Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSW6210601_Supplement-EZ Form_20211008SUPPLEMENT-EZ COVER PAGE FORMS LOADED PROJECT INFORMATION 1 lProiectName I Graceland Subdivision I 2 jProject Area ac 55.76 3 Coastal Wetland Area ac 0 4 Surface Water Area ac 5 Is this project High or Low Density? Low 6 1 Does this protect use an off -site SCM? No COMPLIANCE WITH 02H .1003(4) 7 Width of vegetated setbacks provided feet 8 Will the vegetated setback remain vegetated? 9 If BUA is proposed in the setback, does it meet NCAC 02H.1003 4 c-d ? 10 1 Is streambank stabilization proposed on this project? NUMBER AND TYPE OF SCMs: 11 Infiltration System 12 Bioretention Cell 13 Wet Pond 14 Stormwater Wetland 15 Permeable Pavement 16 Sand Filter 17 Rainwater Harvesting RWH 18 Green Roof 19 Level Spreader -Filter Strip LS-FS 20 Disconnected Impervious Surface DIS 21 Treatment Swale 22 Dry Pond 23 StormFilter 24 Silva Cell 25 Ba filter IFilterra 26 FORMS LOADED DESIGNER CERTIFICATION 27 Name and Title: 28 Or anization: C. Scott Brown, PE 4D Site Solutions, Inc. 29 Street address: 409 Chicago Drive - Suite 112 30 City, State, Zip: Fayetteville, NC 28306 31 Phone numbers : 910-426-6777 32 Email: sbrown(a)4dsitesolutions.com Certification Statement: I certify, under penalty of law that this Supplement-EZ form and all supporting information were prepared under my direction or supervision; that the information provided in the form is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete; and that the engineering plans, specifications, operation and maintenance agreements and other supporting information are consistent with the information provided here. Seal Signature of Designer Date DRAINAGE AREAS 1 Is this a high density project? No 2 If so, number of drainage areas/SCMs 0 3 Does this oroiect have low densit areas? Yes 4 If so number of low 4-ify drainage areas 1 5 Is all/part of this project subject to previous rule versions? No FORMS LOADED DRAINAGE AREA INFORMATION Entire Site LD 1 4 Type of SCM Vegetated Conveyances Vegetated Conveyances 5 Total drainage area (sq ft 2,428,774 2,428,774 6 Onsite drainage area (sq ft 2,428,774 2,428,774 7 Offsite drainage area (sq ft 0 0 8 Total BUA in project (sq ft 582876 sf 582876 sf 9 New BUA on subdivided lots (subject to ermitting) (sq ft 379647 sf 379647 sf 10 New BUA not on subdivided lots (subject to permitting) (s Offsite BUA (sq ft lBreakdown of new BUA not on subdivided lots: - Parking (sq ft - Sidewalk (sq ft 203229 sf 203229 sf sf 11 sf 12 27709 sf 27709 sf - Roof (sq ft - Roadway s ft 175520 sf 175520 sf - Future (sq ft - Other, please specify in the comment box below (sq ft 13 New infiltrating permeable pavement on subdivided lots (sq ft sf sf 14 New infiltrating permeable pavement not on subdivided lots (sq ft sf sf 15 Existing BUA that will remain (not subject to ermitting) (sq ft sf sf 16 lExistina BUA that is already ermitted (sq ft sf sf 17 Existing BUA that will be removed (sq ft 4105 sf 4105 sf 18 Percent BUA 24% 24% 19 Design storm inches 20 Design volume of SCM cu ft 21 Calculation method for design volume ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 22 Please use this space to provide any additional information about the drainage area(s): LOW DENSITY DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR LOW DENSITY PROJECTS FROM 02H .1003 1 Is project below density thresholds set forth in the applicable stormwater rule? Yes 2 Does project maximize dispersed flow and minimize channelization of flow? Yes 3 Has the use of piping been minimized per .1003(2)(c)? Yes 4 Side slopes of the vegetated conveyances (H:V) 3 sf 5 Maximum velocity in the vegetated conveyances during the 10-year storm? 4.5 6 Are curb outlet swales proposed? Yes 7 Maximum longitudinal slope of curb outlet swale(s) (%) 5 8 Bottom width of curb outlet swale(s) (feet) 2 It 9 Maximum side slope of curb outlet swale(s) (H:V) 3:1 10 Minimum length of curb outlet swale(s) (feet) 100 It 11 Are treatment swales used instead of curb outlet swales? No 12 Is stormwater released at the edge of the setback as dispersed flow? Yes 13 Have stormwater outlets been designed to prevent downslope erosion? Yes 14 Are variations to rule .1003 proposed? No ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 15 1131ease use this space to provide any additional information about this low density project: Swale # Drainage Area ac BUA (ac) Pervious area ac C Q (cfs) Slope M V,,,o„, (fps) V,.,,,, (fps) Flow depth (ft) 1 1.06 0.08 0.98 0.35 1.43 0.75 4.50 129 0.35 2 3.32 026 3.06 0.35 4.47 0.70 4.50 1.48 0.73 3 2.84 022 2.62 0.35 3.83 0.50 4.50 1.50 0.83 4 1 1.97 0.61 1.36 0.50 3.79 0.75 2.00 1 1.51 0.84 5 0.72 0.17 0.55 0.45 2.55 1.00 2.00 1.71 0.45 6 4.30 0.99 3.31 0.45 7.45 0.50 2.00 1.77 0.90 7 1.39 0.43 0.96 0.50 3.71 0.50 2.00 1.46 0.64 8 5.09 0.78 4.31 0.40 7.84 0.60 4.50 1.91 0.88 9 2.65 0.61 2.04 0.45 4.60 1.80 4.50 2.48 1 0.52 10 1.49 0.34 1.15 0.45 3.57 1.90 4.50 1.89 0.53 11 1.95 0.30 1.65 0.40 3.01 0.30 4.50 1.15 0.66 12 1.65 0.38 127 0.45 2.85 0.30 4.50 1.14 0.65 13 1927 4.45 14.82 0.45 33.38 1.00 4.50 3.77 1.42 14 1949. 4.50 14.99 0.45 33.77 120 4.50 3.98 1.38 15 5.32 123 4.09 0.45 921 0.80 4.50 2.03 0.94 16 25.91 5.98 1993. 0.45 1 44.89 0.70 2.00 1.85 2.53 17 1.77 0.41 1.36 0.45 3.06 0.60 4.50 1.53 0.74 18 0.53 024 029 0.60 2.50 0.50 4.50 1.32 0.53 19 1.69 0.39 1.30 0.45 2.92 0.50 4.50 1.37 0.57 20 3.35 0.77 2.57 0.45 5.80 1.50 4.50 1.36 0.47 21 3.96 0.91 3.04 0.45 6.85 0.60 4.50 128 0.54 22 4.68 1.08 3.60 0.45 8.10 4.00 4.50 2.14 0.44 23 1.57 0.36 121 0.45 2.72 0.50 4.50 1.35 0.55 24 25 26 27 28 29 30