SW7070127_HISTORICAL FILE_20200826

NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Qual

STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
POST -CONSTRUCTION PERMITS
PERMIT NO.
SW
DOG TYPE
❑ CURRENT PERMIT
❑ APPROVED PLANS
(LSD HISTORICAL FILE
(❑ COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION
DOC DATE(��
YYYYMMDD

ROY COOPER
Govemor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
BRIAN WRENN
Dttaemr
• ...
AugustEnytronzmentalQuattry
• 2020
The village at Columbia, LLC
Attention: Mr. Glen R. Lindengren, Manager
1200 Butterworth Court
Stevensville, MD 21666
Subject: Stormwater Permit Renewal
Stormwater Management Permit SW7070127
The Village at Columbia
Tyrrell County
Dear Mr. Lindengren:
A Division of Energy, Mineral; ,and Land Resources file review has'determined that
Stormwater Permit SW7070127 for a stormwater treatmeht,system: consisting of'a wet
detention pond to serve the Village at Columbia expires on February 9, 2021. This is a
reminder that permit renewal applications are due 180 days prior to expiration. We do
not have a record of receiving a renewal application.
If you wish to keep this permit active, please submit a completed permit renewal
application along with a $505.00 fee for permit renewal. If this project was never built
and you do not plan to build it in the future; please advise. Permit application forms for
renewal can be found on ourwebsite at
rules/Stormwatel:: rr gram 1120er_r nst r• . North Carolina General Statutes and the
Coastal Stormwater rules require that this property be covered under a stormwater
permit if it is constructed. Failure to maintain a permit subjects the owner to. assessment
of civil penalties.
If you have questions, please feel free to corntact me at (252)' 948-3923. 1 will be glad to
discuss, this by phone or meet with you. If you would like, I•can e-mail you a- copy of the
application form. You can request a copy by e-mailing me at roger.thoroe aancdenr aov.
Sincerely,
RogeVK. Thorpe
ti Environmental Engineer
®Ip Alft North Carolina Department of Envini mental Quality I DMsion of Energy. Mineral and land Resources
Washington Regional Office 1 943 Washington Square Mall I Washington, North Cmatlnn 27889
O1eV'� 2SZ946.6481

fi
610 Lynndalc Coup
Suit, F.
Greenville. NC z7858
1 [phone]
1'[phone]
www.pandO.com
Nor,G C,,nd a
S,wh C,,ndiun
Ahwa,h.... u,
Nnn YW,
KhoAr h1a... I
FUSS & O'NEILL
Disciplines to Deliver
January 24, 2007
The Village at Columbia, LLC
1018 Magothy Avenue
Arnold, MD 21012
Attention: bit. Don Dove, Dlanager
Reference: Soil Scientist Investigation
The Village at Columbia
Columbia, North Carolina
Fuss & O'Neill Project No. 20060507.A10
Dear Mr. Dove:
Fuss & O'Neill, Inc. has completed the soil scientist investigation for the property located in
Columbia, North Carolina. Two hand auger borings were attempted across the proposed
location of the sedimentation basin. Also, a soil pit was dug to inspect the mineral soil
immediately beneath the soil surface to confirm the major soil units and estimate a vertical
drainage rate. This investigation was performed using current USDA-NRCS soil taxonomy
methods.
The property contains soils similar to the:
• Tomotley series (Fine -loamy, mixed, semiactive, thermic Typic Endoaquults)
The seasonal high water table (SHW I) was observed at approximately 5 inches below the
mineral soil surface. Observations would indicate that the soil properties should be expected
to perform similarly to standards for Tomotley soil series found in the USDA Tyrell County
Soil Survey. Fuss & O'Neill appreciates the opportunity, to provide you with this services if you
should have any questions about this project please feel free to call [phone].
Respectfully,
Fuss & O'Neill, Inc. SI SOIL
C. EA(y
C. Scott Carpenter, LSS
Scientist Ill
Nam\
9I.
Attachments FI
I3. Godwin
ist I
N:\p2006\501- Me village a Columbia\Correspondence\Soil Science Evaluation Repoctdoc 0 2007 Ivss & O'Neill, Inc.

at
I I
we R —
3 — —
u
,
1
1
A 1213 1 1 /
\ 9W1
1209
/ 1260 nY+ .._
/
i
Off,
1200
M
- � � .
10
Tive 1113 � 1110
117
�T
1.
_,RNONG
,
8 \•/ -� 1125
\ .a 1109 \
I
.S
I
1220
\
209 1 I ,� J
1216
_I'I_•
1203 ,
121
22
U
1214
I
II 1 1229
-
SITE
�.
( O 12
1300
` - -
❑OS'
-
1
�
_ r
O,e,30
13
303
• 325
�,
1131 1301
05
107
1106
r1105 jm
1103 ' t30'6
1122 ` A-7
� u \ 1307
V / 4 1:e�aa y'
Noss - _ Property Boundary
-R opeq bowdvy uva appioaauaed umg naw.ry obumad 5oaaa�n 1 Miles _
Scale: 1" = 2 miles VICINYIY MAP FIGURE
Drawn By JEG FUSS &O'NEILL "hV'llagc "Cola.°b`" 1
lievlewed 6y CSC CohOnbia, North Cemli,. 1
Disciplines to Deliver
Dale: January -'07 Puss & O'Neill Project N0. 20060501.AIO

G2(E)
M
f
3y f
• I l /•
COLUMB ��.
-
�
WIInW: e �i'1' at j �� MI'. • 5
ou ■y -64
B
BHd
i
— - +p4b�
Y \`F __
IBM
13,
CP
�g • 7185 w ,� r_ '� T
- _ _.0 1 nt>n 2,000 4,000 FlevenY,
Not¢ -Nopary bwnduy urn app.avmv2dumgeswoey obmned fiom churl
am
Scale: 1" = 2,000' USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP FIGURE
Drawn By JEG FUSS & O'NEILL The Vilbge st Columbia
Reviewed By. CSC Disciplines to Deliver CoAunbis, North C.Iuss G
Date: January - r07 Fuss & ONeW Pmject Nm 20060501A10

0
AaA
1 ^�
11 /• %
III 1 /' /• /• /\\
11 /
i
NA Almvicm Sniea. burry 6e
A4 A,,mm Seeiee. tine randy
Notea -Nopay boundagv appr�ted ux'vg a mavq obmned fiom cE,
1
Draw. N = 20
Drawn By: JrG
Reviewed By: CSC
Date: January-'07
I.,—d
Road
Dirt Road
r Property Bourxary
0 100 200 400 [_- USDA Soil Boundary
Fret
USDA -MRCS SOILS MAY FIGURE
FUSS&O'NEILL 11teVintageatColu[nbia
Columbia, North Carolina 3
Disciplines to Deliver
Fuss & O'Nedl Project No. 20060501.A10

RFUSS&O'NEILL
Owner: N%: 00.1 40,t
Address: %,ie ✓1142c -:7R (S/,
Project No.: _ZCV&O-Z-,V/./I
Type of Wastewater:
Water Supply: ❑ Private 0 Public
SOIL/SITE EVALUATION
Date: l A6—p7
ra 4a6, n!G State: .VG
County: % r.�e !l
✓/"- Property Size:
❑ Well ❑ Spring ❑ Other
Evaluation Method: MAUger Boring tp Pit ❑ Cut
jiP TPt
y6
Y� I
tFF
P�
Ia
�" LANDSGP}t
•+ r
his
u* f�S
'�;;
OBIZON
r
�K3 �{
1 ,Lw1,tLY"
t#� SiOI1'1MORPHOLOGY t+,,��iPROFILE'I
a � i -' s
&�CI URE/ �y CONSISTLNCC/t+
�' �� T�.� [ t [ .
h ,
ACTORS
u� [. [ mml SAPRO R]'STIt
WI INLSS/' 31 X
C,LG
PItOF7LwC t$$
� �
40r
©— 6
/1S
10`2 q
464"
/,Ova
DESCRIPTION
.�
INITIAL SYSTEM
REPAIRSYST[iM
OTHERFACCORS:
t+41zfi �
•�--���
SITE CLASS] FICATION:/.•
j
h_
EvaluatedBy-. /450-1 _ C..50%Pwd'-J �..�• �"" � r^ ,/
Comments:
N:\Namml Resources\Sub-Surface\F&O Soil Sheccdoe 0 2006 Fuss & O'Neill, Inc.

LOCATION TOMOTLEY NC+SC VA
Established Series
Rev. AG
02/2000
TOMOTLEY SERIES
MLRA(s): 133A, 153A, 153B
MLRA Office Responsible: Raleigh, North Carolina
Depth Class: Very Deep
Drainage Class: Poorly drained
Permeability: Moderate to moderately slow
Surface Runoff. Slow
Parent Material: Formed in loamy marine and fluvial sediments
Slope: 0 to 2 percent
Mean Annual Air Temperature (type location): 61 degrees F.
Mean Annual Precipitation (type location): 48 inches
TAXONOMIC CLASS: Fine -loamy, mixed, semiactive, thermic Typic Endoaquults
TYPICAL PEDON: Tomotley fine sandy loam —cultivated. (Colors are for moist soil.)
Ap--O to 7 inches; dark grayish brown (1 OYR 4/2) fine sandy loam; weak medium granular structure; very friable;
common fine and medium roots; slightly acid; abrupt smooth boundary. (5 to 10 inches thick)
Btgt--7 to 12 inches; light gray (10YR 7/1) fine sandy loam; weak medium subangular blocky structure; friable; few
fine prominent yellowish brown (1 OYR 5/6) soft masses of iron accumulation; few faint clay films on faces of peds;
few fine and medium roots; slightly acid; clear smooth boundary.
Btg2--12 to 42 inches; light brownish gray (2.5Y 6/2) sandy clay loam; moderate medium subangular blocky structure;
friable, slightly sticky, slightly plastic; common medium prominent strong brown (7.5YR 5/8) and yellowish brown
(1 OYR 5/6) soft masses of iron accumulation; few distinct clay films on faces of peds; strongly acid; clear smooth
boundary. (Combined thickness of the Btg horizon is 20 to 40 inches.)
BCg--42 to 50 inches; 35 percent light brownish gray (2.5Y 6/2), 35 percent gray (1 OYR 6/1), and 30 percent yellowish
brown (I OYR 5/8) sandy loam with pockets of loamy sand; weak fine subangular blocky structure; friable; very
strongly acid; clear smooth boundary. (0 to 30 inches)
Cg--50 to 72 inches; gray (I OYR 6/1) loamy sand; massive; friable; many medium prominent yellowish brown (I OYR
5/6) and strong brown (7.5YR 5/8) soft masses of iron accumulation; very strongly acid.
TYPE LOCATION: Chowan County, North Carolina; 0.3 mile northwest of the intersection of N.C. Highway 32 and
Business U.S. 17; 100 feet east of N.C. Highway 32.
RANGE IN CHARACTERISTICS:
Solum Thickness: 30 to more than 60 inches
Depth to Bedrock: Greater than 60 inches
Depth to Seasonal High Water Table: 0 to 12, November to April
Soil Reaction: Extremely acid to strongly acid in the A, Eg, BEg, BA, and Btg horizons and extremely acid to
moderately acid in the BCg and Cg horizons.
Other Features: Few to common fine flakes of mica and fine black minerals are in the lower B and C horizons of some
pedons. The content of rounded pebbles range from 0 to 5 percent throughout the solum.. Some pedons have a few

concretions of ironstone in one or all horizons.
A or Ap horizon:
Color —hue of IOYR to 5Y or is neutral, value of 2 to 4, and chroma of 0 to 2 Texture —loamy sand, loamy fine sand,
sandy loam, fine sandy loam, loam, or silt loam
Eg horizon (if it occurs):
Color —hue of 1 OYR or 2.5Y or is neutral, value of 4 to 8, and chroma of 0 or 2 Texture —loamy sand, loamy fine sand,
sandy loam, fine sandy loam, loam, or silt loam
Redoximorphic features (if they occur) --iron masses in shades of brown, yellow, or red and iron depletions in shades of
olive or gray
BEg or BA horizon (if it occurs):
Color —hue of 10YR or 2.5Y or is neutral, value of 4 to 7, and chroma of 0 to 2. Texture —sandy loam, fine sandy loam,
loam, or silt loam
Redoximorphic features (if they occur) --iron masses in shades of brown, yellow, or red and iron depletions in shades of
olive or gray
Btg horizon:
Color —hue of 10YR to 5Y or is neutral, value of 4 to 7, and chroma of 0 to 2. Texture --commonly sandy clay loam,
clay loam, loam, sandy loam, or fine sandy loam; some pedons have thin subhorizons of silt loam or silty clay loam;
some pedons are clay or sandy clay below 40 inches
Redoximorphic features —iron masses in shades of brown, yellow, or red and iron depletions in shades of olive or gray
BCg or CBg horizon (if it occurs):
Color —hue of 1 OYR to 5Y or is neutral, value of 4 to 8, and chroma of 0 to 2. Texture —fine sandy loam, sandy loam,
loam, clay loam, sandy clay loam, silt loam, or sandy clay; this horizon commonly has thin strata or pockets of
contrasting textures
Redoximorphic features --iron masses in shades of brown, yellow, or red and iron depletions in shades of olive or gray
Cg horizon:
Color —hue of 10YR, 2.5Y, 5Y, 5BG, 5GY or is neutral, value of 4 to 8, and chroma of 0 to 2
Texture —is variable, ranging from sand to clay; pockets or strata of contrasting textures are common
Redoximorphic features —iron masses in shades of brown, yellow, or red and iron depletions in shades of olive or gray
COMPETING SERIES:
Partlow soils —have angular quartz fragments in the solum, may be underlain by saprolite, and the geographic setting is
in the Piedmont Province.
GEOGRAPHIC SETTING:
Landscape: Coastal Plain
Landform: Terraces
Elevation: 5 to 100 feet above mean sea level
Parent Material: Formed in loamy marine and fluvial sediments
Mean Annual Air Temperature: 60 to 70 degrees
Mean Annual Precipitation: 45 to 55 inches
Frost Free Period: 200 to 270 days
GEOGRAPHICALLY ASSOCIATED SOILS:
Argent soils —poorly drained soils (seasonal high water table 0 to 12 inches) in fine family on similar landscape
Arapahoe soils —very poorly drained soils (seasonal high water table 0 to 12 inches) in coarse -loamy family on similar
landscapes
Augusta soils --Somewhat poorly drained soils (seasonal high water table 12 to 18 inches) on higher landscapes
Cape Fear soils --very poorly drained soils (seasonal high water table 0 to 12 inches) in fine family on similar
landscapes

Deloss soils —very poorly drained soils (seasonal high water table 0 to 12 inches) on similar landscapes
Nimmo soils —poorly drained soils (seasonal high water table 0 to 12 inches) in coarse -loamy family on similar
landscapes
Pasquotank soils —poorly drained soils (seasonal high water table 0 to 12 inches) in coarse -silty family on similar
landscapes
Perquimans soils --poorly drained soils (seasonal high water table 0 to 12 inches) in fine -silty family on similar
landscapes
Portsmouth soils --very poorly drained soils (seasonal high water table 0 to 12 inches) with contrasting textures on
similar landscapes
Roanoke soils —poorly drained soils (seasonal high water table 0 to 12 inches) in fine family on similar landscape
Wahee soils --somewhat poorly drained soils (seasonal high water table 12 to 18 inches) in fine family on higher
landscapes
Yon es soils —poorly drained soils (seasonal high water table 0 to 12 inches) with base saturation more than 35 percent
on similar landscapes
DRAINAGE AND PERMEABILITY:
Agricultural Drainage Class: Poorly drained
Permeability: Moderate to moderately slow
USE AND VEGETATION:
Major Uses: Mostly cultivated
Dominant Vegetation: Where cultivated--com, oats, soybeans, small grain, truck crops, and pasture. Where wooded—
loblolly pine, willow oak, yellow poplar, red maple, water tupelo, sweetgum, blackgum, and water oak. Understory
plants include inkberry, large gallberry, southern bayberry, switchcane, blueberry, sweetbay and American holly.
DISTRIBUTION AND EXTENT:
Distribution: Lower Coastal Plain of North Carolina, South Carolina and Virginia
Extent: Moderate
MLRA OFFICE RESPONSIBLE: Raleigh, North Carolina
SERIES ESTABLISHED: Beaufort County, South Carolina; 1975.
REMARKS: Particle -size data is available for this pedon. The April 1993 revision placed the Tomotley series in fine -
loamy, mixed, thermic Typic Endoaquults. In several older soil surveys in South Carolina, and possibly other states,
soils correlated Tomotey may have siliceous mineralogy. Those soils are outside the range of the series and no
geographically associated soils that have siliceous mineralogy were listed in the April 1993 revision of the Tomotley
series.
Diagnostic horizons and soil properties recognized in the typical pedon are:
Ochric epipedon - the zone from the surface to a depth of 7 inches (Ap horizon)
Argillic horizon - the zone from depths of 7 to 42 inches (Btgl and Btg2 horizons)
REVISED=7/9/96,MHC
MLRAS=153A, 153B, 133A
ADDITIONAL DATA:
TABULAR SERIES DATA:
SOI-5 Soil Name Slope Airtemp FrFr/Seas Precip Elevation
NC0167 TOMOTLEY 0- 2 60- 70 200-270 45- 55 5- 100

SOI-5_
P1oodL P1oodH Watertable
Rind
Months Bedrock
NC0167
NONE
RARE 0-1.0
APPARENT
NOV-APR
60-60
SOI-5
Depth
Texture
3-Inch
No-10 Clay%
-CEC-
NC0167
0-7
LS LFS
0-0
95-100 2-10
1-8
NC0167
0-7
SL FSL
0-0
95-100 5-20
2-10
NC0167
0-7
SIL L
0-0
95-100 5-27
2-11
NC0167
7-42
FSL SCL CL
0-0
95-100 18-35
4-8
NC0167
42-50
FSL SCL SC
0-0
95-100 15-45
3-9
NC0167
50-72
VAR
SOI-5
Depth
-pH- O.M.
Salinity Permeability
Shrink
-Swell
NC0167
0- 7
3.5- 5.5 1.-6.
0-0
6.0-20
LOW
NC0167
0- 7
3.5- 5.5 1.-6.
0-0
2.0-6.0
LOW
NC0167
0- 7
3.5- 5.5 1.-6.
0-0
2.0-6.0
LOW
NC0167
7-42
3.5- 5.5 .5-1.
0-0
0.6-2.0
LOW
NC0167
42-50
3.5- 6.0 0.-.5
0-0
0.2-2.0
LOW
NC0167
50-12
- -
-
-
National Cooperative Soil Survey
U.S.A.

_ �; ,�..
a,
i
�=`f �� `�� - ..
'� ! �
.�, L�
` w
_ � :-r
,� ; ,,
—'� '
;� � / ,
`` •'�' ar � \ _ i I 'yam �_F .
�. � �
I'
�� � $�y�
.!" � �_ r (. tom`. � .�,_ + _.,. \
't a ¢ 1.
i • � /
�/
r ._ � , ��
M� �
` � iV
1 ' ., ��
4 �� �: err_ � �. ��i __ �,
o -' � . ,
` `. s
\ , T t..
y

0
610 1.ynndule COUrt
FUSS & O'NEILL
Disciplines to Deliver
February 1, 2007
Mr. Scott Vinson, PE
NCDENR
Division of Water Quality
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
Re: RevisionState Stormwater Permit Application
Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan Approval
The Village at Columbia
Fuss & O'Neill Project No. 20060501.A10
Dear Scott,
.itSCEINTED
FFa 5120
pW @
PROS #
Attached is a letter to Roberto regarding plan modifications to address wetland issues.
Please bear in mind that the attached changes reduce the contributory area to the detention
basin from 7.2 acres to 6.66 acres. This change in theory reduces the required temporary
pool volume. We wish to keep the pond dimensions unchanged to provide for
contingency against changes he owner may desire in the future. In this case we would like
to keep the calculations unchanged to avoid complications with your review. The
calculations and the pond dimensions as presented will provide a degree of conservancy in
the design regarding pollutant capture. -- --�
Should changes occur for this site occur, we would be in a position to submit for a permit
modification to account for this without physical changes to the detention pond or its
outlet structures. The package includes the following:
1. A letter to Roberto Sheller explaining why the changes are required.
2. P.rojectl?lans IReyised-(2sefs)
3. Wetland Narrative (2 sets)
s°m8 e
cteen,�ne. nc 27xsx Please let us know if additional information would be helpful.
t [phone] Sincerely,
f (252) 355-81 x6
www.handO.cnm— l � J I
Todd'1'ripp. P17 /7—
N"fl, Candiva
South Carolina
Senior Project Manager
c: Don Dove, Member/Manager
M'w"hartnt,
Lyn Hardison
Nem lark
iUinde Island

FUSS & O'NEILL
Disciplines to Deliver
February 1, 2007
Mr. Roberto Scheller
NCDENR — 401 Water Quality Section
Division of Water Quality
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
RE: Revision - Preconstmction Notification
The Village at Columbia
Fuss & O'Neill Project No. 20060501.A10
Dear Roberto,
FEg � 2
200�
DV Q
PRoa # _—
After discussions with Mr. Tom Steffens with the US Army Corps of Engineers, we
realized that the presence of the 100-year flood plain excluded the possibility for a
Nationwide 39 wetlands permit.
Our only recourse was to go for an individual permit or to reduce the impact sufficient to
qualify as a minor fill of less than 0.1 Acres. We chose the latter. After much wrangling
with requirements for setbacks and with the location of the roadway we worked out a plan
that accomplishes this.
area -to the wet -detention pond; however we will still
By copy of this letter we will also forward our application to the Corps.
Enclosed for your review are the following:
1. Two sets of full size plans.
2. Two sets of specifications.
010 tynnd,le Court 3. Two sets of Yz size plans
Suite e 4. Two copies of the revised PCN Application Form (I'he only revision is the Filling
Greenville, NC 27858 in of the NWP type.
t [phone] 5. Two copies of the revised PCN Application Form addendum.
[phone]
Sincerely
ww,
TandOxonr =�rt f
Mwh C. u,,I mt Todd Tripp, PE
.5 1/5 Cannliun Senior Project Manager
Cunnerti..t
c: Don Dove, Member/Manager
Mat .t`i'.....
its
Tom Steffens, USACE — Washington Regulatory Field Office — Six Sets
Nn, la,k
Scott Vinson, NCDWQ — Coastal Stormwater Permitting Unit
iu,,,dr- itt,te

Based upon our initial reconnasaince of the site, we believed that existing wetlands on this site were minimal and
followed an existing canal. It turns out that we had veiwed this site during dry weather. We returned with a
licensed sod scientist and performed a detailed evaluation and followed up with a site visit and review by the local
US Army Corps representative. The existing wetlands were much more extensive as shown on the revised
attached plans. The owner had secured a business plan with financing based upon his initial investigations (by
others), which was similar to our original estimate. We visited with NCDWQ personnel and based upon
discussions we made the following changes to minimize impacts to the extent possible:
1. We shortened the access road and shifted it to place get the roadway and ditches out of the wetlands to the
extent possible. Proposed impacts are now less than a 0.08 acres.
2. We eliminated a drainage swale which was originally proposed to prevent drainage from impervious areas from
(draining off -site. To deal with this, the Owner must install roof drains to redirect this water. This change will
reduce the likelihood of drainage of adjacent wetlands.
3. We eliminated a wet detention basin required by Stormwater Rules and redesigned the drainage system and the
other remaining basin to accomodate additional discharge. This was a difficult redesign due to elevations and
limited upland space but was successfully completed while preserving the economic viability of the project
Item 2 from Page 8 of 12
Wetland
Impact by
Residential Lot
Type of
Impact
Type of
Wetland
Distance to
Nearest
Stream
Wetland
Area
Impacted-
Square Feet
Wetland
Area
Impacted-
Acres
Located in 100-
year Flood
Plain ?
7
Fill
Unknown
Not Determined
645
0.01
Yes
8
Fill
Unknown
Not Determined
1,942
0.04
Yes
20
Fi0
Unknown
Not Determ ned
178
0.00
Ycs
21
Fill
Unknown
Not Determ ned
96
0.00
Yes
Pump Station
Fill
I Unknown
I Not Determined
97
0.00
Yes
Totals 2,958 0.07
g+. �NfnUii
rC\JA •, • .9
�V, oo� ; 174CO
{„ •t4lUt Hi Ntly.

1
••� deg'. •i : '..i •,'•'••t'.
/ _ 1
�. .fexlNal::

Impact Justification ( Minimization):
Based upon our initial reconnasaince of the site, we believed that existing wetlands on this site were minimal and
followed an existing canal. It turns out that we had veiwed this site during dry weather. We returned with a
licensed soil scientist and performed a detailed evaluation and followed up with a site visit and review by the local
US Army Corps representative. The existing wetlands were much more extensive as shown on the revised
attached plans. The owner had secured a business plan with financing based upon his initial investigations (by
others), which was similar to our original estimate. We visited with NCDWQ personnel and based upon
discussions we made the following changes to minimize impacts to the extent possible:
1. We shortened the access road and shifted it to place get the'roadwa'y and ditches out of the wetlands to the
extent possible. Proposed impacts are now less than a 0.08 acres.
2. We eliminated a drainage swale which was originally proposed to prevent drainage from impervious areas from
draining off -site. To deal with this, the Owner must install roof drains to redirect this water. This change will
reduce the likelihood of drainage of adjacent wetlands.
3. We eliminated a wet detention basin required by Stormwater Rules and redesigned the drainage system and the
other remaining basin to accomodate additional discharge. This was a difficult redesign due to elevations and
limited upland space but was successfully completed while preserving the economic viability of the project
Item 2 from Page 8 of 12
Wetland
Impact by
Residential Lot
Type of
Impact
Type of
Wetland
Distance to
Nearest
Stream
Wetland
Area
Impacted-
S uare Fcet
Wetland
Area
Impacted-
Acres
Located in 100-
year Flood
Plain ?
7
Fill
Unknown
Not Determined
645
0.01
Yes
8
Fill
Unknown
Not Determined
1,942
0.04
Yes
20
Fill
Unknown
Not Determ ned
178
0.00
Yes
21
Fill
Unknown
Not Determined
96
0.00
Yes
Pump Station
Fill
I Unknown
I Not Determined
97
1 0.00
1 Yes
Totals 2,958 0.07
g+_. ��ptrrnrgy
PIN CAR P, " 10
= q 17 FS0 <:
r,., 'trrruutt'•t

Village of Columbia
Page 1 of 2
Village of Columbia
Erosion Control Narrative
I. Project Description
The purpose of the project is to construct a forty six home site of buildings with
paved drives with a club house and pool. Approximately 10.3 acres will be
disturbed during the construction phase. The total site area is 10.3 acres located
in Columbia, Tyrrell County at the end of Carter Lane.
II. Site Description
The site is basically flat with sloping from Carter Lane to the back of the
property. The area is covered with small vegetation with no apparent erosion
problems. The property apparently drains away in sheet flow to other adjacent
areas. Carter Lane is the west front of the property with a canal at the south and
east property boundary
III. Adjacent Property
Land use for the site and adjacent properties on the west side of Carter Lane are
in a residentiall area. Land to the east side is residential. There is no runoff
contributing to the site area from the adjacent areas.
IV. Soils
The soil in the project area is a sandy loam with no erosion control problems
expected. The expected seasonal high water table is four to six inches below the
ground surface. Top soil will be stockpiled on site to used with the wet
detention pond planting. Any excess will be hauled off accordingly to other
locations.
Planned Erosion and Sedimentation Control Practices
I. Wet Detention Pond
The wet detention pond will be constructed in the back of the site adjacent to a
canal at the property boundary. All surface water from disturbed areas,
approximatelyacres will be directed to drain to the wet detention pond.
6.66G. L.
5cA Fvb . I, zoo 7 /e T 7r �/ .
N:\p2OO6\501-The Village at Columbia\Info & Calculations\Lrosion Control \aaauve.doc

Village of Columbia
Page 2 of 2
II. Construction Entrance
A temporary gravel construction entrance will be installed along Carter Lane of
the west side of the site. The construction entrance is to keep runoff directed to
the wet detention pond.
III. Drop Inlet Protection
A temporary block and gravel drop inlet protection to be installed at every drop
inlet located on the site. Runoff in these drop inlets will be direct to the wet
detention pond. The protection will reduce the sediment load in the pipes and
wet detention pond.
IV. Site Grading
Grading will be requited on the entire site with the buildings at the highest
elevation and paved areas graded to channel runoff to desired swales per design.
The entire site will have silt fence constructed around the boundary to maintain
sediment from running off the site. After completing grading for the wet
detention pond, native transplants for wetland conditions will be provided for
the aquatic bench to reduce erosion during wet periods and to remove runoff
contaminants. The entire site will be seeded within fifteen days of completion.
Construct homes and direct roof drains to maintain runoff on site. Prepare any
disturbed compacted stone for paving, buildings, any areas on the site not
constructed should be seeded see seeding schedule Sheet 2 of the plans.
V. Outlet Protection
All culverts will be provided with rip rap outlet protection.
VI. Work Sequence
The work sequence for the project is given on Sheet 2 of the plans.
VII. Specifications
Specifications for erosion control are contained in Section 2540. Seeding
specifications and the seeding schedule is contained in Section 2821 of the
Specifications.
N:\p2006\501-The Village air Columbia\Info & Calculations\Erosion Control Narmtive.doc

FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY/OWNERSHIP FORM
SEDIMENTATION POLLUTION CONTROL ACT
No person may initiate any land -disturbing activity on one or more acres as covered by the Act before this
form and an acceptable erosion and sedimentation control plan have been completed and approved by the
Land Quality Section, N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources. (Please type or print and, if
the question is not applicable or the e-mail and/or fax information unavailable, place N/A in the blank.)
Part A.
1. Project Name: Village of Columbia
2. Location of land -disturbing activity: County Tyrrell City or Township Columbia
Highway/Street Int. SR1300 & Carter Lane. LatitudeN35°-54' 42"LongitudeW76°-14' 27" WGS 84
3. Approximate date land -disturbing activity will commence: January 30, 2007
4. Purpose of development (residential, commercial, industrial, institutional, etc.): Residential
5. Total acreage disturbed or uncovered (including off -site borrow and waste areas): 10 AC
6. Amount of fee enclosed: $ 500.00 . The application fee of $50.00 per acre (rounded
up to the next acre) is assessed without a ceiling amount (Example: a 9-acre application fee is $450).
7. Has an erosion and sediment control plan been filed? Yes No Enclosed X
8. Person to contact should erosion and sediment control issues arise during land -disturbing activity:
Name Don Dove E-mail Address DDDove(a)verizon.net
Telephone [phone] Cell # 443-7425729 Fax # [phone]
9. Landowner(s) of Record (attach accompanied page to list additional owners):
Don Dove. Village at Columbia, LLC 443-742-5729 410-757-0331
Name Telephone Fax Number
1212 Butterworth Court 1212 Butterworth Court
Current Mailing Address Current Street Address
Stevensville MD 21666
City State Zip City State Zip
10. Deed Book No. 211 Page No. 6, 7 Provide a copy of the most current deed.
Part B.
Person(s) or firm(s) who are financially responsible for the land -disturbing activity (Provide a
comprehensive list of all responsible parties on an attached sheet):
Village at Columbia, LLC DDDove cDverison.net
Name E-mail Address
1212 Butterworth Court 1212 Butterworth Court
Current Mailing Address Current Street Address
Stevensville MD 21666
City State Zip City State Zip
Telephone [phone] Fax Number 410-757-0331

Jan 22 07 04143p Employee
252-355-e1es p.2
2. (a) If the Financially Responsible Parry is not a resident of North Carolina, give name and street address
of the designated North Carolina Agent:
Name E-mail Address
A '2' g,4X 2 S 'fS3/ 15�,
Current Mailing Address Current Street Address
City State Zip City State Zip
Telephone ;z 15 2 Z/�il /�� Fax Number
(b) If the Financially Responsible Party is a Partnership or other person engaging in business under an
assumed name, attach a copy of the Certificate of Assumed Name. If the Financially Responsible
Party is a Corporation, give name and street address of the Registered Agent:
Name of Registered Agent
Current Mailing Address
City State Zip
Telephone
E-mail Address
Current Street Address
City State Zip
Fax Number
The above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and was provided
by me under oath (This form must be signed by the Financially Responsible Person if an individual
or his attorney -in -fact, or if not an individual, by an officer, director, partner, or registered agent with
the authority to execute instruments for the Financially Responsible Person). I agree to provide
c ected infor tion should there by any q an e in the information provided herein.
I IPYl 1 -PVCMV"IfY\ Member/Manager
Type or
Title or Authority
l' X, o! O
Date
1 e r n-e_k a Notary Public of the County of 0 ue w �'I A n h e—
Y� 1 iU rc� I �.�,y� I [ appeared
State ofi�fo�n 6liae, hereby certify that Z fN� t
personally before me this day and being duly sworn acknowledged t the above form was
executed by him.
Witness my hand and notarial seal, this QD�day of CIVI (X w' .20Q1
_
Notary
Seal /OOp
My commission expires

FLIM M TYRI Canty, NC
an 0aa 07 2De8 at 02:36.22 PH
ly IWan L Arntrnq
Rojofw of Doodo
BOOK 211 PAGE 6
LT #
Land Transfer$ 0.00 (Exempt)
Excise Tax: $ 0,00 (Exempt)
This Instrument should be mailed to the preparer. Michael C. Casey, Esq., P.O. Box 28. Nags Head, NC 27959, a licensed
North Carolina attorney. Delinquent taxes, if any, to be paid by the closing attorney to the count, tax collector upon
disbursement of closing proceeds.
Bnef Index Description; METES AND BOUNDS
Parcel Identifier Number:
NORT
THIS DEED OF GIFT is made this 7" day of December, 2006, by and between:
LINDEN DEVELOPMENT, LCC
(hereinafter referred to In the neutersingular as "the Grantor') and
THE VILLAGE AT COLUMBIA, LLC
1212 Butterworth Court J
Stevensville, MD 21666
(hereinafter referred to In the neuter singular as "the Grantee") :
WITNESSETH, that the Grantor has and by these presents does hereby give, grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the Grantee,
Its heirs, successors, administrators and assigns, all of that certain lot or parcel of land situated the Columbia Township of said
Tyrrell County, North Carolina, and more particularly described as follows:
All that tract or parcel of land shown and delineated as "10.23 AC. M-" on a plat of survey
entitled "MAP PREPARED FOR Handi Works OBX, LLC" dated July 25, 2005, prepared by Billy R.
Leggett, Professional Land Surveyor, a copy of which is recorded with that Deed recorded at Book
206 at page 262 of the Tyrrell County Public Registry.
TOGETHER WITH a non-exclusive right of way easement in conjunction with Grantor, 45 feet in

BOOK 211 PAGE 7
width, extending from SR 1300 to the northwest comer of the above -described tract, as shown on the
Plat referred to above, and further being SUBJECT TO said easement as It extends from the
northwest comer of the land conveyed to and along the western boundary of the tract of land
conveyed to The State of North Carolina by deed recorded in Book 186 at page 663.
The property herein described was acquired by the Grantor by deed recorded in Book 206 at Page 262, in the
Public Registry of Tyrrell County.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges and appurtenances thereto belonging to the
Grantee in fee simple.
The Grantor covenants with the Grantee that Grantor is seized of the premises in fee simple, has the right to convey the same
In fee simple, that title Is marketable and free and clear of all encumbrances, and that Grantor will warrant and defend the bde
against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever except for the following exceptions:
1 Ad Valorem taxes for 2006 and all subsequent yeare.
2. Subject to any easements and restrictive covenants as may appear of record In the Public Registry of
Tyrrell County.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set his hand and seal.
Linden D vIdpment, LLC
By: (SEAL)
len R. Lindengren, Manager
STATE OF 1 I IQ YIn �Ct Vz�
COUNTYOF
I, = lr6eD)otv�e %J I If m6L4 a Notary Public of the County and State aforesaid, do hereby certify
that
Glen R. Lindengren personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged that he/she is Manager
of Linden Development, LLC, a corporation, and acknowledged, on behalf of Linden Development, LL,C
the due execution of the foregoing instrument. Witness my hand and official stamp or seal, this
day of-00ohna:, 2006.
bec ey"bx r
IO�II,�Zo10 ��rn�
Notary Public
A�,

The Village at Columbia
Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan
Calculations
1) Flood Peaks
a. Drainage Area No. 1 — 3.41 Acres — Eastern Roadway Ditch at the
Pond
• Establish Time of Concentration - Concept for these calculations is
that there are two components to the Time of Concentration: 1)
Overland flow at the ridge line prior to flow concentration, 2)
Concentrated flow in the basin main channel to our point of interest.
We will be using Seelye (See Attached Nomograph) for overland
time and Kirpitch (See attached Nomograph) for the channel time.
Overland (Seelye) L= 100'
5=0.5%
Average ff Grass - 4To = 16 min. H
Channel ss��+rp*r�'
Grp 900' 'CAR
•S/ OC•�9
T= 12 min.
Tc = 12 + 16= 28 min. 3� 11 1
7480
• Rate of Discharge Using Rational (Hatteras IDF) t1G7N8EQ' Q
Q=CIAO� ......• 1?z %%,
QZ= 0.40*(2.6 in/hr) * (3.41 Ac) = 3.5 cfs i I Z7,
Qlo= 0.40*(3.9 in/hr) * (3.41 Ac) = 5.3 cfs
b. Drainage Area No. 2 — 3.01 Acres — Western Roadway Ditch at the
Pond
• Establish Time of Concentration — Same as above — see Paragraph a.
• Rate of Discharge Using Rational (Hatteras IDF)
Q=CIA
Q2= 0.40*(2.6 in/hr) * (3.01 Ac) = 3.1 cfs
Q10= 0.40*(3.9 in/hr) * (3.01 Ac) = 4.7 cfs
Prepared by Fuss & O'Neill Inc. — Consulting Engineers
Page 1 of 4

The Village at. Columbia
c. Drainage Area No. 3 —7.2 Acres —Total for all disturbed on Kendall
Court
Establish Time of Concentration — Same as above — see Paragraph a.
Rate of Discharge Using Rational (Hatteras IDF)
Q=CIA
QZ= 0.40*(2.6 in/hr) * (7.2 Ac) = 7.5 cfs
Qlo= 0.40*(3.9 in/hr) * (7.2 Ac) = 11.2 cfs
2) Ditch Calculations
New Roadway ditches will have 3:1 side slopes and a 0.2% Longitudinal
Slope
Worst Drainage Area 1 at pond — Ditch Newly Constructed
Ditch Width (B) = 0'
Manning's N = 0.023 For Bare Earth
Side Slopes (M) = 3:1
Longitudinal Slope 0.20%
Drainage Area = 3.41 Acres
Qio= 5.3 cfs
Normal Depth (Y) @ 10cfs (10-yr discharge for Area No. 3) = 0.82 feet.
V10 = 2.66 fps
From Table 8.05d of the Planning and Design Manual, these velocities
should be acceptable for any of the soils listed which would include our
site but they are on the margin. Establish Ditch lining at the Cul-de-Sac
• Worst Drainage Area 1 at pond — Ditch Established with good ground
cover
Ditch Width (B) = 0'
Manning's N = 0.030 For Lawns
Side Slopes (M) = 3:1
Longitudinal Slope 0.20%
Drainage Area = 3.41 Acres
Qio= 5.3 cfs
Normal Depth (Y) @ 10cfs (10-yr discharge for Area No. 1) =1.11 feet.
V10=2.66 fps
Prepared by Fuss & O'Neill Inc. — Consulting Engineers
Page 2 of 4

The Village at Columbia
From Table 8.05d of the Planning and Design Manual, these velocities are
acceptable for ditches with established
3) Sediment Traps —Rock Check Dams
We need 1800 cubic feet of storage per disturbed acre.
Ditch Width (B) = 0'— This will be a swale
Top Width Ditch = 2' Depth X 3:1 Side Slopes X 2 slopes = 12' Top Width
Cross Sectional Area at dam face = ((12'+0')/2) X 2'Depth = 12 SQFT
Volume = ((12 SQFT + 0 SQFT)/2) X L
L is the length of the water surface behind the dam.
With a 0.2% ditch longitudinal slope, L for a 2 foot deep ditch will be:
L = 2/(0.02 ft/ft) = 100'
Therefore volume per RCD is approximately:
Volume = ((12 SQFT + 0 SQFT)/2) X 100'
Volume = 600 CUFT
Acreage allowable per RCD = 600 CUFT / 1800 CUFT per Acre
Acreage allowable per RCD = 0.333 Acres
Disturbed area at any given time per side of roadway is approximately 15
feet.
Length allowable between RCD's is 0.277 X 43,560 ftZ per acre / 95' width
L allowable = 153 feet
OK, set spacing at 150 feet between each RCD.
4) Level Spreader
Determine the Level Spreader dimensions
G Area is Area 3 listed under 1(c) (See above).
QZ= 0.40*(2.6 in/hr) * (7.2 Ac) = 7.5 cfs
Q10= 0.40*(3.9 in/hr) * (7.2 Ac) = 11.2 cfs
Minimum Length = 20 Feet, and minimum entrance width is 16 feet.
5) Outlet Protection for Culvert at Station 17+00
Determine the Rip Rap Outlet Protection Apron dimensions:
Prepared by Fuss & O'Neill hic. — Consulting Engineers
Page 3 of 4

The Village at Columbia
Area is Area 3 listed under 1(c) (See above).
Q2= 0.40*(2.6 in/hr) * (7.2 Ac) = 7.5 cfs
Qlo= 0.40*(3.9 in/hr) * (7.2 Ac) =11.2 cfs
Enter Figure 8.06.03 with an 36-inch culvert and 9 cfs:
d50 = 0.35 ft = 4" stone
La is less than 4 feet so use 6 feet.
Prepared by Fuss & O'Neill Inc. — Consulting Engineers
Page 4 of 4

Ditch Calculation.xls
Manning's Equation to Determine Ditch Velocities by Trial and Error
�=1.49A/n*R^ .57)*S^(.5)
not any existingChannel, n and slope are a constant.
iince the Q for design is set for a given location it can be considered a constant also.
3implifying Man nin 's E nation for constants to the left and variables to the ri ht ives:
Qn/(1.49*S^.5)=R^ .67
Note Input is in Boldface Type
or
uued
=
Zavailable
t
Bare Earth Conditions
Established Lawn
Desi Q=
5.3
B=
0
Design Q=
5.3
B=
0
Mann. n=
0.023
Assumed
yn=
0.815
Mann. n=
0.030
Assumed yn=
1.107
Upstream channel
reach invert=
NA
Side Slope
M:1=
3
Upstream
channel
reach
invert=
NA
Side Slope
M:1=
3
Downstream
channel reach
invert=
NA
Hydraulic
Radius=
0.39
Downstrea
m channel
reach
invert=
NA
Hydraulic
Radius=
0.53
Length channel
reach=
NA
Average
Velocity=
2.66
Length
channel
reach=
NA
Average
Velocity=
1.44
Sloe(FF/FT)=
0.006
Zavailable=
1.06
Slope/FT)-
0.002
Zavailable=
2.39
Zre nixed=
1.06
Zre uired=
2.39
Page 1

L
i 10 20 40 60 2 3 4 6 8 12 18 24
Minutes Hours
Duration
Figure 8.03b Rainfall intensity duration curves —Wilmington.
1130
5 10 20 40 60 2 3 4 6 8 12 18 24
Minutes Hours
Duration
Figure 8.03c Rainfall intensity duration curves —Hatteras.
Appendices
8.03.5

Pig. 1.5.1.2
n
n
H (FT.)
500
400 Tc (MIN.)
300 EXAMPLE 200
Height = 100 Ft. 150
200 Length =3,0-00Ft.
w Time of concentration =l4Min. 1
150 00
0 80
O 100 L (FT.)
w 10,000 60
Xq
50
a so f z 40
Z 40 `` J -5,000 30
�j 25
00 30 a 3 000
w ~
No y .� Z 20
~0 20 Use nomograph Tc for natural tL 2,000 .0 15
f basins with well defined channels. O 1,500 Z
_.
w
for overland flow on bare o-
2
earth,and for mowed gross road- O 10
CM
P.-10 . _..1;000� u_
in side channels. O 8
For overland flow, grassed-sur=' w w
w faces, multiply—T� by 2. "t 7 6
O 5 _Fo_r_overland flow, concrete or 500 5
~ ate.. asphalt surfaces, multiply Tc 4
by 0.4. x 300
= 3 For concrete channels, multiply 3
2 Tc by 0.2. 200
150 2
100
I
1
8csed on study by P.Z. Kirpich,
Civil Engineering, Vol. 10, No.6, June 1940, p. 362
TIME OF CONCENTRATION OF SMALL
DRAINAGE BASINS
1-14

I—
w
W
IL
z
a_
In
LL
O
J
2
c�
z
W
J
FIG. /. 5. Z %
35
800
700
600
;
30
5 00
v
paved
9
400
z
25
� .8
300
U_
Bare
200 Sod
.6
20
ui
Poor
\ Grass
W
~
z
Surface
.5
,Q
w
Average
�
= y
J
z
Grass
U L._.. ....
W
W
ur-feee
I.0
p
15
90
3
\
2.0
J
N /
/
~
80 Dense
Grass
i \
a
z
o
70
\
5.0
z/
60
/ 10
0
Ir
50
2p
a
w
U
40
10
z
O
U
30
9
w
J
z
20
IN
OVERLAND FLOW TIME
L
7
0
REPRINTED WITH PERMISSION FROM 'DATA BOOK FOR CIVIL ENGINEERS' VOL. I -DESIGN
2to EDITION (1951) BY E.E.SEELYE
1-13 E

Llemorandum
To:
NCDENR
CC:
From:
The Village at Columbia LLC
Date:
1/22/2007
Re:
Acting Member Statement
JAN 2 4 2007
OWQ-WARD
This is to inform you that we Glen R Lindengren and Donald F Dove are acting member managers of
The Village at Columbia LLC
1tt qq
i
� i ]� �,� i�RY�'�} �`- �d4 Fw♦�n ri -m � f 'E+ u iwh��i l+�ru t i�'� �. a 9.
,
'"Pt4, ern.
,�2 �r�'"Lc`'. "v �P .tti.

0
FUSS & O'NEILL
Disciplines to Deliver
January 24, 2007
Mr. Scott Vinson, PE
NCDENR
Division of Water Quality
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
Re: State Stormwater Permit Application
Etosion and Sedimentation Control Plan Approval
The Village at Columbia
Puss & O'Neill Project No. 20060501.A10
Dear Scott,
JAN 2 4 [ K .l
DWQ-WARD
An application package for the State stormwater permit is enclosed for your review. The
package includes the following:
1. A check for the application fee in the amount of $4000.00 payable to NCDENR.
2. Project Calculations (2 sets)
3. Project Plans & Specifications (2 sets)
4. Project Narrative (2 sets)
Please let us know if additional information would be helpful.
Sincerely,
Todd Tripp. P
Senior Projcet Manager
610 Lynndalc Cnua
Suite F. c:
Greenville, NC 27858
r(252) 355-1370
f [phone]
www.Fando.nun
Nrtb C,,rnliu„
Sou,b Gvolian
Gnneainrt
Nca Yark
1?&dc Islaed
Don Dove, Member/Manager
The Village at Columbia
Attachments

NCDENR��a���
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington NC 27889 [phone] FAX [phone]
Request for Express Permit Review JAN 2 4 2007
FILL-IN all information below and CHECK required Permit(s). ()WQ-VAR®
Please include this with the application package upon submittal. Project application received after 2 noon will be
stamped in the following workday. Thank you! Lyn Hardison Iyn.hardisonna ncmail.not
APPL
PROJECT
-�';
County
State or National Environmental Policy Act (SEPA, NEPA) —EA or EIS Required- ❑Yes [gNo
hC STREAM ORIGIN Determination;-._ # of Stream_calls; Stream Name
RFSTORMWATER ❑ Low Density-- ` ['High Density -Detention Pond ❑ High Density -Other
❑ Low Density -Curb & Gutter... ❑ High Density -Infiltration ❑ Off Site
r_
PROJECT SYSTEM(S) TRIBUTARY TO_ .\ )� tnc STREAM NAME ��t �� n71)TRIVER 'BASIN
- -
=--------------------------------------------- ------------ ------------------------
COASTAL. ❑ Excavation &F.ill- ❑ Bridges & Culverts ' ❑ Structures Information
MANAGEMENT ❑ Upland Development- ..❑ Marina Development ❑ Urban Waterfront
LAND QUALITY [V Erosion and Sedimentation'Contiol Plan with (0 acres to be disturbed. CK # 3 124-ice-"
❑ WETLANDS (401) ❑ No Wetlands on Site (letter from COE) ❑Wetlands Delineated/No JD
❑ Greater than 0,1 AC Wetlands Impacted ❑Jurisdictional Determination has been done
ED-Cess han 0.1 AC Wetlands Impacted ❑Greater tha 0.5 AC Wetlands Impacted
CIRCLE Y/N: 401 Application [2es ❑ No 404 Application in Process w/USCOE MYes ❑ No
The legislation allows additional fees, not to exceed 50% of the original Express Review permit application
fee, to be charged for subsequent reviews due to the insufficiency of the permit applications.
For DENR use only
CHECK # .,i I t'z
SUBMITTAL DATES:
Fee Split for multiple permits:
SW t-24l--c'I
$
CAMA
$
LQS
$ rca�
401 1- - 0'l
$ r'LYc
Total Fee Amount $ Gror