SW7130602_COMPLIANCE_20130603

NORTH CARULINA
Department of Environmental Qua!
M OA

STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
POST -CONSTRUCTION PERMITS
PERMIT NO.
DOC TYPE
❑ CURRENT PERMIT
❑ APPROVED PLANS
❑ HISTORICAL FILE
COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION
DOC DATE
D 5
YYYYMMDD

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
(EXPRESS WILMINGTON DISTRICT
JUN 0 3'2013 Action Id. SAW-2013-00552 County: Chowan U.S.G.S. Quad: NC -Edenton copy
NC ®ENR NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERNIINATION
Property Owner: The Broadway Group, LLC Agent: ATC Associates of North Carolina, PC
c/o Ms. Melissa Ballard c/o Mr. Benjamin Wilson
Address: 132 Holmes Ave., NW Address: 2725 Millbrook Road, Suite 121
Huntsville Alabama 35801 Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Property description: Property is an undeveloped parcel currently forested with pines.
Size (acres) 3.95 Nearest Town Edenton
Nearest Waterway Queen Anne Creel c River Basin Pasauotank
USGS HUC 3010205 Coordinates 36.076338-76.594545
Location description: The property Is located in Edenton on North Broad Street in Chowan County, North Carolina.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
Based on preliminary information, there may be wetlands on the above described property. We strongly suggest you have
this property inspected to determine the extent of Department of the Army (DA) jurisdiction. To be considered final, a
jurisdictional determination must be verified by the Corps. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action
under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process( Reference 33 CFR Part 331). If you wish, you may
request an approved JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also, you may
provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
B. Approved Determination
_ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or
our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
There are waters of the U.S. including wetlands on the above described property subject to the permit requirements of
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
We strongly suggest you have the wetlands on your property delineated. Due to the size of your property and/or our
present workload, the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner. For a more timely
delineation, you may wish to obtain a consultant. To be considered final, any delineation must be verified by the Corps.
The waters of the U.S. including wetlands on your project area have been delineated and the delineation has been
verified by the Corps. We strongly suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be
reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to
CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be.
relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
_ The waters of the U.S. including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat
signed by the Corps Regulatory Official identified below on — Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
X There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
Page 1 of 2

X The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act
(CAMA): You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to
determine their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US and/or wetlands without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). If you have any questions regarding this
determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Mr. Dan Bacon at 910-251-4619.
C. Basis For Determination The subject area did not exhibit the three parameters identified in the Regional
Supplement to the 1987 Corps of Engineers Manual. Wetland Hydrology was the lacking indicator.
D. Remarks Site was visited on 26 March 2013
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the
particular site identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation
provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation
in USDA programs,you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources
Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in
B. above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Jason Steele, Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 1OM15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for
appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP.
Should you decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by 26 May 2013.
**It is not necessaryra
'subaAn1oiLyrs1,o,,,0ffieef you do not object to the determination n this
correspondence.**
Corps Regulatory O
Date: 3/26/2013 �)fteo
Expiration Date: 3/26/2018
The Wilmington District is, providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to
do so, please complete the allac omer Satisfaction Survey or visit httn://oer2.nwp.usace.army,mil/survey.html to
complete the survey online.
LA

C®pv
EApplicant: !he Broadway Group Wimb000per: SAW-2013-00552
Attached is:
See Section below
PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter of permission)A
❑
PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter of permission)B
IINITIAL
PERMIT DENIAL
C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
❑
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
G I n e a
a b a � sace ar .m l.r e a on _ eeo. o
a 0
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section Il of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: if you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section Ii of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section 11 of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL. DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which maybe appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideraiiori by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDIJIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact: also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Mr. Jason Steele, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Attn: Mr. Dan Bacon CESAD-PDO
2407 West 5`h Street U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
Washington, North Carolina 27889 60 Forsyth Street, Room IOM15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone:[phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of anv site investigation. and will have the onnormnity to narticinate in all site investigations.
or
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: Mr. Dan Bacon, 2407 West 5th Street, Washington,
North Carolina 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Jason Steele,
Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone].

JUN 0 3 2013
u NC ®ENR
ATC Associates of North Carolina, PC
2725 E. Millbrook Rd
Suite121 Phone: [phone]
Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax: [phone]
www.atcassociates.com
April 23, 2013
Ms. Melissa Ballard
The Broadway Group
132 Holmes Avenue NE
Huntsville, Alabama 35801
RE: Report of Infiltration and Mean Seasonal High Water Table
Proposed Dollar General
Edenton, North Carolina
ATC Project #: 45.27739.0060
Gentlemen:
ATC Associates has performed field geotechnical borings hand auger borings, and
laboratory index testing on the soils at the above referenced facility.
INVESTIGATION FOR INFILTRATION RATES AND SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE
The subject property is located in Chowan County. We understand from conversations
with you that the proposed storm water management features will consist of two
infiltration ponds in the eastern portion of the site.
ATC observed the property, taking note of the land (slope, drainage patterns, past use,
etc.) as well as soil conditions (depth, texture, structure, seasonal wetness, restrictive
horizons, etc.) using hand auger borings in the area of the ponds. The approximate
locations of the borings and tests are shown on the location diagrams in the Appendix
to this report.
FIELD AND LABORATORY TESTS
Laboratory testing consisted of visual classification of the soil samples and grain size
analysis were alsoperformed in order to estimate the permeability. Based on Hazen's
Formula of k=(DIO ) where Dio is the 10% finer grain size in mm and the estimated
permeability of the soils (k) is in cm/sec. Laboratory test results are included in the
Appendix.

Infiltration Evaluation and Seasonal High Water Table —
Proposed Dollar General
Edenton, North Carolina
Page 2
The soils map from the USDA web site indicates that the basin will be in the area of
Roanoke Silt Loam. The Roanoke soils are characterized as well drained and having a
moderate permeability with a Ksat value of 0.00 to 0.20 inches per hour.
A typical Roanoke Silt Loam profile is reported as:
0 to 8 inches: Silt loam
8 to 13 inches: Clay loam
13 to 58 inches: Clay
58 to 80 inches: Fine sandy loam
The seasonal mean high water table (SMHWT) level was determined using the NRCS
method of observing the soils for redoxomorphic features as well as observing the local
hydrology and the water levels in the borings.
The proposed construction will consist of two wet ponds. The bottom of the rain ponds
are expected to be within 6 inches of the Seasonal High Water Table.
SOIL CONDITIONS
The soil borings indicated that the soil conditions vary slightly across the site with regard
to soil types. The soil conditions and test results for the boring in the storm water
infiltration pond locations are noted below.
TEST RESULTS AT BORING D-1 and D-2 Visual classification confirms the
classification of Roanoke Silt Loam at a depth of approximately 6 inches to 36 to 54
inches. The soil consists of a dark grey CLAYEY SILT with a trace to.some Fine Sand.
Beneath the surface CLAYEY SILT layer is a SILTY FINE SAND extending to the
termination of boring at 6 to 7 feet below the ground surface.
Permeability (Hydraulic Conductivity) Rate estimated from grain size and soil type =
At 12 inches in dark grey SILTY CLAY
k= 1.5 x 10"6 cm/sec or 0.002 inches/hr
The infiltration rate for the underlying SILTY SAND will be higher but will be
dependent on lateral permeability because of the high water table. A
mounding analysis would be required to determine the infiltration rate if this
layer is used.
ATC Project #: 003.38347.0028
(SA

Infiltration Evaluation and Seasonal High Water Table —
Proposed Dollar General
Edenton, North Carolina
Page 3
Note: Because there is generally some soil structure which provides secondary
permeability pathways slightly higher rates of permeability than those estimated by
grain size and soil type are recommended.
EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Seasonal Mean High Water Table (SMHWT)
Based on our field observations the seasonal mean high water table (SMHWT) level
was determined using the NRCS method of observing the soils for redoxomorphic
features as well as observing the local hydrology and the water levels in the borings.
Based on these observations the SMHWT levels at the site of the infiltration basin is 40
inches in the area of both D-'end D-2.
Recommended Permeability and Infiltration Rates
Based on our borings, the soil types and our testing of the soils we recommend the
following Infiltration rate be used.
• Use an infiltration rate of 0.002 inches/hour
We have enjoyed working with you on this project. If you have any questions please do
not hesitate to contact us.
Respectfully,
ATC Associates of North Carolina,
Herbert L." Tooie" Hales, II P.E.
Geotechnical Engineer
Tooie. Hales(a�atcassociates.com
u �
W,
*SS �0o'.y9 'GZ
SEAL"
10361
Benjamin V. Wilson, P.E.
Principal Engineer
wil son45(cDatca ssociates.com
ATC Project #: 003.38347.0028

ATTACHMENTS
Maps and Location Diagrams
Hand Auger Boring Logs D-1 and D-2
Soil Information
Test Results

SHOWING BORING LOCATIONS
SOURCE: GOOGLE
SITE AERIAL PHOTO
Proposed Dollar General
3.95 Acre Site — North Broad Street
Edenton, North Carolina
ATC PROJECT NO.
003.38347.0028
SCALE: NOTED
�ATt

0
a
re• .�
ruw rawc m w
m - nar
• Q2
\%
2.0270
••F•11
u•w w a•ci�.vp
u,n •�
445
I
•Q% 1 Il:t.w.w
1
• �wiOOw•.� \ \
_ •' ••R4
SITE LAYOUT WITH BORING LOCATIONS
SOURCE: The Broadway Group
SITE USGS MAP
ATC PROJECT NO.
Proposed Dollar General 003.38347.0028
3.95 Acre Site — North Broad Street SCALE: NOTED
Edenton, North Carolina

Project Name:
Project Location:
Client:
Dynamic Cone
Penetration Test u
(DCP) d
aBlows per E
n 1.75 inches u10i
LOG OF
A TC Associates of North Carolina, PC HAND
2725 E. Millbrook Road Suite 121 Phone: [phone] AUGER
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 Fax: [phone] D-1
Dollar General
Edenton, NC
Broadway
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
ATC Project # : 003.38347.0028
Engineer: BVW
Depth DCP (Blows per 1.75 inch) Water Level and
Change Lab Test
(Ft) --E--Moisture Content (%) Results
� 0 10 20 30 40 50
0
0.5
6-10-12
1
CLAYEY SILT,
Trace to Some Fine Sand
2.5
6-7-7
2
Dark Grey with Brown Mottles
Very Stiff, (ML-CL)
2.5
4-8-9
3
FINE SANDY SILT, Some Clay
3.5
5-12.14
4
Grey, Stiff, (ML-SM)
5
12-16
5
FINE SAND, Trace Silt
5.0
5
Grey, Medium Dense, (SM)
10-11
6
Boring Terminated at 6.5 feet
7.5
1
Hand Auger Used Full Depth
7.5
10 I I ! I I 10
1 12.5
12.5
W,
12
—2
01,11,
2
L 4
12�
111
l'I
■
24
■
2
Date Started: 4/18/2013 Drilling Method: Hand Auger
Date Completed: 4/18/2013 Sampling Method: Auger Bucket - Disturbed
Soil Tech T Hales Page: 1 of 1
Cp=3.5 tsf
Cp=3.0 tsf
Water Level
at 4.5 feet
after 1.0 hrs
at 4.3 feet
after 5 days

LOG OF
mm
ATCAssociates ofNorth Carolina, PC HAND
2725 E. Millbrook Road Suite 121 Phone. [phone] AUGER
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 Fax: [phone] D-2
Project Name:
Dollar General
Project Location:
Edenton, NC
Client:
Broadway
Dynamic Cone
Penetration Test
(DCP)
v
nBlows per
E
0 1.75 inches
„9
SAMPLE D
ATC Project # : 003.38347.0028
Engineer: BVW
Depth [fDCP (Blows per 1.75inch)Change (Ft)Moisture Content (%) Results
0 10 20 30 40 50
0
CLAYEY SILT,
0.5
12-14
1
Trace to Some Fine Sand
Dark Grey with Brown Mottles
2.5
7.10.11
2
Very Stiff, (ML-CL)
2.5
6-11.12
3
3.0
FINE SAND, Trace to Some Silt
12-16
4
Grey, Medium Dense, (SM)
5
5
9-12-15
5
a-12
6
7.5
7.5
Baring Terminated at 7.0 feet
Hand Auger Used Full Depth
1 12.5
15
10
12.5
15
1�
7
121
81
5B
Started: 4/18/2013 Drilling Method: Hand Auger
o Completed: 4/18/2013 Sampling Method: Auger Bucket - Disturbed
Tech T Hales Page: 1 of 1
Water Level
at 5.0 ft
after 0.25 hrs
at 4.4 feet
after 5 days

Map Unit Description: Roanoke silt loam—Chowan County, North Carolina
Chowan County, North Carolina
Ro—Roanoke silt loam
Map Unit Setting
Landscape: Coastal plains
Elevation: 0 to 20 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 42 to 58 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 to 64 degrees F
Frost -free period: 190 to 270 days
Map Unit Composition
Roanoke, drained, and similar soils: 80 percent
Roanoke, undrained, and similar soils: 10 percent
Description of Roanoke, Drained
Setting
Landform: Depressions on marine terraces, flats on marine terraces
Down -slope shape: Concave, linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parentmaterial: Clayey marine deposits and/orfluviomarine deposits
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low
to moderately high (0.00 to 0.20 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: High (about 9.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Land capability (nonirrigated): 3w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D
Typical profile
0 to 8 inches: Silt loam
8 to 13 inches: Clay loam
13 to 58 inches: Clay
58 to 80 inches: Fine sandy loam
Description of Roanoke, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Depressions on marine terraces, flats on marine terraces
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Clayey marine deposits and/orfluviomarine deposits
Edenton, Chowan Co
Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2/14/2013
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 2

Map Unit Description: Roanoke silt loam-Chowan County, North Carolina
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low
to moderately high (0.00 to 0.20 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity., High (about 9.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Land capability (nonirrigated): 4w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D
Typical profile
0 to 8 inches: Silt loam
8 to 13 inches: Clay loam
13 to 58 inches: Clay
58 to 80 inches: Fine sandy loam
Data Source Information
Soil Survey Area: Chowan County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 12, Jul 2, 2012
Edenton, Chowan Cc
Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2/14/2013
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 2

Map Unit Description: Roanoke silt loam-Chowan County, North Carolina
Chowan County, North Carolina
Ro—Roanoke silt loam
Map Unit Setting
Landscape: Coastal plains
Elevation: 0 to 20 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 42 to 58 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 to 64 degrees F
Frost -free period., 190 to 270 days
Map Unit Composition
Roanoke, drained, and similar soils: 80 percent
Roanoke, undrained, and similar soils: 10 percent
Description of Roanoke, Drained
Setting
Landform: Depressions on marine terraces, flats on marine terraces
Down -slope shape: Concave, linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material: Clayey marine deposits and/or fluviomarine deposits
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low
to moderately high (0.00 to 0.20 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of pending: None
Available water capacity: High (about 9.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Land capability (nonirrigated): 3w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D
Typical profile
0 to 8 inches: Silt loam
8 to 13 inches: Clay loam
13 to 58 inches: Clay
58 to 80 inches: Fine sandy loam
Description of Roanoke, Undrained
Setting
Landform: Depressions on marine terraces, flats on marine terraces
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parentmaterial: Clayey marine deposits and/or fluviomarine deposits
Edenton, Chowan Cc
Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2/14/2013
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 2

Map Unit Description: Roanoke silt loam-Chowan County, North Carolina
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Poorly drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low
to moderately high (0.00 to 0.20 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 0 to 12 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: High (about 9.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Land capability (nonirrigated): 4w
Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D
Typical profile
0 to 8 inches: Silt loam
8 to 13 inches: Clay loam
13 to 58 inches: Clay
58 to 80 inches: Fine sandy loam
Data Source Information
Soil Survey Area: Chowan County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 12, Jul 2, 2012
Edenton, Chowan Cc
Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2/14/2013
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 2

UATC Associates of North Carolina, PC
2725 E. Niillbrook Road Suite 121 Phone: [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 Fax: [phone]
Project Name: Dollar General ATC Project # : 003.38347.0028
Project Location: Edenton, NC Engineer: BVW
Client: Broadway
a H a
t n Blows per 0. ta Ec
u
i o 6inches
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
4 4 5 18 1 CLAYEY SILT,
Trace to Some Fine Sand
Dark Grey with Brown Mottles
5 e 5 4 18 2 Very Stiff, (ML-CL)
LOG OF
BORING
B-1
Depth --a SPT (Blows per Foot) Water Level
Change t Moisture Content (%) Lab Test
(Ft) Results
1 f 10 1 100
0 EE
FINE SANDY SILT, Some Clay 1 5.0
z 1 t z 12 1 3 Grey and Brown, Stiff, (ML-SM)
5
8.0
10 2 2 1 18 4
SILTY FINE SAND, 10
Very Loose to Medium Dense
Light Grey (SM)
�� 1r-11 01 1 1 16 1 5
20 1 5 6 7 15 6
Boring Terminated at 20.0 feet 20
Hollow Stem Auger Used
Full Depth
1 25
1 30
(Date Started:
Date Completed
Driller:
25
30
4/22/2013 Drilling Method: Hollow Stem Auger
4/22/2013 Sampling Method: Split Spoon
J&L Page: 1 of 1
Water Level
at 5.6 ft
after 1.0 hrs

mmATC Associates of North Carolina, PC
2725 E. Dlillbrook Road Suite 121 Phone: [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 Fax: [phone]
Project Name:
Project Location
Client:
u_
L
0 Blows per
0 6inches
u
Dollar General
Edenton, NC
Broadway
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
ATC Project # : 003.38347.0028
Engineer: BVW
Depth
Change
--t—SPT (Blows per Foot) Water Level and
Lab Test
t Moisture Content (%) Results
1 10 100
0
5 6 6 16 1 CLAYEY SILT,
Trace to Some Fine Sand
Dark Grey with Brown Mottles
5 6 5 5 16 2 Very Stiff, (ML-CL) 5
FINE SANDY SILT, Some Clay 5.0
1 2 3 10 3 Grey and Brown, Stiff, (ML-SM)
8.0
10 2 3 2 1a 4
SILTY FINE SAND, 10
Very Loose to Medium Dense
Light Grey (SM)
15 1011141 181 5
20 1416161 151 6
25
30
15
Boring Terminated at 20.0 feet I 20
Hollow Stem Auger Used
Full Depth
25
30
112 III
r
5,1
1
'l
Date Started: 4/22/2013 Drilling Method: Hollow Stem Auger
Date Completed: 4/22/2013 Sampling Method: Split Spoon
Driller: J&L Page: 1 of 1

UATC Associates of North Carolina, PC
2725 E. Millbrook Road Suite 121 Phone: [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 Fax: [phone]
Project Name: Dollar General ATC Project # : 003.38347.0028
Project Location: Edenton, NC Engineer: BVW
Client: Broadway
LL
Blows per
Depth
Change
0 6Inches 0C y" SAMPLE DESCRIPTION (Ft)
0 1st end 3rd 8 inches topsoil and rootmat
CLAYEY SILT, 0.9
3 4 5 18 1 Trace to Some Fine Sand
Dark Grey with Brown Mottles
Very Stiff, (MIL-CL)
5 5 8 5 18 2 3.5
FINE SANDY SILT, Some Clay
3 2 1 18 3 Grey and Brown, Stiff, (ML-SM)
10 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 18 1 4
SILTY FINE SAND,
Very Loose to Medium Dense
Light Grey (SM)
15 1011111 141 5
20 3 5 8 18 6
Boring Terminated at 20.0 feet
Hollow Stem Auger Used
Full Depth
1 30
(Date Started: 4/22/2013
Date Completed: 4/22/2013
Driller: J&L
BE
LOG OF
BORING
B-3
t SPT (Blows per Foot) Water Level and
Lab Test
t Moisture Content (%) Results
1 10 100
0 I . . . I r�.l rrrrrrn
5
I
15
20
25
30
Drilling Method: Hollow Stem Auger
Sampling Method: Split Spoon
Page: 1 of 1
Water Level
at 4.8 feet
after 1.0 hrs

ATC Associates of North Carolina, PC
2725 E. Millbrook Road Suite 121 Phone: [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 Fax: [phone]
Name: Dollar General ATC Project # : 003.38347.0028
Location: Edenton, NC Engineer: BVW
Broadway
� n a
aBlows per u -0Ea
8 inches & = rn SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
Depth---t—SPT (Blows per Foot) Water Level
Change MtLab Test
(Ft) t oisture Content (%) Results
00
1 . . „.-10 „.i1
0 ,i
3 5 I 5 18 1 I Dark Grey with Brown Mottles
Very Stiff, (ML-CL)
3.0
FINE SANDY SILT, Some Clay
1 1 0 2 1 18 3 Grey and Brown, Stiff, (ML-SM)
womwl
SILTY FINE SAND,
Very Loose to Medium Dense
Light Grey (SM)
15 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 18 1 5
20 5 6 1 8 18 1 6
Boring Terminated at 20.0 feet
Hollow Stem Auger Used
Full Depth
30
Date Started: 4/22/2013
Date Completed: 4/22/2013
Driller: J&L
8.0
s
15
20
25
30
2
Drilling Method: Hollow Stem Auger
Sampling Method: Split Spoon
Page: 1 of 1
Water Level
at 4.5 feet
after 1.0 hrs

Project Name:
Project Location
Client:
LL_
L
00 Blows per
6inches
u
A TC Associates of'North Carolina, PC
2725 E. D1illbrook Road Suite 121 Phone: [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 Fax: [phone]
Dollar General
Edenton, NC
Broadway
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
ATC Project # : 003.38347.0028
Engineer: BVW
Depth
Change
4 a a 18 1 Dark Grey with Brown Mottles
Very Stiff, (ML-CL)
3.0
5 5 6 6 18 2
FINE SANDY SILT, Some Clay
4 2 2 18 3 Grey and Brown, Stiff, (ML-SM)
SILTY FINE SAND, 8.0
10 2 2 2 18 4 Loose, Light Grey (SM)
Boring Terminated at 10.0 feet
Hollow Stem Auger Used
Full Depth
25
30
Started: 4/22/2013
Completed: 4/22/2013
J&L
LOG OF
BORING
P-1
SPT (Blows per Foot) Water Level and
Lab Test
t Moisture Content (%) Results
1 10 100
o , ....
5
10
15
20
25
Tr1
Drilling Method: Hollow Stem Auger
Sampling Method: Split Spoon
Page: 1 of 1
Water Level
at 5.8 feet
after 0.25 hrs

om
ATC Associates of North Carolina, PC
2725 E. Millbrook Road Suite 121 Phone: [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 Fax: (919) 87I-0335
Project Name: Dollar General ATC Project # : 003.38347.0028
Project Location: Edenton, NC Engineer: BVW
Client: Broadway
E3
Blows per
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
Depth SPT (Blows per Fool) Water Level and
Change Lab Test
(Ft) i—Moisture Content (%) Results
.! 100
0
3 5 6 18 1 Dark Grey with Brown Mottles
Very Stiff, (ML-CL)
3.0
5 5 7 6 18 2
FINE SANDY SILT, Some Clay
3 3 3 18 3 Grey and Brown, Stiff, (ML-SM)
SILTY FINE SAND, 8.0
10 3 3 3 12 4 Loose, Light Grey ISM)
Boring Terminated at 10.0 feet
Hollow Stem Auger Used
Full Depth
15
20
25
30
Started: 4/22/2013
Completed: 4/22/2013
J&L
5
10
15
20
25
30
Drilling Method: Hollow Stem Auger
Sampling Method: Split Spoon
Page: 1 of 1
Water Level
at 5.3 feet
after 0.25 hrs
0

UATC Associates of North Carolina, PC
2725 E. Millbrook Road Suite 121 Phone: [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 Fax: [phone]
Project Name: Dollar General
Project Location: Edenton, NC
Client: Broadway
Dynamic Cone
Penetration Test
v (DCP) m
aBlows per E
ATC Project # : 003.38347.0028
Engineer: BVW
LOG OF
HAND
AUGER
Depth DCP (Blows per 1.75 inch) Water Level and
Change Lab Test
(Ft) t Moisture Content (%) Results
0 10 20 30 40 50
0
0.5
e-10-12
1
CLAYEY SILT,
Trace to Some Fine Sand
2.5
6-7.7
2
Dark Grey with Brown Mottles
Very Stiff, (ML-CL)
zs
4-8-9
3
3.5
FINE SANDY SILT, Some Clay
e-12-14
4
Grey, Stiff, (ML-SM)
5
12-16
5
FINE SAND, Trace Silt
5.0
5
Grey, Medium Dense, (SM)
10-11
6
Boring Terminated at 6.5 feet
7.5
Hand Auger Used Full Depth
zs
10
11
Mtiy
10
12.5
1s
I12i
Is� 2
I
2
4
■
1-2�
24
I
�I
■
2
Started: 4/18/2013 Drilling Method: Hand Auger
Completed: 4/18/2013 Sampling Method: Auger Bucket - Disturbed
Tech T Hales Page: 1 of 1
;p=3.5 tsf
;p=3.0 tsf
Water Level
at 4.5 feet
after 1.0 hrs
at 4.3 feet
after 5 days

LOG OF
ty� " A TC Associates of North Carolina, PC HAND
�I 2725 E. Millbrook Road, Suite 121 Phone: [phone] AUGER
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 Fax: [phone] D-2
Project Name: Dollar General ATC Project # : 003.38347.0028
Project Location: Edenton, NC Engineer: BVW
Client: Broadway
Dynamic Cone
Penetration Test
(DCP) 2
cBlows per E
n - 1.75 inches
Will
2.5
!.1
7.5
10
i61
Depth — @ DCP (Blows per 1.75 inch) Water Level and
Change Lab Test
(Ft) t Moisture Content (°/) Results
0 10 i 30 i 50
0
CLAYEY SILT,
0.5
12-14
1
Trace to Some Fine Sand
Dark Grey with Brown Mottles
7.10-11
2
Very Stiff, (ML-CL)
3.0
6-11-12
3
FINE SAND, Trace to Some Silt
12-16
4
Grey, Medium Dense, (SM)
9.12.15
5
8-12
6
Boring Terminated at 7.0 feet
Hand Auger Used Full Depth
1
7
2.5 T
6�
1
5
81
7.5
10
12.5
15
Date Started: 4/18/2013 Drilling Method: Hand Auger
Date Completed: 4/18/2013 Sampling Method: Auger Bucket - Disturbed
Soil Tech T Hales Page: 1 of 1
Water Level
at 5.0 ft
after 0.25 hrs
at 4.4 feet
after 5 days

Ok
ir-
to
H