20211433 Ver 1_Determination Request_20210924

Stream Origin/Buffer Applicability Determination
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk * below are required. You will not be able to submit the form until all
mandatory questions are answered.
Project Name:*
New Hope Road Development
Is this a transportation project?* f Yes r No
Is this request for a mitigation site?* f Yes No
What type of request is this?*
17 Buffer
r Isolated Wetland
Check all that apply.
r IP Stream Determination
r Stream
Owner Information
Name on the Recorded Deed:* Gray Tracy Harris
Responsible Party : (for LLC, Corporations, businness, agency, etc.)
Telephone Number: 919-906-5289
How would you like to received your determination?*
Email Address:* [e-mail]
Is there an agent or consultant responsible for the request?*
(
Attach agent authorization letter:*
Agent/Consultant Information
1200_001.pdf
21002269A_Agent Authorization
Form AI -Away 210923.pdf
FCF only
How would you like to receive your f USPS
determination letter?* C' Email
Name of Agent:*
Company Name:*
Email Address:*
Project Information
George Buchholz
Colliers Engineering and Design
george.buchholz@colliersengineeri
ng.com
Has anyone form DWR done a previous site visit?*
46.86KB
673.93KB

Date of Visit:
Nearest Highway/Street:* New Hope Road
Nearest Town:* Goldsboro
Nearest Named Stream:* Bear Creek
River Basin:* Neuse
County:*
Please attach a map of the site indicating project boundaries on the USGS 1:24,000 Topo.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach docurrent
Figure 1.pdf
Rif file type only
1.35MB
TOPO map look up: https://viewer.nationalmap.gov/basic/
Please attach a map of the site indicating project boundaries on the NRCS Soil Survey.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach docurrent
Figure 2.pdf 3.42MB
Rif file type only
Soil Survey Link: https://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/surveylist/soils/survey/state/?stateld=NC
Latitude and Longitude
Please provide the Latitude and Longitude for physical location for the determination that. If you have a
physical address you can look up the Latitude and Longitude by typing in an address or filling out the
information manually.
Choose below how you would like to provide this information.
r Address Lookup
f Manually
Latitude:
Longitude:
Misc attachments:
35.330340 N
-77.832781 W
21002269A DWR Buffer Determination
Request.pdf
pdf or lire file types only
8.13MB
By digitally signing below, I certify that:
o I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
o I agree that submission of this form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the
"Uniform Electronic Transactions Act")
o I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes

(the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
o I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written
signature; AND
o I intend to electronically sign and submit the "Determination Request' form."
Signature
Date Submitted:
Initial Review
....................................................
ID#* 20211433
Version* 1
Do you want to send for review?* C' Yes r No
Select Reviewer:* Robert Tankard:eads\rbtankard
Select Regional Office:* Washington Regional Office - [phone]
9/24/2021

DigiSign Verified: A3582F3C-A8C7-4CA1-B527-D863CD325D 1 F
2000 Regency Parkway
Suite 295
Cary North Carolina 27518
Main: 877 627 3772
PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION FORM
Name: Tracy Harris Gray
Colliers
gainimaisR
Engineering
& Design
Address: 507 Competition Rd, Raleigh NC 27603-1961
Phone: 919406'5289
Email: [e-mail]
Project Name/Description:
New Hope Road Development
Project Number: 21002269A
Date: 09-22-2021
Project Manager:
George Buchholz
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Attn: Emily Thompson
Washington Regulatory Field Office
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, NC 27587
Re: Property Owner Certification
Dear Ms. Thompson:
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
TomtG
Property Owner (please print) Property Owner Signature
Tracy Gray
09-22-2021
Date
Maser Consulting is now Colliers Engineering & Design
Accelerating success.

DigiSign Verified: 90411AB8-C6CD-46A0-9488-0A59013E29F0
2000 Regency Parkway
Suite 295
Cary North Carolina 27518
Main: 877 627 3772
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
Name: ZSGS, LLC (Attn: Souheil)
Colliers
Engineering
& Design
Address: 14201 Wyndfield Circle, Raleigh, NC 27615
Phone:
Email: [e-mail]
Project Name/Description:
Project Number:
Date:
New Hope Road Development
21002269A
Project Manager:
George Buchholz
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Attn: Emily Thompson
Washington Regulatory Field Office
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, NC 27587
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
Dear Ms. Thompson:
I, the undersigned, hereby designate and authorize Maser Consulting P.A to act in my behalf as my agent in the
processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request supplemental information in support of applications,
etc. from this day forward.
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for government officials
to enter the property when accompanied by Maser Consulting P.A. staff.
Souheil Al-Awar
Print Signature
09-23-2021
Date
Maser Consulting is now Colliers Engineering & Design
Accelerating success.

pm 38.`
•
,ocosin
Prepared For:
ZSGS, LLC
14201 Wyndfield Circle
Raleigh, NC 27615
Prepared By:
Raleigh Office
2000 Regency Parkway Ste 295
Cary, NC 27518
T:919.439.8461 Engineering
www.col I lersengineering.cam & Design
Colliers
0 1,000 2,000 4,000
Feet
Project Location
ooppyr g' 2 13 National
Project Location Map
Goldsboro, Wayne County, North Carolina
New Hope Road Development
Date:
6/10/2021
Project #:
21002269A
Drawn By:
AAP
Figure 1
Project Location

epared For
ZSGS, LLC
14201 Wyndfield Circle
Raleigh, NC 27615
Prepared By
Raleigh Office
2000 Regency Parkway Ste 295
Cary, NC 27518
T 919 439 8461 Engineering
www col liersengineenng corn & Design
Colliers
Project Location
GA
New Hope Road Development
Goldsboro, Wayne County, North Carolina
6/10/2021
21002269A
AAP
0 250 500 1,000
Feet
Figure 2

2000 Regency Parkway Suite 295 Cary North Carolina 27518
Main: 877 627 3772
September 24, 2021
Mr. Josh Brigham
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
New Hope Road Development
Buffer Determination Request
Colliers Engineering & Design Project No. 21002269A
Dear Tim,
Colliers
Engineering
& Design
On June 8th and 9th, 2021, Colliers Engineering & Design (CED) conducted field delineations for the New Hope
Road Development located off New Hope Road within Wayne County, North Carolina (hereinafter described as
"Subject Property"). The Subject Property is approximately 150 acres and comprised of the following three (3)
Wayne County Parcel Numbers: 3547669929, 3547768373, 3547788070. The Subject Property is located at
latitudinal coordinates 35.330340 N and longitudinal coordinates -77.832781 W. The Subject Property is located
along New Hope Road and is divided by the road into a northern and southern section. This Neuse River Riparian
Buffer Determination Request is required as part of environmental due diligence investigations at the Subject
Property for the location of a potential residential development.
Attached is a Wetland Delineation Report (dated June 16, 2021). Surface waters were delineated on the Subject
Property based upon the methodology in the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NC DWR) Methodology
for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Stream and Their Origins (Version 4.11) and are detailed in the
attached report.
At this time, we are requesting a Neuse River Riparian Buffer Determination for the Sullivan Properties Project.
If you should have any comments, questions, or concerns; please feel free to contact me at
[e-mail] or at 919-475-3874.
Sincerely,
Colliers Engineering & Design
George Buchholz, REM, PWS
Project Manager
R:\Projects\2021\21002269A\Reports\Ecological\jD Request\DWR Buffer Determination Request
Maser Consulting is now Colliers Engineering & Design
Accelerating success.

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
S. ❑ANIELSMITH
Director
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
Date Received
DWR Use Only: Project #
Buffer Determination Request Form
Property Owner Information
1. Owner Information
la. Name(s) on Recorded Deed
Gray Tracy Harris
lb. Responsible Party (for LLC)
lc Mailing Address
507 Competition Road, Raleigh, NC 27603-1967
ld. Telephone Number
919-906-5289
le. Email Address
[e-mail]
Address of Property: latitudinal coordinates 35.330340 N and longitudinal coordinates -77.832781 W
Project Description (attach plan if available): environmental due diligence investigations at the Subject Property for the location of a potential
residential development
Consultant/Agent Information
4. Agent/Consultant Information
4a. Name, Company
George Buchholz
4b. Mailing address
2000 Regency Parkway, Suite 295 Cary, NC 27518
4c. Telephone no.
919-475-3874
4d. Email address
George.buchholz@colliersengineering
.com
5. Project and Site Information
5a. Name of project
New Hope Road Development
5b. County
Wayne
5c. Nearest Named Stream
Bear Creek
5d. River Basin
Neuse
6. Has anyone from DWR visited the site?
Y / N
Staff Name
Date of Visit?
Attach a map of the site indicating project boundaries on the USGS 1:24,000 Topo and/or NRCS Soil Survey.
—
Please return form Josh Brigham
to: 1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
Email: [e-mail]
Please contact the Raleigh Regional Office at [phone] if you have any questions.
NOR". CAPC1—INA
bepanmenL m Ernimnmenlai uuai M
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of water Resources
Raleigh Regional Office 13800 Barrett Drive I Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
919.791.4200

DigiSign Verified: 90411AB8-C6CD-46A0-9488-0A59013E29F0
2000 Regency Parkway
Suite 295
Cary North Carolina 27518
Main: 877 627 3772
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
Name: ZSGS, LLC (Attn: Souheil)
Colliers
Engineering
& Design
Address: 14201 Wyndfield Circle, Raleigh, NC 27615
Phone:
Email: [e-mail]
Project Name/Description:
Project Number:
Date:
New Hope Road Development
21002269A
Project Manager:
George Buchholz
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Attn: Emily Thompson
Washington Regulatory Field Office
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, NC 27587
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
Dear Ms. Thompson:
I, the undersigned, hereby designate and authorize Maser Consulting P.A to act in my behalf as my agent in the
processing of permit applications, to furnish upon request supplemental information in support of applications,
etc. from this day forward.
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for government officials
to enter the property when accompanied by Maser Consulting P.A. staff.
Souheil Al-Awar
Print Signature
09-23-2021
Date
Maser Consulting is now Colliers Engineering & Design
Accelerating success.

DigiSign Verified: A3582F3C-A8C7-4CA1-B527-D863CD325D 1 F
2000 Regency Parkway
Suite 295
Cary North Carolina 27518
Main: 877 627 3772
PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION FORM
Name: Tracy Harris Gray
Colliers
Engineering
& Design
Address: 507 Competition Rd, Raleigh NC 27603-1967
Phone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Project Name/Description:
Project Number:
Date: 09-22-2021
New Hope Road Development
21002269A
Project Manager:
George Buchholz
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Attn: Emily Thompson
Washington Regulatory Field Office
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, NC 27587
Re: Property Owner Certification
Dear Ms. Thompson:
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Tracy Gray TGam.
Property Owner (please print) Property Owner Signarure
09-22-2021
Date
Maser Consulting is now Colliers Engineering & Design
Accelerating success.

9/24/21, 9:23 AM
ConnectGlS Feature Report
41,C0 N N Ec HOSTI KTI
WAT MEr-OUNf f
Wayne
Printed September 24, 2021
See Below for Disclaimer
Streets
Local Roads
- Interstate
— US Routes
— NC Routes
Railroads
S)AFB Runway
DLblic Airports
Parcels
Previous Lot Lines
Lot -Line
— Parcel -Hook
it and Town
Extra Territorial Jurisdiction
0
County Borders
0
SiAFB Boundary
Surrourdirg Centerlines
Local Roads
- Interstate
— US Highway
— NC Highway
Regulated Ditches and Streams
Rivers and Lakes
https://wayne.connectgis.com/Download File.ashx?i=_ags_map5fe7dd703faa4cc781 b879dda730ef40x.htm&t=printid 1/2

9/24/21, 9:23 AM
ConnectGlS Feature Report
OBJECTID PIN
57952 3547669929
Co -Owner Name
Owner Address 3
Owner Zip
27603-1967
Owner Address 1
507 COMPETITION RD
Owner City Owner State
RALEIGH NC
Unit or Apt
Owner Name
GRAY TRACY HARRIS
Owner Address 2
Deed Date
1/1/1994 12:00:00 AM
REID Deed Book Deed Page
0023725 1094E 685
Sale Month Sale Year Sale Price
1 1994 0
Previous Deed Book Previous Deed Page Previous Sale Month
0094E 0685 1
Previous Sales Year Previous Sale Price Property Use
1994 0 50 - RURAL SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENCE
Record Source Property Address Legal Description
Owner 2798 NEW HOPE RD NEW HOPE RD
Acres Neighborhood Account Number
52.16 04904 697320
Township Code Building Value Outbuilding Value
04 18810 0
Land Value Total Market Value Total Assessed Value
209840 228650 63200
Vacant Or Improved Vacant or Improved 2 Calculated Acres
I I 53.78
Users of the GIS information/data contained in this web mapping application are hereby notified that the information was compiled from recorded deeds, plats and
other public records and data. Users are notified that the aforementioned public primary information sources should be consulted for verification of the data contained
n this information. The County of Wayne and the mapping companies or other entities assume no legal responsibility for the information contained herein. By accepting
this disclaimer you agree and understand the disclaimer.
https://wayne.connectgis.com/Download File.ashx?i=_ags_map5fe7dd703faa4cc781 b879dda730ef40x.htm&t=printid 2/2

9/24/21, 9:23 AM
ConnectGlS Feature Report
.CONNECTGIS
WEB H05TIkIG
Wayne
Printed September 24, 2021
See Below for Disclaimer
Streets
Local Roads
- Interstate
— U S Igo utes
— NC Routes
Railroads
SJAFB Runaway
Public Airports
Parcels
Previous Lot Lines
Lot -Line
— Parcel -Hoak
Cat and Town
fa
Ex_ra Territorial Jurisdiction
County Borders
SiAFB Boundary
Surrounding C:er:erlires
Local Rods
- Interstate
— US. Highway
— NC Highway
Regulated Ditches and Streams
Rivers and Lakes
https://wayne.connectgis.com/Download File.ashx?i=_ags_mapda2142e47bdb4ea98f250dadec4c8861 x.htm&t=printid 1/2

9/24/21, 9:23 AM
ConnectGlS Feature Report
OBJECTID PIN
45408 3547768373
Co -Owner Name
Owner Address 3
Owner Zip
27603-1967
Owner Address 1
507 COMPETITION RD
Owner City Owner State
RALEIGH NC
Unit or Apt
Owner Name
GRAY TRACY HARRIS
Owner Address 2
Deed Date
1/1/1994 12:00:00 AM
REID Deed Book Deed Page
0023744 1094E 685
Sale Month Sale Year Sale Price
1 1994 0
Previous Deed Book Previous Deed Page Previous Sale Month
0094E 0685 1
Previous Sales Year Previous Sale Price Property Use
1994 0 50 - RURAL SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENCE
Record Source Property Address Legal Description
Owner NEW HOPE RD NEW HOPE RD
Acres Neighborhood Account Number
25.28 04904 697320
Township Code Building Value Outbuilding Value
04 0 0
Land Value Total Market Value Total Assessed Value
73510 73510 9050
Vacant Or Improved Vacant or Improved 2 Calculated Acres
V 26.24
Users of the GIS information/data contained in this web mapping application are hereby notified that the information was compiled from recorded deeds, plats and
other public records and data. Users are notified that the aforementioned public primary information sources should be consulted for verification of the data contained
n this information. The County of Wayne and the mapping companies or other entities assume no legal responsibility for the information contained herein. By accepting
this disclaimer you agree and understand the disclaimer.
https://wayne.connectgis.com/DownloadFile.ashx?i=_ags_mapda2142e47bdb4ea98f250dadec4c8861x.htm&t=printid 2/2

9/24/21, 9:21 AM
ConnectGlS Feature Report
' : 522 Feet
Wayne
Printed September 24, 2021
See Below for Disclaimer
Streets
Local Roads
- Interstate
— US Routes
— PAC Routes.
Railroads
SJAFB Runway
1
Public Airports
Parcels
Previous Lot Lines
Lot -Line
— Parcel -Hook
City and Town
RAP
Extra
ppxt�Territorial Jurisdictior
County Borders
0
SJAFB Boundary
L t
Surrounding Centerlines
Local Roads
- Interstate
— LIS Highway
— NE Highway
Regulated Ditches and Streams
Rivers and Lakes
https://wayne.connectgis.com/DownloadFile.ashx?i=_ags_map045eb2fd5b8c4e4a987746901 da6ef61 x.htm&t=printid 1/2

9/24/21, 9:21 AM
ConnectGlS Feature Report
OBJECTID PIN
21204 3547788070
Co -Owner Name
Owner Address 3
Owner Zip
27603-1967
Owner Address 1
507 COMPETITION RD
Owner City Owner State
RALEIGH NC
Unit or Apt
Owner Name
GRAY TRACY HARRIS
Owner Address 2
Deed Date
1/1/1994 12:00:00 AM
REID Deed Book Deed Page
0023748 1094E 685
Sale Month Sale Year Sale Price
1 1994 0
Previous Deed Book Previous Deed Page Previous Sale Month
0094E 0685 1
Previous Sales Year Previous Sale Price Property Use
1994 0 50 - RURAL SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENCE
Record Source Property Address Legal Description
Owner NEW HOPE RD NEW HOPE RD
Acres Neighborhood Account Number
68.5 04904 697320
Township Code Building Value Outbuilding Value
04 0 0
Land Value Total Market Value Total Assessed Value
216080 216080 29450
Vacant Or Improved Vacant or Improved 2 Calculated Acres
V 69.91
Users of the GIS information/data contained in this web mapping application are hereby notified that the information was compiled from recorded deeds, plats and
other public records and data. Users are notified that the aforementioned public primary information sources should be consulted for verification of the data contained
n this information. The County of Wayne and the mapping companies or other entities assume no legal responsibility for the information contained herein. By accepting
this disclaimer you agree and understand the disclaimer.
https://wayne.connectgis.com/DownloadFile.ashx?i=_ags_map045eb2fd5b8c4e4a987746901 da6ef61 x.htm&t=printid 2/2

Wetland Delineation Report
New Hope Road Development
Colliers Engineering & Design Project Number: 21002269A
June 16, 2021
Prepared for: Prepared by:
ZSGS, LLC
14201 Wyndfield Circle
Raleigh, NC 27615
Colliers
Engineering
& Design
Colliers Engineering & Design, Inc. (DBA Maser Consulting)
2000 Regency Parkway
Suite 295
Cary, NC 27518
Main: 919-439-6082
Colliersengineering.com
Accelerating success.

Colliers
lil
Engineering
& Design
Table of contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
1.0 PROJECT INFORMATION 2
2.0 INTRODUCTION 3
3.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 4
4.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION 5
4.1 U.S. Geological Survey Map 5
4.2 Soil Survey 5
5.0 WETLAND & SURFACE WATER DELINEATION METHODOGY 7
6.0 WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER DELINEATION RESULTS 8
6.1 Wetland and Surface Water Summary 8
6.2 Vegetation 8
6.3 Soils 8
6.4 Hydrology 9
7.0 WETLAND DELINEATION CONCLUSION 10
8.0 REFERENCE 11
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A - FIGURES
APPENDIX B - DATA FORMS
APPENDIX C - USACE ANTECEDENT PRECIPITATION TOOL
APPENDIX D - PHOTOGRAPHS
Wetland Delineation Report I June 16, 2021

Colliers
Engineering
& Design
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On behalf of ZSGS LLC, Colliers Engineering & Design (CED) conducted field delineations for the New Hope Road
Development located off New Hope Road within Wayne County, North Carolina (hereinafter described as "Subject
Property"). The Subject Property is located at latitudinal coordinates 35.330340 N and longitudinal coordinates
-77.832781 W. The Subject Property is located along New Hope Road and is divided by the road into a northern
and southern section.
The Subject Property is approximately 150 acres in size and was investigated to identify potential jurisdictional
Waters of the U.S. (WOTUS) and wetlands subject to Federal or State regulatory jurisdiction. The delineation
methodologies developed by the USACE and the USEPA, as described in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual, Technical Report Y-87-1 and the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland
Delineation Manual: Atlantic Gulf Coastal Plain Region (Version 2.0) and the subsequently issued USACE regulatory
guidance regarding the identification of jurisdictional stream channels through the recognition of field indicators
of an ordinary high-water mark within drainage features (Environmental Laboratory, 1987; USACE 2012; USACE
2005) were utilized during our investigation. Surface waters were delineated based upon the methodology in the
North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NC DWR) Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Stream and Their Origins (Version 4.11). The location and size of jurisdictional areas delineated are
shown on the attached Figure 5 Waters of the U.S. Delineation Map (Appendix A).
Based on the field investigations, two (2) wetland features, four (4) stream features, and one (1) pond feature was
delineated within the Subject Property by CED on June 8th and 9th, 2021. A total of 1464 linear feet of perennial
(R3) stream, 631 linear feet of intermittent (R4) stream, 19.755 acres of wetland (PFO), and 0.225 acres of pond
(PUB) were delineated within the Subject Property. It is CED's professional opinion that the stream and wetland
features delineated on the Subject Property would be considered jurisdictional WOTUS since the southern section
drains to Mill Branch, while the northern section of the property above New Hope Road drains north east towards
the rail road and ultimately to an unnamed tributary that eventually drains into Bear Creek. The pond (PUB) is
not hydrologically connected to any ditches or streams and there is no direct discharge; and therefore, it is
considered excluded and not a jurisdictional WOTUS. The location and size of jurisdictional areas delineated are
shown on Figure 5. Wetland Determination Map (Appendix A).
Wetland Delineation Report I June 16, 2021 Page 1 111

Colliers
Engineering
& Design
1.0 PROJECT INFORMATION
Project Name
New Hope Road Development
Project Location
New Hope Road
Municipality
Goldsboro
County
Wayne
State
North Carolina
Latitude/Longitude
35.330340 N / -77.832781 W
Subject Property Size
+/- 150 acres
U.S.G.S. Quadrangle
La Grange, NC
Potential Jurisdictional
Waters of the U.S. (WOTUS)
and wetlands
Stream 1 (R4) = +/- 215 LF
Stream 2 (R4) = +/- 63 LF
Stream 3 (R4) = +/- 353 LF
Stream 4 (R3) = +/- 1464 LF
Wetland 1 (PFO) = +/- 14.616 AC
Wetland 2 (PFO) = +/- 5.139 AC
River Basin (HUC) & sub-
watershed
Neuse River Basin: 8 Digit HUC Code 03020202
Sub-watershed(s): Outlet Bear Creek sub -watershed
Nearest Stream
Mill Branch on Subject Property.
Bear Creek off subject property (northeast). Northern section of
property drains north east towards an unnamed tributary that
eventually drains into Bear Creek.
Navigable Water Nexus
The stream features delineated on the Subject Property would be
considered jurisdictional WOTUS and wetlands since the southern
section drains into Mill Branch; the northern section of property drains
north east towards an unnamed tributary that eventually drains into
Bear Creek.
Isolated Wetlands/Waters
Present (Yes/No)
Yes; Pond 1 (PUB) located on subject property south of New Hope Road.
The pond does not have an outlet and is not directly connected to a ditch
or stream.
Wetland Delineation Report I June 16, 2021 Page 2 111

Colliers
Engineering
& Design
2.0 INTRODUCTION
On behalf of ZSGS, LLC, Colliers Engineering & Design (CED) conducted field delineations for the New Hope Road
Development located off New Hope Road within Wayne County, North Carolina (hereinafter described as "Subject
Property"). The Subject Property is located at latitudinal coordinates 35.330340 N and longitudinal coordinates
-77.832781 W. The Subject Property is located along New Hope Road and is divided by the road into a northern
and southern section. Access to the Subject Property can be achieved from New Hope Road. The Subject
Property is bordered to the south and east by Highway 70 and residential homes, to the north by a railroad and
agricultural properties, and to the west by Highway 70. Mill Branch runs through the south of the Subject
Property.
The Subject Property was investigated to identify potential jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. (WOTUS) and wetlands
subject to Federal or State regulatory jurisdiction. According to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) regulations described in Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33
CFR Section 328.3 and 40 CFR Section 230.3) respectively, wetlands are "...areas that are inundated or saturated
with surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal
circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions." In
addition, CED determined each stream feature's applicability to the Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules.
Wetland Delineation Report I June 16, 2021 Page 3 111

Colliers
Engineering
& Design
3.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
The Subject Property is located within the Neuse River Basin (HUC 03020202), within the Outlet Bear Creek sub -
watershed. Access to the Subject Property can be achieved by New Hope Road. Mill Branch is located south and
within the southwestern section of the Subject Property. The northern section of the subject property, above New
Hope Road, drains north east across the railroad tracks towards an unnamed tributary; which ultimately drains
into Bear Creek. The Subject Property does not contain a floodway or floodplain according to FEMA Floodplain
Panel Map 3720354800K. The forested areas are comprised of a mixture of oak, pine, red maple, and sweetgum
species that dominate the canopy layer.
Wetland Delineation Report I June 16, 2021 Page 4 111

Colliers
Engineering
& Design
4.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Prior to on -site field investigations, several publicly available sources of information were reviewed to determine
the likelihood of wetlands and surface waters occurring within Subject Property. These mapping resources
generally include, but are not limited to, the United States Geological Survey (USGS) maps (Figure 1. Project
Location Map, Appendix A), the U.S. Department of Agriculture - Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS)
soils database (Figure 2. Soil Series Map, Appendix A), National Hydrography Dataset (NHD), and the U.S. Fish &
Wildlife Service National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) database (Figure 3. National Wetlands Inventory Map,
Appendix A).
4.1 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MAP
The Subject Property appears on the La Grange, North Carolina Quadrangle USGS Maps (Figure 1. Project
Location Map, Appendix A). The USGS map depicts the Subject Property located north and south of New Hope
Road. The USGS depicts a perennial stream (Mill Branch) located within the Subject Property to the south. The
southern section of the Subject Property drains south to Mill Branch, which ultimately drains into Bear Creek. A
railroad is located north of the Subject Property. The northern section of the Subject Property, above New Hope
Road, drains north east across the railroad tracks towards an unnamed tributary; which ultimately drains into
Bear Creek. Residential and agricultural areas are located within the vicinity of the Subject Property to the north
and east. The Subject Property is relatively flat, elevations at the Subject Property range from 0 to 100 feet above
mean sea level (MSL) based on the USGS map.
4.2 SOIL SURVEY
The NRCS Web Soil Survey depicts the following eleven (11) map units within the Subject Property and provides
a description of the properties and qualities of each soil:
• Bibb sandy loam, 2 to 10 percent slopes (Bb) - Poorly drained, low runoff, with a depth to water table
about 0 to 12 inches.
• Dragston loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes (Dr) - Somewhat poorly drained, very low runoff, with a
depth to water table about 12 to 30 inches.
• Goldsboro loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes (GoA), southern coastal plain - Moderately well drained,
depth to the water table about 24 to 36 inches.
• Kenansville loamy sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes (Ke) - Well drained, very low runoff, depth to the water
table more than 80 inches.
• Leon sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes (Ln) - Poorly drained, very high runoff, depth to the water table about
0 to 12 inches.
• Lynchburg sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes (Ly) - Somewhat poorly drained, depth to the water table
about 6 to 18 inches.
• Norfolk loamy sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes (NoA) - Well drained, depth to the water table about 40 to 72
inches.
• Rains sandy loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes (Ra) - Poorly drained, depth to the water table about 0 inches.
• Troup sand (Tr) - Somewhat excessively drained, very low runoff, depth to the water table more than 80
inches.
• Wagram loamy sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes (WaB) - Well drained, low runoff, depth to the water table
about 60 to 80 inches.
• Weston loamy sand (Woodington) (We) - Poorly drained, very low runoff, depth to the water table about
0 to 12 inches.
Wetland Delineation Report I June 16, 2021 Page 5 111

Colliers
Engineering
& Design
Of the eleven (11) map unit soils, five (5) of the soils are listed as being hydric, Bibb sandy loam (Bb), Leon sand
(Ln), Rains sandy loam (Ra), Wagram loamy sand (WaB), and Weston loamy sand (We); and are most likely to
contain wetlands primarily due to the shallow seasonal high-water table. In addition, the Soil Survey Map (Figure
2. Soil Series Map, Appendix A) shows one (1) perennial stream, Mill Branch, located within the Subject Property.
Wetland Delineation Report I June 16, 2021 Page 6 111

Colliers
Engineering
& Design
5.0 WETLAND &SURFACE WATER DELINEATION METHODOGY
The wetland delineation methodologies developed by the USACE and the USEPA, as described in the 1987 Corps
of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, Technical Report Y-87-1 and the Regional Supplement to the Corps of
Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Atlantic Gulf Coastal Plain Region (Version 2.0) and subsequently issued
USACE regulatory guidance regarding the identification of jurisdictional stream channels through the recognition
of field indicators of an ordinary high-water mark within drainage features (Environmental Laboratory, 1987;
USACE 2012; USACE 2005), were utilized during our investigation. These methodologies generally involve the
review of three parameters (vegetation, soils, hydrology) when making a wetland or non -wetland determination.
Surface waters were also delineated based upon The North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NC DWR)
Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Stream and Their Origins (Version 4.11).
The Subject Property was walked, community types were characterized, and wetland and surface water
boundaries were flagged. Sample stations were established along the boundaries to examine vegetation, soils,
and hydrology. Using this data, boundaries were established based on changes in vegetation, soils, hydrology,
and surface water characteristics.
Wetland Delineation Report I June 16, 2021 Page 7 111

Colliers
Engineering
& Design
6.0 WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER DELINEATION RESULTS
6.1 WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER SUMMARY
On -site field investigations of the Subject Property were conducted by CED on June 8th and 9th, 2021. The on -site
delineation did verify the presence of surface waters within Subject Property. A summary of the aquatic
resources identified within the Subject Property is provided below in Table 1: Aquatic Resource Summary. The
location and size of the aquatic resources delineated are shown on Figure 5: Wetland Delineation Map (Appendix
A).
Table 1: Aquatic Resource Area Summary Table
Aquatic
Resource
PFO Area (AC)
Aquatic
Resource
PUB Area
(AC)
Aquatic
Resource
R3 Length
(LF)
R4 Length
(LF)
Wetland 1
14.616
Pond 1
0.225
Stream 1
215
Wetland 2
5.139
Stream 2
63
Stream 3
353
Stream 4
1464
Total
Wetlands
(AC)
19.755
Total
Pond (AC)
L.
Total
Stream by
Class (LF)
1464
',21
Total
Stream
(LF)
2095
Note 1: Cowardin Classification; PFO = palustrine forested wetland; PUB = palustrine unconsolidated bottom (pond), R3 =
perennial stream, R4 = intermittent stream
6.2 VEGETATION
Representative plant species within the wetland areas include the following: red maple (Acer rubrum), water oak
(Quercus nigra), red bay (Persea borbonia), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), netted chainfern (Woodwardia
areolata), cinnamon fern (Osmundastrum cinnamomea), common greenbrier (Smilax rotundifolia), and giant
cane (Arundinaria gigantea).
Representative plant species within the upland areas include the following: sweetgum, pine (Pinus tadea), red
maple, American holly (Ilex opaca), muscadine (Vitus rotundifolia), Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia),
common greenbrier.
6.3 SOILS
Hydric soils are defined as soils that formed under conditions of saturation, flooding, or ponding long enough
during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part of the soil (USDA 2003). The soils
in the wetland areas were variable, but for the most part, exhibited low chroma matrices with redoximorphic
features. Soils within the wetland areas on -site exhibit low chroma matrix colors and concentrations that are
characteristic of reducing anaerobic conditions associated within the formation of hydric soils. Wetland soils are
typically very dark gray (10YR 4/1), dark grayish brown (10YR 4/2) and gray (10YR 5/1) within the upper 16 inches.
Jurisdictional soils are generally underlain by gray (10YR 6/1) below 16 inches. Redox concentrations greater than
3% were observed between 0 and 16 inches below soil surface and are typically gray (10YR 6/1). Soils within
jurisdictional areas meet the F3 Depleted Matrix hydric soil indicator. Textures within the jurisdictional areas
Wetland Delineation Report I June 16, 2021 Page 8 111

Colliers
Engineering
& Design
include sandy loam, loamy sand, and sand. The upland soils within each area varied from brown (10YR 5/3) to
yellowish brown (10YR 5/4) within the upper 16 inches. Soil textures include sandy loam and sand.
6.4 HYDROLOGY
On -site field investigations of the Subject Property were conducted by CED on June 8th and 9th, 2021. The USACE
Antecedent Precipitation Tool (APT) was utilized for the Subject Property and is provided Appendix C. Based the
USACE APT tool, the on -site field investigations were conducted in "Normal" precipitation conditions with a 30-
day rolling total.
The delineated wetlands exhibited primary and secondary indicators of wetland hydrology. Positive indicators of
wetland hydrology on the property included the following: surface water (A1), high water table (A2), saturation
(A3), water -stained leaves (B9), and oxidized rhizospheres on living roots (C3). Secondary indicators include
drainage patterns (B10), and the FAC-neutral test (D5). Indicators of wetland hydrology are largely absent in
upland areas.
Wetland Delineation Report I June 16, 2021 Page 9 111

Colliers
Engineering
& Design
7.0 WETLAND DELINEATION CONCLUSION
Four (4) stream features, two (2) wetland features, and one (1) pond were delineated within the Subject Property
by CED on June 8th and 9th, 2021. A total of 1464 linear feet of perennial (R3) stream, 631 linear feet of intermittent
(R4) stream, 19.755 acres of wetland (PFO), and 0.225 acres of pond (PUB) were delineated within the Subject
Property. Field investigations were conducted in accordance with the manuals, methodologies, and regulatory
guidance procedures as stated in Section 5.0 Wetland and Surface Water Delineation Methodology.
It is CED's professional opinion that the stream features 4 and 3 and wetland 2 would be considered jurisdictional
WOTUS because they are hydrologically connected to Mill Branch. Stream features 1 and 2 and wetland 1 would
be considered jurisdictional WOTUS because they drain north east towards an unnamed tributary that eventually
drains into Bear Creek. The pond (PUB) is not hydrologically connected to any ditches or streams and there is no
direct discharge; and therefore, it is considered excluded and not a jurisdictional WOTUS. The location and size
of jurisdictional areas delineated are shown on Figure 5. Wetland Determination Map (Appendix A).
Wetland Delineation Report I June 16, 2021 Page 10 111

Colliers
Engineering
& Design
8.0 REFERENCE
Cowardin, L. M., V. Carter, F. C. Golet, and E. T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats
of the United States. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C.
Environmental Laboratory. 1987. "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual" Technical Report Y-87-1. US
Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss.
Environmental Laboratory. 2012. "Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual:
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region (Version 2.0)". Technical Report ERDC/EL TR-09-19. US Army
Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, Miss.
Federal Interagency Committee for Wetland Delineation. 1989. Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineation
Jurisdictional Wetlands. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, and U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service, Washington D.C. Cooperative technical
publication. 76 pp. plus appendices.
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 2019. Flood Map Service Center. https://msc.fema.gov/portal.
National List of Hydric Soils 2010, United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resource Conservation
Service, https://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/main/soils/use/hydric/
North Carolina - Division of Water Resources. 2010. Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial
Stream and Their Origins, Version 4.11.
United States Department of Agriculture. Natural Resources Conservation Service
http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/HomePage.htm
United States Fish and Wildlife Service. National Wetlands Inventory
http://www.fws.gov/nwi/Overview.html
USDA, NRCS. 2003. Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States, Version 5.01, G.W. Hurt, P.M. Whited, and
R.F. Pringle (eds.). USDA, NRCS in cooperation with the National technical Committee for Hydric Soils,
Fort Worth, TX.
Wetland Delineation Report I June 16, 2021 Page 11 111

APPENDIX A
FIGURES
Wetland Delineation Report 1 June 16, 2021
Colliers
lil
Engineering
& Design

Prepared For:
ZSGS, LLC
14201 Wyndfield Circle
Raleigh, NC 27615
Prepared By:
Raleigh Office
2000 Regency Parkway Ste 295
Cary, NC 27518
T:919.439.8461 Engineering
www.colliersengineering.cam & Design
Colliers
1,000 2,000 4,000
Feet
Project Location
opyrig t:© 2013 National eographic Society, i-cubed
Project Location Map
Goldsboro, Wayne County, North Carolina
New Hope Road Development
Figure 1
Project Location

epared For
ZSGS, LLC
14201 Wyndfield Circle
Raleigh, NC 27615
Prepared By
Raleigh Office
2000 Regency Parkway Ste 295
Cary, NC 27518
T 919 439 8461 Engineering
www col liersengineenng con, & Design
Project Location
GA
New Hope Road Development
Goldsboro, Wayne County, North Carolina
6/10/2021
21002269A
AAP
0 250 500 1,000
Feet
Maxar, Microso;
Figure 2

epa
ed For
ZSGS, LLC
14201 Wyndfield Circle
Raleigh, NC 27615
Prepared By:
Raleigh Office
2000 Regency Parkway Ste 295
Cary, NC 27518
r:919.439.8461 Engineering
www.col liersengineering.con, & Design
GA
Streams
Waterbody
100 Year Floodzone
i NWI
Soils
Project Location
Bbhy`GoA
WaB'
NoB Ly
WaB
Environmental Data Resource Map
New Hope Road Development
Goldsboro, Wayne County, North Carolina
Date:
6/10/2021
MC Project #:
21002269A
Drawn By:
AAP
0 375 750
Na
GoA
Nb
Nb
1,500
Feet
Maxar, M
Figure 3

Prepared For:
ZSGS, LLC
14201 Wyndfield Circle
Raleigh, NC 27615
Prepared By:
Raleigh Office
2000 Regency Parkway Ste 295
Cary, NC 27518
T:919.439.8461 Engineering
www.col liersengineering.con, & Design
Colliers
- 1 ft Contours
Q Project Location
Lidar and Contours Map
New Hope Road Development
Goldsboro, Wayne County, North Carolina
Date:
6/10/2021
MC Project #:
21002269A
Drawn By:
AAP
Figure 4

Aquatic Resource Summary Table
Aquatic Resource
Wetland 1
Wetland 2
Total Wetland
(AC)
PFO Area
(AC)
14.616
19.755
Aquatic
Resource
Pond 1
Total Pond
(AC)
PUB Area
(AC)
Aquatic Resource
Stream 1
Stream 2
Stream 3
Stream 4
Total Stream by
Class (LF)
Total Stream (LF)
R3 Length
(LF)
R4 Length
(LF)
215
63
353
Note 1: Cowardin Classification; PFO = palustrin forested wetland, PUB = Pond, R3 = perennial stream, R4 =
intermittent stream,
Prepared For:
ZSGS, LLC
14201 Wyndfield Circle
Raleigh, NC 27615
Prepared By:
Raleigh Office
2000 Regency Parkway Ste 295
Cary, NC 27518
T:919.439.8461 Engineering
www.col liersengineering.con, & Design
Colliers
Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD)
Culverts
• Data Points
--- Intermittent Stream
Perennial Stream
• 50 FT Neuse River Buffer
Pond
Wetlands (PFO)
Q Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD)
Q Project Location
Wetland Delineation Map
New Hope Road Development
Goldsboro, Wayne County, North Carolina
Date: I MC Project #: I Drawn By:
6/14/2021 21002269A AAP
500
1,000
Feet
Figure 5

Aquatic Resource Summary Table
ti►
Aquatic Resource
PFO Area
(AC)
Aquatic
Resource
PUB Area
(AC)
Aquatic Resource
R3 Length
(LF)
R4 Length
(LF)
-'
Wetland 1
14.616
Pond 1
0.225
Stream 1
215
Wetland 2
5.139
Stream 2
63
353
lry, is
LIV..}
i` "Ike
- "'IF
"
...t..`
�t
Stream 3
Stream 4
1464
Total Wetland
(AC)
19.755
Total Pond
(AC)
0.225
Total Stream by
Class (LF)
1464
631
'
y— �4
Total Stream (LF)
2095
Note 1: Cowardin Classification; PFO = palustrin forested wetland, PUB = Pond, R3 = perennial stream, R4 =
ntermittent stream,
epa
ed For
ZSGS, LLC
14201 Wyndfield Circle
Raleigh, NC 27615
Prepared By:
Raleigh Office
2000 Regency Parkway Ste 295
Cary, NC 27518
T:919.439.8461 Engineering
www.col liersengineering.con, & Design
GA
Potential Non -Wetland Waters of the
US; Intermittent Stream 2; +/- 63 FT
Potential Waters of the US; Wetland 1;
PFO; +/- 14.616 AC
® Culverts
• Data Points
--- Intermittent Stream
Perennial Stream
50 FT Neuse River Buffer
Pond
Wetlands (PFO)
Q Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD)
Q Project Location
Potential Non -Wetland Waters of the US;
Intermittent Stream 1; +/- 215 FT
Data Point 8
Wetland Delineation Map
New Hope Road Development
Goldsboro, Wayne County, North Carolina
6/14/2021
MC Project #:
21002269A
Drawn By:
AAP
Data Point 7
0 112.5 225 450
Feet
s3 r, [iUufi0t
1
Figure 5A

Aquatic Resource Summary Table
Aquatic Resource
PFO Area
(AC)
Aquatic
Resource
PUB Area
(AC)
Aquatic Resource
R3 Length
(LF)
R4 Length
(LF)
Pond 1: +/- 0.225 AC
Wetland 1
14.616
Pond 1
0.225
Stream 1
215
rt .y
-..;7a..,,
Wetland 2
5.139
Stream 2
63
Stream 3
353
_
'
'mow — ..
-�
••,
.tid'
Stream 4
1464
Total Wetland
(AC)
19.755
Total Pond
(AC)
0.225
Total Stream by
Class (LF)
1464
631
ti
_ .
. -
Total Stream (LF)
2095
Note 1: Cowardin Classification; PFO = palustrin forested wetland, PUB = Pond, R3 = perennial stream, R4 =
ntermittent stream,
Prepa
ed For
Potential Non -Wetland Waters of the
US; Perennial Stream 4; +/- 1464 FT
ZSGS, LLC
14201 Wyndfield Circle
Raleigh, NC 27615
Prepared By:
Raleigh Office
2000 Regency Parkway Ste 295
Cary, NC 27518
T:919.439.8461 Engineering
www.col liersengineering.con, & Design
Colliers
GA
Potential Waters of the US; Wetland 2;
PFO; +/- 5.139 AC
® Culverts
• Data Points
--- Intermittent Stream
Perennial Stream
• 50 FT Neuse River Buffer
Pond
Wetlands (PFO)
Q Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD)
Q Project Location
Data Point 4
Wetland Delineation Map
New Hope Road Development
Goldsboro, Wayne County, North Carolina
Date:
6/14/2021
MC Project #:
21002269A
Drawn By:
AAP
Data Point 1
0 112.5 225
Potential Non -Wetland Waters of the
US; Intermittent Stream 3; +/- 353 FT
Data Point 2
Data Point 5
450
Feet
Data Point 3
Data Point 6
� 5s3I.2124
Figure 5B

APPENDIX B
DATA FORMS
Wetland Delineation Report 1 June 16, 2021
Colliers
lil
Engineering
& Design

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: New Hope Road Development
Applicant/Owner: ZSGS LLC
Investigator(s): GB & TD
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): toe of slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR P
Soil Map Unit Name: Wagram loamy sand
City/County: Wayne County Sampling Date: 6/8/2021
State: _NC Sampling Point: DP1
Section, Township, Range: Goldsboro
Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%):
Lat: 35.330340 Long -77.832781 Datum: NAD 83
NWI classification
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology
No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling poi
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
Yes x No
Yes No x
Yes No x
nt locations, transects, important features, etc.
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (rriinuuurn of one is required; check all that apply)
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
❑�—i Saturation (A3)
LJ Water Marks (B1)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Water Table Present?
Saturation Present?
(Includes capillary fringe)
0
0
0
0
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Yes No X Depth (inches):
Yes No X Depth (inches):
Yes No X Depth (inches):
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (66)
❑, Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
• Shallow Aquitard (D3)
• FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
• Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well. aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30
1 Quercus nigra
2. Oxydendrum arboreum
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
10 Yes FAC
20 Yes FACU
Acer rubrum
20 Yes FAC
8.
50 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 25 20% of total cover: 10
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
1 Acer rubrum
5 No FAC
2. Oxydendrum arboreum
15 Yes FACU
3 Ilex opaca
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Hprh ntrpfilm 1PInf s , ' 5
15 Yes FAC
35 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 18 20% of total cover: 7
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Vitis rotundifolia
10 Yes FAC
Lonicera japonica
10 Yes FACU
Gelsemium sempervirens
10 Yes FAC
30 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 15 _ 20% of total cover: 6
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 5
1 Smilax rotundifolia
2.
3.
4.
5.
10 Yes FAC
10 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
Remarks: (It observed. list morphological adaptations below)
Sampling Point: DP1
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
10 (B)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 60.00% (A /B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
x 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indlcators of hycfric soli r ct wetland nydromy must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3 28 ft (1 m) tall
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes x No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP1
rrouie uescnpuon: tuescnoe to me oeptn neeaea to aocument the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist)
0-8 10YR 5/1
0/0
100
8-16 10YR 5/2 100
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2
Texture Remarks
SL sandy
SL sandy
`Type: C=Concenlralion. D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
2Location: PL=Pare Lining. M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
❑ Histosol (Al)
0Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
f —[ Stratified Layers (A5)
LFJ9 Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
O 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) ❑
O Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) r]
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
El Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) ❑
[J Thick Dark Surface (Al2) 1:
BCoast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S)
9 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑
❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
unless otherwise noted.)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
Delta OchrickF17) (MLRA 151)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
71 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
� 1Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_i i Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
0 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
(MLRA 153B)
❑ -I T Red Parent Material (TF2)
u Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unlccss d+salrbed or prablemac
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site:New Hope Road Development
Applicant/Owner: ZSGS LLC
Investigator(s): GB & TD
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc) toe of slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR P
Soil Map Unit Name: Wagram loamy sand
City/County: Wayne County Sampling Date: 6/8/2021
State: NC Sampling Point: DP2
Section, Township, Range Goldsboro
Local relief (concave, convex, none) concave
Lat: 35.330340 Long: -77.832781
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
No
NWI classification:
Slope (%):
Datum: NAD 83
(If no, explain in Remarks )
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary tridlcators (minimum of one Is required: e
❑r Surface Water (A1)
LJ High Water Table (A2)
❑_ Saturation (A3)
❑ Water Marks (B1)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3)
❑. Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Water Table Present?
Saturation Present?
Sincludes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
fleck all that apply)
Yes No
Aquatic Fauna (813)
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Yes No X
Yes No X
Yes No X
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required).
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
El Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
• Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
• Shallow Aquitard (D3)
• FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
El Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DP2
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30 ) % Cover Species? Status
1 Quercus nigra 10 No FAC
2 Prunus serotina 10 No FACU
3 Acer rubrum 15 Yes FAC
4 Pinus taeda 25 Yes FAC
5.
6
7.
8
60 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 30 20% of total cover: 12
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
1 • Carya tomentosa
15 Yes FAC
2 Oxydendrum arboreum
3.
4.
5.
6.
7
8.
15 Yes FACU
Herb Stratum (DIM 5
30 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover: 6
1 Vitis rotundifolia 5 Yes FAC
2. Lonicera japonica 5 Yes FACU
3 Gelsemium sempervirens 5 Yes FAC
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
15 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 8 20% of total cover: 3
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1 Smilax rotundifolia 10 Yes FAC
2.
3
4.
5.
10 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 10 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC. 60.00% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
x 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is S3 01
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3 28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes x
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP2
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist)
0-8 10YR 5/3
ova
100
Redox Features
Color (moist)
8-16 10YR 5/4 100
OA
Type
Loc Texture Remarks
SL sandy
SL sandy
'Type C=Concentration D=Depiction, RM=Reduced Matrix. MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore L,nEriq, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
• Histosol (Al)
HHistic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) �]
El
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) 11
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (81) (LRR 0, S) _
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
HSandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
• Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
HThin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
ElDepleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
,❑ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches).
Remarks:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
CItt 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
ill Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
11 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
(MLRA 153B)
T❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
u Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
D Other (Explain in Remarks)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed Dr proh;i rnat:r.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No x
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site New Hope Road Development City/County: Wayne County
Sampling Date: 6/8/2021
Applicant/Owner: ZSGS LLC State: NC
Sampling Point: DP3
Investigator(s): GB & TD Section, Township, Range: Goldsboro
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.)' toe of slope Local relief (concave, convex, none). concave Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR P
Soil Map Unit Name: Dragston loamy sand
Lat: 35.330340
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
No
Long -77.832781 _ Datum: NAD 83
NWI classification
(If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
Yes x No
Yes — No X
Yes No X
HYDROLOGY
Is the Sampled Area
[within a Wetland?
Yes
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑t Surface Water (A1)
LJ High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
❑_ Water Marks (B1)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
El
0
0
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
M Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
▪ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
• FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
(includes cap3IIary fringe)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available.
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size
Acer rubrum
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7
8.
Pinus tadea
30
Sampling Point: DP3
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
20 Yes FAC
20
Ilex opaca
15
Yes
FAC
Yes
50% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
Acer rubrum
FAC
55 = Total Cover
28 20% of total cover: 11
10
Yes
Liquidambar styraciflua
Ilex opaca
5
10
Yes
Yes
FAC
FAC
FAC
50% of total cover: 13
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5
Gelsemium sempervirens
2. Osumundastrum cinnamomeum
25 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 5
5 Yes FAC
5 Yes FACW
3 Parthenocissus quinquefolia
5 Yes FACU
4
5
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
15 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 8 20% of total cover: 3
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size. 5
1 Smilax rotundifolia
2.
3.
4.
5.
5
Yes FAC
5 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 3 20% of total cover: 1
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 9 (A)
10 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 90 00% (NB)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
x 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53 0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes x No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP3
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist)
0-8 10YR 5/1 100
8-16 10YR 5/2 100
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Tvne' Loc.
Texture Remarks
SL sandy
SL sandy
'Type: C=Concentration, D Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
• Histosol (Al)
B
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
unless otherwise noted.)
�] Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
D Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
9 Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sons':
❑-I 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
LJ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
11 Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
(MLRA 153B)
T�-I Red Parent Material (TF2)
u Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
IDOther (Explain in Remarks)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (a1).(LRRO..S)._ I)PItanchric.(Fi7).(MLRA.151).
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) 0 Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problemalrc.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: New Hope Road Development
Applicant/Owner: ZSGS LLC
Investigator(s) GB & TD
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc) toe of slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA). LRR P
Lat: 35.330340
City/County: Wayne County Sampling Date: 6/8/2021
State: NC Sampling Point: DP4
Section, Township, Range: Goldsboro
Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%):
Long: -77.832781 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Rains sandy loam NWI classification
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks )
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks
Data point 5 represents Wetland 2.
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (rrfininiurn of one is reaulretl: check all that apply)
0 Surface Water (A1)
Q High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
0 Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
✓❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Yes X
No
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Q Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
1❑f-Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
LJ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two rggulred)
0
o
❑✓
Surface Soil Cracks-(U6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 1
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): surface
includes ca•ilia frin.e
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Standing water within 10 feet of data point.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP4
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30
1 Acer rubrum
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
30 Yes FAC
2 Liquidambar styraciflua
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
30 Yes FAC
60 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 30 20% of total cover: 12
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
1. Acer rubrum 5 Yes FAC
2. Liquidambar styraciflua 5 Yes FAC
3 Persea borbonia
2 No FACW
4 Vaccinium corybosum 5 Yes FACW
5.
6.
7.
Herb Stratum (Piot size: 5
Woodwardia areolata
17 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 9 20% of total cover: 4
}
10 Yes OBL
2 Osumundastrum cinnamomeum
10 Yes FACW
3 Arundinaria gigantea
4
5
6
7
8
9.
10.
11
12.
10 Yes FACW
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size
30 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover: 6
30 _ )
1 Smilax rotundifolia 5 Yes FAC
2. Vitis rotundifolia 5 Yes FAC
3.
4.
10 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
10
11
90 90% (NB)
(B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3 28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes X No
R
emarks. (If obDCi VCu, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

Histosol (Al)
EHistic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
f Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) ❑
❑ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) ❑
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
SOIL
Sampling Point: DP4
rronre uescnpuon: tuescnoe to the aeptn neeaea ro aacument the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist)
0-4 10YR 4/2
100
Redox Fealures
Color (moist) % Tyne' Locz
4-10 10YR 5/1 100
10-16 10YR 6/1 100
1-r
ype: , D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS -Masked -and Grains,
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
Della ()chrrc (F17) (MLRA 151)
Reduced Vedic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Texture Remarks
SL sandy
SL sandy
SL sandy
2Location. i-L=yore i..+rring. M=matrix.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
0 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
111 R• educed Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
u P• iedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
(MLRA 153B)
T❑-I Red Parent Material (TF2)
u Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
ElOther (Explain in Remarks)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

Surface Water (A1)
7--rr High Water Table (A2)
E
Saturation (A3)
LJ Water Marks (B1)
BSediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Water Table Present?
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site New Hope Road Development
Applicant/Owner: ZSGS LLC
Investigator(s): GB & TD
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P
Soil Map Unit Name: Bibb sandy loam
City/County: Wayne County Sampling Date: 6/8/2021
State: NC Sampling Point: DP5
Section, Township, Range: Goldsboro
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope (%):
Lat: 35.330350 _ Long: -77.833681 Datum: NAD 83
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil , or Hydrology
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
NWI classification:
(If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
Yes x
Yes
Yes
No
No X
No X
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Yes
Primary Indicators (minimum of one Is required. check all that apply)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Q Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Q Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Q Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Q Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
0 Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B6)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
ShallowAquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Yes No X Depth (inches):
Yes No X Depth (inches):
Yes No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well. aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30
1 Acer rubrum
2 Pinus tadea
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
20 Yes FAC
20 Yes FAC
3 Ilex opaca
15 Yes FAC
4
5.
6.
7
8
55 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 28 20% of total cover: 11
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size
1. Acer rubrum
15
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
3 Ilex opaca
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
10 Yes FAC
5
Yes FAC
10 Yes FAC
'Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5
25 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 13 20% of total cover: 5
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Gelsemium sempervirens
Osumundastrum cinnamomeum
5
Yes FAC
5 Yes FACW
Parthenocissus quinquefolia
5
Yes FACU
15 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 8 20% of total cover: 3
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size
1 Smilax rotundifolia 5 Yes FAC
2.
3.
4.
5.
5 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 3 20% of total cover: 1
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Sampling Point: DP5
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 9 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 10 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 90 00% (NB)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
FACU species
UPL species
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Multiply by:
x 1 =
x2=
x3=
: 4
x5=
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
x 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53 0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes x No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP5
rrome uescription: tuescrloe to the +tiepin needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist)
0-8 10YR 5/1
100
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Tyne'
8-16 10YR 5/2 100
Loc2
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Texture Remarks
SL sandy
SL sandy
2Location: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
• Histosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
�] Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) ]J Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) El
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) ❑
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) ❑
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) El
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
ECoast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) El
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
Delia Ochric(F17) (MLRA 161)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
I:1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑ R• educed Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
ill P• iedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
E Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
(MLRA 153B)
T❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
u V• ery Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or orobiematin
❑ H
Reduced Vedic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks'
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
x
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site. New Hope Road Development
Applicant/Owner: ZSGS LLC
Investigator(s) GB & TD
City/County: Wayne County
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR P
Soil Map Unit Name: Bibb sandy loam
State: NC
Sampling Date: 6/8/2021
Sampling Point: DP6
Section, Township, Range: Goldsboro
Local relief (concave, convex, none) convex Slope (%):
Lat: 35_330340 Long: -77.832781 Datum: NAD 83
NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes x No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No x
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No x
Remarks:
Is the Sampled Area
11 within a Wetland? Yes No
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Pnmary indicators of one Is required: check all that appiv)
El Surface Water (A1)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
_❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Water Marks (B1)
O Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
ID Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Water Table Present?
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Q Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Yes No X Depth (inches):
Yes No X Depth (inches):
Yes No X Depth (inches):
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two requiredl
El Surface Salt Cracks (8 )
a
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7
8.
Liquidambar styraciflua
Pinus tadea
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
10 Yes FAC
30 Yes FAC
40 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20 20% of total cover: 8
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
1.
2.
3
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Acer rubrum
10 Yes FAC
Liquidambar styraciflua
10 Yes FAC
Ilex opaca
15 Yes FAC
35 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 18 20% of total cover: 7
F'itli Li 1 Ili I (ri1/{ bi{et.
1 Smilax rotundifolia
5
Yes
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9
10
11.
12.
FAC
5 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 3 20% of total cover: 1
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
1 Vitis rotundifolia
2.
3.
4.
5.
5
Yes FAC
5 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 3 20% of total cover: 1
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Sampling Point: DP6
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 7 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC. 100.00% (NB)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
x 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 53 01
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric sail and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP6
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvpe' Locl Texture
0-8 10YR 6/2 100
8-16 10YR 6/3 100
Remarks
SL sandy
SL sandy
'Type. C=Concentralion, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix. MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2LocatIon PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
n Histosol (Al) 9 Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
Histic Epipedon (A2) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
HStratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
aDepleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
Delta Ochrc (F17) (NILRA 151)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (SI) (LRR Q, 5)
0 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
D Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
E
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
E 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
.E 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
11 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
11 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
(MLRA 153B)
T❑i Red Parent Material (TF2)
L.f Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
x
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site:New Hope Road Development
Applicant/Owner: ZSGS LLC
City/County: Wayne County
Sampling Date: 6/9/2021
State: NC Sampling Point: DP7
Investigator(s): GB & TD Section, Township, Range: Goldsboro
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc ): toe of slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P
Soil Map Unit Name: Troup sand
Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%):
Lat: 35.330340 Long -77.832781 Datum: NAD 83
NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary indicators (minimum of one Is re_qulred: cl,ect< ea that aoo1v)
Surface Water (A1)
E High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
❑ Water Marks (B1)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
E Drift Deposits (B3)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Water Table Present?
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)
Yes No X
Yes No X
Yes No X
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
0
o
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30
1 Liquidambar styraciflua
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
10 No FAC
2, Pinus tadea
3.
4.
5.
6.
7,
8
50 Yes FAC
60 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 30 20% of total cover: 12
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
1. Acer rubrum
5 No FAC
2. Liquidambar styraciflua
10 Yes FAC
3 Ilex opaca
5 No FAC
4 Magnolia grandiflora
10 Yes FAC
5.
6.
7.
8.
30
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover: 6
"erb Stratum (Plot ci-re
1 Vitis rotundifolia
30 Yes FAC
2. Smilax rotundifolia
30 Yes FAC
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
60 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 30 20% of total cover: 12
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 5 _ )
1 Smilax rotundifolia 10 Yes FAC
2. Vitis rotundifolia
10 Yes FAC
3 Parthenocissus quinquefolia
4.
5
Yes FACU
5.
25 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 13 20% of total cover:
Sampling Point: DP7
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 8 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 11 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC. 73% (NB)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total %'Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
(B)
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
x 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3 0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydnc soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in (7 6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3 28 ft tall.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes x No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP7
Profile Description; (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist)
0-8 10YR 6/2 100
8-16 10YR 6/3 100
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Loc2
Texture Remarks
SL sandy
T •e C=Concentration, D=De . lotion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
❑ Histosol (A1)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
0 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
HStratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
SL sandy
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) ❑ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Ei Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) ❑ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
aSandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
• Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type.
Depth (inches)
rcemarKs:
0
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
Delia Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
❑ E
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
2Localion: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
IE2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
�
�-s Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
I1 Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
(MLRA 1538)
LI Red Parent Material (TF2)
11 Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or prnhlemaNr.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No x
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: New Hope Road Development
Applicant/Owner: ZSGS LLC
Investigator(s) GB & TD
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.) toe of slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR P Lat: 35.330340 Long -77.832781
Soil Map Unit Name: Lynchburg sandy loam NWI classification
City/County: Wayne County
Sampling Date: 6/9/2021
State: NC Sampling Point: DP8
Section, Township, Range: Goldsboro
Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%):
Datum: NAD 83
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks )
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks
Data Point 8 represents Wetland 1.
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Yes X
No
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check al! that apply]
O Surface Water (Al)
High Water Table (A2)
L° I Saturation (A3)
❑ Water Marks (B1)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ _ Drift Deposits (B3)
,❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Q Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
D
Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Secondary Indicators [minimum of two required)
LI
ID
0
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): 0
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 4
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): 2
(includes capillary fringe)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), If available'
Remarks:
Standing water within 10 feet of data point.
Morphological adaptations: Hydrophobia Ienticel observed on roots
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size 30
1 Acer rubrum
2 Liquidambar styraciflua
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
30 Yes FAC
30 Yes FAC
3 Persea borbonia
4.
5.
6.
7,
8.
25 Yes FACW
85 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 43 20% of total cover: 17
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
1 Acer rubrum
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
5 Yes FAC
Liquidambar styraciflua
5 Yes FAC
Persea borbonia
5 Yes FACW
r !ern Stratum +riot size: 5
15 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 8 20% of total cover: 3
1.
2
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Woodwardia areolata
10 Yes OBL
Osumundastrum cinnamomeum
Arundinaria gigantea
10 Yes FACW
10 Yes FACW
Thelypteris noveboracensis
Osmunda regalis
10 Yes FAC
10 Yes FAC
50 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 25 20% of total cover: 10
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30
1 Smilax rotundifolia
5
Yes FAC
2 Vitis rotundifolia
3.
4
5.
5
Yes FAC
10 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
Sampling Point: DP8
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 13 (A)
13 (B)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC 100 00% (AIB)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW specres x 2 =
FAG species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
x 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.01
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
`Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3 28 ft in
height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

SOIL
Sampling Point: DP8
Pr❑fate Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvoe' Locx
0-6 10YR 4/2 100
6-16 10YR 5/1 100
Texture Remarks
SL sandy
SL sandy
'T •e: C=Concentration, D=De+letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
❑ Histosol (Al)
EHistic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
e
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
El
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) H
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR 0, S)
�] Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
El Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR 0)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (FB)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T)
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
Della Ochric (F17) (MLRA 161)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Remarks:
2Location: PL=Pore Linin! M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sotls':
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
E1 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
-❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
(MLRA 153B)
T❑-1 Red Parent Material (TF2)
IJ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
LiOther (Explain in Remarks)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2 0

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 6/9/21
Evaluator: GB & TD
Project/Site New Hope Road
County:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30*
21
DPVPIopment
Wayne
Stream 1
Feature 1
Latitude: 35.335863
Longitude:-77.833975
Stream Determi n (circle one)
Ephemeral erennial
Other La Grange, NC
e g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 8• )
1 Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
la Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
0
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
CI)
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
�J
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
0111
2
3
5 Active/relict floodplain
0
1
0
3
6 Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7 Recent alluvial deposits
0
i
2
3
8. Headcuts
l CJ
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
/
lc)
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
CO)
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No (0)
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 6.5
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
0
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
E:9
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes 13)
. Biology (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
M
0.51
1 5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
.5
1 1 5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other 40
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 6/9/21
Evaluator: GB &TD
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30*
21.5
: New Hope Road
Project/Site
aeveloQment
County: Wayne
Stream Determi ' z circle one)
Ephemeral ntermittent erennial
Stream 2
Feature 2
Latitude: 35.335914
Longitude: -77.833545
Other La Grange, NC
e g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 9 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
la Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
0
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
�J
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
(?)
2
3
5 Active/relict floodplain
0
1
03
6. Depositional bars or benches
1
2
3
7, Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
8. Headcuts
(0)
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No <0)
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 6.5
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
t
3
13. iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
E0
0.5
1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes (3)
Biology [Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
©
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
Ip
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish0.511.5
M
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
5
6)
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual_
Notes:
Sketch•

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 6/8/21
Evaluator: GB & TD
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30*
28.5
mew Hope Road
Project/Site:
D.eMnpment
County: Wayne
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral ntermhtent erennial
Stream 3
Latitude: 35.331009
Longitude:-77.836471
Other La Grange, NC
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = I o )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
la Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
R
3
3. In -channel structure: exriffle-pool, step -pool,
ripplepool sequence
0
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
l2J
3
5 Active/relict floodplain
0
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
()
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
12 �
3
8. Headcuts
0
2
3
9. Grade control
0
E
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
CO)
0.5
1
1 5
11. Second or greater order channel
No .0-)
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 7.5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
137Tron oxidizing bacteria -
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1 5
1
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
.3
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes
3)
Biolocly (Subtotal = 8.5
18_ Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
CD
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
M
0.5
1
1.5
23_ Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
C.
25. Algae
0
0.5
0 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other 99
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

Date:
NC D1%'Q Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
6/8/21 Project/Site: New Hope Road
Development
County: Wayne
Evaluator:
GB & TD
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
if>_ 19 or perennial if> 30*
35.75
Stream 4
Feature 3
Latitude: 35.326335
Longitude: -77.836449
Stream Determination (circ
Ephemeral Intermitten
Other La Grange, NC
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 19.3 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
la Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
_
2
_
C3)
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
0
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
()
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
C)
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2 )
3
8. Headcuts
0
L )
2
3
9 Grade control
0
0 5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
QO
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 6.5
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
0
3
i3 Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
0
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
E30
0.5
1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes (3)
. Blolo[IY [Subtotal = 9.
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
`0
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
V
1
2
3
22. Fish
�0 5�
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
so
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
i.5
25 Algae
0
0.5
0
1,5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 1; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

Colliers
lil
Engineering
& Design
APPENDIX C
USACE ANTECEDENT PRECIPITATION TOOL
Wetland Delineation Report I June 16, 2021

Antecedent Precipitation vs Normal Range based on NOAA's Daily Global Historical Climatology Network
Nov
2020
Feb
2021
Coordinates
35.330340, -77.832781
Observation Date
2021-06-08
Elevation (ft)
122.58
Drought Index (PDSI)
Mild wetness (2021-05)
WebWIMP H2O Balance
Dry Season
Figure and tables made by the
Antecedent Precipitation Tool
Version 1.0
Written by Jason Deters
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
— Daily Total
- 30-Day Rolling Total
• 30-Year Normal Range
Mar
2021
- nJl_Il
Apr May
2021 2021
Jun
2021
Jul
2021
Aug
2021
Sep
2021
Oct
2021
30 Days Ending
30th %ile (in)
70th %ile (in)
Observed (in)
Wetness Condition
Condition Value
Month Weight
Product
2021-06-08
2.796457
4.839764
5.677166
Wet
3
3
9
2021-05-09
2.498425
3.998032
1.26378
Dry
1
2
2
2021-04-09
2.658662
4.362992
6.200788
Wet
3
1
3
Result
Normal Conditions - 14
Weather Station Name
Coordinates
Elevation (ft)
Distance (mi)
Elevation A
Weighted A
Days (Normal)
Days (Antecedent)
KINSTON AG RSCH
35.2975, -77.5722
60.039
14.866
62.541
7.619
11176
85
LA GRANGE 0.2 NNW
35.308, -77.7899
102.034
2.868
20.546
1.35
38
5
GOLDSBORO 4.4 E
35.3724, -77.8984
133.858
4.703
11.278
2.169
22
0
GOLDSBORO 4 SE
35.3444, -77.9647
108.924
7.499
13.656
3.477
78
0
KINSTON 3.7 WNW
35.3004, -77.6478
121.063
10.632
1.517
4.801
1
0
SNOW HILL 2 SW
35.4519, -77.6842
95.144
11.857
27.436
5.661
35
0
KINSTON 7 SE
35.1967, -77.5433
23.95
18.761
98.63
10.293
2
0
WARSAW 5 E
35.0128, -78.0044
109.908
23.986
12.672
11.097
1
0

APPENDIX D
PHOTOGRAPHS
Wetland Delineation Report 1 June 16, 2021
Colliers
lil
Engineering
& Design

Project No. 21002269A
June 10, 2021
Page 1 of 3
NW
• I • 1 • I • • 1•
N6 E
30 60 90 120
• I• 1• i• I• I•I• I• I• I• 1• I• 1• I
0 37°NE (T) :• 35°19'51"N, 77°50'13"W ±472ft ■ 244ft
11'}
New Hope Road
03 Jun 2021, 09:21:53
Photograph #1: View of Pond 1. Typical view of forested Pond.
0 286°W (T) Q 35°20'9"N, 77°50'1"W ±78ft ■ 107ft
Wetland ? +4-
Photograph #2: View of Wetland (PFO) 1. Typical view of forested wetland.
Colliers
Engineering
& Design

Project No. 21002269A
June 10, 2021
Page 2 of 3
32 0 30
00
E SE
120
• I • I I • • I • I • I • I • • I • I • I • I • I • I • I • I • I •
0 46°NE (T) * 35°209"N, 77°50'2W :t55ft • 107ft
Stream 4
NI Dia nrier Dcksor;
Photograph #3: View of Stream 2. Typical intermittent Stream.
NW N NE
2 330 0 30
- I • I • I I • I • I - 1 • 1 • - I •
0 34°NE (T) 1 35°1949"N,77°5013W ±236ft A 19ft
SEtrearn - - • -
Ma•Tani ler Dickson • 08"..110
•
Photograph #4: Downstream view of Stream 1. Typical Intermittent Stream.
Colliers
Engineering
& Design

Project No. 21002269A
June 10, 2021
Page 3 of 3
0 70°E (T) * 35°20"48"N, 77°50"32"W ±10196ft A 127ft
Photograph #5: View of Stream 4. Typical Perennial Stream.
Colliers
Engineering
& Design

Colliers
Engineering
& Design
Colliers Engineering & Design is a trusted provider of
multi -discipline engineering, design and consulting
services providing customized solutions for public and
private clients through a network of offices nationwide.
For a full listing of our office locations, please visit
colliersengineering.com
1 877 627 3772
Civil/Site • Traffic/Transportation • Governmental • Survey/Geospatial
Infrastructure • Geotechnical/Environmental • Telecommunications • Utilities/Energy
Accelerating success.