20211436 Ver 1_401 Application_20210929

DWR
Division of Water Resources
Initial Review
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
April 11, 2020 Ver 3.1
Has this project met the requirements for acceptance in to the review process?*
6 Yes
✓ No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
CYes r No
Change cnly 1 needed.
BIMS # Assigned* Version#*
20211436 1
Is a payment required for this project?*
6 No payment required
✓ Fee received
✓ Fee needed - send electronic notification
Select Project Reviewer*
Robert Tankard:eads\rbtankard
Information for Initial Review
la. Name of project:
COURTESY COPY Perimeter Fence for Wildlife Exclusion
la. Who is the Primary Contact?*
George Lankford
lb. Primary Contact Email:*
[e-mail]
Date Submitted
9/29/2021
Nearest Body of Water
Stoney Creek
Basin
Neuse
Water Classification
C:NSW
Site Coordinates
Latitude:
35.463819
A. Processing Information
Reviewing Office *
Washington Regional Office - [phone]
lc. Primary Contact Phone:*
[phone]
Longitude:
-77.965547
County (or Counties) where the project is located:
Wayne
Is this a NCDMS Project
✓ Yes G No
Is this project a public transportation project?*
6 Yes r No
Is this a NCDOT Project?*
✓ Yes r: No
la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
17 Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
n Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)

1b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?
r7 Nationwide Permit (NWP)
r Regional General Permit (RGP)
r Standard (IP)
lc. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
r: Yes C No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number: 39 - Commercial/Institutional Developments
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
Id. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
I7 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
I— Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
r Individual Permit
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR401 Certification:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?*
CYes (-No
n 401 Water Quality Certification - Express
✓ Riparian Buffer Authorization
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
C Yes ( No
lg. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
CYes CNo
Acceptance Letter Attachment
1h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
C Yes r No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
C Yes f No
F Yes C No
r Yes 6 No
B. Applicant Information
ld. Who is applying for the permit?
r Owner 17 Applicant (other than owner)
le. Is there an Agent/Consultant for this project?*
6 Yes C No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:
County of Wayne
2b. Deed book and page no.:
book 2862 page 309
2c. Responsible party:
Brandon Gray
2d. Address
Street Address
240 Aviation Road
Address Line 2
City State / F7mince /Region
Pikeville nc
Fastal / Zip Code Country
27863 US
2e. Telephone Number: 2f. Fax Number:
[phone]
2g. Email Address:*
[e-mail]

3. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a. Name:
Jason Elliott
3b. Business Name:
WK Dickson, Inc
3c.Address
Street Address
720 Corporate Center Drive
Address Line 2
(Sty State / Province / Region
Raleigh NC
Postal / Zip code Country
27607 US
3d. Telephone Number: 3e. Fax Number:
[phone]
3f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:
George Lankford
4b. Business Name:
George K Lankford, LLC
4c. Address
Street Address
238 Shady Grove Rd
Address Line 2
41y State / Province / legion
Pittsboro NC
Postal / Zip code Country
27312 US
4d. Telephone Number: 4e. Fax Number:
[phone]
4f. Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Agent Authorization Letter*
02B- AGENT_AUTHORIZATION_FORM_Signed.pdf 216.71 KB
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1b. Subdivision name:
(d appropriate)
lc. Nearest municipality/ town:
Pikeville
2. Project Identification
2a. Property Identification Number:
3602845748
2b. Property size:
335.72
2c. Project Address
Street Address
240 Aviation Rd.
Address Line 2
Criy State / Province / Region
Pikeville NC
Fbstal / Zip code Country
27863 US
3. Surface Waters

3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:*
Stoney Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:*
C:NSW
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?*
Neuse
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located.
030202020101
4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:*
The site is currently an active airport with areas surrounding the runway regularly maintained. An existing fence surrounds much of the airfield, but is not contiguous. The current fence
does not prevent animals from digging beneath and is too low to prevent wildlife from jumping over to access the air field. Shallow ditches are present throughout the area to provide
drainage for the runway and surrounding area. A small portion of the proposed fence will be within a young mixed pine -hardwood forest with a moderately dense shrub under story.
Surrounding land use is mixed residential and agriculture with patches of undeveloped forest. Interstate 795 is located approximately 0.5 miles west of the airport.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?*
r Yes G No r Unknown
4d. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. (for DWR)
Fig 1 - USGS-Vicinity Map-GWW Perimeter Fence.pdf 222.11KB
4e. Attach an 8 1/2 X 11 excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. (for DWR)
Fig 4 - NRCS Soil Map-GWW Perimeter Fence.pdf 340.23KB
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
> 5 acres
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
-650 LF
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:*
To increase airfield safety by construction of a wildlife exclusion fence around the airfield and adjacent hangers and buildings.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:*
The Perimeter Fence project consists of the removal of existing fence and installation of approximately 900 LF of ornamental fence in the terminal area and approximately 18,800 LF of
wildlife fence around the remaining airport perimeter. The existing fence around the airport perimeter is only 3-5 feet tall, wtiich does not provide adequate security. The installation of
the Perimeter Fence project will be packaged and constructed as three (3) separate projects or phases. Phase 1 will consist of all the ornamental fencing and approximately 5,200 LF of
wildlife fence. Phase 2 will consist of approximately 8,000 LF of wildlife fence and Phase 3 will consist of approximately 4,800 LF of wildlife fence. This PCN includes all three construction
phases. The phasing provides better control over disturbed soils and erosion prevention by allowing each phase to be stabilized.
4j. Please upload project drawings for the proposed project.
Fig 3 Proposed Impacts.pdf
Fig 2 - Project Overview-GWW Perimeter Fence.pdf
2021-02-25 Ph 1 Dwgs Sealed_half size.pdf
2021-02-25 Ph 2 Dwgs Sealed_half size.pdf
2021-02-25 Ph 3 Dwgs Sealed_half size.pdf
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?*
G Yes
Comments:
432.2KB
412.35KB
2.05MB
1.94MB
1.62MB
r No O Unknown
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?*
r Preliminary r Approved r Not Verified r Unknown r N/A
Corps AID Number:
SAW-2017-00770
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company:
Other:
George Lankford
George K Lankford, LLC
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR
Mar 24, 2020
5d1. Jurisdictional determination upload

JD Concurrance - GWW Perimeter Fence.pdf 6.24MB
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?*
r Yes ( No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity?
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
la. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
17 Wetlands r Streams -tributaries
r Open Waters r Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
r Buffers
2a. Site #* (?)
2a1 Reason (?)
2b. Impact type * (?)
2c. Type of W.*
2d. W. name *
2e. Forested *
2f. Type of
Jurisdicition*(?)
2g. Impact
area*
W1
fence post footer
P
Pine Flat
W1
Yes
Both
0.001
(acres)
W1
conversion
P
Pine Flat
W1
Yes
Both
0.060
(acres)
W3
fence replacement
T
NON-NCWAM TYPES
W3
No
Both
0.020
(acres)
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.020
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.081
2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.061
2h. Comments:
Impact area W1 contains permanent conversion of forest to maintained (0.06 ac) and fill for concrete footer at fence posts (<0.001 ac)(=10.27 square
feet). Impact W3 is temporary disturbance due to replacement of existing fence in kind.
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:
Most of project is replacement of an existing fence with more appropriate design. Wetland W2 was avoided. Fence will be relocated outside of 50-foot
buffer on Stoney Creek.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:
Limited conversion of forest to maintained access along the fence. Construction vsll be phased to limit area of ground disturbance at one time.
Disturbed wetland areas will be planted in a mix of native herbaceous species.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
r Yes (7 No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
Disturbance of wetlands is limited and below the threshold requirement for Compensatory Mitigation.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
la. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
6 Yes r No
What type of SCM are you providing?

n Level Spreader
n Vegetated Conveyance (lower SHWT)
n Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
n Other SCM that removes minimum 30% nitrogen
fJ Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer
Diffuse Flow Documentation
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?*
✓ Yes ( No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?
( Yes r No
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?*
( Yes rNo
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina)
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? *
✓ Yes (No
Comments:*
The State Clearing House response and comments attached.
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?*
✓ Yes (No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?*
✓ Yes (No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Project is construction of a perimeter fence for safety and will not impact future development. Because of the nature of this project, cumulative and
secondary impacts to surface water quality are determined to be insignificant due to the limited area of disturbance and temporary nature of this
disturbance.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?*
✓ Yes r No ( N/A
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?*
✓ Yes (No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?*
( Yes rNo
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?*
( Yes
What Federal Agency is involved?
FAA
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?
✓ Yes ( No
r No r' Unknown
5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.?

t: Yes r No
5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal?
✓ Yes G No
5h. Does this project involve the construction/installation of a wind turbine(s)?*
✓ Yes r No
5i. Does this project involve (1) blasting, and/or (2) other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, mechanized pile drivers, etc.?
✓ Yes G No
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?
"An on -site investigation was conducted along with a USFWS IPaC report and NCNHP data was reviewed to determine if protected species
may be present. A conclusion of No -Effect for potential protected species was determined and this project will not impact critical habitat.
Consultation Documentation Upload
04 RFOSelfCertify GWW.pdf
05D-speciesconclusiontable-GWW PerimWildlifeExclusionFence-2020 09-21.pdf
NHP 2021 09-21-project_report_wyne_executivejetport_per_32603_32603.pdf
IPaC Species List 2021 09-21.pdf
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?*
✓ Yes f• No
169.02KB
154.1 KB
852.75KB
221.08KB
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?*
NOAA Fisheries Essential Fish Habitat Mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status?*
✓ Yes allo
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?*
NC State Historic Preservation Office HPOWEB GIS Service (http://wwwhpo.ncdcr.gov/).
State Historic Preservation Office response was No Comments (included in Clearing House Comments).
7c. Historic or Prehistoric Information Upload
06A SHPO Review.pdf
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-yearfloodplain?*
✓ Yes f No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?*
DFIRM Map Numbers 3720360200K revision date 06/20/20187, and 720361200K revision date 06/20/20187
551 89KB
Miscellaneous
Comments
Miscellaneous attachments not previously requested.
05E-ClearingHouse Comments.pdf
03 Pre -Filing Meeting Request Acknowledgement - Wayne Executive Jetport Perimeter Fence -2021 07-09.pdf
919.19KB
120.38KB
Signature
*
Fi By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:
George K Lankford
Signature

Date
9/29/2021

Gmail - Pre -Filing Meeting Request Acknowledgement - Wayne Executive Jetport Perimeter Fence https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=f208bc8cfe&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3...
Nog Gmail
George Lankford <[e-mail]>
Pre -Filing Meeting Request Acknowledgement - Wayne Executive Jetport Perimeter Fence
1 message
[e-mail] <[e-mail]> Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 9:05 AM
To: [e-mail]
The North Carolina Division of Water Resources has received the Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form for Wayne Executive Jetport
Perimeter Fence that you submitted on 7/9/2021. Attached is a copy of your request.
All certification requests (applications) must include documentation that a pre -filing meeting request was submitted to the
certifying authority at least 30 days prior to submitting the certification request.
The Division can not accept an application for your project earlier than 30 days from this pre -filing meeting request. Applications
that do not meet this 30-day requirement will be returned.
Please save this email/attachment; it must be submitted with your application to document that this requirement has been met.
This email was automatically generated by Laserfiche workflow. Please do not respond to this email address, as responses
are not monitored.
� DWR Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form.pdf
51K
1 of 1 9/17/2021, 1:59 PM

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT NO. PLAN NO. PARCEL ID: 3602845748
STREET ADDRESS: 240 Avaiation Road
Pikeville, NC 27863
Please print:
Property Owner: County of Wayne
Property Owner:
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
George Lankford
,of WK Dickson
(Contractor / Agent) (Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and acceptance
of this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above):
Wayne County Courthouse, 224 E. Walnut St., Goldsboro, NC 27530
Telephone: [phone]
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
Authorized Signature Authorized Signature
Date: r\`�`T`\ \ Date:

i
%
r
5 TONfy C'EfK CHURc A•[1
Legend
Phase 1 Perimeter Fence
- Phase 2 Perimeter Fence
Phase 3 Perimeter Fence
- Surveyed Ditch (Top of Bank)
--- Ditch Centerline (Sketched Per Aerial)
VA Surveyed Wetlands
r
4 V147,0/y RD
4,1
09.
WI<
DICKSON
community Inirasfructure consultants
Figure 1: Vicinity Map
Wayne Executive Jetport (GVWV) Perimeter Fence
Wayne County, NC
Northeast Goldsboro Quadrangle
0 1,000 2,000
4,000
1:24,000
Feet

Wetland W1
Ditch D1 and D2
See Figure 3.1
Unnamed Tributary UT1
See Figure 3.2
Legend
Phase 1 Perimeter Fence
— Phase 2 Perimeter Fence
Phase 3 Perimeter Fence
Surveyed Ditch (Top of Bank)
— — Ditch Centerline (Sketched Per Aerial)
Surveyed Wetlands
Ditch D3
See Figure 3.3
Wetland W2
Ditch D4
See Figure 3.4
&SON
community infrastructure consultants
Figure 2: Project Overview
Wayne Executive Jetport (GWW) Perimeter Fence
Wayne County, NC
0 400 800 1,600
Feet
1 inch = 800 feet

0.06 AC Permanent Conversion (Clearing)
< 0.001 AC (10.27 SF) Permanent Fill
(Concrete Footings)
- Phase 1 Perimeter Fence
- Phase 2 Perimeter Fence
- Surveyed Ditch (Top of Bank)
--- Ditch Centerline (Sketched Per Aerial)
V- Surveyed Wetlands
n Study Limits
WI<
DICKSON
community Infrastructure consultants
Figure 3.1: Jurisdictional Waters (W1)
Wayne Executive Jetport (GWW) Perimeter Fence
Wayne County, NC
0 100 200
1 inch = 200 feet
400
Feet

•
Legend
- Phase 1 Perimeter Fence
- Phase 2 Perimeter Fence
Phase 3 Perimeter Fence
- Existing Perimeter Fence
- Surveyed Ditch (Top of Bank)
—•••— Ditch Centerline (Sketched Per Aerial)
V- Surveyed Wetlands
I —I Study Limits
W3
W3
0.02 ACRE
Temporary Impact
-ya
--! • fit " �6 -' _, ....: + . ►j am
•
f�.y'e' • i = c ,• L�'`• • 1t-
.•�
•
•
��.-
.r= ' ""...--- L c .
•
r
WI<
DICKSON
community Infrastructure consultants
Figure 3.2: Jurisdictional Waters (W3)
Wayne Executive Jetport (GWW) Perimeter Fence
Wayne County, NC
0 100 200 400
Feet
1 inch = 200 feet

Legend
— Phase 1 Perimeter Fence
— Phase 2Perimeter Fence
Phase 3Perimeter Fence
----Surveyed Ditch (Top ofBank)
--Ditch Centerline (Sketched PorAoria|)
Surveyed Wetlands
JWayne County Soils
DICKSONWK
Figune4: NRCS Soils K8mp
Wayne Executive Jetport (GVVVV) Perimeter Fence
Wayne County, NC
O 500 1.000
1inch =1.00Ofeet

Gmail - RE: Non-DoD Source] JD Request -Wayne Executive Jetport ... https://mail google.com/mail/u/0?ik=f208bc8cfe&view=pt&search=all&...
M Gmail
George Lankford <[e-mail]>
RE: [Non-DoD Source] JD Request -Wayne Executive Jetport (GWW) Perimeter
Fence
1 message
Dailey, Samantha J CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>
To: George Lankford <[e-mail]>, Jason Elliott <[e-mail]>
Good morning George,
Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at
9:38 AM
This office concurs with your preliminary jurisdictional determination dated March 20, 2020; and more specifically,
Figure 2. Project Overview, Figure 3.1 Jurisdictional Waters (VV1, D1 and D2) , Figure 3.2 Jurisdictional Waters (UT1),
Figure 3.3 Jurisdictional Waters (D3), Figure 3.4 Jurisdictional Waters (VV2 and D4), and Figure 3.5 Jurisdictional
Waters (W3 and D5).
This email serves as my concurrence for the above referenced project and may be used for planning purposes and
avoidance and minimization. Given my current workload please let me know when/if you need the JD.
The Corps Action ID for the project is: SAW-2017-00770. Please reference this on all future correspondence.
With regard to permitting the perimeter fence, the use of Nationwide Permit 39 (commercial and institutional
developments), and possibly Nationwide Permit 23 (approved categorical exclusions), is most applicable for the
proposed activites. The installation of concrete to support the posts should be counted as permanent impacts, and
any wetland that would be permanently maintained in conjunction with the fence should be considered permanent
conversion. I would be happy to discuss the project further at your request.
Please let me know if you have any additional questions.
Best Regards,
Sam
Samantha Dailey
Regulatory Project Manager
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Division
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
[phone], Ext. 22
[e-mail]
Original Message
From: George Lankford <gklankford91 @gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2020 3:22 PM
To: Dailey, Samantha J CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) <[e-mail]>; Jason Elliott
<[e-mail]>
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] JD Request -Wayne Executive Jetport (GWW) Perimeter Fence
Ms. Dailey,
1 of 2 5/6/2020, 10:06 AM

Gmail - RE: Non-DoD Source] JD Request -Wayne Executive Jetport ... https://mail google.com/mail/u/0?ik=f208bc8cfe&view=pt&search=all&...
I am please to submit on the behalf of Wayne Executive Jetport (GWW) and the consulting engineering firm, W.K.
Dickson & Co., Inc. a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request. The project is for construction of a perimeter
fence around the airfield.
The attached package contains the forms and mapping information for your review and comment. Please contact me
directly at 919-602-0127 ([e-mail] <mailto:gklankford91 @gmail.com> ) with questions or if additional
information is required.
Thank you for your attention to this important project.
Sincerely,
George Lankford
George K Lankford, LLC
[phone]
2 of 2 5/6/2020, 10:06 AM

Wetland W1
Ditch D1 and D2
See Figure 3.1
Unnamed Tributary UT1
See Figure 3.2
Phase 1 Perimeter Fence
Phase 2 Perimeter Fence
Phase 3 Perimeter Fence
— — Ditch Centerline (Sketched Per Aerial)
Surveyed Wetlands
ODICKSON�
community infrastructure consultants
Figure 2: Project Overview
Wayne Executive Jetport (GWW) Perimeter Fence
Wayne County, NC
0 400 800 1,600
Feet
1 inch = 800 feet

Legend
Phase 1 Perimeter Fence
Phase 2 Perimeter Fence
Phase 3 Perimeter Fence
- Existing Perimeter Fence
- Surveyed Ditch (Top of Bank)
--- Ditch Centerline (Sketched Per Aerial)
Surveyed Wetlands
n Study Limits
�DICKSON
I
community infrastructure consultants
Figure 3.1: Jurisdictional Waters (W1, D1 and D2)
Wayne Executive Jetport (GWW) Perimeter Fence
Wayne County, NC
0 100 200
1 inch = 200 feet
400
Feet

Legend
Phase 1 Perimeter Fence
Phase 2 Perimeter Fence
Phase 3 Perimeter Fence
- Existing Perimeter Fence
- Surveyed Ditch (Top of Bank)
--- Ditch Centerline (Sketched Per Aerial)
Surveyed Wetlands
Study Limits
41.
IICKSON
community infrastructure consultants
Figure 3.2: Jurisdictional Waters (UT1)
Wayne Executive Jetport (GWW) Perimeter Fence
Wayne County, NC
0 100 200
1 inch = 200 feet
400
Feet

Legend
Phase 1 Perimeter Fence
Phase 2 Perimeter Fence
Phase 3 Perimeter Fence
- Existing Perimeter Fence
- Surveyed Ditch (Top of Bank)
--- Ditch Centerline (Sketched Per Aerial)
Surveyed Wetlands
n Study Limits
IICKSON
community infrastructure consultants
Figure 3.3: Jurisdictional Waters (D3)
Wayne Executive Jetport (GWW) Perimeter Fence
Wayne County, NC
0 50 100
1 inch = 100 feet
200
Feet

Legend
Phase 1 Perimeter Fence
Phase 2 Perimeter Fence
Phase 3 Perimeter Fence
- Existing Perimeter Fence
- Surveyed Ditch (Top of Bank)
--- Ditch Centerline (Sketched Per Aerial)
Surveyed Wetlands
n Study Limits
IICKSON
community infrastructure consultants
Figure 3.4: Jurisdictional Waters (W2 and D4)
Wayne Executive Jetport (GWW) Perimeter Fence
Wayne County, NC
0 100 200
1 inch = 200 feet
400
Feet

Legend
Phase 1 Perimeter Fence
Phase 2 Perimeter Fence
Phase 3 Perimeter Fence
- Existing Perimeter Fence
- Surveyed Ditch (Top of Bank)
--- Ditch Centerline (Sketched Per Aerial)
Surveyed Wetlands
n Study Limits
IICKSON
community infrastructure consultants
Figure 3.5: Jurisdictional Waters (W3 and D5)
Wayne Executive Jetport (GWW) Perimeter Fence
Wayne County, NC
0 100 200
1 inch = 200 feet
400
Feet

Species Conclusions Table
Project Name: Wayne Executive Jetport (GWW) Perimeter Wildlife Exclusion Fence
Date: September 21, 2021
2
Species / Resource Name
Conclusion
ESA Section 7 /
Eagle Act
Determination
Notes / Documentation
Red -cockaded Woodpecker
(Picoides borealis)
Endangered
No effect.
No suitable habitat present.
Open stands of mature pine absent from project and immediate area.
Neuse River Waterdog
(Necturus lewisi)
Threatened
No effect.
No suitable habitat present.
No medium or larger streams present.
Carolina Madtom
(Noturus furiosus)
Endangered
No effect.
No suitable habitat present.
No medium or larger streams present.
Atlantic Pigtoe
(Fusconaia masons)
Proposed Threatened
No effect.
No suitable habitat present.
No medium or larger streams present.
Monarch Butterfly
(Danaus plexippus)
Candidate species
No effect.
No suitable habitat present.
Site is regularly maintained graminoids.
Acknowledgement: I agree that the above information about my proposed project is true. I used all of the provided resources to make an
informed decision about impacts in the immediate and surrounding areas.
George K Lankford, President
Signature /Title
September 21, 2021
Date

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
Roy Cooper Mark Edwards
GOVERNOR Acting Secretary
March 30, 2021
George Lankford
Wayne Executive Jetport
c/o George K. Lankford, LLC
Shady Grove Road
Pittsboro, NC 27312-
Re: SCH File # 20-E-0000-0283 Proposed project is for the removal of the existing fence and
installation of approx. 1,000 if of fence in the terminal area and approx. 18,800 if of wildlife
fence around the remaining airport perimeter.
Dear George Lankford:
The above referenced environmental impact information has been submitted to the State Clearinghouse
under the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act. According to G.S. 113A-10, when a state
agency is required to prepare an environmental document under the provisions of federal law, the
environmental document meets the provisions of the State Environmental Policy Act. Attached to this letter
for your consideration are comments made by the agencies in the review of this document.
If any further environmental review documents are prepared for this project, they should be forwarded to
this office for intergovernmental review.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Attachments
Mailing Address:
NC DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
1301 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NC 27699-1301
Sincerely,
CRYSTAL BEST
State Environmental Review Clearinghouse
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
COURIER: #51-01-00
Email: [e-mail]
Website: www.ncadmin.nc.gov
Location:
116 WEST JONES STREET
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL 5. REGAN
Secretary
JAMIE RAGAN
Director
MEMORANDUM
To:
From:
RE:
Date:
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
Crystal Best
State Clearinghouse Coordinator
NC Department of Administration
Lyn Hardison
Division of Environmental Assistance and Customer Service
Environmental Assistance and Project Review Coordinator
Washington Regional Office
20-0283
Scoping - Proposed project is for the removal of the existing
fence and installation of approx. 1,000 If of fence in the
terminal area and approx. 18,800 If of wildlife fence around
the remaining airport perimeter at Wayne Executive
Jetport.
Wayne County
July 10, 2020
The Department of Environmental Quality has reviewed the proposal for the referenced project. Based
on the information provided, several of our agencies have identified permits that may be required and
offered some valuable guidance. The comments are attached for the applicant's review.
The Department agencies will continue to be available to assist the applicant through any
environmental review or permitting processes.
Thank you for the opportunity to respond.
Attachments
a_ECV)
NCF Tri_�gp(b,}Hg
oeor�n a rnrasmsw awaa�
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Environmental Assistance and Customer Service
217 Westiones Street 11639 Mail Service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1639
9T7.623.6748

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. DANIEL SMITH
Director
NORTH CAxROLINA
Etpiefronmeetal Quality
June 15, 2020
MEMORANDUM
To: Lyn Hardison, Environmental Assistance & SEPA Coordinator, NC DEQ
From: Rob Ridings, NC Division of Water Resources, Transportation 401 Permitting Branch
Subject: Scoping comments on proposed Wayne Executive Jetport Perimeter project in Wayne County, State
Clearinghouse Project No. 20-0283.
Reference your correspondence dated June 12, 2020 in which you requested comments for the referenced project.
Preliminary analysis of the project reveals the potential for multiple impacts to streams, riparian buffers and
jurisdictional wetlands in the project area. Streams and tributaries located in the project area include:
Stream Name
River Basin
Stream Classifications
Stream Index Number
303(d) Listing?
Stoney Creek
Neuse
C; NSW
27-62
No
Granny Branch
Neuse
C; Sw; NSW
27-86-14-1-1
No
The Slough
Neuse
C; Sw; NSW
27-86-14-1
No
Further investigations at a higher resolution should be undertaken to verify the presence of other streams and/or
jurisdictional wetlands in the area. In the event that any jurisdictional areas are identified, the Division of Water
Resources requests that applicant consider the following environmental issues for the proposed project:
Project Specific Comments:
1. The streams and tributaries in the project area are all classified as Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW) of the State.
The NCDWR is very concerned with sediment and erosion impacts that could result from this project. The
NCDWR recommends that highly protective sediment and erosion control BMPs be implemented to reduce the
risk of nutrient runoff to these waters. Post -construction stormwater BMPs should, to the MEP, be selected and
designed to reduce nutrients.
2. This project is within the Neuse Basin. Riparian buffer impacts shall be avoided and minimized to the greatest
extent possible pursuant to 15A NCAC 2B.0233. New development activities located in the protected 50-foot
wide riparian areas within the basin shall be limited to "uses" identified within and constructed in accordance
with 15A NCAC .02B .0295. Buffer mitigation may be required for buffer impacts resulting from activities
classified as "allowable with mitigation" within the "Table of Uses" section of the Buffer Rules or require a
variance under the Buffer Rules. A buffer mitigation plan, including use of the North Carolina Division of
Mitigation Services, must be provided to the NCDWR prior to approval of the Water Quality Certification.
Buffer mitigation may be required for buffer impacts resulting from activities classified as "allowable with
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 11617 Mail Service Center 1 Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1637
gi9.7o7.g000

mitigation" within the "Table of Uses" section of the Buffer Rules or require a variance under the Buffer
Rules. A buffer mitigation plan, coordinated with the North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services, must be
provided to the NCDWR prior to approval of the Water Quality Certification.
General Transportation Project Comments:
1. The environmental documents should provide a detailed and itemized presentation of the proposed impacts to
wetlands and streams with corresponding mapping. If mitigation is necessary as required by 15A NCAC
2H.0506(h), it is preferable to present a conceptual (if not finalized) mitigation plan with the environmental
documentation. Appropriate mitigation plans will be required prior to issuance of a 401 Water Quality
Certification.
2. Environmental impact statement alternatives shall consider design criteria that reduce the impacts to streams
and wetlands from storm water runoff. These alternatives shall include road designs that allow for treatment
of the storm water runoff through BMPs as detailed in the most recent version of the North Carolina
Department of Transportation Stormwater Best Management Practices Tool box manual, such as grassed
swales, buffer areas, preformed scour holes, retention basins, etc.
3. After the selection of the preferred alternative and prior to an issuance of the 401 Water Quality Certification,
the applicant is respectfully reminded that they will need to demonstrate the avoidance and minimization of
impacts to wetlands (and streams) to the maximum extent practical. In accordance with the Environmental
Management Commission's Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0506[h]), mitigation will be required for impacts of
greater than 1 acre to wetlands. In the event that mitigation is required, the mitigation plan shall be designed
to replace appropriate lost functions and values. North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services may be
available for assistance with wetland mitigation.
4. In accordance with the Environmental Management Commission's Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0506[h]),
mitigation will be required for impacts of greater than 300 linear feet to any perennial stream. In the event
that mitigation is required, the mitigation plan shall be designed to replace appropriate lost functions and
values. The North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services may be available for assistance with stream
mitigation.
5. Future documentation, including the 401 Water Quality Certification Application, shall continue to include an
itemized listing of the proposed wetland and stream impacts with corresponding mapping.
6. The NCDWR is very concerned with sediment and erosion impacts that could result from this project. The
applicant shall address these concerns by describing the potential impacts that may occur to the aquatic
environments and any mitigating factors that would reduce the impacts.
7. An analysis of cumulative and secondary impacts anticipated as a result of this project is required. The type
and detail of analysis shall conform to the NC Division of Water Resource Policy on the assessment of
secondary and cumulative impacts dated April 10, 2004.
8. The appliacant is respectfully reminded that all impacts, including but not limited to, bridging, fill, excavation
and clearing, and rip rap to jurisdictional wetlands, streams, and riparian buffers need to be included in the
final impact calculations. These impacts, in addition to any construction impacts, temporary or otherwise,
also need to be included as part of the 401 Water Quality Certification Application.
9. Sediment and erosion control measures should not be placed in wetlands or streams.
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
7o7.g000

10. Borrow/waste areas should avoid wetlands to the maximum extent practical. Impacts to wetlands in
borrow/waste areas will need to be presented in the 401 Water Quality Certification and could precipitate
compensatory mitigation.
11. The 401 Water Quality Certification application will need to specifically address the proposed methods for
stormwater management. More specifically, stormwater shall not be permitted to discharge directly into
streams or surface waters. Please refer to the most recent version of the North Carolina Department of
Transportation Stormwater Best Management Practices Toolbox manual for approved measures.
12. Based on the information presented in the document, the magnitude of impacts to wetlands and streams may
require a Nationwide Permit (NW) application to the Corps of Engineers and corresponding 401 Water
Quality Certification. Please be advised that a 401 Water Quality Certification requires satisfactory protection
of water quality to ensure that water quality standards are met and no wetland or stream uses are lost. Final
permit authorization will require the submittal of a formal application by the applicant and written
concurrence from the NCDWR. Please be aware that any approval will be contingent on appropriate
avoidance and minimization of wetland and stream impacts to the maximum extent practical, the development
of an acceptable stormwater management plan, and the inclusion of appropriate mitigation plans where
appropriate.
13. If concrete is used during construction, a dry work area shall be maintained to prevent direct contact between
curing concrete and stream water. Water that inadvertently contacts uncured concrete shall not be discharged
to surface waters due to the potential for elevated pH and possible aquatic life and fish kills. Concrete shall
be handled in accordance with the NPDES Construction General Permit NCG010000.
14. If temporary access roads or detours are constructed, the site shall be graded to its preconstruction contours
and elevations. Disturbed areas shall be seeded or mulched to stabilize the soil and appropriate native woody
species shall be planted. When using temporary structures the area shall be cleared but not grubbed. Clearing
the area with chain saws, mowers, bush -hogs, or other mechanized equipment and leaving the stumps and root
mat intact allows the area to re -vegetate naturally and minimizes soil disturbance.
15. Unless otherwise authorized, placement of culverts and other structures in waters and streams shall be placed
below the elevation of the streambed by one foot for all culverts with a diameter greater than 48 inches, and
20 percent of the culvert diameter for culverts having a diameter less than 48 inches, to allow low flow
passage of water and aquatic life. Design and placement of culverts and other structures including temporary
erosion control measures shall not be conducted in a manner that may result in dis-equilibrium of wetlands or
streambeds or banks, adjacent to or upstream and downstream of the above structures. The applicant is
required to provide evidence that the equilibrium is being maintained if requested in writing by the NCDWR.
If this condition is unable to be met due to bedrock or other limiting features encountered during construction,
please contact the NCDWR for guidance on how to proceed and to determine whether or not a permit
modification will be required.
16. If multiple pipes or barrels are required, they shall be designed to mimic natural stream cross section as
closely as possible including pipes or barrels at flood plain elevation, floodplain benches, and/or sills may be
required where appropriate. Widening the stream channel should be avoided. Stream channel widening at the
inlet or outlet end of structures typically decreases water velocity causing sediment deposition that requires
increased maintenance and disrupts aquatic life passage.
17. If foundation test borings are necessary; it shall be noted in the document. Geotechnical work is approved
under General 401 Certification Number 4085/Nationwide Permit No. 6 for Survey Activities.
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
7o7.g000

18. Sediment and erosion control measures sufficient to protect water resources must be implemented and
maintained in accordance with the most recent version of North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control
Planning and Design Manual and the most recent version of NCS000250.
19. All work in or adjacent to stream waters shall be conducted in a dry work area. Approved BMP measures
from the most current version of the NCDOT Construction and Maintenance Activities manual such as
sandbags, rock berms, cofferdams and other diversion structures shall be used to prevent excavation in
flowing water.
20. While the use of National Wetland Inventory (NWI) maps, NC Coastal Region Evaluation of Wetland
Significance (NC -CREWS) maps and soil survey maps are useful tools, their inherent inaccuracies require
that qualified personnel perform onsite wetland delineations prior to permit approval.
21. Heavy equipment should be operated from the bank rather than in stream channels in order to minimize
sedimentation and reduce the likelihood of introducing other pollutants into streams. This equipment shall be
inspected daily and maintained to prevent contamination of surface waters from leaking fuels, lubricants,
hydraulic fluids, or other toxic materials.
22. Riprap shall not be placed in the active thalweg channel or placed in the streambed in a manner that precludes
aquatic life passage. Bioengineering boulders or structures should be properly designed, sized and installed.
23. Riparian vegetation (native trees and shrubs) shall be preserved to the maximum extent possible. Riparian
vegetation must be reestablished within the construction limits of the project by the end of the growing season
following completion of construction.
Thank you for requesting our input at this time. The applicant is reminded that issuance of a 401 Water Quality
Certification requires that appropriate measures be instituted to ensure that water quality standards are met and
designated uses are not degraded or lost. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact
Rob Ridings at [e-mail].
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
7o7.g000

North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
Gordon Myers, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Lyn Hardison, Environmental Assistance Coordinator
NCDEQ Division of Environmental Assistance and Customer Services
FROM:
Gabriela Garrison
Eastern Piedmont Coordinator
Habitat Conservation
DATE: July 10, 2020
SUBJECT: Request for Environmental Scoping for Removal and Installation of Fencing at Wayne
Executive Jetport, Wayne County, DEQ Project No. 20-0283.
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) have reviewed the subject
document. Comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination
Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667e), North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (G.S.
113A-1 through 113A-10; 1 NCAC 25) and North Carolina General Statutes (G.S. 113-131 et seq.).
The Wayne Executive Jetport Airport proposes to remove the existing airport fencing and install 1,000
linear feet of ornamental fence and approximately 18,800 linear feet of wildlife exclusion fence. The
work will be conducted in 3 phases. The airport is located at 240 Aviation Road NE, north of Goldsboro.
The NCWRC offers the following recommendations to minimize impacts to sensitive aquatic and
terrestrial wildlife resources:
1. Maintain a minimum 100-foot undisturbed, native, forested buffer along perennial streams,
and a minimum 50-foot buffer along intermittent streams and wetlands. Maintaining
undisturbed, forested buffers along these areas will minimize impacts to aquatic and
terrestrial wildlife resources. Wide riparian buffers are helpful in maintaining stream bank
stability. In addition, these buffers provide a travel corridor for wildlife species. Lay down
and staging areas should be located outside wetland areas and at least 100 feet from stream
banks. In addition, heavy machinery and equipment should remain outside of any wetland
areas.
2. The project footprint should have updated surveys for wetlands and streams to ensure there
are no impacts to surface waters. In addition to providing wildlife habitat, wetland areas and
streams aid in flood control and water quality protection. United States Army Corps of
Engineers Section 404 Permits and NC Division of Water Resources Section 401
Certifications are required for any impacts to jurisdictional streams or wetlands.
Mailing Address: Habitat Conservation Division • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]

Page 2
July 10, 2020
Wayne Executive Jetport Fencing Project
DEQ Project No. 20-0283
3. If pesticides or chemicals will be used for site maintenance, stormwater runoff from the site
should be funneled to bio-retention areas prior to discharge to streams or wetlands.
Pesticides, fertilizers and other chemicals should not be used near streams.
4. Sediment and erosion control measures should be installed prior to any land -disturbing
activity. The use of biodegradable and wildlife -friendly sediment and erosion control devices
is strongly recommended. Silt fencing, fiber rolls and/or other products should have loose -
weave netting that is made of natural fiber materials with movable joints between the vertical
and horizontal twines. Silt fencing that has been reinforced with plastic or metal mesh should
be avoided as it impedes the movement of terrestrial wildlife species. Excessive silt and
sediment loads can have detrimental effects on aquatic resources including destruction of
spawning habitat, suffocation of eggs and clogging of gills.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. If I can be of further assistance,
please contact me at [phone] or [e-mail].

State of North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW PROJECT COMMENTS
Reviewing Regional Office: Washington
Project Number: 20-0283 Due Date: 07/08/2020
County: Wayne
After review of this project it has been determined that the DEQ permit(s) and/or approvals indicated may need to be obtained in order for this
project to comply with North Carolina Law. Questions regarding these permits should be addressed to the Regional Office indicated on the
reverse of the form. All applications, information and guidelines relative to these plans and permits are available from the same Regional Office.
PERMITS
SPECIAL APPLICATION PROCEDURES or REQUIREMENTS
Normal Process
Time
(statutory time
limit)
Permit to construct & operate wastewater
treatment facilities, non-standard sewer system
extensions &sewer systems that do not
discharge into state surface waters.
Application 90 days before begins construction or award of
-
construction contracts. On -site inspection may be required. Post-
application technical conference usual.
30 days
(90 days)
•Post
Permit to construct & operate, sewer
extensions involving gravity sewers, pump
stations and force mains discharging into a
sewer collection
system
Fast -Track Permitting program consists of the submittal of an
application and an engineer's certification that the project meets all
applicable State rules and Division Minimum Design Criteria.
30 days
(N/A)
•
NPDES - permit to discharge into surface water
and/or permit to operate and construct
wastewater facilities discharging into state
surface waters.
Application 180 days before begins activity. On -site inspection. Pre -
application conference usual. Additionally, obtain permit to construct
wastewater treatment facility -granted after NPDES. Reply time, 30 days
after receipt of plans or issue of NPDES permit -whichever is later.
90-120 days
(N/A)
•
Water Use Permit
Pre -application technical conference usually necessary.
30 days
(N/A)
•
Well Construction Permit
Complete application must be received and permit issued prior to the
installation of a groundwater monitoring well located on property not
owned by the applicant, and for a large capacity (>100,000 gallons per
day) water supply well.
7 days
(15 days)
)
•
Dredge and Fill Permit
Application copy must be served on each adjacent riparian property
owner. On -site inspection. Pre -application conference usual. Filling may
require Easement to Fill from N.C. Department of Administration and
Federal Dredge and Fill Permit.
55 days
(90 days)
•
Permit to construct &operate Air Pollution
Abatement facilities and/or Emission Sources as
per 15 A NCAC (2Q.0100 thru 2Q.0300)
Application must be submitted and permit received prior to
construction and operation of the source. If a permit is required
in an area without local zoning, then there are additional
requirements and timelines (20.0113).
90 days
•
Any open burning associated with subject
must be in compliance with 15 A NCAC
2D.1900
N/A
60 days
(90 days)
0proposal
Demolition or renovations of structures
containing asbestos material must be in
compliance with 15 A NCAC 20.1110 (a) (1)
which requires notification and removal prior to
demolition. Contact Asbestos Control Group
919-707-5950
Please Note - The Health Hazards Control Unit (HHCU) of the N.C.
Department of Health and Human Services, must be notified of plans to
demolish a building, including residences for commercial or industrial
expansion, even if no asbestos is present in the building.
60 days
(90 days)
■
The Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of 1973 must be properly addressed for any land disturbing activity. An erosion &
sedimentation control plan will be required if one or more acres are to be disturbed. Plan must be filed with and approved
by applicable Regional Office (Land Quality Section) at least 30 days before beginning activity. A NPDES Construction
Stormwater permit (NCG010000) is also usually issued should design features meet minimum requirements. A fee of $65
for the first acre or any part of an acre. An express review option is available with additional fees.
20 days
(30 days)
0
Sedimentation and erosion control must be addressed in accordance with NCDOT's approved program. Particular
attention should be given to design and installation of appropriate perimeter sediment trapping devices as well as stable
Stormwater conveyances and outlets.
(30 days)
•
•
Sedimentation and erosion control must be addressed
Particular attention should be given to design and
as stable Stormwater conveyances and outlets.
in accordance with Local Government's approved program.
Based on Local
Program
installation of appropriate perimeter sediment trapping devices as well
Compliance with 15A NCAC 2H .0126 - NPDES Stormwater Program which regulates three types of activities: Industrial,
Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System & Construction activities that disturb >_1 acre.
30-60 days
(90 days)
■
Compliance with 15A NCAC 2H 1000 -State Stormwater Permitting Programs regulate site development and post-
construction stormwater runoff control. Areas subject to these permit programs include all 20 coastal counties, and
various other counties and watersheds throughout the state.
45 days
(90 days)
•
DEQ INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW PROJECT Form
January 2017/Ibh
Page 1 of 3

State of North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW PROJECT COMMENTS
Reviewing Regional Office: Washington
Project Number: 20-0283 Due Date: 07/08/2020
County: Wayne
PERMITS
SPECIAL APPLICATION PROCEDURES or REQUIREMENTS
Normal Process
Time
(statutory time
limit)
Mining Permit
On -site inspection usual. Surety bond filed with DEQ Bond amount
varies with type mine and number of acres of affected land. Affected
greater than one acre must be permitted. The appropriate bond
must be received before the permit can be issued.
30 days
(60 days)
•area
Dam Safety Permit
If permit required, application 60 days before begin construction.
Applicant must hire N.C. qualified engineer to: prepare plans, inspect
construction, and certify construction is according to DEQ approved
plans. May also require a permit under mosquito control program. And
a 404 permit from Corps of Engineers. An inspection of site is necessary
to verify Hazard Classification. A minimum fee of $200.00 must
accompany the application. An additional processing fee based on a
percentage or the total project cost will be required upon completion.
30 days
(60 days)
•
Oil Refining Facilities
N/A
90-120 days
(N/A)
•
Permit to drill exploratory oil or gas well
File surety bond of $5,000 with DEQ running to State of NC conditional
that any well opened by drill operator shall, upon abandonment, be
plugged according to DEQ rules and regulations.
10 days
N/A
•
Geophysical Exploration Permit
Application filed with DEQ at least 10 days prior to issue of permit.
Application by letter. No standard application form.
10 days
N/A
•
State Lakes Construction Permit
Application fee based on structure size is charged. Must include
descriptions & drawings of structure & proof of ownership of riparian
property
15-20 days
N/A
•
401 Water Quality Certification
Compliance with the T15A 02H .0500 Certifications are required
whenever construction or operation of facilities will result in a
discharge into navigable water as described in 33 CFR part 323.
60 days
(130 days)
•
Compliance with Catawba, Goose Creek, Jordan Lake, Randleman, Tar Pamlico or Neuse Riparian Buffer Rules is required.
Buffer requirements: http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/water-resources-permits/wastewater-
•
branch/401-wetlands-buffer-permits/401-riparian-buffer-protection-program
Nutrient Offset: Loading requirements for nitrogen and phosphorus in the Neuse and Tar -Pamlico River basins, and in the
Jordan and Falls Lake watersheds, as part of the nutrient -management strategies in these areas. DWR nutrient offset
information:
http://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/water-resources/plan ning/non point -sou rce-management/n utrient-offset-information
•
CAMA Permit for MAJOR development
$250.00 - $475.00 fee must accompany application
75 days
(150 days)
•
CAMA Permit for MINOR development
$100.00 fee must accompany application
22 days
(25 days)
•
Abandonment of any wells, if required must be in accordance with Title 15A. Subchapter 2C.0100.
■
Notification of the proper regional office is requested if "orphan" underground storage tanks (USTS) are discovered during
any excavation operation.
•
Plans and specifications for the construction, expansion, or alteration of a public water system must be approved by the
Division of Water Resources/Public Water Supply Section prior to the award of a contract or the initiation of construction
as per 15A NCAC 18C .0300 et. seq., Plans and specifications should be submitted to 1634 Mail Service Center, Raleigh,
North Carolina 27699-1634. All public water supply systems must comply with state and federal drinking water monitoring
requirements. For more information, contact the Public Water Supply Section, [phone].
30 days
•
If existing water lines will be relocated during the construction, plans for the water line relocation must be submitted to
the Division of Water Resources/Public Water Supply Section at 1634 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-
1634. For more information, contact the Public Water Supply Section, [phone].
30 days
•
•
Plans and specifications for the construction, expansion,
through the delegated plan approval authority.
or alteration of the water system must be approved
Please contact them at for further information.
DEQ INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW PROJECT Form
January 2017/Ibh
Page 2 of 3

State of North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW PROJECT COMMENTS
Reviewing Regional Office: Washington
Project Number: 20-0283 Due Date: 07/08/2020
County: Wayne
Other Comments (attach additional pages as necessary, being certain to comment authority)
Division
Initials
No
comment
Comments
Date
Review
DAQ
•
/ /
DWR-WQROS
(Aquifer & Surface)
DRS
&
•
DRS has no comments &
6/16/2020
DWR-PWS
CWW
a
N/A
6/15/2020
DEMLR (LQ & SW)
SD
■
E&S required if disturbance greater than 1 acre, SW not required
6/16/2020
DWM — UST
•
/ /
Other Comments
■
/ /
REGIONAL OFFICES
Questions regarding these permits should be addressed to the Regional Office marked below.
❑ Asheville Regional Office
2090 U.S. 70 Highway
Swannanoa, NC 28778-8211
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
❑ Raleigh Regional Office
3800 Barrett Drive,
Raleigh, NC 27609
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
❑ Fayetteville Regional Office
225 Green Street, Suite 714,
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5043
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
® Washington Regional Office
943 Washington Square Mall,
Washington, NC 27889
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
❑ Winston-Salem Regional Office
450 Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300,
Winston-Salem, NC 27105
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
❑ Mooresville Regional Office
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301,
Mooresville, NC 28115
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
❑ Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Ext.,
Wilmington, NC 28405
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
DEQ INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW PROJECT Form
January 2017/Ibh
Page 3 of 3

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretory
MICHAELSCOTT
Director
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
MEMORANDUM
TO: Michael Scott, Division Director through Sharon Brinkley
FROM: Drew Hammonds, Eastern District Supervisor - Solid Waste Section
DATE: June 16, 2020
SUBJECT: Review: SW 20-0283 — Wayne County (Scoping — Wayne Executive Jetport —
Proposed project is for the removal of the existing fence and installation of approx. 1K if of
fence in the terminal area and approx. 18.8K if of wildlife fence around the remaining perimeter)
The Division of Waste Management, Solid Waste Section (Section) has reviewed the EA
documents for the subject project in Wayne County, NC. Based on the information provided in
these documents, the Section at this time does not see an adverse impact on the surrounding
communities and likewise knows of no situations in the communities, which would affect this
project.
As always for any planned or proposed projects, it is recommended that during any land clearing,
demolition and construction, the Wayne Executive Jetport and/or its contractors would make
every feasible effort to minimize the generation of waste, to recycle materials for which viable
markets exist, and to use recycled products and materials in the development of this project
where suitable. Any waste generated by and of the projects that cannot be beneficially
reused or recycled must be disposed of at a solid waste management facility permitted by
the Division. The Section strongly recommends that the Wayne Executive Jetport require
all contractors to provide proof of proper disposal for all generated waste to permitted
facilities.
Permitted solid waste management facilities are listed on the Division of Waste Management,
Solid Waste Section portal site at: https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/waste-management/waste-
management-rules-data/solid-waste-management-annual-reports/solid-waste-permitted-facility-
list
Questions regarding solid waste management for this project should be directed to Ms. Liz
Patterson, Environmental Senior Specialist, Solid Waste Section, at [phone].
cc: Liz Patterson, Environmental Senior Specialist
NA„D_E W
NOPTH CARD J
Lprl�iwA d Boicsid� �r T
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Waste Management
Fayetteville Regional Office 1225 Green Street, Suite 714 I Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301
910.433.3300

ROY COOPER
Gays„rnf
MI HAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
MIHAEL SCOTT
Nrreror
Date: June 25, 2020
NORTI4 CAROLINA
En vitrortmrrrtat Quality
To: Michael Scott, Director
Division of Waste Management
Through: Janet Macdonald
Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch — Special Projects Unit
From: Bonnie S. Ware
Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch
Subject: NEPA Project #20-0283, Wayne Executive Jetport, Wayne County, North Carolina
The Superfund Section has reviewed the proximity of sites under its jurisdiction to the Wayne Executive
Jetport project. Proposed project is for the removal of the existing fence and installation of approx. 1,000 If
of fence in the terminal area and approx. 18,800 If of wildlife fence around the remaining airport perimeter.
No sites were identified within one mile of the project as shown on the attached report.
Please contact Janet Macdonald at 919.707.8349 if you have any questions.
-"fiE
Ngrth Cargllna Department of ErwIronrnenlal Quaky I DLvtslon of Waste Management
217 Wesl J4rtieS Street 1 1446 Ma1I Serv1ce Center I RaLeigh N4r1h Cargllna 276.49•1b.46
9I9.707,$2Ob

6/25/2020
SEPA/NEPA Review Report
Area of Interest (AOI) Information
Area : 4,977.1 acres
Jun 25 2020 13:08:19 Eastern Daylight Time
• Ire Iiegui.Iory LaMIIII SIles
F'.riceF: �Fvllyw, ej-PpceF'
1-40,0 5
a al Os
0 00
ISM
iem
1/2

6/25/2020
20-0283 Wayne County
Summary
I_ Name
Count
Area(acres)
Length(ml)
Certified DSCA Sites
0
N/A
N/A
Federal Remediation Branch Sites
0
N/A
N/A
Inactive Hazardous Sites
0
N/A
N/A
Pre -Regulatory Landfill Sites
0
N/A
N/A
Brownfields Program Sites
0
N/A
N/A
2/2

Received: 6/29/2020
Historic Preservation Office
COUNTY: WAYNE
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW
F03:AIRPORTS
ER 20-1368
MS RENEE GLEDHILL-EARLEY
CLEARINGHOUSE COORDINATOR
DEPT OF NATURAL & CULTURAL RESOURCE
STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE
MSC 4617 - ARCHIVES BUILDING
RALEIGH NC
REVIEW DISTRIBUTION
DEPT OF AGRICULTURE
DEPT OF ENVIR. QUALITY - COASTAL MG
DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DEPT OF NATURAL & CULTURAL RESOURCE
DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
DNCR - NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM
DPS - DIV OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
EASTERN CAROLINA COUNCIL
PROJECT INFORMATION
APPLICANT: Wayne Executive Jetport
TYPE: National Environmental Policy Act
Scoping
STATE NUMBER: 20-E-0000-0283
DATE RECEIVED: 06/12/2020
AGENCY RESPONSE:07/08/2020
REVIEW CLOSED: 07/13/2020
Due: 7/8/2020
A-- NC
MBF 06/30/2020
H-- NC
RGE 07/16/2020
DESC: Proposed project is for the removal of the existing fence and installation of
approx. 1,000 if of fence in the terminal area and approx. 18,800 if of wildlife
fence around the remaining airport perimeter.
The attached project has been submitted to the N. C. State Clearinghouse for
intergovernmental review. Please review and submit your response by the above
indicated date to 1301 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-1301.
If additional review time is needed, please contact this office at [phone].
AS A RESULT OF THIS REVIEW THE FOLLOWING IS SUBMITTED:
SIGNED BY:
X
NO COMMENT
COMMENTS ATTACHED
DATE: 07/17/2020

COUNTY: WAYNE
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW
F03:AIRPORTS
STATE NUMBER: 20-E-0000-0283
DATE RECEIVED: 06/12/2020
AGENCY RESPONSE:07/08/2020
REVIEW CLOSED: 07/13/2020
MR JOSEPH HUDYNCIA
CLEARINGHOUSE COORDINATOR
DEPT OF AGRICULTURE
1001 MSC - AGRICULTURE BLDG
RALEIGH NC
REVIEW DISTRIBUTION
DEPT OF AGRICULTURE
DEPT OF ENVIR. QUALITY - COASTAL MG
DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DEPT OF NATURAL & CULTURAL RESOURCE
DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
DNCR - NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM
DPS - DIV OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
EASTERN CAROLINA COUNCIL
PROJECT INFORMATION
APPLICANT: Wayne Executive Jetport
TYPE: National Environmental Policy Act
Scoping
DESC: Proposed project is for the removal of the existing fence and installation of
approx. 1,000 if of fence in the terminal area and approx. 18,800 if of wildlife
fence around the remaining airport perimeter.
The attached project has been submitted to the N. C. State Clearinghouse for
intergovernmental review. Please review and submit your response by the above
indicated date to 1301 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-1301.
If additional review time is needed, please contact this office at [phone].
AS A RESULT OF THIS REVIEW THE FOLLOWING IS SUBMITTED:
SIGNED BY:
Bonnie J. Benton for Joe Hudyncia
NO COMMENT
COMMENTS ATTACHED
DATE: 6/12/2020

COUNTY: WAYNE
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CLEARINGHOUSE
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW
F03:AIRPORTS
MS CINDY WILLIAMS
CLEARINGHOUSE COORDINATOR
DPS - DIV OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
4218 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH NC
REVIEW DISTRIBUTION
STATE NUMBER: 20-E-0000-0283
DATE RECEIVED: 06/12/2020
AGENCY RESPONSE:07/08/2020
REVIEW CLOSED: 07/13/2020
DEPT OF AGRICULTURE
DEPT OF ENVIR. QUALITY - COASTAL MG
DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
DEPT OF NATURAL & CULTURAL RESOURCE
DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
DNCR - NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM
DPS - DIV OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
EASTERN CAROLINA COUNCIL
PROJECT INFORMATION
APPLICANT: Wayne Executive Jetport
TYPE: National Environmental Policy Act
Scoping
DESC: Proposed project is for the removal of the existing fence and installation of
approx. 1,000 if of fence in the terminal area and approx. 18,800 if of wildlife
fence around the remaining airport perimeter.
The attached project has been submitted to the N. C. State Clearinghouse for
intergovernmental review. Please review and submit your response by the above
indicated date to 1301 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-1301.
If additional review time is needed, please contact this office at [phone].
AS A RESULT OF THIS REVIEW THE FOLLOWING IS SUBMITTED:
SIGNED BY:
IV
NO COMMENT
COMMENTS ATTACHED
DATE: 7/2/2020

GEORGE K LANKFORD, LLC
238 Shady Grove Road
Pittsboro, NC 27312
919-602-0127 [e-mail]
NC State Historic Preservation Office
Project Review Checklist
March 5, 2020
Project Name- Wayne Executive Jetport
Project Location
Wayne Executive Jetport
240 Aviation Rd, Pikeville, NC 27863
Wayne County
Project Contact Information
WK Dickson
Jason Elliott, PE, Project Manager
720 Corporate Center Drive
Raleigh NC, 27607
Phone [phone]
Wayne Executive Jetport Airport
Brandon Gray
240 Aviation Rd
Pikeville, NC 27863
Phone [phone]
(GWW) Perimeter Wildlife Exclusion Fence
George Lankford, Staff Scientist
720 Corporate Center Drive
Raleigh NC, 27607
Phone [phone]
Project Description
The Wayne Executive Jetport Airport currently has a lot of issues with wildlife presence on the airfield.
The USDA APHIS Wildlife Services completed a Wildlife Hazard Site Visit (WHSV) on January 7, 2019.
One of the recommendations in the WHSV report was the installation of wildlife fencing around the airport
perimeter to stop deer from entering the airfield.
The Perimeter Fence project consists of the removal of existing fence and installation of approximately
1,000 LF of ornamental fence in the terminal area and approximately 18,800 LF of wildlife fence around
the remaining airport perimeter. The existing fence around the airport perimeter is only 3-5 feet tall, which
does not provide much security. Also, the wildlife fence is needed around the airport's perimeter to keep
deer and coyotes off the airfield to avoid hazards caused by the presence of wildlife.
The Perimeter Fence project will be packaged and constructed as three (3) separate projects. Phase 1 will
consist of all the ornamental fencing and approximately 5,200 LF of wildlife fence. Phase 2 will consist of
approximately 8,500 LF of wildlife fence and Phase 3 will consist of approximately 5,100 LF of wildlife
fence.
An environmental evaluation has been completed and the entire project footprint is within airport
property. The existing fence is currently within a maintained perimeter around the airfield, hangers, and
terminal. Approximately 2,500 LF of fence will be within a new corridor that requires clearing of mature
loblolly pine trees and shrubs. Using the on State Historic Preservation Office on-line GIS map service,
there are no known protected sites located within one half mile of the project. No historic buildings or
structures that appeared to be 50 years or older were observed in the project area and the wildlife fence
project does not impact any historic sites.
Attachments;

NC State Historic Preservation Office
Search Results for Y2 mile radius surrounding the Wayne Executive Jetport (GWW) Perimeter Wildlife
Exclusion Fence Project. HPOWEB 2.0 accessed March 4, 2020.
Displayed features:
2/2
Exum House / "Pleasant Grove" : SL :Exum House / "Pleasant Grove"
Site ID WY0798
Status SL
Site Name Exum House / "Pleasant Grove"
Descriptio c. 1860 frame Italianate house
Notes Moved to this location circa 1988-89; was WY0071
YearNR
YearSL 1998
YearDOE
YearDesig
LocalStat
YearSurvey
HDstatus
LinkPath
LocalLink
County Wayne
Quad Name Northeast Goldsboro
Township Stoney Creek
Density L
Location 1107 Mount Carmel Church Road Pikeville
PhotoLink
None
None
Spatial_Ac
Latitude 35.47
Longitude -77.95
YearUpdate
Internal
Robert Scott House : SO :Robert Scott House
Site ID WY0337
Status SO
Site Name Robert Scott House
Descriptio
Notes
YearNR
YearSL
YearDOE
YearDesig

LocalStat None
YearSurvey 1995-1997
HDstatus None
LinkPath
LocalLink
County Wayne
Quad Name Northeast Goldsboro
Township Stoney Creek
Density L
Location W sd SR 1545, 0.6 mi SE of jct w/ SR 1537
PhotoLink
Spatial_Ac
Latitude 35.47
Longitude -77.95
YearUpdate
Internal
• Skip to Map

NCHPO HPOWEB
3/4/2020, 6:50:51 PM
Find resources within a buffer _Query result
project_shapefile_wayne_executive_jetport_23709_23709
Local districts & boundaries
Local individual resources & centerpoints DOE districts & boundaries
Local Landmark =Determined Eligible Boundary
• Local Landmark, Gone C Both DOE and Study List Boundary
1:36,112
0 0.25 0.5
1 mi
I I I + I r I
0 0.4 0.8 1.6 km
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri
Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c)
OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community, NCDOT GIS Unit,
NCDOT STIP Unit
Local HD Center Point North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office
City of Goldsboro, State of North Carolina DOT, Esri, HERE, Garmin, INCREMENT P, NGA, USGS I NCDOT GIS Unit, NCDOT STIP Unit I NCDOT GIS Unit I State of North Carolina DOT, Esri, HERE, iPC

■ ■rn
-Bo's NC DEPARTMENT OF
■ EI= NATURAL AN❑ CULTURAL RESOURCES
■ EM
Roy Cooper, Governor
D. Reid Wilson, Secretary
Walter Clark
Director, Division of Land and Water Stewardship
NCNHDE-15795
September 21, 2021
George Lankford
George K Lankford, LLC
238 Shady Grove Rd
Pittsboro, NC 27312
RE: Wayne Executive Jetport -Perimeter Wildlife Exclusion Fence; 20190561.00.RA
Dear George Lankford:
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database, based on the project area mapped with your request, indicates
that there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary, or within a one -mile radius of
the project boundary.
Please note that although there may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within or
near the project boundary, it does not imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been
surveyed. The results of this query should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat
exists. In the event that rare species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so
that we may update our records.
Please also note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may also not be redistributed without
permission.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at [e-mail] or 919.707.8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL_ AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
Q 121 W. JONES STREET. RALEIGH. NC 27603 • 16S1 MAIL SERVICE CENTER. RALEIGH. NC 27699
OFC 919.707.9120 • FAX [phone]

NCNHDE-15795: Wayne Executive Jetport -Perimeter Wildlife Exclusion Fence
September 21, 2021
▪ Project Boundary
▪ Buffered Project Boundary
1:34,774
0 0.3 0.6
1.2 mi
0 0.475 0.95
1.9 km
Sources, Esri, HERE, Garmin,, Intermap, increment P Corp_, GEBCO, USGS,
FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan,
METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS
User Community
Page 2 of 2

x
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Consultation Code: 04EN2000-2020-SLI-0770
Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-04644
Project Name: Wayne Executive Jetport -Perimeter Wildlife Exclusion Fence
September 21, 2021
Subject: Updated list of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed
project location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The species list generated pursuant to the information you provided identifies threatened,
endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical
habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by
your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally -listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally -protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or

09/21/2021
Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-04644 2
evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes
If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally -protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require
development of an eagle conservation plan (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/
eagle_guidance.html). Additionally, wind energy projects should follow the wind energy
guidelines (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/) for minimizing impacts to migratory birds and
bats.
Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications
towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http://
www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm; http://
www.towerkill.com; and http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/CurrentBirdlssues/Hazards/
towers/comtow.html.
Not all Threatened and Endangered Species that occur in North Carolina are subject to section 7
consultation with the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service. Atlantic and shortnose sturgeon, sea
turtles,when in the water, and certain marine mammals are under purview of the National Marine
Fisheries Service. If your project occurs in marine, estuarine, or coastal river systems you should
also contact the National Marine Fisheries Service, http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in
the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project
that you submit to our office. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis
of this office at [e-mail].

09/21/2021
Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-04644 3
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List

09/21/2021
Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-04644 1
Official Species List
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

09/21/2021
Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-04644 2
Project Summary
Consultation Code:
Event Code:
Project Name:
Project Type:
Project Description:
04EN2000-2020-SLI-0770
Some(04EN2000-2021-E-04644)
Wayne Executive Jetport -Perimeter Wildlife Exclusion Fence
The Wayne Executive Jetport wishes to construct a perimeter fence
project to enclose the airport property by constructing a wildlife exclusion
fence. This project will consist of constructing approximately 19,550
linear feet of wildlife exclusion fencing surrounding the perimeter of
airport property of which approximately 2,500 feet will be on new
alignment. The fence will tie into existing new fencing behind new
hangers currently being constructed to provide a continuous perimeter
fence. The existing perimeter fence is inadequate for wildlife exclusion
and has structure failure at numerous points. Within the new alignment, a
proposed 20-foot-wide corridor is anticipated to allow for access to
inspect, repair, and maintain.
The proposed fence will in large part replace the failing and inadequate
existing 4-foot chain -link fence. The new fencing will consist of 8-foot
chain -link fence with post set concrete and extend 2 to 3 feet at a 45-
degree angle underground to prevent animal digging beneath the fence.
Project Location:
Approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https://
www.google.com/maps/@35.461752464404654,-77.96158850542051,14z
Counties: Wayne County, North Carolina

09/21/2021
Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-04644 3
Endangered Species Act Species
There is a total of 5 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesl, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
Birds
NAME
Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7614
Amphibians
NAME
STATUS
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772
Fishes
NAME
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus
There is final critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not available.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528
Endangered
STATUS
Threatened
STATUS
Endangered

09/21/2021
Event Code: 04EN2000-2021-E-04644 4
Clams
NAME
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. The location of the critical habitat is not
available.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164
Insects
NAME
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
STATUS
Proposed
Threatened
STATUS
Candidate
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.