20130847 Ver 1_More Info Received_20130822

Dennison, Laurie
13 -og41
From: Bob Zarzecki < [e-mail] >
Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 4:38 PM
To: Smith, Cherri L, 'Brown, Craig J SAW' (Craig.J. Brown@ usace.a rmy.mil); Dennison, Laurie
Cc: bobzarzecki @gmail.com
Subject: WESTON LAKEFRONT - REVISED
Attachments: WESTON LAKEFRONT_PCN_Revised Non- 404.pdf
Importance: High
Cherri & Craig:
Attached is the revised application and plans, reflecting the Corps verification that the 121 feet of
stream impact requested is non-jurisdictional/non-404, and requesting approval under the State
Isolated /Non -404 General Permit, Neuse Buffer Rule and requesting a "no permit required" letter from
the Corps. I included a revised cover letter as well. The remainder of the information provided in the
original application remains valid. (Cherri - I also filled in the correct buffer section, thanks for the
catch and understanding.)
Please let me know if this digital copy is sufficient or if you need paper copies.
I appreciate your help as always, and don't hesitate to contact me if you have any questions.
Laurie:
I've been in communication with Cherri on this, but wanted to make sure that you had a digital copy
for your files too.
Thanks!
Bob Zarzecki
Wetlands Department Manager
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
(919) 846 -5900 Office Phone
(919) 256 -4517 Direct Line
(919) 846 -9467 Fax
(919) 270 -2068 Mobile
bzarzecki(a-sandec.com
Visit us at SandEC.com!
This electronic communication, including all attachments, is intended only for the named addressee (s) and may contain confidential information. This electronic
communication may not have passed through our standard review /quality control process. Design data and recommendations included herein are provided as a
matter of convenience and should not be used for final design. Rely only on final, hardcopy materials bearing the consultant's original signature and seal. If you
are not the named addressee (s), any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited. If you have received this electronic
communication in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete the original communication from your system. Thank you

13-oe+7
Environmental Consultants, PA
Road • Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 • Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.SandE.C.com
To- US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Attn- David Shaeffer or Craig Brown
Cc: DENR - Raleigh Regional Office
N.C. Division of Water Resources (formerly DWQ)
3800 Barrett Drive
Raleigh, NC 27699
Attn: Cherri Smith
From. Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A.
Bob Zarzecki
REVISED August 22, 2013
S &EC Project # 12032
N.C. Division of Resources - WeBSCape
Archdale Building — 9"' Floor
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
Attn Karen Higgins
Re: WESTON LAKE FRONT, Weston Parkway, Cary, Wake Co., NC
On behalf of the owners, Highwoods Properties corporations, please find attached a REVISED complete application
and supplemental information requesting written concurrence from the N.0 Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) that
the activities proposed below may proceed under the Isolated Non -404 General Permit and Neuse River Riparian
Buffer Protection Rules. We also request a "No Permit Required" letter from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
verifying that the proposed project will not impact jurisdictional waters of the United States
Please contact me at (919) 846 -5900 if you have any questions or require additional information.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Name
WESTON LAKE FRONT
Project Type
Commercial /Office Development
Owner / Applicant
Hi hwoods Services, Inc & PAPEC Weston III, LLC
County
Wake
Nearest Town
Cary
Waterbody Name
UT to Lake Crabtree
Basin / Sub -basin
Neuse
Index Number
27-33-(3.5)
Class
C; NSW
USGS Cataloging Unit
03020201
IMPACT SUMMARY
Non- Junsdictional/ Non -404 Stream Impact (acres):
0.008
Wetland Impact (acres).
0
Open Water Impact (acres).
0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres)
0.008
Total Non -404 Stream Impact (linear feet):
121
Neuse River Buffer
16,489 sf
Attachments.
REVISED PCN Application Form
REVISED Proposed Plans / Impact Exhibits (3 sheets)
Q6Q01�/G
AUG 2 2 2013

CF WATE9
O
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no. '
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
[I Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number. or General Permit (GP) number.
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑ No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ® Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ® Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
® Yes ❑ No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in-lieu fee program.
❑ Yes ® No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑Yes ®No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Weston Lake Front
2b. County:
Wake
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Cary
2d. Subdivision name:
n/a
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
n/a
3. fawner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Highwoods Services, Inc. & PAPEC Weston III, LLC
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
B:07298 P:0550 & 6:08718 P:1011
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Mr. Randy Roberson V.P. ( Highwoods Properties)
3d. Street address:
3100 Smoketree Court, Suite 600
3e. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27604
3f. Telephone no.:
* call agent
3g. Fax no.:
* send to agent
3h. Email address:
* send to agent
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Mr. Bob Zarzecki
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA (a.k.a., S &EC, PA)
5c. Street address:
11010 Raven Ridge Road
5d. City, state, zip:
Raleigh, NC 27614
5e. Telephone no.:
(919) 846 -5900
5f. Fax no.:
(919) 846 -9467
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
0755978384 & 0755972015
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.8299 Longitude: - 78.7991
-1c. Property size:
40.14 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Lake Crabtree (Crabree Creek)
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C; NSW (Stream Index No. 27- 3343.5))
2c. River basin:
Neuse (03020201)
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The property is currently vacant, wooded land. The property is bordered to the south by Weston Parkway, to the north by Lake Crabtree, and to the
east and west by other office building complexes (similar to what Is proposed on this property). Surrounding land uses include other office building
complexes with the same zoning, and Lake Crabtree County Park.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.031
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 1,400
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to develop a commercial office complex development on the property.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Phase 1 will Include two office buildings, two parking decks, access drives, and associated Infrastructure. Heavy earth moving equipment will be used.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
®preliminary ❑X Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (If known): Bob zarzedQ
Agency /Consultant Company: S &EC
Other.
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps Jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Jurisdictional Determination, September 20, 2002, SAW- 2002 -21494 (expired); N C DWQ Stream Identification, March 21, 2013; Re- verification of the
2002 Jurisdictional Determination by Craig Brown of USACE Raleigh on August 13, 2013, owner accepted 2002 determination without changes.
S. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑Yes ®No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
® Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, explain.
Additional office buildings, parking decks and infrastructure are proposed within the upland areas of the development in the future. However, no future
Impacts are anticipated at this time
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams — tributaries ® Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
Type of jurisdiction
Area of
number
Corps (404,10) or
impact
Permanent (P) or
DWQ (401, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W2 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
2g. Total
Wetland Impacts:
0
2h. Comments:
No impacts are proposed to jurisdictional wetlands
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial (PER) or
Type of
Average
Impact
number
intermittent (INT)?
jurisdiction
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(feet)
feet)
S1 P
Fill
Unnamed
INT
DWO
3
121
S2
Choose one
S3 -
Choose one
_
S4 -
Choose one
S5 -
Choose one
-
S6 -
Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary
Impacts
121
31. Comments:
The jurisdictional limits of the stream from the 2002 determination were reverified by the Craig Brown of the USACE Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
during a site visit held on August 13, 2013. The owner /applicant agreed to the 2002 determination without changes. The road crossing is located
above the jurisdictional origin of the stream and within the DWR (previously DWQ) non -404 but buffered section of stream.
Page 4 of IC
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c. �
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 -
Choose one
Choose
02 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water Impacts
o
4g. Comments: No impacts to open water is proposed.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
Yes No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require miti ation then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
® Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Catawba [] Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet )
69.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1 P
Impact #1 - Road
UT to Lake Crabtree (Crabtree Creek)
No
6,258
3,808
82 P
Impact #2 - SW Outfall
UT to Lake Crabtree (Crabtree Creek)
No
979
630
B3 P
Impact #3 - SW Outfall
UT to Lake Crabtree (Crabtree Creek)
No
875
645
B4 T Impact
#4 - Sanitary Sewer
UT to Lake Crabtree (Crabtree Creek)
No
1,047
2,247
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
YestNo
6h. Total Buffer Impacts :
9,159
7,330
61. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
S&EC was hired by the owner back in 2002 to delineate all jurisdictional waters and buffers. The project engineer and designers have taken every
effort to work around these regulated features, and were guccessful in limiting their impacts to only 121 feet of non jurisdictional /non -404 stream
channel and "allowable" uses within the buffer.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The road was reduced in width at the location of the proposed crossing, retaining walls are proposed to allow for steeper fill slopes and reduced
impacts. The alignment of the road is set by the existing intersection. Temporary erosion control measures will be installed around project boundaries
to avoid and minimize any indirect impacts to remaining jurisdictional wetlands Permanent stormwater best management practices (BMPs) will be
used (e.g., stormwater wetlands), and approved by the Town of Cary, a DWQ certified local government.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: Bachelors Delight Mitigation Bank
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non- riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
S. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer
❑ Yes ® No
mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c•
6d.
6e,
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
o
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
See Impact Map Table: All impacts are "allowable ", No mitigation therefore is proposed.
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
The project Is proposing the use of stormwater wetlands that will remove nutrients prior to discharging
through the buffer and to the streams. The Town of Cary, a DWQ certified local government, will review
❑ Yes ® NO
and approve the SMP for the project and a copy of the SMP approval will be provided to DWQ.
2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
40%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The plan Includes the use of two stormwater wetlands for the entire property that will be initially sized for the first phase of the development and will be
modified, increased in size or configuration, as needed, as the property develops. The stormwater management plan will be reviewed and approved
by the Town of Cary, a certified local government by DWQ, and will ensure proper treatment for the "C, NSW" classified waters.
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
Town of Cary, NC
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Town of Cary, NC
® Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally - implemented stormwater management programs
® NSW
apply (check all that apply):
USMP
Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HOW
4a. Which of the following state- implemented stormwater management programs apply
ORW
(check all that apply):
BSession Law 2006 -248
❑Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federallstate/local) funds or the
❑Yes No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes Q No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 26.0200)?
2b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑Yes © No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
development,
❑ Yes ® No
additional which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project as a whole is proposed as the entire property. The surrounding properties are already developed.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The Town or Cary has adequate sanitary sewer capacity available for the project and will ensure this through their permitting processes required for
this project
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑Yes ®No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
®Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
NHP Map Viewer & online records search. See attached map & list Bald Eagles are identified in the County and known to exist at Lake Crabtree, but
the project is set back off the lake, as adjacent developments have, and is not anticipated to have any effect on them.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAH "EFH Mapper" and online records search.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ®No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
NC SHPO - HPOWEB map viewer and online records search. No structures were found to exist on the property. No records of cultural resources
were found on or adjacent to the property. See attached SHPO- HPOWES map.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
The flood fringe extends onto the property, however no development is proposed within it, and the propose stream crossing is located over 1,000 feet
from it.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
NC Floodplain Mapping Information System and DFIRM. See attached map.
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Bob Zarzecki
��
Revised 8/22/13
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
nature
Date
QAWs signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10

LAKE
CRABTREE
EXIST 48" SANITARY
SEWER
NEW B" SANITARY
SEWER
NEW SANITARY SEWER
MANHOLE (TYP )
50' NEUSE RIVER
BUFFER (MEASURED
FROM TOP OF BANK)
� o _
s o
�� j I
Q� 0'
0 NEW 20 00' TOWN_ i
IC
,UTILI EASEM
\ O
\ I`,
NEW SAN
vr) 1, - \\ \
IMPACT ®2
SANITARY SEWER OUTFALL
BUFFER ZONE 1= 1,047 S F
BUFFER ZONE 2= 2,247 S F
EXIST SANITARY
SEWER MANHOLE
DTI DSCAPE
BUFFER
\ \ It \\ V PRO- POSED-,LOWN
\ I �OF-eAR- GREENWgY
- ESMTASEME
IN
LEGEND
EXIST 4000' TOWN
��' • • �� roa
_�EOcE OF
OF CARY PUBLIC
UTILITY EASEMENT
� ,
PLD
0.
FledmOUlldudU0l941yP
1 S �• X20 00' 50' NEUSE RIVER
20 00 't OFFER (MEASURED
1 �� , ;144 R bP- F BAd .—
`
\ i sr
Z EACH SIDE
100 -YR FLOOD LINE \
PRELIMINARY
DTI DSCAPE
BUFFER
\ \ It \\ V PRO- POSED-,LOWN
\ I �OF-eAR- GREENWgY
- ESMTASEME
IN
LEGEND
BUFFER
® I,047 S FONE 1
PLD
® BUFFER ZONE 2
2,247 S.F
FledmOUlldudU0l941yP
8Q2- 2M5tFmttBotd BalephBC 1166
rdaise�ls� Pa�sar�
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR CONSIAUCTION
1CARO��':
io
ro • /;6
�\
�GINi��yS\
Z CL
pa z
C J
L ~ Q 0
Y CL X
g�Q�
Z a. O
OC
D W OZ
WjW cc
3m3<0
PROJECT:
FD'6�
NORTH
DATE:
0 50 100
150
30 JUL 2013
1SCALE:
1.250,
Dwc, a 1 MS

\
\ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ \
i
NEW RETAINING
WALL (TYP) �y
50' NEUSE RIVER \ y
BUFFER (MEASURED
FROM TOP OF BANK \
EACH SIDE)
NEW RIP -RAP APRON
(TYP )
NEW LANDSCAPE
BUFFER (TYP )
EXISTING WETLANDS
(NO IMPACTS)
PROPOSED TOWN OF
CARY GREENWAY ESMT
LEGEND
®BUFFER
ZONE 1
875 S F
ZONE 2
®BUFFER
645 S F
1�
NORTH
0 50 100 150
PLD
ftONwD g%w _
MR31ta[fhbwkt lc 2168
Td91£6151660 Fa919ftW
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
o< Z
W2 J
LL
LIJ Q 0
Y a
CL
Y V
CL
O W ZZ
WjWW
3m34c
PROJECT:
loft
DATE:
50 JUL 2015
SCALE:
1'.50'
I DWG. # 1 MA

PROPOSED 50' TOWN , ''
OF CARY GREENWAY
EASEMENT ` i' TIP
/t/ 00 jI
\ \ t 1 tl j /.
♦ `� / •-�` yc^ 3 RQP } 1 ,\ + PRO P�EDi
` ♦, "yoo° r. \ y��� t+ ` \\ 'tSTOR AEg/
LAh D
50' NEUSE RIVER BUFFER
(MEASURED FROM TOP OF 1 / FES r 0• /
BANK EACH SIDE)
NEW RIP —RAP APRON
IMPACT 12 ! `� ♦ \ \ \ \ \ \ ` I
STORMWATER OUTFALL �� \ \ ♦ `� `\ \ \ \ �� } \ / / \
BUFFER ZONE 1= 979 S F ♦ t
BUFFER ZONE 2- 630 S F l ` ♦ \ `\ \ \ \
� _ ♦♦ .�o;o� `.. �\ \ � \may
`\
x4cT `I
®BUFFER
ZONE 1
979 S F
ZONE 2
®BUFFER
630 S F
NORTH
0 50 100 150
PLD
Pre�loaUdudDe�n,LLP _
�2AIguFYtksBod Brldph,At IB6
1l1919645'Ifi00 Pa9198ffTIW
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Z GL 4c
pQ z
w2 J
L ~ Q K
Y Q
Y V
CL g a�
d
W A Z
W D W X
3 m 3�
PROJECT:
HHK
DATE:
50 JUL 2013
SCALE:
1 ° =50,
DWG. # IM.3

\ 1 .
STREAM FROM \\�� \ 1.
POINT A -13 ` \ '
A (PIPE
IN `\ l
INLET) ) AND
ND `
BEYOND PIPE
TO LAKE `
NEW 10' LANDSCAPE
c2D L I
BUFFER
IMPACT #1 \
STREAM CROSSING
E•A j �
l
�`. ``_
III V
BUFFER ZONE 1= 6,258 SF `
BUFFER ZONE 2= 3,808 S F
NON- JURISDICTIONAL STREAM �\ `
IMPACT = 121 L F \ `
S INT 1 \ \
TO SINT 3 ♦\ \\ \ \\ `
�TING
NEU ARIAN,
STREAM F TURF\ `
\ oo \ \
NEW ORAIkAY \
NEW CONC CtlR8 \ \ \
BUTTER. ,(TYP)
1 /
\ \ 50 NEUSE RIVER
\ +\ \ \ I BUFFER (MEASURED
\\\ \ { �yFROM TOP OF BANK I
\
1 / li I EACH SIDE) T
I
I p 1
\ i \yNE1�Y (}ETI®Ilt�{G VI�1LL
\ \1 !N, )
111 I � I t
N W 118 S RM I+
± I 1 StU I 11 t
!1 I f{ W I tP� " 4RON
N
1 i 11 `I (TYP)
1 I
I n
I� I
`\
A41
ea •
®BUFFER ZONE 1
6,258 S.F
®BUFFER ZONE 2
3,808 S F
NORTH
• 50 100 150
PID
h&QwwDQw
o"Faftaw mck1c m
Td998m Pauffin
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
. H CAR„ :•.
pa z
i J
L` a °X
Lu
Y Q Yo
CL
Ix
0 Lu ZZ
W D W c
3 co 3 o
PROJECT:
WK
DATE:
15 AU6 2015
SCALE:
1 " =50'
DWG. # I M.2

1
CR B REE
{ y
J AREA 2
TO DAS
fl.' rt
\, �{
\%`
TO
1 'cii
G
•PACT AREA
rREFER TO •L5
inn
Au
tI ACT MmT
^arm.
• NAME
DE91itlP1ION
ZONE1�
Z
TOTAL _
1 MA
STREAM CPOSSINO
I_ 61258 S F
WESTON ,
,
��
LAKE
t
\IJ
7)
FRONT
1 \ , , \
WEI AND NO. z
)-�
STORMWATFR OUTFALL
SANIIAR" SLWER OUTFALL
875 S F
r
645 S F
L ___ J APACT AREA 9
• i REFER TO MA
PROPOSED OFFICE
BUDDING NO. 1
PROPOSED
ocac No. 1
I �
I
1l
F— SUMMARY OF BUFFER IMPACTS
tI ACT MmT
• NAME
DE91itlP1ION
ZONE1�
Z
TOTAL _
1 MA
STREAM CPOSSINO
I_ 61258 S F
3 808 SF
10,066 S F
2 JILS
STORMWATLR OUTFALL
979 SF
_
630 S F
1.609 S F
S IY.4
4 016
STORMWATFR OUTFALL
SANIIAR" SLWER OUTFALL
875 S F
645 S F
1,520 SF
1,047 S F
2,247 SF
3,294 S F
uECT TOTAL
9 159 sr-
7,330 S F
16,489 S F
NORTH
PID
PD9YOIIT 1�19D DC'.BI6N, W.P
mn -m. m wwa rouo
na°�°°rae.na ""wn�c rn+a
nae{srroa w{
iJi•J,�
PRELIMINARY
Nor w c ucnoN
Z Z
J
Iii >
Ow
CL
a
z IX
0 LU02
co LU U.
3 cot 0
ISSUED 30JUL2018
REVISIONS
RM4 SIFfAY II81
DIA"BY UA
cer:a B
PROJECT NYYMIL
OVERALL SITE
u No IM.1