HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0026565_Pretreatment Compliance Inspection Report_20211005ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
S. DANIEL SMITH
Director
Terry Lewallen
Town of Ramseur
P.O. Box 545
Ramseur, North Carolina 27316
NOR [H CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
October 5, 2021
SUBJECT: Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI)
Town of Ramseur
NPDES# NC0026565
Randolph County
Dear Mr. Lewallen:
On September 10, 2021 a Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) was performed by Jim
Gonsiewski of the Winston-Salem Regional Office. You were present for the inspection along with
Ms. Lisa Osthues, Pretreatment Coordinator for the Town of Ramseur. The purpose of this
inspection was to determine the effectiveness of the Town's pretreatment program, which includes
reviewing the files, POTW plant performance, industry monitoring data, and adherence to the
enforcement response plan (ERP).
Background
This is a 0.48 MGD permitted facility. The City has one (1) Significant Industrial User (SIU) which
is categorical. The publicly owned treatment works (POTW) has not had any limits violations since
the last pretreatment compliance inspection.
POTW Interview
There are no plant problems related to pretreatment issues and there are no NPDES permit limit or
monitoring violations recorded from March 2020 through August 2021. The facility is very well
operated.
Pretreatment Program Elements Review
The Headworks Analysis (HWA) renewal was submitted on December 20, 2017. The HWA was
approved on February 8, 2018. The next HWA is due on October 1, 2022.
The last Industrial Waste Survey (IWS) was submitted on April 1, 2021. The IWS was approved
on May 5, 2021. The next IWS is due on April 1, 2026.
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Winston-Salem Regional Office 1450 West Hanes MITI Road, Suite 300 I Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27105
336,776.9800
The Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO) was approved on October 2, 2015.
The Enforcement Response Plan (ERP) was submitted on July 26, 2021. It is currently under
review.
The Short Term Monitoring Plan (STMP) was approved on October 2, 2015.
STMP File Review
The Short Term Monitoring Plan (STMP) is being conducted at the proper locations and
frequencies.
Industrial User Permit (IUP) File Review
A review of the file for Matlab, Inc. (#002) revealed that the monitoring data was well organized
and compliant.
The slug control plan for Matlab, Inc (#002) was in good order.
Action Items
No other action items were noted.
The pretreatment program is considered satisfactory. Ms. Osthues maintains an excellent
pretreatment program. If you have any questions please contact Jim Gonsiewski or me at (336)
776-9800.
Sincerely,
Doouslgned by:
148B49E225094EA...
Lon T. Snider
Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ — WSRO
Enclosure: PCI Report
cc: PERCS Unit — Michael Montebello (Electronic Copy)
Lisa Osthues (Electronic Copy)
WSRO Electronic Files
Laserfiche Files
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Winston-Salem Regional Office 1450 West Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300 I Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27105
336.776.9800
NI
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
Z
PRETREATMENT COMPLIANCE INSPECTION (PCI) REPORT
Water Resources
EYvi+ONY:[NT Pt. .IUP_ r
BACKGROUND INFORMATION (Complete Prior To PCI; Review Program Info Database Sheet(s)1.
1. Control Authority (POTW) Name: Town of Ramseur
2. Control Authority Representative(s): _Lisa Osthues, Terry Lewallen
3. Title(s): Contract Pretreatment Coordinator, ORC
4. Last Inspection Date: Inspection Type (Check One): ❑ PCI ® Audit
5. Has Program Completed All Requirements from the Previous Inspection and Program Info Sheet(s)? ❑ YES ❑ NO
6. Is POTW under an Order That Includes Pretreatment Conditions? ❑ YES ® NO
Order Type, Number, Parameters: Are Milestone Dates Being Met? ❑ YES ❑ NO
ICIS CODING
Main Program Permit Number MM/DD/YY
I NICIO 1 0 1 2 I 6 1 5 1 6 1 5 1 109I 10 121 I
7. Current Number Of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs)?
1
8. Number of SIUs With No IUP, or With an Expired IUP?
0
9. Number of SIUs Not Inspected By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
10. Number of SIUs Not Sampled By POTW in the Last Calendar Year?
0
11. Number of SIUs In SNC For Limits Violations During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual
Periods?
0
12. Number of SIUs in SNC For Reporting During Either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods?
0
13. Number of SIUs in SNC with Pretreatment Schedule?
0
14. Number of SIUs on Schedules?
0
15. Current Number Of Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs)?
1
16. Number of CIUs in SNC?
0
POTW INTERVIEW
17. Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any NPDES Limits Violations?
If Yes, What are the Parameters and How are these Problems Being Addressed?
18, Since the Last PCI, has the POTW had any Problems Related to an Industrial
Discharge (Interference, Pass -Through, Blockage, Citizens' Complaints, Increased
Sludge Production, Etc.)?
If Yes, How are these Problems Being Addressed?
19. Which Industries have been in SNC for Limits or Reporting during
either of the Last 2 Semi -Annual Periods? Not Been Published for
Public Notice?(May refer to PAR if Excessive SIUs in SNC)
SNC for
SNC for
Not Pul
20. Which Industries are on Compliance Schedules or Orders? For all SIUs on an
Order, Has a Signed Copy of the Order been sent to the Division?
21. Are Any Permits or Civil Penalties Currently Under Adjudication? If Yes, Which
Ones?
❑ YES ►1 NO
❑ YES L NO
Limits: 0
Reporting: 0
lished: None
None
❑ YES ► NO
LTMP/STMP FILE REVIEW: Will be revising the STMP this year in October in preparation for the upcoming Headworks Analysis in
2022. Prior inspections indicate that the STMP was being conducted with correct detection levels.
22. Is LTMP/STMP Monitoring Being Conducted at Appropriate Locations and Frequencies? ® YES ❑ NO
23. Are Correct Detection Levels being used for all LTMP/STMP Monitoring? ® YES ❑ NO
24. Is LTMP/STMP Data Maintained in a Table or Equivalent? ® YES ❑ NO Is Table Adequate? ® YES ❑ NO
25. All LTMP/STMP effluent data reported on Discharge Monitoring Report? ® YES ❑ NO Division Inspector, please verify
yourself!
26. If NO to 23 - 26, list violations
NC DWR Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated December 2016 Page 1
27. Should any Pollutants of Concern be Eliminated from or Added to LTMP/STMP? ❑ YES ® NO
If yes, which ones? Eliminated: Added:
NC DWR Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated December 2016 Page 2
28. PRETREATMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS REVIEW— Please review POTW files, verify POTW has copy of Program Element
in their filescomplete with supporting documents and copy of PERCS Approval Letter, and dates consistent with Program Info:
Program Element
Last Submittal
Date In file?
Last Approval
Date In file
Date Next Due,
If Applicable
Headworks Analysis (HWA)
12/20/2017
►4 Yes ❑ No
2/8/2018
0 Yes ❑ No
10/1/22
Industrial Waste Survey (IWS)
4/1/2021
►4 Yes ❑ No
5/5/2021
0 Yes ❑ No
4/1/2026
Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO)
9/22/2015
' Yes ❑ No
10/2/2015
►1 Yes ❑ No
NA
Enforcement Response Plan (ERP)
7/26/2021
Yes ❑ No
Pending
❑ Yes ❑ No
NA
Short Term Monitoring Plan (STMP)
9/22/2015
/0 Yes ❑ No
10/2/2015
r Yes ❑ No
NA
INDUSTRIAL USER PERMIT (IUP) FILE REVIEW (3 IUP FILE REVIEWS OR 1 FILE REVIEW AND 1 IU INSPECTION)
29. User Name
1. Matlab, Inc.
2.
3.
30. IUP Number
0002
31. Does File Contain Current Permit?
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
32. Permit Expiration Date
12/31/25
33. Categorical Standard Applied (I.E. 40 CFR, Etc.) Or N/A
433
34. Does File Contain Permit Application Completed Within One Year Prior
to Permit Issue Date?
❑ Yes /4 No
Extension Granted
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
35. Does File Contain an Inspection Completed Within Last Calendar Year?
' Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑
Yes
❑
No
36. a. Does the File Contain a Slug/Spill Control Plan?
b. If No, is One Needed? (See Inspection Form from POTW)
a. ►5 Yes ■ No
b. ■ Yes ■ No
a. ■Yes ■ No
b. ■ Yes ■ No
a. ■ Yes ■ No
b. ■ Yes ❑No
37. For 40 CFR 413 and 433 TTO Certification, Does File Contain a Toxic
Organic Management Plan (TOMP)?
®Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
38. a. Does File Contain Original Permit Review Letter from the Division?
b. All Issues Resolved?
a. _Yes ■No
b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
a. •Yes ■No
b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
a. ■Yes ■No
b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
39. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Complete
its Sampling as Required by IUP, including flow?
1 Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
40. Does File Contain POTW Sampling Chain -Of -Custody Forms?
i4 Yes ❑ No
❑
Yes ❑ No
❑
Yes
❑ No
41. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the SIU Complete its
Sampling as Required by IUP, including flow?
❑Yes❑No®NIA
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
41b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did SIU submit all reports
on time?
®Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
42a. For categorical IUs with Combined Wastestream Formula (CWF), does
file include process/dilution flows as Required by IUP?
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
❑ Yes ❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
42b. For categorical IUs with Production based limits, does file include
production rates and/or flows as Required by IUP?
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
43a. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
All Limits Non -Compliance from Both POTW and SIU Sampling?
❑ Yes ❑ No
NONE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
43b. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Did the POTW Identify
All Reporting Non -Compliance from SIU Sampling?
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
44. a. Was the POTW Notified by SIU (Within 24 Hours) of All Self-
Monitoring Violations?
b. Did Industry Resample and submit results to POTW Within 30 Days?
c. If applicable, Did POTW resample within 30 days of becoming aware
of SIU limit violations in the POTW's sampling of the SIU?
a.❑Yes❑No®N/A
b.❑Yes❑No®N/A
c.❑Yes❑No®N/A
a.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
c.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
a.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
c.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
46. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was the SIU in SNC?
❑
Yes
No
❑ Yes ❑
No
❑
Yes
❑
No
47. During the Most Recent Semi -Annual Period, Was Enforcement Taken
as Specified in the POTW's ERP (NOVs, Penalties, timing, etc.)?
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
48. Does the File Contain Penalty Assessment Notices?
❑ Yes ❑NoEN/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
49. Does The File Contain Proof Of Penalty Collection?
❑Yes❑NoEN/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
❑Yes❑No❑N/A
50. a. Does the File Contain Any Current Enforcement Orders?
b. Is SIU in Compliance with Order?
a.❑Yes ❑NoiaN/A
b.❑Yes❑NOON/A
a.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
a.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
b.❑Yes❑No❑N/A
51. Did the POTW Representative Have Difficulty in Obtaining Any of This
Requested Information For You?
❑ Yes /1 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
FILE REVIEW COMMENTS:
NC DWR Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated December 2016 Page 3
The files are well organized and complete.
INDUSTRY INSPECTION ICIS CODING:
Main Program Permit Number
I I 1 1 1 I I
1. Industry Inspected:
2. Industry Address:
MM/DD/YY
l 1 l I
3. Type of Industry/Product:
4. Industry Contact: Title:
Phone: Fax:
5. Does the POTW Use the Division Model Inspection Form or Equivalent? ❑ YES ❑ NO
6. Did the POTW Contact Conduct the Following Parts of the Industrial Inspection Thoroughly?
Comments:
A. Initial Interview ❑ YES ❑ NO
B. Plant Tour ❑ YES ❑ NO
C. Pretreatment Tour ❑ YES ❑ NO
D. Sampling Review ❑ YES ❑ NO
E. Exit Interview ❑ YES ❑ NO
Industrial Inspection Comments:
OVERALL SUMMARY AND COMMENTS:
Comments: _A very well run pretreatment program.
Requirements:
Recommendations:
NOD: ❑ YES ® NO
NOV: ❑ YES ® NO
QNCR: ❑ YES ® NO
POTW Rating:
Satisfactory X Marginal UnSatisfactory
PCI COMPLETED BY: Jim Gonsiewski DATE: 10/05/2021
NC DWR Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) Form Updated December 2016 Page 4
United States Environmental Protection Agency
E PA Washington, D.C. 20460
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Form Approved.
OMB No. 2040-0057
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction
1 LN 1
211IlI
Code
2[ I
I I
NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection
3 1 NC0026565 111 121 21/09/10 117
Type
18 [ D I
I l I I l
Inspector Fac Type
191 s1 201 1
I I I I II I I I I I l I I I l I l I 1 I l I
I ll I l I I 1 �66
I
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA Reserved
174 751 1
671 1 7015 1 711 1 72 I N I 73I 11 1 l I I 180
Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
Ramseur WWTP
Roundleaf Rd
Ramseur NC 27316
Entry Time/Date
11:10AM 21/09/10
Permit Effective Date
16/09/01
Exit Time/Date
12:45PM 21/09/10
Permit Expiration Date
21/04/30
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
///
Terry Cheyenne Lewallen/ORC/336-824-3939/
Other Facility Data
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
Terry Cheyenne Lewallen,PO Box 725 Ramseur NC 2731611336-824-3939/
No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit Records/Reports Self -Monitoring Progran
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s)
Jim J Gonsiewski
of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
—oocusigned by: DWR/Division of Water Quality/336-776-9704/
10/5/2021 ao``
'•----EE 197B66F 179045F...
Signatur,e-atlarasiogareept
Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Loti T. Stiidcr 10/5/2021
1/4,—. 1ASRAQR??SCQAFA
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page# 1
NPDES yr/mo/day
31 NC0026565 I11 121 21/09/10
117
Inspection Type
18101
(Cont.)
1
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
On September 10, 2021 a Pretreatment Compliance Inspection (PCI) was performed by Jim
Gonsiewski of the Winston-Salem Regional Office. Terry Lewallen, facility ORC, along with Ms. Lisa
Osthues, Pretreatment Coordinator for the Town of Ramseur, were present for the inspection. The
purpose of this inspection was to determine the effectiveness of the Town's pretreatment program,
which includes reviewing the files, POTW plant performance, industry monitoring data, and
adherence to the enforcement response plan (ERP).
This is a 0.48 MGD permitted facility. The City has one (1) Significant Industrial User (SIU) which is
categorical. The publicly owned treatment works (POTW) has not had any limits violations since the
last pretreatment compliance inspection.
There are no plant problems related to pretreatment issues and there are no NPDES permit limit or
monitoring violations recorded from March 2020 through August 2021. The facility is very well
operated.
The Headworks Analysis (HWA) renewal was submitted on December 20, 2017. The HWA was
approved on February 8, 2018. The next HWA is due on October 1, 2022.
The last Industrial Waste Survey (IWS) was submitted on April 1, 2021. The IWS was approved on
May 5, 2021. The next IWS is due on April 1, 2026.
The Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO) was approved on October 2, 2015.
The Enforcement Response Plan (ERP) was submitted on July 26, 2021. It is currently under review.
The Short Term Monitoring Plan (STMP) was approved on October 2, 2015.
The Short Term Monitoring Plan (STMP) is being conducted at the proper locations and frequencies.
A review of the file for Matlab, Inc. (#002) revealed that the monitoring data was well organized and
compliant.
The slug control plan for Matlab, Inc (#002) was in good order.
No other action items were noted. The program was considered satisfactory.
Page# 2
Permit: NC0026565
Inspection Date: 09/10/2021
Owner - Facility: Ramseur VVWTP
Inspection Type: Pretreatment Compliance
Permit Yes No NA NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new EIOND
application?
Is the facility as described in the permit? LIED
# Are there any special conditions for the permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public? ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection? MODE
Comment: The facility conditions have not changed.
Page# 3
A