20052078 Ver 1_Closeout Report_20130829

j 5_�() `)�
NAKED CREEK STREAM RESTORATION
EEP ID 261
USACE 404 ACTION ID # - SAW - 2005 -00414 1 as
DWQ 401# 2005 -2078 `--- -� `U1�
f`1( CQF3
CLOSEOUT REPORT
L 4 WATER �
PROJECT TYPE: STREAM RESTORATION
Project Setting & Classifications
County
Wilkes County
General Location
Town of Wilkesboro
Basin:
Yadkin - Pee Dee
Ph sio ra hic Region:
Blue Ridge
Ecore ion:
Appalachian Highlands
USGS Hydro Unit:
03040101010100
NCDWQ Sub - basin:
12- 31- 3 -(0.5)
Wetland Classification
September 2009
Thermal Regime:
Warm
Trout Water:
No
Beaver Removal
Summer 2012
Monitoring Year 5
October 2012
Project Performers
January 2013
Source Agency:
EEP
Provider:
September 2013
Designer:
Kimley -Horn
Associates, Inc.
Monitoring Firm
EcoEn ineerin —
Channel Remediation
Fluvial Solutions, Inc.
Plant remediation
Carolina Silvics
Property Interest Holder
NC Stewarship Program
Overall Project Activities and Timeline
Milestone
Month -Year
Project Instituted
March 2004
Permitted
January 2005
Construction Completed
Winter 2006
As -built survey
August 2007
Monitoring Year -1
September 2008
Monitoring Year -2
September 2009
Monitoring Year 3
July 2010
Monitoring Year 4
Aril 2011
Beaver Removal
Summer 2012
Monitoring Year 5
October 2012
Invasive treatment
January 2013
Supplemental Planting
January 2013
Closeout Submission
September 2013

Protect Setting and Background Summary The Naked Creek Stream Restoration project falls within the Eller and Day Properties in Wilkes County, North Carolina approximately 10 6 rules
west of Wilkesboro, North Carolina and 18 4 miles east of Boone, North Carolina The site stream lies within USGS hydrologic unit 030401010 10 100 in the Yadkin River Basin Pnor to
restoration, the site consisted of one reach (UtNkd), an approximately 2,800 linear foot portion of an unnamed tributary to Naked Creek (Drainage area 0 5 mil) UtNkd drained a watershed
consisting of predominantly forested and agncultural land Pasture land surrounded the project reach and the stream banks lacked strong rooted vegetation (e g woody or deep rooted herbaceous
vegetation) Due to the lack of bank protection and denuded watershed, the stream channel incised (bank height ratios of 1 7) and entrenched (entrenchment ratios of 1 5) In this condition and
with regular impacts due to cattle traffic, bank erosion had accelerated and the variety of bed features diminished For most of the riparian buffer, pasture grasses dominated with isolated
specimens of hardwoods The altered conditions of the stream and the riparian buffer reduced water quality and impaired habitat BEHI measurements indicated bank failure nsk ranging from
high to very high The reach was restored to a C stream type within the existing floodplain using a Priority II approach The npanan buffer was replanted with native woody species to restore
ecological function to the buffer This resulted in 2,590 linear feet of stream restoration and - 2 9 acres of npanan buffer (non - credited) It was anticipated that the restoration treatments would
improve mstream and nparian habitat, channel shading, and reduce agricultural inputs and bank sediments The site is also included within the boundary of an EEP Local watershed plan (see
App A ) The project is fenced in all locations that border pasture The boundary however is narrow and EEP was required to agree to a 10 foot fence maintenance zone on the inside of the fence
where vegetation could periodically be maintained The resulting forested widths resulted in a reduction of approximately 894 SMUs (see Table l below) using the nearest point stream credit
based on riparian buffer width methodology (IRT 2011, draft ver 4 6) Livestock crossings were removed from the creditable footage as well and are gated Power utilities were credited at a
2 1 ratio Collectively, this produced the specialized ratio found below in Table I The stream has remained stable and exhibits no bank erosion and the profile exhibits vertical stability Other
than some aggradation in XS Pool 1 all cross sections exhibited little change or some narrowing and bank building Structures are maintaining their intended grade, flow deflection, and habitat
functions with dust minor piping on a few structures The vegetation plots exhibited an overall year 5 mean of 405 stems per acre (243 -609) with 2 -5 woody species per plot and 9 woody species
across the data set The site has met its goals and represents a sustainable improvement over the pre - existing condition - -
Goals and Obiectives
The projects intent is to improve stability to degraded channels and restore ecological function to the channels and adjacent npanan buffer through the following objectives
- Use NCD to restore dimension, pattern, and profile and enhance project streams
- Re- establish riparian buffers
- Protect stream and riparian buffer from immediate impacts through exclusionary fencing of livestock and create controlled, stable crossings
- Protect stream and riparian buffer from future impacts through a conservation easement
Success Criteria
The stream geometry will be considered successful if the cross - section geometry, profile, and sinuosity are stable or reach a dynamic equilibrium It is expected that there will be minimal changes
in the designed cross sections, profile, and/or substrate composition Changes that may occur during the monitoring period will be evaluated to determine if they represent a movement toward a
more unstable condition (e g down cutting, erosion, mid- channel bars, etc ) or are minor changes that represent an increase in stability (e g settling, vegetative changes, coarsening of bed
Page 2 of 17

material, etc ) An initial, though not exclusive, indicator of success will be adherence to design or reference ratios of stream geometry found in the Baseline Morphology and Hydraulic Summary
table or to comparable and stable reference systems Deviation from the design ratios will not necessarily denote failure as it is possible to maintain stability and not stay within the design
geometry Additionally, deternunation of true bankfull will be difficult until the stream has had adequate flooding events to create strong bankfull indicators The following key indicators of
stability provide a more complete picture of stream stability
Stream Type Maintenance of the design stream type or progression or conversion to stable stream type such as B, C, or E will indicate stability
Bank Height Ratio Bank height ratio between 10 and 1 1 will indicate flood flows have access to the active floodplam and that higher flows do not apply excessive stresses to stream
banks ER> 14
Vegetation plots exhibit stem counts > 260 stems per acre
Asset Summary
'1' '
Riparian Wetland
Pre —
Total
(SMU)
Units
Restoration
Construction
Mitigation
Watershed
As -Built Linear
Segment/Reach
(acreage/linear
Approach
Acreage
Footage /Acreage
Mitigation Ratio
Mitigation Units (SMU/WMU)
0
feet
STREAM
UT Naked Creek
2,800
R
339
2,590
1.52712*
1,696
*Ratio and associated 894 SMU reduction is the result of applying the nearest point buffer width method to the project stream (IRT draft method 4.6 — using
the as yet unreleased /unpublished Mountain tables) and small adjustments for power utility crossings (50% credit yield in those locations)
MITIGATION UNIT TOTALS
'
Stream Mitigation Units ,
'1' '
Riparian Wetland
Non - riparian
Total
(SMU)
Units
Wetland Units
Wetland
Riparian Buffer
Nutrient Offset
WMU
1,696
0
0
0
0
0
Page 3 of 17

Naked Creek Project - Asset and Monitoring Features Map
0 200 400 800 1,200 1,600
Feet
Page 4 of 17

Page 5 of 17

Naked Creek Project - Project Remediation Map
0 200 400 800 1,200 1,600
Feet
Page 6 of 17

.............
M HE
-- ----- -----------
TG'3
C
.rl
Naked Creek
l:osgitsdinal Prorde
�.._ 20LI (Year -5) Mositoring
1711
LM
1300
1317
13H
1306
1301
1707
130E
1301
- -- ---- -- - - - - -- 1311
Im
IZl7
UK
l
X
0
its/
im
1215
IW
1%9
.. Im
1271
IE70
1277
1811
1275
1274 Im
IE'12
• 500 1101 1500
STATION (feet)
. �'� 1Mc 3>rto of taS�st is �►we l� I®pr%d pot). vaa adjeant ioo�II�. Pivrm mh.e mt �d
Page 7 of 17
29H 2500
vR-0 1 W 822107
YR -1 TW 9118108
O
YR -1 Structures
YR -2 TW 9!18109
0
YR -2 Stnbctures
- -YR
-3 TW 7/18/10
0
YR-3 Structures
YR-4 TW 4114111
X
YR } Structures
-
YR -5 TW8110112
- 0
YR -5 Structures
AYR -5 WS
29H 2500

w
as
00
O
J
NaWbll r t le I>, MapEo1e0. •od H.d..WW hlndtednµ.0
Vint dire tS —Rnwub P4eet7FP Pro*11N=hn :ff
N 'r) I
Ir I r .
11
1' ik0
OWN
I
�EIdEi
]
®EIDEFII�
®m
®FPEiEL3�
®�11i[I
R.C[S
lam
®m
ME�Mmaw
�9��f3�111111167iAllll�iti
If ®I
®tl1�
®Il�rmmmmm
�n�1�.]�FISH�_iEa�10iL•�ii9s1'
_��_�_�_�_�_�
�
®iPJtL7ti7�
©�L�71�9t
©�
®
®
®i.C1i:0�
D
®CLIC!1�ID�
N 'r) I
Ir I r .
11
1' ik0
�9��f3�111111167iAllll�iti
If ®I
®tl1�
®Il�rmmmmm
�n�1�.]�FISH�_iEa�10iL•�ii9s1'
_��_�_�_�_�_�
N 'r) I
Ir I r .
11
1' ik0
.ureew�weai= a+.m� ,rte
emai.e.wWn clu null -Ilpmv nl.,Irmv v�.mrvo,Im �.u.ar I.e,,�
7
��I
fr
�n�1�.]�FISH�_iEa�10iL•�ii9s1'
_��_�_�_�_�_�
KEENOMEMIMMMEMN
mum.
.ureew�weai= a+.m� ,rte
emai.e.wWn clu null -Ilpmv nl.,Irmv v�.mrvo,Im �.u.ar I.e,,�
7
��I
fr

Table 7. Stem Coast Told ad Plmied by Plot Species
Noted Cret Sbr Rnterafa fteprt F Praiet Minn r. MI
.lar'rr.r... �p..r rN �grrC�lrV�...�>.w. 6.�rrY��F.�.✓•e ��rrr �rrF../F �r+�..Y4
rr..�.....�yM,.swaww.wrre�Y srr.... rrr� ...Yrr.r..ra• +r.r,wrr...r��r
.11..L.•11...CW.rUwYa..N •Y I..�Jfr[T•Tr.IIWrN....r �.
Table 9. Veri6ration of Bankfull Events
Naked Creek Stream Restoration Project/M Project Number: 261
Date e(Dals Cwietfiw
Date doccermce
Mdbrd
Photo # Crf available
OR-Sim Crest Gage bond at Swfiw
0WIMO
Bet>.een 09!1609 and
10+97. Observed elevation an gage at
A%wiable
07/15/10
elentim 1297.81
0406111
Betnem 07115/10 and
burted at SMw
an F97
1O. Observed elevation gage at
Available
X11
elevation 129793
OWM(12
Betnem 04A6I11 and
WE= Cap buited at Sutim
10+97. Observed elevation m gage at
Not Asadable
09U/12
elrumm 129795
rrare! A Q6r gage was timmm0 ®avg me Apiv eemmmniag r ear L mEm awesagmam so mar aaaLLUU eve Q oe OOO�ea
drrrng subsegomt mammrng yon. The crag Page is bard at Statim 10+97 and is ducted m dw Cowatidared Cww Cmckam
Plan View looted m AppEaft A
Table 7. Sim Cant Told and Pbatd by Plot S"m
Nabed Creek Srm ROW26M Prajrst/M Prard Nodur: 261
. ar.�.. r...�...r rer�ly Y.Yb.r W'.�r�. ar r..r..#r•.Fr��e r�arr.��...F rr+P�.1
.Ya.e.�arr•�.. rr.yr�rr..r..r rxY Yrwy lY 1 r mw. �Y.�. ryFr. n.xm. rr..a Trx.r.rY r..rere F�� w � n.. � oameu. a u.un.�w. pvr a....
nr.ra- ra..r' Yra.ru. rc v • u.ras r -rr rrrr�rr Yr
r.a.r.
Page 9 of 17

Waadw Va atatb- PLinan
VaRefnhon
co—unity zones wah plats is Type
Iicihnufla Memo Cammaa Nana
Snaam B]nk' RfpalLVl UpWpa
Cmo
J7
63
ru
r <fuu .4—
Yr r
13R
RR
Ri
.wtvd—
an— roll—
BRC'J
BR.CV
urw.r
SIgr -L N.C.,
BRCV
BRCV
cm.lun rruu
Sr auhcnv
BR
BRC\
,Y+..mJ+euu
Ri
OR C11
UrT�A
in
HR,. fV
+]+rn],annlr
Bl pm
OR
ItRfV
WR
1'LNA� +deA��,A•1
Lamlu.uM
a:5q
n✓.er a,oUVU
Seam Lt tl.t 41*0
1 BR
Ih'rt t +KnJ
Nn[r WA
ISR
IIR l4
A+nn MNTO
NBmo[A
OR
1a +n+ +].Lun uo4.
Sftn l 0
I
+
Bi[L NRYA
aya
97
M.A+ara+11L
WM BUenara
RR
n.Ml
un
8R
BR
rlR
Imlann a-,r
yo+
RR
BR
.,nnY.Ln
t F
RR
�ngnu rmnlr
LY[mJa N-F.-
OR
FIR
t,i114Y. 6—M,
S..r h h
OR
Vj— -1-1
IRR vw
OR
..ryMlfmlln+nu n6n.w.
WWrt. t
Ifd
�Mlrr ay <r.W UU
Lt— I >LcefWp,o[a
BR
OR
+�u
S BY 0.`F w
?J a
IR
.wda+ ix.n,.
ilusl \u
OR
OR
f4.n avnu rn]nuv
Ni[I..FleJel
MA
OR
(Ofii.w mn.ivulm
SIutl Lle6m
G.^.
.cY S. +Aan
BruCaynlluFY
BR
fug rmnvYxJ
N.4 Iim
M
r r:Yti+mv
ra>mJ
OR
1 routs, �
[m rcr
Sq'hIY
fJ'wS. A� vv..
SUk Ba'11Y
RR
Inn Ar, nlyrrA,
UY hlnY
V.Mn rv.`n�
RA 11 ary
I<R
aJ,.,fflY, y+uVn to
\B:huL
OR
uV,
Nif i.k.
BR
Rf.ak�W.w. vml.+l
S—v W.
OR
.0 Jufnfn,
S—V R.I
OR
..'M
•1.var� t�iv
Halt u[
Y 4nu Aax'hwu
Seox L,:.f
OR
RR
1 nanuw mvnave+
LI Ik.
OR
v an r +w
S- ,]mm w u
0..w
l,numnui. ua
AV
Page 10 of 17

EEP Recommendation and Conclusion
Although the buffers are narrow, assets have been adjusted according to IRT draft guidance The
stream is stable and the buffer is dense and has now gained some size The project has largely
met its goals, is maintaining intended features and functions, and represents a meaningful and
sustainable improvement over the pre - existing condition EEP recommends regulatory closure
with the assets proposed
Contineencies
None
Page 11 of 17

Pre Construction - 2003
Page 12 of 17

Post - Construction Photos
Page 13 of 17

APPENDIX A - Watershed Planning Summary
261 — Naked Creek
The Naked Creek project is located in the Kerr -Scott Reservoir Local Watershed Plan (LWP),
within the upper Yadkin River basin of Wilkes County. The 18- square mile Naked Creek -Lewis
Fork watershed (HU 030401010 10 100) is characterized by 21 percent agricultural land use, 11
animal operations, 24 percent non - forested riparian buffers and less than one percent impervious
cover (2009 Upper Yadkin RBRP). There are no NC NHP natural heritage element occurrences
(NHEOs) or significant natural heritage areas (SNHAs) within the watershed, nor are there any
NC WRC priority aquatic habitats.
Major causes of stream degradation within this local watershed, as reported in the LWP
documents, include disturbed riparian buffers, livestock (cattle) access to streams, historically
channelized streams
and unstable, heavily
Management Strategies
Naked Creek Project
Stream bank erosion
Stream restoration & enhancement, riparian
eroded stream banks.
ASHE
established riparian buffer and livestock
Reducing inputs of
exclusion along over 2,500 I.f.
Lack of adequate forested buffer
Stream restoration & enhancement, riparian
WILKES
sediment, nutrients and
buffer restoration/enhancement
amounting to over 2.5 ac
Stream channelization
Stream restoration
fecal coliform to the
Kerr -Scott Reservoir
over 2,000 I.f.
(used for both
WATAUGA >
1
Installed exclusion fencing along the project
recreation and water
W here needed; installed livestock watering
#e
supply) are primary
.-
�}
x. Upp•r Y.OW • .�:�:�
Rs�•n .�..ir
objectives for any
3 �
M ,
projects implemented
r \�
within this LWP area.
The Naked Creek -
Lewis Fork watershed
'CAL
includes several
• DWELL
subwatersheds and
Legend
-
.�
stream reaches
• EEP prw�.ml3 aoaoias
• EEp prwc. TNrll
-
e
identified as high-
eqi— WPeaaem911
. 319ftIM
-
�-- ALEXANDER
priority `targets' for
Oftli s ""
EEP lna wa•sneepons
�
UIV
stream
�erpr >wrnr�•wa'am n
N
w e
EEP 2013 Project Closeout u +
°M1e5R
�c1e,",e�„' .,
a
Naked Creek (Yadkin 03040101)
12J.-2013
restoration/enhancement, buffer restoration and agricultural BMPs by the LWP technical team
(EEP, NC DWQ and Tetra Tech, Inc.) and local stakeholders.
There are no other stream restoration projects or agricultural BMPs documented within the
Naked Creek watershed.
The table below summarizes the major LWP - identified stressors in the Naked Creek watershed,
recommended management strategies, and stressor- related objectives achieved by the Naked
Creek project. EEP's Naked Creek project will contribute to reductions in sediment, nutrients
and fecal coliform inputs (CU -wide stressors documented within the upper Yadkin River
subbasin).
Stressors and Issues
Management Strategies
Naked Creek Project
Stream bank erosion
Stream restoration & enhancement, riparian
Restored/ enhanced/ stabilized stream and
buffers, livestock exclusion
established riparian buffer and livestock
exclusion along over 2,500 I.f.
Lack of adequate forested buffer
Stream restoration & enhancement, riparian
Planted native woody veg. of riparian buffer
buffer restoration/enhancement
amounting to over 2.5 ac
Stream channelization
Stream restoration
Restored dimension, pattern, and profile to
over 2,000 I.f.
Livestock access to streams
Livestock exclusion; alternate watering
Installed exclusion fencing along the project
W here needed; installed livestock watering
s stems.
Page 14 of 17

Appendix B. Land Ownership and Protection
SITE PROTECTION INSTRUMENT
The land required for the construction, management, and stewardship of this mitigation project
includes a portion of the following parcels.
htto: / /www.nceeo.net/GIS DATA/261 NakedCreek.ndf
LONG -TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN
Upon approval for close -out by the Interagency Review Team (IRT), the site will be transferred
to the DENR Stewardship Program, which will be responsible for periodic inspection of the site
to ensure that restrictions required in the conservation easement are upheld.
Site Protection
Deed Book &
Acreage
Grantor
County
Instrument
Page Number
protected
James Alan Day and wife,
Conservation
DB 1019, P 361;
Wilkes
0.95
Angela J. Day
Easement
DB 1068, P 187
Frank Eller and wife, Sadie
Conservation
DB 1019, P 417;
Wilkes
2.95
Caroline Eller
Easement
DB 1068, P 188
htto: / /www.nceeo.net/GIS DATA/261 NakedCreek.ndf
LONG -TERM MANAGEMENT PLAN
Upon approval for close -out by the Interagency Review Team (IRT), the site will be transferred
to the DENR Stewardship Program, which will be responsible for periodic inspection of the site
to ensure that restrictions required in the conservation easement are upheld.

APPENDIX C — Jurisdictional Determinations and Permits
.(ke— U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
ODYiY WILNUNGTON DISTRICT'
Action iD Count) Wilkes USGS Quad Purlea r
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property Owner /Authorized Agent � C Ecosystem Enhancement Proaram. Arta, Mr. Salam Murtada
Address 1652 Mnll Servke Center
Bnlefsh, North Carolina 27699
Telephone No 919, 715.0476
Size lad lOCaben of property (water body, road namelnumber, town, etc) Armroximately 9.240 Uof stream located
somh of US 421. off ibe west side of lewn Fork Baotist Church Rd. (NCSR I ISM west of Wfikabora Wilkes
CottoM. NC.
Description of projects arcs and acuvMr Construebon activities assoclated with the restoration and enhancement of ti
atiminimately 9.2401(of Naked Creek and an unstated tributary of Ready Creek, Activitles Include vadhar.
nlaeement of atrnctaees In-stream and for bank stabiivsttlon arrd de:ydam»ent of a yeeetated buffer, `
Applicable Law ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
❑ Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorimtion Regional General Permit Number
Nattonwxlc Permit Number 377
Your work is outhortred Dy'the above referenced permit provided It is accomplished in strict accordance with the attached
conditions and your submitted plans Any violation of tho attached conditions ar deviation from yaur submitted plow may subject the
permlucc to a stop work order, a restoration order and/or appropriate legal action
This verification will remain valid maul the expiration date Idemilied below unless the nationwide authorization Is modllled,
suspended or revoked. If prior to the expiration data Identified below, the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and/or
modified, this verification will remain valid until the expiation date identified below, provided it complies with all requirements of
the modified nationwide parfait. If the oanonwide permit authorization expires or is suspended, revolted, or is modified, such that the
activity would ao longer comply with the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i a, are
under coiwructlon) or are Linda contract to commence In reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the
activay Is completed within twelve meadis of the data or do nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation, unless
discretioreiry authority has been exercised an a case-by-case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the authorization.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also requite an individual Section 401 Witter Quality Cemfrcation. You
diould sonata the NC Divnma of water Quality (telephone ( 919) 733. 1786) to down= Seaton 401 regttadnents.
For acuvilms occurring within the twenty coastal courittes subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Aar (CAMA)
prior to beginning work )on must contact the N C Division of coasw Management
This Depanmem ofdie Army venfiuuon dots not relieve the pctmmoc ofthe responsibnliry to obtain any other required Federal,
State or lord approvatsrperran.
If there arc any questions regarding this vanfication, any of die conditions of ttie Permit, or the Corps of Engineers regulatory
program, please contact Tom Walker 0 010125 1-04 82
Corps Regulatory Officai /o1st"-7P' Date 01a312006
Expiration Data of Venfi'catton 031IM007
Page 16 of 17

APPENDIX D — Debit Ledger
Mitigation Project Name Naked Creek
EEP IMS ID 261
River Basin YADKIN
Cataloging Unit 03040101
^MYrrc� �.rc�rr r�oarv�
-
0
c°iU
V W
q e
J: I
is w N
m t —°
rnn w`
V.J. I
m o
I
z
z
°
z
Beginning Balance feet and acres
2,590.00
NCDOT Pre -EEP Debits feet and acres): Not Applicable
EEP Debits feet and acres):
DWQ Permit No
USACE Action
IDs
Impact Project Name
2007 -0965
2007 -02093 -297
K-4703
879.62
2007 -03338 -286
SR 2101 - Division 11
65.67
2007 -03241 -286
SR 1328A - Division 11
18.33
2007 -03850 -286
SR 1109 - Division 11
36.65
2008 -00751 -286
SR 1301 - Division 11
54.98
2005 -20719 /
2005 -20720
SR 1514 - Division 11
15.27
2005- 20815i
2005 -20816
SR 2215 - Division 11
38.18
2005 -21168 /
2005 -21169
SR 2075 - Division 11
15.28
-
2005 -21196 /
2005 -21197
SR 1514 - Division 11
15.28
2006 -20386 /
2006 -20387
SR 1144 - Division 11
35.12
2006 -20426
SR 1572 - Division 11
33.60
2006 -20446 /
2006 -20447
SR 1116 - Division 11
146.60
2006 -20456
SR 1151 - Division 11
21.38
2006 - 205771
2006 -20578
SR 1337 - Division 9
45.81
2007 -00141 -297
SR 1561 - Division 11
61.08
2007- 00121 -297
SR 1546 - Division 11
39.71
2007 -00747 -297
SR 1764 - Division 11
114.53
2007 -01041 -297
SR 1715 - Division 11
61.08
2011 -01589
SR 1345 - Division 11
30.54
Remaining Balance (feet and acres)
861.29
Page 17 of 17