310789_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20210816

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
1}pe of \'ieif: Q (Iompliance Inspection 00perationRcicw O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: , 1�/�,, �A,rr�ivaal Times` Departure Time: ® County: I Region:
Farm Name: H. Ca"id* 1 Irwin Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Phone:
Facility Contact HoT& C `h Title: tt /lpe Phone:
Onsite Representative: \ ` ` - Integrator:
��I s�
Certified Operator: �_ �1 l`-) n/�. �1fQ( 1_ 1 Certification Number. (-�I("jI5Z'Sq
Back-up Operator: 2(;j'le' (gjfy)I—Ir-�C(�ert�i/fintion Number:
�L"j-I
Location of Farm: Latitude: 3H.-p-J,D-f4 Longitude:
Swine
Other
Other
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry, Capacity Pop.
Loco
nnn-Laver
Design Current
Dry Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layers
Non-Ltwins
Pullets
Turke
Tmke Pouets
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Stmeture ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? _
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
[]Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[]Yes
K No
❑ NA
❑ NE
[]Yes
W No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
M No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[X No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Faciti Number: Date of ins ection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway,?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate Ibrems to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large tress, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
2] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat. notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes K] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes r�f No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need [:]Yes [% No [:]NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [�g No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Pending ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manue/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s): (on
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes to No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
0Wf1P ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other.
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
[:]Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Cmp Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
W No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
J�fNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
2142015 Continued

Facili Number: Date of Ina ectlon:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a PDA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
�gy No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
2g No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[4 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
[:]Yes
5P No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
CQ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
4,_No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
5,( No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawines of facility to better explain situations (use additional paces as necessarv).
Gofrer�-Cay C®c 51J5e5-�( �
IrCID.C. on�)e (nib✓ i'L 12^2020
�a5}e A�al�s+� gym I+J 6+ l back age k Thl r✓► �� 3�5
-o--�l 2.3) N Q�Q
bI-19^Zi Z.29N o IC1!l�dr'6rb14b
i2.3o-zo Z.oy N Pd) CkCd0jZ5 in rea"i
14605 IodG � 12o
(�116c an )i- of -2o i g 1�3 GP!' Lqvats Covr- On ) ee3oon
�d1T�' o�-Ila-2oiq Jce�xs✓
fills "aA'1 a
ftMr tvl
Reviewer/Inspector Name: / Phone: 'p1i(�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: / f( s�,14 --- Date: p^ )(Q
Page 3 of 3 21412015