SW7071013_HISTORICAL FILE_20071102

STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
POST -CONSTRUCTION PERMITS
PERMIT NO.
SW
DOC TYPE
❑ CURRENT PERMIT
❑ APPROVED PLANS
HISTORICAL FILE
COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION
DOC DATE
y/�U
YYYYM M D D

Quible
Quible & Associates, P.C.
ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES • PLANNING • SURVEYING
SINCE 1959
October 31. 2007
Samir Dumpor
NCDENR
Division of Water Quality
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, North Carolina 27889
Re: Stormwater Review SW7071013
Proposed Belhaven Fish & Oyster Multifamily Residential
Additional Information
Dear Mr. Dumpor:
P.O. Drawer B70
K"ty Hawk, NC 27949
Phone. [phone]
Fax: [phone]
PRINCIPALS
Sean C. Boyle, P E.
Joseph S. Lassiter, C.E.P.
Eduardo J. Valdlvieso, P.E.
ASSOCIATES
Joseph J. Anlouf. P.E.
Katherine C. Morchellp, R.I.S.
RLF I r
Enclosed, please find a package of additional information as requested in your October 26"' letter.
Specifically, your requests are addressed as follows (numbers correspond to numbered comments from
your letter):
J1. "file Applicant was errantly listed as "Dixon and I lo'yle Partnership." The proper Applicant is
"Day Beacon #9, LLC." A printout from the NC Department of the Secretary of State is attached
to this letter identifying John W. Dixon as the Registered Agent. Corrected copies of the
Application and Supplements are also included.
V 2. The Supplement for Basin 2 has been corrected to show 115 c.f. of required storage volume.
3. The vegetated filter and level spreader widths have been revised to 13 feet (this was a new
requirement in the new BMP Manual that I had not picked up on).
4. The level spreader is acting as the control device at an elevation of 5.0'. That being said, the top
of DI#1 has also been raised to an elevation of 5.0 feet.
5. The infiltration basin detail and notes have been revised to require 4" of #57 stone over filter
fabric along the side slopes, but with a sand bottom.
6. Two copies of revised plans, application, and supplements are included in this package. Two
copies of the narrative (unchanged with this submittal) are also included so that you can
completely replace the original submission package.

If you have any questions, or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at
[phone].
Sincerely,
Quible & Associates, P.C.
David A. Deel, P.E.
ene: as stated

North Carolina Secretary of State
Page I of I
Elaine F. Marshall
Secretary
CORPORATIONS
Corporations Home
Search By Corporate Name
Search For New Corporation
Search By Registered Agent
Important Notice
Corporations FAQ
Homeowners' Association FAQ
Tobacco Manufacturers
Dissolution Reports
Non -Profit Reports
Verify Certification
Online Annual Reports
LINKS & LEGISLATION
KBBE 132B Annual Reports
SOSID Number Correction
2001 Bill Summaries
1999 Senate Bills
Annual Reports 1997
Corporations 1997
Register for E-Procurement
Dept. of Revenue
ONLINE ORDERS
Start An Order
New Payment Procedures
CONTACT US
Corporations Division
Secretary of State's web site
TOOLS
Secretary of State Home
Secretary of State Site Map
Printable Page
North Carolina
DERAR !�r
MENT OI= THE
SECRETARY 01= STATE
PO Box 29622 Raleigh, INC 27626-0622 (9191807-2000
Date: 10/30/2007
Click here to:
View Document Filings I
Print apre-populated Annual Report Form I Annual Report G
Report I
Corporation N
Name
Name Type
NC Day Beacon #9, LLC Legal
Limited Liability (Company Information
SOSID: 0809900
Status: Current -Active
Date Formed:
10/26/2005
Citizenship:
i
Domestic
State of Inc.:
NC
Duration:
Perpetual
Registered Agent
Agent Name:
I
Dixon, John W.
Registered Office Address:
103 East 8th Street
Registered Mailing Address:
Nags Head NC 27959
PO Box 1327
Nags Head NC 27959
Principal Office Address:
103 East 8th Street
I
Nags Head NC 27959
Principal Mailing Address:
PO Box 1327
Nags Head NC 27959
For questions or comments about the Secretary of State's web site, please send e-mail to Webmaster.
http://www.secretary.state.iic.us/corporations/Corp.aspx?Pitem1d=7847447 10/30/2007

Michael 17. Easley, Governor
i William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
rNorth Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
I
� I Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
October 26, 2007
.•1
Dixon & HoylePartnership
Attn.: John W. Dixon
P.O. Box 1327
Nags Head, NC 27959
i
Subject: Stormwater Review SW7071013
Belhaven Fish & Oyster
Beaufort County
Dear Mr. Dixon:
This office received a Coastal Stormwater permit application and plans for the subject project on October
18, 2007. A preliminary review of the project indicates that before a State Stormwater permit can be issued the
following additional information is needed.
1 1. Our search of the North Carolina Department of the Secretary of State website didn't find any results for
Dixon & Hoyle Partnership registration. Please advise if applicant name is correct or provide the
registration information; i
2. The Stormwater Calculations and Narrative shows required volume for Infiltration basin of 115 c.f., while
the supplement calls for 106 c.f.. Please revise the Supplement for Infiltration Basin 2 to reflect this
change;
V/ 3. Revise the vegetated filter and level spreader width to at! least 13 feet, to comply with the minimum level
/ spreader length;
V 4. As proposed, the D.I. #1 will be used as an off-line bypass, however by setting the top elevation of said D.I.
to 4.5' and having the bottom elevation of Infiltration basin #1 at 4.3', the effective storage will be only
0.2' before the stormwater start to bypass the system. Revise the top elevation of D.I. #1;
i
5. Ideally, the sides of an open infiltration basin should be vegetated, but could be stabilized with pretty much
any suitable material as long as it didn't create a nuisance condition and prevented erosion of the slopes into
the basin. As proposed, 4" of #57 stone over filter fabric on the side slopes of an infiltration basin would be
acceptable, however the bottom should be left with a 4" sand layer, unvegetated with no rock or gravel or
/filter fabric. Please revise;
6. Provide two sets of signed and sealed calculations, plan shleets and documents.
The above requested information must be received in this office prior to November 2, 2007 or your
application will be returned as incomplete. The return of this project will necessitate resubmittal of all required
items including the application fee. If you need additional time to submit the required information, please mail
or fax your request for time extension to this office at the Letterhead address.
You should also be aware that the Stont water Rules require that the permit be issued prior to any
development activity. Construction without a permit is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H.1000 and North Carolina
General Statute 143-215.1 and may result in civil penalties of up to $10,000 per day.
N''o�� `h Carolina
watura!!y
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Washington Regional Office Phone (252) 946'16481 FAX [phone] Customer Service
Internet: h2o.em.stale.nc.us 943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, NC 27889 1-877-623-6748
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

Please reference the Stormwater Project Number above on all correspondence. If you have questions, please
feel free to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
-C7:E
Samir Dumper, PE
Environmental Engineer
Washington Regional Office
cc: Andy Deel, PE, Quible & Associates, P.C.
lWashington Regional Office`7

iDE
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Request for Express Permit Review
FILL-IN all information below and CHECK required Permit(s). Fax or email this completed form along with a narrative
and vicinity map of the project location to the appropriate One -Stop Coordinator:
• Fayetteville or Raleigh Region -David Lee 919-791-4203; davfd.le%encmail.net RECEIVED
• Mooresville & Asheville Region -Patrick Grogan 704-663-3772'or patrick.oroaan(a)ncmail.net
• Washington Region -Lyn Hardison 252-946-9215 or IVn.hardison(aDncmall.net OCT 1 8 2001
• Wilmington Region -Cameron Weaver 910-350-2004 or camerdn.weaverdncmail.net
Project application received after 12 noon will be stamped in the following work day. ®`n'Q_INA R®
APPLICANT Name 1n}n u) p;y , i11ac.aa,-n 20Compan•{�I NV idll
Address-- pXc,, 4- -0, �7A�,•kHE,r �T I
City/State NuaS Heac(, NC Zip_jz95 r
Phone_(z52) 441-211/J Fax I Email
PROJECT SYSTEM(S) TRIBUTARY TO PanFrno C.rPPj� SURFACE WATER CLASSIFICATION IF;
PROJECT Name fBLLLa ei Fill, +n,,,frr i County �F
PROJECT LOCATION (ADDRESS) S {l o� I �F P� lim s{reef aMl (1e IP 5}.
ENGINEER/CONSULTANT �o,,;d A . >7e l V.
Company—O,i 61a A•.eesaj y p c I
Address P o C)Irajer g7n City/StateklHu ltaa?c Nc' Zip 27949
Phone[phone]- s3nn Fax_(zs2)2EI- /2-601 Email cqj�e ryible con.
State or National Environmental Policy Act (SEPA, NEPA) - EA or EIS Required Yes No
❑ STREAM ORIGIN Determination: of Stream calls; Stream Name
® STORMWATER ❑Low Density ❑ High Density -Detention Pond ❑High Density -Other
❑ Low Density -Curb & Gutter ® High Density -Infiltration ❑ Off Site
WETLANDS MUST BE ADDRESSED BELOW
❑ COASTAL ❑ Excavation & Fill ❑ Bridges & Culverts I El
Information
MANAGEMENT ❑ Upland Development ❑ Marina Development ❑ Urban Waterfront
❑ LAND QUALITY Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan with Qlq(Zacres to be disturbed.(CK # (for DENR use))
❑ WETLANDS (401): Check all that apply Isolated wetland on Property ❑ Yes ❑ No
Wetlands on Site ❑ Yes ❑ No / Buffer Impacts: ❑ No ❑ YES: acres)
Wetlands Delineation has been completed: ❑ Yes ❑ No / Minor Variance: ❑ No ❑ YES
Major General Variance ❑ No ❑ YES
US ALOE Approval of Delineation completed: ❑ Yes ❑ No 401 Application required: ❑Yes ❑ No If YES, ❑ Regular
404 Application in Process w/ US ACOE: ❑ Yes ❑ No / Permit Received from US ACOE ❑ Yes ❑ No
Perennial, Blue line stream, etc on site ❑ yes ❑ No
The legislation allows additional fees, not to exceed 50% of the original Express Review permit application fee, to be
charged for subsequent reviews due to the insufficiency of the permit applications.
For DENR use only
Fee Split for multiple permits: (Check #3) Total Fee Amount $40O�1)
SUBMITTAL FeeI I ISUBMITTAL DATES Fee

._ �... .. ...: ..�. Crri JZ'U=UINI3 v a........... 13`,4i A "!.eS v:..'' ,."...,•
Date Received Fee Paid Permit Number
State of North Carolina 5 4CK l oligI6 7
E Et3V� L-V) Department of Environment and Natural Resources
OCT 1 8 2007 Division of Water Quality
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
DWQ-�WAP0 This form may be photocopied for use as an original
le� v 4L _ � �
I. GENERAL INFORMATION {
1. Applicants name (specify Che name of the corporation, individual, etc. who owns the project):
.�n.i xt�p b l-�nv�.o arinPi S�7D
21 Print Owner/Signing Official's name and title (person legally responsible for facility and compliance):
3'All U) D)xdnl COn"altrul Parjner
3. Mailing Address for person listed in item 2 above:
City: N a e H Earl State:__A C. Zip: 2 7 9 S 9
Telephone Number: _(_--;_ 6_Z ) qq f - 2 110
4. Project Name (subdivision, facility, or establishment name - should be consistent with project name on plans,
specifications,letters, operation and maintenance agreements, etc.):
Relkavei, FisA t Cvz6ler
5. Location of Project (street address):
5QU1k 5)dp of 1-0it. ��„}_5}Je-J (WUley-51reet)i rrn , rax; � ize)<?.
city:_'BeLoyeh County: BeratJorl
6. Directions to project (from nearest major intersection):
(gale j5 �Occr�A.j I u 1[c�r°Iv 70C2Li�i O` r' L�1�'Y' ,usY/�r n� Pao �i�n
11tee� 0hel ci r Mt4e4
7. Latitude: 330 32' 1 3 Ail1, N Longitude: _aO 3 7 ' 20. 13 ° W of project
8. Contact person who can answer questions about the project:
Name:_David A naPl (- E Telephone Number: ( 2Sz ) 26/. 3 00
II. PERMIT INFORMATION:
1. Specify whether project is (check one): _X-_New Renewal - Modification
Form SWU-101 Version 3.99 Page 1 of 4

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT&NA-ruRAL-RESOURCES
Division of Water Quality - Storinwater Permitting Unit
COASTAL STORMWATER
The following items are considered when reviewing an app
Stormwater management. This checklist is intended to (1)
during the review process and (2) facilitate communication
intended to replace information (including other lists) whict
supplements, BMP manual or the regulations. Nor is it intf
respect to the sufficiency of the information submitted.
ON CHECKLIST
cation in accordance with T15A:02H.1000,
assist the reviewers in maintaining consistency
3etween the reviewer and applicant. It is not
may be part -of the application -form,
ided to bypass best professional judgement with
This double sided page lists those items impacting "Application Completeness". 'Project Types and
Supplements" follows the checklist and provides an overview of low density, general, and high density
projects and the associated supplement forms. The latest 'versions of all referenced forms and documents
may be obtained on-line at hftp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/su/Forms Documents.htm.
APPLICATION
1) Stormwater Permit Application Form SWU-101
a.
VOriginal and one copy are provided. The cc
p�eJ iti
All
b..
�[ tems of the application are completed
C.
✓Named applicant is an owner or corporation
'Z d.
For corporations, registration with the SecrE
_
d tabase,
e.
Signing official is the owner, a corporate Pr(
member/manager. Documentation is required
wishes to delegate signature authority, a signe
and i must in the name, title, mailing add
si er
f.
eceiving stream classification is correct.
g1ubmittal
requirements are initialed by hani
PC
In.
riginal signature is provided under applicE
2) Plans
0
a.
b.
C.
d.
e.
f.
9•
h.
i.
j•
k.
I.
M.
will be returned to the applicant with the
of State is verifiable on the online
ident or Vice President, or an LLC
arifying LLC member status. If the permittee
letter from the applicant must be provided
ss and phone number of the authorized
certification.
V .Two copies are provided. The copy will be returned to the applicant with the permit.
Plan is based on a topographical survey.
�17 evelopment / project name is consistent with the application form.
ngineer name, firm and seal are located on each page of the plans. For low density
prpsects not requiring engineered stormwater controls, the plans need not be sealed.
,Legend is provided including north arrow, scale, and plan details.
�✓/ Location map is shown with named streets or NCSR numbers and distance to nearest
town or city.
✓pate is listed.
on number & date are listed, if applia
rty and project boundaries are includ(
ids are delineated, or a note on the F
geologic features are included: rock
high water line is identified, if applica
age areas are delineated, including al
ig contours, proposed contours, spot
ble.
ns states that none exist.
itcrops, streams, lakes, ponds, etc.
off -site contributions.
;levations, and finished floor elevations are
cisgrly shown.
o. V Built -upon areas, existing anc
P. • ��ots and or building numbers
planned and including buildings, roads, etc. are shown.
are labeled.

q. v Stormwater conveyance and management systems are shown. These include level r
spreaders, side swales, wet detention ponds, infiltration trenches and basins, etc.
r. N4For wet ponds, average depth Is consistent with maximum depth.
S. K Monitoring wells or benchmarks are located.
� t. Drainage easements and pipe sizes are identified.
? u. _ Vegetated buffers (where required) are labeled.
? V. Vegetated filters (where required) are identified.
`1 W. Level spreaders (where required) are identified.
x. Q hDimensioned typical unit footprint for multi -unit developments are given.
Y. etails of roads, parking, cul-de-sacs, sidewalks, and collection systems are shown.
z. Details of stormwater control measures are included.
aa. Vegetative stabilization plan Is included.
3) Supplement Form(s) — these are general supplement requirements; see the following page for
further i f6rmation on specific project types.
a. _One original and one copy are provided. The copy will be returned to the applicant with the
permit.
b. N Correct supplements are provided for each drainage area.
c: All items on the supplement(s) are completed.
d, project information is consistent with the application and plans.
e. Operation and Maintenance agreement for engineered stormwater systems Including curb
outlet systems is signed and notarized.
use, drainage, and stormwater
Z „n.2 , management plans are clearly described.
5 `P� f!�� Uri jv,�c. rn� iS wrany
j�gal
\01� 6) Calculations
�t r2
7)
�{000
V�4) Fee - $420 made payable to NCDENR is enclosed,
? ✓6) 2 Narrative - the existing and proposed site characteristics,
a. I Supporting calculations are provided for the numerical data submitted in the application
:pd supplements.
b. ✓ For engineered stormwater controls, supporting calculations are signed and sealed.
Soils Report
a. �✓For projects with engineered stormwater controls, a soils report is provided.
b. ✓9n-site soil borings at the location of the proposed treatment system are included.
C. A soil orofile and chararterictirs inrludino thin denth to thin cPacnnnl hinh water tnhlp
(S WT) is given.
d. L%Findings are related to the NRCS County Soils map, an 81/2 x 11 inch copy of the county
soils map with the project location shown is provided.
8) Ve etafon Plan
a. _ Temporary and permanent grass seeding specifications are provided.
b. 21For projects with engineered stormwater controls, the plan includes additional species,
locations, spacing, soil preparation, fertilizer requirements, procedures and a schedule for
installation. The plan was prepared by a qualified individual.
9) Deed Restrictions - Deed restrictions are provided for subdivisions and projects with outparcels.
These are necessary to ensure ongoing compliance. Examples of appropriate forms for each type
of project are available upon request (reference document names and locations).
J:\WPDATA\WQS\State SW-TMA\SW Application Review Checklist revised (Updated 6/18107)

PROJECT TYPES AND
A. Low Density: Supplement SWU-104 or SWU-105
Applicability:
■ Low density projects may not result in built -upon surfaces in excess of 25% or 30%, depending on
the classification of the receiving stream. For calculating density with wetlands, see guidance
memo (reference document and location).
■ In low density projects, stormwater is conveyed primarily via sheet flow and swales with limited
piping for under road conveyance. Curb outlet systems may also be used in a low density project.
■ No area of the project may be configured such that it 'constitutes a pocket of high density. In other
words, if development is concentrated such that the undeveloped land does not significantly impact
treatment of the stormwater runoff from the developed or impervious surfaces, the low density
option may not be applied to the overall project.
• Low density projects must maintain a 30 foot wide vegetative buffer. That is, any impervious
surfaces must be at least 30 feet from surface waters, measured horizontally from the structure to
the mean high water line of the surface water.
• All swales and related vegetated slopes must be 3:1 (horizontal to vertical) or flatter.
• Regulatory References: NCAC Title 15A, 02H.1005,IO2H.1008(g).
SWU-104 is required for low density projects for which lot subdivision and selling is intended. All
sections of the supplement should be completed including the built -upon area per lot calculation.
Deed restrictions are required.
SWU-105 is required for low density projects in which curb and gutters are incorporated. All sections
should be completed including swale design, Table 11. Supporting calculations should also be
supplied. The maintenance agreement contained within the supplement must be signed and
notarized. I
4
Applicability:
• General permits may be issued for certain groups of
(1) construction of single family residences (SWG(
(2) bulkheads and boat ramps (SWG02),
(3) clearing and grading (SWG03), and
(4) linear utility projects (SWG04).
• For these types of projects, a Notice of Intent should
Certificate of Coverage will be issued covering the a
■ Regulatory Reference: NCAC Title 15A, 02H.1013.
C
General Considerations:
All runoff from the built -upon area shall be collected
to an engineered stormwater control device or syste
contributing off -site areas.
Wet ponds and infiltration basins and trenches are c
control devices. Other options include bioretention
stormwater wetlands, off -site systems, and innovati
lar activities, including
be submitted. Upon review and approval, a
iplicant under a general permit.
swales, piping, or other means and directed
Runoff shall also be collected from
imonly utilized engineered stormwater
:as, extended dry detention basins,
and alternative systems.

■ All systems shall be designed to meet minimum criteria, as listed in the regulations, the supplement'
and in accordance with the current version of the Water Quality Section Stormwater Best
Management Practices (BMP). The current BMP manual may be viewed through a link at
• All swales and related vegetated slopes shall be 3:1 (horizontal to vertical) or less steep.
• Operation and Maintenance plans are required for each engineered stormwater management
system. Plans are included in the respective supplements and they must be signed and notarized.
• For the purposes of operation and maintenance access, all stormwater management structures
shall be located within recorded drainage easements.
Plans for engineered stormwater control systems shall be prepared and sealed by a professional
engineer.
Supporting calculations must also be signed, dated and sealed.
■ One supplement shall be submitted for each drainage area.
Regulatory Reference: NCAC Title 15A, 02H.1008.

The most current policyOctober 5 2006 re ardln the amount of wetlands that can be included
In the site area Is ictaed by whichever of the following two calculation methods yields the least
amount of site area:
Method 1: Calculate the acreage of the wetlands.Divide the wetland acreage by the total site
acreage. If the result is 25% or less, thenithe total project area Is the total site
acreage. If the result is more than 25%, then calculate the amount of wetland to
Include such that no more than 25% of the site area acreage consists of wetlands in
this manner: subtract the entire wetlands' area from the site area to get the uplands
area, then divide the uplands area by 0.75.
Method 2: Calculate the area of a 100 foot wide strip of wetlands measured from the uplands
area into the wetland.
Compare the two numbers, and choose the one that
EXAMPLE A:
Total site area = 55 acres
Total wetland area = 15 acres
►100' wide strip of wetland area = 5 acres
Method 1: 15 acres wetlands / 55 acres
55 acres site —15 acres wetla
Project area for calculating de
Method 2: 55 — 15 = 40
Project area for calculating de
Since 45 < 53.33, use area derived via Method
EXAMPLE B:
Total site area = 55 acres
Total wetland area = 10 acres
0-100' wide strip of wetland area = 5 acres
Method 1: 10 / 55 = 18.2% (<25%)
Project area for calculating den
Method 2: 55 — 10 = 45 acres
Project area for calculating der
Since 50 < 55, use area derived via Method 2
EXAMPLE C
Total Site Area = 55 acres
Total Wetland Area = 40 acres
Do- 100' strip of wetland area = 15 acres
Method 1: 40 / 55 = 73% (>25%)
55 — 40 = 15 acres
Project area for calculating
the smallest project area.
27.3% (> 25%)
= 40 acres uplands
= 40 / .75 = 53.33 acres
= 40 + 5 = 45 acres
to calculate the allowable density.
= 55 acres
y = 45 + 5 = 50 acres
calculate the allowable density.
= 15 / .75 = 20 acres
Method 2: 55 — 40 = 15 1
Project area for calculating density = 15 + 15 = 30 acres
Since 20 < 30, use area derived via Method 1 for calculating the allowable density.
®The 1 00'wetland strip is measured from the 401/404 line waterward (into the wetlands) of the
project for a distance of 100', or to the mean high water, (MHW) line or to the property line,
whichever comes first. No credit for wetlands located outside of the property line or beyond the
MHW line can be given. By definition, the project area includes only that area above the MHW
Line. I
S:\WQS\STORMWATER\FORMS\WETLANDS POLICY AND EXAMPLE CALCS
Last updated 10/05/2006

,egiltto?r•�
C7 •�cSv11J!I `
•
Stormwater Management Plan Narrative . Q SEA"
Belhaven Fish & Oyster Q;y5158
September 28, 2007
General
The following narrative will detail the stonnwater management plan for the proposed redevelopment of the Belhaven
Fish & Oyster site in Belhaven, NC.
Belhaven Fish & Oyster is a proposed multifamily residential housing development to be located on 0.88 acres of
previously developed land located on the south side of Water Street immediately south of the intersection of Pamlico
Street and Water Street. The site's improvements have been razed and the site is currently being utilized for storage
of boats, construction equipment, and shipping containers. Significant remnants of previous development remain
buried shallow (2' or less) beneath the current ground surface. This application proposes to redevelop this property
as a small (single building with 10 units) multifamily residential housing development. As per state regulations, a
high density permit is being pursued. i
I
The proposed stormwater management method will consist of two infiltration basins with enough storage capacity to
hold the runoff generated by a 1.19 inch rainfall event. The following narrative, application and calculations will
demonstrate the parameters of this design which will illustrate an effective stormwater management system in full
compliance with all state regulations.
Summary of Existing Conditions
The subject parcel is located on the south side of Water Street immediately south of the intersection of Pamlico
Street and Water Street and consists of 0.88 acres of previously developed land. The site's improvements have been
razed and the site is currently being utilized for storage of boats, construction equipment, and shipping containers.
Significant remnants of previous development and other debris remain buried shallow (2' or less) beneath the current
ground surface. Additionally, the existing site is currently covered with approximately 3,250 sf of impervious cover
compacted gravel) near the Water Street Frontage. There are no discernable existing stormwater controls and the
bulk of stormwater runs off the site to the perimeter property lines without treatment from BMP's.
Summary of Proposed Conditions
i
The Belhaven Fish & Oyster project will consist of demolition of remaining above ground improvements, removal of
subgrade improvements and debris within the development footprint, and redevelopment with a single multifamily
dwelling structure with associated parking and utility infrastructure. Ass part of the new development, stormwater
BMPs in the form of dry infiltration basins are proposed to provide infiltration for runoff from collected areas within
the site. Complete storage and disposal of the l" rainfall event will be' provided within the infiltration basins with the
collection system providing an off-line bypass and 30' vegetated filter at the system outfall.
OCT 1 8 2007
DWQ- ARQ

Site Summary Table
Total Impervious
Coverage (above grade)
Stormwater
Measures
Existing Conditions
3,250 sf of coverage
None
Proposed Conditions
17,524 sf of coverage
Complete storage and infiltration
of 1 inch rainfall event
Stormwater Collection, Treatment, Storage and Disposal
Collection
The stormwater runoff will be collected and directed via site grading, curb and gutter, and drop inlets which convey
runoff to the infiltration basins via storm sewer.
Treatment
The basins will offer several methods of stormwater runoff treatment prior to release. Runoff from paved areas will
sheet flow to drop inlets and be directed to the wet detention basin via a storm sewer system. Large particulates and
debris will accumulate at the drop inlet grates. Runoff will discharge from the storm sewer system via upwelling
within drop inlets placed within each basin. These drop inlets are provided with sumps and this upwelling will also
serve to trap large debris and sediment within the drop inlets (which will need to be cleaned periodically as part of
the maintenance of the system).
The exposed basin bottoms will be grassed according to the general seeding specifications and maintained according
to the operation and maintenance plan and the basin bottom under the building will be topped with a layer of clean
sand. The runoff will undergo filtration of fine particulates and pollutants by the vegetation within the basin bottoms
and side slopes as well as filtration by the surface sand within the basins. If the weather yields precipitation that
exceeds the storage capability of the basin system then the accumulated runoff will overflow the storm sewer via
upwelling within a drop inlet located on the west side of the propertylwhich discharges to a 30' vegetated filter.
A secondary treatment method is also available when the stormwater (runoff infiltrates into the subsurface. When the
water passes through the void spaces between the particles of soil material particulates and pollutants that have a
particle or grain size larger than the void size will be filtered out. In addition some pollutants will adsorb to the
surface of the soil particles. The benefit of this adsorption will prevent the pollutants from reaching the water table
and in some nutrient and microbe rich areas existing within the subsurface the pollutants will be consumed as food
and undergo a natural biodegradation.

Sty
This infiltration basin system will offer a portion of storage above the ground surface and a portion of storage within
the void spaces available in the subsurface.
Within Drainage Area I, the runoff generated by a I inch storm will require 1,337 ft' of storage. The storage
available above the ground surface is 1,455 ft3 (equivalent to runoff generated by 1.09 inch storm). Additional
storage is available within the subsurface in the two (2) feet of separation between the basin bottom and the seasonal
high water table and the additional separation between the submerged basin side -slopes and the seasonal high water
table. A more detailed discussion of subsurface storage volume can be found within the soils section of this
narrative. I
Within Drainage Area 2, the runoff generated by a 1 inch storm will require 115 ft} of storage. The storage available
above the ground surface is 275 ft' (equivalent to runoff generated by 2.4 inch storm). Additional storage is
available within the subsurface in the two (2) feet of separation between the basin bottom and the seasonal high
water table and the additional separation between the submerged basin side -slopes and the seasonal high water table.
A more detailed discussion of subsurface storage volume can be fo�lund within the soils section of this narrative.
Disposal
As discussed in previous sections the majority of stormwater runoff entering this management system will be
infiltrated, therefore infiltration will be the primary source of disposal. The system has been designed with storage
so that this site will have the capability to handle in excess of a 1 inch storm event. At such time that the capacity
were to be exceeded the system will then overflow into the adjacent vegetated filter via upwelling within a drop inlet
structure.
Soils
II
Quible & Associates performed on -site soil borings to verify soil type and determine elevation of mean high
groundwater.
Information collected on site indicates that the soils found throughout this site are composed of a mixture of sands,
silts, clays, and debris which have been deposited and modified significantly over time through the urban
development of this area. These findings generally correlate with the description mapped and discussed in the
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service,) Soil Survey of Currituck County, North
Carolina, which map the soil for this site as follows:
Ur - Urban land, Urban areas which have generally been greatly alte�ied by cutting, filling, grading and shaping
Infiltration rates can vary wildly within these soils. A significant layer of debris was encountered approximately 2'
below the ground surface at all boring locations within this site which prevented deeper exploration. Pursuant to this
finding„ Quible & Associates has referred to exploratory information and experience on a neighboring site, Day
Beacon #9 (NCDENR Stormwater Permit #SW7051 110). The Day Beacon #9 site is located approximately 150' to
the east / southeast of the subject site and has a similar site history with similar site layout, topography, and
geography. At the Day Beacon #9 site, Quible & Associates performed multiple soils borings and slug tests to verify
minimum adequacy of the soils with respect to infiltration. Similar to the project site, there were locations where
borings were not able to penetrate due to subsurface debris, but enough borings were able to be made to gather the
information to produce a design. Soils boring logs from that site are included in the appendix of this narrative. As
with the Day Beacon #9 site, this project proposes to remove all in -situ soils and debris from within the infiltration

basin footprint down to an elevation of Off (and deeper if a visual inspection by the engineer dictates that it be
excavated further) with backfill of the excavation utilizing a porous sand. This construction process was
implemented on the Day Beacon #9 site and the infiltration basins are in place and functioning as anticipated. In
order to provide a conservative result, a minimal infiltration rate of 0.52 inches per hour was assigned to the
backfilled soil for the purposes of calculating drawdown times. It is anticipated that the actual infiltration rate will
be much higher.
i
As mentioned in the storage section of this narrative a more detailed description of the method of determining the
subsurface storage volume available as a function of the soils would be discussed in this section. The following
determination of the volume available in the subsurface is based on the definition of Porosity: The ratio of volume of
void spaces in a rock or sediment to the total volume of the rock or sediment.
Porosity = q =
Volume of pore space
x 100
Vohmteof ba'lksolid
Table 10.3. Tvnical Total Pnrnsitirn Z
Material
Total Porosity,(%)
Unaltered granite and gneiss
0-2
Quartzites
0-1
Shales, slates, mica-schists
0-10
Chalk
5-40
Sandstones
5-40
Volcanic tuff
30-40
Gravels
25-40
Sands
15-48
Silt
35-50
Clays
40-70
Fractured basalt
5-50
Karst limestone
5-50
Limestone, dolomite
0-20
Table 5.1 Porosities for Common Consolidated and UnconsolidatedlMaterials}
' David M. Nielson, Editor, Practical Handbook of Ground -Water Monitorin (Michigan: Lewis Publishers, Inc.,
1991), pg. 675
z David M. Nielson, Editor, Practical Handbook of Ground -Water Monitorin , (Michigan: Lewis Publishers, Inc.,
1991),pg. 406
Fletcher G. Driscoll, Ph.D., Principle Author and Editor, Groundwl ter and Wells. 2"d edition, (Minnesota: Johnson
Filtration Systems Inc., 1986), pgs. 66-67

Unconsolidated
Sediments
(%)
Consolidated Rocks I
(%)
Clay
45-55
Sandstone
5-30
Silt
35-50
Limestone/dolomite
1-20 ,
Sand
25-40
Shale
0-10
Gravel
25-40
Fractured crystalline rock 1
0-10
Sand & gravel mixes
10-35
Vesicular basalt
10-50
Glacial till
10-35
Dense, solid rock
<1
Based on the information in the proceeding tables a value of 20% void space has been assigned to the sandy soils
located on the subject parcel. This value should be considered conservative. A distance of two vertical feet is to be
maintained between the infiltration basin bottom and the seasonal high water table elevation. Soil borings and other
infonnation (as discussed above) indicate a conservative seasonal li igh water table of approximately 2.0 feet MSL.
The proposed infiltration basin bottom elevation was designed at an elevation of 4.3 MSL, providing for a vertical
separation of 2.3 feet. Within this separation distance exists a volume of soil containing a minimum of
approximately 20% void space. This void space will become filled with water and provides for an additional volume
for stonnwater runoff storage.
Calculations
A set of sample calculations can be found within the appendix portion of this narrative.
Conclusions
The proposed stormwater management plan for this site will handle tin excess of the 1.0 inches of stormwater runoff
generated by all surfaces, pervious and impervious located within thIe drainage area by incorporating two infiltration
basins. The proposed system will offer preliminary, primary and secondary methods of treatment as well as an
alternate method of disposal should the capacity be exceeded. The construction plans produce infiltration basins
with infiltration rates approximately 0.52 inches per hour, conditions ideal for an infiltration basin system. This
proposed design will more than adequately serve the stormwater management requirements of this site.
I
David M. Nielson, Editor, Practical Handbook of Ground -Water Monitoring, (Michigan: Lewis Publishers, Inc.,
1991),pg. 675
z David M. Nielson, Editor, Practical Handbook of Ground -Water NI nitorin , (Michigan: Lewis Publishers, Inc.,
1991), pg. 406
r Fletcher G. Driscoll, Ph.D., Principle Author and Editor, Groundwalter and Wells, 2"d edition, (Minnesota: Johnson
Filtration Systems tile., 1986), pgs. 66-67 1

Quible & Associates, P.C.
ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES • PLANNING • SURVEYING
SINCE 1959
December 7, 2005
Mr. Scott Vinson
NCDENR-Division of Water Quality
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
Re: Daybeacon #9
Stormwater Pond Infiltration Data
Mr. Vinson:
PO. Drawer 870
Kdv Hrnh, NC 27949
Phone. [phone]
Fax: [phone]
PRINCIPALS
Sean C, Boyle, P.E.
Joseph S Lassder, CEP
Eduardo J. VaIdMeso, P.E.
ASSOCIATES
Joseph J, AnII PE.
Kofherine C. Marchello. PLS.
This letter and information package serve as a report summarylof groundwater data collected on
December 6, 2005 at the Daybeacon #9 Site in Belhaven, North Carolina (Figure 1). Groundwater data
was gathered from two temporary monitoring wells installed on December 6, 2005 for the purpose of
discerning the infiltration rates expected in the location of the proposed infiltration basin depicted on the
enclosed copy of the site plan (Figure 2).
One temporary well SW -IC (third attempt) was installed in the location depicted on the enclosed Figure
2 to a depth of nine feet below ground surface. A copy of Aquifer Protection Section Form GW-1 b has
been have been included as Appendix A. An additional temporary monitoring well SW-213 (second
attempt) was installed in the location depicted on the enclosed Figure 2 to a depth of eight and a half feet
below ground surface. A copy of Aquifer Protection Section Form GW-lb has been included as
Appendix A.
Based on the lithology recorded during the installation of the temporary monitoring wells, an
impermeable surface of compacted oyster shells, gravels and asphalt was discovered in five separate
borings in the vicinity of the proposed stormwater basin. The layer of oyster shells and fill was
immediately underlain by silts and clays. This layer of compacted oyster shells, asphalt and fill material
was recorded at a consistent depth of one to two feet below the ground surface. Detailed boring logs and
stratigraphy are presented in Appendix B. j
I
Agtesoly® software was used to calculate hydraulic conductivitylat the site. In -Situ@ mini -Troll data
loggers, calibrated to manufacturers specifications, were inserted in the test wells (SW -IC and SW-213)
and subsequently a slug of water was removed from each well using a 36" disposable polyethylene bailer.
A depth to water measurement was recorded at predetermined intervals for the duration of each test. The
data from each test was downloaded into the Aqtesolv® software land used to calculate hydraulic
conductivity (K) based on the Bouwer-Rice Method for unconfined aquifers.
The Aqtesolv@ software automatically matches a best fit line base d on the total number of points for the
entire test. However, the initial portion of the curve (displacement vs. time) is actually the water from
the filter pack rushing into the well. Therefore, a visual match solution is preferred to account for the
initial instantaneous recharge from the surrounding sand filter pack.

Based on data collected from the slug tests conducted on September 6, 2005 and analyzed using the
unconfined Bouwer-Rice Method, the hydraulic conductivity at the site ranges from 5.471E `ft/min in
SW-1C to 3.451E 3ft/min in SW-2B. This translates to a range of 0.39 in/hr in SW -IC to 2.48 in/hr in
SW-2B. Slug test data for each test has been included as Appendix C.
It is recommended that the impermeable surfaces encountered in each of the borings be excavated and
removed from the site. Please note, these impermeable surfaces or horizons were reportedly removed
during site demolition activities. However, Dixon -Hoyle switched contractors prior to the completion of
the demolition and subsequent filling of the site. Therefore, it is assumed that the old asphalt entrance
and sub -grade is still intact at the site.
Please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at 252.261. 300 or via e-mail at weadusC amble coax if
you have any questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
Quible & Associates, P.C.
Zlb�
Warren Eadus, L.G.
cc Andy Deel, P.E.
File

76° 38'
•�•ep
�i7,,•e
0.00° W P76° 37'
0.00" W 76° 36'
0.00" W
,5,.'
a
`
1-
FIM
Z
M
Belhaven
�...i
'o •` 'Y
�'�•�W
/fj i(Cj�
Y" r
P tv �..
N,\
Cedar . 5 , „
`�
fir; G �jBelhaven N - _ a
+� �\iand• Phng.C�
GumlPt: ��. /j 1s
INZ
r.•• •' l t .9g�.'�(3h,�)
i .
` \ !
to Low
9� ♦
-.. ' "\.e ci'°•, t �`'.�� i4'',
i i
,tpfOh-S (• p0•. n�l+• • r ,e �.. �atta llna1Pt:
o
o
c�
+.r+. � ` � _' +•._ ° ; '\ t:xd
,s j ``
:. .i - {BivalvePt
fT� y
\ '`;` � C ��.�,,i � t� i+t � t Tog{eYe Pt , 7
•• t t \•y
Z
0
o
tt-
>y 1 ,i
0
r
/F ungo Pt.
Z
^..:/ ' Persimmon Tr-e Pt
/ •�• f
Z
P I1 N G
—
flick
Ores
..
n.
.. L)10,
IN
76° 38' 0.00"
76' 37' 0.00' 76° 36' 0.00'
Name:BELHAVEN
Date: 12/8/2005 Location: 035- 31 56.87" N 0760 37' 10.49" W
Caption: Figure
1
Scale: 1 inch equals 2000 feet Site Location Map
Daybieacon #9
rnn`,�,ht (C' 1998 M h
Inc.
9 aptec

FIGURE 2
COPY OF RELEVANT PORTION OF SITE PLAN
DAYBEACON #9
+AU
EA
ON BRATIONOUNDED BY 8' CONTOUR TO BE EXCAVATED
EPTH OF W BELOW EX. GRADE & BAOKFILLED
ND. SP SP-SM SOILS
/8F
FORIERWMhr; /A6.
PW 7605-00-76-57.25
W45 moftfew
WA,0•
a"AWM 6E6'
H51v 74
I Ran. Fwrl &ER
AT IM Z5BcT7pV mm
Mr4roow1 j1
/�, PAl2/G05T7B£T
Al '
I T
TT/ELtlFJ ' I os
�}
�1s5
Ai,
(RE LIf�FJ
I
1ROM
401-. A
I
�I rraxirowNs F,s,L
0+00
0411

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources- Division of Water Quality
WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION # I Y41 D
1. WELL CONTRACTOR:
Ww>u�u E���>s
Well Contractor (Individual) Name
Q,I t3/fc i. AAs oL�s G
W ell Contractor Company Name
STREET ADDRESS _ B SUa tier 7q*l(-
SeuT( ZN 5({OB FIG 2-
City or Town State Zip Code
ZLs� 2L1-$3o0
Area code- Phone number
2. WELL INFORMATION:
SITE WELL ID #(if applicable) `J W - G
STATE WELL PERMIT#(if applicable) Nk
DWQ or OTHER PERMIT #(if applicable) IM
WELL USE (Check Applicable Box) Monitoring Wr Municipal/Public ❑
Industrial/Commercial❑ Agricultural Recovery p Injection❑
IrrigationD Other ❑ (list use) r ir.±h l (
DATE DRILLED([# 0,S -`i
TIME COMPLETED /( AM VPM ❑
3. WELL LOCATION:
CITY: BP/iftall COUNTY_/
1% L4 S'Eq
(Street Name, Numbers, Community, Subdivision, Lot No., Parcel, zip Code)
TOPOGRAPHIC / LAND SETTING:
❑Slope ❑Valley ❑Flat ❑Ridge ❑ Other
(check appropriate box)
LATITUDE y63L 41.30 pl May he hl degrees,
LONGITUDE f �' r' mo¢des, seconds or
s �'� W in a decimal roV,mu
Latitude/longitude source: ❑GPS ❑Topographic map
(location of well must be shown on a USGS topo map and
attached to this form if not using GPS)
4. FACILITY-ie the name of the business where the well is located.
FACILITY ID #(if applicable)
NAME OF FACILITY_[g A Dfd♦Finaa Flo
STREETADDRESS 3W w4tm Snaz�
li�lf-IhuFi✓ KC
Cdy or Town State Zip Code
CONTACT PERSON tgA x / )
MAILING ADDRESS PO bfi- .l -o Ate.,
Cititor Town State Zip Code
one
( T7_) _-Z = 33go
Area cote - Phnumber
5. WELL DETAILS:
TOTAL DEPTH:_ 9
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES ❑ NO �T
C. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: - s FT.
(Use "+" if Above Top of Casing)
d. TOP OF CASING IS + j FT. Above Land Surface"
'Top of casing terminated at/or below land surface may require
a variance in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C .0118.
a. YIELD (gpm): k METHOD OF TEST
T. DISINFECTION: Type_ Amount
9. WATER ZONES (depth):
From_ To c! From To
FrIom To From To
From To From 70
6. CASING: Thickness/
Fro I Depth Diameter Weight Material
_+,�_ To-:-� Ft. 2-
From To Ft.
From To Ft.
7VGROUT: Depth Material Method
NFroml To FL
Froml To Ft.
From To Ft.
8. SCREEN: Depth Diameter Slot Size Material
From To -9 Ft. Z in. t O / In.
From To Ft._in. in.
From To Ft. in. in.
9. SAND/GRAVEL PACK:
Depth Size Material
Fromro To -9 Fl, 1�2
From To Ft.
From To Ft.
10. DRILLING LOG
From To, \ Formation Description
/ ow-kirpwrl Jr
--�—_ A1A-Fn/ SN05 .� 1• �.ejpy
fg.r,E2y Sr4Eii < t
(rS � ? Lr y/iiLL�S/LTS A'.yp SH,nL
It.
IDO
15A
E
9&-4 4C/A1W SA/DS
R I IVY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE W ❑H
ELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS
-1EN PROVIDED TO THE WELL OW NER.
OFF IFIED WELL CONTRACTOR /2 � E
ATE
PRINTED NAME OF PERSON COP
Submit the original to the Division of Water Quality within 30 days. Attn: Information Mgt.,
1617 Mall Service Center- Raleigh, NC 27699.1617 Phone No. [phone] ext 568.
Form G W -1 b
Rev. 7/05

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources- Division of Water Quality
WELL CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION # 13+10
1. WELL CONTRACTOR:
�N�J 'D • Ed:•DV S
Well Contractor (Individual) Name
GI U I Td Lr Y p ssroG1 R?� c -� C
W ell Contractor Company Name
STREET ADDRESS
10� *Rft We2449
City a Town State Zip+TCode
12S2 )- 14 "! go
Area code- Phone number
2. WELL INFORMATION:
SITE WELL ID #(If applicable) SW - Z(3
STATE WELL PERMIT#(If applicable) u k
DWQ or OTHER PERMIT #(if applicable) VA -
WELL USE (Check Applicable Box) Monitoring M'Municipal/Public ❑
Industrial/Commercial❑ Agricultural❑ Recovery Injection
Irrigatiorio Other ❑ (list use)
DATE DRILLED_&b ,vr
TIME COMPLETEDI­ AM ❑ PM W"
3. WELL LOCATION:
CITY: 23l!7'ZVQL1 COUNTY_rM2Wr
(Mreet Name, Numbers, Community, Subdldslon, lot No., Parcel, Zip Code)
TOPOGRAPHIC / LAAN�ND SETTING:
CI Slope OValley Flat El Ridge ❑ Other
(check appropriate box)
LATITUDE 2gj1.31 rr N May be in degrees,
s minutes, seconds or
LONGITUDEa'b� '.S4rSb W in a decimal format
Latitude/longimdesource: ❑GPs ❑ Topographic map
(location of well must be shown on a USGS FOOD, map and
attached to this form if not using GPS)
4. FACILITY. is the name of Ne hueinese where the well is Ioratei
FACILITY ID #(if applicable)_
NAME OF FACILITY &
AIrn
�
STREET ADDRESS 311,
W till
51Cg4VT
�d(tsvE,v
u�
City or Town
State
Zip Code
CONTACT PERSON j//44L
WJ G7
gS (4&60
MAILING ADDRESS PO
D jL
5*0
-kin Lfawg=
ke-
7-Tl+ q
Clyw Town
Slate
Zip Code
(26'z )- M l - ��o0
Area code - Phone number
— — - ---
d. TOP OF CASING IS +-!, S FT. Above Land Surface"
'Top of casing terminated at/or below land surface may require
a variance in accordance With 15A NCAC 2C .0118,
e. YIELD (gam): Al METHOD OF TEST
T. DISINFECTION: Type_ h6l-d Amount t 6
g. WATER ZONES (depth):
From + To 9 From To
From To From To
Froom To From To
I
6. CASING: Thickness/
Di
e3 `S meter Weight Material
From_ ? • � plh-2 r
From To Ft.
From To Ft.
I
,,7r GROUT: Depth Material Method
From
To
Ft.
From
To
Ft.
From
To
Ft.
I
8. SCREEN:
Depth
Diameter Slot Size Material
Froml_ -5
To'S.6
Ft. Z in. •ol in. YG
From
To
FL_m. in.
From
I
To
Ft, in. in.
—
SAND/GRAVEL PACK:
Depth
From D
To
Size Material
Ft._.SZ g2a
From
To
-
Ft.
From
I
To
Ft.
10. DRILLING LOG
From To
r
I
3 S�
I
S S —
.S.SrL�•Or
—6 190r
11. REMARKS
5. WELL DETAILS: I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
/�� 15A NCAC 2C, WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS
p
a. TOTAL DEPTH: . - - RECORD HA$ gEJN g{tOVIDED TO TH ELL OW NER.
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES ❑ NO ®� /I/71�„/� Ll OS
SIGNATURE ` CER4WrED WELL CONTRACTOR D TE
24
C. WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: - 5,5 FT. I
(Use "+" if Above Top of Casing) WMW U-01DliS
PRINTED NAME OF PERSON CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
Submit the original to the Division of Water Quality Within 30 days. Attn: Information Mgt.,
1617 Mail Service Center- Raleigh, NC 27699.1617 Phone No. [phone] ext 568. Form GW-lb
Rev. 7/05

Q ON
Quible & Associates, P.C.
ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES • PLANNING • SURVEYING
8 Juniper Trail • P.O. Drawer 870 • IIM Hav& NC 27949
Phone [phone] • FAa 259-901-19An . PAA,1I
JOB_ . .01. €;P'I s-7,
t
SHEET NO. OF
CALCULATED BY DATE
BY Id" , DATE L ✓.� j v r�

SINCE 1959
SHEET
QIIIble & Associates, P.C. CALCULATED BY
ENGINEERING • EPMRONMENTAL SCIENCES • PLANNING • SURVEYING
CALCULATED
Juniper Trall • P.O. Drawer 870 • Ki ty Hawk. NC 27949 CHECY:ED EY_
Phone [phone] • FAX [phone] e E-Mall: [e-mail]
SCALE
OF I
DATE _
DATE 1 '.y- i "� f {? 1
y +aNS 10. { . r ;I l :zhfi Va I l/116 aRe[�N� u. ►�r lru,

10.
rdw
0.1
0.01
o _.
°
° o
°
d
0
b.o
°
0.0011JI11 111.1
0. 6. 12. 18.
Time (min)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: 0:\2003\p03185\Stormwater\sw2b aqt
Date: 12/07/05 Time: 09:,
Company: Quible & Associates P.C.
Client: Dixon -Houle Partnership
Project: 03185
Location: Belhaven
Test Date: 12/6/05
Saturated Thickness: 15. ft
Initial Displacement: 1.3 ft
Total Well Penetration Depth: 8.5 ft
Casing Radius: 0.3333 ft
Aquifer Model: Unconfined
K = 0.003451 ft/min
AQUIFER DATA
Anisotropy F
WELL DATA (SW-2B)
Static Water
Screen Leng
Wellbore Ra
SOLUTION
Solution Me
y0 = 0.7691
w
24
(Kz/Kr): 1.
30.
umn Height: 2.4 ft
5. ft
0.167 ft
Bouwer-Rice

AQTESOLV for Windows
Data Set: Q:\20031p03185\Storinwater\sw2b.agt
Date: 12/07/05
Time: 09:44:46
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Quible & Associates, P.C.
Client: Dixon -Hoyle Partnership
Project: 03185
Location: Belhaven
Test Date: 12/6/05
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 15. ft
Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 1.
SLUG TEST WELL DATA
Test Well:: SW-2B
X Location: 0. ft
Y Location: 0. ft
Initial Displacement: 1.3 ft
Static Water Column Height: 2.4 ft
Casing Radius: 0.3333 ft
Wel!bore Radius: 0.167 ft
Well Skin Radius: 0.3333 ft
Screen Len the 5. ft
Total Well F enetration Depth: 8.5 ft
No. of Observations: 29
Time min
Dis lacemen uJ� me
min
Dis lacement ft
0.167
1 3
0.25
0.78
6.
7.0.3333
0.31
0.75
8.
0.4167
0.74
9.
0.23
0.5
0.6667
0.73
0.71
10
'
0.
.2
0.8333
0.7
11.
13. 2.
.1
0.16
1.083
0.65
14.
0.14
1.25
1.417
0.62
0.6
14.
0.14
0.12
1.75
0.56
10. 6.
25.
0
2.
3.
0.53
0.5
.1
0 .0 09
4.
0.41
30.
30.
.
0.08
SOLUTION
Model: Unconfined
n Method: Bouwer-Rice
Factor: 2.439
VISUAL ESTIMATION RESULTS
Estimated Parameters
Parameter
-_K-
y0
Estimate
0-06345-i ft/min
0.791
i2/07/05
09:44:46

❑
1.
❑
0
°
o
E
° n
U
CO
a
N_
0
0.1
0.01 L I
0. 6. 12. 18.
Time (min)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: 0:\2003\p03185\Stormwater\swic aqtt
Date: 12/08/05 Time: 07::
Company: Quible & Associates P.C.
Client: Dixon -Houle Partnership
Project: 03185
Location: Belhaven
Test Date: 12/6/05
Saturated Thickness: 15. ft
Initial Displacement: 2.05 ft
Total Well Penetration Depth: 9. ft
Casing Radius: 0.1667 ft
Aquifer Model: Unconfined
K = 0.0005471 ft/min
ECT
AQUIFER DATA
Anisotropy
WELL DATA (SW-1C)
Static Wati
Screen Ler
Wellbore P
SOLUTION
Solution Mel
y0 = 1.571 ft
n
24.
(Kz/Kr): 1.
30.
Column Height: 3.25 ft
:h: 5. ft
lius 0.3333 ft
Bouwer-Rice

AQTESOLV for Windows
' --------.-.._--------
Data Set: Q:\2003\p03185\Stormwater\swlc.agt
Date: 12/08/05
Time: 07:33:41
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Quible & Associates, P.C.
Client: Dixon -Hoyle Partnership
Project: 03185
Location: Belhaven
Test Date: 12/6/05
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 15. ft
Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 1
SLUG TEST WELL DATA
Test Well:: SW-1C
X Location: 0. ft
Y Location: 0. ft
Initial Displacement: 2.05 ft
Static Water Column Height: 3.25 ft
Casing Radius: 0.1667 ft
Wellbore Radius: 0.3333 ft
Well Skin Radius: 0.3333 ft
Screen Length: 5. ft
Total Well Penetration Depth: 9. ft
No. of Observations: 27
Time min
Observation Data
Dis lacemen -mime min'
0.1667
2.05
7.
0.3333
1.87
8
0.4167
1.8
9
0.5
0.75
1.73
1.64
10.
0.8333
1.59
11.
12.
1.083
1.25
1.55
13.
1.417
1.24
1.45
14.
16.
1.75
3.
1.36
20.
4.
1.1
0.98
25.
30.
5.
0.87
SOLUTION
Model: Unconfined
i Method: Bouwer-Rice
=actor: 1.9
VISUAL ESTIMATION RESULTS
Estimated Parameters
Parameter Estimate
K
y0 -( 5 l ft/min
AUTOMATIC ESTIMATION RESULTS
Estimated Parameters
12/08/05
07:33:41

AQTESOLV for Windows
--- --- --- -- --
Par aKmeter Estimate Std. Error
y0 0DOU54T1 O-OUO -166 ft/min
0.1233 ft
Parameter Correlations
K y0
K 1.00 036
y0 0.56 1.00
Residual Statistics
for weighted residuals
Sum of Squares ...... 3.15 ft2
Variance ............ 0.126 ft2
Std. Deviation ........ 0.355 ft
Mean ............... 0.004987 ft
No. of Residuals...... 27
No. of Estimates...... 2
12/08/05
2 I 07:33:41

Qu i b l e SINCE 1959
Quible & Associates, P.C.
ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES • PIANNING • SURJEVING
8 Juniper Trail • P.O. Drawer 870 • Kitty Hawk, NC 27949
Phone [phone] • FAX [phone] • E-Mall: [e-mail]
JOB
SHEET NO. OF 7
CALCULATED BY A % DATE
CHECKED BV DATE
SCALE
�rai�u�e /is2cT7 1,6, 32.0 3F (0, �6
Con ue 1i4 /01 it rr ; _ 3, J,6 3: 3 r
.. ..i. � .. .. A�rG`/i .1 �'/L%..ar�5 �j,lC•,. J.. S.i'.
SEAL
0L5158
0.�.'rO..... � ti
,i•
[, /
17 c'1:
f,J
l,6Y9?-
CU
i 9a 2 SF
385e,-1
-
2,134
11067�F
S,G
22283E

Q u i b l e SINCE 1959
Quible & Associates, P.C.
ENGINEERING - ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES - PLANNING - SURVEYING
8 Juniper Trail - P.O. Drawer 870 - Kitty Hawk, Ni 27949
Phone [phone] - FAX [phone] - E-Mail: quible@earthlink,nef
NO. _ 2 OF
-ATED BY A A DATE
=D BY DATE
Cie
I i.A.
02� z I
A) A
0,67 dog,
Rect L
-1 A,
[A = .0. 38 A4:,
36 "Ar
J114936 X/0) 4 (C
3 05, cf5

Quible SINCE 1959
Quible & Associates, P.C.
ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES • PLANNING • SURVEYING
8 Juniper Trail • P.O. Drawer 870 • Kitty Hawk, INC 27949
Phone [phone] • FAX [phone] • E-MaiC [e-mail]
level
L1..10'
Treaiea" Sxr+, 10' L
rry N=o:�3'
45 = 2, .77e
3. 06 c. Fs
-2 OF
'ED BY .I16 U DATE
BY- DATE
sei (ftEl CA•UGSireavn Euc�e
of Ueye+u}@ci %iie�
_� �C)ri"Or to c1, "irC}ty /^ wL'•il/� .tn. 0,�� t.WureY dep"'A
cw�r level 51 r�'��.dei� uiJ. 4 33. r'ps wAler veleeily.

Q u' b I e SINCE 1959
SHEET NO. 4- OF
QUIble & Associates, P.C. CALCULATED BY DATE
ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES • PLANNING • SURVEYING I
8 Juniper Trail • P.O. Drawer 870 • Kitty Hawk, NC 27949 CHECKED BY DATE
Phone [phone] • FAX [phone] • E-Mail: quible@earthlink, net SCALE

Q u' b l e SINCE 1959
Quible & Associates, P.C.
ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES • PLANNING • SUW VING
8 Juniper Trail • P.O. Drawer 870 • Kitty Hawk, NC 27949
Phone [phone] • FAX [phone] • E-Mail; [e-mail]
SCALE
1
prciwdclz 0, 5?, 1"/h
0.7
--.1 OF
ED BY DATE
BY DATE
a, 6_7 cdq
Eck ;-hCQ
. .. ..%1/ fau.:�.'.G'✓ {ine. �ni rll. i'41f /CIi� l�6 rl.�! ✓/Cl. 7�E GNI"/. GCC c/ t.l.r c'�' ✓vt?�
ri//oL i. lC) lkt; :�cJ;,,., fl(7i f ' I,l1t •I i d
(237 H1c .,
10

Q u I b l e SINCE 1959
Quible & Associates, P.C.
ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES • PLANNING • SURVEYING
8 Jumper Trail • P.O. Drawer 870 • KM Hawk, NC 27949
Phone [phone] • FAX [phone] • E-Mall: [e-mail]
i, e
SHEET NO. b OF
SCALE
BY
BY
DATE
DATE

n
5l&ed
7 ctC 7
HYDRAULIC GRADE
LINE
PROJECT
Outlet
Water 0°
0°
JUNCTION LOSS
STATION Surface
L S
o S.
H
(
2
Elev.
°
7.
o
He 0 1
V
I
0 V LI
i I 2q HI ANCLE Ho
Ht
1.3 0.5
Ht Ht
FINAL Wolor Rim
Surleea Elev.
H
El".
(1) (2) (3)
(4)
(5) (6)
(�)
(8)
(9) (10)
(11)
(12) (13) (14) (15 )
t 2'i
2.y1
a,®/
D.DI
(16)
(17) (1 a)
(19) (20) (21)
3.4A
0.71
— — SdD'e o.o'
OOx
0.03
4
0,01
a
r'
°
dl
m
of SZ
oa
m
36 .2
-
CIO/
6,2
-
- -
- -
_
_
_
�7
n
_
3
°
�r
—
`0
—
-n
0
3
2 2 2 V
H, = 0.35 2g H,= 0.25 2Vg H,= K 2g FINAL H = H1+ H7
HI= Ho+ HI+ H,
90' K
= 0.70
SO- K
- 0.47 20' K = 0.16
80' K
- 0.66
40' K
- 0.38 15' K = 0.10
70' K
= 0.61
30' K
- 0.28
60'K=0.55
25'K=
0.22

Belhaven Fish and Oyster
Subject: Belhaven Fish and Oyster
From: "David Deel" <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 15:49:35 -0400
To: "Samir Dumpor" <[e-mail]>
CC: "Lyn Hardison" <[e-mail]>
Samir,
Back in March, I brought you Belhaven Fish and Oyster for a fas
meeting, the job got placed on hold and so I have not officially si
to re -introduce you to the property and to establish if I need to ct
please find a .pdf schematic of the grading plan for the site as w
our earlier meeting, I had shown the infiltration basin under the t
infiltration basin had approx. 1.5" of storage without a vegetated
from the small infiltration basin into the veg filter). The attached
been re -graded to move it out of the 50' buffer and the small infi
for a 2.4" rainfall event.
I a{
ck pre -application meeting. Shortly after our
tted anything yet. The purpose of this e-mail is
back for a pre -application meeting. Attached,
s a .pdf excerpt from the project narrative. At
ng extending into the 50' buffer and the small
(for reasons of grade, I can't get the overflow
shows that the basin under the building has
)n basin has been re -graded to provide storage
Since our meeting, CAMA has reviewed the project and is ready tdapprove, pending the Stormwater and Erosion
Control Permits. At this time, we would like to bring the project back to you under the express permitting process.
Please advise if we need to join you for another pre -application meeting or if we should just go ahead and send the
submission package.
Thanks,
Andy
Content -Description: StormNarrative.pdf
StormNarrative.pdf Content -Type: application/octet-stream
Content -Encoding: base64
Content -Description: Grading&Drainage l 0-02-07.pdf
Grading&Drainagel0-02-07.pdf. Content -Type: I application/octet-stream
base64
loft
10/12/2007 4:12 PM

FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY/OWNERSHIP FORM OCT 1 9 2007
SEDIMENTATION POLLUTION CONTROL ACT
EXPRESS PERMITTING OPTION S'('U ° y'
No person: may initiate any land -disturbing activity on one a more acres as covered by the Act before this
form and an acceptable erosion and sedimentation control plan have been completed and approved by the
Land Quality Section, N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources. (Please type or print and, if
the question is not applicable or the e-mail and/or fax information unavailable, place N/A in the blank.)
Part A.
1. Project Name Belhaven Fish & Oyster
2. Location of land -disturbing activity: County Beaufort County' City or Township Belhaven
Highway/Street Water Street Latitude 35.53705556 N Longitude 76.62225833 W
3. Approximate date land -disturbing activity will commence: Mav 2007
4. Purpose of development (residential, commercial, industrial, institutional, etc.): Residential
5. Total acreage disturbed or uncovered (including off -site borrow and waste areas): 0.90 Ac
6. Amount of fee enclosed: $ The Express Permitting application fee is a dual
charge. The normal fee of $per acre (rounded up to the next acre) is assessed without a ceiling
amount. In addition, the Express' Permitting supplement is $250.00 per acre up to eight acres, after
which the Express Permitting supplemental fee is a fixed $21000.00 (Example: 9 acres total is $2,450).
7. Has an erosion and sediment control plan been filed? Yes No Enclosed X
8. Person to contact should erosion and sediment control issues arise during land -disturbing activity:
Name John W. Dixon E-mail Add
Telephone [phone] Cell #
9. Landowner(s) of Record (attach accompanied page to list
Current Mailing Address Current
City State Zip
10. Deed Book
Part B.
Page
ne
Fax # [phone]
itional owners):
it Address
State
Fax Number
Provide a copy of the most current deed.
Person(s) or firm(s) who are financially responsible for, the land -disturbing activity (Provide a
comprehensive list of all responsible parties on an attached sheet):
Dixon & Hoyle Partnership
Name E-mail Ar
P.O. Box 1327
Current Mailing Address Current Ic
Naps Head NC 27959
City State Zip City
Telephone [phone] Fax Num
Address
Zip

Quible
Quible & Associates, P.C,
ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES • PLANNING • SURVEYING
SINCE 7959
October 15, 2007
P.O. Drower 870
Nifty Hawk. NC 27949
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
PRINCIPALS
Sean C. Boyle, P.E.
Joseph S. Lossitec C.E.P.
Eduo,do J, Valdmeso, PE
ASSOCIATES
Joseph J. Anlauf, P.E.
Katherine C. Marchele. PLS.
Samir Dumpor
NCDENR
Division of Water Quality
943 Washinbnon Square Mall y®
Washington, North Carolina 27889
Re: Stormwater Management Plan (High Density Application) OCT 18 2007
Proposed Belhaven Fish & Oyster Multifamily Residential
Town of Belhaven
®WQ WARO
Dear Mr. Dumpor:
Enclosed, please find an application package for a high densit)� storniwater permit for the above
referenced project. This application is being made to be processed as a fast track application.
The following items are included and shall be considered part of this submittal package:
I . Review Fee Check for $4000.00 (included with cover Metter to Lyn Hardison)
2. Two (2) copies of the Stormwaler Management permit Application Form w/two (2) copies
of two Infiltration Basin Supplements (original signatures included)
3. Two copies of two new infiltration basin supplements (excel spreadsheet version)
3. Stormwaler Management Plan Narrative
4. Two (2) copies of the Plans
If you have any questions, or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at
[phone].
Sincerely,
uible & s oCP
.C.
D vLd A. I)I
enc: as stated
cc: Mr. John W. Dixon