20171292 Ver 1_Year 1 Monitoring Report_20210928

ID#* 20171292 Version* 1
Select Reviewer:*
Erin Davis
Initial Review Completed Date 09/29/2021
Mitigation Project Submittal - 9/28/2021
Is this a Prospectus, Technical Proposal or a New Site?* r Yes r No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
V Stream r Wetlands r- Buffer r- Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:*
Jamey McEachran
Project Information
..................................................................................................................................................................
ID#:* 20171292
Existing IDY
Project Type: r DIMS r Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Compass Point
County: Yadkin
Document Information
Email Address:*
[e-mail]
Version:
*1
Existing Version
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Monitoring Plans
File Upload: Compass Point MY1 Monitoring Report.pdf 16.34MB
Rease upload only one RDFcf the conplete file that needs to be subnitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Jamey McEachran
Signature:*

COMPASS POINT
MITIGATION SITE
EMKIN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
RES YADKIN 01 UMBRELLA MITIGATION BANK
SAW-2017-01465
YEAR I MONITORING REPORT
Provided by:
pres
Bank Sponsor: Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC
An entity of Resource Environmental Solutions
3600 Glenwood Ave, Suite 100
Raleigh, NC 27612
919-209-1056
September 2021

Table of Contents
1.0 Project Summary..................................................................................................................................... 2
1.1 Project Location and Description.............................................................................................. 2
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives.................................................................................................... 2
1.3 Project Success Criteria............................................................................................................. 3
StreamSuccess Criteria................................................................................................................... 3
VegetationSuccess Criteria............................................................................................................. 4
1.4 Project Components.................................................................................................................. 4
1.5 Stream Design/Approach.......................................................................................................... 4
1.6 Construction and As -Built Conditions...................................................................................... 6
1.7 Monitoring Performance (MY 1)............................................................................................... 6
Vegetation........................................................................................................................................ 6
StreamGeomorphology................................................................................................................... 7
StreamHydrology............................................................................................................................ 7
WetlandHydrology.......................................................................................................................... 7
2.0 Methods.................................................................................................................................................. 7
3.0 References............................................................................................................................................... 8
Appendix A: Background Tables
Table 1: Project Mitigation Components
Table 2: Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3: Project Contacts Table
Table 4: Project Background Information Table
Figure 1: Site Location Map
Appendix B: Visual Assessment Data
Figure 2: Current Conditions Plan View
Vegetation Plot Photos
Monitoring Device Photos
Crossing Photos
Stream and Vegetation Problem Areas
Appendix C: Vegetation Plot Data
Table 5: Planted Species Summary
Table 6: Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Table 7. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
Appendix D: Stream Measurement and Geomorphology Data
Baseline Cross -Section Plots
Table 8. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 9. Cross Section Morphology Data Table
Appendix E: Hydrology Data
Table 10. 2021 Rainfall Summary
Table 11. Documentation of Geomorphically Significant Flow Events
Stream Flow Hydrographs
Table 12. 2021 Max Hydroperiod
Table 13. Summary of Groundwater Monitoring Results
Groundwater Hydrographs
Compass Point 1 Year 1 Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site September 2021

1.0 Proiect Summary
L I Project Location and Description
The Compass Point Mitigation Site ("the Project") is located in Yadkin County, approximately 4.5 miles
northeast of Boonville. Water quality stressors that affected the Project included livestock production,
agricultural production, and lack of riparian buffer. The Project presents 5,289 linear feet (LF) of stream
restoration and enhancement generating 4,155 Cool Stream Mitigation Units (SMU) along three unnamed
tributaries that drain directly to the Yadkin River.
The Project is located in the Yadkin RiverBasin within Cataloging Unit 03040101, Target Local Watershed
030401011001, and NCDWR sub -basin 03-07-02. The current State classification for the Yadkin River at
this location is Class C (NCDWR 2011).
The Project's total easement area is approximately 16.46 acres within the overall drainage area of 271 acres
and consisted of cattle pastures and wooded areas. Grazing livestock historically had access to most stream
reaches within the Project. The lack of riparian buffer vegetation, deep-rooted vegetation, and unstable
channel characteristics had contributed to the degradation of stream banks throughout the Project area.
The stream design approach for the Project combined the analog method of natural channel design with
analytical methods to evaluate stream flows and hydraulic performance of the channel and floodplain. The
analog method involved the use of a reference reach, or "template" stream, adjacent to, nearby, or
previously in the same location as the design reach. The template parameters of the analog reach were
replicated to create the features of the design reach. The analog approach is useful when watershed and
boundary conditions are similar between the design and analog reaches (Skidmore et al., 2001). Hydraulic
geometry was developed using analytical methods to identify the design discharge.
The Project will be monitored on a regular basis throughout the seven-year post -construction monitoring
period, or until performance standards are met. Upon approval for closeout by the Interagency Review
Team (IRT), the site will be transferred to Unique Places to Save (UP2S). This party shall serve as
conservation easement holder and long-term steward for the property and will conduct periodic inspection
of the site to ensure that restrictions required in the conservation easement are upheld. Endowment funds
required to uphold easement and deed restrictions will be finalized prior to site transfer to the responsible
parh'-
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives
Through the comprehensive analysis of the Project's maximum functional uplift using the Stream Functions
Pyramid Framework, specific, attainable goals and objectives will be realized by the Project. These goals
clearly address the degraded water quality and nutrient input from farming that were identified as major
watershed stressors in the 2009 Upper Yadkin Pee -Dee River RBRP.
The Project goals are:
• Improve water transport from watershed to the channel in a non -erosive manner in a stable channel;
• Improve flood flow attenuation on site and downstream by allowing for overbank flows and
connection to the active floodplain;
• Improve instream habitat;
Restore and enhance native floodplain vegetation; and
Indirectly support the goals of the 2009 Upper Yadkin Pee -Dee RBRP to improve water quality
and to reduce sediment and nutrient loads.
Compass Point 2 Year 1 Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site September 2021

The Project objectives to address the goals are:
• Designed and reconstructed stream channels sized to convey bankfull flows that will maintain a
stable dimension, profile, and planform based on modeling, watershed conditions, and reference
reach conditions;
• Added in -stream structures and bank stabilization measures to protect restored and enhanced
streams;
• Installed habitat features such as brush toes, constructed riffles, woody materials, and pools of
varying depths to restored and enhanced streams;
• Reduced bank height ratios and increased entrenchment ratios to reference reach conditions;
• Increased forested riparian buffers to at least 50 feet on both sides of the channel along the Project
reaches with a hardwood riparian plant community;
• Treated exotic invasive species; and
• Established a permanent conservation easement on the Project that excludes livestock from stream
channels and their associated buffers.
Limitations to achieving these watershed goals arise by remaining constrained to the project boundaries.
While we are restoring the habitat and streams to stable and effective conditions that achieve our goals
within the Project parcels, we are unable to influence the effect of all riparian buffers and livestock impact
in other areas within the watershed. However, with responsible restoration and stewardship of the majority
of reaches within this small watershed, overall watershed functionality and health will improve to meet the
RBRP goals.
1.3 Project Success Criteria
The Project follows the USACE 2003 Stream Mitigation Guidelines and the "Wilmington District Stream
and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update" dated October 24, 2016. Cross section and vegetation plot
data will be collected in Years 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7. Hydrology data and visual monitoring will be reported
annually.
Stream Success Criteria
Four bankfull flow events must be documented within the seven-year monitoring period. The bankfull
events must occur in separate years. Otherwise, the stream monitoring will continue until four bankfull
events have been documented in separate years.
There should be little change in as -built cross sections. If changes do take place, they should be evaluated
to determine if they represent a movement toward a less stable condition (for example down -cutting or
erosion) or are minor changes that represent an increase in stability (for example settling, vegetative
changes, deposition along the banks, or decrease in width/depth ratio). Cross sections shall be classified
using the Rosgen stream classification method, and all monitored cross sections should fall within the
quantitative parameters defined for channels of the design stream type. Bank height ratio shall not exceed
1.2, and the entrenchment ratio shall be no less than 1.4 within restored reaches. The entrenchment ratio
shall be no less than 2.2 for all measured riffle cross -sections on a given reach. Channel stability should be
demonstrated through a minimum of four bankfull events documented in the seven-year monitoring period.
Digital images are used to subjectively evaluate channel aggradation or degradation, bank erosion, success
of riparian vegetation, and effectiveness of erosion control measures. Longitudinal images should not
indicate the absence of developing bars within the channel or an excessive increase in channel depth. Lateral
images should not indicate excessive erosion or continuing degradation of the banks over time. A series of
Compass Point 3 Year 1 Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site September 2021

images over time should indicate successional maturation of riparian vegetation.
Vegetation Success Criteria
Specific and measurable success criteria for plant density within the riparian buffers on the Project follow
IRT Guidance. Vegetation monitoring plots are a minimum of 0.02 acres in size and cover a minimum of
two percent of the planted area. The interim measures of vegetative success for the Project is the survival
of at least 320 planted three-year old trees per acre at the end of Year 3, at least 260 planted five-year old
trees at seven feet in height at the end of Year 5, and the final vegetative success criteria is at least 210
trees per acre with an average height of ten feet at the end of Year 7. Volunteer trees are counted, identified
to species, and included in the yearly monitoring reports, but did not count towards the success criteria of
total planted stems. Moreover, any single species can only account for up to 50 percent of the required
number of stems within any vegetation plot. Any stems in excess of 50 percent are shown in the monitoring
table but were not used to demonstrate success.
1.4 Project Components
The Project area is comprised of a single easement location along three unnamed tributaries to the Yadkin
River, totaling 5,289 linear feet. There are eight stream reaches, DWI -A, DWI-B, DWI-C, DWI-D, DW1-
E, DW2-A, DW2-B, and DW3, divided by treatment type. The Project is accessible from Pulliam Road.
The stream mitigation components are summarized below. The one minor change from the Mitigation Plan
credits was a result of an easement area decrease (0.04 acres) at the top of DWI -A. The easement was offset
30 feet from the parcel line, however, during the original survey an incorrect parcel line was used. This
error was corrected in the recorded easement but was never updated in the design files. Therefore, the length
of DWI -A is now 15 linear feet (6 SMU) shorter in As -Built than what was shown in the Mitigation Plan,
causing a reduction in total credits from 4,161 SMUs to 4,155 SMUs. More details about project stream
lengths and credits are provided in Appendix A.
Compass Point Mitigation Credits
Cool Stream
Riparian Wetland
Non -Riparian Wetland
Totals
4,155
NA
NA
1.5 .S'tream Design/Approach
Stream restoration efforts along the tributaries of the Project were accomplished through analyses of
geomorphic conditions and watershed characteristics. The design approach applied a combination of
analytical and reference reach -based design methods that meet objectives commensurate with both
ecological and geomorphic improvements. Treatment activities ranged from minor bank grading and
planting to re-establishing stable planform and hydraulic geometry. For full restoration reaches, natural
design concepts were applied and verified through rigorous engineering analyses and modeling. The
objective of this approach was to design a geomorphically stable channel that provides habitat
improvements and ties into the existing landscape. Specifically, treatments included Priority I and II stream
restoration, Enhancement II, and Enhancement III.
The Project has been broken into the following reaches:
Reach DW1-A - This reach begins on the southwest end of the Project, flows northeast to a confluence
with DW 1-B and DW2-B, and totals 247 linear feet of Enhancement II. Open pasture was located adjacent
Compass Point 4 Year 1 Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site September 2021

to the reach. Enhancement activities included improving habitat through livestock exclusion fencing and
riparian planting. The livestock exclusion fencing removed livestock access to the riparian areas and
provides wildlife corridors throughout the Project area. A flow gauge was installed midway on the reach to
monitor hydrology.
Reach DWI-B - This reach begins on the southern end of the Project from DWI -A and DW2-B, flows
north to DWI-C, and totals 1,948 linear feet of Priority I/II restoration. Managed pasture was located
adjacent to the reach on the upstream end. The downstream end was surrounded by intermittently grazed
pasture and disturbed secondary growth in an area with previous timber harvest. Restoration activities
included constructing a new channel within the natural valley with appropriate dimensions and pattern and
backfilling the abandoned channel. In -stream structures such as log sills, brush toes, and log vanes were
installed for stability and to improve habitat. Habitat was further improved through buffer plantings and
livestock exclusion. Buffer activities improve riparian areas that filter runoff from adjacent pastures,
thereby reducing nutrient and sediment loads to the channel.
Reach DWI-C — This reach begins on the north end of the Project from DWI-B, and flows northeast to a
culvert crossing and DWI-D. This reach totals 566 linear feet of Priority I/II restoration, beginning
immediately downstream of a bedrock drop structure at the bottom of DWI -B. Sections of the existing road
were decommissioned in the easement and planted. Restoration activities included constructing a new
channel within the natural valley with appropriate dimensions and pattern, cutting a floodplain bench and
backfilling the abandoned channel. In -stream structures such as log sills, brush toes, and log vanes were
installed for stability and to improve habitat. Habitat was further improved through buffer plantings and
livestock exclusion. Livestock exclusion fencing removed livestock access to the riparian areas and
provides wildlife corridors throughout the Project area.
Reach DWI-D - This reach begins at the downstream end of DWI-C and culvert crossing in the northern
end of the Project, and flows northeast to DWI-E. The reach totals 758 linear feet of Priority I/II restoration.
Restoration activities included constructing a floodplain bench to aid in connectivity to the existing
floodplain and constructing a new channel with appropriate dimensions and pattern. When possible, bed
material was harvested and reused to create stable bed features. In -stream structures such as log sills, brush
toes, and log vanes were installed for stability and to improve habitat. Habitat was further improved through
buffer plantings and livestock exclusion. Buffer activities improve riparian areas that filter runoff from
adjacent pastures, thereby reducing nutrient and sediment loads to the channel.
Reach DW1-E - This reach begins on the north end of the Project, from DWI-D and flows north until it
drains to the Yadkin River. This reach totals 432 linear feet of Enhancement III. Managed cropland was
located adjacent to the reach. Enhancement activities included improving habitat through livestock
exclusion fencing.
Reach DW2-A - This reach begins on the southeast end of the Project, and flows west to DW2-B. This
reach totals 760 linear feet of Enhancement IL Sparse woodland and managed pasture was located adjacent
to the reach. Enhancement activities included targeted bank stabilization, riparian buffer planting, and
installation of livestock exclusion fencing. An existing ford crossing was removed. Buffer activities
improve riparian areas that filter runoff from adjacent pastures, thereby reducing nutrient and sediment
loads to the channel.
Reach DW2-B - This reach begins at the downstream end of DW2-A, and flows north to the confluence
with DWI -A to become DWI-B. This reach totals 485 linear feet of Priority I Restoration. Actively
managed pasture was present on both sides of the reach. Restoration activities included constructing a new
channel within the natural valley with appropriate dimensions pattern and backfilling the abandoned
channel. Native bed material was harvested when possible. In -stream structures such as log sills, brush toes,
Compass Point 5 Year 1 Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site September 2021

and log vanes were installed for stability and to improve habitat. Habitat was further improved through
buffer plantings and livestock exclusion. A crossing was installed along this reach. Buffer activities improve
riparian areas that filter runoff from adjacent pastures, thereby reducing nutrient and sediment loads to the
channel.
Reach DW3 - This reach begins on the south end of the Project at the adjacent powerline easement, and
flows north to DW2-A. This reach totals 93 linear feet of Enhancement IL Disturbed woodland and
intermittently grazed pasture was located adjacent to the reach. A maintained powerline easement is located
adjacent to the reach. Enhancement activities included improving habitat through livestock exclusion
fencing, and riparian buffer planting. The livestock exclusion fencing removed livestock access to riparian
areas and provides wildlife corridors throughout the Project area.
1.6 Construction and As Built Conditions
Stream construction, planting, and fencing was completed in June 2020. The Project was closely built to
design plans and guidelines. One minor adjustment was made to the easement, causing a total decrease of
0.04 acres. The easement was offset 30 feet from the parcel line, however, during the original survey an
incorrect parcel line was used. This change to the easement was already corrected in the original recorded
easement but was not updated in the original mitigation plan. Therefore, the length of DWI -A is now 15
linear feet (6 SMUs) shorter in As -Built than what was shown in the Mitigation Plan, causing a reduction
in total credits from 4,161 SMUs to 4,155 SMUs. A few other minor changes were made to structures
during construction which are detailed in the redline version of the as -built survey in the As -Built Report
(submitted August 2020). Project credits are based on design centerline, but as -built stream lengths are also
shown on Table 1.
Also, there were a few changes to the planting plan due to bareroot availability. Planting plan changes are
shown in Table 5.
1. 7 Monitoring Performance (MY])
Ve etg ation
Monitoring of the eight permanent vegetation plots and three random plots was completed during
September 2021, approximately 15 months after as -built monitoring. Vegetation data is in Appendix C,
associated photos are in Appendix B, and plot locations are in Appendix B. MY1 monitoring data indicates
that 10 out of 11 plots are exceeding the interim success criteria of 320 planted stems per acre. Vegetation
Plot 8 (VP8) showed evidence of a large out of bank event from DWI-E covering trees within the plot in
debris and excess soil. Planted stem densities ranged from 283 to 1,052 planted stems per acre with a mean
of 633 across all plots. A total of 13 species were documented within the plots. Volunteer species were
noted in three of the plots. The average stem height across all vegetation plots was 2.2 feet.
Supplemental planting was performed across the site in January 2021. This supplemental planting included
about 700 bareroot trees. The locations of the supplemental planting are on Figure 2. Additionally, RES
performed invasive species treatments in the wooded areas of the site in March 2021. As requested in the
As -Built Credit Release Letter, RES has begun removing black walnut stems from the site. Current visual
assessments of vegetation outside of the monitoring plots indicate that the herbaceous vegetation is
becoming well established throughout the project. The low stem density area in and around VP8 (Figure
2) will be supplemental planted with container trees this dormant season to avoid damage from Yadkin
River flooding.
Compass Point 6 Year 1 Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site September 2021

Stream Geomorphology
Geomorphology data for MY1 was collected during July 2021 approximately 13 months after as -built
monitoring. Summary tables and cross section plots are in Appendix D. Overall the baseline cross sections
and profile on the restoration reach relatively match the design. Cross sections 12 and 13 on DWI-D show
slight signs of degradation, this is not a cause of concern yet as sediment moving through the system is a
natural process but will be closely monitored. The as -built conditions show that shear stress and velocities
have been reduced for all restoration reaches. All reaches were designed as very coarse sand bed channels
and remain classified as very coarse sand bed channels post -construction.
Visual assessment of the stream channel was performed to document signs of instability, such as eroding
banks, structural instability, or excessive sedimentation. The channel is transporting sediment as designed
and will continue to be monitored for aggradation and degradation. As requested in the As -Built Credit
Release Letter, RES has included a photo of the culverted crossing on DWI -A in Appendix B. As of
September 2021, there was water and substrate in all three of the culverts. RES will continue to include
photos of this crossing and does not believe it is necessary to repair the crossing at this time.
Stream Hydrology
In June 2020, one stage recorder was installed on restoration reach DWI-B to document bankfull events
and a flow gauge was installed on reach DWI -A to track the frequency and duration of stream flow events.
The site is on track to meet its hydrologic performance standards as evident by two bankfull events recorded
on 11/20/2020 and 07/02/2021 through the DWI-B stage recorder and the DWI -A flow gauge recording
consecutive flow for 196 days in 2020 and 266 days of consecutive flow since the last download on
9/23/2021. Stream hydrology data has been included in Appendix E. The stage recorder and flow gauge
locations can be found on Figure 2 and photos are in Appendix B.
Wetland Hydrology
Three groundwater wells were installed in June 2020. The goal of the groundwater wells is to track the
hydrology in the jurisdictional wetlands on site post -construction. There is no hydroperiod success criteria
for these groundwater wells. Wetland hydrology data has been included in Appendix E for GW2 and GW3.
GW1 data was unrecoverable as of the most recent collection. Data will be recovered and included in the
Monitoring Year 2 Report if possible. Groundwater well locations can be found on Figure 2.
2.0 Methods
Stream geomorphology monitoring was conducted using a Topcon GTS-312 Total Station. Three-
dimensional coordinates associated with cross-section data were collected in the field (NAD83 State Plane
feet FIPS 3200). Morphological data were collected at 14 cross -sections. Survey data were imported into
CAD, ArcGIS®, and Microsoft Excel® for data processing and analysis.
Stream hydrology is monitored using stage recorders and flow gauges, which utilize automatic pressure
transducers, and were installed within the channels. The stage recorders record frequency, duration, and
stage of bankfull events and are programmed to record readings at an hourly interval. A surveyed elevation
was recorded at the bed and top of bank at the stage recorder elevation, allowing for accurate bankfull
events to be recorded. Flow gauges record frequency, duration, and stage of flow events and are
programmed to read at an hourly interval. The height of the adjacent downstream riffle (from the gauge) is
used to detect flow.
Compass Point 7 Year 1 Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site September 2021

Vegetation success is being monitored at eight permanent monitoring plots and three random plots for a
total of 11 plots. Locations of random plots will vary from year to year and will be shown in Figure 2, and
species and height will be recorded for all woody stems. Vegetation plot monitoring follows the CVS-EEP
Level 2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation, version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008) and includes analysis of species
composition and density of planted species. Data are processed using the CVS data entry tool. In the field,
the four corners of each plot were permanently marked with PVC at the origin and metal conduit at the
other corners. Photos of each plot are taken from the origin each monitoring year.
Wetland hydrology is monitored to document maintenance of jurisdictional groundwater levels in the
stream restoration area (as requested by IRT). This is accomplished with three automatic pressure
transducer gauges (located in groundwater wells) that record daily groundwater levels. One automatic
pressure transducer is installed above ground for use as a barometric reference. Gauges are downloaded
quarterly and wetland hydroperiods are calculated during the growing season. Gauge installation followed
current regulatory guidance. Visual observations of primary and secondary wetland hydrology indicators
are also recorded during quarterly site visits.
3.0 References
Harman, W., R. Starr, M. Carter, K. Tweedy, M. Clemmons, K. Suggs, C. Miller. 2012. A Function -
Based Framework for Stream Assessment and Restoration Projects. US Environmental Protection
Agency, Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds, Washington, DC EPA 843-K-12-006.
Lee Michael T., Peet Robert K., Roberts Steven D., and Wentworth Thomas R. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol
for Recording Vegetation Level. Version 4.2
Peet, R.K., Wentworth, T.S., and White, P.S. (1998), A flexible, multipurpose method for recording
vegetation composition and structure. Castanea 63:262-274
Resource Environmental Solutions. 2019. Compass Point Mitigation Site - Final Mitigation Plan.
Rosgen, D. 1996. Applied River Morphology, 2nd edition, Wildland Hydrology, Pagosa Springs, CO.
US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2003. April 2003 NC Stream Mitigation Guidelines. USACE.
2016. Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update. Skidmore,
2001.
Compass Point 8 Year 1 Monitoring Report
Mitigation Site September 2021

Appendix A
Background Tables

Table 1. Compass Point - Mitigation Assets and Components
Existing
Mitigation
Footage
Plan
Mitigation
As -Built
As -Built
or
Footage or
Mitigation
Restoration
Priority
Mitigation
Plan
Footage or
Credits
Project Segment
Acreage
Acreage
Category
Level
Level
Ratio (X:1)
Credits
Acreage
Comments
DW1-A
315
262
Cool
E II
N/A
2.5000
105
247
99
Riparian planting, livestock exclusion, Permanent Conservation Easement, 15 LF
lost at as -built due to easement change
DW1-B
48
110
Cool
R
1 & 2
1.0000
110
110
110
Full Channel Restoration, Planted Buffer, Exclusion of Livestock, Permanent
Conservation Easement
DW1-B
1,907
1,838
Cool
R
1 & 2
1.0000
1838
1838
1838
Full Channel Restoration, Planted Buffer, Exclusion of Livestock, Permanent
Conservation Easement
DW1-C
604
566
Cool
R
1 & 2
1.2000
472
566
472
Full Channel Restoration, Planted Buffer, Exclusion of Livestock, Permanent
Conservation Easement
DW1-D
262
259
Cool
R
1 & 2
1.0000
259
259
259
Full Channel Restoration, Planted Buffer, Exclusion of Livestock, Permanent
Conservation Easement
DW1-D
415
499
Cool
R
1 & 2
1.0000
499
499
499
Full Channel Restoration, Planted Buffer, Exclusion of Livestock, Permanent
Conservation Easement
DW1-E
432
432
Cool
E III
N/A
7.5000
58
432
58
Riparian planting, livestock exclusion, Permanent Conservation Easement
DW2-A
760
760
Cool
E II
N/A
2.5000
304
760
304
Riparian planting, livestock exclusion, Permanent Conservation Easement
DW2-B
514
485
Cool
R
1
1.0000
485
485
485
Full Channel Restoration, Planted Buffer, Exclusion of Livestock, Permanent
Conservation Easement
DW3
93
93
Cool
E II
N/A
3.0000
31
93
31
Riparian planting, livestock exclusion, Permanent Conservation Easement
Project Credits
Restoration Level
Stream Riparian Wetland Non -Rip Coastal
Warm Cool Cold Riverine Non-Riv Wetland Marsh
Restoration
3663
Re-establishment
Rehabilitation
Enhancement
Enhancement
Enhancement II
434
Enhancement III
58
Creation
Preservation
Total
4155

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Compass Point Mitigation Site
Elapsed Time Since grading complete: 1 year 3 months
Elapsed Time Since planting complete: 1 year 3 months
Number of reporting Years :
Activity or Deliverable
Data Collection
Complete
Completion or
Delivery
Mitigation Plan
NA
Jun-19
Final Design — Construction Plans
NA
Apr-20
Stream Construction
NA
Jun-20
Site Planting
NA
Jun-20
As -built (Year 0 Monitoring — baseline)
Jun-20
Aug-20
Supplemental Planting
NA
Jan-21
Invasive Species Treatment
NA
Mar-21
Year 1 Monitoring
XS: Jul-21
VP: Se -21
Sep-21
Year 2 Monitoring
Year 3 Monitoring
Year 4 Monitoring
Year 5 Monitoring
Year 6 Monitoring
Year 7 Monitoring
= The number of reports or data points produced excluding the baseline

Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Compass Point Mitigation Site
Designer
RES / 3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100, Raleigh, North
Carolina 27612.
Primary project design POC
Dan Sweet & Frasier Mullen
Construction Contractor
Carolina Environmental Contracting Inc / PO Box 1905, Mount
Airy, NC 27030
Construction contractor POC
James Poe
Survey Contractor
Ascension Land Surveying PC / 116 Williams Rd., Mocksville,
NC 27028
Survey contractor POC
Chris Cole
Planting Contractor
H&J Forestry
Planting contractor POC
Matt Hitch
Monitoring Performers
RES / 3600 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 100, Raleigh, North
Carolina 27612.
Stream Monitoring POC
lRyan Medric [phone]
Vegetation Monitoring POC
JRyan Medric [phone]

Table 4. Project Background Information
Project Name
Compass Point
County
Yadkin
Project Area (acres)
16.46
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)
Latitude: 36.269624 N Longitude:-80.638420 W
Planted Acreage (Acres of Woody Stems Planted)
12.92
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province
Northern Inner Piedmont
River Basin
Yadkin
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit
03040101
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14-digit 1
03040101160010
DWR Sub -basin
03-07-02
Project Drainage Area (Acres and Square Miles)
271 ac (0.42 mil)
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area
1 %
CGIA Land Use Classification
Reach Summary Information
Parameters D/V1-A DVV1-B
DVV1-C
DVV1-D
D/V1-E
W-A
W-B
DINS
Length of reach (linear feet) (designed) 262 1,949
566
759
432
968
277
93
Valley confinement (Confined, moderately confined, unconfined)
Drainage area (Acres) 96 237
256
269
271
83
90
28
Perennial, Intermittent, Ephemeral p p
p
p
I p
I p
p
p
NCDWR Water Quality Classification
Stream Classification (existing) Cob F4/G4c
Cob
B4c
E6
C4b
G4c
Cob
Stream Classification (proposed) C4b C4
C4/C4b
B4c
E6
C4b
C4b
C4b
Evolutionary trend (Simon) (existing)
FEMA classification
1+1
Regulatory Considerations
Parameters
Applicable?
Resolved?
Suppor
ting
Docs?
Water of the United States - Section 404
Yes
Yes
SAW -
2016-
02357
Water of the United States - Section 401
Yes
Yes
DWR #
18-0063
Endangered Species Act
Yes
Yes
Mit Plan
Historic Preservation Act
Yes
Yes
Mit Plan
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA or CAMA)
No
N/A
N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
Yes
N/A
Mit Plan
Essential Fisheries Habitat
No
N/A
N/A

Rockford
Compass Point Site
Lenoir
Morganton
Brookford
Yadkin Mve-r—
a
o�
Run or
Legend
Conservation Easement
Service Area - 03040101
TLW - HUC - 03040101090050
N
Date: 8/20/2020
Figure 1 - Site Location Map
4gW E
s Compass Point Mitigation Site Drawn by: HKH rep
Checked by: RTM
0 375 750
Yadkin County, North Carolina , inch =750 feet
Feet

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data

A,
Vecietation Condition Assessment
U) Target Community
.T Present Marginal Absent
U
W Absent
0. No Fill
rn
Gl
Present
7111 4
5
A.
Z
d'
f
I
A 411,
I
A.
411.
rk
res
0 125 250
Feet
Current Conditions
Plan View
Compass Point
Mitigation Project
MY1 2021
Yadkin County, North Carolina
Date 9/27/2021 Drawn by: RTM_
Checked by: KC 1 in= 250 feet
Legend
Conservation Easement
Vegetation Plot
>320 stems/acre
F
F-I <320 stems/acre
F IMY1 Random VP
Supplemental Planting
Existing Wetland
Cross Section
Design Centerline
Restoration
Restoration (1.2:1)
Enhancement 11
Enhancement 11 (3:1)
Enhancement Ill
As -Built Top of Bank
Flow Gauge
O Stage Recorder
Groundwater Well

Compass Point MYl Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos (9/23/2021)
Vegetation Plot 1
Vegetation Plot 3
Vegetation Plot 5
y.
�w-Yf' r e'
Vegetation Plot 2
Vegetation Plot 4
Vegetation Plot 6

Vegetation Plot 7
Vegetation Plot 8

Compass Point MYl Random Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos (9/23/2021)
Random Vegetation Plot 1
4
'yy ,
4• � F d J 5 f
� v�i:r� n f&Ae%`S � _.e �i. i--":.
T K.
s£
k d, s r•
5
i F -y.
Random Vegetation Plot 3
Random Vegetation Plot 2

y
R
AM
Ale
_J
C

Stream Problem Areas
Compass Point
Feature Issue / Location Photo
N/A N/A
Vegetation Problem Areas
Compass Point
Feature Category / Location / Size
Photo
:a•
Low Stem Density Area / VP8 / 0.24 acres

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data

Appendix C. Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 5. Planted Species Summary
Common Name
Scientific Name
Mitigation Plan %
As -Built %
Total Stems Planted
Willow Oak
Quercus phellos
15
14
2,200
Water Oak
Quercus nigra
15
13
2,200
River Birch
Betula nigra
15
13
2,000
Sycamore
Platanus occidnetalis
15
13
2,000
Northern Red Oak
Quercus rubra
10
13
2,000
Persimmon
Diospyros virginiana
5
9
1,400
Green Ash
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
10
5
800
Yellow Poplar
Liriodendron tulipifera
10
5
800
Crab Apple
Malus an usti olia
0
3
500
Black Walnut
Ju lans nigra
0
2
400
Silky Dogwood
Cornus amomum
0
2
350
Sugarberry
Celtis laevigata
0
2
300
Elderberry
Sambucus canadensis
0
2
300
Eastern Redbud
Cercis canadensis
0
2
300
American Plum
Prunus americana
0 MER2
300
Blackgum
Nyssa sylvatica
5
0
0
Total
15,850
Planted Area
1 12.92
As -built Planted Stems/Acre
1 1,227
Table 6. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary
Plot #
Plante d
Stems/Acre
Volunteer
Stems/Acre
Total
Stems/Acre
Success
Criteria
Met?
Average
Plante d
Stem
Height
1
364
0
364
Yes
1.6
2
809
40
850
Yes
2
3
324
0
324
Yes
1.7
4
809
40
850
Yes
2.1
5
1052
0
1052
Yes
2.4
6
688
162
850
Yes
2.3
7
809
0
809
Yes
1.9
8
283
0
283
No
3.4
R1
405
0
405
Yes
2.3
R2
647
0
647
Yes
2
R3
769
0
769
Yes
2.5
Project Avg
633
22
655
Yes
2.2

Appendix C. Vegetation Assessment Data
Table 7. Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot Species
Current Plot Data (MY12021)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
201701465-01-0001
201701465-01-0002
201701465-01-0003
201701465-01-0004
201701465-01-0005
201701465-01-0006
201701465-01-0007
201701465-01-0008
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Shrub Tree
4
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
9
9
9
8
8
8
5
5
5
4
4
4
1
1
1
Celtis laevigata
sugarberry
Tree
1
1
1
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
Tree
2
2
2
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
1
1
1
3
3
3
Diospyrosvirginiana
common persimmon
Tree
Juglans nigra
blackwalnut
Tree
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
Malus angustifolia
southern crabapple
Tree
Morus rubra
red mulberry
Tree
8
8
8
4
4
4
2
2
2
1
1
1
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
8
8
8
2
2
3
8
8
8
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
Prunus americana
American plum
Tree
1
1
1
6
6
6
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
1
1
1
4
4
4
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
1
1
1
3
3
3
1
1
1
8
8
8
6
6
6
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
4
4
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
6
6
6
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
4
4
3
3
3
1
1
1
Salix nigra
blackwillow
Tree
1
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
9
9
9
20
20
21
8
8
8
20
201
21
261
261
26
17
17
21
20
20
20
7
7
7
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.02
0.02
0.02
1 0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
1 0.02
31
31
3
j
4
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
6
6
6
6
6
7
8
8
8
4
4
4
364
364
364
809
850
324
324
324
809
809
850
1052
1052
1052
688
688
850
809
8091
8091
2831
2831
283
Current Plot Data (MY12021)
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
201701465-01-R1
201701465-01-112
201701465-01-113
MY1(2021)
MYO(2020)
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Pnol-S
P-all
T
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
1
1
1
1
1
5
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
5
5
5
13
13
131
45
45
45
35
35
35
Celtis laevigata
sugarberry
Tree
1
1
11
1
1
1
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
Tree
2
2
2
4
4
4
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
2
2
2
6
6
6
4
4
4
Diospyrosvirginiana
common persimmon
Tree
5
5
5
1
1
1
3
3
3
9
9
9
7
7
7
Juglans nigra
blackwalnut
Tree
3
3
3
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
3
3
3
Malus angustifolia
southern crabapple
Tree
1
1
1
Morus rubra
red mulberry
Tree
15
15
15
20
20
20
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
4
4
4
26
26
27
18
18
18
Prunus americana
American plum
Tree
7
7
7
7
7
7
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
1
1
1
6
6
6
5
5
5
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
30
30
30
46
46
46
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
3
3
3
2
2
2
24
24
24
65
65
65
Salix nigra
Iblackwillow
Tree
1
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACREI
101
101
10
161
16
16
19
19
19
172
1721
178
219
219
219
1
1
1
11
8
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.27
0.20
31
31
3
61
61
6
5
51
5
121
121
13
141
141
14
4051
4051
405
6471
6471
647
7691
7691
769
6331
6331
655
11081
11081
1108

Appendix D
Stream Measurement and
Geomorphology Data

Upstream
Downstream
Compass Point - Reach DW2-B - Cross Section 1 - . _iI - Restoration
877
876
875
x
c
P
°
w 873
872
871
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO 2020 MY1 2021 — — — Approx. Bankfull ...... Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 1
Pool
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull flevation (ft) - Based on ABASAI
874.04
874.2
Bankfull Width (ft)t
10.9
11.1
Flood rove Width (ft)t
-
-
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2
2.3
2-2
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
874.04
874.0
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2f
12.0
10.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 1
-
-
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio'
-
-
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

Upstream
�u .PP!"
....... . . . . . . .
�14
V.
f
dim .
` Y
h
vt
J,
R - ^` _
..........
Downstream
Compass Point - Reach DW2-13 - Cross Section 2 - Riffle - Restoration
877
876
875
c
° 874
°
111 873
872
00/
871
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO 2020 MY1 2021 — — — Approx. Bankfull — — Floodprone Area ...... Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 2 Riffle
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Bevation (ft) -Based on ABA%SA1
873.63
873.7
Bankfull Width (ft)1
9.6
10.6
Flood rove Width (ft)1
50
>49.9
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2
1.1
1.1
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
873.63
873.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2
7.2
7.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 1
>5.2
>4.7
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1
1.0
1.0
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

Upstream
Downstream
Compass Point - Reach DW1-13 - Cross Section 3 - Pool - Restoration
871
870
869
$
•SS•
•ss•
i•as
SS i•
•ad•
•ss•
i•ss
i•ss
SS i•
•SS•
•ss•
i•ss
SS i•
c
° 868
00,
W 867
866
865
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO 2020 MY1 2021 — — • Approx. Bankfull ...... Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 3
Pool
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on ABAXSAI
868.42
868.5
Bankfull Width (tl)1
11.6
11.9
Flood rove Width (f1)1
-
-
Bankfull Max Depth (tlf
1.9
2.2
Low Bank Elevation (tl)
868.42
868.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2
12.8
12.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratios
-
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

Upstream
Downstream
Compass Point - Reach DW1-B - Cross Section 4 - Riffle - Restoration
871
870
869
x
° 868
.ss
rsrs.
.r.
rs.s.
n,
w 867
866
865
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO 2020 MY1 2021 — — — Approx. Bankfull — — Floodprone Area ...... Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 4 RiMc
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Flevation (ft) - Based on ABASAI
868.29
868.4
Bankfull Width (ft)'
12.9
13.9
Flood rove Width (ft)'
49.8
>50
Bankfull Max De th (ft)2
1.4
1.4
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
868.29
868.3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ftz)z
11.1
10.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratios
>3.8
>3.6
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio'
1.0
1.0
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

Upstream
Downstream
Compass Point - Reach DW1-B - Cross Section 5 - Riffle - Restoration
863
862
861
c
0 860
- -
.....
- -
.....
- -
.....
- -
....................
- -
-
- -
.....
- -
.....
- -
.....
-
.. ..
- -
.....
- - -
.....
- -
.....
- -
.........
.
-
a1
w 859
858
857
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO 2020 MY1 2021 — — — Approx. Bankfull — — Floodprone Area ...... Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 5 Riffle
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Basedon ABASAI
860.30
860.3
Bankfull Width (ft)1
13.0
18.2
Flood rove Width (ft)1
50
>50
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2
1.7
1.3
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
860.30
860.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2f
13.1
9.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio 1
>3.8
>2.7
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1
1.0
0.9
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years banlfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years banlfull elevation

Upstream
Downstream
Compass Point - Reach DW1-13 - Cross Section 6 - Pool - Restoration
863
862
861
$ 860
0
859
w
858
857
856
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO 2020 MY1 2021 — — — Approx. Bankfull ...... Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 6 (Pool)
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull UeNa Lion (ft) - Based on ABASAI
859.88
859.9
Bankfull Width (ft)1
13.2
13.1
Flood rove Width (ft)'
-
-
Bankfull Max De th ft z
3.3
3.4
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
859.88
859.9
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ftz)z
19.8
20.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratios
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio'
-
-
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

Upstream
Downstream
Compass Point - Reach DW1-13 - Cross Section 7 - Pool - Restoration
851
850
849
.....
— —
.....
— —
.....
— —
....
— —
— —
— —
....
.....
— —
.....
— —
................
— —
— —
—
— —
— —
....
— —
— —
c
° 848
2
W 847
846
845
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO 2020 MY1 2021 — — — Approx. Bankfull ...... Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 7 (Pool)
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull UeNa Lion (ft) - Based on ABASAI
849.11
849.1
Bankfull Width (ft)'
15.2
16.6
Flood rove Width (ft)t
-
-
Bankfull Max De th (ft)2
2.3
2.5
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
849.11
849.3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (82)2
17.4
21.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratios
Bankf fl Bank Height Ratio'
-
-
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

Upstream
Downstream
Compass Point - Reach DW1-13 - Cross Section 8 - Riffle - Restoration
852
851
850
c
849
.....
.....
....
....
..
.....
.....
.....
..
.....
.....
w 848
847
846
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO 2020 MY1 2021 — — —Approx. Bankfull — — Floodprone Area ...... Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 8 Riffle
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull IIevation (ft) - Based on ABASAI
848.97
849.0
Bankfull Width (ft)'
11.6
11.6
Flood rove Width (ft)l
50
>50
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2
1.4
1.6
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
848.97
849.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2f
10.5
11.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio'
A.3
A.3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio t
1.0
1.1
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

Upstream
Downstream
Compass Point - Reach DW1-B - Cross Section 9 - . _ A - Restoration
845
844
843
x
min
c
.....
.....
...........
....
....
.....
.....
.....
.
...
.....
...
W 841
840
839
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO 2020 MY1 2021 — — — Approx. Bankfull ...... Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 9 (Pool(
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY-3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull IIevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSAI
842.19
842.1
Bankfull Width (ft)
12.4
10.6
Floodprone Width (ft)l
-
-
Bankfull Max Depth (fi z
2.2
2.5
Low Bank Elevation (8)
842.19
842.4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
14.4
16.8
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratios
-
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1
-
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

)p
t
6rk �
Upstream
Downstream
Compass Point - Reach DW1-13 - Cross Section 10 - Riffle - Restoration
845
844
843
i
C
° 842
11•T
T1A•
•'RA
•AR
T•71
fT•T�
'RA
�T�T
11•T
AR
°
w 841
840
839
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO 2020 MY1 2021 — — — Approx. Bankfull Floodprone Area ...... Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 10 (R1IDc
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY-3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull IIevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSAi
842.10
842.2
Bankfull Width (ft)1
12.2
13.3
Floodprone Width (ft)1
>49.9
>50.1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2
1.6
1.5
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
842.10
842.2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ftz)z
12.6
12.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio'
4.1
1
>3.8
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1
1.0
1.0
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

Upstream
Downstream
Compass Point - Reach DW1-C - Cross Section 11 - Pool - Restoration
826
825
824
.....
..........
....
.....
..................
..
.........
c
° 823
°
w 822
821
820
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO 2020 MY1 2021 — — — Approx. Bankfull ...... Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 11 e
Banldull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA
73751
Bankfull Width (ft)'
5.7
Flood fone Width fl1
>50
Bankft'ull Max Depth ft2
0-8
Low Bank Elevation fl
73751
BanldiM Cross SectionalArea q�
2-9
BanldiMEntrenchmentRatio1
>3-;
Bankfull Bank Hei t Ratio
1-0
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

Upstream
Downstream
Compass Point - Reach DW1-C - Cross Section 12 - Riffle - Restoration
826
825
824
c
w 822
821
820
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO 2020 MY1 2021 — — — Approx. Bankfull — — Floodprone Area ...... Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 12 Riffie
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Basedon AB-XSAI
823.07
822.9
Bankfull Width (ft)'
13.8
12.7
Floodprone Width (ft)i
51.3
>51.4
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2
1.2
1.6
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
823.07
823.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2
10.3
12.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio'
>3.7
>4.0
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1
1.0
1.1
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

Upstream
Downstream
Compass Point - Reach DW1-D - Cross Section 13 - Pool - Restoration
814
813
812
$
c
° 811
.
.
. ..
. .
...
...
. .
...
. .
...
..
...
. .
...
. .
...
. .
. .
°
W 810
809
808
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO 2020 MY1 2021 — — — Approx. Bankfull ...... Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 13 Pool
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Basedon AB-XSAi
811.60
811.5
Bankfull Width (ft)'
13.6
13.0
Floodprone Width (ft)l
-
-
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2
1.9
2.4
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
811.60
811.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2
17.1
21.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio'
-
-
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1
-
-
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

Upstream
Downstream
Compass Point - Reach DW1-D - Cross Section 14 - Riffle - Restoration
814
813
00000
812
C
° 811
�i�
YL•
•Y4!
L�LI
L�L�
LPL
Yy•
•LIY
•L�
y�J•
Y
u' 810
809
808
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48
Distance (ft)
MYO 2020 MY1 2021 — — — Approx. Bankfull — — Floodprone Area ...... Low Bank Elevation
3X Vertical Exaggeration
Cross Section 14
(Riffle)
MYO
MY
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on AB-XSA
811.03
811.2
Bankfull Width (ft)'
15.4
17.0
Floodprone Width (ft)'
41.8
>42.8
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2
1.1
1.1
Low Bank Elevation ft
811.03
811.2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (fe)Z
12.7
13.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio'
>2.7
>2.5
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio'
1.0
1.0
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

Table 8. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Compass Point Mitigation Site - Reach DW1-B
Parameter
Gauge
Regional Curve
Pre -Existing Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only
LL
UL
Eq.
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Med
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
---
---
---
11.5
---
---
17.7
---
2
7.1
---
---
13.7
---
2
---
13.0
---
11.6
12.4
12.6
13.0
0.7
4
Floodprone Width (ft)
13.1
---
---
24.9
---
2
>30
---
---
>50
---
2
---
---
---
49.8
49.9
49.9
50.0
0.1
4
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
---
---
---
0.8
---
---
1.2
---
2
1.0
---
---
1.4
---
2
---
0.9
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
'Bankfull Max Depth ft
1.3
---
---
1.5
---
2
1.2
---
---
1.7
---
2
---
1.3
---
1.4
1.5
1.5
1.7
0.2
4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft)
---
13.7
14.5
2
6.7
---
1
18.1
2
---
11.1
---
10.5
11.8
1 11.9
1 13.1
1 1.2
1 4
Width/Depth Ratio
9.6
21.6
2
7.4
---
9.8
2
---
1 15.3
---
---
---
---
---
---
I ---
Entrenchment Ratio
1.1
1.4
2
>2.2
---
---
>4
2
---
1 >2.2
---
3.8
4.0
4.0
4.3
0.2
4
'Bank Height Ratio
1.7
2.5
2
1.3
---
---
1.3
2
---
1.0
---
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.0
4
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
6
---
---
18
---
---
13
---
50
10
29
27
71
12
25
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
1
3
3
7
1
25
Pool Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
3
---
---
42
---
---
14
---
88
19
45
43
102
15
24
Pool Max depth (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
--
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
Pool Spacing (ft)
---
---
---
--
---
---
8
---
---
64
---
31
---
125
52
73
72
145
18
24
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
20
---
---
55.5
---
---
24
---
76
24
---
---
76
---
---
Radius of Curvature (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
7
---
---
103.3
---
---
30
---
80
30
---
---
80
---
---
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
0.9
---
---
7.6
---
---
2.1
---
5.7
2.1
---
---
5.7
---
---
Meander Wavelength (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
33
---
---
66
---
---
95
---
181
95
---
---
181
---
---
Meander Width Ratio
---
---
---
---
---
---
2.9
---
---
4.8
---
---
6.8
---
13
6.8
---
---
13
---
---
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ib/fZ
---
---
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
--
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/mZ
---
---
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
F4/G4c
E4/E4b
C4
C4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
---
---
---
--
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
---
---
--
Valley length (ft)
1884
---
1799
---
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
2054
---
1922
---
Sinuosity (ft)
1.09
---
1.07
---
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.015
---
0.018
---
Channel slope (ft/ft)
0.014
---
0.017
---
3 Bankfull Flood lain Area acres
---
---
---
---
4% of Reach with Eroding Banks
---
---
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1= The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2=For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in -line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rare).
3. Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top ofbank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4=Proportion ofreach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Ofvalue/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Table 8. Baseline Stream Data Summary (continued)
Compass Point Mitigation Site - Reach DW1-C
Parameter
Gauge
Regional Curve
Pre -Existing Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only
LL
UL
Eq.
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD'
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Med
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD'
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
13.6
---
---
1
7.1
---
---
13.7
---
2
---
14.0
---
---
---
13.8
---
---
---
Floodprone Width (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
1
>30
---
---
>50
---
2
---
---
---
---
51.3
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
0.9
---
---
1
1.2
---
---
1.4
---
2
---
0.9
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
'Bankfull Max Depth ft
---
---
1.3
---
---
1
1.2
---
---
1.7
---
2
---
1.3
---
---
---
1.2
---
---
---
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftZ
--
12.0
1
6.7
---
I ---
1 18.1
1
2
---
12.2
---
---
---
10.3
Width/Depth Ratio
15.5
1
7.4
---
---
9.8
2
---
16.1
---
---
---
---
Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
1
>2.2
---
---
>4
2
---
>2.2
---
---
---
3.7
---
---
'Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1
1.3
---
---
1.3
2
1.0
---
---
---
1.0
---
---
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
6
---
---
18
---
---
13
---
50
14
24
23
38
9
7
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
1
2
2
4
1
7
Pool Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
3
---
---
42
---
---
14
---
88
25
43
45
55
12
6
Pool Max depth (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
--
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
Pool Spacing (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
8
---
---
64
---
---
31
---
125
41
69
73
84
15
6
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
20
---
---
55.5
---
---
24
---
76
24
---
76
Radius of Curvature (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
7
---
---
103.3
---
---
30
80
30
---
80
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
---
---
---
---
---
--
0.9
---
---
7.6
---
---
2.1
---
5.7
2.1
---
5.7
---
---
---
Meander Wavelength (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
33
---
---
66
---
---
95
---
181
95
---
181
Meander Width Ratio
---
---
---
---
---
--
2.9
---
4.8
---
---
6.8
---
13
6.8
13
---
---
---
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ib/fZ
---
---
---
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
--
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/mZ
---
---
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
C4b
E4/E4b
C4
C4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
---
---
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
---
---
Valley length (ft)
550
---
525
---
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
600
---
566
---
Sinuosity (ft)
1.09
---
1.08
---
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.022
---
0.014
---
Channel slope (ft/ft)
0.02
---
0.0127
---
3 Bankfull Flood lain Area acres
---
---
---
---
4% of Reach with Eroding Banks
---
---
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1= The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2=For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in -line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rare).
3. Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top ofbank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4=Proportion ofreach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Ofvalue/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Table 8. Baseline Stream Data Summary (continued)
Compass Point Mitigation Site - Reach DW1-D
Parameter
Gauge
Regional Curve
Pre -Existing Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only
LL
UL
Eq.
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD'
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Med
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD'
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
12.9
---
---
1
7.1
---
---
13.7
---
2
---
15.0
---
---
---
15.4
---
---
---
Floodprone Width (ft)
---
---
26.7
---
---
1
>30
---
---
>50
---
2
---
---
---
---
41.8
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
1.2
---
---
1
1.2
---
---
1.4
---
2
---
0.9
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
'Bankfull Max Depth ft
---
---
1.9
---
---
1
1.2
---
---
1.7
---
2
---
1.1
---
---
---
1.1
---
---
---
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftZ
--
15.3
1
6.7
---
I ---
1 18.1
1
2
---
13.0
---
---
---
12.7
Width/Depth Ratio
10.8
1
7.4
---
---
9.8
2
---
17.3
---
---
---
---
Entrenchment Ratio
---
---
2.1
---
---
1
>2.2
---
---
>4
2
---
>2.2
---
---
>3.7
---
---
---
'Bank Height Ratiol
1.5
1
1.3
---
---
1.3
2
1.0
---
---
---
1.0
---
---
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
6
---
---
18
---
---
---
---
---
11
29
25
66
16
11
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
2
3
3
5
1
11
Pool Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
3
---
---
42
---
---
14
---
88
33
57
52
88
19
10
Pool Max depth (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
--
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
Pool Spacing (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
8
---
---
64
---
---
31
---
125
60
86
79
143
26
10
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
20
---
---
55.5
---
---
24
---
76
24
---
76
Radius of Curvature (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
7
---
---
103.3
---
---
30
80
30
---
80
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
---
---
---
---
---
--
0.9
---
---
7.6
---
---
2.1
---
5.7
2.1
---
5.7
---
---
---
Meander Wavelength (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
33
---
---
66
---
---
95
---
181
95
---
181
Meander Width Ratio
---
---
---
---
---
--
2.9
---
4.8
---
---
6.8
---
13
6.8
13
---
---
---
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ib/fZ
---
---
---
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
--
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/mZ
---
---
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
B4c
E4/E4b
C4b
C4b
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
---
---
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
---
---
Valley length (ft)
734
---
710
---
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
800
---
758
---
Sinuosity (ft)
1.09
---
1.07
---
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.011
---
0.022
---
Channel slope (ft/ft)
0.01
---
0.021
---
3 Bankfull Flood lain Area acres
---
---
---
---
4% of Reach with Eroding Banks
---
---
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1= The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2=For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in -line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rare).
3. Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top ofbank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4=Proportion ofreach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Ofvalue/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Table 8. Baseline Stream Data Summary (continued)
Compass Point Mitigation Site - Reach DW2-B
Parameter
Gauge
Regional Curve
Pre -Existing Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only
LL
UL
Eq.
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD'
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Med
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD'
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
6.6
---
---
1
7.1
---
---
13.7
---
2
---
10.0
---
---
---
9.6
---
---
---
Floodprone Width (ft)
---
---
10.9
---
---
1
>30
---
---
>50
---
2
---
---
---
---
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
1.3
---
---
1
1.2
---
---
1.4
---
2
---
0.8
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
'Bankfull Max Depth ft
---
---
1.7
---
---
1
1.2
---
---
1.7
---
2
---
1.1
---
---
---
1.1
---
---
---
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftZ
--
8.5
1
6.7
---
I ---
1 18.1
1
2
---
8.0
---
---
---
7.2
Width/Depth Ratio
5.1
1
7.4
---
---
9.8
2
---
12.5
---
---
---
---
Entrenchment Ratio
---
---
1.6
---
---
1
>2.2
---
---
>4
2
---
>2.2
--
---
---
5.2
---
---
'Bank Height Ratiol
2.5
1
1.3
---
---
1.3
2
1.0
---
---
---
1.0
---
---
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
6
---
---
18
---
---
10
---
20
12
20
17
30
6
9
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
0
2
2
4
1
9
Pool Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
3
---
---
42
---
---
23
---
41
17
30
31
44
8
9
Pool Max depth (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
--
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
Pool Spacing (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
8
---
---
64
---
---
33
---
52
33
50
53
58
9
8
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
20
---
---
55.5
---
---
30
---
36
---
---
---
---
Radius of Curvature (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
--
7
---
---
103.3
---
---
23
40
---
---
---
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
---
---
---
---
---
--
0.9
---
---
7.6
---
---
2
---
4
---
---
---
---
Meander Wavelength (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
33
---
---
66
---
---
82
---
87
Meander Width Ratio
---
---
---
---
---
--
2.9
---
4.8
---
---
8.2
---
8.7
---
---
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ib/fZ
---
---
---
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
--
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/mZ
---
---
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
E4/E4b
C4b
C4b
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
---
---
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
---
---
Valley length (ft)
---
230
---
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
---
277
---
Sinuosity (ft)
---
1.2
---
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
---
0.031
---
Channel slope (ft/ft)
---
0.026
---
3 Bankfull Flood lain Area acres
---
---
---
---
4% of Reach with Eroding Banks
---
---
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
Shaded cells indicate that these will typically not be filled in.
1= The distributions for these parameters can include information from both the cross-section measurements and the longitudinal profile. 2=For projects with a proximal USGS gauge in -line with the project reach (added bankfull verification - rare).
3. Utilizing XS measurement data produce an estimate of the bankfull floodplain area in acres, which should be the area from the top ofbank to the toe of the terrace riser/slope.
4=Proportion ofreach exhibiting banks that are eroding based on the visual survey for comparison to monitoring data; 5. Ofvalue/needed only if the n exceeds 3

Appendix D. Table 9 - Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Sections)
Project Name: Compass Point
Cross Section 1 (Pool)
Cross Section 2 (Riffle)
Cross Section 3 (Pool)
Cross Section 4 (Riffle)
Cross Section 5 (Riffle)
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on ABASA'
874.0
874.2
873.6
873.7
868.4
868.5
868.3
868.4
860.3
860.3
Bankfull Width ft'
10.9
111
1 9.6
10.6
1 11.6
11.9
12.9
13.9
13.0
18.2
Floodprone Width (ft)'
-
-
50.0
>49.9
-
-
49.8
>50
50
>50
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2
2.3
2.2
1.1
1.1
1.9
2.2
1.4
1.4
1.7
1.3
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
874.04
874.0
873.6
873.7
868.4
868.5
868.3
868.3
860.3
860.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2
12.0
10.5
7.2
7.1
12.8
12.2
11.1
10.3
13.1
9.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio'
-
-
>52
>4.7
-
-
>3.8
>3.6
>3.8
>2.7
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio'
-
1.0
1 1.0
1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1 0.9
Cross Section 6 (Pool)
Cross Section 7 (Pool)
Cross Section 8 (Riffle)
Cross Section 9 (Pool)
Cross Section 10 (Riffle)
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on ABASA'
859.9
859.9
849.1
8491
1 849.0
849.0
842.2
842.1
842.1
842.2
Bankfull Width ft'
13.2
13.1
15.2
16.6
11.6
11.6
12.4
10.6
12.2
13.3
Flood rove Width (ft)'
-
-
-
-
50
>50
>49.9
>50.1
Bankfull Max DeptLL
3.3
3.4
2.3
2.5
1.4
1.6
2.2
2.5
1.6
1.5
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
859.9
859.9
849.1
849.3
849.0
849.1
842.2
842.4
842.10
842.2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2
19.8
20.3
17.4
21.1
10.5
11.6
14.4
16.8
12.6
12.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio'
-
-
-
-
>4.3
>4.3
-
-
4.1
>3.8
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio'
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.0
Cross
Section
11
(Pool)
Cross
Section
12
(Riffle)
Cross Section
13
(Pool)
Cross
Section
14
(Riffle)
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY5
MY7
MY+
Bankfull Elevation (ft) - Based on ABASA'
823.9
824.0
823.1
822.9
811.6
811.5
811.0
811.2
Bankfull Width ft'
14.7
15.7
13.8
12.7
13.6
13.0
15.4
17.0
Flood rove Width (ft)'
-
-
51.3
>51.4
-
-
41.8
>42.8
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)2
22
2.2
1.2
1.6
1.9
2.4
1.1
1.1
Low Bank Elevation (ft)
823.88
823.9
823.1
823.1
811.60
811.7
811.0
811.2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)2
19.7
18.0
10.3
12.4
17.1
21.0
12.7
13.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio'
-
-
>3.7
>4.0
>2.7
>2.5
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio'
1.0
1.1
-
1 A
1.0
1 - Uses the as -built cross sectional area as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation
2 - Uses the current years low top of bank as the basis for adjusting each subsequent years bankfull elevation

Appendix E
Hydrology Data

Table 10. 2021 Rainfall Summary
Mont
Average
Normal Limits
Elkin Station
Precipitation
30 Percent
70 Percent
January
3.89
2.80
4.59
2.78
February
3.49
2.41
4.16
5.08
March
4.66
3.21
5.55
4.70
April
3.56
2.22
4.31
2.49
May
4.31
2.90
5.16
2.51
June
3.93
2.26
4.78
3.45
July
4.10
2.93
4.85
6.59
August
3.33
2.36
3.95
5.60
September
4.00
2.33
4.86
3.36
October
3.69
2.11
4.45
---
November
3.13
2.35
3.65
---
December
3.54
2.29
4.26
---
Total
45.63
30.17
54.57
36.56
Above Normal Limits
Below Normal Limits
Table 11. Documentation of Geomorphically Significant Flow Events
Number of Bankfull
Year Events
Maximum Bankfu7WD7ateof
Height (ft)
Maximum Bankfull Event
Stage Recorder DW 1-B
MYO/12020 2
0.15
11/12/2020
2
0.05
7/2/2021
Number of Flow Events
"Gagge
Maximum Consecutive
Flow Days
Maximum Cummlative
FlowDays
Maximum Consecutive
Flow Date Range
1-A
MYO/12020
1 1
196
196
6/19/2020-12/31/2020
MYl 2021
1 1
1 266
266
1/1/2021-9/23/2021

MY1 2021 Compass Point Flow Gauge DW1-A Stream Flow Hydrograph
15
14
13
2
12
11
10
Q-
9 —
d
o
�
w
d
c
8
7
1
6
5
4
3
lop
2
1
1
01 0
6/19/20 7/19/20 8/19/20 9/19/20 10/19/20 11 /19/20 12/19/20 1 /19/21 2/19/21 3/19/21 4/19/21 5/19/21 6/19/21 7/19/21 8/19/21 9/19/21
Months
— Rain —Depth — — — DS Riffle �Betl

Table 12.
2021 Max Hydroperiod (Growing Season 5-Apr through 28-Oct, 206 days)
Well ID
Consecutive
Cumulative
Occurrences
Da s
Hydroperiod
Days
Hydroperiod
6W1
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
GW2
11
5
34
17
14
GW3
84
41
165
80
3
Note: Data was unrecoverable from GW 1 in MYl
Table 13.
Summary of Groundwater Monitoring Results
Compass Point
Well ID
H dro eriod
Year 0/1
(2020)
Year 1
(2021)
Year 2
(2022)
Year 3
(2023)
Year 4
(2024)
Year 5
(2025)
Year 6
(2026)
Year 7
(2027)
GW1
NA
NA
GW2
3
5
GW3
64
41

MY1 2021 Compass Point GW2
10 12.0
Growing
Seaso
i
Growing Season
11.0
0
10.0
9.0
N
d
8.0
-10
t�
vowl
ai
7.0 v
O
d
6.0 p
-20
W
'++
�
L
5.0
4.0 a
-30
O
,L^
V
3.0
2.0
-40
1.0
0.0
-50
6/19 7/19 8/19 9/19 10/19 11/19 12/19 1/19 2/19 3/19 4/19 5/19 6/19 7/19 8/19 9/19 10/19 11/19 12/19
Months
lllllllllllllllllllllllllllElkin Daily Rainfall - GW2

MY1 2021 Compass Point GW3
10 12.0
Gr
wing
Seasom
G
owinc
Seasc
n
11.0
0
10.0
9.0
N
d
8.0
-10
t�
�►
as
7.0 v
O
d
6.0 p
-20
W
'++
�
L
5.0
4.0 a
-30
O
,L^
V
3.0
2.0
-40
1.0
OIL0.0
IL
-50
6/19 7/19 8/19 9/19 10/19 11/19 12/19 1/19 2/19 3/19 4/19 5/19 6/19 7/19 8/19 9/19 10/19 11/19 12/19
Months
lllllllllllllllllllllllllllElkin Daily Rainfall - GW3