20130822 Ver 1_Add Info_20130829

Ward, Garcy
From: Rogerson, Maria A
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 2:47 PM
To: Ward, Garcy
Subject: RE: Comments on Permit Applications 730067, 730068
From: Ward, Garcy
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 2:08 PM
To: Rogerson, Maria A
Cc: Brame, Bill Jr.; Johnson, Jay B; Steffens, Thomas A SAW
Subject: RE: Comments on Permit Applications 730067, 730068
Maria,
Thanks for the breakdown. I can account for those impacts in what they provided in the application. What that
breakdown doesn't account for is the `Wetland Impact by Others' column on the plan sheet which amounts to 1714 sf or
.039 ac. Those impacts are not accounted for in the Impact Summary table. I need to know what type of impact (Fill,
HC, MC, etc.) this is. Thanks.
Garcy Ward
Environmental Senior Specialist
North Carolina Division of Water Resources
Washington Regional Office
From: Rogerson, Maria A
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 1:51 PM
To: Ward, Garcy
Cc: Brame, Bill Jr.; Johnson, Jay B
Subject: FW: Comments on Permit Applications 730067, 730068
Here is the response I got back from - ff last week concerning Pitt 67. Let me know your
waiting questions concerning this project. As for Pitt 68 they are still looking into a response concerning that bridge. I
am on • back from •s • Pitt 142. Pitt 63 1 will try and
talk to Jay and Van today about that since if I can. Sorry for the delay in response.
From: Reck, Jeff [ mailto :JReckCa)moffattnichol.com]
Sent: Friday, August 23, 2013 9:46 AM
To: Rogerson, Maria A
Subject: RE: Comments on Permit Applications 730067, 730068

�fT�►liiE�C�c1�11 /[�l
1028.2 A
1777.4 SF Fill
Let us know if you need any additional explanation on our impact numbers.
Thanks,
Jeff
From: Rogerson, Maria A [mai Ito: marogerson(a)ncdot.aov]
Sent: Friday, August 23, 2013 8:39 AM
To: Reck, Jeff
Subject: RE: Comments on Permit Applications 730067, 730068
I think the issue really lies in rounding and the total for permanent fill in wetlands. Looks like the total should
be .05 and not .06. If you could provide me with the SF for permanent fill and mechanized clearing separately
I think that would clarify things for Garcy.
From: Reck, Jeff [ mailto :JReck(a)moffattnichol.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 5:32 PM
To: Rogerson, Maria A; Ben Crawford (BCrawfordCa)stewartinc.com)
Cc: Johnson, Jay B; Brame, Bill Jr.; Bacon, Thomas A
Subject: RE: Comments on Permit Applications 730067, 730068
Maria,
On Bridge 67.
The summary sheet has 0.06 ac of Permanent Fill Wetland Impact, <0.01 ac of Excavation in Wetlands, and 0.03 ac of
Mechanized Clearing in Wetlands. It is our understanding that all of these impacts are considered Wetland Impacts.
The plans show 3800 sf of Wetland Impact, which is Fill, Excavation, and Mechanized Clearing added together (3800 sf =
0.09 ac). The 0.09 ac of impacts is correct.
Bridge #68.
Thanks,
Jeff

From: Rogerson, Maria A [mai Ito: marogerson(a)ncdot.aov]
Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 4:55 PM
To: Ben Crawford (BCrawfordCa)stewartinc.com)
Cc: Reck, Jeff; Johnson, Jay B; Brame, Bill Jr.; Bacon, Thomas A
Subject: Comments on Permit Applications 730067, 730068
Ben
I had a phone conversation with Garcy with DWQ today about the subject permit applications. Please see the
following comments below and address as soon as possible:
1) 730067 - He has no issue with the design except for the numbers do not seem to correspond for
wetland impacts. It appears that the numbers in the summary table do not match what are on the
plan sheets. If you can take a look at that and verify which one is correct and revise accordingly he can
go ahead and approve the permit.
2) 730068 - He has concerns with the proposed use of the existing ditch as treatment. If the existing
ditch cross section meets the requirements for buffer treatment it can be counted in the column
"actual length" on sheet 3 of 4 in the SMP. If the existing channel is modified to meet the treatment
requirements it can be counted in the "actual column ". He is questioning the large amount of actual
vs. recommended. Doesn't appear on the plans that we actually have the amount that is shown on the
table. Please check these numbers and respond.
Let me know if you need any clarification on the request above. Thanks.
Maria
Maria A. Rogerson, P.E.
Division 2 Bridge Program Manager
Phone [phone]
Fax [phone]
Email: marogerson @ncdot.gov
Email cermspondpiice to acid 'rori this spndpr is subJpct to thp N.C. ;Public Records _aw and may by disclos d u Uiiird par ips.