20191692 Ver 5_BPDP for PN_20210928

Mitigation Project Information Upload
ID#* 20191692 Version*5
Select Reviewer:*
Katie Merritt
initial Review Completed Date D9121/2021
Mitigation Project Submittal -9/20/2021
1s this a Prospectus,Technical Proposal or a New Site?* C Yes ( No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
r Stream r Wetlands Pr Buffer 17 Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:* Email Address:*
Raymond Holz rholz@ restorationsystems.com
Project Information
ID#:* 20191692 Version:*5
Existing flYt Existing Version
Project Type: C DMS r' Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Raleigh Farm(Phase B-C)
County: Wake
Document Information
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Plans
File Upload: 2019-1692 V5_Phase B-C_Raleigh
56.77MB
Farm_BPDP_2021-09-20_.pdf
Rease upload only one RUF of the corrplete file that needs to be submitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Raymond Holz
Signature:

Mitigation Project Information Upload
ID#* 20191692 Version*5
Select Reviewer:*
Katie Merritt
initial Review Completed Date D9124/2021
Mitigation Project Submittal -9/24/2021
1s this a Prospectus,Technical Proposal or a New Site?* C Yes r No
Type of Mitigation Project:*
r Stream r Wetlands Pr Buffer 17 Nutrient Offset
(Select all that apply)
Project Contact Information
Contact Name:* Email Address:*
Raymond Holz rholz@ restorationsystems.com
Project Information
ID#:* 20191692 Version:*5
Existing flYt Existing Version
Project Type: C DMS r' Mitigation Bank
Project Name: Raleigh Farm Phase B-C
County: Wake
Document Information
Mitigation Document Type:*
Mitigation Plans
File Upload: 2019-1692 V5_Phase B-C_Raleigh
56.77MB
Farm_BPDP_2021-09-20_.pdf
Rease upload only one RUF of the corrplete file that needs to be submitted...
Signature
Print Name:* Raymond Holz
Signature:

Bank Parcel Development Package
RALEIGH FARM — PHASE B-C
NUTRIENT OFFSET AND BUFFER MITIGATION BANK PARCEL
Neuse River Basin
DWR ID#: 2019-1692 V5
•
•
It h Y _
Bank Parcel Sponsor
Restoration Systems, LLC
POC: Barrett Jenkins
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
. _ - , Raleigh, NC 27604
- ' `,fig'^= " .
919.755.9490
September 20, 2021

Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction 1
1.1 Bank Sponsor 2
1.2 Project Location & Fee-Simple ❑wnership 2
1.3 ❑irections to Parcel from Raleigh 3
1.4 Parcel Overview 3
1.5 Historic Land Use 6
2.0 Project Area-Current Conditions 7
2.1 Physiography 7
2.2 Soils 7
2.3 Existing Vegetative Communities 8
2.4 Parcel Design and Implementation Constraints 9
2.4.1 Threatened and Endangered Species 11
2.4.2 Cultural Resources 11
3.0 Restoration Plan 12
3.1 Project Schedule 13
3.2 Permitting 13
3.3 Planting Plan 14
3.3.1 Permanent Seed Mix 15
3.4 Parcel Protection & Easement Boundaries ,..,15
3.5 As-Built Report 16
4.0 Monitoring and Maintenance Plan ,.16
4.1 Monitoring Protocol & Success Criteria 16
4.2 Parcel Maintenance ,..,16
4.3 Maintenance Areas 16
4.4 Long Term Management Plan 17
5.0 Financial Assurance 17
6.0 Mitigation Potential 17
7.0 References 18
Tables
Table 1. Bank Parcel Easement Tracts 1
Table 2. Bank Parcel Fee Simple❑wnership (Project Parcels) 3
Table 3. Phase B Project Features Descriptions 3
Table 4. Phase C Project Features Descriptions 5
Table 5. Timeline of Land Use 7
Table 6. Parcel Soils 7
Table 7. Reference Forest Ecosystem 9
Table 8. Documented and Recorded Parcel Constraints& Design Avoidance 9
Table 9. USFWS Federally Protected Species List 11
Table 10. Restoration Plan Activities 12
Table 11. Phase B-C Project Schedule 13
Table 12. Phase B Proposed Hardwood Bare Root Planting Plan by Species ....14
Table 13. Phase C Proposed Hardwood Bare Root Planting Plan by Species 15
Table 14. Phase C Proposed Hardwood Bare Root Planting Plan by Species 16
Table 15. Raleigh Farm Bank Parcel - Phase B-C, 2019-1692v5, Project Credits 19
Raleigh Farm-Phase B-C Bank Parcel Development Plan(2019-1692 V5) Table of Contents
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020201

Appendices
Appendix A: Figures&Photos
Figure 1—Parcel Location and Service Area
Figure 2—Parcel Easements and Features
Figure 3—USGS Topography
Figure 4—NRCS Soil Survey
Figure 5—Current Conditions
Figure 6—NRRRF& Proposed Project Footprint
Figure 7A—Phase B Biosoild Application Fields
Figure 7B—Phase C Biosoild Application Fields
Figure 8A—Phase B Restoration Plan
Figure 8B—Phase C Restoration Plan
Figure 9—Phase B Credit Determinations
Figure 10—Phase C Credit Determinations(A-C)
Figure 11A--Phase B Monitoring Plan
Figure 11B—Phase B Monitoring Plan
Existing Conditions Photos
Appendix B: DWR Correspondence
Appendix C: USDA, NRCS Web Soil Survey Report
Appendix D: EDR Report
Appendix E: USFWS Report
Appendix F: NC NHP and NC SHP❑ Correspondence
Raleigh Farm—Phase B-C Bank Parcel Development Plan(2019-1692 V5) Table of Contents
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020201

Bank Parcel Development Package
Raleigh Farm Phase B-C—Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel
Wake County, NC—Neuse River Basin
1.0 Introduction
The Raleigh Farm Phase BC Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel ("Parcel" or "Site") is
proposed under the terms and conditions of the Raleigh Farm Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset
Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument, made and entered into on , 20_, by Restoration
Systems,LLC(RS),acting as Bank Sponsor(Sponsor),and the North Carolina Department of Environmental
Quality(NCDEQ), Division of Water Resources(DWR).The Parcel shall be planned and designed according
to the MBI, the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295, which became effective on
November 1,2015, and the Nutrient Offset Credit Trading Rule 15A NCAC 02B.0703.
Located in Wake County,the Parcel encompasses 107.9 acres of agricultural land and forests.The primary
purpose of the Parcel is to provide Riparian Buffer Credit (RBC) and Nutrient Offset Credits (NOC) for
stormwater and wastewater permitting requirements within the United States Geological Survey(USGS)
Cataloging Unit 03020201 — RBC and NOC are available for offsets within the Cataloging Unit, excluding
the Falls Lake Watershed (Appendix A, Figure 1). The Site will restore 55.123 acres and preserve 41.372
acres of riparian area, measured perpendicularly 200 feet off the top of bank, from 11 unnamed
tributaries,the Neuse River,two (2)in-line ponds,and one(1)agricultural ditch (Site Features)(Figures 2-
5, Appendix A). An additional 11.405 acres will be permanently protected within the conservation
easement but will not generate credit. The 11.405 acres consist of areas beyond 200-feet from Site
Features,the footprint of Site Features, non-credited areas, and non-credited access/maintenance areas
within the conservation easement.
The Site is situated on four tracts of land (Project Parcels), owned by the City of Raleigh (City). Project
Parcels are part of the City's Neuse River Resource Recovery Facility(NRRRF)and managed by the City of
Raleigh Public Utilities Department, also known as Raleigh Water. Due to the Site's total size,the Parcel is
divided into two Phases, "B"and "C"—implementation, management,and reporting will be conducted as
one single Bank Parcel, Phase B-C.
The Parcel's Site Features drain directly to and includes the Neuse River. Proposed Parcel easement tracts
will provide permanent protection to restored and preserved riparian buffers—Table 1 details the Site's
Easement Areas, by Phase,with individual and total acreages.
Table 1. Bank Parcel Easement Tracts
Easement Total Phase Easement Total Phase
Phase Tract No. Acreage Acreage Phase Tract No. Acreage Acreage
8 3.86 14 1.28
9 7.51 15 5.41
10 6.46 16 25.13
33.94
Phase B 11 8.60 Phase C 17 12.37 73.96
12 4.93 18 2.15
13 2.58 19 16.94
20 10.68
Total Parcel Acreage= 107.90
Raleigh Farm—Phase B-C Bank Parcel Development Plan(2019-1692 VS) Page 1 of 19
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020201

The City began residual biosolid application on portions of the Project Parcels in 1980 and currently has
1,439 acres permitted for land application of biosolids on the larger farm. Land application of biosolids
has occurred on the parcels since acquired by the City except for the 10-year moratorium between 2003
and 2013.The Site, and proposed easement areas, are located away from fixed infrastructure associated
with the application of biosolids (i.e., application piping and wellheads). In addition to biosolid
applications, the property is managed for hay and row crop production. A review of aerial photography
indicates agricultural areas of the property were converted from forest to agricultural before 1993,with
no significant changes to land use since.
Phase B-C will have its own credit release schedule for milestones met in accordance with the Raleigh
Farm Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument for Nutrient Offset and Riparian Buffer Credits(UMBI).
DWR representatives conducted onsite determinations for the applicability and suitability of Site Features
on June 2 and 8, 2020.Stream Determination letters for both Phase B and C were provided on August 17,
2020,and Site Viability letters were provided on September 24, 2020(Phase B)and September 25, 2020
(Phase C).All letters are provided in Appendix B.
RS will secure a conservation easement to preserve the Site in perpetuity, restricting any development
that would impair or interfere with the Site's conservation values. City allowance of a conservation
easement is further described in Section 3.4(Parcel Protection&Easement Boundaries)of this document.
Per the referenced Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument(UMBI)above, RS will arrange the transfer of
the conservation easement and its interests in perpetuity to a qualified holder under NC.General Statute
("GS") 121-34 et seq. and 170(h)of the Internal Revenue Code before the approval of the As-Built Report
by DWR. The holder shall be a land trust or stewardship program accredited by the Land Trust
Accreditation Commission and/or approved by DWR.A land trust must be certified under 501(c)(3)of the
Internal Revenue Code and must have the qualifications outlined in GS 105-130.24 and GS 105-151.12.
1.1 Bank Sponsor
The Site is proposed by Restoration Systems, LLC(RS). Information for RS is provided below;
Restoration Systems, LLC
Attention: Barrett Jenkins
1101 Haynes Street,Suite 211
Raleigh, NC 27604
bj e n ki ns@ resto rat io nsyste m s.co m
919.755.9490
1.2 Project Location&Fee-Simple Ownership
The Parcel is located approximately three miles northwest of Clayton,five miles east of Garner,and seven
miles southeast of Raleigh in Wake County, NC. The City is the current fee-simple owner of tracts
associated with the Bank Parcel.The Parcel is within the Neuse River Basin 14-digit USGS Cataloging Unit
03020201100030 of the Middle Atlantic Coastal Plain (North Carolina Division of Water Resources EDWRI
Sub-basin Number 03-04-02) (Figure 1, Appendix A). Fee simple ownership and Project Parcel details are
provided in Table 2.
Raleigh Farm—Phase B-C Bank Parcel Development Plan(2019-1592 V5) Page 2 of 19
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020201

Table 2. Bank Parcel Fee Simple Ownership (Project Parcels)
Owner Name D.B/Pg. NC PIN# Acreage
City of Raleigh 9885/449 1751047213 1462.55
City of Raleigh 12203/2060 1751110436 47.86
City of Raleigh 4890/535 1751625844 211.53
City of Raleigh 15585/445 1751449602 127.97
1.3 Directions to Parcel from Raleigh:
- Head South on N. Blount St.
- Turn left onto Martin Luther King Jr Blvd. (1.1 mi)
- Turn right onto Rock Quarry Rd. (0.2 mi)
- Keep right to stay on Rock Quarry Rd. (7.4 mi)
- Turn left onto Old Baucom Rd. (1.8 mi)
- Latitude, Longitude:35.707071°, -78.479510°
1.4 Parcel Overview
The Site's footprint totals 107.9 acres over four tracts of land. Current land use is a mixture of managed
fields for biosolid applications from the City's NRRRF, row crop agriculture, and unmanaged hardwood
forests (Figure 5-7,Appendix A).The Site will provide riparian area restoration and preservation along 11
unnamed tributaries,the Neuse River,two(2)in-line ponds, and one(1)agricultural ditch (Site Features).
All Site Features drain directly to the Neuse River.
Site Features are devoid of woody vegetation outside of forested areas due to historic and active
agricultural practices. Managed features are maintained (mowed/brush hogged) to keep woody
vegetation from establishing.
DWR representative conducted onsite stream determinations and site viability assessments for mitigation
potential on June 8,2020(Phase 6)and June 2,2020(Phase C). A summary of applicable Parcel Features,
by classification and Phase, is provided in Tables 3 and 4 and graphically depicted in Figures 2-5 of
Appendix A.
Table 3. Phase B Project Features Descriptions
Classification tSubject Riparian Land uses Buffer 3 Nutrient Offset
Feature to Buffer Credit
onsite adjacent to Feature(0-200') Viable
Rule Viable
1A Ephemeral No Combination of non-forested agricultural 27 Yes Yes(non-
fields and mature forest forested areas only)
Combination of non-forested agricultural
1B Stream Yes fields and mature forest YeS Yes(non-
forested areas only)
Utility line is present
2A Combination of non-
(ends at confluence Ephemeral No forested agricultural fields and mature 2,7 Yes Yes(non
w/2C} forest forested areas only)
Raleigh Farm—Phase B-C Bank Parcel Development Plan(2019-1592 VS) Page 3 of 19
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020201

Table 3. Phase B Project Features Descriptions(Continued)
Classification 'Subject a Riparian Land uses Buffer 3 Nutrient Offset
Feature to Buffer Credit
onsite Rule adjacent to Feature(0-200) Viable Viable
2B
Combination of non-forested agricultural �, Yes(non-forested
(ends at confluence Ephemeral No Yes
fields and mature forest areas only)
w/2C)
Mostly mature forest with some
agricultural field Yes(non-forested
2C Stream Yes 2 Yes
areas only)
Utility line and a greenway are present
Combination of non-forested agricultural
fields and mature forest Yes{non forested
3A Stream No 2 Yes areas only)
Trash is located in the stream and needs
to be removed where possible
Combination of non-forested agricultural
fields and mature forest
4B
A gas line is proposed to impact stream;
(starts above pond Stream Yes existing utilities are present(see map) 2 Yes Yes(non forested
&continues to areas only)
Main tributary 4)
A force main was located along this
stream;A utility line is present through
the pond.
6A Ephemeral No Mostly mature forest with some adjacent 27 Yes Yes(non-forested
agricultural field areas only)
Table 3. Phase B footnotes:
'Subjectivity calls for the features were determined by DWR in correspondence dated August 17, 2020
using the 1:24,000 scale quadrangle topographic map prepared by USGS and the most recent printed
version of the soil survey map prepared by the NRCS
2The area of preservation credit within a buffer mitigation site shall comprise of no more than 25 percent
(25%) of the total area of buffer mitigation per 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(5) and 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(4). Site
cannot be a Preservation Only site to comply with this rule.
3 NC Division of Water Resources - Methodology and Calculations for determining Nutrient Reductions
associated with Riparian Buffer Establishment
'Landuses may also include the application of bio-solids associated with the NRRRF
'The area of the mitigation site on ephemeral channels shall comprise no more than 25 percent (25%)of
the total area of buffer mitigation per 15A NCAC 02B.0295(o)(7).
Raleigh Farm—Phase B-C Bank Parcel Development Plan(2019-1592 VS) Page 4 of 19
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020201

Table 4. Phase C Project Features Descriptions
Buffer 3
Classification Subject 6 Riparian Land uses Nutrient Offset
Feature to Buffer Credit
onsite adjacent to Feature(0-200') Viable
Rule Viable
1A Forested above the pond and mostly non Yes(non forested
(includes Pond 1& Ephemeral No forested agricultural fields around and 2,7 Yes
ends at 1B) downstream of pond areas only)
18 Combination of non-forested agricultural
fields and mature forest Yes(non-forested
(begins at DWR Stream Yes 2 Yes
E/I flag) areas only)
A greenway is present downstream
2A Stream Yes Combination of non-forested agricultural 2 Yes Yes(non-forested
fields and mature forest areas only)
2B Wetland No fully forested with adjacent agricultural No No
(ends at DWR flag 2C) fields
2C Stream Yes Combination of non-forested agricultural 2 Yes Yes(non-forested
fields and mature forest areas only)
2D Wetland No fully forested with adjacent agricultural No No
(ends at DWR flag 2E) fields
2E Stream Yes Combination of non forested agricultural 2 Yes Yes(non-forested
fields and mature forest areas only)
Combination of non-forested agricultural
fields and mature forest
3A Stream Yes 2 Yes Yes(non forested
There is an access crossing present across areas only)
the stream and a greenway located
downstream
4A Ephemeral No Combination of non-forested agricultural z 7 Yes Yes(non-forested
fields and mature forest areas only)
Combination of non-forested agricultural
4B Stream Yes fields and mature forest 2Yes Yes(non-forested
areas only)
A greenway is present downstream
Mature forest along both sides of channel
5B Stream *No with non-forested agricultural located along 2 Yes Yes(non forested
(includes Pond 5 left bank areas only)
Mature forest along both sides of channel
Pond 5 In-line Pond Yes with non-forested agricultural located along 2 Yes Yes(non forested
left bank areas only)
Mature forest along both sides of channel
5C with non-forested agricultural located along
(starts below Stream Yes left bank 2 Yes Yes(non forested
areas only)
Pond 5)
utility line present downstream
Raleigh Farm—Phase B-C Bank Parcel Development Plan(2019-1592 V5) Page 5 of 19
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020201

Table 4. Phase C Project Features Descriptions(Continued)
Buffer
Classification Subject 6 Riparian Land uses Nutrient Offset
Feature to Buffer Credit
onsite adjacent to Feature j0-200'j Viable
Rule Viable
6A Ditch No narrow forested fringe and non-forested No Yes(fields only)
>3'depth agricultural fields
Table 4. Phase C footnotes:
t Subjectivity calls for the features were determined by DWR in correspondence dated August 17, 2020
using the 1:24,000 scale quadrangle topographic map prepared by USGS and the most recent printed
version of the soil survey map prepared by the NRCS
2The area of preservation credit within a buffer mitigation site shall comprise of no more than 25 percent
(25%) of the total area of buffer mitigation per 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(5) and 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(4). Site
cannot be a Preservation Only site to comply with this rule.
3 NC Division of Water Resources - Methodology and Calculations for determining Nutrient Reductions
associated with Riparian Buffer Establishment
° Determinations made for this Site are determined based on the proposal provided in maps and figures
submitted with the request.
5 All features proposed for buffer mitigation or nutrient offset, must have a conservation easement
established that includes the tops of channel banks when being measured perpendicular and landward
from the banks,even if no credit is viable within that riparian area.
6 Land uses may also include the application of bio-solids associated with the NRRRF
The area of the mitigation site on ephemeral channels shall comprise no more than 25 percent (25%)of
the total area of buffer mitigation per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(7).
* Per 2021-09-10 conversation with DWR,agricultural pond and exempt from Buffer Rule. Meeting Notes
are provided in Appendix B
1.5 Historic Land Use
City of Raleigh's Neuse River Resource Recovery Facility(NRRRF)
The City began biosolid residuals application in 1980 and currently has 1,439 acres permitted for land
application.Land application of biosolids has occurred on Site since the City's acquisition of Project Parcels
except for a 10-year moratorium between 2003 and 2013. Several areas in the Site's proposed footprint
are subject to biosolids application. Specific field boundaries and active biosolid application areas are
further detailed in Figures 6-7, Appendix A. The property is currently managed for hay and row crop
production.
Table 5 details a review of the City's Parcels with aerial photography beginning in 1969.
Raleigh Farm—Phase B-C Bank Parcel Development Plan(2019-1692 V5) Page 6 of 19
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020201

Table 5.Timeline of Land Use
Period Arial Photo Land Use
Date
1969-89 02/9/1969 Fragmented agricultural within forested lands,progressively more land clearing for
12/7/1989 agricultural purposes
Evidence of final forest to agricultural conversion
Early 90's 02/18/1993 - Phase B, Features 4 and 5(easement areas 11 and 12)
- Phase C, Features 1,2,3,4,and 6(easement areas 15, 16, 17,and 19)
02/21/1999 Established City agricultural fields with no substantial difference observed to land
1999_ 01/ use activities.
07/25/2025/201010
Present 05/19/2015 - 2014-2015, Phase B—failure of an in-line agricultural pond along Feature 4(area
02/04J2019 outside of proposed Parcel footprint).
2.0 Project Area—Current Conditions
2.1 Physiography
The Site encapsulates heavily modified headwater stream systems within the Middle Atlantic Coastal
Plain.Specifically, Ecoregion IV---45f Northern Outer Piedmont, located within the eastern portion of the
Piedmont, to the Coastal Plain Fall Line, in northern North Carolina (the transition between North
Carolina's Piedmont and Coastal Plain).This ecoregion consists of dissected irregular plains, rounded hills
and ridges, and low to moderate gradient streams with mostly cobble, gravel, and sandy substrates
(Griffith et al. 2002).
The watershed is dominated by agricultural land, fringe forests, and impervious surfaces associated with
single-family homes and roads. Surrounding area land use is primarily row-crop agriculture, with some
low-density residential housing,cattle pasture,and forested lands.
2.2 Soils
A detailed soil report for the Site was produced using the Natural Resource Conservation Service's(NRCS)
Web Soil Survey (USDA 2019)(Appendix C). Based on the custom report,the Bank Parcel contains the soil
series outlined in Table 6.
Table 6. Parcel Soils
Map Unit Map Unit Name Acres in Percent of Hydric
Symbol Parcel Parcel Soil Rating
AaA Altavista fine sandy loam,0 to 4 percent slopes,rarely flooded 8.4 7.8% No*
AuA Augusta fine sandy loam,0 to 2 percent slopes, rarely flooded 0.6 0.6% No
ChA Chewacla and Wehadkee soils,0 to 2 percent slopes,frequently flooded 17.5 16.2% Yes
FrB Fuquay loamy sand,0 to 6 percent slopes 12.2 11.3% No
GrC Gritney sandy loam,6 to 10 percent slopes 7.6 7.1% No
HeB Helena sandy loam,2 to 6 percent slopes 1.7 1.6% No
LyA Lynchburg sandy loam,0 to 2 percent slopes 1.6 1.5% Not
RgC Rawlings-Rion complex,6 to 10 percent slopes 10.4 9.6% No
RgD Rawlings-Rion complex, 10 to 15 percent slopes 12.3 11.4% No
*May contain inclusions of hydric soils
Raleigh Farm—Phase B-C Bank Parcel Development Plan(2019-1592 V5) Page 7 of 19
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020201

Table 6. Parcel Soils(Continued)
Map Unit Acres in Percent of Hydric
Symbol Map Unit Name Parcel Parcel Soil Rating
RkA Riverview fine sandy loam,0 to 2 percent slopes,occasionally flooded 5.7 5.2% No*
WaD Wake-Rolesville complex, 10 to 15 percent slopes,very rocky 2.9 2.6% No
WaE Wake-Rolesville complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes,very rocky 17.8 16.5% No
WeB Wedowee sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes 3.1 2.9% No
WeC Wedowee sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes 1.2 1.1% No
WfB Wedowee-Saw complex,2 to 6 percent slopes 0.8 0.7% No
NA Open Water 4.1 3.9% NA
Totals 107.9 100.0%
*May contain inclusions of hydric soils
2.3 Existing Vegetative Communities
Of the Site's 107.9-acre footprint, 57.265 acres are in managed agricultural fields or pasture (Phase B =
11.043 acres, Phase C= 46.222 acres).Typical crops grown include corn and soybeans,though individual
fields are often subject to other crops like sunflowers. Pasture areas are comprised predominantly of
Bermuda and fescue(Festuca sp.)gasses. Pasture fields are cut/managed throughout the year.In general,
Site Features are subject to agricultural impacts in the upper half of each individual watershed. As the
Features migrate downstream,they typically enter disturbed fringe forests,which expand as Site Features
move down valley.
Site Features drain to the Neuse River. To the south of the Parcel and abutting the City's property is the
Clemmons Educational State Forest and other lands managed by the State of North Carolina (NHP Report
Appendix F). Existing hardwood forests of these managed properties are consistent with Piedmont mesic
forests, which occur on moist portions of upland habitat, steep north-facing slopes, lower slopes, along
ravines, high sections of outer floodplains, and stream bottoms. The most common subtypes in the
Piedmont are Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest and Basic Mesic Forest (Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley.
2012).
Proposed Parcel easements connect proposed riparian buffer restoration and preservation areas to
existing fringe forests along the Neuse River. Phase B and the upper extent of Phase C's vegetation
community is consistent with a dry Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest(Piedmont Subtype). Lower portions of
Phase C are located in the Neuse River's floodplain. Observed species within the Neuse floodplain are
consistent with Schafale and Weakley's Piedmont Bottomland Forest(2012).
Given the Parcels physiography, RS has determined a mix of Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Piedmont
Subtype) and Piedmont Bottomland Forest is the most appropriate reference forest (Schafale, M.P. and
A.S. Weakley. 2012).Table 7 outlines the species included in these reference forest ecosystems.
Raleigh Farm—Phase B-C Bank Parcel Development Plan(2019-1592 vs) Page 8 of 19
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020201

Table 7. Reference Forest Ecosystem
Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest(Piedmont Subtype)and Piedmont Bottomland Hardwoods
(Schafale,M.P.and A.S.Weakley.2012)
Understory/Shrub Species
Deerberry(Vaccinium stamineum) Red maple(Acer rubrum)
Downy arrowwood(Viburnum rafinesquianum) Flowering dogwood(Corn us florida)
American strawberry bush(Euonymus americana) American holly(flex opaca)
American hophornbeam(Carpinus caroliniana) Papaw(Asimina triloba)
Southern sugar maple(Acer floridanum)
Canopy Species
Tulip(Liriodendron tulipifera) Lobloliy pine(Pinus taeda)
American sweetgum(Liquidambarstyraciflua) Shagbark hickory(Carya ovata)
Cherrybark oak(Quercus pagoda) Bitternut hickory(Carya cordiformis)
Swamp chestnut oak(Quercus michauxii) American beech(Fagus grandifolia)
American elm (Ulmus americana) Northern red oak(Quercus rubra)
Southern hackberry(Celtis laevigata) Red maple (Acer rubrum)
Green Ash(Fraxinus pennsylvanica) Sugar maple(Acer saccharum)
2.4 Parcel Design and Implementation Constraints
The presence of conditions or characteristics that have the potential to hinder restoration activities on
the Site were evaluated. The evaluation focused primarily on the presence of hazardous materials,
utilities, restrictive easements, rare/threatened/endangered species or critical habitats,the potential for
hydrologic trespass,and existing NRRRF infrastructure.Existing information regarding Site constraints was
acquired and reviewed, including an Environmental Records Report developed by Environmental Data
Resources Inc.,which located no evidence of environmental risk associated with the Parcels(Appendix D).
A North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Report was conducted and concluded three known historic
locations within the area, but all are located outside the proposed footprint(Appendix F).
Site conditions(existing or future)that have the potential to restrict the restoration, implementation and
long-term protection of the Site were documented digitally and during the field investigation.A summary
of findings and design avoidance is detailed in Table 8.
Table 8. Documented and Recorded Parcel Constraints& Design Avoidance
Constraint Subject to Design Avoidance
Phases
Duke Power(Formally
Progress Energy of the
Carolinas,and Carolina RS reviewed subject parcels and identified recorded deeds that reference the
Power& Light Co.) B&C establishment of the easement in 1981.Subject records place the easement
at 200 feet.The Site's proposed easements are located outside of the utility
200-foot, Richmond-Wake, easement.
500 KV Overhead
Transmission Line
Raleigh Farm—Phase B-C Bank Parcel Development Plan(2019-1592 VS) Page 9 of 19
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020201

Table 8. Documented and Recorded Parcel Constraints&Design Avoidance(Continued)
Constraint Subject to Design Avoidance
Phases
Duke Power(Formally
Progress Energy of the
Carolinas,and Carolina RS reviewed subject parcels and identified recorded deeds that reference the
Power& Light Co.) B establishment of the easement in 1966.Subject records place the easement
at 90 feet.The site's proposed easements are located outside of the utility
90-foot, Richmond-Wake, easement.
230 KV Overhead
Transmission Line
Beginning construction in 2020 with an expected completion date in 2021,
Dominion Energy's T-030 Gas Pipeline Extension Project will maintain a 50-
Dominion Energy's T-030 foot utility easement over Project Parcels associated with Phases A.The new
Gas Pipeline Extension easement abuts and runs parallel along Duke Power's 200-foot overhead
Project(Franklin and Wake B transmission line easement.The Sponsor accessed the digital file of the
County)DWR Project ID No. permanent and temporary construction easements for the T-030 Gas
2019-0828 V2 Pipeline.Site design avoids all temporary and permanent easements
associated with the T-030 Gas Pipeline.The Site's proposed easements are
located outside the T-030 Gas Pipeline easement(permanent and temporary).
An existing City of Raleigh greenway trail (Neuse River Trail)meanders near
City of Raleigh&Wake portions of Phase B(Easement Areas 10, 11, 12,and 13)and Phase C
B&C (Easement Areas 14, 16, 17,and 19).The average width of the greenway
County Greenway
easement is 50-feet(25'on either side of the greenway's centerline).The
Site's footprint is outside of ail greenway easements and footprints.
A digital and physical review of active and inactive NRRRF infrastructure was
completed as part of the site's design. NRRRF conducts surface water testing
in pre-defined locations along Site Features and within proposed conservation
NRRRF biosolid application easements.These activities are consistent with allowable activities of the
&ground water monitoring B,&C proposed conservation easement.
infrastructure Appendix B includes written confirmation outlining DWR's allowance for the
the City to place a conservation easement over the subject parcels including
fields currently permitted for the application of biosolids.Areas historically
used for biosolid application will be removed from the City's NPDES permit.
Phase B—No constraints,all NRRRF infrastructure is located outside of the
Parcel's footprint.
Phase C—Two in-line ponds are within the proposed Phase C footprint—
NRRRF existing agricultural Feature 1A(Pond 1)and Feature 5A/5B(Pond 5). Both ponds have outfalls
C
ponds&BMP infrastructure connecting them to downstream waters.The proposed conservation
easement includes the earthen dams and their outlets. Easement areas over
the dams and outlets are designated as Maintenance Easements and allow for
access and maintenance. No RBC or NOC will be generated within designated
Maintenance Easements.
Raleigh Farm—Phase B-C Bank Parcel Development Plan(2019-1592 V5) Page 10 of 19
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020201

Table 8. Documented and Recorded Parcel Constraints& Design Avoidance(Continued)
subject to
Constraint Phases Design Avoidance
Dilapidated and abandoned agricultural infrastructure items are detailed in
the Restoration Plan(Section 3)
Dilapidated/ Earthen roads(farm paths)exist throughout the Site and are typically found
abandoned agricultural B&C along forest edges—Section 3, Restoration Plan,details the removal and
infrastructure and earthen restoration of farm paths.The Phase B Conservation Easement Area 16 will
farm roads include the gravel road which crosses Feature 1A, below Pond 1.The path and
the culvert that carries Feature 1A under the path within the conservation
easement will ensure perpetual protection and hydrologic connection of
Feature 1A with Feature 1B.
Table 8 Note:All utility easements will be shown on the Conservation Easement Plat& Parcel's As-Built Survey and
sealed by a licensed surveyor of North Carolina.
2.4.1 Threatened and Endangered Species
Species with the classification of Endangered (E),Threatened (T),or officially Proposed(P)for such listing
are protected under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA), as amended (16 USC 1531 et seq.). Six
species, listed in Table 9, are federally listed within Wake County by the United States Fish and Wildlife
Service(USFWS) (USFWS 2020) (Appendix E).
Table 9. USFWS Federally Protected Species List
Common Name Scientific Name Status
Cape Fear shiner Notropis mekistocholas Endangered
Red-cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis Endangered
Dwarf Wedgemussel Alasmidonta heterodon Endangered
Tar River Spinymussel Porvaspina steinstansana Endangered
Yellow lance Elliptio steinstansana Threatened
Michaux's sumac Rhus michouxii Endangered
The biological conclusion is no effect on the species listed above, and proposed mitigation activities will
result in positive benefits for these species through improved habitat and water quality.
2.4.2 Cultural Resources
The term "cultural resources" refers to prehistoric or historic archaeological sites, structures, or artifact
deposits over 50 years old. "Significant"cultural resources are those that are eligible or potentially eligible
for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. Evaluations of site significance are made with
reference to the eligibility criteria of the National Register(36 CFR 60).
Field visits were conducted in June 2020 to ascertain the presence of structures or features that may be
eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. No structures were found. An online search using the
North Carolina State Historic Preservation Offices(SH PO)Web GIS Service(http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/)
and the National Register of Historic Places GIS Search
(https://www.nps.gov/maps/full.html?mapld=7adl7cc9-b808-4ff8-a2f9-a99909164466)identified zero
structures within the Parcel boundaries or within 1 mile of the Parcel(Appendix F).
Raleigh Farm—Phase B-C Bank Parcel Development Plan(2019-1592 V5) Page 11 of 19
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020201

3.0 Restoration Plan
The primary goals associated with the restoration of riparian areas within the Bank Parcel will focus on
improving water quality, enhancing flood attenuation, and restoring wildlife habitat.These goals will be
achieved by restoring and preserving forested riparian areas adjacent to stream channels, in-line ponds,
ephemeral channels, and an agricultural ditch(Figures 8A and 8B,Appendix A).
Goals will be accomplished by the following:
1. Removing nonpoint sources of pollution associated with agricultural production, including;
a. Ceasing the broadcast application of class B biosolids, fertilizer, pesticides, and other
agricultural materials into and adjacent to Parcel Features.
b. Providing a restored buffer to filter runoff from adjacent lands.
2. Reducing sedimentation within onsite and downstream receiving waters by reducing bank
erosion, vegetation maintenance, and agricultural land disturbances by ceasing agricultural and
current land use activities.
3. Promoting floodwater attenuation by increasing frictional resistance of floodwaters crossing
Parcel floodplains.
4. Improving aquatic habitat by enhancing stream bed shading and natural detritus input.
5. Providing a terrestrial wildlife corridor and refuge in an area extensively disturbed by agricultural
practices.
6. Restoring and re-establishing natural community structure, habitat diversity, and functional
continuity.
7. Protecting the Parcel's riparian buffer functions and values in perpetuity.
Primary components of the Restoration Plan include:
1. Removal of dilapidated/abandoned agricultural infrastructure within forested areas where
feasible.
2. Removal of existing compacted earth roads associated with agricultural use,
3. Parcel-wide soil preparation & herbaceous vegetation treatment,
4. Riparian area restoration (replanting) extending from the top of bank (TOB) out 200' where
applicable and,
5. Parcel protection in perpetuity through a permanent conservation easement.
Table 10 details the Restoration Plan activities.
Table 10. Restoration Plan Activities
Restoration Phase Specific Actions
Plan Activity
The City,who actively self-manages the farm operations,will treat fescue within the Parcel ahead
Herbaceous of planting efforts.Treatment will consist of a broadcast application using Roundup Custom
Treatment
(Glyphosate)at rate of 3%and a surfactant of AgriDex at a rate of 1%mixed with water.
- Remove existing farm paths located within the proposed easements by deep ripping to break
soil compaction associated with historic farm equipment and vehicle use. NRRRF will
Removal of establish new roads dependent on future use and need outside of the Site's proposed
Existing easements.
Infrastructure
- Remove large debris from the easement as is feasible and without damaging the existing
riparian buffer Feature 3A,Phase B.
Raleigh Farm—Phase B-C Bank Parcel Development Plan(2019-1592 V5) Page 12 of 19
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020201

Table 10. Restoration Plan Activities (Continued)
Restoration
Plan Activity
Phase Specific Actions
Within the Site's proposed conservation easements:
- Treat Bermuda and fescue grass species within active pasture areas (see Herbaceous
Treatment note above).
Site -wide discing of agricultural and pasture areas ahead of planting — discing will occur
parallel to the Site Features, promoting floodwater attenuation by increasing frictional
Riparian
resistance of floodwaters crossing Parcel floodplains.
Restoration
- Establishment of a native herbaceous community via site -specific seed mix (See Planting Plan
— Section 3.3.1)
Establishment of a native hardwood forest via the planting of bare -root saplings from the top
of bank out a maximum of 200' along Parcel Features —Section 3.3 Planting Plan
3.1 Project Schedule
Project restoration activities, milestones, and anticipated completion dates are outlined in Table 11.
Table 11. Phase B-C Project Schedule
Activity / Milestone
Completion Date
Site Mitigation Banking Instrument and Bank Parcel Development Package Approval
Q4 2021
Acquisition of Conservation Easement
Q4 2021
Removal of Existing Infrastructure & rubble within easement (as feasible)
Q1 2022
Planting
Q1 2022
As -Built & Assignment of Conservation Easement
Q2 2022
Year 1 monitoring
Q4 2022
Year 2 monitoring
Q4 2023
Year 3 monitoring
Q4 2024
Year 4 monitoring
Q4 2025
Year 5 monitoring
Q4 2026
Closeout
Q1 2027
3.2 Permitting
Restoration activities requiring heavy equipment include:
1.) Remove existing, earthen farm paths within the proposed easements by deep ripping with
agricultural equipment to break up soil compaction associated with historic farm equipment and
vehicle use. The main gravel road, which runs east -west through Phase C (easement area 16), will
remain.
2.) Remove reinforced concrete pipes & other debris located within the proposed easement as feasible
without damaging existing forest/vegetation.
Raleigh Farm —Phase B-C Bank Parcel Development Plan (2019-1592 V5) Page 13 of 19
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020201

Construction activities will not require permitting or authorization from federal, state, or county agencies
for impacts to regulated waterways or ground -disturbing activities.
3.3 Planting Plan
Restoration of the riparian area allows for recolonization and expansion of characteristic species across
the landscape. The riparian areas will be restored according to the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (November 1, 2015). The planting plan for the entire riparian restoration area
(Phases B and C combined) includes planting 34,500 native bare root hardwood saplings across 57.265
acres are in managed agricultural fields or pasture (Phase B = 11.043 acres, Phase C = 46.222 acres) at a
density of +/-600 stems per acre (Figures 8A and 8B, Appendix A). Community associations utilized in the
proposed planting plan include Schafale and Weakley's (2012) Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Piedmont
Subtype) and Piedmont Bottomland Hardwoods, as detailed in Section 2.3, Existing Vegetative
Communities. Species composition includes native species known for fruit production.
Tree species will be mixed thoroughly before planting to provide a diverse and random plant across the
Site. Planting density is set to ensure sufficient diversity and density of planted stems outlined in Rule 15A
NCAC O2B .0295 of 260. No one tree species will be greater than 50% of the established stems — Tables 12
and 13 detail tree species reserved by the Sponsor for planting. The final planted species is subject to final
species availability. The Sponsor will note any changes to the planting list in the Site's Baseline Document
and As -built Survey.
Table 12. Phase B Proposed Hardwood Bare Root Planting Plan by Species
Common Name
Scientific Name
Tree/Shrub
Phase B (11.043 Ac.)
Species % of Total
River birch
Betula nigra
Tree
1,000
15%
Persimmon
❑iospyros virginiana
Tree
800
12%
Tulip poplar
Liriodendron tulipifera
Tree
800
12%
Red mulberry
Morus rubra
Tree
500
7%
Black Gum
Nyssa sylvatica
Tree
400
6°%
Sycamore
Platanus occidentalis
Tree
400
6%
White Oak
Quercus alba
Tree
400
6°%
Water oak
Quercus nigra
Tree
900
13%
Cherrybark oak
Quercus pagoda
Tree
700
10%
Willow oak
Quercus phellos
Tree
800
12%
Total
10 Species
6,700
100%
Space Pursefully Left Blank
Raleigh Farm —Phase B-C Bank Parcel Development Plan (2019-1692 V51 Page 14 of 19
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020201

Table 13. Phase C Proposed Hardwood Bare Rapt Planting Plan by Species
Common Name
Scientific Name
Tree/Shrub
Phase C (46.222 Ac.)
Species % of Total
River birch
Betula nigra
Tree
4,000
14%
Persimmon
Diaspyros virginiana
Tree
3,000
11%
Tulip poplar
Liriodendron tulipifera
Tree
3,200
12%
Red mulberry
Marus rubra
Tree
2,200
8%
Black Gum
Nyssa sylvatica
Tree
1,600
6%
Sycamore
Platanus occidentalis
Tree
1,800
6%
White Oak
Quercus alba
Tree
2,000
7%
Water oak
Quercus nigra
Tree
3,600
13%
Cherrybark oak
Quercus pagoda
Tree
3,000
11%
Willow oak
Quercus phellos
Tree
3,400
12%
Total
10 Species
27,800
100%
3.3.1 Permanent Seed Mix
The Sponsor will broadcast a permanent seed mix over all riparian restoration areas. The seed mix will
include native grasses and forbs, with a variety of annual and perennial plants known to benefit wildlife
and pollinators. The grass seed component will focus on low -growing species that favor establishing the
target forest community, particularly species such as purpletop (Tridens flavus) and bentgrass (Agrostis
hyemalisj. The forb component will include a diverse mixture of native and naturalized forbs and
wildflowers, including fifteen or more species.
3.4 Parcel Protection & Easement Boundaries
Before the release of any credits, RS will record a permanent conservation easement at the Wake County
Register of Deeds sufficient to ensure protection, operation, and maintenance of restored riparian buffers
and other riparian areas in perpetuity.
The form of the conservation easement shall be consistent with the standards employed by the State of
North Carolina in the protection of restored riparian buffers and riparian areas and shall be approved by
the DWR before the release of any credits.
Appendix B includes written confirmation from NCDWR approving of the implementation of this plan on
portions of fields currently permitted for the application of biosolids under NCDWR permit WQ0001730 -
City of Raleigh. Fields currently permitted for the application of biosolids will be removed from the City
of Raleigh's above referenced permit after the conservation easement is recorded and prior approval of
this Bank Parcel's As -Built report by NCDWR.
Parcel easement boundaries will be identified in the field to ensure a clear distinction between the Parcel
and adjacent properties/land uses. The Sponsor will install marking and signage of the easement boundary
adjacent/close to utility and greenway easements to ensure the clear designation of the easement.
Boundaries may be identified by cattle fence, marker, bollard, post, tree -blazing, or other means as
allowed by Site conditions and/or conservation easement requirements and will be installed before the
As -Built Site visit by DWR. Boundary markers disturbed, damaged, or destroyed will be repaired and/or
replaced on an as -needed basis. The easement boundary will be checked annually as part of monitoring
activities and reported to DWR.
Raleigh Farm —Phase B-C Bank Parcel Development Plan (2019-1692 V51 Page 15 of 19
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC: 03020201

3.5 As-Built Report
A Baseline Monitoring Document and As-Built Survey will be submitted to DWR documenting the
completion of the Site's Restoration Plan and in accordance with the MBI.
4.0 Monitoring and Maintenance Plan
4.1 Monitoring Protocol& Success Criteria
Restoration monitoring procedures for vegetation will monitor plant survival and species diversity.
Quantitative sampling will include forty-nine (49) [Phase B = 12, Phase C= 37) permanent 10 x 10-meter
vegetation plots as outlined in the CVS Level 1-2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4.2 (Lee et al.
2008) and will occur no earlier than Fall of each year (Figures 11A and 11B- Monitoring Plan). Vegetation
plot placement will adequately represent riparian buffer credit and nutrient offset credit areas. A
reference photo will be taken from the origin point of each plot. All planted stems in the plots will be
marked with flagging tape and recorded. Data collected will include species, height, vigor, and planting
type (planted stem and/or volunteer). Monitoring of the restoration efforts will be performed for five
years or until success criteria are fulfilled.The Sponsor shall submit to DWR annual monitoring reports no
later than December 31 of each year. Each report will document the success of the vegetation and any
maintenance,supplemental planting, or encroachment within the easement areas.Success criteria within
the riparian restoration areas will be based on the survival of planted species at a density of 260 stems
per acre after five years of monitoring.
The first annual monitoring activities will commence at the end of the first growing season, at least six
months after planting has been completed.
4.2 Parcel Maintenance
A remedial action plan will be developed and implemented with the approval of DWR in the event the
Parcel or a specific component of the Parcel fails to achieve success criteria as outlined above. Other
vegetation maintenance and repair activities may include pruning, mulching, and fertilizing. If exotic
invasive plant species require treatment, such species will be controlled by mechanical (physical removal
with the use of a chainsaw) and/or chemical methods (aquatic approved herbicide) in accordance with
North Carolina Department of Agriculture (NCDA) rules and regulations.
If mowing is deemed necessary by the Sponsor during the monitoring period, the Sponsor must receive
approval from DWR prior to conducting any mowing activities within Neuse Buffer Zones 1 and 2 to
ensure that no buffer violations have occurred.
4.3 Maintenance Areas
City of Raleigh actively manages areas surrounding the site, including the monitoring of
existing groundwater monitoring wells located around and within the Site footprint, as required under
their Non-Discharge Permit for biosolids application #WQ0001730 as well as the permit's
corresponding Corrective Action Plan issued 9/2/2010 by DWR. Raleigh shall retain rights to
passive access to monitor and maintain wells for compliance with the permit, the permit's
corresponding "Corrective Active Plan for the NRRRF" and any parts of 15A NCAC 02L .0107
(e) as applicable. Well reference #s and locations within the Site footprint are as follows:
Project Phase Well Label Adjacent Parcel Conservation
Feature Easement Area
Phase B MW-55 Main Trib. 4 13
Phase C MW-53R Neuse River 14
Phase C GP-12R Feature 2E 17
Raleigh Farm—Phase B-C Bank Parcel Development Plan(2019-1692 V5) Page 16 of 19
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020201

Additionally, maintenance areas will be delineated on the final survey to be included in the conservation
easement footprint, and excluded from nutrient offset and riparian buffer credit generation. These areas
are reserved for infrastructure maintenance such as earthen dams, culverted crossings, and piped
discharges. Land clearing and vehicular traffic in these areas necessary for infrastructure maintenance is
allowed.
4.4 Long Term Management Plan
The conservation easement will preserve all areas and prohibit all use of the property inconsistent with
its use as a nutrient offset and riparian buffer mitigation property, including any activity that would
materially alter the biological integrity of the Site/Parcel. RS will transfer or assign the conservation
easement and its interests in perpetuity to a qualified holder under NC General Statute ("GS") 121-34 et
seq. and 170(h) of the Internal Revenue Code prior to the submittal of the As-Built Report. The holder
shall be a land trust or stewardship program that is accredited by the Land Trust Accreditation Commission
and/or has been approved by DWR.A land trust must be certified under 501(c)(3)of the Internal Revenue
Code.
5.0 Financial Assurance
As required by the UMBI, the Sponsor will secure all financial assurances according to the UMBI. No
bond shall be less than $150,000 to cover costs of construction and no less than $100,000 to cover
monitoring expenses.
Monitoring bonds shall be renewed with confirmation of renewal provided to DWR with each annual
monitoring report. DWR reserves the right to alter the credit release schedule if monitoring reports
are submitted without proof of bond renewals.
6.0 Mitigation Potential
The Parcel will generate Neuse River Riparian Buffer Credits (RBC) and Nutrient Offset Credit (NOC,
nitrogen) on restored riparian areas measured from the top of bank out perpendicularly 200-feet on
subject Features (streams, ephemeral channels, a ditch, and in-line ponds). Per the Consolidated
Mitigation Buffer Rule,the Parcel will generate RBC via allowed activities under Section (n), Non-forested
Areas[Restoration Site] and (o),Alternative Buffer Mitigation Options.Specifically,RBC is to-be generated
from sub-sections (o)(4), (o)(5), & (o)(7). Parcel compliance with these sub-sections is detailed below.
(o)(4) — Preservation of Buffer on Non-Subject Streams: Preservation of buffers on intermittent or
perennial streams that are not subject per 15A NCAC 02B .0233 are proposed via the permanent
protection under a perpetual conservation easement from cutting, clearing, filling, grading, and similar
activities that would affect the functioning of the buffer. Features proposed under(o)(4) were confirmed
as intermittent or perennial streams by DWR representatives during the June 2-3, 2020 site visit for
applicability and suitability (Appendix B). The area of preservation credit is capped at 25 percent of the
total area of buffer mitigation.
(o)(5) — Preservation of Buffers on Subject Streams: Buffer preservation is proposed on streams that are
subject per 15A NCAC 02B .0233 to permanently protect the buffer from cutting, clearing, filling, grading,
and similar activities that would affect the functioning of the buffer beyond the protection afforded by
the existing buffer rules on sites that meet the definition of a preservation site. The area of preservation
credit is capped at 25 percent of the total area of buffer mitigation.
Raleigh Farm—Phase B-C Bank Parcel Development Plan(2019-1692 V5) Page 17 of 19
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020201

(o)(7)—Mitigation on ephemeral channels:The Parcel will generate riparian buffer credit on "ephemeral
channels" as defined as a "natural channel exhibiting discernible banks within a topographic crenulation
(V-shaped contour lines) indicative of natural drainage on the 1:24,000 scale (7.5 minute) quadrangle
topographic map prepared by the US Geologic Survey,or as seen on digital elevation models with contours
developed from the most recent available LiDAR data" (15A NCAC 02B .0295).Appendix A Figures depict
the delineated watershed draining to each ephemeral channel proposed for RBC(Features 1A,2A,3A,4A,
and 6A). The entire area proposed for RBC from ephemeral channels is within the contributing drainage
area. All subject ephemeral channels are directly connected to an intermittent or perennial stream, are
contiguous with the Site and are proposed for permanent protection under the Site's conservation
easement.The RBC derived from ephemeral channels will not total more than 25 percent of the total area
of buffer mitigation.The proposed buffer credit areas meet all applicable requirements of Paragraph (n)
of Rule [15A NCAC 02B .0295] for restoration or enhancement, and all applicable requirements of
Subparagraph (o)(4) or (o)(5) of Rule [15A NCAC 02B .0295] for preservation. Ephemeral features were
confirmed DWR representatives during the June 2, 2020 and June 8, 2020 site visit for the applicability
and suitability of Site Features(Appendix B).
DWR has determined the nitrogen abatement of restored riparian areas on this Bank Parcel to be 2,273.02
lbs. per acre as agreed to in the Raleigh Farm MBI. RBC will be measured to the nearest whole square foot.
Riparian buffer restoration credits can be converted and transferred to NOC upon approval from DWR.
However, conversions of NOC from widths 101'-200' (measured from top of bank)to RBC will not occur.
Provided in Appendix B is a complete DWR Credit Determination Table, which details the individual
components, generated credit, and which features generating RBC credit comply with criteria to also be
convertible to NOC.The Sponsor must request and receive written approval of the conversion and transfer
of any mitigation credits from DWR prior to adding or removing credits from the ledgers.
The Sponsor will maintain three individual ledgers,one to account for riparian buffer restoration credits,
one to account for riparian buffer preservation credits,and one to account for NOC.All credit assets shall
be accurately depicted on these credit ledgers. All accounting will be in accordance with DWR's Clarified
Procedures for Calculating Buffer Mitigation Credits and Nutrient Offset Credits (November 2019) (link in
UMBI). The complete DWR Mitigation Credit Table is shown on the following page,Table 13.
7.0 References
Griffith,G.E.,JM Omernik,J.A. Comstock, M.P.Schafale, W.H. McNab, D.R. Lenat,T.F. MacPherson,J.B.
Glover, and VB Shelbourne. 2002. Ecoregions of North Carolina and South Carolina. US Geological
Survey, Reston,Virginia.
Schafale, M. P.and Weakley, 2012. A Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Fourth
Approximation.
US Department of Agriculture(USDA), 2019. Web Soil Survey(online). Available:
https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/HomePage.htm [Accessed July 19, 20201
US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2020. Endangered Species,Threatened Species,and Candidate Species,
Wake County, North Carolina (online).Available:
https://www.fws.gov/raleigh/species/cntylist/wake.html (Accessed July 19, 2020)
Raleigh Farm—Phase B-C Bank Parcel Development Plan(2019-1592 V5) Page 18 of 19
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020201

Credit Table 15.Raleigh Farm Bank Parcel-Phase B-C,2019-1692v5,Project Credits
Neuse 03020201-Outside Falls Lake Project Area
19.16394 N Credit Conversion Ratio(ft5/pound)
N/A P Credit Conversion Ratio(ft2/pound)
Subject?(enter Total(Creditable) Convertible to Delivered Delivered
NO if Min-Max Buffer Initial Credit Final Credit Riparian Buffer Convertible to
Credit Type Location Feature Type Mitigation Activity Feature Name Total Area(ft) Area of Buffer %Full Credit Riparian Nutrient Offset: Nutrient
ephemeral or Width(ft) Ratio(x:1) Ratio(x:1) Credits Nutrient Offset?
ditch'1 Mitigation(ft') Buffer? N(Ibs) Offset:P(Ibs)
Phase B - - -
Buffer Rural Yes I/P Restoration 0-100 1B,2C,3A,4B 50,549 50,549 1 100% 1.00000 Yes 50,549.000 Yes 2,637.714 -
Nutrient Offset Rural No Ephemeral Restoration 0-100 1A,2A,2B,6A 36,275 1 100% No - Yes 1,892.878 -
Nutrient Offset Rural No Ephemeral Restoration 101-200 1A,2A,2B,6A 119,728 1 33% No - Yes 6,247.567 -
Nutrient Offset Rural No Ephemeral Restoration 101-200 113,2C,3A,4B,Neuse 248,810 1 33% No - Yes 12,983.226 -
Phase C - - -
Buffer Rural No Ephemeral Restoration 20-29 Pond 1 154 0 1 75% N/A - No - -
Buffer Rural No Ephemeral Restoration 0-100 1A,4A,Pond 1 392,416 248,967 1 100% 1.00000 Yes 248,967.000 Yes 20,476.791 -
Buffer Rural No In-Line Pond Restoration 0-100 Pond 5 6,749 6,749 1 100% 1.00000 Yes 6,749.000 Yes 352.172 -
Buffer Rural Yes I/P Restoration 0-100 18,2A,2C,2E,3A,4B, 297,034 297,034 1 100% 1.00000 Yes 297,034.000 Yes 15,499.631 -
5C,Neuse
Nutrient Offset Rural No Ditch Restoration 0-100 6A 30,007 1 100% No - Yes 1,565.805 Nutrient Offset Rural No Ditch Restoration 101-200 6A 49,214 1 33% No - Yes 2,568.052 -
Nutrient Offset Rural No Ephemeral Restoration 101-200 1A,4A,Pond 1 428,090 1 33% No - Yes 22,338.308 -
Nutrient Offset Rural No In-Line Pond Restoration 101-200 Pond 5 32,357 1 33% No - Yes 1,688.432 -
Nutrient Offset Rural Yes I/P Restoration 101-200 1B,2A,2C,2E,3A,4B, 705,850 1 33% No - Yes 36,832.196 -
5B,5C,Neuse
Totals(ft2): 2,397,233 603,299 603,299.000 125,082.774 0.000
Total Buffer(ft2): 746,902 603,299
Total Nutrient Offset(ft2): 1,650,331 N/A
Total Ephemeral Area(fe)for Credit: 382,570 248,967
Total Eligible Ephemeral Area(fe): 248,967 25.0% Ephemeral Reaches as%TABM
Enter Preservation Credits Below Total Eligible for Preservation(ft2): 248,967 25.0% Preservation as%TABM
Total(Creditable)
Min-Max Buffer Initial Credit Final Credit Riparian
Credit Type Location Subject? Feature Type Mitigation Activity Feature Name Total Area(sf) Area for Buffer %Full Credit
Width(ft) Ratio(8:1) Ratio(8:1) Buffer Credits
Mitigation(fta)
Rural No Ephemeral 20-29 6A 50 5 75% -
Rural No Ephemeral 0-100 1A,2A,28,6A 116,595 5 100% -
Rural Yes I/P 20-29 2C,4B, 609 10 75% -
Rural Yes I/P 0-100 1B,2C,3A,48,Neuse 643,688 197,852 10 100% 10.00000 19,785.200
Rural Yes I/P 101-200 1B,2C,3A,48,Neuse 120,855 10 33% -
Rural No Ephemeral 0-100 1A,4A,Pond 1 103,334 5 100% -
Rural No Ephemeral 101-200 1A,4A,Pond 1 45,635 5 33% -
Rural No In-Line Pond 0-100 Pond 5 51,115 51,115 5 100% 5.00000 10,223.000
Rural No In-Line Pond 101-200 Pond 5 6,983 5 33% -
Rural Yes I/P 20-29 2E,3A 1,165 10 75% -
Rural Yes I/P 0-100 18,2A,2C,2E,3A,4B, 616,772 10 100% -
5B,5C,Neuse
Rural Yes I/P 101-200 2C,2E,3A,5B,SC,Neuse 92,549 10 33% -
River
Preservation Area Subtotals(fe): 1,799,350 248,967
TOTAL AREA OF BUFFER MITIGATION(TABM)
Mitigation Totals Square Feet I Credits
Restoration: 603,299 603,299.000
Enhancement: 0 0.000
Preservation: 248,967 30,008.200
Total Riparian Buffer: 852,266 633,307.200
TOTAL NUTRIENT OFFSET MITIGATION
Mitigation Totals Square Feet Credits
[Nutrient Offset: Nitrogen: 1,650,331 86,116.465
Phosphorus: 0.000
1.The Randleman Lake buffer rules allow some ditches to be classified as subject according to 15A NCAC 02B.0250(5)(a).
last updated 08/03/2020

Appendix A: Figures and Photos
Figure 1--Parcel Location and Service Area
Figure 2—Parcel Easements and Features
Figure 3—USGS Topography
Figure 4—NRCS Soil Survey
Figure 5—Current Conditions
Figure 6—NRRRF& Proposed Project Footprint
Figure 7A--Phase B Biosoild Application Fields
Figure 76—Phase C Biosoild Application Fields
Figure 8A—Phase B Restoration Plan
Figure 86—Phase C Restoration Plan
Figure 9—Phase 6 Credit Determinations
Figure 10—Phase C Credit Determinations(A-C)
Figure 11A—Phase B Monitoring Plan
Figure 11B—Phase B Monitoring Plan
Existing Conditions Photos
Raleigh Farm—Phase B-C Bank Parcel Development Plan(2019-1692 V5) Appendices
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020201

2
�=. d«0
d'LL�Q z O WCo 7
ao eve« ¢aWm_1 A ¢S� cv W
�v. W Dui D 2 7 U W 3 p W 0.
ir
Er
ry Z O a�ah gF¢Fa d '� Uz2Q 41 mry
L $ 7' a a ff d 0o m a` z-tea
dus 6 �T $�
=a= r
UW TOOL)
H S U W j
IY PP EN
J
W ma' m
c. = 1111!
0 p r
Ili 141 ,eww2 2
¢ : z 6U F -E
} LP
5 46/0 z 1QQ 0 C7 R►
W 56,„ ..a p z
.0 u
a "11.1. a •
o �, ~ a =
x
O
_ wo o
r m }
q J c
z
f
= *1111. EL is,
._ . ...
e• l11111-
W
. . ,
..,.. .
m
, __,.._,...1.1.."0„.
a ...
0
. =
�;T.
j W W a
Cte a 8j ilj !O EC
la
_ E is a o °�° O g a
f W 7
�¢ p� J z
o ' It
z Lu ay t!} a
�1 w o ti Mt,ii(Y 7 g tY'i +•
i a
N S..16 \\,„ . r.' l'i .........4„,*
11 _ ' Ii
j 'r' • c
I.
a,
'N''. lo461140104, '5 !
\.
L jz :
a :
.,-' z• 4 .. ..,,,,u, . 6 i : .
O _ q .a
Cm = rPk.
d < • ill.* C T
■ O C ? a i
li
G � c %r g m
U WIA c ? 0 2 v
U ? 2 V 4 z

` /` .. d d d'LL�2 9 - wQN a G 7
CI)
O fv a�. QLLW J T Pi
-~r,v. W H D °� LLOILLL N ..
}U.aagi W _ 7 C D W W Q Q a 0
LJ-
a e ID a - 1 Q t m¢W 3` m
c c = o o elc`
yc° *^ k •
VFfl
.'
t2
LS-
!- .s.
3 3
- S t m p .f'• y
r
V e2
.:,• r ■
41.05''' , _. .
..-------------------''....:-ZT.F✓ l f $
4 E.M1 , r n
. ‘_ - • ,...:lli
ii] ,c.
S
/ —
•
1 U
k.
�1 q
l 2
c t.y ti' a 7
4
i; '1 „, c 'e. • ii
ii r.
ry k w ry\:44/1---*107- r. VOW _L'H'..
cp
.t. 411106. ----- : •• i
•
I
- - E„j 3 E 8 t r+ _ e 3 3
w l ¢cn 4,
m _ r r m E1
E.
. , • ii. • • - "\I_
w w I m 1HI
'• %k'•' 'A—•.
itit,
a P. p�p re �m r� a w ❑ E a
n Ct r. t a ._ . ,. '
a` °
n is : 1Doa
❑ . i' .
A

y� N W Z rr11 wc' x - o
vil , c':
O 2 a V re a c� 0�`Z3 wOa_z mc cr) Y0x a w fY M
nm NN 2FDpV VwV�� o :7 -Ex `'+
o -V-'� cOC,- E �wm~Q 4 V na 6�c5 .. lA a� C.�❑wD W oy ¢CY2 a m I- ?r&F3 a 2N !L g vid m Q.�QF N g . of m
. ,
•
c` a` a ti N p o` o 0 c ro El 14:1 V „ 11 .
•.._.
....,.., .
i .. , ...,,,,
„... ,,,LB _..,,, E-L .-
z �i w
�N �� y jbz
MEI
1::i .:ijimiNill
M ,., .e 5-a s 3 3 ••i
s
51
Skkl
�a2 ... cig i;� �caz cat c.�
P
N =N t. N Vi 2N
,J . ..„
,,_. * _------r
•., ,
yy-C 2: . r 7
f 4.: Z: ....1.1:f.--.. /
...
a
V iN .u�
Lx> �sA''1o00 � w7 �V 'c` I � �� Y�
_ %,..iii
�N vim.c7 ,jp� qp� �'.
$, a wN •
•
1 V1 •• XS
�, t J.S., y •� lir .N 9
4
,/
4
Sia %----..,-..7 ..-./...P % Ilk . '
i'.'�1 m
11.&\-----.' .'--------- _
, .... 4
,,
s„-, ?i` r.\.".....u.
JA .,. • .... ,
sv
-4\-7-\\-\tu...%
; _.., ,_j....,,.„..c _---.__ ___
.7reff
...„ if
A111111111111)000)4 pop - ‘ „\10 .,I ../ )} . r---iN 4,)
„ . _.,. ..,-../ •
ff _ • .,. m
�� — r n JFI , .111
1 f-, .4 ire: ,,z .. _ .".,..,.,..\\,,,,,
S �• .,,E 0 _a AO n i 1, • 0v 2
o o
LIiIL :
F.' v

y Y
co , , ,., '12
O n "'O a• Q1..W Q7J T Td
y re u n --o V�� c� ` awm~ U (.3 Z ca2 oa Q 4 � aN
E ❑° omeny -� Y2C7a mzV z N !a_a ° v a gFQF
00 �1 c ti
a a ti o` o in O:
ti
iF_ ,
g u, N.
m'n y
mm 15
�N N
N p
Ea 0 of O
I 0 a U 2 ...4 - /-,, rvt N1- NY ❑1- NS
nN ! «% 2 n d1 W1 1 °1
r r c. - 4- $ r wo �ci ,1ca ci ma o
[ .41 _r eiN ! II
VAnrr a
• r,
"A. r' .- `.,
1 •
' :Alit' • ‘i. ...' . . . '-...7 7,/,'" --"z g E t- . 4. 4
II
- -- ``, m '
ht = iitii
ir- -r l I F
- - ry r i a s
_ ! x
E:::\_-. . ,
F ;,
i
k $ I s
ir
le
•
• I %, 1:.kr
1/4
4G i; el
aa" 2 r
is 4 ' •.7_•
1 __!
' irei c _,..---- =.-,1!,
a . m 2 a U l r - _ ai ` as� LL 1
_ i t i3 v; +
v w a .� r, is - S
OO r F 4 1 �

0 D ° n � m a �wwP7J m ' zp w m w
c o� bwzw 2 w—
w tl 2 V w o m = tit r
a w H—
I❑ ! J a a 5 ti VO �' 3 ei ci �� L-
. Ft re2
d d 2 F ❑ ❑ CO d z _
{ A \•' ..
41e ` Ill
m ii
V —
§ i-'"--A
r"\?\LI_
&¢ a rr E ' f k1 E E
11�_w��r e x
r -
,7 , ,
t
r I co x
`n
I
LL 1: Stn
U _
l H � yi:
r t •
N r a
...i .iiiii , i, _ .\\.........\\
i x r
22r1347.'
m
�F R
LL = 1 - - a j, LL 1 .a .
U r U c n 0
5aa I
C_ O 2 v.J ` N
- t L LL
...:'11::: :'...1''' ' '''''
rg
'i
t.
ti E u f `f ~
1
■!
r
1
V y
a m rk\\ �\J
isa`LLm
E E ry 3 $ �a Viii
a
c -
t L. LL A r6 m a 4 F W W w w k 2 § '2 r6 u g N ' :l ..
n 00 V ea m ti m m m U C1 m U x ¢ o. v o. .r
t 5 m y q u" N i ig5 yT; s
a $ E• t EK LZ w 5 l M E r rE E E E G d d a m !+�� J 2 .$

•
` Act•ve Hazen and Sawyer Wel �: �i:'':• �� tia e. .. Phase C:F alum 56 Legend
), - ,� -1. Plyse C:Feanrc SC
r✓ Act ve Vadose Zone Monitoring Station•'-- •yo Project Parcels
• • Act.veCOm compliance well
�� - _�_ 0
t "-----•••� 2 :J + - Q Phase B"Proposed Easement:33.94 Acres
111
Ec •
• Active WOnitOnng Welk •• 'x [ •� -
T'!J 2 , -�4-. PhaseC-Proposed Easement:73.96 Awes,
Actve5urfars Water , . 6-W-'1' �' m. •• .^v'. _'`.'••�• .
j TW-2Ri.4 Myy.72d r ,f�.- 4 y w � Site Features By Classification RESTORATION
'• r Active Remediation Well • Y ., ►`"'r` '"� ._ SYSTEMS i[.LC
.'; •' 'SW-CD .. - ImenriderltlPerenrial
A;.tiveti5G5 Wel ; r. t A SY JCL' - pi OW Ephemeral
• • Abandoned Compliance Well f - + ' Phase C;Pond I - Prepared for
P:1 Yl' F. [Ag,In•Line Pond&Spillway} _ - in•Line Pond
▪ $• Abandoned Monitoring Wen 5W-28 + I.
owl NC❑E4
_ Division of
• • Abandoned Surface Water A,TW-1BR• cfl� Phase C:Feature 26&29•Wetlands Water Resources
Inactive Hater and Sawyer Well • -- Phase C:Feature 1 AJ -
Yl 0 Inactive Stream Gauge — _ e R b1y.•;14 WetrandslWaters
}k — ? •.
.� • IrlaCtiva IJSGS Well i • 'l3AR •} ! --- • �.-1p.4 Program&a01
Phase C.Pmd 1 S[ormwater
C 0 Home / �'�,. ``� MW-45 — (Bpn.In-Line Pond) - - 67e' MW-126D
tr�R.SR f
i` fry %• ' Project
(]utcraplHould9rs i•
, 14,,-:sa l f
• Active dIOSUId Applr3tlOn Areas .1 ' Phase C;Feature 3R
r :% .• RALEIGH FARM
+ NUTRIENT OFFSET
Field BOurica-ies(numbered) ■ f
Phase C;Feature 1 A /. : r • AND BUFFER
Constructed Wetands ' MITIGATION BANK
J .."'�' •. J• yr!•'. '..
l4(L. ' h1W-115 7 PARCEL
S ® Private Ornldng Atli p r1 r�r.f� .. e,
Lll ;. •
/ Parcels v�;/�i.•• r Phase C;Feature 4A f PHASE B-C
WAKE HY [ENE ; �* •. II.11V
r Wake County,NC
-Ponds and Streams l + •
L,-: ye•_90Fy .v� .;'• ��', • ' [y. +
�•.� ] `"r•'%•i/r. / F Title:
Existing 3reernvay j / f.• t ._� .. Ay lS ,
. / �` Phase C:Fr�nuirc••I is
/ . '"-'I M N-53R + NRRRF MAP
SW 2v
Pilaw B;Feature tin /, �+ .
:�� Ph..1,C:Fr':il11,1ii SW-77 GP"'2R
+ Raleigh Crue rem,
9
r Ft'r�■■ ■. • _ �' .'7�' Neuse River Trail
• ■ VIM;i.e.
� 2016 C 11 or Raleigh NRRRF
pi,..,B:Main Trib.•i .. I r-
•
y r - ■ .. • s ._ .. Drawn by RJH
3 i I B Feature
1 y ^' MW-18 l Phase C.Feature 2A
333��� •.'SW'1F
, I hose.B:Feature 3R], •.rk fl 1 4' I '`•. [ Date:
I
+ + yy r •
� SEPT.2021
ry n�2� • ■r MW.201• ~ RW-"r.9 �.
f Phase C,Faaturc:26 I Wc'unndl
♦ RW.28 Scale:
e, :< p �rrs ..• MW105.• c RW-27 • - 1:8,500
y
+'ca!ry Ry, { ■ MtV• -__ Phase C;Feature ZC PrO}aCt No.:
Rom'' 201g-1fi92 V5
�• `r -�.ti -RW-2d /I Phase C;Feature 2L3 lWF1Ianu) ~
Rwza FIGURE
' I'he5i[C: Cn[ure 2L
'T TW-34 . - 'tit ry g ¢
• I Phase B;Feature 26 - S1 a. • i
�" q�1 f} 4 3y �`' a y n snn nnn nnn nnn
TW-3° fiF 10h L .• 4. + 'sry Frei I.

1- ,. ¢
z N WZ a 17 Oti G
al...
co
(00
~ry 3 ��o` a�c 0N� 3
N 72W
¢W�mJm Wpzw
2FDpVwo m0 0
J¢wOp
rnV
= -'W = CI :CI aN aN CCD
wm~Q OW H —
sICo a o U-- o2c� wo¢ -a zLi-
z?� wrn8 _ a = 3, d5
I-
C a ti o o r
•
T
ei xx
•F N y en IN
fi :: !.rr mod.•'
0
•
T-13
A 1'�
01
'a' pp N
•
•
O W .'
a
•
N m
In
N is
4 - •is�. . •
i °
•
•
y s
. •
•
f 4
O
%.e
1
i
L '
eri
t *r
�- \ .'
i
f __ .
4 •
H \ ..,•
!
m I.
g r
-A G \
n
m ce
2
m .s 9 3 $d 2
m :3 T a 3 s - T
a a •
m �, m $ _ m U Y C y j 0.L ski R
a s

I
I— ¢
i
0O•s}u W 'Z2W (
Q W u_07 J T T
wpzW m
2 F p V w o0wm
w oQ~ U
_2Va = y
a v-a d q�¢Pam p J¢wp
v.,V
= VwpeW
aLn-a¢ a G
>
ti
* O l
Cn
=Hn 41
zN
L.
CO
fY0Li-
a a
ti o o in L
•
•
L.;
w 2
T
,/ •- - :-'''
...'"7\4.\'''‘.....• d ••.-,4
2.
��r
l• U L U •
r .meµ, r m i1
1. r 4.
', I `�- /!
: ,
•
s = y
r
• � o� i •
I _ w
Ili- '.,?..,, -
4. y y
L
1 C y
1 q0 40,
I r 6 U t
_ _ I / a N
4
.,ter'
•
I
••
• n
e a
6 -. _
�_ 6 s 3 a w a a m
N b n .6 °0 o e . d
v c4i i w m v; • 1 ❑E
2 p G T. w t E °,' -C E -" c7 1�wq I f° 72
a C- $ 2 r N w m m m figif.
g c ¢ -. -. Ci
❑ a y a -5 a v v a
I 1 c 19 D 6 • ❑ a w' it w w LT
N x

y 1-
L Ef N ,`G w Q,2 2 O G
-Fr.�r. Dc� 5 wOlwizw m .' w¢z 0 I-, , fY
�. - ❑O F NNE 2FD0V w o Vice¢ w ..�
a �r� o U-�-'a' c7 c� E �rywm~Q v1 V ¢O� rv - N U. 00
1_, 4 xra aE
a z ti - c a In c -
U RI B ..
Q[] 1 1 • . x
3 [
7 ] w
2 Z nI w�a 3 re
•♦♦v♦v♦� +v. _ m N
j / '• t ���•�� _ p�
:I 1'• :# 8.4.
I
t \ N.
• 4;'' ...-• •••
•
--- ,, : -♦♦ ♦♦♦:♦•
1100 ,' / ,, ,. 4
♦i �i'i�
., GOO♦i ,
M1'�1 3
I
1 0
tt„ } 1
1
f; ii♦i♦i♦i♦i�i
t % ►♦♦♦�♦•A�♦♦♦♦♦/ m
' g ♦♦�♦��yy Q"
a i��.
m 3 so
N H tis�
wu�i S e - � 5
vn
m •� �s wAwe
d m m m . d p�Go 0% "[�
2w Q, 2§
w a

y Y ril
CsI01` Ef u
2 I
. !_... `0ix l. _ T UO cO
~ D= 3 "Orwizw m c w¢z •
- wtl 2 V VwN� o N QNF 5 ❑., � `a yiwm OQ 4 V =I-a u . Zom oes �CY2Va = w au1 a w�Sr. vg d v d?QF 0ce a d
�..+r.4.T a
Q1 H� '
i . 12-Ili
En R
ga- -rif. = r.
: 7 2
M
1 •
r
' • ....." i -;-: .
`t 7 Li
t ,
ti V
C
�♦ *Ile— .♦♦ •.i♦i♦i ♦♦♦♦♦.- ..+.♦* ♦
' ' ��i 4♦♦ �i0♦`• - •
•
, It • 4. „,__
. . g • . . ,
,,.
ci le.
1 ♦♦♦♦♦O ♦ O♦i♦i♦i♦i♦i .. ,..
I i a" v ♦ '♦♦.�ii� ♦.♦ i
Syr` a m S .o c.. ♦�♦♦♦.♦�r.�♦• 0m r
_► r z 5LL� g av
ram_ c V€ • -
Na - -- `c — 5-Ez
m •``r U V
' +
•
Q 16 9
V w
r u• A Y
e
c .o C.]u w
[ a8 - c L d g
u _N
€ g = L N -- DER � -
4. 1 1
1 1 U�

I- Y
cif) , ''•-. 0p3 Imo?' QI.I`.LL�J r, mF¢ M
C - O n d N w �' 2 p�p V NwI� p Vl� M1 a �A Ce
= TT
. 1,M•
a o � N _ a dr g a ��¢P u o a
c o
a ti D o In 0- _
z;
, .E ;i/
- a Cli
;a i l
IIw .!t 1 E
m u�'� mL' Y2 f •e8 0�eg_ pg ► ., c c�Et," Eo l •
_E ��ao~ gE le.
x :ii
off € `,
c w O m =u b. z,_ - - - Jy//J•-J/
2• 7 2
• ..- e 7.\\\\ I
ziLL. •i f., . . „ „.
, .i, - ', ,\., F, -- g ,•__.••• , • -- • •r
`-ti ,f r , F/fr'
.N.fiL \ . ••.
E \.; /././(4::.-'71'iN :
•
•
' r • ► 1 �. - ►
s 0. f 1 1
0.
;,,,:„, I.?0,..- w
► NQ ‘1/1
: J -V l,V ice
lay, a'�° [:c ` l+r - _~ V '\•
2.
4:' 71.14. ,..oe.. f-N. •
iE
a a
8▪ `26
m G W a a o W m ., m ,, W a z E it--,D
N $ N y a 2, ' i� t u°'. g�z S '' $ 2 r `moo alp, 'ti'
,gg oEi i N n w � � W � '2'
g � E��+ � gg• -a W -Y R p, b
U T a W N 7 m y m , y Q S S « 2 3 G 2 p ' 5 �.•`9
_ L I '
yy y m � aJ (q V % J
.i= .2 .2 2 � � 2 n r3 � F [� g�p � ❑
:▪ C 4 4 4-' 4 G & W n �R ,t 2 2 2 2 2 W q1 2 G g if 2 - , _
• xano5Rn -OO' n;• ' 2I I I . ® t - I1~ _ -- 61
fi °W6.11 ! IP\

W z z a z ti $
mi i /` `0 3 m m� a Qlw.w 03J r, OF * ti al,
L3..1
H�• D c o e7S w C it z w m c w 1-z I- CC /'"�
�,. -_ O nm N 5E 2F)0V VwI1i� o VI w `J
J[aa 3 Ll '!I_•-' c0 C,t ,_ Owm~Q 4 U =ix2 o N a C�
P� uH E' Zo°: �°oin -�CY2C7a 2 .01
aUw z a z� !i
c:✓ 2_ w dd d ,I-S~ a w V m
o cgs ❑ m m -
a a` z ti • 5 o In O:
i
4,s,...,\4,..\\.':A. i..--_ ,
P. ' sp.-may
•
; =; - g
o
x z
r ` I ,
i [..... _
4 J
m U 1 II
-,t -------'.. ...."----
1 r` -S he. " ' w f
1 i
11
c c 001111.'. 2 E.?...-. 8
x fitr,r o2 y Ci TT
a
IT i _ .." ...--ti
)11
��
V
E o tS n k
i N _ O C
a q m .3- of . . . p.1 1 ', ' - �n zi�i.,y • .St 2
Y[y
g 4 U - 6 l' n OW 8 8 a -8 �;
a I- i i w ' 6 i C o 2 2 o I✓ 2 _ i 1 - f n
LL . i a I '
F3 i I m - -1
E❑ 0 0 _4
I R I I I I - -_--. I o
!
. = i 3

w z a z o
m90 �LL�¢ z O * a o ry
O3 m'T — •
Qu.WP7J 1nq T UFF t ti w
C4 - Ond ww 2pu_pV L" o NOz d .A D
U[aa � U.�_'o- c�C� � OWm�Q U =ce2 o N an' [a a
r- u� ' zoo woe- _iCY2Ua = aUw a 2� !i ��
✓ a w Ada y �FQF a ° w m
a a ti o` o N a` -
142 4-""",,,...:::::::::
• :`
~ , r c
1 a�
1 m�
_ s • 1 oQ_i .1
\ 0 11 ■ W 1
m % c' 2. 1
cc 1 z
1
` 1 . r
e
s a t y
. 1 3 N y's t ..
I i 1 = �■ '1,
5 ,,, 1
3a� ' y - ,
Eby . y: t 6?
,,. w 44
00Z • p w-
ag
1 r.
- y 2
f `
Y
1 a
1
1 l
■
%
C
E
EP Fa E2 E
K D d u o E G E
n• H 2 i c
_z " o W- Ems_ r d
o
V `3 2, '`ao tE g V 6
o g m x i 7!o 4 t 3 g g
•I 'a ,,L ry e . _ E s a 1
3 g c
1 n_ilhllililfl_ _______
2a 2 r9 ° "° 'DO 01'❑m 1 1 R 1 I l � •• '...\

�Lai z z a z ti 0
/`Cin
`03 �m� a QI.I`.W GO CZ�J T OF 0 4' ti 0.1
CO
C - Ond min-LE2p�pV VwIr�� o NOz d1:1, ,A f7�
Cew U.�_'o--r cis c•V 0wm~Q 4 U =ix2 H N a� C.. O
� i__, z� wrn8 �_orx x d aUw ?ti
,. a g v i d m _ F w e 6 m
v � 4-' ❑ m g -
c a z ti g o` o 0 6=
► . 4411110 ... ••. ; ',-........... .------:?:, 1............7
r
n
• � �v da 'f.r
\ ► w ly
l
a ••
• - • r
• ,1 • a
•
•
` •
•
\ -% - _
r
• a r
♦ r
a rr
•
e''a c�•• 1
Ez f
- .. r
0 5 u V 1
r f
._L 'c' .. 1 r 1
m2 .- 1 .-.1 I r
E'
r !
ti.c E •
- 1 1 Nc - - l - • 1 ,•
r
2 m 0 !
f
� 7
-_ 7
x ti r
1
a a E ¢ m m I
2 — g Ec
U ^ o L' C:z 1
- 7
qg
Z o r
r
5c m r
r
_ ` -...
,
-„,..._ . -. , • ,
p� ,
� r� •
r E
_ Em
a3: �' w eV, E� •
g o q X m ti E
sl OFF o� w TQ
oc m ��
w 4 .,r, aE W s 28
c.
E 2 a .fi' ?E ' sE' e E
M1 v ffi as�.r _ rE� cr.
I. = a m B o IX _ry Eg PN ag o f
_ 3 n e s 4 Y `,2
a
v' 3 P-' i . - o �.•I Ug W� E
g y q ri as a o 0. W o ° o ? .4 ¢ E ata v 93F
P, C m w o, nm 6 e1 � li r l a a " m : c2 ' ' "9 '° � _ • 5 o cE6 Foy �8-
L.
ae• 7 2 .L .2 Z °:. t g 3 '. t y w w w w 1 P U 7 -- ' -� w ro E 8,a o m c O g
.o o $ + ❑ 40 ® I n1 ' - I ,
- Z 1 ! 1 oI I I I . ...•• L r z 0- z

L �W z 2 a z - $
cill 1 /` `03 �m�d Q�.".W ti)CZ�J T UF< s
z a)
feppC O w O d a
n d w 2 o N -
V
P� u� aE.' Zo°: �°oen ruCY2U ce
ruwoa a = aUw ti
atigt, QF a ° w y m❑ d -
r...
q., 614,41,...4...,
*1%
em
`
Yr WE
IX
� �
C a - ag 0m@0_ ocI ` g
teu1• th
f_ e o. --.- E'Ee 6o❑ �QrgaE" gwo 5 xk Wy 6e1 a m 8 sPF Ste
° c1as
+
a pow sa§ I OP"' a z5 tro
V t ££ d • I
ffi r
•
m6 1
m
•
a i
f ■
■
f
e
E f
I
■ b a E L _ '
4 gg -. Tv 'a I
c
hL
ES a . -3 E tL7 ❑
ya Y2N . a J, _ - -
1 m g
1 - ter - e
1 . - = Li
• •
• c
r • a �aa
n ' 7 2 y
n'TEz !T"
E." ,-`z
g_z �9
{ g 2 _ � ' ..
, w _ - _-- -
'K
10.
77 •, ti�.; .. Yy. •• N
'
• `
... . _ ... .

0.
Y
` N w 0D! UhJI
u51
C4. -' O arm 3pM 1.;-..L. . z >,,,, LE
�, a a
v 2 m q o
a a ti 2 d a`
c . .e y.40
W� M o
4 16,
aQ x z 1'
N
y ry I I1
N ';
o▪ a m 4= ❑m.. E
z, n W F g n m r v
▪ i_, dQa� / r hl
- ........>
a C=z pc
_
3
z \
f + L
1, Y ,
z
____ ,
3:1 ' ` - r
\\
��
Eiji
1
a + 1` - ❑ ,�,:
i 1 j
V I !
i ,I T y 1
I 0.
E ` m
r------------/ .
,,,
,N/j. , v .----. .'''',
2, lir
E Z
G �' N �d O E m �L � �`� u - .T ,
8 ��.. - q oz
7 I n p ! $ c r� m W F o z ' [L, .. .��.r
75 2 o 0 0 o pm -, i E t a ►1�. Ri
8
E E ; D 2 O D 5 E w m 1 N a �4 �'?
4
1 i !lDUi : I I I !
ii1G.Z.Kc' d�Rr - __

y Y
` ` Ef N .{w Z _ z O
CO
! .. `03 mcoa re¢Ww�J T Uz s a ti L3..1
cii)
~ �c� `03 I`Olwizl' m wKz a a fY
C - O n 4, N N 2F�pV VwI�� o r<VQ =
U.J U.�_oe cis c� ,_ 0wm~Q U =za H .. N a' 0 r--
1^,� s F z?N W LA rO W_o Q a = y CL 2 N
3 �a d e
Li, a` z P q o` o ,n a` -
•
x' ,sue Yr .
e
A6111 - i \ -:-
T
_ s►ia*ems,;` .,
'..=! . .. ._..-•.' -,.....j........:,..1 U
�ce� ❑
;.: 3 3
a o P
❑ cis
u U
fillW, .. 0 .„„.
0 L7 -Q 0 _
,, • • 11.1.114\ . . ___. r....,
W . In
U o ❑ ❑
a8 ❑ w '\ ❑ ec
deli_
09 a _ ,r• •
R E2 %. T
_-- 1�6 .. ❑ o d
- y
i rr ❑ ; J
L.V ❑ _
T cfn� 22 mZ - s R2
"L� �' Vf'i C• C r
�,^ a - a
gE
m v / 1'
witmoi;
n:.
�. © -
.1 Cg 2 i `' o W.
• E a
aE G 5w v
8
mv C rW - C • G Co
0-
❑ vz fl
IIJht
c v, m m . 0w - . '
U aU g 0- U 2 ? mmsL: yfiEi � I y v�t x i
❑O ®0 • I © F I I I 1 0. n 8..x .�4,ry.. P•S.- - --1,1P4 r7 . .- 'OM. '_ — ��

Raleigh Farm Bank Parcel—Neuse 01;Wake County Photo Date:09/29/2020
,...,.,i:,.._.,,,,.;..,.,„,.,.•=•,,A-...i.-....„.i-6-.,:,
ea
-1'...,.-..,t.-
,I4.i
t.
tea „n iV r . .. - :: -r!:
4
e --.'•-:: .,,4.; ,-L:L. .fe--2-.1*-Li,..- I-,:.'Llt-_-::--'1,...;!BA'm.21,."-,•:,,,,ni-.7.5,,,4-:,0.1.ed., of , A-::: .-s;,,4,, -..0 •.,.
...
..�'�: n'' �.L.
am_'-' '��r` �;� ,K, y:_.. .. :3:, ��i�'�`::r•r., �!- �=�?i •F ..x�..vim="err•. . �. -. . w . ",...�� ' _x� •`�� :���1 �?
xfio
N.
r• * " y_ .,-.•y:-x . i`: .�:....•'-i';. -y r erg'' V-,,S^ °..I,`,...,,T. .• .
eitLikFT:37,._.,,,.:,,i':,-;,,,_.,,._74.,.:,,.,,,,-,..t.-4,4;,".:.4: .•••'`-.'•''''---'40.-,4•----_, --t-.„‘,,,,,,,:,..--,'' .. ';'- 4:-..-.,- f'd'',....41.-.e*,:f•-,',•-4•••dl'._ ..-f...--''-f:k i
!.+ 1,,- •. Vim•'
L 1 .•
� y� : . +� ��i'"' r �:� ;" "•_ { "._.:mar�,77,14.
•
'Ji�iit - s.. :+1�'3-.: •.,. ".. +' t? .: •�:.--a te. / • "; r••. ,
Image 1: Phase B—Feature 3A, historic ag.equipment—to-be removed as appropriate
•
Image 2:Phase C—Feature 2A and B
1

Raleigh Farm Bank Parcel—Neuse 01;Wake County Photo Date:09/29/2020
irr a •-t."..,10,-
. ,.._ ._,. . .- -
4_ ... ._ .., _ ".. •
11101111111111111.11F-- -
s i7
— ,
-
NO
1:17
.. i
,
, •'
,
c.
Image 3:Phase C—Pond 2
1 1 ' '-' b' ' -141" ' - '' f' A., '0, •' 2 i. .A.o.,,P '--.91 'i',, .:-/L:Oi iri, -,--H' ,..;_."' rs7'0) I'S- LW' 4 •_..t. - 0,•Aff, . . ,.,-;- . • ,, ,,:‘ , ,.* ,-. .,,
- -, •,:L -0.,e' ,; -, .' V ;_,..„age741m..\
'-'t.,AcV i---..t...4 ''4 ITV r''...-- g?le a stir :',--- , - ..:' -.of. % . ,fiL. ,..,.0 .1,-,...7.•,
..,! , 4, , :.--,-. . 3,:-....: • ,•!,,,,,,;4.-4, • . 1,01 --,...N.:,
ie . ,.. 4.4. 0.or i ''.4•'
'A m "'.."4. W-." '''..1'.-: 3 . • • . . . r• '• lkt*,211,1
_-_,-.,,,,, - -,-.. i. -, !„... 41.2 1 • .. _
,----4-'r—; , c m-r•• ,. ,,,•.,:c. •
i , ',.- n/ riltgr_r„,, kk....: 4: ,K-it, -. - , ,'"-,' Ak.,' At ,r.-_:t , o-ii' " .=„ft•• .
i'A ;!-,:, Aiti iir),....ifif-._-9.1.-1 7:', "..--et.-::-''.4'7'4 LI! " ' .3'... : ' a‘i' • : WI*
" i'l •'fr.,.:•4i'••• 'ii - • • -.44. ,• ' . ,6i, ••,,••_-; ir.,..': •.. ,a "• , ,_4* .v. .
tr. 41,2 , ,1 i Nr. i 4 , ..„,,,..,*.,..,f .•511,.. ,L.,,! ,,,.,,r :1 ,,, ., :: • 7' , ..• -,, -gz.,'-' ' -::,--•?:-.t, ! .,' L'j , 4 ,1r j •..Lyjoji ; '• 1&,a 4 !ri!,,,7:.-'. . , ,P,
. :.t 4''', r, r StO i - . I. • r ,1 ,'' •''" ''' '
.4.1 '• ,-..ii .-:-!,":'4,71.119•;,"r 1 t
TtA.,,-
. • ,:' i$ ',:kr' ', •;`..r.-1, 1 ' ''' -, ''.1 4 !, '-'' • -. ' ..-4.,4*• . ' . ,
. It
r- . . : • c i.• :.,..4 .:-
i .„. , 4, 4. . r I ,.3 ,J 1•..' I 4 Li.1!_ , •„..a4 1 rr- .t.".4. tIr.i. - # .' 4 ' 1. -'s F'• %- 1,
• id. ;i':.• .
•;... 4'
....-0:...:,..--,,,,,..-ijm...- .. . .. _
__. ,
• . -. - ., tz
.14.....!,- -
•. :..-e-,„4-, ,----
-
%110606...
' 61"4' t '..7- ':::21-2). .
- -:•'' .... .
':,:•. '.'T'1.-',„ *I' ',..4,4‘el. i''''' :).' -.. ''' ' '' V' ' ' ' ' . ' ' .. ,.,* .t.4
0, ,r,,,,,,,,,._ :. „'‘,.; ' •-..e,.' • , ,,.';••• .,- '•o.•'•'•l.. , ,, ,..,,A.,,,, ,Lx; .. , ..., * wit :,, _
oiiik4-4 - -4, • --
.4.,),404,„ •,. •. . ,, .,,. :,_.., , ,,,,_.., , , . ,•.,i.,:,...,..-
•r,•',. ,' .„,,.:,, .rp,,. ' ': .;:N• . • • . , ,-, a ;':, ' ,,,Lt{I,.•P r'`• _ .,: .-, "4 r‹ •„ : , . . t,. ....,S'r,..0,- .-1Z.:.
,'"'4,'VP VT-51',Y.,',j. e j.4 fr ',hi 1,j ,L1,0.1".,','p 1 '•-,.'.. - 4, ...: ,''.1. ' ' . • ... r-
:.:4„ ,*11''.4', , '..: ,J. '';'•,':F44Tol.ve'4',¢07.; '' '• ' "' ', e:r,`1`:1,:'',-;.' .."' :,. .': - .', „,' • - ,•
- -'
''''-`.:41:3?-'_.i•'4 i• ',, ' ',. - ' '-:.''.' ' ''
Image 4: Phase C—Feature 3A Ag.Crossing,to remain within 60-foot easement break
)

Appendix B: DWR Correspondence
Raleigh Farm—Phase B-C Bank Parcel Development Plan(2019-1692 V5) Appendices
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020201

Docusign Envelope ID:AC F875FD-8AA5-41A1-BD65-22AF9AA50486
SATE
ROY COOPER u] .,--/i" .0- j.
Governor
MICHAEL S.REGAN '' '',, "man x
Secretary ._' +"_°'-
S.DANIEL SMITH NORTH CAROLINA
Director Environmental Quality
August 17,2020
Project 2019-1692 V2
Wake County
Barrett Jenkins
Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes Street,Suite 211
Raleigh, NC 27604
Subject: On-Site Determination for Applicability to the Neuse Buffer Rules 15A NCAC 02B.0714
Project Name: Raleigh Farm Site Phase B
Address: 8599 Old Baucom Rd.,SR 2542, Raleigh, NC 27610
Location: 35.703464,-78.485697, (north of the road)
Site Inspection Date: 6/8/20
Dear Mr.Jenkins:
On June 8, 2020,Shelton Sullivan of the Division of Water Resources (DWR)conducted an on-site review
of features located on the subject property at the request of Barrett Jenkins with Restoration Systems,
LLC to determine the applicability to the Neuse Riparian Area Protection Rules,Title 15A North Carolina
Administrative Code 02B .0714.
The enclosed maps) depict the feature(s)evaluated and this information is also summarized in the table
below. Streams were evaluated for being ephemeral,at least intermittent, and subjectivity to the Neuse
Riparian Area Protection Rules. Streams that are considered "Subject" have been located on the most
recently published NRCS Soil Survey of Wake County and/or the most recent copy of the USGS
Topographic (at 1:24,000 scale) map(s), have been located on the ground at the site, and possess
characteristics that qualify them to be at least intermittent streams. Features that are considered "Not
Subject" have been determined to not be at least intermittent, not present on the property, or not
depicted on the required maps.
This determination only addresses the applicability to the buffer rules and does not approve any activity
within buffers or within waters of the state. There may be other streams or features located on the
property that appear or do not appear on the maps referenced above. Any of the features on the site
may be considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers and subject to the Clean
Water Act.
The following table addresses the features observed and rated during the DWR site visit:
Nonm Eno Quality I Division of Water Resources
�J��IIn 512 North rthCaroli SalisburyaDepart Street
ent 11 of617 Mail Servicenmental Center I Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1617
ocpenmemcr emnenmmw aural 919.107.9000

Docusign Envelope ID:ACF875FD-8AA5-41A1-BD65-22AF9AA50486
Project 2019-1692V2,Raleigh Farm Phase B
Wake County
Page 2 of 3
Feature Feature Type Subject to Start @ Stop @ Depicted on Depicted on
Point ID (stream/pond/E/l/P') Buffer Soil Survey USGS Topo
(ditch/wetland/other) Rules
1A Ephemeral No 1A 1B Yes No
1B Stream-At least Yes 1B Confluence with Neuse Yes No
intermittent River
2A Ephemeral No 2A 2C,Confluence with 28 No No
and becomes
Intermittent
2B Ephemeral No 2B 2C,Confluence with 2A Yes No
and becomes
Intermittent
2C Stream-At least Yes 2C Confluence with Main Yes No
intermittent Tributary4
3A Stream-At least No 3A Confluence with Main No No
intermittent Tributary4
4A Ephemeral No 4A 4B Yes Yes
4B Stream-At least Yes 48,Continues Confluence with Neuse Yes Yes
intermittent as Main River
Tributary 4
5A Not Present No See site map See site map No No
5B Not Present No See site map See site map Yes No
5C Stream-At least Yes 5C Confluence with Main Yes No
intermittent Tributary4
6A Ephemeral No 6A Confluence with Main No No
Tributary 4
1 E:Ephemeral,1:Intermittent, P: Perennial
This on-site determination shall expire five(5)years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected
parties that dispute this determination made by the DWR may request an appeal determination by the
Director of Water Resources. An appeal request must be made within sixty(60) calendar days of the
date of this letter to the Director in writing,as per 15A NCAC 02B.0714(4).
If sending via U.S. Postal Service: If sending via delivery service(UPS, FedEx, etc.)
Paul Wojoski - DWR 401 & Buffer Paul Wojoski-DWR 401 & Buffer
Permitting Branch Supervisor Permitting Branch Supervisor
1617 Mail Service Center 512 N Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Raleigh, NC 27604

Docusign Envelope ID:ACF675FD-8AA5-41A1-BD65-22AF9AA50486
Project 2019-1692V2,Raleigh Farm Phase B
Wake County
Page 3 of 3
This determination is final and binding as detailed above, unless an appeal is requested within sixty(60)
calendar days.
This letter only addresses the features on the subject property and within the proposed project easement
boundary and does not approve any activity within buffers or within waters of the state. If you have any
additional questions or require additional information, please contact Shelton Sullivan at
[e-mail] or 919-707-3636. This determination is subject to review as provided in
Articles 3 &4 of G.S. 150B.
Sincerely,
DocuSigned by:
r�
:
9490916A53EF4E0...
Paul Wojoski
Supervisor, DWR 401 & Buffer Permitting
Attachments: site Map with labeled points,NRCS Soil Survey, USGS Topographical Map
cc: Raymond Holz via email [e-mail]
Barrett Jenkins via email [e-mail]
Katie Merritt via email [e-mail]
401& Buffer Permitting Branch files
Filename:20191692v2_RaleighFa rmPhaseB_Strea mCa lls.docx

u'L a o
5... r,At - _ t L N 7
r3' 4 - _ - ,. a v. 16
N I
a_O N
o3' ' - A (o a m L
w ° O 8 0-
a; a f > ., I
+ N LL d N
O
w 1 E a
Z O re
w i W Z. Q
. T
u 2 i .. r
-' v 0 .
NI ! m m vN
i z� ,>
N d Nw
W 7 i N n
CU
0 O L a, V 0 a, 16 �I>it fF
Y a Y N N LL C li-
O �p a x
w a Ei;.
,,, / � 0 ® 1_'0H—I0U I' III � i=ii
�gI 6
«iZ'...it 4� 1 Fii in_ it li llik
/ ..r, , ....,._.2.,,, ..- '
/ • 74 till;
~ 1 t2V T i 11
i
i is �4.o <.
— ----
- ` � !
"
t' \ �,\ E r-�0 .7'it
i,
!` o o \6.\\ . ''t'
\ JP ii '',3..\,-1 -3
LL \ r
m _ v <—_ _ 1
i • fi
a ,- RYA �` j I I (
J \
1 i
. _ -� � ,- � ‘
0
sx,
X .

....5 V
-
W W ; 2▪Q 2 v o L Er
co
.. 0 d i wr
O • 0 li.l VJ OD D N
.Q 'J i J V J 7_1- [6 CM07 Ur n ar o
a a a h
/ : '
i •'. r r
r f��++j'
r
f
r i•
4 • - _
I - �-- -" NI' m L r
. • ( ........ •. _.. , ---___ /
' \ ...171"1\gr
\ .11—erlIgiot 4 \ . - -'1C:L,:a — -.
4 '■ s� ;i l r
• i;i )N.
' N �.. -ter 1111
, 1 S I SM,.: 1
(r'4•• .
1• n e. "r ., k 3
" NI:
o
•� 1 I \ •
•
T� N
it ! ` j
; :. r
a
a
' L.. - 4,▪ LI i .„-7,..--,..—,-...: \ ' i‘''' ae' .
• \ r-I "i 1 .....‘441\ ' '
re▪ L Ilin 41.0
ii ,
d sr' ; •
LL a w •yI
Y C
mmo R` r
o • ti
i
"
i� I
-J • • .
W • V'•
a
•
•
m _- -Ar.. .
g

DocuSign Envelope ID:ACF875FD-8AA5-41A1-6D85-22AF9AA50486
Phase B:Wake County Soil Survey for Reference
, a
r WmCZ WmG f ,
LoB / 1
-t C h
Afa
ACf �vrnB? 1
WO
r • , MA
, ' Fab
•tILI .,.-C, i
0 . 4- 6.
Crl '
,
apB2 WmC
r
CeB2 �u
� k
_ q ti 1 WmD2
•
lE3 V' w wmB2 q$
` ( , ` wmC-<,.. "A”.,-..-
•
1 yr _WmC2 - % Fab
AaB • Ape -•-_ _ i . .. _ .
-_ WmC? .
i
G . Wmc2 • '` _. r. tip,
(No ( ii2 ) V_M ApB

11)
Zr T z F,F m CZ
3 ttl
f =:WW i N 2- a m
11 i Cin ~ Ci � � �"
.e - 4 N D i-a as cn rn R. L=7
tt
n r E 1m c� m D
a a a ❑ [a q h
- & .F�r ���1�
•
— 4,1//
46'eti
,, /
Nor7--/if 4
/ ,00 8„T
/
4
,! I
ir
♦ .r
AIL_
41)4 / if
1°Imimik ----- ----- . _... -7!--7-'------ 'N a 46.11.1111111111'YEN.P
411Nt‘-k , ...._
Oil
S \\\ •
14"111111111
fl r I,
414w0r4IV --.1111Alk Pilli .
444, A. iiiik‘ X . a_______ 7
2e1.1 ,i,. ... ",:tidia,,.• 7
.. ,.. , .. 141 II
4 1 lli yk., --
a 0 1
a
\ \\,,\4,.,,,,yikilli!ek,. .111111ki. t•
r
I/
r
N
CO Prl
E P L
[LL] w
o
4 ,
1 'i (ST
Y �
0 � m 0 5 � � �+‹... 1
,,,,,„,,, \
. r
m .
W � �0
g
0 AL
co
.It.

DocuSign Envelope ID:C059370B-B39D-46D5-82D4-8741163F88E3 .._,
�o STATE
: Ev �ii;
Y
ROY COOPER ,,,, ,,r :=Governor ',\ , r _ ,
i"
MICHAEL S.REGAN 3=� •
Secretary `a l-
v11 vat_
S.DANIEL SMITH NORTH CAROLINA
Director Environmental Quality
September 24, 2020
Barrett Jenkins DWR# 2019-1692v2
Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes St, Suite 211
Raleigh, NC 27604
(via electronic mail: bjen kin s(a)restorationsystems.com)
Re: Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation &Nutrient Offset—Raleigh Farm Phase B Site
Near 8599 Old Baucom Rd. (SR 2542), Raleigh NC 27610
Lat.,Long. 35.703464, -78.485697 (north of the road)
Neuse 03020201
Dear Mr. Jenkins,
On February I1, 2020, Katie Merritt, with the Division of Water Resources (DWR), received a
request from you on behalf of Restoration Systems, LLC (RS) for a site visit near the above-
referenced site in the Neuse River Basin within the 8-digit Hydrologic Unit Code 03020201. The site
visit was to determine the potential for riparian buffer mitigation and nutrient offset within a
proposed Easement Boundary, which is more accurately shown in the attached map labeled
"'CORPUD-Site Features Phase B" prepared by RS and edited by DWR. On June 2, 2020 and June
3, 2020, Ms. Merritt performed site assessments of the subject site and identified the following site
constraints:
• UTILITIES: Gas lines are being proposed on parts of the site where streams are located.
Existing powerline easements are also present. Specific locations and associated
easements of gas lines were unknown at the time of the DWR site visit, but the attached
CORPUD figure details where the proposed and temporary easements will be located.
• PERMITS: State,Federal and/or Local permits may be associated with this property.
Wetland delineation flagging and other stream call determinations were observed on the
site.
• EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE: The City of Raleigh owns the property on the site
and has used the land for applying biosolids associated with the Neuse River Resource
Recovery Facility (NRRRF). Existing underground and above ground infrastructure is
present for purposes of irrigating the property. The City of Raleigh Public Utilities
Department (CORPUD) manages the property. Existing dirt paths, culverted crossings,
deeded access roads and greenways are present throughout and are adjacent to ditches
and streams onsite where mitigation would be proposed. Some Groundwater Monitoring
Wells were located onsite, but their locations are not depicted on any maps attached to
this correspondence. All existing infrastructure within the proposed conservation
easement shall be delineated and included as part of the site's restoration plan along with
specific details on management and maintenance and what will be included or excluded.
o Application of bio-solids will not be permitted within a conservation easement.
mon Q I ourc
, Jn 5i2North NorthCarolina SalisburyDepart Streetent 11611 of MailEnvir Servicenmetal Centeruality I Raleigh,Division NorthofWater CarolinResa 2 76es9 9-1611
oea„•,nir i. �i wnnir 919.707.9000

Docu5ign Envelope[0.C059370B-B390-4605-8204-8741163F88E3 Raleigh Farm Phase B Site
Restoration Systems,LLC
September 24,2020
o Impervious surface will not be permitted within a conservation casement unless it
is an access easement or located outside of creditable areas for mitigation or
nutrient offsets.
o Disruption in connectivity between top of bank and adjacent riparian areas will
not be permitted within a conservation easement.
o Monitoring wells must remain fully functional and shall be allowed to be
maintained and accessed as needed.
Ms. Merritt's evaluation of the features onsite and their associated mitigation determination for the
riparian areas are provided in the table below. This evaluation was made from Top of Bank (TOB)
and landward 200' from each feature for buffer mitigation pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295
(effective November 1, 2015) and for nutrient offset credits pursuant to 15A NCAC O2B .0703.
Feature Classification Subject 6Riparian Land uses Buffer 'Nutrient 4'5Mitigation Type Determination
onsite to adjacent to Feature Credit Offset w/in riparian areas
Buffer 10-200') Viable Viable
Rule
i A Ephemeral No Combination of non- =. Yes Yes (non- Non forested areas Restoration Site
forested agricultural fields forested per 15A NCAC 02B.0295(o)(7)
and mature forest areas only)
Forested Areas- Preservation Site per
15ANCAC 02B.0295(o)(4)
1 B Stream Yes Combination of non- 'Yes Yes(non- Non-forested areas-Restoration Site
forested agricultural fields forested per 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n)
and mature forest areas only)
Forested Areas- Preservation Site per
Utility line is present 1SANCAC 02B.0295(o)(5)
2A - Ephemeral No Combination of non- Yes (non- Non-forested areas-Restoration Site
s
(ends at forested agricultural fields Yes forested per 15A NCAC 02B.0295(0)(7)
confluence and mature forest areas only)
wl2C) Forested Areas- Preservation Site per
15ANCAC 02B.0295(o)(4)
2B Ephemeral No Combination of non- '-.'Yes Yes(non- Non-forested areas-Restoration Site
(ends at forested agricultural fields forested per 15A NCAC 02B.0295(o)(7)
confluence and mature forest areas only)
w12C) Forested Areas- Preservation Site per
15ANCAC 02B.0295(o)(4)
Page 2 of 5

Dacu5ign Envelope[0.C059370B-B39i0-4605-82Q4-8741163F88E3 Raleigh Farm Phase B Site
Restoration Systems,LLC
September 24,2020
Feature Classification 'Subject 5Riparian Land uses Buffer 3Nutrient 4 SMitigation Type Determination
onsite to adjacent to Feature Credit Offset w/in riparian areas
Buffer f0-200'l Viable Viable
Rule
2C Stream Yes Mostly mature forest with Yes(non- Non-forested areas-Restoration Site
some agricultural field �'� forested per 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n)
areas only)
Utility line and a greenway Forested Areas- Preservation Site per
are present 15A NCAC 02B.0295(0)(5)
All areas within existing or proposed
easements must he excluded from the
Restoration and Preservation Site.
3A Stream f to Combination of non- Yes (non- Non-forested areas-Restoration Site
forested agricultural fields Yes forested per 15A NCAC 02B.0295(o)(3)
and mature forest areas only)
Forested Areas- Preservation Site per
Trash is located in the 15A NCAC 02B.0295(o)(4)
stream and needs to be
removed where possible
4A Ephemeral No non-forested agricultural *see note *see note
fields *Note:A gas line is proposed to impact
most of this channel and therefore this.
existing utilities are present reach may not be present after
(see map) construction;
-
413 Stream Yes Combination of non- afire Yes (non- Non-forested areas-Restoration Site
(starts above forested agricultural fields forested per 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n)
pond& and mature forest areas only)
continues to Forested Areas- Preservation Site per
Main A gas line is proposed to 15ANCAC 02B.0295(o)(5)
tributary 4) impact stream;existing
utilities are present(see All areas within existing or proposed
map) easements must be excluded from the
Restoration and Preservation Site
A force main was located
along this stream;A utility Cannot be used as a Restoration Site until
line is present through the after gas line is constructed&
pond_ construction easements are no longer
needed
5A Not Present No - N/A N/A N/A N/A
Page 3 of 5

DocuSign Envelope ID.C059370B-B39i0-4605-82Q4-8741163F88E3 Raleigh Farm Phase B Site
Restoration Systems,LLC
September 24,2020
Feature Classification LSubiect 6Riparian Land uses Buffer 3Nutrient 4•5Mitigation Type Determination
onsite to adjacent to Feature Credit Offset w/in riparian areas
Butler (0-200') Viable Viable
Rule
5R Not Present Nn N/A N.A N/A N/A
5C Stream Yes M aiure forest except along No Preservation Site per 15A NCAC 028
maintained utility line .0295(o)(5)
(power line)
All areas within existing or proposed
Utility line is present along easements must be excluded from the
the entire reach to its Restoration and Preservation Site
confluence with Feature 4.
Must include top of bank within easement
to he creditable.
GA Ephemeral No Mostly mature forest with - Yes(non- Non-forested areas-Restoration Site
some adjacent agricultural T Yes forested per 15A NCAC 02B.0295(o)(7)
field areas only)
Forested Areas- Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 02B.0295(0)(5)
ISubjectiyity calls fo the features we�t deters jned by DWR in correspondence Slated August,17,2020 using the 1:24,00 sca e
quadrangle topographic map prepared by USGS and Inc most recent punted version of the soil survey map prepared by the NKCS
2The area ofpreservationcteclit within a buffer mitigation_site shall comprise of no morethan 25 percentL25%).of the total area.of
buffer mitigation per 15A r CAC 0295(oX5)and 15A NCAC 0295(ox4). Site cannot be a Preservation only site to comply with this
rule.
NC Division of Water Resources-Methodology and Calculations for determining Nutrient Reductions associated with Riparian
Buffer Estahlis merit
'Determinations made for this Site are determined based on the pmposal provided in maps and figures submitted with the request.
ll featuresb proposed for buffer mitt tion or nutrient offset,must t have a conservation e seinendt_established that includes the tops of
channel ban when bear measured perpendicular and landwardram the banks,even i no credit is viable within t at npanan area.
5 Landuses may also include the application of bio-solids associated with the NRRRF
7The area of the mitigation site on ephemeral channels shall comprise no more than 25 percent(25%)of the total area of buffer mitigation
per 15A NCAC 028.0295(oX7).
Determinations provided in the table above were made using a proposed easement boundary showing
proposed mitigation areas shown in Figure 1 and the CORPUD map. Maps representing the proposal
for the Site are attached to this letter and are initialed by Ms. Merritt on September 24, 2020.
Substantial changes to the proposed easement boundary as well as site constraints identified on page 1
of this letter could affect the Site's potential to generate buffer and nutrient offset credits.
This letter does not constitute an approval of this Site to generate buffer and nutrient offset credits.
Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295, a mitigation proposal and a mitigation plan shall be submitted to
DWR for written approval prior to conducting any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or surface
waters for buffer mitigation credit. Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0703, a proposal regarding a proposed
nutrient load-reducing measure for nutrient offset credit shall be submitted to DWR for approval prior
to any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or surface waters.
All vegetative plantings, performance criteria and other mitigation requirements for riparian restoration,
enhancement and preservation must follow the requirements in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 to be eligible for
buffer and/or nutrient offset mitigation credits. For any areas depicted as not being viable for nutrient
offset credit above, one could propose a different measure, along with supporting calculations and
sufficient detail to support estimates of load reduction, for review by the DWR to determine viability
for nutrient offset in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0703.

Dacu5ign Envelope[0.C059370B-B39i0-4605-82Q4-8741163F88E3 Raleigh Farm Phase B Site
Restoration Systems,LLC
September 24,2020
This viability assessment will expire on September 24,2022 or upon approval of a mitigation
plan by the DWR, whichever comes first. This letter should be provided in any nutrient offset,
buffer, stream or wetland mitigation plan for this Site.
Please contact Katie Merritt at(919) 707-3637 if you have any questions regarding this
c one spondence.
Sincerely,
r7DocuSigned by:
I'�swri WO�Q
sag 0918AMEF4E0...
Paul Wojoski, Supervisor
401 and Buffer Permitting Branch
PWlkym
Attachments: Phase B-Figure I, CORPUD-Site Features Phase B
cc: File Copy (Katie Merritt)
Page 5 of 5

1
1
J1 1
�I
f
S
f'.
it /r'
0
01 t
i
f f
� a
f
• A
i .1 '
F, ../ -.� x r.No .
• .e �r
m r
. . 0<-4
ch
�
i •
. TIC f
d ........ 3 1 -- ,
Ip0d I
�-� f �.�• +whip ,
rtt
ate, :?ter ' t b. r�t 'F~'.. -----• — -Y
Ci
.
' ±: !�u -
co
co
1
cr
I
a • {
co
v . fir
0
rn
C7 ! .
°0 ky
f II
C7
a
a
Li
o L
.+
c
w
c
ai
in
m
U
O
a

I •
A
m
PI •
`4 n • H cc ?
a s
re 4-
•
•
I ;
L. i o_
6
0.
❑ II
1. .. 21 ❑ i ° I I I V
• rI J 5•
11 - 7 ' 1 N F:
7 • d. ,r o 0
;r ,1•' i ... .) E
•�r
f
j,
I a.
N a f j
k. 1 {
•
/ 7I. i '
O ,
[r 4-
4i
i •S �'Sl
I
% . I 't ;
a
11
-_ f
r
I
'� j
� l .
.
J
o 1
m ,
M

Docusign Envelope ID:ACF675FD-8AA5-41A1-BD65-22AF9AA50486
y „.,,STATE
•
C r; 1_,-...e'i•
ROY COOPER ;a, A,. - .
Governor
MICHAEL S.REGAN a,, . .
Secretary 4uwv�.
5.DANIEL SMITH NORTH CAROliNA
Director Environmental Quality
August 17, 2020
Project 2019-1692 V3
Wake County
Barrett Jenkins
Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes Street,Suite 211
Raleigh, NC 27604
[e-mail]
Subject: On-Site Determination for Applicability to the Neuse Buffer Rules 15A NCAC 02B.0714
Project Name: Raleigh Farm Site Phase C
Address: 5619 Mial Plantation Road, Raleigh, NC 27610
Location: Lat., Long. 35.708058, -78.475047
Site Inspection Date: 6/2/2020
Dear Mr.Jenkins:
On June 2, 2020, Shelton Sullivan of the Division of Water Resources (DWR)conducted an on-site review
of features located on the subject property at the request of Barrett Jenkins with Restoration Systems,
LLC to determine the applicability to the Neuse Riparian Area Protection Rules, Title 15A North Carolina
Administrative Code 02B .0714.
The enclosed map(s)depict the feature(s)evaluated and this information is also summarized in the table
below. Streams were evaluated for being ephemeral, at least intermittent, and subjectivity to the Neuse
Riparian Area Protection Rules. Streams that are considered "Subject" have been located on the most
recently published NRCS Soil Survey of Wake County and/or the most recent copy of the USGS
Topographic (at 1:24,000 scale) map(s), have been located on the ground at the site, and possess
characteristics that qualify them to be at least intermittent streams. Features that are considered "Not
Subject" have been determined to not be at least intermittent, not present on the property, or not
depicted on the required maps.
This determination only addresses the applicability to the buffer rules and does not approve any activity
within buffers or within waters of the state. There may be other streams or features located on the
property that appear or do not appear on the maps referenced above. Any of the features on the site
may be considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers and subject to the Clean
Water Act.
The following table addresses the features observed and rated during the DWR site visit:
DE�� North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality 1 Division of Water Resources
a;) 512 North Salisbury Street i 1617 Mail Service Center I Raleigh.North Carolina 27699-1617
nenwneai i EMir Rw wa r 919.707.9000

Docusign Envelope ID:ACF675FD-8AA5-41A1-B065-22AF9AA50486
Project 2019-1692V3,Raleigh Farm Phase C
Wake County
Page 2 of 3
Feature Type Subject to
Feature Depicted on Depicted on
Point ID (stream/pond/E/1/P) Buffer Start @ Stop @ Soil Survey USGS Topo
(ditch/wetland/other) Rules
1A Stream-Ephemeral No 1A Includes Pond 1 Yes Yes
and ends at 18
Continues to the
18 Stream Yes
At least Yes 18 confluence with Yes
intermittent
Neuse River
Stream-At least
2A Yes 2A 2B Yes No
intermittent
2B Wetland No 28 2C Yes No
Stream-At least
2C Yes 2C 2D Yes No
intermittent
20 Wetland No 2D 2E Yes No
Stream At least Continues to the
2E Yes 2E confluence with Yes No
intermittent
Neuse River
Stream At least Continues to the
3A Yes 3A confluence with Yes No
intermittent
Neuse River
4A Stream-Ephemeral No 4A 4B No No
Stream-At least Continues to the
4B intermittent Yes 4B confluence with No No
Neuse River
4C Ditch—Not connected No See site map See site map No No
5A Stream-Ephemeral No 5A 5B Yes Yes
Includes Pond 5
Stream-At least and continues
5B Yes 58 to confluence Yes Yes
intermittent
with Neuse
River
Stream-At least Continues to
5C intermittent Yes 5C confluence with Yes Yes
Neuse River
5❑ Not Present No See site map See site map Yes No
Continues to
GA Ditch No 6A confluence with No No
Neuse River
ot
7 Not Evaluated Evaluated See site map See site map Yes No
* E:Ephemeral,I:Intermittent,P:Perennial
This on-site determination shall expire five(5)years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected
parties that dispute this determination made by the DWR may request an appeal determination by the
Director of Water Resources. An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) calendar days of the
date of this letter to the Director in writing,as per 15A NCAC 02B.0714(4).
If sending via U.S. Postal Service: If sending via delivery service(UPS, FedEx,etc.)
Paul Wojoski - DWR 401 & Buffer Paul Wojoski-DWR 401 & Buffer
Permitting Branch Supervisor Permitting Branch Supervisor
1617 Mail Service Center 512 N Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Raleigh, NC 27604

Docusign Envelope ID:ACF675FD-8AA5-41A1-BD65-22AF9AA50486
Project 2019-1692V3,Raleigh Farm Phase C
Wake County
Page 3 of 3
This determination is final and binding as detailed above, unless an appeal is requested within sixty(60)
calendar days.
This letter only addresses the labeled features on the subject property and within the proposed project
easement boundary and does not approve any activity within buffers or within waters of the state. if you
have any additional questions or require additional information, please contact Shelton Sullivan at
[e-mail] or 919-707-3636. This determination is subject to review as provided in
Articles 3 &4 of G.S. 150B.
Sincerely,
e—DocuSigned by:
Paa Wove
949d91 BA5300EF4E0...
Paul Wojoski
Supervisor, DWR 401 & Buffer Permitting
Attachments: Site Map with labeled points,FRCS Soil Survey, USGS Topographical Map
cc: Raymond Holz via email [e-mail]
Barrett Jenkins via email [e-mail]
Katie Merritt via email [e-mail]
401& Buffer Permitting Branch files
Filename:20191692v3_Raleigh FarmC_StreamCalls.docx

ra
N
U
'1 Q
u.
w is
C f FT U
rrd
W N 0 a
a. a °' a
-- ci. co cc
r m
r
w' G -)_ N Li- a)
F
d _ - W La C T 7 2
` z ti • z ' CD w CD D _ m
w.
0
i.S •[.!>.sc •'er`•.F6 � ' J 1 of y!;jta
'.l r'1Y. -'1,• r. 1• 7 s9
•
-.. 01
F. j^,•' F `... r ate.^:• --_
/' '` -:: i
�.,a.. 0 '.cam_ _ --- •r:,� .. _ �f� �.
•
ti. i'
15. r
c
Aftiti ,. .
s r ,ec '
ID
i r

_101 Cin 7:L'.
� i1iJPtitIH 60
it�
a
I
or.7. r. 1P '4.. \
'IN �� '.+ +lik. N,
II
tip
- f f i' �•
—
1 _�
i
� � f+. 7 Apt i � �es �■ f
4.
7 Jr en
iii_ 3: ) t it., r
.... ) z A -6 t .1 1
LI \ 4 ill,
____ _. .
-4.e........1i_l
N A:--1 I..\--..,.--,.1/4l'A::; \
C,t N,'Tk',r-e
- '4 '.`
-- _*-NlIii'i.
.lkt:.7
-:r4
11i
1/1104'111
I/
ii
II
_ —— l•, .`
r•/.
- 1 _1, µdi ' .6l
,
/ a' i Cti
- . # - .. .
_ — _ -
7.4-. ,)' ? 4..."'s t_li .
( ,
d H € -. •FI •1;61.51.:6
' .' N. 1
CI. w
o v m a I, iTTT
. _,.,,_ Fes . r.-.• I
N
g

DocuSign Envelope ID:ACF675FD-8AA5-41A1-SD65-22AF9AA50486
Phase C: Wake County Soil Survey for Reference
4
/ Iiiik . 111 'm8 ':i. . '. --- ,,...' -11111.-'--,--A...,.-,•:, ,...i:i/7
ApD f AI
_ . - -• NoB Wm92
,?Co
Lv WaB " 4- +Ap
..t. . )
FaB2 WaB • NOB -- ,•. WmC2
19 /,/ ad 4.1, .-4_Nr . ,
, 0 Apc2 - _ . ,: .
. . ..
_ ..
/ lir
�-. t Wad ., .
iA + /;f • \ ' 61
' ippetts F.�B
•
.2 /• At< "e+ .i1�i
_ l
0/
l i• MA .r
FaB
1
- I
i f �r
:
_ COGa tilt�, / , �„m........././ ;} `
Wrn D2 .
. _ � 1 q.

S O
' - I (11) Z
E
iu I-❑ t C7 r
.� ntL
a i Q 2 Z m m mIC2E D
4 N
a a ❑ ❑
1 1 -' e fi i
r , , i 111
r `� ,)= . ..7+ 1
, \,.,__.
0
\ .,,L._,, n ck,
-/ ,
'\- --- -*-\-H---i--\' . \----- . . ----'-- - )..--)
V 1. ,N _ L____
!...,,
, ,,,,,,,....,
I, .,
• .....,,,,..,
�VA-
i, ,. \:„
, , ,, ,r
....,,,,, k \
.....,...,I 6 I I I I
j , • + �pAo Ii '--
,'t
�+ i, wo`,P :
! ---)
C' 8 .1 fis--7_,
,„„ii.N
i�l pc,,,:,:.
,Q c
.,,„lot
'---/N.j___________Yj . 0 i cillit. Ilith'ift--,,.:,. , A
k___: :i i' 1414ip i lik ,./. -
ikk \ At'4, 61 4 o AT IL /i 1
Zc==-_ „ ....,,,,, - ilinvo r 1 I/ /
,--_yE
—.--"..- "'.-'---'.. - : t 1°' 1../: i A §
... . . . ? f
*,,,, ,e----.-.------,.. _ ..._... .____...,_.. _ :1. .',). 4
. 7 as., ,. .._ _ ...___ . ....”..,
74'7"
... - -- r---r-'''''.. __,..-.":7-.4%Ntital s
. 1 'Zit" ,,, 44,
e4 . VI ._ ,
d m °f �
Or )_.....1 :..
°' s w ''. \\ 1 / \ 0,161 41 .
E • \..., / 1 _444 ?ala
$ a io
r ^\ 4eiv..
r,

DocuSign Envelope[0.3BE18B63-D93F-4C3A-90F5-5719BC4437E1 .._7,r a-\i-`j
ROY COOPER •1/ �r. Y
f
Governor �'�
,"
MICHAEL S.REGAN - "
Secretary " `a l-
wu,va�_
S.DANIEL SMITH NORTH CAROLINA
Director Environmental Quality
September 25,2020
Barrett Jenkins DWR 2019-1692v3
Restoration Systems, LLC
1 101 Haynes St, Suite 211
Raleigh,NC 27604
(via electronic mail: bjenkins(2 restorationsystems.com)
Re: Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation &Nutrient Offset---Raleigh Farm Phase C Site
Near 5619 Mial Plantation Road, Raleigh,NC 27610
Lat., Long. 35.708058,-78.475047
Neuse 03020201
Dear Mr.Jenkins,
On February 11,2020,Katie Merritt, with the Division of Water Resources(DWR), received a
request from you on behalf of Restoration Systems,LLC(RS) for a site visit near the above-
referenced site in the Neuse River Basin within the 8-digit Hydrologic Unit Code 03020201. The site
visit was to determine the potential for riparian buffer mitigation and nutrient offset within a
proposed Easement Boundary,which is more accurately shown in the attached map labeled
"CORPUD-Site Features Phase B"prepared by RS and edited by DWR. On June 2,2020, Ms.
Merritt performed a site assessment of the subject site and identified the following site constraints:
• UTILITIES: Gas lines are being proposed on parts of the site where streams are located.
Existing powerline easements are also present. Specific locations and associated
easements of gas lines were unknown at the time of the DWR site visit, but the attached
CORPUD figure details where the proposed and temporary easements will be located.
• PERMITS: State, Federal and/or Local permits may be associated with this property.
Wetland delineation flagging and other stream call determinations were observed on the
site.
• EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE: The City of Raleigh owns the property on the site
and has used the land for applying bio-solids associated with the Neuse River Resource
Recovery Facility (NRRRF). Existing underground and above ground infrastructure is
present for purposes of irrigating the property. The City of Raleigh Public Utilities
Department(CORPUD)manages the property. Existing dirt paths, culverted crossings,
deeded access roads and greenways are present throughout and are adjacent to ditches
and streams onsite where mitigation would be proposed. Some Groundwater Monitoring
Wells were located onsite,but their locations are not depicted on any maps attached to
this correspondence. All existing infrastructure within the proposed conservation
easement shall be delineated and included as part of the site's restoration plan along with
specific details on management and maintenance and what will be included or excluded.
o Application of bio-solids will not be permitted within a conservation easement.
-lam North m Quality I of Resourc
Sit NoCarolinarth SalisburyDepart Streetent 11611of Mail ServiceEnvironmental Center I Raleigh.Division NorthWater Carolina 276es99-1611
nararr1 cn of Ent:L
a.� nmmaai wMO-\ 919.707.9000

fDocusign Envelope f0:3BE18B63-D93F-4C3A-90F5-5719BC4437E3 Raleigh Farm Phase C Site
Restoration Systems,LLC
September 25,2020
a Impervious surface will not be permitted within a conservation easement unless it
is an access easement or located outside of creditable areas for mitigation or
nutrient offsets.
o Disruption in connectivity between top of bank and adjacent riparian areas will
not be permitted within a conservation easement.
o Monitoring wells must remain fully functional and shall be allowed to be
maintained and accessed as needed.
Ms. Merritt's evaluation of the features onsite and their associated mitigation determination for the
riparian areas are provided in the table below. This evaluation was made from Top of Bank (TOB)
and landward 200' from each feature for buffer mitigation pursuant to 15A NCAC 028 .0295
(effective November 1, 2015)and for nutrient offset credits pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0703.
Feature Classification 1Suhject 6Riparian Land uses Buffer 3Nutrient 4.5Mitigation Type Determination
onsite to adjacent to Feature Credit Offset w/in riparian areas
Buffer 10-200') Viable Viable
Rule
l A Ephemeral No Forested above the pond -''Yes Yes(non- Non-forested areas-Restoration Site
(includes and mostly non-forested forested per 15A NCAC 02B.0295(o)(7)
Pond 1 & agricultural fields around areas only)
ends at i B and downstream of pond Forested Areas- Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 028.0295(o)(4)
Non-forested areas-Restoration Site
per 1SA NCAC 028.0295(o)(7)
Must include all of Pond 1 to 1B to he
creditable
The dam needs to have controlled
access by RS and should be deeded
along with Conservation Easement so
that dam integrity is maintained. No
trees can be planted&no credit
obtained along the dam or within
controlled access area.
lB Stream Yes Combination of non- 'Yes Yes(non- Non-forested areas-Restoration Site
(begins at forested agricultural fields forested per 15A NCAC 028.0295(n)
DWR and mature forest areas only)
Ell flag) Forested Areas- Preservation Site per
A greenway is present 15A NCAC 0213.0295(o)(5)
downstream
2A Stream Yes Combination of non- -'Yes Yes(non- Non-forested areas-Restoration Site
forested agricultural fields forested per 15A NCAC 028.0295(n)
and mature forest areas only)
Forested Areas- Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 028.0295(o)(5)
Page 2 of 5

DocuSign Envelope f0:3BE18B63-D93F-4C3A-90F5-5719BC4437E1 Raleigh Farm Phase C Site
Restoration Systems,LLC
September 25,2020
Feature Classification ;Subject 6Riparfan Land uses Buffer 3Nutrient 4•5Mitigation Type Determination
onsite to adjacent to Feature Credit Offset w/in riparian areas
Buffer J0-200'1 Viable Viable
Rule
2B Wetland Nn fully forested with adjacent No No N/A
(ends at agricultural fields
DWR flag
2C)
2C Stream Yes Combination of non- 2Yes Yes(non- Non-forested areas-Restoration Site
forested agricultural fields forested per 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n)
and mature forest areas only)
Forested Areas- Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 02B.0295(o)(5)
2D Wetland No fully forested with adjacent No No N/A
(ends at agricultural fields
DWR flag
2E)
2E Stream Yes Combination of non- 2Yes Yes(non- Non-forested areas-Restoration Site
forested agricultural fields forested per 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n)
and mature forest areas only)
Forested Areas- Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 02B.0295(o)(5)
3A Stream Yes Combination of non- 2Yes Yes(non- Non-forested areas-Restoration Site
forested agricultural fields forested per 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n)
and mature forest areas only)
Forested Areas- Preservation Site per
There is an access crossing 15A NCAC 02B.0295(o)(5)
present across the stream
and a greenway located Credit is not viable within access crossing_
downstream
4A Ephemeral No Combination of non- 2 7Yes Yes(non- Non-forested areas-Restoration Site
forested agricultural fields forested per 15A NCAC 02B.0295(o)(7)
and mature forest areas only)
Forested Areas- Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 02B.0295(o)(4)
4B Stream Yes Combination of non- 2Yes Yes(non- Non-forested areas-Restoration Site
forested agricultural fields forested per 1SA NCAC 02B.0295[n)
and mature forest areas only)
Forested Areas- Preservation Site per
A greenway is present 15A NCAC 02B.0295[o)(5)
downstream
4C Ditch No N/A No No Not hydrologically connected to a
stream
5A Ephemeral No Mature forest along both 27Yes Yes(non- Non-forested areas-Restoration Site
(ends at sides of channel with non- forested per 15A NCAC 02B.0295(o)(7)
DWR flag forested agricultural located areas only)
5B along left bank Forested Areas- Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 02B.0295(o)(4)
Page 3 of 5

Docusign Envelope[0.3BE18B63-D93F-4C3A-90F5-5719BC4437E3 Raleigh Farm Phase C Site
Restoration Systems,LLC
September 25,2020
Feature Classification tSuhject 6Riparian Land uses Buffer 3Nutrient 4•5Mitigation Type Determination
onsite to adjacent to Feature Credit Offset w/in riparian areas
Buffer 10-200') Viable Viable
Rule
S13 Stream Yes Mature forest along both =Yes Yes(non- Non-forested areas-Restoration Site
(includes sides of channel with non- forested per 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n)
Pond 5 forested agricultural located areas only)
along left bank Forested Areas- Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 02B.0295(o)(5)
Pond 5 In-line Pond Yes Mature forest along both 2Yes Yes(non- Non-forested areas-Restoration Site
sides of channel with non- forested per 1SA NCAC 02B.0295(n)
forested agricultural located areas only)
along left bank Forested Areas- Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 02B.0295(o)(5)
5C Stream Yes Mature forest along both 2Yes Yes(non- Non-forested areas-Restoration Site
(starts below sides of channel with non- forested per 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n)
Pond 5) forested agricultural located areas only)
along left batik Forested Areas- Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 02B.0295(o)(5)
utility line present
downstream
5D Not Present N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
6A Ditch No narrow forested fringe and No Yes(fields Non-forested areas-Restoration Site
>3'depth non-forested agricultural only) per 15A NCAC 02B.0295(n)
fields
7 Not Evaluated N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
'Subjectivity calls for the features were determined by DWR in correspondence dated August 17,2020 using the 1:24,000 scale
quadrangle topographic map prepared by USGS and the most recent printed version of the soil survey map prepared by the NRCS
2The area of preservation credit within a buffer mitigation site shall comprise of no more than 25 percent(25%)of the total area of buffer
mitigation per I5A NCAC 0295(o)(5)and I5A NCAC 0295(oX4). Site cannot be a Preservation Only site to comply with this rule.
3NC Division of Water Resources-Methodology and Calculations for determining Nutrient Reductions associated with Riparian Buffer
Establishment
4 Determinations made for this Site are determined based on the proposal provided in maps and figures submitted with the request.
s All features proposed for buffer mitigation or nutrient offset,must have a conservation easement established that includes the tops of
channel banks when being measured perpendicular and landward from the banks,even if no credit is viable within that riparian area.
6 Land uses may also include the application of bio-solids associated with the NRRRF
'The area of the mitigation site on ephemeral channels shall comprise no more than 25 percent(25%)of the total area of buffer
mitigation per I5A NCAC 02B.0295(o)(7).
Determinations provided in the table above were made using a proposed easement boundary showing
proposed mitigation areas shown in Figure I and the CORPUD map. Maps representing the proposal
for the Site are attached to this letter and are initialed by Ms.Merritt on September 25,2020.
Substantial changes to the proposed easement boundary as well as site constraints identified on page
I of this letter could affect the Site's potential to generate buffer and nutrient offset credits.
Page 4 of 5

Docu5ign Envelope[0.3BE18B63-D93F-4C3A-90F5-5719BC4437E1 Raleigh Farm Phase C Site
Restoration Systems,LLC
September 25,2020
This letter does not constitute an approval of this Site to generate buffer and nutrient offset credits.
Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295,a mitigation proposal and a mitigation plan shall be submitted to
DWR for written approval prior to conducting any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or
surface waters for buffer mitigation credit. Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0703, a proposal regarding a
proposed nutrient load-reducing measure for nutrient offset credit shall be submitted to DWR for
approval prior to any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or surface waters.
All vegetative plantings,performance criteria and other mitigation requirements for riparian
restoration, enhancement and preservation must follow the requirements in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 to
be eligible for buffer and/or nutrient offset mitigation credits. For any areas depicted as not being
viable for nutrient offset credit above, one could propose a different measure,along with supporting
calculations and sufficient detail to support estimates of load reduction, for review by the DWR to
determine viability for nutrient offset in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0703.
This viability assessment will expire on September 25, 2022 or upon approval of a mitigation
plan by the DWR,whichever comes first. This letter should be provided in any nutrient offset,
buffer, stream or wetland mitigation plan for this Site.
Please contact Katie Merritt at(919) 707-3637 if you have any questions regarding this
correspondence.
Sincerely,
—DocuSr ned by:
Pria Weie
`-949D 1EA53EFAE0...
Paul Wojoski, Supervisor
401 and Buffer Permitting Branch
PW/kym
Attachments: Phase C-Figure 1, Phase C-Figure 2, CORPUD-Site Features Phase C
cc: File Copy (Katie Merritt)
Page 5 of 5

iris,"
_..,,. . i ,
...___._ .
et
lii r( w `
Air 1
1
a
r;_. b
..111 .
...
, .
...elth
. . ,I.
. ... ,
.,,,,,,,
•
itt.
1/4
lip.
,.
AA- 0 I 1., . I ir
irai
._. .
, v, „a.,
_.,..0,
. , c .,
r. . .
,. .
..... .
..„
. .z._ , .
..
� _ .c 4, - -
rn ,..,..iv
{
-
r
tiJ
i I . I ii.IP
1 ,,
..
, L
_.....,.,i,:.....pk _ ,,
T.)] A . ,
.,
„ ,
.,.4
a), i
1 .
,,,,,, ._ , , .
r ..,,
......
4. _....._-'7..-- .. .. .
- --. i
PA
44
lb* ...
•
3 _ �i ,
ti 1'`i! fir , .
•
rr -
0,
ti . ,..., -,-
. .coII \ 1.,-1-,. . .
..6 ..
ti
1,.
0
1r _ . , \\. , .
_ ; .
0.) .
C., ..
in
CO
-=t r - t - - -- -- -s.. - -
co
al
CD
Li
ai
C
W
C
al
in
7
U
O
d

1111411114\''''''.'''''.':. ' --.\ -..._ ..
E
i
W ,c, - - .
1 • i-Li \my- -... '''.
r • yam
_ ell1
- LI
I
- l,4,,., ,.._ ou
y . :
Nit __44.15.
c,
�- II
: ':L.. ' ,1-
IZ .j
fl I I
..--, '..0 11.11
U . _
. .
......_.,.._..
............:.....„...v.... ._, ___ ...._
• _ - illP-1 , So:.4zi, ' .
. •:;: :.) . .
rs
t
rr
Cri
Cr.? \ ,
11 ••.., .... I rit.
121
-*Vizor.
m r
co1
it
a gg✓
m
Q
y'�O •
o
D•
C
1ii
C
07
7
U
O
n

so
•
L 9
es N
in!
"*... I I ' 1 i ....-. ....... . . . . ...
71
•
0
rn N
T
03
III
o`
'•;' .� L o
La
No
_ � L rr..•, - !::i --
-. -.... ••.-'NI* !z? ,' • .. -' ••• .•-",.., 1 ''''' •• j. '. 0
••,,, ' lik, • .. - it a
ti , �i <I titi� N lie
�� .... M S
}1 I
— e ,';
'411411I'llr 1 ..... *i...,...
mT c
... N. _- +
1
m
'A • `• w.. h.•Y '1
g . --- V '''.
- i'
w`.s •
--

Docusign Envelope ID: 3BE18B63-D93F-4C3A-9DF5-5719BC4437E1
Docu
Certificate Of Completion
Envelope Id: 95DD3A31A526497ABC6DB260E4D88BCA
Subject: Please DocuSign: Raleigh Farm C Figures.pdf
Source Envelope:
Document Pages: 3
Certificate Pages: 1
AutoNav: Disabled
Envelopeld Stamping: Disabled
Time Zone: (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada)
Record Tracking
Status: Original
9/25/2020 1:41:46 PM
Signer Events
Katie Merritt
[e-mail]
DWR
❑EQ
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Not Offered via DocuSign
Signatures: 0
Initials: 3
Holder: Katie Merritt
[e-mail]
Signature
Signature Adoption: Pre -selected Style
Using IP Address: 149.168.204.10
Status: Completed
Envelope Originator:
Katie Merritt
217 W. Jones Street
Raleigh, NC 27699
[e-mail]
IP Address: 149.168.204.10
Location: Docusign
Timestamp
Sent: 9/25/2020 1:41:56 PM
Viewed: 9/25/2020 1:42:03 PM
Signed: 9/25/2020 1:42:29 PM
Freeform Signing
In Person Signer Events Signature
Timestamp
Editor Delivery Events Status
Timestamp
Agent Delivery Events Status
Timestamp
Intermediary Delivery Events Status
Timestamp
Certified Delivery Events Status
Timestamp
Carbon Copy Events Status
Timestamp
Witness Events Signature
Timestamp
Notary Events Signature
Timestamp
Envelope Summary Events
Envelope Sent
Certified Delivered
Signing Complete
Completed
Status
Hashed/Encrypted
Security Checked
Security Checked
Security Checked
Timestamps
9/25/2020 1:41:56 PM
9/25/2020 1:42:03 PM
9/25/2020 1:42:29 PM
9/25/2020 1:42:29 PM
Payment Events Status Timestamps

Docu
•
6 SECURED
Certificate Of Completion
Envelope Id: 3BE18B63D93F4C3A9DF55719BC4437E1
Subject: Please DocuSign: Raleigh C Viability to Sign.pdf
Source Envelope:
Document Pages: 9
Certificate Pages: 1
AutoNav: Enabled
Envelopeld Stamping: Enabled
Time Zone: (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada)
Signatures: 1
Initials: 0
Status: Completed
Envelope Originator:
Katie Merritt
217 W. Jones Street
Raleigh, NC 27699
[e-mail]
IP Address: 149.168.204.10
Record Tracking
Status: Original Holder: Katie Merritt
9/25/2020 1:47:37 PM
[e-mail]
Location: ❑ocusign
Signer Events Signature
Timestamp
Paul Wojoski Da.Si ned by'
[e-mail]
969a91 RA53EFd EO
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Security Level: Email. Account Authentication
(None)
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Not Offered via DocuSign
Signature Adoption: Pre -selected Style
Using IP Address: 149.168.204.10
Sent: 9/25/2020 1:48:36 PM
Viewed: 9/25/2020 1:56:26 PM
Signed: 9/25/2020 1:56:31 PM
In Person Signer Events
Signature
Timestamp
Editor Delivery Events
Status
Timestamp
Agent Delivery Events
Status
Timestamp
Intermediary Delivery Events
Status
Timestamp
Certified Delivery Events
Status
Timestamp
Carbon Copy Events
Status
Timestamp
Witness Events
Signature
Timestamp
Notary Events
Signature
Timestamp
Envelope Summary Events
Status
Timestamps
Envelope Sent
Certified Delivered
Signing Complete
Completed
HashedlEncrypted
Security Checked
Security Checked
Security Checked
9/25/2020 1:48:36 PM
9/25/2020 1:56:26 PM
9/25/2020 1:56:31 PM
9/25/2020 1:56:31 PM
Payment Events
Status
Timestamps

Barrett Jenkins
From: Saunders, Erickson G <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2021 11:14 AM
To: Barrett Jenkins
Cc: Merritt, Katie;Thornburg, Nathaniel; Dalton, Marla
Subject: RE: [External] RE: WQ0001730 -City of Raleigh RLAP Additional Information Request
Follow Up Flag: Flag for follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
Barrett,
The project is still in house with us at the moment, I believe we are still waiting on one more thing from the additional
information request not related to the buffer restoration project.
You are right,the permit will reference this project and have a condition that a permit modification shall be submitted
to formally remove the sections that are a part of the buffer project. I don't know if we necessarily have authority to
provide the approval for the implementation of the plan, but we have no objections to the implementation as long as it
is removed from the permit and the final easement is sufficient. Katie mentioned that our office and hers would work
internally to provide you with assistance with the easement language that we would require.
As for what we might need from you,the only other comment I had for the CoR's response was that there was not an
updated acreage table for the residuals land application fields after the conservation easement goes into effect. I see
that there are certain amount of acres that are considered overlap on the maps, but I would still want the post-
easement acres in a nice table to put into our permit. I know Marla had also mentioned that some of the fields would be
too small and would be removed altogether, so CoR should propose which of those fields should be removed altogether.
Let me know if you have any other questions.
Erick Saunders
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Permitting
[phone] Office
[e-mail]
From: Barrett Jenkins [mailto:[e-mail]
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2021 6:26 PM
To:Saunders, Erickson G<[e-mail]>
Cc: Merritt, Katie<[e-mail]>;Thornburg, Nathaniel <[e-mail]>; Dalton, Marla
M aria.Dalton @ ra leigh nc.gov>
Subject: RE: [External] RE:WCt0001730-City of Raleigh RLAP Additional Information Request
CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify.Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
Report Span,.
Erick,
1

I am working on a final draft for our buffer restoration/nutrient offset project on Raleigh's NRRRF property and wanted
to check in with you to see if Raleigh had completed their biosolids application permit renewal and if that renewal
mentioned future plans to implement the buffer restoration project as discussed?
We are looking for written approval from you to allow us to implement our restoration plan and then have Raleigh apply
for a permit modification to formally update the spray field maps after our conservation easement is recorded.
Please let me know where things stand from your end and if I can provide anymore information.
Katie Merritt,who is permitting our restoration project is cc'd as well as Marla Dalton with Raleigh Water.
Thanks,
Barrett Jenkins
Restoration Systems
512.230.0424
From:Saunders, Erickson G<[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2021 3:16 PM
To: Merritt, Katie [e-mail]>; Barrett Jenkins<[e-mail]>
Cc:Thornburg, Nathaniel <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] RE:WQ0001730-City of Raleigh RLAP Additional Information Request
Katie, it's kind of my fault, my additional information asked for them to provide a draft excerpt of the future
conservation easement. I'm not familiar with how your process works so I threw it back on the City of Raleigh to provide
it to me. I didn't ask for anything final regarding the easement,just a draft to ensure the easement would fall within the
scope of our rules. We won't approve anything based on what we receive, it was kind of meant to be a launching point
to make sure it was known that the easement would need special considerations and language to address the
requirements of our program.
Mr. Barrett,
We recognize that whatever maps you send aren't finalized at the moment. I expect we will issue the permit with a
condition for Raleigh to provide a permit modification to formally remove those areas from the permit to get the
finalized version. We just want to anticipate the removal of certain land application areas now so that we have
something concrete in place to help formalize their removal later on. Just to be clear though, Raleigh should be
providing this information to me, so you may want to provide this information to them because they are supposed to
provide a "Post-buffer mitigation map" which shows what land application areas will still be permitted after this action is
done.
As for the language you provided, it'll probably need to get edited to conform with our rules, but this can be done down
the line if needed. It looks to be missing provisions allowing for the State to enter the site for groundwater monitoring
and remediation activities,which is a requirement in the 02L .0107 groundwater rules. The bolded language only
appears to grant Raleigh that kind of access. Again,that's just off the top of my head and is in no way comprehensive,
and we'll discuss with Katie and probably the Groundwater Section to determine what all needs to be included in the
final easement. We'll also discuss your other final questions regarding the level of restriction and specific easement
language.
Regards,
Erick Saunders
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Water Resources
2

Water Quality Permitting
{919]707-3659 Office
[e-mail]
From: Merritt, Katie
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2021 2:30 PM
To: Barrett Jenkins<[e-mail]>; Saunders, Erickson G¢[e-mail]>
Cc:Thornburg, Nathaniel <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [External] RE: W00001730-City of Raleigh RLAP Additional Information Request
Hey Barrett,
Just as a side note, I will be taking the lead on providing RS with language for the conservation easement
associated with the Proposed Mitigation Bank. Therefore, Erick, Nathanial and I will work internally together
on what that language needs to be before sending anything to RS. Then, I will contact RS directly with the
suggested language to include and we can discuss. At this time, DWR is not ready to engage in assistance with
the conservation easement since there is not yet an MBI or Plan approved for the Bank yet. Once we get those
documents finalized, DWR staff will meet to go over the necessary changes to the current easement template.
Unless I have misunderstood, I don't believe Raleigh is required to have a conservation easement recorded to
get the permit renewed.
Let's plan to talk more about this next week at our teams meeting.
Thank you,
Katie
Get Outlook for iOS
From: Barrett Jenkins<[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2021 11:24:51 AM
To:Saunders, Erickson G<[e-mail]>
Cc: Merritt, Katie<[e-mail]>.;Thornburg, Nathaniel<[e-mail]>
Subject: [External] RE:WC/0001730-City of Raleigh RLAP Additional Information Request
CAUTION:External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify.Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
Report Spam.
Erick,
Please find attached two draft maps showing areas in which the proposed conservation easement overlaps with existing
fields approved for residuals application. At this point our conservation easement is in draft form and we don't
anticipate finalizing until later this year. Is it okay to provide you updated maps of the changes in the residual
application field boundaries after the Conservation Easement Survey is finalized? This may not coordinate with Raleigh's
permit renewal schedule exactly. I'm asking to make sure I understand what we need to do but also when. Are these
maps sufficient for Raleigh residuals permit renewal that is in process?
Also attached is the draft conservation easement which already includes the below language:
"ARTICLE IV.
GRANTEE'S RIGHTS
3

"' �+\'4
ROY COOPER ,r-r .�I`� .
Governor
MICHAEL S.REGAN , a r,,;
Secretary d° a"° -
LINDA CULPEPPER NORTH CAROLINA
Director Environmental Quality
November 21,2019
To:
N.C. Division of Mitigation Services, Private&Public Mitigation Banks,other Interested Parties
Subject: Clarified Procedures for Calculating Buffer Mitigation Credits&Nutrient Offset Credits for
Riparian Projects Regulated under 15A NCAC 02B .0295 and 15A NCAC 02B .0240
This letter, and the included attachments, outlines procedures and provides guidance for calculating
buffer mitigation credits and nutrient offset credits for projects submitted to the Division of Water
Resources(DWR) for review. In March 2019, the DWR established a small Work Group("Group")
consisting of 7 people to discuss crediting inconsistencies for nutrient offset and buffer mitigation
projects. The Group consisted of 3 staff members from DWR,two staff members from the Division
of Mitigation Services,and one representative from each of two private mitigation banks. The
procedures and guidance provided in this Ietter were made by consensus from the Group for
implementing 15A NCAC 02B .0295 ("Rule .0295")and 15A NCAC 02B .0240("Rule.0240).
These procedures are for implementing buffer mitigation or nutrient offset projects where a
draft mitigation plan or a draft Bank Parcel Development Plan (BPDP)is submitted to the
DWR for review after the date of this letter. All other projects must comply with mitigation
plans and BPDPs submitted to DWR for review prior to the date of this letter.
A summary of the issues resolved by the Group and associated guidance for credit calculations are
detailed in Attachment A "Issues and Resolutions Ver 1.0-Buffer Mitigation&Nutrient Offset".
For further information regarding this correspondence,please contact Katie Merritt with DWR at
katie.merritt4,ncdenr.gov or by phone at 919-707-3637.
Sincerely,
X___.j...„.\_-\\, C___--,s-Al\. ---)--
Ji regson
Deputy Director, Division of Water Resources
Attachments: A, B,C,and D
5 North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
512 North Salisbury Street 11G17 Mail Service Center I Raleigh.North Carolina 27699 Ibt7
NOP�H LAli011
oi..u,.ae ..daaw � 919.707.9000

Attachment A
Issues and Resolutions Vet.1.0- Buffer Mitigation&Nutrient Offset November 21,2019
Issue#1: Procedure for crediting mitigation activities within riparian areas for buffer
nuti2ation and nutrient offsets.
Applying ratios and reductions under 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (m)and (n)respectively for buffer
mitigation credit,while also applying the DWR-Methodology and Calculations for determining
Nutrient Reductions associated with Riparian Buffer Establishment
https:IIfiles.nc.gov/ncdeylWater%20QualitylPlanning/NPU/Nutrient%20Qf]set%20Ru1e/A -Buller-
Credit.pdf, often leads to differences in measuring and accounting. Establishing procedures on how
credits are measured, calculated, converted and presented in mitigation plans involved addressing
inconsistencies and creating guidance on rounding, significant digits,units of measurement, as well
as developing credit ratios and conversion ratios.
Resolution: Established(a)guidance for rounding&decimal places, (b)guidance for physical
measurements,(c) buffer mitigation credit ratios, (d)credit conversion ratios, (e) formula for credit
conversions, and(f)a format for presenting credits.
a) Established guidance for rounding and decimal places. See Table 1.0
Table 1.0—Guidance for Rounding
Physical Credit Ratios& Credits 'Nutrient Effectiveness for
Measurements Credit Conversion Phosphorus&Nitrogen
Ratios
Round to nearest whole Round to 5 decimal Round to 3 decimal places Round to 2 decimaI places
number places
Example: Example: Example: Nitrogen: 2,273.02 lbs/ac/30yrs
1,452.6424 ft2= 1,453 ft2 6.06061444=6.06061 49,625.4876 ft2=49,625.488 ft2
Phosphorus:146.40 lbs/ac/30yrs
'DWR-Methodology and Calculations for determining Nutrient Reductions associated with Riparian Buffer
Establishment hftps:/Ifile.c.nc.gov/ncdeq/Water%20Quality/Planning/NPU/Nutrient%20Qffset%2ORule/Ag-Buffer-
Credit.pdf
b) Established guidance for physical measurements. See Table 2.0
Table 2.0—Guidance for Physical Measurements
Credit Type 'Mitigation Activity Unit of Guidance
Measurement
•
Riparian Buffer Riparian RIEIPIEx Square Foot Measure area and
round to the nearest
whole number
Nutrient Offset Riparian RJE Square Foot Measure area and
(Nitrogen) round to the nearest
whole number
Nutrient Offset Riparian PIE Square Foot Measure area and
(Phosphorus) round to the nearest
whole number
1R=Restoration,E=Enhancement(not cattle exclusion),Ex=Enhancement for permanent
exclusion of grazing livestock,P=Preservation
Page 2 of 8

Attachment A
Issues and Resolutions Ver 1.0- Buffer Mitigation&Nutrient Offset November 21,2019
c) Established a buffer mitigation credit ratio for each scenario under 15A NCAC 02B .0295
(m)and(n). See Table 3.0
Table 3.0: Buffer Mitigation Credit Ratio
3lnitial
Stream Buffer 1Mitigatiou 2�Min-Max Unit �O�O `Final Credit Riparian
Location Subjectivity Activity Buffer Width Ratio Full Ratio(x:1) Buffer Credit
(ft) (x:1) Credit (fta)
N/A N/A R,E and P <20 0 0 0
N/A N/A R 20-29 _ 1 75% 1.33333
N/A N/A R 30-100 l 100% 1.00000
N/A N/A R 101-200 1 33% 6.06061
N/A N/A E,Ex 20-29 2 75% 2.66667
N/A N/A E,Ex 30-100 2 100% 2.00000 Credits(f2)
N/A N/A E,Ex 101-200 2 33% 6.06061 rounded up to
Rural Subject P 20-29 10 75% 13.33333 3 decimal
places
Rural Subject P 30-1 00 10 100% 10.00000 -
Rural Subject P 101-200 10 33% 30.30303
Rural Non-Subject P 20-29 5 75% 6.66667
Rural Non-Subject P 30-100 5 100% 5.00000
Rural Non-Subject P _ 101-200 5 33% 15.15152
Urban Subject or Non- P 20-29 3 75% 4.00000
Subject
Urban Subject or Non- P 30-100 3 100% 3.00000
Subject
Urban Subject or Non- P 101-200 3 33% 9.09091
Subject
I R=Restoration,E=Enhancement(not cattle exclusion),Ex=Enhancement just for permanent exclusion of grazing livestock,P=
Preservation,
2a11 minimum physical measurement ranges of riparian widths are measured landward and perpendicular from top of bank and
assumed to be continuous with top of bank without breaks
Derived from 15A NCAC 02B.0295(m)
"Derived from 15A NCAC 02B.0295 in).
5 Combining initial ratios in Rule.0295(m)with physical measurements and corresponding credit reductions in Rule.0295(n)
Page 3 of 8

Attachment A
Issues and Resolutions Ver 1.0 -Buffer Mitigation & Nutrient Offset November 21,2019
d) Established credit conversion ratios for Nitrogen and Phosphorus to simplify the conversion
of buffer mitigation credits(square feet)into nutrient offset credits(pounds)where credits
are deemed by DWR as being eligible for either credit type. See Tables 4a and 4b.
Table 4a:Nutrient Offset Credit Conversion Ratio(CCR)in Square Feet per Pound without Delivery Factors
'Service Area z 2Min-Max 3Initial 'Nitrogen 'Phosphorus Nutrient
River Basin/WS and Hydrologic Mitigation riparian Unit CCR CCR Offset Credits
Unit Code Activity Width(ft) Ratio (ft2/pound) (ft2/pound) (lhs)
(x:1)
Cape Fear—Randleman
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Catawba
R&E N/A N/A N/A N/A
Neuse-03020201 (Lower Falls Credits(lbs)
Lake, Upper Falls Lake, Outside R 50-200 1 19.16394 N/A
rounded up to
Falls Lake),03020202,03020203, 3 decimal
Neuse 03020204 50-200 2 places
E 9.58197 N/A
Tar-Pamlico-03020101,03020102, R 50-200 l 19,16394 297.54099
03020103,03020104,03020€05
E 50-200 2 9.58197 148.77050
Yadkin—Goose Creek
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
I service area is defined in I5A NCAC 02B.0240 and G.S. 143-234.26
2R=Restoration,E=Enhancement(not cattle exclusion)
2Al€minimum physical measurement ranges of riparian widths are measured landward and perpendicular from top of bank and
must be contiguous with top of bank
4DWR-Methodology and Calculations for determining Nutrient Reductions associated with Riparian Buffer Establishment
https:/files,nc.trovincdeq/li'ater%20Qual itiiPlanningINPUINutrietrt%20nI)"set9420RuleMg-Bu jfer-Crecht pdf
Page 4 of 8

Attachment A
Issues and Resolutions Ver 1.0- Buffer Mitigation&Nutrient Offset November 21,2019
Table 4b: Nutrient Offset Credit Conversion Ratio(CCR)with Delivery Factors
Credit Generated(lbs/30
Jordan 5u8watershed Nitrogen Phosphorus
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 2,249.360 143.810
Cape Fear-Jordan Upper New Hope 2,169.260 143.810
Cape Fear-Jordan Lower New Hope 2,273-020 146.4130
Rounded Up.to 5th decimal
Delivery oethrery Nitrogen Phosphorus
Jordan SOEwatershed Watershed l0 Factors Factors CCR CCR
TN TP (Wpm'nd) Isfipound)
►
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002010010 25% 1045 77.4620z 3,028.99660
CapeFear-Jordan Haw 0▪3930002010020 37% 36% 52.3392; 841.38795
CapeFear-Jordan Haw 030300020/0030 44% 40% 44.0125; 757.24915
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw ►63030002010040 49% 44% 39.521C 688.4083:
le-
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 0303000201005D 55% 48% 35.2100: 631.0409E
lh
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002020010 15% 4% 129.1033 7,572.49149
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 0 r 000▪3932620920 22% 12% 88.025042,524.1638:
CapeFear-Jordan Haw 103030002020030 48% 43% 40.3448 704.4178:
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002020040 32% 33% 60.5172: 917.8777E
Cape Fear-Jo don Haw 03030002020050 32% 32% 60.5172: 946.56I4/
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw `3030002020060 47% 42% 41.2032J 721.1896;
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002020070 54% 47% 35.8620A 644.4673;
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002039010 60% 56% 32.27585 5-40.8922!
r
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030902030020 44% 31% 44.0125, 977.0956:
r
CapeFear-Jordan Haw 03030902030030 25% 8% 77.4620/ 3,786.2457
✓
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030092030040 42% 30% 46.10836 1,009.6655
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002030050 64% 62% 30.25861 488.547-
v.
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 63036902030060 39% 19% 49.65512 1,594.2087•
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw ;13030002030070 36% 18% 53.7930E 1,682.7758'
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002030080 73% 64% 26.52810 473.2807
CepeFear-Jordan Haw 0▪3030002040010 30% 14% 64.55170 2,163.5691�
CapeFear-Jordan Haw 0▪3030002040020 28% 14% 69.16254 2,163.569I1
►
Cape Fear-Jordan Hew 03030002040030 71% 63% 27.27531 480.7931
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002040040 32% 15% 60.5172/ 2,019.3310
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw ►03030002040050 52% 50% 37.24131 605.7993
T
pee Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002040060 54% 51% 35.8620E 593.9209
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002040070 67% 60% 28.90375 504.8327
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002040080 53% 51% 36.53870 593.9209
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002040090 54% 51% 35.86206 593.9209
CapeFear-Jordan Haw 03030002040100 75% 65% 25.8206f 465.9994:
cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002040110 66% 60% 29.3416E 504.8327
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002050010 74% 68% 26,1696: 445,.a-•
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002050020 81% 74% 23.90804', 409.3238
CapeFear-Jordan Haw 03030002050030 42% 17% 46.10836 1,781.7627
Cape fear-lardan Haw 03039002050040 80% 73% 24.20689 414.9310
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002050050 71% 67% 27.2753• 452.0890'
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002050060 79% 73% 24.5133: 414.9310
CapeFear-Jordan Haw 03030002050070 78% 72% 24.8275E 420.6939.
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002050080 80% _ 73% 24.20685 414.9310'
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002050090 79% 73% 24.5133: 414.9310'
Cape fear-Jordan flaw 03030002050100 81% 75% 23.90804 403.8662
Cape Gear-Jordan flaw 03030002060010 81% 74% 23.90801 409.3238
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002060020 95% 97% 20.3847' 312.2676'
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030902060030 88% 91% 22.00626 332.8567
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030902060040 97% 98% 19.96445 309.0812'
W Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002060050 92% 95% 21.04947 318.8417
Cape Fear-Jordan Haw 03030002060062 98% 99% 19.7607: 305.9592.
Cape Gear-Jordan Upper New Hope 03030002060070 40% 19% 502014E 1,594.2087-
Cape Fear-Jordan Upper New Hope 03a30002069080 69% 45% 34.03489, 673.1103•
Cape Fear-Jordan Upper New Hope 03030002080100 69% 63% 29.10230 480.7931
Cape Fear-Jordan Upper New Hope 03030002060110 61% 58% 32.91899 522.24081
Cape Fear-Jordan Upper New Hope 03030902060120 69% 63% 29.1023E 480.7931
Cape Fear-Jordan Upper New Hope 03030002060140 85% 8945 23.6242: 340.33671
Cape Fear-Jordan Upper New Hope 03030002066130 69% 63% 29.10234 480.7931
Cape Fear-Jordan Lower New Hope 03030002060160 85% W 90% 22.54581 330.60111
CapeFear-Jordan Upper New Hope 03030002060090* 92% 94% 21.8267-s 322.2336'
Cape Fear-Jordan tower New Hope 03030002060090' 92% v 94% _ 20.8303:, 316.5329
CapeFear-Jordan tipper New Hope 03030002060060' 94% 96% 21.3623; 315.9204:
Cape Fear-Jordan Lower New Hope 03930002960060' 94% 96% 20.3871; 309.9385
Cape Fear-Jordan Upper New Hope 03030002060150' 88% 91% 22.8188_5 332.8567
Cape Fear-Jordan Lower New Hope 03030002060150' 88% 91% 21.7772( 325.9681 Page 5 of 8
'Watershed a located In both the Upper New Hope{UNH)and Lower New Hope)LNH)5ubwatersheds.

Attachment A
Issues and Resolutions Ver 1,0 - Buffer Mitigation & Nutrient Offset November 21,2019
e) Establish a formula for credit conversions. See Table 5.0
Table 5.0 Calculation Formula for Credit Conversions
Credit Type 'Mitigation 'Credit Conversion Formula Final Project
Activity (Quantity/Credit Conversion Ratio—X) Credits
Riparian Buffer Riparian Creditable Area(ft2)-Final Buffer Credit Ratio=X
RIEIPIEx ft2 buffer credits
Nutrient Offset Riparian RIE Total Area(ft2) -Credit Conversion Ratio ft2/lb-N= rounded up to
(Nitrogen) X lbs-N 3 decimal
places
Nutrient Offset Riparian RIE Total Area(ft2) -Credit Conversion Ratio ft2/ lb-P =
(Phosphorus) X lbs-P
'R=Restoration,E=Enhancement(not cattle exclusion), Ex—Enhancement just for permanent exclusion of grazing
livestock, P=Preservation
2 A user-friendly tool has been developed in conjunction with this memo to assist in entering a project's credits.
This tool is referenced in Issue#1 (f)of this memo.
f) Developed a format for presenting credits in project plans submitted to the DWR. The
"Project Credit Table" template is a user-friendly"calculation tool" to calculate a project's
riparian buffer and nutrient offset credits and is designed to comply with Rule .0295, Rule
.0240, and the guidance provided in this letter. The calculation tool is useful and
recommended, and is intended to increase efficiency in the review process. A link to the
most up-to-date calculation tool is found at https://deq.nc.Rov/about/divisions/water-
resources/water-quality-permitting/401-buffer-permitting-branchlnutrient and a screenshot is
included in Attachment B. A set of instructions for using the calculation tool is included in
Attachment C.
Page 6 of 8

Attachment A
Issues and Resolutions Ver 1.0 - Buffer Mitigation & Nutrient Offset November 21, 2019
EXAMPLES
Example A- Calculating Buffer Credits on Agricultural land within 0-100' riparian width: Using
Tables 1.0-5.0 included in this memo, and the Project Credit Table referenced in (f) below, the
following example is provided:
A total creditable area of 2.2 acres (95,832 ft2) of agricultural land within top of bank to 100 feet
adjacent from the Neuse River is approved for riparian restoration ("R"). The site will yield the
following buffer credits:
Project Credit Table
Nt .0 2Qi01.Ooade Fall' Lake
19.18 394
Y•'A
vice Area
,N trail Ram (tl/ ridit}
P Credit Ratio (s1/1Iedi[i
Grdir TRH
Eras -
l001tron
Ayr.'
ter
feaha. Type
/P
lfrt 1841i0l ArtlH{y
Raneri41er.
WAS. Pei
0.100
Feature Rama
TOW Ana
Nei sa RAyer
95,832
95.132
rut lcredll
1.1da (4:11
f{Faq 01011
Final Cred11
latu 1441)
Convertible
10.880arNin
■as
Rip.rlwa WSW
Crmir
95.832. �0
Instead ()fusing the Project Credit Table above, one can enter the formula from Table 5.0 as follows:
Creditable Area (ft) ÷ Final Credit Ratio = X ft2 buffer credits
95,832 ft2 (1.0 x 100%) = 95,382.000 IA' buffer credits
Example B- Calculating Nutrient Offset Credits from Example A
Using Tables 1.0-5.0 included in this memo, and the Project Credit Table referenced in (f), the
following example is provided:
Project Credit Table
Naure 0102030 i-04trn. rare. 4.4.
19 19394
4
Serrke Pea
9 Grdn Retie fsl fveddi
P hedh Raga fsgnMlq
kklireti
apnMufy a.
44121.01
Fart.re iyaa
18141p0on Aemiq
eYna1.a.40m
Fr rwlr 9.
Ted A ..144
sew
I[r.d'rktr1
Ares 0FO.__.
> M
VAIN G14e
Rrve i..11
A FW I LMR
iYW C.adl.
WO 1=11
m 4104.144
a.e.r!
111/444. aril..
Crrda
Comerew.
14 N.914•111
N64.14n11}14a4
Yet
1/9
aarmrarier
0.100
140 12
Tar
951182 091
*a1
5.1�] E+:
Instead of using the Project Credit Table above, one can enter the formula from Table 5.0 as follows:
Total Area (ft2) ÷ Credit Conversion Ratio ft2/ Ib-N = X lbs-N
95,832 ft2 - (19.16394 ft2 /lb-N) = 5,000.642 lbs-N nutrient offset credits
Page 7of8

Attachment A
Issues and Resolutions Ver 1.0 - Buffer Mitigation & Nutrient Offset November 21, 2019
Issue #2: Clarifications to DWR response to Item I. of the March 10, 2017 memorandum to
DMS from DWR titled "DWR Responses to Questions from DMS regarding implementation of
the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule (15A NCAC 02B)" provided in Attachment D.
DWR issued a memo to DMS on March 10, 2017. Item I of this memo clarifies how to calculate the
25% of the total area of buffer mitigation cited under 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(4), (o)(5) to achieve
the allowed amount of preservation area. Examples on how to calculate the Total Area of Buffer
Mitigation (TABM) and the Eligible Preservation Area (EPA) are included. However, the memo
does not address when applicable credit ratios and credit reductions provided in 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 (m) and (n) should be applied to the TABM to achieve the EPA.
Clarification: To achieve the EPA, the TABM is calculated by measuring the area of Restoration
(R) and Enhancement (E) before applying any credit ratios and credit reductions provided in 15A
NCAC 02B .0295 (m) and (n).
Example: [2 acres (R) + 1 acre (E)] / 0. 75 = 4 acres (TABM)
4 acres (TABM) * 0.25 =1 acre (EPA)
1 acre (P) + 3 acres (RIE) = 4 acres total
Page 8 of 8

- ` , , , , : , , , . , i II
231 .
$i| , I IIIIII IIIIIIII
2£
\\
&
I662." i : . , , . . , . , , , � � / t
8
[„ z �\ �/
- B La-!) k i d
7 ! , , , , , , . , , , 2 \ � � : , ) |\l !f £-- .
� _ . t
k $ k �@l . - t $
- | _ § CIC �-
g $= fgaai #} .
p � ,
E - fk�
;. . . .
!
- 7;
2� ))
co /e • $ .
31t .., -
\ �6\f � {22ƒ
/ 7 ¥ . . \ 7
2 / 0
$ ,\ / } / k {
2 :e. i. . . g i
; ■
� « Is
k ƒ § ƒ
„ Pa
' - $¥ # r, 2
\- g . \ \
(I
/ ) -) ■ ; ;
f ) { /\ }}
J ! i
. L.
\ \ r
) §\\ _ , . -. /
5,! ® 2 \
. ! . . }
\ 2 \ k \
) . . § . I )
§ § , \
` ' !
) } 7 *

o
a
m �°n a v X d O
c o a
a 8 = m
E .J 0 a `m ai ti 0/ d
' ' = a E m .x 13 ,�
'Q, C C Y 7 0
1- D C m -5 0 0 [� C
m v C 0 N 11, w4mO •- yaL " -
? w
?it. m c 9 N l7
3- a c ? c a ? c '
3r u t o 0o 0 of
a o u 7 ,n t' Y u ` + c
n v p c r N A p?p -8 a U
a u a U a c y o z a
w 0. m u C a µ u N 7 O d E v
0 2
99 c O IC -.0
a c W 2 W w a d CR
I v u d .E 7 u E Q ' g E m = E z
_c b ❑' E c Y �_ § o a 3 oci o
r . t L c $ 0. ..T iB m a m g _ '-' d E u
a o Y m o, t,
3 E _ w r c v y E u u ti "0 T
w o', 41 74 m c .° c ,, m w c a a a ' 9 E a 3N
a. v E ' a E c E t Cp o 0 c m 7_ -g o Luc E E' N A "" c'i
_ w Y g� co n u E '11v
Q at 03 $ " 8 m a o 7. 3 .0 w m m Y Ar. v c -o ? 3 z a
` ° - - - $ m — is v o v b a a o 2 cc;- a )• m ro _ c
CY n '2 'Li
= U a i u 3 E E a z° ,-. E o o ,
++ _ " N `m d a rw o°` E o c f3 = m 2 .o a a •a M a
w u [7 +�
N o 0 a 0 I' a �+ a _a r o °' Sis CZ �+ c i
m y ¢ 6 ^+ D
-Po u v y ° m M I m c F m « o m m `v .m m 't a a
n 3 _c - c
ro '-' b a i== - E1r13 6 •4 a Y t• o ro a ° m o p ? 3 Q E "' m 5 & a a
a E m y ❑ a •
w .- N 3 -c w o o _8 a ❑ w m r o E o o a N
Q t` y o O �+ `. �' m —d m is ❑ 7- m 4 om r1°+ is = C a. CO C
= C c N 90 w C E N N
4...3 u` `m `d r E 5 a % ❑` ❑ m oci ° u E a E o
(_) u `a CO E N n+ 'Q m u �' S 0 -, a -a a °u E d a m ,v c ?
.� o N - s 5 N a o m d m t 1 3 m z a a ,
$- w m ❑ Y ? m a �c " o u a a C o d a a - Ul ,,, v N N
d ai c F .� 7 a a v - t o E m E E ' m 4 E -ii = & v
3 v w . y ° w a p = 47 N m ami = Tal
d 3 d E a y F c o
-a t y raw ++ c a c a E _ -0 a ❑ Ln v 'c E �q� k r o
m C @ O c j 41 c 3 a c° m a y n+ c o `9 o a 0 2 2 z ,
y 4- b ; ° ,. o ° .w° c t $ - a 'E 8 u c C .. m v t 3 c 2 -6
u o r `• o 0 0 r .O A v m c s d w ,v o m u�i o E❑E . a o o ❑ 'E a s
,4 r+ - a w y ❑ v t m —tz.
o a E o p c o w w m --wo . 2. ` '-
,c-o o .a m 6 w t o rG o v w 1O E m $ u = c o ❑ Li' ❑ '^ d
Q ° -E 1, y cc m c c a 0 p g m a o 8 a c a -7 N o -n E n+ 7 ry az m E o , n
•c a c r � o -- 0 `" a ❑ - d ' '° d o c m w 3 Ec o m , c 3 x °; L
c_`-S c E i w ,n c 01 a ° '� c m m n
❑ N 4 a s ,c c c a t d ,v o E, a o ° c
' C w c m E w m y v .m+ m
w w ,Z N i I _ E m c ! m �+ c w y i o>• ry v E ro m ❑ m ❑ a
.d. -y . C 7 y C C w F ar ° m t. N y m E C ❑ ❑ C u L g;
m ° m }9 f+ u ° u c r m ` E c - a u . ,_ G a E E m u 0 m C c Nc ,,0
U E b 9 v n — c o Jr, -g -40 ' C a a = c 't 3 C '- " 0 - rmn c f6 •lj m -° cri
u -E . E U o E- d 19 a t m $ 2 2 'o a a C N p 0 E m E E T y a Z a s
m ❑ d m ° N
2 ° u � � a E ❑ m a w ❑ m u
a -8 v $ u Z r a t y a w ac c 0 E a a m o y = `w 'b gj d CE E ,c = = a
is a U t 24t1 .22 2 w - 5 iv 3 ' ) ei '- m a N m Q _ . y c 3 p_ E 'E c v ,2 .2 ..`e-
a w L IU
a "E E « Y° r°- - A Q m `m ❑ ,-,•• `- 3 E w c be u F - v ❑ N ,°- w E ° 0 .q m =' �, a w a m .P a u ,c ` `G - i ° y m n F w N E H .a .2 0 c Q ,, a ,a T 6- m
G , E r .P = sa • a �i �' a a E a a & e . 3 :: h v ++ C 'Ea c E ec m Y `o s
c u
1. E v LI = a h °gym a d ° `—y t ° u .n m a m } a u
E ;. •C .0 m 7 w f . . t
F ti = H ° N' u o 8 i = .a e i rn v Li .D n co °s .o f I I I I l a s 3 •a t7 U. Es rc a o z if

Attachment D
ROY COOPER
MICFIAEL S. REGAN
Water Resources
(-N YIRONr[141 AL Qum.'IY S. JAY LIMMERMAN
March 10, 2017
MEMORANDUM
To: N.C. Division of Mitigation Services
From: S. Jay Zimmerman, N.C. Division of Water Resources Director
Subject: DWR Responses to Questions from DMS regarding implementation of the
Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule [15A NCAC 02B .0295]
On November S, 2016,the Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) met with the Division of Water
Resources(DWR)to discuss questions they had regarding implementation of the Consolidated
Buffer Mitigation Rule [15A NCAC 0213 .0295]. Below is a short summary of each question and
DWR's response.
I. Calculation of"25%of the Total Area of Buffer Mitigation"
15A NCAC 02B.0295 (o) (4)and (5) state "The area of preservation credit within a buffer
mitigation site shall comprise of no more than 25 percent of the total area of buffer mitigation."
DMS believes the following calculations should be used to determine the area eligible for
preservation:
Restoration (R)+Enhancement (E) +Preservation (P)=Total Area of Buffer Mitigation (TABM)
TABM * 0.25 = Eligible Preservation Area (EPA)
Example: 2 acres (R) + 1 acre(E)+7 acres(P)= 10 acres(TABM)
10 acres (TABM) * 0.25=2.5 acres(EPA)
Response:
In the example above,45%of the area of the site would come from preservation,with the
remaining 55%coming from restoration/enhancement:
2.5 acre (P)+3 acres(R/E) =5.5 acres total
Based on a review of the language in the rule,the documents throughout the rulemaking
process, including correspondence with OSBM on the fiscal note, areas where buffer
mitigation credits are not being generated should not be used to calculate the "total area of
buffer mitigation."
The restoration or enhancement area shall be at least 75%of the area generating buffer
mitigation;the remaining 25%of the area generating buffer mitigation can be preservation:
75% (R/E) +25%(P) = 100%TABM
stele of North Carolina I Environmental Quality. Water Resources
1517 Mail Service Center I Raleigh,North Carolina 27699.1617
919 807 ,300

Page 2 of 3
To calculate the area eligible for preservation:
[Restoration (R)+ Enhancement (E)]/0.75=Total Area of Buffer Mitigation (TABM)
TABM * 0,25 = Eligible Preservation Area (EPA)
Example: [2 acres (R)+ 1 acre (E)] /0,75 =4 acres(TABM)
4 acres(TABM) * 0.25 = 1 acre (EPA)
1 acre (P)+3 acres (RJE)=4 acres total
II. Defining Breaks Between Restoration and Enhancement Areas
❑M5 asked for clarification on how DWR defines the breaks between restoration'and
enhancement2. Specifically, DM5 asked whether drip lines were still used and whether
individual trees were excluded from restoration sites.
Response:
DWR has not considered the drip line to represent the outer edge of a wooded area for
several years. This was clarified in a memo from DWR to DM5 in August 2013. Individual
trees do not need to be delineated and removed from the restoration area, rather DWR
looks for areas or zones when determining restoration,enhancement or preservation areas.
For example:
I � i
Restoration
Enhancement
Preservation
114001.4.
characterized by an absence of trees and by a lack of dense growth of smaller woody stems or
are characterized by scattered individual trees such that the tree canopy is less than 25%of the
cover and by a lack of dense growth of smaller woody stems
characterized by conditions between that of a restoration site and a preservation site such that
the establishment of woody stems will maximize nutrient removal and other buffer functions

Page 3 of 3
ill. Prior Grazing
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(6)describes enhancement of grazing areas adjacent to streams. It
states that the applicant or mitigation provider shall demonstrate that grazing was the
predominant land use since the effective date of the applicable buffer rule. DMS asked
when is the predominance of grazing demonstrated?
Response
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (I)states that the authority shall issue a mitigation determination that
specifies the area,type and location of the mitigation and the water quality benefits to be
provided by the mitigation site. During the on-site evaluation, DWR looks at existing
conditions to determine whether grazing has been a continuous land use in the proposed
mitigation area (e.g. hoof shear, manure, cattle fencing, etc.) since the effective date of the
applicable buffer rule. DWR also evaluates satellite imagery. If it is not clear to DWR that
grazing has been the predominant land use since the effective date of the applicable buffer
rule, ❑WR will ask for additional documentation (e.g. landowner documentation, photos,
maps,etc.).
If the grazing site is proposed for retroactive credit as described in 15A NCAC 0213 .0295
(o)(1), additional documentation of the pre-existing conditions may be required.
If there is a disagreement regarding the documentation requested by DWR,the request will
be elevated to the Water Quality Permitting Section Chief.
IV. Clarification of Use of 8-19-08 Diffuse Flow Clarification Memo
DM5 asked for verification that the Buffer Interpretation Clarification Memo#2008-019,
issued August 19, 2008, was still eligible for use, and whether that method or an alternative
method as provided for in the rule could be used at the discretion of the project proponent.
Response:
The Buffer Interpretation Clarification Memo#2008-019, issued August 19, 2008, is still
eligible for use to comply with 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (l)(3).

From: Merritt.Katie
To: Ray Holz
Subject: Buffer Subjectivity-Ag Ponds-Raleigh Farms
Date: Friday,September 10,2021 11:42:57 AM
Attachments: 20191692 Ver 4 Draft BPDP-Raleigh 20201224.pdf
Hey Raymond,
This email serves to acknowledge that two (2) in-line ponds associated with the Raleigh Farms A Site
& Raleigh Farms B-C Site are considered "not subject"to the Neuse Buffer Protection Rules due to
the fact that they are agricultural ponds and are therefore"exempt"from that Rule under Session
Law 2013-413 Section 52. Pond 5 on the Raleigh Farm B-C site and Pond 2 on the Raleigh Farm
A site are both "not subject" and therefore shall be referred as such in any Bank Parcel Development
Plans (BPDP)and corresponding Figures/Credit Tables submitted with the Plans. A site plan attached
to this email shows the ponds referenced above.
Thank you for you attention to this matter,
Katie

Appendix C: USDA, NRCS Web Soil Survey Report (available upon request to DWR)
Raleigh Farm—Phase B-C Bank Parcel Development Plan(2019-1692 V5) Appendices
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020201

Appendix D: EDR Report (full report available upon request to DWR)
Raleigh Farm—Phase B-C Bank Parcel Development Plan(2019-1692 V5) Appendices
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020201

09/22/2020 Event Code: 04EN2000-2020-E-04278 4
Clams
NAME STATUS
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni Proposed
There is proposed critical habitat for this species. Your location is outside the critical habitat. Threatened
Species profile:https:Ilecos.fws.govlecplspecies/S164
Dwarf Wedgemussel Alasmidonta heterodon Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile:fittps;llecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/784
Flowering Plants
NAME STATUS
Michaux`s Sumac Rhus michauxii Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile:https:llecos.fws.govlecplspecies15217
Critical habitats
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.

Appendix F: NC NHP and NC SHPO Correspondence
Raleigh Farm—Phase B-C Bank Parcel Development Plan(2019-1692 V5) Appendices
Neuse River Basin 8-Digit HUC:03020201

▪ •w• Roy Cooper,Governor
M� NC DEPARTMENT OF Susi Hamilton,Secretary
MEOW NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
▪ mew Walter Clark.Director,Land and Water Stewardship
NCNHDE-12821
September 4, 2020
Allison Keith
Axiom Environmental
218 Snow Ave
Raleigh, NC 27603
RE: Raleigh Parm Nutrient Site; 20-021
Dear Allison Keith:
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project
boundary. These results are presented in the attached 'Documented Occurrences' tables and map.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one-mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one-mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally-listed species is documented within the project area or indicated within a one-mile
radius of the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS)for guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review,and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional
correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Clean Water
Management Trust Fund easement, or an occurrence of a Federally-listed species is documented
near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rodney.butler@ricdcr,gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
QO 121 W.JONES STREET,RALEIGH.NC 27603 • 1651 FiAiL SERVICE CENTER,RALEIGH,NC 27600
I OFC 919.707.9120 • FAX [phone]

al
m a
N
rl N
C •") !NO NO N NC I [ )CI El) O
rR) L) [I ) Le)) CI ) L17 V) NO 7,
U) (!) rz ,
Z
M
0 ...
• �'C � � (D ( ML CD UC7 C7
p a
i7 alz
z
U
YJN al Z
_a) a
w• in m` R) L c C
I'dt,
a roUU
ro a) c m C ra 3 r
I a l o O a) CC] U
.. 0 ...C _C:
t I—
Q
C V
b
CI n
a) u � `°
r m
0
0) ❑ V) Q N a
c U- y
E E E C E !CB a) e - ID z
❑ _
N 7, E EE +' Q) '� - ry U
ro 7 7 7_ 7 7_ 7 (71 cc @ a? C E -a y a)
O o C7 o o -c aa) O o s
a) a) a) a) a) a) —
a) a) a) a > v 0, ❑
rr)a) Q rv7 4") 41 K) re) r rv7 U Z a) �, To m N p c j I,
,, m
.. u �,
-c E' C UV Ocn ❑av) r'n Co ' >
a) a) a) .� ra a ❑ m
co a) E L - w w w La] Wu U a � ; c
c — a7 0[7 - a, o
co U1 UC
N p W Q + can aV u +. ❑
C3 q_) 0O [v a) c L + "
c NCO 0 a) 0 4 •, c
pN N C O) 6' Lf) O 0) LL LL �'' O
ro• O w Q N N N r-- CN N N cs1 a' O N
a) EZ ,0n N r0 6 O ' N LI7 LC] c ❑
tg p 0 p p 0 D C o1.0
Q U J N O co CO CO N N CD U Z U co p C p
n O Q O D Q D Q 0 �7 a) I ▪ e m
ED a) (I) �m Q rD Q m E + m o)
z To c a
7 ❑ O co
❑ m . ❑
CI C0 cEri V
a) C N + -5
C) = 0. O pci 0) 2 a) ro i . .L-
Tv
C ,[rJ) 8 -5 E E _ N U U-z ro V
C _Q a N J C 7, rp CY rU rc7 N
Z ° no E m b 4i m a) T mm oa
U �c LL J ❑ Q � � C ❑ U ° O -0O •V -or m
,� 0 D .� c u- Cl] m ry 3 V N U c U i rn n a p
N Oc) to,
D Q z [aJ U z Liz UI c -0 ro j
a) C) ro U ro as I N ❑
0U — CJC w CD J i 0 > "c _ -q a
W SL * N ❑ 2' ❑ co
0 -o IA r6 s 7 "':j -O N V N
C1 U N � C 01 a) Q C c a1 L
co CL r0 G7 fi3 Q U N LL rroo a) l) Et! CD
- C ID 7 ❑ p N '' U C7a) -0 O C N
a) �C €1 C N rD S] > rJ a) a) N O C -a) V O 4
_ O - a +-' U 7 0. o d a) O m 72C
To '� Li] C o CD CD m CI- J 4 C1 C w a ' L En ix '�
w O N C v C SJ 7] C N N i
a ❑ u 7 N w 0 W N Q E
E aci E a E E E -r3 m -0 � a N o a) Z c a) `m a) � '-
L) — rD f0 rD Q7 0 0 41 .... -O 47 r"J , a) N 4. to rn y
C u7 Q w J J J LL LL u) LL v q' o G 2 7 E •+-a •� a
' Li_
a) U7 - a) U7 c C i7
© LC CO in a) LL E r6 3 U1 rD I _ ❑ 2
in O N NC C C — io c
CD n CO M 0n O n n E o U m ❑ ° ro ❑ a ° c a
c 10 Ln co F, Co LC) 0) U 7� O CD u �1 E a-+ i '❑' Q N
q) 1.]..I N IC CV LO SV N 0 co Z ❑ CJ O a) 0 z d E
LA
D V7 a U r6 El) -D ,C s7.- O d c
U LL ID N 4) w O) r0 W Q) C
O 'U a) a) a) a) a) 4--' +7i.� ,7 a' j Q Q V) ro N o a1 N E 7
— ( m CD CAD CD C C Q 'O -Q c c c IZ ▪ N 6
C p � 3 W W W ro EE ro EE � � o) 0) E � � , E � � ce 4 •-
CD C Q L > L > C 7 -C 7 _c ❑ ❑ S-- -
a: O m j E' j m tn j °'En j m m En D 0 m E rD a) co rco 0 :U o a) j 0 z ,v y
JJ 'r- C'] :-L COW CY1000-5LL �] W ZU ZO ZU7 Z ZZU 0Z LLU Z.ZA 0 1)

C t'Ni 'Ni N7 N) N7 N N N U) M
co U7 U7 U7 U7 U7 U7 U7 U7 rM U7 [17
C LC] (9 dr M Lr) M Lf [] N 0 r+) H
0
ro 00L7 0L7 0 NI 00
Q >, >. -0 -o -❑
ti Vl C C C ro C 0) C Cl)
m .� U Q1 U U U O) • 61
U C-II C a = a` 0) Q ❑ a '0 a) I co
a a7 c _C U) U _C -a
a) in in 1— 1— LAW
`r TO N
7 L
I I
I I
-� y
ro a o i i I I I I I I I I I I
M+
E > E E EE E E +' N
Cl) U 7, a 7 7 7 7 7 7 E 7 C f0 +
19 4 Q) - _a1 a 00
a 7 > O > O 0 0�) 4) 0�) Q) ( N a) 2 J OJ
C U U) LC) J : Z Z Z Z Z Z N 10 O
Q r,;) r,;) r� M r,;) M r,;') M
+, U
V V
C C
a) ❑ E - ro z c-.
LIJ LLJ LLJ W W m 0 m W 2
-0 ccv � r W 0
a) 0) a0N
C a) 0) 0)
I
fCp N O 0) 0) {.j {.j r N N N N cy ro ro a a .CT) 0 0 a p
CA
Ln-0 2 dr dr 0
roW +N0ZQa) JN ❑ 80 aA 50 Q- p0p N Nn 0OOD•o
v N N N N C r)
0) Q N N N �
ra d a)
rp a) 07
Q ro O Q) a (13
d
Of a L Q
+ C
= N Q a U O C
T.) 7 ro O1 Z CD
ro ToN U ❑ I
E Q) +-'Lii _Q Q S- J 7 a c 7,
a) D c C L. lE p U7 roE ro 0 Lo 0 Iv) N
C ro C ro 7, ❑ J p O C y
Cl) a 0 ❑ 0 Y C LL m Q
❑) 0 C +� O 0) N
- a, r6 a C C 0) Si) 4- a s
O E ❑ ❑ O 'C 0 eD if) ❑ O
0 U Cr V W L7 J V) as
CL
C 0 C Nnm, ❑ ❑
a) ro ro vo " r6 0 N
E C C 7 ',7 -0 E LL [o — E
Cl)a) _c 03 C S - r,c ro n > ro 0 0 J w a rr00 N C
W _
ro D CLIE U > > O m D 0
CEO CO N p c E fa ro ro m 00 m Q J _C f 0 to
•c a) O OiT, U C O co N C 16 x a r. CI-r-� D C C
I .1) = a ro � E p a •E 0OU ? ELn > E •ELEc °7 y 23
ro E a) E O a E V, N E' _O -0 i l' >, C N
E •U p ❑ a) = ro ro ro m O = .C) ❑ E .m 1 m ro U -0 m
= UO U) V U) ❑)Q W J J J Z W U) a W Ul d „ a a U) C) O
ro ❑ c a
❑ r4) r) N n 0 0 Li-) v) a 0) .-,
O n r� ( M 0 _ co N N CO OD
O
CO
E a N re) Lr) CO CO Lr) a) a) a) a) U 7,
N W r+) r+) N n N Lr) M N N N) p ro
_C CI
❑_ a o `� a) w
_ E w w �L r6 r6 r6 r6 r6 7 7 7 _ 7 r0 E L.L
o C m C m m m m m m m To
a) C CL 0 v, ❑ v _c > _c > -c > _c > _c " E i E " E L E Z (1)
En
I X D ro m ° › ° › ° › ° › ° m p 0 m 0 ro O rroo v +� a
W H (9 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ W m W m W m W m W z U Z U 2 U z o > z i ) z

a]
N
ro
tit
E.
6
N
O
N
T
7
M
ci
a
I
z
U
Z
ai
V
7
N
0
N
O
N
V
in
-
.0
E
Q B
y rp
N -7
C C C C C C C 0 =
E EEEEEE vU
,0.1 C C C C C C C E Z
a m 1.) 0.) 0.) 0.) 0a) [ r
7- 00 0 00 7.0 0 0 00 O
a) 0 L7UL7C."J0 L -
+1 u
C ro ro m m W 0 ro m ro ro ro, ro 1
? ?2 9 ro ro i 0 ro U 0 U 0 U 0 Q
*., 0 1-, -I-, � ❑ 0 ❑ 0 ❑ 0 rum
0 o.. a U) --1 cn cn cn -1 —I a
+, .-, 0 7
N N • 7
7 7 c
1_
1— H •ro
N ., .J N IU
C a) C C (I) T.
CD (D
ro a) a) LL ❑
U m
cc (0 _C .c E
a m D .-• 6 N C Ln
0 U _
Z c u v ar 3 0
< (N — 0Q ( Q
0 0 N
o)Q ? o aoC p o
v U -, C y, O U
O 1— c ro (0 C
in
o c E 'c U V C C C C C C
(1.1 m -1 rn m 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° .rij �
01 ( U U � a) UUUUUU D
cumwooN c c 0 ' ❑ O ❑ ,7 ❑ 'D Cro > > Y .. _Y a) a) y a
Z NZllam ro rt3 ro (0 ro _o ❑2QUHu Uu_ LLLO
S2
i › O -o CC] N N
ro CJO a
O C] U] w
a) C 00
� LL a) ',_ c C roOc
> LL LL ❑C > N a' N N N CCO 0 ,_ a) L i2mNO u - NO
U ❑ u_ CC ra°J , a) a) 0) 0 �o U ro >, E E 2 a) )Z ro (4 ro a) Q) u) ro ro +s ,- .-s -, c 6
E �- > CO 0) 0) CL' Cl.' C C C C O d
f6 f6 ,i._ a) a) N a)
pc 0 o aai 0 0 p O O E E E E c o
�, C a) a) a) a)
ro ❑ t, " Z Z .W m ro ro n E
Im (0 _c .N N j == W W L1J W o
Q) Q) c -0 O-) ro rr3 � m 4 m e
Q Q- 0 2 N a) N C C C C C C - .
O Wl C MC C C d 0 0 0 0 0 0 N °,
CB °) O aroi4-' r° .w O � UUUUUU o '=
ro e m pr EE o � a�i U � E � Y Y Y E
E
JO
rca cc o .f._ a) .w U •O U •o o; ro co ar no ro ro CO F4
IEUF- U Uzcizc--. 0z � � � oI

Ncg
s.
/ 5� x m W ti 1■ / /r 1 o'or'°t E m u�i S
/7 / I ///
.4p. ,/-4:A
c0
J
1@
i:itS Oj co[+j v] a g g 0
��yagg.tmeal A V y
2
i'''uaye e,
C v
..._ ( t;:4--.....\\
4—, 101, •k;ft
AV ."•14:::k;.%!;,N, litkvoit
Li_ 441
a) ,'%.- NOIRI•dikt '''. ', 1r,
.(T) N% #1<.\ iC::) ref-:- /Of "
Mk \r-1 A.,. l b
4,41
Q . r Cal .
a)
� . ' _. .
AN pfad , i ',r W as //' ' '' ..
9 \,'Af 1 ,2
DCP>. ..
0 Ary 7o
•
1.. 4a z
❑ Q
m m
o o
ry O a 7
o m 1:7 is -E
N U N Z mu,
4 of 0 d c
.o 0_ CO Z 2

N
~r r' w U
GO 0
_: K • T• TO
r +. . illitp„.. :
IIP
• - . _
IL 7
I
•
i. •4 •
'"h� r f r •
r _0
E
6-7
CO
F , a)
(73 ._ . . -. 11,6.:- -........... ; 0
tiol- ; ,...so
r•Nria 4 . .
CE
CC ir i .... > Z
;rt 4. a p c 0 r -., . ,..„
>.
, .a.I,
r y ,.• a-0i a
cn
rtr
'' .s i' _s '• - vi?),
V
c
Z C _ L7
• m
A . 4~ k _ ca c
iMIK •a U
i =03 p
_ J J
1 i _ •FD
in
co■ 8
U
t:• !•' a z
• f f r .5
" �j } s ti ` `1 -a
1111k. A
- ' r. Ny • • 7 Q 'a j