SW7130602_HISTORICAL FILE_20130610

�Vn
NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Qual

STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
POST -CONSTRUCTION PERMITS
PERMIT. NO.
SW 2�b�jOlpD�
DOC TYPE
❑ CURRENT PERMIT
❑ APPROVED PLANS
HISTORICAL FILE
❑ COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION
DOC DATE
Coz M& za
YYYYM M D D

Pat McCrory
NC®ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Thomas A. Reeder
John E. Skvarla, III
Governor Activity Director Secretary
June 10, 2013
Mr. Robert M. Broadway, Manager
The Broadway Group, LLC
132 Holmes Ave. NW
Huntsville, AL 35802
Subject: Request for Additional Information
Stormwater Permit No. SW7130602
New Retail Store No. 6339 - Edenton
Chowan County
Dear Mr. Broadway:
The Washington Regional Office received a Coastal Stormwater Permit Application for the New
Retail Store No. 6339 - Edenton project on June 3, 2013. A preliminary review of that
information has determined that the application is not complete. The following information is
needed to continue the stormwater review:
Since the project is located within 5 miles from the Edenton Airport, it is
necessary to inform the Airport authorities that this project will utilize a wet
detention basin as a BMP of your choice. It is not clear from the submitted
application if that was done or not. Please clarify.
A detailed BMP planting plan not provided.
It appears that the 3" orifice will drain the required volume in less than 2 days.
Please check the size of orifice calculations by using the Section 3 of the BMP
Manual (orifice equation). Also make sure to sign and seal the Calculations.
The requested information should be received in this Office prior to June 17, 2013, or the
application will be returned as incomplete. The return of a project will necessitate resubmittal of
all required items, including the application fee.
If you need additional time to submit the information, please mail, email or fax your request for
a time extension to the Division at the address and fax number at the bottom of this letter. The
request must indicate the date by which you expect to submit the required information.
The construction of any impervious surfaces, other than a construction entrance under an
approved Sedimentation Erosion Control Plan, is a violation of NCGS 143-215.1 and is subject
to enforcement action pursuant to NCGS 143-215.6A.
Please reference the State assigned project number on all correspondence. If you have any
questions concerning this matter please feel free to call me at [phone] or email me at
[e-mail].
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Internet: www.ncwalerqualitv.ore
943 Washington Square Mall Phone: [phone]
Washington, NC 27889 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled110°/ Post Consumer Paper
NorthCarolina
Natural&

Page 2 of 2
Sincerely,
Samir Dumpor
Environmental Engineer
CC: Jerry Cargile, P.E. 4 Site Incorporated (7500 South Memorial Parkway, Suite
209, Huntsville, AL 35802)
V Washington Regional Office

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF FUTURE EASEMENT AGREEMENT
I, W. Trent Ragland, III, as agent for Anna W. Ragland Family Trust,
hereby acknowledge that The Broadway Group, LLC has requested an
easement over a portion of our property to tie in to the storm water
system. This easement has been requested by The Broadway Group,
LLC on order to purchase a portion of our property known as 1317
North Broad Street, and also identified by the Chowan County GIS as
parcel ID 781509053218.
/ � J
W. Trent Ragland, III
State of North Carolina
County of A1'4
;Subscr' ed and sworn to before me this%3 day of �� 2013.
Notary Public SANDRA E HOW
NOTARY PUBLIC
My commission expires: � , /��/3 NOTARY
Coun
iY. North Carolina
MY Commission Expires July 21, 2013

Dumpor, Samir
From:
Matthew Gillespie <[e-mail]>
Sent:
Thursday, June 13, 2013 4:57 PM
To:
Dumpor, Samir
Cc:
'Melissa Ballard'
Subject:
Edenton, NC New Retail Store No. 6339
Attachments:
D00058.pdf
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
Samir,
Please see the attached PDF's for the revised calculations per your letter dated 6/10/13.
Please let me know if you need anything else.
Thanks,
Matthew Gillespie, El
Senior Project Manager
® ®INCORPORATED
7500 Memorial Parkway SW, Suite 209
Huntsville Alabama 35802
Office: 256.539.12211 Fax: [phone]
Cell: 256-682-8651
wwwAsiteinc.biz

9t07::,! ,7IIGjPfitJiT
cc--.:nxuvun:c_or�vavamm�a:ze�:.r��s�-az^.�:.sx: rr�'ry :n��_s.� ax :^na�.r�:.x.'a.c�-:cs: ra;.+x.=•a:=�xyar._-..' : enrn�evs�x-_3c�.v—....xms:_:.,
«id �ni�Ji2P�;aigtellE�rrr 9,gz�!lir� bJ9f1,J6\�
irnt? , _1gmu0
",.,dird r, •?. l&,M
C,U(3 r)N 91oil. I,e19A %-W DO rtufnea3
ibq.R2OD0(3
qu violin,
b31 ,Ili 11
::nnlq
:+nE)2
:or
:xAn�nlri�c4JA
:ed'i qLI vrollol
•z1)J6,2 Pell
;umr.'
6 r1•,Or\d hajh0 59JYS! lu, 'Y 19Q enO,Je.I nIG:1 U9ZIv9l Or!J ial e'l(h ro i ;6Y6 �ldi 99' 926s!'a
.9ZI9 af'IfIJ'(nt, b9 ;M unq 11 worUI 8rn J9i 52E5:1
,2)Ir16,1 r
192F,06 , "19to?q 107f,92
u _a
C y
t

r
ORPORATED
(41 03 2013t5oo South Memorial Pkwy
Ste 209 • Huntsville, AL 35801
UMEW.1221 • fax [phone]
12,4 3 7 2, -776 SF
(8,558 A,-J
W.xcl: -7 = 27 Y, ZG I( 7?.67) (77)
—; 78,S 11
/
land
planning
civil
engineering
land
surveying
landscape
architecture
E el e., +-6 n •
"YOL,� I65y
JOB No.
DATE
tA` z3y,Ss3y sF
GiaSs-D° `/I zo(3.1)./
W ae dS-r,�= 9E•13
• C� ` i.7.1
w ooC/5
Q _ t y96 ' sA-40w
y O,z6i•
"ddd 5
Pac-DEv X—IvfFF is �,Y 15"6PP
/?_ oo(e SCALE A/—/S
SHEET / OF 3
E X-�
=ya loY?-
7-5Y2 �O'//{ /06Y't
Plc•••ocv; 12.PQFF,•r6 E FFkWY_47—DIT6a1 It
/o7C. 2-5 Y,1 $o Y2
26.? I 7,1(
Z9.9
RZ, DEv To µwY 17 (I_Y2� o `�• t P�yT-9eU- /a•6
1
(2
ZY4
5Y2
/o YR
25Y2
S6Y1
/m YRI
D = 57z
GvanAt" D = I z, 11 4
( IM
s= 0.557,
WuoC15
5=�0.657.
�i aSS
Z
b'P < (3.03 (i
6A
C7_--
Puna /U6ye
10 vt
D�

land
planning
g
civil
engineering
land
7500 South Memorial Pkwy surveying
Ste 209 r Huntsville, AL 35801 I landscape
phone [phone] • fax [phone] architecture
DEu"I_ p,Eu-1
9A: 3G-7,z7G 5r` BA= 5 098if
I.Z(e5 A: c/
C razS"0= 73.87
W o.A5-D> Z�S, o75 (7Z. z71
DZv-2
I
i c N 77•(7
6)- = Z09' nG -0e.N
Gal � �z-ta T (u•>,e
JOB NO. 13 - ooC. SCALE
DATE 5(7�(3 SHEET
�T/a SC"i c "zid.3).
Tiy�ely: 3t1,392 �(v9.75.j
n, t "
S_ o�3rc%
CJ�/1 (-Flti-Mt
p6u-4
134= I-7, z3e 5r
(o.1, o qy
G-amass-�- SLS�
LuaAr-9 = �D
Cam = 88.7
5= 3.37•
/qC(
Z OF 3
RV 6.0s + 0,9 (7n)
09e s J
bi qV
y6re3 #3

land
planning
civil
�I engineering
��INCORPORATED land
7500 South Memorial Pkwy surveying JOB NO. 13 00& SCALE
Ste 209 • Huntsville, AL 35801 landscape DATE 5;17�/5 SHEET 3 OF 3
phone [phone] • fax [phone] architecture
w ed' �° �t C Pam, , «y rend )
AA Vdl
e�6 i
CP
1. .7
S z Say tt� Ar�0. Vol... k s�
` 133.7.. /09/ ZoIf9
/6zz 36-71 o --
�/ $ /D313 5!5
11 s zsvy zzti8 Se99 �---
/Z G 3ZG8 'Z9oy :8ao8 71'7'"�= SlSi3 -F-4
Tf.tsA
35 %5 �Zo7(8ae9) -L517 /`j 7qo --> zof = 2958 F3
5 / ; 998
I_= Ne4d CPl 4, (sr/ ' Udl 0-0 4 Val C(49
1 1/ D 2•�N 90
lz
�3 � /8r�i lkao, y`az�3
ZgO,e //82-Z1,7).
U
A'�e�af.a PPlrh.iBol j)R�''1"A
G465 G 1E5 + 1771/ "765' J.5 jI
1% + SZ65 /l r —/ bH
t [dZSX ( /.�li ���l (J 3✓1) `�, JJ7-)�% ( J

r,A
Ma ®INCORPORATED
7500 South Memorial Pkwy
Ste 209 • Huntsville, AL 35801
phone [phone] • fox 256.539.1220
land n e �
planning or i-i GtloW_-
civil
engineering NCONE(C 5{ornuc+er�MP/cnual �}�3.5,2
land
surveying J08 NO. f 3-006D SCALE
landscape DATE �9 %ti p? SHEET OF
architecture
T.-r—-i....
b1ss
-5
1 j i l,lf
Q f Z
4o 4
1 ,0
CY
52
'Z,
ci
I
I
- --
1(9 -!"I'
I�
I

For DENR Use ONLY
Reviewer:
North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources svomc: U f C'V
NCDENR Request for Express Permit Review Time:
Confirm:
FILL-IN all the information below and CHECK the Permit(s) you are requesting for express review. Call and Email the completed form to the
Environmental Permit Coordinator along with a completed DETAILED narrative, site plan (PDF file) and vicinity map (same items expected in the
application package of the project location. Please include this form in the application package.
• Asheville Region -Alison Davidson 828-296-4698; alison.davidson(ncdenr.gov
• Fayetteville or Raleigh Region -David Lee 919-791-4203; david.lee(ancdenrgov
• Mooresville & Winston Salem Region - Patrick Grogan 704-235.2107, patrick.grogan(g),ncderingov
• Washington Region -Lyn Hardison 252-948-3842, Ivn.hardison(g,ncdenr.gov
• Wilmington Region -Janet Russell 910-796.7307, janet.russell(glncdenr oov
• Wilmington Region -Cameron Weaver 910-796-7421,cameron.weaveroncdenrgov
NOTE: Project application received after 12 noon will be stamped in the following work day.
Enter Related SW
Permits of Request
SW
SW
SW
SW _
SW
Project Name: EDENTON, NC NEW RETAIL STORE NO.6339 County: CHOWAN
Applicant: ROBERT BRAADWAY Company: THE BROADWAY GROUP, LLC
Address: 132 HOLMES AVE. NW City: HUNTSVILLE, State: AL Zip: 35802 G������
Phone: [phone], Fax: _-_ Email: [e-mail] Gd�
Physical Location:LOT 2 BOSWELL CHAPPELL TRACT, NORTH SIDE OF NORTH BROAD EAST OF COKE AVE.JUN 0 3 2013
Project Drains into QUEEN ANNE CREEK waters - Water classification C. NSW (for classification see-
http://h2o,enr.state.nc.usthims/reports/reportsWB.html) Ai
Project Located in CHOWAN River Basin. Is project draining to class ORW waters? N, within Yz k6 mile and draining to class SA wate r WN e
and draining to class HQW waters? N
Engineer/Consultant: JERRY M. CARGILE Company: 4SITE INC
Address: 7500 SOUTH MEMORIAL PARKWAY, SUITE 209 City: HUNTSVILLE, State: AL Zip: 35802-_
Phone: [phone], Fax: [phone], Email: 'ca1 [e-mail]
SECTION ONE: REQUESTING A SCOPING MEETING ONLY
❑ Scoping Meeting ONLY ❑ DWO, ❑ DCM, ❑ DLR, ❑ OTHER:
SECTION TWO: CHECK ONLY THE PROGRAM (S) YOU ARE REQUESTING FOR EXPRESS PERMITTING
❑ 401 Unit ❑ Stream Origin Determination: _ # of stream calls - Please attach TOPO map marking the areas in questions
❑ Intermittent/Perennial Determination: _# of stream calls - Please attach TOPO map marking the areas in questions
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification ❑ Isolated Wetland (_linear ft or _acres)
❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization ❑ ❑ Minor Variance Major General Variance
® State Stormwater ❑ General ❑ SFR, ❑ SFR < 1 ac. ❑ Bkhd & Bt Rmp, ❑ Clear & Grub, ❑ Utility ❑ Other
❑ Low Density ❑ Low Density -Curb & Gutter _ # Curb Outlet Swales ❑ Off -site [SW _ (Provide permit #)]
® High Density -Detention Pond _ # Treatment Systems ❑ High Density -Infiltration _ #Treatment Systems
❑ High Density -Bio-Retention _ # Treatment Systems ❑ High Density -SW Wetlands _ # Treatment Systems
❑ High Density -Other _ # Treatment Systems /❑ MOD:❑ Major El Minor ❑ Plan Revision ❑ Redev. Exclusion SW (Provide permit #)
❑ Coastal Management ❑ Excavation & Fill ❑ Bridges & Culverts ❑ Structures Information
❑ Upland Development ❑ Marina Development ❑ Urban Waterfront
® Land Quality ® Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan with 21 acres to be disturbed.(CK # '7 (for DENR use))
SECTION THREE - PLEASE CHECK ALL THAT IS APPLICABLE TO YOUR PROJECT (for both scoping and express meeting request)
Wetlands on Site ❑ Yes ❑ No
Wetlands Delineation has been completed: ❑ Yes ❑ No
US ACOE Approval of Delineation completed: ❑ Yes ❑ No
Received from US ACOE ❑ Yes ❑ No
Buffer Impacts: ❑ No ❑ YES: —acre(s)
Isolated wetland on Property ❑ Yes ❑ No
404 Application in Process w/ US ACOE: ❑ Yes ❑ No Permit
For DLNR use only �,�
Fees lit for multiple permits: Check# 1_ Total Fee Amount E_`-t"00-el
SUBMITTAL DATES
Fee-
SUBMITTAL DATES
Fee
CAMA
$
Variance (❑ Maj; ❑ Min)
$
SW (® HD, ❑ LD, ❑ Gen)
$ rj r1P
401:
$
LQS
$
Stream Deter,_
$
NCDENR EXPRESS June 2011

EXPRESS
JUN 0 3 Z013
NC ®KNOWLEDGEMENT OF FUTURE EASEMENT AGREEMENT
I, W. Trent Ragland, III, as agent for Anna W. Ragland Family Trust,
hereby acknowledge that The Broadway Group, LLC has requested an
easement over a portion of our property to tie in to the storm water
system. This easement has been requested by The Broadway Group,
LLC on order to purchase a portion of our property known as 1317
North Broad Street, and also identified by the Chowan County GIS as
parcel ID 781509053218.
W. Trent Rag nd, III
State of North Carolina
County of A1,4 k,:F-r
Subscr' ed and sworn to before me this2-3 day of /*' ,/ - V 2013.
Notary Public =SANRAI � VARDUBLIMy commission expires: / / rth Carolina
s July 21, 2013

EXPRESS
JUN 03 Z02 DESIGNATION OF AUTHORIZED AGENT
NC ®ENR
I, W. Trent Ragland, III, as agent for Anna W. Ragland Family Trust,
hereby designate and appoint The Broadway Group, LLC to act on my
behalf for the purpose of submitting the Application and all related
documents to NCDENR for the purpose of obtaining a permit for
Erosion and Sediment Control and to do any and all necessary work on
this property. This permit is required for The Broadway Group, LLC to
purchase a portion of our property known as 1317 North Broad Street,
and also identified by the Chowan County GIS as parcel ID
781509053218.
7 ,M,O
State of North Carolina
County of 4V4 A-E
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 3 day of %1%,V, 2013.
SANDRA E ti MARD
NOTARY PUBLIC
otary Public Make County, North Carolina
My commission expires: a, ,, my Commission Expires July 21, 2013
�I

EXPRESS v� ATC Associates of North Carolina, PC
JUN 0 3 2013 2725 E. Millbrook Rd Suite 121 Raleigh, NC 27604
Phone:[phone] Fax:[phone]
NC®ENR www.atcassociates.com
HCI February 23, 2013
Ms. Melissa Ballard
The Broadway Group, LLC
132 Holmes Ave., NW
Huntsville, AL 35801
Office-256-533-7287
Fax-256-533-7236
Melissa. Ballard(a)broadway4roup.net
Cc: Stephanie T. Pryor, P.E.
Project Manager - Cardno ATC
stephanie.pryor(a)cardno.com
ATC Project No. 003.38347.0028
Reference: Wetlands and Stream Determination
3.95 Acre Site — North Broad Street
Edenton, North Carolina
Chowan River Basin
Dear Ms. Ballard:
As authorized, Mr. Benjamin V. Wilson, P.E. of ATC Associates visited the site
observed the entire site and the low lying areas. A preliminary determination was made
of the streams and wetlands in accordance with the following methods:
• Wetlands for 404 Permitting - A determination was made of the wetlands based
on the Corps of Engineers (COE) 1987 Wetlands Manual using the routine
method which is the currently accepted methodology.
• Streams for 404 Permitting by the (COE) - A preliminary determination was
made of the streams based on our experience with the most recent methodology
used by the US Army Corp of Engineers.
• Streams for 401 Permitting and Determination of Stream Delineation by
NCDENR- A preliminary determination was made of the streams using the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) stream determination form method.
The site is located in the drainage area of an unnamed tributary to Queen Anne Creek
which drains directly into the Albemarle Sound in the Chowan River Basin. The site is
NOT shown as having a stream on either the Edenton, NC 7.5 Minute USGS
quadrangle or the Chowan Perquimans County SCS Soil Survey (see attached maps).

Wetlands and Stream Determination - 3.95 Acre Site — North Broad Street
Edenton, North Carolina - Chowan River Basin
February 23, 2012
STREAM EVALUATION: Based on the literature review and the site investigation no
streams were noted at the site.
WETLANDS EVALUATION: The delineation of wetlands at the site was difficult
however conditions at the site do not support a determination of wetlands for the
following reasons.
Hydrophitic Vegetation Indicators — The site has been planted in loblolly pines and
the other plants growing at the site do not conclusively support a determination of
wetlands.
Hydric Soil Indicators - The soil survey indicated that the soils at the site are Roanoke
Silt Loam. Roanoke Silt Loam is listed as a hydric soil on the NC Hydric Soils List, and
the field indicators support a determination of F3 (depleted matrix) in accordance with
the NRCS "Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States" version 7.0, 2010 and
the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual:
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region (Version 2.0) Environmental Laboratory U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers November 2010. However, there was a lack of significant
redoximorphic features in the soil down to a depth of at least 20 inches.
Wetland Hydrology Indicators — The area topography, the soil moisture and
groundwater indicators do not support a shallow water table. Also lack of primary and
secondary indicators of wetland hydrology do not support a determination of wetlands
on the site.
See Attached maps for location of data points soil maps etc.
A summary of features at the site is included in the tables below:
Wetlands and Streams Subject to 404 Permitting by COE
Feature
Amount
(Approximate)
Description
Notes
Wetlands
0.0 Acres
Stream Bank to Bank
No streams on site
Wetlands
0.0 Acres
Wetlands
Streams -Perennial
0 linear ft
Flow year round
None
Streams Intermittent
0 linear ft
Only flow for part of
None
the year
Only flow during
These are mentioned
Streams -Ephemeral
0 linear ft
rainfall and dry up
on the 404 permit but
quickly after event is
are not permitted.
past.
2

Wetlands and Stream Determination - 3.95 Acre Site — North Broad Street
Edenton, North Carolina - Chowan River Basin
February 23, 2012
Streams and Buffers Subject to 401 Permitting by NCDWQ
Feature
Amount
(Approximate)
Description
Notes
Streams -Perennial
0 linear ft
Flow year round
No Streams on site
or within 100 ft
Streams Intermittent
0 linear ft
Only flow for part of
No Streams on site
the year
or within 100 ft
Only flow during
Streams -Ephemeral
NA
rainfall and dry up
NA
quickly after event is
past.
'Chowan River Basin
Based on preliminary plans for development of the site we anticipate the development at
the site can minimize impacts at the site. Maps with approximate locations of the wetlands
and streams on the site and the data point locations are enclosed with this letter.
A site visit to verify the determinations will be required by NCDWQ and/or the USACE.
Prior to the site visits an agent authorization form will be required. An agent authorization
form is attached that has been executed by the owner. I will be glad to contact the
regulatory agencies at the appropriate time to set up the field confirmation.
Please contact Ben Wilson at [phone] or [phone] if you have any
questions or if we can be of further service.
Respectfully,
ATC ASSOCIATES OF NORTH CAROLINA, PC
�Z
Benjamin V. Wilson, P.E.
Principal Engineer
wilson45(a)atcassociates.com
Attachments: Ben Wilson NCSU/NCDENR Stream Certification
Site Maps and Delineation Maps (6)
Photographs
Stream Forms (None)
Wetlands Forms (3)
Agent Authorization Form
3

VEYARi NTof NCDENR
FORESTRY and
ENVIRONMENTAL �or-wnregoc
RESOURCES
NCMIEUNIVER517V > C
O <
Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources
North Carolina State University
Wetlands and Stormwater Unit
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Certificate of Training
This certifies that
Benjamin Wilson
has successfully completed training in
Intermittent and Perennial Stream Identification
For Regulatory Applications
October 5-8, 2010
Raleigh, NC
Training was provided on: (1) the science of stream networks, hydrologic functions of streams and riparian
zones, stream maps, and stream characteristics for identification of stream types; (2) State of North Carolina
Administrative Rules for Stream Definitions and the Protection and Maintenance of Vegetated Riparian
Buffers; and (3) the North Carolina Division of Water Quality Methodology for Identification of Intermittent
and Perennial Streams and Their Origins, Version 4.11. Seotember 1 2010. The course included written and
field exams.
Dr. Ja*t D. Gregory, Ph.D. CPSS, Fj", lessor Emeritus, Course Director

SITE AERIAL
SHOWING DATA POINT LOCATIONS
SOURCE: USGS National Map GIS Aerial Photo -
SITE AERIAL PHOTO
ATC PROJECT NO.
Wetlands and Stream Determination 003.38347.0028
3.95 Acre Site — North Broad Street SCALE: NOTED
Edenton, North Carolina
Chowan River Basin

SITE AERIAL 2010 AND TOPO
SHOWING DATA POINT LOCATIONS
SOURCE: Chowan County GIS Aerial Photo - 2010
SITE AERIAL AND TOPO
ATC PROJECT NO
Wetlands and Stream Determination 003.38347.0028
3.95 Acre Site — North Broad Street SCALE: NOTED
Edenton, North Carolina
Chowan River Basin

SITE USGS MAP
SOURCE: National Map Viewer- USGS Edenton, NC 7.5' Quadrangle
SITE USGS MAP
Wetlands and Stream Determination
3.95 Acre Site — North Broad Street
Edenton, North Carolina
Chowan River Basin
ATC PROJECT NO.
003.38347.0028
SCALE: NOTED

SITE SOIL MAP - NRCS
SOURCE: NRCS
SITE SOIL MAP
Wetlands and Stream Determination
3.95 Acre Site — North Broad Street
Edenton, North Carolina
Chowan River Basin
ATC PROJECT NO.
003.38347.0028
SCALE: NOTED
c/

mcl `-
�
M > '--In p �
� CD m o p
CD U)
m
73
�o zCD O o D
CD s�3 O c�a
1 ^
WN W� ` �i 9r
CD
f
NoaCD
a
rtA
CD D
CD s
73
n o n ..
w
D
m CO
Z A 0 - r+
-4m
O n
m o -i
0 °D O
m
i
v

SITE PHOTOS 2 I5113
BRAOD STREET
EDENTON, NORTH CAROLINA
Photograph No. 1: Front of site looking northeast along Broad Street.
Photograph No. 2: Front of site looking southwest along Broad Street.
PROJECT NO 003.38347.0028 ATC ASSOCIATES

SITE PHOTOS 2(15J13
BRAOD STREET
EDENTON, NORTH CAROLINA
Photograph No. 3: Data Point E-1 in Loblolly planting.
Photograph No. 4: Low chroma soils at 12 inches.
PROJECT NO. 003.38347.0028 ATC ASSOCIATES

-:��i�: ...sty,,•_ -• .., r�� .S' _-
.. a,.i.
s `�►`�. " !err `� '' ~- .

1, _ , i ,�9r•"
J

SITE PHOTOS 2/15113
BRAOD STREET
EDENTON, NORTH CAROLINA
Photograph No. 11: Data point E-3 looking west..
Photograph No. 12: Looking across Broad Street to existing shopping center to sout at same
elevation.
PROJECT NO 003.38347.0028 ATC ASSOCIATES

(Vwc
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual) p{= Z.
P. 1
Project / Site: E0.9,01i
Applicant / Owner:_/Y4
County:
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes__ No Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes_ No Transact ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes_x No Plot ID:
(explain on reverse if needed) 6
5/7r� 1
/�Ud�Ti Nw
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Smtum ,Indicator
I. P/ fl/��' ' (ti./.i Wi.c ;�%� 7GE _t�.� 9.
11.
4._j-:Lr£C i C_�ur 90 /11L >r �-">'- 12.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dorninant Species that sre OBL, FACW or FAC excluding FAC-).
Remarks: Wetland Vegetation Present Based Upon Greater than 50% of the Plant Species ar ar not
Classified as FAC-OBL in the National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands. Sample plot was
taken...1,t/ 4 %`/O/CQ'L 4.4f-14
HYDROLOGY
�. , Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks):
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Primary Indicators:
_ Aerial Photographs
QLalnundated
Other
WoSaturated in Upper 12"
_
_/_v Water Marks
Drift Lines
No Recorded Data Available
.6&
A& Sediment Deposits
Field Observations:
A -Id Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: /A�Uw6 ,n.
P ( )
Secondary Indicators:
/✓d Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
tl
Depth to Free Water in Pit: > SO in.)
o Water -Stained Leaves
c 5 Local Soil Survey Data
It -
AL(� FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: %(in.)
41& Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: ND lam' $ tnl'41-7Cr✓L ! E✓�1�� �7Y/E G-rJ l r ° 1 M �! G': (� D� �'1
No.7r A
AT(' AccnrinfaQ of Nnrth r'arnlinn Pr:

n/rCAJ
SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): 13-AA%IZL 51LT Lo%pvK Drainage Class: f-boW /V r✓�.
Taxonomy (Subgroup):
Confirm Mapped Type? Yes4 No_
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors
Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist)
(Munsell Moist) AbundancelContrast Structureetc.
�(
Hydric Soil Indicators:
*Histosol
'✓OConcretions-
- - -- •=.� H;stic;Epip6don -
"' NA High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
rV� Sulfidic Odor
ILA- Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
o Aquic Moisture Regime
Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions'
Listed on National Hydric Soils List
.
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:9TJ,17kk_ 1-1"rWfC Sots UST /0 A n�ocE rc� � 2r�c
m//YS A1.3-r'5 O 3 li -
i✓� �G �u�! F��'7✓Zf f
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes _ Now,_ Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No, Within a Wetland? Yes_ NqX
Hydric Soils Present? Yes X No
Remarks: Location (describe) - Is no lassified as a wetland based upon the criteria set forth in the
1987 Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands -Delineation Manual.
d07_ 1-/45"7ur1,40Sr
(NucATC Associates of North Carolina, PC

1
3
DATA FORM r-pG Al-rarj
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual)
Project / Biter—PJ✓ o� $ % �� %
Applicant/Owner: �,�/Jt✓�
Investigator: / LcJ/LSo n J
Date: : /� /3
County: e
State: G
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes C No_
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes_ NoZ
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No_
Community ID:
Transact ID:
Plot ID:
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
2.s : E_
3.
4--Of{=
7
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
11
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-)- � (-.�C l i
Remarks: Wetland Vegetation Present Based Upon Greater than 50% of the Plant Species are[C2 not
Classified as FAC-OBL in the National List of PI nt Species that Occur in Wetlands. Sample plot was
taken.pJTl//� o� /firN� f94 AYrl✓�
HYDROLOGY
NJ Recorded Data (Describe In Remarks)
_ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs
Other
,�No Recorded Data Available
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water:
tN
Depth to Free Water in Pit J y 4' ntin.)
Depth to Saturated Soil: Sal r (in.)
Remarks:
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Primary Indicators:
rJOlnundated
—66�Saturated in Upper 12"
ill Q Water Marks
NJ Drift Lines
ATO Sediment Deposits
/VJ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators:
NA_ Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
lt/ Water -Stained Leaves
,' Local Soil Survey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
ATIA.---- :-I--
G /. d t j 1` Q 4 ✓Jr1?�1

u L ��,�7%� iV
2 --A 20r--2
SOILS
Map Unit Name�/
(Series and Phase): • iZ�m �(e� S� L�(� Drainage Class: �%20 & / 024-AIV
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Confirm Mapped Type? Yes �o_
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(Inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure. etc.
FZ—rr / ,J 7r S �2 �71� 7r i �l/L Jr— U�7tY 1T'i s�-i tA�L. a/i"-1
3z-z r e3 rg:,.J ; s;wa-ef CL , cVASk
Hydric Soil Indicators:
NV HistosolConcretions
+—=•i6LLd�Hc.istic Epipedon--- -^- - - ---Higti Organic Coriient in'Sdrface Layer in Sanity Soils
��'
�ClSulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Nu Aquic Moisture Regime C Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
�QReducing Conditions'JIr" >_Listed on National Hydric Soils List
:;K Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors =Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: fd n/p7Z—: - (ywlG/f /[vn/t/k b{_/10E �G/J iLtyT`r�L(
go-r r2C--/JuJc T--SftTv2CI /6b?EO r • J T p ?o
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No � Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No �G Within a Wetland? Yes_ No4
Hydric Soils Present? Yes Now_
Remarks: Location (describe)4/is not ssified as a wetland based upon the criteria set forth in the
1687 Army Corps of Engineers Wetlan s elineation Manual.
No7- X). F C,AAlo
MT ATC Associates of North Carolina, PC
I

a
I
�I
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Determination Manual) o F.Z
Project I Site: t^�i/�- T� 'J - � �Y% J
Date: 2 i 3
County
Applicant I Owner: f9/�d4VkJAY
Investigator: °JILf
State:
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes No_
Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical situation)? Yes No_
Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area? Yes No
_
Plot ID:
(explain on reverse if needed)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant species Stmtum Indicator
q 3. p0tb 9S- oti-r— P/8Z 11.
4. 12,
5. 13.
6. 14.
7. 15.
8. 16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are DEL, FACW, or FAC excluding FAC-).
Remarks: Wetland Vegetation Present Based Upon Greater than 50% of the Plant Species are r not
Classified as FAC-OBL in the National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands. Sample plot was
taken.✓. /YL Jq(t�}C
HYDROLOGY
•NJRecorded Data (Describe In Remarks):
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
Primary Indicators:
_
_ Aerial Photographs
A& -Inundated
Other
Saturated in Upper 12"
_
Water Marks
VD Drift Lines
No Recorded Data Available
,&r2 Sediment Deposits
Field Observations-
11110 Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: 40 n/J- (I,.)
Secondary Indicators:
Oxidized Roots Channels in Upper 12"
,(/
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0 in.)
(I O Water -Stained Leaves
ZC Local Soil Survey Data
7 p
yo
NJ FAC-Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Soil: 2 (in.)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: 1v� �L ltf �f 2 Cj ✓�C. S /%r%Ct✓'i l /�G l� /P �i
/Vo
L�
ATC Associates of North Carolina, PC

SOILS
Map Unit Name
(Series and Phase): 12o4-A101V-S
-44�q �n /'Drainage Class: AgA7'0?47A1CY
Taxonomy (Subgroup):
Confirm Mapped Type? Yes_ No_
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Colors
Mottle Colors Mottlo Texture, Concretions, `
linchesl Horizon (Munsell Moist)
(Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure. etc.
/ate-�� — l•a` y�6%!
7�-4'f o F Z �
Hydric Soil Indicators:
AA) Histosol
Concretions
Histic Epipedon
High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor
,% Aquic Moisture Regime
/U '
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Listed On Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Condit' s 6
--Chrom
Listed on National Hydric Soils List
;;oCGleyed prto Colors =Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: /✓JTG �z��/L/� jOGIS LI �f %i � t g"/5) tL1' 4i(X
NZ, 2I fio/
i�r-j'l"r/21' S ri o iAJ To r0l Za r,
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes _ No �<_ Is the Sampling Point
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes _ No XC Within a Wetland? Yes_ NOK
Hydric Soils Present? Yes _�K- No-K_
Remarks: Location (describe) • s no lassified as a wetland based upon the criteria set forth in the
1987 Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual.
rJfl'�J�iC/�}
u
ATC Associates of North Carolina, PC
I

RIGHT -OF -ENTRY
This AGREEMENT is made by and between _f�rlZ:�An' L (hereafter referred to as
"owner") and the United States Army Corps of Engineers (hereafter referred to as "USACE").
The purpose of this AGREEMENT is to provide USACE with Right -of -Entry to the following described
premises: property situated along the north side of North Broad Street east of the intersection of Coke
Avenue —see attached map for specific project location .
Owner represents and warrants that it is the Owner of or otherwise has authority to grant a Right -of -Entry
to the above -described premises.
Owner grants USACE, its agents, subcontractors and employees the right to enter upon the above -
described premises, as necessary, for the purpose of installation and sampling of temporary groundwater
monitoring wells.
In consideration for granting the Right -of -Entry, USACE agrees that it shall indemnify and hold Owner
harmless from any and all claims, damages (including personal injury and property damage), and other
liabilities arising out of and to the extent caused by the acts of USACE, it's agents, subcontractors,
employees or any other entities or persons while present on the premises pursuant to this Right -of -Entry.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Representative
Y � _
49
Owner
By: By:
Date: Date: Z

Hydrologic Soil Group--Chowan County, North Carolina
(Edenton, NC Soil Map)
M-4'25'
356250 356340 356430 3%1620 3%610 356/00 356190
r:
s _ -
"I
41
I
15fin1n 356160 356250 356340 3564W 356520 351 10 356700 90
� M4PSmIe:1:3,890 XerFbXan A4Im (9.5'x 11'jXMXL
N Meters
0 50 100 200 300
Feet
0 200 400 600 1.200
�% Natural Resources Web Soil Survey
r Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey
m
5/6/2013
Page 1 of 4
36'4'44-
36- 4.29-

Hydrologic Soil Group-Chowan County, North Carolina
Edenton, NC Soil Map
Hydrologic Soil Group
' ..Hydrologic Sal Group=' Summaryby:Map Unit-Chowan County; NortFi Carolina (NC041)
Map'unit symbol
'too - iPname _
_ Rating;
Acres in AOI'.'
Percent of AOI'
At
Augusta fine sandy loam
BID
L 1.3
4.4 %
Au
Augusta -Urban land
complex
BID
2.2
7.2%
Ro
Roanoke silt loam
CID
27.3
88.3 %
Ur
Urban land
0.0
0.1%
Totals for Area of Interest
30.9
100.0%
Description
Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are
assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the
soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive precipitation
from long -duration storms.
The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D) and
three dual classes (A/D, B/D, and CID). The groups are defined as follows:
Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly
wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or
gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission.
Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These
consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained
soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils
have a moderate rate of water transmission.
Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist
chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or
soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water
transmission.
Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when
thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink -swell
potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer
at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material.
These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission.
If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (A/D, B/D, or CID), the first letter is
for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in their
natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes.
Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/6/2013
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 4

y
a
N
m
J
s
Flow (cfs) Denth fft)
I
r

Project Description
File Name., .........................
Project Options
FlowUnits ................................................
Elevation Type .........................................
Hydrology Method ....................................
Time of Concentration (TOC) Method .....
Link Routing Method ................................
Enable Overfim Pending at Nodes .........
Skip Steady State Analysis Time Periods
Analysis Options
Start Analysis On ........................
End Analysis On ............. .
Start Reporting On ......................
Antecedent Dry Days......
Runoff (Dry Weather) Time Step
Runoff (Wet Weather) Time Step
Reporting Time Step ...................
Routing Time Step ......................
Number of Elements
13-006 Edenton NC DG Pre-Dev Hydro. SPF
CFS
Elevation
SCS TR-55
SCS TR-55
Hydrodynamic
YES
YES
May 07. 2013
00'.00:00
May 12, 2013
00 00:00
May 07, 2013
00 00:00
0
days
001:00:00
days hh:mm:ss
0 00:05.00 -
days hh:mm:ss
000:05'.00
days hh:mmas
5
seconds
Oty
RainGages.................................................................
1
Subbasins....................................................................
3
Nodes.................................... ....................................
.. 5
Junctions
..................... 3
Curtails...............................................................
1
Flow Diversions ..................................................
0
Inlets. ..................... ..........................
......... ......... 0
Storage Nodes ...................................................
1
Links... .................... ................... .......................
........... 4
Channels............................................................
2
Pipes..................................................................
2
Pumps................................................................
0
Orifices...............................................................
0
Weirs............ ............................
0
outlets................................................................
0
Pollutants....................................................................
0
LandUses..................................................................
0
Rainfall Details
SN Rain Gage Data Data Source Rainfall Rain State County Return Rainfall Rainfall
ID Source ID Type Units Period Depth Distribution

Subbasin Summary
SIN Subbasin
Nee Weighted
Total
Total
Total
Peak
Time of
ID
Curve Rainfall
Runoff
Runoff Runoff
Concentration
Number
Volume
(ac)
(in)
(in)
(ac-in)
(cts)
(Oayshh:mm:ss)
1 EX-1
8.56
78.51
6.00
3.63
31.07
11.54
0 01:2943
2 EX-2
5.39
77.12
6.00
3.49
18.80
5.09
0 0222.30
3 EX-3
0.81
81.30
6.00
3.91
3.16
1.22
0 01:24:14

Node Summary
SIN Element
Element
Invert Ground/Rim
Initial Surcharge Pooded Peak Max HGL
Max
Min
Time of
Total Total Time
ID
Tyye
Elevation
(Max)
Water
Elevation
Area Inllm
Elevation Surcharge Freeboard
Peak Flooded
Flooded
Elevation Elevation
Attained
Depth
Attained
Flooding
Volume
Attained
Occurrence
(ft)
(it)
(ft)
(it)
(It') (cf.)
01)
(11)
(ft)
(days hh:mm)
(ac-in)
(min)
1 END 151N CPP
Junction
11.34
1540
11.34
15.40
0.00 16.52
13.03
0.00
2.37
0 0000
0,00
0.00
2 END 241N RCP
Junction
11.18
15,60
11.18
15.60
0.0011.52
13.14
0.00
2.46
000:00
000
0.00
3 EX 241N RCP
Junction
11.06
15.60
11.06
15.60
0.00 11.52
13.38
0.00
2.22
0 0000
0.00,
0.00
4 EX HWV 17 DITCH
Outfall
11.34
16.51
12.99
5 E%151N CPP
Storage None
12T2
14.50
12.12
0.00 5.07
1343
0.00
0.00

Link Summary
SN Element
Element From
To (Outlet)
Length
Inlet
Outlet Average Diameter or
Manning's Peak Design Flow
Peak Flow/ Peak Flow Peak Flow
Peak Flow
Total Time Reported
ID
Type (Inlet)
Node
Invert
Invert Slope
Height
Roughness Flow
Capacity
Design Flow
Velocity
Depth
Depth/
Surcharged Condition
Node
Elevation Elevation
Ratio
Total Depth
Ratio
(ft)
(fl)
(t) (%)
(In)
(cfs)
(cts)
(fvsec)
In)
(min)
1 EX 151N CPP
Pipe EX 151N CPP
END 151N CPP
40.00
12.12
11.34 1.9500
15.000
0.0120 5.35
9.77
0.55
4.38
1.25
1.00
33.00 SURCHAF
2 EX 241N RCP
Pipe EX 24 IN RCP
END 241N RCP
1600
11.06
11.18 .0.7500
24.000
0.0130 11.52
19.59
0.59
3.68
1.98
0.99
0.00 Calculated
3 EX DITCH
Channel END 241N RCP
END 151N CPP
299.00
11.18
11.34-0.0500
24,000
0.0320 11.43
1809
0.63
0.90
1.82
0.91
0.00
4 EX HW V 17 DITCH Channel END 151N CPP
EX HWV 17 DITCH
5.00
11.34
11.34 0.1000
24.000
0.0320 16.51
24.73
0.67
12,41
1.67
0.84
- 0.00

Subbasin Hydrology
Subbasin : EX-1
Input Data
Area(ac)........... ........................................................... 8.56
Weighted Curve Number .... .......................... ................. 78.51
Rain Gage lD................................................................. CHOWANCODNTY
Composite Curve Number
Area
Soil
Curve
Soil/Surface Description
(acres)
Group
Number
> 75%grass cover, Good
1.92
D
86.00
Woods, Good
6.30
D
77.00
Paved roads with curbs 8 sewers
0.34
D
g8.00
Composite Area 8 Weighted CN
8.56
78.51
Time of Concentration
TOC Mathotl : SCS TR-55
Sheet Flow Equation :
Tc = (0 007' ((n' Lf)A0.8)) I ((PA0.5)' (SfAOA))
Where :
Tc = Time of Concentration (hr)
n = Manning's roughness
Lf = Flow Length (ft)
P = 2 yr, 24 hr Rainfall (inches)
Sf = Slope (fl/fl)
Shallow Concentrated Flow Equation
V = 16,1345(SV0.5) (unpaved surface)
V = 20.3282' (Sf"0.5) (paved surface)
V = 15.0' (SfA0.5) (grassed waterway surface)
V = 10.0' (Sf^0.5) (neatly bare 8 uNiiled surface)
V = 9.0' (SfA0.5) (cultivated straight rows surface)
V = 7.0' (SV0.5) (short grass pasture surface)
V = 5.0' (SVO.5) (woodland surface)
V = 2.5' (SfA0.5) (forest w/heavy litter surface)
To = (Lf / V)1(3600 seclhr)
Where
Tc = Time of Concentration (hr)
Lf = Flow Length (ft)
V = Velocity(ft/sec)
Sf = Slope (far)
Channel Flow Equation
V = T 49 - (RA(2/3))' (SfA0.5)) I n
R =Aq/Wp
To = (Lf / V) / (3600 sec/hr)
Where
Tc= Time of Concentration (hr)
Lf = Flow Length (ft)
R = Hydraulic Radius (ft)
Aq = Flow Area (ft')
W p = Wetted Perimeter (ft)
V = velocity (fusee)
Sf = Slope (ft/ft)
n = Manning's roughness

Sheet Flow Computations
Manning's Roughness:
Flow Length (1t)
Slope (%) :
2 yr, 24 hr Rainfall (in):
Velocity (ft/sec) :
Computed Flow Time (min)
Shallow Concentrated Flow Computations
Flow Length (R)
Slap.(%):
Surface Type
Velocity (fUsec)
Computer Flaw Time (min)
Channel Flow Computations
Manning's Roughness
Flow Length (ff)
Channel Slope (o)
Crass Section Area (W)
Wetted Perimeter (f):
Velocity (fUsec) :
Computed Flaw Time (min) .
Total TOG (min) ..................89.72
Subbasin Runoff Results
Total Rainfall (in) ....................................
Total Runoff (in) ....... .............................
Peak Runoff (cfs)...................................
Weighted Curve Number ......................
Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss)
Subarea
Subarea
Subarea
A
B
C
0.4
0.4
0.00
26
240
0,00
12.7
.6
0.00
3.90
3.90
0.00
0.14
006
000
3.16
63.43
0.00
Subarea
Subarea
Subarea
A
B
C
314
8
0.00
32
15
0.00
Woodland
Grassed waterway,
Unpaved
0.28
5,81
000
18,69
002
000
Subarea
Subarea
Subarea
A
B
C
0,03
0.00
0.00
715
0.00
000
24
00o
000
15,2
0,00
000
13,03
0.00
000
2.70
0.00
0.00
4.42
0.00
0.00
.... 6.00
3.63
..... 11.54
..... 78,51
..... 0 01:29.43

Subbasin : EX-1
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
12
1
11
1
10
9
a
7
6
0
c
4
3
2
1
0
Rainfall Intensity Graph
U Zb JU 3� 4U 4b bb ru 15 Uu U5 w Ub 1 U
Time (hm)
Runoff Hydrograph
5
5....___
-
0
5
5
7
6
5
5
5
4
3
6
21
—L—q-
5
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 W 65 70 75 80 85 W 95 100 105 110 115
Time (Irrs)

Subbasin : EX-2
Input Data
Area(ac),......... ............... ................ .......... ._...... ......... 5.39
Weighted Curve Number ............. ...............-................. 77.12
Rain Gage ID .............. .... ..................... ......... ......... ..... CHOWAN COUNTY
Composite Curve Number
Area
Soil
Curve
SoillSurface Description
(acres)
Group
Number
> 75%grass cover, Good
0,21
D
80.00
Woods, Good
5,17
D
77.00
Composite Area & Weighted CN
5.38
77.12
Time of Concentration
Sheet Flow Computations
Manning's Roughness
Flow Length (ft)
Slope (%) :
2 yr, 24 hr Rainfall ((n)
Velocity (f /a.c) :
Computed Flow Time (min) :
Shallow Concentrated Flow Computations
Flow Length (ft)
Slope (%) :
Surface Type:
Vcloaty (Nsec) :
Computed Flow Time (min) :
Total TOG (min) .................. 142.51
Subbasin Runoff Results
Total Rainfall (in) ...................................
Total Runoff(in)._.... .............. -..............
Peak Runoff (cfs)....... - ..........................
Weighted Curve Number ....... ...............
Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss)
Subarea
Subarea
Subarea
A
B
C
0.6
0.00
0.00
242
0.00
0,00
.4
0,00
0.00
3.90
0,00
0,00
0.04
000
c.Bg
103.86
0.00
0.00
Subarea
Subarea
Subarea
A
B
C
496
185
0,00
0.28
0.8
0,00
Woodland
Woodland
Unpaved
0.26
0.45
0.00
31.79
6.85
0.00
6,00
349
5.09
77.12
0 02'.22:31

Subbasin : EX-2
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
4
4
4
4
3
Rainfall Intensity Graph
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 SO 85 W 95 100 105 110 115 120
Time (hrs)
Runoff Hydrograph
2
5
6
4
4
4
2
3
8 ---
6.
-
-
- --
---
--
---
E-f-E
4
4
0 5 10 15 20 25 W 35 40 45 SO 55 60 65 70 75 N 85 90 95 100 105 110 115
Time (hrs)

Subbasin : EX-3
Input Data
Area (ac).........................
Weighted Curve Number
Rain Gage ID ..................
Composite Curve Number
0,81
81.30
CHOWAN COUNTY
Soil/Surface Description
Area
(acres)
Soil
Group
Curve
Number
75%grass cover, Good
042
D
80.00
Woods, Good
0.28
D
77.00
Paved roads with curbs 8 sewers
0.10
D
98.00
Composite Area 8 Weighted CN
0.80
81.30
Time of Concentration
Sheet Flow Computations
Manning's Roughness:
Flow Length (th :
Slope (%) :
2 yr, 24 hr Rainfall (in):
Velocity (fusee):
Computed Flow Time (min):
Channel Flow Computations
Manning's Roughness
Flow Length (ft) :
Channel Slope (%):
Cross Section Area (ft') :
Wetted Perimeter (ft)
Velocity ((Uses):
Computed Flow Time (min) :
Total TOC (min) ......... - ....... 84.24
Subbasin Runoff Results
Total Rainfall (in)- ..................................
Total Runoff (in)........
Peak Runoff (cfs) ..............................--
Weighted Curve Number .......................
Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss)
Subarea
Subarea
Subarea
A
B
C
0.6
0.4
0.4
146
62
5
0.55
0.65
40
3.90
3,90
3.90
0,04
0.05
0,16
61.03
20.80
0.53
Subarea
Subarea
Subarea
A
B
C
0,03
0.00
000
195
0,00
0.00
0.1
000
0.00
15.2
0.00
0,00
13,03
0.00
0.00
1.74
0.00
0,00
1.87
0.00
0,00
6,00
3,91
1.22
81,30
0 01:24:14

Subbasin : EX-3
5
If
a
a
0
0
7 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Rainfall Intensity Graph
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 W 95 100 105 110 115 120
Time (hrs)
Runoff Hydrograph
25
.2
15
95
B5
75
1.7
55
1,5
45
).4
35
).3
25
).2
15
05
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 W 55 w 65 To 75 W 85 90 95 100 105 110 115
Time (hrs)

Junction Input
SN Element
Invert Groundam GroundfRim
Initial Initial Surcharge Surcharge Ponded Minimum
ID
Elevation
(Max)
(Max)
Water Water
Elevation
Depth
Area
Pipe
Elevation
Offset Elevation Depth
Cover
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft) (ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft')
(in)
1 END 151N CPP
11.34
15.40
4.06
11.34 0.00
15.40
0.00
0.00
0.00
2 END 241N RCP
11.18
15.60
4.42
11.18 0.00
15.60
0.00
0.00
0.00
3 EX 241N RCP
11.06
15.60
4.54
11.06 0.00
15.60
0.00
0.00
0.00

Junction Results
SN Element
Peak
Peak Max HGL Max HGL
Max
Min Average HGL Average HGL
Time of
Time of
Total Total Time
ID
Inflow
Lateral
Elevation
Depth
Surcharge Freeboard
Elevation
Depth
Max HGL
Peak Flooded
Flooded
Inflow
Attained
Attained
Depth
Attained
Attained!
Attained
Occurrence
Flooding
Volume
Attained
Occurrence
(cfs)
(cfs)
(ft)
(ft)
A
(ft)
(ft)
(f)
(days hh:mm)
(days hh:mm)
(ac-in)
(min)
1 END 151N CPP
16.52
1.22
13,03
1.69
0.00
2.37
11.68
0.34
0 13:12
0 00'.00
0.00
coo
2 END 241N RCP
11.52
0.00
13.14
1.96
0.00
2.46
11.71
0.53
0 1310
0 00.00
0.00
0.00
3 EX 24 IN RCP
11.52
11.52
13.38
2.32
0.00
222
11.72
0.66
0 13:08
0 00:00
0,00
0.00

Channel Input
SN Element
Length
Inlet Inlet
Odder Outlet Total Average Shape
Height Width
Manning's Entrance ExillBend Additional Initial Flap
ID
Invert Invert
Invert Invert Drop Slope
Roughness Losses
Losses Losses Flow Gate
Elevation Offset Elevation Offset
(it)
(ff) (ff)
(tt) (tt) (tt) (%)
(tt) (it)
(cts)
1 EX DITCH
299.00
11.18 0.00
1134 0.00 -0,16 -0.0500 Trapezoidal
2,000 12200
0.0320 0.5000
0,5000 00000 0.00 No
2 EX HWY 17 DITCH
5.00
11.34 0.00
11,34 0.00 0,00 0,1000 Trapezoidal
2000 12200
0.0320 0,5000
0,5000 0.0000 0.00 Yes

Channel Results
SIN Element Peak Time of Design Flow Peak Flow/ Peak Flow Travel Peak Flow Peak Flow -Total Time Froude Reported
ID Flow Peak Flow Capacity Design Flow Velocity Time Depth DepW Surcharged Number Condition
Occurrence Ratio Total Depth
Ratio
(cfs) (days hh:mm) (ofs) (fVsec) (min) (ft) (min)
1 EX DITCH 11.43 0-1105 1809 0.63 0.90 554 1.82 0.91 0.00
2 EX HWY 17 DITCH 16.51 013:12 24.73 0.67 1241 0.01 1.67 0.84 0.00

Pipe Input
SN Element
Length
Inlet Inlet
Outlet •ballet Total Average Pipe
Pipe Pipe
Manning's Entrance ExiUBend Additional Initial Flap
No. of
ID
Invert Invert
Invert Invert Drop Slope Shape
Diameter or Width
Roughness
Losses
Losses
Losses Flow Gate
Barrels
Elevation Offset Elevation Offset
Height
(ft)
(ft) (h)
(ft) (f) (ft) (/)
(in) (in)
(nfs)
1 EX 151N CPP
40.00
12.12 000
11,34 0.00 078 1.9500 CIRCULAR
15060 15.000
0.0120
0.5000
0.5000
0.0000 0.00 No
1
2 EX 241N RCP
16.00
11.06 000
11.18 0.00 -0.12 .0.7500 CIRCULAR
24.000 24.000
0.0130
0.5000
0,5000
0.0000 0.00 No
1

Pipe Results
SN Element
Peak
Time of Design Flow
Peak Flow/ Peak Flaw Travel Peak Flow
Peak Flaw
Total Time
Fmude Reported
ID
Flow
Peak Flow
Capacity
Design Flow
Velocity Time
Depth
DepW
Surcharged
Number Condition
Occurrence
Ratio
Total Depth
Ratio
(cfs)
(days hh, mm)
(cfs)
(fVsec) (min)
(fl)
(min)
1 EX 151N CPP
5.35
0 13'.55
9.77
0.55
4.38 0.15
1.25
1.00
33,00
SURCHARGED
2 EX 241N RCP
11.52
0 13'.05
19.59
059
3,68 0,07
1.98
0,99
0.00
Calculated

Storage Nodes
Storage Node : EX 15 IN CPP
Input Data
Invert Elevation (ft)................................................
12.12
Max (Rim) Elevation (It) -- ............................
14.50
Max (Rim) Offset (ft).............. .---- ...........
_........ 2.38
Initial Water Elevation(11).....................................
12.12
Initial Water Depth (ft)...........................................
0.00
Ponded Area (fl')..................................................
0.00
Evaporation Loss ..................................................
0.00
I
Storage Area Volume Curves
Storage Curve: EX STORAGE
Stage Storage Storage
Area Volume
Ift) (ft') In')
0 0 0.000
.88 70 30.80
1.88 6700 3415.80

Storage Area Volume Curves
Storage Volume (ft )
Storage Area (ft')
Storage Area — Storage Volume

Storage Node : EX 15 IN CPP (continued)
Output Summary Results
Peak Inflow (cfs).......... ...................... ...... .... ......
5.07
Peak Lateml Inflow(cfs)......................................
5,07
Peak Outflow (cfs).._..........................
5.35
Peak ExfilVation Flow Rate (cfm) .........................
000
Man HGL Elevation Attained (ft)..... _....................
13.43
Max HGL Depth Attained (it) .._........................._
- 1.31
Average HGL Elevation Attained (fq ................-...
12.32
Average HGL Depth Attained (ft) ............ .............
0.2
Time of Max HGL Occurrence (days hh:mm) .......
0 1333
Total FAItration Volume (1000-ft') .......................
0.000
Total Flooded Volume(ac-in) ...............................
0
Total Time Flooded (min) ...................................
0
Total Retention Time (sec) _... _..._.......................
0.00

Project Description
File Name ............................
Project Options
FlowUnits ................................................
Elevation Type .........................................
Hydrology Method ....................................
Time of Concemotbon (TOC) Method .....
Link Routing Method ...._..........................
Enable Overflow Ponding at Nodes .........
Skip Steady State Analysis Time Periods
Analysis Options
Stan Analysis On ........................
End Analysis On ..........................
Stan Reporting On ......................
Antecedent Dry Days ..................
Runoff (Dry Weather) Time Step
Runoff (W at Weather) Time Step
Reporting Time Step ...................
Routing Time Step ......................
Number of Elements
13-006 Edenton NC DG Post-Dov Hydro.SPF
CFS
Elevation
SCS TR-55
SCS TR-55
Hydrodynamic
YES
YES
May 07, 2013
00:00:00
May 12, 2013
00:00:00
May 07, 2013
00.00:00
0
days
0 01:00:00
days hh:mar ss
000'.05.00
days hh:mmas
000.05'.00
days hh:mmas
5
seconds
Cry
RainGages.................................................................
1
Subbasins.......................
4
Nodes- .... - ..... .... ... — .................... - ........
- ................. 9
Junctions.....................-.....................................
6
Gutialls................. ._......... ._.............
............ ... 1
Flow Diversions ..................................................
0
Inlets...................................................................
0
Slorogo Nodes ...................................................
2
Links............................................................................
11
Channels............................................................
4
Pipes..................................................................
3
Pumps...............................................................
0
Orifrcas...............................................................
2
Weirs........................_.................
...................... 2
Outlets......................................
_........................ 0
Pollutants............ ......... .................. ...........:.................
0
LandUses .... .................. .............._......................._...
0
Rainfall Details
SIN Rain Gage Data Data Source Rainfall Rain State County Return Rainfall Rainfall
tD Source ID Type Units Period! Depth Distribution
(years) (inches)
1 CHOWAN COUNTY Time Series 10 YR Cumulative inches North Carolina Chowan 10 6.00 SCS Type III 24-hr

Subbasin Summary
SN Subbasin
Area Weighted
Total
Total
Total
Peak
Time of
ID
Curve Rainfall
Runoff
Runoff
Runoff
Concentration
Number
Volume
(ad)
(in)
fin)
(ac-in)
lots)
(days hh:mm:ss)
1 DEV-1
843
78.55
6D0
3.63
30.64
11.39
0 01,29.43
2 DEV-2
4.70
77.67
6.00
3.55
16.66
5.00
0 02:03:06
3 DEV-3
1.27
92.55
6.00
5,13
6,49
6.17
0 000300
4 DEV-4
0,40
88,73
6.00
4.71
1.86
1.52
0 00:16:25

Node Summary
SN Element
Element
Invert GroundlRim
Initial Surcharge Ponded Peak Max HGL
Max
Min
Time of
Total Total Time
ID
Type
Elevation
(Max)
Water
Elevation
Area Inflow
Elevation Surcharge Freeboard
Peak Flooded
Flooded
Elevation Elevation
Attained
Depth
Attained
Flooding Volume
Attained
Occurrence
(f)
th)
(ft)
(ft)
Of) (cfs)
(ft)
(it)
(ft)
(days hh:mm)
(acAn)
(min)
i BEGIN FLUME
Junction
14.23
15.00
14.23
0.00
0.00 5.00
14.82
0.00
1.49
0 0000
0.00
0.00
2 HWY 17 DITCH
Junction
11.34
15.40
11.34
15.40
0.00 15.83
12.06
0.00
3.34
0 0000
0.00
0.00
3 STIR 1 E-WALL
Junction
11.66
15.60
11.66
1560
0.00 11.36
13.16
0.00
2.44
0 00.00
0.00
0.00
4 STIR 2 E-WALL
Junction
11.59
15.60
11.59
15.60
0.00 11.58
13.01
0.00
2.59
0 00'.00
0.00
0.00
5 STIR 3 WEIR BOX Junction
10.00
15.00
13.50
16.00
0.00 0.55
14.03
0.00
4.30
0 00.00
0.00
0.00
6 STR4
Junction
1540
16.00
13.40
16.00
0.00 5.53
1403
0.00
9.37
0 00.00
0,00
000
7 DUMMY
Outfall
11.34
18.98
13.10
8 EX 151N CPP
Storage Node
12.12
1540
12.12
0.00 5.52
13.00
000
0.00
9 WET POND
Storage Node
6.00
16.20
13.50
8269.00 6.16
1476
0.00
0.00

Link Summary
SN Element
Element From
To (Outlet)
Length
Inlet
Outlet Average Diameteror
Manning's Peak Design Flow
Peak Flow/ Peak Flow Peak Flow
Peak Flow
Total Time Reported
ID
Type (Intel)
Node
Invert
Invert
Slope
Height
Roughness Flow
Capacity
Design Flaw
Velocity
Depth
Depth/
Surcharged Condition
Node
Elevation Elevation
Ratio
Total Depth
Ratio
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
N
(in)
(cfs)
(cfs)
(ftfsec)
(ft)
(min)
1 1 TO 2
Pipe STR 1 E-WALL
STR 2 E-WALL
74.00
11.66
11.59
00900
24.000
0.0130 11.36
13.92
0.82
2.31
1 46
0.73
0.00 Calculated
2 3 TO 4
Pipe STR 3 WEIR BOX STR 4
18.00
13-50
1340
0.5600
12.000
0.0130 0.55
5.31
0.10
1.25
0.58
0.58
0.00 Calculated
3 EX 151N CPP
Pipe EX 151N CPP
HWY 17 DITCH
40.00
12.12
11.34
1.9500
15.000
0.0120 5.34
9.77
0.55
6.68
0.79
0.64
0.00 Calculated
4 EAST FLUME
Channel STR 4
EX 151N CPP
358.00
13.40
12.12
0.3600
24.960
0.0320 5.52
96.29
0.06
1.23
075
0.36
0.00
5 EX DITCH
Channel STR 2 E-WALL
HWY 17 DITCH
247.00
11.59
11.34
0.1000
28.800
0.0320 11.60
37.08
0.31
2.01
1.06
0.44
0.00
6 EX HWY 17 DITCH
Channel HWY 17 DITCH
DUMMY
5.00
11.34
11.34
0A000
28.800
0.0320 18.98
36.85
0.52
13.95
0.86
043
0.00
7 NORTH FLUME
Channel BEGIN FLUME
STR 4 -
208.00
14.23
13.40
0 4000
24.960
0.0320 4.99
101,73
0.05
1.44
0.61
0.29
0 00
8 LOW FLOW
Orifice WET POND
STR 3 WEIR BOX
6.00
10.00
3.000
0.22
9 MEDIUM FLOW
Orifice WET POND
STR 3 WEIR BOX
6.00
10.00
4.000
0.33
10 DRIVEWAY LP
Weir STR 1 E-WALL
STR 2 E-WALL
11.66
11.59
0.00
_
11 GRATE TOP
Weir WET POND
STIR
6.00
13.40
0.00

Subbasin Hydrology
Subbasin : DEV-1
Input Data
Area(ac)........................................................................
8 43
Weighted Curve Number ...............................................
78,55
Rain Gage lD.................................................................
CHOWAN COUNTY
Composite Curve Number
Area
Soil
Curve
Soil/Surface Description
(acres)
Group
Number
> 75%grass cover, Good
2.01
D
80.00
Woods, Good
6,09
D
77.00
Paved roads with curbs 8 sewers
0.34
D
98.00
Composite Area 8 Weighted CN
8,44
78.55'
Time of Concentration
TOG Method : SCS TR-55
Sheet Flow Equation:
Tc = (0,007' (in - Lf)A0.8)) / ((PA0.5)' (Sf"0.4
Where:
To = Time of Concentration (hr)
n = Manning's roughness
Lf = Flow Length (h)
P = 2 yr, 24 hr Rainfall (inches)
Sf = Slop. (fvft)
Shallow Concentrated Flow Equation
V = 16.1345(SfA0.5) (unpaved surface)
V = 20.3282' (Sf"0.5) (paved surface)
V = 15.0 • (Sf 0.5) (grassed waterway surface)
V = 10,0 - (Sf"0.5) (nearly bare 8 unddled surface)
V = 9.0' (Sf^0.5) (cultivated straight rows surface
V = 7.0' (Sf"0.5) (short grass pasture surface)
V = 5.0' (Sf10.5) (woodland surface)
V = 2 5 (SV0.5)(forest w/heavy litter surface)
Tit = (Lf / V) / (3600 sec/hr)
Where
To = Time of Concentration (hr)
Lf = Flow Length (it)
V = Volocity (ft/soc)
Sf = Slope (fvft)
Channol Flow Equation
V=(1.49-(R"(2/3))'(Sf"0.5))/n
R =Aq/Wp
To = (Lf / V) / (3600 secthr)
Where:
Te = Time of Coocentra0on (hr)
Lf = Flow Length (ft)
R = Hydraulic Radius (ft)
Aq = Flow Area (W)
Wp = Wetted Perimeter (h)
V = Velocity (f /sec)
Sf = Slope (ft f )
n = Manning's roughness

Sheet Flow Computations
Morning's Roughness:
Flow Length (11)
Slope (%) :
2 yr, 24 In Rainfall (in) :
Velocity (fVsec) :
Computed Flow Time (min) :
Shallow Concentrated Flow Computations
Flow Length (1)
Slope (%) :
Surface Type:
Velocity (fVsec)
Computed Flaw Time (min) :
Channel Flow Computations
Manning's Roughness
Flow Length (it):
Channel Slope (%) :
Cross Section Area (W)
Wetted Perimeter (it)
Velocity (fVsec) :
Computed Flow Time (min) :
Total TOC (min) ..................89. 12
Subbasin Runoff Results
Total Rainfall(in)...................................
Total Runoff (in) _ .................................
Peak Runoff (cfs)..................................
Weighted Curve Number .....................
Time of Concentration (days hh'. mm:ss)
Subarea
Subarea
Subarea
A
B
C
0.4
0.4
0.00
26
240
0.00
12.7
S
0,00
3.90
3,90
000
0,14
0.06
O'GO
3,16
63.43
0.00
Subarea
Subarea
Scheme
A
B
C
314
8
0,00
.32
15
0,00
Woodland
Grassed waterway
Unpaved
0.28
5.81
0,00
18.69
0.02
0.00
Subarea
Subarea
Subarea
A
B
C
0.03
0.00
0.00
715
0.00
0.00
.24
000
0,00
152
0.00
0.00
13.03
0.00
0.00
2.70
0,00
000
442
0,00
0.00
6.00
3.63
11.39
78.55
0 01:29 43

Subbasin : DEV-1
6
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
2 2
2
'E 2
2
Rainfall Intensity Graph
4
4
4
2
3
6
-- ------
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
4
2
2
8
6
4
2
6
.2
8,
7
6
0
5
4
3
2
1
0
5 10 15 20 26 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 120
Time (hrs)
Runoff Hydrograph
5
5
5
4
3
5
2
5
U J lu 1J zu jb 40 4* w 55 w bt lu 1b w Ub w Vb I u lub I u lib
Time (hrs)

Subbasin : DEV•2
Input Data
Area (ac) .........................
Weighted Curve Number
Rain Gage ID ........ ...._...
Composite Curve Number
4.70
77.67
CHOWAN COUNTY
Sot/Surface Description
Area
(acres)
Soil
Group
Curve
Number
> 75%grass cover, Good
0,77
D
80.00
Woods, Good
3,89
D
77.00
Paved parking 8 roofs
0.04
D
98.00
Composite Area 8 Weighted CN
4.70
77.67
Time of Concentration
Sheet Flow Computations
Manning's Roughness:
Flow Length (8)
Slope (%)'.
2 yr, 24 m Rainfall (in) :
Velocity (fl/sec) :
Computed Flow Time (min) :
Shallow Concentrated Flow Computations
Flow Length (ft)
Slope (%) :
Surface Type:
Velocity (fusec) :
Computed Flow Time (min) :
Total TOC (min) _........__....123. 11
Subbasin Runoff Results
Subarea
Subarea
Subarea
A
B
C
0.6
0,00
0.00
242
0.00
0.00
0.4
0.00
0.00
3.90
0.00
O60
0,04
0.00
0.00
103.86
0.00
000
Subarea
Subarea
Subarea
A
B
C
182
208
358
0,28
04
0,36
Woodland
Paved
Paved
0.26
1.29
1,22
1167
269
4.89
Total Rainfall (in)............................................................
6,00
Total Runoff (in) _ ....................................
..... 3.55
Peak Runoff(cfs).......................... ............._......._........
5.00
Weighted Curve Number ....... .......................................
7767
Time of Concentration (days hh:mm:ss) . ..............
0 02:03:07

Subbasin : DEV-2
5.
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
2
2 ,�G
2
2
0
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
0
Rainfall Intensity Graph
2
6
4
2
4
8
6
4
2
3
6
4
2
2
8
4
2
6
4
2
—
-----
-
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 120
Time (hrs)
Runoff Hydrograph
2
4 - — -
6
4
- — —
--
-------
2
3
6
4
2
2
8
6
4
2
6
4
2
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 SO 85 90 95 100 105 110 115
Time (hrs)

Subbasin : DEV-3
Input Data
Area(ac)_...........................-.............................. .................... _... 1,27
Weighted Curve Numb er............. _ ............................... 92,55
Rain Gage ID -- ................ ........... ..._.......... CHOWAN COUNTY
Composite Curve Number
Area
Soil
Curve
Soil/Surface Description
(acres)
Group
Number
> 75 % grass cover, Good
0,38
D
80.00
Paved parking 8 roofs
0.88
D
98,00
Composite Area 8 Weighted CN
1,26
92.55
Time of Concentration
User -Defined TOC override (minutes).3
Subbasin Runoff Results
Total Rainfall (in) _ ..... ... ..................... - ..............
... ....... . 6.00
Total Runoff (in) .... .... -........................
5.13
Peak Runoff (ofs).............. -........ ................. --- ............
. 6.17
Weighted Curve Number--- - ....................
......... 92.55
Time of Concentrafion (days hh:mm:ss)......... - ........
.... 000:03:00

Subbasin: DEV3
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
Rainfall Intensity Graph
b lu I � �U Z� JU jb 4U 4b bb bU bb lu lb w bb 9U Yb 1U 0
Time (hrs)
Runoff Hydrograph
Time (hrs)
160 165 no its

Subbasin : DEV-4
Input Data
Area (ad) .. _...._..._..............
Weighted Curve Number....
Rain Gage ID ......................
Composite Curve Number
040
88.73
CHOWAN COUNTY
Area
Soil Curve
Soil/Surface Description
(acres)
Group Number
> 75%grass cover, Goad
0.20
D 80.00
Paved parking & roofs
0,19
D 98.00
Composite Area & Weighted CN
0.39
8873
Time of Concentration
Sheet Flow Computations
Manning's Roughness:
Flow Length Ifl):
Slope (%) :
2 yr, 24 hr Rainfall (in)
Velocity (ff/sec) :
Computed Flow Time (min):
Shallow Concentrated Flow Computations
Flow Length (it) :
Slow (%) :
Surface Type
Velocity(fl/sec)
Computed Flow Time (min) :
Total TOC (min) ..................16.43
Subbasin Runoff Results
Subarea
Subarea
Subarea
A
B
C
0.4
0 4
0.00
35
8
0.00
3.3
38
0.00
3,90
3,90
0.00
0.08
0.17
0,00
6,87
0.79
0.00
Subarea
Subarea
Subarea
A
B
C
247
0 00
0,00
0.1
0.00
0.00
Grassed waterway
Unpaved
Unpaved
0,47
0.00
0.00
836
0.00
0.00
Total Rainfall(in)................... ... ...........................
.......... 6,00
Total Runoff(in).............................................................
4.71
Peak Runoff (cfs)_.........................................................
1.52
Weighted Curve Number ..............................................
88,73
Time of Concentration (days hhtmmss) ........................
0 00.16 26

Subbasin : DEVA
5.
5
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Rainfall Intensity Graph
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 120
Time (hrs)
Runoff Hydrograph
3
9
7
61
4
3
--
F'
2
lU 1 IV 10 jo 4U 40 w 65 w 9b TUO lub 11U 115
Time (hrs)

Junction Input
SN Element
Invert Ground/Rim Gmun&Rim
Initial
Initial Surcharge Surcharge Ponded Minimum
ID
Elevation
(Max)
(Max)
Water
Water
Elevation
Depth
Area
Pipe
Elevation
Offset Elevation
Depth
Cover
pp
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(tl)
(ft')
(in)
1 BEGIN FLUME
14.23
1500
0.77
14.23
0.00
0.00
-15,00
0.00
0.00
2 HIM 17 DITCH
11-34
1540
4.06
11.34
0.00
15.40
0.00
0.00
0.00
3 STIR 1 E-WALL
11,66
15.60
3.94
11.66
0.00
15.60
0.00
n.00
0.00
4 STR 2 E-WALL
11.59
15.60
4.01
11.59
0.00
15.60
0.00
0.00
0.00
5 STR3 WEIR BOX
10L0
15.00
5.00
13.50
3.50
16.00
1,00
0.00
0,00
6 STR4
1340
16.00
2.60
13.40
0.00
16,00
0.00
0.00
0.00

Junction Results
SN Element
Peak
Peak Max HGL Max HGL
Max
Min Average HGL Average HGL
Time of
Time of
Total Total Time
ID
Inflow
Lateral
Elevation
Depth Surcharge Freeboard
Elevation
Depth
Max HGL
Peak Flooded
Flooded
Inflow
Attained
Attained
Depth
Attained
Attained
Attained
Occurrence
Flooding Volume
Atemed
Occurrence
(cfs)
(ofs)
(ft)
(f)
(ft)
(ft)
. (ft)
(ft)
(days hh:mm)
(days hh:mm)
(ac-in)
(min)
1 BEGIN FLUME
5.00
5.00
14.82
0.59
0.00
1.49
14.28
0.05
0 1325
0 00'.00
0.00
000
2 HWV 17 DITCH
15.83
0.00
12.06
072
0.00
3.34
1142
0.08
0 13:21
0 00,00
0.00
000
3 STIR 1 E-WALL
11.36
11.36
13.16
1.50
0.00
244
11.75
0,09
0 1304
0 0000
000
0.00
4 STR2E-WALL
11.58
L51
13.01
1.42
0,00
2.59
11.68
0,09
01302
000.00
000
000
5 STR 3 WEIR BOX
0.55
0,00
14,03
4,03
0.00
4.30
13.56
3,56
0 13:28
0 00:00
0.00
O.o0
6 STIR 4
5,53
0.00
14.03
0,63
0.00
9.37
13,49
009
0 13:28
0 00:00
0.00
0.00

Channel Input
SN Bernard
Length
Inlet
Inlet
Outlet Outlet Total Average Shape
Height Width
Manning's Entrance ExiVBend Additional Initial Flap
ID
Invert
Invert
Invert Invert Drop
Slope
Roughness
Losses
Losses
Losses Flow Gate
Elevation Offset Elevator, Offset
0t)
(a)
(ff)
(ff) (4) (h)
N
Oft) (ff)
(cfs)
1 EAST FLUME
358,00
1340
000
12.12 0.00 1.28
0.3600 User -Defined
2.080 20.000
0.0320
0.5000
0.5000
00000 0.00 No
2 E% DITCH
24700
11.50
0.00
11.34 0.00 0.25
0.1000 Trapezoidal
2.400 14.010
0.0320
0.5000
0.5000
0.0000 0.00 No
3 EX HWY 17 DITCH
5.00
11.34
0.00
11.34 000 0.00
0.1000 Trapezoidal
2.400 14.040
0,0320
0,5000
0.5000
0.0000 0.00 Yes
4 NORTH FLUME
208.00
14.23
0.00
13.40 0.00 0.83
0.4000 User -Defined
2.080 20.000
0.0320
0.5000
0.5000
0.0000 0.00 No

Channel Results
SN Element
Peak
Time of Design Flow
Peak Flowl Peak Flow Travel Peak Flow
Peak Flow
Total Time Froude Reported
ID
Flow
Peak Flow
Capacity
Design Flow
Velocity
Time
Depth
DepW
Surcharged Number Condition
Occurrence
Ratio
Total Depth
Ratio
(cfs)
(days hh:mm)
(cfs)
(FUsec)
(min)
(ft)
(min)
1 EAST FLUME
5.52
0 1328
9629
0.06
1.23
4.85
0.75
0.36
000
2E%DITCH
11.60
013'.05
37.08
0.31
2.01
2.05
1.06
0.44
000
3 EX HWV 17 DITCH
18.98
013:11
3685
0.52
13.95
0.01
0.86
043
000
4 NORTH FLUME
4.99
0 13:25
101.73
0.05
1.44
2.41
0.61
0.29
0.00

Pipe Input
SN Element
Length
Inlet
Intel
Outlet OWet Total Average Pipe
Pipe Pipe
Manning's Entrance Exit/Bend Additional Initial Flap
No. of
ID
Invert
Invert
Invert Invert Drop
Slope Shape
Diameter or Width
Roughness
Losses
Losses
Losses Flow Gate
Barrels
Elevation Offset Elevation Offset
Height
(ft)
(ff)
(h)
(ft) (ft) (ft)
N
(in) (in)
(cf.)
1 1 T'O2
74.00
11.66
0.00
11.59 0.00 0.07
0.0900 CIRCULAR
24.000 24.000
00130
0.5000
0.5000
0.0000 0.00 No
2
2 3 TO 4
18.00
13.50
3.50
13.40 0.00 0.10
05600 CIRCULAR
12.000 12.000
0.0130
0.5000
0.5000
0.0000 0.00 No
2
3 EX 151N CPP
40.00
12.12
0,00
11.34 0.00 0.78
1.9500 CIRCULAR
15.000 15.000
0.0120
0.5000
05000
0.0000 0.00 No
- 1

Pipe Results
SN Element
Peak
Time of Design Flow
Peak Flay/ Peak Flow Travel Peak Flow
Peak Flow
Total Time
Froude Reported
ID
Flow
Peak Flow
Capacity
Design Flow
Velocity Time
Depth
Depth]
Surcharged
Number Condition
Occurrence
Ratio
Total Depth
Ratio
lets)
(days hhtmm)
(cts)
(Wise) (min)
(fl)
(min)
11T02
11.36
013',05
13.92
0.82
2.31 0.53
1.46
0.73
0.00
Calculated
23TO4
0.55
0 1239
5.31
0.10
1.25 0.24
0.58
0.58
0.00
Calculated
3 EX 45IN CPP
5.34
0 13',43
9.77
0.55
6.68 0.10
0.79
0.64
0.00
Calculated

Storage Nodes
Storage Node : EX 15 IN CPP
Input Data
Invert Elevation (X)............................... _.... ....
................ .._..... 12.12
Max (Rim) Elevation (ft)........ ...............................
..... --- ... .... ..... 1540
Max (Rim) Offset (fi)...................................................................
3.28
Initial Water Elevation (It)............................................................
12.12
Initial Water Depth pp.................................................................
0.00
Porded Area(tt').........................................................................
0.00
Evaporation Loss.........................................................................
0.00
Storage Area Volume Curves
Storage Curve: FLUME STORAGE
Stage
Storage
Storage
Area
Volume
(fl)
(tt')
(111)
0
0
0.000
.88
5066
2229.04
1.88
16926
13225.04

Storage Area Volume Curves
Storage Volume (ft )
Storage Area (tt`)
Storage Area —Storage Volume

Storage Node : EX 15 IN CPP (continued)
Output Summary Results
Peak Inflow (cis)
... 552
Peak Lateral Inflow (da) ... ........ ...... . ......... .... .....................
O'Do
Peak Outflow (cfs) ......................... ......... .... .. .............
5.34
Peak Exfileat!Dn Flow Rate (cfm)
000
Max HGL Elevation Attained (11) ..................................................
13.00
Max HGL Depth Attained (ft) ........ .... .... ..... .... - ...
....... 0.88
Average HGL Elevatim Attained (11) ...
12.20
Average HGL Depth Attained (11) ................................................
0.08
Time of Max HGL 0mummoe (date hh:mm).- ... --.
-- 0 13:43
Total Exfikrabon Volume (1000-112) ........................... ................
0.000
Total Flooded Volume (ac-in) . ................... . ................................
0
Total Time Doodled (min) ............................................................
0
Total Retention Time (sec) ..........................................................
0.00

e
Storage Area Volume Curves
atones Volume tIm
Storage Area (W)
— Storage Area — Storage Volume
C
a
A
a

Storage Node: WET POND
Input Data
Invert Elevation(ft)........ ......_... .... ..............................................
6.00
Max (Rim) Eleva6an (ft)..............................................................
1620
Max (Rim) Offset (ft)...................................................................
1020
Initial Water Elevaton(11)............................................................
13.50
Initial Water Depth (R).................................................................
7,50
Poneeo Area (fe).........................................................................
8289.00
EvaporationLoss.........................................................................
0.00
Storage Area Volume Curves
Sbrage Curve: WET POND
Stage
Storage
Storage
Area
Volume
(ft)
On
UP)
0
177
0.000
1
447
312.00
2
844
957.50
3
1337
2048,00
4
1908
3669.50
5
2549
5897.00
6
3268
8805.50
7
4D82
1247o50
7.5
8269
15553.25
8
10303
20196.25
9
13888
32291.75
10
32758
55614.75

EXPRESS FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY/OWNERSHIP FORM
JUN 0 3 2013 SEDIMENTATION POLLUTION CONTROL ACT
EXPRESS PERMITTING OPTION 08012007
Nolte s0 r�ti`a�jl�iRitiate any land -disturbing activity on one or more acres as covered by the Act before this
form and an acceptable erosion and sedimentation control plan have been completed and approved by the
Land Quality Section, N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources. (Please type or print and, if
the question is not applicable or the e-mail and/or fax information unavailable, place N/A in the blank.)
Part A.
1. Project Name Edenton NC -New Retail Store
2. Location of land -disturbing activity: County Chowan City or Township Edenton
Highway/Street Broad Street Latitude 36 04'33" N Longitude 76 35'40" W
3. Approximate date land -disturbing activity will commence: 7/1/2013
4. Purpose of development (residential, commercial, industrial, institutional, etc.): Commercial
5. Total acreage disturbed or uncovered (including off -site borrow and waste areas): 2.33
6. Amount of fee enclosed: $ 195.00 . The Express Permitting application fee is a dual charge. The
normal fee of $65.00 per acre is assessed without a ceiling amount. In addition, the Express Permitting
supplement is $250.00 per acre up to eight acres, after which the Express Permitting supplemental fee
is a fixed $2,000.00 (Example: 9 acres total is $2,585). NOTE: Both fees are rounded up to the next
whole acre and need to be paid by separate checks to NCDENR.
7. Has an erosion and sediment control plan been filed? Yes No Enclosed XX
8. Person to contact should erosion and sediment control issues arise during land -disturbing activity:
Name Melissa Ballard E-mail Address melissa ballard(a broadwaygroup.net
Telephone [phone] Cell # 256-424-2567 Fax # [phone]
9. Landowner(s) of Record (attach accompanied page to list additional owners):
Anna W. Ragland Family Trust by
W Trent Ragland Agent 919-782-7283 919-782-4224
Name Telephone Fax Number
305 Transylvania Ave Same
Current Mailing Address Current Street Address
Raleigh NC 27609 Same
City State Zip City State Zip
10. Deed Book No. 835 Page No. 453 Provide a copy of the most current deed.
Part B.
1. Person(s) or firm(s) who are financially responsible for the land -disturbing activity (Provide
comprehensive list of all responsible parties on an attached sheet):
The Broadway Group LLC melissa baIlard (o)broadwavgroup net
Name E-mail Address
132 Holmes Ave NW Same
Current Mailing Address Current Street Address
Huntsville AL 35801
City State Zip
State
Telephone [phone] Fax Number 256-533-7236
Zip

2. (a) If the Financially Responsible Party is not a resident of North Carolina, give name and street address
of the designated North Carolina Agent:
Meahan Hu
Name
7511 Bedfordshire Drive
Current Mailing Address
Charlotte NC 28226
City State Zip
Telephone [phone]
meghan hu(d)gmail com
E-mail Address
Same
Current Street Address
City
Fax Number
State Zip
(b) If the Financially Responsible Party is a Partnership or other person engaging in business under an
assumed name, attach a copy of the Certificate of Assumed Name. If the Financially Responsible
Party is a Corporation, give name and street address of the Registered Agent:
Name of Registered Agent
Current Mailing Address
City State Zip
Telephone N/A
N/A
E-mail Address
Current Street Address
City State Zip
Fax Number N/A
(c) In order to facilitate Express Permitting, it is necessary to be able to contact the Engineer or other
consultant who can assist in providing any necessary information regarding the plan and its preparation:
4Site Inc.
Engineering Firm or other consultant
Matthew Gillespie
Individual contact person (type or print)
mgillespiena 4siteinc biz
E-mail Address
256-539-1221 256-539-1220
Telephone Fax Number
The above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and was provided by me
under oath (This form must be signed by the Financially Responsible Person if an individual or his attorney -in -
fact, or if not an individual, by an officer, director, partner, or registered agent with the authority to execute
instruments for the Financially Responsible Person). I agree to provide corrected information should there be
any change in the information provided herein.
Type
Signature
Manager
Title or Authority
5/23/2013
Date
I, M6 i S 5 -b . t�A.[Larcj a Notary Public of the County of KOa tSa n
Alp% r.o /1
State offdafEk-6ereline, hereby certify that �0�0.1.�t' (n• 'i 0 YUOIsi-tom a.Ln appeared personally
before me this day and being duly sworn acknowledged that the above form was executed by him.
Witness my hand and notarial seal, this a4*1D day of " NLLt x- 20 13
Notary
Seal I
My commission expires ') I I J I. t I v^_

Dumpor, Samir
From: Matthew Gillespie <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 11:06 AM
To: Dumpor, Samir
Cc: 'Melissa Ballard'
Subject: FW: Edenton, NC New Retail Store No. 6339 Wet Pond
Samir,
See the attached email approval of the wet pond from the Manager of the Edenton Airport.
Thanks,
Matthew Gillespie, El
Senior Project Manager
®SITS
® ®INCORPORATED
CMI.INGI,(1'Nti . UMIS(I.M wKINIIGl1
7500 Memorial Parkway SW, Suite 209
Huntsville Alabama 35802
Office: 256.539.12211 Fax: [phone]
Cell: 256-682-8651
wwwAsiteinc.biz
From: harry davis fmailto:davislanding()yahoo.coml
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 9:58 AM
To: Matthew Gillespie
Subject: Re: Edenton, NC New Retail Store No. 6339 Wet Pond
Matthew Gillespie:
The management of Northeastern Regional Airport has no objection to the construction of a "Wet Pond" at the
site described as three miles NW of the approach end of RW 19. More specifically described as N360433 and
W763540.
Regards,
Harry Davis
Manager, Northeastern Regional Airport
From: Matthew Gillespie <mgillespie(@4siteinc.biz>
To: davislandingna Vahoo.com
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 10:45 AM
Subject: FW: Edenton, NC New Retail Store No. 6339 Wet Pond
Harry,

See email below.
Thanks,
Matthew Gillespie, EI
Senior Project Manager
7500 Memorial Parkway SW, Suite 209
Huntsville Alabama 35802
Office: 256.539.12211 Fax: [phone]
Cell:256-682-8651
www.4siteinc.biz
From: Matthew Gillespie [mailto:maillesoieCab4siteinc biz]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 11:05 AM
To: '[e-mail]'
Cc: 'Melissa Ballard'
Subject: Edenton, NC New Retail Store No. 6339 Wet Pond
Mr. Davis,
Thank you for speaking with me this moming. As mentioned on the phone NCDENR has a rule requiring any
developer who is planning on constructing a "wet pond" or any device that will permanently hold water, within
5 miles of an airport, is required to notify the local airport and receive approval to construct the "wet pond".
We are the civil engineering firm representing the developer and we need to request Edenton Airport Approval
to construct a new "Wet Pond" (i.e. a stormwater detention pond that will permanently hold water) located at
our site. The site is located approximately 3.0 miles form the NW corner of Runway 19.
Project Site Location:
Lat: 36 degrees, 04 minutes, 33 seconds N
Long: 76 degrees, 35 minutes, 40 seconds W
Do you approve of the construction of a wet pond for the above described property?
Thanks,
Matthew Gillespie, EI
Senior Project Manager
7500 Memorial Parkway SW, Suite 209
Huntsville Alabama 35802
Office: 256,539.12211 Fax: [phone]
Cell: 256-682-8651
w•ww.4siteinc. biz