20100141 Ver 3_More Info Received_20130823

Engineering, PLLC
August 22, 2013
Mr. Danny Smith
NC DENR
Division of Water Quality
3800 Barrett Drive
Suite 101
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
William W. Dreitzler, P.E.
800 New Charleston Drive
Fuquay Varina, NC 27526
Phone: [phone]
[e-mail]
10 -014 v.3
Nicholas S. Rightmyer, P.E.
P.O. Box 1448
Roanoke Rapids, NC 27870
Phone: [phone]
nsrightm @yahoo.com
Reference: Re- Submittal of Nationwide 29 Pre- Construction Notification — MODIFICATION
DWQ Project # 10 -0141, Ver.3
Collymore Lane Residential Subdivision
Warren County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Smith:
For your review, please find attached the
Subdivision project:
• Four (4) Pre- Construction Not
• Four (4) Stormwater Calculatii
• Four (4) Wetlands Impacts M.
• Two (2) Construction Drawin
• Two (2) Construction Drawings kria.,
Comments from your letter dated June 25`h have been addressed as follows:
Collymore Lane Residential
Comment 1): Please provide a site plan showing streams and protected riparian buffers as overlays on
the site plan. Zone 1 and Zone 2 of the riparian buffer must be differentiated on this plan.
DM2 response: The boundaries of the riparian buffers were added to the site plan and an impacts
map was created with each impact zone clearly defined.
Comment 2): Enumerate all stream and riparian impacts on the site plan and clearly label impacts.
These impacts must then correspond to the impacts listed in the application.
DM2 response: Each impact area is labeled on the attached impacts map and corresponds with the
impacts listed in the application.

Comment 3): Since the project proposes to impact protected riparian buffers, there needs to be a
diffuse flow plan or an explanation for why a diffuse flow plan is not included with the application.
"See original application" is not an adequate response to the question.
DM2 response: A diffuse flow plan is not proposed for this project, and an explanation is
included on the application. Slopes within the buffer areas are greater than the maximums
permissible for level spreaders. The alternative to level spreaders is typically installation of BMP
measures upstream of the buffers, however, because the project is of a very low density, and
stormwater runoff flows through grassed yards, shoulders, and conveyance channels before
reaching the buffer area, it is our opinion that the BMP treatment is not warranted.
Comment 4): Plan sheets must be stamped, signed, and dated.
DM2 response: Plan sheets included in this re- submittal have been stamped, signed, and dated.
Please feel free to contact me at your earliest convenience if you have questions or need additional
information.
Sincerely,
DM2 Engineering, PLLC
Nicholas S. Ri er, P.E.
Project Engineer
Cc: Collymore Bey
ADM2 Engineering, PLLC

ot WA L14
o <
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
© Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
Q Yes ❑ No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express Q Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes Q No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ® No
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Collymore -Bey Property
2b. County:
Warren
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Vaughn / Macon
2d. Subdivision name:
Collymore Lane
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
n/a
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Mr. Clement Collymore -Bey
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
DB 873 PG 48
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Mr. Clement Collymore -Bey AUG � ' � 2013
3d. Street address:
1151 Macon Embro Road - wa
3e. City, state, zip:
Macon, North Carolina 27551 wench
3f. Telephone no.:
(919) 724 -3194
3g. Fax no..
3h. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
Same as Owner
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
S. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Nicholas S. Rightmyer, PE
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
DM2 Engineering, PLLC
5c. Street address:
P.O. Box 1448
5d. City, state, zip:
Roanoke Rapids, NC 27870
5e. Telephone no.:
(252) 532 -2364
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
nsdghtm @yahoo.com
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
H6 33 & H6 33A
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 36.39161 Longitude: - 78.06503
1c. Property size:
26.74 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Intermittent tributary to Little Fishing Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C,NSW
2c. River basin:
Tar - Pamlico
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site is forested, except for the existing dearing and roadway construction, and consists of gently rolling topography. Land use within the general
vicinity consists of mostly rural agricultural land with scattered residential dwellings
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.25
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 1,893
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to replace existing metal pipes with reinforced concrete pipe, and to add required energy dissipators.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The existing pipe will be removed and replaced with RCP, and the Energy dissipators will be installed.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency /Consultant Company: Dramby Environmental Consultin
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
DYes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
A 401 permit has been issued for this project. This application is for replacement of the installed pipe and installation of dissipator pads.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes © No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ❑X Streams — tributaries ❑X Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Tem ora
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W2 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary m
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P
Culvert #1
unnamed
INT
DWQ
60
S2 P
Dissipator #1
unnamed
INT
DWQ
32
S3 P
Culvert #2
unnamed
INT
DWQ
24
S4 P
Dissipator #2
unnamed
INT
DWQ
24
S5 T
Future Utility Install
unnamed
INT
DWQ
10
S6 -
Choose one
-
-
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
150
3i. Comments:
All existing pipe that was included in the original application to be removed. Length shown above include new pipe length to be installed plus length of
dissipator pads The temporary impacts included above are from the original application for future utility installations.
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 -
Choose one
Choose
02 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water Impacts
4g. Comments:
6. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse Q Tar - Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet )
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1 P
Roadway Grading
unnamed
No
4,322
3,116
B2 T
EC & Utility Install
unnamed
No
1,317
982
B3 P
Roadway Grading
unnamed
No
1,985
1,237
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
7,624
5,335
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The proposed design is similar to the original design, except for the addition of dissipator pads. The width of the second crossing was reduced to the
minimum to meet the developers needs.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
A sediment and erosion control plan has been prepared and will be implemented during construction.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes Q No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete If Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Pro ram
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete If Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Level spreaders are not appropriate due to excessive slope within the buffer. The majority of the runoff
Yes No
from impervious surfaces flows through grass shoulders, yards, and grass ditches, all of which help
❑ ©
reduce pollutants before reaching the buffer. Check dams are proposed just outside of the buffer areas
to reduce velocity before entering the buffer.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
10
2b. Does this proj ect require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
The proposed design is very similar to the original design that was previously permitted, with no additional pervious area proposed. The development
is low density, and utilizes grassed ditches for drainage. The volume of traffic on the proposed roadway is expected to be very low, which minimizes
pollutant loads from vehicle traffic. A large percentage of the development will remain undisturbed and will remain pervious, greatly offsetting the
impervious area proposed. Per the original application, no special control measures should be needed for these stream crossings.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Warren County
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally- implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
USMP
apply (check all that apply):
® Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
ORW
(check all that apply):
HSession Law 2006 -246
[]Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
6. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
Q Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes © No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑X Yes ❑ No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑Yes ❑X No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
Adequate erosion control measures were not implemented during the initial construction, which has resulted in sediment deposits within the
downstream stream beds. The proposed erosion control plan includes instructions to remove the sediment with shovels and buckets and restore the
stream bed to native soils / grades.
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Homes will have individual septic systems on each lot.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

P .
S. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
Yes ® No
impacts?
T--
Sc. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Previously detemdrred from original submitlal
S. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Previously detemmned from odpal submittal
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
[3 Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Previously determined from original submittal
B. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100.year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
Sc. What source(s) did you use to make the ftoodptain determination?
Previously determined from original Submittal
4 /°'O
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applican ig nure
ftenrs sgnatu y tf aaModao
Date
letter from the a RMU Is rovided.
Page 10 of 10

f
10 -oty1 V3
Stormwater Management Calculations
for:
LwwZ:R'.
COLLYMORE LANE MACON EMBRO ROAD Warren County, North Carolina
Project #:
xxx
SS!�I0O O� �Z
August 2013
Prepared by:
DM2 Engineering, PLLC
William W. Dreitzler, P.E.
1416 Pendergrass Road
Sanford, NC 27330
Phone: [phone]
bill dreitzler@yahoo com
Nicholas S Rightmyer, P.E.
P.O. Box 1448
Roanoke Rapids, NC 27870
Phone [phone]
nsnghtm @yahoo com
1#$- �N"01 0 t3
O g. ZZ �Z

/i
--Rainfall Intensity (in /hr)
Project: Collymore Bey Subdivision
PREPARED BY:
1 (10yr) = 7
Date: August 2013
DM2 ENGINEERING,
PLLC
I (2yr) = 5.5
By: NSR
DITCH CALCULATIONS
Road
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Main
Side (Left / Right)
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L L
L
L
L
L
R
R
R
R
Start Station
0 +00
1 +50
2 +50
5 +75
6 +50
CULV 1
CULV 1
8 +50 CULV 2
CULV 2
13 +5
14 +25
15 +00
0 +00
1 +50
2 +50
5 +75
End Station
1 +50
2 +50
5 +75
6 +50
CULV 1
CULV 1
8 +50
CULV 2 CULV 2
13 +5
14 +25
15 +00
CULV 3
1 +50
2 +50
5 +75
6 +50
c
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
A (Ac)
0.16
0.21
0.42
0.05
0.05
48.1
1.29
1.45
0.48
0.32
0.31
0.16
0.08
0.06
1.18
0.1
op = (6fs)
0.56
0.735
1.47
0.21
0.175
134.68
4.515
5.075
1.68
1.12
1.085
0.56
0.28
0.21
4.13
0.42
Op total
0.56
1.295
2.765
2.975
3.15
153.615
15.785
11.27 4.865
2.8
1.12
2.205
2.765
0.28
0.49
4.62
5.04
Slope (ft/ft)
! 0.085
0.04
0.04
0.0675
0.1
0.06
0.0375
0.0375
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.085
0.04
0.04
0.0675
iBottom Width (ft)
f 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sideslope,(x:1)
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Sideslope (0)
2
2
2
2
4
4
2
2
2
2
4
2
2
1.5
2
Max Depth (ft)
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
Is Grass Liner OK?
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
NO
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
Grass Type
Fescue
Fescue
Fescue
Fescue
Fescue
Fescue
Fescue
Fescue
Fescue
Fescue
Fescue
Fescue
Fescue
Fescue
Fescue
Class _ _ _
Erodible
Erodible
Erodible
Erodible
Erodible
Erodible
Erodible
Erodible
Erodible
Erodible
Erodible
Erodible
Erodible
Erodible
Erodible
Pro os_ed_Liner _
NAG S75
NAG S75
NAG S75
NAG C125
NAG C125
NAG S75
NAG C125
NAG S75
NAG C125
NAG C125
NAG S75
NAG S75
NAG S75
NAG SC150
NAG C125
,A eptabts Volo ty?
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
Retardence Glass
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
Max Velocity (ft)
4.5
5
5
4.5
3.5
4.5
5
5
3.5
3.5
3.5
4.5
5
5
4.5
Roughness Coefficient
0.12
0.09
0.07
0.06
0.06
0.04
0.04
0.07
0.08
0.06
0.07
0.16
0.14
0.05
0.05
Actual Velocity
1.26
1.44
2.16
2.84
3.06
5.15
4.08
2.11
2.13
3.05
2.99
0.82
0.81
2.87
3.67
Actual Depth
0.42
0.60
0.72
0.65
0.54
0.94
1.05
0.73
0.46
0.54
0.51
0.37
0.49
0.85
0.74
Adequate mitt ?
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
Retardence Class
B
B
B
B
B
B
C
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
Roughness Ccefl Tent
1.36
0.64
0.30
0.25
0.27
0.10
0.06
0.31
0.54
0.28
0.29
4.00
2.30
0.19
0.17
Acts Velocity
0.20
0.32
0.69
0.98
1.03
2.61
3.20
0.67
0.52
1.00
0.96
0.07
0.10
1.12
1.50
Actual q�
1.06
1.26
1.27
1.10
0.94
1.32
1.19
1.29
0.93
0.94
0.90
1.23
1.42
1.36
1.16
Temp. Liner OK (2yr)?
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
NO
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
Permissable Shear Stress
1.55
1.55
1.55
2.25
2.25
1.55
2.25
1.55
2.25
2.25
1.55
1.55
1.55
2
2.25
Permissable Velocity
5
5
5
10
10
5
10
5
10
10
5
5
5
8
10
Roughness Coefficient
0.055
0.055
0.052
0.022
0.022
0.043
0.020
0.052
0.022
0.022
0.055
0.055
0.055
0.044
0.022
Actual Velocity
2.08
1.93
2.44
5.75
6.33
4.73
6.95
2.40
5.41
6.41
3.19
1.75
1.51
3.21
6.56
Actual'Depth
0.29
0.46
0.60
0.40
0.33
0.87
0.71
0.61
0.26
0.33
0.44
0.22
0.32
0.71
0.49
Actual Shear Stress
1.54
1.15
1.49
1.70
2.09
3.24
1.67
1.42
1.75
2.26
3.03
1.19
0.80
1.77
2.07
Is Turf Re. Mat OK?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
YES
N/A
N/A
N/A
YES
YES
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Liner i
NAG SC250
NAG SC250
NAG SC250
NAG SC250
NAG SC250
NAG C350
NAG SC250
NAG SC250
NAG P550
NAG C350
NAG C350
NAG SC250
NAG SC250
NAG SC250
NAG SC250
IiProposed
Unveg. - Stable (2 yr)?
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
Permissable Shear Stress ;
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
3
2.5
2.5
3.25
3
3
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
!Permissable Velocity !
9.5
9.5
9.5
9.5
9.5
10.5
9.5
9.5
12.5
10.5
10.5
9.5
9.5
9.5
9.5
j Roughness Coefficient (
0.040
0.040
0.039
0.040
0.040
0.033
0.031
0.039
0.041
0.041
0.041
0.040
0.040
0.036
0.037
!Actual Velocity
2.64
2.45
3.02
3.68
4.04
5.71
4.97
2.97
3.39
4.02
3.98
2.22
1.92
3.71
4.41
lActual Depth
0.26
0.41
0.54
0.50
0.42
0.79
0.84
0.54
0.32
0.42
0.39
0.20
0.28
0.66
0.60
!Actual Shear Stress
1.37
1.02
1.34
2.12
2.61
2.95
1.97
1.27
2.21
2.85
2.71
1.06
0.71
1.64
2.53
Vegetated - Stable?
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
Permissable Shear Stress
15
15
15
15
15
20
15
15
25
20
20
15
15
15
15
Permissable Velocity
8
8
8
8
8
10
8
8
12
10
10
8
8
8
8
Roughness Coefficient 1
0.040
0.040
0.038
0.039
0.040
0.032
0.029
0.038
0.041
0.041
0.041
0.040
0.040
0.034
0.036
lActual Velocity
2.80
2.60
3.28
3.99
4.29
6.29
5.50
3.22
3.60
4.27
4.23
2.36
2.04
4.06
4.80
Actual Depth
0.28
0.45
0.58
0.55
0.46
0.85
0.91
0.59
0.35
0.45
0.43
0.22
0.31
0.71
0.65
Actual Shear Stress v
1.50
1.11
1.45
2.30
2.86
3.17
2.12
1.38
2.42
3.12
2.97
1.16
0.77
1.77
2.73
/i

Grass Type
Fescue
Fescue
Fescue
Fescue
Fescue
Fescue
Fescue
_ SOD Clams s
Erodible
NAG C125
Rainfall Intensity (in /hr)
Erodible
NAG C125
Erodible
NAG S75
Erodible
NAG C125
Erodible
NAG C125
Erodible
NAG S75
Proposed Liner _
d
At0a ;ie Veto]
YES
YES
I (10yr) = 7
YES
YES
YES
YES
Retardence Class
D
D
D
D
1 (2yr) = 5.5
D
D
Max Velocity (fVs)
4.5
3.5
3.5
5
3.5
3.5
DITCH CALCULATION:
Roughness Coefhclent
0.06
0.08
0.09
0.11
0.07
0.09
0.12
Actual Velocity
3.34
Road
Main
Main
Main
Side
Side
Side
Side
Side
Side
Side (Left / Right)
R
R
R
L
L
L
R
R
R
Start Station
6 +50
CULV 1
CULV 1
0
1 +50
2 +50
CULV 2
1 +50
2 +50
End Station
CULV 1
CULV 1
CULV 3
1 +50
2 +50
END
1 +50
2 +50
END
C
0.47
0.5
0.92
0.39
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
A (Ac)
0.95
0.05
Temp. liner OK (2 yr)?
NO
0.08
0.06
0.24
0.34
0.06
0.19
op = (cfs)
2.25
0.175
153.615
DITCH
0.28
0.21
0.84
1.19
0.21
0.665
OP total
5
5.215
158.83
5
1.33
1.05
0.84
2.065
0.875
0.665
;Slope (ft/ft)
0.055
0.07
6.28
5.55
0.105
0.105
0.03
0.105
0.105
0.03
Bottom Width (ft)
0.27
0
0.41
0.32
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sideslope (x:1)
2.12
3
0.71
Is Turf Re. Mat OK?
3
3
3
3
3
3
jSideslope (x:1)
Proposed Liner
4
NAG SC250
NAG P550
2
2
2
2
2
2
Max Depth ft
YES
1.5
NO
YES
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
Is Grass Liner OK?
YES
2.5
Permissable Velocity
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
Grass Type
Fescue
Fescue
Fescue
Fescue
Fescue
Fescue
Fescue
_ SOD Clams s
Erodible
NAG C125
Erodible
NAG C125
Erodible
NAG C125
Erodible
NAG S75
Erodible
NAG C125
Erodible
NAG C125
Erodible
NAG S75
Proposed Liner _
d
At0a ;ie Veto]
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
Retardence Class
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
Max Velocity (fVs)
4.5
3.5
3.5
5
3.5
3.5
5
Roughness Coefhclent
0.06
0.08
0.09
0.11
0.07
0.09
0.12
Actual Velocity
3.34
2.29
2.01
0.98
2.88
1.81
0.85
Actual Ceptb
0.67
0.48
0.46
0.59
0.54
0.44
0.56
Adequate CapaciW
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
Retardence Class ,
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
Roughness Coefficient
0.20
0.46
0.59
1.20
0.31
0.72
1.66
Actual Velocity
1.28
0.60
0.47
0.16
0.92
0.39
0.12
Actual D�dt
1.08
0.94
0.94
1.43
0.95
0.95
1.48
Temp. liner OK (2 yr)?
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
Permissable Shear Stress
2.25
2.25
2.25
1.55
2.25
2.25
1.55
Permissable Velocity,
10
10
10
5
10
10
5
Roughness Coefficient
0.022
0.022
0.022
0.055
0.022
0.022
0.055
Actual Velocity
6.28
5.55
5.23
1.56
6.19
5.00
1.47
Actual Depth
0.43
0.27
0.25
0.41
0.32
0.23
0.38
Actual Shear Stress ,
1.89
1.80
1.65
0.77
2.12
1.54
0.71
Is Turf Re. Mat OK?
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Proposed Liner
NAG P550
NAG SC250
NAG P550
NAG SC250
NAG SC250
NAG P550
NAG SC250
Unveg. - Stable (2 yr)?
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
Permissable Shear Stress
3.25
2.5
3.25
2.5
2.5
3.25
2.5
Permissable Velocity
12.5
9.5
12.5
9.5
9.5
12.5
9.5
Roughness Coefficient
0.040
0.040
0.041
0.040
0.040
0.041
0.040
Actual Velocity
4.01
3.54
3.28
1.97
3.96
3.13
1.86
Actual Depth
0.54
0.34
0.32
0.37
0.41
0.30
0.33
Actual Shear Stress f
2.36
2.25
2.08
0.68
2.65
1.94
0.63
Vegetated - Stable?
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
Permissable Shear Stress
25
15
25
15
15
25
15
Permissable Velocity,
12
8
12
8
8
12
8
Roughness Coefficient
0.039
0.040
0.041
0.040
0.040
0.041
0.040
Actual Velocity f
4.36
3.76
3.48
2.10
4.20
3.33
1.98
Actual Depth
0.58
0.38
0.35
0.40
0.44
0.32
0.37
Actual Shear Stress ___i
2.55
2.46
2.28
0.75
2.91
2.12
0.69

DM2 Engineering, PLLC
William W. Dreitzler, P.E.
1416 Pendergrass Road
Sanford, NC 27330
Phone: [phone]
bill.dreitzler @yahoo.com
PIPE CALCULATIONS
n = 0.013
Nicholas S. Rightmyer, P.E.
P.O. Box 1448
Roanoke Rapids, NC 27870
Phone: [phone]
nsrightm @yahoo.com
Upstream
S
C I A
g
0 total
Rea.
Pro. Size
Culvert 1
1
From Ditch Calcs =>
114.74
114.74
44.08
48
Culvert 2
1
From Ditch Calcs =>
2.49
2.49
10.48
15
Culvert 3
3
From Ditch Calcs =>
51.88
51.88
26.64
30
Summary of Calculations
s = slope
n = roughness coefficient
Q = flowrate - from ditch calculations or Q =CiA
Req. Size= 16 *(((Q *n) /(sgrt(s /100))) ^(3 /8))
Project Name: Collymore
Project Number: )000t
Project Location : Macon, NC
Designed by: NSR
Date: 24- Apr -13

DM2 Engineering, PLLC
William W. Dreitzler, P.E.
1416 Pendergrass Road
Sanford, NC 27330
Phone: [phone]
[e-mail]
Nicholas S. Rightmyer, P.E.
P.O. Box 1448
Roanoke Rapids, NC 27870
Phone: [phone]
nsrightm @yahoo.com
DISSIPATOR PAD CALCULATIONS
Type A = no defined Channel
Type B = into defined channel
Project Name: Collymore
Project Number: =oc
Project Location: Macon, NC
Designed by: NSR
Date : 4/24
Summary of Calculations
Zone = per figure 8.06.b.1 in the Design Manual
Length = per figure 8.06.b.2 in the Design Manual
B.W. = Bottom Width of downstream ditch
Width = 3 ' pipe diameter
Depth = ( ( width - bottom width) / 2) / sideslope
Thickness = per table on bottom of page 8.06.6 of the Manual
Stone Type = per figure 8.06.b.2 in the Design Manual
Type B
Type B
Type A
Type B
Outlet
Dia.
Velocity
Zone
Type
sideslope
B.W.
Width
Depth
Length
Thickness Stone Tyne
CLVT 1
48
12.65
3
B
4
0
12
1.5
32
2 1
CLVT 2
15
4.80
1
B
4
0
12
1.5
5
1 A
CLVT 3
36
15.88
3
B
4
0
12
1.5
24
2 1
Summary of Calculations
Zone = per figure 8.06.b.1 in the Design Manual
Length = per figure 8.06.b.2 in the Design Manual
B.W. = Bottom Width of downstream ditch
Width = 3 ' pipe diameter
Depth = ( ( width - bottom width) / 2) / sideslope
Thickness = per table on bottom of page 8.06.6 of the Manual
Stone Type = per figure 8.06.b.2 in the Design Manual

* . s
DM2 Engineering, PLLC
William W. Dreitzler, P.E.
1416 Pendergrass Road
Sanford, NC 27330
Phone: [phone]
bill.dreitzler @yahoo.com
Nicholas S. Rightmyer, P.E.
P.O. Box 1448
Roanoke Rapids, NC 27870
Phone: [phone]
nsrightm @yahoo.com
SKIMMER BASIN CALCULATIONS
i = 7.0
Project Name: Collymore
Project Number: )o=
Project Location: Macon, NC
Designed by: NSR
Date : 4124/2013
#
c
TAW)
61(10)
SA re
L:W
L
W
SA pro
Mac)
V rea
D
X_1
V pro
WL
WD
1
0.4
0.33
0.92
300
2
25
12
300.3
0.34
612
3.0
2
624.1
4
0.18
2
0.4
1.00
2.80
910
6
74
12
910
0.39
702
2.0
2
1491
4
0.38
3
0.4
1.50
4.20
1365
6
90
15
1365
0.92
1656
2.0
2
2324
5
0.43
* D1
0.4
0.6
1.79
N/A
20
10
200
0.12
216
1.4
2
227
2.0
' D2
0.4
o.1
0.28
N/A
20
10
200
0.09
162
1.4
2
227
0.3
= CHECK DAM WITH WEIR
Summary of Calculations
C = runoff coefficient= weighted average from table 8.03a of the design manual
i(10) = average intensity of rainfall in inches per hour based on a ten year storm
TA(ac) = drainage area in acres
Q(10) = flow into the basin in cubic feet per second based on a ten year storm = C i(10) * A(Ac)
SA req = surface area required at design flow in square feet = 325' Q(10)
L = proposed length of basin in feet at spillway invert
W = proposed width of basin in feet at spillway invert
SA pro = surface area provided in square feet = L * W
DA(ac) = Disturbed Area in acres
V req = volume required in cubic feet =1800 * A(ac)
D = Depth of the skimmer basin from bottom of basin to spillway invert
X:1 = Proposed sideslope ratio (2:1 min)
v ro = proposed volume of the basin in cubic feet = (((L *W) +((L- 2D) *(W- 2D))) /2) *D
WL = Length of weir in feet
WD = Flow Depth through weir
SD = Skimmer size in inches
OD = Orifice diameter in inches
DT = Dewatering Time in days
SD OD DT
1.5 0.5 3.1
1.5 0.75 3.2
1.5 1 2.8

EROSION CONTROL PLANS
FOR:
ILIv V �
�l *4 1 ol 4 z k d FA W1111 11 kyJ 61
W 0 MV% J ILI 0 4 kyl I Fol i CV- A RAW,111
►_
PROPERTY CORNER
O
RIGHT OF WAY
RAW
UTILITY POLE
-0-
POINT OF HORTIZONTAL INTERSECTION
PI
TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
Ill
POINT OF HORIZONTAL CURVATURE
PC
TRANSMISSION TOWER
0
POINT OF HORIZONTAL TANGENCY
PT
GATE VALVE
H
VERTICAL POINT OF INTERSECTION
VPI
WATER METER
13wM
VERTICAL POINT OF CURVATURE
VPC
FIRE HYDRANT
VERTICAL POINT OF TANGENCY
VPT
MANHOLE
Q
EDGE OF PAVEMENT
EP
CLEANOUT
•
CURB & GUTTER
C &G
CATCH BASIN
®
BACK OF CURB
BC
DROP INLET
®
TOP OF CURB
TC
YARD INLET
Q
TOP OF SIDEWALK
TS
JUNCTION BOX
❑
TOP OF WALL
TW
HANDICAP
86
REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
RCP
WHEEL CHAIR RAMP
(LD
POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PIPE
PVC
SPOT ELEVATION
10000
DUCTILE IRON PIPE
DIP
SIGN
i
CORRUGATED METAL PIPE
CMP
SITE LIGHT
HIGH POINT
HP
■
i
BREAK POINT
BP
RIGHT OF WAY
CENTER LINE
UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE
OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE
SANITARY SEWER PIPE
STORM DRAIN PIPE
WATER LINE
GAS LINE
TELEPHONE LINE
FENCE LINE
TREE LINE
DRAINAGE FLOW
CURB AND GUTTER
SPILL CURB AND GUTTER
CONCRETE PAVEMENT `.;;;��TT,°!" •' ".'a,,:;'•
ASPHALT PAVEMENT : :I
NOTE: EXISTING FEATURES ARE SHOWN SI- : -"DED.
PROJECT DEVELOPER
CLEMENT COLLYMORE BEY
1151 MACON EMBRO ROAD
MACON, NC 27551
PHONE: [phone]
CONTACT: COLLYMORE BEY
NOTE:
THIS EROSION CONTROL PLAN IS FOR ROAD
CONSTRUCTION ONLY. ALL LOT DEVELOPMENTS WILL
REQUIRE A SEPARATE EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND
PERMIT
o�
0����iiiii�rrrr� .
"1011111110".
®g- -1 z -2a"3
ENGINEERS SEAL AND SIGNATURE
LOCATION MAP
SCALE: NTS
ENGINEERING, PLLC
1416 PENDERGRASS ROAD
SANFORD, N.C. 27330
PHONE: [phone]
P.O. BOX 1448
ROANOKE RAPIDS, NC 27870
PHONE: [phone]
3

DAVID 01CHAEL HIGHT JR
DB 9�,:- PC 638
WARRE"i COUNTY REGISTRY
THEODORE J & ROSALIND STEWART
DB 810 PC 33
WARREN COUNTY REGISTRY
PAMELA E63YRD
D nn r
�q PG B 652 PC 147
WARREN COUNTY REGIS-RY
ALICE WILLIAMS
DB 492 PG 23
WARREN COUNTY REGISTRY
-4 co
ev
CEDAR CREEK LAND CO, LLC
DB 795 PG 473
WARREN COUNTY REGISTRY
CLEMEh'7 COLLYMORE BEY
DB 70P, PC 574
WARRE', COUNTY REGISTRY
WILFRED A & JOYCE M OJO
DB 864 PC 533
WARREN COUNTY REGISTRY
41P
lk
43
4v-
SAMUEL & LUCINDA R SULLIVAN
DB 763 PC 858
WARREN COUNTY REGISTRY
d 'v IQ
ARTHUR L STEWART & OTHERS
DB 630 PC 293
WARREN COUNTY REGISTRY/
CHERYL BELL
DB 870 PG 549
WARREN COUNTY RE61/STRY
THOMAS HUDGINS
UNLISTED INFO
Z
z
Z
AZZIDIN & KHADIJA TAHROUC HOUF
DB 879 PG 841
WARREN COUNTY REGISTRY
CLEMENT COLLYMORE BEY
DB 873 PG 48
WARREN COUNTY REGISTRY
II
CLEMENT COLLYMORE BEY
DB 873 PC 48
WARREN COUNTY REGISTRY
CLEMENT COLLYMORE BEY
DB 873 PC 48
WARREN COUNTY REGISTF\1"
---- -- — --------
CLEMENT COLLYMORE BEY
DB 873 PG 48
&AVREN--C OUNTY-RECISTRY
CLEMENT COLLYMORE BEY
DB 873 PG 48
WARREN COUNTY REGISTRY
#. Z
CLEMENT COLLYMORE BEY
DB 873 PC 48
WARREN COUNTY REGISTRY
CLEMENT COLLYMORE BEY
DB 873 PG 48
WARREN COUNTY REGISTRY
JAMES B JR & OLIVIA H BANKS
DB 876 PC 291
WARREN COUNTY REGISTRY
GENE FAULCON
DB 686 PG 423
WARREN COUNTY REGISTRY
Z
1. LOCATION OF PARCEL LINES SHOWN IS APPROXIMATE. DATA WAS
DIGITIZED FROM A MAP DOWNLOADED FROM THE WARREN COUNTY
GIS WEBSITE.
HEIRS OF MRS M T HARRIS
C/O ANDREA GOODE
DB 136 PC 474
WARREN COUNTY REGISTRY
Rt, FFLIS T WARWICK HEIRS
C/ 0 JUDY W PRITCHETT
DE 482 PC 78
WARREN COUNTY REGISTRY
NUF:1SHA V JONES
DB 373 PC 101
WARREN COUNTY REGISTRY
AP 7URNER JR
1B 705 PG 264
WARREN COUNTY REGISTRE
I
1416 PENDERGRASS ROAD
SANFORD, N.C. 27330
PHONE: [phone]
P.O. BOX 1448
ROANOKE RAPIDS, NC 27870
PHONE: [phone]
\\����o��N CARO�
62
IN
SCOT
0/11111110\
og-zz- W05
ENGINEERS SEAL AND SIGNATURE
•
a
n •
•
•
I * PRELIMINARY PLANS *
NorFoR
Tm�hw;IA
REVISIONS
NO. BY I DATE DESCRIPTION o
xx xxx MM -DD xxx
= W -.Tixyivj ilk I
NUNN
90=9K12-0
PROJECT NO:
START DATE:
SCALE:
SHEET:
f
NS
NSR
WWD
XXXXX
02-10-2013
1" =80'
C-2 OF 7
.r—
LL

EXISTINN G
18" RCP/
-0
I
j L__ �'CT— ; —
t --ZZZZ=- - -----
�7
81 6' SHOULDER 18' ROADWAY 6' SHOULDER 5' DITCH 7'
1 FT 1/4" Fr 1/4" FT 1 FT 2:1
1.5:1 MAX
2:1
TYPICAL SECTION
(50' R/W)
INIV 34k.0
114V
7, +w-
7+DO 'W- JU
-- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -�,— — / ; ' - - -: , —/ / ; / / k / � � � ENGINEERING, PLLC
/ 1) 1416 PENDERGRASS ROAD
7?
/ / "// / SANFORD, N.C. 27330
REMOVE 40 LF 36" CM
/P A
REPLACE /WITH 24 L�A" RCP 30., PHONE: [phone]
yv/= 348?8
INV = 363,3 P.O. BOX 1448
ACCES9 PATH
ROANOKE RAPIDS, NC 27870
PHONE: [phone]
oo
INV=/ 47.1/ o
f- 14 A 5 6
PROPOSED 0',D-MN 'NT
��\A CARO
A
G E I ME REMOVE 3&LF 1
56 IF 15" RCP @ 3.6�.-
5" HDPS
_ -1 --1 - / �
= O-t-+ "I ", "I, ---_ --1 1\ -- -- — —
REr�&VE 0 FW'
\ \
REP LAC WIT d LF 48" b CENTER T .0;911
'-.-JUST T HE
'x \ \ \ ` \ 1 ~ ` \ \ — —
P%pjlN THE PROP D_ROADWAY
1. ROADWAY HAS BEEN ROUGHED IN. GRADES SHOWN ARE
RECOMMENDED REVISIONS.
2. PIPE INVERTS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. INVERTS SHALL BE
ADJUSTED SO THAT 20% OF THE PIPE DIAMETER IS BELOW THE NATIVE
STREAMBED ELEVATION.
3. DITCHES SHOULD BE LINED WITH THE NORTH AMERICAN GREEN
PRODUCT SPECIFIED IN THE DITCH LINER DETAILS LIST.
DITCH LINER
DETAILS
DESIGNED BY:
NSR
ROAD SIDE: BEGIN
WWD
TE MP. 1-lit-k
TRM L I N E R
Main L 0+00 1 +50
Fescue
I NAG 1375
N/A
Main L 1+50 2+60
i Fescue
NAG S75
N/A
Main L 2+50 i 6+76
Fescue
I NAG S16
N/A
Main L 5+75 j 6+50
i Fescue
I NAG C125
N/A
Main L 6+5 0 'CuLvi
Fescuel
NAG 0125
N/A
Main L CULV 1 1 8+60
i Fescue
NJA
NAG 0350
Main L 8+50 Ii CULV 2
Fescue
I NAG 0125
N/A
Main L CULV 2' 13+5
Fescue
NAG S7
N/A
Main L 13+5 i 14+25
Fescue
NAG 0125
N/A
------------
Main L 14+25 i 15+00
Fescue
NIA
NAG 0350
Main L 15+00 l CULV' 3
Fescual
NIA
NAG 0360
Main R 0+00 1 1+60
Fescue
NAG S76
N/A
Main R 1+50 i 2+60
Fescue
NAG S76
WA
Main R 2+50 5+75
Fescue
NAG SC150
WA
Main R 5+75 1 13+60
j Fescue
NAG 0125
N/A
Main R 5+60 1 CULV ljFescmoj
NAGC125
NSA
KA 0; m In e'l III %I I I -I I
Nif
SEA
'"11111101",
og - zz-20 (3
ENGINEERS SEAL AND SIGNATURE
•
..
* PRELININA R Y PLA NS *
NOTFOR
REVISIONS
NO. BY DATE DESCRIPTION
XX XXX MM-DD xxx
DRAWN BY:
NSR
DESIGNED BY:
NSR
z
WWD
PROJECT NO:
2013-01
START DATE:
02-10-2013
3
1" = 60'
0
1%
Uj
019
ge
CA
2
•
z
-
LL
0
w
CL
0
LU
<
•
z
02
z
ry
z
00
40
z
LU
C9
* PRELININA R Y PLA NS *
NOTFOR
REVISIONS
NO. BY DATE DESCRIPTION
XX XXX MM-DD xxx
DRAWN BY:
NSR
DESIGNED BY:
NSR
CHECKED BY:
WWD
PROJECT NO:
2013-01
START DATE:
02-10-2013
SCALE:
1" = 60'
M
h$
rL

1. ROADWAY HAS BEEN ROUGHED IN. GRADES SHOWN ARE
RECOMMENDED REVISIONS.
3, DITCHES SHOULD BE LINED WITH THE NORTH AMERICAN GREEN
PRODUCT SPECIFIED IN THE DITCH LINER DETAILS LIST.
12' SHOULDER 18' ROADWAY SHOULDER 5' DITCH 7'
1- / FT 1/4" / FT 1/4" / FT 1- 1
/ FT
1.5:1 MAX
o I� 3:1
2:1
TYPICAL SECTION
(50' R /W)
Z/
/
/
m
m/ n /
/
/9 y
f
I �
� I 1
l \
o f;
390
380
370
360
/
I
DITCH LINER DETAILS
1 0►AD151DE'
BEGIN END ' F jifk. P. LINERTRrA LINER
Main
L
a_.
' 0+00 ! 1 +50 1 Fescue I
_._.- ._..._
NAG S75
_.__.
N/A
Main
L
1` 1+50 ( 2+50 Fescue
NAG S75
-------------
N/A
Main
L
2+60 6 +75 Fescue '
NAG 1375
WA
Main
L
5 +7 5 6+60 FescueT
NAG 0125
NSA
Main a
L
6+60 CULL 1 ; Fescue i
NAG 0125
NSA
Mam s
L
"CUL1f 11 8-60 'Fescue!
NIA
I�AG C350
Main
L
- 8+60 CULL' 2 j Fescue 1
NAG 0126
N /A _
Main
L
J
CULL!2 13+5 1 Fescue,
NAG S75
N/A
Main
L
13+5 j 14 +25 ! Fescue I
NAG 0125
N/A
Main
L
14 +25 15+00 Fescue i
NJA
NAG 0350
—Main f
L
16+00 1 CULV 3 Fescue i
Nib,
VAC 0350
Main
R
3w 0+00 1-+60 ; Fescue,
NAG S76 _._._.
_NSA
y
Main
R
1+50 2+60 ; Fescue!
NAG S75
N/A
+
i o
t ale z
R
' 2+50 c 5 +75 Fescue !
NAG SC150
NSA
1aln c
R
5 +75 6+50 Fescue
NAG 0125
NSA
Main {
R
6+50 10 U LV 1 j Fescue #
NAG 0125
N/A
Main �i
R
CLJLV 1 CULL' 3' N0 �
DITCH
Side
L
0 ! 1+50 I Fescue I
NAG 0125
WA
Side 1
L
1 1+50 i 2+50 Fescue
NAG 0125
WA
Side
L
2+50 i END i Fescue
NAG S75
N/A _-
Side k
R
�j CULV 21 1-x50 1 Fescue ;
NAG 0125
N/A
Side 11
R
i 1+50 2+50 Fescue ;
NAG 0125
N/A
Side R
2+50 END ; Fescue i
NAG 1375
� _...N /A
1. ROADWAY HAS BEEN ROUGHED IN. GRADES SHOWN ARE
RECOMMENDED REVISIONS.
3, DITCHES SHOULD BE LINED WITH THE NORTH AMERICAN GREEN
PRODUCT SPECIFIED IN THE DITCH LINER DETAILS LIST.
12' SHOULDER 18' ROADWAY SHOULDER 5' DITCH 7'
1- / FT 1/4" / FT 1/4" / FT 1- 1
/ FT
1.5:1 MAX
o I� 3:1
2:1
TYPICAL SECTION
(50' R /W)
Z/
/
/
m
m/ n /
/
/9 y
f
I �
� I 1
l \
o f;
390
380
370
360
/
I
150.000VC
m
00
i
a0
Uj
00
m
ENGINEERING, PLLC
1416 PENDERGRASS ROAD
SANFORD, N.C. 27330
PHONE: [phone]
P.O. BOX 1448
ROANOKE RAPIDS, NC 27870
PHONE: [phone]
�,N CARo� %,,
_ ®CEA
/ 3 43
'0/111111w\
06,_Z-Z-2,01 j
ENGINEERS SEAL AND SIGNATURE
� r
•
•
•
•
* PRELIMINARY PLANS
HOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
i
NO. I BY I DATE DESCRIPTION
N
XX XXX MM -DD XXX
cc
a
i=
'C
a
DRAWN BY: NSR
DESIGNED BY: NSR
60 0 60 120 30 CHECKED BY: WWD
PROJECT NO: 2013 -01
START DATE: 02 -10 -2013
Scale: 1 " = 60'
SCALE: 1" = 60'
1
/ ,
/1
' <l
o
CD
+
iT
+
00
3 +00
3+ 3 —
\
I
_-
oq
Z
150.000VC
m
00
i
a0
Uj
00
m
ENGINEERING, PLLC
1416 PENDERGRASS ROAD
SANFORD, N.C. 27330
PHONE: [phone]
P.O. BOX 1448
ROANOKE RAPIDS, NC 27870
PHONE: [phone]
�,N CARo� %,,
_ ®CEA
/ 3 43
'0/111111w\
06,_Z-Z-2,01 j
ENGINEERS SEAL AND SIGNATURE
� r
•
•
•
•
* PRELIMINARY PLANS
HOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
i
NO. I BY I DATE DESCRIPTION
N
XX XXX MM -DD XXX
cc
a
i=
'C
a
DRAWN BY: NSR
DESIGNED BY: NSR
60 0 60 120 30 CHECKED BY: WWD
PROJECT NO: 2013 -01
START DATE: 02 -10 -2013
Scale: 1 " = 60'
SCALE: 1" = 60'

r , - ; ,-- '- "' � \ \ \ �` '; 1, � , '\ \ \ „ \ ,\ \ , \ � \ \ ` _ -_ / /, / /,' /, � � . , �• . � j j l( I I I� if � I \ � \ \ \ `--- --t- / / I 1 � I � I I '� ' I � � \ .� � �
LIMIT§ OF DISTYRBANC)a A 1 1 \ V \ //
cyl-
�I 1 I' 1 �, •� ` � v � � � v \ � - � , � , , 1 , i � � , \ V v v
� n
f
I
+
j } I \ V A v v v
�K\IM\�ER
SKIMMER BASIN 3 \ \ A I _ / / / / / � /
C C CAM
CHECK DAMS~ / /
0 20'x100' / / LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE 1 ` \ \ CHECK DAM ` \ \ \ - CHEC DAM
/ CONSTRUCTION � � - - \ � - / !
ENTRANCE - _ e - -- - - - - - - - �"- / - /
/ / / / - - 1 _ -'- _.. -T _ �" -�--, \ \ a.."a /I l / SI�tT FE(�lCI G
/ -- - - - - \
-� Q \ 00 1 x 20'L x1 / � 5 - (� 6
+00 3 +00 4 +00 5 +00 \ 6+ 0 7+ p -+ 0 11 00 12 0 P P INLET
R RA U LET /PROT CTIQN
/ - -O �}� ,.._ _ � �� � � �-- � � \PR EC ST RA E'AR A/ �` /E
/ CHEC DAMS \ `,
C AS 1 R RA�
) j � � \ '� °1, �a/r. al i 40'n -� Gr -d oa a?w ai ai M.a G•r' - -ai a•i'- aiCr -ai `Qi+r� Ci +ai ai C•i.•oa �iYaa G"•al 4/'-. al i
/ 1 I \ CHECKlbAM
N\C\ � ER BASIN 1 \ �IMITS OF DISTU B N SILT FENCIN� \, / i \ � \ \ 1 Ri ROTECTiON C D M 12' x 32' x 2.0 \\ i
ASS 1 RIPRA\P
vv,
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
1. OBTAIN GRADING PERMIT.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL NCDENR AT (919) 791 -4,270 PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION BEGINNING.
3. PERFORM SELF- INSPECTIONS AND KEEP RECORDS AS REQUIRED BY NCDENR SELF INSPECTION PROGRAM.
INFORMATION AND INSPECTION FORMS MAY BE FCijND AT
http://www. dlr. enr. state. nc. us/pages/sedimentation new. hfml ,
PHASE 1 - INSTALLATION OF DEVICES
4. STAKE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ON PROPERTY.
5. CLEAR FOR EROSION CONTROL DEVICES. DISTURB ONLY WHAT IS NECESSARY FOR CONSTRUCTING
EROSION CONTROL DEVICES.
6. INSTALL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE.
7. INSTALL SKIMMER BASIN #1 - #3, AND TEMPORARY LIVERSIONS #1 & #2. INSTALL LINERS AND SEED BASINS
AND DIVERSIONS.
8. RE -GRADE THE RIGHT ROADSIDE DITCH BETWEEN STATION 0 +00 AND CULVERT 1. INSTALL LINER
IMMEDIATELY.
9. INSTALL SILT FENCING IN THE AREAS SHOWN ON TLE PLAN.
10. RE -GRADE ALL REMAINING DITCHES AS NEEDED APB D INSTALL LINERS IMMEDIATELY.
11. PERFORM A SELF INSPECTION. IF ACCEPTABLE, PFOCEED TO PHASE 2.
PHASE 2 - ROUGH GRADING
12. BEGIN ROUGH GRADING THE SITE.
13. REPLACE CULVERTS AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
14. REMOVE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT FROM THE STREAM AND WETLAND AREAS WITH SHOVELS AND BUCKETS
TO NATIVE SOILS AND DISCARD THE SEDIMENT INTO ONE OF THE SKIMMER BASINS.
15. MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROL FEATURES AS NEED =D. SEE SHEET C -6 FOR STABILIZATION TIMEFRAMES. ANY
TRENCHES MUST BE BACKFILLED DAILY.
16. THE CONTRACTOR SHOULD MAKE EVERY EFFORT -0 KEEP SEDIMENT AND /OR MUD OFF OF THE ADJACENT
ROADWAYS. REMOVE ANY MATERIAL FROM THE ASPHALT IMMEDIATELY.
13. PERFORM A SELF INSPECTION. IF ACCEPTABLE, PROCEED TO PHASE 3.
PHASE 3 - FINAL GRADING AND PAVING
14. CONTINUE GRADING THE SITE.
15. ONCE FINISHED GRADE IS ESTABLISHED, PROVIS10 "IS FOR PERMANENT GROUND COVER MUST BE
ACCOMPLISHED WITHIN THE STABILIZATION TIMEFFAME SHOWN ON SHEET C -6.
16. PERFORM A SELF INSPECTION. IF ACCEPTABLE, PF:,OCEED TO PHASE 4.
PHASE 4 - FINAL STABILIZATION / REMOVAL OF DEVICES
17. MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROL DEVICES WHILE VEG=ETATION IS BEING ESTABLISHED,
18. AFTER THE ENTIRE SITE IS COMPLETELY STABILIZED, PERFORM A SELF INSPECTION. IF ACCEPTABLE,
REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEV..ES AND COMPLETE ANY NECESSARY GRADING IN THE
LOCATIONS OF THE REMOVED DEVICES. PROVIDE = ERMANENT GROUNDCOVER FOR ANY RESULTING
DENUDED AREAS.
SKIMMER BASIN INFORMATION
NO.
BOTTOM
EL.
(FT)
DIMENSIONS
@ BOTTOM
(F)
WEIR
CREST EL..
(F�
DIMENSIONS
@ WEIR EL.
(�
WEIR
LENGTH
(�
TOP OF
BERM R
(�
TOP OF BERM
INSIDE DIM.
(�
SKIMMER
SIZE
(IN)
ORIFICE
DIAMETER
(IN)
1
346.8
12.5 X 0.3
349.8
24.5 X 12.3
4
351.0
30.5 X 18.3
1.5
0.5
2
1 347.6
165.9 X 4.3
349.6 1
73.9 X 12.3
1 4
351.0
18.3 X 79.9
1 1.5
1 0.8
3
1 347.6
1825 X 7.1
349.6
90.5 X 15.1
1 5
1 351.0
21.1 X 96.5
1 1.5
1 1.0
1. LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE= 2.7 + / -AC
2. THIS EROSION CONTROL PLAN IS FOR ROAD CONSTRUCTION ONLY.
ALL LOT DEVELOPMENTS WILL REQUIREA SEPARATE EROSION
CONTROL PLAN AND PERMIT.
. 1. L .. Y .-_ . . . - . l- V . ­11
.
SILT FENCE SF
INLET PROTECTION
TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH TD
LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE
CHECK DAM
ENGINEERING, PLLC
1416 PENDERGRASS ROAD
SANFORD, N.C. 27330
PHONE: [phone]
P.O. BOX 1448
ROANOKE RAPIDS, NC 27870
PHONE: [phone]
,V� CAROIi�',%
�Q�oFESSio,
�S
%, COT1 R \\1
�g•_Z2P
ENGINEERS SEAL AND SIGNATURE
•
r
•
•
•
•
•
I.
* PRELIN /NARY PLANS
NOTFOR!1
REVISIONS
NO. BY DATE DESCRIPTION
XX XXX MM -DD XXX
DRAWN BY:
DESIGNED BY:
CHECKED BY:
PROJECT NO:
START DATE:
SCALE:
SHEET:
s
NSR
NSR
WWD
XXXXX
02 -10 -2013
1" =60'
V5OF1
M
N
Co
Co
c
a
tD
it
DITCH LINER DETAILS
1� AV ICE, BEGIN i RA83 TEMP. LINER�TRM LINER
Blain
L
0+00
i 1.60
Fescue j
NAG S75
N/A
Main
1 +50
2450
f"
Fescue
NAB S76_..
i N/A
' ..._L_
Main
L
J...._.
2 +6 0
-...._
5 +76
Fescue 1
NAG S76
_^
I N/A
Main I
L
8 +78
; 6+50
Fescue I
NAG C128
N/A
Main r
L__
6+50
OUL 1,
Fescue l
NAG C128
� NSA
Main ;
L
i CU 1
8-60
Fescue !
NJA
i NAG 0350
-Main ^
L
8-E50
; OULV 2'
Fescue �
NAG C128
WA
. Main x
L
13+3
! Fescue
NAG 376
WA
Main
L
? 13+5
1 14 +25
Fescue ;
NAG C123
i N/A
µ Main I,
L
14 +25 �
18+00
Fescue !
NJA
NAG C350
Main $
L
;16+00 ^�
GULF 31
Fescue
NJA
NAG 0350
main
R
0+00
1+50
Fescue ;
NAG S76
1 WA
Main
R
1 +50 �
2460
,
1 Fescue
NAG S76
� NSA
gain ;
R
2-50 ;
+76
Fescue
NAB SC160
NSA
Main
R
� +76
� 6+60
I Fescue i
NAG C125
tvlalin
R
64-50
t CULV I
Fescue ;
NAG C125
i N/A
Main
R
CtLUJL1MGULF
3
F­k)
DITOH
Side
L
_ 0
1.50
Fescue
NAG C12-5
N/A
Side
L
1+50
2+60
Fescue i
NAG C126
� N/A
Side
L
z 2-50
, END
Fescue
NAG S75I
N/A
Side
R
CULV 2
1+50
, Fescue
NAG C128
N/A
Side
R
4 1+50
I
1 2-60 ?
I
Fescue,
NAG C128
� WA
Side R 2-150
END
? Fescue
NAG 376
1 N/A
1. LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE= 2.7 + / -AC
2. THIS EROSION CONTROL PLAN IS FOR ROAD CONSTRUCTION ONLY.
ALL LOT DEVELOPMENTS WILL REQUIREA SEPARATE EROSION
CONTROL PLAN AND PERMIT.
. 1. L .. Y .-_ . . . - . l- V . ­11
.
SILT FENCE SF
INLET PROTECTION
TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH TD
LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE
CHECK DAM
ENGINEERING, PLLC
1416 PENDERGRASS ROAD
SANFORD, N.C. 27330
PHONE: [phone]
P.O. BOX 1448
ROANOKE RAPIDS, NC 27870
PHONE: [phone]
,V� CAROIi�',%
�Q�oFESSio,
�S
%, COT1 R \\1
�g•_Z2P
ENGINEERS SEAL AND SIGNATURE
•
r
•
•
•
•
•
I.
* PRELIN /NARY PLANS
NOTFOR!1
REVISIONS
NO. BY DATE DESCRIPTION
XX XXX MM -DD XXX
DRAWN BY:
DESIGNED BY:
CHECKED BY:
PROJECT NO:
START DATE:
SCALE:
SHEET:
s
NSR
NSR
WWD
XXXXX
02 -10 -2013
1" =60'
V5OF1
M
N
Co
Co
c
a
tD
it

PERMANENT SEEDING
PROVIDE PERMANENT SEEDING TO ALL DENUDED AREAS THAT WILL NOT BE COVERED BY PAVING, BUILDINGS, OR OTHER LANDSCAPING
WITHIN THE TIMEFRAME SPECIFIED ON THE STABILIZATION TIMEFRAME TABLE.
COMPLETE GRADING BEFORE PREPARING SEEDBEDS. IF SOILS BECOME COMPACTEC DURING GRADING, LOOSEN THEM TO A DEPTH OF 6.8
INCHES.
SEEDBED REQUIREMENTS:
THE SOIL SHOULD MEET THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM CRITERIA FOR VEGETATION :ESTABLISHMENT:
• ENOUGH FINE - GRAINED (SILT AND CLAY) MATERIAL TO MAINTAIN ADEQUATE MOISTURE AND NUTRIENT SUPPLY (AVAILABLE WATER
CAPACITY OF AT LEAST 0.05 INCHES OF WATER TO 1 INCH OF SOIL
• SUFFICIENT PORE SPACE TO PERMIT ROOT PENETRATION.
• SUFFICIENT DEPTH OF SOIL TO PROVIDE AN ADEQUATE ROOT ZONE. THE DEPTH OF ROCK OR IMPERMEABLE LAYERS SUCH AS
HARDPANS SHOULD BE 12 INCHES OR MORE, EXCEPT ON SLOPES STEEPER THAN 2:1 WHERE THE ADDITION OF SOIL IS NOT
FEASIBLE.
• A FAVORABLE PH RANGE FOR PLANT GROWTH, USUALLY 6.0 -6.5.
• NO LARGE ROOTS, BRANCHES, STONES, LARGE CLODS OF EARTH, AND TFSH. CLODS AND STONES MAY BE LEFT ON SLOPES
STEEPER THAN 3:1 IF THEY ARE TO BE HYDROSEEDED.
IF THE ABOVE CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET, SPECIAL SOIL CONDITIONERS OR TOPSOIL MAY BE APPLIED.
SEEDBED PREPARATION:
LIME: APPLY LIME ACCORDING TO SOIL TEST RECOMMENDATIONS. IF THE SOIL. PH IS NOT KNOWN, FOLLOW RATES ON THE SEEDING
SPEC TABLE.
FERTILIZER: FERTILIZE ACCORDING TO SOIL TEST RECOMMENDATIONS. WHERE SOIL TESTS ARE NOT AVAILABLE, FOLLOW RATES ON
THE SEEDING SPEC TABLE.
SURFACE ROUGHENING: IF AREAS TO BE SEEDED BECOME HARDENED, SEALED, OR CRUSTED, LOOSEN IT JUST PRIOR TO SEEDING BY
DISKING, RAKING, HARROWING OR OTHER SUITABLE METHODS. GROOVE OR F RROW SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 ON THE CONTOUR
BEFORE SEEDING.
PLANT SELECTION:
SELECT THE APPROPRIATE SPECIES BASED ON THE PLANTING SEASON, SOIL TYPE, SLOPES, AND LAND USES. SEE SEEDING SPEC
TABLES IN PLANS FOR RECOMMENDED PERMANENT SEEDING MIXTURE.
SEEDING:
USE CERTIFIED SEED (INSPECTED BY THE NORTH CAROLINA CROP IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION).
APPLY SEED WITH A BROADCAST SEEDER, DRILL, CULTIPACKER SEEDER, OR H`DROSEEDER ON A FIRM, FRIABLE SEEDBED. USE
SEEDING RATES GIVEN IN TABLES,
WHEN USING A DRILL OR CULTIPACKER SEEDER, SMALL GRAINS SHOULD BE PLANTED NO MORE THAN ONE INCH DEEP AND GRASSES
AND LEGUMES ON MORE THAN Yz INCH.
WHEN BROADCAST SEEDING, SUBDIVIDE AREA INTO WORKABLE SECTIONS AND DETERMINE THE AMOUNT OF SEED NEEDED FOR EACH
SECTION. APPLY ONE -HALF THE SEED WHILE MOVING BACK AND FORTH ACROSS THE AREA AND APPLY THE REMAINING SEED IN THE
SAME MANNER BUT AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE FIRST PASS. COVER SEED BY RAKING OR CHAIN DRAGGING, AND THEN LIGHTLY FIRM
WITH A ROLLER OR CULTIPACKER.
MULCH AREAS IMMEDIATELY AFTER SEEDING IN ACCORDANCE WITH RATES GIVEN IN TABLES. USE A MINIMUM RATE OF 4,000 LB /ACRE.
HYDROSEEDING:
SURFACE ROUGHENING IS REQUIRED. FINE SEEDBED PREPARATION IS NOT NB' ESSARY.
RATE OF WOOD FIBER APPLICATION SHOULD BE AT LEAST 4,000 -6,000 LB /ACRE,
APPLY LEGUME INOCULANTS AT FOUR TIMES THE RECOMMENDED RATE WHEN ADDING INOCULANT TO HYDROSEEDER SLURRY.
APPLY LIME IN DRY FROM.
IF USING PULL BEHIND METHOD, PROVIDE 2 APPLICATIONS. THE FIRST WITH 1/3 OF THE MULCH AND ALL SEED AND INOCCULANT AND
FERTILIZER. THE SECOND APPLICATION WITH 2/3 OF THE MULCH RATE.
IF USING THE TOWER METHOD, PROVIDE 2 APPLICATIONS, THE FIRST WITH 1/3 OF THE MULCH AND ALL SEED AND INOCCULANT. THE
SECOND WITH 2/3 THE MULCH RATE IN OPPOSING DIRECTION OF THE FIRST PASS.
IRRIGATION:
IRRIGATE DURING DRY PERIODS OR TO SPEED DEVELOPMENT OF FULL COVER,
MAINTENANCE:
IF STAND IS INADEQUATE, RE- EVALUATE PLANT CHOICE AND QUANTITIES OF LINE AND FERTILIZER. REESTABLISH THE STAND AFTER
SEEDBED PREPARATION OR OVER -SEED THE STAND. CONSIDER SEEDING TEMPORARY, ANNUAL SPECIES IF THE TIME OF YEAR IS NOT
APPROPRIATE FOR PERMANENT SEEDING.
Table 6.10a
Seeding mixture
DESIGNED BY:
Seeding mixture
Temporary Seeding
Species Rate ( lblacre )
Recornm&n dations for Fall
Recommendations for Late
Rye (grain) 120
02 -10 -2013
Winter and Early Spring
Annuai lespedeza (Kobe in
Mountains —Aug. 15 - Dec. 15
Piedmont and Coastal Plain,
Coastal Plain and Piedmont —Aug. 15 - Dec. 30
Korean in Mountains) 50
Soil amendments
Omit annual lespedeza when duration of temporary cover is not 4o
Follow soil tests or apply 2,000 lb/acre ground agricultural limestone
extend beyond June.
and 1,000 lb/acre 10 -10 -10 fertilizer.
Seeding dates
Mulch
Mountains —Above 2500 feet: Feb. 15 - May 15
Apply 4,000 lblacre straw, Anchor straw by tacking with asphalt, netting,
Below 2500 feet: Feb. 1= May 1
or a mulch anchoring teal. A disk with blades set nearly straight can be
Piedmont —Jan. 1'- May 1
used as a mulch anchoring tool.
Coastal Plain —Dec. 1 -Apr. 15
Maintenance
Soil amendments
Repair and refertilize damaged areas immediately. Topdress with 50
I
Follow recommendations of soil tests or apply 2,000 lb/acre grourd
lblacre of nitrogen in March, I f it is necessary to extent temporary
agricultural limestone and 750 lblacre 10 -10 -10 fertilizer.
cover beyond June 15, overseed with 50 lblacre Kobe (Piedmont and
Mulch
Coastal Plain) or Korean (Mountains) lespedeza in late Februa ry or
Apply 4,000 Ib /acre straw. Anchor straw by tacking w i th asphalt, n t ti-G
early March.
r
or a mulch anchoring tool. A disk with blades set hearty straight can n-
..
used as a' mulch anchoring tool.
Maintenance
Refertilize if growth is not fully adequate. Reseed, refertilize and muHm
immediately following erosion or other damage.
TEMPORARY SEEDING
PROVIDE TEMPORARY SEEDING TO ALL DENUDED AREAS THAT WILL NOT BE BROUGHT TO FINAL GRADE WITHIN THE TIMEFRAME SPECIFIED IN THE
TABLE BELOW.
COMPLETE GRADING BEFORE PREPARING SEEDIi�iEDS. IF SOILS BECOME COMPACTED DURING GRADING, LOOSEN THEM TO A DEPTH OF 6 -8 INCHES.
SEEDBED PREPARATION:
LIME: APPLY LIME ACCORDING TO SOIL T,:-::ST RECOMMENDATIONS. IF THE SOIL PH IS NOT KNOWN, APPLY AT A RATE OF 1 TO 1 Y TONS PER
ACRE ON COARSE - TEXTURED SOILS AND 2 -3 TONS PER ACRE OF FINE - TEXTURED SOILS. APPLY LIME UNIFORMLY AND INCORPORATE INTO THE
TOP 4 -6 INCHES OF SOIL, SOILS WITH PH'IIGHER THAN 6 DO NOT NEED LIME.
FERTILIZER: FERTILIZE ACCORDING TO SOIL TEST RECOMMENDATIONS, WHERE SOIL TESTS ARE NOT AVAILABLE, APPLY A 10 -10 -10 GRADE
FERTILIZER AT 700 -1,000 LB /ACRE. INCOF.:PORATE FERTILIZER INTO THE TOP 4-6 INCHES OF SOIL. IF A HYDRAULIC SEEDER IS USED, DO NOT
MIX SEED AND FERTILIZER MORE THAN 3G MINUTES BEFORE APPLICATION.
SURFACE ROUGHENING: IF AREAS TO BE SEEDED BECOME HARDENED, SEALED, OR CRUSTED, LOOSEN IT JUST PRIOR TO SEEDING BY
DISKING, RAKING, HARROWING OR OTHER SUITABLE METHODS. GROOVE OR FURROW SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 ON THE CONTOUR BEFORE
SEEDING.
PLANT SELECTION:
SELECT THE APPROPRIATE SPECIES BASTED ON THE PLANTING SEASON.
SEEDING:
APPLY SEED WITH A BROADCAST SEEDER, DRILL, CULTIPACKER SEEDER, OR HYDROSEEDER, USE SEEDING RATES GIVEN IN TABLES,
BROADCAST SEEDING AND HYDROSEEDII`IG IS ACCEPTABLE ON STEEP SLOPES WHERE EQUIPMENT CANNOT BE DRIVEN, HAND
BROADCASTING IS NOT RECOMMENDED.
SMALL GRAINS SHOULD BE PLANTED NO MORE THAN ONE INCH DEEP AND GRASSES AND LEGUMES ON MORE THAN % INCH. BROADCAST SEED
MUST BE COVERED BY RAKING OR CHAIR DRAGGING, AND THEN LIGHTLY FIRMED WITH A ROLLER OR CULTIPACKER. HYDROSEEDED MIXTURES
SHOULD NOT INCLUDE A WOOD FIBER MULCH.
MULCHING:
MULCHING IS REQUIRED UNDER THE FOLLC`'VING CONDITIONS:
• SEEDING IN FALL (WOOD FIBER MUi -:HES NOT ACCEPTABLE)
• SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1
• EXCESSIVELY HOT OR DRY WEATHER
• ADVERSE SOILS (SHALLOW, ROCKY, OR HIGH IN CLAY OR SAND)
• AREAS RECEIVING CONCENTRATED FLOW.
FOR CONCENTRATED FLOW AREAS (DITG.c1ES, CHANNELS, SWALES, ETC.) ANCHOR MULCH WITH NETTING.
MAINTENANCE:
CONTRACTOR TO MONITOR GRASS ESTABiLISHMENT. PROMPTLY RESEEED AREAS WHERE A HEALTHY, DENSE GROWTH DOES NOT ESTABLISH.
CONTRACTOR MAY NEED TO PROVIDE NETTING OR TEMPORARY LINERS TO AREAS WHERE GRASS CANNOT BE ESTABLISHED DUE TO EROSION.
NPDES Stormwater Discharge Permit for , %'onstruction Actl Aties (NCG01)
SITE AREA DES,SRIPTION
NODENRIDivision of Water Quality
STABILIZATION ( TiMEFRAME EXCEPTIONS
@) } Perimeter dikes, swales, ditches, slopes 1 7 days I None 1
• High Quality Water ;aHCIWj Zones 7 days None
Zones
NSlopes steeper than 3:1
Table 6.10b Seeding mixture
Temporary Seeding Species Rate (lblacre)
Recommendations for German millet 40
summer
In the Piedmont and Mountains, a small- stemmed Sudangrass may be
substituted at a rate of 50 Ibiacre.
Seeding dates
Mountains ---May 15 -Aug. 15
i Piedmont --May 1 -Aug. 15
Coastal Plain- --Apr. 15 -Aug. 15
Sail amendments
Follow recommendations of soil tests or apply 2,000 lblacre ground
agricultural Iimestane and 7601blacre W -10 -10 fertilizer.
Mulch
Appty4,000Ib /acre straw. Anchor straw by tacking with asphalt, netting,
ora mulch anchorin g to ol. A i k rth bla d es set nearly straight can be
used as a mulch anchoring tool.
Maintenance
Refertilize if growth is not fully adequate. Reseed, refertilize and mulch
immediately following erosion or other damage.
7 days If slopes are 10' or less in length and are
not steeper than 2:1, 14 days are allowed:
Slopes 3:1 or flatten 1 14 days I 7 days for slopes greater than 50' in length.
All other areas with slopes flatter than 4:1
14 days I None, except for perimeters and HQW Zones.
Table 6.10c
Seeding mixture
DESIGNED BY:
Ter :rorary Seeding
Species Rate (lblacre)
species, Rate (ib /acre)
Recornm&n dations for Fall
Rye (grain) 120
Blend of two turf-type tall
02 -10 -2013
Seeding dates
fescues (90 %) and two or
Mountains —Aug. 15 - Dec. 15
more improved Kentucky
Coastal Plain and Piedmont —Aug. 15 - Dec. 30
bluegrass varieties (10 0/0) 200 -250
Soil amendments
Follow soil tests or apply 2,000 lb/acre ground agricultural limestone
Seeding dates
and 1,000 lb/acre 10 -10 -10 fertilizer.
Hest' Possible
Mulch
Fall: Aug. 25 - Sept. 15 Aug. 20 - Oct. 25
Apply 4,000 lblacre straw, Anchor straw by tacking with asphalt, netting,
Winter: Feb. 1 - Mar. 31
or a mulch anchoring teal. A disk with blades set nearly straight can be
For quality turf, avoid spring seeding.; Where grading Is completed
used as a mulch anchoring tool.
during late winter or spring, an alternative is to seed 30 lblacre Kobe
Maintenance
lespedeza, keep mowed, prepare seedbed, and seed a permanent
Repair and refertilize damaged areas immediately. Topdress with 50
I
mixture in early fall.
lblacre of nitrogen in March, I f it is necessary to extent temporary
Soil amendments
cover beyond June 15, overseed with 50 lblacre Kobe (Piedmont and
Apply lime and fertilizer according to soil tests, or apply 4,000 Ib /acre
Coastal Plain) or Korean (Mountains) lespedeza in late Februa ry or
ground agricultural limestone and 1,000 lblacre 10 -10 -10 fertilizer.
early March.
r
Mulch
..
MAINTENANCE PLAN
THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING EROSION CONTROL DEVICES THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT DURATION.
ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE CHECKED FOR STABILITY AND OPERATION FOLLOWING EVERY RUNOFF- PRODUQNG
RAINFALL BUT IN NO CASE LESS THAN ONCE EVERY WEEK, ANY NEEDED REPAIRS SHALL BE MADE IMMEDIATELY TO MAINTAIN ALL DEVICES AS
DESIGNED.
SEDIMENT TRAPS:
1. SEDIMENT TRAPS ARE TO BE CLEANED OF SEDIMENT WHEN ITS STORAGE CAPACITY IS REDUCED BY 50 %. AFTER CLEANING SEDIMENT,
RESTORE TRAP TO ORIGINAL DIMENSIONS,
2. REPLACE GRAVEL ON THE ROCK SPILLWAY THAT IS IMPAIRED BY SEDIMENT,
3. CHECK STRUCTURE EVERY WEEK FOR EROSION AND PIPING
4. PERIODICALLY CHECK THE DEPTH OF THE SPILLWAY TO ENSURE IT IS A MINIMUM OF 1.5 FEET BELOW THE LOW POINT OF THE E.M. BANKMENT,
IMMEDIATELY FILL ANY SETTLEMENT OF THE EMBANKMENT TO SLIGHTLY ABOVE DESIGN GRADE,
5, ANY RIP RAP DISPLACED FROM SPILLWAY MUST BE REPLACED IMMEDIATELY.
6, AFTER ALL AREAS HAVE BEEN PERMANENTLY STABILIZED, REMOVE TRAP AND ALL UNSTABLE SEDIMENT, GRADE ACCORDING TO GRADING
PLAN OR BLEND IN WITH ADJACENT GRADES - ADDITIONAL COMPACTION EFFORTS MAY BE REQUIRED IF STRUCTURE IS PROPOSED
OVERTOP AREA. STABILIZE AREA,
BAFFLES:
1, MAINTAIN ACCESS TO BAFFLES. SHOULD THE FABRIC COLLAPSE, DECOMPOSE, TEAR, OR BECOME INEFFECTIVE, REPLACE IT PROMPTLY,
2, REMOVE BUILDUP SEDIMENT WHEN IT REACHES ONE -HALF FULL. TAKE CARE NOT TO DISTURB BAFFLES DURING CLEANOUT.
SILT FENCE:
2, SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM BEHIND THE SEDIMENT FENCE WHEN IT BECOMES ABOUT 0.5 FT DEEP AT THE FENCE. THE FENCE
SHALL BE REPAIRED AS REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A SUFFICIENT BARRIER,
3. SHOULD THE FABRIC OF A SEDIMENT FENCE COLLAPSE, DECOMPOSE, TEAR, OR BECOME INEFFECTIVE, REPLACE IT PROMPTLY.
4. AFTER ALL AREAS HAVE BEEN PERMANENTLY STABILIZED, REMOVE ALL FENCING MATERIALS AND UNSTABLE SEDIMENT. GRADE AREA TO
GRADING PLAN OR BLEND WITH ADJACENT GRADES. STABILIZE AREA,
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE:
1. MAINTAIN GRAVEL PAD IN A CONDITION TO PREVENT MUD OR SEDIMENT FROM LEAVING CONSTRUCTION SITE. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC
TOP DRESSING WITH 2 -INCH STONE,
2. IMMEDIATELY REMOVE ALL MATERIALS SPILLED, WASHED, OR TRACKED ONTO PUBLIC ROADWAYS,
TEMPORARY DIVERSIONS:
1, IMMEDIATELY REMOVE EXCESS SEDIMENT FROM FLOW AREA AND REPAIR DIVERSION RIDGE,
2. CAREFULLY CHECK OUTLETS AND MAKE TIMELY REPAIRS AS NEEDED,
3. AFTER ALL AREAS HAVE BEEN STABILIZED REMOVE THE RIDGE AND THE CHANNEL AND GRADE ACCORDING TO GRADING PLAN OR BLEND
WITH ADJACENT GRADES. STABILIZE AREA.
RIP RAP LINED DITCHES /CHANNELS /OUTLETS:
1. PAY CLOSE ATTENTION TO INLET AND OUTLET SECTIONS WHERE CONCENTRATED FLOW ENTERS.
2, INSPECT FOR INDICATIONS OF PIPING, SCOUR HOLES, OR BANK FAILURES. MAKE REPAIRS IMMEDIATELY.
3. MAINTAIN VEGETATION ADJACENT TO THE ROCK LINING IN A HEALTHY, VIGOROUS CONDITION TO PROTECT THE AREA FROM EROSION AND
SCOUR,
GRASS LINED DITCHES /CHANNELS /SWALES:
1. DURING GRASS ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD, INSPECT AFTER EVERY RAINFALL.
2. AFTER GRASS HAS ESTABLISHED, INSPECT PERIODICALLY AND AFTER HEAVY RAINFALL. IMMEDIATELY MAKE REPAIRS.
3. PAY CLOSE ATTENTION TO INLET AND OUTLET SECTIONS WHERE CONCENTRATED FLOW ENTERS,
4. GRASS SHOULD BE MAINTAINED IN A HEALTHY VIGOROUS CONDITION AT ALL TIMES, SINCE IT IS THE PRIMARY EROSION PROTECTION.
Table 6.,11m
NSR
DESIGNED BY:
Seeding mixture
Seeding No. 3P for: Gentle
species, Rate (ib /acre)
PROJECT NO:
Slopes, Soils with Average
Blend of two turf-type tall
02 -10 -2013
or Better Moisture
fescues (90 %) and two or
Retention,
more improved Kentucky
Cooler Sites; High
bluegrass varieties (10 0/0) 200 -250
Maintenance
Seeding dates
Hest' Possible
Fall: Aug. 25 - Sept. 15 Aug. 20 - Oct. 25
Winter: Feb. 1 - Mar. 31
For quality turf, avoid spring seeding.; Where grading Is completed
during late winter or spring, an alternative is to seed 30 lblacre Kobe
lespedeza, keep mowed, prepare seedbed, and seed a permanent
mixture in early fall.
Soil amendments
Apply lime and fertilizer according to soil tests, or apply 4,000 Ib /acre
ground agricultural limestone and 1,000 lblacre 10 -10 -10 fertilizer.
Mulch
Apply 4,000 fblacre small grain straw or equivalent cover of another
suitable mulch. Anchor straw t .y tacking with asphalt, netting, roving, or
by crimping with a mulch anchoring tool. A disk with blades set nearly
straight can be used as a mulch anchoring tool.
Maintenance
Fertilize according to soil tests or apply 40 Ib /acre nitrogen in Jan. or
Feb., 40 lb in Sept., and 40 lb in Nov., from a 12 -4 -8, 16 -4 -8, or similar
turf fertilizer. Avoid fertilizer applications during warm weather, as this
increases stand losses to disease. Mow to a height of 25 -3.5 inches
as needed. Reseed, fertillze, and mulch damaged areas Immediately.
'Refer to Appendix 8.02 for botanical names.
•
1416 PENDERGRASS ROAD
SANFORD, N.C. 27330
PHONE: [phone]
P.O. BOX 1448
ROANOKE RAPIDS, NC 27870
PHONE: [phone]
SEA -
=z • /03 4 ' �-
o•
%,,SCOTT R�G�`•
Z 2,
ENGINEERS SEAL AND SIGNATURE
•
•
•
U)
W
I-
0
Z
J
0
Z
0
0
0
0
ry
W
* PRELIMINARY PLANS
NOTFOR
• : •
REVISIONS
NO. I BY I DATE I DESCRIPTION
XX XXX I MM -DD XXX
DRAWN BY:
NSR
DESIGNED BY:
NSR
CHECKED BY:
WWD
PROJECT NO:
2013 -01
START DATE:
02 -10 -2013
SCALE:
NTS
M
N
a
w
0
C
a
it

100'-0" MINIMUM LENGTH
EXISTING MIN. STONE DEPTH
GRADE SEE NOTE 2.
DIVERSION PUBLIC
RIDGE RIGHT OF WAY
GRADE 2% SEE NOTE 4. WIDTH VARIES
-
A
1.51
MIN
151
�4Z
IN
MIN
81 MAX VARIABLE AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER
t
MIN. 10 GA. --STEEL POST
LINE WIRES ITI WOVEN WIRE FABRIC
LIP
SILT FENCE
GEOTEXTILE
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC
FABRIC
ER FABRIC
FILTER FABRIC
z x FILL SLOPE
PROFILE
ENGINEERING, PLLC
R, �11) -
CID
NOTES FOR BOTH:
c"I
cl, .iv
IN 33 LIED TDSE ONE
NATURAL GROUND
MAXIMUM
1. MINIMUM WIDTH OF CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PAD SHALL BE 20 FEET. SEE PLANS FOR LOCATION, ACTUAL WIDTH
A -
'nD
W RF= Fzj�QIIA GRADE
—
24" MIN. SLOPES
ES
AND CONFIGURATION,
2. STONE SHALL BE 2 IN TO 3 IN STONE OR RAILROAD BALLAST. PROVIDE 12-INCH THICK AT ENTRANCE FOR FIRST
15 FEET INTO PROJECT AND 6-INCH THICK FOR REMAINDER.
1416 PENDERGRASS ROAD
6" MIN. COVER
OVER SKIRT
7
3. REMOVE ALL VEGETATION ANQ OTHER OBJECTIONAL MATERIAL FROM THE FOUNDATION AREA. GRADE AND CROWN
RD, N.C. 27330
N
FOUNDATION AREA FOR POSITIVE DRAINAGE.
MIN. 12-1/2 GA. ANCHOR SKIRT AS
2 2 2
1
4. DIVERSION RIDGE HAS 3:1 SIDE SLOPES.
PHONE: [phone]
INTERMEDIATE WIRES DIRECTED BY
I I ENGINEER
11 11
I ES
VARIES
5. THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED TO PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC
RIGHTS-OF-WAY. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING WITH ADDITIONAL STONE AND REPAIR AND/OR
1.51
GRAD
CLEANOUT OF ANY MEASURES USED TO TRAP SEDIMENT.
CLASS "B" RIP RAP
P.O. BOX 1448
FRONT VIEW SIDE VIEW
12" NCDOT #5 or o
ROANOKE RAPIDS, NC 27870
NOTE:
#57 WASHED
PHONE: [phone]
USE SILT FENCE ONLY WHEN DRAINAGE AREA DOES NOT FOR REPAIR OF SILT FENCE FAILURES,
' " PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY
100-0 MINIMUM LENGTH
STONE Isk 24" MAX
EXCEED 1/4 ACRE AND NEVER IN AREAS OF USE No. 57 WASHED STONE. FOR ANCHOR
WIDTH VARIES
FILTER FABRIC F AT CENTER
CONCENTRATED FLOW WFEN SILT FENCE IS PROTECTING CATCH
END OF SILT FENCE NEEDS TO BE TURNED UPHILL. BA -1N'
COMPACTED SOILS
EXISTING MIN, STONE DEPTH
GRADE —\ SEE NOTE 2,
SECTION A-A
v\ CAROB
.11 _T
=1 1=1 I I=, 1
44v.
.0
� " .1
..T1 :,1"4_1 :t
PROFILE
4
SILT FENCING
TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
CHECK DAM
IN
.......
NTS A-##
NTS
NTS
NTS [D-##
00SC1111OT� 0\0 z0\5
ENGINEERS SEAL AND SIGNATURE
UPSTREAM END OF OVERFLOW
STORM DRAIN
. . . . . . . . . .
7 113 PIPE
4'
4 DIAMETER
z
• 4�1
4
0
w
1w
BURY BOTTOM
OF PLYWOOD
Z
Ng
0:;
3/4" EXTERIOR PI YWOOD
j
0 C
—STEEL FEN CE PLYWOOD INLET PROTECTION POST CrYP,)
uj 0
UPSTREAM END OF
STORM DRAIN
cg
OVERFLOW
Z z
Lj
0
0 j
Lu Lu
1/3 PIPE
DIAMETER
0
♦ 4
0 Z 0
0
ca
WASHED STONE FILTER
ACROSS PIPE INLET 1
0 0
zpq
rl
1% z
t1 tf I,
Lu w Lu
HARDWARE CLOTH
99 109
cc
NOTE: ALL PARTIALLY COMPLETED STORM DRAINS
STONE FILTER INLET PROTECTION SHAILL BE PROTECTED AT THE END OF
EACH DAY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THESE
DETAILS,
xxx
xxx
xxx
PIPE INLET PROTECTION
NTS E-##
NTS rF-##
NTS G-##
NTS I _u_u
H-fw
OVERFILL 6°
PRELIMINARY PLANS
FOR SETTLEMENT
EARTH BERM
EMBANKMENT
ErT M
ARM ASSEMBLY
DESIGN 21
SETTLED MIN
TOP
FABRIC FOLDED
SEDIMENT P17
INFLOW
NOT FOR
OVER HORIZONI
POST A
STRUCTURE
INLET FIRST SECOND OUTLET
"C" ENCLOSURE
ZONE: CHAMBER: CHAMBER: ZONE:
CONSTRUCTION
7:1 SIDE
HORIZONTAL POST
35% OF 25% OF 25% OF 15% OF
5' MAX. E MAX. EMERGENCY
FILL BY-PASS
s
FENCE AND FABRIC
SURFACE SURFACE SURFACE SURFACE
AREA AREA AREA AREA
:1 810E 6" BELOW
BURIED IN TRENCH
WATER ENTRY UNIT
ABRIC SLOP=- MAX. SETTLED TOP
TOP VIEW
911 OF DAM
REVISIONS
6"x6" TRENCH,
NATURAL
BACKFILLED AND 00
NO,
BY
DATE
DESCRIPTION
3' MIN. GROUND COMPACTED
L
EMERGENCY
PVC END CAP PVC ELBOW PVC VENT PIPE
STONE CROSS SECTION
SECTION AT OPENING
SKIMMER SPILLWAY
SCHEDULE 40 PVC PIPE
XX
XXX
MM-DD
XXX
NOTES:
DEWATERING
DEVICE
A - SEDIMENT STORAGE ZONE
RIP-RAP WEIR AS
1. DRIVE STEEL FEhIr;E POST AT LEAST 18" INTO
SOLID GROUND
FR_
B - MAXIMUM SEDIMENT DEPTH CARRY DIMENSIONED AND
77
C - VFLOOD STORAGE ZONE RIP-RAP UP
NOTED ON PLANS
2. WOOD POSTS AR'-- NOT ACCEPTABLE
—I I 1=1 11-111-111 — I-
3. USE STAPLES VARART TO ATTACH FABRIC
D - VMINIMUM FREEBOARD 51 SPILLWAY TO "HOG WIRE"
PVC END CAP
MIN SIDES
#5 WASHED STONE
v,
STS
�y
4. BAFFLES SPACED MAXIMUM OF VIN FRONT
PERSPECTIVE VIEW 2/3 OF SEDIMENT TRAP (CLOSEST TO RIP-RAP WEIR).
5. USE A 700 G/M2 C0IR/JUTE MATERIAL
BAFFLES
PVC PIPE ORIFICE PLATE
TOP OF BERM
PVC TEE
PLAN VIEW
1/2" HOLES IN :-;
UNDERSIDE SCHEDULE 40 PVC PIP
EMBANKMENT
P C TEE
P
OP EL, OF STMWATER C
TOP OF BAFFLE SHOULD
BE 6" HIGHER THAN THE
INFLOW STRUCTURE VFREEBOARD
2 3'
MIN.
BOTTOM OF THE SPILLWAY
�±, HV=r,
F--
5'MIN. A f
><'
T
B
FILTER LAYER
2'MIk.
#1 FILTER FABRIC
RIP-RAP
><
><
6" MIN, INVERT --- ......
EMERGENCY
EMERGENCY
FLEXIBLE HOSE
DRAWN BY: NSR
OR 6" OF #5
------- VARIES
.............
SPILLWAY
DESIGNED BY: NSR
CLEAN KEYWAY­- STONE
17' MIN.
BOTTOM OF BAFFLE IN
DEWATERING
ZONE
CHECKED BY: WWD
BASIN WHEN
SEDIMENT
OG WIRE ATTACHED
TO POSTS WITH
TRENCH AND TRENCHI
FILLED WITH SOIL AND
PROJECT NO: 2013-01
REACHES THIS
LENGTHS OF WIRE
COMPACTED
FILTER
FABRIC
START DATE: 02-10-2013
LEVEL CROSS SECTION
SEDIMENT STORAGE ZONE BAFFLES
END VIEW FRONT VIEW
SCALE: NTS
BAFFLE INSTALLATION - STEP 1 BAFFLE INSTALLATION - STEP 2
SECTION VIEW
TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP
FABRIC BAFFLES
SKIMMER SEDIMENT BASIN
SKIMMER DEWATERING DEVICE
SHEET: C-7 OF 7
NTS
NTS
NTS
NTS