20180785 Ver 1_Year 0 Monitoring Report_2021_20211005

Mitigation Project Information Upload
ID#* 20180785 Version* 1
Select Reviewer:*
Erin Davis
Initial Review Completed Date 10/05/2021
Mitigation Project Submittal - 10/5/2021
Is this a Prospectus,Technical Proposal or a New Site?* r Yes r No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
rJ Stream 17 Wetlands r Buffer r Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:* Email Address:*
Jeremiah Dow [e-mail]
Project Information
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
ID#:* 20180785 Version:*1
Existing ID## Existing Version
Project Type: C' DMS r Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site
County: Chatham
Document Information
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation As-Built Plans
File Upload: HipBoneCreek 100059_MY0_2021.pdf 21.4MB
Rease upload only one R7Fof the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Jeremiah Dow
Signature:*

Hip Bone Creek Baseline Monitoring Report
Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site
Cape Fear River Basin - 03030003
Monitoring Year 00
DMS Contract 7528
DMS Project Number 100059
DWR#: 2018-0785
USACE AID #: SAW-2018-01160
Chatham County, North Carolina
e
•
y y
�-. w8' iF ,�,.'S,db k , l
..'"•••te. tittatt •
� t
r ra h �eR 'F 3 4
Prepared for:
NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,NC 27699
Baseline Data Collected: May 2021
Date Submitted: August 2021

Monitoring and Design Firm
Prepared by:
411
K C I
ASSOCIATES OF NC
KCI Associates of North Carolina, PC
4505 Falls of Neuse Road
Suite 400
Raleigh,NC 27609
[phone]
Project Contact: Tim Morris
Email: tim.morris(akci.com
Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#100059 Baseline Monitoring Report

KC I ENGINEERS • SCIENTISTS • SURVEYORS • CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS
ASSOCIATES OF
NORTH CAROLINA, AI! 4505 Falls of Neuse Road Suite 400 Raleigh,NC 27609 [phone] [phone] Fax
MEMORANDUM
Date: August 27,2021
To: Jeremiah Dow,DMS Project Manager
From: Tim Morris,Project Manager
KCI Associates of North Carolina,PA
Subject: Hip Bone Creek Mitigation Site
MY-00 Baseline Monitoring Report Comments
Cape Fear River Basin CU 03030003
NCDMS Project# 100059
Contract#7528
Please find below our responses in italics to the MY-00 Baseline Monitoring Report comments from
NCDMS received on August 13,2021,for the Hip Bone Creek Mitigation Site.
• Title Page—Please correct the river basin and HUC.
KCI Response: This error has been corrected.
• We highly recommend following the most recent DMS monitoring template released in October
2020.The new template is designed to shorten reports and simplify many of the tables.
KCI Response: The morphology tables have been updated to conform to the October 2020
template. Future monitoring reports will use the October 2020 template.
• Table 1 —Please add the surveyed as-built stream lengths to this table.The existing
footage/acreage column can be replaced with the as-built lengths.Also,adjust wetland areas,if
necessary,based on the response to comment 9.f.
KCI Response: The Existing Footage/Acreage column has been replaced with the As-Built
Lengths.
• Table 4—Please update the Regulatory Considerations on this Table since the Section 401 and
404 permits were issued.
KCI Response: Table 4 has been updated to reflect that these permits have been issued.
• CCPV—The photo points should be labeled so they can be matched with the photo log.
KCI Response: The missing labels have been added to the CCPV.
KCI ASSOCIATES OF NORTH CAROLINA, P.A. www.kci.com
Employee-Owned Since 1988

Table 7a—We highly recommend using new template tables. T1 geomorphology data needs a
separate table foreach reach so that as-built condition and design parameters can be compared.
KCI Response:Both Table 7 and Table 8 have been updated to match the October 2020 template.
• The Visual Stream Stability Assessment and Visual Vegetation Assessment tables were not
included.Please ensure these are included in the MY1 report.
KCI Response: These tables were not included since there are not usually concerns about stream
stability and vegetative cover in the baseline report. These tables will be included in all future
monitoring reports.
• Record Drawing/As-built Sheets
o The Title Sheet should include the DMS Project Number(100059),DWR#(20180785),
and USACE#(SAW-2017-0016160).The asset table should be updated based on the
response to Comment 3 above.
KCI Response: These changes have been made.
o All plan sheets should show Limits of Disturbance,and typically we would see
monitoring devices such as cross sections,monitoring wells,crest/flow gauges,and veg
plots.
KCI Response:Monitoring devices and the LOD have been added to the plan sheets.
o Recommend removing callouts for in-channel structures that are not a deviation from
design.For example,on Sheet 3 the "Installed 'Step Pool' (TYP.)"can be removed along
with the other stream structure callouts.
KCI Response: This change has been made.
o Sheet 8—River Birch, Southern Red Oak,and Persimmon species did not change from
the amount proposed in the mitigation plan and should be colored black.
KCI Response: This change has been made.
o Sheet 10& 11 —Please update the Boundary Marking Plan sheets to show that fencing
was not constructed at numerous crossings. These changes should be called out in red as
deviations from design.
KCI Response: The interiors of the crossings were not fenced during DMS's site visit on
August 13 because KCI's fencing subcontractor is waiting for the necessary material to
arrive. Once this material arrives, the fencing will be installed as soon as possible. In the
meantime the landowner has agreed not to move cattle through these crossings.
• Digital Files
o The submitted stream and wetland features appear to be from the mitigation plan. Please
include as-built features that accurately represent the Restoration Footage and Acreage
column in the asset table.
KCI Response:Because there was no change in alignment between design and
construction of the site, the figures from the mitigation plan accurately represent the
Restoration Footage and Acreage column in the asset table.A shapefile of the center line
surveyed during the as-built survey has been included in the digital deliverables, but
because of limitations in the precision of this survey,particularly around bends in the
stream, the lengths of the reaches as represented in this shapefile do not perfectly align
with those in the Restoration Footage and Acreage column in the asset table.
o Please include unique ID's for the stream gauges that will relate to the ID's used for any
supporting data.
KCI Response: This change has been made.
o Please submit the existing stream features(displayed in Fig. 7 of mitigation plan).
KCI Response: This shapefile has been included in the digital deliverables.
o Note that in order to meet the 2 year in the ground requirement to apply volunteers
towards performance standards,height and x,y coordinates would need to be reported for
KCI ASSOCIATES OF NORTH CAROLINA, P.A. www.kci.com
Employee-Owned Since 1988

volunteers rather than stem counts binned by height.
KCI Response: This has been noted.
o Veg Plot 3's stems per acre value reported in Table 6 does not match the value included
in the Plot 3 tab in the Hipbone Veg MY00 excel file.Please review these data and
correct any outstanding mismatches.
KCI Response:Plot 3's tab has been updated to display the correct totals.
o Two wetland polygons overlap with stream features that represent no-credit segments on
T2 and T3 (e.g. the TOB was not excised from the polygon). Please clarify and remove
the stream footprint from the wetland areas if necessary based on USACE JD.
KCI Response: The area within the TOB of T2 and T3 has been removed from the
wetland area. This resulted in a loss of 0.017 acres of wetland rehabilitation, 0.022 acres
of wetland enhancement and 0.020 WMC's.
Please contact me if you have any questions or would like clarification concerning these responses.
Sincerely,
Tim Morris
Project Manager
KCI ASSOCIATES OF NORTH CAROLINA, P.A. www.kci.com
Employee-Owned Since 1988

TABLE OF CONTENTS
PROJECT SUMMARY 1
BASELINE CONDITONS 2
REFERENCES 3
Figure 1. Project Site Vicinity Map 4
Appendix A—Background Tables
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits 6
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History 7
Table 3. Project Contacts 8
Table 4. Project Information 9
Appendix B —Visual Assessment Data
CCPV 11
Photo Reference Points 14
Vegetation Plot Photos 16
Appendix C —Vegetation Plot Data
Table 5. Species and Quantity of Planted Stems 20
Table 6. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species 21
Appendix D — Stream Measurement and Geomorphology Data
Table 7.Baseline Stream Data Summary 25
Table 8. Cross-section Morphology Data Table 27
Longitudinal Profile Plot 29
Cross-section Plots 33
Pebble Counts 49
Appendix E —As-Built Plan Sheets
As-Built Plan Sheets 58
Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#100059 Baseline Monitoring Report

PROJECT SUMMARY
The Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site(HBCRS)is a full delivery project for the North Carolina Division of
Mitigation Services (DMS). The site was completed in 2021 and restored and enhanced a total of 4,026
linear feet of stream and 6.023 acres of riparian wetland.The HBCRS is a riparian system in the Cape Fear
River Basin (03030003 8-digit cataloging unit) in Chatham County, North Carolina. The site's natural
hydrologic regime had been substantially modified by relocation and straightening, impacts from cattle,
installation of field ditches,and other anthropogenic impacts.This site offers the chance to restore impacted
agricultural lands to a stable stream and wetland ecosystem with a functional riparian buffer, floodplain
access,and riparian wetlands.
The HBCRS is protected by an 18.68 acre permanent conservation easement, held by the State of North
Carolina. The site is located approximately 3.3 miles southeast of Siler City,North Carolina. Specifically,
the site is on Carter Brooks Road just east of US-421. The center of the site is at approximately 35.6804N
and-79.4018 W in the Siler City USGS Quadrangle.
The North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) published the Cape Fear River Basin
Restoration Priorities (RBRP) in 2009. The project's 14 digit CU (03030003070020, Tick Creek/Rocky
River) was identified as a Targeted Local Watershed (TLW) in the RBRP and is one of three 14 digit
hydrologic units in the DMS Upper and Middle Rocky River Local Watershed Plan(LWP).The goals and
priorities for the HBCRS are based on the information presented in the RBRP and LWP: maintaining and
enhancing water quality,restoring hydrology,and improving fish and wildlife habitat(NCEEP,2009).The
project will support the following TLW goals:
- Reduce and control sediment inputs.
- Reduce and manage nutrient inputs.
The project will also address the following stressors and sources listed in the LWP:
- Stream bank erosion
- Lack of adequate forested buffer
- Livestock access to streams
- Fecal coliform bacteria
- Nutrient inputs
- Floodplain alteration
The project goals will be addressed through the following objectives:
- Relocate channelized streams to historic landscape positions
- Install a bankfull-sized channel cross-section
- Install bedform diversity with pools,riffles,and habitat structures
- Demarcate the project easement boundaries and fence out livestock
- Plant the site with native trees and shrubs and a herbaceous seed mix
- Reconnect streams to a floodplain
- Redevelop wetland microtopography to slow the flow of surface and subsurface drainage
Project planting and construction were completed in April 2021.The site was constructed as designed with
only a few minor modifications from the design plan. Invasive species on site were treated and removed
during construction. A step pool was added at STA 10+00 on Ti. There were multiple small headcuts on
T3 that were stabilized throughout the reach with stone RIFFLE enhancements. Riffle enhancements were
added to the beginning EII section of T3. See Appendix E—As-Built Plan Sheets for details concerning
these changes.
Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#100059 1 Baseline Monitoring Report

The monitoring components were installed in May 2021.Two automatically recording pressure transducer
stream gauges that take a reading every 10 minutes were installed: one each in the upper third of T1-1 and
T3-1 to monitor the number of consecutive days of flow in these streams. An additional automatically
recording pressure transducer stream gauge was installed along T1-5 to record the occurrence of bankfull
events. Cameras were installed in the vicinity of each of the flow gauges and set to record a short video
once a day to provide additional verification of flow. Eight automatically recording pressure transducer
groundwater monitoring gauges were installed within the wetlands on site. Seven of these gauges were
installed within the re-establishment riparian wetlands on site and one of these gauges was installed within
the rehabilitation wetland on site. To determine the success of the planted mitigation areas,ten 10 m x 10
m permanent vegetation monitoring plots were established. An additional eight 10 m x 10 m random
vegetation monitoring plots were sampled throughout the site as well. The locations of the planted stems
relative to the origin were recorded within the permanent plots and the species and height of each planted
stem were recorded for all plots. Any volunteers found within the plots were also grouped into size
categories by species, but separate from the planted stems. Eight permanent photo reference points were
established and will be taken annually. Sixteen permanent cross-sections(8 riffle cross-sections and 8 pool
cross-sections)were also established and a detailed longitudinal profile of the stream was taken. Wolman
pebble counts were performed at all of the riffle cross-sections. The cross-section measurements will be
repeated in future monitoring years,but the longitudinal profile will only be repeated if there are concerns
about bed elevation adjustments. Reports will be submitted to DMS each year and the first year of
monitoring will take place in 2021. First year monitoring data is scheduled to be collected in November
2021, six months after baseline data collection.
Vegetative success criteria for the stream mitigation is 260 woody stems/acre after five years, and 210
woody stems/acre after seven years.Trees in each plot must average seven feet in height at Year 5 and ten
feet in height at Year 7.Volunteer species must be present for a minimum of two growing seasons and must
be a species from the approved planting list to count toward vegetative success. A single species may not
account for more than 50%of the required number of stems within any plot. A minimum of four bankfull
events must also be recorded during the monitoring period. All project streams must show a minimum of
30 continuous days of flow within a calendar year (assuming normal precipitation). A "normal" year is
based on NRCS climatological data for Chatham County with the 30th and 70th percentile thresholds as the
range of normal, as documented in the USACE Technical Report "Accessing and Using Meteorological
Data to Evaluate Wetland Hydrology,April 2000."Wetlands on the site must present continuous saturation
or inundation within 12"of the soil surface for 12%of the growing season.Bank height ratios(BHR)should
not exceed 1.2 and the entrenchment ratios (ER) should be 2.2 or greater. BHR and ER at any measured
riffle cross-section should not change more than 10% from the baseline condition during any given
monitoring interval (e.g. no more than 10% between years 1 and 2, 2 and 3, 3 and 5, or 5 and 7). Visual
assessments will also be used to identify problem areas.
BASELINE CONDITIONS
The site was planted in April 2021. The baseline vegetation monitoring was conducted May 13 and May
14, 2021. The average plot stem density from the eighteen surveyed plots is 1,005 planted stems/acre.
Baseline monitoring was conducted during dormancy, so many of the stems were not identified to species.
During MY01,these trees will be identified to species.
The baseline longitudinal profile was surveyed in May 2021. The baseline cross-sections were surveyed
between May 18 and May 19,2021.The baseline survey found that the stream was constructed as designed
and all structures were installed as planned with small variations, as called out in the as-built plans. The
profile and cross-section surveys found that the dimension and profile of the stream were built as designed,
with some small variation as is typical for stream restoration projects.A post construction drone video of
the site can be found at the following link: https://youtu.be/4xzm5mH9IgY
Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#100059 2 Baseline Monitoring Report

REFERENCES
NCDENR,Ecosystem Enhancement Program. 2009. Cape Fear River Basin Restoration Priorities
2009. Raleigh,NC.
https://files.nc.gov/ncdeq/Mitigation%20Services/Watershed Planning/Cape Fear Riv
er Basin/RBRP%20CapeFear%202009%20Revised%20032013.pdf
NCDEQ,Division of Mitigation Services.June 2017."As-built Baseline Monitoring Report
Format,Data and Content Requirement."
https://file s.nc.gov/ncdeq/Mitigation%20Services/Document%20Management%20Libra
ry/Guidance%20and%20Template%20Documents/6_AB_Baseline Rep Tempi June
%202017.pdf
NCIRT. October 24,2016."Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation
Update."https://saw-reg.usace.army.mil/PN/2016/Wilmington-District-Mitigation-
Update.pdf
USACE, Sprecher, S.W.;Warne,A. G. 2000. "Accessing and Using Meteorological Data to
Evaluate Wetland Hydrology."
https://ntrl.ntis.gov/NTRL/dashboard/searchResults/titleDetail/ADA378910.xhtml
Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#100059 3 Baseline Monitoring Report

ospeigii
alga
age �� ����0�� �����
I
Project Location:
Chatham County, NC
Billy F,rt;
421
r9hthppse C/� �,-� Sam Fields Rd
u�c
G)
a
N^^
0
0
CdrfP„
of
°Jy`
Gilmore Lodge Rd
�a Buck Gunter Rd
US d21'
4?ask. �y
00
e,pij Dixon Rd
a.
�C‘l
Mc�
Project Easement
FIGURE 1. PROJECT SITE VICINITY MAP N
0 0.25 0.5 HIP BONE CREEK RESTORATION SITE ,\ Image Source:ESRI
1 =1Miles �\ World Street Map
CHATHAM COUNTY, NC i, VV

APPENDIX A
Background Tables
Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#100059 5 Baseline Monitoring Report

Table 1.Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#100059
Mitigation Credits
Stream Riparian Non-riparian Buffer
Wetland Wetland
Type R RE R RE Re RE R RE
Linear 2,860 1,166 4.511 1.473
Feet/Acres
Credits 2,860.000 466.400 4.021 0.589
TOTAL 3,326.400 4.610
CREDITS I
Project Components
Project As-built Restoration Creditable
Component Stationing/ Restoration Approach Mitigation Ratio Mitigation
Footage/ Footage or Footage or Notes/Comments
-or- Location Level (PI,PH etc.) (X:1) Credits
Reach ID Acreage Acreage Acreage
Ti Reach 1 10+00 to 745 780 750 R I 1:1 750.000 30'exception STA
17+80 13+12 TO 13+42
T1 Reach 2 17+80 to 890 906 906 R I 1:1 906.000
26+86
T1 Reach 3 26+86 to 208 269 209 R I 1:1 209.000 60'exception STA
29+54 27+77 to 28+37
T1 Reach 4 29+54 to 295 295 295 EII N/A 2.5:1 118.000
32+49
T1 Reach 5 32+49 to 447 452 452 R I/II 1:1 452.000
37+01
T3 Reach 1 300+00 to 280 310 280 EII N/A 2.5:1 112.000 30'exception STA
303+10 301+57 to 301+87
T3 Reach 2 311+10 to 590 591 591 EII N/A 2.5:1 236.400
317+00
T3 Reach 3 317+00 to 545 573 543 R I 1:1 543.000 30'exception STA
322+73 317+98 to 318+28
Riparian N/A 1.473 1.495 1.473 E N/A 2.5:1 0.589 30'exception STA
Enhancement 13+12 to 13+42
Riparian
Wetland Re- N/A 3.040 3.040 3.040 R N/A 1:1 3.040
establishment (Re-est.)
Riparian
Wetland N/A 1.471 1.488 1.471 R N/A 1.5:1 0.981
Rehabilitation (Rehab.)
Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#100059 6 Baseline Monitoring Report

Component Summation
Stream Riparian Wetlands Non-Riparian
Restoration Level (linear feet) (Acres) Wetlands Buffer(square feet)
(Acres)
Riverine Non-Riverine
Restoration 2,860 4.511
Enhancement 1.473
Enhancement I
Enhancement II 1,166
Creation
Preservation
High Quality
Preservation
Table 2. Project Activity&Reporting History
Hipbone Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#100059
Activity or Report Data Collection Complete Actual Completion or
Delivery
Mitigation Plan March 17,2020
Final Design-Construction Plans March 17,2020
Construction Grading Completed April 16,2021
Planting Completed April 30,2021
Baseline Monitoring/Report May 2021 July 2021
Vegetation Monitoring May 14,2021
Stream Survey May 21,2021
Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#100059 7 Baseline Monitoring Report

Table 3.Project Contacts
Stony Fork Restoration Site,DMS Project#97085
Design Firm KCI Associates of North Carolina,PC
4505 Falls of Neuse Road
Suite 400
Raleigh,NC 27609
Contact:Mr.Tim Morris
Phone:[phone]
Fax:[phone]
Construction Contractor Chatham Civil Contracting
811 Archie Johnson Road
Siler City,NC 27344
Contact:Mr. Stephen James
Phone:[phone]
Planting Contractor Shenandoah Habitats
1983 Jefferson Highway
Waynesboro,VA 22980
Contact:Mr.David Coleman
Phone:[phone]
Monitoring Performers
KCI Associates of North Carolina,PC
4505 Falls of Neuse Road
Suite 400
Raleigh,NC 27609
Contact:Mr.Adam Spiller
Phone:[phone]
Fax:[phone]
Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#100059 8 Baseline Monitoring Report

Table 4.Project Information
Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#100059
Project Name Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site
County Chatham County
Project Area 18.68 ac
Project Coordinates(lat.and long.) 35.6804 N,-79.4018
Planted Acreage(acres of woody
stems planted) 17.40
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province Piedmont
River Basin Cape Fear
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit 03030003 USGS Hydrologic Unit 14-digit 03030003070020
DWQ Sub-basin 03-06-12
Project Drainage Area(acres) 158 acres
Project Drainage Area Percentage of 1%
Impervious Area
CGIA Land Use Classification Pasture/Fannland(85%),Forest(9%),Open Water(5%),and Rural Development(1%)
Existing Reach Summary Information
Parameters T1 T3
Length of reach(linear feet) 2,439 2,202
Valley confinement Unconfmed Unconfmed
Drainage area(acres) 158 acres 43 acres
Perennial,Intermittent,Ephemeral Intermittent Intermittent
NCDWQ Water Quality Classification C C
Rosgen Stream Classification(Existing/ G4/C4 and C4b G4/C4
Proposed)
Evolutionary trend(Simon) Channelized,Stage III Channelized,Stage IIII
FEMA classification None None
Existing Wetland Summary Information
Parameters T1 T3
Size of Wetland(acres) 2.52 ac(WA and WE) 0.99 ac(WB,WC,WD,WF,and WG)
Wetland Type Headwater Forest Headwater Forest
Mapped Soil Series Georgeville Chewacla/Wehadkee
Drainage class Well Drained Poorly Drained
Soil Hydric Status Non-Hydric Hydric
Source of Hydrology Stream Floodplain Stream Floodplain
Restoration or Enhancement Method Enhancement Re-establishment,Rehabilitation,and
Enhancement
Regulatory Considerations
Regulation Applicable? Resolved? Supporting
Documentation
Waters of the United States—Section 404 Yes NWP 27 issued SAW-2018-01160
Waters of the United States—Section 401 Yes NWP 27 issued DWR# 18-0785
Endangered Species Act Yes Yes USFWS
Historic Preservation Act No Yes NCSHIPO
Coastal Zone Management Act
(CZMA)/ Coastal Area Management Act No N/A N/A
(CAMA)
FEMA Floodplain Compliance No Yes N/A
Essential Fisheries Habitat No N/A N/A
Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#100059 9 Baseline Monitoring Report

APPENDIX B
Visual Assessment Data
Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#100059 10 Baseline Monitoring Report

I
7\ ;
I
T1 Reach 5 i
I
(\ T1 Reach 4
Page 2 ,', T1 Reach 3
i
i
I .as T3 Reach 3
i }
i P • ,-
i I
W
Project Easement(18.68 acres) I
Stream Mitigation i —F -�- _ -- --- --- -- r T3 Reach 2
Restoration (2,860 If/2,860 SMC) I �
t v
•Enhancement II (1,1661f/466 SMC) I •, .
,
No Credit I
Riparian Wetland Mitigation I :,
3
-Re-establishment(3.040acres/3.040 WMC) I — - - ~
I
Rehabilitation (1.473 acre/0.981 WMC) I My -
Enhancement (1.473acre/0.59 WMC) I - «
Photo Points I '.T1 Reach 1 •
�-Cross-sections P,�ag@ 7 y .
• Bankfull Gauge I I
• Flow Gauge I I-
I
Flow Camera I
Wetland Gauges I I
S Successful I
I
sir :
Successful e I
Vegetation Plots _ •'
I Successful - j T3 Reach 1
Not Successful . -- t .
CURRENT CONDITIONS PLANVIEW PAGE N
0 200 400 Image Source:NC OneMap
Feet HIP BONE CREEK RESTORATION SITE 2017 Orthoimagery.
CHATHAM COUNTY, NC

,\
• 0-' 3 T1 Reach 2 $ - =E.
• x
T2 Reach 1 * ,f -
XS3� ®o
� T3 Reach 2
PP_1 6Vr
.31
la WM2' -
PP2 p0
3k- R7
i 13+00.: �3
p
x0`Xs2
A-
S
7
; - WM1
11+00
104,00
Project Easement(18.68 acres) d
T1 Reach 1 ':
Stream Mitigation .+00
Restoration (2,860 lf/2,860 SMC)
Enhancement II (1,166 If/466 SMC) - - i _ O
No Credit " -
O
Riparian Wetland Mitigation `
Re-establishment (3.040 acres/3.040 WMC) •s
Rehabilitation (1.473 acre/0.981 WMC) -
Enhancement (1.473 acre/0.59 WMC)
,i"
Photo Points
- Cross-sections -1--303+00
C Bankfull Gauge - LAPT.r '_
• Flow Gauge -
Flow Camera �" . -
Wetland Gauges - y
Successful .30A}p6
i Not Successful
1
Vegetation Plots App
I I Successful - ' i °13 Reach 1
Not Successful
�. s:�fs ice_ .�.-.
CURRENT CONDITIONS PLANVIEW PAGE N
0 100 200 Image Source:NC OneMap
Feet HIP BONE CREEK RESTORATION SITE 2017 Orthoimagery.
CHATHAM COUNTY, NC

ko
h
�t -. . - r 'AZ. t , A 1.1
'
0
_. � r
o
c.: WM5
- '' T1 Reach 5
4 yi'
.;
.,
. .
...., . . ,. _
•
, . . Litki
k04. T1 Reach 4
v--1 ,• 00 ;' �
PP4 0 M
Project Easement(18.68 acres) - 0
Stream Mitigation `'6'% `5 r
•Restoration (2,860 If/2,860 SMC) O T1 Reach 3
Enhancement II (1,166If/466 SMC) WM4?S 32?+QQ {s
No Credit ° S8 l tj� i;'.I Itir;-�
Riparian Wetland Mitigation WM3< .K • .�,? `t `
- Re-establishment (3.040acres/3.040 WMC) 24+00• I
" 7x�OL
Rehabilitation (1.473 acre/0.981 WMC) R4 _•' -- O � ' .
23+Di '
Enhancement (1.473 acre/0.59 WMC)
Photo Points 22+00- y�y
-Cross-sections G►W
• Bankfull Gauge ko0' 0
• Flow Gauge ,A 21 r .. ,\$k0 O
Flow Camera 2D+D'-
x5^i ^0 T3 Reach 3
Wetland Gauges •,`'''Ss ,, ^
`r Successful f0\ • XS13• p0
S Not Successful +oo tS \ 1\1
19 �3 3 R8
Vegetation Plots • 'PPS 8 • . `3'�la*OO
I Successful QQ•''> Beach 2 .
Not Successful ( "
CURRENT CONDITIONS PLANVIEW PAGE N
0 100 200 Image Source:NC OneMap
Feet HIP BONE CREEK RESTORATION SITE 2017 Orthoimagery.
CHATHAM COUNTY, NC

Photo Reference Photos
. �.
,--.4...-,,,,.:.,a.-.,--,:„.,,,,-_,-,...-:
am« 0
k y
_�.. ?K _ ...� .. - eC. ,u�i14:.41:' "dL. •
...�Sa � . .:.a`{`$ :.'"�.�'1 ..r.,.. ..
PP 1 —MY-00—5/24/21 PP2—MY-00—5/24/21
,'. '
f`
PIIIIIIMIIPPIPP
., x..a „ :
-s`•, -a :.- yaw `+ :tea i^'n,:
rf
^ "`^k 4 ate, rt ,. YJs -.
ir?-4:4*-dWtt*-4•:.*•;.:.'"''?•'-:VE't •01,-ti;;•?40V..--1.. ,:--,•.-.:Ti.'•'''•'.fil- ,:4•49t1•4471,0*-:1 .-,,,,,.'•!"7";•:-'!..,:t•n•04::-4,--,PAVAT'%,,'.",:[-:•,----..:-•H-- ' "''—-'
a,
a
.`s-^ .'°.`� .yN u::. ^r,Al`tim441 w�.. P.T:.. �' •
PP3 —MY-00—5/24/21 PP4—MY. -00—5/24/21
•
jiliIllIllIllIll.l. ' ... __ _ - , -t. .-,
s14
— ;a$
:._}wx _• r it K Z r fief �` ': €"�4�°�'
�, I "rr"° '"#. �
%
PP5—MY-00—5/24/21 PP6-MY-00-5/24/21
Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#100059 14 Baseline Monitoring Report

•
'„
i
� x
h
. S` ..~ . . _ *' a' F i•s /Y!'- i • i . •v`.,, 1�,r r. " r
PP7—MY-00—5/24/21 PP8 —MY-00—5/24/21
•
•
,�,_. '�$x �` gib' ah VLT
.....
Jp& • ! `mks.'.' ¢' L
'1 �kn
PP9—MY—()()—5/24/21 PP10—MY-00—5/24/21
Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#100059 15 Baseline Monitoring Report

Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
,.. , a
�,79u •-,,r2 '� „ �L i:.-.F•e.= 3, X c ,s {r ' ' ,�=' x w•.,, y"� '4'71 „,'�*.�!�4 x
� '� -max st�s�;,'�?"` � r��f r� �.�� M�_- ,� � '"s
•
r
� ? R sty` y',�}Y,, �a �',vaa,� . � , � .�ar �� t �> �.� �,�v;7�'
�`.=;.,p 4 mr' a r - R. v `k ';. .,-r f n i °.L .
.d ��` �is � u `'� Ah'i. �; .%3., �:.r. a a:'�.,,'.�w' S �., r,��,� ..�. '4`•er ,•`��.,�.
Vegetation Plot 1 -MY-00-5/14/21 Vegetation Plot 2-MY-00-5/14/21
Y
l
inlir ..,
•
k <
.,„ f a - ''' ,4-, -
Vegetation Plot 3 -MY-00-5/13/21 Vegetation Plot 4-MY-00-5/13/21
!*, ..
moo:
',, ;
: a-:-� .,
°?
is , .y'Pr'c. ,'" kY' � ,�' Yr # "�r
FCC Y. r,t .. -, ,yw` ,.s \ _.r14 �'d �fS ICT F .. ...�
Vegetation Plot 5-MY-00-5/13/21 Vegetation Plot 6-MY-00 - 5/14/21
Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#100059 16 Baseline Monitoring Report

}
cam;. 3�Y+.. 1,
rk 4 pia. b .a4 % 1 ;#3 �
iirvj, P
•
3i,n14PSV-G.. - Ms'�A�.•.� •V.z '.'•r. ^µ -�.- .. .. -'ten '
Vegetation Plot 7—MY-00—5/13/21 Vegetation Plot 8—MY-00—5/13/21
r.
_.< ,..:.
•
C • J
ij y,.- 4 'iFr,F} 3 2
!--,, '... ,--''A'''' 1',,':-'''.,k*,,,,,-,,,-,2: iilf#,..,,z15:0,,,,..7.,z.f.„*.ff.,„::.: - -- . .. .
-1� 7x -`^y�,' a.+t n,,, r .zy.,� "yr 5s .� .c.
Vegetation Plot 9—MY-00—5/13/21 Vegetation Plot 10—MY-00—5/13/21
..., r ,
IIIIIpllNIWIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIII
ya`
. T
a
t
E1
'
a , s �, N
31� g _ .ice 1 .> �"'- ix , ' ,r - _ - - -
d # %AYy, -" -- "`''? fir. - - -N.
� 4 _. % , '.,'.t 1• "•` 44Fy. is'i i f.,4 _
] 99
Vegetation Plot RI —MY-00—5/14/21 Vegetation Plot R2—MY-00—5/14/21
Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#100059 17 Baseline Monitoring Report

'4
Illpgirt-- >-"
IIP
as �_�
w� v� dk�3 l .'i`'. i.l"WTfiPkn4 T f
(i ., , - -,,,,,,,,,- ,„-,. ,i,4 ,,,,liti7.:,,,4•A"--41 - ,.o.,A,,,-,Lg.,.-w ,; ,.,.?.....,,,,:iti,,,,'..,SN;
11'
r ,...,....:.:::,..a,.;.:.
�x �
'-'.,4Y I S }fir ;,, a F v �; �'1 3.:',..1::::,:,::::.,t,::::,-;,,:-:,,,::, ,.,..,:".,:-.,1,,,,,-,,,,.1.0,,,,,,„,,,,,.,,,,..(.... ,,,,..,,:f,... yv,,. :1P:'4(i':itHr''j,''2'•.::;•7:fr'''':':4:3..;"'ZI*1.-f. ..''''''''''',"%'..'''''llr'''j-,:7-rLe-t---.. ., ' , i ,
�! a
.z p t*ry �'� `5 +s,` `er ,.. ���� "it ,t '�' 4 s ,° �f '
i 1 f 1, 1 ' y' fad¢ k �a 6
� „�s a ����, f�. .f"- � ate. �,&�"a �"" 1
B .' sa 'M1 5F1k P �.4F J -n
Vegetation Plot R3 -MY00-5/14/21 Vegetation Plot R4-MY00-5/14/21
= '''
,
. _
rr4ir
‘41114.46-
Vegetation Plot RS-MY00-5/13/21 Vegetation Plot R6-MY00-5/13/21
oniiiiiiiiiiiiiiipirpwigr
•
°*' f P- R k '1 s
4-,-;-,„-,1".,Xirei4g-,";i,"*. .',;.,.."":.: .ig----:;7.41,-,,-;_.,;,1_,. ..,-;4,,-,.,e."&,‘„,---,, --
At
Vegetation Plot R7-MY-00-5/13/21 Vegetation Plot R8-MY-00-5/13/21
Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#100059 18 Baseline Monitoring Report

APPENDIX C
Vegetation Plot Data
Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#100059 19 Baseline Monitoring Report

Table 5.Species and Quantity of Planted Stems
Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#100059
Common Name Scientific Name Bare Root Live Stakes
Sycamore Platanus occidentalis 4,380
Swamp Chestnut Oak Quercus michauxii 380
River Birch Betula nigra 4,225
Willow Oak Quercus phellos 3,535
Pin Oak Quercus palustris 1,845
Southern Red Oak Quercus falcata 1,690
Persimmon Diospyros virginiana 845
Black Willow Salix nigra 800
Silky Willow Salix sericea 1,000
Silky Dogwood Cornus ammomum 1,000
Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#100059 20 Baseline Monitoring Report

Table 6. Stem Count by Plot and Species
Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#100059
Current Plot Data(MY00 2020)
Plot 01 Plot 02 Plot 03 Plot 04 Plot 05 Plot 06 Plot 07
Species Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total
American Sycamore(Platanus occidentalis) 7 7 12 12 3 3 6 6 8 8 14 14 3 3
Black Willow(Salix nigra) 1 1
Buttonbush(Cephalanthus occidentalis)
Honey Locust(Gleditsia triacanthos)
Lob lolly Pine(Pinus taeda) 1
Oak(Quercus sp.) 1 1 5 5 3 3 1 1 10 10
Persimmon(Diospyros virginiana) 1 1 1 1
Pin Oak(Quercus palustris) 2 2 6 6 2 2 1 1
Red Maple(Acer rubrum) 7
River Birch(Betula nigra) 12 12 8 8 2 2 5 5 13 13 6 6 1 1
Swamp Chestnut Oak(Quercus michauxii) 2 2
Sweetgum(Liquidambar styraciflua)
Willow Oak(Quercus phellos) 1 1 3 3 2 2 4 4 1 1 6 6
Winged Elm(Ulmus alata) 5
Unknown 4 4 2 2 1 1 1 1 10 10
Stem county 27 r 27 29 29 17 30 19 19 26 r 26 r 23 r 23 30 30
size(ares) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
size(ACRES) 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025
Species count r 8 8 r 5 • 5 r 5 8 r 5 5 5 5 r 5 • 5 r 5 • 5
Stems perACREr 1,093�1,093 r 1,174 r1,174 r 688 1,214 r 769 1 769 1,052 1,052 r 931 r931 r 1,214 r1,214
Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#100059 21 Baseline Monitoring Report

Table 6. Stem Count by Plot and Species
Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#100059
Current Plot Data(MY00 2020)
Plot 08 Plot 09 Plot 10 Plot RI Plot R2 Plot R3 Plot R4
Species Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total
American Sycamore(Platanus occidentalis) 2 2 10 10 2 2 8 8 11 11 3 3
Black Willow(Salix nigra)
Buttonbush(Cephalanthus occidentalis)
Honey Locust(Gleditsia triacanthos)
Lob lolly Pine(Pinus taeda)
Oak(Quercus sp.) 1 1 12 12 7 7 3 3 2 2
Persimmon(Diospyros virginiana) 2 2 1 1
Pin Oak(Quercus palustris) 3 3 1 1 4 4 1 1
Red Maple(Acer rubrum) 10
River Birch(Betula nigra) 22 22 18 18 11 11 10 10 10 10 4 4
Swamp Chestnut Oak(Quercus michauxii) 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 1
Sweetgum(Liquidambar styraciflua) 3
Willow Oak(Quercus phellos) 1 1 6 6 7 7 4 4 1 1 1 1
Winged Elm(Ulmus alata) 7
Unknown 6 6 3 3 1 1
Stem count r 29 29 31 31 37 37 26 26 26 r 26 r 26 r 26 9 r 29
size(ares) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
size(ACRES) 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025
ri, r.
Species count r 5 r. 5 r 4 4 7 7 r 5 5 5 5 r 6 r. 6 p 4 7
Stems per ACRE r 1,174 p1,174 r 1,255 r1,255 r 1,497 r1,497 r 1,052 '1,052 1,052 1,052 r 1,052 r1,052 r 364 r1,174
Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#100059 22 Baseline Monitoring Report

Table 6. Stem Count by Plot and Species
Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#100059
Current Plot Data(MY00 2020) Annual Means
Plot R5 Plot R6 Plot R7 Plot R8 MY00(2021)
Species Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total Planted Total
American Sycamore(Platanus occidentalis) 2 2 1 1 7 7 5 5 104 104
Black Willow(Salix nigra) 1 1
Buttonbush(Cephalanthus occidentalis) 2 2
Honey Locust(Gleditsia triacanthos) 1 1
Loblolly Pine(Pinus taeda) 1
Oak(Quercus sp.) 8 8 12 12 1 1 9 9 75 75
Persimmon(Diospyros virginiana) 1 1 6 6
Pin Oak(Quercus palustris) 1 1 3 3 3 3 27 27
Red Maple(Acer rubrum) 17
River Birch(Betula nigra) 6 6 8 8 136 136
Swamp Chestnut Oak(Quercus michauxii) 3 3 1 1 12 12
Sweetgum(Liquidambar styraciflua) 3
Willow Oak(Quercus phellos) 1 1 5 5 7 7 7 7 57 57
Winged Elm(Ulmus alata) 12
Unknown 1 1 29 29
•
Stem count r 21 23 27 28 20 20 24 24 447 r 483
size(ares) 1 1 1 1 1
size(ACRES) 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.025 0.445
• •
Species count r 6 7 r 5 6 6 6 4 4 r 9 15
Stems per ACRE r 850 r 931 r 1,093 rl,133 809 809 971 r 971 r 1,005 r1,086
Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#100059 23 Baseline Monitoring Report

APPENDIX D
Stream Measurement and Geomorphology Data
Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#100059 24 Baseline Monitoring Report

Table 7a.Baseline Stream Data Summary, Hip Bone Creek,Reach T1-1
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Design Monitoring Baseline(MYO)
Riffle Only Min Mean Med Max n Min Max Min Max n
Bankfull Width(ft) 5.2 6.3 6.3 7.3 2 5.4 5.5 6.4 2
Floodprone Width(ft) 12.0 13.4 13.4 14.8 2 35 42 54.8 54.9 2
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 2 0.4 0.4 0.6 2
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 0.9 1.1 1.1 1.3 2 0.7 0.8 1.1 2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2) 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.5 2 2.2 2.1 3.9 2
Width/Depth Ratio 11.0 16.4 16.4 21.8 2 13.0 10.7 14.5 2
Entrenchment Ratio 1.6 2.3 2.3 2.9 2 6.5 7.8 8.5 9.9 2
Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.2 2 1.0 1.0 1.0 2
Max part size(mm)mobilized at bankfull 30 29 42
Rosgen Classification G4c/G4 C4b C4b
Bankfull Discharge(cfs) 8.1-8.6 8.0 5.6-13.5
Sinuosity(ft) 1.0 1.2 1.2
Water Surface Slope(Channel)(ft/ft) 0.003-0.025 0.024 0.0249
Other
Table 7b.Baseline Stream Data Summary,Hip Bone Creek,Reach T1-2
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Design Monitoring Baseline(MYO)
Riffle Only Min Mean Med Max n Min Max Min Max n
Bankfull Width(ft) 4.4 7.3 7.3 10.2 2 7.0 6.5 7.9 1
Floodprone Width(ft) 12.6 20.4 20.4 28.2 2 42 56 56.7 57.2 1
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.4 0.7 0.7 1.0 2 0.6 0.7 0.7 1
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.5 2 0.9 1.1 1.1 1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2) 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 2 4.0 4.6 5.4 1
Width/Depth Ratio 4.5 14.7 14.7 24.8 2 12.2 9.3 11.7 1
Entrenchment Ratio 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.9 2 6.0 8.0 7.1 8.7 1
Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2 1.0 1.0 1.0 1
Max part size(mm)mobilized at bankfull 33 25 29
Rosgen Classification G4c/G4 C4 C4
Bankfull Discharge(cfs) 14.1 -14.6 13.6 13.7-15.6
Sinuosity(ft) 1.0 1.2 1.2
Water Surface Slope(Channel)(ft/ft) 0.003-0.025 0.015 0.014
Other
Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#100059 25 Baseline Monitoring Report

Table 7c.Baseline Stream Data Summary, Hip Bone Creek,Reach T1-3 and 5
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Design Monitoring Baseline(MYO)
Riffle Only Min Mean Med Max n Min Max Min Max n
Bankfull Width(ft) 4.6 11.8 11.6 19.3 4 8.6 9.3 9.4 1
Floodprone Width(ft) 12.5 28.3 25.4 49.9 4 30 58 47.8 77.5 1
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.4 0.7 0.6 1.3 4 0.7 0.8 0.8 1
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 1.1 1.7 1.8 1.9 4 1.1 1.2 1.4 1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2) 5.8 6.6 6.0 8.8 4 6.0 7.2 7.3 1
Width/Depth Ratio 3.6 24.2 25.6 42.1 4 12.4 11.8 12.3 1
Entrenchment Ratio 2.0 2.5 2.6 2.7 4 3.5 6.7 5.1 8.3 1
Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.5 4 1.0 1.0 1.0 1
Max part size(mm)mobilized at bankfull 18 17 23
Rosgen Classification G4c/G4 C4 C4
Bankfull Discharge(cfs) 15.3-22.7 19.8 19.3-20.0
Sinuosity(ft) 1.0 1.14 1.14
Water Surface Slope(Channel)(ft/ft) 0.003-0.025 0.0082 0.0101
Other
Table 7d.Baseline Stream Data Summary,Hip Bone Creek,Reach T3
Parameter Pre-Existing Condition Design Monitoring Baseline(MYO)
Riffle Only Min Mean Med Max n Min Max Min Max n
Bankfull Width(ft) 4.6 11.8 11.6 19.3 3 5.8 6.5 7.2 2
Floodprone Width(ft) 12.5 28.3 25.4 49.9 3 30 40 45.2 50.3 2
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft) 0.4 0.7 0.6 1.3 3 0.5 0.5 0.5 2
Bankfull Max Depth(ft) 1.1 1.7 1.8 1.9 3 0.7 0.8 0.9 2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft2) 5.8 6.6 6.0 8.8 3 2.7 3.4 3.9 2
Width/Depth Ratio 3.6 24.2 25.6 42.1 3 12.7 12.3 13.3 2
Entrenchment Ratio 2.0 2.5 2.6 2.7 3 5.2 6.9 7.0 7.0 2
Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.5 3 1.0 1.0 1.0 2
Max part size(mm)mobilized at bankfull 39 23 29
Rosgen Classification G4 C4 C4
Bankfull Discharge(cfs) 2.7-9.0 8.7 9.7-11.1
Sinuosity(ft) 1.0 1.13 1.13
Water Surface Slope(Channel)(ft/ft) 0.02-0.039 0.017 0.0183
Other
Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#100059 26 Baseline Monitoring Report

Table 8. Cross Section Dimensional Morphology Summary
Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#100059
Cross-Section 1(Riffle) Cross-Section 2(Pool) Cross-Section 3(Riffle)
Dimension and Substrate Station 12+00,T1-1 Station 12+25,T1-1 Station 16+25,T1-1
MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07
Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfulll Area 566.3 565.6 555.7
Bank Height Ratio_Based on AB Bankfulll Area 1.0 1.0 1.0
Thalweg Elevation 566 563.7 555
LTOB2 Elevation 566.3 565.6 555.7
LTOB2 Max Depth(ft) 0.8 1.9 1.1
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area(ft2) 2.1 10.9 3.9
Cross-Section 4(Pool) Cross-Section 5(Riffle) Cross-Section 6(Pool)
Station 16+37,T1-1 19+37 Station,T1-2 Station 19+62,T1-2
MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07
Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfulll Area 555.0 550.3 549.7
Bank Height Ratio_Based on AB Bankfulll Area 1.0 1.0 1.0
Thalweg Elevation 553.5 549 547.6
LTOB2 Elevation 555.0 550.3 549.7
LTOB2 Max Depth(ft) 1.5 1.1 2.1
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area(ft2) 8.1 5.4 14.0
Cross-Section 7(Riffle) Cross-Section 8(Pool) Cross-Section 9 Riffle)
Station 24+62,T1-2 Sation 25+00,T1-2 Station 28+75,T1-4
MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07
Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfulll Area 542.6 542.5 536.6
Bank Height Ratio_Based on AB Bankfulll Area 1.0 1.0 1.0
Thalweg Elevation 542 540.2 535
LTOB2 Elevation 542.6 542.5 536.6
LTOB2 Max Depth(ft) 1.1 IIMMMEI MEMI. IMI.11
_
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area(ft2) 4.6 16.7 - Al_
Cross-Section 10 (Pool) Cross-Section 11(Riffle) Cross-Section 12(Pool)
Station 29+00,T1-4 Station 34+00,T1-4 Station 34+37,T1-4
MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07
Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfulll Area 536.3 531.5 I. 531.3
Bank Height Ratio_Based on AB Bankfulll Area 1.0 1.0 1.0
Thalweg Elevation 534 530.2 529
LTOB2 Elevation 536.3 531.5 531.3
LTOB2 Max Depth(ft) 2.6 1.2 2.4
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area(ft2) 20.0 7.3 20.8
Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#100059 27 Baseline Monitoring Report

Table 8. Cross Section Dimensional Morphology Summary
Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site,DMS Project#100059
Cross-Section 13(Riffle) Cross-Section 14(Pool) Cross-Section 15(Riffle)
Dimension and Substrate Station 317+37,T3-3 Station 317+50,T3-3 Station 319+62,T3-3
MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07 MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07
Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull l Area 548.8 548.3 544.7
Bank Height Ratio Based on AB Bankfull l Area 1.0 1.0 1.0
lhalweg Elevation 548 547.2 544
LTOB2 Elevation 548.8 548.3 544.7
LTOB2 Max Depth(ft) 0.8 1.1 0.9
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area(ft2) 3.4 4.3 3.9
Cross-Section 16 (Pool)
Station 319+87,T3-3
MY00 MY01 MY02 MY03 MY05 MY07
Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull l Area 544.2
Bank Height Ratio Based on AB Bankfull l Area 1.0
lhalweg Elevation 542.7
LTOB2 Elevation 544.2
LTOB2 Max Depth(ft) 1.4
LTOB2 Cross Sectional Area(ft2) 8.6
Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMS Project#100059 28 Baseline Monitoring Report

Longitudinal Profile
Hip Bone Creek - T1-1
Monitoring Year 00, 2021
571 ■■ ■
570 v ' •
• ■••
`569 ` - E■■
■
568 — ■ • ■ ■ ■
567 - —
--
—— ■
566 - -A ■ •
565 - 0- 0
564 - — ❑ ❑
A ��Q
563 - —
■ SBKF=-0.0251x+596.35
562 -
561 - • �■■
■■■■ ■
$560 `�
559 - - r ,, ■ ■
m ■ ■ ■ 5ws= U.U14 3x+595.42
a 558 -
W 557 — ■
556 - - S ❑��
555 ■
554
....11 • i■ ❑
553 , ■
552
551 --
550
549
548
547 ,
1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800
Station(ft)
Design MY00 ---Water Surface • Bankfull A Cross Section • Structure

Longitudinal Profile
Hip Bone Creek - T1-2
Monitoring Year 00, 2021
553 —
552 i 7 1
551 �, ❑ ❑❑
•
550 ❑
.... ■ ■
549 v ®-
548 ■ ■ ■
547 •• • ■ ■ ❑
....� ❑
❑ •
$546 O ■
■
Sri _ ■
o
545 "11K �� SeKF= 0.0138x+576.79
as v
riliob
w 544 w --
❑ ❑__LLD SWS=-0.014x+576.29
./,
0
543 v '.--�-,„„` ■ ■
■542 ` ♦� El�❑ ❑
541 ��, ❑
'*, ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
540 �- • ■
539 •
538
537
1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700
Station(ft)
Design MY00 ———Water Surface • Bankfull ♦ Cross Section • Structure

Longitudinal Profile
Hip Bone Creek- T1-3 and T1-5
Monitoring Year 00, 2021
540 1 —
539 ❑❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑
538 r-
537 14. ■ ❑ ❑LJ
•
536 i •` n ❑ r, ❑ n❑ -
A SBKF=-0.01x+565.79
535 -- -
❑❑
O 534 A — -- - ^♦ i❑ ❑❑
♦ on
4... Sw,=-0.0101x+564.9
LT, 533
LT,
532 ` `—♦♦� ❑El
❑
■ ❑
531 �� --�` ❑ ❑
530 JILT ❑
529 - ` -_
r '
528
527 I ,
2700 2800 2900 3000 3100 3200 3300 3400 3500 3600 3700
Station(ft)
Design MY00 ———Water Surface • Bankfull A Cross Section • Structure

Longitudinal Profile
Hip Bone Creek T3
Monitoring Year 00, 2021
556
I
555
554
553 I■ ❑
O
552
551 ❑
❑ O
550 -
■
549 �i. _ ..
548 -4..„ ■• • SBKF=-0.0181x+ 1123.3
ME
547 A
$ 546 — —E—.■ SWS=-0.0183x+ 1129.4
o
545 •
cu 544 •
as / —� ❑ ❑ KM
543 —! ❑
542 — • •--r•
•541 ■ k-
540 ❑ •
539 — - - —
538
537
536 I ,
31514 31614 31714 31814 31914 32014 32114 32214
Station(ft)
Design MY00 ———Water Surface • Bankfull A Cross Section • Structure

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Cape Fear River
''. :: '
Site: Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site - .
XS ID XS1
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.06 -
Date: 5/20/2021 _
Field Crew: TS,KB,CP := _`'
Station F SUMMARY DATA •
..... .--"":';c.'''':
0.0 566.70 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 566.35 .-q _
0.0 566.22 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Areas ft: 2.1 ^ '- -
8.6 566.13 LTOB Cross-Sectional Area(sq ft): 2.1
17.1 566.14 Bankfull Width(ft): 5.5 - .'+�:. - ,'F/'
23.5 566.44 Flood Prone Area Elevation(ft): 567.15 ^?:.ifs.:, ,
25.9 566.45 Flood Prone Width(ft): 55 ,.I •
26.4 566.38 Max Depth at Bankfull(ft): 0.8 •. ' ~`.,•t'` N'-
27.2 566.26 Mean Depth at Bankfull(ft): 0.4
28.3 566.04 W/D Ratio(ft/ft): 14.54
rr
28.7 566.02 Entrenchment Ratio(ft/ft): 9.9 .
'� .
29.0 565.74 Bank Height Ratio ft/ft: 1.0 s. �-. 'a-t' i k
29.6 565.58 Thalweg Elevation(ft): 565.54
30.3 565.72
30.7 565.86
31.6 566.21 Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site,XS1,Riffle,T1-1
569
32.6 566.65
33.6 566.65
35.7 566.65 I
39.1 566.64 568
44.4 566.77 -
49.1 566.66
53.6 566.91 w
56.7 567.58 567 -
58.6 567.88 =
0
59.8 567.88
59.9 568.41 W 566
565 , ,
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Station(feet)
----Bankfull ----Flood Prone Area -MY00

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Cape Fear River
Site: Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site
XS ID XS2 Wii
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.06
Date: 5/20/2021
Field Crew: TS,KB,CP
Station ElevatiM SUMMARY DATA -
0.0 566.46 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 565.65 _ _
0.1 566.06 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(sq ft): 10.9
8.8 565.61 LTOB Cross-Sectional Area(sq ft): 10.9 - .
19.5 565.67 Bankfull Width(ft): 10.3
24.0 565.67 Flood Prone Area Elevation(ft): 41t.
•
25.4 565.68 Flood Prone Width(ft):
26.5 565.39 Max Depth at Bankfull(ft): 1.9 -
27.8 564.93 Mean Depth at Bankfull(ft): 1.1
28.8 564.66 W/D Ratio(ft/ft): --- .
29.7 564.28 Entrenchment Ratio(ft/ft): --- - . . '
30.2 563.92 Bank Height Ratio(ft/ft): 1.0 -
30.7 563.68 Thalweg Elevation(ft): 563.71 ..
31.7 563.70
32.4 563.81 Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site,XS2,Pool,T1-1
33.5 564.07 568
33.8 564.61 -
35.1 565.07 568
35.9 565.62 567
36.4 565.74
38.8 565.62 567
41.1 565.28 566
44.6 565.64 w __
46.0 565.97 566
48.6 566.56 0 565
51.9 566.95
55.3 566.68 m 565
57.3 567.00 W 564
57.6 567.23
564 -
563
0 10 20 30 40 50
Station(feet)
----Bankfull -MY00

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Cape Fear River
Site: Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site
XS ID XS3 -
-
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.08
Date: 5/20/2021
Field Crew: TS,KB,CP .- •
r '. -'-'
•
Station F SUMMARY DATA -•
0.0 557.59 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 555.66 - •s '-
0.2 557.29 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(sq ft): 3.9 �;, t• .
2.0 557.24 LTOB Cross-Sectional Area(sq ft): 3.9 - -- '
4.2 556.77 Bankfull Width(ft): 6.4 • . ="'q
8.3 556.16 Flood Prone Area Elevation(ft): 556.75 = O`'
11.9 555.48 Flood Prone Width(ft): 55 Y Y
17.3 555.64 Max Depth at Bankfull(ft): 1.1 • .=afv[ .o.. _
•
23.5 555.64 Mean Depth at Bankfull(ft): 0.6 + ,
•
26.6 555.78 W/D Ratio(ft/ft): 10.7 "` .• - ••-
27.4 555.66 Entrenchment Ratio ft/ft: 8.5 ti,• r - :• �.� ;
( ) ..,., fit'� ;' :.
28.0 555.59 Bank Height Ratio(ft/ft): 1.0 ter*
29.0 555.11 Thalweg Elevation(ft): 1. 1.56 �� J
29.2 554.75
30.2 554.69
30.9 554.56 Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site,XS3,Riffle,T1-1
31.3 554.72 559
32.1 554.97 559
33.4 555.45 558
34.4 555.98
35.3 555.84 558
39.4 555.81 557
43.5 555.86 w
ca
49.4 555.90 557
55.9 556.32 0 556 -
58.8 556.67 --
61.2 557.19 m 556
63.9 557.71 W 555
66.1 558.04
68.6 558.09 555 -
68.9 558.57 554
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Station(feet)
----Bankfull ----Flood Prone Area -MY00

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Cape Fear River 11111111111M4 - Imo
Site: Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site ._
XS ID XS4 '
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.08 -
Date: 5/20/2021 � • ,
Field Crew: TS,KB,CP - ' '~ '
Station ElevatiM SUMMARY DATA • -` -'t
0.0 557.60 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 555.02 s 'y r+, 4
0.1 557.14 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(sq ft): 8.1 , '• �� E.A•t�
_ --ems
2.4 556.85 LTOB Cross-Sectional Area(sq ft): 8.1 ,' ' " . =a'
4.,yti •
5.6 556.15 Bankfull Width(ft): 9.8 5 4-;
,
9.7 555.28 Flood Prone Area Elevation(ft): --- .� .
18.4 554.94 Flood Prone Width(ft): ---
24.7 555.27 Max Depth at Bankfull(ft): 1.5 �;4 '�. ;r ...
27.2 555.29 Mean Depth at Bankfull(ft): 0.8 §•- - ' : =+';=` - ...•
28.5 555.21 W/D Ratio ft/ft: --- - hr
29.3 555.07 Entrenchment Ratio(ft/ft): --- y•' i• .;.-,;_ F
31.1 554.69 Bank Height Ratio ft/ft: 1.0
32.4 554.22 Thalweg Elevation(ft): i 553.55 i '':;:n.;,
32.8 554.07
33.4 553.68
34.4 553.71 Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site,XS4,Pool,T1-1
34.8 553.55 559
35.1 553.96
36.2 553.67 558
36.6 553.71
37.0 553.74 t
37.5 554.08 557
38.4 554.51 w
39.3 555.02 556
39.9 555.18 s
o
41.0 555.09
43.0 555.17 555
44.9 555.66 ly
48.0 556.63 554
51.2 556.98
53.4 557.32 553 I
56.1 557.31 0 10 20 30 40 50
56.3 557.52
Station(feet)
----Bankfull MY00

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Cape Fear River11.11"11.110111 - f W 7 '
Site: Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site
XS ID XSS
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.13 _--
Date: 5/20/2021 •
Field Crew: TS,KB,CP •'6"
Station ElevatiM SUMMARY DATA r -
0.0 551.89 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 550.26 Fi' t, •
0.1 551.45 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(sq ft): 5.4 +
3.1 551.34 LTOB Cross-Sectional Area(sq ft): 5.4 .
5.2 551.21 Bankfull Width(ft): 7.9 �; � - •
5.4 550.82 Flood Prone Area Elevation(ft): 551.38 y+ '`
•
8.4 550.33 Flood Prone Width(ft): 57 a+ • - - '
12.7 550.06 Max Depth at Bankfull(ft): 1.1
18.0 550.03 Mean Depth at Bankfull(ft): 0.7 � .
21.5 550.15 W/D Ratio(ft/ft): 11.7 + .
24.9 550.33 Entrenchment Ratio(ft/ft): 7.1 (' •
26.1 550.34 Bank Height Ratio(ft/ft): 1.0r .
27.0 549.88 Thalweg Elevation(ft): 549.15 . • '
28.1 549.41
28.6 549.15 Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site,XSS,Riffle,T1-2
29.5 549.20
29.7 549.21 554 -
30.3 549.47
30.6 549.26 553
31.5 549.30
32.0 549.59
33.3 549.98 552
34.2 550.26 w
35.0 550.30 m
37.2 550.28 0 551
41.1 550.39
44.6 550.68 m
49.1 550.73 W 550
57.4 551.20
63.2 552.10
66.5 552.94 549 I I '
70.9 553.08 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
71.1 553.58
Station(feet)
----Bankfull ----Flood Prone Area -MY00

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Cape Fear River a `^
Site: Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site
XS ID XS6
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.13
Date: 5/20/2021 s
Field Crew: TS,KB,CP • -
`sir_•....
Station El SUMMARY DATA ,-'r_'-•._ -
0.0 551.46 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 549.75 •
0.0 550.95 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(sq ft): 14.0 " .
2.5 550.95 LTOB Cross-Sectional Area(sq ft): 14.0 . • .:
4.8 550.31 Bankfull Width ft: 11.3
6.3 549.88 Flood Prone Area Elevation(ft): ---
- -
9.2 549.71 Flood Prone Width(ft): --- .. .
11.1 550.02 Max Depth at Bankfull(ft): 2.1 r .
15.4 549.64 Mean Depth at Bankfull(ft): 1.2 . .
•
18.6 549.40 W/D Ratio(ft/ft): ___
23.0 549.63 Entrenchment Ratio(ft/ft): --- +
27.0 549.90 Bank Height Ratio(ft/ft): 1.0 y
28.8 549.83 Thalweg Elevation(ft): 547.64 .'. ^.:,..r „ • -
29.7 549.75
30.9 549.40 Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site,XS6,Pool,T1-2
32.0 548.90 553
33.0 548.38 -
33.9 548.13
34.4 547.77 552
35.1 547.64
36.0 547.70 551
36.8 547.75
37.7 548.01 w
38.7 548.33 t 550 ---- ----
39.5 548.79 =
0
40.6 549.52 0 549
41.2 549.87 N
42.8 549.95 W
44.6 549.96 548
49.1 550.19
53.2 551.44 547 - I I
56.8 552.34 0 10 20 30 40 50 60
58.3 552.51
60.7 552.37 Station(feet)
60.8 552.66 ----Bankfull -MY00

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Cape Fear River
Site: Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site . -- -•
XS ID XS7 t
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.14 • - .
Date: 5/21/2021 - - •
Field Crew: TS,KB,CP '''0•,4 '
Station El SUMMARY DATA "'•' ,. .
0.0 542.73 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 542.65 -
0.1 542.62 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(sq ft): 4.6 - -
7.2 542.64 LTOB Cross-Sectional Area(sq ft): 4.6
14.4 542.60 Bankfull Width(ft): 6.5 . •
19.2 542.69 Flood Prone Area Elevation(ft): 543.73 - -
20.8 542.61 Flood Prone Width(ft): 57 . •
-
-
21.6 542.65 Max Depth at Bankfull(ft): 1.1
22.2 542.40 Mean Depth at Bankfull(ft): 0.7 • -'�
23.3 542.06 W/D Ratio(ft/ft): 9.3 , =-. A---- t
23.9 541.81 Entrenchment Ratio(ft/ft): 8.7 a,. ,... �•-�•
24.2 541.56 Bank Height Ratio(ft/ft): 1.0 • ` _
24.8 541.59 Thalweg Elevation(ft): 541.56 �» t• r;.;
25.4 541.69
26.0 541.72 Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site,XS7,Riffle,T1-2
26.7 541.75 547
27.6 542.07 -
28.5 542.57
29.1 542.81 546
29.9 542.84
32.9 542.82 545
37.6 542.67
42.9 542.91 w -
47.5 543.13 ' 544
52.8 542.84 =
0
55.8 543.21 0 543
58.9 544.35
63.2 545.58 W
65.4 546.11 542
67.1 546.17
67.2 546.65 541 I I
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Station(feet)
----Bankfull ----Flood Prone Area -MY00

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Cape Fear River
Site: Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site
XS ID XS8
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.14 ` -
Date: 5/21/2021 _.-„ • - - - .
Field Crew: TS,KB,CP
Station El SUMMARY DATA -
0.0 542.86 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 542.47 -
0.0 542.49 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(sq ft): 16.7 ,
7.0 542.49 LTOB Cross-Sectional Area(sq ft): 16.7
14.3 542.55 Bankfull Width(ft): 13.1 .
•
20.8 542.25 Flood Prone Area Elevation(ft): --- _
24.6 542.36 Flood Prone Width(ft): ---
25.6 542.47 Max Depth at Bankfull(ft): 2.2
26.6 542.23 Mean Depth at Bankfull(ft): 1.3
•
-
28.7 541.71 W/D Ratio(ft/ft): --- •
-
•
30.5 541.17 Entrenchment Ratio(ft/ft): --- �" `9.•° .
31.3 540.92 Bank Height Ratio(ft/ft): 1.0 •
32.1 540.69 Thalweg Elevation(ft): 540.23
32.5 540.40
33.6 540.31 Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site,XS8,Pool,T1-2
34.3 540.23 546
35.3 540.26
36.1 540.50
37.0 541.12 545
38.0 542.00
38.8 542.59 544
40.5 542.64
42.5 542.69 w -
44.8 542.74 t 543
46.6 543.23 0 - _ _
48.1 543.66 0 542
50.0 544.25 N
51.6 544.65 W
54.1 544.70 541
54.3 544.97
0 10 20 30 40 50
Station(feet)
----Bankfull -MY00

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Cape Fear River
Site: Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site
XS ID XS9 .
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.19
Date: 5/21/2021 s
Field Crew: TS,KB,CP
Station El SUMMARY DATA - _
0.0 540.47 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 536.62 _ = ��
0.1 540.07 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(sq ft): 7.2 • _ • - .• ;'„q
3.9 540.02 LTOB Cross-Sectional Area(sq ft): 7.2
6.1 539.44 Bankfull Width(ft): 9.4 • . . .;;I,5j
10.9 537.62 Flood Prone Area Elevation(ft): 537.99 • '%
13.1 536.83 Flood Prone Width(ft): 48 -
•
21.1 536.81 Max Depth at Bankfull(ft): 1.4
29.2 536.75 Mean Depth at Bankfull(ft): 0.8
31.5 536.76 W/D Ratio(ft/ft): 12.3
32.4 536.69 Entrenchment Ratio(ft/ft): 5.1
-
33.2 536.52 Bank Height Ratio(ft/ft): 1.0 ..
34.3 536.10 Thalweg Elevation(ft): 535.26
35.2 535.81
35.5 535.51 Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site,XS9,Riffle,T1-3
36.0 535.39 541
36.5 535.37 -
37.2 535.26
37.7 535.27 540
NN\
38.2 535.27
39.0 535.66 539
40.2 536.03
41.6 536.46 I
55.9 537.35 535
58.8 538.37 -
62.2 539.49 534
65.9 539.68 0 10 20 30 40 50 60
66.1 539.98
Station(feet)
----Bankfull ----Flood Prone Area MY00

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Cape Fear River
Site: Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site ________________________________________________________________________-
XS ID XS10
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.19 '" --
Date: 5/21/2021
Field Crew: TS,KB,CP
. '
Station El SUMMARY DATA ti r
0.0 539.99 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 536.31 -
0.0 539.65 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(sq ft): 20.0 �, -
as
2.2 539.50 LTOB Cross-Sectional Area(sq ft): 20.0
6.9 538.20 Bankfull Width(ft): 12.7
12.0 536.36 Flood Prone Area Elevation(ft): ---
16.1 536.34 Flood Prone Width(ft): ---
22.4 536.43 Max Depth at Bankfull(ft): 2.6 +'�:
27.9 536.31 Mean Depth at Bankfull(ft): 1.6 ,< - ri
31.0 536.24 W/D Ratio(ft/ft): --- ,
32.6 536.39 Entrenchment Ratio(ft ft): ' ' .
33.4 536.38 Bank Height Ratio(ft/ft): 1.0 ��- `�
34.1 536.12 Thalweg Elevation(ft): 533.74
36.0 535.50
36.8 535.10 Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site,XS10,Pool,T1-3
37.9 534.39 540
38.4 534.08 -
39.1 533.81
40.4 533.88 539
41.9 533.74
42.9 533.84 538
43.6 534.49
44.7 535.09 w m 537
45.4 535.56 -
46.4 536.07 = 536
0
46.8 536.31
47.9 536.24 2 535
53.2 536.36 W
54.9 536.66 :::
- I
63.6 539.50 0 10 20 30 40 50 60
63.7 539.90
Station(feet)
----Bankfull -MY00

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Cape Fear River - • _
Site: Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site
XSID XS11 - . _ -
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.25
Date: 5/20/2021 -
Field Crew: TS,KB,CP
Station F SUMMARY DATA ,
0.0 534.63 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 531.45
0.0 534.22 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(sq ft): 7.3 • •
1.8 533.89 LTOB Cross-Sectional Area(sq ft): 7.3 -
6.0 532.80 Bankfull Width(ft): 9.3 i`
11.1 531.74 Flood Prone Area Elevation(ft): 532.70 -
14.4 531.52 Flood Prone Width(ft): 77 . •� _ `"t^"
22.0 531.47 Max Depth at Bankfull(ft): 1.2 • _ ..
30.5 531.50 Mean Depth at Bankfull(ft): 0.8
37.4 531.36 W/DRatio(ftft): 11.8 •
41.7 531.44 Entrenchment Ratio(ft/ft): 8.3 .
42.9 531.45 Bank Height Ratio(ft/ft): 1.0 • �;:. g• ..•
44.1 530.82 Thalweg Elevation(ft): 530.21
45.0 530.45
45.6 530.21 Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site,XS11,Riffle,T1-5
46.2 530.24 535
46.8 530.26
47.4 530.34
47.9 530.35 534
48.8 530.46
50.3 530.76
51.8 531.39 533
52.7 531.56 _ •
54.1 531.57
60.1 531.33 0 532
69.0 531.43 N
76.0 531.66 m - - -- •
80.2 531.91 W 531
82.7 532.38
85.6 533.11
87.9 533.76 530 -
89.3 534.02 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
90.5 534.04
90.4 534.30 Station(feet)
----Bankfull ----Flood Prone Area -MY00

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Cape Fear River ` WITT, '• •
,�, '��",ac' •
Site: Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site 'll
XS ID XS12 • ;' •
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.25 •
Date: 5/20/2021 - _ r,-- -
Field Crew: TS,KB,CP • -
y.• _
Station El SUMMARY DATA
M
0.0 534.53 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 531.32 =� ;''
0.1 534.19 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(sq ft): 20.8
1.1 534.08 LTOB Cross-Sectional Area(sq ft): 20.8 _.
2.8 533.50 Bankfull Width(ft): 15.1 4` -•'"
•
4.9 532.91 Flood Prone Area Elevation(ft): --- - '�- -
8.7 532.10 Flood Prone Width(ft): --- '"
12.4 531.31 Max Depth at Bankfull(ft): 2.4 ;
16.1 531.17 Mean Depth at Bankfull(ft): 1.4 .. ; �•••
. .• • :
23.8 531.32 W/D Ratio(ft/ft): --- is -
31.7 531.18 Entrenchment Ratio(ft/ft): ---
40.1 531.29 Bank Height Ratio(ft/ft): 1.0
46.3 531.25 Thalweg Elevation(ft): 528.96
47.1 531.32
47.8 531.12 Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site,XS12,Pool,T1-5
49.1 530.69 535
50.6 530.19 -
52.1 529.88
53.7 529.63 534
55.7 529.25
56.5 529.15 533
57.4 528.96
58.7 529.24 4 532
59.8 529.71 m
60.5 530.18 = 531
0
61.3 530.59
62.2 531.30 . 530
62.5 531.34 W
63.3 531.33 529
68.2 531.41 -
70.6 531.49 528 - I I I '
72.7 532.02 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
75.8 532.84
80.2 533.34 Station(feet)
83.3 533.30 ----Bankfull -MY00

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Cape Fear River
Site: Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site
XS ID XS13
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.05 - • '" •
Date: 5/20/2021 i
Field Crew: TS,KB,CP • • w,
Station F SUMMARY DATA
0.0 550.98 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 548.84
0.1 550.53 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(sq ft): 3.4
2.4 550.58 LTOB Cross-Sectional Area(sq ft): 3.4 . -
5.6 549.77 Bankfull Width(ft): 6.5 - •
11.0 548.71 Flood Prone Area Elevation(ft): 549.67 • '
•15.7 548.70 Flood Prone Width(ft): 45 -�.
21.5 548.83 Max Depth at Bankfull(ft): 0.8 • � � .�
24.1 548.88 Mean Depth at Bankfull(ft): 0.5 'Or;'''.
24.9 548.93 W/D Ratio(ft/ft): 12.3 X' A. i Wt..
25.7 548.69 Entrenchment Ratio(ft/ft): 7.0 - `-
26.5 548.42 Bank Height Ratio(ft/ft): 1.0 'y�. 1 i, • ,�.:• .
:: �.
26.9 548.17 Thalweg Elevation(ft): � 548.00 ' �. - ,� j + • •.T.': ;._ _•+-;{;'.' ..
27.3 548.00
28.0 548.02 Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site,XS13,Riffle,T3-3
28.8 548.07 552
29.5 548.03
29.6 548.01 -
30.4 548.45 551
31.2 548.63
31.7 548.84
32.6 548.89 550
34.9 548.96 w
m
37.8 549.00
41.8 548.93 0 549
47.4 549.10
52.3 549.80 m
56.2 550.56 W 548
58.4 550.69 -
58.6 551.16 -
547
0 10 20 30 40 50
Station(feet)
---•Bankfull ---•Flood Prone Area -MY00

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Cape Fear River
Site: Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site .
•
XS ID XS14 . .
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.05 ,-.4 -- y,� - - -•_ ;'''''�' _ rsm
-.- -•
Date: 5/20/2021 :. y x✓t ,.: • i,
Field Crew: TS,KB,CP ` ,
t .:.,ri,,-rt. ,• ..ti
Station El SUMMARY DATA r. _
0.0 550.47 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 548.25 ,y;�r. 6 - . .• . -
0.2 550.06 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(sq ft): 4.3 - •_ _ _ • .
5.3 549.64 LTOB Cross-Sectional Area(sq ft): 4.3 :. -
9.8 548.70 Bankfull Width(ft): 6.2 . . �
14.5 548.16 Flood Prone Area Elevation(ft): --- -
20.0 548.40 Flood Prone Width(ft): ---
25.8 548.35 Max Depth at Bankfull(ft): 1.1 {
29.9 548.20 Mean Depth at Bankfull(ft): 0.7 .. Z •
32.3 548.47 W/D Ratio(ft/ft): ---
33.5 548.41 Entrenchment Ratio(ft/ft): --- •-
�•.•
34.7 547.98 Bank Height Ratio(ft/ft): 1.0 .'-.
35.0 547.58 Thalweg Elevation(ft): 547.16
35.7 547.28
36.3 547.16 Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site,XS14,Pool,T3-3
36.8 547.26 551
38.1 547.19
38.8 547.64
39.3 547.88 550
40.1 548.25 I
41.2 548.26
43.6 548.38 549
45.5 548.41 -
46.9 548.84 m
48.3 549.06 0 548
49.2 549.65
51.0 549.70 m
54.7 549.78 W 547
54.8 550.10 -
546
0 10 20 30 40 50
Station(feet)
----Bankfull -MY00

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Ca e Fear River _
Site: Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site
XSID XS15
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.06 .
Date: 5/20/2021 . , . T$!
Field Crew: TS,KB,CP . -. 3
' .' 't"tf N •
Station F SUMMARY DATA • i- f ^ r"
0.0 546.56 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 544.72 • - K`� . .lit'
0.1 546.23 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(sq ft): 3.9 ti • '
1.5 545.95 LTOB Cross-Sectional Area(sq ft): 3.9E = li^ _�t . .
5.4 545.31 Bankfull Width(ft): 7.2 " •
. 'r';
... .• .
6.7 545.26 Flood Prone Area Elevation(ft): 545.64 - • • • •-• .' , • 0II'
9.8 545.15 Flood Prone Width(ft): 50 -
AY ■14.7 544.97 Max Depth at Bankfull(ft): 0.9 k `'
19.2 544.93 Mean Depth at Bankfull(ft): 0.5 jy""#�' ;'d"
•
21.4 544.85 W/DRatio(ft/ft): 13.3 �
23.2 544.79 Entrenchment Ratio(ft/ft): 7.0 • •:r:-
23.7 544.77 Bank Height Ratio(ft/ft): 1.0 - ' a: rC rr„ s - i
24.3 544.62 Thalweg Elevation(ft): 543.80
25.2 544.31
25.9 544.04 Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site,XS15,Riffle,T3-3
26.5 543.87 547
26.9 543.86
27.7 543.83 -
28.4 543.80
2H
543.97 546
2 544.38
3 544.72
3 544.70 ,544.66 544.53 0
40.6 544.36
44.1 544.46 m
46.5 544.50 Gj 544
48.3 544.76 -
50.9 545.12 -
53.2 545.33 543 ' ' ' '
54.3 546.11 0 10 20 30 40 50
56.7 546.03
56.7 546.49 Station(feet)
----Bankfull •Flood Prone Area -MY00

Cross-Section Plots
River Basin: Cape Fear River ..-
Site: Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site
XSID XS16 __ ._._ .
Drainage Area(sq mi): 0.06 •
Date: 5/20/2021 -
Field Crew: iTS,KB,CP .. :,.
Station Elevati g SUMMARY DATA .
0.0 545.82 Bankfull Elevation(ft)-Based on AB-Bankfull Area 544.17 - .
0.1 545.43 Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area(sq ft): 8.6
3.3 545.43 LTOB Cross-Sectional Area(sq ft): 8.6
8.3 545.25 Bankfull Width(ft): 10.0 - �"
12.3 545.18 Flood Prone Area Elevation(ft): ---
15.3 545.27 Flood Prone Width(ft): --- .
18.2 544.62 Max Depth at Bankfull(ft): 1.4
20.0 544.34 Mean Depth at Bankfull(ft): 0.9
22.1 544.23 W/D Ratio(ft/ft): ---
23.5 544.17 Entrenchment Ratio(ft/ft): p.
3'.
24.1 544.11 Bank Height Ratio(ft/ft): 1.0
24.7 543.73 Thalweg Elevation(ft): 542.73
24.8 543.60
25.7 543.31 Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site,XS16,Pool,T3-3
26.6 542.83 547
27.4 542.74
28.1 542.73 -
29.2 542.73 546
30.2 543.11
31.1 543.39
31.7 543.58 545
32.6 543.83 w -
m
7"'---------j
33.1 544.09
33.8 544.24 0 544
36.2 544.36
'' /
39.5 544.43
43.1 544.43 W 543
47.7 544.30 -
52.8 544.24 -
57.7 544.41 542
62.2 545.41 0 10 20 30 40 50 60
66.3 545.78
66.5 546.25 Station(feet)
----Bankfull -MY00

Cross-Section 1 Riffle-MY-00
Particle Millimeter Count Particle Size Distribution
Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C 9 XS 1 Riffle
Very Fine .062-.125 S
Fine .125 -.25 A
Medium .25 -.50 N
Coarse .50- 1 D 1 100% - • • • •
Very Coarse 1 -2 S ;,
Very Fine 2-4 5 '� 80%
Fine 4-5.7 G 1
Fine 5.7-8 R 60% _ As Built
Medium 8- 11.3 A 5 :
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 1
H
Coarse 16-22.6 E 2 : 4o°io •
Coarse 22.6 -32 L 10 0
Very Coarse 32-45 S 10 20%
Very Coarse 45 -64 33
Small 64-90 C 15 0% - ,
Small 90- 128 0 6 0.01 0.1 1 to too moo 10000
Large 128- 180 B Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L
Small 256-362 B Size(mm) Size Distribution Type
Small 362-512 L D16 5.3 mean 19.5 silt/clay 9%
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 32 dispersion 5.2 sand 1%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 47 skewness -0.36 gravel 68%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK D65 56 cobble 24%
Total 98 D84 72 boulder 0%
Note: D95 96 bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 3 Riffle-MY-00
Particle Millimeter I Count Particle Size Distribution
Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C 7 XS 3 Riffle
Very Fine .062-.125 S
Fine .125 -.25 A
Medium .25 -.50 N
Coarse .50- 1 D 100% • • • • • • •
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 4
Very Fine 2 -4 10 80%
Fine 4-5.7 G 2
Fine 5.7-8 R 8 ; 60% .(
Medium 8- 11.3 A 10 ct
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 60/1
4, 40%
Coarse 16-22.6 E 7 w .�
Coarse 22.6 -32 L 4 �f
Very Coarse 32-45 S 8 20%
Very Coarse 45 -64 20 •
Small 64-90 C 8 o°% -
Small 90- 128 O 3 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 woo l0000
Large 128- 180 B Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L
Small 256-362 B Size(mm) Size Distribution Type
Small 362-512 L D16 2.7 mean 12.6 silt/clay 7%
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 8.8 dispersion 4.9 sand 4%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 17 skewness -0.11 gravel 77%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK D65 40 cobble 11%
Total 97 D84 59 boulder 0%
Note: D95 83 bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 5 Riffle-MY-00
Particle Millimeter I Count Particle Size Distribution
Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C 11 XS 5 Riffle
Very Fine .062-.125 S 6
Fine .125 -.25 A
Medium .25 -.50 N
Coarse .50- 1 D 100% • • • • •
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 11
Very Fine 2-4 4 80%
Fine 4-5.7 G 2 1
Fine 5.7-8 R 1 60% —.—AsBuilt
Medium 8- 11.3 A 6
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 1 A,
Coarse 16-22.6 E 5 5 4o°io
w
Coarse 22.6 -32 L 5 0
Very Coarse 32-45 S 9 20% •
•Very Coarse 45 -64 30
Small 64-90 C 6 o°%
Small 90- 128 O 3 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 woo l0000
Large 128- 180 B Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L
Small 256-362 B Size(mm) Size Distribution Mlil
Small 362-512 L D16 0.11 mean 2.5 silt/clay 11%
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 8 dispersion 128.3 sand 17%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 28 skewness -0.63 gravel 63%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK D65 47 cobble 9%
Total 100 D84 59 boulder 0%
Note: D95 80 bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 7 Riffle-MY-00
Particle Millimeter I Count Particle Size Distribution
Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C 30 XS 7 Riffle
Very Fine .062-.125 S 8
Fine .125 -.25 A 1
Medium .25 -.50 N 2
Coarse .50- 1 D 100% ' • • • •
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 10
Very Fine 2-4 4 80%
Fine 4-5.7 G 1
Fine 5.7-8 R ‘- 60% TAsBulk
Medium 8- 11.3 A 1 t
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 1
4, 40%
Coarse 16-22.6 E 8 w •�• •
Coarse 22.6 -32 L 5 ._--_____,
Very Coarse 32-45 S 30 20%
•
Very Coarse 45 -64 33
Small 64-90 C 10 o°%
Small 90- 128 O 3 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 woo l0000
Large 128- 180 B 1 Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L
Small 256-362 B I Size(mm) Size Distribution Type
Small 362-512 L D16 0.062 mean 1.9 silt/clay 20%
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 2.2 dispersion 267.0 sand 14%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 33 skewness -0.72 gravel 56%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK D65 43 cobble 10%
Total 147 D84 58 boulder 0%
Note: D95 80 bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 9 Riffle-MY-00
Particle Size Distribution
Particle Millimeter I Count Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C 11 XS 9 Riffle
Very Fine .062-.125 S 7
Fine .125 -.25 A
Medium .25 -.50 N 4
Coarse .50- 1 D 1 t00% �•
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 11 7(
Very Fine 2 -4 8 80%
Fine 4-5.7 G 3
e
Fine 5.7-8 R 1 60% j' _ As Built
Medium 8- 11.3 A 9 4
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 5
Coarse 16-22.6 E 11 w 4o°io
Coarse 22.6 -32 L 3 r
0
Very Coarse 32-45 S 9 20% �. . '
Very Coarse 45 -64 15
Small 64-90 C 10 o°%
Small 90- 128 0 1 o.oi o.1 1 to too woo l0000
Large 128- 180 B 2 Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L
Small 256-362 B Size(mm) Size Distribution Type
Small 362-512 L D16 0.26 mean 4.0 silt/clay 10%
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 3.3 dispersion 27.3 sand 20%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 13 skewness -0.33 gravel 56%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK 3 D65 32 cobble 11%
Total 114 D84 61 boulder 0%
Note: D95 100 bedrock 3%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 11 Riffle-MY-00
Particle Size Distribution
Particle Millimeter I Count Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C 14 XS 11 Riffle
Very Fine .062-.125 S 1
Fine .125 -.25 A
Medium .25 -.50 N
Coarse .50- 1 D 1
i00%o
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 20
Very Fine 2 -4 5 80% „.v'
Fine 4-5.7 G 5 .'.
Fine 5.7-8 R 10 60% rr
Medium 8- 11.3 A 9 A • T AS Bulk
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 8 40°io
Coarse 16-22.6 E 7 w
Coarse 22.6 -32 L 3
Very Coarse 32-45 S 4 20%
Very Coarse 45 -64 12
Small 64-90 C 7 o°% -
Small 90- 128 0 1 0.oi o.i 1 to too woo 10000
Large 128- 180 B Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L
Small 256-362 B Size(mm) Size Distribution Type
Small 362-512 L D16 1 mean 7.0 silt/clay 13% II
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 2.4 dispersion 7.0 sand 21%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 7.4 skewness -0.02 gravel 59%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK D65 14 cobble 7%
Total 107 D84 49 boulder 0%
Note: D95 73 bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 13 Riffle-MY-00
Particle Size Distribution
Particle Millimeter Count Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C 14 XS 13 Riffle
Very Fine .062-.125 S
Fine .125 -.25 A
Medium .25 -.50 N
Coarse .50- 1 D 1 100% OOOOOO • • •
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 7
Very Fine 2 -4 4 80%
Fine 4-5.7 G 2
Fine 5.7-8 R s ; 60%
Medium 8- 11.3 A 1 A AsBullt
Medium 11.3 - 16 V 2
40%
Coarse 16-22.6 E 4 w
Coarse 22.6 -32 L 9 .�• •-•-•—•�
Very Coarse 32-45 S 17 20%
•
Very Coarse 45 -64 35
Small 64-90 C 4 o°%
Small 90- 128 01 o.oi o.i 1 to too woo 10000
Large 128- 180 B Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L
Small 256-362 B Size(mm) Size Distribution Type
Small 362-512 L D16 1.1 mean 7.9 silt/clay 14%
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 22 dispersion 17.2 sand 8%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 36 skewness -0.50 gravel 74%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK D65 47 cobble 4%
Total 100 D84 57 boulder 0%
Note: D95 63 bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

Cross-Section 15 Riffle-MY-00
Particle Size Distribution
Particle Millimeter Count Hip Bone Creek Restoration Site
Silt/Clay <0.062 S/C 11 XS 15 Riffle
Very Fine .062-.125 S
Fine .125 -.25 A
Medium .25 -.50 N
Coarse .50- 1 D 100% • • • • • • •
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 10
Very Fine 2 -4 7 80%
Fine 4-5.7 G 5
Fine 5.7-8 R 1 60% As Bu_lr
Medium 8- 11.3 A A
Medium 11.3 - 16 V E.
w
40%
Coarse 16-22.6 E _ s
Coarse 22.6 -32 L 1 •
Very Coarse 32-45 S 10 20% •
Very Coarse 45 -64 36
Small 64-90 C 17 o°% -
Small 90- 128 O 3 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 woo l0000
Large 128- 180 B 3 Particle Size-Millimeters
Large 180-256 L
Small 256-362 B I Size(mm) Size Distribution Type
Small 362-512 L D16 1.5 mean 10.5 silt/clay 11%
Medium 512- 1024 D D35 34 dispersion 16.8 sand 10%
Lrg-Very Lrg 1024-2048 R D50 48 skewness -0.51 gravel 58%
Bedrock >2048 BDRK D65 56 cobble 22%
Total 104 D84 73 boulder 0%
Note: D95 99 bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%

APPENDIX E
As-Built Plan Sheets
Mill Dam Creek Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC,PA
DMSProject#97136 57 Baseline Monitoring Report

N C D E Q D I V I S IO A O F \1 I T I G A T I 1 \E VICES STATE CONTRACT NUMBER SHEET TOTAL HE N.C. 7528 1 11a 640
00
��a. HIP BONE CREEK
z
y s eRo°� -1--',.. RESTORATION RESTORATION SITE --
CFO 421 Ro �OZ - REVISIONS
S
U f' z"3 CHATHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA -
CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN \
/— PROJECT ' \
v
1176) LOCATION v CATALOGING UNIT 03030003 -- vv
DMS Project #100059
END DWR #20180785 -�c v
BROOKS RD. / TRIBUTARY 1 USACE #SAW-2018-01160 --vv �'
/
VICINITY MAP
/ - �� BEGIN
NOT TO SCALE - ----- �, _---
/ - A v i
TRIBUTARY 3
/ 5v
-
..-
AS-BUILT PLANS -
NOTES: v - v v -
NO MAJOR CHANGES WERE MADE TO vv vv ,
THE ORIGINAL CONSTRUCTION PLANS. �- v -
\
Project Component A+-B+ilt Restaration Approach \ < \ -
Restoration Creditable \ \ \ _ \
-or- StationingFootage/e/ Footageor Footageor Level (PI,PP etc. Mitigation Ratio 1 Mitigation Notes/Comments \ \
g ) � ) Credits �\ \
Acreage Amreage \ \ / \
Reach ID Acreage \\ \ \ \ , \
30'exception STA A\ \\ /' V A\ -, \
TI Reath 1 10s00 to 19+80 745 780 750 R I 1:01 750 13+12 TO 13+42 \ \ / \ i \
TI Reath 2 19+80 to 26+86 890 906 906 R I 1:01 906 \\ S` \ \ - \ \
\ / - \
C11TI Reath 3 26+86 to 29+54 208 269 209 R I 1:01 209 60'exception STA \ S. V \
/ \ -
NTI Reach 4 9+54 to 32+49 295 295 295 ElI N/A 8 -
TIRad 5 a9ms9+m 447 452 452 R vII of 452 V A BEGIN
TRIBUTARY 1
300+00 to 30'exception STA NC GRIT \ ��' \ \ \ \
T3 Reach 1 303+]0 280 310 280 Ell N/A 2.5:1 112 301+59 to 301+89 j Q� NA� \\ 4 \\ -- N \ \\ \
�� - \ \ \
T3 Reath 2 311+10 319+OOo 590 591 591 Ell N/A 2.5:1 236.4 \ - 3
v SHEET ,,
T3 Reath 3 317+00 to 545 573 543 R I 1:01 543 30'exception STA \ \ -- \ N /
• . 322+23 312+98 to 318+28 \ \ - \ /
It 90'exception STA \ /
Riparian P dhmhcanmt N/A 1.495 1.495 1.473 E— N/A 2.5:1 0.589 13+12 to 13+42
Riparian Wetland R+. A \ \ / /
eatablitun®t N/A 3.04 3.04 3.04 (Re-ext.) N/A 1:01 3.04 \ \ / /
--
Riparian Wetland N/A 1.488 1.488 1.471 (Atmb/ N/A 1.5:1 0.981 \\ \ BEGIN
I A I
Rehabilitation U I i Y
Ellill TRIBUTARY 2
V v
DIRECTIONS TO SITE INDEX OF SHEETS Prepared in the Office of: PROJECT ENGINEER
`t111IIIl ljjjjlr7
1 TITLE SHEET ``�e� 3IpO4•�//i'
1[1.14
FROM RALEIGH,TAKE US-1 SOUTH TO 2 GENERAL NOTES&PROJECT LEGEND ��ASSOCIATES OF NC Q� �9
SANFORD.FOLLOW US-421 NORTH FOR 3 7 SITE PLAN NcwEERs•RvANNERs•EcovocisEs _
ABOUT 17 MILES.TAKE A RIGHT ONTO gsos FALLS 400usL ROAD SEAL
8-9 PLANTING PLAN RALEIGH,NC 27609 -
GILMORE LODGE ROAD AND THEN A 10-11 BOUNDARY MARKING PLAN - • 040899
QUICK LEFT ONTO CARTER BROOKS Prepared for: Prepared by:
ROAD.THE ENTRANCE DRIVE TO THE SITE
IS ABOUT 0.8 MILE ON THE RIGHT. KRISTIN E.KNIGHT, PEsZ
• G NE... \0`;
O e kJ-
A'
JEREMIAH DOW PROJECT ENGINEER /'V
V DAIS PROJECT MANAGER ALEX FRENCH rrI7IIIII Eljj111
PROJECT DESIGNER AUGUST 17,2021
P.E.
SIGNATURE: J

\\11111 11111,,,
"� \-\ CAR0�',,
�O..FESSIp�q.�i9
GENERAL NOTES:
SEAL
THIS SET OF PLANS IS BASED OFF OF AN AS-BUILT SURVEY COMPLETED - 040899
BY KCI ASSOCIATES OF NC IN MAY OF 2021. - •
0
THIS PLAT DOES NOT REPRESENT A BOUNDARY SURVEY OF THE PARENT • G N�. '.x' :\ N
TRACTS. THE PARENT TRACT BOUNDARIES ADJACENT TO THIS EASEMENT ,,'ST/N.E. �" a
ARE NOT CHANGED BY THIS PLAT. '''111 I I 1111
DISTANCES SHOWN ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES IN U.S. SURVEY AUGUST I7, 202I
FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
THE BASIS OF THE MERIDIANS AND COORDINATES FOR THIS PLAT IS THE
NORTH CAROLINA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, NORTH AMERICAN
DATUM 1983(NAD 83), BASED ON DIFFERENTIAL GPS OBSERVATIONS.
ALL DISTANCES ARE GROUND UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
NO UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATING PERFORMED DURING THE COURSE a�
OF THIS SURVEY. w "�R°< a
t -% 2a
jor
zs
w
m 2m
H Lio
�
—z w 5
PROJECT LEGEND: �u_ ¢z
0 8 ram/o w W V
Designed Thalweg I 1 Za
w/Approximate Bankfull Limits = liz
Cross—section w �
Installed Riffle Enhancement Minor
z ,
_ Contour Line (As—Built) Siw
Installed Riffle Grade Control MA Major Contour Line (As—Built)
w
(—
Installed Step Pool II As—Built Thalweg Q
w/Approximate Bankfull Limits z
Installed Live Lift ^ Q
cc Q U
Former Channel Filled X x x 0 i
w z
z
Installed Buried Brush Material cc
r
and Log Sill w z
1 1 fY t o
U
Photo Point C� w Q
z II
Stream/Wetland Gauge Z m =
U
d
2
.1, AUGUST 2021
Vegetation Plot N.T.S.
GENERAL
NOTES&
PROJECT
LEGEND
SHEET 2 OF 11

EXISTING GRAVEL DRIVE
CONTINUES TO CARTER `�1�'"III"1�i,�
BROOKS ROAD ;��`,cN CAR° //,,
O •'4SS/ i�,
.b oti -9
SEAL
040899 - =
� •
AGNE. `� • o
11111`` oc cc
:I'Cul' IT IT, 2021
A20 z 6
h4 Q
EXISTING
ow� 1 il E
GRAVEL DRIVE e y /y a
w
EXISTING
WETLAND'WA'
BEGIN
TRIBUTARY 1 H ,'a,
0
�.l FILLED FORMER CHANNEL ~~z w 5. n a
�� CONSERVATION EASEMENT /,' — \\\ (TYPICAL ALL HATCHING) T • 0 0
0
ir)
—_ ---------- .. \\� MENT �a H_ .. \\ CONSERBON \-—-----------RT— OA. /
111111
/ // \ 1 SG 1 / q_ O O r z CC
NSERV m al �� i''
CATTLE PATH ATION EASEMENT4 .__ XS1 m LLJ
STABILIZED INCOMING FILLED AND GRADED �` I , I—
TO DISPERSE INCOMING e n
—__/
DRAINAGE WITH DRAINAGE THROUGHOUT I/VM
ROCK OUTLET. WETLAND 1• Z Z
CONSERVATION EASEMENT • — O J
ADDED'STEP POOL' ¢ L� ct
INSTALLED 12' l ' (1)48"DIA.x 24'LONG HDPE STREAM < U
WIDE ACCESS DRIVE PP2 CULVERT O
(2)12"DIA.,24'LONG FLOODPLAIN I H
CULVERTS(PEP) CO O
z
W z
z
rY O
W
Z =
~NAQ 7flIO O
Q
s3 ALL TOPOGRAPHIC AND FEATURE CO0
DATA ARE BASED ON THE AS-BUILT d
—40'—20' 0' 40' 80' SURVEY COMPLETED MAY 2021. _
thiliii
GRAPHIC SCALE
DP, AUGUST 2021
SCALE: GRAPHIC
SITE
PLAN
SHEET 3 OF 11

004 111111// /
.,�-�N CAR°''
�o/0 �ssiol;'• -v
SEAL
040899 - -
Ge 2,
,\�pp z
o
STG N V. C?� Lu
N
E. -40'-20' 0' 40' 80' a cc
'///IIIIIII\1`\` 11 1 1 1 i
FILLED FORMER DITCH AND IT'--1
AUGUST 17, 2021 GRAPHIC SCALE GRADED TO DISPERSE
FLOW THROUGHOUT WETLAND. 1 1
-T--1-_
1 1
1
EXISTING 1 1 1
WETLAND'WC' \ r-
1 1
�1 1
, /- r
'� VP3
: >
a_
EXISTING �� WM3 ������/"� i
a'WIDENED FLOODPLAIN
WETLAND'WF' ��� R4 I1 F EXTENTS AND TIED BANKS
iloi1WM4 1 a
OUT AT A 3:1 SLOPE.
• • _ 1 ° Y
INSTALLED 12' --- z
w
REDIRECTED AND STABILIZED •
WIDE ACCESS DRIVE �I ® •
INCOMING DRAINAGE WITH `� � _�
ROCK OUTLET. ��, p i I�+ �\\_� r ��`�►( NA� • 1! n
(1)36"DIA.x 24'LONG HDPE p � - �� �— - - �� ��� lit
1 w o
STREAM CULVERT �
CONSERVATIO XS7
w LL
7 I o • ¢o
•
iiir^, /if ' x i'�� _------ / XS8 w �o w U)
____ ; ''97'�• _ to ( z ¢ WF
�--/1/lop� �' rj / XS6 --EMENj U Et
LL O
�� __ ---- 1=-- ----- -- -- tGd`� R� ONSERVP�\O ��`� +� w :°:=z'
BEGIN \i 'P1 Ail - �� -- - C XS16 Z
TRIBUTARY2 _ -- �.. _ �� "� Agar w S
40,4ffir
AkhN \\ '� �JQ *+`a ii
\`` VP6 /� %•J XS15 I,a�►
EXISTING /-111 // 6 Z Z
71
WETLAND'WB' *, ar A
J o
� ;�.+ XS4 VP9 Q a
FILLED FORMER CHANNEL N ;, U
00+9 l �� (TYPICAL ALL HATCHING) Q =
= INSTALLED 12' �
WIDE ACCESS DRIVE c cc
am cc
/LjgTC XS3 _ JI/� I zWSF '� (1)48"DIA.x 24'LONG HDPE STREAM �:�!/ / LLI
FSy7'3, pR (2)12"CU DIA.,2 (LONNG FLOODPLAIN 1 - \. �'/��G, L Oa
/goTgR �" \ PP10 U Q 2
Y/ 1 �i►,„.• XS14�i� Z i�`:1` ADDED RIFFLE 0 Q
4 ` 1ENHANCEMENTS 03 =
it XS13 UAtibilliiiii-
k I\ ®11ALL TOPOGRAPHIC ONO FEATUREI i�EXISTING II F____ �E: AUGUST 2021
DATA ARE BASED ON THE AS BUILT WETLAND'WE' DV, AUGUST
GRAPHIC
SURVEY COMPLETED MAY 2021. 1
12,
0 Sl
SITE
0� \ PLAN
MATCHLINE-SEE SHEETS 6 AND 7 FOR TRIBUTARY 3
SHEET 4 OF 11

1111111111//j''
s.00
04
�O oFEss/o v'.-9-
SEAL
040899 - =
'4P N
` ` Np
:))/ G NE. G,` - w
80'
I ' '' 40'
-40'-20' 0'
GRAPHIC SCALE
EXISTING AiUGIUNST1 IT1•,120121‘‘
WETLAND'WG'
FILLED FORMER EXISTING DITCH AND
GRADED TO DISPERSE
FLOW THROUGHOUT WETLAND.
t.
EXISTING
co
WETLAND'WD' >
a,
"111,\_ / W®mot-cnao<',v Q O'
1:1 elliii.
=AcQ
p LL ��- _ I CONSERVATION EASEMENT PP5 vAf\ON EASEMENT --WM
// SPOIL w >xii
Ft ':° r 0 ,,,,' ifir,„,-,4„,,,
�` COHSE ��- REMO:PE:DE:::::::
�osld3z��/�
LW
NI
a ct) f--- RESTORATION 11111 _w our� � �� � �'`i�, �` ENHANCEMENT II - 2/ _ iiz z zo�_ \ ENHANCEMENT II __ w a--- --- IV ®lla r RESTpTlO _,--- �\ /� - o G dE
END _ _ N a
:IBUTARY 3 `� ___ O + cc o a
, + ill . .i-
i:i
Aim �� �INSTALLED 1lifik /
WIDE ACCESS DRIVE CONSERVE \' ,�� �� I z
(1)60"DIA.x 30'LONG HDPE STREAM TION ASEMENT � '� w
CULVERT
w (2)18"DIA.,30'LONG FLOODPLAIN XS12
cn CULVERTS(PEP)
w ' END
' TRIBUTARY 1 H
li
v ENHANCEMENT REACH: co
/ Q
BANKS GRADED BACK AT A 3:1 SLOPE Z Z
INSTALLED QUALITY
AND STABILIZED WITH COIR MATTING. TREATMENT AREA. O
RIFFLE/POOL SEQUENCE INSTALLED FILLED FORMER CHANNEL O
TO ADD BED VARIABILITY. (TYPICAL ALL HATCHING)
U
0 H
CO
LLJ O
CC Z
W z
z
LLI W O
L
W
OZ I-
CO V
ALL TOPOGRAPHIC AND FEATURE d
DATA ARE BASED ON THE AS-BUILT =
SURVEY COMPLETED MAY 2021.
EASE: AUGUST 2021
SCALE: GRAPHIC
SITE
PLAN
SHEET 5 OF 11

``0 111111,10,
vv`‘,�H CARn'',/
INSTALLED 12' • Q` �/
/ ----_ v�� WIDE ACCESS DRIVE � •� ESS�O�;•,ti�-
N
G
-_� --��� �� ��; ;--__ (1)36"DIA.x 24'LONG HDPE STREAM �� SEAS
CULVERT _
=Q-CaNSER = 040899 =
'%' --- Vg jO _
o FgSF� z
�� 7��, _ VP7 ___ _ -40'-20' 0' 40' 80' ';STj� Lu
BEGIN itix
�� �� - I ' _ --__ I I i I GRAPHICSCALE i
TRIBUTARY3_- \�\•� \_�� _—�__- _ AUGUST 17, 2021
// tea_ CZ--- z�
vvv // v -
�� � �� — N —v — O
�� / / �\ - �� v. \��.,----- A
Z¢� � �tN.\* '\ "-.. '''' ' \\\ \-\\ \\\ '''''\ '',-.. 111011111-0: I:'\' ' ‘' '\'' '\ .......... . --:-.—;:::--:.--:-,'\':'\''''''`,....
cn2°<ti o�/ , �� - --� � oiff�/ /
/ / / / / / GRADED EXISTING TERRACE �� �;hu
BANKS BACK AT A 3:1 SLOPE, ` i \\ EXISTING ow i-E
BOTH SIDES OF VALLEY. •\vvv O� vv WETLAND'WH' s1I(TaO a.1-
CO v,, _�_ ,_x vvv w
^D
[O v O to� X 710N FgSEM�
`� R A1 Wv � CONA 7 N/% � \ O N 11ZO
in o
J
\ a LLPo —,_.- �/ PO8 . iz'
_ � z/ _ ��_
w w a
R7 ('
FORMER DITCH FILLED MEN-
I—
AND GRADED TO DISPERSE FLOW ��O APSE �i
THROUGHOUT 20'WIDE FLOODPLAIN. �.1 CO
INSTALLED EVERY 50'ALOG SILLS AND BRUSH LONGRIAL D DITCH CO // j%�� O
TO AID IN STABILIZATION AND /
HABITAT CREATION. - ���� _,-
�' ��WM6 // --_ O Q z
/ / / I Z
,/ // / i VP10 / 'r LLJ O
ALL TOPOGRAPHIC AND FEATURE - -- Z
DATA ARE BASED ON THE AS-BUILT _----.< 0 <
SURVEY COMPLETED MAY 2021. ��`' „- --- O1 U
/ / / d
/ Z
/
v // EXISTING EASE: AUGUST 2021
WETLAND'WH' sCLE: GRAPHIC
SITE
PLAN
SHEET 6 OF ii

...0 '1,..ssfo;1,...-9-
yc _ Q
"q°r97 SEAL • =
040899 - =
�'t ' . GiNE. . `Z` • o
-40'-20' 0' 40' 80' ' ':/ST • \ , w
`1111 � � E. Ir
''',1 1 1 1 1,x 0 0
GRAPHIC SCALE
AUGUST 17, 2021
MATCHLINE-SEE SHEETS 3-5 FOR TRIBUTARY 1
ADDED RIFFLE I* `L ..
MULTIPLE SMALL HEADCUTS ENHANCEMENTSill 1
STABILIZED THROUGHOUT REACH O N aut
1
pm t
1MTH STONE RIFFLE ENHANCEMENT O ` 1 EXISTING
(1)4.0'DIA.x 24'LONG HDPE 2 R4 1 WETLAND'WC'
STREAM CULVERT U' _ Q
%
CA20 Z 6
INSTALLED 12' % / p �a
O i' I�u
WIDE ACCESS DRIVE 2 \ itf iill.„,------0 0 / WO -, .--
(13
A ,' �j>ice' ®I�gJ; �,g \ :ill
i(( -
1 o lyz
o - SIN, I ..,-,r ,, - iiiimi,-. - i_,/-- ,.,14-6,, co)Efi . .:c 7
H t rte.. rn - . 0 a
D of4P -- --1 XS14 -_�� S15 I . 1 1 ►/� " w�
ce
m o ---- XS13 XS7 i %) ill !N .!
H - ----- a XS16 A �► P31 a z�
ct ------ �- �� - SG3 1 4 1 O 111111 !
o0
two i
w - WM7 �.. ) �111 1 m �Q
= i an .'�/ 1W PP10 VP9 VAS-,- ----- -40001011101" , �� I!'/ 1 �� �1 Z w ,�
w �;` 1
w \ �a
z �� � 1 �i W
71
EXISTING �;�liat . Z z
,itow\-
2 WETLAND'WE' iii
FILLED FORMER CHANNEL __�' H Ln H
levli saki:. "tr.
(TYPICAL ALL HATCHING) ,,uti, 1 < U
�� `�\�) i EXISTING W ct
WETLAND'WG' Z
y� �\� 1\1 i �' `J r
PPS(1,0� W z
w �0 z
we 27ii0 p U O
11
W Q
HDATA ARE BASED ON THE AS-BUILTSURVEY COMPLETED MAY 2021.
(1)5.0'DIA.x 30'LONG HDPE
STREAM CULVERT '.ry -.
• Q PP5 oc,E: AUGUST 2021
INSTALLED 15' Ili GRAPHIC
WIDE ACCESS DRIVE I f-
pi, I
\ SITE
PLAN
MATCHLINE-SEE SHEETS 3-5 FOR TRIBUTARY 1
SHEET 7 OF ii

\\��1111111,,'/
RIPARIAN FOREST PLANTING: ‘,c�{ CAR°
PLANTING ZONE 1 =17.4 ACRES 0`.•E.SS/p <''//• 9
12"-18"BARE ROOT MATERIAL ..CZZ 17.**.
968 STEMS/ACRE(9'X 5'SPACING),RANDOM SPECIES PLACEMENT - SEAL
COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME STATUS %OF TOTAL #OF PLANTS Al _ 040899 `
i■■\ 21
i■■■\. z
AMERICAN SYCAMORE PLATANUS OCCIDENTALIS FACW 26 4,380 C
i■■■■■\ o
SWAMP CHESTNUT OAK QUERCUS MICHAUXII FACW 2 380 �������� is, ..•G N�•. '��j�,`
PIN OAK QUERCUS PALUSTRIS FACW 11 1,845 ��������� j
RIVER BIRCH BETULA NIGRA FACW 25 4,225 M �� ��/ E. a
4■■■■■, '��1111111�\�
Cc
WILLOW OAK QUERCUS PHELLOS FAC 21 3,535 A
������ �����
SOUTHERN RED OAK QUERCUS FALCATA FACU 10 1,690 ����� �������
AMERICAN PERSIMMON DIOSPYROS VIRGINIANA FAC 5 845 �����; �� �� AUGUST 17, 2021
16,900 .a����==o1�������
.1■■■■� ■■■■■►
i■■■■■rI�■■■■■■■I
iM■■■■■■I1■■■■■■■r
STREAM ZONE : i■■■■■■■ME mom'Immor
I■■■■■■■■ '
STREAM ZONE iA■■■■■■■■■/ "..■■■r1.......-
LIVE STAKES: 1.5'TO 2'LENGTHS, 1/2'TO 2"DIAMETER, A■■■■■■■■■■�1■■■■■�
PLANTED ONE ROW PER BANK AT 3'SPACING,RANDOM A■■■■■■■■■■■M .....I
SPECIES PLACEMENT. Ad■■■■■■■■■.".
COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME ��...........r;������r
QtN��[\
I,II,II,II,II,II,II,II,II,II,II,II,IIr Ammo,'
�� /.:‘ 2 a
BLACK WILLOW SALIX NIGRA .■■■■■■■■■■■■■ri■■■■■■o E'u
SILKY WILLOW SALIX SERICEA ,MMEMMEMMEMMEM, , . ,1 E
I■■■■■■■■■■■■■I I■■■■■■,' _ _-
SILKY DOGWOOD CORNUS AMOMUM ■MEMEMEMEMEME. ■����o,
I■■■■■■■■■■■■r' .■■■■■■I ,,�''�' z0 Ps
I■■■■■■■■■■■■I AI■■■■■I -70 0' 70' 140' z 4,
I■■■■■■■■■■■iMMEMMEMMEMMI I■■■■■.ri
A■■■■■■■■■4MMEMMEMMMI" "....fir GRAPHIC SCALE
■■■■■■■■■rA.. ..►, 01 2
I■■■■■■■■I■�� � r
I■■ ■■■■W W
1111111 , ' ' , z ,
N
W
lommor .Ammr o 0Qz
, (I)i
, ,. ■■■■.' u) c,Lt
Al•■■■■■r
-`2z w
\■■■■■■I
.. ' AEI" a
a L'
��� z w _,0
a m z VQ
7 0�
I- 0 SQUARE CUT--_ A w a
Q z vv IllUrk BUDS
F m \_ 4 (FACING UPWARD)�'
O W T ` W
coO LIVE CUTTING `n I—
(0.5"TO 2"DIAMETER) w fA
w Q
0 =,
LIVE STAKE < Q
11 ANGLECUT 30°45° - Q
STREAM BANK CROSS-SECT/ON H
' O
W � z
1 I ) >--
z
//
PLANTING NOTES:
RIFFLES-1 ROW OF LIVE STAKES ON BOTH SIDES OF CHANNEL. 0 Q
POOLS-NO LIVE STAKES ON INNER BENDS, 1 ROW ON OUTER BENDS. Z <
' - O
hi
m V
0_2
/ %IL LIVE STAKES
SCALE: NTS SAL E AUGUST 2021
GRAPHIC
PLANTING
PLAN
MATCHLINE-SEE SHEET 9
SHEET 8 OF i1

MATCHLINE-SEE SHEET 8
111�J11i11,1J
.� \ CAROi',,,
O • ESS/o /2,
SEAL
040899 - -
Gi • x z
sr•• •• \�
iN E aLu
'''�1111111 w
AUGUST 17, 2021
.�■■■I■■■E, Eu:
- 11111.1k \ ,
a
■■■I■■■■■\ PLANTING ZONE 1 \ ro, JaI■■■L 7■■■■l [,
IMMMOMMEMMk
'MEW/MEM \
I■■■l ■■■■■L
IEEEMOMMEEE■' STREAM ZONE / z W
■■■■E► ■■■■■\
I■■■■I MENE ■1
IIMMEM EEEE' `OME■, *NOTE:SEE SHEET 8 FOR PLANTING QUANTITIES
■■■■■�\■■■■■I W o
IEEEEEIMMEMM�IEEE■. ^z Z N
•■■■■I■■■■■MI w
II■■■■■■■■■■I
IEEEEEEEEEE 'I l o LiUWJ U_
IMMEMMMF- MI=■■■■■ ■ 1
Z
Z�
=■■■■■ IMME / IR
= a i
IEEEEE MI w ¢
MPH' ' I■1 _ Z 2Q
EI w c�
■ MI
I® •I ANY AREAS 1 1THIN THE
IME
ANY AREAS WITHIN THE ,EE EEI FORESTED AREA DEEMED
FORESTED AREA DEEMED IEEE Ion LOW DENSITY WAS w
LOW DENSITY WAS WMMM1 MEI PLANTED PER DESIGN I-
PLANTED PER DESIGN MEER MEI REPRESENTATIVE GUIDANCE C
REPRESENTATIVE GUIDANCE 1EEEE E1 Z Z
IEEE EI
MEER ■I I 0
71
m ■ _ <. ■ Q
\o. • QII
O J
moi im
II~ o
(\ z
/ w
■■■■■■LMENEM
hi z
ME■■\ 0
MMMEMMMO■\, �����,����1 w _
jzz •.p.■..-�--
I■■■\I■■■\ Z0 Q
-70 0' 70' 140' I■■■■II■■■I _
` i i i I IMMI MMER
GRAPHIC SCALE
IEEE\\■■■1
,MMEMIMMMOR
EEIllow-- DA.E, AUGUST 2021
.....__ 222 GRAPHIC
PLANTING
PLAN
SHEET 9 OF 11

EASEMENT BOUNDARY MARKING �.Q�o �9-
THE EASEMENT BOUNDARY MARKED SEAL
WITH METAL OR SALT TREATED WOOD POSTS iv CAE
AND CONSERVATION EASEMENT SIGNS AT THE +�
CORNERS AND AT A MINIMUM OF 100' INTERVALS
ALONG THE BOUNDARY. z
is, •. N.• C? ' z
+ Ei'fillI .
j1• Q w
5/8"REBAR 30"IN LENGTH WITH 3-1/4"ALUMINUM CAPS 1-� 0 AUGUST 17, 2021
O ON ALL EASEMENT CORNERS.
0 O
• 6-FOOT TALL DURABLE WITNESS POST ALONG BOUNDARY 0
OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT.POSTS ARE MADE
OF MATERIAL THAT WILL LAST A MINIMUM OF 20 YEARS.
THE PROVIDER ATTACHED A CONSERVATION EASEMENT
SIGN TO EACH WITNESS POST AND PLACE ADDITIONAL SIGNS +
AT NO MORE THAN 100-FOOT INTERVALS ON BOUNDARY LINES. 'I-
—X— INSTALLED WOVEN WIRE FENCE / I
© INSTALLED GATE +
/J� x a
zEJ
,. 9 fib'/ +71
I zz w5 u.,
II. a
V3 �Y ;
*
7i
-70 0' 70' 140' W
I1111
GRAPHIC SCALE
U)
„ © IxC c,
o
I ~ ~z SZ U)N
Ill UJ Q
oU p—
/� \ Cu K
o a
W WU
* `-2 S'1
{ • 1
1 T + O 9 QO
r fillC7
+ 0 + u W
r
W ¢WJ
0 Z
O 0w a
+ 0
W
X H
111 (0
O 71
Q
0 Q UQ
X 0 =
0
O
W
0
Et z
x x w z
O CC Li o
o w Q <
k '`11
)1( * © ZO
03
©(� 0 2
x \* +X
scn: AUGUST 2021
E. GRAPHIC
BOUNDARY
k + MARKING
/ > \ \ PLAN
MATCHLINE-SEE SHEET 11
SHEET 10 OF 11

MATCHLINE-SEE SHEET 10
ft
'(:((' 41/
��{ CARD'',
\ Q` S S <�
-1- O .•'FE Ip•'•.2
QUO ti .9
7( f
-\-
XX+X _ _
SEAL
_ 040899
/
Gz
GiN� * o
A \ + �N E. aj
0
. -/- +\4_
(*r - AUGUST 17, 2021
X
f
0 X- "G --1-
0 ` X—r 0 f
x----,
© G X
f f k
f
I
a=
0 �c� adi9•
w
S ��
ib3NJ'� Q',
Z W
I �
x
k \
x ��
Z 2 N
x II z S N
00
lifl
x ►,/o H
x FriZ
-70 0' 70' 140' ,, LL o
`1 ILU X
GRAPHIC SCALE ZEi
II\II ki x w ,
f X
EASEMENT BOUNDARY MARKING Z z
\ 11\! ->, -7,- w_
THE EASEMENT BOUNDARY MARKED X o
WITH METAL OR SALT TREATED WOOD POSTS x f Q Q
AND CONSERVATION EASEMENT SIGNS AT THE <
CORNERS AND AT A MINIMUM OF 100' INTERVALS
ALONG THE BOUNDARY. f X C' O Z) Hi
col—
f L z
0 Y 1
O 5/3'REBAR 30"IN LENGTH WITH 3-1/4"ALUMINUM CAPSd!i X G LLI z
ON ALL EASEMENT CORNERS. ` X—•� X O
• 6-FOOT TALL DURABLE WITNESS POST ALONG BOUNDARY 0 X-4 U Q 2
OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT.POSTS ARE MADE C uJ Q
OF MATERIAL THAT WILL LAST A MINIMUM OF 20 YEARS. X Z I
THE PROVIDER ATTACHED A CONSERVATION EASEMENT X�—
SIGN TO EACH WITNESS POST AND PLACE ADDITIONAL SIGNS 0 O =
AT NO MORE THAN 100-FOOT INTERVALS ON BOUNDARY LINES. m V
0
—X— INSTALLED WOVEN WIRE FENCE X-
I
© INSTALLED GATE
X ID,Sc E. AUGUST 2021
E. GRAPHIC
BOUNDARY
MARKING
PLAN
SHEET ii OF ii