SW3140304_HISTORICAL FILE_20181205

NORTH CAROLINA J
Department of Environmental Qua

STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
POST -CONSTRUCTION PERMITS
PERMIT NO. SW
DOC TYPE ❑ CURRENT PERMIT
❑ APPROVED PLANS
WHISTORICAL FILE
((❑ COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION
DOC DATE 911?zAcQ6
YYYYMMDD

USDA United States A product of the National Custom Soil Resource
Department of Cooperative Soil Survey,
Agriculture a joint effort of the United Report for
States Department of
N RCS Agriculture and other Cleveland County
Federal agencies, State 7
Natural agencies including the North Carolina
Resources Agricultural Experiment
Conservation Stations, and local
Service participants
F� 40
4fo <ana FNq, ��jG'
P �,y
tP
October 10, 2013

�� b tip10
Fc
0 6NRo� ge°�'OO�C�ee
V101 Q,\P.54
2e�`o
M°°,
Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas. They
highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information about
the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for many
different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban planners,
community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers. Also,
conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste disposal,
and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand, protect, or enhance
the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil properties
that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions. The information
is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of soil limitations on
various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for identifying and complying
with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some cases.
Examples include soil quality assessments (http://soils.usda.gov/sqi/) and certain
conservation and engineering applications. For more detailed information, contact
your local USDA Service Center (http://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?
agency=nres) or your NRCS State Soil Scientist (http://soils.usda.gov/contact/
state_off ces/).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as septic
tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to basements or
underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States Department
of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural
Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation
Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil
Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Soil Data Mart Web site or the NRCS Web Soil Survey. The Soil
Data Mart is the data storage site for the official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs
and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where
applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual
orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an
individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited
bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means

for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should
contact USDA's TARGET Center at [phone] (voice and TDD). To file a
complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400
Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call [phone]
(voice) or [phone] (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and
employer.

Contents
Preface....................................................................................................................2
HowSoil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5
SoilMap..................................................................................................................7
SoilMap................................................................................................................8
Legend..................................................................................................................9
MapUnit Legend................................................................................................10
MapUnit Descriptions........................................................................................10
Cleveland County, North Carolina..................................................................12
GrD—Grover gravelly sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes, rocky ............
12
HtC—Hulett gravelly sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, stony................13
UdC—Udorthents, loamy, 0 to 15 percent slopes.......................................14
References............................................................................................................16

How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous areas
in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous areas and
their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and limitations
affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length, and shape of
the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and native plants; and
the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil profiles. A soil profile is
the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The profile extends from the
surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the soil formed or from the
surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is devoid of roots and other
living organisms and has not been changed by other biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource areas
(MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that share
common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water resources,
soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey areas typically
consist of parts of one or more MLRA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that is
related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the area.
Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind of
landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and miscellaneous
areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific segments of the
landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they were formed. Thus,
during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict with a considerable
degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a specific location on the
landscape.
Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their
characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil
scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only
a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented by
an understanding of the soil -vegetation -landscape relationship, are sufficient to verify
predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.
Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They
noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock
fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them to
identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their
properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).
Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil
characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for
comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic
classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character of
soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil
scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the

Custom Soil Resource Report
individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that
they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and
research.
The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the
objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have
similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a unique
combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable
proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components of
the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes
the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such landforms and
landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of
resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite investigation is
needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.
The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of
mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape, and
experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the soil -
landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at specific
locations. Once the soil -landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller number of
measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded. These
measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color, depth to
bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for content of
sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil typically vary from
one point to another across the landscape.
Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of
characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct
measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit
component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other
properties.
While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally
are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists interpret
the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field -observed characteristics
and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the soils under different
uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through observation of the soils
in different uses and under different levels of management. Some interpretations are
modified to fit local conditions, and some new interpretations are developed to meet
local needs. Data are assembled from other sources, such as research information,
production records, and field experience of specialists. For example, data on crop
yields underdefined levels of management are assembled from farm records and from
field or plot experiments on the same kinds of soil.
Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on such
variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over long
periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example, soil
scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will have
a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict that a
high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.
After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the
survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and
identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings, fields,
roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.

Soil Ma
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of soil
map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.

Custom Soil Resource Report
Soil Map
im 458540 458580 458020 458650 458700 458740 4587W 458820 4588
Map Smie: 1:1,740 if pnrrted m A lands pe (11" x 8.5') shed.
N 0 25 50 100 150
Fttt
0 50 100 200 300
Map prnje :Wd6 Mermtr Qa cadimtes: WGS84 Edge bm UrM Zone 17N WGSM
8

MAP LEGEND
Area of Interest (AOI)
I
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
0
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
0
Soil Map Unit Points
Special
Point Features
Wa
Blowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
0
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
Lava Flow
�.
Marsh orswamp
�+
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
@p
Rock Outcrop
+
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
.�
Severely Eroded Spot
®
Sinkhole
Dp
Slideor Slip
0
Sonic Spot
Custom Soil Resource Report
g
Spoil Area
®
Stony Spot
w
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
[�
Other
Special Line Features
Water Features
I
Streams and Canals
Transportation
hF1
Rails
.,y
Interstate Highways
vV'
US Routes
s.�
Major Roads
r'
Local Roads
Background
®
Aerial Photography
0
MAP INFORMATION
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,C
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrastir
soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL: http:/Iwebsoilsuwey.nres.usda.gov
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Marcell:
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accui
calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data a
the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Cleveland County, North Carolina,
Survey Area Data: Version 15, Jul 2, 2012
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,I
or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Oct 22, 2010—Apr
2011
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shift

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Cleveland County, North Carolina (NC045)
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
GrD
Grover gravelly sandy loam, 15
to 30 percent slopes, rocky
1.0
14.5%
HtC
Hulett gravelly sandy loam, 8 to
15 percent slopes, stony
1.2
17.0%
UdC
Udorthents, loamy, 0 to 15
percent slopes
4.9
68.5%
Totals for Area of Interest
7.2
100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils
or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along with the
maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits forthe properties of the soils. On the landscape,
however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability
of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend
beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic
class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic
classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas
for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes
other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They generally
are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used.
Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas are identified
by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a given area, the
contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit descriptions along with
some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor components may not have been
observed, and consequently they are not mentioned in the descriptions, especially
where the pattern was so complex that it was impractical to make enough observations
to identify all the soils and miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness
or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate pure taxonomic
classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. The delineation of such segments
10

Custom Soil Resource Report
on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If
intensive use of small areas is planned, however, onsite investigation is needed to
define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions. Each
description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil properties
and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major horizons
that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness, salinity,
degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the basis of such
differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas shown on the
detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase commonly
indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha silt loam, 0
to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps. The
pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar in all
areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present or
anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered practical
or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The pattern and
relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar. Alpha -
Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas that
could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion of
the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can be
made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made up
of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil material
and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
11

Custom Soil Resource Report
Cleveland County, North Carolina
GrD—Grover gravelly sandy loam, 15 to 30 percent slopes, rocky
Map Unit Setting
Elevation: 200 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 240 days
Map Unit Composition
Grover, rocky, and similar soils: 90 percent
Minor components: 1 percent
Description of Grover, Rocky
Setting
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Residuum weathered from mica schist and/or other micaceous
metamorphic rock
Properties and qualities
Slope: 15 to 30 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 7.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Land capability (nonirrigated): 6e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Typical profile
0 to 5 inches: Gravelly sandy loam
5 to 13 inches: Sandy loam
13 to 27 inches: Sandy clay loam
27 to 57 inches: Sandy loam
57 to 80 inches: Sandy loam
Minor Components
Rock outcrop
Percent of map unit: 1 percent
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down -slope shape: Linear
12

Custom Soil Resource Report
Across -slope shape: Convex
HtC—Hulett gravelly sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, stony
Map Unit Setting
Elevation: 200 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 240 days
Map Unit Composition
Hulett, stony, and similar soils: 90 percent
Description of Hulett, Stony
Setting
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Residuum weathered from mica schist and/or other micaceous
metamorphic rock
Properties and qualities
Slope: 8 to 15 percent
Surface area covered with cobbles, stones or boulders: 0.1 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 7.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Land capability (nonirrigated): 3e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Typical profile
0 to 8 inches: Gravelly sandy loam
8 to 27 inches: Clay
27 to 37 inches: Sandy clay loam
37 to 56 inches: Sandy clay loam
56 to 80 inches: Sandy loam
13

Custom Soil Resource Report
UdC—Udorthents, loamy, 0 to 15 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
Elevation: 200 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation. 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 50 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period: 145 to 240 days
Map Unit Composition
Udorthents, loamy, and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 8 percent
Description of Udorthents, Loamy
Setting
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Shoulder, summit, backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Loamy and clayey mine spoil or earthy fill derived from igneous,
metamorphic and sedimentary rock
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 25 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to high (0.00 to
1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water capacity: Moderate (about 8.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Land capability (nonirrigated): 7e
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Typical profile
0 to 80 inches: Sandy clay loam
Minor Components
Urban land
Percent of map unit: 8 percent
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder, backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
14

References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2004.
Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling and
testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep -water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric soils
in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service. U.S.
Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://soils.usda.gov/
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making
and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation Service,
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://soils.usda.gov/
Soil Survey Staff. 2006. Keys to soil taxonomy. 10th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://soils.usda.gov/
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual, http://soils.usda.gov/
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.glti.nres.usda.gov/
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://soils.usda.gov/
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States, the
Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296.
http://soils.usda.gov/
16

Custom Soil Resource Report
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210.
17

101
MARZIANO & MCGOUGAN, P.A.
consulting engineers
The T.J. Ellison WTP is located adjacent to Moss Lake (Kings Mountain Reservoir) in
Cleveland County, North Carolina. The site is located in the Broad River Basin and
slopes to the west towards Buffalo Creek. The proposed WTP upgrade will include
new filters, modifications to existing sedimentation basins, new blower building, new
bulk chemical storage, new finished water pump station, new backwash tank, new
chemical feed vault, and new P.A.C. tower. These upgrades will increase the plant's
capacity from 8 MGD to 12 MGD to serve existing industrial customers.
The total limits of disturbance (LOD) for this project is 3.05 acres. This includes 0.52
acres of open water area clue to the existing sedimentation basins and existing gravity
thickener. The majority of this project is on previously disturbed land around the
existing WTP, however the clearing of approximately 0.2 acres of wooded land will be
required. Silt fence will be placed in strategic locations as shown on the plans to
prevent runoff during construction. All land not built upon will be returned to pre -
construction conditions. As shown in the stormwater calculations, the addition of
new structures on site will cause a minimal increase in peak flows. Below is a table
showing the pre and post construction flows on the site.
Peak Flows cfs
Pre
Post
Difference
2 year
2.23
2.80
0.57
10 year
4.19
4.92
0.73
25 year
7.44
8.16
0.72
Marziano &
McGougan, P.A.
1300 Second Avenue
Suite 211
Conway, SC 29526
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
ne\32WiKINcs AIOU.YfAI\%M ❑PGMDr.\ O.N—hang\sd.,.m Na Fmdoo eo�wgtiu\e-try ,�d,�oz zZu.do�

D 1 4(iiniLk
_ DWQ USE ONLY
Date Received
Fee Paid
Permit Number
Zo/
SW3". 630N
Applicable Rules: ❑ Coastal SW -1995 ❑ Coastal SW - 2008 II - Post Construction
(select all that apply) ❑ Non -Coastal SW- HQW/ORW Waters ❑ Universal Stormwater Management Plan
❑ Other WQ Mgmt Plan:
State of North Carolina �p
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION %RM
This form may be photocopied for use as an original
L GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Project Name (subdivision, facility, or establishment name - should be consistent with project' a oe on plans,
specifications, letters, operation and maintenance agreements, etc.):
T I Ellison WTP Upgrade
2. Location of Project (street address):
1432 Oak Grove Road
City:Kings Mountain County:Cleveland Zip:28086
3. Directions to project (from nearest major intersection):
From the intersection of HWY 74 and HWY 74B take HWY 74B/Stony Point Rd north until it intersects with
Oak Grove Road (approximately 2 2 miles) Turn Left onto Oak Grove Road and after approximately 1.7
miles the WTP will be on your right at 1432 Oak Grove Road
4. Latitude:35° 16' 27.88" N Longitude:81° 27' 09.98" W of the main entrance to the project.
Il. PERMIT INFORMATION:
1. a. Specify whether project is (check one): ®New ❑Modification ❑ Renewal w/ Modificationt
tRenezuals With modifications also requires SWU-102 - Renewal Application Form
b.lf this application is being submitted as the result of a modification to an existing permit, list the existing
permit number , its issue date (if known) , and the status of
construction: ❑Not Started ❑Partially Completed* ❑ Completed* *provide a designer's certification
2. e of project (check one):
�" ®Low Density [ -]High Density ❑Drains to an Offsite Stormwater System ❑Other
3. If this application is being submitted as the result of a previously returned application or a letter from DWQ
requesting a state stormwater management permit application, list the stormwater project number, if
assigned, and the previous name of the project, if different than currently
proposed,
4. a. Additional Project Requirements (check applicable blanks; information on required state permits can be
obtained by contacting the Customer Service Center at 1-877-623-6748):
❑CAMA Major
❑NPDES Industrial Stormwater
®Sedimentation/Erosion Control: 3.05 ac of Disturbed Area
❑404/401 Permit: Proposed Impacts
b.If any of these permits have already been acquired please provide the Project Name, Project/Permit Number,
issue date and the type of each permit:
5. Is the project located within 5 miles of a public airport? MNo VYes
If yes, see S.L. 2012-200, Part VI: http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ws/su/statesw/rules laws
FormSWU-101 Version06Aug2012 Page I of

III. CONTACT INFORMATION
1. a. Print Applicant / Signing Official's name and title (specifically the developer, property owner, lessee,
designated government official, individual, etc. who owns the project):
Applicant/ Organization:Citv of Kings Mountain
Signing Official & Title:Edgar O Murphrey, Jr.,Mayor
b.Contact information for person listed in item la above:
Street Address:101 W. Gold Street
City:Kings Mountain State:NC Zip:28086
Mailing Address (if applicable):PO Box 429
City:Kings Mountain State:NC Zip:28086
Phone: (704 ) 734-4525
Email:[e-mail]
Fax: (704 ) 730-2152
c. Please check the appropriate box. The applicant listed above is:
® The property owner (Skip to Contact Information, item 3a)
❑ Lessee* (Attach a copy of the lease agreement and complete Contact Information, item 2a and 2b below)
❑ Purchaser* (Attach a copy of the pending sales agreement and complete Contact Information, item 2a and
2b below)
❑ Developer* (Complete Contact Information, item 2a and 2b below.)
2. a. Print Property Owner's name and title below, if you are the lessee, purchaser or developer. (This is the
person who owns the property that the project is located on):
Property Owner/1
Signing Official &
b.Contact information for person listed in item 2a above:
Street
City:
Mailing Address (if
City:
Phone: ( _)
Sta te:
State:
Fax: ( )
3. a. (Optional) Print the name and title of another contact such as the project's construction supervisor or other
person who can answer questions about the project:
Other Contact Person/ Organization: Marziano & McGougan P A
Signing Official & Title:ioseph W. McGougan P.E.
b. Contact information for person listed in item 3a above:
Mailing Address:1300 Second Ave Ste. 211
City:Conway State:SC Zip:29526
Phone: (843 ) 488-0124
Email: imcgou [e-mail]
Fax: (843 ) 488-0129
4. Local jurisdiction for building permits: Cleveland County
Point of Contact:Paul Ezell Phone #: (704 ) 484-4997
Form S WU-101 Version 06Aug2012 Page 2 of 6

IV. PROJECT INFORMATION
1. In the space provided below, briefly summarize how the stormwater runoff will be treated.
Stormwater runoff should be minimal and will be further restrained by silt fencing.
2. a. If claiming vested rights, identify the supporting documents provided and the date they were approved:
❑ Approval of a Site Specific Development Plan or PUD Approval Date:
❑ Valid Building Permit Issued Date:
❑ Other: Date:
b.If claiming vested rights, identify the regulation(s) the project has been designed in accordance with:
❑ Coastal SW -1995 ❑ Ph 11- Post Construction
3. Stormwater runoff from this project drains to the Broad River basin.
4. Total Property Area: 3.05 acres
5. Total Coastal Wetlands Area: 0 acres
6. Total Surface Water Area: 0.52 acres
7. Total Property Area (4) - Total Coastal Wetlands Area (5) - Total Surface Water Area (6) = Total Project
Area+:2.53 acres
Total project area shall be calculated to exclude the followin the normal pool of impounded structures, the area
between the banks of streams and rivers, the area below the Normal High Water (NHW) litre or Mean High Water
(MHW) line, and coastal wetlands landward frorn the NHW (or MHW) line. The resultant project area is used to
calculate overall percent built upon area (BUA). Non -coastal wetlands landward of the NHW (or MHW) line may
be included in the total project area.
8. Project percent of impervious area: (Total Impervious Area / Total Project Area) X 100
9. Flow many drainage areas does the project have?l (For high density, count 1 for each proposed engineered
Stormwater BMP. For low density and other projects, use 1 for the whole property area)
10. Complete the following information for each drainage area identified in Project Information item 9. If there
are more than four drainage areas in the project, attach an additional sheet with the information for each area
provided in the same format as below.
Basin Information.
Drairfa e Area 1'
;Drama e, Area _
Errairungre Area -
Drama 'e Area
Receiving Stream Name
Buffalo Creek
Stream Class *
WS-III; CA
Stream Index Number *
9-53-(2.9)
Total Drainage Area (so
2.53
On -site Drainage Area (so
2.53
Off -site Drainage Area (so
0
Proposed Impervious Area** (so
36155
Impervious Area** total
33
Iin ervious' Surface Area l
Draina�e Area 1..
mina e Area ..:'
Drama e.Area
Drainage, Area _
On -site Buildings/Lots (so
6355
'B
f%r
On -site Streets (sf)
On -site Parking (so
2000
1
On -site Sidewalks (so
2400
Other on -site (so
1000
Future (so
Off -site (sf)
Existing BUA*** (so
24400
Total (so:
36155
Stream Class and Index Number can be determined at: http.AortaLrucdertr.or fwgf ebAvq[ps/csu/classifications
** Im eroious area is defined as the built upon area including, but not limited to, buildings, roads, parking areas,
sidewalks, gravel areas, etc.
* Report only that amount of existing BUA that will remain after development. Do not report any existing BUA that
is to be removed and which will be replaced by new BUA.
Form SWU-101 Version 06Aug2012 Page 3 of 6

11. How was the off -site impervious area listed above determined? Provide documentation.
Projects in Union County: Contact DWQ Central Office staff to check if the project is located within a Threatened &
Endangered Species watershed that maybe subject to more stringent stormwater requirements as per 15A NCAC 02B .0600.
V. SUPPLEMENT AND O&M FORMS
The applicable state stormwater management permit supplement and operation and maintenance (O&M) forms
must be submitted for each BMP specified for this project. The latest versions of the forms can be downloaded
from http://portal.ncdenr.oriz/web/wq/ws/su/bmp-manual.
VI. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Only complete application packages will be accepted and reviewed by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ).
A complete package includes all of the items listed below. A detailed application instruction sheet and BMP
checklists are available from hn://_portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ws/su/statesw/forms dots. The complete
application package should be submitted to the appropriate DWQ Office. (The appropriate office may be
found by locating project on the interactive online map at hqp://poortal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ws/su/maps.)
Please indicate that the following required information have been provided by initialing in the space provided
for each item. All original documents MUST be signed and initialed in blue ink. Download the latest versions
for each submitted application package from http portalmcdermorg/web/wq/ws/su/statesw/forms_docs.
1. Original and one copy of the Stormwater Management Permit Application Form.
t ti is
2. Original and one copy of the signed and notarized Deed Restrictions &Protective Covenants
Form. (if required as per Part VII below)
3. Original of the applicable Supplement Form(s) (sealed, signed and dated) and O&Mri
1A
agreement(s) for each BMP.
4. Permit application processing fee of $505 payable to NCDENR. (For an Express review, refer to
http://www.envhelp.org/pages/onestopexpress.html for information on the Express program
and the associated fees. Contact the appropriate regional office Express Permit Coordinator for
additional information and to schedule the required application meeting.)
5. A detailed narrative (one to two pages) describing the stormwater treatment/managementfor
the project. This is required in addition to the brief summary provided in the Project
Information, item 1.
6. A USGS map identifying the site location. If the receiving stream is reported as class SA or the
receiving stream drains to class SA waters within 1/2 mile of the site boundary, include the r/2
mile radius on the map.
7. Sealed, signed and dated calculations (one copy).
8. Two sets of plans folded to 8.5" x 14" (sealed, signed, & dated), including:
a. Development/Project name.
b. Engineer and firm.
c. Location map with named streets and NCSR numbers.
d. Legend.
e. North arrow.
f. Scale.
g. Revision number and dates.
h. Identify all surface waters on the plans by delineating the normal pool elevation of
impounded structures, the banks of streams and rivers, the MHW or NHW line of tidal
waters, and any coastal wetlands landward of the MHW or NHW lines.
• Delineate the vegetated buffer landward from the normal pool elevation of impounded
structures, the banks of streams or rivers, and the MHW (or NHW) of tidal waters.
i. Dimensioned property/project boundary with bearings & distances.
j. Site Layout.with all BUA identified and dimensioned.
k. Existing contours, proposed contours, spot elevations, finished floor elevations.
1. Details of roads, drainage features, collection systems, and stormwater control measures.
m. Wetlands delineated, or a note on the plans that none exist. (Must be delineated by a
qualified person. Provide documentation of qualifications and identify the person who
made the determination on the plans.
n. Existing drainage (including off -site), drainage easements, pipe sizes, runoff calculations.
o. Drainage areas delineated (included in the main set of plans, not as a separate document).
p. Vegetated buffers (where required).
Form SWU-101 Version 06Aug2012 Page 4 of

9. Copy of any applicable soils report with the associated SHWf elevations (Please identify
l t additiont clth) Il f the borin locations with the existin
e eva tuns m o ep s as we as a map o g g
elevations and boring logs. Include an 8.5"x11" copy of the NRCS County Soils map with the
project area clearly delineated. For projects with infiltration BMPs, the report should also
include the soil type, expected infiltration rate, and the method of determining the infiltration rate.
(Infiltration Devices submitted to WiRO: Schedule a site visit for DWQ to verifij the SHWT prior
to submittal, [phone].)
10. A copy of the most current property deed. Deed book: 3 Page No: 112�
11. For corporations and limited liability corporations (LLC): Provide documentation from the NC
Secretary of State or other official documentation, which supports the titles and positions held
by the persons listed in Contact Information, item la, 2a, and/or 3a per 15A NCAC 21-1.1003(e).
The corporation or LLC must be listed as an active corporation in good standing with the NC
Secretary of State, otherwise the application will be returned.
htW://www.secretary.state.nc.us/Corporations/CSearch.aspx
VIL DEED RESTRICTIONS AND PROTECTIVE COVENANTS
For all subdivisions, outparcels, and future development, the appropriate property restrictions and protective
covenants are required to be recorded prior to the sale of any lot. If lot sizes vary significantly or the proposed
BUA allocations vary, a table listing each lot number, lot size, and the allowable built -upon area must be provided
as an attachment to the completed and notarized deed restriction form. The appropriate deed restrictions and
protective covenants forms can be downloaded from
ht!p://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ws/sLi/statesw/forms-docs. Download the latest versions for each submittal.
In the instances where the applicant is different than the property owner, it is the responsibility of the property
owner to sign the deed restrictions and protective covenants form while the applicant is responsible for ensuring
that the deed restrictions are recorded.
By the notarized signature(s) below, the permit holder(s) certify that the recorded property restrictions and
protective covenants for this project, if required, shall include all the items required in the permit and listed
on the forms available on the website, that the covenants will be binding on all parties and persons claiming
under them, that they will run with the land, that the required covenants cannot be changed or deleted
without concurrence from the NC DWQ and that they will be recorded prior to the sale of any lot.
VIIL CONSULTANT INFORMATION AND AUTHORIZATION
Applicant: Complete this section if you wish to designate authority to another individual and/or firm (such as a
consulting engineer and/or firm) so that they may provide information on your behalf for this project (such as
addressing requests for additional information).
Consulting Engineeraoseph W. McGougan P.E.
Consulting Firm: Marziano & McGougan P.A.
Mailing Address:1300 Second Ave Ste. 211
City:Conway State:SC Zip:29526
Phone: (843 ) 488-0124
Emad:[e-mail]
Fax: (843 ) 488-0129
IX. PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION (if Contact Information, item 2 has been filled out, complete this
section)
I, (print or hjpe name of person listed in Contact Information, item 2a) , certify that I
own the property identified in this permit application, and thus give permission to (print or hjpe name of person
listed in Contact Information, item 1a) with (print or hjpe name of organization listed in
Contact Information, item 1a) to develop the project as currently proposed. A copy of
the lease agreement or pending property sales contract has been provided with the submittal, which indicates the
party responsible for the operation and maintenance of the stormwater system.
Form SWU-101 Version 06Aug2012 Page 5 of 6

As the legal property owner I acknowledge, understand, and agree by my signature below, that if my designated
agent (entity listed in Contact Information, item 1) dissolves their company and/or cancels or defaults on their
lease agreement, or pending sale, responsibility for compliance with the DWQ Stormwater permityeverts back to
me, the property owner. As the property owner, it is my responsibility to notify DWQ immediately and submit a
completed Name/Ownership Change Form within 30 days; otherwise I will be operating a stormwater treatment
facility without a valid permit. I understand that the operation of a stormwater treatment facility without a valid
permit is a violation of NC General Statue 143-215.1 and may result in appropriate enforcement action including
the assessment of civil penalties of up to $25,000 per day, pursuant to NCGS 143-215.6.
a Notary Public for the State of County of
do hereby certify that
before me this _ day of
personally appeared
and acknowledge the due execution of the application for
a stormwater permit. Witness my hand and official seal,
MCF&I
My commission
X. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION
I, (print or hjpe name of person listed in Contact Information, item la) Edgar O Murphrey Jr.,Mai/or
certify that the information included on this permit application form is, to the best of my knowledge, correct and
that the project will be constructed in conformance with the approved plans, that the required deed restrictions
and protective covenants will be recorded, and that the proposed project complies with the requirements of the
applicable Stormwater es uA�er;1,5�C 21-1 .1000 and any other applicable state stormwater requirements.
Signatu
Date: T—
I, i`1'L IA L. a Notary Public for the State of NoP-+ t Ca" 1,ttC . County of
OaE e (u rt� do hereby certify that i�7d!74,r personally appeared
before me this day of INl 2c v�O 1 4 and acknowledge the due execution of the application for
a stornwater permit. Witness my hand and official seal, �F
t. SESSvi�p/.
O,y
NOtory Pub Ile
c Clevelantl County
_My Commission Expires=
09/05/2015
SEAL
My commission expires 9 - O S / J
Form SWU-101 Version 06Aug2012
Page 6 of 6

�10�MARZIANO & MCGOUGAN, P.A.
c on s u It in g e n g in e e r s
.DcC,®etc
March 4, 2014f0 a FNq� . �ZDfB
/EJ quo a/Coe
NCDENR
Public Water Supply
610 East Center Avenue, Ste 301
Raleigh, NC 27699-1634
®
MPR `� �,0�4 MEND
RE: T J. Ellison Water Treatment Plant Upgrade
MM Project No. 32005/3.00
To Whom It May Concern:
Enclosed please find the Permit Application packages for the above referenced project. A copy of
this submittal has been forwarded to Cleveland County Planning Department. As a part of this
submittal, we have included the following items:
• Sediment and Erosion Control Package - $195 fee
• Stormwater Management Permit Application Package - $505 fee
If you have any questions or if we can provide additional information, please contact this office.
Sincerely,
Jessica S. McGougan, P.E.
o
� s
z o
n �,
1.... CC-v, t/�� ,w� �V"""k �+
O�
F
�
;pO
o n
Qc
C.
p Cr.
I,
Marziano &t
McGougan, P.A.
1300 Second Avenue
Suite 211
Conway, SC 29526
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
M:132005-KINGS MOUNTAIN U7P UPGRADM300-Permating1LDENR 03.04.14.doce

W.-I
FEr_- *Ph -('A Application Completeness Review sr �
g/First Submittal ❑ Re -submittal Date Received: 3 v� / Date Reviewed: 3 B Bill Diuguid
Development/Project Name. c, r no s o TaLz s G
Receiving stream name %jGCF<,g Classification: S_ _C
River Basin: 8g0,4
u„
For post -construction requirements, a program will be deemed compliant for the areas where it is
VJ-
implementing any of the following programs: WS-I, WS-II, WS-III, WS-IV, HOW, ORW, Neuse River Basin
NSW, Tar -Pamlico River Basin NSW, and the Randleman Lake Water Supply Watershed Nutrient' /- 5 7nr
I High Densitv Projects that require a 401/404 within an NSW require 85% TSS. 30% TN and.306VTP..rem6M. I
T&E Species (Goose Creek Waxhaw Creek or Six Mile Creek Water Sheds): At 1A 'Ce
Latitude and Longitude: /4 7-7 6 W - S/ z7 o?. 9' S Juriscliction
Project Address: 3 o e go
z 90 9 G .y
Engineer name and firm:-Zr-"SCc& S . Mu,1
cGo( E.� mwR�,A vo d GouG.r. as o s�-
Phone:'Tif3-JY91 -6/7-4 Email: � - c a
Is the project confirmed to be in the State MSI Stormwate er jurisdiction? Yes or ❑ No
Low Density (no curb and gutter)>f WO Low Density with curb and gutter outlets ❑ High Density ❑ Other
-a�01/404 i p cts to surface waters, wetlands, an bAuffers (add language to cover letter and/or add info letter)
q) /ifMCA
c/kePez &X1'_5 dY- ok14- dAA-,J3-?b maxis i!� of S�/sys/Qw
Check for $505.00 included I'll
V,,Original signature (not photocopy) on application
br Legal signature (Corporation-VP/higher, Partnership -General Partner/higher, LLC-member/manager, Agent).
Check
If an agent signs the application, a signed letter of authorization from the applicant must be provided which.
includes the name, title, mailing address and phone number of the person signing the letter.
t Copy of property deed showing ownership or control
Klty -r- For subdivided projects, a signed and notarized deed restriction statement
u Sealed, signed & dated calculations
d/A-a - Correct supplement and O&M provided for each
❑ Bioretention
❑ Dry Detention Basin
❑ filter Strip
Grass Swale (le- X/5_7 i, )
❑ Infiltration Basin J
❑ Infiltration Trench
❑ Level Spreader
❑ Permeable Pavement
❑ Restored Riparian Buffer
BMP on site (check all that were provided & number of each)
❑ Rooftop Runoff Management
',\❑ Sand Filter
❑ Stormwater Wetland
❑ Wet Detention Basin yy6Mr-
Low Density0so Q= Exrs-ri.,, G -SW sys-Te„
❑ Curb Outlet
❑ Off -Site
❑ NCDOT Linear Road
a Two sets of sealed, signed & dated layout & finish grading plans with appropriate details
arrative Description of stormwater management provided
uir oils report, geotech information provided .
rites Wetlands delineated or a note on the plans or in the accompanying documents that none exist on site and/or
adjacent property
mr�zDetails for the roads, parking area, cul-de-sac radii, sidewalk widths, curb and gutter;
6f Dimensions & slopes provided
�a' Drainage areas delineated ❑ Pervious and impervious reported for each ❑ Areas of high density
-a-BMP operation and maintenance agreements provided
GK Applicationcomplete ❑ Application Incomplete Returned: (Date)
oTN�lc_ pa ��l F p1ca TEcT t�IS-1EE cA
Comments
C'f, w-
April 26, 2013 Revision, Bill Diugui
OK46�SuL
W,
v 1✓S
�✓�+` n 0 11J6rArA.
d
� 4 -VroP n'W,4'TEs 'PIPE s ys Em 4 oe wic_r✓ R.uvoFiff. AlQ"
4C7_"IL of pisTN.Ie-I4-n/cE /.c VGCv SrnN1t
$af F9ALoc'
S 7 b em t /a r�,2 a� a ,✓s 7a a� cc t ✓ �,g,�� i� -Ta_i�
Lv/,/G SSA �E_ 417A_j/C/iy

T.J. Ellison WTP Upgrade
Kings Mountain, NC
Peak Flows (cfs)
Pre Post Difference
2 year 2.23 2.80 0.57
lgear 4.19 4.92 0.73
25 year 1 7.441 8.16 0.72
Stormwater Calculations
Comparison
W.
4

T.J. Ellison WTP Upgrade
Kings Mountain, NC
u"A"Q'F
IQP 2.23 peak discharge(cfs)
qu 425 unit peak discharge (cfs/mi2/in)
A 0,00476 drainage area (mi2)
Q 1.1 runoff (in)
Fla 1 pond and swamp adjustment factor
To 0.38 hours
rN
Stormwater Calculations
Pre- Construction
2 Year Storm Event
soils acres
%
o runoff (Open Water
acres %
I acres
Impervious
%
imp.
I acres
Gravel Rd
%
gravel
I acres
Open Space
% Good
Cond
acres
Forest
%
thin stand
I CN
Udorthents
2.17
0.7115
C
0.41 0.13
0.37
0.15
98
0.08
0.03
89
1.31
0.52
74
0
0.00
77
55.68
Grover
0.38
0.1246
B
0.12 0.04
0.04
0.02
98
0.04
0.02
85
0.11
0.04
61
0.07
0.03
66
7.40
Hulett
0.5
0.1639
B
0 0
0.14
0.06
98
0
0.00
85
0.23
0.09
61
0.13
0.05
66
14.42
3.05
1
0.53 0.17
0.22
0.02
0.65
0.08
78 CN
remaining
drainage
area
2.52
P (inches)
3.1 25 year/24 hour
Ia
0.564
Ia/P
0.1819
L(ft)
600
slope (%)
2

T.J. Ellison WTP Upgrade
Kings Mountain, NC
u'A'Q'F
q 2.801 peak discharge (cis)
qu 490 unit peak discharge(cfs/mi2tin)
A 0.00476 drainage area (mil)
Q 1.2 runoff (in)
Fp 1 pond and swamp adjustment factor
Tc 0.33 hours
rN
Stormwater Calculations
Post- Construction
2 Year Storm Event
soils acres
%
o runoff (Open Water
acr
Impervious
I acres %
imp.
acres
Gravel Rd
%
gravel
Open Space
I acres % Good
Cone
acres
Forest
%
thin stand
I CN
Udorthents 2.17
0.7115
C
0.51 0.17
0.49 0.20
98
0.18
0.07
89
0.98 0.40
74
0
0.00
17
55.06
Grover 0.38
0.1246
6
0.06 0.02
0.04 0.02
98
0.04
0.02
85
0.19 0.07
61
0.04
0.02
66
8.44
Hulett 0.5
0.1639
B
0 0
0.29 0.12
98
0
0.00
85
0.21 0.08
61
0
0.00
66
16.63
3.05
1
0.57 0.19
0.33
0.02
0.55
0.02
80 CN
remaining drainage
area
148
P (inches)
3.1 25 year/24 hour
la
0.5
la/P
0.1613
L (ft)
440
slope (%)
2

T.J. Ellison WTP Upgrade
Kings Mountain, NC
= u'A'Q•F
q 4.19 peak discharge(cfs)
qu 440 unit peak discharge(cfs/mi2/in)
A 0.00476 drainage area (mil)
q 2 runoff (in)
Fp 1 pond and swamp adjustment factor
Tc 0.38 hours
rN
Stormwater Calculations
Pre- Construction
10 Year Storm Event
soils acres
%
o runoff (Open Water
acres % I
acres
Impervious
%
Imp.
acres
Gravel Rd
%
gravel
I acres
Open Space
% Good
Cond
acres
Forest
%
thin stand
I CN
Udorthents 2.17
0.7115
C
0.51 0.17
0.37
0.15
98
0.08
0.03
89
1.21
0.48
74
0
0.00
77
52.54
Grover 0.38
0.1246
B
0.01. 0.00
0.04
0.02
98
0.04
0.02
85
0.21
0.08
61
0.07
0.03
66
9.78
Hulett 0.5
0.1639
B
0 0
0.14
0.06
98
0
0.00
85
0.23
0.09
611
0.13
0.05
66
14.36
3.05
1
0.52 0.17
0.22
0.02
0.65
0.08
77 CN
remaining drainage
area
2.53
C
Gravel Road 0.51 0.01
graded,
Open Space no plant
cover 0.3 0.20
Forest 0.3 0.02
0.4
P (inches) 4.3 25 year/24 hour
Ia 0.597
Ia/P 0.1388
L (ft) 600
slope (%) 2
C

T.J. Ellison WTP Upgrade
Kings Mountain, NC
= u'A'Q'F
ICtp4.92 peak discharge (cfs)
qu 470 unit peak discharge(cfs/mi2tin)
A 0.00476 drainage area (mil)
Q 2.2 runoff(in)
Fp 1 pond and swamp adjustment factor
Tc 0.33 hours
rN
Stormwater Calculations
Post- Construction
10 Year Storm Event
soils acres
%
o runoff (Open Water
acres %
acres
Impervious
%
imp.
acres
Gravel Rd
%
gravel
acres
Open Space
% Good
Cond
acres
Forest
%
thin stand
CN
Udorthents
2.17
0.7115
C
0.51 0.17
0.49
0.20
98
0.18
0.07
89
0.98
0.40
74
0
0.00
77
55.06
Grover
0.38
0.1246
B
0.06 0.02
0.04
0.02
98
0.04
0.02
85
0.18
0.07
61
0.04
0.02
66
8.44
Hulett
0.5
0.1639
B
0 0
0.29
0.12
98
0
0.00
85
0.21
0.08
61
0
0.00
66
16.63
3.05
1
0.57 0.19
0.33
0.02
0.55
0.02
80 CN
remaining
drainage
area
2.48
C
Gravel Road 0.51 0.01
graded,
Open Space no plant
cover 0.3 0.17
Forest 0.3 0.00
0.5 C
P(inches) 4.3 25 year/24 hour
Ia 0.5
Ia/P 0.1163
L(ft) 440
slope (%) 2

T.J. Ellison WTP Upgrade
Kings Mountain, NC
u'A'Q'F
q 7.441 peak discharge (ds)
qu 460 unit peak discharge(ds/mi2tin)
A 0.00476 drainage area(mi2)
Q 3.4 runoff (in)
Fp 1 pond and swamp adjustment factor
Tc 0.38 hours
[N
Stormwater Calculations
Pre- Construction
25 Year Storm Event
soils acres
%
o runoff (Open Wale
acres %
acres
Impervious
%
imp.
acres
Gravel Rd
%
gravel
open Space
acres % Good
Caudill
acres
Forest
% thin
stand
I CN
Udorthents 2.17
0.7115
C
0.41 0.13
0.37
0.15
98
0.08
0.03
89
1.31 0.52
74
0
0.00
77
55.68
Grover 0.38
0.1246
B
0.12 0.04
0.04
0.02
98
0.04
0.02
85
0.11 0.04
61
0.07
0.03
66
7.40
Hulett 0.5
0.1639
B
0 0
0.14
0.06
98
0
0.00
85
0.23 0.09
61
0.13
0.05
66
14.42
3.05
1
0.53 0.17
0.22
0.02
0.65
0.08
78 CN
remaining drainage
area
2.52
1
Pinches) 5.7 25 year/24 hour
la 0.564
Ia/P 0.0989
L (ft) 600
slope (%) 2

T.J. Ellison WTP Upgrade
Kings Mountain, NC
u'A'Q'F
IQP 8.161 peak discharge (cfs)
qu 490 unit peak discharge (cis/mi2rn)
A 0.00476 drainage area (mil)
Q 3.5 runoff (in)
Fp 1 pond and swamp adjustment factor
Tc 0.33 hours
rN
Stormwater Calculations
Post- Construction
25 Year Storm Event
soils acres
%
o runoff (Open Water
acres %
I acres
Impervious
%
imp.
I acres
Gravel Rd
%
gravel
Open Space
I acres % Good
Cond
acres
Forest
%
thin stand
I CN
Udorthents
2.17
0.7115
C
0.51 0.17
0.49
0.20
98
0.18
0.07
89
0.98 0.40
74
0
0.00
77
55.06
Grover
0.38
0.1246
B
0.06 0.02
0.04
0.02
98
0.04
0.02
85
0.18 0.07
61
0.04
0.02
66
8.44
Hulett
0.5
0.1639
B
0 0
0.29
0.12
98
0
0.00
85
0.21 0.08
61
0
0.00
66
16.63
3.05
1
0.57 0.19
0.33
0.02
0.55
0.02
80 CN
remaining
drainage
area
2.48
C
I Gravel Road 1 0.51 0.01
graded,
Open Space no plant
cover 0.3 0.17
Forest 0.3 0.00
0.5 C
P (inches) 5.7 25 year/24 hour
la 0.5
la/P 0.0877
L (ft) "0
slope (%) 2

Pat McCrory
Governor
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
May 12, 2014
The Honorable Edgar 0. Murphrey, Jr., Mayor
City of King's Mountain
101 W. Gold Street
King's Mountain, North Carolina 28086
Subject: Stormwater Permit No. SW314304
T.J. Ellison Water Treatment Plant Upgrade
Low Density Stormwater Project
King's Mountain, Cleveland County
The Honorable Edgar 0. Murphrey, Jr, Mayor:
John rla, III
Secreettayry
o a 2 �®
4ioo,!`m
�i
,0/ 02
�n
The Stormwater Permitting Unit received a complete Stormwater Management Permit Application for
the subject project on March 11, 2014. Staff review of the plans and specifications has determined that
the project, as proposed, will comply with the Stormwater Regulations set forth in Title 15A NCAC
21-1.1000 and Session Law 2006-246. We are forwarding Permit No. SW3140304, dated May 12, 2014,
for the construction, operation and maintenance of the subject project.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until rescinded and shall be subject to the
conditions and limitations as specified therein, and does not supersede any other agency permit that
may be required. Please pay special attention to the conditions listed in this permit regarding the
Operation and Maintenance of the BMP(s), recordation of deed restrictions, procedures for changes of
ownership, transferring the permit, and renewing the permit. Failure to establish an adequate system
for operation and maintenance of the stormwater management system, to record deed restrictions, to
follow the procedures for transfer of the permit, or to renew the permit, will result in future
compliance problems.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this permit are unacceptable, you have the right
to request an adjudicatory hearing by filing a written petition with the Office of Administrative
Hearings (OAH). The written petition must conform to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General
Statutes. Per NCGS 143-215(e) the petition must be filed with the OAH within thirty (30) days of
receipt of this permit. You should contact the OAH with all questions regarding the filing fee (if a filing
fee is required) and/or the details of the filing process at 671.4 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-
6714, or via telephone at 919-431-3000, or visit their website at www.NCOAH.com. Unless such
demands are made, this permit shall be final and binding.
If you have any questions, or need additional information concerning this matter, please contact Bill
Diuguid at [phone], or [e-mail].
Sincerely,
for Tracy E. Davis, P.E., CPM, Director
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612
Phone: [phone] \ Internet: www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity 1Affrmatiive Action Employer— Made in part by recycled paper

FFWA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory John E. Skvarla, III
Governor 086 Secretary
May 12, 2014
The Honorable Edgar 0. Murphrey, Jr., Mayor
City of King's Mountain
101 W. Gold Street
King's Mountain, North Carolina 28086
Subject: Stormwater Permit No. SW314304
T.J. Ellison Water Treatment Plant Upgrade
Low Density Stormwater Project
King's Mountain, Cleveland County
The Honorable Edgar 0. Murphrey, Jr, Mayor
eel
��Iko
00,
'00apo��O
0 o..
od/O 0
The Stormwater Permitting Unit received a complete Stormwater Management Permit Application for
the subject project on March 11, 2014. Staff review of the plans and specifications has determined that
the project, as proposed, will comply with the Stormwater Regulations set forth in Title 1SA NCAC
21-1.1000 and Session Law 2006-246. We are forwarding Permit No. SW3140304, dated May 12, 2014,
for the construction, operation and maintenance of the subject project.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until rescinded and shall be subject to the
conditions and limitations as specified therein, and does not supersede any other agency permit that
may be required. Please pay special attention to the conditions listed in this permit regarding the
Operation and Maintenance of the BMP(s), recordation of deed restrictions, procedures for changes of
ownership, transferring the permit, and renewing the permit. Failure to establish an adequate system
for operation and maintenance of the stormwater management system, to record deed restrictions, to
follow the procedures for transfer of the permit, or to renew the permit, will result in future
compliance problems.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this permit are unacceptable, you have the right
to request an adjudicatory hearing by filing a written petition with the Office of Administrative
Hearings (OAH). The written petition must conform to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General
Statutes. Per NCGS 143-215(e) the petition must be filed with the OAH within thirty (30) days of
receipt of this permit. You should contact the OAH with all questions regarding the filing fee (if a filing
fee is required) and/or the details of the filing process at 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-
6714, or via telephone at 919-431-3000, or visit their website at www.NCOAH.com. Unless such
demands are made, this permit shall be final and binding.
If you have any questions, or need additional information concerning this matter, please contact Bill
Diuguid at [phone], or [e-mail].
Sincerely,
for Tracy E. Davis, P.E., CPM, Director
Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources
1612 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1612
Phone: [phone] Internet: www,ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity 1 AKrmauve Acdon Employer - Made in part by recycled paper

u
^ 3
Pr `
I��� � T a �` v�,'T 14 � l �.1A �4 �sM � Q' s G♦: � ti� tt `
.^ 7 .e is - '-..,.� r---• ,"---•� ur ,4y�`� q � � t .ti, �. .
Cs ,Ol
r p
♦�. 4
rY � i asy'J ^ re-n �o `b' X` �•
G®®gle earth feet 2000
metersi 600

NCDENR - Stormwater Permitting Map Viewer
Page I of 2
NC Department of Envlronment and Natural Resources
Energy Mineral and Land Resources -. Stormwater Permitting Map Viewer
Back to Stormwater Permitting (hftpoiD mi.ncmnr.oM/eb/ir/swm )
Stormwater Permitting Map Viewer
Enter Address: 1 1432 Oak Grove Road Kings Mountain nc Find Address Reset
Latitude (decimal degrees, N): Longitude (decimal degrees, W): F-r Find Location
Need to convert de / I k r&6S decumathum)
degrees,, seconds todecimatJoirmat?, hatptl�"rdftloR.,fcc,Swlrrb audio lIDDDM o k
or, just enter coordinates in the 'ADDRESS' field like this: (deg min sec) (deg min sec), and then Click Find Address'.
Need help with this mop? Contact Bethany Georgoutias at [phone] or [e-mail]
Click on the map to see permitting information.
Please check with the local government to verify current boundaries and specific stormwater requirements.
vlA
U
fftste ldermittfiig ' horltln,' 'A
E�I?Wnuftp,te Permitting XtathWitles 0
Wttjhtn: I/Tnrila, �wlwh Water L7
:mhahkN2736S9m 45�z-
17?1IU.!-,Uhl.1-trvl.USl&i 100 m Tdd-
P—re1ayGeott.hUuaJavaStrptAINY3 oho.aseaeowmsuon —rat, and mods & Fuume Tebt.,dum. assoneismasussi_
Nob: Now urbanised areas from the 2010 U.S. Census are refleenul in map permittirl Information.
Sea 2012 ndsrmwmr.refir*mce dateslast updated December ZOI 2.
N.C. Dempa3l...1 of En,hoesurnmot end kennel Resou.,.,
1601 Modi Servke Center, Raleigir, NC 27699-Idll
J.n,$St.
A,'hoku. 9.,Idrr,r 512 N. sdutituyst.
Toll Free: [phone]
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/Ir/sw-permitting-map 3/25/2014