20160980 Ver 2_Year 3 Monitoring Report_20211005

ID#* 20160980 Version* 2
Select Reviewer:*
Katie Merritt
Initial Review Completed Date 10/07/2021
Mitigation Project Submittal - 10/5/2021
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?* r Yes r No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
r Stream r Wetlands W Buffer V Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Jamey McEachran
Project Information
...................................................................................
ID#:* 20160980
Existing IDr
Project Type:
Project Name:
County:
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Version:
*2
Existing Version
r DMS r Mitigation Bank
Meadow Spring Riparian Buffer and Nutrient
Offset Mitigation Site
Johnston
Document Information
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Plans
File Upload: Meadow Spring Bank Parcel MY3 Report.pdf 5.55MB
Rease upload only one RDFof the corrplete file that needs to be subrritted...
Signature
Print Name:* Jamey McEachran
Signature:*

Bank Parcel Development Plan Year 3 Monitoring Report
Meadow Spring Mitigation Site
DWR Project # 2016-0980v2
Johnston County, North Carolina
Neuse River Basin
HUC 03020201
Prepared By:
fires
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
919-829-9909
Bank Sponsor: EBX-Neuse I, LLC
October 2021

Table of Contents
1 Project Summary.................................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Project Location and Description.............................................................................................. 1
1.2 Project Success Criteria............................................................................................................. 1
1.3 Project Components.................................................................................................................. 2
1.4 Riparian Restoration and Enhancement Approach.................................................................... 3
1.5 Construction and As -Built Conditions...................................................................................... 4
1.6 Year 3 Monitoring Performance................................................................................................ 4
2 Methods..................................................................................................................................................4
3 Reference................................................................................................................................................5
Annendix A: Site Mans
Figure 1: Site Location Map
Figure 2: Current Conditions Plan View
Appendix B: Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 2: Plant Species Summary
Table 3: Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table
Table 4: Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
Appendix C: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data Sheets
n

I Proiect Summary
L I Project Location and Description
EBX—Neuse I, LLC, an entity of Resource Environmental Solutions (RES), is pleased to provide this
Monitoring Report for the Meadow Spring Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Bank (Parcel).
This Parcel was designed to provide riparian buffer mitigation credits for unavoidable impacts due to
development within the Neuse River Basin, United States Geological Survey (USGS) 8-digit Hydrologic
Unit Code (HUC — 03020201). In addition, it provides nutrient offset credits in the 03020201 HUC,
excluding the Falls Lake Watershed, for existing and proposed development requiring such mitigation. This
Bank Parcel Development Package (BPDP) is in accordance with the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule
15A NCAC 02B .0295, 15A NCAC 02B .0240 and the RES Neuse Umbrella Mitigation Banking
Instrument for Riparian Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Credits (UMBI), made and entered into by
EBX-Neuse I, LLC acting as the Bank Sponsor (Sponsor), and the North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality -Division of Water Resources (DWR). Supporting figures can be found in Appendix
A. The BPDP was also designed in concurrence with Meadow Spring Stream Mitigation Site in the Neu -
Con Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank (SAW# 2016-01989). The mitigation plan for the
Meadow Spring Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank was approved by the Interagency Review Team (IRT)
and constructed in May 2019.
The Meadow Spring Parcel is located in Johnston County approximately three miles north of Smithfield,
North Carolina (Figure 1). The Parcel is located within Neuse River Basin USGS 14-digit HUC
03020201100050, a Targeted Local Watershed, and DWR Subbasin Number 03-04-02. To access the Site
head East on NC 70 from the Town of Wilson Mills and turn right onto Wilson Mills Road and head south
for approximately 1.5 miles. The coordinates of the site are 35.5437°N and - 78.3303°W.
When combining the Meadow Spring Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank with the Meadow Spring
Riparian Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Bank, the conservation easement totals approximately 60.93
acres and includes three unnamed tributaries to the Neuse River. The Parcel is located in an area formerly
dominated by agricultural fields, cattle pastures and wooded areas. The majority of the Parcel was grazed
pasture and disturbed riparian forest. Additional land use practices included the maintenance and removal
of riparian vegetation and the relocation, dredging and straightening of onsite streams that resulted in
degraded water quality and unstable channel characteristics. The Parcel also contained an agricultural pond
that was in place for over 40 years.
The Meadow Spring Stream Mitigation Site was built to provide stream enhancement and restoration on
approximately 7,392 linear feet of streams and wetland restoration and enhancement on approximately
36.51 acres of wetlands, to generate 14.41 wetland mitigation units, within the conservation easement
through a separate mitigation banking instrument with the IRT. The Meadow Spring Bank Parcel was built
to restore and enhance stream systems with their adjacent riparian buffers and their functions and values to
compensate, in appropriate circumstances, for unavoidable riparian buffer impacts and nutrient load
reduction requirements. DWR staff performed an onsite viability assessment for buffer mitigation and
nutrient offset on October 18, 2016 and approved the BPDP in May 2018.
1.2 Project Success Criteria
Annual vegetation monitoring will occur each year for a minimum of five (5) years and will be conducted
during the fall season with the first year occurring at least five months from initial planting. Six vegetation
monitoring plots were installed a minimum of 100 m2 in size and cover at least two percent of the riparian
restoration area. Plots were randomly placed throughout the planted Neuse buffer zones and nutrient offset
Meadow Spring 1 Year 3 Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site October 2021

mitigation area and are representative of the crediting areas. The following data will be recorded for all
trees in the plots: species, common name, height, planting date (or volunteer), and grid location. All stems
in plots will be flagged with flagging tape. Photos are to be taken from all photo points each monitoring
year and provided in the annual reports. Visual inspections and photos will be taken to ensure that
enhancement areas are being maintained and compliant. The measures of vegetative success for the Parcel
will be the survival of at least 4 native hardwood tree species, where no one species is greater than 50
percent of the established stems, established at a density of at least 260 planted trees per acre at the end of
Year 5. Native volunteer species may be included to meet the performance standards upon DWR approval.
Invasive and noxious species will be monitored and treated so that none become dominant or alter the
desired community structure of the site.
A visual assessment of the cattle exclusion areas within the conservation easement will also be performed
each year to confirm:
• Fencing is in good condition throughout the site;
• no cattle access within the conservation easement area;
• no encroachment has occurred;
• diffuse flow is being maintained in the conservation easement area; and
• there has not been any cutting, clearing, filling, grading, or similar activities that would
negatively affect the functioning of the buffer.
RES must monitor the stream mitigation bank for a minimum of seven years, or until IRT approval.
Therefore, plots placed within riparian restoration areas that are outside of the mitigation area for buffer
and nutrient offset credits will be monitored in accordance with the monitoring protocol in the Meadow
Spring Stream Mitigation Plan.
1.3 Project Components
This Bank generates approximately 4.42 acres (192,368 W) of riparian buffer restoration credits on existing
non -forested pasture, 1.79 acres (26,805 fC) of buffer enhancement credits via cattle exclusion, and 1.88
acres (4,271 lbs) of nitrogen nutrient offset credits. The slight increase in credits is due to a more accurate
treeline survey being used to determine as -built areas. The riparian buffer mitigation credits generated
service Neuse buffer impacts within the USGS 8-digit HUC 03020201 of the Neuse River Basin. The
Nitrogen nutrient offsets generated service nutrient load reduction requirements where payments are
authorized in 15A NCAC 02B .0240 within the USGS 8-digit HUC 03020201, excluding the Falls Lake
Watershed. The Sponsor maintains three credit ledgers. One ledger accounts for buffer Restoration credits,
one ledger accounts for buffer Enhancement credits, and one accounts for Nitrogen nutrient offset credits.
All mitigation credit assets shall be shown on these credit ledgers. The total potential mitigation credits that
the Meadow Spring Bank generates are summarized in the table below.
Meadow Spring 2 Year 3 Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site October 2021

Table 1. Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Credit
Riparian Buffer Credit
Riparian
Credit
Existing
Credit Per
% Full
Mitigation Type
Ratio
Mitigation Assets
Zone
Type
Acreage
Acre ft2
Credit
Riparian
Restoration
1.87
43,560
L1
100%
81,474 W(1.87 ac)
0-50'
Buffer
Riparian
Enhancement via Cattle
0.69
43,560
2:1
100%
15,002 W (0.34 ac)
Buffer
Exclusion
Riparian
Restoration
2.55
43,560
1:1
100%
11Q894 W(2.55 ac)
Buffer
51-100'
Riparian
Enhancement via Cattle
0.27
43,560
2:1
100%
5,775 ff (0.13 ac)
Buffer
Exclusion
Riparian
Enhancement via Cattle
101-200'
0.84
43,560
2:1
33%
6,029 ff (0.14 ac)
Buffer
Exclusion
Total Restoration
4.42
192,368 ft' (4.42 ac)
Total Enhancements
1.79
26,805 ftz (0.62 ac)
includes ratios & reductions
Nutrient Offset Credit
Credit
Credit Per
Zone
Mitigation Type
Acreage
Ratio
Mitigation Assets (Ibs)
T e
Acre lbs
101-200'
Nitrogen
Restoration
1.88
2,273.02
N/A
4,2711bs (1.88 ac)
TOTAL
1.88
4,271lbs (1.88 ac)
The Sponsor may use the 4.42 acres (192,368 W) of riparian restoration generated on the non -forested
pasture for either Neuse riparian buffer credits or Nitrogen nutrient offset credits, but not both. The Sponsor
must submit a written request and receive written approval from DWR prior to any credit conversions and
transfers to the buffer and nutrient offset credit ledgers. With each conversion and transfer request submitted
to the DWR, the Sponsor will provide all updated credit ledgers showing all transactions that have occurred
up to the date of the request.
1.4 Riparian Restoration and Enhancement Approach
The land uses adjacent to the streams purposed for buffer restoration and enhancement were primarily
composed of forested and non -forested pasture which were grazed by livestock, but also included, row -
crops, maintained lawns, and hardwood forests.
Restoration activities based on the design approach included meandering the channel within the natural
valley, backfilling the existing stream, reconnecting the channel to its floodplain, removing the existing
dam embankment (the pond) and restoring hydrology to historically drained wetlands. Diffuse flow is
maintained throughout the mitigated riparian areas.
Enhancement also occurs in areas of grazing adjacent to the stream in accordance with the Consolidated
Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(6). RES installed cattle exclusion fencing in all riparian
areas where enhancement credit under this part of the rule is being requested to exclude access to riparian
areas and their associated streams. All fencing was installed to NRCS specifications.
All riparian restoration areas were planted from top of bank back at least 50 feet from the stream with bare
root tree seedlings on an eight by eight foot spacing to achieve an initial density of 680 trees per acre. Bank
planting and stabilization also incorporates the use of a riparian seed mix and temporary ground cover to
prevent erosion after construction. The buffered channels provide water quality and habitat functions within
Meadow Spring 3 Year 3 Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site October 2021

the sensitive Neuse River watershed, such as nutrient and sediment removal, filtration of runoff, and
improved aquatic and terrestrial habitat. Some areas adjacent to the forested areas may require maintenance
due to the rapid regeneration of some species, such as red maple (Acer rubrum) and sweetgum
(Liquidambar styraciflua).
1.5 Construction and As -Built Conditions
Revegetation of the Site included treating invasive species and planting native hardwood bare root trees.
Prior to planting, RES prepped the site by spraying and ripping the easement. Coastal Plain Small Stream
Swamp is the target community type and was used for all areas within the project. The community is defined
by Schafale (2012). The planting of bare root trees occurred in May and June 2019. Deviations from the
initial planting plan were due to bare root availability. A list of the planted species can be found in Table
2.
Stream construction activities were completed in June 2019. The site was constructed in accordance with
the Approved Mitigation Plan and associated permits. RES acquired 404 (SAW-2016-01989), 401 (DWR
# 16-0980), and NPDES Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (JC#18-097-P; Figure 4) Permits. There were
no easement changes between the submittal of the BPDP Approval and the construction of the site. The
conservation easement is marked every 150-200 feet with North Carolina Wildlife Habitat Foundation signs
attached to either fences or t-posts. Fences were installed in areas where livestock were present, and t-posts
are used as physical barriers where livestock are not present.
1.6 Year 3 Monitoring Performance
The Meadow Spring Year 3 monitoring activities were completed in September 2021. All Year 3
Monitoring (MY3) data is present below and in the appendices. The Site is on track to meet interim success
criteria.
Monitoring of the six fixed vegetation plots was completed during September 2021. Vegetation tables are
in Appendix B and associated photos are in Appendix C. MY3 monitoring data indicates that all six plots
located in buffer/nutrient crediting areas are exceeding the interim success criteria of 320 planted stems per
acre. Planted stem densities ranged from 526 to 850 planted stems per acre with a mean of 695 planted
stems per acre across all plots. A total of 15 species were documented within the plots. Volunteer species
were observed in four out of six plots. The average tree height observed was 5.7 feet.
Visual assessment of vegetation outside of the monitoring plots indicates that the herbaceous vegetation is
becoming well established throughout the project. All of the fencing was in good condition and there was
no evidence of cattle in the easement. There was no encroachment observed or similar activities that would
negatively affect the functioning of the buffer. Diffuse flow was also maintained throughout the
conservation easement area. Supplemental planting was performed in January 2021, however, not within
any buffer/nutrient crediting areas. A few small areas of re -sprouted Chinese privet were observed in the
wetland crediting areas of the easement. Treatments took place in 2021 and will continue to take place as
needed throughout the monitoring period.
2 Methods
Vegetation success is being monitored at six fixed monitoring plots. Vegetation plot monitoring follows
the CVS-EEP Level 2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation, version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008) and includes analysis
of species composition and density of planted species. Data is processed using the CVS data entry tool. In
the field, the four corners of each plot were permanently marked with PVC at the origin and metal conduit
at the other corners. Photos of each plot are to be taken from the origin each monitoring year.
Meadow Spring 4 Year 3 Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site October 2021

3 Reference
EBX — Neuse I, LLC (2018). Meadow Spring Buffer/Nutrient Offset Site — Bank Parcel Development Plan.
Lee Michael T., Peet Robert K., Roberts Steven D., and Wentworth Thomas R., 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol
for Recording Vegetation Level. Version 4.2
NCDENR. 2009. "Meuse River Basinwide Water Quality Plan." Division of Water Quality. http://
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ps/bpu/basin/neuse/2009. (October 2013).
NC Environmental Management Commission. 2014. Rule 15A NCAC 02B.0295 - Mitigation Program
Requirements for the Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Buffers.
Schafale, M.P. 2012. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Fourth
Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation,
NCDENR, Raleigh, NC.
Meadow Spring 5 Year 3 Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site October 2021

Appendix A
Site Maps

1913 r.
Company Wrench P
Double Barley Brewing
9
0
D.0-T. State Yard P
® Maintenance Engineer
North Carolina ©h
Dot -Equip
a'
1�m'd
aW W
Johnston Correctional
Institution
Legend
Conservation Easement
10
Pi Concrete 9
Services, Inc
Handy Andy Carpets 9 cq°
Marathon 9
S T Wooten Corporaunn
4
The Light of Christ
��,, International outreach...
Q e, Q Landwood Church 9
`� °'A gultalo Rd
Court Nursing
Illation Center
0 4
a e��
4
N L M�3Ne br
field Senior Manor
s�
Ressurection Hill Church
HP
rwvod s! Maa><nr
CA�lenson wy [7
a""eensr`ptensu SmithN" Neuse Charter School
Pented First
PentecostalQ a �E StateEmployees © 9 P
n Houses 2 '�,. Credd Un on
p see M �urwo°d5r°v Kids Care Pediatrics
p�Fnsbn Hwy ns
4 c v Smdhfield•Selma
d 5ja��sr s Smithfield Recreatron
Aquatics Center High School
Pxos, Smithfield
Smithfield Middle School 9 Community
a Park
c
a�
S M I T H F I E L D
er¢rsr WMPM 9 14n
OfridOr 9 •• �ppa prd'LT
6
® Walmart Supwcentar
McDonald's © 'm s~ �a,l°v ^� Belk 9
i
Lion {� y t;
d I
N
Date: 10/25/2019
Figure 1 - Site Location Map
w e Drawn by: RTM res
Meadow Spring Buffer/Nutrient Site
n S Checked by: BPB
0 1,000 21000
Johnston County, North Carolina
1 inch = 2,000 feet
Feet

Appendix B
Vegetation Assessment Data

Appendix B. Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 2. Planted Species Summary
Common Name
Scientific Name
Total Stems Planted
Water Oak
Quercus nigra
3,500
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Quercus michauxii
2,700
Sycamore
Platanus occidentalis
2,300
Baldcypress
Taxodium distichum
21000
Green Ash
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
2,000
Overcup Oak
Quercus lyrata
2,000
Willow Oak
Quercus phellos
2,000
Persimmon
Diospyros virginiana
2,000
Swamp Tupelo
Nyssa bi ora
2,000
Water Tupelo
Nyssa aquatica
1,700
Yellow Poplar
Liriodendron tuli i era
1,600
Crab Apple
Malus angustifolia
800
S Dogwood
Cornus amomum
800
Flowering Dogwood
Cornus florida
800
Buttonbush
Cephalanthus occidentalis
700
Blackgum
Nyssa sylvatica
600
American Plum
Prunus americana
500
American Hazelnut
Corylus americana
400
River Birch
Betula nigra
400
Elderberry
Sambucus nigra
100
Total
28,900
Table 3. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Average
ve rage
Planted
Volunteer
Total
Planted
Plot #
Criteria
Stems/Acre
Stems/Acre
Stems/Acre
Stem
Met?
Height (ft)
1
850
324
1174
Yes
6.7
2
526
1052
1578
Yes
4.5
3
647
0
647
Yes
6.9
8
688
0
688
Yes
7.6
9
607
1942
2550
Yes
2.1
11
850
971
1821
Yes
5.6
Project Avg
695
715
1410
Yes
5.7

rn
�
m
ti ry
m m
m ry
�n
ti ti
a ti
a
ti a
a
ry ry
ti o
0 0
p
m
m
ti ry
m m
m ry
�n
ti ti
a ti
a
ti a
a
ry ry
ti o
0 0
�
d
o
�
v,
c
a
m
ti ry
m m
m ry
�n
ti ti
a ti
a
ti a
a
ry ry
ti o
0 0
rn
�
m
i
d
�
�
�
c
a
tia
W
vi 7F
c
Q
N
~
~
~
�
d
o
O
c
a
n
m ti
o
a
F
m
ro
a
d
o
c
a
75
o
F
o
d
�
O
W
�
o
c
a
m ti
a
�
ry
m
m
�
�
0
c
d
o
a o
in
a
ry
m
�n
o
a
ip
�n
m
a
ry
ry
1p
0
o
F
N
o
N
o
O,
-
A
m
a
77ry
o
ry
�
O
a
p
M
m
ry
a
m ry
�
rv�
6
a
O
g
�
p
c
o
m
ry
a
m ry
�
rv�
U
N
N
m
ry
m ry
ip
I� n
�
O
O
�
a
�
N
o
F
i0 ry
i0
m
i0 W
m
c
n 5
c
d
o
O
a
vt
g
c
d
o
N
N
LF
ti
vl O
�
O
O
�
a
�
� v �
N Q N
y
9 9
9
N
N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
N N
-
N
m
o
Z
a-
Y o
L
o
c
c
o
o
-Oo t
v
o o
v
n
u
n
u y
o
in
g
o
.- u
uY'u a
L .•
v
Q
E
T
L
o
n°
E
3 u
v
v
v n
v
o a
o
o
o
v
_
O
O
O'
O
9 T
m
E
2
�
N
O
Q C
C T
O
m
V V
V V
o
a �
Z
Z Z
a a
a` U
8 8
8 U
U H

Appendix C
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos

Meadow Spring MY3 Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Plot 1 (9/28/2021)
Vegetation Plot 3 (9/28/2021)
Vegetation Plot (9/28/2021)
Vegetation Plot 2 (9/28/2021)
Vegetation Plot 8 (9/28/2021)
Vegetation Plot 11 (9/28/2021)

Appendix D
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data Sheets

Plot (continued): 06122019-01-0001 Sep 2021 Data o THIS YEARS DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH CDddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 06122019-01-0001 Pa Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year (1-5): Date: / / _ / / New planting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.550308 Datum: NAD27
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E: 78.34365 UTM Zone: 17N
Coordinate Accuracy (m): 0.5 X-Axis bearing (deg): L200
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: 10 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Sep 2021 Data z THIS YEARS DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH * Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
1
Betula nigra
O
R
0.3
0.3
360.0
2.8 ❑
5
Quercus phellos
R
5.8
1.0
220.0
0.8 ❑
6
Betula nigra
@
R
7.1
1.1
325.0
1.4 ❑
7
Betula nigra
O
R
8.6
1.2
280.0
0.9 ❑
9
Betula nigra
Cu)
R
9.9
1.3
320.0
1.1 ❑
10
Quercus lyrata
O
R
9.9
3.6
200.0
0.6 ❑
12
Taxodium distichum
O
R
7.9
3.6
200.0
0.7 ❑
13
Taxodium distichum
R
6.9
3.5
130.0
DBH? ❑
14
Taxodium distichum
O
R
5.8
3.5
155.0
0.4 ❑
15
Quercus lyrata
O
R
4.6
3.5
200.0
0.6 ❑
16
Quercus lyrata
O
R
3.7
3.5
205.0
0.8 ❑
17
Taxodium distichum
O
R
2.7
3.4
122.0
DBH? ❑
18
Quercus phellos
O
R
1.6
3.4
245.0
1.3 ❑
19
Taxodium distichum
O
R
0.4
3.3
70.0
❑
20
Liriodendron tulipifera
®
R
0.3
6.1
120.0
DBH? ❑
23
Quercus lyrata
O
R
3.7
6.5
145.0
0.2 ❑
24
Liriodendron tulipifera
O
R
4.9
6.7
155.0
0.4 ❑
25
Liriodendron tulipifera
O
R
5.9
6.9
142.0
0.3 ❑
27
Liriodendron tulipifera
0
R
8.2
7.2
Missin g
❑
30
Liriodendron tulipifera
R
4.2
9.9
135.0
DBH? ❑
31
Quercus phellos
R
2.8
9.5
320.0
1.6 ❑
32
Quercus phellos
®
R
1.3
9.2
210.0
0.6 ❑
#stems: 22 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (in) (in) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1--unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M-missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued): 06122019-01-0001 Sep 2021 Data o THIS YEARS DATA
map source X Y ddh Height DBH * ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species char (m) (m) (mm) (cm) (cm) (mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsampling**:
Height Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
p
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
**Requimd ifcttoff>10cmor subsample?100%. 01
•2
• 3
♦ 64
N5
46
7
::8
}-dK)
F:10 Form WS2,ver9.1
Map of stems on plot 06122019-01-0001
b
:5
O
J)
®
v
Jt
u
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 200 - #stems: 22
map size:
small
N _0_
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1--unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M-missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 06122019-01-0002 Pa Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year (1-5): � Date: / / New laming date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.550128 Datum: NAD27
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E: 78.34304 UTM Zone: 17N
Coordinate Accuracy (m): 0.5 X-Axis bearing (deg): L 256
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: 10 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Sep 2021 Data z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH * Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char O.lm O.lm lcm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
33
Cornus florida
O
R
0.3
0.5
40.0
34
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
3.0
0.9
220.0
1.2
35
Quercus lyrata
R
2.8
1.8
220.0
0.4
36
Cornus florida
O
R
2.5
3.2
60.0
37
Quercus nigra
O
R
2.3
4.3
275.0
1.2
38
Quercus nigra
®
R
2.0
5.2
210.0
0.7
40
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
1.8
7.2
155.0
0.4
41
Quercus lyrata
®
R
1.1
9.1
160.0
0.5
43
Quercus lyrata
O
R
4.1
8.8
60.0
44
Quercus lyrata
R
4.2
7.8
65.0
46
Quercus lyrata
O
R
4.6
5.3
100.0
50
Quercus lyrata
O
R
5.6
1.0
40.0
53
Quercus phellos
R
9.2
1.3
162.0
0.4
#stems: 13 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
SpCC1CS Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1--unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M-missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 1 Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued):
06122019-01-0002
Sep 2021 Data
o
THIS YEARS DATA
ID Species
map source X Y
char (m) (m)
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
CDddh
Height
(mm) (cm)
DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(cm) sprout
Explanation of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsampling**:
Height Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
p
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub.-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Suer
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
**Required ifciioff>lOcmor subsample?100%. 01
•2
• 3
♦ 64
1 N5
:46
::7
8
}-dK)
::10 Form WS2,ver9.1
Map of stems on plot 06122019-01-0002
Y
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 256 -
# stems: 13
0 map size:
small
N
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1--unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M-missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 06122019-01-0003 Pa Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year (1-5): � Date: / / New laming date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.549423 Datum: NAD27
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E: 78.34261 UTM Zone: 17N
Coordinate Accuracy (m): 0.5 X-Axis bearing (deg): L 260
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: 10 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Sep 2021 Data z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH * Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
Name
ID Species char O.Im O.Im Icm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
60
Quercus alba
O
R
0.3
0.4
80.0
❑
63
Quercus alba
O
R
3.5
1.9
132.0
DBH? ❑
64
Quercus lyrata
R
4.7
1.5
225.0
0.5 ❑
66
Quercus michauxii
O
R
8.6
2.5
Missin g
❑
68
Platanus occidentalis
R
6.5
4.1
215.0
0.7 ❑
69
Quercus michauxii
O
R
2.0
6.1
Missin g
❑
70
Quercus alba
O
R
1.0
6.6
90.0
❑
71
Platanus occidentalis
®
R
0.5
9.8
400.0
3.0 ❑
74
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
4.9
8.2
375.0
3.5 ❑
75
Taxodium distichum
O
R
7.6
8.5
270.0
1.2 ❑
76
Corylus americana
R
7.8
7.1
90.0
❑
77
Liriodendron tulipifera
O
R
8.6
5.0
275.0
1.4 ❑
78
Corylus americana
R
9.5
9.7
160.0
0.2 ❑
890
Quercus lyrata
R
9.6
7.0
85.0
❑
891
Corylus americana
O
R
7.5
9.0
285.0
1.3 ❑
1332
Diospyros virginiana
®
R
1.0
8.0
142.0
0.3 ❑
1661
Diospyros virginiana
O
R
4.7
8.3
145.0
0.3 ❑
1662
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
9.9
9.9
400.0
3.8 ❑
#stems: 18 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
SpCC1CS Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1--unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M-missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 1 Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued):
06122019-01-0003
Sep 2021 Data
o
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ID Species
map source X Y
char (m) (m)
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
CDddh
Height
(mm) (cm)
DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(cm) sprout
Explanation of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsampling**:
Height Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
p
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub.-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Suer
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
**Required ifciioff>lOcmor subsample?100%. 01
•2
• 3
♦ 64
1 N5
:46
::7
8
}-dK)
::10 Form WS2,ver9.1
Map of stems on plot 06122019-01-0003
Y
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 260
# stems: 18
0 map size:
small
N
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1--unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M-missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 06122019-01-0008 Pa Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year (1-5): � Date: / / New laming date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.549514 Datum: NAD27
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E: 78.339046 UTM Zone: 17N
Coordinate Accuracy (m): 0.5 X-Axis bearing (deg): L 105
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: 10 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Sep 2021 Data z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH * Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
Name
ID Species char O.lm O.lm lcm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
196
Betula nigra
R
9.0
0.9
300.0
1.0 ❑
197
Corpus florida
O
R
7.7
0.7
60.0
❑
198
Betula nigra
O
R
6.5
0.4
205.0
1.3 ❑
199
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
0.2
0.2
320.0
1.1 ❑
201
Quercus phellos
O
R
2.9
1.2
260.0
0.5 ❑
202
Quercus phellos
O
R
4.0
1.5
260.0
0.7 ❑
203
Quercus phellos
O
R
5.3
2.0
220.0
0.4 ❑
204
Quercus phellos
O
R
6.6
2.3
280.0
0.5 ❑
205
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
7.9
2.8
310.0
1.1 ❑
206
Betula nigra
O
R
9.2
3.1
240.0
0.4 ❑
209
Quercus alba
R
6.6
5.3
Missing❑
211
Betula nigra
O
R
3.4
4.5
250.0
0.5 ❑
213
Quercus alba
®
R
0.5
3.9
60.0
215
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
®
R
2.0
7.2
255.0
1.2 ❑
216
Corpus amomum
R
3.6
7.8
165.0
0.4 ❑
217
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
5.0
8.4
310.0
1.5 ❑
219
Betula nigra
O
R
1.8
9.7
340.0
1.6 ❑
1338
Corpus amomum
R
8.0
9.3
95.0
❑
#stems: 18 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
SpCC1CS Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1--unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M-missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 1 Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued):
06122019-01-0008
Sep 2021 Data
o
THIS YEARS DATA
ID Species
map source X Y
char (m) (m)
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
CDddh
Height
(mm) (cm)
DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(cm) sprout
Explanation of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsampling**:
Height Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
p
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub.-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Suer
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
**Required ifciioff>lOcmor subsample?100%. 01
•2
• 3
♦ 64
1 N5
:46
::7
8
}-dK)
::10 Form WS2,ver9.1
Map of stems on plot 06122019-01-0008
Y
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 105 N #stems: 18
map size:
0 small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1--unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M-missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 06122019-01-0009 Pa Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year (1-5): � Date: / / New laming date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.550187 Datum: NAD27
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E: 78.338805 UTM Zone: 17N
Coordinate Accuracy (m): 0.5 X-Axis bearing (deg): 30
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: 10 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Sep 2021 Data z THIS YEAR'S DATA
0
Map Source* X Y Height DBH * Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
Name
ID Species char O.lm O.lm lcm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
222
Quercus alba
O
R
0.4
2.7
20.0
❑
223
Quercus alba
®
R
0.4
4.0
50.0
❑
224
Betula nigra
O
R
0.5
5.2
40.0
❑
225
Quercus phellos
O
R
0.2
6.5
70.0
❑
226
Quercus alba
®
R
0.2
7.6
100.0
❑
228
Quercus alba
O
R
1.3
9.2
35.0
❑
229
Betula nigra
(j)
R
1.5
7.4
72.0
❑
230
Quercus phellos
O
R
2.1
5.5
105.0
DBH? ❑
231
Betula nigra
®
R
2.1
4.0
Missin g
❑
234
Quercus alba
R
4.5
1.0
Missin g
❑
235
Betula nigra
O
R
4.5
2.3
125.0
DBH? ❑
239
Liriodendron tulipifera
O
R
4.1
6.8
20.0
❑
241
Betula nigra
O
R
3.9
9.6
120.0
DBH? ❑
242
Quercus alba
O
R
6.3
7.9
Missin g
❑
248
Quercus alba
R
8.5
0.2
Missin g
❑
249
Quercus alba
O
R
8.7
0.7
38.0
❑
251
Quercus phellos
O
R
8.7
3.2
65.0
❑
254
Quercus alba
@
R
8.5
7.9
35.0
❑
1670
Quercus alba
O
R
3.0
6.0
45.0
❑
#stems: 19 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
SpCC1CS Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1--unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M-missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 1 Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued):
06122019-01-0009
Sep 2021 Data
o
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ID Species
map source X Y
char (m) (m)
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
CDddh
Height
(mm) (cm)
DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(cm) sprout
Explanation of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsampling**:
Height Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
p
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub.-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Suer
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
**Required ifciioff>lOcmor subsample?100%. 01
•2
• 3
♦ 64
1 N5
:46
::7
8
}-dK)
::10 Form WS2,ver9.1
Map of stems on plot 06122019-01-0009
Y
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 30 # stems: 19
N map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1--unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M-missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 06122019-01-0011 Pa Role: Date last planted:
VMD Year (1-5): � Date: / / New laming date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Taxonomic Standard: Notes: sampled, specify reason below
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N: 35.54959 Datum: NAD27
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E: 78.337572 UTM Zone: 17N
Coordinate Accuracy (m): 0.5 X-Axis bearing (deg): L 350
Plot Dimensions: X: 10 Y: 10 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
ID
Species Name
h
Map
char
source *
X Y
O.lm O.lm
Sep 2021 Data
Height DBH
*
lcm 1 cm
z
0
279
Platanus occidentalis
®
R
0.9
9.3
Missin g
❑
280
Platanus occidentalis
®
R
0.3
8.5
Missin g
❑
281
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
0.6
5.0
Missin g
❑
282
Platanus occidentalis
J)
R
1.4
5.8
Musing
❑
283
Platanus occidentalis
®
R
2.1
6.4
270.0
2.0 ❑
284
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
2.7
7.3
Missing
❑
285
Platanus occidentalis
R
3.3
8.0
Missin g
❑
286
Cornus amomum
O
R
3.9
8.9
85.0
❑
287
Platanus occidentalis
(in)
R
4.7
9.6
420.0
4.0 ❑
288
Quercus lyrata
O
R
8.4
9.8
170.0
0.4 ❑
290
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
@
R
7.0
8.5
95.0
❑
292
Cornus amomum
O
R
5.7
6.8
48.0
❑
294
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
4.4
4.9
500.0
3.6 ❑
298
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
R
1.7
1.7
118.0
DBH? ❑
299
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
1.0
1.1
162.0
0.6 ❑
300
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
0.3
0.4
380.0
3.0 ❑
302
Quercus lyrata
O
R
5.0
1.3
140.0
0.1 ❑
303
Quercus lyrata
R
6.5
3.0
150.0
0.2 ❑
305
Quercus lyrata
O
R
7.8
4.9
143.0
0.2 ❑
306
Quercus lyrata
O
R
8.5
6.1
100.0
❑
307
Quercus lyrata
R
9.2
6.8
190.0
0.6 ❑
308
Quercus lyrata
O
R
9.8
7.5
95.0
❑
309
Quercus lyrata
O
R
9.8
3.4
70.0
❑
310
Quercus lyrata
O
R
9.3
2.9
95.0
❑
311
Quercus lyrata
ss,
R
8.6
1.6
100.0
❑
312
Quercus lyrata
O
R
7.9
0.9
220.0
0.8 ❑
313
Comus amomum
O
R
7.5
0.4
60.0
❑
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
Icm* 1 cm sprout
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1--unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M-missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued):
06122019-01-0011
Sep 2021 Data
o
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ID Species
map source X Y
char (m) (m)
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
CDddh
Height
(mm) (cm)
DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(cm) sprout
#sterns: 27 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Species Name Source* * X Y Height DBH Vigor* Damage* Notes
p (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm
Explanation of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsamplina**:
Height Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right): Ll 10cm Ll 50cm Li 100Cm Li 137cm
Species Name
p
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub.-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBII)
* *Requi red if curt -off >10cm or subsample ? 100%. 01
•2
• 3
• ♦4
NS
6
::7
8
}
::10 Form WS2, ver 9.1
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1--unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M—missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 06122019-01-0011 X-axis: 350 ° # stems: 27
---------------- map size:
,CAPITAL LETTERS represent stems that are different from stems
marked with lowercase letters (i.e. "A" is different from "a"). 0� N small
Y:5rr
v
m
0
0
b
O
A
i
O
O
T
T
z
O
Os
a
Or
�-m
(0,0)
X:5m
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1--unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M-Missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1