20170537 Ver 2_Year 3 Monitoring Report 2021_20211003

Mitigation Project Information Upload
ID#*
20170537
Select Reviewer:*
Version* 2
Katie Merritt
Initial Review Completed Date 10/04/2021
Mitigation Project Submittal - 10/3/2021
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?* r Yes t: No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
r Stream r Wetlands rJ Buffer rJ Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Jamey McEachran
Project Information
ID#:*
20170537
Existing ID##
Project Type: r DMS C•' Mitigation Bank
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Version:
*2
Project Name: Hannah Bridge Riparian Buffer and Nutrient
Offset Mitigation Project
County:
Johnston
Document Information
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Report
File Upload:
Signature
.............................................
Print Name:*
Signature:*
Existing Version
Hannah Bridge Bank Parcel MY3 2021 Report.pdf 8.44MB
Rease upload only one R]Fof the complete file that needs to be submitted...
Jamey McEachran
jaAvl netadkak

Bank Parcel Development Plan Year 3 Monitoring Report
Hannah Bridge Mitigation Site
DWR Project # 2017-0537v2
Johnston County, North Carolina
Neuse River Basin
HUC 03020201
Prepared By:
res
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
919-829-9909
September 2021

Table of Contents
1.0 Project Summary 1
1.1 Project Location and Description 1
1.2 Project Success Criteria 2
1.3 Project Components 2
1.4 Riparian Restoration Approach 3
1.5 Construction and As -Built Conditions 4
1.6 Year 3 Monitoring Performance 4
2.0 Methods 5
3.0 Reference 5
Appendix A: Site Maps
Figure 1: Site Location Map
Figure 2: Current Conditions Plan View
Appendix B: Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 2: Plant Species Summary
Table 3: Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary Table
Table 4: Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
Appendix C: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Appendix D: Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data Sheets
i

1.0 Project Summary
1.1 Project Location and Description
EBX—Neuse I, LLC (EBX), an entity of Resource Environmental Solutions (RES), is pleased to provide
this Bank Parcel Development Monitoring Report for the Hannah Bridge Riparian Buffer and Nutrient
Offset Mitigation Bank (Parcel). This Parcel is designed to provide riparian buffer mitigation credits for
unavoidable impacts due to development within the Neuse River Basin, United States Geological Survey
(USGS) 8-digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC — 03020201). In addition, it also provides nutrient offset
credits in the 03020201 HUC, excluding the Falls Lake Watershed, for existing and proposed development
requiring such mitigation. This Parcel is in accordance with the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A
NCAC 02B .0295, 15A NCAC 02B.0703 and the RES Neuse Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument for
Riparian Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Credits (UMBI), made and entered into by EBX-Neuse I,
LLC acting as the Bank Sponsor (Sponsor), and the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality -
Division of Water Resources (DWR). Supporting figures can be found in Appendix A. The Parcel has also
been designed in concurrence with the Hannah Bridge Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site in the Neu -Con
Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank (SAW# 2015-01799). The mitigation plan and baseline
report for the Hannah Bridge Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank have been approved by the Interagency
Review Team (IRT).
The Parcel is located in Johnston County approximately five miles south of the town of Four Oaks, NC
(Figure 1). The Parcel is located within Neuse River Basin USGS 14-digit HUC 03020201150020 and
North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR) Subbasin Number 03-04-04. To access the Parcel from
the town of Four Oaks, travel South on NC Hwy 96 and turn left on Green Pasture Road. The coordinates
of the site are 35.380621°N and -78.417107 °W.
When combining the Hannah Bridge Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank with the Hannah Bridge Buffer
Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Bank, the conservation easement totals 46.2 acres and includes unnamed
tributaries, and storm water runoff from adjacent pastures that flow directly to Hannah Creek. The drainage
area of the Parcel is 1.39 mi2. The Parcel is located in an area dominated by agriculture, livestock, and
residential land use. A majority of the Parcel was utilized for livestock pasture. Additional land use practices
included the maintenance and removal of riparian vegetation and the relocation, dredging and straightening
of onsite streams has resulted in degraded water quality and unstable channel characteristics.
The Hannah Bridge Mitigation Site was built to provide stream restoration and enhancement on
approximately 8,524 linear feet of streams and wetland restoration, enhancement, and preservation on 16.7
acres of wetlands within the conservation easement through a separate mitigation banking instrument
with the North Carolina IRT. Riparian restoration, enhancement, and preservation of the Neuse riparian
buffer (as defined in 15A NCAC 02B .0233) and other riparian areas onsite result in immediate water
quality benefits within the vicinity of the Parcel and include the removal of livestock access to Parcel
streams and reduction in nutrient loads from agricultural land -uses. The riparian restoration activities
within the Parcel also result in improved water quality within the downstream watershed.
Hannah Bridge 1 Year 3 Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site September 2021

1.2 Project Success Criteria
Riparian buffer vegetation monitoring will be based on the CVS-EEP Level 2 Protocol for Recording
Vegetation. Annual vegetation monitoring will occur each year for a minimum of five years and will be
conducted during the fall season with the first year occurring at least 5 months from initial planting. Ten
vegetation monitoring plots were installed a minimum of 100 m2 in size and cover at least two percent of
the riparian restoration area. Plots were randomly placed throughout the planted Neuse buffer zones and
nutrient offset mitigation area and are representative of the crediting areas. The following data will be
recorded for all trees in the plots: species, height, planting date (or volunteer), and grid location. Photos are
to be taken from all photo points each monitoring year and provided in the annual reports. The measures of
vegetative success for the Parcel will be the survival of at least 4 native hardwood tree species, where no
one species is greater than 50 percent of the established stems, established at a density of at least 260 planted
trees per acre at the end of Year 5. Native volunteer species may be included to meet the performance
standards. Invasive and noxious species will be monitored and treated so that none become dominant or
alter the desired community structure of the site.
RES must monitor the stream mitigation bank for a minimum of seven years, or until IRT approval.
Therefore, plots placed within riparian restoration areas that are outside of the mitigation area for buffer
and nutrient offset credits will be monitored in accordance with the monitoring protocol in the Hannah
Bridge Stream Mitigation Plan.
1.3 Project Components
Before ratios and reductions were applied, this Bank generates credit in 4.585 acres (199,724.56 ft2) of
riparian buffer restoration area, 0.385 acres (4,907.04 ft2) of riparian buffer enhancement area via cattle
exclusion, 3.41 acres (7,396.49 ft2) of riparian buffer preservation, of which only 1.660 preservation acres
were used for crediting, area, and 4.79 acres (10,891.71 lbs) of nutrient offset area. The riparian buffer
mitigation credits generated services Neuse buffer impacts within the USGS 8-digit HUC 03020201 of the
Neuse River Basin excluding the Falls Lake Watershed. The Nitrogen nutrient offsets generated services
nutrient load reduction requirements where payments are authorized in 15A NCAC 02B .0703 within the
USGS 8-digit HUC 03020201, excluding the Falls Lake Watershed. The Sponsor maintains three credit
ledgers. One ledger accounts for buffer restoration credits, one ledger accounts for buffer preservation and
enhancement credits, and one accounts for nitrogen nutrient offset credits. All mitigation credit assets shall
be shown on these credit ledgers. The total potential riparian buffer and nutrient offset mitigation credits
that the Hannah Bridge Bank generates are summarized below.
Hannah Bridge 2 Year 3 Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site September 2021

Table 1. Hannah Bridge Mitigation Credits
Riparian Buffer Credit
Riparian
Zone
Credit
Type
Mitigation Type
Existing
Acreage
Used
Acreage
Credit Per
z
Acre (ft)
Ratio
% Full
Credit
Mitigation Assets
0-100'
Riparian
Buffer
Restoration
4.585
4.585
43,560
1:1
100%
199,724.56 ft2 (4.59 ac)
Riparian
Buffer
Enhancement via
Cattle Exclusion
0.147
0.147
43,560
2:1
100%
3,197.83 ft2 (0.07 ac)
Riparian
Buffer
Preservation: Subject
Streams
2.717
1.622
43,560
10:1
100%
7,065.43 ft2 (0.16 ac)
Riparian
Buffer
Preservation: Non
Subject Streams
0.038
0.038
43,560
5:1
100%
331.06 ft2 (0.01 ac)
101-200'
Riparian
Buffer
Enhancement via
Cattle Exclusion
0.238
0.238
43,560
2:1
33%
1,709.22 ft2 (0.04 ac)
Riparian
Buffer
Preservation: Subject
Streams
0.653
0.000
43,560
10:1
o
33%
0.00 ft2 (0.00 ac)
Riparian
Buffer
Preservation: Non
Subject Streams
0.002
0.000
43,560
5:1
33%
0.00 ft2 (0.00 ac)
Total Restoration
4.585
4.585
199,724.56 ft2 (4.59 ac)
Total Enhancements
0.385
0.385
4,907.04 ft2 (0.11 ac)
includes ratios & reductions
Buffer Preservation
3.410
7,396.49 ft2 (0.17 ac)
includes ratios & reductions
Nutrient Offset Credit
Zone
Credit
Type
Mitigation Type
Acreage
Credit Per
Acre (Ibs)
Ratio
Mitigation Assets (Ibs)
0-100'
Nitrogen
Restoration
1.59
2,273.02
N/A
3,619.66
101-200'
Nitrogen
Restoration
3.20
2,273.02
N/A
7,272.05
TOTAL
4.79
10,891.71
*According to 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o) (4) and (5), "the area of preservation credit within a buffer
mitigation site shall comprise of no more than 25% of the total area of buffer mitigation ".
All riparian restoration in the table above is generated on land determined by DWR as being agricultural.
Therefore, the 4.585 acres (199,724.56 ft2) of Neuse riparian buffer restoration credits shown in the table
above, can be used for either Neuse riparian buffer credits or Nitrogen nutrient offset credits, but not both.
Neither riparian buffer preservation nor enhancement credits can be converted into nutrient offset credits.
The Sponsor must submit a written request and receive written approval from DWR prior to any credit
conversions and transfers to the buffer and nutrient offset credit ledgers. With each conversion and transfer
request submitted to the DWR, the Sponsor is to provide all updated credit ledgers showing all transactions
that have occurred up to the date of the request.
1.4 Riparian Restoration Approach
The land use adjacent to most of the streams on the Bank Parcel was pasture. Neuse riparian buffer
restoration was used for riparian buffer credit in cultivated areas while enhancement or preservation was
used in forested areas. All riparian restoration areas were planted from top of bank back at least 50 feet
from the stream with bare root tree seedlings on an 8 by 8 foot spacing to achieve an initial density of 680
trees per acre. The buffered channels provide water quality and habitat functions within the sensitive Neuse
River watershed. Rapidly regenerating species and invasive species may develop greater individual species
Hannah Bridge 3 Year 3 Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site September 2021

density and create a less diverse mix. During the site visit on April 16, 2015, DWR determined the upstream
portion of reach TH3 to be a ditch, while the downstream portion was a stream. The portion classified as a
ditch is only viable for nutrient offset credits. All disturbed areas within the easement were planted with
native wetland vegetation and livestock will be excluded with fencing installed along the easement
boundary.
Buffer enhancement occurred in areas where grazing was adjacent to the stream in accordance with the
Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(6). This includes areas adjacent to reaches
HB 1 and HB4. RES installed cattle exclusion fencing to exclude access to riparian areas and their associated
streams. All fencing was installed to NRCS specifications. Some areas adjacent to the forested areas may
require maintenance due to the rapid regeneration of some species, such as red maple (Acer rubrum) and
sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua). Minimal maintenance is anticipated due to the past cultivation
history. Buffer enhancement can only generate buffer mitigation credit and is not transferrable into nutrient
offset credits.
HF1 and HF2 are in forested areas where cattle were not observed to be present and are subject to the Neuse
Buffer Protection Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0233 and are therefore generate preservation buffer mitigation
credit under 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n) and (o)(5). Preservation activities ensure that the buffer is
permanently protected from cutting, clearing, filling, grading, and similar activities that would affect the
functioning of the buffer. Where HF2 flows into an oversized, channelized ditch nutrient credits are
generated. Preservation buffer credits also are generated in reaches HB1, HB3, HB4, and TH3 when
restoration activities occur in forested areas. Buffer preservation can only generate buffer mitigation credit
and is not transferrable into nutrient offset credits.
1.5 Construction and As Built Conditions
Revegetation of the site included treating invasive species and planting native hardwood bare root trees.
Prior to planting, RES prepped the site by spraying and ripping the easement. Coastal Plain Small Stream
Swamp is the target community type and was used for all areas within the project. The community is defined
by Schafale (2012). The planting of bare root trees occurred in April and May 2019. Deviations from the
initial planting plan were due to bare root availability. A list of the planted species can be found in Table
2.
Stream construction activities were completed in May 2019. The site was constructed in accordance with
the Approved Mitigation Plan and associated permits and the construction was approved by the IRT on a
site visit in July 2019. RES acquired 404 (SAW-2015-01799), 401 (DWR # 17-0537), and NPDES Erosion
and Sediment Control Plan (JC# 18-040-P) Permits. There were no easement changes between BPDP
approval and construction. The small change in crediting is due to a more accurate tree line survey being
used to generate the as -built credits. The conservation easement is marked every 150-200 feet with North
Carolina Wildlife Habitat Foundation signs attached to either fences or t-posts. Fences were installed in
areas where livestock is present, and t-posts are used as physical barriers where livestock is not present.
1.6 Year 3 Monitoring Performance
The Hannah Bridge Year 3 Monitoring (MY3) activities were completed in September 2021. All MY3
data is present below and in the appendices. The Site is on track to meeting vegetation and stream
interim success criteria. As requested by DWR in the Task 3 Credit Release Letter, RES has added three
random vegetation plots in DWR crediting areas that were measured in MY2 and will be measured
each year for the remainder of the monitoring period.
Hannah Bridge 4 Year 3 Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site September 2021

Ten permanent vegetation plots (VP) and three random vegetation plots (RVP) were monitored during
September 2021. Vegetation tables are in Appendix B and associated photos are in Appendix C. MY3
data indicates that all 13 plots are exceeding the interim success criteria of 320 planted stems per acre.
Planted stem densities ranged from 324 to 850 planted stems per acre with a mean of 588 planted stems per
acre across all plots. A total of 16 species were documented within the plots. Volunteer species were noted
in five plots, with an average of 663 stems per acre. The average tree height observed was 7.3 feet.
Visual assessment of vegetation outside of the monitoring plots indicates that the herbaceous vegetation is
becoming well established throughout the project. RES performed supplemental planting of about 600
bareroot trees in January 2021. This planting occurred in and around VP 11, 16, and throughout areas of
lower stem density within the Project boundaries. RES inspected the easement boundary and found no
evidence of damaged fencing, missing easement markers or encroachment. Additional areas of Chinese
privet re -sprouts were reported in MY3 totaling about 3 acres. These areas will be treated in late 2021 or
2022.
2.0 Methods
Vegetation success is being monitored at 10 permanent monitoring plots. Vegetation plot monitoring
follows the CVS-EEP Level 2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation (Lee et al. 2008) and includes analysis of
species composition and density of planted species. Data is processed using the CVS data entry tool. In the
field, the four corners of each plot were permanently marked with PVC at the origin and metal conduit at
the other corners. Photos of each plot are to be taken from the origin each monitoring year. Additionally,
RES will conduct three 100 m2 vegetation transects in each year starting in MY2 and ending in MYS. One
transect will be placed entirely within the nutrient offset area near VP 3, one transect will be placed entirely
within the nutrient offset area near VP6, and one transect will be placed entirely within the nutrient offset
area near and VP12. The vegetation transects are to include the same vegetation data as the permanent
monitoring plots. DWR requested the vegetation transects as a result of the permanent vegetation plots
being installed half in the nutrient offset area and half in the wetland mitigation area.
3.0 Reference
Environmental Banc & Exchange — Neuse I, LLC (2017). Hannah Bridge Mitigation Site — Bank Parcel
Development Plan
Lee Michael T., Peet Robert K., Roberts Steven D., and Wentworth Thomas R., 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol
for Recording Vegetation Level. Version 4.2
NCDENR. 2009. "Neuse River Basinwide Water Quality Plan." Division of Water Quality. http://
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ps/bpu/basin/neuse/2009. (October 2013).
NC Environmental Management Commission. 2014. Rule 15A NCAC 02B.0295 - Mitigation Program
Requirements for the Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Buffers.
Schafale, M.P. 2012. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Fourth
Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation,
NCDENR, Raleigh, NC.
Hannah Bridge 5 Year 3 Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site September 2021

Appendix A
Site Maps

9lackmon f[tl
Ceek„b
Blackmon sry
Crossroads feR
Oak Forest
Webb MITI Rd
Charlie Rd
strlcklands Crossroads RP
hn<
K
Charlie RP
ti
u`
0
S trick [ands CrP S,
White oak Re
erool P.
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri
oak Fo. Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC,
esr R°OpenStreetMap contributors, and th,eGIS'U'ser Community
rSA..iritir j�►�a%„volpol�til
0 500 1,000
Feet
Figure 1 - Site Location Map
Hannah Bridge Buffer/Nutrient Site
Johnston County, North Carolina
Date: 8/5/2019
Drawn by: RTM
Checked by: BPB
1 inch = 2,000 feet
res

Vegetation Condition Assessment
Target Commun'ty
Present Marginal Absent
fires
N
w
E
S
0 150 300
Feet
Figure 2
Current Conditions Plan View
Hannah Bridge Buffer/Nutrient Site
MY3 2021
Johnston County, North Carolina
Date: 9/21/2021
Drawn by: RTM
1 in = 300 feet
LEGEND
Convservation Easement
Vegetation Plot
>320 stems/acre
o Random Vegetation Plot
Buffer/Nutrient Credit Type
Restoration, 0-100'
Enhancement, 0-100'
Enhancement, 101-200'
▪ Preservation, 0-100'
▪ Preservation, 101-200'
- Nutrient, 0-100'
© Nutrient, 101-200'
Wetland Mitigation
— Stream Alignment

Appendix B
Vegetation Assessment Data

Appendix B. Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 2. Planted Species Summary
Common Name
Scientific Name
Total Stems Planted
Water Oak
Quercus nigra
5,500
Overcup Oak
Quercus lyrata
4,000
Bald Cypress
Taxodium distichum
3,500
Sycamore
Platanus occidentalis
3,500
Willow Oak
Quercus phellos
3,000
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Quercus michauxii
2,400
Green Ash
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
2,200
Tuliptree
Liriodendron tulipifera
2,000
River Birch
Betula nigra
1,600
Buttonbush
Cephalanthus occidentalis
1,500
Cherrybark Oak
Quercus pagoda
1,100
Blackgum
Nyssa sylvatica
600
Silky Dogwood
Cornus amomum
500
Total
31,400
Table 3. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Plot #
Planted
Stems/Acre
Volunteer
Stems/Acre
Total
Stems/Acre
Success
Criteria
Met?
Average
Stem
Height (ft)
2
850
0
850
Yes
8.3
3
647
202
850
Yes
4.8
6
688
243
931
Yes
10.9
9
769
0
769
Yes
9.6
11
324
0
324
Yes
5.4
12
688
162
850
Yes
8.3
14
567
0
567
Yes
6.6
15
526
81
607
Yes
5.1
16
324
283
607
Yes
4.8
18
486
0
486
Yes
3.6
R1
647
0
647
Yes
5.4
R2
486
0
486
Yes
11.1
R3
647
0
647
Yes
7.4
Project Avg
588
75
663
Yes
7.3

Appendix B. Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 4a. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
Hannah Bridge
Current Plot Data (MY3 2021)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
05082019-01-0002
05082019-01-0003
05082019-01-0006
05082019-01-0009
05082019-01-0011
05082019-01-0012
05082019-01-0014
05082019-01-0015
05082019-01-0016
05082019-01-0018
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
Betulanigra
river birch
Tree
4
4
4
5
5
5
1
1
1
2
2
2
Cephalanthus occidentali
common buttonbush
Shrub
5
5
5
1
1
1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
1
1
1
3
3
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
Liquidambarstyraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
5
6
3
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
2
2
5
5
5
Pinus taeda
loblolly pine
Tree
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
1
1
1
3
3
3
6
6
6
1
1
1
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
2
2
2
Quercus
oak
Tree
1
1
1
Quercus alba
white oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
3
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak
Tree
8
8
8
4
4
4
8
8
8
6
6
6
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
Quercusnigra
water oak
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
4
4
4
1
1
3
2
2
2
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
Tree
1
1
1
3
3
3
1
1
1
3
3
3
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
21
21
21
16
16
21
17
17
23
19
19
19
8
8
8
17
17
21
14
14
14
13
13
15
8
8
15
12
12
12
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
7
7
7
6
6
7
5
5
6
8
8
8
6
6
6
7
7
8
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
5
7
4
4
4
850
850
850
647
647
850
688
688
931
769
769
769
324
324
324
688
688
850
567
567
567
526
526
607
324
324
607
486
486
486
Current Plot Data (MY3 2021)
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
05082019 R1
05082019-R2
05082019-R3
MY3 (2021)
MY2 (2020)
MY1 (2019)
MYO (2019)
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
PnoLS
P-all
T
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
4
4
4
16
16
16
12
12
12
12
12
12
15
15
15
Cephalanthus occidentali
common buttonbush
Shrub
1
1
1
7
7
7
6
6
6
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
1
1
1
3
3
3
2
2
2
12
12
14
5
5
5
7
7
7
15
15
15
Liquidambarstyraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
14
10
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
1
1
1
6
6
10
1
1
3
2
2
2
15
15
15
Pinus taeda
loblolly pine
Tree
3
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
1
1
1
4
4
4
5
5
5
34
34
34
24
24
24
17
17
17
28
28
28
Quercus
oak
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
9
9
9
68
68
68
Quercus alba
white oak
Tree
2
2
4
2
2
2
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
35
35
35
31
31
31
26
26
26
8
8
8
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
1
1
1
20
20
20
14
14
14
10
10
10
5
5
5
Quercusnigra
water oak
Tree
5
5
5
5
5
5
4
4
4
3
3
3
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
6
6
6
6
6
6
7
7
7
6
6
6
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
1
1
1
22
22
24
20
20
20
18
18
18
17
17
17
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
11
11
11
11
11
11
Salix sericea
silky willow
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
11
11
11
8
8
8
9
9
9
17
17
17
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
22
22
22
8
8
8
14
14
14
189
189
213
136
136
151
121
121
121
197
197
197
1
1
1
13
10
10
10
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.32
0.25
0.25
0.25
8
8
8
3
3
3
7
7
7
15
15
16
13
13
15
11
11
11
11
11
11
890
890
890
324
324
324
567
567
567
588
588
663
550
550
611
490
490
490
797
797
797

Appendix B. Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 4b. Random Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data
Random Plot 1
#
Species
Height (cm)
1
Quercus lyrata
130
2
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
150
3
Platanus occidentalis
210
4
Quercus rubra
165
5
Betula nigra
275
6
Salix sericea
105
7
Cephalanthus occidentalis
100
8
Betula nigra
75
9
Quercus rubra
210
10
Quercus rubra
265
11
Betula nigra
80
12
Quercus rubra
210
13
Betula nigra
270
14
Taxodium distichum
200
15
Taxodium distichum
100
16
Quercus rubra
110
Stems/Acre
647
Average Height (cm)
166
Average Height (ft)
5.4
Plot Size (m)
25 x 4
Random Plot 2
#
Species
Height (cm)
1
Platanus occidentalis
210
2
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
250
3
Platanus occidentalis
750
4
Quercus rubra
260
5
Quercus rubra
280
6
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
330
7
Quercus rubra
85
8
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
110
9
Platanus occidentalis
600
10
Quercus lyrata
100
11
Quercus rubra
400
12
Platanus occidentalis
700
Stems/Acre
486
Average Height (cm)
340
Average Height (ft)
11.1
Plot Size (m)
25 x 4
Random Plot 3
#
Species
Height (cm)
1
Quercus michauxii
155
2
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
110
3
Taxodium distichum
180
4
Quercus rubra
140
5
Platanus occidentalis
600
6
Platanus occidentalis
150
7
Platanus occidentalis
210
8
Liriodendron tulipifera
160
9
Quercus rubra
100
10
Platanus occidentalis
600
11
Quercus lyrata
230
12
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
150
13
Quercus phellos
120
14
Quercus lyrata
250
15
Platanus occidentalis
350
16
Quercus lyrata
120
Stems/Acre
647
Average Height (cm)
227
Average Height (ft)
7.4
Plot Size (m)
25 x 4

Appendix C
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos

Hannah Bridge MY3 Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Vegetation Plot 2 (09/07/2021)
Vegetation Plot 6 (09/07/2021)
Vegetation Plot 11 (09/07/2021)
Vegetation Plot 3 (09/07/2021)
Vegetation Plot 9 (09/07/2021)
Vegetation Plot 12 (09/07/2021)

Vegetation Plot 14 (09/07/2021)
Vegetation Plot 16 (09/07/2021)
Vegetation Plot 15 (09/07/2021)
Vegetation Plot 18 (09/07/2021)

Hannah Bridge DWR MY3 Random Vegetation Plots (9/01/2021)
Random Vegetation Plot 1 Start (09/01/2021)
Random Vegetation Plot 2 Start (09/01/2021)
Random Vegetation Plot 3 Start (09/01/2021)
Random Vegetation Plot 1 End (09/01/2021)
Random Vegetation Plot 2 End (09/01/2021)
Random Vegetation Plot 3 End (09/01/2021)

Appendix D
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data Sheets

Plot (continued): 05082019-01-0002
map source X Y
ID Species char (m) (m)
Sep 2021 Data
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
0
ddh
(mm)
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(cm) (cm) sprout
Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 05082019-01-0002
Date:
VMD Year (1-5):
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
4
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
35.3780
-78.420458
Datum:
UTM Zone:
0.5 X-Axis bearing (deg):
10
Y:
10
NAD27
17N
10
Party:
Role: Date last planted:
Newje.l.anting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
❑ Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y ax s (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
ID Species Name
Map Source* X Y
char 0.1m 0.1m
Sep 2021 Data
Height DBH
lcm* 1 cm
C
0
CD
*
Height
lcm*
THIS YEAR'S DATA
DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
1 cm prout
908 Platanus occidentalis
912 Quercus lyrata
913 Taxodium distichum
915 Quercus phellos
916 Quercus lyrata
918 Quercus lyrata
919 Betula nigra
920 Quercus lyrata
921 Quercus lyrata
922 Quercus lyrata
924 Betula nigra
925 Quercus lyrata
926 Betula nigra
927 Betula nigra
928 Quercus phellos
929 Quercus nigra
931 Quercus pagoda
932 Quercus nigra
933 Quercus lyrata
934 Quercus phellos
936 Quercus phellos
937 Quercus lyrata
# stems: 22
Species Name
O R 0.3 0.3 310.0 2.3❑
® R 1.1 4.8 Missing ❑
® R 1.9 3.4 170.0 0.5 ❑
O R 3.9 0.9 155.0 0.2 ❑
O R 6.0 0.7 80.0 ❑
O R 4.3 3.7 215.0 0.5❑
Q R 4.0 4.4 250.0 0.7 ❑
R 3.4 5.4 200.0 0.6 ❑
O R 2.5 7.0 260.0 1.2 ❑
O R 1.6 8.8 370.0 1.7 ❑
O R 3.0 9.5 600.0 6.3 ❑
O R 3.7 8.1 280.0 1.0 ❑
O R 4.4 6.8 450.0 4.0 ❑
R 5.2 5.6 550.0 6.1 ❑
O R 5.9 4.1 48.0 ❑
Q R 6.5 2.8 135.0 DBH? ❑
O R 7.7 0.6 105.0 DBH? ❑
O R 9.7 3.3 220.0 0.5 ❑
O R 8.9 4.6 240.0 0.8 ❑
O R 8.0 6.1 145.0 0.2 ❑
R 6.2 8.9 240.0 0.8 ❑
O R 9.3 9.9 280.0 2.1 ❑
New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Source*(m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm
Vigor*
Damage*
Notes
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 1
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued): 05082019-01-0002
map source X Y
ID Species char (m) (m)
Sep 2021 Data
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
0
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
& subsampiing" *:
Height Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ 10em ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Specie s Name
u
c
SEEDLINGS — HEIGHT CLASSES
SAPLINGS — DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm -
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH
**Requiredifcut-off >1Ocmorsubsample?100%. •1
I:2
3
I.:4
.-.5
Is:6
t7
Ins
Ise
N. Form WS2, ver 9.1
Map of stems on plot 05082019-01-0002
(0,0)
X:5m
X-axis: 10°
# stems: 22
map size:
small
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 2
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 05082019-01-0003
VMD Year (1-5): 4 Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
35.3775
-78.419435
0.5
10
Datum:
UTM Zone:
X-Axis bearing (deg):
Y:
10
NAD27
17N
178
Party:
Role:
Date last planted:
New planting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
❑ Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y ax s (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
ID Species Name
Map Source* X Y
char 0.1m 0.1m
Sep 2021 Data
Height DBH
lcm* 1 cm
0
CD
THIS YEARS DATA
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
lcm* 1 cm prout
939 Platanus occidentalis
940 Platanus occidentalis
941 Quercus lyrata
943 Quercus michauxii
945 Quercus phellos
946 Quercus lyrata
947 Quercus nigra
948 Taxodium distichum
949 Taxodium distichum
952 Quercus phellos
953 Quercus phellos
954 Quercus phellos
955 Quercus lyrata
956 Quercus lyrata
957 Taxodium distichum
958 Platanus occidentalis
# stems: 16
Species Name
O R 0.3 0.5 215.0 0.5❑
O R 4.1 1.0 220.0 0.7 ❑
O R 3.0 2.1 220.0 0.5 ❑
® R 0.8 5.0 230.0 0.6 ❑
O R 1.5 7.6 145.0 0.1 ❑
® R 2.8 6.3 160.0 0.3 ❑
R 3.9 5.0 133.0 DBH? ❑
O R 5.1 4.0 80.0 ❑
O R 6.1 2.7 125.0 DBH? ❑
O R 8.8 4.3 135.0 DBH? ❑
R 7.6 5.7 140.0 0.1 ❑
O R 6.3 7.3 155.0 0.3 ❑
R 5.0 8.6 125.0 DBH? ❑
O R 3.6 9.8 40.0 ❑
O R 7.8 9.8 135.0 DBH? ❑
R 9.0 8.4 90.0 ❑
New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm
Vigor*
Damage*
Notes
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 3
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMa1, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued): 05082019-01-0003
map source X Y
ID Species char (m) (m)
Sep 2021 Data
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
0
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
& subsampling**:
Height Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ 10em ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Specie s Name
u
c
SEEDLINGS — HEIGHT CLASSES
SAPLINGS — DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm -
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH
**Requiredifcut-off >1Ocmorsubsample?100%. •1
I:2
3
I.:4
.-.5
Is:6
t7
Ins
Ise
N. Form WS2, ver 9.1
Map of stems on plot 05082019-01-0003
0
•
Y:5m
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 178 °
# stems: 16
map size:
small
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 4
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 05082019-01-0006
VMD Year (1-5): 4 Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
35.3801
-78.417073
0.5
10
Datum:
UTM Zone:
X-Axis bearing (deg):
Y:
10
NAD27
17N
59
Party:
Role:
Date last planted:
New planting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
❑ Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y ax s (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
ID Species Name
1010 Platanus occidentalis
1012 Quercus lyrata
1014 Quercus nigra
1015 Quercus pagoda
1017 Quercus lyrata
1018 Quercus michauxii
1019 Platanus occidentalis
1020 Platanus occidentalis
1021 Quercus lyrata
1022 Quercus lyrata
1023 Quercus lyrata
1024 Quercus lyrata
1025 Platanus occidentalis
1026 Quercus lyrata
1027 Platanus occidentalis
1028 Quercus lyrata
1698 Platanus occidentalis
# stems: 17
Species Name
Map Source* X Y
char 0.1m 0.1m
O R 0.4 0.5
O R 2.8 2.2
0 R 0.7 5.0
O R 0.8 9.4
® R 2.7 6.7
R 3.9 5.1
® R 4.7 3.9
O R 5.6 2.1
O R 6.2 0.7
R 9.3 1.8
O R 8.3 3.1
R 6.3 6.2
O R 5.5 7.5
O R 4.6 8.6
O R 3.6 9.7
R 8.3 8.1
O R 7.0 4.2
Sep 2021 Data
Height DBH
lcm* 1 cm
0
CD
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
lcm* 1 cm prout
570.0 7.0
180.0 0.7 ❑
160.0 0.6
330.0 1.7 ❑
250.0 1.0
100.0 ❑
400.0 2.1 ❑
650.0 10.0 ❑
360.0 2.5
300.0 1.6 ❑
100.0
45.0 ❑
800.0 5.6 ❑
205.0 0.7 ❑
600.0 1.5 ❑
300.0 1.7
300.0 1.9 ❑
New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted.
X Y Height DBH
Source*(m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm
If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Vigor*
Damage*
Notes
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 5
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMa1, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued): 05082019-01-0006
map source X Y
ID Species char (m) (m)
Sep 2021 Data
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
0
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
& subsampling**:
Height Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ 10em ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Specie s Name
u
c
SEEDLINGS — HEIGHT CLASSES
SAPLINGS — DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm -
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH
**Requiredifcut-off >1Ocmorsubsample?100%. •1
I:2
3
I.:4
.-.5
Is:6
t7
Ins
Ise
N. Form WS2, ver 9.1
Map of stems on plot 05082019-01-0006
Y:5m
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 59
# stems: 17
map size:
small
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 6
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 05082019-01-0009
VMD Year (1-5): 4 Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
35.3803
-78.4151
0.5
10
Datum:
UTM Zone:
X-Axis bearing (deg):
Y:
10
NAD27
17N
128
Party:
Role:
Date last planted:
New planting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
❑ Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y ax s (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
ID Species Name
Map Source* X Y
char 0.1m 0.1m
Sep 2021 Data
Height DBH
lcm* 1 cm
0
CD
THIS YEARS DATA
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
lcm* 1 cm prout
1067 Quercus michauxii
1068 Quercus lyrata
1069 Quercus pagoda
1070 Quercus pagoda
1071 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
1073 Quercus michauxii
1074 Quercus lyrata
1075 Quercus lyrata
1076 Quercus phellos
1077 Quercus lyrata
1078 Quercus lyrata
1079 Quercus lyrata
1080 Betula nigra
1081 Betula nigra
1082 Betula nigra
1083 Betula nigra
1084 Betula nigra
1085 Quercus michauxii
1086 Quercus sp.
1087 Taxodium distichum
# stems: 20
Species Name
O R 8.8 0.9 213.0 0.9❑
O R 9.3 4.7 243.0 1.5 ❑
R 8.0 3.6 152.0 0.4 ❑
O R 6.8 2.5 320.0 3.0 ❑
O R 5.8 1.6 243.0 0.6 ❑
O R 0.4 0.3 213.0 0.9 ❑
0 R 1.9 1.7 289.0 3.1 ❑
® R 3.7 3.2 305.0 3.0 ❑
O R 5.0 4.2 305.0 2.4 ❑
R 6.2 5.6 289.0 1.8 ❑
R 7.6 6.7 350.0 2.5 ❑
O R 9.0 8.1 274.0 1.6 ❑
O R 7.4 9.9 441.0 4.2 ❑
O R 6.0 9.1 396.0 5.4 ❑
O R 4.5 7.9 396.0 5.3 ❑
R 3.2 6.6 381.0 3.5 ❑
O R 2.0 5.3 350.0 4.0 ❑
0 R 0.6 4.0 Missing ❑
® R 0.4 7.4 198.0 0.7 ❑
® R 1.6 8.7 228.0 0.9 ❑
New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor*
Damage*
Notes
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 7
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMa1, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued): 05082019-01-0009
map source X Y
ID Species char (m) (m)
Sep 2021 Data
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
0
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
& subsampling**:
Height Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ 10em ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Specie s Name
u
c
SEEDLINGS — HEIGHT CLASSES
SAPLINGS — DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm -
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH
**Requiredifcut-off >1Ocmorsubsample?100%. •1
I:2
3
I.:4
.-.5
Is:6
t7
Ins
Ise
N10 Form WS2, ver 9.1
Map of stems on plot 05082019-01-0009
0
T
Y:5m
0
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 128°
# stems: 20
map size:
small
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 8
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 05082019-01-0011
VMD Year (1-5): 4 Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTIVI-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
35.3807
-78.415965
0.5
10
Datum:
UTM Zone:
X-Axis bearing (deg):
Y:
10
NAD27
17N
208
Party:
Role:
Date last planted:
New planting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
❑ Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y ax s (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
ID Species Name
Map Source* X Y
char 0.1m 0.1m
Sep 2021 Data
Height DBH
lcm* 1 cm
0
CD
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
lcm* 1 cm prout
1114 Quercus phellos
1117 Platanus occidentalis
1118 Betula nigra
1119 Liriodendron tulipifera
1120 Quercus phellos
1121 Quercus michauxii
1125 Quercus michauxii
1126 Quercus nigra
1127 Quercus lyrata
# stems: 9
Species Name
® R 3.3 0.2 182.0 1.0
® R 2.8 5.4 198.0 0.7 ❑
O R 1.6 7.3 350.0 2.9 ❑
0 R 2.9 9.0 Missing ❑
O R 4.6 8.0 205.0 1.6 ❑
O R 5.5 6.1 168.0 0.7 ❑
O R 9.1 3.6 45.0 ❑
R 7.5 9.5 48.0 ❑
O R 9.2 8.9 130.0 DBH? ❑
New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space
X Y Height DBH
Source*(m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm
Vigor*
seeded_ use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Damage*
Notes
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
& subsamdine *:
Height Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
S •ecies Name
u
c
SEEDLINGS - HEIGHT CLASSES
SAPLINGS - DBH
TREES - DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
sap!
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBI-1
**Requiredifcut-off >lOcm or subsample?100%. 01
I.2
• 3
I.:4 `"5
It *6
I�7
I:18
I
1410 Form WS2, ver 9.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 9
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMa1, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 05082019-01-0011
Y:5m
n
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 208 °
# stems: 9
map size:
small
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 10
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 05082019-01-0012
VMD Year (1-5): 4 Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
35.3814
-78.413113
0.5
10
Datum:
UTM Zone:
X-Axis bearing (deg):
Y:
10
NAD27
17N
95
Party:
Role:
Date last planted:
New planting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
❑ Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y ax s (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
ID Species Name
Map Source* X Y
char 0.1m 0.1m
Sep 2021 Data
Height DBH
lcm* 1 cm
0
CD
THIS YEARS DATA
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
lcm* 1 cm prout
1129 Quercus lyrata
1130 Platanus occidentalis
1131 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
1132 Quercus lyrata
1134 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
1135 Quercus pagoda
1136 Quercus pagoda
1137 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
1138 Quercus alba
1139 Quercus phellos
1141 Platanus occidentalis
1142 Platanus occidentalis
1143 Betula nigra
1144 Quercus phellos
1145 Platanus occidentalis
1146 Betula nigra
1147 Quercus phellos
# stems: 17
Species Name
O R 7.0 0.8 137.0 0.2 ❑
O R 8.9 1.8 412.0 4.3 ❑
R 9.5 5.0 155.0 0.2 ❑
O R 8.3 4.5 275.0 1.0 ❑
O R 5.1 2.9 290.0 0.7 ❑
® R 3.6 2.1 106.0 DBH? ❑
O R 2.0 1.3 138.0 0.2 ❑
O R 0.4 0.4 198.0 0.8 ❑
® R 0.4 3.4 152.0 0.6
0 R 2.4 6.1 137.0 0.2 ❑
R 7.3 7.1 395.0 4.0 ❑
R 9.2 8.2 381.0 3.9 ❑
O R 6.3 9.5 365.0 4.2 ❑
R 3.2 8.1 228.0 1.1 ❑
O R 0.4 7.1 396.0 2.9 ❑
® R 1.0 9.1 420.0 5.0 ❑
O R 4.0 9.7 128.0 DBH? ❑
New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Source*(m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm
Vigor*
Damage*
Notes
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 11
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMa1, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued): 05082019-01-0012
map source X Y
ID Species char (m) (m)
Sep 2021 Data
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
0
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
& subsampling**:
Height Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ 10em ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Specie s Name
u
c
SEEDLINGS — HEIGHT CLASSES
SAPLINGS — DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm -
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH
**Requiredifcut-off >1Ocmorsubsample?100%. •1
I:2
3
I.:4
.-.5
Is:6
t7
Ins
Ise
N. Form WS2, ver 9.1
Map of stems on plot 05082019-01-0012
Y:5
o
o
O
o
o
4)
o
0 0
o
0
o
(0,0)
X:5m
X-axis: 95 � N
# stems: 17
map size:
small
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 12
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 05082019-01-0014
VMD Year (1-5): 4 Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
35.3821
-78.412387
0.5
10
Datum:
UTM Zone:
X-Axis bearing (deg):
Y:
10
NAD27
17N
136
Party:
Role:
Date last planted:
New planting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
❑ Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y ax s (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
ID Species Name
Map Source* X Y
char 0.1m 0.1m
Sep 2021 Data
Height DBH
lcm* 1 cm
0
CD
THIS YEARS DATA
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
lcm* 1 cm prout
1174 Taxodium distichum
1176 Quercus phellos
1179 Taxodium distichum
1180 Quercus michauxii
1181 Quercus michauxii
1183 Platanus occidentalis
1184 Quercus michauxii
1185 Quercus phellos
1187 Quercus phellos
1188 Taxodium distichum
1189 Quercus phellos
2115 Platanus occidentalis
2116 Platanus occidentalis
2117 Platanus occidentalis
# stems: 14
O R 0.4 0.5 270.0 0.6 ❑
® R 0.4 3.8 120.0 DBH? ❑
CD R 0.9 8.7 120.0 DBH? ❑
O R 5.0 9.8 220.0 1.0 ❑
O R 4.7 8.2 90.0 ❑
R 4.2 3.7 310.0 1.9 ❑
O R 4.0 1.4 130.0 DBH? ❑
O R 6.7 3.5 275.0 1.1 ❑
O R 7.5 8.0 290.0 1.5 ❑
O R 9.3 7.4 150.0 0.3 ❑
R 9.1 4.8 175.0 0.9 ❑
O R 3.0 8.0 165.0 0.5 ❑
® R 3.0 6.0 220.0 0.7 ❑
R 6.0 2.0 270.0 1.2
Species Name
New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted.
X Y Height DBH
Source*(m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm
If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
Vigor*
Damage* Notes
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 13
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMa1, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued): 05082019-01-0014
map source X Y
ID Species char (m) (m)
Sep 2021 Data
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
0
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
& subsampling**:
Height Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ 10em ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
u
c
SEEDLINGS — HEIGHT CLASSES
SAPLINGS — DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH
**Requiredifcut-off >lOcmorsubsample?100%. •1
I:2
3
I.:4
.-.5
Is:6
t7
Ins
Ise
N. Form WS2, ver 9.1
Map of stems on plot 05082019-01-0014
CD
ED
Y:5m
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 136°
# stems: 14
map size:
small
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 14
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 05082019-01-0015
VMD Year (1-5): 4 Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
35.3830
-78.416015
0.5
10
Datum:
UTM Zone:
X-Axis bearing (deg):
Y:
10
NAD27
17N
330
Party:
Role:
Date last planted:
New planting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
❑ Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y ax s (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
ID Species Name
Map Source* X Y
char 0.1m 0.1m
Sep 2021 Data
Height DBH
lcm* 1 cm
0
CD
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
lcm* 1 cm prout
1195 Cephalanthus occidentalis 0 R 9.5 5.9 85.0 ❑
1196 Cephalanthus occidentalis R 8.7 5.0 150.0 0.2 ❑
1197 Quercus michauxii O R 7.6 3.9 245.0 1.2 ❑
1198 Quercus michauxii 0 R 6.6 3.1 260.0 1.4 ❑
1199 Quercus michauxii O R 5.7 2.3 70.0 ❑
1201 Cephalanthus occidentalis O R 3.8 0.4 55.0 ❑
1205 Platanus occidentalis O R 3.8 3.6 140.0 0.6 ❑
1208 Quercus lyrata O R 6.7 6.8 25.0 ❑
1217 Quercus phellos R 2.3 6.2 Missing ❑
1218 Cephalanthus occidentalis ® R 1.2 5.3 275.0 0.8 ❑
1219 Cephalanthus occidentalis O R 0.4 4.5 150.0 0.4 ❑
2118 Quercus phellos ® R 5.0 0.5 110.0 DBH? ❑
2119 Platanus occidentalis R 3.8 4.9 210.0 0.5 ❑
2120 Platanus occidentalis ® R 3.6 6.0 235.0 0.7 ❑
# stems: 14
Species Name
New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Source*(m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm
Vigor*
Damage* Notes
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 15
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMa1, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued): 05082019-01-0015
map source X Y
ID Species char (m) (m)
Sep 2021 Data
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
0
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
& subsampiing" *:
Height Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Specie s Name
u
c
SEEDLINGS — HEIGHT CLASSES
SAPLINGS — DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm -
137 cm
Sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH
**Requiredifciioff>1Ocmorsubsample?100%. •1
I:2
3
I.:4
.-.5
Is:6
t7
Ins
Ise
N. Form WS2, ver 9.1
Map of stems on plot 05082019-01-0015
(0,0)
X:5m
X-axis: 330'
N
# stems: 14
map size:
small
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 16
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 05082019-01-0016
VMD Year (1-5): 4 Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTIVI-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
35.3830
-78.414487
0.5
10
Datum:
UTM Zone:
X-Axis bearing (deg):
Y:
10
NAD27
17N
330
Party:
Role:
Date last planted:
New planting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
❑ Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y ax s (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
ID Species Name
Map
char
Source* X Y
0.1m 0.1m
Sep 2021 Data
Height DBH
lcm* 1 cm
0
CD
THIS YEAR'S DATA
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
lcm* 1 cm prout
1241 Fraxinus pennsylvanica ® R 9.0 7.8 145.0 0.6 ❑
2121 Quercus michauxii O R 4.7 5.7 130.0 DBH? ❑
2122 Quercus alba R 4.9 2.5 55.0 ❑
2123 Quercus michauxii O R 2.0 2.0 125.0 DBH? ❑
2124 Platanus occidentalis ® R 2.0 4.9 295.0 1.2 ❑
2125 Platanus occidentalis R 5.0 9.6 210.0 0.7 ❑
2126 Cephalanthus occidentalis ® R 10.0 5.5 125.0 DBH? ❑
2439 Quercus michauxii O U 0.4 2.1 90.0 ❑
# stems: 8
Species Name
New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Source*(m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm
Vigor*
Damage*
Notes
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species
& subsampiing**:
Height Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): LJ 10cm LJ 50cm LJ 100cm LJ 137cm
S 1ecies Name
u
e
SEEDLINGS - HEIGHT CLASSES
SAPLINGS - DBH
TREES - DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
Sub-
sap!
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBI-1
* *Re quired ifcrtoff>10cmorsubsample?100%. •1
10.2
••4 3
I..4 `"5
Is:6
I�7
Ins
Ise
�10 Form WS2, ver 9.1
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 17
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMa1, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m.
Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 05082019-01-0016
Y:5m
0 0
T
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 330°
# stems: 8
map size:
small
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 18
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Plot 05082019-01-0018
VMD Year (1-5):
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
4
Date:
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
0.5
10
Datum: NAD27
UTM Zone:
X-Axis bearing (deg):
Y: 10 ❑ Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
17N
Party:
Role:
Date last planted:
New planting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
ID Species Name
Map Source* X Y
char 0.1m 0.1m
Sep 2021 Data
Height DBH
lcm* 1 cm
0
CD
THIS YEARS DATA
Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
lcm* 1 cm prout
2446
2447
2448
2449
2450
2451
2453
2454
2455
2457
2458
2459
2460
2461
2462
2463
2464
# stems:
Liriodendron tulipifera
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Quercus phellos
Quercus michauxii
Liriodendron tulipifera
Liriodendron tulipifera
Liriodendron tulipifera
Quercus michauxii
Quercus michauxii
Quercus phellos
Liriodendron tulipifera
Taxodium distichum
Liriodendron tulipifera
Quercus michauxii
Liriodendron tulipifera
Quercus michauxii
Quercus sp.
17 New Stems,
Species Name
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
R 0.4
R 0.6
R 2.6
R 1.9
R 1.9
R 3.2
R 4.1
R 4.2
R 4.6
R 6.2
R 6.2
R 7.6
R 8.1
R 8.1
R 7.3
R 8.3
0.3
6.4
7.4
3.5
1.3
0.3
2.9
4.4
7.9
5.3
2.3
0.6
3.2
5.7
8.3
9.8
R 9.5 1.5
137.0 0.2 ❑
122.0 DBH? ❑
214.0 0.6 ❑
99.0 ❑
Missing ❑
Missing ❑
8.0 ❑
160.0 0.3 ❑
122.0 DBH? ❑
Missing ❑
60.0 ❑
138.0 0.2 ❑
198.0 0.8 ❑
Missing ❑
Missing
16.0
30.0
not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y
Source* (m) (m)
Height DBH
1 cm* 1 cm
Vigor*
Damage*
Notes
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 19
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMa1, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 05082019-01-0018
Y:5m
•c
(0,0)
X:5m
•
Please measure bearing stems: 17
of X-axis and record at map size:
top of plot. small
*SOURCE: Tr=Transplant, L=Live stake, B=Ball and burlap, P=Potted, Tu=Tubling, R=bare Root, M=Mechanically, U=Unknown p. 20
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1