WQCS00067_Inspection_20211006

ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
S. DANIEL SMITH
Director
Timothy Lawrence
US MCAS Cherry Point
MCAS Cherry Point
Psc Box 8006
Havelock, NC 28533
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Qualify
October 06, 2021
SUBJECT: Compliance Inspection Report
Cherry Point Collection System
Collection System Permit No. WQCS00067
Craven County
Dear Mr. Lawrence:
The North Carolina Division of Water Resources conducted an inspection of the Cherry Point Collection
System on 9/30/2021. This inspection was conducted to verify that the facility is operating in
compliance with the conditions and limitations specified in Collection System Permit No. WQCS00067.
The findings and comments noted during this inspection are provided in the enclosed copy of the
inspection report entitled "Compliance Inspection Report".
There were no significant issues or findings noted during the inspection and therefore, a response to this
inspection report is not required.
If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Robert Tankard with the Water
Quality Regional Operations Section in the Washington Regional Office at 252-946-6481 or via email at
[e-mail].
ATTACHMENTS
Cc: Laserfiche
Sincerely,
Rottal Te.44441
Robert Tankard, Assistant Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Washington Regional Office
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Washington Regional Office 1943 Washington Square Mall I Washington, North Carolina 22889
252.946,6481

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: WQCS00067 Effective: 08/01/16 Expiration: 07/31/24 Owner : US MCAS Cherry Point
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Cherry Point Collection System
County: Craven Commanding General Environmental Affairs De
Region: Washington
Contact Person: Timothy Lawrence
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications: CS3,
Primary ORC: Timothy Micheal Bert
Secondary ORC(s):
Brian Edward Maness
Jeffery Allen Davis
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Title: Environmental Engineer Phone: [phone]
Certification: 998176 Phone: [phone]
1004232
991811
NC0003816 US MCAS Cherry Point - Cherry Point WWTP
Inspection Date: 09/30/2021
Entry Time 10:OOAM Exit Time: 01:OOPM
252-466-2520
252-466-1229
Primary Inspector: Robert B Tankard Phone: [phone] Ext.233
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Collection System Inspect Non Sampling
Permit Inspection Type: Collection system management and operation
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
▪ Miscellaneous Questions
▪ Capital Improvement Plan
▪ Inspections
▪ Lines
(See attachment summary)
▪ General
▪ Map
▪ Spill Response Plan
▪ Pump Stations
▪ Sewer & FOG Ordinances
▪ Reporting Requirements
▪ Spills
Page 1 of 6

Permit: WQCS00067 Owner - Facility: US MCAS Cherry Point
Inspection Date: 09/30/2021
Inspection Type : Collection System Inspect Non Sampling Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
The inspection was on September 30, 2021. The attendees for USMC Cherry Point were:Timothy Lawremce, Rob Godwin,
Brian Maness, Tim Bert, Ricky Bobby and Mike Bryant. The reivew of the paperwork was performed in the Water Plant
conference Room. The operators prints off the work orders and keeps everything in order. A copy of the CIP was not
available, but Mr. Timothy Lawrence said that the updated CIP was available. All records appeared to be in order.
A site inspection of two high priority lines and four pump stations were performed. The high priority lines were the Mill Creek
Crossing and the Hunter's Branch crossing. No issues were observed. The high priority lines are being inspected quarterly.
Pump stations 3879, 1798, 3978 and 3981 were inspected. No issues were observed.PS 1798 was listed in the permit as a
simplex pump serving multiple buildings. It has been upgraded as a duplex pump station.
The facility was found to be in compliance.
Page 2 of 6

Permit: WQCS00067 Owner - Facility: US MCAS Cherry Point
Inspection Date: 09/30/2021
Inspection Type : Collection System Inspect Non Sampling Reason for Visit: Routine
General
Is there a properly designated primary ORC and at least one back-up of proper grade?
Are logs being reviewed by the system management or owner on a regular basis?
# What is that frequency?
# Are there any issues being addressed currently or any in the planning stages?
Is there a specific pump failure plan available for all pump stations?
Does plan indicate if pump parts/new pumps are in spare parts/equipment inventory?
Are new/significantly upgraded pump stations equipped with anti -corrosion materials?
Does the permittee have a copy of their permit?
# Is permit expiring within the next 6 months?
If Yes, has the Permittee applied for renewal?
Comment:
Sewer and FOG Ordinances
Is Sewer Use Ordinance (SUO) or other Legal Authority available?
Does it appear that the Sewer Use Ordinance is enforced?
Is there a Grease Control Program that legally requires grease control devices?
What is the standard grease trap cleaning requirement in the FOG ordinance?
Is Grease Control Program enforced via periodic inspections/records review?
Is action taken against violators?
# Have satellite systems adopted an equivalent or more stringent ordinance?
Is grease/sewer education program documented with req'd customer distribution?
# Are other types of education tools used like websites, booths, special meetings, etc?
If Yes, what are they? (This can reduce mailing to annual.)
Reminders are sent with an all hands on deck notification.
Comment:
Capital Improvement Plan
Has a Capital (CIP) or System Improvement Plan been developed and adopted?
Is it designated for wastewater only or does it have a dedicated section?
Does CIP cover three to five year period of earmarked improvements?
Does CIP include description of project area?
Does CIP include description of existing facilities?
Does CIP include known deficiencies?
Does CIP include forecasted future needs?
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ •
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ • ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ • ❑
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑•
❑ ❑ ❑•
❑ ❑ ❑•
❑ ❑ • ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Permittee acknowledge that a CIP had been accepted, however they did not have a hard copy
at the location of the meeting.
Page 3 of 6

Permit: WQCS00067 Owner - Facility: US MCAS Cherry Point
Inspection Date: 09/30/2021
Inspection Type : Collection System Inspect Non Sampling Reason for Visit: Routine
Map
Is there a overall sewer system map?
Does the map include:
Pipe Type (GS/FM)
Pipe sizes
Pipe materials (PVC, DIP, etc)
Pipe location
Flow direction
Approximate pipe age
Pump station ID, location and capacity
# Force main air release valve location & type
# Location of satellite connections
Is the map being updated for changes/additions within 1 year of activation?
Comment:
Reporting Requirements
# Have there been any sewer spills in the past 3 years?
If Yes, were they reported to the Division if meeting the reportable criteria?
If applicable, is there documentation of press releases and public notices issued?
Is an Annual Wastewater Performance Report being filed with the Division, if required?
Is the report being made available to all its sewer customers?
# How is it being made available?
Comment:
Inspections
Are adequate maintenance records maintained?
Are pump stations being inspected at the required frequency?
# Is at least one complete functionality test conducted weekly per pump station?
Is there a system or plan in place to observe the entire system annually?
Is the annual inspection documented?
# Does the system have any high -priority lines/locations?
Are inspections of HPL documented at least every 6 months?
Are new lines being added to the HPL list when found or created?
Comment:
Spill Response Action Plan
Is a Spill Response Action Plan available?
Is a Spill Response Action Plan available for all personnel?
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ •
❑ ❑ ❑ •
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Page 4 of 6

Permit: WQCS00067 Owner - Facility: US MCAS Cherry Point
Inspection Date: 09/30/2021
Inspection Type : Collection System Inspect Non Sampling Reason for Visit: Routine
Does the plan include:
24-hour contact numbers
Response time
Equipment list and spare parts inventory
Access to cleaning equipment
Access to construction crews, contractors, and/or engineers
Source of emergency funds
Site sanitation and cleanup materials
Post-overflow/spill assessment
Does the Permittee appear to respond within 2 hours of first knowledge of a spill?
Comment:
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Spills Yes No NA NE
Is system free of known points of bypass? • ❑ ❑ ❑
If No, describe type of bypass and location
Are all spills or sewer related issues/complaints documented? • El El El
# Are there repeated overflows/problems (2 or more in 12 months) at same location? ❑ • ❑ ❑
# If Yes, is there a corrective action plan? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Very few reported spills.
Lines/Right-of-Ways/Aerial Lines
Please list the Lines/Right of Ways/Aerial Lines Inspected:
Mill Creek crossing and Hunter's Branch crossing.
USMC added an ariel line: C Street 14 feet of 8" ductile iron.
Are right-of-ways/easements maintained for full width for access by staff/equipment?
If No, give details on temporary access:
Is maintenance documented?
Are gravity sewer cleaning records available?
Has at least 10% of lines older than 5 yrs been cleaned annually?
Were all areas/lines inspected free of issues?
Comment:
Pump Stations
Please list the Pump Stations Inspected:
Pump Stations 3879, 1798, 3978 and 3981.
# Number of duplex or larger pump stations in system
# Number of vacuum stations in system
# Number of simplex pump stations in system
# Number of simplex pump stations in system serving more than one building
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
70
0
11
0
Page 5 of 6

Permit: WQCS00067 Owner - Facility: US MCAS Cherry Point
Inspection Date: 09/30/2021
Inspection Type : Collection System Inspect Non Sampling Reason for Visit: Routine
How many pump/vacuum stations have:
# A two-way "auto polling" communication system (SCADA) installed?
# A simple one-way telemetry/communication system (auto -dialer) installed?
For pump stations inspected:
Are they secure with restricted access?
Were they free of by-pass structures/pipes?
Were wet wells free of excessive grease/debris?
# Do they all have telemetry installed?
Is the communication system functional?
Is a 24-hour notification sign posted ?
Does the sign include:
Owner Name?
Pump station identifier?
# Address?
Instructions for notification?
24-hour emergency contact numbers?
Are audio and visual alarms present?
Are audio and visual alarms operable?
# Is there a backup generator or bypass pump connected?
If tested during inspection, did it function properly?
Is the back-up system tested at least bi-annually under normal operating conditions?
# Does it have a dedicated connection for a portable generator?
# Is the owner relying on portable units in the event of a power outage?
# If Yes, is there a distribution plan?
If Yes, what resources (Units/Staff/Vehicles/etc) are included in Plan?
# Does Permittee have the approved percentage of replacement simplex pumps?
Is recordkeeping of pump station inspection and maintenance program adequate?
Do pump station logs include at a minimum:
Inside and outside cleaning and debris removal?
Inspecting and exercising all valves?
Inspecting and lubricating pumps and other equipment?
Inspecting alarms, telemetry and auxiliary equipment?
Comment:
31
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Page 6 of 6