20071115 Ver 1_Mitigation Closeout Report_20130829

09— 1 � . �, 5
Beaverdam Mitigation Project
EEP ID (IMS #) 92530
FDP CONTRACT NUMBER D06029 -B
USACE ACTION ID #
DWQ 404#
CLOSEOUT REPORT
Stream and Wetland
Project Setting and Classifications
County
Harnett
General Location
Erwin, NC
Basin
Cape Fear
Physiographic Region
Coastal Plain
Ecore ion
Southeastern Plains
USGS Hydro Unit
03030004 - 110020
NCDWQ Sub -basin
03 -06 -14
Wetland Classification
Riparian
Thermal Regime
Warm
Trout Water
No
Proiect Performers
Source Agency
NC EEP
Provider
EBX -Neuse 1, LLC
Designer
Kimle -Hom and Associates
Monitoring Firm
WK Dickson & Co., Inc.
Overall Project Activities and Timeline
month
Activity
February 2008
Construction Completed
February 2008
Planting Completed
February 2008
Post Construction Monitoring Gauges Installed
May 2008
As -Built Report Submitted
November 2008
1 st Annual Monitoring Report
Late 2008
Cattle accessed and damaged vegetation plots
Early 2009
Supplemental Planting and Fence Repaired
November 2009
2nd Annual Monitoring Report
October 2010
3rd Annual Monitoring Report
November 2011
4th Annual Monitoring Report
November 2012
1 5th Annual Monitoring Report

Protect Setting and Background Summary
This stream and wetland mitigation project was developed to provide stream and wetland mitigation units
for the NC EEP full delivery process Previous stream conditions demonstrated significant degradation as
a result of livestock access Livestock access resulted in the direct input of nutrients and biochemical
oxygen demand into the streams and wetlands Hoof -shear created bank instability resulting in heavy
sedimentation Water quality was also diminished due to increased turbidity from bank erosion and
elevated water temperatures caused by a lack of vegetative shading Habitat was reduced by the
diminished water quality and continued loss Of physical habitat such as bed features, woody debris, and a
well - developed vegetation community Migrating head cuts incised the channels and drained wetlands
The project is located in a relict floodplam terrace Restoration of the stream included establishment of
stable cross - sectional geometry, restoration of planform sinuosity, preventing livestock access, and
increased streambed diversity The site required supplemental planting in year 2 to meet vegetative
success criteria
Goals and Objectives
• Produce a minimum of 10,200 stream mitigation units (SMU) and 9 riverme wetland mitigation
units (WMU) for the NCEEP
• Improve riparian and aquatic habitats and water quality through ecological restoration practices
Success Criteria
Wetland Hydrology
Restoration of the water table to within 12 inches of the soil surface for at least 10% of the
growing season continuous( (approximately 24 days)
During periods of low rainfall, the restoration gauge hydroperiod must exceed that of the
reference gauge, provided the gauges both exceed 5% of the growing season, to be deemed
successful
Stream and Wetland
Survival of at least 320 planted stems per acre after the year three monitoring period
Vegetation
Survival of at least 260 planted stems per acre after the year five monitoring enod
A maximum of 20 percent of the site species composition may be comprised of non - invasive
volunteers
A photo log will be maintained over the monitoring period and must demonstrate maturation of
planted vegetation and volunteer h dro h ticspecies
Stream
Bankf ill events a minimum of two bankfull events must be documented within the five -year
monitorin eriod
Cross - Sections There should be little change in as -built cross sections Cross sections shall be
classified using the Rosgen stream classification method and all monitored cross - sections should
fall within the quantitative parameters defined for "E" or "C" type channels
The longitudinal profiles should show that the bedform features are remaining stable Bedforms
observed should be consistent with those observed in "E" and "C" type channels
Photographs will be used to evaluate stream characteristics
Sampling of benthic macroinvertebrates within the restored stream channel shall be conducted in
the first three years of post-restoration monitoring

Restoration Reach
Mitigation Approach
Acreage Watershed
As -Built
Linear Footage
(Streams)
As -Built
Acreage
(Wetlands)
Mitigation Ratio
Stream
Mitigation
Units (SMU)
Wetland
Mitigation Units
( nits
STREAM
UT 1 -A
Restoration
601.6
3,403
1:1
3,403
UT1 -B
Restoration
492.5
UT 1 -C
Restoration
305.8
UT 1 -D
Restoration
32.9
829
1:1
829
UTl -E (Valley)
Restoration
38.2
556
1:1
556
UT1 -F
Restoration
44.2
583
1:1
583
UT2
Restoration
140.8
1,264
1:1
1,264
UT3 -A
Restoration
262.4
3,479
1:1
3,479
UT3 -13
Restoration
186.6
UT3 -C
Enhancement
23.3
292
2.5:1
117
WETLAND
WR -A
Riverine Wetland Restoration
3.7
1:1
3.7
WR -B
Riverine Wetland Restoration
6.2
1:1
6.2
WE -A
Riverine Wetland Enhancement
0.8
2:1
0.4
WE -B
Riverine Wetland Enhancement
0.7
2:1
0.35
WE -C
Riverine Wetland Enhancement
0.14
2:1
0.07
WE -D
Riverine Wetland Enhancement
0.4
2:1
0.2
WR -A
Riverine Wetland Enhancement
3.7
2:1
3.7
Total
10,406
11.94
10,231
10.92
Mitigation Unit TYP
Mitigation L'nit Total
Stream IN4itigation Units
lU.� 3l
S
Wetland Mitigation Units
(WMN)
10.92

NIT, ma cm
M--.) 0 cwbw@
71
M-9
MA 7
M33MEMER11IT'
kl n-F
I'llix:
R"
44A
T2
M'D
rtqTT-f_ M�D Uff oN07,4;,MDD
T x0i
M-3
T2
M'D

Structure Legend
6% Rock Goss Wdr
Log Cross Mir
/ L.9 'Are
— Log Gtede Ca rd
. SfeW end Functiond
. SbHe snd NM FuncUmd
..-..end Fmcomel
- Untpde end Nd FUnCimel
Supplemental Seeding
and Planting Areas
WETLAND HYDROPERIOD
AW 1
Supplemental Seeding
SOA3 and Platting Areas � 1 �%
5 -10%
EF < 5%
Legend
O AW T.
0 CG
C) R i Gd
Restored Streams
Enhanced Streams
- - - Access Road
Cross Sections
Wetland Restoration Area REF 2
® Wetland Enhancement Area
Easement Boundary
_ Vegetation Plots
Im
Id 0 100 200 400 Feet Beaverdam Mitigation Project N-kwK SON
1 inch = 200 feet 2012 Stream Current Conditions Map - B WATERSHED SCIENCES

FBX
Beaverdam Creek Mitigation Site
USGS Map
SOURCE: USGS, 0 1,000 2,000 4,000
Erwin, NC Quadrangle, 1973 Feet

SOIL SERIES LEGEND
Non- Hydric Soils Hydric Soils
AnB Alpin sand, 0 to 6% slopes AtA Altavista fine sandy loam, 0 -3 percent slopes, rarely flooded
Dy1F Dyrsstrochrepts, steep Au Augusta fine sandy loam, rarely flooded
MaA Marlboro sandy loam, 0 to 2% slopes Ch Chewacla and Congaree loams, frequently flooded
MaB Marlboro sandy loam, 2 to 6% slopes GoA Goldsboro loamy sand, 0 -2 percent slopes
Pd Pits -Dumps complex Ro Roanoke loam, occasionally flooded
StA State fine sandy loam, 0 to 3% slopes, rarely flooded We Wahee fine sandy loam, occasionally flooded
WkB Wickhamfine sandy loam, 0 -6 percent slopes, rarely flooded
WkD Wickham fine sandy loam, 6-15 percent slopes, rarely flooded
Beaverdam Creek Mitigation Site
Soils Map A
SOURCE: 2010 Bing . 500 1,000 2,000 +�l "
Feet
Scale: NTS
"� " feet

Stream Observation Areas
70NI K"
14 efre. R
� �
1 7r -- Dsdc^ y tVno'n 4!L�h
r4
�
4 4
"1 � '
UT l -A
Sparse vegetation on left and right banks,
Left/Fight
SOA 1
153+00-
Remedial actions are underway to correct
Banks
153 +30
sparsely vegetated areas
UT1 -B
Easement fencing is loose at stream
Left/Right Bank
SOA2
118 +90 -
crossing allowing limited cattle access,
Fencing
119 +51
*Easement fencing has been repaired
Sparse vegetation on left and right banks,
Left/Right
UT3 304 +30 -
SOA3
Remedial actions are underway to correct
Banks
304 +50
sparsely vegetated areas

103
102
a 101
5
100
99
c 102
u 101
w
it
Beaverdam
UTl -B Upper
Station 112 +72 to 119+20
• LTS ♦ RTR + WWw3rr —Yuri —Ym2 —Yw3 —Ym4 rt-Ynr3
11272 11372 11472 11572 11672 11772 11972
Ch.—I DiW-. (e)
Beaverdam
UTl-C
Station 107 +00 to 112 +72
• LTB • RTS VJater SR —Year 1 —Year 2 Year 3 —Year 4 — Year 5
10600 10a00 11000 11100 11200 11300
Channel Distance (it)
Beaverdam
Url-D
Station 154 +00 to 159 +30
• LTS • RTB --- -water srf —Year 1 —Yost 2 —Year 3 —Year 4 — •—near 5
104
103
Z 102
9
°1 101
w
C0
11400 15500 15600 15700 15800
Channel Qstance ffi)

BCB%V ABM
UTI-F
Station 182 *80 to 185.80
• LTB • RTB - -- •rata nl —Yowl —Yw 2 —Yw 3 _Yw 4 +Yw s
103
102
y 101
E
00
DD
18:80 18380 18.90 n�-or
CT•nnM Dptl•ne•..at
98
3
d 47
w
32
Z 102
X
W t 101
Bawerdam
UT3 -A
Station 329 +00 to 335+00
• LT8 • RTB I water sA —Yar 1 —Yea 2 —Year 3 —Yw 4 -*YOW 55
33000 33100 33200 33300 33400 33`.-0CI
Channel Distance (It)
Bea%adam
1."1.3 -B
Station 307 +00 to 315 +20
• LTS . RTB - -- water of —Yowl —Yw 2 —Yw 3 —Yw 4 wYw 5
• + it
30800 30900 31000 31100 31200 31300 31400 31500 316,30
Charnel DQstance lftl

0 10 20 30 40 90 60 10 40
wia (a)
—b.At.UI3"— M.B.1 —7-1 —T-2
Beaverdoem, Crou Sftdm 3, Pod
lol
10,
It to to 30 40 50 60 'D I.
Bloom (A)
—k.1kbAEW— —Maul —Y-1 —Y.1 —1-1 Y-. --m—
Ile., erd S.,Ilon 5, Pottle
lom
IN
Iw
Iw
lot
lF Iw
-- --------------
96
10 at 30 a to a
sraaial (A)
—T—I —T—: —Y-3 —Y
Bvuvffdam,CrmsSecdw2. laffir
la
tm
lot
too 16 2• 30 40 10
Widh (ft)
Baverdm. Cron Secdon A. WMe
103
102
301
too
0 10 20 30 40 50 w -0 I'D
stahm (III
—F-kfW1EJ—_—F1,4N— —MB,,h —r— —1—: —1—
Daverdsam. Crass Smfom C Pod
1w -
Iw
Q 101
I. AtEi
99 Or-
91 E
to 20 R a so do
L —B'ku;rj"- —Y-2 —T-) —y- —1-7,

1%
IN
IN
Ion
102
xl
IN
%
07
M
%
Bemverdatm, Cro" Section 7, Pad
0 10 A 70 e0 50 p '0
Station (ti)
�OwHu[I F1wwn —Bae —Tw1 —rat: —YV) —Tn. �TV3
Beaveedr, Cron Smiles 9, Pool
Ion
la
C 103
102
1p - -
%
0 10 30 b N .0 p 70 OD
W a fN
�0)OMJI 61w.m ��N0 w6 �Tw1 -�Tw2 �Tm1 �.Tm• m�T�.+ I
I1r.lerd— ("."S-d... I I. MITI,
101
Q
101
0 10 20 JO a !0 m 70 to
SOmm (fl)
— e.elmr�w.,r — rewnaxN. —Nlw mmrmi —Yon: �rrl w. +r«.. �Te,.
Beserdu, Crux SecKm A W Me
IN
101 —
102
101
e loo
%
O1
It W m A 0 }0 p
Stollen is)
— BUtlW16M4m �Fbo/IRaw AfY AsBUa —Toni —T-2 m�Par) �Sm. w�Ym3
Brmverd=L Crap Smiles 10. W Me
IV
1%
IW
c
G IN aliftsm
Im
m
102
Ia ---
IW
o to 30 10 m % p A 00
wwth (a)
��imkYe [Y.Ym �ilaob Txa A.n �AaOuli �Yml -- -Twt �TmJ ��Tv. �im5
IN
a 10�
y
Ion. ... ....... .. ..........�.�— _.____ -___._ ___- ...__. _...
w
0 10 >0 p a 41 m A p m
Sxtip Jfll
�Q..t40 eiwy.a. �AI•ewe m�2m1 � —Yev: �Tml ��TMI

E lol
1e
S
tao
BeoYreedoa. Cron $-cum 13, Pad
V to t0 to do A W
slaxwi
It
�ga,itrO Elw+l.'n ��A+ewi —Yat r�Yw•� �TrS
linircdem, ('rmS tieca0a it. f'ortl
tat
r
ylot
tm
w
0 10 m m 40 t0 w
Sttial(tll
—R ding— —41W —Yw1 —Y-1 —Yrrl r Y-1 =Y—S 1
Bavdrdoa, Cron Sedloa 17, P0o1
I0U
102
101
E 100
r
e
V o to m to a w ao
�HUdfull El+.u. • w:L••wt r�Y•rl —Ya' rr•t'nrt - -Y.ra
Bearerdam Credo Seeder IL Wfee
0 10 m ]0 10 !0 0 v 60
20M tit)
�ewohut Elnsrm — I1nN1'nr Aa —boa8 �TrH �Yr: �Yerf - ---Yrt �Taf
e
x
lot
B".wdro cmu See /W 14 WWe
lao
o to m m n w do m
urirn N)
— �vH�tl Flw�q, �i1m1/Rar Mt �NHWt �)'at —Trl �Tri r.�Tra +�Taf
Berverdrm. Cross Salim 1 8� MMe
Im
103 -
.01
1f
0 Iro
w
0 10 .0 30 40 SO so
St.tiOe (fl)
�Haiftil E[arrrm �Fl,n•lrm.v qr•o --- -w: F:JI. �Trr: —Ynr? Teri- • -�Yevq

101
loo
W
C %
%
91
N
91
9efvectinm, Crass Section 19. Pool
0 10 00 00 40 10 60 D
Sttiioo 191
Summary of Crest Gauge Monitoring Results
Bnvss'Mm. Cross 9Moo S0. Wilk
R
C
W
a
0 10 'A b 10 •0 00 ?0
9s4m 19)
�NtlaO GwraE �IIoo-IRaM Arm �•AShJt w�Tel —T..:: �T.rl —T-4 —Tw5
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
CG1
CG2
CG3
CG1
I CG2
CG3
CG1
CG2
CG3
CG1
CG2
CG3
CG1
I CG2
CG3
Number of Bankfull
0
0
3
1
1
5
2
1
5
2
1
3
1
0
2
Events
Maximum Height
0.6
1.4
1.4
1.1
1.3
Above Bankfull feet

Summary of Morphologic Parameters Monitoring Results
Parameter
Cross Section 1
Pool
Cross Section 2
Riffle
Cross Section 3
Pool
Cross Section 4
Riffle
" -KT
Dimension
Base
MY]
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3 I
MY4
MY5
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MY
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
BF Width ft
284
264
250
223
230
240
253
244
228
262
29 1
284
266
218
208
275
225
223
228
228
248
22 1
143
247'
BF Cross Sectional Area ft
317
264
234
207
203
216
181
162
114
168
187
168
228
192
190
192
168
176
117
116
129
132
63
87
BF Mean Depth ft
1 l
10
09
09
09
09
07
07
05
06
06
06
09
09
09
07
07
08
05
05
05
06
04
04
BF Max Depth (ft)
26
25
24
20
20
18
14
13
11
13
13
14
22
20
21
19
18
17
14
13
14
13
11
13
Width/Depth Ratio
25 5 1
262
268
240
26 1
2661352
366
45 9
408
453
478
31 0
247
227
393
30 1
282
444
448
477
37 1
326
68 1
Parameter
Cross Section 5
Riffle
Cross Section 6
Pool
Cross Section 7
Pool
Cross Section 8
Riffle
Dimension
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Basey
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
I MY4
MY5
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
BF Width ft
76
75
87
100
90
99
90
92
97
112
86
107
79
98
94
107
102
110
69
73
77
87
83
64
BF Cross Sectional Area )
50
50
47
51
34
49
84
87
69
74
54
48
87
107
106
154
87
96
44
47
48
52
47
38
BF Mean Depth ft
07
07
05
05
04
05
09
09
07
07
06
04
I 1
11
11
14
08
09
06
06
06
06
06
06
BF Max Depth ft
12
14
14
12
09
11
17
20
16
17
10
10
20
22
23
21
16
17
12
14
12
14
11
13
Width/Depth Ratio
114
1 111
1 163
1 196
1 243
1 199
95
98
136
169
138
240
72
90
83
75
120
126
107
113
124
147
148
1 107
Parameter
Cross Section 9
Pool
Cross Section 10
Riffle
Cross Section 11
Riffle
Cross Section 12
Pool
Dimension
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
BF Width ft
185
197
199
184
187
211
164
151
161
169
168
178
98
118
115
124
122
110
1 195
198
188
205
196
216
BF Cross Sectional Area
293
259
250
240
244
248
184
165
158
151
155
148
68
90
87
83
-81
69
222
204
185
212
169
196
BF Mean Depth ft
16
13
13
10
13
12
1 1
11
10
08
09
08
07
08
08
07
07
06
11
10
10
11
09
09
BF Max Depth ft
38
31
30
30
28
27
25
21
21
23
20
20
13
15
15
13
13
13
27
26
25
25
20
21
Width/Depth Ratio
118
149
158
1 141
144
180
146
137
1 163
188
183
215
140
154
1 151
184
185
176
172
1 192
197
197
227
239
Parameter
Cross Section 13
Pool
Cross Section 14
Riffle
Cross Section 15
Pool
Cross Section 16
Riffle
SBase
Dimension
Base
MY]
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MY]
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
Base
MY
MY2
MY3
MY4
MYS
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MYS
BFWA
183
194
195
182
173
153
90
92
99
89
96
90
197
242
243
246
245
238
99
90
91
112
93
85
BF Cross SectionalA158
153
163
152
100
97
54
48
52
48
45
42
188
230
222
237
195
201
58
46
44
45
50
44
BF Mean D09
08
08
08
06
06
06
05
05
05
05
05
10
10
09
10
08
08
06
05
05
04
05
05
BF Max D23
20
21
19
14
15
12
10
10
10
10
10
22
24
23
20
19
18
11
09
09
09
10
]0
W idth/De
21 3
246
232
21 8
299
242
15 1
174
1 187
165
204
193
20 7
254
1 265
256
1 308
282
1 169
175
188
28 1
176
165

Parameter
Cross Section 17
Pool
Cross Section 18
Riffle
Cross Section 19
Pool
Cross Section 20
Riffle
}�— ,Xznsnxn
r&6&i-�9E
h,L "�e ;':;��$: -- r..,k -'i. _-_' Wh
`MY4
FCAZ7— Aw'v
—_I1, 4,C zAw0 WIir.
° =b.
-' "Tr Ivry:, y��-••� Y r
iCti �
1
Dimension
Base
MYl�MY2
MY3
MY4
I MY5
Base
MY]
MY2
MY3
MY5
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4f
MY5
Base
MY]
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
BF Width ft
306
307
313
314
243
234
76
74
71
91
84
75
192
185
205
195
186
195
105
104
104
107
105
121
BF Cross Sectional Area ft
463
458
446
43 5
336
322
96
75
79
8 5
82
74
282
289
274
282
248
242
95
91
89
92
84
—97
BF Mean Depth ft
15
15
14
14
14
14
13
10
11
09
10
10
l5
16
13
14
13
12
09
09
09
09
08
08
BF Max Depth ft
37
37
35
33
28
28
19
17
18
18
17
17
33
32
31
31
26
25
17
16
16
17
15
17
Width/Depth Ratio
197
206
220
226
176
170
61
73
65
98
86
75
131
118
153
135
139
156
116
119
121
124
131
I50
Results of 2012 Vegetation Monitoring — Planted Species by Plot

noummary of mesutts
Numb_e_r
Stems
,_Planted
2008
Stems
2009
Stems
2010
Stems
2011
Stems
2012
Stems
Pent
I- o/Plot
Cover 2012
As�Bmlt
2008,E
Year 1
200,9
Year 2�
20,101'
Year 3
I20a11
Yea4
20112
Year5
1
31
18
27
24
26
24
97
620
360
540
480
520
480
2
32
21
29
25
29
29
100
640
420
580
500
580
580
3
30
17
21
1 19
19
19
98
600
340
420
380
380
380
4
32
17
26
25
26
24
98
640
340
520
500
520
480
5
31
13
25
19
12
22
80
620
260
500
380
240
440
6
1 33
18
19
18
21
23
99
660
360
380
360
420
460
7
31
18
30
24
24
25
80
620
360
600
480
480
500
8
33
28
27
24
18
15
95
660
560
540
480
360
300
9
20
17
17
1 17
16
16
70
400
340
340
340
320
320
10
23
21
30
29
32
28
95
460
420
600
580
640
560
11
38
24
22
20
18
19
85
760
480
440
400
360
380
12
1 35
32
32
28
24
24
100
700
640
640
560
480
480
13
34
25
27
25
27
27
1 90
680
500
540
500
540
540
14
1 33
24
24
31
36
36
1 90
660
480
480
620
1 720
720
2012 Precipitation for Beaverdam Swamp Site
12
Growing
Season
10
ag
U
L"
6
AL
ez
a4
- -
_
IV2
------------
-- --
0
J F M A M J J A S O N D
1�11 Dunn Daily Rainfall MQV0530th /70th Percentile
— & Dunn Monthly Rainfall - -(>— On -Site Automatic Raingauge

Summary of Hydrology Monitoring Data 2008 -2012
Gauge
Max Consecutive Hydroperiod
(percent of growing season
Normal Limits
2008
1 2009
1 2010 1 2011
2012
Restoration /Enhancement Area
AW1
23
31
20
14
10
AW2
4
10
8
4
4
AW5
7
21
13
8
12
AW6
4
10
4
5
4
AW7
7
16
13
7
10
Gauges Outside Restoration /Enhancement Area
AW3
12
100
48
0
3
AW4
2
3
0
0
0
AW8
6
24
20
4
5
Reference Gauges
RAW]
30
32
24
20
12
RAW2
6
14
10
8
11
RAW3
6
21
13
8
11
Comparison of Normal Rainfall to Observed Rainfall (2012)
Month
Average
Normal Limits
Dunn Preci itation
30
Percent
70
Percent
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
January
4.12
3.00
5.18
1.65
1.48
3.02
0.66
1.43
February
3.59
1 2.36
4.27
3.29
1.83
2.56
1.73
1.51
March
4.71
3.42
5.78
3.69
3.84
1.96
2.54
3.95
April
3.25
1.99
4.34
8.88
0.56
0.63
2.13
2.07
May
3.82
2.37
4.75
2.86
2.17
2.75
2.99
4.47
June
4.50
2.56
5.22
2.69
0.43
1.28
6.31
2.47
July
5.64
3.42
6.89
4.31
2.50
2.71
1.70
3.16
August
4.86
3.17
6.02
4.72
2.65
1.38
4.74
4.10
September
4.50
2.24
5.56
5.01
1.84
0.36
2.19
October
3.16
1.89
4.26
1.43
1.83
0.55
2.53
November
3.08
2.07
4.01
2.18
0.90
0.82
2.42
December
3.57
2.18
4.35
2.04
3.95
1.25
0.80
Average
- --
42.45
51.56
- --
- --
- --
- --
Total
48.80
- --
- --
42.75
23.98
1 19.27
30.74
Below 30 percentile
Below monthly average

EEP Recommendations and Conclusions
Three of the five hydrology momtormg stations within the restoration/enhancement area recorded
hydropertods of at least 10 percent of the growing season and met the hydrologic success criterion for
2012 All three of the reference gauges experienced hydropertods greater than 10 percent of the
growing season Gauges AW2 and AW6 exhibited some difficulty meeting hydrologic success
However, the average hydropenod through the monitoring period averaged 6% for Gauge AW2 and
5 4 % for Gauge AW-6 It should be noted that rainfall at the site through the monitoring period was
well below the 30`h percentile
Gauges AW3, AW4, and AW8 had hydropertods less than the success criterion but were located
outside of the credited wetland restoration area
Dunn weather station rainfall data indicates that the 2012 growing season rainfall amounts were
below normal for most of the growing season, except for March, April, May, and August when
rainfall levels were within the normal range or slightly above Dunn weather station rainfall data
indicates that 2010, 2011, and 2012 annual rainfall patterns are below normal limits
The restored stream channel has remained stable and is providing the intended habitat and hydrologic
functions All monitoring cross sections and longitudinal profile for 2012 showed little adjustment in
stream dimension over the previous year
Vegetation monitoring has documented the average number of stems per acre on the site to be 473,
with a stem density range of 300 to 720 stems per acre All vegetation plots have achieved the success
criterion of 260 trees per acre at monitoring year 5
The project has achieved success based on stated success criteria and is recommended for regulatory
closure
Contingencies
None

Construction Phase
UT3 looking downstream
UT3 looking downstream.
UT3 looking downstream.
UT3 looking upstream.
UT3 wetland.
Top of UT3 looking downstream

N
13

APPENDIX A
The Beaverdam Swamp site is not within a watershed planning area

Appendix B. Land Ownership and Protection
SITE PROTECTION INSTRUMENT
The land required for the construction, management, and stewardship of this mitigation project
includes a portion of the following parcels.
http: / /www.nceep.net /GIS DATA /PROPERTY /92530 Beaverdam5wamp.pdf
LONG -TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN
Upon approval for close -out by the Interagency Review Team (IRT), the site will be transferred
to the DENR Stewardship Program, which will be responsible for periodic inspection of the site
to ensure that restrictions required in the conservation easement are upheld.
Site Protection
Deed Book & Page
Acreage
Grantor
County
Instrument
[Number
protected
Burris Holdings, LLC
Mecklenburg
Conservation
19477/882
0.165
Easement
Conservation
William A. Shaw
Mecklenburg
Easement
19477/923
2.52
Dixie River Land
Mecklenburg
Conservation
Company, LLC
Easement
19751/936
43.850
Conservation
William H. Kelley, III
Mecklenburg
Easement
19993/946
0.580
Conservation
MI Homes, Inc.
Mecklenburg
Easement
19997/341
1.530
Conservation
Mecklenburg County
Mecklenburg
Easement
20020/976
22.530
Conservation
Bellasera Berewick, LLC
Mecklenburg
Easement
20025/633
2.530
Conservation
Waters Construction
Mecklenburg
Easement
20030/529
15.910
Company, LLC
Disposition by
Dixie River Land
Mecklenburg
Easement
24431/290
-0.170
Company, LLC
http: / /www.nceep.net /GIS DATA /PROPERTY /92530 Beaverdam5wamp.pdf
LONG -TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN
Upon approval for close -out by the Interagency Review Team (IRT), the site will be transferred
to the DENR Stewardship Program, which will be responsible for periodic inspection of the site
to ensure that restrictions required in the conservation easement are upheld.

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WIIMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID 2007 -01525 -043 County Harnett USGS Quad Erwin
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Modification
Property Owner / Authorized Agent Mr. Norton Webster
Environmental Banc and Exchan e
Address 909 Capability Drive, Suite 3100
Raleigh, NC 27606
Telephone No: 919 - 829 -9909
Size and location of property (water body, road name /number, town, etc) The project area is approximately 50 acres
in size and is adjacent to unnamed tributaries of Beaverdam Swamp and the Cape Fear River and located off of
Beaver Dam Road, south of NC Highway 217 east of Beaverdam Swamp, west of the Cape Fear River southwest
of Erwin, Harnett County North Carolina.
Description of projects area and activity This project is known as the Beaverdam Swamp Stream and Wetland
Restoration Project. This permit authorizes the temporary discharge of fill material into 9,538 linear feet of stream
channel and 2.1 acres of wetlands to conduct stream restoration and wetlands enhancement.
Applicable Law ® Section 404_(Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
❑ Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization Regional General Permit Number
Nationwide Permit Number 27
See attached special, General and regional conditions for this permit
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the attached
conditions and your submitted plans. Any violation of the attached conditions or deviation from your submitted plans may
subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order and/or,appropriate legal action.
This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization is modified,
suspended or revoked If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and/or
modified, this verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below, provided it. complies with all requirements of
the modified nationwide permit If the nationwide permit authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the
activity would no longer comply with the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (1 e, are
under construction) or are under contract to commence m reliance upon the nationwide perrmt, will remain authorized provided the
activity is completed within twelve months of the date of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation, unless
discretionary authority has been exercised on a case -by -case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the authorization
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification You
should contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone [phone]) to deternnne Section 401 requirements
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA),
prior to beginning work you must contact the N C Division of Coastal Management .
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal,
State or local approvals /permits.
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of Engineers regulatory
program, please contact Ronnie Sm 910- 251 -4829
Corps Regulatory Official Date 1/28/2008
Expiration Date of Verification 1/28/2010
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public To help us ensure we continue to do so,
please complete the attached customer Satisfaction Survey or visit hM / /www saw usace army mil/WETLANDS /index html to
complete the survey online
Page 1 of 2

Determination of Jurisdiction:
❑ Based on preliminary information, there appear to be waters of the US including wetlands within the above described project area
This preliminary deterrrunation is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process
( Reference 33 CFR Part 33 1)
❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States witlun the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act Unless there is a change m the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification
® There are waters of the US and/or wetlands within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of Section
404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification
❑ The jurisdictional areas within the above described project area have been identified under a previous action Please reference
jurisdictional deterrmmahon issued Action ID
Basis of Jurisdictional Determination, This site extubits wetland criteria as described in the 1987 Corns Wetlands Delineation
Manual and is adjacent to unnamed tributaries of Beaverdam Swamp and the Cane bear River, which is a traditional
navigable water of the US. �---�
Corps Regulatory Official
Date 1/28/2008
SURVEY PLATS, FIELD SKETCH, WETLAND DELINEATION FORMS, PROJECT PLANS, ETC, MUST BE
ATTACHED TO THE FILE COPY OF THIS FORM, IF REQUIRED OR AVAILABLE
Copy Furnished
Mr Todd St John
Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc.
3001 Weston Parkway
Cary, NC 27513
Mr Ian McMillan
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
Mr Ken Averitte
NCDENR -DWQ
225 Green Street, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301
Mr Guy Pearce
NCEEP
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
Page 2 of 2

Action ID Number: 2007 - 01525 -043 County: Harnett
Permittee: Environmental Banc and Exchange - Mr. Norton Webster
Date Permit Issued: 1/28/08
Project Manager: Ronnie Smith
Upon completion of the activity authorized by this permit and any mitigation required by the permit,
sign this certification and return it to the following address:
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
POST OFFICE BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402 -1890
Please note that your permitted activity is subject to a compliance inspection by a U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers representative. If you fail to comply with this permit you are subject to permit suspension,
modification, or revocation.
[ hereby certify that the work authorized by the above referenced permit has been completed in
accordance with the terms and condition of the said permit, and required mitigation was completed in
accordance with the permit conditions.
o�
Signature of Permi ee ate

Applicant. Environmental Banc and File Number. 2007 - 01525 -043
Date- January 28, 2008
Exchange — Mr. Norton Webster
Attached is.
See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of
A
permission) '
PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
B
PERMIT DENIAL
C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
fill IN tr at] � e�I'i dl n ' he ab
e� 'i n iticnal 'R� €o natiu a,�: he i d a h t (, ►��, rus'tc .r� it�ilirretitii , s,� .��;eccwca�r, or
A INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT. You may accept or object to -the permit.
• ACCEPT If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized Your signature
on the Standard Perimt or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit
• OBJECT- If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request that the
permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district engineer Your
objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right to appeal
the permit in the future Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may (a) modify the
perrrnt to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit
having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written After evaluating your objections, the district engineer
will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below
B. PROFFERED PERMIT- You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit
• APPEAL. If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you
may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form
and sending the form to the division engineer This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of
this notice
C PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a penrut under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer This form must be received by the division engineer
within 60 days of the date of this notice
D APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION• You may accept or appeal the approved JD or
provide new information
ACCEPT You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of
this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD
APPEAL. If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer This form must be received by
the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice

T-. Tlt)T)T 7T . T w r<r ,
E, rX�-Cl.,ttvllty-t'M x J UtU61)lU I1UNAL DETERMINATION. You do not need to respond to the Corps
regarding the preliminary JD The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved
JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new
information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD.
. 44 L001 _R X
FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS - (Describe your reasons for appealing'the decision or your
objections to an initial proffered permit in clear concise statements You may attach additional mformatiorf to
this form to clarify where your reasons or objections are addressed in the administrative record)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps
memorandum for the record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the
review officer has determined is needed to clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps
may add new information or analyses to the record However, you may provide additional information to clarify
the location of information that is already in the administrative record
If you have questions regarding this decision If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you
and/or the appeal process you may contact may also contact -
Ronnie Smith Mr. Mike Bell, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
CESAD- ET -CO -R
U S Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303 -8801
RIGHT OF ENTRY. Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any
government consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You
will be provided a 15 day notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site
investigations
Date-
Telephone number
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: Ronnie Smith, Regulatory Specialist,
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office, PO Bog 1890, Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
For Permit denials and Proffered Permits send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Mike Bell,
Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD- ET -CO -R, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M15, Atlanta, Georgia
30303 -8801

Beaverdam Swamp Stream and Wetland Restoration project
Environmental Banc and Exchange
Harnett County
AID# 2007 -01525 -043
Special Conditions:
Wetland Success Criteria:
1) The minimum requirement to meet hydrology success criteria in the restored and enhanced wetland areas will
be saturation within the upper 12 inches of the soil for 10% of the growing season.
2) The success of riparian and wetland vegetation planting will be gauged by stem counts of planted species. Stem
counts of over 320 three year old trees per acre after 3 years, and 260 five year old trees per acre after five years
will be considered successful.
3) Within 30 days from the date of this verification, an addendum to Section 8.2 (Wetland Success Criteria) of the
project plans must be provided to our office. The addendum shall reffect.the above special conditions.
Corp Regulatory Official Ronnie Smith Date: January 28, 2008

�oF W 9Q Michael F Easley, Governor
William G Ross Jr, Secretary
r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
t? '� Coleen H Supins, Director
Division of Water Quality
August 29, 2007
REC, - , DWQ Project # 07 -1115
Harnett County
Mr Norton Webster SEP 0 6 2007
Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC KiMhEY -HORN
909 Capability Drive, Suite 1300 WlR.
Raleigh, NC 27606
Subject Property- Beaverdam Swamp Stream/Wetland Restoration/Enhancement
Beaverdam Swamp (030614,18-23-34, C]
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions - REVISED
Dear 1&. Webster-
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to
place fill within or otherwise impact 1.63 acres of 404 /wetlands (associated with Ut3) and 3,510
lmear feet of perennial stream (Ut3, temporary, perennial stream impact),, as described in your
application dated June 20, 2007, and received by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on June
25, 2007, with additional information received from you on August 28, 2007, to conduct the
proposed wetland and stream restoration/enhancement. After reviewing your application, we
have decided that the impacts are covered by General Water Quality Certification Number(s)
3626 (GC3626). The Certification(s) allows you to use Nationwide Permit(s) NW27 when
issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). This Certification replaces the
Certification issued to you on August 27, 2007. In addition, you should obtain or otherwise
comply with any other required federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your
project including (but not limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control, and Non - discharge
regulations Also, this approval to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct
impacts to waters as depicted in your application shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or
CAMA Permit.
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change
your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the
property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and
is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in
the future) exceed one acre of wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may
be required as described in 15A NCAC 211.0506 (h). This approval requires you to follow the
conditions listed in the attached certification and any additional conditions listed below.
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 -1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone [phone] /FAX [phone] / Internet: litta.02o eor,slate ne us/ncwetlands
An Equal Opportunity /Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled/10° /9 Post Consumer Paper
No" Carolina
dYa /llPll�1J

Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC
Page 2 of 4
August 29, 2007
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
I. Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and
general conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No other
impacts are approved including incidental impacts.
Type of Impact
Amount Approved nits
Reference
404/Wetland
1.63 (acres)
Correspondence from
KHA dated August 28,
2007
Stream t3 — erennial temporary
3,510 (linear feet
PCN page 9 of 13
2. No Waste, Spoil,, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas
beyond the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre - Construction Notification. All
construction activities, including theAesign, installation, operation, and maintenance of
sediment and erosion control Best Management Practices, shall be performed so that no
violations of state water quality standards; statutes, or rules occur.
3. Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications
governing the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best
Management Practices in order to protect surface, waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed,
installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the
North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion
control measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified
in the most recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control
Manual. The devices shall be maintained on all construction sites, borrow sites, and
waste pile (spoil) projects, including contractor -owned or leased borrow pits
associated with the project.
c. Sufficient materials required for stabilization and/or repair of erosion control
measures and stormwater routing and treatment shall be on site at all times
4. Sediment and Erosion Control Measures
Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the
maximum extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in
wetlands and waters is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored
within six months of the date that the Division of Land Resources has released the project;

Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC
Page 3 of
August 29, 2007
5. Protective Fencing
The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary and along the construction corridor within
these boundaries approved under this authorization shall be clearly marked with orange
warning fencing (or similar high visibility material) for the areas that have been approved
to infringe within the buffer, wetland or water prior to any land disturbing;
6. Wetland/Stream Restoration/Enhancement Plans
You have our approval for your proposed final wetland and stream
restoration/enhancement at the site. The wetland and stream restoratton/enhancement at
the site must be constructed and maintained according to the plans approved by this
Office. Any repairs or adjustments to the site must be made according to the approved
plans or must receive written approval from this Office to make the repairs or
adjustments. The restored and enhanced wetland and stream must be preserved in
perpetuity by use of a conservation easement or other similar mechanism as part of the
approved plans.
7. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or
applicable Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to
return the attached certificate of completion to the 401 Oversight/Express Review
Permitting Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, NC, 27699 -1650.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may
result in criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your proposed
impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted -in your application and,as authorized by this
Certification, shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved
wetland or stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60
days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which
conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative
Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C. 27699 -6714. This certification and its
conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
Any disputes over determinations regarding this Authorization Certificate (associated with the
approved buffer impacts) shall be referred in writing to the Director for a decision. The
Director's decision is subject to review as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of G.S 150B.

Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC .
Page 4 of 4
August 29, 2007
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean
Water Act If you have any questions, please telephone Cyndi Karoly or fan McMillan at 919-
733 -1786.
Sinc ly, Oj
Coleen H Sullins, Director
Division of Water, Quality
CHS /rjm
Enclosures: GC3626
Certificate of Completion
cc: USACE Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
Ken Aventte, DWQ Fayetteville Regional Office
DLR Fayetteville Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Todd St. John, Kimley -Horn & Associates, Inc., 3001 Weston Parkwa y, Cary, NC 27513
Filename 071115BeavadamSwampStreamWetlandRes tomtion(Hacnett401_Revtsed i
j

DWQ Project No..
Applicant.
Project Name:
Certification of Completion
County:
Date of Issuance of Certification or Authorization-
Certificate of Comuletion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, and any
subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return this certificate to the 401 Oversight/Express Permitting Unit,
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699 -1650. This form may be
returned to DWQ by the applicant, the applicant's authorized agent, or the project engineer. It is not necessary to send
certificates from all of these.
Applicani 's Certification
hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was
used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial
compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications,
land other supporting materials.
Signature: Date-
Agent's Certdicatton
L . hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was
used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial
compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications,
and other supporting materials.
Signature. Date:
If this project was designed by a Certified Professional
i
L as a duly registered Professional (i.e., Engineer,
Landscape Architect, Surveyor, etc.) in the State of North Carolina,, having been authorized to observe (periodically,
weekly, full time) the construction of the project; for the Permttne hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care
and diligence was used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within
substantial compliance and intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and
specifications, and other supporting materials.
Signature. Registration No Date

Mitigation Project Name Beaverdam Swamp (Statewide ILF Portion)
EEP IMS ID 92530
River Basin CAPE FEAR
Cataloging Unit 03030004
Aoolied Credit Ratios 1 1 1 5 1 2 5'1 5 1 1 1 3 1 2 1 5 1 1 1 3 1 2 1 5 1 1 1 3'1 2'1 5 1 1 1 3 1 05 1 1 1 1 1
Information as of 3/17/2013
O V
K U
E
EL
W
W
K
c
O
z'
o
O
z
E
O
zW
O
z
C
)
y
a
U
E
E °C 1
U W
Z
S
' z p
W0
a
0
z
°
O w
z
Beginning Balance (feet and acres)
9.90
2.00
NCDOT Pre -EEP Debits (feet and acres): Not Applicable
EEP Debits (feet and acres):
DWO Permits
USACE Action IDs
Impact Project Name
2000 -1432
2002 -20899
NC DOT TIP R -2417 -
Sanford Bypass
8.84
2006 - 154192 -047
Copper Creek
Subdivision
1
0.16
Remaining Balance (feet and acres)
0.901
1 2.00
Information as of 3/17/2013

Mitigation Project Name Beaverdam Swamp ( NCDOT ILF Portion)
EEP IMS ID 92530
River Basin CAPE FEAR
Cataloging Unit 03030004
Aoolied Credit Ratios 1'1 1 'Ili 2 51 5 1 1 1 3'1 91 5'1 1 1 31 2 1 5 11 1 1 3 1 9 1 5 1 1 1 3 1 n, 1 1 1 1 1
Information as of 3/17/2013
M
t6 A
E N
D:
A P
p)
P U
R
_6
d L
W
m
d
a
o
'C
G
N
O W
z�
c
6"
C
O u
z
A m
O. U
C m
O L
z W
A o
O. Z
C v
O
za`
o
.�- «
d
W
ro c
O
y d
q u
U
m
E
v
« m
q L
u W
L" o
'A
A
n
d
ua
�-
T
z 0
y mod"
m0
_
a
Ot
r
z
p
z
P
L
O. o.
L
d
O
z
Beginning Balance (feet and acres)
10,114.00
292.00
NCDOT Pre -EEP Debits (feet and acres): Not Applicable
EEP Debits feet and acres):
DWQ Permits
USACE Action IDs
Impact Project Name
Statewide ILF Credit Purchase
3,161.00
Remaining Balance (feet and acres)
6,953.00
1292.001
Information as of 3/17/2013
M