HomeMy WebLinkAboutSW3140603_HISTORICAL FILE_20140926STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
POST -CONSTRUCTION PERMITS
PERMIT NO. SW!�/� )
DOC TYPE 1 ❑ CURRENT PERMIT
❑ APPROVED PLANS
HISTORICAL FILE
COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION
DOC DATE
YYYYMMDD
EN
G
G
I
NEE
R I
N
August 28, 2014
Mike Randall, PE
North Carolina Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Attention: Mike Randall, P.E.
Re: Resubmittal Response Letter
The Conservancy at Waxhaw Creek
Union County, NC
L'agle Engineering Inc. .lob Number: 4673-C-NC
Dear Mr. Randall:
SEe2�tio�Q� �0s
Eagle Engineering, Inc. (EEI) has addressed comments received from NCDEMLR. A brief
explanation of revisions is included below.
Civil
1. Application page has been updated to reflect the proper numbers on the supplement form.
Updated page is included with this submittal.
2. The BMPs are located within it's own lot (Common Open Space) with direct access to a
public right of way.
3. BMPs are designed (and supplement documentation updated) for 90% removal rate.
4. The water quality orifice for BMP 1 has been updated so that it drains in between 2 and 5
days.
5. The water quality orifice for BMP 2 has been updated so that it drains in between 2 and 5
days.
6. Elevations are now shown in the plan view detail of BMP 2.
We trust this submittal meets NCDEMLR standards. If you have any questions or require additional
information, please feel free to call or email at your convenience.
Sincerely,
EAGLE ENGINEERING, INC.
Andrew R. Poindexter, E.I.
Project Engineer
Atlanta
www.eagleonline.net
John 14. Ross, P.E.
Principal
Charlotte
P.O. Box 551 2013-A Van Buren Avenue
Alpharetta. CA 30004. Indian "I rail, NC 28079
Ph 678.339,0640 Ph 704.882.4222
Fax 678.339,0534 Fax 866.775.0329
Application Completeness Aeview /
&�' First Submittal ❑ Re -submittal Date Received: ate Reviewed: V
Z By Bill Diuguid
Development/Project Name: C G
Receiving stream name Classification: G „ce'OV`,'
River Basin: G/] T, - kJ 0,4
For post -construction requirements, a program will be deemed compliant for thetareastw`heP6!it is!C'
implementing any of the following programs: WS-I, WS-II, WS-III, WS-IV, HQW 1614 N Neuse'River Basin
NSW, Tar -Pamlico River Basin NSW, and the Randleman Lake Water Supply Watershed NutrientT VI
yr
High Density Projects that require a 401/404 within an NSW require 85% TSS, 30% T.Nr ancl`30%fTP removal.
T&E Species (Goose Creek,
Latitude and Longitude:_?-5t
Project Address: S TP e
Engineer name and firm:,
Phoner10*_'89z03
Waxhaw Creek or Six Mile Creek Water Sheds): yES— b✓fIJ_/TAb/ cgd�_XK
S/ �Z6 —160 rf3 Si Jurisdiction u,y, ./
Is t e project confirmed to be in the State MSI Stormwater Perrhit jurisdiction? Ga'Yes or ❑ No
Low Density (no curb and gutter) ❑ Low Density with curb and gutter outlets ❑ High Density ❑ Other
401/404 impacts to surface waters, wetlands, and buffers (add language to cover letter and/or add info letter)
t'BUA�. t
R-,Check for $505.00 included
o/ Original signature (not photocopy) on application
Legal signature (Corporation-VP/higher, Partnership -General Partner/higlier, LLC-member/manager, Agent).
Check spelling, capitalization, punctuation: http://www.-secretarv.state.ne.us/corporations/thepape.asi)x
If an agent signs the application, a signed letter of authorization from the applicant must be provided which
igoludes the name, title, mailing address and phone number of the person signing the letter.
Copy of property deed showing ownership or control.
u p For subdivided projects, a signed and notarized deed restriction statement Cale%- 141c1.,4 I
t�Sealed, signed & dated calculations
;K Correct supplement and O&M provided for each BMP on site (check all that were provided & number of each)
❑ Bioretention
❑ Dry Detention Basin
❑ Filter Strip
❑ Grass Swale
U Infiltration Basin
❑ Infiltration Trench
❑ Level Spreader
❑ Permeable Pavement
❑ Restored Riparian Buffer
❑ Rooftop Runoff Management
❑ Sand Filter
❑ Stormwater Wetland
E? Wet Detention Basin
❑ Low Density
❑ Curb Outlet
❑ Off -Site
❑ NCDOT Linear Road
E( Two sets of sealed, signed & dated layout & finish grading plans with appropriate details
Narrative Description of stormwater management provided
Soils report, geotech information provided
Wetlands delineated or a note on the plans or in the accompanying documents that none exist on site and/or
adjacent property
etails for the roads, parking area, cul-de-sac radii, sidewalk widths, curb and gutter;
imensions & slopes provided
Drainage areas delineated ❑ Pervious and impervious reported for each ❑ Areas of high density
or" BMP operation and maintenance ag�greements provided
❑ Application complete ER'Application Incomplete Re ed(Date)
y� -Fo
Comments y$o_D IZ"7-A C-r'* J S /i47i /'✓rt✓ i Cm Aim. w, 4v Sr s
April 26, 2013 Revision, Bill Diuguid
ffl'-U;W�
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory John E. Skvarla, III
Governor Secretary
August 26, 2014 c9
Mr, Dennis Moser, �`g\ N�p�m�t!
Owner/developer
Griffin Land Holdings LLC & Liquid Development LLC EQ 2 Ei �o14c JPGN1`
231 Post Office Dr., Suite B8 S a Ss
Indian Trail, North Carolina 28079REsO
Subject: Additional Information Request N�
The Conservancy at Waxhaw Creek in Union County
Dear Mr. Moser:
The Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources (DELMR) received a Stormwater
Management Permit Application for the subject project on June 24, 2014. A preliminary review of that
information has determined that the application is not complete. The following information is needed to
continue the stonmvater review:
✓ The numbers on application and supplement form do not agree.
✓ No deed restrictions - BMP shall be located in a recorded drainage easement with access to a public
ROW.
✓ Per supplement form the wet pond is designed for 85% TSS removal. Basin discharge shall be
evenly distributed across a minimum 30 feet long vegetative filter strip unless it is designed to
remove 90% TSS.
✓ Discharge rate of the treatment volume shall completely draw down between 2 and 5 days. The
drawdown for BMP 1, with a Water Quality'rreatment Volume of 41,435 ft3 and a 4.5 inch diameter
orifice, is less than 2 clays.
✓ The drawdown for BMP 2, with a Water Quality Treatment Volume of 15,959 ft3 and a 2.25 inch
diameter orifice, is less than 2 days.
✓ Elevations on Plan View of BMP 2 sheet C-3.16 not shown.
The construction of any impervious surfaces, other than a construction entrance under an approved
Sedimentation Erosion Control Plan, is a violation of NCGS 143-215.1 and is subject to enforcement action
pursuant to NCGS 143-215.6A.
Please note that this request for additional information is in response to a preliminary review. The
requested information should be received by this Office prior to September 30, 2014, or the application will
be returned as incomplete. The return of a project will necessitate re -submittal of all required items,
including the application fee. If you need additional time to submit the information, please mail your request
for a time extension to the Division at the address at the bottom of this letter. The request must indicate the
date by which you expect to submit the required information.
Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
Energy Section • Geological Survey Section - Land Quality Section
1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1612.919-707.9200 / FAX: 919-715-8801
512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 • Internet: http://Portal,ncdenr.oM/web/Ir/
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper
Please reference the State assigned project number SW3140603 on all correspondence. Any original
documents that need to be revised have been sent to the engineer or agent. All original documents must be
returned or new originals must be provided. If you have any questions concerning this matter please feel free
to contact me at (919) 807-6374 or inikc.randall@ncdenr.gov.
ncdenr.gov.
Sincerely,
Micheal F. Randall
Stormwater Permitting Unit
cc: SW3140603 File, Mooresville Regional Office
ec: John Rose
BMP 1 Calculations
Project:
Latitude: 34.857
Long: 80.7307
Permitting Authority: State
Acres (Site): 66.49 acres
Acres (Drainage Area): 1,911,678 ftz
Acres (BUA): 186,871 ft'
% BUA: 9.78
Design Storm: Difference between pre and post
Regulatory Credits
85% TSS
25%Total Nitrogen
40% Total Phosphorus
General Requirements
✓ Sizing shall take into account all runoff at ultimate build out, including off -site drainage. Note: n mu berc on
application'aand supplement form do not agree. _
✓ vegetated slopes shall be no steeper than 3:1.
✓ BM shall be located ni a recorded drainage easement with access,to a public ROM _
✓ Per supplement form.the wet pond is designed for 85%TSS removal. Basin discharge shall be evenly distributed
across a minimum 30 feet long vegetative filter strip unless itis_de_s_igned to_remoye_9_O_ %T_ SSF�
✓ The design storage shall be above the permanent pool. _
✓ Discharge rate of the treatment volume shall completely, draw dawn between 2 and 5 days!
✓ The average depth_of the permanent pool shall be a minimum of 3 feet
✓ Permanent pool surface area shall be determined using Tables 10-1, 10-2, 10-3, and 10-4.
✓ The flow within the pond shall not short circuit the pond.
✓ BMP shall be designed with a forebay.
✓ BMP shall not be located to produce adverse impacts on water levels in adjacent wetlands.
✓ A minimum 10-foot wide vegetated shelf shall be installed around the perimeter. The inside edge of the shelf shall
be 6" below the permanent pool elevation; the outside edge of the shelf shall be 6" above the permanent pool
elevation.
✓ The forebay volume should be about 20% of the total permanent pool volume, leaving about 80% of the design
volume In the main pool.
✓ Freeboard shall be a minimum of 1 foot above the maximum stage of the basin.
✓ The permanent pool elevation shall be within 6 Inches (plus or minus) of the SHWT elevation. Developer is providing
a geosynthetic clay liner
Water Quality Treatment Volume Provided: 41,435 ft3
Volume = 3630 * Rd * Rv * Ac
Where Ac=(Drainage Area in sf)/43,560 sf/ac = 1,911,678 ft2 /43,560 ft2/ac = 43.89 acres
Rd = Design Storm (Waxhaw Creek the developer must control and treat the difference in the stormwater
runoff from the predevelopment and post -development conditions for the one-year, 24-hour storm = 2:inches'
I = Impervious Portion / Drainage Area = 186,871/1,911,678=9.78%
Rv = 0.05 + (0.9 * 1) = 0.05 + (0.9 *.0978) = .135
Volume North Carolina 5tormwater = 3630 * 2.0 * 0.135 * 43.89 Acres = 43,016 ft3
From Plans (estimate): (200 ft * 150 ft)/2 *3 ft = 45,000 ft3+/-
Discharge Rate (cfs) for 2 to 5 days
Discharge Rate = CdA [2 g Ho] A 0.5
For 6 4.5,inch diameter,orifice
r = 2.25 inches/12 inches/ft = 0.1875 ft
A=3.14r2=3.14(0.1875)2=0.11sf
Cd = 0.6
g = 32,2
Ho = (Temporary Pool Elevation -Permanent Pool Elevation) / 3 = (536.03-534.5)/3 = 0.5
Discharge Rate = 0.6 (0.11) [(64.4) (0.5)] A 0.5 = 0.375 cfs
Water Quality Treatment Volume Provided: 41,435 ft3
(41,5 ft3/0.375 ft3 43/sec)_/ 86,200seconds/day =1.28 days
Permanent Pool Surface Area (SA) provided: 17,205 ft2
SA = DA/100 * Ratio
Average Depth: 3.0
BUA = 9.78 %
DA = Drainage Area = 1,911,678 ft2
Ratio= 0.9 (from Table 10-2 based on 10% BUA, 3.0 ft average depth, 85%TSS)
SA = DA/100 * Ratio.= 1,911,678 ft2/100 * 0.9 = 17,205 ft2
From Plans (estimate): (200 ft * 150 ft)/2 = 15,000 ft2+/-
BMP2
Project:
Latitude: 34.857
Long: 80.7307
Permitting Authority: State
Acres (Site): 66.49 acres
Acres (Drainage Area): 547,985 ftZ =
Acres (BUA): 72,580 ftZ =
% BUA: 13.24
Design Storm: Difference between pre and post
Regulatory Credits
85% TSS
25%Total Nitrogen
40%Total Phosphorus
General Requirements
✓ Sizing shall take into account all runoff at ultimate build out, including off -site drainage. Note: numbers noo
application and supplement form_ do not agree
✓ Vegetated slopes shall be no steeper than 3:1. _ __ _
✓ $MP shall beatare loced in corded drainage easement with access to a public ROW! �6aQps6"kctt►wo
✓ Per'supplement form the wet pond is designed for 85%TSS removal. Basin discharge shall be evenly distributed
r- — —
across aminimum 30 feet long vegetative filter strip unless it is designed to remove 90%TSS:
✓ The design storage shall be above the permanent pool.
✓ Discharge rate of the treatment volume shall completely draw down between_2 and 5 days!
✓ The average depth of the permanent pool shall be a minimum of 3 feet.
✓ Permanent pool surface area shall be determined using Tables 10-1, 10-2, 10-3, and 10-4.
✓ The flow within the pond shall not short circuit the pond.
✓ BMP shall be designed with a forebay.
✓ BMP shall not be located to produce adverse impacts on water levels in adjacent wetlands.
✓ A minimum 10-foot wide vegetated shelf shall be installed around the perimeter. The inside edge of the shelf shall
be 6" below the permanent pool elevation; the outside edge of the shelf shall be 6" above the permanent pool
elevation.
✓ The forebay volume should be about 20% of the total permanent pool volume, leaving about 80% of the design
volume in the main pool.
✓ Freeboard shall be a minimum of 1 foot above the maximum stage of the basin.
✓ The permanent pool elevation shall be within 6 inches (plus or minus) of the SHWT elevation. Developer is providing
a geosynthetic clay liner
: eGve, , ov+s on? Ie4 n f e F 6 M Z� aw 5h�- - 3, i1e .
Water Quality Treatment Volume Provided: 15,959 ft3
Volume = 3630 * Rd * Rv * Ac
Where Ac=(Drainage Area in sf)/43,560 sf/ac = 547,985 ft2 /43,560 ft2/ac = 12.6 acres
Rd = Design Storm (Waxhaw Creek the developer must control and treat the difference in the stormwater _
runoff from the predevelopment and post -development conditions for the one-year, 24-hour storm = 2 inches
I = Impervious Portion / Drainage Area = 72,580/547,985=13.24%
Rv = 0.05 + (0.9 * 1) = 0.05 + (0.9 *0.1324) = 0.17
Volume North Carolina Stormwater = 3630 * 2.0 * 0.17 * 12.6 Acres=15,550 ft3
From Plans (estimate): 80 ft *80 ft *3 ft = 19,200 ft3
Discharge Rate (cfs) for 2'to 5 d y
Discharge Rate = CdA [2 g Ho] A 0.5
For a 2.25 inch diameter orifice
r = 1.125 inches/12 inches/ft = 0.094 ft
A = 3.14 r2 = 3.14 (0.094) 2 = 0.027 sf
Cd = 0.6
g = 32.2
Ho = (Temporary Pool Elevation -Permanent Pool Elevation) / 3 = (2.39)/3 = 0.8
Discharge Rate = 0.6 (0.027) [(64.4) (0.8)) A 0.5 = 0.1162 cfs
Water Quality Treatment Volume Provided: 15,959 ft3
(15,959 ft3/0.1162 ft3/sec) / 86,200 seconds/day =1.6 days
Permanent Pool Surface Area (SA) provided: 6,483 ft2
SA = DA/100 * Ratio
Average Depth; 3.0
BUA = 13.24 %
DA = Drainage,Area = 547,985 ft2
Ratio= 1.2 +/- (from Table 10-2 based on 13.24 % BUA, 3.0 ft average depth)
SA = DA/100 * Ratio = 547,985 ft2/100 * 1.2 = 6,575 ft2
From Plans (estimate): 80 ft * 80 ft = 6,400 ft3
-i% " ... ):. '. .ap:� ..:rut i • ..,. f ; I .i`,. .: C': r • i , .
Attention: ATTN: Mr. Mike Randall, PE
NCDEMLR
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
ENGIN EER'ING D �_
�LSC�i�r�
F- ,; I'
2013 Van Buren Avenue, Suite A S! i /!
Indian Trail, NC 28079 Lu1� 7
rpm Y6
(4weagleonln`e.nne`t�G--" `--•••�' QURrr
82-4222 phone
ww
AlLify
Letter of Transmittal
D�P";C:\ tF 1 Date: 08/28/2014
as73
V" o um er.
-+n'�R.erSThe Conservancy at Waxhaw Creek
."_•c�1'C`"— Stormwater Plan Review
Delivered by:❑ Hand ❑ UPS ❑ Mail ❑ Fedex ❑ Courier ❑ Other
We are transmitting the following items:
❑ Prints ❑ Copy of Letter ❑ Specifications ❑ Application ❑ Mylars ✓❑ Report
❑✓ Plans ❑ Shop Drawings ❑ Calculations ❑ As Builts ❑ Check ❑✓ Other
No.
Date
Copies
Items to be Transmitted
1
08/28/2014
2
Construction Documents
2
08/28/2014
2
Stormwater and Erosion Control Calculations
3
08/28/2014
1
Supplemtal Forms
4
08/28/2014
1
Revised BUAs
5
6
'I hese are trancmined as checked below:
✓❑ For Approval
❑ For Your Use
❑ As Requested
❑✓ For Review
❑ Corrected Prints
❑ Copies for Distribution
Remarks:
Please contact Eagle Engineering with any questions.
❑ Approved as Submitted
❑ Approved as Noted
❑ Copies for Approval
Note: Unless revision block states "Released for Construction ", all plans enclosed are to be considered
"Preliminary" and "Not,for Construction", and are provided for permitting, information and bidding use only.
Cc: File
Roger Horton (Union County Planning)
Signed: Andrew R. Poindexter, E.I.
W 51'41-N
W 5C 1T N
3. Depth to Water Table —Union County, North Carolina
3 (The Conservancy at Waxhaw Creek)
7
524300 524100 524500 524600 524700 524800 534MG
3
$ MapSde:1:5,280 ipiKdw Aki6gape(11'x85")shed.
N Me2*s
0 50 100 200 300
A0 250 500 1000 15W
Mal prgedim: Web Mawr Cm w7dr4aTxs:MS84 Edge bas. UTM Zone 17N w iS84
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey
ii Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey
M' 51' 41' N
xn�
R
3N 51' iT N
525000 525100 525M 525300
3
6/23/2014
Page 1 of 3
Depth to Water Table —Union County, North Carolina
(The Conservancy at Waxhaw Creek)
MAP LEGEND
Area of Interest (AOI)
n
Area of Interest (AOp
Soils
Soil Rating Polygons
0
0-25
0
25-50
Q
50-100
0
100-150
150 - 200
.
> 200
(]
Not rated or not available
Soil Rating Lines
N
0-25
..
25-50
r 0
50 - 100
• 1
100 - 150
N
150 - 200
> 200
..r
Not rated or not available
Soil Rating Points
0-25
25 - 50
13
50-100
100-150
150-200
> 200
Not rated or not available
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
µ{ Rails
N Interstate Highways
0%0 US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
. Aerial Photography
MAP INFORMATION
The soil surveys that comprise your AGI were mapped at 1:24.000
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line
placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting
soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL: http:/Iwebsoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate
calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of
the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Union County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 14, Dec 21, 2013
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000
or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Feb 26, 2010--Apr 3,
2011
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digilized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting
of map unit boundaries may be evident.
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 6/23/2014
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3
Depth to Water Table —Union County, North Carolina
The Conservancy at Waxhaw Creek
Depth to Water Table
-' Depth to Water Table— Summary:by Map Unit —Union County North Cerohna (NC179)�r 4 F -,•
=Map unit symbol
. .Map:unit name
`Rating (centimeters).r
a ..' Acres in`AOI
`Percen[ of"AOI
CeB2
Cecil gravelly sandy clay
>200
56.9
86.2%
loam, 2 to 8 percent
slopes, moderately
eroded
CeC2
Cecil gravelly sandy clay
>200
7.2
10.9%
loam, 8 to 15 percent
slopes, moderately
eroded
HeB
Helena fine sandy loam,
61
1.9
2.9%
2 to 8 percent slopes
Totals for Area of Interest
66.1
100.0%
Description
"Water table" refers to a saturated zone in the soil. It occurs during specified
months. Estimates of the upper limit are based mainly on observations of the water
table at selected sites and on evidence of a saturated zone, namely grayish colors
(redoximorphic features) in the soil. A saturated zone that lasts for less than a month
is not considered a water table.
This attribute is actually recorded as three separate values in the database. A low
value and a high value indicate the range of this attribute for the soil component. A
,.representative" value indicates the expected value of this attribute for the
component. For this soil property, only the representative value is used.
Rating Options
Units of Measure: centimeters
Aggregation Method: Dominant Component
Component Percent Cutoff.' None Specified
Tie -break Rule: Lower
Interpret Nulls as Zero: No
Beginning Month: January
Ending Month: December
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 6/23/2014
210 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3
GI G
N NEE R I N
'RECEIVED
2013 Van Buren Avenue
Indian Trail, NC 28079
JUN 24 20iq
(704) 882-4222 phone/(866) 775-0329 (ax
www.eagiconline.net 65-�
DENR-LAND QUALITY
zsosnti
STORMW ER PERMITTING
Letter of Tran"smi al
'y JP� ,. � Date: June 23 2014
Attention: Bill Diuguid ��`o�U�tid.`-r tiOR L'LI'JobNumber: a673
v- Q��S .�vx jx
C"
NCDENR DEMLR
Re' "The Conservancy at Waxhaw Creek Phase 1
1612 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1612
'Stormwater Permit Submittal
Delivered by: ❑ Hand UPS ❑ Mail ❑ Fedex ❑ Courier ❑ Other
We arc transmitting the following items:
❑ Prints ❑ Copy of Letter ❑ Specifications ❑✓ Application ❑ Mylars ✓❑ Report
✓❑ Plans ❑ Shop Drawings ✓❑ Calculations ❑ As Builts ✓❑ Check ✓❑ Other
No.
Date
Copies
Items to be Transmitted
1
06/23/2014
2
Applications
2
06/23/2014
1
O&M Agreements for BMPs
3
06/23/2014
1
Check 1019 for $505.00
4
06/23/2014
1
Narrative and Stormwater Calculations
5
06/23/2014
1
USGS Map and Deed
6
i 06/23/2014
2
Construction Plans
These are transmitted as checked below:
❑ For Approval
❑ For Your Use
❑ As Requested
❑✓ For Review
❑ Corrected Prints
❑ Copies for Distribution
Remarks:
If you have any questions please contact our office.
❑ Approved as Submitted
❑ Approved as Noted
❑ Copies for Approval
Note: Unless revision block states "Relectsed for Construction ", all plans enclosed are to be considered
"Preliminary" and "Not for Construction", and are provided for permitting, information and bidding use only.
Cc: File
Signed: Andrew R. Poindexter. E.I.
0
i
�1
Kl)rY z 2, (�� CK DER'oriT
Application Completeness Review
@r First Submittal ❑ Re -submittal Date Received:
Development/Project Name:
Receiving stream name t kCw'w
For post -construction requirements, a program will
implementing any of the following programs: WSA,
NSW, Tar -Pamlico River Basin NSW, and the.,Ran,
Reviewed: G Z By Bill Diuguid
x �jaeJ G ,t�,L
Classification: L
ipliant for the areas where it is
VS -IV, HOW, ORW, Neuse River Basin
'ter Supply Watershed Nutrient
j High Density Projects that require a 401/404 within an NSWrequire'�85% TSS, 30% TN and 30% TP removal. I
T&E Species (Goose Creek, Waxhaw Creek or Six Mile
Latitude and Longitude:3zi S/ 2-5
Project Address: STeliki-97 'RoAn
Engineer name and firm:, o Kti 4. m o s s �E
Water Sheds):WAXfdR tAl GIZEL/c
t S/ Jurisdiction U,V,. r c e u.j7-v
Is t e project confirmed to be in the State MSI Stormwater Perrnit jurisdiction? Ca'Yes or ❑ No
Low Density (no curb and gutter) ❑ Low Density with curb and gutter outlets ❑ High Density ❑ Other
�j 401/404 impacts o surface waters, wetlands, and buffers (add language to cover letter and/or add info letter)
R— Gheck for $505.00 included
pK/Original signature (not photocopy) on application
e Legal signature (Corporation-VP/higher, Partnership -General Partner/higher, LLC-member/manager, Agent).
L) 0AJA/IS M[25'E i- 0L.(AIXx/GE t/LL DPt.X
If an agent signs the application, a signed letter of authorization from the applicant must be provided which
i9cludes the name, title, mailing address and phone number of the person signing the letter.
Y Copy of property deed showing ownership or control „
3 For subdivided projects, a signed and notarized deed restriction statement (area- r�c/&_J_e.11)
[Sealed, signed & dated calculations
V Correct supplement and O&M provided for each BMP on site (check all that were provided & number of each)
❑ Bioretention
❑ Dry Detention Basin
❑ Filter Strip
❑ Grass Swale
❑ Infiltration Basin
❑ Infiltration Trench
❑ Level Spreader
❑ Permeable Pavement
❑ Restored Riparian Buffer
❑ Rooftop Runoff Management
❑ Sand Filter
❑ Stormwater Wetland
EMet Detention Basin
❑ Low Density
❑ Curb Outlet
❑ Off -Site
❑ NCDOT Linear Road
E( Two sets of sealed, signed & dated layout & finish grading plans with appropriate details
t�/Narrative Description of stormwater management provided
�l/Soils report, geotech information provided
� Wetlands delineated or a note on the plans or in the accompanying documents that none exist on site and/or
adjacent property
etails for the roads, parking area, cul-de-sac radii, sidewalk widths, curb and gutter;
dimensions &slopes provided
o' Drainage areas delineated ❑ Pervious and impervious reported for each ❑ Areas of high density
erg BMP operation and maintenance 999reements provided ���t//pp
❑ Application complete Application Incomplete Retwrfned: k7m.1, ( -fo �. se.y (Date)
ii
Comments fi4-7t /Y%r✓S ^I,Sri✓[q - AEa Ar,_ u'.� 6r SXUi
April 26, 2013 Revision, Bill Diuguid
Engineering Properties ---Union County, North Carolina The Conservancy at Waxhaw Creek
Engineering Properties
This table gives the engineering classifications and the range of engineering
properties for the layers of each soil in the survey area.
Hydrologic soil group is a group of soils having similar runoff potential under similar
storm and cover conditions. The criteria for determining Hydrologic soil group is
found in the National Engineering Handbook, Chapter 7 issued May 2007(http://
d irectives. sc. egov. u sda. gov/Open Non WebContent. aspx?content=17757.wba ).
Listing HSGs by soil map unit component and not by soil series is a new concept
for the engineers. Past engineering references contained lists of HSGs by soil
series. Soil series are continually being defined and redefined, and the list of soil
series names changes so frequently as to make the task of maintaining a single
national list virtually impossible. Therefore, the criteria is now used to calculate the
HSG using the component soil properties and no such national series lists will be
maintained. All such references are obsolete and their use should be discontinued.
Soil properties that influence runoff potential are those that influence the minimum
rate of infiltration for a bare soil after prolonged wetting and when not frozen. These
properties are depth to a seasonal high watertable, saturated hydraulic conductivity
after prolonged wetting, and depth to a layer with a very slow water transmission
rate. Changes in soil properties caused by land management or climate changes
also cause the hydrologic soil group to change. The influence of ground cover is
treated independently. There are four hydrologic soil groups, A, B, C, and D, and
three dual groups, A/D, B/D, and C/D. In the dual groups, the first letter is for drained
areas and the second letter is for undrained areas.
The four hydrologic soil groups are described in the following paragraphs:
Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly
wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or
gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission.
Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These
consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained
soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils
have a moderate rate of water transmission.
Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist
chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or
soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water
transmission.
Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when
thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink -swell
potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer
at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material.
These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission.
Depth to the upper and lower boundaries of each layer is indicated.
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 6/23/2014
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 4
Engineering Properties —Union County, North Carolina
The Conservancy at Waxhaw Creek
Texture is given in the standard terms used by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
These terms are defined according to percentages of sand, silt, and clay in the
fraction of the soil that is less than 2 millimeters in diameter. "Loam," for example,
is soil that is 7 to 27 percent clay, 28 to 50 percent silt, and less than 52 percent
sand. If the content of particles coarser than sand is 15 percent or more, an
appropriate modifier is added, for example, "gravelly."
Classification of the soils is determined according to the Unified soil classification
system (ASTM, 2005) and the system adopted by the American Association of
State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO, 2004).
The Unified system classifies soils according to properties that affect their use as
construction material. Soils are classified according to particle -size distribution of
the fraction less than 3 inches in diameter and according to plasticity index, liquid
limit, and organic matter content. Sandy and gravelly soils are identified as GW,
GP, GM, GC, SW, SP, SM, and SC; silty and clayey soils as ML, CL, OL, MH, CH,
and OH; and highly organic soils as PT. Soils exhibiting engineering properties of
two groups can have a dual classification, for example, CL-ML.
The AASHTO system classifies soils according to those properties that affect
roadway construction and maintenance. In this system, the fraction of a mineral soil
that is less than 3 inches in diameter is classified in one of seven groups from A-1
through A-7 on the basis of particle -size distribution, liquid limit, and plasticity index.
Soils in group A-1 are coarse grained and low in content of fines (silt and clay). At
the other extreme, soils in group A-7 are fine grained. Highly organic soils are
classified in group A-8 on the basis of visual inspection.
If laboratory data are available, the A-1, A-2, and A-7 groups are further classified
as A-1-a, A-1-1b, A-2-4, A-2-5, A-2-6, A-2-7, A-7-5, or A-7-6. As an additional
refinement, the suitability of a soil as subgrade material can be indicated by a group
index number. Group index numbers range from 0 for the best subgrade material
to 20 or higher for the poorest.
Rock fragments larger than 10 inches in diameter and 3 to 10 inches in diameter
are indicated as a percentage of the total soil on a dry -weight basis. The
percentages are estimates determined mainly by converting volume percentage in
the field to weight percentage.
Percentage (of soil particles) passing designated sieves is the percentage of the
soil fraction less than 3 inches in diameter based on an ovendry weight. The sieves,
numbers 4, 10, 40, and 200 (USA Standard Series), have openings of 4.76, 2.00,
0.420, and 0.074 millimeters, respectively. Estimates are based on laboratory tests
of soils sampled in the survey area and in nearby areas and on estimates made in
the field.
Liquid limit and plasticity index (Atterberg limits) indicate the plasticity
characteristics of a soil. The estimates are based on test data from the survey area
or from nearby areas and on field examination.
References:
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling
and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification
of soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 6/23/2014
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 4
Engineering Properties --Union County, North Carolina The Conservancy at Waxhaw Creek
Report —Engineering Properties
Absence of an entry indicates that the data were not estimated. The asterisk "' denotes the representative texture; other
possible textures follow the dash. The criteria for determining the hydrologic soil group for individual soil components is found
in the National Engineering Handbook, Chapter 7 issued May 2007(http://directives.sc.egov.usda.gov/
Open Non WebContent.aspx?content=17757.wba).
Engineenng Propertes—Umon'County, `North Carolina
Map'':unit symbol`and
Pc£ of
Hydrolo'.
Depth
- USDA texture
'':Classificatlon-
F, ragments �.
•Percentage passing sieve number—'
Lrquid.'
Plast'icit
;sod name
map
grc �;ti
e
: __ "
,,
t c , -�- .— ,-
':1040
limit ,
=.y,index°
unif
group
�"
t Unified AASHTO
>10; 3 70
4 2001.
R
>
x
- a
=inches inches+`
,
: ' - -
_
-
-
In
Pct
Pct
Pct
CeB2—Cecil gravelly
sandy clay loam, 2 to
8 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
Cecil, moderately
85
B
0-6
Gravelly sandy clay
SC-SM,
A-6, A-4,
0
0-7
72-95
44-95
35-90
19-56
20-40
5-15
eroded
loam
SC
A-2-4
6-40
Clay, clay loam,
ML, MH
A-7-5, A-5
0
0-5
96-100
89-100
65-100
46-87
38-80
9-37
sandy clay
40-55
Sandy clay loam,
SM, CL,
A-4, A-6
0
0-1
93-100
82-100
65-94
44-68
20-40
3-17
loam, clay loam
ML, SC
55-80
Fine sandy loam,
SM, SC-
A-2-4, A-4
0-1
0-1
88-100
70-100
49-84
22-46
7-30
NP-7
sandy loam, loam,
SM
gravelly sandy
loam
usDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 6/23/2014
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 4
Engineering Properties --Union County, North Carolina
The Conservancy at Waxhaw Creek
a
trigineenng Properties Union. County North Carolina
Map.. unit symbol and
Pct. of
Hydrolo#Depth'
USDA'teiiture
Classification]
Fragments
Percentage.passmg sieve number=
Ggwd�
Plasbcit
soil name_
n6ap,
gic::'
n `
-- : -
'
p.
.'�
>.'10 40
hmd
y codex,
3
unit.
group `
4 _
Unified AASHTO
>70I- 3 70�
-_ 4�
3 � '
,^
-,inches inches,
_
g
In
Pct-I
Pct
CeC2—Cecil gravelly
sandy clay loam, 8 to
15 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
Cecil, moderately
80
B
0-6
Gravelly sandy clay
SC-SM,
A-6, A-4,
0
0-7
72-95
44-95
35-90
19-56
20-40
5-15
eroded
loam
SC
A-2-4
6-40
Clay, clay loam,
MH, ML
A-7-5, A-5
0
0-5
96-100
89-100
65-100
46-87
38-80
9-37
sandy clay
40-55
Sandy clay loam,
SC, SM,
A-4, A-6
0
0-1
93-100
82-100
65-94
44-68
20-40
3-17
clay loam, loam
ML, CL
55-80
Loam, sandy loam,
SC-SM,
A-2-4, A-4
0-1
0-1
88-100
70-100
49-84
22-46
7-30
NP-7
gravelly sandy
SM
loam, fine sandy
loam
HeB—Helena fine
sandy loam, 2 to 8
percent slopes
Helena
85
D
0-8
Fine sandy loam
SC, ML,
A-4, A-2-4
0
0-4
90-100
81-100
69-100
28-50
15-35
NP-10
SC-SM,
SM
8-45
Clay, clay loam,
CH
A-7-5,
0
0-5
95-100
89-100
70-100
59-90
50-85
24-50
sandy clay
A-7-6
45-80
Fine sandy loam,
SM, SC-
A-4, A-2-4
0
0-4
84-100
69-100
47-94
21-56
0-28
NP-6
clay loam, loam,
SM
sandy loam, sandy
clay loam
Data Source Information
Soil Survey Area: Union County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 14, Dec 21, 2013
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 6/23/2014
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 4
SOS I D: 1354157
Date Filed: 12/30/2013 3:10:00 PM
Elaine F. Marshall
North Carolina Secretary of State
State of North Carolina.
Department of the Secretary of State
Limited Liability Company '1Nys�NP0r1.iGr
ARTICLES OF ORGANIZATION LQ�4
cc? �' V n t'40
Pursuant to §57C-2-20 of the General Statutes of North Carolina, the undersigned does herebyrsubm
y:itl0�
these Articles of Organization for the purpose of forming a limited liability compan'�N��v�
UZ.'"teo
1. The name of the limited liability company is: The Conservancy at Waxhaw Creek, LLC
2. If the limited liability company is to dissolve by a specific date, the latest date on which the
limited liability company is to dissolve: Of no date for dissolution is specified, there shall be no
limit on the duration of the limited liability company.)January 1, 2090
3. The name and address of each person executing these articles of organization is as fdllows:
(State whether each person is executing these articles of organization in the capacity of a member,
organizer or both. Note: This document must be signed by all persons listed.)
Wesley S. Hinson, Organizer
309 Post Office Drive
Indian Trail, NC 28079
4. The name of the initial registered agent is: Wesley S. Hinson
5. The street address and county of the initial registered office of the limited liability company is:
Number and Street 309 Post Office Dive
City Indian Trail State: NC Zip Code: 28079 County: Union
6. The mailing address, if different from the street address, of the initial registered office is:
7. Principal office information: (Select either a or b.)
a. [E The limited liability company has a principal office.
The principal office telephone number: 704-882-1700
The street address and county of the principal office of the limited liability company is:
Number and Street 231 Post Office Drive, Unit 8 8
City, State, Zip Code Indian Trail, NC 28079 County Union
The mailing address, if different from the street address, of the principal office of the company is:
b. ❑ The limited liability company does not have a principal office.
10
8. Check one of the following:
(i) Member -managed LLC: all members by virtue of their status as members shall be
managers of this limited liability company.
X (ii) Manager -managed LLC: except as provided by N.C.G.S. Section 57C-3-20(a), the
members of this limited liability company shall not be managers by virtue of their status as
members.
9. Any other provisions which the limited liability company elects to include (e.g., the purpose of
the entity) are attached.
10. (Optional): Please provide a business e-mail address:
The Secretary of State's Office will e-mail the business automatically at the address provided
above at no cost when a document is filed. The e-mail provided will not be viewable on the
website. For more information on why this service is offered, please see the instructions for this
document.
11. These articles will be effective upon filing, unless a future date is specified:
This is the 30 day of December 2013
Gll/
Signature
Wesley S. Hinson, Organizer
Type or Print Name and Title
The below space to be used if more than one organizer or member is listed in Item k3 above.
Signature
ype and Print Name and I itle
Signature
ype and Print Name and I itle
Signature
ype and Print Naine an ite
Signature
ype and Print Name and Fiffie—
NOTES:
I. Filing fee is $125. This document must be filed with the Secretary of State.
CORPORATIONS DIVISION P.O. Box 29622
(Revised March 2013)
RALEIGH, NC 27626-0622
(Form L•01)
BK 06219 PG0677
6219
0677
1S1pN OF �N� 5EG U�1tG�`,
p1V �Np QUP .........-
SEP
,,�vcltEN3
D`v wlfl`0AN
s.
RECEIVED
JUN 24 2014 .
DENRdAND QUALITY
STORMWATER PERMffTING
FILED ELECTRONICALLY
UNION COUNTY NC
CRYSTAL CRUMP
FILED May 05, 2014
AT 08:26:00 AM
BOOK 06219
START PAGE 0677
END PAGE 0683
INSTRUMENT # 10618
EXCISE TAX $0.00
NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL WARRANTY DEED
Excise Tax $ -0- transfer
Parcel Identifier No, 05099004A
Verified by Union County on the _ day of , 20—.
By:
Mail/Box to: HINSON FAULK P.A., 309 POST OFFICE DRIVE, INDIAN TRAIL NC 28079
This instrument was prepared by: HINSON FAULK P.A. / FILE NO. 2014043416
Brief description for the index: 193.726 Acres Steele Road Prop
THIS DEED made this the ��day of April, 2014, by and between
GRANTOR
Griffin Land Holdings, LLC
A North Carolina Limited Liability Company
Mailing Address
2500 West Roosevelt Blvd
Monroe, NC 28110
Liquid Development, LLC
A North Carolina Limited Liability Company
Mailing Address
231 Post Office Drive, Unit B8
Indian Trail, NC 28079
Tiae fn,., nm Company, Indegmdenre'I'i,le G,n,
14011AWMODIt1
The Conservancy at Waxhaw Creek, LLC
A North Carolina Limited Liability Company
Mailing Address:
231 Post Office Drive, Unit B8
Indian Trail, NC 28079
Enter in appropriate block for each party: name, address, and, if appropriate, character of entity, e.g., corporation or partnership.
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs, successors, and assigns, and shall include
singular, plural, masculine, feminine or neuter as required by context.
W ITNESSETH, that the Grantor, for a valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, has
and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the Grantee in fee simple, all that certain lot or parcel of land situated
in the City of Indian Trail, Union County, North Carolina and more particularly described as follows:
See Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
The property hereinabove described was acquired by Grantor by instrument recorded in Book 3661, Page 166-
A map showing the above described property is recorded in Plat Book I, Page 72.
submitted electronically by "Hinson Faulk, P.A."
in compliance with North Carolina statutes governing recordable documents
and the terms of the submitter agreement with the union County Register of Deeds.
N.C. Bar Assoc. Form No. 3 ® 1976, Revised 0 1977, 2002
6219
0678
BK 06219 PG0678
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges and appurtenances thereto belonging to the Grantee in
fee simple.
And the Grantor covenants with the Grantee, that Grantor is seized of the premises in fee simple, has the right to convey the same in
fee simple, that title is marketable and free and clear of all encumbrances, and that Grantor will warrant and defend the title against
the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever except for the exceptions hereinafter stated.
Title to the property hereinabove described is subject to the following exceptions:
All such valid and enforceable easements, restrictions and rights of way of record and the lien of ad valorem taxes for the current year
which the grantee herein assumes and agrees to pay.
All or a portion of the property herein conveyed does not include the primary residence of a Grantor.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor duly executed the foregoing as of the day and year first above written.
Griffin Land Holdings, LLC
By: �1,+�-i.�:�. ----` (SEAL)
Christopher Gri4m, Manager
Liquid 1)4velkpm4ht, LLC
M3
W. Moser, Manager
SEAL - STAMP State of North Carolina - County of Union
I, the undersigned Notary Public of YM L.Lk,, L.w i County and State aforesaid,
certify that Christopher Grissom, either personally known to me or proven by
satisfactory evidence, who is the Manager of Griffin Land Holdings, LLC, a North
Carolina limited Liability Company, personally appeared before me this day, and
acknowledged that (s)he is Manager of Griffin Land Holdings, LLC, and that as
Manager, duly authorized to do so, voluntary executed the foregoing instrument on
�s ✓�
behalf of said company for the purposes stated therein. Witness my hand and
V n•
e p"w.
official stamp or seal, this day of April, 2014. —mil
_to d'
Notary Public
b F3+ryl ;o
jj _
rA LA l- [
Printed Name: � I'`.
My Commission Expires:
State of North Carolina - County of Union
6219
0679
BK 06219 PG0679
I, the undersigned Notary Public of ? °County and State aforesaid,
certify that Dennis W. Moser, either personally known to me or proven by
satisfactory evidence, who is the Manager of Liquid Development, LLC, a North
Carolina Limited Liability Company, personally appeared before me this day, and
acknowledged that (s)he is Manager of Liquid Development, LL.C, and that as
Manager, duly authorized to do so, voluntary executed the foregoing instrument on
behalf of said company for the purposes stated therein. Witness my hand and
.Y:
+
official stamp or seal, this day of April, 2014.
�_�- jl
'"s�f.• jQ`\°�
Notary Public
`lta.aao'B.,i
` � r
U_f} td I �) a- I t- e)
Printed Name.
My Commission Expires:
The foregoing Certificate(s) of
is/are certified to be correct. This
instrument and this certificate are duly registered at the date and time and in the Book and Page shown on the first page hereof.
Register of Deeds for County
By
Deputy/Assistant - Register of Deeds
6219
0680
BK 06219 PG0680
EXHIBIT A
BEGINNING at a nail set in the centerline of NCSR #1177 (Steele Road) said nail being in the line
of the Paul Yates Adams, Jr. property as described at Deed Book 100, page 335 and Estate File
86 E 253 of the Union County Registry, said point of beginning along NCSR#1177 (Steele Road),
N. 87-04-47 W. 950.17 feet to a point; thence N. 88-55-21 W. 60.71 feet; thence S. 87-55-37 W.
50.69 feet, thence S. 84-13-25 W. 50.57 feet; thence S. 78-19-13 W. 48.61 feet; thence S: 72-
56-19 W. 51.24 feet; thence S. 65-14-49 W. 50.67 feet; thence S. 56-29-11 W. 50.53 feet; thence
S. 49-07-41 W. 50.52 feet; thence S. 46-22-30 W. 49.98 feet; thence S. 46-59-48 W. 113.25 feet;
thence S. 46-57-51 W. 48.16 feet; thence S. 50-47-34 W. 50.63 feet; thence S. 56-13-59 W. 50.13
feet; thence S. 64-05-06 W. 53.39 feet; thence 5.70-14-40 W. 49.57 feet; thence S. 72-48-41 W.
51.65 feet; thence S. 73-49-03 W. 553.15 feet to a nail set in the centerline of NCSR #1177
(Steele Road); thence leaving NCSR #1177 (Steele Road), N. 50-45-33 W. 30.46 feet to a bent
rebar, thence N. 50-45-06 W. 2327.55 feet to a metal T-post 12,05 feet on the south edge of
creek; thence along said creek N. 77-36-09 E. 88.12 feet; thence N. 47-31-54 E. 77.89 feet;
thence N. 03-27-49 W. 120.85 feet; thence N. 07-37-57 E. 271.35 feet; thence N. 01-26-39 W.
129.99 feet; thence N. 50-01-34 E, 301.28 feet; thence N. 67-43-45 E. 91.79 feet; thence N.85-
29-57 E. 107.47 feet; thence S. 76-35-35 E. 108.78 feet; thence N. 86-25-15 E. 127.37 feet;
thence N. 27-32-45 W. 95.80 feet; thence N. 41-54-22 E. 195.19 feet; thence N. 36-28-10 E.
86.35 feet; thence N. 84-13-32 E. 82.74 feet; thence S. 69-07-22 E. 123.55 feet; thence N. 25-
31-06 E. 65.88 feet; thence N. 49-34-56 W. 82.72 feet; thence N. 50-16-36 E. 156.19 feet; thence
S. 85-05-21 E. 58.77 feet; thence S. 38-46-52 E. 89.64 feet; thence N. 76-27-35 E. 49.50 feet;
thence N. 56-33-41 E. 55.39 feet; thence N. 62-11-39 E. 136.79 feet; thence, N. 79-26-39 E.
107.09 feet thence N. 73-41-07 E. 339.03 feet to a metal T-post; thence.N. 13-0847 W. 1122.00
feet to a point in the creek; thence N. 52-49-48 E. 101.09 feet; thence N. 29-13-58 E. 144:74
feet; thence N. 04-11-33 W. 156.41 feet; thence N. 52-14-27 W. 106.60 feet; thence N. 30-57-
13 W. 151.89 feet; thence N. 00-53-01 W. 98.79 feet; thence N. 52-20-33 E. 85,02 feet; thence
S. 72-17-17 E. 366.55 feet; thence S. 54-34-28 E. 133.73 feet; thence S. 69-50-49 E. 146.86 feet;
thence S. 80-32-D4 E. 216.63 feet; thence S. 59-19-30 E. 291.51 feet; thence N. 75-10-00 E. 86.00
feet to an iron; thence N. 71-06-08 E. 99.00 feet to an iron; thence N. 45-51-21 E. 263.81 feet
to an iron; thence N. 42-12-26 E. 273.39 feet to an iron; thence N. 28-47-14 E.499.20 feet to a
20" willow oak on the south bank of the creek; thence N. 13-43-38 E. 447.17 feet to a point in
the creek; thence N. 55-05-27 E. 352.42 feet; thence N. 28-31-07 E. 178.22 feet; thence N. 46-
0943 E. 280.82 feet to a point in the creek; thence leaving said creek S. 20-12-26 E. 2953.00
feet to a metal T-post; thence 5., 67-17-09 W. 415.52 feet to a nail at the base of a bent iron;
thence S. 21-03-00 E. 469.15 feet to a metal T-post; thence S. 48-07-19. W. 2168.95 feet to an
axle; thence S. 49-45-07 E. 912.60 feet to the point of beginning, containing 346.109 acres
according to a plat and survey entitled "Boundary Survey The Survey of the Property of Cresful
W. Horne and wife, Billie W. Horne and Mark T. Lowe and wife, Janet D. Lowe, made by Carroll
L. Rushing, NCRLS, and dated March 24, 2004, reference to which survey is made for a more
complete description of the above described property.
EXCEPTED from the above described property is the right of way of Steele Road, the right of
way of Duke Power and other easements and rights of way of record.
Also being known as all of that certain lot or parcel of land containing 346,109 acres, more or
less, as shown on plat thereof entitled "The Property of Cresful W. Horne and wife, Billie W. and
Mark T. Lowe and wife, Janet D," as prepared by Carroll L. Rushing and Company, RLS, dated
April 20, 2004 and recorded in Plat Cabinet I, Page 72, Union County Public Registry, reference
to which plat is hereby made for a more particular metes and bounds description.
LESS AND EXCEPT the property conveyed to Catawba Lands Conservancy recorded in Book
6159, Page 366 of the Union County Registry and more particularly described as follows:
621'
19
BK 06219 PG0681
0681
BEING A PORTION OF THE GRIFFIN LAND HOLDINGS, LLC PROPERTY AS SHOWN ON PLAT CABINET 1, FILE
72 RECORDED IN THE UNION COUNTY PUBLIC REGISTRY AND BEING MORE PARTICULLARLY DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT AN EXISTING NAIL LOCATED IN THE CENTER OF STEELE ROAD, BEING THE SOUTHERN
PROPERTY CORNER OF THE AFORESAID GRIFFIN LANDHOLDINGS, LLC PROPERTY. SAID NAIL HAVING
NORTH CAROLINA GRID COORDINATES OF N: 406,933.52; E: 1,480,813.10 (NAD 83/2012):
THENCE, FROM THE POINT OF COMMENCEMENT AND WITH THE WESTERN LINE OF THE GRIFFIN LAND
HOLDINGS, LLC PROPERTY, N 51" 22' 32" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 1,167.80 FEET TO A 1/2".NEW IRON
REBAR, THE POINT AND PLACE OF BEGINNING OF THE CONSERVATION AREA.
THENCE, N 51° 22' 32" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 1178.25 FEET TO AN EXISTING T-POST ON THE BANK OF THE
WAXHAW CREEK; SAID T-POST HAVING NORTH CAROLINA GRID COORDINATES OF N:. 409,397.96; E:
1,478,980.23 (NAD 83/2012).
THENCE, N 51° 22' 32" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 12.05 FEET TO A POINT IN THE WAXHAW CREEK.
THENCE, ALONG SAID CREEK, THE FOLLOWING TWENTY-FOUR (24) CALLS:
(1) N 76- 28' 26" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 88.93 FEET TO A POINT.
(2) N 46" 53' 02" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 77.89 FEET TO A POINT.
(3) N 04° 06' 41" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 120.85 FEET TO A POINT.
(4) N 06° 59' 05" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 271.35 FEET TO A POINT.
(5) N 02° 05' 31" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 129.99 FEET TO A POINT.
(6) N 49° 22' 42" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 301.28 FEET TO A POINT.
(7) N 67" 04' 53" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 91.79 FEET TO A POINT.
(8) N 84" 51' 05" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 107.47 FEET TO A POINT.
(9) S 77° 14' 27" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 108.78 FEET TO A POINT.
(10) N 85- 46' 23" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 127.37 FEET TO A POINT.
(11) N 28- 11' 37" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 95.80 FEET TO A POINT.
(12) N 41° 15' 30" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 195.19 FEET TO A POINT.
(13) N 35° 49' 18" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 86.35 FEET TO A'POINT,
(14) N 83° 34' 40" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 82.74 FEET TO A POINT.
(15) S 69° 46' 14" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 123.55 FEET TO A POINT,
(16) N 24" 52' 14" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 65.88 FEET TO A POINT,
(17) N 50° 13' 48" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 82.72 FEET TO A POINT.
(18) N 49° 37' 44" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 156.19 FEET TO A POINT.
(19) S 85° 44' 13" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 58.77 FEET TO A POINT.
(20) S 39° 25' 44" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 89.64 FEET TO A POINT.
(21) N 75° 48' 43" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 49.50 FEET TO A POINT.
(22) N 55° 54' 49" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 55.39 FEET TO A POINT.
(23) N 61° 32' 47" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 136.79 FEET TO A POINT.
(24) N 78° 47' 47" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 107.09 FEET TO A POINT.
THENCE, LEAVING WAXHAW CREEK, N 73` 02' 15" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 339.03 FEET TO A 1/2" NEW IRON
REBAR BY A 16" POPLAR WITH A BLAZE AND TWO HACKS.
THENCE, N 13° 47' 39" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 1104.00 FEET TO A 1/2" EXISTING IRON REBAR ON THE
BANK OF THE WAXHAW CREEK.
THENCE, N 13- 47' 39" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 18.00 FEETTO A POINT IN WAXHAW CREEK.
THENCE, ALONG SAID CREEK, THE FOLLOWING TWELVE (12) CALLS:
(1) N 52° 10' 56"
E FOR A DISTANCE OF 101.09 FEET TO A POINT.
(2) N 28° 35' 06"
E FOR A DISTANCE OF 144.74 FEET TO A POINT.
(3) N 04° 50' 25"
W FOR A DISTANCE OF 156.41 FEET TO A POINT.
(4) N 52° 53' 19"
W FOR A DISTANCE OF 106.60 FEET TO A POINT.
(5) N 31° 36' 05"
W FOR A DISTANCE OF 151.89 FEET TO A POINT.
(6) N Ol" 31' 53"
W FOR A DISTANCE OF 98.79 FEET TO A POINT.
(7) N 51° 41' 41"
E FOR A DISTANCE OF 85.02 FEET TO A POINT.
(8) S 72° 56' 09"
E FOR A DISTANCE OF 366.55 FEET TO A POINT.
(9) S 55° 13' 20"
E FOR A DISTANCE OF 133.73 FEET TO A POINT.
(10) S 70" 29' 41"
E FOR A DISTANCE OF 146.86 FEET TO A POINT.
(11) S 81° 10' 56"
E FOR A DISTANCE OF 216.63 FEET TO A POINT.
62 q p BK 06219 PG0682
06812
(12) S 590 58' 22" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 295.51 FEET TO A POINT.
THENCE, LEAVING WAXHAW CREEK,.N 74" 33' 36" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 83.02 FEET TO A 1/2" EXISTING
IRON PIPE.
THENCE, N 70- 29' 53" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 99.03 FEET TO A S/8" EXISTING IRON PIPE.
THENCE, N 45° 15' 00" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 263.98 FEET TO A 1/2" EXISTING IRON PIPE.
THENCE, N 41` 37' 36" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 273.42 FEET TO A 5/8" EXISTING IRON PIPE.
THENCE, N 28- 11' 35" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 199,20 FEET TO A POINT ON THE BANK OF WAXHAW CREEK.
THENCE, N 13° 07' 59" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 447.17 FEET TO A POINT ON THE BANK OF WAXHAW CREEK.
THENCE, ALONG SAID CREEK, THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) CALLS:
(1) N 54° 29' 48" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 352.42 FEET TO A POINT.
(2) N 27` 55' 28" E FOR A DISTANCE OF.178.22 FEET TO A POINT.
(3) N 45' 47' 19" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 279.92 FEET TO A POINT ON THE BANK OF WAXHAW CREEK.
THENCE, LEAVING THE CREEK, S 20° 48' 47" E PASSING AN EXISTING T-POST, ON LINE AT 13.58 FEET FOR
A TOTAL DISTANCE OF 228.25 FEET TO A 1/2" NEW IRON REBAR.
THENCE, WITH A NEW LINE RUNNING WITHIN THE GRIFFIN LAND HOLDINGS, LLC PROPERTY THE
FOLLOWING SIXTY ONE (61 )'CALLS:
(1) 5 690 13' 23" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 27.74 FEET TO A 1/2" NEW IRON REBAR.
(2) S 49` 08' 42" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 310.43 FEET TO A 1/2" NEW IRON REBAR.
(3) S 14° 26' 00" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 362.91 FEET TO A 1/2" NEW IRON REBAR.
(4) S 14° 01' 55" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 818.96 FEET TO A 1/2" NEW IRON REBAR.
(5) S 08` 24' 02" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 199.88 FEET TO A 1/2" NEW IRON REBAR.
(6) N 69- 13' 23" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 251.85 FEET TO A 1/2" NEW IRON REBAR.
(7) 5 20° 46' 37" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 118.85 FEET TO A 1/2" NEW IRON REBAR
(8) WITH THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 205.00 FEET, AN ARC
LENGTH OF 95.31 FEET AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS S 07` 2728" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 94.45 FEET
TO A 1/2" NEW IRON REBAR.
(9) S 05` 51' 41" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 97,94 FEET TO A 1/2" NEW IRON REBAR.
(10) N 84° 08' 19" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 45.15 FEET TO A 1/2" NEW IRON REBAR.
(11) N 570 30' 52" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 217.35 FEET TO A 1/2" NEW IRON REBAR.
(12) S 86° 07' 59" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 93.06 FEET TO A 1/2" NEW IRON REBAR.
(13) S 12° 47' 21" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 112:89 FEET TO A 1/2" NEW IRON REBAR.
(14) S 03` 52' 01" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 41.46 FEET TO A 1/2" NEW IRON REBAR.
(15) S 58° 31' 28" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 1052.80 FEET TO A 1/2" NEW IRON REBAR.
(16) S 31° 28' 32" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 136.53 FEET TO A 1/2" NEW IRON REBAR.
(17) S 05° 03' 23" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 281.38 FEET TO A 1/2" NEW IRON REBAR.
(18) S 47" 53' 24" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 418.10 FEET TO A 1/2" NEW IRON REBAR.
(19) N 65" 55' 01" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 203.78 FEET TO A 1/2" NEW IRON REBAR.
(20) N 55- 03' 08" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 105.51 FEET TO A 1/2" NEW IRON REBAR.
(21) N 75- 54' 11" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 184.06 FEET TO A 1/2" NEW IRON REBAR.
(22) N 58- 31' 28" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 184.54 FEET TO A 1/2" NEW IRON REBAR.
(23) 5 84° 56' 10" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 513.21 FEET TO A 1/2" NEW IRON REBAR, SAID POINT LOCATED S
600 05' 17" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 166.59 FEET FROM AN EXISTING NAIL AT A T-POST.
(24) S 05° 03' SO" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 267.85 FEET TO A 1/2" NEW IRON REBAR.
(25) N 84" 56' 10" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 242.32 FEET TO A 1/2" NEW IRON REBAR.
(26), S 79- 11' 09" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 202.65 FEET TO A 1/2" NEW IRON REBAR.
(27), 5 63° 35' 03" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 264.53 FEET TO A, 1/2" NEW IRON REBAR.
(28), S 24" 59' 34" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 134.84 FEET TO A 1/2" NEW IRON REBAR.
(29), S 40° 26' 54" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 278.54 FEET TO A 1/2" NEW IRON REBAR.
(30) S 66° DO' 30" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 245,64 FEET TO A 1/2" NEW IRON REBAR.
(31), N 41° 47' 55" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 367.61 FEET TO A 1/2", NEW IRON REBAR.
(32), N 59° 28' 40" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 129.17 FEET TO A 1/2" NEW IRON REBAR.
(33), S 60° 59' 57" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 212.09 FEET TO A 1/2" NEW IRON REBAR.
(34), N 53° 22' 51" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 77.36 FEET TO A 1/2" NEW IRON REBAR.
(35), N 66° 25' 49" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 157.89 FEET TO A 1/2" NEW IRON REBAR.
(36), N 31° 22' 25" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 95.14 FEET TO A 1/2" NEW IRON REBAR.
(37), N 53° 22' 51" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 43.98 FEET TO A 1/2" NEW IRON REBAR.
(38), N 28` 33' 46" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 374.85 FEET TO A 1/2" NEW IRON REBAR.
(39), N 350 3750" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 250.33 FEET TO A 1/2" NEW IRON REBAR.
6219 EK 06219 PG0683
0683 ..
(40), N 77° 12' 26"
W FOR A DISTANCE OF 627.04 FEET TO A 1/2" NEW IRON REBAR.
(41), S 29003' 27"
W FOR A DISTANCE OF 683.92 FEET TO A 1/2"
NEW IRON REBAR.
(42), S 23- 41' 34"
W FOR A DISTANCE OF 52,43 FEET TO A 1/2"
NEW IRON REBAR.
(43), S 22° 43' 30"
E FOR A DISTANCE OF 355.S0 FEET TO A 1/2"
NEW IRON REBAR.
(44), S 52- 38' 14"
E FOR A DISTANCE OF 195.72 FEET TO A 1/2"
NEW IRON REBAR.
(4S), S 35" 50' 47"
E FOR A DISTANCE OF 313.25 FEET TO A 1/2"
NEW IRON REBAR.
(46), S 48° 28' 55"
E FOR A DISTANCE OF 212.34 FEET TO A 1/2"
NEW IRON REBAR.
(47), S 65- 52' 06"
E FORA DISTANCE OF 301.53 FEET TO A 1/2"
NEW IRON REBAR.
(48), S 60- 55' 59"
E FOR A DISTANCE OF 373.30 FEET TO A 1/2"
NEW IRON REBAR
(49) WITH THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 255.00 FEET, AN ARC
LENGTH OF 96.83 FEET AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS S 13' 13' 46" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 96.25 FEET
TO A 1/2" NEW IRON REBAR
(50), N 87" 38' 58" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 96.54 FEET TO A 1/2" NEW IRON REBAR.
(51) S 16- 15' 24" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 432.68 FEET TO A 1/2" NEW IRON REBAR
(52) WITH THE ARC OF A CIRCULAR CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 255.00 FEET, AN ARC
LENGTH OF 106.59 FEET AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS S 79" 54' 24" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 105.81
FEET TO A 1/2" NEW IRON REBAR.
(53) S 65° 59' 40"
W FOR A DISTANCE OF 39.26 FEET TO A 1/2" NEW IRON REBAR.
(54) N 24' 33' 25"
W FOR A DISTANCE OF 183.53 FEET TO A 1/2" NEW IRON REBAR.
(55) N 070 48' 43"
E FOR A DISTANCE OF 205.99 FEET TO A 1/2" NEW IRON REBAR.
(56) N 22- 38' 48"
W FOR A DISTANCE OF 163.31 FEET TO A 1/2" NEW IRON REBAR.
(57) N 820 34' 28"
W FOR A DISTANCE OF 351.90 FEET TO A 1/2" NEW IRON REBAR.
(58) N 170 25' 21"
W FOR A DISTANCE OF 266.83 FEET TO A 1/2" NEW IRON REBAR.
(59) N 77° 40' 02"
W FOR A DISTANCE OF 479.39 FEET TO A 1/2" NEW IRON REBAR.
(60) S 74° 16' 21"
W FOR A DISTANCE OF 515.69 FEET TO A 1/2" NEW IRON REBAR.
(61) S 16° 26' 03" W A DISTANCE OF 954.58 FEET TO THE POINT AND PLACE OF BEGINNING OF THE
CONSERVATION AREA.
CONTAINING 152.383 ACRES MORE OR LESS AS SHOWN ON A CONSERVANCY DEDICATION PLAT MAP
PREPARED BY EAGLE ENGINEERING, INC. (RUSSELL L. WHITEHURST, PLS) AND DATED NOVEMBER 11,
2013.
Also conveyed herewith is a non-exclusive easement for Ingress, egress and regress to and from the tract
described above and Steele Road, twenty feet in width, identified as "20' Access Easement" as shown on
a Conservancy Dedication Plat Map prepared by Eagle Engineering, Inc. (Russell L. Whitehurst, PLS) dated
November 11, 2013, and being ten feet along each side of the following centerline:
BEGINNING at a concrete nail in the right-of-wayofSteele Road (SR 1177), said nail.also being the common
corner of the property of Griffin Land Holdings, LLC, and Liquid Development, LLC, described in Plat
Cabinet I, File Number 72, and the property of Laika, LLC, described In Deed Book 5575, Page 13; thence
proceeding along a tie line, North 87-44-41 West 610.42 feet to the POINT AND PLACE OF -BEGINNING;
thence North 29-58-54 West 229.08 feet to a point; thence North 17-31-47 West 112.88 feet to a point;
thence North 8-34-02 West 155.74 feet to a point; thence North 11-40-35 East 266.82 feet to a point;
thence North 6-54-34 West 296:76 feet to a point; thence North 41-35-52 West 200.18 feet to a point;
thence North 28-05-55 West 218.90 feet to a point; thence North 17-15-05 West 113.30 feet to a point;
thence North 30-13-36 West 69.33 feet to a point; thence North 44-11-58 West 141.72 feet to a point;
thence North 23-58-39 West 194.15 feet to a point; thence North 5-52-27 West 257,95 feet to a point;
thence North 21-17-04 East 96.16 feet to a point; thence North 31-14-48 East 208.62 feet to a point in the
boundary line of the Conservation Area, which point is South 35-37-50 East from a new iron rod set in the
boundary line of the Conservation Area.