated through visual assessments
and cross - sectional surveys
Main Channel
The pattern, profile, and dimension of the restored channel appear stable for the majority of the
project The structures appear to be in good condition, however, a few structures have moderate
scour around the vane arms where they tie into the bankfull elevation Instances of localized
bank scour occurred earlier in the monitoring history and were scattered across the site but
generally did not advance, with bank stability percentages at or above 95% for the project's
monitoring history A few of these areas were severe and associated with some mid and
transverse bars that subsequently flushed out of the system Vegetation growth has improved in
these areas and is further stabilizing previous bank scour Within these areas, vegetation growth
has unproved, which is stabilizing the banks One (1) area within the restored reach is still
illustrating signs of aggradation (approximate stationing 19 +93), but there has been little to no
changes occurring in the past few monitoring years
The average bankfull width (26 61 ft) of the surveyed cross - sections is higher than the proposed
22 4 ft but continues to illustrate a narrowing trend in comparison to the average bankfull width
in 2006 (32 40 ft) The average surveyed mean bankfull depth is 2 02 ft compared to the
proposed 2 5 ft, however, in comparison to the average mean depth in 2006 (1 89 ft), the Site's
average cross - sectional depth continues to increase The surveyed bankfull widths and depths
lead to an average Width/Depth (W/D) ratio of 16 24, and the sinuosity is 1 5 The W/D ratio
(16 24) is typical of a C -type channel, but the sinuosity (1 5) is typical of an E -type channel
Therefore, due to these defining characteristics for the 2010 monitoring year, the stream was
classified as an E4c The average W/D ratio (13 65) has decreased since the 2006 monitoring
year (18 52) indicating that the channel is becoming more narrow and deep, which is typical for
E -type streams
The 2010 substrate analysis illustrates that all of the cross - sections within the restoration site are
recovering from the drought conditions and beaver activity experienced in previous monitoring
years The thalweg profile appears to be stable, and was characterized by well - defined riffle and
pool features The average water surface slope and the average bankfull slope were the same for
the surveyed reach, 0 0040 ft/ft The surveyed water surface slope was slightly steeper than the
proposed 0 0034 ft /ft, but similar to the previous monitoring year surveyed slopes
A crest gauge is located downstream of cross - section 6 within the Back Creek project site One
bankfull or greater event occurred within the Back Creek restoration project in monitoring year
2010 Other indicators such as old wrack Imes and staining were observed at the bankfull and
greater elevations within the restoration site as well
Back Creek Monitoring Report February 2011
EEP Project No 17 Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Page 1 -4
Executive Summary
Upstream Tributary
Based on current monitoring data and the visual inspection, the channel seems to be functioning
properly and maintaining stability No erosion or structure failure was observed along this reach
Central Tributary
The tributary appears to be maintaining its proposed function as a B -type storm drain channel
There are some areas with minor bank erosion, but no structural failure is occurring along this
reach Cross - section 9, which is located midway along the tributary has remained vertically and
laterally stable Minor sediment deposition occurred in 2010, which resulted in a decrease in the
cross - sections mean depth (1 04 ft) from previous monitoring year ranges (124-1 32 ft) The
d50 and d84 particle size has decreased from 0 33 mm to 0 2 mm and 3 43 to 1 67, respectively
Most likely, these fine particles will be flushed with future ram events
Overall, the Site appears to be maintaining vertical and lateral stability with stable structures and
minimal bank erosion A few of the areas with aggradation, such as lateral and transverse bars,
have adjusted from previous monitoring year As a result of being flushed out with higher flows,
these depositional areas have not advanced from the previous monitoring years Please refer to
Appendix 4 for detailed stream data tables and plots and Appendix 12 for the location of the
monitoring features
1.4 Wetland Assessment
Three groundwater monitoring gauges and one ram gauge were installed on -site Two of these
groundwater gauges were installed in close proximity to Vegetation Plot 2 One gauge is located
within an emergent wetland area adjacent to the main channel The monitoring gauges are
programmed to download groundwater levels daily and were downloaded monthly from March
to November in order to capture hydrological data during the 2010 growing season The target
wetland hydrological success criterion is saturation or inundation for at least 12 5 percent of the
growing season in the lower landscape (floodplain) positions To achieve the above hydrologic
success criterion, groundwater levels must be within 12 -inches of the ground surface for 30
consecutive days, which is 12 5 percent of the March 21 to November 16 (241 days) growing
season
All gauges on -site achieved the wetland success criterion of soil saturation within the upper 12
inches for 30 consecutive days during the growing season There were no problem areas
observed within the wetland restoration zones for the Site Within the wetland zones,
hydrophytic vegetation and hydrology indicators have developed In some areas, the appropriate
soil chroma has also developed It is suspected that these areas may have already had hydric
conditions present Hydrophytic vegetation consists of a thick herbaceous layer of sedge species
(Carex spp ), rush species (Juncus spp ), bulrush species (Scirpus spp ), spotted touch -me -not
(Impatiens capensis), and smartweed species (Polygonum spp ) The general success of
hydrology within the wetland restoration zones is adequate to meet success requirements
Surface inundation to ground saturation was observed throughout the site, therefore, appropriate
hydrological condition for the wetland zones appears to be present Please refer to Appendix 5
for wetland plots and a summary of the wetland criteria attainment
Back Creek Monitoring Report February 2011
EEP Project No 17 Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Page 1 -5
Executive Summary
1.5 Annual Monitoring Summary
In summary, the Site has met the stream, vegetation, and wetland mitigation goals for monitoring
year 5 The 2010 vegetation plot monitoring results indicate that the planted and naturally
recruited vegetation is doing well at the Site, although some minor vegetation problems were
noted due to the severe drought experienced during the 2007 growing season The pattern,
profile, and dimension of the restored channel and the two unnamed tributaries appear to be
maintaining vertical and lateral stability with stable structures and minimal bank erosion A few
problem areas were observed, such as moderate bank erosion, moderate to poor streambank
cover, loose matting, and aggradation These areas of stream instability do not appear to have
advanced from the previous monitoring years For the 2010 monitoring year, all gauges
achieved the wetland success criterion of soil saturation within the upper 12 inches for 30
consecutive days
The background information provided in this report is referenced from the mitigation plan and
previous monitoring reports prepared by EcoScience (2003) Summary mformation/data related
to the occurrence of items such as beaver or encroachment and statistics related to performance
of various project and monitoring elements can be found in the tables and figures in the report
appendices Narrative background and supporting information formerly found in these reports
can be found in the mitigation and restoration plan documents available on ESP's website All
raw data supporting the tables and figures in the appendices is available from EEP upon request
Back Creek Monitoring Report February 2011
EEP Project No 17 Monitoring Year 5 of 5

SECTION 2
METHODOLOGY

SECTION 2
METHODOLOGY
2.1 Methodology
Methods employed for the Site were a combination of those established by standard regulatory
guidance and procedure documents as well as previous monitoring reports completed by
EcoScience Geomorphic and stream assessments were performed following guidelines outlined
in the Stream Channel Reference Sites An Illustrated Guide to Field Techniques (Harrelson et
al, 1994) and in the Stream Restoration a Natural Channel Design Handbook (Doll et al, 2003)
Vegetation assessments were conducted following the NCEEP 2004 Stem Counting Protocol
which consists of counting woody stems within the established vegetation plots JJG used the
Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, Georgia, and surrounding areas by Alan S Weakley as the
taxonomic standard for vegetation nomenclature for this report Precipitation data for the
hydrographs was obtained from an off -site resource in Concord, NC weather station (the nearest
station offering daily precipitation data) through Weather Underground URL
(http //www wunderground com/history /auport/KJOF /2010 /12 /16 /CustomHistory html)
Back Creek Monitoring Report February 2011
EEP Project No 17 Monitoring Year 5 of 5

0
SECTION 3
REFERENCES

SECTION 3
REFERENCES
Doll, B A, Grabow, G L, Hall, K A, Halley, J , Harman, W A, Jennings, G D , and Wise, D E ,
2003 Stream Restoration A Natural Channel Design Handbook
EcoScience Corporation 2003 Mitigation Report (Back Creek Stream and Wetland
Restoration) Raleigh, NC
Harrelson, Cheryl C, Rawlins, C L, Potyondy, John P 1994 Stream Channel Reference Sites
An Illustrated Guide to Field Technique Gen Tech Rep RM -245 Fort Collins, CO U S
Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment
Station 61 p
Rosgen, D L 1996 Applied River Morphology Wildland Hydrology Books, Pagosa Springs,
CO
Weakley, A S 2008 Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, Georgia, Northern Florida, and
Surrounding Areas (Draft April 2008) University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill,
NC
Back Creek Monitoring Report February 2011
EEP Project No 17 Monitoring Year 5 of 5

IR
SECTION 4
APPENDICES
Appendix 1 - General Figures and Plan Views
Appendix 2 - General Project Tables
Appendix 3 - Vegetation Assessment Data
Appendix 4 — Stream Assessment Data
Appendix 5 — Wetland Assessment Data

JJG
APPENDIX 1
GENERAL FIGURES AND PLAN VIEWS
1.1 Project Vicinity Map
1.2 Current Condition Plan View
Back Creek Monitoring Report February 2011
EEP Project No 17 Monitoring Year 5 of 5

PROJECT SITE DETAIL
Central Tributary- Restoration
Reach I- Restoration
- Reach 2- Enhancement
AerkalSoume: 2007MecklenburgCounlyGIS Upstream Tributary- Restoration
'e
A � /
PP
s 4^
rol
.r rv
J PIP •jl ; �nm \i� Legend
r t �� �I o Tower •" ( c.
USGS Source: NC Conservation Easement
DOTG /S � ' -
County Boundary
Directions to the site: own
From Charlotte, take I -85 north to US 29/University City Blvd. / *k.
Follow US 29 north to Back Creek Church Rd., turn right. /! 2.000 1,000 0 2,000
Follow Back Creek Church Rd. approximately 0.5 miles, site is
on the left just north of the bridge. t •;y, Feet
Appendix 1.1 Project Vicinity Map
Back Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 17
Mecklenburg County, NC
x'11 131 'l Monitoring Year 5 of 5
J Submittal Date: February 2011

LEGEND I 1
.a
� CROSS VANE O
MEANDER REVETMENT 16' ACCESS GATE
%1�10 c
MODIFIED CROSS VANE
GRADE CONTROL SILL
IMPERVIOUS
CHANNEL BLOCK O \
O
c b J —HOOK VANE I �x
STEP —POOL STRUCTURE I 4 00
#� PHOTO POINT
RAIN GAUGE ='
�# GROUNDWATER GAUGE I CROSS
� ' SF�n I
• MANHOLE w �/ EXISTING 25 WIDE LO
VEGETATION PLOT ; V. V_ QH�! o EASEMENT SEWER I LO �
O
DOWN TREE �Y LEA , pi p��,��D�NgC^o Q 0
I � p ciN
2010 CURRENT CONDITIONS N= I ti �� ti ww
v� Z
BANK SCOUR C7 EXISTING 25' WIDE ,� / _
AGGRADATION = SANITARY SEWER 1 U LLj
x EASEMENT a / / I Q W
0 I ZkO� / � � m N
1k \ 2
0 001 WID
EXISTING 128 WER COMPANY
R DUKE PO
Y �1'V
I
GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40 so 160
1 ,
( IN FEET )
I inch = 40 ft.
NC ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM DATE DECEMBER 2010
NOTES: EEP PROJECT NO. 17 BACK CREEK STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SCALE 1 " =40'
1. GENERAL SITE DATA PROVIDED BY NCEEP. MECKLENBURG COUNTY,
JOB NO.: JJX31100
&os5�vsfem 2• ALL LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE. NORTH CAROLINA APPENDIX 1.2
1'.IICi;liit.0110It MONITORING YEAR 5 of 5 CURRENT CONDITION PLAN VIEW
" °"" FIGURE 1 OF 6

Cn ri
Im y
rn
-n C7
G1 r
CZ i
rn
rn
U)
0 D
(Jt
0)+
0
N
CONSERVATION- - --
i
EASEMENT BOUNDARY-
PERM ANE�OIL/
REINFO ENT MAT
EPHEMERAL POOL
GRAPHIC SCALE
40 80
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 40 ft.
I � / 10
a
EXISTING 25' WIDE w
SANITARY SEWER Q 0
EASEMENT i ~ M
(n
-- w
_ -- w
-- Z
I J C.D
U LL_
w
4 a
2 N
NC ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM DATE DECEMBER 2010
NOTES: EEP PROJECT NO. 17 BACK CREEK STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SCALE 1 " =40'
1. GENERAL SITE DATA PROVIDED BY NCEEP. MECKLENBURG COUNTY,
telll JOB NO.: JJX31100
� 2. ALL LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE. NORTH CAROLINA APPENDIX 1.2
'� 1til ;fl��cllt MONITORING YEAR 5 of 5 CURRENT CONDITION PLAN VIEW
"""" FIGURE 2 OF 6
CROSS VANE
RAIN GAUGE
MEANDER REVETMENT
O#
GROUNDWATER GAUGE
lMODIFIED
CROSS VANE
O
DOWN TREE
ffiffffl
GRADE CONTROL SILL
IMPERVIOUS
CHANNEL BLOCK
2010
CURRENT CONDITIONS
J- HOOK VANE
STEP -POOL STRUCTURE
BANK SCOUR
AGGRADATION
##
PHOTO POINT
•
MANHOLE
NC ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM DATE DECEMBER 2010
NOTES: EEP PROJECT NO. 17 BACK CREEK STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SCALE 1 " =40'
1. GENERAL SITE DATA PROVIDED BY NCEEP. MECKLENBURG COUNTY,
telll JOB NO.: JJX31100
� 2. ALL LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE. NORTH CAROLINA APPENDIX 1.2
'� 1til ;fl��cllt MONITORING YEAR 5 of 5 CURRENT CONDITION PLAN VIEW
"""" FIGURE 2 OF 6

/ T
l•
/ / N
N
o0
m� �o
I
M � 15+ 00
� m
m w x
N � \
O y 1 ��X00
,+, / \
O / +00 \
13
/ ++
N C E sgF�rY F LL.
�°
�1r
w
� Z Ir
LEGEND
71
C CROSS VANE O# GROUNDWATER GAUGE
a
mN
YiFcif'
MEANDER REVETMENT i MANHOLE ` I
MODIFIED CROSS VANE O DOWN TREE
GRADE CONTROL SILL � -` — I
-- -
CONSER Vq TION
IMPERVIOUS 2010 CURRENT CONDITIONS EASEMENT NpgRY `
CHANNEL BLOCK EXISTING 15' WIDE BOU
J —HOOK VANE BANK SCOUR SANITARY SEWER
EASEMENT
STEP —POOL STRUCTURE AGGRADATION GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40 80 160
APHOTO POINT
RAIN GAUGE ( IN FEET )
1 inch = 40 ft.
NC ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM DATE DECEMBER 2010
NOTES: EEP PROJECT NO. 17
BACK CREEK STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SCALE 1 " =40'
1. GENERAL SITE DATA PROVIDED BY NCEEP.
MECKLENBURG COUNTY, JOB NO.: JJX31100
tem ,
2. ALL LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE. NORTH CAROLINA APPENDIX 1.2
MONITORING YEAR 5 of 5 CURRENT CONDITION PLAN VIEW
.RO�.�.. FIGURE 3 OF 6

Okoo -
SP1 LEGEND
CROSS VANE
y Sp 2 RAIN GAUGE MEANDER REVETMENT 2010 CURRENT CONDITIONS
SP3 O# GROUNDWATER GAUGE N
MODIFIED CROSS VANE
• MANHOLE v BANK SCOUR
'
SP 4 � DOWN TREE GRADE CONTROL SILL AGGRADATION
SPS IMPERVIOUS
\x0 o PHOTO POINT CHANNEL BLOCK
J —HOOK VANE
6 9 STEP —POOL STRUCTURE CONSER
SP O� E,q SEAy �A TION
S VEGETATION PLOT - NT Bnj "',_ y
\ SP % �QS
SPB 22 +00 - --
SP 9 2 I ' J Qp
/ \
\ h
�y
0^
6' XIS O N c0
+O
18,1-00 N
0 Lj_ / QO
G R•'y � HIC SCALE � �
19 +p0 W L
\ 40 0 20 40 80 160
( IN FEET) �; W
/ 1 inch = 40 ft.
NC ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM DATE DECEMBER 2010
NOTES: EEP PROJECT NO. 17 BACK CREEK STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SCALE 1 " =40'
1. GENERAL SITE DATA PROVIDED BY NCEEP. MECKLENBURG COUNTY,
JOB NO.: JJX31100
2. ALL LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE. NORTH CAROLINA APPENDIX 1.2
i llslitLf "111C]it MONITORING YEAR 5 of 5 CURRENT CONDITION PLAN VIEW
r " °' FIGURE 4 OF 6

GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20
40 80 160
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 40 ft.
x\
I
\
m>
o
L0
m M
\
EX /s
\
/
+
000 co
�
/
\ANT RY 5' w /oe
No
w\
o D
eR Eg
SX oo
SM
_
F-
N
/
0)
+
/
W
LLI
Z
4
�
LEGEND
H LLI
LLJ
OV CROSS VANE
•
MANHOLE
MEANDER REVETMENT
o
DOWN TREE
COQ /
6x0
MODIFIED CROSS VANE
%6�O
O
GROUNDWATER GAUGE
�SF
Zg +O 0
GRADE CONTROL SILL
Cl
�0�,
16
IMPERVIOUS
S
27 +00
CHANNEL BLOCK
2010 CURRENT CONDITIONS
_ \
J -HOOK VANE
STEP -POOL STRUCTURE
BANK SCOUR
#� PHOTO POINT
AGGRADATION
RAIN GAUGE
EEP PROJECT NO. 17
NC ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM DATE DECEMBER 2010
BACK CREEK STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION SCALE 1 " =40'
NOTES:
1. GENERAL SITE DATA
PROVIDED BY NCEEP.
MECKLENBURG COUNTY,
Ecosystem
2. ALL LOCATIONS
ARE
APPROXIMATE.
NORTH CAROLINA
APPENDIX 1.2
JOB NO.: JJX31100
MONITORING YEAR 5 of 5
CURRENT CONDITION PLAN VIEW
FIGURE 5 OF 6

LEGEND
bo \
CROSS VANE O GROUNDWATER GAUGE
x
MEANDER REVETMENT 0 MANHOLE N \
u EXISTING 25' WIDE
MODIFIED CROSS VANE n DOWN TREE SANITARY SEWER
0 EASEMENT �
GRADE CONTROL SILL
IMPERVIOUS
CHANNEL BLOCK 2010 CURRENT CONDITIONS
J -HOOK VANE
BANK SCOUR /
STEP -POOL STRUCTURE /
AGGRADATION 00'-Sf
#� PHOTO POINT
RAIN GAUGE
y �
y V V
/ �� FG � y y \
y
�
X
/ y GRO 3100
mD
(7 30 +00 / 0 0 /
C Z /
;u m I
()
CJI
O/V eR
SEMENT '
/
o D
rioN
, GRAPHIC SCALE
N
e0�/�/�g
40 0 20 40 80 160
o) 0O
R Y
+
v
CA
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 40 ft.
NC ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
DATE DECEMBER 2010
NOTES:
EEP PROJECT NO. 17
BACK CREEK STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION
SCALE 1 " =40'
1. GENERAL SITE DATA PROVIDED BY NCEEP.
MECKLENBURG COUNTY,
&osystem
2. ALL LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE.
NORTH CAROLINA
APPENDIX 1.2
JOB NO.: JJX31100
I'I�1II 3ulli
MONITORING YEAR 5 of 5
CURRENT CONDITION PLAN VIEW
FIGURE 6 OF 6

1
JIG
APPENDIX 2
GENERAL PROJECT TABLES
2.1 Project Mitigation Structure and Objectives
2.2 Project Activity and Reporting History
2.3 Project Contacts
2.4 Project Attribute Table
Back Creek Monitoring Report February 2011
EEP Project No 17 Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix 2 1 Project Mitigation Structure and Objectives
Back Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration /EEP Project No. 17
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Segment/Reach Y
Mitigation
Type
Approach
Lmear
Footage or
Acres
Stationing
- a
_
„ F Comments''
(ft)
Back Creek/Reach 1
R
P2
1,300 If
0 +00 -13 +00
Channel restoration, relocation with use of grade
Back Creek/Reach 2
El
P2/3
2,000 If
13 +00 -33 +00
Channel restoration, in -place with use of grade control
Upstream Tributary
R
P2
400 If
0+00-4+00
Channel restoration, relocation with use of grade
Central Tributary
R
P2
375 If
0+00-3+75
Channel restoration, relocation with use of grade
Wetland Areas
R
0 4 ac
Restoration of wetlands
Wetland Area
E
-
3 5 ac
-
Enhancement ofjunsdictional wetland
Component Summations
Restoration Level
Stream (If)
Wetland (ac)
Upland (ac)
Buffer (ac)
BMP
Riparian
Non -
Riparian
Restoration (R)
2,075
04
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Enhancement (E)
N/A
35
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Enahncement I (E)
2,000
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Enhancement 1I (E)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Creation (C)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Preservation (P)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
HQ Preservation (P)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Totals
4,075
39
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A

Appendix 2 2 Protect Activity and Reporting History
Back Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration /EEP Protect No 17
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Elapsed Time Since Grading Complete 5 Years
Elapsed Time Since Planting Complete: 4 Years 10 Months
Number of Reporting Years 5
°
Activity or Report
Data Collection Completed
Actual Completion or
s< a Delivery °
Restoration Plan
N/A
Jan -03
Final Design -90%
N/A
N/A
Construction
N/A
Dec -05
Temporary S &E mix applied to entire project area*
N/A
2005
Permanent seed mix applied to reach
N/A
N/A
Woody plantings for reach
N/A
Feb -06
As -Built Plansheet (Design Markups)
N/A
Jul -04
Year 1 Monitoring
Nov -06
Jan -06
Year 2 Monitoring
Aug-07
Nov -07
Year 3 Monitoring
May/Jun-08
Nov -08
Year 4 Monitoring
Jul -09
Nov -09
Year 5 Monitoring
Feb -11
Feb -11
*Seed and mulch is added as each section of construction is completed

Appendix 2.3 Project Contacts Table
Back Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration /EEP Project No 17
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
EcoScience Corporation
Designer
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 101
Raleigh, NC 27604
Shamrock Environmental Corportation
Construction
503 Patton Avenue
Greensboro NC 27406
Planting Contractor
Henry Rosso
Shamrock Environmental Corportation
Seeding Contractor
503 Patton Avenue
Greensboro, NC 27406
Jordan, Jones and Goulding
Monitoring Performers
309 E Morehead Street, Suite 110
Charlotte, NC 28202
Stream Monitoring, POC
Alison Nichols, 704 -527 -4106 ext 227
Vegetation Monitoring, POC
Wetland Monitoring, POC

Table 2.4 Project Attribute Table
Back Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration /EEP Project No. 17
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Project County
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Ph sio ra hic Region
Piedmont
Ecore ion
Southern Outer Piedmont
Project River Basin
Yadkin PeeDee
USGS HUC for Project 14 digit),
03040105010050
NCDW Sub -basin for Project and Reference
03 -07 -11
Within extent of EEP Watershed Plan?
U
WRC Class Warm Cool, Cold
U
% of project easement fenced or demarcated9
100%
Beaver activity observed during design hase9
U
-
Restoration Component Attribute
Table
Main Channel
Upstream
Tributary
Central
Tributary
Drainage Area (sq mi
41
01
04
Stream Order
3rd
1 st
1 st
Restored Length (ft)
3,300
400
375
Perennial or Intermittent
Perennial
Intermittent
Intermittent
Watershed type Rural, Urban, Developing)
Urban
Watershed LULC Distribution
Agriculture
-
Commercial
-
Public /Institutional
-
Residential
Transportation
-
Watershed Im ervious Cover %
—20%
NCDW AU/Index number
13 -17 -7
NCDWQ classification
WS -II, H W,C
303d listed9
No
Upstream of a 303d listed sedment?
Yes
Reasons for 303d listing or stressor
4s 4t 5
Total acreage of easement
14 acres
Total vegetated acreage within the easement
3 9
Total planted acreage as part of the restoration
U
Ros en classification of the pre-existing
C4
N/A
13-type
Ros en classification of the As -Built
C5
N/A
B-type
Valley Type
-
Valley sloe
-
Valley side slope range
-
Valley toe slope range
-
Cowardm classification
N/A
Trout waters designation
No
Species of concern, endangered, etc ? (Y/N)
N/A
Dominant soil series and characteristics
Aab, CcB2, CcD2, Ch, CuD2, EnD, PaF,
MeB MeD
Series
Monacan Enon
Wilkes
Depth
-
Clay %
-
K
-
T
-
"N /A" items do not apply / " -" items are unavailable / "U" items are unknown

APPENDIX 3
VEGETATION ASSESSMENT DATA
3.1 Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success
3.2 Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
3.3 Vegetation Plot Summary Data Table
3.4 Vegetation Condition Assessment
Back Creek Monitoring Report February 2011
EEP Project No 17 Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix 3.1 Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success
Back Creek Stream and Wetland Restorahon/EEP Protect No. 17
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Vegetation Plot ID
Vegetation Survival Threshold
Met
Plot 1
Y
Plot 2
Y
Plot 3
Y
Plot 4
N*
*Plot 4 did not meet based on planted stems, but with volunteers demonstrates a
density of 404 stems per acre

1. Vegetation Plot 1
(10/2010)
3. Vegetation Plot 3
(10/2010)
2. Vegetation Plot 2
(10/2010)
4. Vegetation Plot 4
(10/2010)
Prepared For: Appendix 3.2 Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos Prepared by:
Back Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 17
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
I;>> iaa timent Submittal Date: December 2010

Appendix 3 3 Vegetation Plot Summary Data Table
Back Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration /EEP Project No 17
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Type =Shrub or Tree
P = Planted
T = Total
Current Data (MY5 -2010)
Annual Means
Species
Common Name
Type
Plot 1
Plot 2
1 Plot 3
Plot 4
Current Mean
MY1 - 2006
MY2 - 2007
MY3- 2008
MY4- 2009
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
uercur mrchauxu
swamp chestnut oak
T
4
4
6
8
5
6
3
3
5
5
5
5
5
7
Fraxinus pennvylvanma
green ash
T
6
17
8
12
12
29
4
8
8
17
7
7
7
7
8
8
8
17
Plaranusoccidenlahs
amencan sycamore
T
5
3
6
6
6
8
1
1
5
5
4
4
5
5
5
8
5
6
Betula ni ra
river birch
T
4
5
4
4
10
14
3
3
5
7
4
4
6
6
6
6
5
6
Ulmur amerncana
I amencan elm
T
2
2
2
2
1
1
1 2
2
2
2
2
2
Luuidambarsr racilua
sweet gum
T
3
2
52
4
1
2
1 2
1 15
1 N/A
1 6
N/A
10
N/A
1 10
2
15
Aaer nibnim
red ma le
T
1
1
I
N/A
1
N/A
2
N/A
1
N/A
2
N/A
1
Aaer ne undo
boxelder
T
1
8
N/A
45
1 N/A
N/A
N/A
1
N/A
5
ucrc v SP
oakspecies
I T
2
N/A
1 2
1 N/A
I N/A
N/A
N/A
2
Plot Area (acres)
0 057
s
Species Count
5
7
5
7
3
5
3
6
4
6
4
5
4
1 5
4
3
4
6
Stem Count
21
35
26
85
28
56
1 8
23
21
50
16
20
21
26
21
13
21
51
StemsperAcrel
368
614
456
1491
491
982
1 140
404
364
873
285
346
364
461
364
224
364
886
Type =Shrub or Tree
P = Planted
T = Total

Appendix 3 4 Vegetation Condition Assessment
Back Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration /EEP Project No 17
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Planted Acreage 172
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Mapping
Threshold
(acres)
Number of
Polygons
Combined
Acreage
% of
Planted
Acreage
Bare Areas
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material
0 1
7
0 008
005%
Low Stem Density Areas
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on MY3, 4, or 5 stem count criteria
0 1
0
0
0%
z Total
- ,- 0
0
-0,05% 'r
Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor
Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small given the momtonng year
Easement Acreage 14
Mapping
% of
Threshold
Number of
Combined
Planted
Vegetation Category
Definitions
(SF)
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
Invasive Areas of Concern
Areas of points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale)
1000
0
0
0%
Easement Encroachment Areas
Areas of points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale)
none
0
0
0%

0
APPENDIX 4
STREAM ASSESSMENT DATA
4.1 Stream Station Photos
4.2 Qualitative Visual Stability Assessment
4.3 Verification of Bankfull Events
4.4 Cross - Section Plots and Raw Data Tables*
4.5 Longitudinal Plots and Raw Data Tables*
4.6 Pebble Count Plots and Raw Data Tables*
*Raw data tables have been provided electronically
Back Creek Momtormg Report February 2011
EEP Project No 17 Monitormg Year 5 of 5

Photo Point 1 -View Southeast (11/2010)
ft+ed Fair:
Photo Point 2 -View South (11/2010)
Appendix 4.1 Stream Station Photos
Back Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration /EEP Project No. 17
E+Ste�n Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Submittal Date: December 2010
bv-

Photo Point 3 -View Upstream
Main Channel (11/2010)
Photo Point 4 -View Upstream
Main Channel (11/2010)
Photo Point 3 -View Downstream
Main Channel (11/20 10)
Photo Point 4 -View Downstream
Main Channel (11 /2010)
Fnpuvd For
Appendix 4.1 Stream Station Photos
r....��� Back Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 17
Ilkosrteln l Monitoring Year 5 of 5
-- -- Submittal Date: December 2010
Pegmvd by:
YJ G'

Photo Point 5 -View Upstream
Main Channel (11/2010)
Photo Point 6 -View Upstream
Main Channel (11/2010)
P;parad For
Photo Point 5 -View Downstream
Main Channel (11/2010)
Photo Point 6 -View Downstream
Main Channel (11/2010)
Appendix 4.1 Stream Station Photos
rBack Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 17
I,Cvc Monitoring Year 5 of 5
.�.. Submittal Date: December 2010

Photo Point 7 View Southwest (11/2010)
Photo Point 8 -View Upstream
Main Channel(11 /2010)
Photo Point 8 -View Downstream
Main Channel (11 /2010)
Appendix 4.1 Stream Station Photos
Back Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 17
ern Monitoring Year 5 of 5
1'a� �,u c�ncnl Submittal Date: December 2010
R-A if

Photo Paint 9 -View Upstream
Main Channel (11/2010)
Photo Point 10 -View Upstream
Main Channel (11/2010)
Photo Point 9 -View Downstream
Main Channel (11/2010)
Photo Point 10 -View Downstream
Main Channel (11/2010)
Prapaod For:
Appendix 4.1 Stream Station Photos
Back Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 17
it Year 5 of 5
1t Submittal Date: December 2010
Prop"
pie

Photo Point 11 -View Upstream
Main Channel (11/2010)
Photo Point 12 -View Upstream
Central Tributary (12/2010)
Photo Point 11 -View Downstream
Main Channel (12/2010)
Photo Point 12 -View Downstream
Central Tributary (12/2010)
Prepared Fo[: Prepared by:
Appendix 4.1 Stream Station Photos
r..�� Back Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 17
I'k'Osysteni Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Submittal Date: December 2010

Photo Point 13 View Northwest (11/2010)
Photo Point 14 -View Upstream
Main Channel (11 /2010)
Photo Point 14 -View Downstream
Main Channel (11/2010)
PrIPMwd 7sr:
Appendix 4.1 Stream Station Photos
C� Back Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 17
Istem . Monitoring Year 5 of 5
"''" �� "nl Submittal Date: December 2010

Photo Point 15 -View Upstream
Main Channel (11/2010)
Photo Point 16 -View Upstream
Main Channel (11/2010)
Photo Point 15 -View Downstream
Main Channel (11/2010)
Photo Point 16 -View Downstream
Main Channel (11/2010)
Amm d 7W.
Appendix 4.1 Stream Station Photos
r, Back Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 17
Stern Monitoring Year 5 of 5
"7t ct��r't Submittal Date: December 2010
PrWKW b►:
PC

Photo Point 17 -View Veg Plot 4 (11/2010)
Photo Point 18 -View Upstream
Main Channel (11/2010)
Photo Point 18 -View Downstream
Main Channel (11/20 10)
Appendix 4.1 Stream Station Photos
r, Back Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 17
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
III Wii •G)lenf Submittal Date: December 2010
-P,r%IXW by:
Y �7
J�G

Photo Point 19 -View Upstream
Main Channel (11/2010)
Photo Point 20 -View Upstream
Main Channel (11 /2010)
Photo Point 19 -View Downstream
Main Channel (11 /2010)
Photo Point 20 -View Downstream
' "' Main Channel (11/20 10)
►� Fv -- PrWKW bir
Appendix 4.1 Stream Station Photos'
Back Creek. Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 17
Ij:a1 t,u ti merit Monitoring Year 5 of 5 '
Submittal Dater December 2010

Photo Point 21 -View Upstream
Upstream Tributary (11/2010)
Photo Point 22 -View Upstream
Upstream Tributary (11/2010)
PrWavi Pw.
Photo Point 21 -View Downstream
Upstream Tributary (11/2010)
Photo Point 22 -View Downstream
Upstream Tributary (11/2010)
Appendix 4.1 Stream Station Photos
CBack Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 17
l cc�ss-� t Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Submittal Date: December 2010
PnpwW

Appendix 4.2 Qualitative Visual Stability Assessment
Main Channel (3,300 If)
Back Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration /EEP Project No 17
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Major
Channel
Category
Channel
Sub-Category
Metric
1 Bed
1 Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
Aggradation
Degredation
2 Riffle Condition
Texture /Substrate
3 Meander Pool
Condition
Depth Sufficient
Lenth Appropriate
-
- -
4 Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide)
24
2 Bank
1 Scoured /Eroded
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or scour
and erosion
2 Undercut
Banks underr,ut /overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears likely
Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
3 Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
26
3 Engineered
Structures
1 Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dilodged boulders or logs
2 Grade Control
Grade control strictures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
26
2a Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms
3 Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%
1
287
4 Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining -Max Pool Depth Bankfull Depth? 16
Roofwads /lo s providing some cover at baseflow
Number
Stable,
Performing
as intended
Total
Number in
As -Built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Number with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust
for
Stablh71ng
Woody
Vegetation
1
42
99%
-
- -
0
0
100%
24
24
'4 __
- y
100%
26
26
100%
26
26
100%
25
26
96%
26
26
100%
-
'
11
287
96%
8
213
97%
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Totals
11
287
96%
8
213
97%
18
18
- -
z
100%
4
--
-
18
18
100%
18
18
100%
15
15
100%
18
IS
100%

Appendix 4 2 Qualitative Visual Stability Assessment
Upstream Tributary (400 If)
Back Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration /EEP Project No 17
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
I Bed 1 Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
2 Riffle Condition
Number
Stable,
Performing
as Intended
3 Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
Lenth Appropriate
% Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Condition
Footage with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
0
4 Thalweg Position
100%
;
- $
+
-
0
Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide)
{� ,�
2 Bank
1 Scoured /Eroded
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or scour
and erosion
100%
7
Banks undercut /overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears likely
100%
2 Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are
100%
7
providing habitat
3 Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
7
100%
3 Engineered
Structures
I Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no ddodged boulders or logs
2 Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
0
2a Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms
0
100%
3 Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%
100%
4 habitat
Pool forming strictures maintaining -Max Pool Depth Bankfull Depth >_ 1 G
Rootwads/lo s providing some cover at baseflow
Number
Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Total
Number in
As -Built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Number with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust %
for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
0
0
100%
;
- $
+
-
0
0
100%
8
8
1 -_1 "t
t-
-
t
T P t
100%
7
7
100%
7
7
100%
7
7
100%
7
7
100%
-
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Totals
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
8
8
'3
1
r�
J
100%
"
--
8
8
100%
8
8
100%
8
8
100%
8
8
100%

Appendix 4 2 Qualitative Visual Stability Assessment
Central Tributary (375 If)
Back Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No 17
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Adjust %
Number
Number with
Footage with
for
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Woody
Woody
Woody
Category
Sub-Category
Metric
as Intended
As -Built
Segments
Footage
as Intended
Vegetation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1 Bed
1 Vertical Stability
Aggradation
__
0
0
100%
Degredation
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run units)
-
2 Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
8
8
__�. z _
100%
3 Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
7
7
100%
Lenth Appropriate
7
7
100%
Condition
_
Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
7
7
100%
-
4 Thalweg Position
__
Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide)
7
7
= _ -
100%
21Bank
I Scoured/Eroded
Batik lacking vegetative cover resulting supply from poor growth and/or scour
and erosion
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Banks undercut /overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears likely
2 Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are modest appear sustainable and are
' _ _ _ ..
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
providing habitat
3 Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
= .'
- Totals
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
3 Engineered
Structures
I Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dilodged boulders or logs
8
8
-
- -
100%
-
2 Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
8
8
100%
` LJ�
2a Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms
8
8
100%
��_
-
3 Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%
8
8
100%
-_ r
=
4 Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining -Max Pool Depth Banld'ull Depth ? 1 6
Rootwads/lo s providing some cover at baseflow
8
8
°
100 /o

Appendix 4.3 Verification of Bankfull Events
Back Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration /EEP Protect #17
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Date of
Date of Collection
Occurrence
Method
Photo # (►f available)
Summer/Fall 2006
9/13/06
Visual Assessment
N/A
10/9/2007
Unknown
Crest Gauge
N/A
8/19/2008
Unknown
Crest Gauge
N/A
Crest Gauge and Visual
7/15/2009
Unknown
N/A
Assessment
11/11/2009-
Crest Gauge and Visual
11/18/2009
N/A
11/12/2009
Assessment
11/8/2009-
Crest Gauge and Visual
11/19/2010
N/A
11/12/2010
Assessment

Appendix 4.4 Cross - Section Plots and Raw Data Tables
Back Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration /EEP Project No. 17
Main Channel
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Project Name
Back Creek
EEP Project Number
17
Cross - Section 1D
XS -1, Riffle, 2 +98
Survey Date
11/2010
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation ft
95.79
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft 2)
28.20
Bankfull Width ft
17.78
Flood Prone Area Elevation (ft)
98.16
Flood Prone Width ft
220.00
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.53
Bankfull Max Depth ft
2.37
W/D Ratio
11.62
Entrenchment Ratio
494
Bank Height Ratio
1.00
Station
Elevation
Notes
-0.03
96.12
X1
0.17
96.31
x 1 -1 t
0.25
96.15
X1
20.51
96.22
x1
28.57
96.01
xl
35.72
96.46
xl
37.57
96.19
xl
39.95
95.95
x1
41.38
95.68
xl
43.83
94.52
xl
45.6
94.23
X1
46.49
9395
xt
47.07
93.42
X1
47.73
93.54
XI -lew
49.47
93.43
x 1
50.65
93.45
X
52.32
93.47
X
53.8
93.54
xl -rew
54.42
94.06
x 1
54.46
94.44
X
55.6
94.7
X
57.87
95.28
X
58.56
95.76
X1
60.38
95.5
X1
64.14
95.94
x1
71.9
96.06
X1
79.48
96.53
x 1
87.35
96.89
x1 -I t
87.89
96.82
X
XS -1: View Upstream
XS -1: View Downstream
Back Creek (Main Channel) - MY5
Cross- Section 1 -Riffle
97.5
•-
97
96.5
- - -
96
..................... ............. ............................... ... .............................. r. .......
.
` 95.5
- - -- - - - -- -
95
0 94.5
- -- -
94
- -
w
93.5
. ................................................... ...............................
93
92.5
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0
Station (ft)
MY 1-9/2006 MY2- 8/2007 - MY3- 4/2008 MY4- 6/2009 MY5 - 11/2010 • ...... Water Surface ....... Bankfull

Appendix 4.4 Cross - Section Plots and Raw Data Tables
Back Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 17
Main Channel
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Project Name
Back Creek
EEP Project Number
17
Cross - Section ID
XS -2, Pool, 7 +56
Survey Date
11/2010
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation ft
94.59
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft)
71.37
Bankfull Width ft
29.09
Flood Prone Area Elevation ft
N/A
Flood Prone Width ft
N/A
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
2.45
Bankfull Max Depth ft
5.26
W/D Ratio
11.87
Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
Bank Height Ratio
1.00
Station
Elevation
Notes
0.24
95.78
x2
0.75
95.81
x2-1 pt
7.77
95.51
x2
13.04
95.56
x2
20.63
95.34
x2
27.63
94.61
x2
33.22
94.06
x2
37.36
92.08
x2 -lew
37.94
90.65
x2
40.33
89.88
x2
43.58
89.35
x2
46.50
89.81
x2
48.33
90.83
x2
49.96
92.08
x2 -rew
51.94
92.98
x2
54.32
94.09
x2
62.81
95.93
x2
67.76
95.83
x2
73.33
95.81
x2
75.74
95.85
x2
81.01
95.88
x2 -r t
97
96
95
94
93
92
0 91
w
90
89
88
XS -2: View Upstream
Back Creek (Main Channel) - MY5
Cross - Section 2 -Pool
qRW3h_Lh,*I_ ���N = _�� � 5".-IMOAM
XS -2: View Downstream
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0
Station (ft)
MY 1-9/2006 MY2- 8/2007 MY3- 4/2008 MY4- 6/2009 --o- MY5 - 11/2010 ....... Water Surface ....... Bankfull

Appendix 4.4 Cross - Section Plots and Raw Data Tables
Back Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 17
Main Channel
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Project Name
Back Creek
EEP Project Number
17
Cross- Section ID
XS -3, Riffle, 12 +23
Survey Date
11/2010
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation 11
92.41
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft)
48.85
Bankfull Width ft
30.08
Flood Prone Area Elevation ft
95.36
Flood Prone Width ft
200.00
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.62
Bankfull Max Depth ft
2.95
W/D Ratio
18.57
Entrenchment Ratio
6.65
Bank Height Ratio
1.00
Station
Elevation
Notes
-0.01
95.04
x3 -1 t
0.26
94.83
0
9.41
93.98
0
18.32
9336
0
28.11
92.92
0
35.02
91.27
0
38.74
90.33
0
42.21
89.70
x3 -lew
44.60
89.51
0
44.97
89.51
0
47.61
89.46
0
48.72
89.70
x3 -rew
52.35
90.54
0
56.87
92.25
0
60.92
92.66
0
62.90
92.92
0
69.67
93.16
0
77.67
92.99
0
84.67
92.95
0
88.74
92.73
0
93.15
92.37
0
94.54
1 92.23
x3-rpt
XS -3: View Upstream
Back Creek (Main Channel) - MY5
Cross - Section 3 -Riffle
101
99
97
95
_ 93
C
0
91
w
89
87
XS -3: View Downstream
....... ................................ ...... .. ............................... .....................
....................................... ............................... . .......................................................................
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0
Station (ft)
MY 1- 9/2006 MY2- 8/2007 - MY3- 4/2008 MY4- 6/2009 MY5 - 11/2010 • • ..... Water Surface • • - - • - - Bankfull

Appendix 4.4 Cross - Section Plots and Raw Data Tables
Back Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration /EEP Project No. 17
Main Channel
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Project Name
Back Creek
EEP Project Number
17
Cross- Section ID
XS -4, Pool, 15 +60
Survey Date
11/2010
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation ft
91.12
Bankfull Cross- Sectional Area (ft)
46.85
Bankfull Width ft
18.16
Flood Prone Area Elevation ft
N/A
Flood Prone Width ft
N/A
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
2.58
Bankfull Max Depth ft
3.81
W/D Ratio
7.04
Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
Bank Height Ratio
1.00
Station
Elevation
Notes
-1.58
92.12
x4 -1 t
0.65
92.45
x4
6.58
92.62
x4
11.64
92.35
x4
18.11
92.03
x4
23.30
91.45
x4
28.17
91.65
x4
29.81
90.83
x4
31.52
89.53
x4 -lew
32.02
88.69
x4
35.94
88.01
x4
38.15
87.59
x4
39.86
87.31
x4
43.21
88.01
x4
44.28
88.42
x4
46.18
89.53
x4 -rew
47.23
91.00
x4
48.84
92.22
x4
52.42
92.64
x4
58.55
92.74
x4
59.54
92.76
x4
59.54
92.73
x4
59.55
92.84
x4
60.16
92.8
x4
94
93
92
T
91
90
0
89
w 88
87
86
10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0
MY1- 9/2006 MY2- 8/2007 - MY3- 4/2008
XS -4: View Upstream
Back Creek (Main Channel) - MY5
Cross- Section 4 -Pool
XS -4: View Downstream
35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0 60.0
Station (ft)
MY4- 6/2009 MY5- 11/2010 ....... Water Surface ....... Bankfull
...................................... . .......................................
.................................................................... ....... . ....
35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0 60.0
Station (ft)
MY4- 6/2009 MY5- 11/2010 ....... Water Surface ....... Bankfull

Appendix 4.4 Cross - Section Plots and Raw Data Tables
Back Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 17
Main Channel
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Project Name
Back Creek
EEP Project Number
17
Cross - Section ID
XS -5, Riffle, 19 +73
Survey Date
11/2010 .
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation ft
93.80
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (fe)
49.50
Bankfull Width ft
29.89
Flood Prone Area Elevation ft
96.86
Flood Prone Width ft
190.00
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
.1.66
Bankfull Max Depth ft
3.06
W/D Ratio
18.01
Entrenchment Ratio
6.36
Bank Height Ratio
1.00
Station
Elevation
Notes
-0.21
95.50
x5 -I t
-0.09
95.33
x5
3.66
94.58
x5
7.12
93.94
x5
11.06
93.90
x5
15.84
93.16
x5
20.48
92.41
0
21.62
92.63
0
21.77
92.55
x5
22.97
91.47
0
26.56
91.06
x5 -lew
27.21
90.94
0
28.73
90.97
0
30.77
91.08
0
32.36
90.74
x5
34.51
91.06
x5 -rew
35.32
91.64
0
37.66
92.51
0
39.14
93.31
0
44.35
94.35
0
51.39
94.65
x5
59.21
95.17
x5
59.27
95.18
0
59.32
95.17
x5
98
97
96
95
94
93
92
w 91
90
89
88
XS -5: View Upstream
Back Creek (Main Channel) - MY5
Cross- Section 5 -Riffle
XS -5: View Downstream
........................................... 1
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0
Station (ft)
MY1- 9/2006 MY2- 8/2007 MY34/2008 MY4- 6/2009 MY5 - 11/2010 ....... Water Surface ....... Bankfull

Appendix 4.4 Cross - Section Plots and Raw Data Tables
Back Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration /EEP Project No. 17
Main Channel
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Project Name
Back Creek
EEP Project Number
17
Cross - Section ID
XS -6, Pool, 24 +50
Survey Date
11/2010
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation ft
87.71
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft 2)
90.45
Bankfull Width ft
49.48
Flood Prone Area Elevation ft
N/A
Flood Prone Width ft
N/A
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.83
Bankfull Max Depth ft
5.29
W/D Ratio
27.04
Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
Bank Height Ratio
1.00
Station
Elevation
Notes
0
87.91
x6-1 pt
0.18
87.94
x6
0.21
87.93
x6
0.46
87.64
x6
2.26
87.52
x6
6.05
87.54
x6
10.9
87.4
x6
13.62
87.39
x6
17.67
86.56
x6
19.92
86.05
x6
20.74
85.51
x6
21.67
84.35
x6 -lew
22.27
84.2
x6
22.69
83.75
x6
23.46
83.24
x6
25.04
82.72
x6
26.19
82.45
x6
27.72
82.45
x6
28.98
82.42
x6
30.7
82.42
x6
32.65
82.86
x6
34.67
83.5
x6
34.78
84.35
x6 -rew
35.42
85.81
x6
37.95
86.04
x6
40.08
86.82
x6
45.8
87.25
x6
48.77
87.57
x6
50.44
87.78
x6
50.72
87.94
x6 -r t
90
89
88
87
86
85
84
c 83
0
> 82
cU 81
80
0.0
XS -6: View Upstream
10.0
XS -6: View Downstream
Back Creek (Main Channel) - MY5
Cross - Section 6 -Pool
.................................................. ...............................
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
Station (ft)
MY1- 9/2006 MY2- 8/2007 MY34/2008 MY4- 6/2009 --s- MY5- 11/2010 ....... Water Surface ....... Bankfull

Appendix 4.4 Cross - Section Plots and Raw Data Tables
Back Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 17
Main Channel
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Project Name
Back Creek
EEP Project Number
17
Cross - Section ID
XS -7, Riffle, 30 +37
Survey Date
11/2010
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation ft
82.62
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft 2)
56.77
Bankfull Width ft
30.39
Flood Prone Area Elevation ft
85.74
Flood Prone Width ft
232.00
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.87
Bankfull Max Depth ft
3.12
W/D Ratio
16.25
Entrenchment Ratio
7.63
Bank Height Ratio
1.00
Station
Elevation
Notes
0.15
83.25
0
6.27
83.44
0
11.05
83.37
0
14.1
83.52
0
18.34
82.45
x7
21.38
81.46
0
26.41
80.85
0
29.63
80.19
0
32.55
80.64
0
35.35
80.2
0
37.4
79.92
x7 -lew
38.17
79.69
0
39.43
79.53
0
40
79.5
0
41.03
79.61
0
42.48
79.84
0
42.8
79.92
x7 -rew
43.71
81.23
0
45.31
81.22
x7
47.63
81.87
0
48.09
82.67
0
48.88
82.85
0
51.85
83.21
0
55.47
83.52
0
60.45
83.64
0
61.45
83.55
0
61.51
83.68
0
61.7
83.67
x7 -r t
XS -7: View Upstream
XS -7: View Downstream
Back Creek (Main Channel) - MY5
Cross - Section 7 -Riffle
84
83.5
-
83
- - - - - --
..........................
........... ............................... ............................................ ............................... ..._
82.5
- -
Ap
81.5
c
m
80.5
- -- -
..... .....
79.5
79
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0
Station (R)
MY 1- 9/2006 MY2- 8/2007 MY3- 4/2008 MY4- 6/2009 - MY5 - 11/2010 ...... Water Surface • • • .... Bankfull

Appendix 4.4 Cross - Section Plots and Raw Data Tables
Back Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration /EEP Project No. 17
Cnetral Tributary
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Project Name
Back Creek
EEP Project Number
17
Cross - Section ID
XS -8, Riffle
Survey Date
11/2010
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation ft
93.26
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft)
8.35
Bankfull Width ft
13.14
Flood Prone Area Elevation ft
94.59
Flood Prone Width ft
200.00
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.63
Bankfull Max Depth ft
1.33
W/D Ratio
20.86
Entrenchment Ratio
15.22
Bank Height Ratio
1.00
Station
Elevation
Notes
7.80
93.92
X8-1 Pt
20.70
93.37
x8
24.14
92.44
x8
26.73
91.93
x8
30.16
92.62
x8
32.71
93.20
x8
36.05
93.33
x8
41.12
93.22
x8
41.40
1 93.32
x8 -r t
Y:)
94.5
94
93.5
93
a
0
92.5
92
91.5
91
XS -8: View Upstream
Back Creek (Central Tributary) - MY5
Cross - Section 8 -Riffle
10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0
Station (ft)
MY1- 9/2006 MY2- 8/2007 MY3- 4/2008 - - MY4- 6/2009
XS -8: View Downstream
35.0
t MY5 -11 /2010
_I
40.0
...... • Bankfull

Appendix 4.4 Cross - Section Plots and Raw Data Tables
Back Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration /EEP Project No. 17
Central Tributary
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Project Name
Back Creek MY5
EEP Project Number
17
Cross - Section ID
XS -9, Riffle
Survey Date
11/2010
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation ft
982.67
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft2)
12.26
Bankfull Width ft
11.81
Flood Prone Area Elevation ft
984.75
Flood Prone Width ft
110.00
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.04
Bankfull Max Depth ft
2.08
W/D Ratio
11.36
Entrenchment Ratio
9.31
Bank Height Ratio
1.00
Station
Elevation
Notes
-1.65
985.38
x9 -I t
-1.64
985.14
x9
-0.15
984.96
x9
1.93
984.46
x9
3.91
983.7
x9
5.94
982.79
x9
7.5
982.41
x9
9.36
982.05
x9
10.46
981.56
x9
11.45
981.51
x9
1195
981.34
x9 -lew
12.49
981.06
x9
13.09
980.81
x9
13.67
980.66
x9
14.31
980.62
x9
14.9
980.59
x9
15.49
980.59
x9
16
980.68
x9
16.16
981.34
x9 -rew
16.5
982.19
x9
17.27
982.56
x9
18.07
982.63
x9
18.77
982.79
x9
19.7
983.23
x9
21.13
983.84
x9
22.9
984.52
x9
23.92
984.76
x9
25.53
984.7
x9 -r t
XS -9: View Upstream
XS -9: View Downstream
Back Creek (Central Tributary) - MY5
Cross - Section 9 -Riffle
990
988
- - -
986
- `- -
iE
984
S........................
............................. .............................. ...............................
> 982
-
w.............
............................... ... ............. ./ .................................... ...............................
980
978
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Station (ft- arbitrary)
MY2- 8/2007 MY3- 4/2008 MY4- 6/2009 --- --- MY5-11/201 0 • • • • • • • Water Surface ....... Bankfull

Appendix 4.5 Longitudinal Plots and Raw Data Tables
Back Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 17
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
98
96
94
92
L 90
i
C3
88
O
Ri
i
86
W
84
82
Back Creek
Longitudinal Profile
2010 Monitoring Year
Bankfull/Top of Bank = - 0.004 *STA + 98.2
Water Surface = -0.004 *STA + 95.99
♦ ♦
--------------------
im--------------------------------------- ----------------------- - - - - -- ♦
NIX J \� it--- - - - - -- - -- - - - -- ♦
80
280
480 680 880 1080 1280 1480 1680
Station (ft)
-- TW (MY2- 8/2007) TW (MY34/2008) TW (MY4- 6/2009) - TW (MY5- 11/2010)
- - - - - -- WS (MY5- 11/2010) ♦ BKF (MY5- 11/2010) ♦ Structures 0 Cross - Section

Appendix 4.5 Longitudinal Plots and Raw Data Tables
Back Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 17
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
93
91
89
87
w
85
i
G�
G
°— 83
:e
W
81
I'D
77
Back Creek
Longitudinal Profile
2010 Monitoring Year
Bankfull/Top of Bank = - 0.004 *STA + 98.2
Water Surface = -0.004 *STA + 95.99
1800 2000 2200 2400 2600 2800 3000 3200
Station (ft)
-- TW (MY2- 8/2007)
— TW (MY34/2008)
TW (MY4- 6/2009)
-- TW (MY5- 11/2010)
- - - -- -- WS (MY5- 11/2010)
♦ BKF (MY5- 11/2010)
♦ Structures
40 Cross - Section

Appendix 4.6 Pebble Count Plots and Raw Data Tables
Back Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 17
Main Channel
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Project Name Back Creek
EEP Project Number 17
Cross - Section ID XS -1, Riffle, 2 +98
Survey Date 11/2010
Description Material
Sand
very fine sand
fine sand
medium sand
coarse sand
very coarse sand
Gravel
very fine gravel
fine gravel
fine gravel
medium gravel
medium gravel
course gravel
course gravel
very coarse gravel
very coarse gravel
Cobble
small cobble
medium cobble
large cobble
very large cobble
Boulder
small boulder
small boulder
medium boulder
large boulder
Bedrock
bedrock
TOTAL % of whole count
0
Summary Data
D50
22.6
D84
72.67
1
D95
88.56
Size mm
Total #
Item %
Cum %
0.062
6
6%
6%
0.125
0
0%
0%
0.250
9
9%
9%
0.50
4
4%
4%
1.00
2
2%
2%
2.0
10
10%
10%
4.0
0
0%
0%
5.7
0
0%
0%
8.0
5
5% i
5%
11.3
0
0%
0%
16.0
8
8%
8%
22.3
6
6%
6%
32.0
5
5%
5%
45
12
12%
12%
64
11
11%
11%
90
18
18%
18%
128
3
3%
3%
180
1
1%
1%
256
0
0%
0%
362
0
0%
0%
512
0
0%
0%
1024
0
0%
0%
2048
0
0%
0%
40096
1 0
1 0%
0%
100
1 100%
100%
Back Creek (Main Channel) - MY5
Cross - Section 1 - Cumulative Percent
100%
90%
80%
70%
ej
60%
> 50%
40%
U 30%
20%
10%
0%
001 01 1 10 �p0 `Opo
Particle Size (mm)
MYl- 6/2006 MY2- 8/2007 MY34/2008 — - MY4- 6/2009 MY5- 11/2010
Back Creek (Main Channel) - MY5
Cross - Section 1 - Individual Class Percent
100%
J
90% — — --
— — -- — — — — —
=
80% — --
— — — — — --
—
70%
U
50%
A
40%
- - --
-
M
30%
20%
-- - --
Back Creek (Main Channel) - MY5
Cross - Section 1 - Individual Class Percent
100%
90% — — --
— — -- — — — — —
=
80% — --
— — — — — --
—
70%
U
50%
A
40%
- - --
-
M
30%
20%
-- - --
— - — — - - --
— --
10%
--
AtAL�_A__
St
0°i°
Oy ti
'L 1K �1 'b ,b „ V �Fi b5 q0 g lr90 fhb
fib, �1b
o��Lo`y5 Or1�7
�y
`OVtX �op00 �0p1b
o
Particle Size (mm)
■MYI- 6/2006
■MY2 - 8/2007 ■MY3 -4 /2008 :1MY4- 6/2009
■MY5 - 11/2010 1

F_
Appendix 4.6 Pebble Count Plots and Raw Data Tables
Back Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 17
Main Channel
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Name Back Creek
oject Number 17
ection ID XS -2, Pool, 7 +56
Date 11/2010
Sand
very fine sand
fine sand
medium sand
coarse sand
very coarse sand
Gravel
very fine gravel
fine gravel
fine gravel
medium gravel
medium gravel
course gravel
course gravel
very coarse grave
very coarse grave
Cobble
small cobble
medium cobble
large cobble
very large cobble
Boulder
small boulder
small boulder
medium boulder
large boulder
Bedrock
bedrock
TOTAL % of whole count
8
Summary Data
D50
0.63
D84
6.85
D95
64
ze mm
Total #
Item %
Cum %
0.062
11
11%
11%
0.125
8
8%
8%
0.250
10
10%
10%
0.50
18
18%
18%
1.00
12
12%
12%
2.0
10
10%
10%
4.0
8
8%
8%
5.7
6
6%
6%
8.0
2
2%
2%
11.3
4
4%
4%
16.0
0
0%
0%
22.3
0
0%
0%
32.0
1
1%
1%
45
2
2%
2%
64
3
3%
3%
90
2
2%
2%
128
0
0%
0%
180
3
3%
3%
256
0
0%
0%
362
0
0%
0%
512
0
0%
0%
1024
0
0%
0%
2048
0
0%
1 0%
40096
0
0%
1 0%
100
100%
100%
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
_0 40%
E 30%
U 20%
10%
0°/
Back Creek (Main Channel) - MY5
Cross- Section 2 - Cumulative Percent
Particle Size (mm)
-MY1 -6 /2006 -- -MY2- 812007 -MY34/2008 MY4- 6/2009 -MY5- 11/2010
Back Creek (Main Channel) - MY5
Cross - Section 2 - Cumulative Percent
100%
80%
- -- —
— -- — — - — —
70%
- --
- - -- - - - - -- - — -
50%
U
40%
30%
— —
—
20%
— -
-
.E c
10%
- - — - - - — -
0%
oh 1
ti A �!� 1b ^�1 Rb bR q� 1y� X40 �5b 5b`1 h1ti
oobLo`ry5 OR5
1`^i �R"�
�o'yk 'oogb
Particle Size (mm)
■MY1- 6/2006
■MY2 - 8/2007 ■MY3- 4/2008 uMY4- 6/2009 ■MY5- 11/2010

Appendix 4.6 Pebble Count Plots and Raw Data Tables
Back Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 17
Main Channel
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Project Name
Back Creek
EEP Project Number
17
Cross - Section ID
XS -3, Riffle, 12 +23
Survey Date
11/2010
0.125
Description
Material
Silt/Clay
Silt/Clay
Sand
very fine sand
fine sand
medium sand
coarse sand
very coarse sand
Gravel
very fine gravel
fine gravel
fine gravel
medium gravel
medium gravel
course gravel
course gravel
very coarse gravel
very coarse gravel
Cobble
small cobble
medium cobble
large cobble
very large cobble
Boulder
small boulder
small boulder
medium boulder
large boulder
Bedrock
bedrock
TOTAL % of whole count
0%
Summary Data
D50
51.05
D84
84.58
1
D95
112.8
Size mm
Total #
Item %
Cum %
0.062
11
11%
11%
0.125
5
5%
5%
0.250
0
0%
0%
0.50
4
4%
4%
1.00
5
5%
5%
2.0
2
2%
2%
4.0
0
0%
0%
5.7
4
4%
4%
8.0
0
0%
0%
11.3
0
0%
0%
16.0
0
0%
0%
22.3
0
0%
0%
32.0
4
4%
4%
45
8
8%
8%
64
22
22%
22%
90
24
24%
24%
128
10
10%
10%
180
1
1%
1%
256
0
0%
0%
362
0
0%
0%
512
0
0%
0%
1024
0
0%
0%
2048
0
0%
0%
40096
0
0%
0%
100
100%
100%
Back Creek ( Main Channel) - MY5
Back Creek (Main Channel) - MY5
Cross - Section 3 - Individual Class Percent
100%
Cross - Section 3 - Cumulative Percent
100%
-- — - -- - -- —
11111111
��IRII�N�llllly
70% —
90%
moll
a'
60% - -
— -- - -
'/x,11
50%
®�
80%
U
40%
- --
fm
30% -
c'o
20%
- - --
--
S
10%
--
— —
c
70%
CZ �5 "I� ♦
1� D� h!� S ♦) ♦b �L p7 bR �O ♦�� ♦�O �b�o
�bL h ♦`L
O�5
11 z
♦ �y'>
♦p1D. �Ob4�oOp�b
Particle Size (mm)
■MYI -6 /2006
•MY2 - 8/2007 ■MY34/2008 +MY4- 6/2009
■MY5- 11/2010
_—
U
60%
50%
40%
30%
c'L
V
20%
10%
0%
OD♦ �♦
♦ ♦O
♦DO
Op0
Particle Size (nun)
—MYI- 6/2006
MY2- 8/2007 MY3- 4/2008 °MY4-
6/2009
MY5- 11/2010
Back Creek ( Main Channel) - MY5
Cross - Section 3 - Individual Class Percent
100%
80% —
-- — - -- - -- —
--
��IRII�N�llllly
70% —
— -- -- - -- —
- - - --
a'
60% - -
— -- - -
'/x,11
50%
®�
U
40%
- --
-0
30% -
c'o
20%
- - --
--
S
10%
--
— —
0%
CZ �5 "I� ♦
1� D� h!� S ♦) ♦b �L p7 bR �O ♦�� ♦�O �b�o
�bL h ♦`L
O�5
11 z
♦ �y'>
♦p1D. �Ob4�oOp�b
Particle Size (mm)
Back Creek ( Main Channel) - MY5
Cross - Section 3 - Individual Class Percent
100%
80% —
-- — - -- - -- —
--
=
70% —
— -- -- - -- —
- - - --
a'
60% - -
— -- - -
_
50%
U
40%
- --
-0
30% -
c'o
20%
- - --
--
S
10%
--
— —
0%
CZ �5 "I� ♦
1� D� h!� S ♦) ♦b �L p7 bR �O ♦�� ♦�O �b�o
�bL h ♦`L
O�5
11 z
♦ �y'>
♦p1D. �Ob4�oOp�b
Particle Size (mm)
■MYI -6 /2006
•MY2 - 8/2007 ■MY34/2008 +MY4- 6/2009
■MY5- 11/2010
_—

Appendix 4.6 Pebble Count Plots and Raw Data Tables
Back Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 17
Main Channel
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Project Name Back Creek
EEP Project Number 17
Cross - Section ID XS4, Pool, 15 +60
Survey Date 11/2010
Description
Material
Size mm
Total #
Item %
Cum
Silt/Clay
silt/clay
0.062
10
10%
10%
Sand
very fine sand
0.125
6
6%
6%
fine sand
0.250
8
8%
8%
medium sand
0.50
18
18%
18%
coarse sand
1.00
14
14%
14%
very coarse sand
2.0
9
9%
9%
Gravel
very fine gravel
4.0
4
4%
4%
fine gravel
5.7
2
2%
2%
fine gravel
8.0
3
3%
3%
medium gravel
11.3
1
1%
1%
medium gravel
16.0
0
0%
0%
course gravel
22.3
8
8%
8%
course gravel
32.0
0
0%
0%
very coarse gravel
45
6
6%
6%
very coarse gravel
64
7
7%
7%
Cobble
small cobble
90
2
2%
2%
medium cobble
128
0
0%
0%
large cobble
180
2
2%
2%
very large cobble
256
0
0%
0%
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
0%
small boulder
512
0
0%
0%
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
0%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
0%
Bedrock
bedrock
40096
0
0%
0%
TOTAL % of whole count
100
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50 0.79
D84 34.17
D95 61.29
100%
90%
80%
V 70%
U
60%
> 50%
40%
E 30%
U 20%
10%
0%
Noo
ti o
Particle Size (mm)
�—MY1- 6/2006 -MY2- 8/2007 —MY3- 4/2008 °° -MY4- 6/2009 —MY5- 11/2010
Back Creek (Main Channel) - MY5
Cross - Section 4 - Cumulative Percent
Back Creek (Main Channel) - MY5
Cross - Section 4 - Individual Class Percent
100%
90%
- --
80%
- — -- —
- - -
70%
—
-
n°'.
60%
-
A
50%
U
40%
a
30%
20%
c
10%
— - -
0 °r°
oqb
Particle Size (mm)
■MY1- 6/2006
•MY2 - 8/2007 ■MY34/2008 MY4- 6/2009
■MY5- 11/2010

Appendix 4.6 Pebble Count Plots and Raw Data Tables
Back Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 17
Main Channel
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Project Name
Back Creek
EEP Project Number
17
Cross - Section ID
XS -5, Riffle, 19 +73
Survey Date
11/2010
0.125
Description
Material
Silt/Clay
silt/clay
Sand
very fine sand
fine sand
medium sand
coarse sand
very coarse sand
Gravel
very fine gravel
fine gravel
fine gravel
medium gravel
medium gravel
course gravel
course gravel
very coarse gravel
very coarse gravel
Cobble
small cobble
medium cobble
large cobble
very large cobble
Boulder
small boulder
small boulder
medium boulder
large boulder
Bedrock
bedrock
TOTAL % of whole count
0%
Summary Data
D50
7.08
D84
Bedrock
D95
Bedrock
Size mm
Total #
Item %
Cum %
0.062
22
22%
22%
0.125
11
11%
11%
0.250
6
6%
6%
0.50
3
3%
3%
1.00
0
0%
0%
2.0
2
2%
2%
4.0
0
0%
0%
5.7
0
0%
0%
8.0
10
10%
10%
11.3
0
0%
0%
16.0
4
4%
4%
22.3
2
2%
2%
32.0
5
5%
5%
45
0
0%
0%
64
1
1%
1%
90
2
2%
2%
128
3
3%
3%
180
2
2%
2%
256
0
0%
0%
362
0
0%
0%
512
0
0%
0%
1024
0
0%
0%
2048
0
0%
0%
40096
1 27
27%
27%
100
100%
100%
100%
90%
80%
y 70%
U
i 60%
> 50%
is 40%
3
E 30%
U 20%
10%
0%
No X00 000
1
Particle Size (mm)
MY1- 6/2006 —MY2- 8/2007 MY34/2008 MY4- 6/2009 MY5- 11/2010
Back Creek (Main Channel) - MY5
Cross - Section 5 - Cumulative Percent
Back Creek (Main Channel) - MY5
Cross - Section 5 - Individual Class Percent
100%
90%
80%
- - -
-
a
$
70% --
- -- - - -
- -
pv
60%
50%
-
- --
U
40%
72
30% —
— -
20% - -
—
- -
5
10%
0%
Oh ti
ti h^ ��^� tib �ti ph b� �O �ti4� ��O �5b
�bti �titi N cb
oObLO��S Otis
�,y^�
OO�b
Particle Size (mm)
L ■MYI- 6/2006
■MY2- 8/2007 ■MY3 4/2008 MY4- 6/2009
■MY5- 11/2010

Appendix 4.6 Pebble Count Plots and Raw Data Tables
Back Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 17
Main Channel
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Project Name Back Creek
EEP Project Number 17
Cross - Section ID XS-6, Pool, 24 +50
Survev Date 11/2010
Description
Material
Size mm
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt/Clay
silt/clay
0.062
4
4%
4%
Sand
very fine sand
0.125
0
0%
0%
fine sand
0.250
11
11%
11%
medium sand
0.50
9
9%
9%
coarse sand
1.00
4
4% 1
4%
very coarse sand
2.0
8
8%
8%
Gravel
very fine gravel
4.0
0
0%
0%
fine gravel
5.7
3
3%
3%
fine gravel
8.0
1
1%
1%
medium gravel
11.3
10
10%
10%
medium gravel
16.0
9
9%
9%
course gravel
22.3
1
1%
1%
course gravel
32.0
6
6%
6%
very coarse gravel
45
11
11%
11%
very coarse gravel
64
8
8%
8%
Cobble
small cobble
90
13
13%
13%
medium cobble
128
2
2%
2%
large cobble
180
0
0%
0%
very large cobble
256
0
0%
0%
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
0%
small boulder
512
0
0%
0%
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
0%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
0%
Bedrock
bedrock
40096
0
0%
0%
TOTAL % of whole count
1 100
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50 11.56
D84 63.62
D95 84.33
100%
90%
80%
y 70%
60%
U 50%
-a 40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Back Creek (Main Channel) - MY5
Cross - Section 6 - Individual Class Percent
oobLO`�5 0�5 05 1 'y �!� `` > ♦�' 41:)
Particle Size (mm)
■ MY5- 11/2010
■MY1- 6/2006 ■MY2 - 8/2007 ■MY3 -4 /2008 - MY4- 6/2009
Back Creek (Main Channel) - MY5
Cross - Section 6 - Cumulative Percent
loo °ro
90%
} _
80 %—I
-�
Ale-
n
60%
7
50%
40%
o
30%
-
i.,;..
0%
Doti o}
� `o BOO
000
Particle Size (nmi)
MYl- 6/2006
MY2- 8/2007 MY34/2008 MY4- 6/2009
MY5- 11/2010
100%
90%
80%
y 70%
60%
U 50%
-a 40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Back Creek (Main Channel) - MY5
Cross - Section 6 - Individual Class Percent
oobLO`�5 0�5 05 1 'y �!� `` > ♦�' 41:)
Particle Size (mm)
■ MY5- 11/2010
■MY1- 6/2006 ■MY2 - 8/2007 ■MY3 -4 /2008 - MY4- 6/2009

Appendix 4.6 Pebble Count Plots and Raw Data Tables
Back Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 17
Main Channel
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Name Back Creek
o'ect Number 17
ection ID XS -7, Riffle, 30 +37
Date 11/2010
Description
Material
Size mm
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
silt/clay
0.062
7
7%
7%
Sand
very fine sand
0.125
10
10%
10%
fine sand
0.250
2
2%
2%
medium sand
0.50
14
14% 1
14%
coarse sand
1.00
8
8%
8%
very coarse sand
2.0
11
11%
11%
Gravel
very fine gravel
4.0
4
4%
4%
fine gravel
5.7
2
2%
2%
fine gravel
8.0
6
6%
1 6%
medium gravel
11.3
5%
5%
medium gravel
16.0
2
2%
2%
course gravel
22.3
4
4%
4%
course gravel
32.0
7
7%
7%
very coarse gravel
45
5
5%
1 5%
very coarse gravel
64
1
1%
1%
Cobble
small cobble
90
9
9%
9%
medium cobble
128
2
2%
2%
large cobble
180
1
1%
1%
very large cobble
256
0
0%
1 0%
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
0%
small boulder
512
0
0%
0%
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
0%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
0%
Bedrock
bedrock
1 40096
1 0
1 0%
1 0%
TOTAL % of whole count
I
1 100
1 100%
1 100%
Summary Data
D50
1.82
D84
37.2
D95
84.22
i UU-ro
90%
19 80%
u 70%
U
c 60%
> 50%
40%
30%
U
20%
10%
0%
OD♦ O~ ♦ ♦O ♦�O OHO
Particle Size (mm)
MYl 6 /2006 _ -MY2- 8/2007 -MY3 4 /2008 - MY4 6/2009 MY5- 11/2010
Back Creek (Main Channel) - MY5
Cross - Section 7 - Cumulative Percent
Back Creek (Main Channel) - MY5
Cross - Section 7 - Individual Class Percent
100%
90%
— --
c
80%
y
70%
- -- -
°�
60%
- - - -
- - — -
U
50%
A
40%
- - - --
- -
72
30%
- - -
- - - - -- - -
-
10%
0%
♦y5 �h 1
L b h!� 4b ♦^� ♦b i ^�L Dh
0 cp ♦y� 1�p �,�b ��L h ♦L
oapLO oy5
♦ dry
♦DAR oogC�
Particle Size (mm)
■MY1- 6/2006
OMY2- 8/2007 ■MY3- 4/2008
'$MY4- 6/2009 ■MY5- 11/2010

Appendix 4.6 Pebble Count Plots and Raw Data Tables
Back Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 17
Central Tributary
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Project Name Back Creek MY5
EEP Project Number 17
Cross - Section ID XS -9, Riffle
Survey Date 11/2010
Description
Material
Size mm
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt/Clay
silt/clay
0.062
22
22%
22%
Sand
very fine sand
0.125
15
15%
15%
fine sand
0.250
11
11%
11%
medium sand
0.50
10
10% 1
10%
coarse sand
1.00
8
8%
8%
very coarse sand
2.0
10
10%
10%
Gravel
very fine gravel
4.0
12
12%
12%
fine gravel
5.7
3
3%
3%
fine gravel
8.0
2
2%
2%
medium gravel
11.3
4
4%
4%
medium gravel
16.0
0
0%
0%
course gravel
22.3
3
3%
3%
course gravel
32.0
0
0%
0%
very coarse gravel
45
0
0%
0%
very coarse gravel
64
0
0%
0%
Cobble
small cobble
90
0
0%
0%
medium cobble
128
0
0%
0%
large cobble
180
0
0%
0%
very large cobble
256
0
0%
0%
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
0%
small boulder
512
0
0%
0%
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
0%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
0%
Bedrock
bedrock
40096
0
0%
0%
TOTAL % of whole count
100
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50 0.2
D84 1.67
D95 9.65
100%
90%
80%
70%
a 60%
50%
3 40%
U 30%
20%
10%
0%
Back Creek (Central Tributary) - MY5
Cross - Section - Cumulative Percent
PP 1 01 -M Wd
ILME i ONE 0
61
1
10
00
Particle Size (mm)
OHO
-MY2- 8/2007
-MY3- 4/2008 --
MY4- 6/2009
-MY5- 11/2010
80%
Back Creek (Central Tributary) - MY5
Cross - Section 9 - Individual Class Percent
100%
90%
80%
70%
-
a
60%
V
50%
a
40%
L�J
>
30%
— -
10%
-
0%
Particle Size (mm)
�EMY2- 8/2007 ■MY3 -4 /2008 MY4- 6/2009 ■MY5- 11/2010

APPENDIX 5
WETLAND DATA ASSESSMENT
5.1 Precipitation — Water Level Plots for Gauges*
5.2 Wetland Criteria Attainment
*Raw data tables have been provided electronically
Back Creek Monitoring Report February 2011
EEP Project No 17 Monitoring Year 5 of 5

Appendix 5.1 Precipitation - Water Level Plots for Gauges
Back Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 17
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Growing Season: March 21- November 16
Back Creek Hydrology Monitoring -MY5
Groundwater Gauge 1
10
9
S
S
234 Consecutive Days
6
0
b
�
3
-5 �
v
a
4 0
o -5
3
O
a
-10
2
I
-15 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
00 N_ 00
00 Ch
00 T O O
Date
Rainfall Amount -Gauge Height - Required Depth

Appendix 5.1 Precipitation - Water Level Plots for Gauges
Back Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration /EEP Project No. 17
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Growing Season: March 21- November 16
Back Creek Hydrology Monitoring -W5
Groundwater Gauge 2
10
- - -
9
5
8
0
7
-5
30 Consecutive
6
_
Days
ro -10
5
v
E
e
R -15
4
Q
0
.a
-20
3
p
a
-25
2
-30
1
-35
—
0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 0
0 0
Date
Rainfall Amount —Gauge Height Required Depth

i
Appendix 5.1 Precipitation - Water Level Plots for Gauges
Back Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 17
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Growing Season: March 21- November 16
Back Creek Hydrology Monitoring -MY5
Groundwater Gauge 3
10
-
9
5
8
7
0
6
.-
-5
c
c.
.,
S
o
b3
-10
55 Consecutive Days
0
5
4
2-15
A
-20
2
-25
1
-30
a -� �� -�- �' - - —� -
��- 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N N N N
0 0 0 0
N N N N
00 N �O O M l� V1 00 N Vl
Q� M l�
~
Date
Rainfall Amount —Gauge Height — Requited Depth

6
Appendix 5 2 Wetland Criteria Attainment
Back Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration /EEP Project No 17
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Summary of Groundwater Gauge Results for Years I through 5
Success Criteria Achieved /Max Consecutive Days During Growing Season
(Percentage %)
Year 1 (2006)
Year 2 (2007)
Year 3 (2008)
Year 4 (2009)
Year 5 (2010)
Gauge
Yes /241 Days
Yes /142 Days
Yes /241 Days
Yes /241 Days
Yes /234 Days
GW 1
(100 %)
(59 %)
(100 %)
(100 %)
(100 %)
Yes /40 Days
Yes /58 Days
Yes /67 Days
Yes /96 Days
Yes /30 Days
GW2
(17 %)
(24 %)
(28 %)
(40 %)
(38 %)
Yes/] 03 Days
Yes /64 Days
Yes /83 Days
Yes/] 00 Days
Yes /55 Days
GW3
(43 %)
(27 %)
(34 %)
(42 %)
(53 %)