20211327 Ver 1_More Info Received_20210922

Strickland, Bev
From: Jeff Levi <[e-mail]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 12:24 PM
To: Johnson, Alan
Subject: [External] Fwd: SAW-2021-01948_Westrow Phase 1 (Notice of Incomplete Pre -
Construction Notification)
Attachments: Westrow_ PCN_PJD Submittal.pdf
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
Report Spam.
Hi Alan,
I received this message from Bryan today and I wanted to be sure you have all of the supporting info that was
included in the ePCN. This is for project number 20211327.
A pdf of the hard copy is attached.
Thanks,
Jeff
Forwarded message
From: Jeff Levi <[e-mail]>
Date: Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 11:43 AM
Subject: Re: SAW-2021-01948_Westrow Phase 1 (Notice of Incomplete Pre -Construction Notification)
To: Roden Reynolds, Bryan K CIV (USA) <[e-mail]>
Cc: Daniel Kuefler <[e-mail]>
Bryan,
I'm a little confused here. I submitted this through the ePCN website and all of this information was included
and should have been forwarded to you. I even attached the full pdf of the application which also has all of the
information you are requesting.
I've attached the pdf of the PCN submittal package. The maps and drawings you requested are in this pdf and
so is the agent authorization form with the Crescent contact information.
Chase Kerley
Crescent River District, LLC
227 West Trade ST, Suite 1000
Charlotte, NC 28202
980-321-6284
CKERLEY@Crescent Communities.com
I secured mitigation credits from the RES Catawba Umbrella Mitigation Bank and the letter is included in the
attached pdf.
i

Has this happened before? Should I send the application separately from here on to be sure this doesn't happen
again? Should I reach out to Alan Johnson at NCDWR to be sure he has everything?
Please let me know if you need anything else at this time.
Thank you,
Jeff
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 10:45 AM Roden Reynolds, Bryan K CIV (USA)
<[e-mail]> wrote:
Mr. Levi,
On September 9, 2021, we received the request for jurisdictional determination you submitted on behalf of
Crescent Communities, LLC on a property located in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. I have completed
my initial review of the report and have determined the PCN is insufficient to review.
a. The PCN lacked all supporting documentation such as but not limited to: maps and figures,
construction drawings, agency correspondence, etc. Therefore, please provide a complete PCN with
all the additional supplemental information.
b. The PCN lacked a Compensatory Mitigation Reservation Letter from NCDMS. Therefore, please
include this reservation letter in the revised PCN.
c. The PCN lacked a signed Agent Authorization Form from the applicant (i.e., Crescent
Communities, LLC).
d. Provide the following information for the applicant (i.e., Crescent Communities, LLC)
• Point of contact (first and last name)
• Mailing address
• Telephone number
• Email address
Please provide the information requested above in ONE consolidated response within 30-days of the date of
this correspondence. If you do not respond within 30-days, the request will be administratively canceled.
Please contact me via telephone or e-mail if you have any questions.
Thanks,
2

Bryan Roden -Reynolds, PWS
Regulatory Project Manager
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District
Charlotte Regulatory Field Office
8430 University Executive Park Drive
Charlotte, NC 28262
Office: [phone]
Jeff Levi
Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC
828-699-3697
Jeff Levi
Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC
828-699-3697
3

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID #: SAW -
Prepare file folder ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Westrow Phase 1
Begin Date (Date Received):
Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
2. Work Type: ❑✓ Private ❑ Institutional ❑ Government ❑ Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form B3d and B3e]:
Construct a roadway connecting the proposed mixed use/residential development and construct a sewerline from Beaverdam Creek
Trunk sewer to the development.
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: Crescent River District, LLC
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group, Jeff Levi, 10612-D Providence Road, PMB 550, Charlotte, NC, 28277
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form B5b]:
7. Project Location— Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form Blb]:
35.19173 ON,-80.98445 °W, approximately 126 acres, Dixie River Rd., south of Sadler Rd, Charlotte,
NC 28278
0
8. Project Location — Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form Bla]: 11320101,11328143,11328148,14114201,14128103
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Mecklenburg
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Charlotte
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form B2a]: Catawba River
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: Upper Catawba / 03050101
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ❑✓
Regulatory Action Type:
❑ Standard Permit
✓ Nationwide Permit #
Regional General Permit #
✓ Jurisdictional Determination Request
Section 10 and 404 ❑
❑ Pre -Application Request
❑ Unauthorized Activity
❑ Compliance
❑ No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
August 30, 2021
Mr. Bryan Roden -Reynolds
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue
Asheville, NC 28801
Mr. Byron Hamstead
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa St.
Asheville, NC 28801
Mr. Alan Johnson
NCDEQ
Division of Water Resources
610 East Center Street, Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
Mr. Paul Wojoski
NCDEQ
Division of Water Resources
Wetlands & Storm Water Branch
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
Subject: Pre -Construction Notification for NWP#29, 39, 58, & Request for Preliminary
Jurisdictional Determination for the 126-acre Westrow Phase 1 project, in Charlotte,
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina.
Dear Messrs. Roden -Reynolds, Johnson, Hamstead, and Wojoski,
Enclosed is a request for a Nationwide Permit #29, 39, 58, and a request for Preliminary
Jurisdictional Determination for the — 126-acre Westrow Phase 1 project to be located west of 1
485, west and southeast of Dixie River Road, in Charlotte, NC. The site is a proposed multi use
development with mixed use residential/commercial, and community farm consisting of 6
streams totaling approximately 3144 linear feet and 1 wetland totaling 0.016 acres within the
project area.
Charlotte Office:
10612-D Providence Rd.
PMB 550
Charlotte, NC 28277
[phone]
[e-mail]
www.wetlands-epg.com
1
Asheville Office:
1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
Suite 10, PM 283
Asheville, NC 28805

Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
Due to the locations of the onsite aquatic features, complete avoidance of impacts was not
practicable. Impacts to site surface waters associated with the proposed development were
limited through site selection location, design, and location of the road crossing along the
stream valleys. Proposed permanent loss to jurisdictional waters associated with this project
will be approximately 193 linear feet (0.0345 acres) of perennial stream for a culverted road
crossing. The temporary and permanent impact of the proposed Westrow Avenue Culvert
provides access to the residential development Preserve East and the proposed pump station
as well as act as the required route for water services to the pump station and as the route for
the sewer force main which transports the pump station discharge to the proposed
gravity sewer in Dixie River Road. The temporary impacts of the proposed utilities that service
this area include gravity sewer, which crosses Perennial Stream EE as it drains to the pump
station and Beaverdam Creek as it discharges into the recently constructed trunk
sewer. The RES Catawba Dogtown Mitigation Bank has accepted our request for 193 linear feet
of compensatory mitigation. The acceptance letter is included in this submittal.
Enclosed is a copy of our Threatened/Endangered Species Evaluation for the site. No listed
species were identified within the project area and we believe that there will be no effect on
listed species or their critical habitat as designated under Section 7 of the Endangered Species
Act. Please refer to the Threatened and Endangered Species Evaluation Section for additional
details on the Threatened and Endangered Species survey.
Also enclosed is a copy of the Cultural Resources Evaluation report for the site. Results of the
study shows that it appears that survey of the current project area would probably result in the
detection of no new major cultural resources. This is because: 1) there is a high percentage of
overlap between the current project area and previous cultural resources study areas; 2) only
one minor cultural resource was found in the current project area during previous survey
efforts; and 3) much of the unsurveyed land in the current project area includes areas poorly
suited for most types of human occupation/use.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide this information. Please contact me at 828-699-3697
or [e-mail] if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
9 (
Jeff Levi,
Biologist
Len Rindner, PWS
Principal
Charlotte Office: www.wetlands-epg.com Asheville Office:
10612-D Providence Rd. 1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg, I
PMB 550 Suite 10, PM 283
Charlotte, NC 28277 Asheville, NC 28805
[phone]
[e-mail] 2

C
O
cd
u
a
a
Q
.E
L
O
CL
Permit Application

a`'oF wArE�Q�
O Niii� ^Y
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29,39,58 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑ No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑X Yes ❑ No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Westrow Phase 1
2b.
County:
Mecklenburg
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Charlotte
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Crescent River District, LLC
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
32152-282; 32809-788; 35876-075&070; 32256-111
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Chase Kerley
3d.
Street address:
227 West Trade St STE 1000
3e.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC, 28202
3f.
Telephone no.:
980-321-6284
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b.
Name:
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
4d.
Street address:
4e.
City, state, zip:
4f.
Telephone no.:
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Jeff Levi
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC - Wetlands & Enviromental Planning Group
5c.
Street address:
10612-D Providence Road, PMB 550
5d.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28227
5e.
Telephone no.:
828-699-3697
5f.
Fax no.:
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
11320101,11328143,11328148,14114201, 14128103
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.19173 Longitude:-80.98445
1 c.
Property size:
126 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Catawba River
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS-V,B
2c.
River basin:
03050101 Upper Catawba
3.
Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Majority of the project area is disturbed mixed pine -hardwood forested with surrounding light residential.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.016
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 3,144
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Construct a roadway connecting proposed mixed use/residential development & construct sewerline from Beaverdam trunk sewer to the development.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Excavation and grading of the site will use standard equipment - excavator, trackhoe, dump trucks, etc.
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (includingall prior phases in the past?
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
4d.
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑X Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, explain.
Future projects will utilize the proposed sewerline and road for access.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ❑X Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W2 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 T
Excavation
Stream EE
PER
Corps
7
32
S2 T
Excavation
Beaverdam Creek
PER
Corps
10
31
S3 T
con struction/dewatering
Stream EE
PER
Corps
7
200
S4 P
Culvert
Stream EE
PER
Corps
7
193
S5 -
Choose one
S6 -
Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
456
3i. Comments:
Open cut sewer installation will temporarily impact 63 If (0.0123 ac) of stream. A coffer dam will temporarily impact 200 If (0.0318 ac) of stream. A
culvert for a road crossing will permanently impact 193 If (0.0345 ac) of streams.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
Choose one
Choose
O2 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B 1
Yes/No
B2 -
Yes/No
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D.
Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.
Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The site plan was designed to avoid onsite surface water features to the maximum extent practicable while still incorporating necessary site
development/access. Due to the location/extent of jurisdictional features, complete avoidance was not practicable. Impacts were limited through
site location, plan design and location/orientation of lots, access routes, retaining walls, and stormwater treatment facilities. Of the 3144 If (0.582 ac) of
onsite streams and 0.016 acres of wetlands, permanent impacts to surface waters will be limited to 193 If (0.0345 ac) of stream.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Construction techniques will implement approved erosion control methods to avoid/minimize impacts to onsite/adjacent offsite receiving conveyances
2.
Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a.
Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2b.
If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑X Corps
2c.
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑X Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3.
Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a.
Name of Mitigation Bank: RES Catawba Umbrella Mitigation Bank - Dogtown
3b.
Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Stream
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity: 386
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c.
Comments:
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c.
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d.
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f.
Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h.
Comments:
5.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a.
If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes X❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
Stormwater
for the project will be treated with 4 BMPs. One surface sand filter and three wet ponds. Stormwater
plan has been designed to meet
Mecklenburg County Stormwater criteria. See sheet 12 and 13 in Plans/Exhibits.
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
Mecklenburg County
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
Mecklenburg County
❑X Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑X No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑X No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes X❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
El Yes ❑X No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑X Yes ❑ No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Cumulative effects are unknown at this time. As future development is proposed, impacts will be minimized and the project will go through the typical
permitting process. The project will rely heavily on existing infrastructure to minimize impacts and future impacts.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater
generated on the site will be transported to the nearest treatment facility via installation of sewer lines to the Beaverdam Trunk Sewer.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ❑X No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ❑X No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
A Threatened/Endangered species assessment was conducted in which no species of concern were identified. See attached T&E report.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
See attached Cultural Resources Evaluation Report
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
❑X Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
No permanent impacts are being proposed to Beaverdam Creek. No elevation changes are being proposed. Temporary impacts will be returned to
pre-existing conditions and elevations.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
polaris 3G; www.fema.gov
Jeff Levi
n
08-30-2021
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Appli an gent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.
Page 10 of 10

Contact Name *
Contact Email Address*
Project Owner*
Project Name*
Project County*
Owner Address:*
Is this a transportation project?*
Jeff Levi
[e-mail]
Crescent Communities, LLC
Westrow Phase 1 Infrastructure
Mecklenburg
Street Address
227 W. Trade St, Suite 1000
Address Line 2
City
Charlotte
Fbstal / Zip Code
28202
r Yes r No
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
W 401 Water Quality Certification - 17- 401 Water Quality Certification -
Regular Express
F Individual Permit F Modification
F Shoreline Stabilization
Does this project have an existing project ID#?*
r Yes r No
State / Rovince / Fbgion
NC
Country
USA
Do you know the name of the staff member you would like to request a meeting with?
Alan Johnson
Please give a brief project description below and include location information.*

The attached exhibits reflect the proposed development for the
Westrow Phase 1 Infrastructure Plans, including the roadways and
utilities to service the future development within Westrow and
Preserve East. Westrowwill propose a community farm as well as
mixed use development, including both residential and commercial
development, throughout the site as each block is developed.
Preserve East will propose residential development only.
The temporary impacts of the proposed utilities that service this area
include gravity sewer, which crosses Perennial Stream EE as it drains
to the pump station and Beaverdam Creek as it discharges into the
recently constructed trunk sewer. Additionally, the temporary and
permanent impacts of the proposed Westrow Avenue culvert provide
access to the the future Preserve East development and the
proposed pump station, as well as act as the required route for water
services to the pump station.
By digitally signing below, I certify that I have read and understood that per the Federal Clean Water Act Section
401 Certification Rule the following statements:
• This form completes the requirement of the Pre -Filing Meeting Request in the Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification
Rule.
• I understand by signing this form that I cannot submit my application until 30 calendar days after this pre -filing
meeting request.
• I also understand that DWR is not required to respond or grant the meeting request.
Your project's thirty -day clock started upon receipt of this application. You will receive notification regarding meeting location
and time if a meeting is necessary. You will receive notification when the thirty -day clock has expired, and you can submit an
application.
Signature *
Submittal Date 7/7/2021

Jurisdictional
Determination Request
Information

Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC,
August 13, 2021
Assigned Project Manager
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Charlotte Regulatory Field Office —
Wilmington District
Subject: Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination and authorization for a proposed residential
development and utilities, in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina.
To Whom It May Concern,
Enclosed is a Request for a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination and PCN for the approximately 126-acre
Westrow Phase 1 project located in Charlotte, North Carolina. The purpose of the project is a proposed residential
development and utilities. The project is located along Dixie River Road, south of Sadler Road. The project area
consists of six streams totaling approximately 3144 linear feet and one wetland approximately 0.016 acres. The
project consists of one permanent stream crossing proposing to impact one of the jurisdictional streams and two
temporary road crossings for sanitary sewer line utilities located within the project area as shown on the attached
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request and PCN.
We would like to seek concurrence on the enclosed request at your earliest convenience. Thank you for your
consideration and please contact me if you have any questions, (828) 442 - 1419 or email at
[e-mail].
Sincerely,
Patrick J. Kealy Leonard S. Rindner PWS
Biologist Principal
Charlotte Office: www.wetlands-epg.com Asheville Office:
10612-D Providence Rd. 1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
PMB 550 Suite 10, PMB 283
Charlotte, NC 28277 Asheville, NC 28805
[phone] (828) 442 - 1419
[e-mail] 1 [e-mail]

urisdictional Determination Reauest
US Army Corps
of Engineers
Wilmington district
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.g,M.mil/Missions/Re ug lato!yPermitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: Dixie River Rd
City, State:
Charlotte , NC 28278
County: Mecklenburg
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): See attached Tax Parcel Ma
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC, WEPG
Mailing Address: 10612-D Providence Road, PMB 550
Charlotte NC 28277
Telephone Number: 828-442-1419
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
EI am the current property owner.
aI am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
1-1 Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION'
Name: Crescent River District, LLC
Mailing Address: 227 West Trade St, Suite 1000
Charlotte, NC 28202
Telephone Number: 980-321-6284
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
' Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Chase Kerley - Crescent River District LLC
Print Name
Owner ❑ Authorized Agents
el
�51Z
Date � _
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST; (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
rocess.
✓ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:_
For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
❑✓ I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓❑ Size of Property or Review Area +/- 126 acres.
❑✓ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
Longitude
35.19173
:1 00
0 A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than l 1x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
✓❑ Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'
✓❑ Vicinity Map
✓❑ Aerial Photograph
USGS Topographic Map
IVI Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCWAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
❑✓ NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
❑ Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatorregdocs/JD/RGL 08-02_App A Prelim_ JD_ Form_fillable.pdf
' Please see http://www.saw.usace.g.M.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the proj ect area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

Wetlands and
Leonard S REndner, PLLC
Agent Authorization Letter
The purpose of this form is to authorize our firm to act on your behalf in matters related to aquatic
resource (i.e. stream/wetlands) identification/mapping and regulatory permitting. The
undersigned, who are either registered property owners or legally authorized to conduct due
diligence activities on the property as identified below, do hereby authorize associates of
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC, Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group (WEPG) to act on my
behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance, and acceptance of applicable
permit(s) and/or certification(s).
Project/Site Name: Westrow Phase 1
Property Address: Dixie River Road, Charlotte, NC 28208
Parcel Identification Number (PIN): 11320101,11328143,11328148,14114201,14128103
Select one: 1 am the current property owner
Name: Chase Kerley
Company: Crescent River District, LLC
Mailing Address: 227 West Trade ST, Suite 1000
Telephone Number: 980-321-6284
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Property "erlested Buyer* I Other` Date
* The Interested BuyerlOther acknowledges that an agreement andlor formal contract to purchase andlor conduct
due diligence activities exists between the current property owner and the signatory of this authorization in cases
where the property is not owned by the signatory.
Charlotte Office: www.wetlands-epg.com Asheville Office.
10612-D Providence Rd 1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
PMB 550 Suite 10, PMB 283
Charlotte, NC 28277 Asheville. NC 28805
[phone]
len,rindner@wetlands-epg corn 2

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: Click here to enter a date.
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group, Patrick,
Kealy, 10612-D Providence Road, PMB 550, Charlotte, NC, 28277
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, Westrow Phase 1, Charlotte
Regulatory Field Office
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: (+/-) 126 acres, Dixie River Rd, south
of Sadler Rd, Charlotte, NC 28278
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County: Mecklenburg City: Charlotte
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Latitude: 35.19173 , Longitude:-80.98445
Universal Transverse Mercator: 17s, WGS84
Name of nearest waterbody: Beaverdam Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Estimated amount of
Type of aquatic
Geographic authority to
Latitude (decimal
Longitude (decimal
aquatic resources in
resources (i.e.,
which the aquatic resource
Site Number
degrees)
degrees)
review area (acreage
wetland vs. non -
"may be" subject (i.e.,
and linear feet, if
wetland waters)
Section 404 or Section
applicable
10/404)
Intermittent
328 LF
Non -wetland
35.19129000
-80.98839000
404
Stream AA
0.038 acres
waters
Intermittent
36 LF
Non -wetland
35.19437000
-80.99077000
404
Stream RX
0.002 acres
waters
Intermittent
11 LF
Non -wetland
35.19436000
-80.99042000
404
Stream RY
0.001 acres
waters
Perennial
1373 LF
Non -wetland
35.19187000
-80.98998000
404
Stream AA4
0.221 acres
waters
Perennial
1365 LF
Non -wetland
35.19473000
-80.98926000
404
Stream EE
0.313 acres
waters
Perennial
Stream
31 LF
Non -wetland
35.18610000
-80.98372000
404
Beaverdam
0.007 acres
waters
Creek
Wetland RD
35.19317000
-80.99170000
0.016 acres
Wetland
404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review
area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an
approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed the
various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General
Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction notification" (PCN), or
requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has
not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit
applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an official
determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD
before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit
authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or
different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than
accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant
can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5)
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an AJD
constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g.,
signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area
affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such
jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any
administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD
or a PJD, the JD will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual
permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be
administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over
aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic
resources in the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is
practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"
navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the
review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where
indicated for all checked items:
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: Figl_Approximate Wetland Map, dated 08/10/21 _
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1:24000 Charlotte West NC Quad. Fig. 4 (1993) dated
08/10/21
® Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Mecklenburg County. NC, Sheet 6, 1980: Fig. 5 dated
08/10/21.
® National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: Fig. 7 National Wetlands Inventory, dated 08/13/21
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is:
(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ®Aerial (Name & Date): Fig 3. Aerial Map, dated 08/10/21
or ®Other (Name & Date): Westrow Phase 1_Photo log, photos 1 — 10 dated,
04/21/21, 04/22/21, 05/04/20, 04/03/20
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
® Other information (please specify): Fig 6. NRCS Soils Map — Hydric Soil Rating (Web soil survey) dated 08/13/21
Fig 8. Tax Parcel Map, dated 08/13/21
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of Regulatory
staff member completing PJD
Click here to enter a date.
Ell L� z / 08/13/21
Signature and date person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is
impracticable) t
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the
established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an
action.

Waters Name
Cowardin_Codel HGM_Codel Meas_T
Waters_ TypeJNWPR_Determine_Cod
tud
i
Intermittent Stream AA
North Carolina
R4
RIVERINE
Linear
328 FOOT
PJD404
35.19129000
-80.98839000
Intermittent Stream RX
North Carolina
R4
RIVERINE
Linear
36 FOOT
PJD404
35.19437000
-80.99077000
Intermittent Stream RY
North Carolina
R4
RIVERINE
Linear
11 FOOT
PJD404
35.19436000
-80.99042000
Perennial Stream AM
North Carolina
R3
RIVERINE
Linear
1373 FOOT
PJD404
35.19187000
-80.98998000
Perennial Stream EE
North Carolina
R3
RIVERINE
Linear
1365 FOOT
PJD404
35.19473000
-80.98926000
Perennial Stream Beaverdam
Creek North Carolina
R3
RIVERINE
Linear
31 FOOT
PJD404
35.18610000
-80.98372000
Wetland RD
North Carolina
PFO
DEPRESS
Area
0.016 ACRE
PJD404
35.19317000
-80.99170000

APPROXIMATE AQUATIC RESOURCE LINEAR FEET AND ACRES
WETLANDS Acres STREAMS
LF
—
Acres
WESTROW
PHASE 1
Wetland RD 0.016 Intermittent Stream AA
328
0.038
Intermittent Stream RX
36
0.002
Aquatic Resource
Intermittent Stream RY
11
0.001
Acreage Table
Perennial Stream AA4
1373
0.221
Perennial Stream EE
1365
0.313
Perennial Stream Beaverdam Creek
31
0.007
SUBTOTAL 0.016 SUBTOTAL
TOTAL WETLAND 0.016 TOTAL STREAMS
Wetlands and Environmental Planning GrauP
3144 0.582
3144 0.582
TOTAL SITE ACREAGE 126
TOTAL WETLAND AND STREAM ACREAGE 0.598
TOTAL UPLAND ACRES 125.402
Notes:
Wetland and stream
dimensions are based
on survey
Prepared for:
Crescent River District LLC
227 West Trade St
Charlotte, NC 28202
Leonard 5_ Rindner, PLLC:.

LEGEND
r
n� Tributary
Wetland
DP Data point
Photo location and direction
Project boundary study limits
I
�r l
c ,
LOCATION a f
i
Lat: 35.19173 °N, Long: -80.98445 °W ,
HUC: 03050101 (Upper Catawba)
t:
Project Boundary
-
� �--�--_..-__.� • f �. � � �.. .. Study Limits
i,(✓ t
126 acres
r �—�'--- 1, i '✓ ° _�u � i }
Intermittent'
Stream RX
Perennial Stream EE 7
Intermittent Stream RY
Ir
-`
6 7 8 — I( f� ✓% {
IN
i.
§ _ F
DP2
7
�'' I DP3 �\
Wetland RD z 1
Perennial Stream AA4
+/- 1373 LF
Intermittent Stream AA _ J,
328 LF)y
o �'A
i Perennial Stream
fr Beaverdam Creek .
(+/- 31 LF)� '
\�
0 250- 500 ft
10
- _'-
Map created using Free and Open Source QGIS Version 3.4.4 Madeira
ti
Acres: WESTEROW PHASE 1 Drawn by: Reviewed bv:
FIGURE NO. +/- 126 PJK/JAL
Mecklenburg County, NC Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
1 Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
Date: APPROXIMATE WETLAND MAP Prepared Crescent River District LLC
08110121 For: 227 wTrade St leo ° For study purposes only West ra+904-2277
Subject to USACE/NCDEQ verification Charlotte, NC 28202

HARBOR HOUSE
-South,Point zs
i
Charlotte/Douglas
International
`t Airport
Berryhill 00
SITE 'L
i
0 Mirn000k
lJ
W
a
7
3
DRIERS FORK
S 2}2- '.1 = =__ F v_ a. 4 2D21 TomTom
VICINITY MAP
LOCATION
Lat: 35.19173 °N, Long:-80.98445 °w
HUC: 03050101 (Upper Catawba)
Approximate Site
Location
(+/-) 126 acres
0
1000 feet 2M m
Source: httPs://www.bing.com/maps/ @2021 Tomram,@apenstreetMap
Acres: WESTEROW PHASE 1 Drawn By: Reviewed By:
FIGURE (+/-) 126 Mecklenburg County, NC PJK/JAL
2 VICINITY MAP Prepared for:
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
OS/10/21 Crescent River District LLC
Approximate Location, For Study Purposes Only 227 West Trade St 09G4-2277
Subject to USACE, NCDEQ and CMSS verification Charlotte, NC 28202

2021 Aerial Map
�''
• M �
t fir.
Y.
•1
'
Project Boundary
Study Limits
•� ;
(+/-) 126 acres
_
4
'
a
L .
_ 1
d I .
'
r
N.
e1 300
600 900 1,200
.`
LOCATION
4 0.0450.0H
0.1 hAile -
Lat: 35.19173
°N, Long: -80.98445 °W
HUC: 03050101 (Upper Catawba
Acres:
WESTROW PHASE 1 Drawn By: Reviewed By:
FIGURE
(+/-) 126
Mecklenburg County, NC PJK/JAL
Wetlands and Environmental Nanning Grot
3
2021 Aerial Map — Approximate Location Prepared for:
OS/10/21 Crescent River District LLC
Leonard S. Rindoer, PLLC.
For Study Purposes Only 227 West Trade St
F 904-2277
Subject to USACE and NCDEQ verification Charlotte, NC 28202

USGS A' - Charlotte West, NC • ,• ••
c ,�$1V—
sso
- r Project Boundary r = s
oil
Study Limits l�f lie 700
L�
(+/-) 126 acres -` Dn •� -- ' y 1,
I V
�
0 -
6
5.
��
o -
�50 r,
LOCATION
' Lat: 35.19173 2N L80.98445 2W
` Feel ,on g: -
0 300 600 BCD 1.200 A r HUC: 03050101 (Upper Catawba)
Acres: WESTROW PHASE 1 Drawn By: Reviewed By:
FIGURE (+/-) 126 Mecklenburg County, NC PJK/JAL
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
4 USGS Map — Charlotte West, NC Quad. (1993) Prepared for:
OS/10/21 Crescent River District LLC - _
Approximate Location, For Study Purposes Only 227 West Trade St9G4-2277
Subject to USACE and NCDEQ verification Charlotte, NC 28202

NRCS ARCHIVED SOIL MAP — MECKLENBURG COUNTY
v
PaF MeB CeR2 P
k
Cea i(8 Lo
PaF
r Project Boundary
Study Limits
a B (+/-) 126 acres
PaE ��-
r HeB '
)aE U.J PaF a
PaF CeD 2, C
La
Daly a
PaF Ceg
PaE
PaF - F
eB WkF
aCeD?
2 Pal- PaF
Feet N
n 300 600 900 1,200 A
LOCATION United States Department of Agriculture, Natural
Lat: 35.19173 2N, Long:-80.9844S 2W Resources Conservation Service. 1980.
HUC: 03050101 (Upper Catawba) Soil survey Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. Sheet 6
Jr
tb
Acres: WESTROW PHASE 1 Drawn By: Reviewed By:
FIGURE (+/) 126 Mecklenburg County, NC PJK/JALWetlands ard Enviro"mental Na.
5 NRCS PUBLISHED SOILS MAP Prepared for:
OS/10/21 Crescent River District LLC _
(Mecklenburg County, NC. Sheet 6) 227 west Trade St9G4-2277
Subject to USACE and NCDEQ verification Charlotte, NC 28202

WEB SOIL SURVEY
S
s?
ail M h nit �= lip -tthis - ale.
35- 11' 1" N 35° 11' 1" N
500203 50040D 50060D 50000D 5010DO 501200 5014CO 501600
3 3
Map Scale: 1:50,5W a printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet
� Mears
N Q 150 X0 60D 900
i Feet
A
Q 600 1000 2000 3000
Map projection: Web Mercator Comer coordinates: WCLS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84
usDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 8/13/2021
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 2
Acres: WESTROW PHASE 1 Drawn by: Reviewed by:
FIGURE +/- 126 Mecklenburg County, NC PJK
6a Date: NRCS SOILS MAP (Web Soil Survey) Prepared for:
htt s Crescent River District LLC _
08113121 P.-Ilwebsoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/WebSoilSurvey.ospx 227 West Trade St
Subject to USACE/NCDEQ verification Charlotte, NC 28202

WEB SOIL SURVEY
Hydric Rating by Map Unit
0
u
o o
Project Boundary
Study Limits
LrC1' D D
0
Z�
o
p
i
0
Soils
o
Soil Rating Polygons
Q Hydric (100%)
0 Hydric (fib to 99%)
0 Hydric (33 to 65%)
Hydric (1 to 32%)
Not Hydric (l
❑ Not rated or not available
Acres:
WESTROW PHASE 1
Drawn by: Reviewed by:
FIGURE
+/- 126
Mecklenburg County, NC
PJK
6 b
Prepared for:
Date:
NRCS SOILS MAP — HYDRIC RATING
08113121
Web Soil Survey
Crescent River District LLC
227 West Trade St
Subject to USACE/NCDEQ verification
Charlotte, NC 28202
Map unit symbol
Map unit name
Rating
CeB2
Cecil sandy clay loam, 2
0
to B percent slopes,
moderately eroded
Cecil sandy clay loam, 8
0
CeD2
to 15 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
Dal
Davidson sandy clay
0
loam, 2 to B percent
slopes
DaD
Davidson sandy clay
0
loam, 8 to 15 percent
slopes
paE
Davidson sandy clay
0
loam, 15 to 25 percent
slopes
HeB
Helena sandy loam, 2 to
7
6 percent slopes
MeB
Mecklenburg fine sandy
0
loam, 2 to 8 percent
slopes
MO
Monacan loam, 0 to 2
5
percent slopes,
frequently ttooded
PaE
Pacolet sandy loam, i 5
0
to 25 percent slopes
Pal'
Pacolet sandy loam, 25
0
to 45 percent slopes
VaD
Vance sandy loam, 8 to
0
15 percent slopes
WkB
Wilkes loam, 4 to 8
0
percent slopes
WkD
Wickes loam, 8 to 15
0
percent slopes
WkE
Wilkes loam, 15 to 25
0
percent slopes
WkF
Wilkes loam, 25 to 45
0
percent slopes

U.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceNational Wetlands Inventory
,y
101
1:15,432�
0.125 025 0.5 mi
0
10 0.2 0.4 0.8 km
LOCATION
Lat: 35.19173 °N
Wetlands Long:-80.98445 2W
HUC: 03050101 (Upper Catawba)
Dixie !
Berryl l l 'f? `-
Project BoundaryF;, -
Study Limits '
I
00
(+/-) 126 acres
I
August 12, 2021
Wetlands Freshwater Emergent Wetland Lake
Estuarine and Marine Deepwater . Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland Other
Estuarine and Marine Wetland Freshwater Pond Riverine
Beaverdam Creak
b
if
C
r°
C U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National S
O Wetlands team gov
J
�
ID
�
¢
v
+
s�U
z
>vy
�30
N N
Q
'fl
N
3
a
a
a
v
a
a
Q
� o
0
� a
0 z T
Z
j N OL
Z a) LLJ
= O or, Ov
O O
H a U Q a
Z Q a
Q
J = -0 Q
LN N a) ++
W U N
U �
L
a ILL
v
Z -�
O �
Q
Z
This map is for general reference only. The US Fish and Wildlife
Service is not responsible for the accuracy or currentness of the
base data shown on this map. All wetlands related data should
be used in accordance with the layer metadata found on the
Wetlands Mapper web site.
FIGURE
7
National Wetlands Inventory (Ni
This page was produced by the NWI mapper
08/13/21

TAX PARCEL MAP
Project Boundary
Study Limits
126 ac total)
r
-w
PARCEL #: 11328143
CRESCENT RIVER DISTRICT LLC
_ 227 W TRADE ST STE 1000
ti CHARLOTTE, NC 28202-1664
lie
• r l
1 1
1 r
rr
4
I 1
r1
PARCEL #: 11328148
l
CRESCENT COMMUNITIES II LLC
227 W TRADE ST STE 1000
l ti
CHARLOTTE, NC 28202-1664
1 �
1 1
r r
� x
MeckleI nburg
i
}
Date Printed: 8/13/2021 9:57:45AM
PARCEL#: 11320101
CRESCENT RIVER DISTRICT LLC
227 W TRADE ST STE 1000
CHARLOTTE, NC 28202-1664
r✓r � - �
f I �-
PARCEL #: 14114201
CRESCENT RIVER DISTRICT LLC
227 W TRADE ST STE 1000
CHARLOTTE, NC 28202-1664
a
—IL PARCEL #: 14128103
CRESCENT RIVER DISTRICT LLC
l r 227 W TRADE ST STE 1000 6s
r CHARLOTTE, NC 28202-1664
F ` r •• I`t
-
"L
If p
LOCATION
Lat: 35.19173 °N, Long:-80.98445 °W
0 0.0450.09 0,.18�1E� Source: https://poiaris3g.mecklenburgcountync.gov HUC: 03050101 (Upper Catawba)
Acres: WESTROW PHASE 1 Drawn By: Reviewed By:
FIGURE +/- 126 Mecklenburg County, INC PJK/JAL
Wetlands and Enviro"mental Fianning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLILC.
8 Date: TAX PARCEL MAP Prepared for:
Crescent River District LLC len.rindnerou wer_
08113121 Approximate Location - For Study Purposes Only 227 West Trade St , . •, .
-2277
Subject to USACE/NCDEQ verification Charlotte, NC 28202

d�.
low
MINK wpm --
nil
.. 4F
41�
ytAM VAN
-10 •� - `1' � � '.ter �. 7 .'@`k'�^ �'�Y r - -
.3�
P _
'L it

PHOTO 2a: View downslope from the origin of Intermittent Stream AA, facing downslope.
DATE/TIME: 2021:04:21— 10:36:00, COORDINATES: 35.19114,-80.98812
PHOTO 3: View of Wetland RD, facing upslope.
DATE/TIME: 2021:04:21— 11:20:00, COORDINATES: 35.19317,-80.99171
WEPG-
Wettands and Environmental Planning Group
Westrow Phase 1; Mecklenburg County, NC
Representative Landscape Photographs
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

n.
%r

PHOTO 5a: View of Intermittent Stream RY, facing upslope to the origin/headcut.
DATE/TIME: 2021:04:22 — 11:45:00, COORDINATES: 35.19436,-80.99042
PHOTO 6: View of Intermittent Stream RX, facing downslope.
DATE/TIME: 2021:04:21— 12:03:00, COORDINATES: 35.19437,-80.99077
Westrow Phase 1; Mecklenburg County, NC
Representative Landscape Photographs
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC,

PHOTO 6a: View of Intermittent Stream RX, facing upslope to origin/headcut.
DATE/TIME: 2021:04:21— 12:03:00, COORDINATES: 35.19437,-80.99077
PHOTO 7: View of non -aquatic feature (gully or Swale), facing upslope.
DATE/TIME: 2021:04:21— 12:05:00, COORDINATES: 35.19460,-80.99053
Westrow Phase 1; Mecklenburg County, NC
Representative Landscape Photographs
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC,

PHOTO 8: View of Perennial Stream EE, facing upslope.
DATE/TIME: 2021:04:21— 12:07:00, COORDINATES: 35.19473,-80.98926
PHOTO 9: View of non -aquatic feature (gully or Swale), facing upslope.
DATE/TIME: 2020:05:04— 03:20:00, COORDINATES: 35.19883,-80.98907
Y.E P
Wettands and Environmental Planning Group
Westrow Phase 1; Mecklenburg County, NC
Representative Landscape Photographs
Leonard 5. Rindner, PLLC.

PHOTO 10: View of Perennial Stream Beaverdam Creek, facing upslope.
DATE/TIME: 2020:04:03 — 03:22:00, COORDINATES: 35.18610,-80.98372
WE PG
Wettands and Environmental Planning Group
Westrow Phase 1; Mecklenburg County, NC
Representative Landscape Photographs
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.,
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Westrow Phase 1
Applicant/Owner:
Crescent River District LLC
City/County: Charlotte/Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 04/21/21
State: NC Sampling Point: DP1:wtidRD
Investigator(s): WEPG Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.19317 Long:-80.99171 Datum: NAD84
Soil Map Unit Name: MO: Monacan Loam NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Data Point #1 (DP1) is representative of Wetland RD. Conditions were "Normal' compared to the 30 year normal range. (Antecendent Precipitation
Tool for this location on 04/21 /21)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
X Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (C1)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (61) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (62) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (613)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP1:WtIdRD
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 20 )
% Cover Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
55 Yes
FAC
Number of Dominant Species
2. Ulmus americana
20 Yes
FACW
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
3. Fagus grandifolia
10 No
FACU
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 60.0% (A/B)
85 =Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50% of total cover:
43 20% of total cover:
17
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
1. Fagus grandifolia
25 Yes
FACU
FACW species 20 x 2 = 40
2.
FAC species 70 x 3 = 210
3.
FACU species 55 x 4 = 220
4.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
5.
Column Totals: 145 (A) 470 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.24
25 =Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover:
13 20% of total cover:
5
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
15 Yes
FAC
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
2. Elaeagnus angustifolia
15 Yes
FACU
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
3. Fagus grandifolia
5 No
FACU
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
4.
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
5.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
35 =Total Cover
50% of total cover:
18 20% of total cover:
7
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2.
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
4
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
5.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
g
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7•
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
8.
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
g
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
10.
3 ft (1 m) in height.
11.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 20
)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5'
Hydrophytic
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
The plot size of the Tree and Woody Vine strata
were limited to 20' due to the width
of the wetland. Wetland understory was sparsely vegetated.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP1:WtIdRD
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Type Loc
Texture Remarks
0-4
7.5YR 3/2
100
Loamy/Clayey
4-10
7.5YR 5/1
80
7.5YR 4/6 20 C M
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
10-20
7.5YR 5/1
60
7.5YR 4/6 40 C PL/M
Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
—Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
X Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
—Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
—Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
—Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
—Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
—Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
—Stripped Matrix (S6)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers OMB Control #: 0710-xxxx, Exp: Pending
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Requirement Control Symbol EXEMPT.,
See ERDC/EL TR-07-24; the proponent agency is CECW-CO-R (Authority: AR 335-15, paragraph 5-2a)
Project/Site: Westrow Phase 1 City/County: Charlotte/Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 04/21/21
Applicant/Owner: Crescent River District LLC State: NC Sampling Point: DP2: Upld
Investigator(s): WEPG Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.): hillside Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0-3
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P, MLRA 136 Lat: 35.19327 Long:-80.99163 Datum: NAD84
Soil Map Unit Name: WkF: Wilkes Loam NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Data Point #2 (DP2) was taken approximately 30' north and east of Wetland RD (DP1). Conditions were "Normal" compared to the 30 year normal
range. (Antecendent Precipitation Tool for this location on 04/21/21)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
—Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) _True
Aquatic Plants (1314)
—Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) —Hydrogen
Sulfide Odor (C1)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_Saturation (A3) _Oxidized
Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_Moss Trim Lines (B16)
—Water Marks (61) —Presence
of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_Sediment Deposits (132) _Recent
Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_Drift Deposits (133) _Thin
Muck Surface (C7)
_Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
—Algal Mat or Crust (134) —Other
(Explain in Remarks)
—Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
—Shallow Aquitard (D3)
—Water-Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (613)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP2: Upld
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
1. Fagus grandifolia
55
Yes
FACU
Number of Dominant Species
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
25
Yes
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
3.
Total Number of Dominant
4.
Species Across All Strata: 9 (B)
5.
Percent of Dominant Species
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 22.2% (A/B)
80
=Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
50% of total cover:
40 20% of total cover:
16
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
1. Fagus grandifolia
45
Yes
FACU
FACW species 0 x 2 = 0
2. Acer saccharum
20
Yes
FACU
FAC species 30 x 3 = 90
3.
FACU species 215 x 4 = 860
4.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
5.
Column Totals: 245 (A) 950 (B)
6.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.88
65
=Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover:
33 20% of total cover:
13
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1. Elaeagnus angustifolia
45
Yes
FACU
3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
2. Acer saccharum
15
Yes
FACU
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
3
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
4.
-Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
5.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
60 =Total Cover
50% of total cover:
30 20% of total cover:
12
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1. Lonicera japonica
20
Yes
FACU
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2. Elaeagnus angustifolia
15
Yes
FACU
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
4
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
5.
Shrub - Woody Plants, excluding woody vines,
g
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7•
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
8.
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
g
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately
10.
3 ft (1 m) in height.
11.
Woody Vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
35 =Total Cover
50% of total cover:
18 20% of total cover:
7
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30
)
1. Bignonia capreolata
5
Yes
FAC
2.
3.
4.
5'
Hydrophytic
5
=Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
3 20% of total cover:
1
Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Relatively sparse understory.
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP2: Upld
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches)
Color (moist)
%
Color (moist) % Type Loc
Texture Remarks
0-6
7.5YR 3/2
100
Loamy/Clayey
6-12
7.5YR 4/6
80
7.5YR 5/2 20 D PL
Loamy/Clayey
12-20
7.5YR 4/6
60
7.5YR 5/2 40 D M
Loamy/Clayey
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_Histic Epipedon (A2)
_Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_Coast Prairie Redox (All6)
_ Black Histic (A3)
—Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
—Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
—Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
—Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
—Red Parent Material (F21)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_Sandy
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Dark Surface (S7)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks
ENG FORM 6116-4-SG, JUL 2018 Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

STREAM REACH EVALUATION FORM
Date: 04/21/21 1 Evaluator: I WEPG
Proiect: Westrow Phase 1: (DP3) Intermittent Stream AA
Data Point: DP3
Name: Int. Strm. AA
Easting:-80.98839
Northina: 35.19129
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if > 19 or perennial if > 30* 29
(riaht-click the purple number and left -click Update Field to summarize points) - A
A. Geomorphology
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
2
3. In -channel structure: riffle- / step- pool se uence
0
1
2
3
2
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
2
5. Active/relic flood lain
0
1
2
3
1
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
1
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
1
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
2
9. Grade controls
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
Geomorphology Subtotal
a Man-made ditches are not rated: see discussion in NCDWQ Manual
B. Hvdroloav
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
1
13. Iron Oxidizing Bacteria
0
1
2
3
0
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
1
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles Wrack lines
0
0.5
1
1.5
.5
17. Soil -based Evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
3
Hydrology Subtotal
6
C. Bioloav
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
2
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
1
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW= 0.75, OBL= 1.5, Other= 0
0
Biology Subtotal
* Derennial streams may also be identified usina other methods. See Daae 35 of NCDWQ manual.
Notes:
Sand, gravel, cobble
Adapted from NCDWQ: Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and their
Origins.
(version 4.11)

STREAM REACH EVALUATION FORM
Data Point: DP4
Name: Per. Strm. EE
Date:
04/21/21 1 Evaluator: I WEPG
Eastin :
- 80.99117 W
Project:
I Westrow Phase 1: DP4 Perennial Stream EE
Northing:
35.19409 N
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent if > 19 or perennial if > 30*
37.0
(right -click the purple number and left -click Update Field to summarize points
A. Geomorphology
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
la. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
2
3. In -channel structure: riffle- / step- pooll se uence
0
1
2
3
2
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
3
5. Active/relic flood lain
0
1
2
3
2
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
2
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
1
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
0
9. Grade controls
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
3
Geomorphology Subtotal
a Man-made ditches are not rated: see discussion in NCDWQ Manual
B. Hydrology
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
2
13. Iron Oxidizing Bacteria
0
1
2
3
0
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
1
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
16. Organic debris lines or piles Wrack lines
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
17. Soil -based Evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
3
Hydrology Subtotal
7
C. Biology
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
2
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20. Macrobenthos note diversity and abundance
0
1
2
3
2
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW=
0.75, OBL= 1.5, Other= 0
0
Biology Subtotal
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See page 35 of NCDWQ manual.
Notes:
Perennial stream with fish observed in pools.
Adapted from NCDWQ: Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and their
(version 4.11)
Origins.

N
X
LU
N
C6
■7
Plans/Exhibits

w
cA
r
MATCHLINE: THIS SHEET-
1��///ram
)�/�.^�..�T��
—-�
Z \`—
r
PROJECT AREA /fl/lJII1�� ll1`� T\LJ \\ 1 11 II11
BOUNDARY
�fy ��
INTERMITTENT 7- ��iJj'
PROJECT AREA r
BOUNDARY
i
V -
(mn(l(�t�
-� ,INTERMITTENT
STREAM RY
Lu
v iklC� LENGTH = 11± LF > --7_ 1{II!)I (I ��(1 j �// ! �> � �) 1{ fir t /�� — Q �
M
r/l a fl%; rc1<< z >_
o2L
LLj
It
�/1��r90 ) �`� �1--z
ac 0
Lu
\\ / ) l - - — - -- �/ /lf / 1 rJ. Ili / cry cn
���ir� ��� �4'PERENNIAL � \\ �T� ��/ n��� -- � ' �� / i f�(1 -.1 "' i Lu
T�
0
y��((6
`` 1�1�ti1ti1,) ti
I�jr�ll�,lf1�l�(/rC ��Z AM RX
LENGTH E36±LF
PNNIALII
STREAM EET
LENGTH = 1365± LF
WETLAND
1
WETN D RDA�
AREA: 703± SF
(0.016 AC)
.
STREAM AA4 VA iT
�1� LENGTH = 1373± LF \ �� j/r✓� C t r` 1 ` L \ �l/f T 1t ���
STING PROPERTY LINES
0 \1,��� �SS(� ��l �J��Jr ( L �\ INTERMITTENT — \� 1�~ �t \� �� `� // / Z r1
STREAM AA \\�� 4 �T�� �� Z
�!( \ Sri �t ==� \\` 1\\�\� i�// \ c�
r o� �r 1 /
� K 3 � o?l. 1r�, r� LENGTH = 328± LF � Y o
15y 14 s S cs ti ill \�? {. , . �- +-ti
;\�\` \` MATCHLINE: FOR CONTINUATION REFER TO SHEET
1 "= 400' o
0 200' 400' 800' a 6
¢ w
9M
`em9
V)
z
0
0
z
0
(i
z
X
w

WPM
..> �
\�111 i�l� 1��� =\\\t L\ `\�`� \\ �/ ~ j < \� /�� /�✓��r ��J ) I 1 I /ill/� \ _ Aa
.r �, J-("1, ��`�! I \ �.� C ✓
$ o1J J //C �\ \\� l 5 A C LWE: F O TINUQTI N EF I �T
rC r D1 r
7 I a� 5 1 L 1!
�P_OECLAREABOUNDARYo�
If
S,.-V 9 �. ra ��\ �i � f � /� �,��+```' �.'�..�,�---._,.^ � �� � >�) '�)�` \\ w �/r� ✓j J r•� }�`� J�` �l 111J1J � lll� �'�
r,- J ��—� \l\\\\ �'ti- / / / / � � �� r \ `` �� �(jf��1/ ► '��''�'�'�1 i $ t I � f '-• � 1 r> p'1� // � �/� _
I(�r�
Jet
�I )vow �� �-' Jl�( '' ,." r�--� /e/ Y .�- -• �� 1 � \4 I(j({{��,1 11\ � it/� f � � �h� ��i 11l � \``\\\ `��
r
\ts!rr���ll\1(�`�-,\\�`\11`2 (}jl`l` 1 EXISTING Q
\\�� r I
/ ) I f PROPERTY LIN
\` j / illy �
�� /�J / ��/ t/1 1 -� �, � ^vi.� ��� j 1 rS � f � � l�, ► °�till1\�-J f�ti �
\�%
/%//// 1 / / (� -- ' / `� I 4 }l �} i �l It « '� �� �!�� �>✓ /'�/I/ �,� — 06
XISTIt PRI E5 Y LINE /i }� \\ ll 4 \ \ P�F ENNIAL STR � A ✓_� / i
�� 1 1 1 �. t /, III �. Q�
7 4 t t� I �� �� VA_'� BEAVERDAM CREEK ( �iI ((Irr \ �W U Z
`�\\`\�� ���� �S�� ✓ram J�r�1��� 4ti�1y1 INTERMITTENT II �it, 1 �J'l>1G H=1t (�( II� �JJ>>> _ — _o
` \ [ g /{� \
vv �ivv�v) �i �✓ �1 ���/r , A ��� } STREAM CC��
CL O w o
WETLAND-D-
I� J��� > Z Z
(� J�\� \vl\ 417�AREA=18+/-SF`{> -»- / �f III%/ i O
! f
)�1 t�7l\ z � (0.0004AC)
z z
EXISTING 24"0 BEAVERDAM � w Q w
CREEK TRUNK SEWER AND / I X
J/Jf / �` ti\ )f 1))✓/��� EASEMENT U U w
,,�/!s '' r �f , / \�� 1I1� ��//O ���\\ )�1) Jjl ���-`� y�v •`V���Ij /)1 %r���r � /1l �� \1,� � i�� \�� V'.�.w \\ � �,/�
EXISTING CLT
L\��ASEMENT I 1�
\ ° WATER SEWER )
ACCESS Em
��
�— z
Z
o
Y O
U O
N
H N C0 M
O
1 "= 400' o o —
LL
�O
00 200' 400' 800,
0 w a wfd
¢ w

PROJECT AREA-
BOUNDARY i
PlMn, t
STREAM
LENGTH = 36±
NOIMPA
PERENNIAL,
STREAM EE
LENGTH = 1365± LF
PUMP STATION
ACCESS�ROAD„
-
��� � -STATION SAND /
�!- WETLAND RD,
1�AREA = 703± SF
(0.016 AC)_
/i1� ' • // NO IMPACT
MATCHLINE: THIS SHEET_
PROPOSED SEWER CROSSING #1 PROJECT AREA
� BOUNDARY
-PERENNIAL STREAM EE �r^�
TEMPORARY IMPACT = 32 LF (0.0052 AC)
POSED
PRESOERVE
RESIDENTIAL INTERMITTENT
E P K / STREAM RY LENGTH = 11± LFodd
ENO IMPACT pRESERVEEAST
Irfjp \if�V1—�ii/rrf
/ f PROPOSED CULVERT 1,j ! I` RESIDENTIAL
ff % PERENNIAL STREAM EE
e / TEMPORARY IMPACT = 200 LF (0.0318 AC)
i 5PERMANENT IMPACT = 193 LF (0.0345 AC)
f
MATCHLINE: THIS SHEETi//
PROJECT AREA BOUNDARY
(-
WET
POND#
ti
RESIDENTIAL
p�Illll�l
�� �PERENNIAL
STREAM AA4
jv1, LENGTH = 1373± LF
,r 1
/ k NO IMPACT
_h � j INTERMITTENT STREAM AA>�
LENGTH = 328± LF.
NOIM_PACT
9M
Iw ,>.
. �i► /�.
I ,,
I .
Igo czt_
row
I `inJ Is„ r
I 1�■ I'
r ��•�'
�a ��/
��(,
v.110GWtiI nos
rp �I■M
>La I
.. •. •
.1'9�[
`mini `A�IAIr,! 1� •
�� ��� al
•! •
ra•��,jA-rppl� r:5tl �!/'
f/I
Wwo
nJii • �'n • *'r \_s �l /
Lr • • U riia T % \�I ��{ T I",� � �� ��'
�
ir.enr.li
fir.—w A a r r [. / / �/'! !
Mimic
Anal
i' ,
�' i;i ' ' ;� '►
'
•'•:-
0
.•. .
km
1 11 11 :11
rn

r
WET _POND #1
1
o�
RIVER DISTRICT DRIVE �%
ll / 1y
j MATCHLINE: FOR CONTINUATION REFER TO SHEET 3-- J�
i f
�o
3:
ti
.1
..- I�j)I
Al (t�tf �` �(�'�� f ) r✓�� ALL �, ,7 5�/rs)),,11i
PROPOSED SEWERi�
CROSSING #2 i !
BEAVERDAM CREEK
\`C�
TEMPORARY IMPACT = 31 LF •��
EXISTING PROPERTY LINE f �( } ��({ {��\ t ���� ���Sri, " )��
PERENNIAL
STREAM �?
BEAVERDAM CREEK
/� r r�j�✓ ll�ll�(I J``�\?� �j�•�{!\ l��`///Ill/�J
/// PROJECT AREA BOUNDARY
z �PROPOSED
i30' CHARLOTTE
J WATER SANITARY
SEWER EASEMENT
'EXISTINGZ{ti
PROPERTY LINE
ltl� INTERMITTENTSTREAM
NO IMPACT
WETLAND-D T
a AREA = 18+/- SF /
NO IMPACT
�g9
a
EXISTING 24"0
BEAVERDAM CREEK 1/� IIIII J
J � �('\ �� �`TRUNK SEWER AND
�1I
EXISTING CLT
SEWER ) �
' Y
H
1 "=400' o
0 200' 400' 800,
¢ w
U
Q J
Z J
J
OU
0r
Lu U
cn =
d0LLu —J
Z % CL
LLj
O I H
� ~ W
wQw Lu
>
= 0Y
UU O
0
0
C, N C0 M
�
L
0
o LL
hi d z o
0
o in a Ln

/• II � r/r/ �1 � r ��\ 6o y �/ / _
/ I 1
J / PROP. FORCEMAIN
/ (TYP.)
/ PUMP STATION\
ACCESS ROAD,
L
- PROP. OPEN CUT SEWER INSTALLATION fn
TO IMPACT PERENNIAL TRIBUTARY EE\ PROP.
TEMPORARY IMPACT = 32 LF (0.0052 AC)� HEADWALLS
STREAM AND BANKS TO BE RESTORED (TYP.)
J AFTER SEWER INSTALLATION
-
1 / PROP
/ 30' SANITARY SEW"=Rl 610 SSMH-112 /
/ EASEMENT (TYP.)_
PROP. SANITARY
SEWER (TYP.)'
PROP. PUMP AROUND-
DISCHARGE LOCATION/ _
/ %PERENNIAL 0 PROP SSMH-1
TRIBUTARY EE "/�-
// PROP PROP SSMH-2 \
6SMH-3
or
JCVVCR MULIC00 I[VV 1 C AIVU
EASEMENT (NOT PAVED)
PROP. WATERMAIN
(TYP.) ' I I / L - PROJECT
PROP. STORM / / i i l ` - - -BOUNDARY (TYP.)
l DRAINAGE (TYP.)i
PROP. FORCEMAIN-
(TYP.)
_ STREAM TOP OF
em9
BANK=
1
PROPOSED TEMPORARY
COFFER DAM (OR
APPROVED EQUAL)
PROPOSED /
,TEMPORARY STREAM // w
- PUMP AROUND
PROP. ROAD 96" 0 CULVERT (BURIED 1') �
032 TO IMPACT PERENNIAL TRIBUTARY EE / U U
62o TEMPORARY IMPACT = 200 LF (0.0318 AC) Z J CL
s PERMANENT IMPACT = 193 LF (0.0345 AC) J -
�O j b I KtAM � 0(-)
w
EX. STREAM % I I - Q � w
\ l CENTERLINE (TYP.) / W U vj >-
o gd0 \ 1010, Q
PROP. FORCEMAIN I Q H
00 6a2 (TYP.) CL p W m_
Z oC
o LLI ~
6yti / O Z Q
I 6y6 /I cn_j0 Z
w
/ > U U CL
J � 652
o �
C
m
Z
Z
Y
0
U
O
0
N I
H
N C2
O
M
Z
1"=100'
o
—
LL
o
U
U
hi m a)
to
0 50' 100' 200' a 0
o rn 6-U)
Ln
¢ w

645
645
�M
640
640
PROP.
G
D OA
C
T R I
E
eM9
za9
a ��
635
635
PROP.
ll;tz
630
W
TER
I
630
15" R P
625
CI-
625
I
z
O
PRO62O FORCEP
A2LU
620
u
N
U u
615
615
z
JO U w
Q � J
610
610
Q o w
zLU
> w
>CL
L Q
605
605
O 0
O
D
U 0
600
CENT
LIN
600
WQLLJ w
U U 3
595
595
m
PROP.
96"
R
P C
L
R
B
E
z
Y
0
590
590
U
�
CN
N o M
0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50
2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 4+50
1 "= 8'VERTICAL
1"=80' HORIZONTAL
z
°
o —
o LL
2
60
0 4' 8'
16' 0 40' 80' 160'
¢ w
�' a �' `D

640
635
630
625
620
615
610
605
600
595
590
85
640
635
630
625
620
615
610
605
600
595
W
590 1"=8' VERTICAL Z
0 4' 8' 16'EL v
585 1"=80' HORIZONTAL Z
¢
0 40' 80' 160' a v
¢ w
�M
�M
�a
`qQ
zm�{
�gI
C NTE
INE
TR
A
LU
LL
O
CL
Q J
zJ
� v w
— Q J
N U U) U
=
> LU it]
z >
w� Q
0 I__z O
U
N 0� c N
Q LLJ LLI
U U
PRO
. 1
" FOPqEV
IN—
X
O
. 15"
C
PROP.
HEADWALL
YOTFIERS
i
BY OTHERS
A WA L
187.82
96" RCP
100 YEAR
STORM:
598.13
CULVERT
1.06%
LF
OF
@
O Y A S OR : 5
s EA
7.8
594.
DOWNSTREAM—LJJ
NV' 93•
oY
A SrR:5
7.0
2 Y
AR ST
R
: 596.5
ri=gi\10
_-
o0
N r�
—
o
o U LL
° tO
5
RO
I L
MATMIALz
1' O
AP
ROVE
5 5 00
P OP. 8" SA
I I I
1+50 2+00
EX.
I
2+50
GRADE
IT
17
CENTERLINE
S
I
@ STREAM
WE
3+00
0+00 0+50
1+00
I
3+50

625
620
615
610
605
600
595
590
585
5
625
620
615
610
605
600
595
590
585
w
W
m
z
580 °
z
Y
U
H
z
°
¢
U
¢ w
z�
�M
�M
�a
0
goo
`em9
�gI
0
U
N
N
O
Q J U
O U_
N U C/) U
Q Lu
CL o w z
Lu
> z> >
i LLl Q
� w O
H
>W Q co w
SSMH-1
RIM: 606.39
8" INV. IN: 597.45 (SSMH-2)
8" INV. OUT: 587.24 (SSMH-112)
SSMH-112
RIM: 598.98
8" INV. IN: 585.93 (SSMH-1)
8" INV. IN: 585.93 (SSMH-113)
10" INV. OUT: 585.76 (SSMH-111)
EXI TIN RA EZ
S W R CENT LI
OF
N
I
SEEP
L A
11
1
9 .3
A
I- E
P
C
L
R
S
=1+3.7
E
PC
R
JA
2 4.
1
0
O
0
N
N C0 M
O
o LL
�O
�' a �'
_
#1t3l.64
LF OF 8" PVC Pipe @ 1.00%
0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00
1"=8' VERTICAL 1"=80'
2+50
HORIZONTAL
80'
3+00
3+50
160'
0 4' 8' 16' 0 40'

SSMH-202 /
INTERMITTENT STREAM C V�\\ co' /
N IMPACT
\ v
l //
\ POSTI COtJSTRUCTIOIN
1 N B�FFER
/ WETLAND D
` 50' WETLAN
I BUFFER
61 SELTING STREAMXISTING
7 j I OP OF BANK
� � PROP �� TY LINE
616 J v / f
EXI TING SEWER
\ , ,EASEMENT /
\ PROP. 30' SANITARY
J SEWER EASEMENT
(TYP.)
605 POST CONSTRUCTION
/ ` \ BUFFER
]�,
SWIM BUFFER BEA/AM
/ CREEK EXISTING
STREAM
CENTERLINE (TYP.)
'ROP
3SMH-201
PROPOSED
COFFER DAM AND EXISTING/�,
BYPASS PUMP
ARO-UND SYSTEM/ CHARLOTTES
/ 6p2 WATER SEWER
BEAVERDAM CREEK ACCESS
z�
9M
/ 31 LF (0.0071 AC) OF / EASEMENT U w
TEMPORARY IMPACT FOR. / Q
OPEN CUT OF SE ER / � � J J U
Gy PROPOSED / U Q
�p _ANTI -SEEP / — Q IL
COLLARS (TYP) W U F —
/ w
_z � U
H Z Q
F-- -iU w
EXIST / W Q co Q
SSMH-201 I \ _ m
/ EXISTING 14" /
TRUNK SEWE13
z
CD
z
Y 0
U O
0
N n
H N C0 M
O
1"=50' o
;t i� LL
6O
0 25' 50' 100' Q:ia¢ o U) a U) CN
¢ w

620
615
610
605
.mm
595
590
585
RIM: 603.00
12" INV. IN: 592.99 (SSMH-202)
12" INV. OUT: 592.79 (EXIST SSMH-14
N
R
117.72 LF OF 12" PVC Pipe @ 1
SSMH-14
RIM: 603.85
24" INV. IN: 589.39 (SSMH-15)
24" INV. OUT: 589.39 (SSMH-13)
0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 4+50 5+00 5+50
1"=8' VERTICAL 1"=80' HORIZONTAL
0 4' 8' 16' 0 40' 80' 160'
9M
�M
�a
�LLo
620 `em9
_ 1 Mgt
615
610
605
600
Q J
z J
W
J
595
J
�
LL
o
_
U
CL
CL
Lu
V)
Q
—
590
a- o w
z
>z>
> W
(„
Ln
O
585
O o UJ
u
Ln
w
wQw
>=0�
U U
N
580
w
w
m
z
z
C7
z
Y
U
0
o �
M
�
N �
z
0
O_
LL
F
U_
O
U
hi d
O
�O
¢
w

CROSS-SECTION
INSTALLED LIVE STAKE DETAIL
'I'llFIRM
Asa►
o � �
PLAN VIEW
ISEE NOTE a)
REQUIREDBY THECITv-CHARLOTTE TO BE IrvCL E.'.A DE FORTHIS TYPE OF TECHNIQUE.
THS FIGURE IS NOT
TOREPRESEMASTANDARD DESIGN METHOD FOR THIS TYPE OF TECHNIQUE AND SHALL NOT BE USED AS SUCH, 1IF1T TYl
�gfoa CHARLOTTE-MECnENBURG I LIVE STAKING 1 OF2
� STORM WATER SERVICES
j'p GENERIC DETAIL REQUIREMENTS
,L�6'-0"MAX
NOT TO SCALE
CITY "\�J�IMNDI INCLUDES
CHARLOTTE
LAND TEMPORARY STREAM BANK PROTECTION
30.22
NOTES:
1. TEMPORARY STRUCTURAL, TIMBER OR BRIDGE CROSSING
ARE PREFERRED TO MINIMIZE IMPACTS.
2. ALL TEMPORARY CROSSINGS SHALL BE REMOVED WITHIN
60-90 DAYS.
3. MINIMUM PIPE DIAMETER FOR BEAVERDAM CREEK AND
PERENNIAL TRIBUTARY EE CROSSINGS SHALL BE 72" CMP.
4. CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT CROSSING DETAIL TO ENGINEER
FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
5. CONTRACTOR TO FOLLOW CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE AS
SHOWN IN WESTROW PHASE 1 INFRASTRUCTURE EROSION
CONTROL PLANS REGARDING CROSSING OF PERENNIAL
TRIBUTARY EE.
PHOTO: LIVE STAKES INSTALLED OVER EROSION
CONTROL FABRIC
LIVE STAKE DETAIL
MEANT TO DEFINE THE MINIMUM INFORMATION REQUIRED BYTHE CITY OF CHARLOTTE TO BE INCLUDED Iry A DETAIL FORTHIS TYPE OF TECHNIQUE.
THS FGURE iS NOT MEANT TO REPRESENT A STANDARD DESIGN METHOD FOR THIS TYPE OF TECHNIQUE AND SHALL NOT BE USED AS SUCH. NOT TO SCALE
K7iVRM CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG LIVE STAKING 20F2
RACSTORM WATER SERVICES DA
GENERIC DETAIL REQUIREMENTS
SURFACE - DNE-
NOTES:
1. REMOVE THE STRUCTURE WHEN NO
LONGER NEEDED. (NOT TO EXCEED 1
YEAR).
BURFACB adw dvERSIOu 2. AS A MINIMUM, DESCN ME
STRUCTURE TO PASS 2 YEAR PEAK
FLOW WITHOUT OVERTOPPING.
/ 3. ENSURE /THAT FLOW VELOCITY
THAT EOUTLET OFOF THE
HE CROSSING
STRUCTUREREIS
IS E NON NL. FOR THE
NIECE —NIECE —STREAM CHANCXANNL.
<. ADDITIONAL MEASURES MAY BE
REQUIRED BY ME EROSION CONTROL
COORDINATOR OR CITY ENGINEER
BASED ON SITE SPECIFIC CONDINONE.
SHED STONE
k­
'gr.
R. wwew� rt rcen�a
'
.—N..
.'FENWR_ NOTE E „HDM R
• CITY OF CHARLOTTE
LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING
a1 OTEE, INCLUDES CHARLOTTE ETJ 30.14 15
U
Q J
Z —i
J F_:
00
L.L
Lu U
L,^
C)
LL LL
LLJ
Z >
LLI
OOU J
Q
LuQLu F-
= 0� LU
U U Q
D_
LLI
DO
z
z
Ne
a
0
N
M
H
N �
z
o
LL
O
o
H
Q
U
#£ O
a1
U
d
m .o
aD =
Cl.QfLA
<

1 1
PROJECT AREA- /
I ,
BOUNDARY i
%fir PERENNIAL
STREAM RX
LENGTH = 36± LF
NO IMPACT
PEREINI AL. .
STREAM EE
LENGTH = 1365± LF
PUMP STATION
ACCESS ROAD
'fir , t /PUMP
FILTER #4
�E� ( MATCHLINE: THIS SHEET_
PROPOSED SEWER CROSSING #1 PROJECT AREA
BOUNDARY
-PERENNIAL STREAM EE
G -TEMPORARY IMPACT = 32 LF (0.0052 AC) (rjj
PROPOSED ( - tl / , \ �l I 1 //G ✓�/� /J /��/ `/
PRESERVE EAST
RESIDENTIAL PEREN/NIAL ✓ / �/ / % i / \
E P K STREAM RY
LENGTH = 11± LF
Nn IMPACT ��i//%� 1, fr, JIf.L.Il.111 SE
i / / ( 1 PRESERVE EAST
/ f PROPOSED CULVERT 1,j I )` RESIDENTIAL
ff % PERENNIAL STREAM EE T �`� r/
/ TEMPORARY IMPACT = 200 LF (0.0318 AC)
PERMANENT IMPACT = 193 LF (0.0345 AC)
--�it / rWET1',,v�v/I
�')
/ WETLAND RC / � � RESIDENTIAL
�� �EVELOPMENT
?� AREA = 703± SF �w
(0.016 AC)NOIMPACT
,� \\
fVr
//�� % �/� PERENNIAL M
cDMI
j/ ��) } � l) l STREAM
%/�) f fS�% 1 LENGTH = 1373± LF \
NO IMPACT -
INTERMITTENT STREAM AA>.
LENGTH = 328± LF.
NO IMPACT'
i1
9M
now
-r/a �. -`ti ....e<,III 1, wRR\'• 1Ja�.i�l� `�.y.'�Y /
YEA., r:.r�`•r
�L
(, `ice 11'* t �,
fwffi
a!l�1.��
•
�
Wl
CL
•i5n
`�i1� Is -� - • �i 11 ,fit 1 OR /��/
0�$11n -
\�:,, N T
"r,'
kkSs ,�+ • , ;Ely'
CL
Moir
�
/—
_

r
WET _POND #1
1
o�
RIVER DISTRICT DRIVE �%
ll / 1y
j MATCHLINE: FOR CONTINUATION REFER TO SHEET 3-- J�
i f
�o
3:
ti
I A-4 ��
J \\\\\ \l 1�� f i 1 `` PROPOSEDSEWER
\�`� '� `1 n \ CROSSING #2 l\`C
!
��} )i{ %✓ �� J �f��r� `"� i%� BEAVERDAM CREEK�
TEMPORARY IMPACT = 31 LF •��
0.0071 AC)l�
EXISTING PROPERTY LINE
PERENNIAL STREAM(
BEAVERDAM CREEK
�/� r- r�j`�✓ ll�l����l�(I J``�\?� �j�•�{! � �\ l��`///Ill/��J
n
/// PROJECT AREA BOUNDARY
z �PROPOSED
i30' CHARLOTTE
J WATER SANITARY
SEWER EASEMENT
'EXISTINGZ{ti
PROPERTY LINE
INTERMITTENT STREAM
TRIBUTARY-C
NO IMPACT
ill
WETLAND-D T
a AREA = 18+/- SF /
NO IMPACT
�g9
/
EXISTING 24"0 / 1 \ i
BEAVERDAM CREEK 1/� Iit
II J
TRUNKSEWER AND
������
\EASEMENT.
1 l 1(t �� EXISTING CLT
1 ��\ WATER SEWER ) w
ACCESS EASEMENT I / m
/ , Solt/rr l .�� , r �\ \ .
' Y
1 "=400' o
Q
0 200' 400' 800,
a U
¢ w
Q Q
z_ CL
J J cl�
0w ~
Lu U t 3
22E O
d Oz0 Ln
w U
F- z Q
Z
w=� Lu
3 U U CL
0
0
o r M
N �
o LL
o O
hi d a
6 c0i .o t M
pw a U)

N
ca
s
U
L
N
L
U
4-
0
N
ca
U
L
Q�
U
Certificate of
Credit Purchase

fires
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC Stream and Stream Banks
Statement of Availability August 27, 2021
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Bryan Roden -Reynolds
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Center, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Re Project: Westrow Phase 1
This document confirms that the Crescent River District, LLC (Applicant) for the Westrow Phase 1
(Project) has expressed an interest to utilize 386.00 Stream Mitigation Credits from the EBX sponsored
RES Catawba Umbrella Mitigation Bank, specifically 386.00 Stream credits from the Dogtown Site, in
the Catawba HUC 03050101. As the official Bank Sponsor, Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC,
attests to the fact that mitigation is available for reservation at this time.
These mitigation credits are not considered secured, and consequently are eligible to be used for alternate
purposes by the Bank Sponsor, until payment in full is received from the Applicant resulting in the
issuance of a Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate by the bank acknowledging that the Applicant has
fully secured credits from the bank and the Banker has accepted full responsibility for the mitigation
obligation requiring the credits/units.
The Banker will issue the Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate within three (3) days of receipt of the
purchase price. Banker shall provide to Applicant a copy of the Mitigation Credit Transfer Certificate and
a documented copy of the debit of credits from the Bank Official Credit Ledger(s), indicating the permit
number and the resource type secured by the applicant. A copy of the Mitigation Credit Transfer
Certificate, with an updated Official Credit Ledger will also be sent to regulatory agencies showing the
proper documentation.
Please contact me at 919-209-1075 if you have any questions.
Best Regards,
V
Caitlan B. Parker
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
701 E. Bay Street, Suite 306
Charleston, SC 29403

Threatened & Endangered Species ~
Report

WEPG
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species
Evaluation
Westrow Phase 1
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
For:
Land Design
223 N Graham Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
H
Crescent River District, LLC
227 West Trade Street, Suite 1000
Charlotte, NC, 28202
Jeff Levi
Biologist
Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group
Field Evaluated: September 27, 2020 & August 3, 2021
August 9, 2021
Charlotte Office: www.wetlands-epg.com Asheville Office:
I0612-D Providence Rd. 1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
PMB 550 Suite 10, PM 283
Charlotte, NC 28277 Asheville, NC 28805
[phone]
[e-mail]

Westrow Phase 1 —Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation
GENERAL LANDSCAPE DESCRIPTION:
The Westrow Phase 1 site is approximately 126 acres and is located East of
Dixie River Road, south from Sadler Road, and West 1-485 in Charlotte,
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina (Figures 1 & 2). It can be found on the
Charlotte West, NC USGS Topographic Quadrangle Map at a latitude of
35.19173 N and longitude of 80.98445 W (Figure 2). The site consists of pine
dominated mixed forest, pine plantation, alluvial forest and open canopy areas
along Dixie River Road. The topography is relatively low sloped with the
elevation ranging from approximately 600 to 730 feet.
Figure 1:
2021 Aerial Map
i' Project Boundary
Study Limits
(+/-I 126 acres
e
of .
a ..ter_ ._ .•
I3
rat i
0 300 600 90a 1,200
LOCATION
Lat: 35.19173 2N, Long:-90.98445 2W
HUC: 03050101 (Upper Catawba)
Acres:
W ESTROW PHASE 1
L),—, By' Reviewed By:
FIGURE
(+/-(126
Mecklenburg County, NC
PJx/1AL
1
OS/]0/21
2021 Aerial Map —Approximate Location
Prepared far:
Crescent River LLC _
For stud P� onl
y ryoses y
stDistrict
227 West Trade St
Trade
Subject w USACE and NCUE4 venficarian
Chadntte, NC 28202
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S, Rindner, PLLC.

Westrow Phase 1 —Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation
Figure 2:
ProjectUSGS MAP -Charlotte West, NC Quadrangle (1993)
42
Boundary
Study Limits
126 acres
' _ 11all
T �1
LOCATION
`/ • bl
�nir�.i✓i���� � 1. 1 t, 'r� �• . � • , • .1 (Upper Catawba
® - " Lee—dzandd..r. PLLC.il Planning Groy,.
Leonard S. Rlndner. PLLC.
USGS Map — Charlotte West, NC
® Quad. - r • len.rindn04) 904l2277 pg.mm
I �N(704) 904-2 pg
Ir vretlandz-epg.mm
METHODOLOGY:
The US Fish and Wildlife Service websites (https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/
cntylist/mecklenburg.html) and (https:Hecos.fws.gov/ipac/) was referenced to
determine the potential occurrence of Threatened, Endangered and Protected
species for Mecklenburg County, North Carolina, the results of which are listed
below (Table 1). Maps and aerial photographs were assembled and the site was
2
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Westrow Phase 1 —Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation
investigated in September 27, 2020 and a follow up visit was made on August 3,
2021.
Table 1: Threatened / Endangered / Protected Species listed for
Mecklenburg County
County: Mecklenburg, NC
*Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS)
**Data search in September 2020; August 2021
Group
Name
Status
Record Status
Invertebrate
Carolina
Endangered
Current
Heelsplitter
(Lasmigona
decorata
Invertebrate
Rusty -patched
Endangered
Historic
Bumble Bee
Bombus affinis
Vascular Plants
Smooth
Endangered
Current
Coneflower
(Echinacea
laevi ata
Vascular Plants
Schweinitz's
Endangered
Current
Sunflower
(Helianthus
schweinitzii)
Vascular Plants
Michaux's Sumac
Endangered
Current
(Rhus michauxii)
Vertebrate
Northern Long-
Threatened
Probable/Potential
Eared Bat (Myotis
septentrionalis
Vertebrate
Bald Eagle
Protected under
Current
(Haliaeetus
the Bald and
leucocephalus)
Golden Eagle
Protection Act
WEPG 3
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Westrow Phase 1 —Threatened /Endangered /Protected Species Evaluation
SPECIES DESCRIPTIONS:
Three plant species with federal protection are listed as potentially occurring in
Mecklenburg County:
• Schweinitz's Sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii), listed as Federally
Endangered, is typically found in open habitats which historically have
been maintained by wildfires and grazing bison and elk herds. Now most
occurrences are limited to roadsides, woodland and field edges, and utility
rights -of -way (ROW).
• Smooth Coneflower (Echinacea laevigata), listed as Federally
Endangered, is typically found in open woods, cedar barrens, roadsides,
clear cuts, dry limestone bluffs and power line rights -of -way, requiring
abundant sunlight and little competition from other plant species.
• Michaux's Sumac (Rhus michauxii), listed as Federally Endangered,
requires habitat of sandy forests and woodland edges. This species
requires periodic fire as a part of its ecology.
Four animal species with federal protection are listed as potentially occurring in
Mecklenburg County:
• Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), protected by the Bald and
Golden Eagle Protection Act, typically inhabits forested areas near large
bodies of open water such as lakes, marshes, seacoasts and rivers,
where there are suitable fish populations and tall trees for nesting and
roosting.
• Carolina Heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata), listed as Federally
Endangered, is restricted to cool, clean, well -oxygenated water. Stable,
silt- free stream beds are required for this species. Typically stable areas
occur where the stream banks are well -vegetated with trees and shrubs.
• Northern Long-eared Bat (Myotis septentrionalis), listed as Federally
Threatened. During summer, northern long-eared bats roost singly or in
colonies underneath bark, in cavities, or in crevices of both live and dead
trees. Males and non -reproductive females may also roost in cooler
places, like caves and mines. It has also been found, rarely, roosting in
structures like barns and sheds. Northern long-eared bats spend winter
hibernating in caves and mines, called hibernacula.
• Rusty -patched Bumble Bee (Bombus affinis), listed as Federally
Endangered, live in colonies that include a single queen and female
workers. Rusty -patched Bumble Bees historically occupied grasslands
and tallgrass prairies. Bumble bees need areas that provide nectar and
WEPG 4
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Westrow Phase I —Threatened I Endangered I Protected Species Evaluation
pollen from flowers, nesting sites (underground and abandoned rodent
cavities or clumps of grasses), and overwintering sites for hibernating
queens (undisturbed soil).
RESULTS:
The site is comprised primarily of pine dominated mixed forest with smaller areas
of pine plantation, mesic mixed hardwood forest, piedmont alluvial forest, and
open areas including roadsides and several powerline right-of-ways. Most of the
understory of the site is dominated by invasive Elaeagnus umbellate (autumn
olive).
The pine dominated mixed forest resembles a disturbed oak hickory/mesic forest
in composition with loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) dominating the canopy and a
reduced diversity due to a dense coverage of pine needles and autumn olive.
The canopy supports loblolly pine, Virginia pine (Pinus virginiana), yellow poplar
(Liriodenron tulipifera), sweet gum (Liquidambar styraciflua), red oak (Quercus
rubra), white oak (Q. alba), southern red oak (Q. falcata), oak (Quercus spp.),
hickory (Carya spp.), and elm (Ulmus sp.). The subcanopy includes American
beech (Fagus grandifolia), red mulberry (Morus rubra), sourwood (Oxydendrum
arboreum), eastern red cedar (Juniperus virginiana), winged elm (Ulmus alata),
black cherry (Prunus serotina), and transgressives. Shrubs include dense areas
of autumn olive with fewer individuals of Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense).
Vines include Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), and greenbriar (Smilax
sp.). The sparse herb layer supports ebony spleenwort (Asplenium platyneuron),
and cranefly orchid (Tipularia discolor).
The mixed mesic hardwood forest communities are located on middle and lower
slopes along stream valleys. The canopy includes American beech, red oak,
hickory, yellow poplar, sweetgum, red maple, and short leaf pine (Pinus
echinata). The subcanopy supports hickory and American beech. Shrubs
include dense areas autumn olive and Chinese privet. Vines include Japanese
honeysuckle and greenbrier. The sparse herb layer includes pipsissewa,
Japanese stiltgrass (Microstegium vimineum), and heartleaf (Hexastylis arifolia).
The pine plantation communities have an extremely low species diversity due to
management as a monoculture, and the result of a thick bed of pine needles
covering the forest floor below a dense shrub layer of autumn olive. The canopy
supports loblolly pine, Virginia pine, yellow poplar, and sweet gum. Shrubs
include dense areas of autumn olive with fewer individuals of Chinese privet.
Vines include Japanese honeysuckle, and greenbriar. The sparse herb layer
supports ebony spleenwort, and cranefly orchid.
The piedmont alluvial forest is located along stream valleys throughout the site.
The canopy supports American sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), green ash
WEPG 5
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Westrow Phase I —Threatened I Endangered I Protected Species Evaluation
(Fraxinus pennsylvanica), red maple, sweet gum, elm, willow oak (Quercus
phellos), and yellow poplar. The subcanopy supports sourwood (Oxydendrum
arborea), black cherry (Prunus serotina), winged elm (Ulmus alata), hornbeam
(Carpinus caroliniana), American holly, and transgressives. Shrubs include silky
dogwood (Corpus amomum), tag alder (Alnus serrulata), paw paw (Asimina
triloba), multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora), giant cane, dense areas of autumn
olive, and Chinese privet. Vines include Japanese honeysuckle, trumpet creeper
(Campsis radicans), and cross vine (Bignonia capreolata). Herbs include
Japanese stilt grass, tearthumb (Persicaria sagittata), river oats (Chasmanthium
latifolium), jewelweed (Impatiens sp.), primrose willow (Ludwigia sp.), grape fern
(Botrychium sp.), sensitive fern (Onoclea sensibilis), and netted chain fern
(Woodwardia areolata).
The open areas represented by powerline right-of-ways and roadside edges do
not have a traditional canopy as they are managed to avoid large woody species.
The often stunted subcanopy includes loblolly pine, Virginia pine, sweet gum,
eastern red cedar, winged elm, yellow poplar, persimmon (Diospyros virginiana),
and tree of heaven (Ailanthus altissima). Shrubs include blackberry (Rubus sp.),
winged sumac (Rhus copallinum), strawberry bush (Euonymus americans),
autumn olive, Chinese privet, groundsel tree (Baccharus halimifolia), shrubby St.
John's -wort (Hypericum sp.), and giant cane. Vines include, wild grape (Vitis
sp.), wisteria (Wisteria sp.), kudzu (Pueraria montana var. lobata), trumpet
creeper, greenbrier, and Japanese honeysuckle. Herbs include St. John's -wort
(Hypericum sp.), yellow crownbeard (Verbesina occidentalis), wingstem
(Verbesina alternifolia), plantain (Plantago sp.), Japanese stilt grass, bushclover
(Lespedeza sp.), dog fennel (Eupatorium capillifolium), goldenrod (Solidago
spp.), tick trefoil (Desmodium sp.), Queen Anne's lace (Daucus carota), mullein
(Verbascum thapsis), pokeweed (Phytolacca americans), aster (Aster spp.),
fireweed (Erechtites hieraciifolius), jimsonweed (Datura stromonium), milkweed
(Asclepius sp.), Asiatic dayflower, heal all (Prunella vulgaris), white snakeroot
(Ageratina altissima), wild onion (Allium sp.), rabbit tobacco (Pseudognaphalium
obtusifolum), Brazilian vervain (Verbena brasiliensis), thoroughwort (Eupatorium
spp.), dock (Rumex spp.), elephants foot (Elephantopus sp.), ragweed (Ambrosia
artemisiifolia), fleabane (Erigeron sp.), black cohosh (Actaea racemosa),
heartleaf, yucca (Yucca filamentosa), plantain (Plantago sp.), nightshade
(Solanum sp.), beggar ticks (Bidens sp.), ironweed (Vernonia sp.), three seeded
mercury (Acalypha rhomboidea), Christmas fern (Polystichum acrostichoides),
ebony spleenwort, assorted grasses, and black-eyed susan (Rudbeckia sp.).
Threatened & Endangered/Protected Species Results
• All potential habitats for Schweinitz's sunflower, smooth coneflower, and
Michaux's sumac along woodland edges, roadside edges, and powerline
right-of-ways were closely examined. No individuals of Schweinitz's
sunflower, smooth coneflower, or Michaux's sumac were observed.
WEPG 6
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Westrow Phase I —Threatened I Endangered I Protected Species Evaluation
• There is no suitable habitat for bald eagles in the project area. No bald
eagles were sighted during the survey nor were any nests or nesting
activity observed.
• Streams on site do not appear to have the habitat characteristics required
to support populations of the Carolina heelsplitter, and they have not been
reported to occur in this portion of the watershed. No mussels were
observed during the survey nor would any be expected on -site.
• Comparing this site location to the USFWS Asheville office's website
(http://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmis/project review/NLEB in WNC.html) it
appears that the site meets the `exempt' criteria which requires no further
action under section 7 or section 9 of the Endangered Species Act for the
northern long eared bat.
• Comparing this site location to the USFWS Range Map for Rusty -patched
Bumble Bee
(https://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/insects/rpbb/rpbbmap.html)
Mecklenburg County is in its Historic Range, and as such, Section 7
consultation is not needed. WEPG concludes that Rusty -patched Bumble
Bee is not present.
7
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Westrow Phase I —Threatened I Endangered I Protected Species Evaluation
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Based on the results of the field evaluation the review of available data, we see
no potential for a `Take' to occur to any of the protected species discussed within
this report. WEPG did not identify any protected species occurring on the subject
property. No further investigation of the presence of protected species on this
site is recommended at this time.
Respectfully submitted,
Jeff Levi
Biologist
August 9, 2021
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.

Cultural Resources
Report

R.S. Webb & Associates
Cultural Resource Management Consultants
2800 Holly Springs Parkway, Suite 200 • P.O. Drawer 1319
Holly Springs, Georgia 30142
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
August 9, 2021
Mr. Jeff Levi
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC
Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group
3714 Spokeshave Lane
Matthews, North Carolina 28105
Subject: Summary of Previous Cultural Resources Studies and Assessment of Need to
Conduct Additional Cultural Resources Work
Westrow Phase 1 Project Development Tract and Infrastructure Corridors
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
R.S. Webb & Associates No. 21-649-149
Dear Mr. Levi:
Pursuant to your request, this letter briefly summarizes previous cultural resources study findings
in the vicinity of the Westrow Phase 1 development tract and infrastructure corridors in Mecklenburg
County, North Carolina (Figure 1). The development tract and associated infrastructure corridors
are hereafter referred to as the "project area". This correspondence also evaluates the need for a
cultural resources field survey of the project area, given the magnitude of previous cultural resources
work conducted in the study vicinity.
Figure 1 shows the various cultural resources studies conducted in the project area vicinity. Previous
studies have been performed by Bamann et al. (2004), Bradley (2009), Hargrove (1984) and Webb
(2016). The Webb study was a reconnaissance -level investigation, while the other three projects
were Phase I -level surveys.
The current project area covers approximately 120 acres, nearly 100 acres of which were covered
by previous cultural resources studies; one cultural resource was identified in the current project area
during these studies. This resource, Isolated Rock Pile No. 1 (IP-1; Figure 1), was recorded during
the Webb (2016) field reconnaissance and was recommended ineligible for the National Register of
Historic Places.
There is always the possibility that cultural resources may be present within any study tract.
However, it appears that survey of the current project area would probably result in the detection of
no new major cultural resources. This is because: 1) there is a high percentage of overlap between
the current project area and previous cultural resources study areas; 2) only one minor cultural
resource was found in the current project area during previous survey efforts; and 3) much of the
unsurveyed land in the current project area includes areas poorly suited for most types of human
occupation/use.

Summary of Previous Surveys and Assessment of Need for Additional Work, Westrow Phase I Project Page 2
August 9, 2021
Mr. Levi, we appreciate the opportunity to work with you on this project. If you have any questions
or comments, please contact me at 770-345-0706.
Sincerely,
R.S. WEBB & ASSOCIATES
kajYlIr
Robert S. (Steve) Webb
President and Senior Principal Archeologist
Attachments: Figure 1
REFERENCES
Bamann, S.E., D. Baicy, and L. Lautzenheiser
2004 Archeological Identification Survey Proposed Relocation of Wallace Neel Road,
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. Coastal Carolina Research, Inc., Tarboro, North
Carolina.
Bradley, D.M.
2009 Archeological Survey and Evaluation of Detailed Study Alternative 9 (Recommended
Route) Proposed Gaston East-West Connector, Gaston and Mecklenburg Counties, North
Carolina. North Carolina Department of Transportation, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Hargrove, T.
1984 Unknown Report Title (Charlotte Outer Loop Survey). Unknown Affiliation.
Webb, R.S.
2016 Letter of Findings - Cultural Resources Reconnaissance Survey, Berryhill No. 2
Development Tract, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. R.S. Webb & Associates, Inc.,
Holly Springs, Georgia.

,�•t -Projec Area" s N
f NC. �, s
—J` K23, 0 yes- 31MK1052Yr
i'
�31MK543-� . (Cemetery-MK1372)
QUADRANGLE LaCRTIQN •: 4Y
�='�• Hargrove (1984) ; }
.1 i•T=Vdr- �y- { ..-._ �,Y n ;..\ oil
NRHP-Listed ,
Cooper Log House
Qi MK1359 MK3265 r(�
03. Structure2 MK24 5
• f�l .-
!.31MKI057"
.. ±' Westrow Phase 1,• ;MK2417�
Project Area. a• _ �F e ..fin. _ MK21 5
Zls p; 1MK1056
31MKI058
:.:31MK-1098 I' MK1375
Bama metal- (2004)
r 5 a I -I G
31MK1099 31MKI101 31MK1054
MK2843
MK2411
31MK1100..- 9
l 31MK1102 ' 1 KI13706 VIK2409}
O, l
' Bradley. (2009) 31MKI I03. 0 �
31MK1104
31 MK546
`��•L• •• � Structure 1. •
Q171
r i 31MK1105
❑ Recorded Historic Structure 0 Rockpile
m Recorded Historic Structure (No Longer Present) A Isolated Find
A Structure on Historic Maps and Aerial Photographs Previous Archeological Project
*Recorded Archeological Site --- Road on Historic Maps and Aerial Photographs
10 Historic Mining Feature
Map Reference: 7.5-Minute USGS Quadrangles Scale
Charlotte West (1993) and 0 762 meters
Belmont (1973), North Carolina
0 2500 feet
Figure 1 Previous Cultural Resources Studies and Known Cultural Resources in Relation to
Westrow Phase 1 Project Area