The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20061483 Ver 1_Year 3 Monitoring Report_20101201UT to Pembroke Creek Wetland and Stream Restoration Monitoring Report EEP Project # 283 Monitoring Year 03 Submitted to: rb� �*— os stem U Wit PROGRAM NCDENR -EEP, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 -1652 Data Collection: 2010 Construction Completed: February 2008 Submitted: December 2010 Monitoring Firm K C ASSOCIATES OF NC Landmark Center 11, Suite 220 4601 Six Forks Road Raleigh, NC 27609 Phone: (919) 278 -2514 Fax: (919) 783 -9266 Project Contact: Adam Spiller Email: adam.spiller(&kci.com KCI Project No: 12071067C PM10 Design Firm F4EcoEngineering A digixion fThe John R. ?&Ad.— C..N.n.In: EcoEngineering, A Division of the John R. McAdams Company Inc. 2905 Meridian Parkway Durham, NC 27713 UT Pembroke KCl Associates o(North Carolina EEP Project # 283 2010- MY03 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / PROJECT ABSTRACT .................. ..............................1 2.0 METHODOLOGY ........................................................................... ..............................2 3.0 REFERENCES .................................................................................. ..............................2 Appendix A — Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables Figure 1 Vicinity Map 4 Table la Project Restoration Components 5 Table lb Project Component Summations 5 Table 2 Project Activity and Reporting History 6 Table 3 Project Contacts Table 6 Table 4 Project Attribute Table 7 Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data Figure 2 Current Condition Plan View 9 Table 5 Vegetation Condition Assessment 11 Photo Point Photos 12 Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos 16 Appendix C — Vegetation Plot Data Table 6 Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table 25 Table 7 CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata 26 Table 8 CVS Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species 27 Appendix D — Wetland Survey Data Cross - Section Plots 30 Appendix E — Hydrologic Data 30 -70 Percentile Graph 35 Precipitation and Water Level Plots 36 Table 9 Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment 55 UT Pembroke KCl Associates of Noi th Carolina EEP Pr oject # 283 2010 - MY03 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / PROJECT ABSTRACT The North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) restored, enhanced, and preserved wetlands and restored a headwater wetland valley, which is analogous to a stream in this setting, at the UT Pembroke Site in Chowan County, North Carolina The 59 -acre site is located within the USGS 8 -digit HUC 03010205 of the Pasquotank River Basin These assets and their acreage totals were revised by the EEP during the summer of 2009, with the revised totals reflected in Table 1 of this report The project goals and objectives are listed below Goal: Modify the channelized water features, based on reference conditions, with the intent to restore the site's primary wetland functions such as nutrient cycling, flood storage, and wildlife habitat Objectives: • Improve water quality in the base► by filtering nutrients through on -site wetlands • Buffer flood flows downstream by increasing infiltration and storage areas • Design a waterway through the wetland complex with appropriate cross - section, slope, and pattern as to provide nutrient filtering, flood storage, and wildlife habitat while meeting the appropriate success criteria for the wetland • Improve terrestrial and aquatic habitat diversity • Establish a contiguous buffer along the project that can serve as a migration corridor for local fauna The restored wetlands and headwater wetland valley were planted with one of three different planting zones, each with various species of bare root trees and shrubs Following the CVS -EEP protocol, sixteen vegetation monitoring plots were established during the baseline data collection immediately after the site was planted Plot number 14 was damaged during road maintenance and was reset in the same location during the second year of monitoring The third year of monitoring found a site average of 212 planted stems /acre, with nine of the sixteen vegetation monitoring plots having planted stem densities less than the three and five -year success criteria of 320 and 260 stems /acre, respectively The site's average total stem density including volunteers is 1,002 stems /acre, with five of the sixteen vegetation plots having densities less than the three and five -year success criteria The only exotic species identified at the site are parrotfeather (Myriophyllum aquaticum), which is present in areas of open standing water, honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), which is scattered throughout the site, and privet (Ligustrum sinense), which is predominantly found in the enhancement wetland Some parts of the site have large cattail (Typha latifoka) populations, which may outcompete desirable vegetation and become problematic There are also areas where the Juncus effusus is growing so vigorously that there are no planted stems in the surrounding area Future supplemental planting is planned for the UT Pembroke site The restored headwater wetland valley is stable In the parts of the site where there are large areas of standing water, the feature becomes less visually defined, but there is still active flow of water across the site A maintenance plan to increase the rate of draw down through the site has been planned and will be initiated in 2011 Fifteen groundwater monitoring wells have been established to monitor wetland hydrology Of these wells, five (4, 5, 6, 9, and 13) were installed in restored wetlands, two (2 and 3) were installed in enhanced wetlands, five (7, 8, 10, 11, and 15) were installed in the headwater wetland valley, and two (12 and 16) were installed in the preserved wetlands as reference wells A new monitoring well, Monitoring Well 17, was installed in the restored wetland in April 2009 In June 2010, four additional monitoring wells, Monitoring Wells 18, 19, 20, and 21, were installed These four wells were installed to sample the hydrologic differences between hummocks and depressions in the restored wetland Wells 18 and 20 are UT Pembroke 1 KC/ Associates of Not th Carolina EEP Pt oject # 283 2010- MY03 in depressions and Wells 19 and 21 are on hummocks. During the site's third growing season, 14 of the 17 wells in the restoration and enhancement areas met the success criterion of having saturated soil conditions occurring within 12 inches of the ground surface for a minimum continuous period of 5% (13 days) of the 263 day growing season (March 10 to November 28) during average climatic conditions. The daily rainfall data obtained from a local weather station shows that the area had average rainfall during the 2010 growing season. The wells that did not meet the success criteria - Wells 2, 3, and 4 - each had water above the jurisdictional depth for a maximum of four, five, and six days, respectively. Monitoring Wells 2 and 3 are in the enhanced wetland and Well 4 is in the restored non - riparian wetland. Summary information/data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or encroachment and statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found in the tables and figures in the report appendices. Narrative background and supporting information formerly found in these reports can be found in the Baseline Monitoring Report (formerly Mitigation Plan) and in the Mitigation Plan (formerly the Restoration Plan) documents available on the EEP's website. All raw data supporting the tables and figures in the appendices are available from EEP upon request. 2.0 METHODOLOGY The cross - sections are surveyed with a total station instrument and stationed according to the distance between survey shots. The stationing is then adjusted to match significant topography changes from the previous year's cross - sections. The Level 2 of the CVS -EEP protocol ( http : / /cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm) was used to collect vegetation data from the UT Pembroke site. 3.0 REFERENCES Lee, M. T., R. K. Peet, S. D. Roberts, and T. R. Wentworth. 2006. CVS -EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4.0 ( http : / /cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm) Weakley, A. S. 2006. Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, Georgia, and Surrounding Areas. (hqp: / /www. herbarium. unc .edu /FloraArchives/WeakleyFlora 2006- Jan.pdf) UT Pembroke 2 KG Associates ojNorth Carolina EEP Project # 283 2010- MY03 Appendix A Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables UT Pembi oke 3 KC7 Associates of Noi th Car of ma EEP Pt olect # 283 2010- AfY03 Directions to the Project Site: From Raleigh, travel on US -64 E. Stay straight on US -17 N. Take exit 224 and take a left at the top of the ramp. Then take a left onto Emperor's Landing Rd. Then take a right onto Tip Toe Rd. Then take a right onto Macedonia Rd. The site will be on your right. Wildcat kd C1, Chowan River ��la� 0 r Edenton �- �S Albemarle Sound Figure 1. Site Vicinity Map UT Pembroke Creek Chowan County, EEP Project # 283 Project Easement Boundary Ecosystem K C I PROGRAM O's (� ^- () ().? �E M i s ASSOCIATES OF NC Table la Protect Restoration Components Project Number and Name 283 - UT to Pembroke Creek L � � y w 6) a o = w o o E Segment/ y y a, � Reach ID W W6i 09 1 Q .a Q Stationing pq Comment Headwater This feature is 100 fet wide for 00 +00 to 34 +73 and Wetland - R - 4,488 if 1 1 4,488 - its entire length, encompassing 40 +00 to 58 +72 Valley 9 96 acres Riparian - R - 13 81 ac - 1 1 1381 - Wetlands Non - Ripanan - R - 4 46 ac - 1 1 446 - Wetlands Non - Ripanan - E - 5 26 ac - 2 1 263 - Wetlands Riparian Wooded - P - 8 95 ac - 5 1 1 79 - Wetlands Non - Ripanan Wooded P 25 92 ac - 5 1 5 18 - Wetlands R = Restoration E = Enhancement P = Preservation Non - Applicable UT Pembroke 5 KCI Associates of Nor th Carolina EEP Pi oject # 283 2010 - MY03 Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History Protect Number and Name. 283 - UT to Pembroke Creek Elapsed Time Since Grading Complete: 2 yr 10 months Elapsed Time Since Planting Complete: 3 yr 0 months Number of Reporting Years: 3 Activity or Report Data Collection Complete Actual Completion or erL Restoration Plan 2006 Sep 06 Final Design - 90 %'" Durham, North Carolina 27713 Mar 07 Construction Feb 08 As -Built Survey a - -e Nov 07 Bare -Root Planting Dec 07 Baseline Monitoring (Mitigation Plan) 119 Ilex Court Oct 08 Year 1 Monitoring Nov 08 Mar 09 Year 2 Monitoring Nov 09 Dec 09 Year 3 Monitoring Nov 10 Dec 10 Table 3. Project Contacts Table Project Number and Name: 283 - UT Pembroke Design Firm EcoEngineenng, A Division of the John R McAdams Company Inc 2905 Meridian Parkway Durham, North Carolina 27713 Contact Mr James M Halley, P E Phone (919) 287 -4262 Fax 919 361 -2269 Construction Contractor Backwater Environmental PO Box 1654 119 Ilex Court Pittsboro, North Carolina 27312 Contact Mr Adam McIntyre Phone 919 482 -8491 Planting Contractor Carolina Silvics, Inc 908 Indian Trail Road Edenton, North Carolina 27932 Phone 252 482 -8491 Monitoring Performers Mitigation Plan and MY -01 EcoEngineenng, A Division of the John R McAdams Company Inc 2905 Meridian Parkway Durham, North Carolina 27713 Contact Mr James M Halley, P E Phone (919) 287 -4262 Fax 919) 361 -2269 MY -02, 03 KCI Associates of NC Landmark Center II, Suite 220 4601 Six Forks Rd Raleigh, NC 27609 Contact Mr Adam Spiller Phone (919) 278 -2514 Fax (919) 783 -9266 UT Pembroke 6 KC/ Associates o/ Not th Carolina EEP Ptoject # 283 2010- A4Y03 Table 4. Project Attribute Table Project Number and Name: 283 - UT Pembroke Project County Chowan County Drainage Area 0 4 nut Drainage Impervious Cover Estimate (% <5% Physiographic Region Outer Coastal Plain Easement Acreage 59 4 ac Planted Acreage 32 6 ac Total Vegetated Acreage 59 4 ac Ecore ion Chesapeake-Pamlico Lowlands and Tidal Marshes Plant Communities Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp, Nonnvenne Wet Hardwood Forest, and Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest Dominant Soil Types Cape Fear, Conetoe, Dragston, Portsmouth, Roanoke, and Tomotle Reference Site ID Reference Sites 1, 2, 3, and 4 USGS HUC for Project and References 03010205 Any portion of the project segment 303d hsted9 No Any portion of the project segment upstream of a 303d listed segment? No Reasons for 303d Listing or Stressor N/A % of Project Fenced 0% UT Pembroke 7 KC/ Associates of Noi th Carolina EEP Pioject # 283 2010- MY03 Appendix B Visual Assessment Data UT Pembr oke $ KCI Associates of Nor th Carolina EEP Pr glec t # 283 2010- MY03 • avow Mai X111 M1, SWIMNION2 202 •_: _ Z yj ' c9z#ioarO8d • . • >133�10 • _ _ NSERVAt10N - EASEMENT _. BOUNDARY _ 4 •.� i - } ' Wa R { F h J JiP.� 0 ZOM ,v5 00S -i ^d_ # WO CD a �. CONSERVATION FcSEMENT BOUNDARY' O . O� }4 LUO IL CL z = OJ CL � � Z 1 F q.� ks ■ O • - ` l WO t U)Z " - , ��, ` v W � •� ' �O uj OJ�OP J N OJ LU . 20 s z � ,' O to , o • . ` + gyp`' a ►_ it ° H LU v JP Hp � a O ; y p OZ o W z W ` 1 -" ° - -- 11'LL ui • ____•• -__ --- -_ - ry { ♦T CL .., / loop Won ul • CD LU > Z z z • _ LU —0 00 LU L) • • . • . . • , •. •■ . • • • • •, • 0 Table 5. Vegetation Condition Assessment Project Number and Name: 283 - UT to Pembroke Creek Wetland and Stream Planted Acreage 326 Easement Acreage 59.4 Number of Combined Vegetation Category Definitions Mapping Threshold CCPV Depiction Polygons Acreage % of Planted Acreage Very limited cover of both woody I Bare Areas 0 1 acres Pattern and Color 0 000 00% and herbaceous material Woody stem densities clearly below Not Depicted, 2 Low Stem Density target levels based on MY3, 4, or 5 0 1 acres Covers Most of 2 2736 83 9% Areas stem count criteria Restoration Area s Total 2 �3'6 „= 83(9% Areas with woody stems of a size 3 Areas of Poor class that are obviously small given 0 25 acres Pattern and Color 0 000 00% Growth Rates or Vigor the monitoring year y r Cumu 83 9 o 4 Invasive Areas of Areas or points (if too small to 1000 SF Pattern and Color 0 000 00% Concern render as polygons at map scale) Al 11 ? 5 Easement Areas or points (if too small to none Pattern and Color I 0 000 00% Encroachment Areas render as polygons at map scale) UT Pembroke j j KCI Associates of North Carolina EEP Project # 283 2010 - MY03 Photo Point Photos Photo Point 1 — 12/2/09 - MY 02 — Facing northwest toward Wildcat Road. Photo Point 2 — 12/2/09 - MY 02 — Facing west toward Macedonia Road. Photo Point 3 — 12/2/09 - MY 02 — Facing south toward the downstream end of the project. UT Pembroke EEP Project # 183 Photo Point 1 — 12/8/10 - MY 03 — Facing northwest toward Wildcat Road. Photo Point 2 — 12/8/10 - MY 03 — Facing west toward Macedonia Road. Photo Point 3 — 12/8/10 - MY 03 — Facing south toward the downstream end of the project. 12 KCI Associates of North Carolina 1010 - MY03 Photo Point 4 — 12/2/09 - MY 02 — Road Crossing Type A — Station 17 +75 — Facing west toward Macedonia Road. Photo Point 5 — 12/2/09 - MY 02 — Road Crossing Type A — Station 50 +75 — Facing west toward Macedonia Road. Photo Point 6 — 12/2/09 - MY 02 — Facing northwest toward Macedonia Road. Photo Point 4 — 12/8/10 - MY 03 — Road Crossing Type A — Station 17 +75 — Facing west toward Macedonia Road. Photo Point 5 — 12/8/10 - MY 03 — Road Crossing Type A — Station 50 +75 — Facing west toward Macedonia Road. Photo Point 6 -- 12/8/10 - MY 03 — Facing northwest toward Macedonia Road. UT Pembroke 13 KCI Associates oJ'North Carolina EEP Project # 283 2010 - MY03 Photo Point 7 - 12/2/09 - MY 02 - Facing south. Photo Point 8 - 12/2/09 - MY 02 - Road Crossing Type B - Station 30 +50 Photo Point 9 - 12/2/09 - MY 02 - Road Crossing Type C - Station 32 +50 Photo Point 7 - 12/8/10 - MY 03 - Facing south. Photo Point 8 - 12/8/10 - MY 03 - Road Crossing Type B - Station 30 +50 Photo Point 9 - 12/8/10 - MY 03 - Road Crossing Type C - Station 32 +50 UT Pembroke 14 KCl Associates of North Carolina EEP Project # 283 2010- MY03 Photo Point 10 - 12/2/09 - MY 02 - Grade transition, facing downstream. Photo Point 11 - 12/2/09 - MY 02 - Grade transition, facing upstream Photo Point 10 - 12/8/10 - MY 03 - Grade transition, facing downstream. Photo Point 11 - 12/8/10 - MY 03 - Grade transition, facing upstream. UT Pembroke 15 KC1 Associates of North Carolina EEP Project # 283 2010- MY03 Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos Plot 1 — 10/26/10 - MY 03 - Facing Macedonia Road on the northwestern portion of the site Plot 2 — 10/26/10 - MY 03 - Facing Macedonia Road on the northwestern portion of the site UT Pembroke 16 KCI Associates oj'North Carolina EEP Prgject # 283 2010- MY03 Plot 3 — 10/27/10 - MY 03 - Facing intersection of Macedonia Road and Wildcat Road Plot 4 — 10/27/10 - MY 03 - Facing Macedonia Road and Wildcat Road on the northeastern portion of the site UT Pembroke 17 KCI Associates ol*North Carolina EEP Project # 283 2010 - MY03 Plot 5 — 10/27/10 - MY 03 - Facing Macedonia Road on western portion of the site Plot 6 — 10/27/10 - MY 03 - Facing Macedonia Road on the central portion of the site UT Pembroke 18 KC1 Associates of North Carolina EEP Project # 283 2010- MY03 Plot 7 — 10/26/10 - MY 03 - Facing intersection of Macedonia Road on the western portion of the site Plot 8 — 10/26/10 - MY 03 - Facing Macedonia Road on central portion of the site just north of the main road UT Pembroke 19 KCI Associates of North Carolina EEP Project # 283 2010 - kfY03 IF Plot 8 — 10/26/10 - MY 03 - Facing Macedonia Road on central portion of the site just north of the main road UT Pembroke 19 KCI Associates of North Carolina EEP Project # 283 2010 - kfY03 sil}ri l� I ��V�I� '•{� V,J`liilj,�`'tl 'd � � �� I i}T 1 „`r 7�`�BI�A�I� I��t �, PI i.7. � :, �+'• .,b) � �t��rff C./ ��j��111 � �i+�Fll� �J�ll�� a�F�i�A .� , r� �� J� r-Ilr r� r � a '4'l �)� ��+ �nw 4.� �it� rtio •,� mpg Am ,,•r ,f' fit dill 011 t ri iN, !fir f JJ ip • af. 'pia. S >il7V 't �' u, ;J, ,..j loan • •V - t 1 r Plot 11 — 10/26/10 - MY 03 - Facing Macedonia Road just south of Plot 9 near the pond Plot 12 — 10/26/10 - MY 03 - Facing Macedonia Road just south of the pond UT Pembroke 21 KCI Associates of North Carolina EEP Project # 283 2010 - MY03 .. .:'i{ i �� / i \ F - -� , .,� �. �' .:.. �s ,, ., � ��i.,:'. ��: � '. � �� ;� Plot 15 — 10/26/10 - MY 03 - Facing east on the southeastern portion of the site Plot 16 — 10/26/10 - MY 03 - Facing Macedonia Road on the southwestern portion of the site UT Pembroke 23 KCl Associates of North Carolina EEP Project # 283 2010 - MY03 Appendix C Vegetation Plot Data UT Pembroke 24 KCI Associates of Noi th Carolina EEP Pi oject # 283 2010- MY03 Table 6. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table Protect Number and Name: 283 - UT Pembroke Vegetation Plot ID Monitoring Year 03 Planted Stem Density (stems /acre) Vegetation Survival Threshold Met? 1 202 No 2 0 No 3 405 Yes 4 405 Yes 5 445 Yes 6 0 No 7 405 Yes 8 405 Yes 9 0 No 10 324 Yes 11 162 No 12 0 No 13 0 No 14 81 No 15 405 Yes 16 162 No UT Pembi oke 25 KC/ Assoc sates of Nos th Carohna EEP Pioject # 283 2010 - MY03 Table 7. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata Project Number and Name: 283 - Ur Pembroke Report Prepared By Laura Lord Date Prepared 12/22/2010 14 55 database name KCI- 2010 -A mdb database location M \2007 \12071067 2007 EEP OPEN END \Ve database computer name 12- 216A -CF18 file size 150597888 DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEM IN THIS DOCUMENT Metadata Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a surnmary ofproject(s) and project data Proj, planted Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year This excludes live stakes Prol, total stems Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year This includes live stakes, all planted stems, and all natural/volunteer stems Plots List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead stems, rrussmg, etc ) Vigor Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots Vigor by Spp Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species Damage List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of total stems impacted by each Damage by Spp Damage values tallied by type for each species Damage by Plot Damage values tabled by type for each plot Planted Stems by Plot and Spp A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot, dead and mnssmg stems are excluded ALL Stems by Plot and spp A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and natural volunteers combined) for each plot, dead and mussmg stems are excluded PROJECT SUMMARY Project Code 283 project Name UT Pembroke Description Stream and wetland restoration site in Chowan County, NC River Basin Roanoke length(ft) 4,488 stream-to-edge width ft 50 areas m 41,691 Required Plots calculate 11 Sam IedPlots 16 UT Pembroke 26 KCI Associates of Noi th Carolina EEP Pr oject t# 283 2010- MY03 Table 8. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species Project Number and Name: 283 - UI' Pembroke Current Plot Data MV3 2010 Scientific Name Common Name Species Type E283 -01 -0001 E283 -01 -0002 E283 -01 -0003 E283 -01 -0004 E283 -01 -0005 E283 -01 -0006 E283 -01 -0007 E283 -01 -0008 E283 -01 -0009 E283 -01 -0010 P -LS P -all T P -IS P -all T P -LS P -all T P -LS P -all T P -IS P -all T P -LS P -all T PAS P -all T P -IS P -all T PAS P -all T P -LS P -all T cer rubrum red maple Tree 18 Baccharis baccharis Shrub Tree Ca rya hickory Tree 1 Dios yros virginiana common persimmon Tree Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash Tree Itea vir inica Virginia sweets ire Shrub u lans ni ra black walnut Tree 2 Li ustrum sinense Chinese privet Shrub Tree Li uidambar styraciflua sweet um Tree 36 18 4 I 2 Liriodendron tuli i era tuli tree Tree 1 1 3 3 7 7 3 3 4 4 Morella ceri era wax myrtle Shrub Tree 4 8 I 1 3 3 N ssa bi ora swamp tupelo Tree I 1 7 7 3 3 Persea palustris swamp bay Tre e Pinus taeda loblolly pine Tree Platanus occidentalis Americansycamore Tree 1 3 3 Po ulus deltoides eastern cottonwood Tree Prunus serotina black cherry Shrub Tree yrus calleryana Callery pear Tree ercus oak Shrub Tree 1 ercus alba white oak Tree I 1 ercus alcata southern red oak Tree Quercus laurifolia laurel oak Tree I 1 1 1 ercus l rata overcup oak Tree ercus michauxii swanip chestnut oak Tree I I I 1 2 2 ercus ni ra water oak Tree 1 I 1 I 2 2 1 1 1 1 ercus hellos willow oak Tre e I I 2 35 Rhus sumac 4 2 Rhus co allinum flameleaf sumac Shrub Tree Salix ni ra black willow Tree Salix sericea silky willow Shrub Tree Sambucus canadensis Common Elderberry Shrub Tree 3 3 3 3 Sambucus ni ra Euro can black elderberry Shrub Tree Taxodium distichum bald cypress Tree Ulmus americana American elm Tree 3 3 1 I 2 2 Stem coun size (ares) size (ACRES) Species coun Stems r ACR 0 4 41 0 0 3 0 10 57 0 10 16 0 11 13 0 0 0 0 10 II 0 10 II 0 0 2 0 8 46 I 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.)2 0.02 0.02 0 4 6 0 0 1 0 5 9 0 3 5 0 5 6 0 0 0 0 4 5 0 4 5 0 0 I 0 3 6 0 161.9 1659 0 0 121.4 0 404.7 2307 0 404.7 647.5 0 445.2 526.1 0 0 0 0 404.7 445.2 0 404.7 445.2 0 0 80.94 0 323.7 1862 UT Pembroke 27 KC1 Associa /es ofN 2010 Carolina EEP Projec•! # 283 MY03 Table 8. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species continued Project Number and Name: 283 - Ur Pembroke Current Plot Data (MY3 2010) Annual Means Scientific Name Common Name Species T E283 -01 -0011 E283 -01 -0012 E283 -01 -0013 E283 -01 -0014 E283 -01 -0015 E283 -01 -0016 MY3 (2010) MY2 (2009) MYl (2008) MYO (2008) P -LS P -all T P -LS P -all T P -LS P -all T P -LS P -all T P -LS P -all T P -LS P -all T P -LS P -all T P -IS P -all T P -LS P -all 7 P -LS P -all T Acer rubrum red maple Tree 18 31 Baccharis baccharis Shrub Tree 8 1 9 6 Ca rya hickory Tree I Diospyros vir iniana common persimmon Tree 5 Fraxinus enns lvanica green ash Tree 1 1 /tea vir inica Virginia sweets ire Shrub 5 5 Jut laps ni ra black walnut Tree 2 3 Li ustrum sinense Chinese privet Shrub Tree 1 Li uidambarst raci ua sweet um Tree 9 73 5 148 178 Liriodendron tuli i era tuli tree Tree 1 1 19 19 21 24 16 16 36 36 Morella ceri era wax nTyrtle Shrub Tree 1 I 9 13 9 11 11 11 17 17 Nyssa bi ora swamp tupelo Tree 11 1 1 14 14 16 16 34 34 Persea palustris swamp bay Tree 1 1 1 I 1 1 3 3 7 7 Pinus taeda loblolly pine Tree 2 Platanus occidentalis Americansycamore Tree 3 2 18 1 30 1 6 Po ulus deltoides eastern cottonwood Tree 1 Prunus serotina black cherry Shrub Tree 3 P rus calleryana Callery pear Tree 1 ercus oak Shrub Tree 1 2 Ottercus alba white oak Tree 3 4 4 5 4 4 2 2 4 4 Quercus falcata southern red oak Tree I I uercus lauri olia laurel oak Tree 2 2 2 2 6 6 34 34 tercus l rata overcu oak Tree 2 3 2 2 4 5 4 4 3 3 6 6 Ottercus michauxii swa chestnut oak Tree 4 4 8 8 I 0 10 13 13 19 19 ercusni ra water oak Tree I I I 1 8 8 10 10 8 8 23 23 Quercus phellos willow oak Tree 45 3 5 1 91 I I Rhus sumac 6 Rhus co allinum flameleaf sumac Shrub Tree 12 Salix ni ra black willow Tree 63 Salix sericea silky willow Shrub Tree 56 Sambucus canadensis Common Elderberry Shrub Tree 6 6 6 6 Sambucus ni ra European black elderberry Shrub Tree 7 7 9 9 Taxodium distichum bald cypress Tree 1 Ulmus americana American elm Tree 2 2 2 ? 10 10 11 11 15 15 31 31 Stem count size (ares) size (ACRES) Species count Stems r ACR 0 4 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 18 0 1 0 100 0 4 28 0 84 396 0 95 1 468 0 100 100 0 225 225 1 1 I I I 1 16 16 16 16 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 4 9 0 3 6 0 13 21 0 14 28 0 11 11 0 l2 12 0 161.9 2023 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 80.94 728.4 0 404.7 4047 0 1 61.9 1 133 0 212.5 1002 0 1240.31 1 184 i 0 1252.9 1252.9, 0 569.11 569.1 UT Pembroke 28 KCI Associates of North Carolina EEP Project # 283 2010 - MY03 Appendix D Wetland Survey Data 29 22 P41 w 20 0 ,w as W 19 18 17 Cross - Section 1 UT Pembroke EEP Project Number 283- MY03 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Station (ft) MY -00 — MY -01, 10/ 11/08 • MY-02,10/21/09 —MY-03, 10/27/ 10 E e� W Oil 19 17 15 Cross - Section 2 UT Pembroke EEP Project Number 283- MY03 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 Station (ft) �– MY-00 - MY-01, 10/11/08 MY-02, 10/21 /09 —MY-03,10/27/10 20 18 w 16 C 0 a� W 14 12 10 Cross - Section 3 UT Pembroke EEP Project Number 283- MY03 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Station (ft) MY-00 -- MY -01, 10/ 11/08 MY-02,10/21/09 —MY-03, 10/27/ 10 20 18 w 10 0 W 14 12 Cross - Section 4 UT Pembroke EEP Project Number 283- MY03 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 Station (ft) �- MY -00 —MY-01, 10/ 11 /08 - MY-02,10/21/09 -+- MY -03, 10/27/ 10 UT Pembroke 30 -70 Percentile Graph 2009 -2010 Edenton, NC Monthly Rainfall 12 M 8 0 �? 6 c 4 2 O, O, O, O O O O, O, O, a�i n ro a o ai ro ro a ro c 7 on a ; > Z° Q Date 0 2009 Rainfall O 2010 Rainfall * 30% Less Than 30% Greater Than Appendix E Hydrologic Data 34 I d v a S c 0 0 5 Q w A O 1/1/2010 1/16/2010 1/31/2010 2/15/2010 3/2/2010 3/17/2010 4/1/2010 4/16/2010 5/1/2010 5/16/2010 5/31/2010 C 6/15/2010 m A 6/30/2010 7/15/2010 7/30/2010 8/14/2010 8/29/2010 9/13/2010 9/28/2010 10/13/2010 10/28/2010 11/12/2010 11/27/2010 Groundwater Depth (in) W W N tJ cn C �� ✓� O v O O A A U Rainfall Depth (in) G� 0 c 0 d C A7 � A •s 0 0 0 0 7Q W N N O (� o O 00 0 0 tz oa. E� 6' N 00 O r O O O A A U Rainfall Depth (in) G� 0 c 0 d C A7 � A •s 0 0 0 0 7Q W N A 0 a s a 0 0 9 s n 'o a w c m 1/1/2010 1/16/2010 1/31/2010 2/15/2010 3/2/2010 3/17/2010 4/1/2010 4/16/2010 5/1/2010 5/16/2010 5/31/2010 6/15/2010 6/30/2010 7/15/2010 7/30/2010 8/14/2010 8/29/2010 9/13/2010 9/28/2010 10/13/2010 10/28/2010 11/12/2010 1 1 /27/2010 Groundwater Depth (in) CIS A W N O O O C O O O O C N N W W Rainfall Depth (in) A A t� R 0 ♦r a C y A� b cr O o � to o OQ W W w dy ' o o� E oso D a N 00 in O lvii O `J O C N N W W Rainfall Depth (in) A A t� R 0 ♦r a C y A� b cr O o � to o OQ W W H ; c n -l0 A L u 3 -15 C 7 -20 -25 -30 -35 UT Pembroke MY03 Ground Water Monitoring Well #4 �.. I r 1■ . ■. -I r 1 Y I 1 1 1 L. I I I I a 1 a � I I'll l 1■ 1 it 10 I 1 IL NMI T 11 1 r I O O C C C O O O C N N N N N N N N N _O O C N N C O O N N N C N C O C N N N O O N N G O O N N N ZB = .- h O h O 7 C+ M 00 r`+1 0\0 N r � M Z � -- �, \ � \ M �--� M � M �--� N �+ N \ N z N •� ,-- N M V1 V) �C n r o0 00 O+ O� O O Date Rainfall Ground Surface +Depth - Jurisdictional Depth 5 4.5 4 3.5 3 s ri u 2.5 G C cr C 2 N 1.5 1 0.5 0 w 9' w 0 v Ig a s 0 a T 8I a c 1/1/2010 1/16/2010 1/31/2010 2/15/2010 3/2/2010 3/17/2010 4/1/2010 4/16/2010 5/1/2010 5/16/2010 5/31/2010 6/15/2010 6/30/2010 7/15/2010 7/30/2010 8/14/2010 8/29/2010 9/13/2010 9/28/2010 10/13/2010 10/28/2010 11/12/2010 11/27/2010 Groundwater Depth (in) O c.n O O Rainfall Depth (in) R O 0 R. C y po b =� 3 0 o � � o W fD W oy A d W ' N O _O O O 00 I. w y O o. ono � c A a N � O 00 UO iZ3 co O n ^- O O 7 O Rainfall Depth (in) R O 0 R. C y po b =� 3 0 o � � o W fD 0 -5 s 10 C L U 3 -15 c 0 -20 -25 -30 -35 -40 0 0 N UT Pembroke MY03 Ground Water Monitoring Well #6 Begin Growing Season 3/10/2010 i End Growing Season 11/28/2010 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N 0 0 N N IA 0 N 0 0 N N Days 070 00 Date Rainfall ---s— Depth Jurisdictional Depth Ground Surface Gauge Malfunction 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N 0 0 N N 0 0 0 N N N 0 N 0 0 N N 070 00 Date Rainfall ---s— Depth Jurisdictional Depth Ground Surface 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .M-i 00 rn 00 N t— N N N 5 4.5 4 3.5 3 E s CL 2.5 C c 2 1.5 0.5 0 A d T v b 6 v 0 S n 0 6 y C d n w L rJ rJ 1/1/2010 1/16/2010 1/31/2010 2/15/2010 3/2/2010 3/17/2010 4/1/2010 4/16/2010 5/1/2010 5/16/2010 5/31/2010 C7 6/15/2010 6/30/2010 7/15/2010 7/30/2010 8/14/2010 8/29/2010 9/13/2010 9/28/2010 10/13/2010 10/28/2010 11/12/2010 11/27/2010 Groundwater Depth (in) V o O O C/1 fJ N W W Rainfall Depth (in) n 0 A� b 0 A 1"r 0 7 O 7Q W v w w C, N O 00 E m D i ' i i a N � 00 w o� -- o on O O C/1 fJ N W W Rainfall Depth (in) n 0 A� b 0 A 1"r 0 7 O 7Q W v S E °- -5 r a :J L -10 u 'a -15 L -20 -25 -30 UT Pembroke MY03 Ground Water Monitoring Well #8 -35 1 r loop In on E., I Ilk, I I I L.. 1 101 1 1 A U ' INIM .11 ■ 11 I IL 1 1 1,01 1 0 ID 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C. 0 N (� - V 1 O � O R M 00 M 00 N r M 7 M -- M Date a>_ Rainfall + Depth Jurisdictional Depth Ground Surface 5 4.5 4 3.5 3 L a u 2.5 = ca 2 N 1.5 0.5 0 9 c 0 m 0 9 S 6 y C A O 1/1/2010 1/16/2010 1/31/2010 2/15/2010 3/2/2010 3/17/2010 4/1/2010 4/16/2010 5/1/2010 5/16/2010 5/31/2010 6/15/2010 6/30/2010 7/15/2010 7/30/2010 8/14/2010 8/29/2010 9/13/2010 9/28/2010 10/13/2010 10/28/2010 11/12/2010 11/27/2010 Groundwater Depth (in) w r"i rj O O O N N W W cn to cn in Rainfall Depth (in) A A s G� 0 C 0 s3. C A� b -s 0 0 o � W �o i � I o �. N � O (� 00 E 7 UQ C CD 0 0 IM. 0 F 00 G7 5' 00 0 0 N 00 O O N N W W cn to cn in Rainfall Depth (in) A A s G� 0 C 0 s3. C A� b -s 0 0 o � W �o w m v m c eo v S n 'o c c d O 1/1/2010 1/16/2010 1/31/2010 2/15/2010 3/2/2010 3/17/2010 4/l/2010 4/16/2010 5/1/2010 5/16/2010 5/31/2010 6/15/2010 6/30/2010 7/15/2010 7/30/2010 8/14/2010 8/29/2010 9/13/2010 9/28/2010 10/13/2010 10/28/2010 11/12/2010 11/27/2010 Ground�ratcr Depth (in) W W N N :JI 11 !..Ji Vl Rainfall Depth (in) A A to N 4` 0 c 0 aC � b O p o � o w 0 w � oQ N O 00 QQ !a I i a G1 0 F 7 N � 00 cn CD O ti cD =03 O O :JI 11 !..Ji Vl Rainfall Depth (in) A A to N 4` 0 c 0 aC � b O p o � o w 0 10 5 0 c -5 r a A -10 3 0 -15 V -20 -25 -30 -35 0 0 0 0 N N UT Pembroke MY03 Ground Water Monitoring Well #11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N 0 0 N N 0 0 0 N N N 0 N 0 0 0 N N N 0 N 0 N 0 0 0 N N N M M M r\1 OO, M N 00 N rn 00 N t-- N N N W—) ^ N r) ) [� z V) Vl 1D 1O t- t— 00 00 (31 OS O O \ ^ Date Rainfall + Depth - Jurisdictional Depth Ground Surface 5 4.5 4 �5 3 L a u 2.5 C 1.5 0.5 0 c 5 0 5 a c -10 a� O L 6i• R -15 3 C 7 -20 -25 -30 -35 -40 0 0 N UT Pembroke MY03 Ground Water 'Monitoring Reference Well #12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N 0 0 N N 0 0 0 N N N 0 N 0 0 N N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 0 0 ^ N N N � M � 7 � Vl � r\1 •� M ^ M � N \ N � N N = Date Rainfall + Depth - Jurisdictional Depth Ground Surface 5 4.5 4 3.5 3 L a 2.5 c sa .0 N 1.5 0.5 0 0 v T a 0 v n F 6 N C O 1/1/2010 1/16/2010 1/31/2010 2/15/2010 3/2/2010 3/17/2010 4/1/2010 4/16/2010 5/1/2010 5/16/2010 5/31/2010 6/15/2010 d fD 6/30/2010 7/15/2010 7/30/2010 8/14/2010 8/29/2010 9/13/2010 9/28/2010 10/13/2010 10/28/2010 11/12/2010 11/27/2010 Groundwater Depth (in) Rainfall Depth (in) U1 C'a Z 0 c 0 a c A� r0 a � o c� o• � ao 0 �w 4� w i i i I wC CD o a?. N 7 O p F 5' 00 � 0 0 d y w N rfj a 0 N � OO C/7 N N O y r p Rainfall Depth (in) U1 C'a Z 0 c 0 a c A� r0 a � o c� o• � ao 0 �w 4� w 10 5 0 °. -5 s a a� C -10 a, td 3 b -15 0 L U -20 -25 -30 UT Pembroke MY03 Ground Water Monitoring Well #15 1■ ■ 1 1■ - I I I ■. 1 1■ 1 1 1 L• I 1 I I �F 1 1 1 I 1 11 ' 1� 1 Y I � '1 ■ 1 1 IL 1 - I 1 1 1 1 1 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N O O O O N N N N O O N N O O O N N N O N O O O N N N O O N N O N O O N N M ^ v. T M 00 M 00 N r- ^ M eY V1 ^ M ^ M N N N \ N -- ^� N M [f' v� vi �p �p r- n 00 00 O, O O Date Rainfall --4-- Depth - Jurisdictional Depth Ground Surface 5 4.5 4 3.5 3 .5 s a 6r 2.5 c I 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 1/1/2010 1/16/2010 1/31/2010 2/15/2010 3/2/2010 3/17/2010 4/1/2010 I4/16/2010 d w cy cp ° 5- N O_ C) O p F 00 w 0 ° 5/1/2010 } 5/16/2010 5/31/2010 O 6/15/2010 C � a 0 6/30/2010 ° a s 7/15/2010 7/30/2010 6 8/14/2010 8/29/2010 9/13/2010 9/28/2010 10/13/2010 10/28/2010 11/12/2010 11/27/2010 Groundwater Depth (in) Rainfall Depth (in) A A n R 0 C a C o � �• 3 QQ � A W 0 A A cfl H� w cy cp ° 5- N O_ C) O p F 00 w 0 ° I I � to ° a F N W 00 pis O in O 7 Rainfall Depth (in) A A n R 0 C a C o � �• 3 QQ � A W 0 A A cfl H� I w v i; m n 0 6 C n A O 1/1/2010 1/16/2010 1/31/2010 2/15/2010 3/2/2010 3/17/2010 4/1/2010 4/16/2010 5/1/2010 5/16/2010 5/31/2010 G 6/15/2010 6/30/2010 7/15/2010 7/30/2010 8/14/2010 8/29/2010 9/13/2010 9/28/2010 10/13/2010 10/28/2010 11/12/2010 11/27/2010 Groundwater Depth (in) w w N N cn O to O to O cn O <n O Rainfall Depth (in) A A c.n to W, 0 C 0 G. C C H � A "S r� o c 0 v�o 0 w eo J w ay N 5 O 00 5, 00 Fm r F1- w A O 0 a r 0 Q - N � 00 NVJ O m O D Rainfall Depth (in) A A c.n to W, 0 C 0 G. C C H � A "S r� o c 0 v�o 0 w eo J I w m T 0 T a s v 9 S n 0 a y n w 1/1/2010 1/16/2010 1/31/2010 2/15/2010 3/2/2010 3/17/2010 4/1/2010 4/16/2010 5/1/2010 5/16/2010 5/31/2010 6/15/2010 d 6/30/2010 7/15/2010 7/30/2010 8/14/2010 8/29/2010 9/13/2010 9/28/2010 10/13/2010 10/28/2010 11/12/2010 11/27/2010 Groundwater Depth (in) w r� iv in is � in Rainfall Depth (in) n 0 C d C A7 a � o o. w 4t ae i w� n o v3. � N O O o� 00 w � O 00 N O .J a rn N _O O r� I 4rII Q. w Iz y 1y C lV 00 00 O ^� O O O in is � in Rainfall Depth (in) n 0 C d C A7 a � o o. w 4t ae I z 0 a 0 w O v T n 'o c d A 1/1/2010 1/16/2010 1/31/2010 2/15/2010 3/2/2010 3/17/2010 4/1/2010 4/16/2010 5/1/2010 5/16/2010 5/31/2010 6/15/2010 d 6/30/2010 7/15/2010 7/30/2010 8/14/2010 8/29/2010 9/13/2010 9/28/2010 10/13/2010 10/28/2010 11/12/2010 I 1 /27/2010 Groundwater Depth (in) A W W N N O cn O v� O v, O cn O vi O O O vA to Vi Rainfall Depth (in) W A A tl� ^s 0 C 0 G. C z � � o �7 O. Fi � O W w � n N O 0 0 o� 0 Al Q a. y N OQ oG 00 O O vA to Vi Rainfall Depth (in) W A A tl� ^s 0 C 0 G. C z � � o �7 O. Fi � O W 10 5 0 S -5 6. s w a G -10 v 3 -15 6. 0 V -20 IM, -30 -35 0 0 0 0 N N UT Pembroke MY03 Ground Water Monitoring Well #20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Y1 N n - O, M 00 M 00 N t- N M c�1 R Vl h �O 10 n n 00 00 as C, Date Rainfall t Depth - Jurisdictional Depth Ground Surface 5 4.5 4 3.5 3 r a 2.5 A ca `c 1.5 0.5 0 ca 5 -5 c r a :J -15 3 b e 0 0 L U -25 -35 -45 UT Pembroke MY03 Ground Water Monitoring Well #21 Begin Growing Season End Growing Season 3/10/2010 11/28/2010 ki 25 Days Gauge Installed 6/17/1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N r 00 00 Date Rainfall + Depth Jurisdictional Depth Ground Surface 5 4.5 4 3.5 3 s a u 2.5 O w e 2 R 1.5 1 0.5 0