20041198 Ver 1_Year 5 Monitoring Report_20110902

Oq-111h
UT to Barnes Creek
Stream and Wetland Restoration Project
RECEIVE'
NC ECOS`( pROMGRAM
ENHANCEMENT
Project No. 397
2010 Monitoring Report: Year 5 of 5
April 2011
Prepared for: NCDENR -EEP
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 -1652
Prepared by: Jordan, Jones & Goulding
309 East Morehead Street, Suite 1 10
Charlotte, NC 28202
Design Firm: Baker Engineering
1447 S. Tryon Street, Suite 200
Charlotte, NC 28203
N-
0
11 loll C'illl'1 it
rWO�aw�n
ATWA
Tsm VAA�
NCDENR

Table of Contents
SECTION 1— EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 1 Goals and Objectives 1 -1
12 Vegetative Assessment 1 -2
1 3 Stream Assessment 1 -2
14 Wetland Assessment 1 -4
1 5 Annual Monitoring Summary 1 -5
SECTION 2 — METHODOLOGY
2 1 Methodology 2 -1
SECTION 3 — REFERENCES
SECTION 4 — APPENDICES
List of Appendices
Appendix 1— General Figures and Plan Views
1 1 Project Location Map
12 Current Condition Plan View
Appendix 2 — General Project Tables
2 1 Project Mitigation Structure and Objectives
2 2 Project Activity and Reporting History
2 3 Project Contacts
2 4 Project Attribute Table
Appendix 3 — Vegetation Assessment Data
3 1 Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success
3 2 Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
3 3 Vegetation Plot Summary Data Table
3 4 Vegetation Condition Assessment
Appendix 4 — Stream Assessment Data
4 1 Stream Station and Cross - Section Photos
UT to Barnes Monitoring Report Jordan, Jones & Goulding
Project No 397 April 2011
Year 5 of 5

rage ii
Table of Contents
4 2 Qualitative Visual Stability Assessment
4 3 Verification of Bankfull Events
4 4 Cross - Section Plots and Raw Data Tables
4 5 Longitudinal Plots and Raw Data Tables
4 6 Pebble Count Plots and Raw Data Tables
Appendix 5 — Wetland Assessment Data
5 1 Precipitation — Water Level Plots for Gauges
5 2 Wetland Criteria Attainment
UT to Barnes Monitoring Report Jordan, Jones & Goulding
Project No 397 April 2011
Year 5 of 5

Pt
SECTION 1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

SECTION I
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Unnamed Tributary (UT) to Barnes Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration Project (Site) is
located north of the Town of Troy in Montgomery County, North Carolina (Appendix 1 1) The
Site is located within the Carolina Slate Belt Ecoregion of the Piedmont physiographic region in
the Yadkin River Basin (USGS HUC 03040103) The stream enhancement /restoration plan was
designed by Baker Engineering and constructed by North State Environmental, Inc
Construction activities were completed in December 2005 The first annual monitoring activities
were conducted in October 2006 This report serves as year five of the five year monitoring plan
for the Site
1.1 Goals and Objectives
Prior to restoration, wetland, stream, and buffer functions on the site were impaired as a result of
agricultural conversion Streams flowing through the site were channelized many years ago to
reduce flooding and provide drainage for adjacent farm fields According to the mitigation plan,
the Site was restored by relocating 3,916 linear feet (If) of stream (Priority 1 and 2) and
enhancing 4 44 acres (ac) of wetlands The Site's riparian areas were planted to improve habitat
and stabilize streambanks The following specific goals were established for the Site (The if and
ac listed in the project goals below are not the same as the final as -built if and ac for stream and
wetland restoration/enhancement work completed)
1 Restore 4,063 if of channel dimension, pattern, and profile (as built conditions included
restoration of 3,916 If)
2 Enhance 3 14 ac of existing wetlands by planting vegetation in previous grazed wetland
areas
3 Restore wetland hydrology to 138 ac of wetland by raising the water table, restoring over
bank flooding, and increasing surface storage
4 Create 0 39 acres of wetland as ephemeral pools in the existing stream bed after construction
for the proposed meandering channel
5 Improve floodplain functionality by matching floodplam elevations with the bankfull stage
6 Establish native streambank and floodplain vegetation in the buffer
7 Improve the water quality in the Barnes Creek watershed by fencing cattle out of the stream
and reducing bank erosion
8 Improve m- stream and riparian habitat by creating deeper pools, areas of re- aeration, planting
a riparian buffer, and reducing bank erosion
UT to Barnes stream channels were designed and constructed as C -type channels In- stream
structures, such as rootwads, log vanes, cross vanes, rock vanes, rock weirs, and log weirs were
used to control streambed grade, reduce stress on streambanks, and promote bed form sequences
and habitat diversity Where grade control was a consideration, constructed riffles or rock weirs
were installed to provide long -term stability Streambanks were stabilized using a combination of
erosion control matting, bare -root plantings, brush mattresses, and transplants The Site was
UT to Barnes Monitoring Report Jordan, Jones & Goulding
Project No 397 April 2011
Year 5 of 5

Page 1 -2
Executive Summary
planted with native riparian vegetation and the permanent conservation easement was fenced
Wetland restoration on the Site consisted of raising the local water table and restoring a natural
flooding regime Drainage ditches within the restoration areas were filled to decrease surface
and subsurface drainage and raise the local water table
Beaver were identified along the main channel and its tributary in the 2010 monitoring year
Multiple control efforts have been implemented over the last 2 years to control beaver activity
Beaver damson the main channel and the tributary were removed in December 2010 Appendix
2 provides detailed project activity, history, contact information, and more in -depth
watershed/site background for the project
1.2 Vegetative Assessment
JJG conducted the 2010 (year 5 of 5) vegetative assessment and vegetative plot analysis in
January 2011 Four vegetation monitoring plots 100 m2 (10m x 10m) in size were previously
established on site by Baker Engineering Vegetation assessments were conducted following the
NCDOT Stem Counting Protocol which consists of counting woody stems within the established
vegetation plots Vegetation success criteria, as defined in the mitigation plan, specifies that
woody planted stems from vegetation monitoring plots should display a surviving tree density of
at least 320 trees per acre at the end of the third year of monitoring, and a surviving tree density
of at least 260 five year -old trees per acre at the end of the five year monitoring period
The 2010 vegetation monitoring indicated an average survivability of 395 stems per acre, which
is greater than the required vegetation survival criteria of 260 stems per acre at the end of the five
year monitoring period Based on the survival rates illustrated over the years and the number of
volunteer species found within the plots, JJG foresees the plant growth to continue to improve
and meet the success requirements in the future Volunteer species improve the average stem per
acre from 395 to 658 for monitoring year five Based on the previous statement, all four plots
have met the success criteria for year five The monitoring data indicate an average of 17
planted stems per plot
In conclusion, the riparian restoration project meets the requirements per the vegetative success
criterion for the 2010 monitoring year Refer to Appendix 3 for more detailed vegetation data
and photos
1.3 Stream Assessment
Stream dimension, pattern, profile, and substrate were evaluated within 3,916 linear feet of the
Site Results from the 2010 stream monitoring effort indicate that stream pattern, profile, and
dimension of UT Barnes and its tributary are maintaining vertical and lateral stability with
minimal problem areas A few problem areas were observed, such as moderate bank erosion, in-
stream vegetation, beaver dams, and inundation/back water areas The beaver dams on the main
channel and the tributary were removed in December 2010 In areas where beaver have not
impacted the hydrology and the channel was visible, the pattern, profile, and dimension of the
restored main channel and its tributary appear stable
UT to Barnes Monitoring Report Jordan, Jones & Goulding
Project No 397 April 2011
Year 5 of 5

Paee 1 -3
Executive Summary
Main Channel
Overall, the present stream dimensions in the main channel appear to be stable The average
bankfull width (18 5 ft) of the surveyed cross - sections is similar to the proposed 18 8 ft, and the
average surveyed mean bankfull depth is 1 6 ft compared to the proposed 14 ft The surveyed
bankfull widths and depths lead to an average Width/Depth ratio of 12 8, which typifies a
Rosgen C -type stream The channel appears to be functioning properly, and it appears that
beaver activity has not impacted the channel hydrology
The reach appears to be maintaining vertical and lateral stability with minimal bank erosion The
main channel's bank stability rating is 100% The streambank areas noted with minimal bank
erosion do not appear to be impacting the channel's stability The bank erosion is occurring in
small, localized areas and is considered to be normal Areas with in- stream vegetation growth
could potentially result in localized areas of aggradation, therefore leading to lateral and/or
vertical shifts in the stream, but this has not resulted in significant adjustments in the bed features
and channel thalweg over the 5 years of annual monitoring The thalweg profile appears to be
stable, and was characterized by well - defined riffle and pool features The average water surface
slope and the average bankfull slope were very similar for the surveyed reach, 0 0052 ft/ft and
0 0048 ft /ft, respectively From the 2010 monitoring year, the substrate analysis illustrates
minimal shifting in bed materials Generally the d50 and d84 is coarsening in riffle cross -
sections, which is indicative of the fines being flushed out that most likely deposited due to the
back water conditions resulting from recurring beaver activity within the restoration site in the
previous monitoring years
Tributary
The channel has been impacted by beaver activity over the recent monitoring years but is free -
flowing at this time The average bankfull width (10 1 ft) of the surveyed cross - sections is lower
than the proposed 14 4 ft, and the average surveyed mean bankfull depth is 10 ft compared to
the proposed 0 7 ft The surveyed bankfull widths and depths lead to an average Width/Depth
ratio of 10 5, which is smaller than in previous monitoring years This shift to a narrower
channel with a smaller W/D ratio is probably due to the establishment of vegetation and the
removal of beaver dams The channel is stable and is functioning appropriately with its current
dimension The average water surface slope and the average bankfull slope were very similar for
the surveyed reach, 0 0094 ft/ft and 0 0090 ft /ft, respectively
The substrate analysis illustrates a shift in bed materials to a coarser substrate composition
Compared to last year's data, the substrate has become coarser This shift is most likely due to
the fines which were deposited because of the back water created by the beaver dams being
flushed from the system
Two crest gauges are located within the project site No bankfull events were recorded within
the restoration project during the 2010 monitoring year due to the malfunction of both gauges
However, visual observation indicates at least one bankfull event probably occurred within the
2010 monitoring year The on -site crest gauge documented the occurrence of two bankfull
UT to Barnes Monitoring Report Jordan, Jones & Goulding
Protect No 397 April 2011
Year 5 of 5

Page 1 -4
Executive Summary
events during the first year (2006) of the post - construction monitoring period No bankfull events
were recorded or observed during the 2007 monitoring, which was conducted from August
through November 2007 Other indicators such as old wrack Imes and staining were observed at
the bankfull and greater elevations within the restoration site as well The Site has met the
hydrologic success criteria with two bankfull events occurring in two separate monitoring years
Overall, the main channel appears to be maintaining grade with stable structures and minimal
bank erosion and has met the year five success criteria The tributary appears to be maintaining
vertical and lateral stability, and the stream has narrowed up and has a smaller W/D ratio, most
likely due to vegetation establishment stabilizing the streambanks and retaining sediment Due
to beaver activity throughout the 5 year monitoring period, time will be needed for this stream to
function as a fluvial system under conditions more similar to a normal flow regime before
reaching its full designed potential The tributary has met the year five success criteria Please
refer to Appendix 4 for more detailed stream data tables and plots and Appendix 12 for the
location of the longitudinal profile stations, cross - section stations, vegetation plots, photo points,
gauges, and problem areas noted
1.4 Wetland Assessment
Eight groundwater gauges were installed across the restored site during 2006 and 2008 to
document water table hydrology in the required monitoring locations The groundwater gauges
are programmed to download groundwater levels daily and were downloaded monthly from
March to November in order to capture hydrological data during the growing season The target
wetland hydrological success criterion is saturation or inundation for at least 12 5 percent of the
growing season m the lower landscape (floodplain) positions To achieve the above hydrologic
success criterion, groundwater levels must be within 12 -mches of the ground surface for 30
consecutive days, which is 12 5 percent of the March 19 to November 16 (243 days) growing
season
The general success of hydrology within the wetland restoration zones is adequate to meet
success requirements Four of the eight groundwater gauges achieved the wetland success
criterion of soil saturation within the upper 12 inches for 30 consecutive days during MY5
Three gauges did not meet the success criteria, and one gauge (MW2) was found to be
malfunctioning and has been replaced Surface inundation to ground saturation was observed
throughout the site, therefore, appropriate hydrological condition for the wetland zones appears
to be present Over the past five years of monitoring, indications are that the wetland zones are
generally functioning as anticipated
With the exception of the previous beaver activity and their possible impact on the water
inundation levels within the wetland areas in some monitoring years, no problem areas were
observed within the wetland restoration zones for the Site Hydrophytic vegetation consists of a
thick herbaceous layer of sedge species (Carex sp ), rush species (Juncus sp ), and smartweed
species (Polygonum sp ) The planted woody stem species throughout the wetland areas are
meeting the required success criteria, however, mortality of woody stems due to beaver chews
has been observed It is suspected that the mortality of planted stems may also be subject to the
UT to Barnes Monitoring Report Jordan, Jones & Goulding
Project No 397 April 2011
Year 5 of 5

Page 1 -5
Executive Summary
planting technique or the soil conditions prior to planting Please refer to Appendix 5 for
wetland raw data tables and plots
1.5 Annual Monitoring Summary
Overall, the Site appears to be stable and has met stream, vegetation, wetland, and hydrologic
mitigation goals for monitoring year 5 Planted and naturally recruited vegetation is doing well
at the site, although some minor vegetation problems were noted due to the severe drought
experienced during the 2007 growing season and the on -going beaver activity The pattern,
profile, and dimension of the main channel and tributary appear to be maintaining vertical and
lateral stability with stable structures and minimal bank erosion A final closeout report for the
UT Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration will be prepared within 30 days of this report
The following general observations were noted in Monitoring Year 2010
Stream Restoration
Moderate bank scour has occurred over the past 5 years along the main channel (approximate
stationing 26 +25), but does not appear to be advancing
One log -vane has bank scour occurring behind the root ball of the log (approximate stationing
27 +00), but this does not appear to be advancing
Upstream from the old beaver dam (approximate station 5 +25), there is heavy sediment
deposition along the tributary
Riparian and Wetland Areas
The following general observations were noted regarding the riparian area and associated
vegetation
Herbaceous seeding appears to provide adequate soil cover
Briars and multiflora rose are a dominant species along the creek, which has crowded out some
of the planted species
The background information provided in this report is referenced from the mitigation plan and
previous monitoring reports prepared by Baker Engineering (2007) and RK &K (2008)
Summary mformation/data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or encroachment
and statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found in
the tables and figures in the report appendices Narrative background and supporting
information formerly found in these reports can be found in the mitigation and restoration plan
documents available on EEP's website All raw data supporting the tables and figures in the
appendices is available from EEP upon request
UT to Bames Monitoring Report Jordan, Jones & Goulding
Project No 397 April 2011
Year 5 of 5

r_v
SECTION 2
METHODOLOGY

SECTION 2
METHODOLOGY
2.1 Methodology
Methods employed for the UT Barnes Stream Restoration Project were a combination of those
established by standard regulatory guidance and procedure documents as well as previous
monitoring reports completed by Baker Engineering and RK &K, LLP. Geomorphic and stream
assessments were performed following guidelines outlined in the Stream Channel Reference
Sites: An Illustrated Guide to Field Techniques (Harrelson et al., 1994) and in the Stream
Restoration a Natural Channel Design Handbook (Doll et al, 2003). Vegetation assessments
were conducted following the NCDOT protocol which consists of counting woody stems within
the established vegetation plots. JJG used the Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, Georgia, and
surrounding areas by Alan S. Weakley as the taxonomic standard for vegetation nomenclature
for this report. Precipitation data for the hydrographs was obtained from both on -site and off -site
resources. Off -site daily precipitation was obtained from Weather Underground for the
Albemarle, NC weather station (the nearest offering daily precipitation data) through the
following URL.
http• / /waterdata uspL2ov /nwis /dv ?cb 00060 =on &cb 00065 =on &cb 00045 =on &format =html&
begin date = 2008 -01 -01 &end date = 2009 -12 -3 1 &site no= 02118500 &referred module =sw.
UT to Barnes Monitoring Report Jordan, Jones & Goulding
Project No. 397 April 2011
Year 5 of 5

re
SECTION 3
REFERENCES

SECTION 3
REFERENCES
Baker Engineering 2007 UT Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration 2007 Annual Monitoring
Report (Year 1) Charlotte, NC
Doll, B A, Grabow, G L, Hall, K A, Halley, J, Harman, W A, Jennings, G D, and Wise, D E,
2003 Stream Restoration A Natural Channel Design Handbook
Harrelson, Cheryl C, Rawlins, C L, Potyondy, John P 1994 Stream Channel Reference Sites
An Illustrated Guide to Field Technique Gen Tech Rep RM -245 Fort Collins, CO U S
Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment
Station 61 p
Rosgen, D L 1996 Applied River Morphology Wildland Hydrology Books, Pagosa Springs,
CO
Rummel, Klepper & Kahl, LLP 2008 UT Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration 2007 Annual
Monitoring Report (Year 2) Raleigh, NC
Weakley, A S 2008 Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, Georgia, Northern Florida, and
Surrounding Areas (Draft April 2008) University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill,
NC
UT to Barnes Monitoring Report Jordan, Jones & Goulding
Project No 397 April 2011
Year 5 of 5

JJG
SECTION 4
APPENDICES
Appendix 1 - General Figures and Plan Views
Appendix 2 - General Project Tables
Appendix 3 - Vegetation Assessment Data
Appendix 4 — Stream Assessment Data
Appendix 5 — Wetland Assessment Data
UT to Barnes Monitoring Report Jordan, Jones & Goulding
Project No 397 April 2011
Year 5 of 5

P-C
APPENDIX 1
GENERAL FIGURES AND PLAN VIEWS
1. Project Location Map
2. Current Condition Plan View
UT to Barnes Monitoring Report Jordan, Jones & Goulding
Project No 397 April 2011
Year 5 of 5

Conservation Easement (As- Built)
Restoration
Wetland Creation
)' Wetland Restoration
s'.
3• �
1 zJi r /
1 � r ✓� ' t
t V i !1J
rri
WL
Ilk
L� f--...5� \�''f,/ 't ✓-1r� ' +J7,���i,/� r��f ����- �j�/
' ' y � sum.. --� )!It '-- f !�'✓r�� ^.� ` Y � f`� �r
- - is�.tw�•- ..- 7 1,.+1+1 -, L r N / •- d' c j •. —•.
`ti
1 ,,f � �i tVr ♦ h � •nvr'/'' ar,. F; 4 M � V� *'j` -� ! . no q t i � J. /L 'rf'� 1 �fJ r+ r rl 1. ♦ (` � ` °' � 1? _
' v 1 ,. ?.: `�! r'r � -- ...•.1f„♦. jFi • 1 1 + r` J r °f � �, r + '.,, �
+ 1, i% `~ ++` +r'J s•' �4 _1 h,� f�f. �. r'°t. `.` ♦�f•.7 r Lli
:.•' �: `� %+i t� f Jf .•'� - I � j? ++rr S l +rrJ ". •r'�at�t - �!r g - r ! r` e ,.
`•7 + �,i f'%�y ftfKi .!l• ,;_�+ii ki '.' Y] , �f! a \'� ` r 2 t l f1 ✓ -�+1'�
i5' +� ! (i -^r • =:
'�`, ry t t ?rf � 1 ��'♦, I' !�J (1 � � V .ate ;_ ' rr•♦ -•'-- ��
y
_r ♦t �✓ -ten .� ��`.� ! a .,` f! � ,; ''tom !- �r�- �rr'Ify _.r�7, l �4�1"7 f', _ , `� �r�.
�l� y • + .. � -.. /', ,� r, } ( 1, t . ... r e ..� -� - e�
,,
(: (� '�� j'. -�',rY .'� t • 1 -.� f�, r t `' J,�!i (' f _ rr•-��� r• '� ��{ r• --�'' fr .'S ;i >' ")� t' t
� �jrC�` r�e�%��4 ,`d -'�� [ .,tt• f ' f 'f 1, mil. �� ��... \ ��!'�li f�= ='' �] , •Jr; -.#J %fr� 1fi � , ��),
]it sr J�7� 1 n!rf /IIi1
�, ' > ,. �. 1 '�• ! % .,� ,., I •1r:`.+ �, { � � r ,� f�;,,,;; r r <� 'l +��f .1 tr. r.st {� +�.
� � a �, ?�f ��,ll - r �=- '1 ♦ '.+J y) 1 i �� ��'1 �. _ �.� � rJ� ✓.' , f _.+t ♦ J. � i' , �,. -� 1
-��� � � f � -' •, tt �_ r .r �'r` fl +a,l Gr;
F
k � �'r -"�` ! .n:,�, ' � ( '�rf 1 `� � �r� h.�:`51t ! �...% ` /:f✓l. - / r r' !� �.; � t , -, 1
� '
tt 1 � r• 11 - l ,1�
���-. �. r � t c` � rl� 1+y'i :r r a� � ^`t w rr ff, %`'• re ��j G t � +lr` lr�.`tlt� 'f�/ r-..
i, rr aii + /rf,rr• /.3t11 tw VIi u f ;+ rr�r
a•f .� �1j . •� �'�- , t'"'1.j/ � .•+ � 5. `-` � :`+ +j . t • Y r. � 1 � , � ! >�ti lr�� ;Cwl �I � �f V a <�
�< <; r! ♦!� .�,. J •l�. \ ' l r` � `, ,, 1. (����,..�•y,/�r�; '�` � �c- .'�.Y. �'`y.�1�.. ✓1 , - +1 mss" f r ., r i �F , ;; 'r. f ,^ 1 j � '� � . _.�.
�. £ r^y:1� _ {•'•! 7"' J'�y '�C Il tEf �'V `� J �F� r _ ` �1 rI r`"- J !i s �i Sl 'may �.� % +'�C�.6� +� �``'. f,
Vti
+.lqr �iJ�l1i'. TJr-� J Q I r' t +' 'y��T, �� r,- Fa ;l 7 - ^ y �� vV f �' �,. lri rl \•_ t / `
'!'•,r! ! %,rl ,..+ )r J> �;.r- 4�•. S �� r j rn /r 1 T �_ �^ nom_• "'ll
+,1 (' S I - .� r t� +�/ ri i r ~.,• - J �.. } i
.� t r ,�,,' .., fiY � I �Jjf ,f � f J�ri�.� r- I ! JJ +, i� •\ ��.. -- -+ r � -� -.,•� •, )`r
-�'tj'. x ~- Al ' ' }� lrl•J "+Iti) �i1'1 /.l;.l • i u .... }• r , J, t 1�'` =!t i lJf'_.
o t .+._ _ r t, _ 1 iN -tip. J - t J 41�r r. _ ���: i t y. +f "t.. r -�� }f r��'•-
Directions to the Site
From Charlotte, take NC 24/27 to Albemarle, continue through Albemarle on NC 24/27 into
the Town of Troy. In Troy, turn North onto NC 134, follow NC 134 approximately 9.5 miles ,` + _'j
NCDOT GIS
to Abner Rd., turn West onto Abner Rd. Go approximately I mile to Flint Hill Rd., turn Left �!- �j. �Jf j " + J USGS Sourre.' )
1; lrl,.
onto Flint Hill Rd. At Lovejoy Rd. turn right (North), the project site is on the right. Continue w ,. � �•. - ! `� � ,•..- .r
north on Lovejoy Rd., turn right onto Hurley Farm Rd to access the site. The project is situated rY r,,. ,1 2,000 1,000 0 2,000
between Hurley Farm Rd. and Flint Hill Rd. Feet
Appendix 1.1 Project Vicinity Map
UT to Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 397
C7Montgomery County, NC
L'}oDtetn Monitoring Year 5 of 5
! al ru r'nl,
"" Submittal Date: April 2011

LEGEND
3
l\
l\
n
MO
1 xQp
n7
Ox
DTI
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
ROCK CROSS—VANE
ROOT WAD
LOG WEIR
® COVER LOG
BRUSH MATTRESS
STEP POOL
® PHOTO POINT
O GAUGE
VEGETATION PLOT
2010 CURRENT CONDITIONS
BANK SCOUR
EPHEMERAL POOL
(Creation) -1
PHOTO POINT
M -58
1.7(00
POINT M -59
POOR VEGETATIVE COVER
r
PHOTO POINT
M -56
y
BEGIN
LONGITUDINAL
PROFILE
_ PHOTO POINT
M -57
3X
W
WETLAND AREA
+s
EPHEMERAL POOL
(Creotion) -3
MONITORING
GAUGE
MW -4 PHOTO POINT
M -54 \
�O
�x
L
PHOTO POINT
M -55
REBAR AND
N 830417.80
E 17pB313.97
ELEV. 639.03
PHOTO POINT
M -53
N
SX 00
`ti' f•_
R 1I
PHOTO
M -52
PHOTO POINT
PHOTO POINT
PROJECT NO. 397
MONTGOMERY COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
MONITORING
YEAR 5 of 5
M -50
M -49
DATE AUGUST 2010
SCALE 1 " =40'
JOB NO.: JJX31100
�O
FIGURE 1 OF 6
N
w
V /
Lij
PHOTO POINT
M -51
\
J
,r
Q
�~
�
,tet??I
NOTES:
1. GENERAL SITE DATA PROVIDED BY NCEEP.
2. ALL LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE.
PROJECT NO. 397
MONTGOMERY COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
MONITORING
YEAR 5 of 5
JACOB 97
NC ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
UT BARNES STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION
DATE AUGUST 2010
SCALE 1 " =40'
JOB NO.: JJX31100
CURRENT CONDITION PLAN VIEW
FIGURE 1 OF 6

LEGEND
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
ROCK CROSS —VANE
ROOT WAD
LOG WEIR
COVER LOG
BRUSH MATTRESS
- STEP POOL
®
PHOTO POINT
0
GAUGE
NC ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
VEGETATION PLOT
2010
CURRENT CONDITIONS
MONTGOMERY COUNTY
BANK SCOUR
UT BARNES STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION
POOR VEGETATIVE COVER
0
G�
Q MONITORING GAUGE PHOTO POINT
W -3
M
M -46
B+00
�P W
W '
a �
W PHOTO POINT
M -48 W
PHOTO POINT
M -45
W PHOTO POINT
M -47
W / O
+4 O
PHOTO POINT
M -39 W W
1 Z +00 k PHOTO POINT
r u J M -38
MONITORING` GAUGE �
u, MW -2 ,k •t W A
`4 PHOTO POINT
M -37
W W RAIN GAUGE t
PHOTO POINT
W � 71.400
W JO W +4 +4
[X
W W
W a W
I
PHOTO POINT V) �
+. M -40 W
\ r Z
O PHOTO POINT
X � M -at �
W W
W
L VEGETATION PLOT-
\- \ REBAR AND CAP
�( N 632058.60
ELEV. 172804,87
89
WETLAND GRAPHIC SCALE EPHEMERAL POOL
PHOTO POINT
M -43 (Creation 5
AREA 4
40 80 160
0 20 0
(Restoration
91% PHOTO POINT
EPHEMERAL POOL M -44
(Creation) -4
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 40 ft.
`-
NOTES:
PROJECT NO. 397
NC ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
DATE AUGUST 2010
r_o�
1. GENERAL SITE DATA PROVIDED BY NCEEP.
MONTGOMERY COUNTY
UT BARNES STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION
SCALE 1 " =40'
OS Sielll
sl,:04
2. ALL LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE.
NORTH CAROLINA
MONITORING
JACOBS
CURRENT CONDITION PLAN VIEW
JOB NO.: ]]X31100
I�r� <�.Rr
YEAR 5 of 5
FIGURE 2 OF 6

EXISTING FEATURES LEGEND
y ®
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE ® PHOTO POINT
4 y \
ROCK CROSS —VANE Q GAUGE
ROOT WAD VEGETATION PLOT
y
-- LOG WEIR
2010 CURRENT CONDITIONS
COVER L 0 G
BANK SCOUR
BRUSH MATTRESS
PaNT WETLAND AREA POOR VEGETATIVE
AUTOMATIC GAUGE '` ''• (Restoration)
COVER
- .� STEP POOL
y
PHOTO POINT
m M -34
MONITORING \
GAUGE
PHOTO POINT MM*=I
PHOTO POINT /
s
Q M -29 AUTOMATIC WELL \
x k y Aw 3 \
Op Y O k DO
p
1 0
h !x a + m
PHOTO POINT
M -28 Q
Z PHOTO POINT r�OX
A M-251
M-35 POINT
17+00 k PHOTO POINT
PHOTO POINT W y .. O
PHOTO POINT
1 M -36 M -32
e
PHOTO POINT W
+ , 4 M -30
PHOTO POINT PHOTO P (R
OINT
Mm6 m
PHOTO POINT
M -31., m N w
Ld
POOL w
EPHEMERAI.S PHEMERAL POOL PHOTO POINT Z
(Creation) -7 M -23 J
(Creation - EPHEMERAL POOL PHOTO POINT
(Creation) -6 M -21 (�
Q
GRAPHIC SCALE
x-
40 0 20 40 80 160
1 R" I I I = � Z
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 40 ft.
`PHOTO POINT
M -22
MATCHLINE SHEET 4
os Siem
j, i,2Il�t ,it
NOTES:
1. GENERAL SITE DATA PROVIDED BY NCEEP.
2. ALL LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE.
PROJECT NO. 397
MONTGOMERY COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
MONITORING
JACOBS 1
NC ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
UT BARNES STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION
DATE AUGUST 2010
SCALE 1 " =40'
JOB NO.: JJX31100
CURRENT CONDITION PLAN VIEW
�
YEAR 5 of 5
FIGURE 3 OF 6

PREP
k
6 Y PHOTO POINT
.tf
y Y
nti Y �� 33
tiF
O°
Sr
PHOTO POINT \
M -19
,�,D Z
n�
k (Creo GO `8 POOL V
1�
3�
PHOTO POINT
M -15 EH PTO POINT3� 33 33 -- 33 30 30 —
1�11�
\ \ PHOTO F
M -16
PHOTO POINT
M -18
XS 5
PHOTO POINT
M -17
CE
LEGEND
NOTES:
1 . GENERAL SITE DATA PROVIDED BY NCEEP.
2. ALL LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE.
PROJECT NO. 397
MONTGOMERY COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
MONITORING
JACOBS
NC ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
UT BARNES STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
CURRENT CONDITION PLAN VIEW
®
PHOTO POINT
ROCK CROSS —VANE
O
GAUGE
ROOT WAD
VEGETATION PLOT
f '
LOG WEIR
2010 CURRENT CONDITIONS
COVER LOG
BANK SCOUR
BRUSH MATTRESS
POOR VEGETATION
`"e
STEP POOL
COVER
PHOTO POINT
M -14
�
�k q �B S37
h 8liypµ� C PHOTO POINT
E ppg6 E M -11
0 EIEV. e1'�
� OO
6k
PHOTO POINT
M -12
PHOTO POINT
M-13
M'I C1-144
Z.
syFFT s
GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40 80
( IN FEET )
I inch = 40 ft.
2 X
00 AUTOMATIC GAUGE
AW -2
\`.
PHOTO POINT y
M -10
Y
Y
'�` Y
160
Y
�8J oo y
\ ! Y ,/
�v
PHOTO POINT
E -2 PHOTO POINT
� M -9
r
W
W
U)
W
Z
J
2
U
H--
cQ
G
r_a�l
L,COS sielli
NOTES:
1 . GENERAL SITE DATA PROVIDED BY NCEEP.
2. ALL LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE.
PROJECT NO. 397
MONTGOMERY COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
MONITORING
JACOBS
NC ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
UT BARNES STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION
DATE AUGUST 2010
SCALE 1 " =40'
JOB NO.: JJX31100
CURRENT CONDITION PLAN VIEW
YEAR 5 of 5
FIGURE 4 OF 6

EXISTING FEATURES LEGEND
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
ROCK CROSS -VANE
ROOT WAD
® LOG WEIR
COVER LOG
BRUSH MATTRESS
STEP POOL
® PHOTO POINT
0 GAUGE
VEGETATION PLOT
2010 CURRENT CONDITIONS
BANK SCOUR
F POOR VEGETATION
COVER
PHOTO POINT
M -8
\ 3j
3
\ 3
PHOTO POINT
CREST GAUGE
CG -1
PHOTO POINT
T-4
PHOTO POINT
M -1
/�
60/ MQ
boy U
9�
�F
G�
GRAPHIC SCALE
20 40 80
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 40 ft.
elll
t`11.�
K,•.,
NOTES:
1. GENERAL SITE DATA PROVIDED BY NCEEP.
2. ALL LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE.
PROJECT NO. 397
MONTGOMERY COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
MONITORING
YEAR 5 of 5
���BS
NC ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
UT BARNES STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION
DATE AUGUST 2010
SCALE 1 " =40'
JOB NO.: JJX31100
CURRENT CONDITION PLAN VIEW
FIGURE 5 OF 6

LEGEND
- CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
ROCK CROSS -VANE
ROOT WAD
LOG WEIR
d
•d
COVER LOG
BRUSH MATTRESS
STEP POOL
m
X
CE
C
k�
®
PHOTO POINT
O
GAUGE
El
VEGETATION PLOT
2010
CURRENT CONDITIONS
MONTGOMERY COUNTY
BANK SCOUR
SCALE 1 " =40'
POOR VEGETATION
NORTH CAROLINA
COVER
VEGETATION PLOT-2
MA T CHUNE SHEET 4
iCreo �� LI POOL
r
r
PFR6T POINT r
T -7
A` rPHOTO POINT
r
oat ')Eq (R Sfr. O
�X r
\r
r
\ r
I
X
PHOTO POINT
T -10
Lit
X CE
X CE
X CE
X CE
X - CE o°
CE ��
GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40 60
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 40 ft.
160
is
PHOTO POINT
T -11
�z
�`
2
sti
r
PHOTO POIN
+ T -9
xs e
BEGIN TRIBUTARY
LONGITUDINAL PROFILE
09
`^
PROJECT NO. 397
NC ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
DATE AUGUST 2010
r,
NOTES:
1. GENERAL SITE DATA PROVIDED BY NCEEP.
MONTGOMERY COUNTY
UT BARNES STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION
SCALE 1 " =40'
NORTH CAROLINA
I'
2. ALL LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE.
MONITORING
J�C�
CURRENT CONDITION PLAN VIEW
JOB NO.: JJX31100
3 4E Eosptem�
YEAR 5 of 5
FIGURE 6 OF 6

&V
APPENDIX 2
GENERAL PROJECT TABLES
2.1. Project Mitigation Structure and Objectives
2.2. Project Activity and Reporting History
2.3. Project Contacts
2.4. Project Attribute Table
UT to Barnes Monitoring Report Jordan, Jones & Goulding
Project No 397 April 2011
Year 5 of 5

Table 2.1 Project Mitigation Structures and Objectives
UT to Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration /EEP Project 397
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Segment/Reach
ntigation
_Type
Approach
Linear,
Footage or
Acres
-Stationing
_11,%,_
u
Comments =
(ft) _
Main Channel
R
P1/ P2
3,305 if
0 +00 -33 +05
Channel restoration, relocation with use of grade
control and bank protection structures
Tributary
R
P2
611 If
0 +00 -6 +11
Channel restoration, relocation with use of grade
control and bank protection structures
Wetland Enhancement
E
- --
4 44 ac
- --
Enhancement of jurisdictional wetland
Suiations
Component `m
Restoration Level
Stream (If)
Wetland (ac)
Upland (ac)
Buffer (ac)
BMP
Riparian
Non -
Riparian
Restoration (R)
3,916
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Enhancement (E)
N/A
444
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Enahncement I (E)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Enhancement II (E)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Creation (C)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Preservation (P)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
NIA
N/A
HQ Preservation (P)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Totals
3,916
444
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
*The final linear footage and acreage listed above is based on the as -built values constructed on -site

Table 2.2 Protect Activity and Reporting History
UT Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration /EEP Project 397
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Elapsed Time Since Grading Complete 4 yrs 11 months
Elapsed Time Since Planting Complete 4 yrs 11 months
Number of Reporting Years 5
_ - Activity 6r Re ort s
Data Collection Comp leted
Actdal Completion or
"Delivery
Restoration Plan
NA
N/A
Final Design-90%
NA
Jul -05
Construction
NA
Mar -06
Temporary S &E mix applied to entire
project area*
NA
Mar -06
Permanent seed mix applied to entire
ro ect area
NA
Mar -06
Planting of live stakes and bare root trees
NA
Mar -06
Mitigation Plan/ As -Built (Year 0
Monitoring)
Jun -06
Jul -06
Year 1 Monitoring
Oct -06
Mar -07
Year 2 Monitoring
Nov -07
Mar -08
Year 3 Monitoring
May-08
Mar -09
Year 4 Monitoring
Aug-09
Dec -09
Year 5 Monitoring
Jun10 -Febl l
Feb -11
*Seed and mulch is added as each section of construction is completed

Table 2.3 Project Contacts Table
UT Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project 397
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Baker Engineering
Designer
1447 South Tryon, Suite 200
Charlotte NC 28203
North State Environmental, Inc
Construction
2889 Lowery Street
Winston -Salem NC 27101
Planting Contractor
North State Environmental, Inc
Seeding Contractor
Monitoring Performers
Baker Engineering
Year 1
1447 South Tryon, Suite 200
Charlotte NC 28203
Rummel, Klepper & Kahl, LLP
900 Ridgefield Drive
Year 2
Suite 350
Raleigh, NC 27609
Jordan, Jones & Goulding
Year 3- Present
9101 Southern Pine Blvd, Suite 160
Charlotte NC 28273
Stream Monitoring, POC
Alison Nichols, 704 - 527 -4106 ext 227
Vegetation Monitoring, POC
Wetland Monitoring, POC

Table 2.4 Project Attribute Table
UT Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration /EEP Project 397
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Project County
Montgomery County, North Carolina
Drainage Area
UT to Barnes (Main Channel)
2 0 sq mi
Tributary
0 18 sq mi
Drainage impervious cover estimate
UT to Barnes (Main Channel)
<5%
Tributary
<5%
Stream Order
UT to Barnes (Main Channel)
2 nd
Tributary
I s`
Ph siogra hic Region
Piedmont
Ecore ion
Carolina Slate Belt
Ros en Classification of As -built
UT to Barnes (Main Channel)
C
Tributary
C
Cowardm Classification
Riverme, Lower Perennial, Unconsolidated
Bottom Cobble - Gravel
Dominant Soil Types
UT to Barnes (Main Channel)
Chenneby Silt Loam and Herndon Silt Loam
Tributary
Chenneby Silt Loam
Reference site ID
Spencer Creek and UT to Spencer Creek
USGS HUC for Pro ect
304010305
NCDW Sub -basin for Project and Reference
03 -07 -09
NCDWQ classification for Project and Reference
C
Any portion of any project segment 303d list9
No
Any. portion of any project segment upstream of a 303d
listed se ment?
No
Reason for 303d listing or stressor?
N/A
% of project easement fenced9
1

AG
APPENDIX 3
VEGETATION ASSESSMENT DATA
3.1. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success
3.2. Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
3.3. Vegetation Plot Summary Data Table
3.3. Vegetation Condition Assessment
UT to Barnes Monitoring Report Jordan, Jones & Goulding
Project No 397 April 2011
Year 5 of 5

Appendix 3.1 Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success
UT Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Vegetation Plot ID
Vegetation Survival
Threshold Met
(Y/1)
Plot 1
Y
Plot 2
Y
Plot 3
Y
Plot 4
Y

Vegetation Plot 1
(1/2011)
Vegetation Plot 2
(1/2011)
Vegetation Plot 3 Vegetation Plot 4
(1/2011) (1/2011)
Prepared For: Appendix 3.2 Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos Prepared by:
UT to Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 397
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
A i.t1 ,Cen? Submittal Date: April 2011

Appendix 3 3 Vegetation Plot Summary Data Table
UT Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration /EEP Project 397
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Current Data (MY5 -2010)
Annual Means
Species
Common Name
Type
Plot 1
Plot 2
Plot 3
Plot 4
Current Mean
MYl - 2006
MY2 - 2007
MY3 - 2008
MY4 - 2009
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
Acer rubrum
Red maple
T
2
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Betula nrgra
River birch
T
1
1
2
2
2
2
4
5
2
3
5
5
2
2
2
2
2
3
Carva cordrformrs
Bitternut hickory
T
2
N/A
2
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Cornus amomum
Silky dogwood
S
1
1
3
2
1
2
1 2
2
3
3
1
1
1 1
2
Carprnus carodnran_a
Ironwood
T/S
1
I
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
Lmdera bencorn
Spicebush
T/S
1
1
1
1
2
2
1 3
1 3
1
1
1
1
Lrqurdambar styraciva
Sweetgum
T
12
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Lrrrodendron hrlrprfera
tuliptree
T
4
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Nvssa sylvatrca
Blackgum
T
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Prnrrs sp
Pine tree
T
3
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Platanus occrdentalrs
Sycamore
T
1 3
3
3
1 2
1 2
4
1 4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Quercrrs falcata
Southern red oak
T
3
3
3
3
2
2
1 3
3
3
3
3
3
Querc:rs Porata
Overcup oak
T
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus sp
12ak species
T
1
2
1
1
1
3
1
2
4
4
3
3
1
1
1
1 2
Salrx nrgra
Black willow
T
1
1
N/A
1
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
Sambucus canadensts
Elderberry
T/S
1
N/A
I N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
Unknown
unknown species
T
2
1 l
1 1
1
1
2
1 1
1
1
3
1 3
2
2
2
1
Plot Area (acres)
Species Count
Stem Count
Stems per Acre
00247
-° — _
5
6
6
11
5
5
5
6
1 11
13
6
5
5
6
11
12
8
9
13
33
7
7
11
16
17
22
14
11
9
12
1725
19 5
324
364
526
1336
283
283
445
648
395
658
567
445
354
486
3543
516 2

Appendix 3 4 Vegetation Condition Assessment
UT Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project 397
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Planted Acreage 10.2
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Mapping
Threshold
(acres)
Number of
Polygons
Combined
Acreage
% of
Planted
Acreage*
Bare Areas
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material
0 1
0
0
000%
Low Stem Density Areas
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on MY3, 4, or 5 stem count criteria
0 1
0
0 00
0 "/0
Total
0
0
0%
Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor
Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small given the monitoring year
Easement Acreage 168
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Mapping
Threshold
(SF)
Number of
Polygons
Combined
Acreage
% of
Planted
Acreage
Invasive Areas of Concern
Areas of points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale)
1000
0
0
0%
Easement Encroachment Areas
Areas of points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale)
none
0
0
0%

APPENDIX 4
STREAM ASSESSMENT DATA
4.1. Stream Station and Cross - Section Photos
4.2. Qualitative Visual Stability Assessment
4.3. Verification of Bankfull Events
4.4. Cross - Section Plots and Raw Data Tables*
4.5. Longitudinal Plots and Raw Data Tables*
4.6. Pebble Count Plots and Raw Data Tables*
*Raw data tables have been provided electronically
UT to Barnes Monitoring Report Jordan, Jones & Goulding
Project No 397 April 2011
Year 5 of 5

M -1 View Upstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
M -2 View Upstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
Prepared For:
r�
1,R��1 xnlcht
M -1 View Downstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
UT to Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration
Monitoring Year 5
Appendix 4.1 Stream Station Photos
M -2 View Downstream
Main Channel (2/2011)
Date: April 2011
EEP Project No.: 397

M -3 View Upstream
Main Channel (2/2011)
M -4 View Upstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
Prepared For:
r~
Fi��3tci�!
M -3 View Downstream
Main Channel (2/2011)
UT to Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration
Monitoring Year 5
Appendix 4.1 Stream Station Photos
M -4 View Downstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
Date: April 2011
EEP Project No.: 397

M -5 View Upstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
M -6 View Upstream
Main Channel (2/2011)
Prepared For:
r�
�' CQ :01.10
1 +a� WY K:01.10
M -5 View Downstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
UT to Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration
Monitoriniz Year 5
Appendix 4.1 Stream Station Photos
M -6 View Downstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
Date: April 2011
EEP Project No.: 397

M -7 View Upstream
Main Channel (2/2011)
M -8 View Upstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
M -7 View Downstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
M -8 View Downstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
Prepared For: UT to Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration Date: April 2011
Monitoring Year 5 1 EEP Project No.: 397
r~ R1�a1 iM 'clIch t
Appendix 4.1 Stream Station Photos

M -9 View Upstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
M -10 View Upstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
Prepared For:
r~
I'.i llfl lelllelll
M -9 View Downstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
UT to Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration
Monitoring Year 5
Appendix 4.1 Stream Station Photos
M -10 View Downstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
Date: April 2011
EEP Project No.: 397

M -11 View Upstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
M -12 View Upstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
Prepared For:
r~
1,11 I'll 'C(lIcht
M -11 View Downstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
UT to Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration
Monitoring Year 5
Appendix 4.1 Stream Station Photos
M -12 View Downstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
Date: April 2011
EEP Project No.: 397
0

M -13 View Upstream
Main Channel (2/2011)
M -14 View Upstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
Prepared For:
r�
,stem
�',ill�li Cllll'tl�
M -13 View Downstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
UT to Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration
Monitoring Year 5
Appendix 4.1 Stream Station Photos
M -14 View Downstream
Main Channel (2/2011)
Date: April 2011
EEP Project No.: 397

M -15 View Upstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
M -16 View Upstream
Main Channel (2/2011)
Prepared For:
M -15 View Downstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
UT to Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration
Monitoring Year 5
Appendix 4.1 Stream Station Photos
M -16 View Downstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
Date: April 2011
EEP Project No.: 397

M -17 View Upstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
M -18 View Upstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
Prepared For:
r�
VII I'll YtVent
M -17 View Downstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
UT to Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration
Monitoring Year 5
Appendix 4.1 Stream Station Photos
M -18 View Downstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
Date: April 2011
EEP Project No.: 397

M -19 View Upstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
M -20 View Upstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
M -19 View Downstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
M -20 View Downstream
Main Channel (2/2011)
Prepared For: UT to Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration Date: April 2011
Monitoriniz Year 5 1 EEP Project No.: 397
r�
nh {
IE 1 'U11Ct
Appendix 4.1 Stream Station Photos

M -21 View Upstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
M -22 View Upstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
Prepared For:
r�
em
1';11 lFii 'E'illl3lf
M -21 View Downstream
Main Channel (2/2011)
UT to Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration
Monitoring Year 5
Appendix 4.1 Stream Station Photos
M -22 View Downstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
Date: April 2011
EEP Project No.: 397

M -23 View Upstream
Main Channel (2/2011)
M -24 View Upstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
Prepared For:
r�
1'111 MI, 'C 110
M -23 View Downstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
UT to Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration
Monitoring Year 5
Appendix 4.1 Stream Station Photos
M -24 View Downstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
Date: April 2011
EEP Project No.: 397
0

M -25 View Upstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
M -26 View Upstream
Main Channel (2/2011)
Prepared For:
r~
el>rl
III ]al 1I let it
M -25 View Downstream
Main Channel (2/2011)
UT to Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration
Monitoring Year 5
Appendix 4.1 Stream Station Photos
M -26 View Downstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
Date: April 2011
EEP Project No.: 397

M -27 View Upstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
M -28 View Upstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
Prepared For:
r�
1?n tat �e�i�tf
M -27 View Downstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
UT to Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration
Monitoring Year 5
Appendix 4.1 Stream Station Photos
M -28 View Downstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
Date: April 2011
EEP Project No.: 397

M -29 View Upstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
M -31 View Upstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
Prepared For:
r�
i ;I �, ,E. em al
M -29 View Downstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
UT to Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration
Monitoring Year 5
Appendix 4.1 Stream Station Photos
M -31 View Downstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
Date: April 2011
EEP Project No.: 397

M -32 View Upstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
M -33 View Upstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
Prepared For:
r=
M -32 View Downstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
UT to Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration
Monitoring Year 5
Appendix 4.1 Stream Station Photos
M -33 View Downstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
Date: April 2011
EEP Project No.: 397
0

M -34 View Upstream
Main Channel (2/2011)
M -35 View Upstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
Prepared For:
r�
l>>i 1r t flue t
M -34 View Downstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
UT to Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration
Monitoriniz Year 5
Appendix 4.1 Stream Station Photos
M -35 View Downstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
Date: April 2011
EEP Project No.: 397

M -36 View Upstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
M -37 View Upstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
Prepared For:
r-'i
ten,
(gat laz �uui•nl
M -36 View Downstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
UT to Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration
Monitoring Year 5
Appendix 4.1 Stream Station Photos
M -37 View Downstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
Date: April 2011
EEP Project No.: 397

M -38 View Upstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
M -39 View Upstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
Prepared For:
r-�I
c1
Nt-
[ .n gat 11cnt
M-38 View Downstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
UT to Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration
Monitoring Year S
Appendix 4.1 Stream Station Photos
M -39 View Downstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
Date: April 2011
EEP Project No.: 397

M -40 View Upstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
M -41 View Upstream
Main Channel (2/2011)
Prepared For:
r=
M -40 View Downstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
UT to Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration
Monitoriniz Year 5
Appendix 4.1 Stream Station Photos
M -41 View Downstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
Date: April 2011
EEP Project No.: 397
0

M -42 View Upstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
M -43 View Upstream
Main Channel (2/2011)
Prepared For:
r�
�SillEll 't'till�ls
M -42 View Downstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
UT to Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration
Monitoring Year 5
Appendix 4.1 Stream Station Photos
M -43 View Downstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
Date: April 2011
EEP Project No.: 397

M -44 View Upstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
M -45 View Upstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
Prepared For:
~ e,,,
FEli Ml I(C: Vui14
M -44 View Downstream
Main Channel (2/2011)
UT to Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration
Monitoring Year 5
Appendix 4.1 Stream Station Photos
M -45 View Downstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
Date: April 2011
EEP Project No.: 397
0

M -46 View Upstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
M -47 View Upstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
Prepared For:
r�
�telll
i',illtli f'IIICIIi
M -46 View Downstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
UT to Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration
Monitoring Year 5
Appendix 4.1 Stream Station Photos
M -47 View Downstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
Date: April 2011
EEP Project No.: 397

M -48 View Upstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
M -49 View Upstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
Prepared For:
RIn r-
IC -11CIII
M -48 View Downstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
UT to Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration
Monitoring Year 5
Appendix 4.1 Stream Station Photos
M -49 View Downstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
Date: April 2011
EEP Project No.: 397

M -50 View Upstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
M -51 View Upstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
Prepared For:
r�
VIII lit] .011uht
M -50 View Downstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
UT to Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration
Monitoring Year 5
Appendix 4.1 Stream Station Photos
M -51 View Downstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
Date: April 2011
EEP Project No.: 397
0

M -52 View Upstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
M -53 View Upstream
Main Channel (2/2011)
Prepared For:
r~
M -52 View Downstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
UT to Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration
Monitoring Year 5
Appendix 4.1 Stream Station Photos
M -53 View Downstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
Date: April 2011
EEP Project No.: 397
im

M -54 View Upstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
M -55 View Upstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
Prepared For:
r=
M -54 View Downstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
UT to Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration
Monitoring Year 5
Appendix 4.1 Stream Station Photos
M -55 View Downstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
Date: April 2011
EEP Project No.: 397

M -56 View Upstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
M -57 View Upstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
Prepared For:
r�
M -56 View Downstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
UT to Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration
Monitoring Year 5
Appendix 4.1 Stream Station Photos
M -57 View Downstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
Date: April 2011
EEP Project No.: 397
�iG

M -58 View Upstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
M -59 View Upstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
Prepared For:
r�
M -58 View Downstream
Main Channel (2/2011)
UT to Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration
Monitoring Year 5
Appendix 4.1 Stream Station Photos
M -59 View Downstream
Main Channel (2 /2011)
Date: April 2011
EEP Project No.: 397

T 1 View Downstream
Tributary (2/2011)
T-2 View Downstream
Tributary (2/2011)
Prepared For:
r�
Fl l
i',11 ]llTI. 'lt:�
T 1 View Upstream
Tributary (2/2011)
UT to Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration
Monitoring Year 5
Appendix 4.1 Stream Station Photos
T-2 View Upstream
Tributary (2/2011)
Date: April 2011
EEP Project No.: 397
im

T-3 View Downstream
Tributary (2/2011)
T-4 View Downstream
Tributary (2/2011)
Prepared For:
r�
I''�n �� ► . tleiEat
T-3 View Upstream
Tributary (2/2011)
UT to Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration
Monitoring Year 5
Appendix 4.1 Stream Station Photos
T-4 View Upstream
Tributary (2/2011)
Date: April 2011
EEP Project No.: 397
im

T-5 View Downstream
Tributary (2/2011)
T-6 View Downstream
Tributary (2/2011)
Prepared For:
r�
1'dl lill 'E'ilil'ilt
T-5 View Upstream
Tributary (2/2011)
UT to Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration
Monitoring Year 5
Appendix 4.1 Stream Station Photos
T-6 View Upstream
Tributary (2/2011)
Date: April 2011
EEP Project No.: 397

T-6 View Downstream
Tributary (2/2011)
T-7 View Downstream
Tributary (2/2011)
Prepared For:
r~
ern
i',II 1� i 'Cllll'll�
T-6 View Upstream
Tributary (2/2011)
UT to Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration
Monitoring Year 5
Appendix 4.1 Stream Station Photos
T-7 View Upstream
Tributary (2/2011)
Date: April 2011
EEP Project No.: 397
U1G

T-8 View Downstream
Tributary (2/2011)
T-9 View Downstream
Tributary (2/2011)
T-8 View Upstream
Tributary (2/2011)
T-9 View Upstream
Tributary (2/2011)
Prepared For: UT to Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration Date: April 2011
Monitorins Year 5 1 EEP Project No.: 397
r=
Appendix 4.1 Stream Station Photos

T 10 View Downstream
Tributary (2/2011)
T 11 View Downstream
Tributary (2/2011)
Prepared For:
r=
T 10 View Upstream
Tributary (2/2011)
UT to Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration
Monitoring Year 5
Appendix 4.1 Stream Station Photos
T 11 View Upstream
Tributary (2/2011)
Date: April 2011
EEP Project No.: 397

E -1 View East (2/2011)
E -1 View South (2/2011)
Prepared For:
r�
l�aa jaVn��t
E -1 View West (2/2011)
UT to Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration
Monitoring Year 5
Appendix 4.1 Stream Station Photos
E -1 View North (2/2011)
Date: April 2011
EEP Project No.: 397

E -2 View East (2/2011)
E -2 View South (2/2011)
Prepared For:
r=
E -2 View West (2/2011)
UT to Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration
Monitoring Year 5
Appendix 4.1 Stream Station Photos
E -2 View North (2/2011)
Date: April 2011
EEP Project No.: 397

E -3 View East (2/2011)
E -3 View South (2/2011)
Prepared For:
r~
l RM ,
E -3 View West (2/2011)
UT to Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration
Monitoring Year 5
Appendix 4.1 Stream Station Photos
E -3 View North (2/2011)
Date: April 2011
EEP Project No.: 397

Cross - Section 1 -View Upstream (2/2011)
Cross - Section 2 -View Upstream (2/2011)
Prepared For:
r�
Cross - Section 1 -View Downstream (2/2011)
Cross - Section 2 -View Downstream (2/2011)
UT to Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration
Monitoring Year 5
Appendix 4.1 Stream Cross - Section Photos
Date: April 2011
EEP Project No.: 397

Cross - Section 3 -View Upstream (2/2011)
Cross - Section 4 -View Upstream (2/2011)
Prepared For:
r=
Cross - Section 3 -View Downstream (2/2011)
Cross - Section 4 -View Downstream (2/2011)
UT to Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration
Monitoring Year 5
Appendix 4.1 Stream Cross - Section Photos
Date: April 2011
EEP Project No.: 397

Cross - Section 5 -View Upstream (2/2011)
Cross - Section 6 -View Upstream (2/2011)
Prepared For:
ry
11`:11 )< r IC Milt
Cross - Section 5 -View Downstream (2/2011)
Cross - Section 6 -View Downstream (2/2011)
UT to Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration
Monitoring Year 5
Appendix 4.1 Stream Cross - Section Photos
Date: April 2011
EEP Project No.: 397
U�

Cross - Section 7 -View Downstream (2/2011)
Prepared For:
r�
Cross - Section 8 -View Upstream (2/2011)
UT to Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration
Monitoring Year 5
Appendix 4.1 Stream Cross - Section Photos
Date: April 2011
EEP Project No.: 397

Appendix 4.2 Qualitative Visual Stability Assessment
Main Channel (3,305 If)
UT to Barnes Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 397
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Adjust %
Number
Number with
Footage with
for
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Woody
Woody
Woody
Category
Sub-Cate2ory
Metric
as Intended
As -Built
Segments
Footage
as Intended
Vegetation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1 Bed
1 Vertical Stability
Aggradation
#
0
0
100%
;
i
Degredation
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run units)
_ - T
2 Riffle Condition
Texture /Substrate
30
30
100%
3 Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
29
29
100%
Lenth Appropriate
29
29
100%
Condition
Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
N/A
N/A
N/A
4 Thalweg Position
-
Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide)
N/A
N/A
N/A
2 Bank
1 Scoured /Eroded
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or scour
and erosion
_
0
0
100%
0
0
N/A
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears likely
-
2 Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are
0
0
100%
0
0
N/A
providing habitat
3 Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
0
0
N/A
Totals
0
0
100%
0
0
N/A
3 Engineered
Structures
I Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no di lodged boulders or logs
21
21
100%
} -
2 Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
21
21
100%
2a Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms
21
21
100%
3 Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%
21
21
100%
4 Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining —Max Pool Depth Bankfull Depth> 1 6
Rootwads /lo s providing some cover at baseflow
21
21
0
100 /o

Appendix 4.2 Qualitative Visual Stability Assessment
Tributary (611 If)
UT to Barnes Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration /EEP Protect No. 397
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Adjust %
Number
Number with
Footage with
for
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Woody
Woody
Woodv
Category
Sub-Category
Metric
as Intended
As -Built
Segments
Footage
as Intended
Vegetation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1 Bed
1 Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0
0
100%
-
Degredation
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2 Riffle Condition
Tcxturc /Substrate
10
10
100%
3 Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
9
9
100%
Lenth Appropriate
9
9
100%
Condition
Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
N/A
N/A
N/A
4 Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide)
N/A
N/A
N/A
-
2 Bank
1 Scoured /Eroded
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or scour
and erosion
0
0
100%
0
0
N/A
Banks undercut/overhangmg to the extent that mass wasting appears likely
2 Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are
0
0
100%
0
0
N/A
providing habitat
3 Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
0
0
N/A
- Totals
0
0
100%
0
0
N/A
3 Engineered
Structures
1 Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dilodged boulders or logs
N/A
N/A
N/A
2 Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
N/A
N/A
N/A
_
2a Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms
N/A
N/A
N/A
-
3 Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%
N/A
N/A
N/A
-
- - "
4 Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining -Max Pool Depth Bankfull Depth >_ 1 6
Rootwads /lo s rovidin some cover at baseflow
N/A
N/A
N/A

Appendix 4.3 - Verification of Bankfull Events
UT To Barnes Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration /EEP Project No. 397
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Date of Collection
Date of Occurrence
Method
Photo # if available
7/13/2006
6/24/2006
CG 1
N/A
7/13/2006
6/24/2006
CG 2
N/A
9/29/2006
8/31/2006
CG 1
N/A
9/29/2006
8/31/2006
CG2
N/A
8/2008
Unknown
CG 1 /CG2
N/A
11/18/2009
11/11/2009-
CG 1 /CG2
N/A

Appendix 4.4 Cross - Section Plots and Raw Data Tables
UT to Barnes Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 397
Unnamed Tributary to Barnes Creek
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Project Name
UT to Barnes Creek
EEP Project Number
397
Cross - Section H)
XS -1, Riffle, 3 +25
,Survey Date
2/2011
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation ft
623.20
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft)
15.13
Bankfull Width ft
16.04
Flood Prone Area Elevation ft
625.02
Flood Prone Width ft
44.64
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.94
Bankfull Max Depth ft
1.82
W/D Ratio
17.06
Entrenchment Ratio
2.78
Bank Height Ratio
1.00
Station
Elevation
Notes
0
623.05
xs1-1 t
0.84
623.20
xsl
2.99
623.29
xsl
5.96
623.37
xsl
9.07
623.42
xs 1
11.85
623.22
xsl
15.1
622.75
xsl -lb
15.81
622.33
xsl
16.51
621.67
xs2
17.17
621.69
xsl -lew
17.82
621.42
xs 1
18.8
621.48
xs 1
19.69
621.38
xs1
20.71
621.46
xs 1
21.55
621.65
xsl
22.64
621.70
xsI -rew
23.99
622.41
xsI -rb
26.65
623.05
xs 1
28.61
623.60
xsl
31.87
623.89
xsl
34.81
623.61
xsl
37.74
623.66
xsl
40.58
623.56
xs1
44.55
623.48
xsl
44.64
623.20
xsI -r t
XS -1: View Upstream
XS -1: View Downstream
UT to Barnes Creek (Main Channel) - MY5
Cross - Section I - Riffle
624.5
624
.. 623.5
623
� 622.5
0
622
w
621.5
621
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 �0
Station (ft)
t MYl- 10/2006 --$-- MY2- 10/2007 --N-- MY3- 5/2008
- ♦- MY5 - 2/2011 ...... Bankfull • • • • • • Water Surface

Appendix 4.4 Cross - Section Plots and Raw Data Tables
UT to Barnes Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration /EEP Project No. 397
Unnamed Tributary to Barnes Creek
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Project Name
UT to Barnes Creek
EEP Project Number
397
Cross - Section ID
XS -2, Pool 4 +81
Survey Date
2/2011
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation ft
622.41
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft 2)
54.63
Bankfull Width ft
27.17
Flood Prone Area Elevation ft
626.87
Flood Prone Width ft
44.99
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
2.01
Bankfull Max Depth ft
4.46
W/D Ratio
13.52
Entrenchment Ratio
1.66
Bank Height Ratio
1.00
Station
Elevation
Notes
0
622.43
xs2 -I t
0.13
622.43
xs2
3.08
622.60
xs2
5.34
622.68
xs2
8.72
622.56
xs2
12.13
622.19
xs2
17.26
621.59
xs2
18.91
621.13
xs2 -lb
22.13
620.72
xs2 -lew
23.8
620.27
xs2 -lew
24.84
620.25
xs2
25.47
620.03
xs2
26.54
619.08
xs2
28.21
618.61
xs2
29.08
618.19
xs2
30.56
618.00
xs2
31.65
617.95
xs2
32.95
618.02
xs2
33.68
618.39
xs2
35.08
620.78
xs2 -rew
37.35
622.39
xs2 -rb
39.64
620.88
xs2
42.06
623.01
xs2
44.99
623.00
xs2 -r t
617
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Station (ft)
--�� MYI- 10/2006 MY2- 10/2007 MY3- 5/2008 --w- MY4- 8/2009 -*- MY5 - 2/2011 ...... Bankfull • • • • • • Water Surface
XS -2: View Upstream
XS -2: View Downstream
UT to Barnes Creek (Main Channel) - MY5
Cross- Section 2 - Pool
624
623
.............................................. ............................... ....... ..........
622
621
...................... ............................... .............................. .......... ...............
620
0
619
w
618
617
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Station (ft)
--�� MYI- 10/2006 MY2- 10/2007 MY3- 5/2008 --w- MY4- 8/2009 -*- MY5 - 2/2011 ...... Bankfull • • • • • • Water Surface

Appendix 4.4 Cross - Section Plots and Raw Data Tables
UT to Barnes Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 397
Unnamed Tributary to Barnes Creek
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Project Name
UT to Barnes Creek
EEP Project Number
397
Cross - Section ID
XS -3, Pool 14 +06
Survey Date
2/2011
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation ft
617.56
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft 2)
48.65
Bankfull Width ft
23.77
Flood Prone Area Elevation ft
621.57
Flood Prone Width ft
45.61
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
2.05
Bankfull Max Depth ft
4.01
W/D Ratio
11.60
Entrenchment Ratio
1.92
Bank Height Ratio
1.00
Station
Elevation
Notes
0
617.80
xs3 -r t
0.05
617.92
xs3
3.96
617.72
xs3
7.11
617.67
xs3
10.24
617.75
xs3
12.93
617.42
xs3
16.21
617.00
xs3
18.79
616.12
xs3 -rb
21.08
615.46
xs3 -rew
21.81
614.79
xs3
23.03
613.95
xs3
23.88
613.70
xs3
24.8
613.55
xs3
25.64
613.55
xs3
27.05
613.62
xs3
29.44
613.71
xs3
30.89
614.03
xs3
31.71
615.46
xs3 -lew
32
616.05
xs3 -Ib
33.45
617.15
xs3
38.22
618.09
xs3
41.19
618.19
xs3
44.84
618.02
xs3
45.61
617.94
xs3-1 t
XS -3: View Upstream
XS -3: View Downstream
UT to Barnes Creek (Main Channel) - MY5
Cross - Section 3 - Pool
619
618
............-mr,.,�ea ............................. ............................... ........... .........................
617
-
�e
616
c
615
a�
m
614
613
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Station (ft)
t MYl- 10/2006 MY2- 10/2007 -*a-- MY3- 5/2008 --w- MY4- 8/2009 -4- MY5 - 2/2011 ...... Bankfull • • • • • • Water Surface

Appendix 4.4 Cross - Section Plots and Raw Data Tables
UT to Barnes Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 397
Unnamed Tributary to Barnes Creek
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Project Name
UT to Barnes Creek
EEP Project Number
397
Cross - Section ID
XS -4, Riffle 14 +67
Survey Date
2/2011
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation ft
617.16
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ftz)
17.25
Bankfull Width ft
14.78
Flood Prone Area Elevation ft
619.42
Flood Prone Width ft
45.30
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.17
Bankfull Max Depth ft
2.26
W/D Ratio
12.63
Entrenchment Ratio
3.07
Bank Height Ratio
1.00
Station
Elevation
Notes
0
617.70238
xs4-1 t
0.73
617.76238
xs4
4.33
617.67238
xs4
7.17
617.54238
xs4
10.43
617.49238
xs4
13.62
617.41238
xs4
16.84
616.93238
xs4
19.55
615.93238
xs4 -lb
20.46
615.39238
xs4 -lew
21.13
615.23238
xs4
22.12
615.17238
xs4
23.62
614.90238
xs4
24.42
614.97238
xs4
24.49
615.32238
xs4 -rew
26.91
615.86238
xs4 -rb
29.04
617.00238
xs4
32.21
617.49238
xs4
35.84
617.63238
xs4
38.92
617.69238
xs4
41.51
617.62238
xs4
45.17
617.47238
xs4
45.3
617.42238
xs4 -I t
614.5
614
0 5 l0 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Station (ft)
�--�- MY 1- 10/2006 MY2- 1012007 MY3- 5/2008 MY4- 8/2009 -♦- MY5- 2/2011 ...... Bankfull • • • .. • Water Surface
XS -4: View Upstream
XS -4: View Downstream
UT to Barnes Creek (Main Channel) - MY5
Cross - Section 4 - Riffle
618
617.5
617
6165
�8
616
x
°
615.5
............................ ...............................
615
614.5
614
0 5 l0 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Station (ft)
�--�- MY 1- 10/2006 MY2- 1012007 MY3- 5/2008 MY4- 8/2009 -♦- MY5- 2/2011 ...... Bankfull • • • .. • Water Surface

Appendix 4.4 Cross - Section Plots and Raw Data Tables
UT to Barnes Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration /EEP Project No. 397
Unnamed Tributary to Barnes Creek
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Project Name
UT to Barnes Creek
EEP Project Number
397
Cross - Section ID
XS -5, Riffle 24 +33
Survey Date
2/2011
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation ft
612.52
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft 2)
15.78
Bankfull Width ft
15.79
Flood Prone Area Elevation ft
614.58
Flood Prone Width ft
45.38
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.00
Bankfull Max Depth ft
2.06,
W/D Ratio
15.79
Entrenchment Ratio
2.87
Bank Height Ratio
1.00
Station
Elevation
Notes
0
612.86944
xs5 -1 t
0.52
612.86944
xs5
4.06
612.85944
xs5
6.77
612.69944
xs5
9.84
612.66944
xs5
12.75
612.88944
xs5
15.78
612.52944
xs5
19.57
611.55944
xs5 -lb
21.24
611.02944
xs5 -lew
22.12
610.81944
xs5
22.75
610.45944
xs5
23.57
610.56944
xs5
24.83
610.77944
xs5 -rew
26.53
611.23944
xs5 -rb
29.76
612.22944
xs5
32.69
612.68944
xs5
34.79
612.71944
xs5
37.67
612.66944
xs5
40.78
612.65944
xs5
45
612.72944
xs5
45.11
612.60944
xs5 -r t
45.38
612.59944
xs5 -r t
45.37
612.62
xs5 -r t
610
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Station (ft)
MY 1- 10/2006 t MY2- 10/2007 ­A- MY3- 5/2008 --m­ MY4- 8/2009 --*--- MY5 -2/201 l ...... Bankfull • • • • • • Water Surface
XS -5: View Upstream
XS -5: View Downstream
UT to Barnes Creek (Main Channel) - MY5
Cross- Section 5 - Riffle
613.5
613 ,
612.5
612
a
611.5
C
0
611
w
610.5
ATw
610
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Station (ft)
MY 1- 10/2006 t MY2- 10/2007 ­A- MY3- 5/2008 --m­ MY4- 8/2009 --*--- MY5 -2/201 l ...... Bankfull • • • • • • Water Surface

Appendix 4.4 Cross - Section Plots and Raw Data Tables
UT to Barnes Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 397
Unnamed Tributary to Barnes Creek
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Project Name
UT to Barnes Creek
EEP Project Number
397
Cross - Section ID
XS -6, Pool 25 +37
Survey Date
2/2011
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation ft
611.38
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft 2)
29.05
Bankfull Width ft
13.22
Flood Prone Area Elevation ft
614.60
Flood Prone Width ft
45.11
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
2.20
Bankfull Max Depth ft
3.22
W/D Ratio
6.01
Entrenchment Ratio
3.41
Bank Height Ratio
1.00
Station
Elevation
Notes
0
612.07
xs6 -lpt
0.55
612.19
xs6
3.32
612.21
xs6
6.81
612.15
xs6
9.64
612.04
xs6 -lb
11.28
612.00
xs6
13.98
611.67
xs6
16.05
611.32
xs6
17.2
610.54
xs6 -lew
19.05
608.70
xs6
20.73
608.63
xs6
22.36
608.35
xs6
24.83
608.16
xs6
26.99
608.46
xs6
27.48
610.41
xs6 -rew
29.31
611.65
xs6
32.98
612.28
xs6
36.89
612.43
xs6 -rb
39.5
612.19
xs6
42.52
612.14
xs6
44.7
612.02
xs6
45.11
611.89
xs6 -r t
Station (ft)
-6- MY I- 10/2006 MY2- 10/2007 --►- MY3- 5/2008 - MY4- 8/2009 --r- MY5 - 2/2011 ...... Bankfull • • • • . • Water Surface
XS -6: View Upstream
XS -6: View Downstream
UT to Barnes Creek (Main Channel) - MY5
Cross- Section 6 - Pool
613
612
-
611
............... ............................... ......................... ......... ...............................
�a
610
a
0
609
w
608
607
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Station (ft)
-6- MY I- 10/2006 MY2- 10/2007 --►- MY3- 5/2008 - MY4- 8/2009 --r- MY5 - 2/2011 ...... Bankfull • • • • . • Water Surface

Appendix 4.4 Cross - Section Plots and Raw Data Tables
UT to Barnes Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 397
Unnamed Tributary to Barnes Creek
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Project Name
UT to Barnes Creek
EEP Project Number
397
Cross - Section ID
YS -7, Riffle 0 +88
Survey Date
2/2011
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation ft
611.35
Bankfull Cross - Sectional Area (ft 2)
6.44
Bankfull Width ft
8.87
Flood Prone Area Elevation ft
612.76
Flood Prone Width ft
44.81
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.73
Bankfull Max Depth ft
1.41
W/D Ratio
12.15
Entrenchment Ratio
5.05
Bank Height Ratio
1.00
Station
Elevation
Notes
0
611.67
xs7-1 t
0.56
611.91
xs7
1.99
611.89
xs7
4.11
611.78
xs7
6.15
611.9
xs7
8.92
611.93
xs7
10.98
611.61
xs7
14.46
611.53
xs7 -lb
16.98
611.23
xs7
18.29
610.98
xs7
19.48
610.5
xs7
20.8
610.11
xs7 -lew
21.55
609.96
xs7
22.55
609.94
xs7
23.3
610.16
xs7 -rew
23.68
610.88
xs7
25.14
611.47
xs7
27.17
611.45
xs7
30.09
611.54
xs7 -rb
32.29
611.44
xs7
34.69
611.45
xs7
38.86
611.41
xs7
42.7
611.38
xs7
44.34
611.17
xs7
44.81
611.17
xs7 -r t
XS -7: View Downstream
UT to Barnes Creek (Unnamed Tributary) - MY5
Cross - Section 7 - Riffle
612.5
612
611.5
............................... .... ..................... . ....,...
:c
�a
611 -
_1�
Apr,
a
610.5
W
........................... ............................... ............................... ...............................
610
609.5
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Station (ft)
t MYI- 10/2006 --*-- MY2- 10/2007 ­40-- MY3- 5/2008 MY4- 8/2009 --0- MY5- 2/2011 • • • • • • Bankfull • .. • .. Water Surface

Appendix 4.4 Cross - Section Plots and Raw Data Tables
UT to Barnes Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 397
Unnamed Tributary to Barnes Creek
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Project Name
UT to Barnes Creek
EEP Project Number
397
Cross - Section ID
XS -8, Pool 1 +33
Survey Date
2/2011
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation ft
610.87
Bankfull Cross- Sectional Area (ft)
14.46
Bankfull Width ft
11.25
Flood Prone Area Elevation ft
613.12
Flood Prone Width ft
38.00
Bankfull Mean Depth 11
1.29
Bankfull Max Depth ft
2.25
W/D Ratio
8.72
Entrenchment Ratio
338
Bank Height Ratio
1.00
Station
Elevation
Notes
-0.43
610.78
xs8 -I t
-0.27
610.79
xs8
1.1
611.07
xs8
4.73
611.18
xs8
7.34
611.16
xs8
10.53
611.2
xs8 -lb
13.98
610.65
xs8
15.28
610.05
xs8
16.01
609.7
xs8 -lew
16.92
609.11
xs8
18.31
608.87
xs8
20.57
608.62
xs8
21.75
608.72
xs8
22.12
609.68
xs8 -rew
23.61
610.8
xs8
25.83
611.46
xs8 -rb
29.96
611.69
xs8
33.37
611.76
xs8
36.96
611.83
xs8
39.1
611.99
xs8- t
609
w
608.5
608
607.5
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Station (ft)
XS -8: View Upstream
UT to Barnes Creek (Unnamed Tributary) - MY5
Cross- Section 8 - Pool
612.5
612
611.5
........................ ............................... .................... ............ ...............................
611
Moor
610.5
-- -
............................ .. .................... ................................ ...............................
610
ILIA-
c
0
609.5
>
609
w
608.5
608
607.5
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Station (ft)
-�-� MYI- 10/2006 t MY2- 10/2007 --"- MY3- 5/2008 MY4- 8/2009 -f- MY5- 2/2011 ...... Bankfull ...... Water Surface

Appendix 4.5 Longitudinal Plots
UT to Barnes Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration /EEP Project No. 397
Main Channel - Longitudinal Profile
2010 Monitoring Year
MY5of5
640
635
RXIA
625
cs
620
0
cs
615
W
RUIR
605
600 +
0
•
•
k�
♦A At V•
IA
500 1000 1500 2000 2500
Station (ft)
—TW (MY1- 10/2006) —TW (MY2- 10/2007) TW (MY3- 5/2008)
TW (MY4- 8/2009) • BKF (MY5 2/2011) TW (MY5- 2/2011)
- - --- -- WS Y5 2/2011 • Cross Sections
3000
3500

614
612
610
L
c�
s.
cc 608
w
0
0
606
W
604
602
600
Appendix 4.5 Longitudinal Plots
UT to Barnes Creek Stream and Wetland Restoration /EEP Project No. 397
Tributary - Longitudinal Profile
2010 Monitoring Year
MY 5 of 5
0
♦ ti
..... ♦ AA ♦
........... .. qLA A
A Y
Y
...... AA
............ ♦ A► ♦
..... A
100 200 300 400 500
Station (ft)
TW- AS- Built- 6/2006 TW (MY 1-10/2006) TW (MY2- 10/2007) TW (MY3- 5/2008)
TW (MY4- 11/2009) TW (MY5- 2/2011) ......... WS (MY5- (2/2011) ♦ BKF (MY5- 2/2011
■ Cross - Sections • Beaver Dam
rellic

Appendix 4.6 Pebble Count Plots and Raw Data Tables
UT to Barnes Creek Stream Restoration /EEP Project No. 397
Unnamed Tributary to Barnes Creek
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Project Name: UT to Barnes Creek
Cross - Section: 1
Cumulative Percent
Feature: Riffle
MY 5 (2/2011 )
Description
Material
Size mm
Total # Item %
Cum %
100%
Silt/Clay
silt /clay
0.062
24
24%
24%
90%
very fine sand
0.125
7
7%
31%
80%
fine sand
0.250
1
1%
32%
70%
Sand
medium sand
0.50
1
1%
33%
60%
coarse sand
1.00
4
4%
37%
50%
very coarse sand
2.0
9
9%
46%
ao%
very fine gravel
4.0
3
3%
49%
30%
fine gravel
5.7
3
3%
52%
v
20%
fine gravel
8.0
9
9%
61%
10%
medium gravel
11.3
2
2%
63%
0%
Gravel
medium gravel
course gravel
16.0
22.3
3
4
3%
4%
66%
70%
00� 01
�o X00 000
Particle Size (mm) 1
course gravel
32.0
8
8%
78%
-MY3- 5/2008' MY4-
8/2009 AMY S (2/2011)
very coarse gravel
45
5
5%
83%
very coarse gravel
64
2
2%
85%
small cobble
90
4
4%
89%
Individual Class Percent
medium cobble 128 3 3% 92%
Cobble
large cobble 180 2 2% 94%
very large cobble
256
4
4%
98%
100%
small boulder
362
2
2%
100%
90%
Boulder
small boulder
medium boulder
512
1024
0
0
0%
0%
100%
100%
80%
`
70%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
a
60%
A
Bedrock bedrock
TOTAL % of whole count
40096
0
100
0%
100%
100%
100%
50%
U n
= 40%
D50 Summary
Data 4.57
:0 30%
20%
r
10%
D84
54.50
o%
D95
199.00
oobLO1�5 015 05 1 ti d �!� 4 �� > �b �ti > �L p5 b� q0 �1� ��o �5b �bti �1ti �Otib �Oa4b00gb
Particle Size (mm)
■MY3. 5/2008' MY4- 8/2009
■MY5(2 /2011)
*Data reported based on reachivide pebble count

Appendix 4.6 Pebble Count Plots and Raw Data Tables
UT to Barnes Creek Stream Restoration/EEP Project No. 397
Unnamed Tributary to Barnes Creek
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
to
Feature: Pool
Summary Data
MY5
(2/2011
Description
Material
Size mm
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt/Clay
silt/clay
0.062
57
57%
57%
Sand
very fine sand
0.125
2
2%
59%
fine sand
0.250
2
2%
61%
medium sand
0.50
1
1%
62%
coarse sand
1.00
0
0%
62%
very coarse sand
2.0
2
2%
64%
Gravel
very fine gravel
4.0
6
6%
70%
fine gravel
5.7
8
8%
78%
fine gravel
8.0
3
3%
81%
medium gravel
11.3
2
2%
83%
medium gravel
16.0
1
1%
84%
course gravel
22.3
3
3%
87%
course gravel
32.0
7
7%
94%
very coarse gravel
45
1
1%
95%
very coarse gravel
64
1
1 %
96%
Cobble
small cobble
90
3
3%
99%
medium cobble
128
1
1%
100%
large cobble
180
0
0%
100%
very large cobble
256
0
0%
100%
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
40096
0
0%
100%
TOTAL % of whole
count
100
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
D84
16
D95
45
was not calculated due to particle size.
Cumulative Percent
100%
90%
80%
Y 70%
c
60%
d
y 50%
40%
30%
7
U 20%
10%
0%
Doti o� � �o 00
1
Particle Size (mm)
-MY3- 5/2008' -MY4- 8/2009 -MYS- 2/2011
100%
90%
80%
70%
Q. 60%
N
_ 50%
U 40%
a 30%
`5 20%
c
10%
0%
Individual Class Percent
00
,o
pb`y 1yh oyh Oh ♦ 'L R h \ % ,,-? �b L -' ''L tb bA q0 `y� `g0 Lhb ebb h�1 ,otib tioa00 oogb
o• o• a
Panicle Size (run)
■MY3 -2008• MY4- 8/2009 ■MY5 - 2/2011

Appendix 4.6 Pebble Count Plots and Raw Data Tables
UT to Barnes Creek Stream Restoration /EEP Project No. 397
Unnamed Tributary to Barnes Creek
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Summa Data
Project Name: UT to Barnes Creek
D84
0.25
D95
4.68
Cross- Section: 3
Cumulative Percent
Feature: Pool
MY 5 (2/2011 )
Description
Material Size mm Total# Item %
Cum %
100% _ —r-
--
Silt/Clay
silt/clay 0.062
67
67%
67%
90%
11.
very fine sand 0.125
10
10%
77%
80%
fine sand 0.250
7
7%
84%
70%
Sand
medium sand 0.50
0
0%
84%
8
60%
coarse sand 1.00
4
4%
88%
50%
very coarse sand 2.0
2
2%
90%
40%
very fine gravel 4.0
3
3%
93%
30%
fine gravel 5.7
5
5%
98%
U
20%
fine gravel 8.0
0
0%
98%
100/0
medium gravel 11.3
1
1%
99%
0%
G ravel
medium gravel 16.0
course gravel 22.3
0
0
0%
0%
99%
99%
oti o>
°
> 10 00 00
Particle Size (nun) 1 do
course gravel 32.0
1
1%
100%
-MY3- 5/2008* bIY4-
8/2009 -MY5(2/2011)
very coarse gravel 45
0
0%
100%
very coarse gravel 64
0
0%
100%
small cobble 90
0
0%
100%
Individual Class Percent
medium cobble 128 0 0% 100%
Cobble
large cobble 180 0 0% 100%
very large cobble 256
0
0%
100%
100%
small boulder 362
0
0%
100%
90%
Boulder
small boulder 512
medium boulder 1024
0
0
0%
0%
100%
100%
c 80%
70%
large boulder 2048
0
0%
100%
°
60%
Bedrock bedrock 40096
TOTAL % of whole count
0
100
0%
100%
100%
100%
50%
U 40%
a 30%
DSO was not calculated due t0 particle size.
a
20%
10%
0%
oobLO`y5 oy5 oh 1 L 5^ ^� tib "� �ti p5 b� qo p �90 �yb �b1 � �oytx �oalb :O b
Particle Size (mm)
■MY3- 5/2008* +MY4- 8/2009 ■MY 5 (2/2011)
*Data reported based on reachwide pebble count
Summa Data
D50
D84
0.25
D95
4.68

Appendix 4.6 Pebble Count Plots and Raw Data Tables
UT to Barnes Creek Stream Restoration/EEP Project No. 397
Unnamed Tributary to Barnes Creek
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Project Name: UT to Barnes Creek
Cross - Section: 4
Feature: Riffle
D84
MY 5 (2/2011)
Description
Material
Size mm
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt/Clay
silt/clay
0.062
8
8%
8%
Sand
very fine sand
0.125
4
4%
12%
fine sand
0.250
10
10%
22%
medium sand
0.50
1
1%
23%
coarse sand
1.00
2
2%
25%
very coarse sand
2.0
5
5%
30%
Gravel
very fine gravel
4.0
5
5%
35%
fine gravel
5.7
0
0%
35%
fine gravel
8.0
5
5%
40%
medium gravel
11.3
0
0%
40%
medium gravel
16.0
8
8%
48%
course gravel
22.3
1 6
6%
54%
course gravel
32.0
12
12%
66%
very coarse gravel
45
10
10%
76%
very coarse gravel
64
6
6%
82%
Cobble
small cobble
90
2
2%
84%
medium cobble
128
3
3%
87%
large cobble
180
6
6%
93%
very large cobble
256
4
4%
97%
Boulder
small boulder
362
2
2%
99%
small boulder
512
1
1%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0%
100%
Bedrock
bedrock
40096
I
1
0%
100%
TOTAL % of whole
count
100
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
18.1
D84
90
D95
218.00
*Data
Cumulative Percent
Individual Class Percent
I vv- /o
90%
80%
70%
a 60%
N
ro 50%
U 40%
a 30%
20%
10%
0%
o�bLO1y5 OyS �5 ♦ L b 5^ �1^� �b �ti^� �L p5 ba qo `y� `qo �5b �bti q
Particle Size (nvn)
■MY3 -2008* MY4- 8/2009 ■MY5(2 /2011)
ed based on reach%vide pebble count

Appendix 4.6 Pebble Count Plots and Raw Data Tables
UT to Barnes Creek Stream Restoration/EEP Project No. 397
Unnamed Tributary to Barnes Creek
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Project Name: UT to Barnes Creek
Cross- Section: 5
Feature: Riffle
D84
MY
5 (2/2011)
Description
Material
Size mm
Total #
Item %
Cum %
Silt /Clay
silt/clay
0.062
34
34%
34%
Sand
very fine sand
0.125
0
0%
34%
fine sand
0.250
0
0%
34%
medium sand
0.50
0
0%
34%
coarse sand
1.00
3
3%
37%
very coarse sand
2.0
5
5%
42%
Gravel
very fine gravel
4.0
2
2%
44%
fine gravel
5.7
4
4%
48%
fine gravel
8.0
4
4%
52%
median gravel
11.3
3
3%
55%
medium gravel
16.0
4
4%
59%
course gravel
22.3
5
5%
64%
course gravel
32.0
6
6%
70%
very coarse gravel
45
8
8%
78%
very coarse gravel
64
9
9%
87%
Cobble
small cobble
90
3
3%
90%
medium cobble
128
5
5%
95%
large cobble
180
2
2%
97%
very large cobble
256
3
3%
100%
Boulder
small boulder
362
0
0%
100%
small boulder
512
0
0%
100%
medium boulder
1024
0
0%
100%
large boulder
2048
0
0%
100%
Bedrock
I bedrock
40096
0
0%
100%
TOTAL % of whole
count
100
100%
1 100%
Summary Data
D50
6.85
D84
57.67
D95
1 128
Cumulative Percent
.. ' ■■ ■111111 ■ ■■ 111111 ■■ ■111111 ■��:Z■�1��� ■111111
�;, ; ■■ ■111111 ■■ ■111111 ■��Illl�i��■1�' ■■ ■111111
■■ ■111111 ■�!�::�ii� ■ ■�IIIII ■ ■/' 111 ■■ ■111111
■■ ■111111-■ ■111111 ■■ ■111111 ��111111 ■■ ■111111
- ■■ ■111111 %■ ■111111■■ , ... ®■ ■111111 ■■ ■111111
■■■1105ME ■111111 x /1111■■ ■11111 ■■111111
■ ■ ■11:::'�� ....11 /■ ■111111 ■ ■ ■1 111■ ■111111
■ ■ ■11■■■111111 ■■ ■111111 111 ■■ ■111111
■■ ■111111■■ ■111111■■ ■11111 ■ ■11111 ■■ ■111111
■■ ■111111 ■■ ■111111 ■■ ■111111 ■ ■ ■1 1111 ■■ ■111111
Individual Class Percent
100%
90%
80%
70%
a 60%
h
�3 50%
40%
v 30%
c 20%
10%
0%
oobLO�yS oti5 05 ♦ �� 3 �v > >b �ti� �L a5 b� qo p `gyp "b ��ti htiti `Otib ryob4�oogb
Particle Size (nine)
■ MY3- 2008• MY4- 8/2009 ■ MY 5 (2/2011)

Appendix 4.6 Pebble Count Plots and Raw Data Tables
UT to Barnes Creek Stream Restoration/EEP Project No. 397
Unnamed Tributary to Barnes Creek
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Project Name: UT to Barnes Creek
Cross- Section: 6
Cumulative Percent
Feature: Pool
MY 5 2/2011
Description
Material Size mm Total #
Item %
Cum %
100%
- - - --
Silt/Clay
silt/clay 0.062
87
87%
87%
90%
very fine sand 0.125
0
0%
87%
%0%
—11
fine sand 0.250
0
0%
87%
IN
70%
Sand
medium sand 0.50
0
0%
87%
60%
coarse sand 1.00
2
2%
89%
50%
very coarse sand 2.0
3
3%
92%
40%
very fine gravel 4.0
5
5%
97%
e
1 30%
fine gravel 5.7
0
0%
97%
=
20%
fine gravel 8.0
1
1%
98%
10%
medium gravel 11.3
1
1 %
99%
0%
Gravel
medium gravel 16.0
course gravel 22.3
0
0
0%
0%
99%
99%
00� o�
♦ �o X00 000
Particle Size (nun)
course gravel 32.0
very coarse gravel 45
0
1
0%
1 %
99%
100%
-MY3- 5/2008*
MY4 - 8/2009 AMY 5 (2/2011)
very coarse gravel 64
0
0%
100%
small cobble 90
0
0%
100%
Cobble
medium cobble 128
large cobble 180
0
0
0%
0%
100%
100%
Individual Class Percent
very large cobble 256
0
0%
100%
100%
small boulder 362
0
0%
100%
90%
80%
Boulder
small boulder 512
medium boulder 1024
0
0
0%
0%
100%
100%
a
70%
large boulder 2048
0
0%
100%
60%
Bedrock bedrock 40096
TOTAL % of whole count
0
100
0%
100%
100%
100%
2
U
50%
40%
30%
— -
b
�0.
Summa
Data
10%
D50
D84
D95
3.2
0%
00�tio`ti5 Oy5 05 ♦ ti
A h^ ``^, do ��� �ti b5 bk q0 `y� `�O 5b �bti ��ti 10yfk �OQ�b00gb
Particle Size (nun)
D50 and D 84 was not calculated due to particle size.
■ MY3 -2008* MY4- 8/2009 ■ MY 5 (2/2011)
*Data reported based on reachivide pebble count

ro
APPENDIX 5
WETLAND DATA ASSESSMENT
1. Precipitation — Water Level Plots for Gauges*
2. Wetland Criteria Attainment
*Raw data tables have been provided electronically
UT to Barnes Monitoring Report Jordan, Jones & Goulding
Project No 397 April 2011
Year 5 of 5

Appendix 5.1 Precipitation - Water Level Plots for Gauges
UT to Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration
UT to Barnes Hydrology Monitoring
MY 2010, Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Groundwater Gauge MW 1
10
9
Growing Season
(March 19 - November 16)
5
8
0
7
-5
6
a
-10
c
5
15
°
0
52 Consecutive
4
C7
20
Days
0
3
•°'
A
-25
a`
2
-30
-35
1
ML A
-40
0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
N N N N
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N
0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N
(71 b
N N
vl NN.
n
O
n
kn n �O 00
0 0 0
Date
Off- -Site Rainfall Amount -Gauge Height
- Required Depth

Appendix 5.1 Precipitation - Water Level Plots for Gauges
UT to Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration
UT to Barnes Hydrology Monitoring
MY 2010, Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Groundwater Gauge MW2
9
0
Growing Season
(March 19 - November 16)
8
-2
0 Consecutive Days
7
-4
6
a
c
3
v
y
5 0
a
0
4 Q
,2 -g
2
N
Ca
3 �
-10
2
-12
1
-14 0
Date
�Off- -Site Rainfall Amount -Gauge Height -Required Depth

Appendix S.1 Precipitation - Water Level Plots for Gauges
UT to Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 397
UT to Barnes Hydrology Monitoring
MY 2010, Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Groundwater Gauge MW3
10
9
34 Consecutive
Growing Season
Days
(March 19 - November 16)
5
; ,'
- 8
0
7
-5
6
C
c
` -10
y
7
3
5
v
o -15
a
o
4
o
-20
.0
v
A
3
-25
2
-30
-35
1
-40
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
0 0 0 0
N N N N
!r 00 �--� v1 O� M O M
M zz N N V- N 00 N
vl O� N
O N
V1 V) r- 00 O,
Date
r
111111111DOff- -Site Rainfall Amount -Gauge Height - Required Depth

Appendix 5.1 Precipitation - Water Level Plots for Gauges
UT to Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 397
UT to Barnes Hydrology Monitoring
MY 2010, Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Groundwater Gauge MW4
9
10
27 Consecutive
Growing Season
5
Days
(March 19 - November 16)
8
0
7
-5
6
a
c
a
3
b
5
5 -15
c
C�J
4
0
-20
d
L
-25
2
-30
-35
1
0
gL
40
-s • . -.�� —•
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
0 0 0 0
N N N N
00
N ^ - N i:z N 00
Date
r.
Off- -Site Rainfall Amount -Gauge Height - Required Depth

Appendix 5.1 Precipitation - Water Level Plots for Gauges
UT to Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 397
UT to Barnes Hydrology Monitoring
MY 2010, Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Groundwater Gauge AW 1
0
9
Growing Season 5 Consecutive Days
(March 19 - November 16)
-5
8
-10
7
-15
- 6
a
-20
5 0
b
c
-25
c
4
A -30
U
3 P.
-35
2
-40
1
-45 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
M �p O M r- v1 O� N
r- N 00 N C; O N
00
Date
Off -Site Rainfall Amount -Gauge Height - Required Depth

Appendix 5.1 Precipitation - Water Level Plots for Gauges
UT to Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration /EEP Project No. 397
UT to Barnes Hydrology Monitoring
MY 2010, Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Groundwater Gauge AW2
9
20
31 Consecutive
Growing Season
(March 19 - November 16)
Days
8
10
7
0
6
C
a
y
G
3
b
5
c -10
c
C7
4
o
•�
U
fl+
M -20
3
L
a
2
-30
1
IL
-40
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
0 0 0 0
N N N N
N O 00 - M \O O
M U1 V1 �O �O 00
O O
~
Date
Off -Site Rainfall Amount -Gauge Height - Required Depth

Appendix 5.1 Precipitation - Water Level Plots for Gauges
UT to Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration/EEP Project No. 397
UT to Barnes Hydrology Monitoring
MY 2010, Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Groundwater Gauge AW3
9
10
Growing Season
(March 19 -November 16)
8
5
7
0
6
_
c -5
c
is
5 0
-10
168 Consecutive Days
e
o
4
c
'a
Z-15
G
3 a
-20
2
-25
1
-30 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
O� N O 00 vi 01 cn 10 O M r` �-- vii ON N
-- M -- N t` N o0 N Q� -- O N Z
00 O O
~
Date
Off- -Site Rainfall Amount -Gauge Height - Required Depth

Appendix 5.1 Precipitation - Water Level Plots for Gauges
UT to Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration /EEP Project No. 397
5.0
0.0
-5.0
.5 -10.0
3
-15.0
0
c7
0
a -20.0
A
-25.0
-30.0
-35.0
0
0
N
O
N
M
UT to Barnes Hydrology Monitoring
MY 2010, Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Groundwater Gauge AW4
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N QQ
vl N N N 0000 N O
n vii I'D
Date
I Off- -Site Rainfall Amount -Gauge Height Required Depth
Growing Season
(March 19 - November 16)
22 Consecutive
Days
0 0
0 0
N N
�O O
O O
0
0
N
�n
9
8
7
6
c
a
5 c
a
0
4
3
2
1
0

Appendix 5.2: Wetland Criteria Attainment
UT to Barnes Stream and Wetland Restoration /EEP Project No. 397
Monitoring Year 5 of 5
Summary of Groundwater Gauge Results for Years 1 through 5
Success Criteria Achieved /Max Consecutive Days During Growing Season
Gauge
(Percentage)
Year 1 (2006)
Year 2 (2007)^
Year 3 (2008)
Year 4 (2009)
Year 5 (2010)
Yes/ 10 Days
Yes /93 Days
Yes /75 Days
Yes /114 Days
No /5 Days
AW 1
(4 %)
(38 %)
(31 %)
(47 %)
(2 %)
Yes /13 Days
Yes /166 Days
Yes /77 Days
Yes /40 Days
Yes /31 Days
AW2
(5 %)
68%
(32 %)
(17 %)
13 %)
Yes /202 Days
Yes/ 12 Days
Yes /143 Days
Yes /243 Days
Yes /168 Days
AW3
(83 %)
(5 %)
(59 %)
100 %)
(69 %)
Yes /130 Days
Yes /37 Days
Yes /108 Days
Yes /215 Days
No /22 Days
AW4
(53 %)
15 %)
44 %)
89 %)
9 %)
Yes /89 Days
Yes /111 Days
Yes /52 Days
MW1*
> 75%
N/A
(37 %)
(46 %)
(21 %)
MW2*
<50%
N/A
Yes /77 Days
Yes /103 Days
; " "'"
(32 %)
(42 %)
2
No/ 14 Days
Yes /129 Days
Yes /34 Days
MW3*
< 50%
N/A
6%
53 %)
14 %)
Yes /138 Days
Yes /115 Days
No /27 Days
MW4*
< 30%
N/A
(57% )
(47% )
1 (11%
*Four Ecotone monitoring gauges were installed to replace the original manual gauges for the 2008
monitoring year
N/A -2007 monitoring did not commence until August 2007
^Percentages were not calculated by previous monitoring firm